UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT
INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number 811-22106
Tortoise Power and Energy Infrastructure Fund,
Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
6363 College Boulevard, Suite 100A, Overland
Park, KS 66211
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
P. Bradley Adams
Diane Bono
6363 College Boulevard, Suite 100A, Overland
Park, KS 66211
(Name and address of agent for service)
913-981-1020
Registrant's telephone number, including area code
Date of fiscal year end: November 30
Date of reporting period: November 30, 2023
Item 1. Report to Stockholders.
(a) The report to Shareholders is attached herewith.
Annual Report | November
30, 2023
2023 Annual Report
Closed-End Funds
Tortoise
2023 Annual Report to Stockholders
This combined report provides you
with a comprehensive review of our funds that span essential assets.
TTP and TPZ distribution policies
Tortoise Pipeline & Energy Fund, Inc. (“TTP”)
and Tortoise Power and Energy Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (“TPZ”) are relying on exemptive relief permitting them to make long-term
capital gain distributions throughout the year. Each of TTP and TPZ, with approval of its Board of Directors (the “Board”),
has adopted a managed distribution policy (the “Policy”). Annual distribution amounts are expected to fall in the range of
7% to 10% of the average week-ending net asset value (“NAV”) per share for the prior fiscal semi-annual period. In accordance
with its Policy, TTP distributes a fixed amount per common share, currently $0.59, each quarter to its common shareholders. TPZ distributes
a fixed amount per common share, currently $0.105, each month to its common shareholders. These amounts are subject to change from time
to time at the discretion of the Board. Although the level of distributions is independent of TTP’s and TPZ’s performance,
TTP and TPZ expect such distributions to correlate with its performance over time. Each quarterly and monthly distribution to shareholders
is expected to be at the fixed amount established by the Board, except for extraordinary distributions in light of TTP’s and TPZ’s
performance for the entire calendar year and to enable TTP and TPZ to comply with the distribution requirements imposed by the Internal
Revenue Code. The Board may amend, suspend or terminate the Policy without prior notice to shareholders if it deems such action to be
in the best interests of TTP, TPZ and their respective shareholders. For example, the Board might take such action if the Policy had the
effect of shrinking TTP’s or TPZ’s assets to a level that was determined to be detrimental to TTP or TPZ shareholders. The
suspension or termination of the Policy could have the effect of creating a trading discount (if TTP’s or TPZ’s stock is trading
at or above net asset value), widening an existing trading discount, or decreasing an existing premium. You should not draw any conclusions
about TTP’s or TPZ’s investment performance from the amount of the distribution or from the terms of TTP’s or TPZ’s
distribution policy. Each of TTP and TPZ estimates that it has distributed more than its income and net realized capital gains; therefore,
a portion of your distribution may be a return of capital. A return of capital may occur, for example, when some or all of the money that
you invested in TTP or TPZ is paid back to you. A return of capital distribution does not necessarily reflect TTP’s or TPZ’s
investment performance and should not be confused with “yield” or “income.” The amounts and sources of distributions
reported are only estimates and are not being provided for tax reporting purposes. The actual amounts and sources of the amounts for tax
reporting purposes will depend upon TTP’s and TPZ’s investment experience during their fiscal year and may be subject to changes
based on tax regulations. TTP and TPZ will send you a Form 1099-DIV for the calendar year that will tell you how to report these distributions
for federal income tax purposes.
2023 Annual Report | November
30, 2023
Closed-end Fund Comparison |
|
Name/Ticker |
Primary
focus |
Structure |
Total
investments
($ millions)(1) |
Portfolio mix
by asset type(1) |
Portfolio mix
by structure(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Midstream
focused |
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Corp.
NYSE: TYG
Inception: 2/2004 |
Energy Infrastructure |
Regulated investment company |
$491.4 |
|
|
Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc.
NYSE: NTG
Inception: 7/2010 |
Natural Gas Infrastructure |
Regulated investment company |
$271.9 |
|
|
Tortoise Pipeline
& Energy Fund, Inc.
NYSE: TTP
Inception: 10/2011 |
North
American
pipeline
companies |
Regulated investment company |
$85.6 |
|
|
Upstream
focused |
Tortoise Energy Independence
Fund, Inc.
NYSE: NDP
Inception: 7/2012 |
North
American
oil & gas
producers |
Regulated investment company |
$67.9 |
|
|
Energy
value chain |
Tortoise Power
and Energy Infrastructure
Fund, Inc.
NYSE: TPZ
Inception: 7/2009 |
Power
& energy infrastructure companies
(Fixed income
& equity) |
Regulated investment company |
$119.6 |
|
|
Multi
strategy focused |
Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund
NYSE: TEAF
Inception: 3/2019 |
Essential
assets |
Regulated investment company |
$223.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) As of 11/30/2023
(unaudited)
Tortoise
2023 Annual Report to closed-end fund stockholders
Dear stockholder,
The 2023 fiscal year offered energy investors significant
opportunity with record levels of production, growing export demand, along with some regulatory clarity. Overall, performance ended the
year mixed with midstream higher and both broader energy and utilities lower. Higher interest rates clearly impacted relative performance.
And cash flow proved to be king. Notable events influencing performance included geopolitical tensions in Ukraine and Israel and OPEC+
decisions around crude oil supply and demand. Effects of the Inflation Reduction Act also started to surface. Finally, the U.S. energy
complex remained ever important to supporting the global economy. Sustainable infrastructure continued to face significant headwinds over
the fiscal year due to a variety of factors including inflation, elevated interest rates, and natural gas prices. Despite the difficult
market environment in the education sector, there was an increase in both the volume and credit quality of education investment opportunities
throughout 2023. The senior living industry experienced a continued rebound in the wake of COVID. Demand for senior living facilities
continued to outpace the bed supply which boded well for the sector.
Energy and power infrastructure
The broad energy sector
returned -4.3% for the annual fiscal period (as measured by the S&P 500 Energy Index). Energy was generally rangebound during the
year, bottoming down 15% in March following the regional banking crisis, and peaking higher by 5% in September following the Organization
of Petroleum Exporting Countries plus Russia’s (OPEC+) announcement to curtail crude oil supplies to the global market. The war
between Russian and Ukraine remained in focus and geopolitically was magnified when the Israel and Hamas conflict intensified in October.
That raised concerns about a broader Middle East conflict. The allocation for free cash flow remained an energy investor focus with lower
debt, dividend growth, and share buybacks being a cornerstone of management’s playbook. These policies, along with disciplined mergers
& acquisitions (M&A), were favored in the higher interest environment and in front of concerns about a slowing economy in 2024.
Global crude oil supply
and demand led energy market sentiment. In the first quarter the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) commercial
inventories built up marginally partly due to slower Chinese demand than expected coming out of COVID lockdowns. This resulted in a decision
by Saudi Arabia in the summer to voluntarily reduce its oil output by 1 million barrels per day (bpd) for the month of July, with the
potential for this cut to be extended. Consequently, oil stocks declined, and crude oil prices rallied in the third quarter. Though Saudi
Arabia consistently extended their cuts in the second half, concerns about a global economic slowdown along with growing production in
the United States and Guyana weighed on prices late in the year. To better balance the market, in November OPEC+ agreed to 2 million
bpd of cuts to start 2024, leaving the oil market in a constructive position on supply and demand.
U.S. crude oil production
growth exceeded expectations, growing nearly 1 million bpd in 2023 to 13.2 million bpd. That level eclipsed the previous record high
of 13.0 million bpd achieved in November of 2019. The growth resulted despite rig counts and well completions falling as the year progressed.
Simply, producers did more with less. Drilling laterals lengthened, completion times shortened and even the application of artificial
intelligence positively impacted efficiencies. The Permian basin, the largest U.S. oilfield, remained the primary driver of growth reaching
six million bpd. Aiding producer returns, oilfield service and material costs declined, resulting in lower break-even costs. The Energy
Information Agency (EIA) forecasts production in 2024 to remain steady, partly due to the lower rig count and completion activity trend
transpiring in 2023.
U.S. natural gas production
grew as well in 2023 as the U.S. exported more liquefied natural gas (LNG) than any other country in the first half. U.S. LNG production
reached nearly 12 billion cubic feet per day (bcf/d). The war in Ukraine continued to present a long-term opportunity for U.S. liquefied
natural gas. LNG exports to Europe accelerated in 2022 and remained elevated in 2023. These exports, lower industrial demand, and a relatively
warm winter in 2022/23 kept European natural gas storage inventories full throughout 2023 and well positioned to keep Europe adequately
supplied for the 2024 winter. U.S. natural gas storage inventories also entered year-end 2023 well supplied at just above the five-year
average partly due to a warm winter a year ago. Also helping inventories is growing U.S. production, that improved from 102 bcf/d to
105 bcf/d over the year. That production will help supply LNG export facilities set to come on-line starting in the second half of 2024
through year-end 2027. In that short timeframe U.S. LNG export capacity will nearly double to 25 bcf/d. The EIA forecasts natural gas
production to be mostly flat in 2024 due partly to limited visibility to near-term demand improvement and, like the drilling cadence
for oil, declining service activity.
Natural gas liquids (NGLs)
do not receive as much attention as crude oil or natural gas because they are less visible to consumers. Nonetheless, that does not diminish
their importance as NGLs are the key components in making plastics along with being a source of heat. And, at 6.8 million bpd, the U.S.
is the world’s largest producer of NGLs. Growth in 2023 surpassed 600 thousand bpd with most marginal production exported to meet
growing Asian petrochemical demand. The EIA forecasts NGL production to be stable in 2024.
The midstream energy
sector returned 7.6% for the fiscal year (as measured by the Alerian Midstream Energy Index or AMNA), topping broader energy. Growing
production volumes and inflation passed through via higher tariff rates benefitted revenues. Further, the sector’s elevated and
higher free cash flow, declining leverage, attractive valuation, and share buybacks supported performance. Finally, disciplined M&A
activity with synergies largely accruing to buyers offered a favorable environment for those seeking acquisition led growth.
(unaudited)
2023 Annual Report | November
30, 2023
Cash flow improved for
midstream companies in 2023 following volumes and tariff increases and cost and capital expenditure discipline. Management teams targeted
cash flow increasingly toward shareholders in the form of debt paydown, dividend and distribution growth, and share repurchases. Leverage
targets are now generally between 3.0x – 4.0x earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) with leverage
being a full “turn” lower versus levels prior to 2020. And in addition to dividend and distribution growth, companies opportunistically
repurchased shares, as buybacks topped $4 billion from the fourth quarter of 2022 through the third quarter of 2023. With leverage targets
now largely achieved, 2024 sets up for incrementally more cash flow earmarked for dividends and buybacks.
Following hawkish interest
rate actions from the Federal Reserve, the prospects of an economic recession weighed on investor psyche during much of the fiscal year.
While multiple recessions occurred in the last 40 years, energy demand still increased in 38 out of the last 41 years (2008 and 2020
decreased). Due to actions taken during the recent 2020 recession that reduced capital expenditures and focused on debt paydown, we believe
the energy sector, and specifically midstream, is well prepared to deal with another potential recession. With the world remaining undersupplied
energy over the long-term and sector balance sheets now less levered than in past recent recessions (2001, 2008 and 2020), we believe
energy is well positioned should lower economic growth materialize.
Broader market concerns
about higher interest rates boosted midstream’s relative attractiveness. As higher rates due to inflation were passed through,
companies generated significant free cash flow that led to little to no debt or equity capital market access requirements even for maturing
debt. Additionally, the good economic growth resulted in higher energy demand. Looking at history, good performance in a higher rate
environment is not surprising. In the 18 time periods when the 10-year Treasury yield increased by 50 basis points or more since 2001,
midstream energy, represented by the Tortoise North American Pipeline Index, returned an average of 7.4%, compared to a S&P 500 Index
average return of 5.9%, and bond returns of -2.6% represented by the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index.
With inflation continuing
to increase in 2023, midstream provided investors inflation protection. Pipelines typically benefit from long-term contracts with inflation
protection from regulated tariff escalators. Additionally, tariffs on regulated liquid pipelines include an inflation escalator aligned
with the Producer Price Index (PPI). Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) indexing allowed for a tariff increase of over 13% beginning
on July 1, 2023. In fact, we estimate that the cumulative total allowable tariff increase since 2020 through year-end 2024 will eclipse
26%. This contract feature serves as protection against higher operating costs.
Midstream companies
remained active in M&A with many discrete assets changing hands along with a handful of corporate transactions. The commonality
among all the transactions was buyer discipline. The buyers only purchased complementary assets to existing footprints where
synergies were obvious and paid a price that made the transaction immediately accretive. Even in the corporate transactions,
premiums paid were constructive. In the largest corporate transaction, ONEOK acquired Magellan Midstream Partners at a 22% premium.
Synergies and diversification drove the rationale as both Tulsa companies transport petroleum products, with ONEOK mostly natural
gas liquids and Magellan refined products and crude oil. ONEOK also estimated a tax benefit of $1.5 billion.
One major new pipeline
received regulatory help with the signing of the Fiscal Responsibility Act (FRA) that resolved the mid-summer debt ceiling scuffle. That
Act approved all construction and operational permits and authorizations required for the Mountain Valley Pipeline (MVP). MVP would transport
2 bcf/d of natural gas from the Marcellus through West Virginia and into Virginia. Equitrans Midstream (ETRN), MVP’s operator,
now estimates pipeline completion in the first quarter of 2024. In addition, the FRA reformed the way the National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA) interacts with agencies to approve energy projects so that project developers have more confidence in permitting processes.
Now, when two or more agencies are involved in review, one will be designated lead agency to reduce delays. Further, the timeframe for
an Environmental Impact Statement is limited to two years and an Environmental Assessment to one year, and there are limits on the number
of pages for each. Despite the improved regulatory efficiency, attaining project approvals remained challenging. For example, Navigator
CO2 Ventures cancelled its proposed $3.5 billion, 1,300-mile carbon capture pipeline due to an unpredictable regulatory and government
process. The pipeline concept involved transporting carbon dioxide emissions from ethanol plants to sites where the greenhouse gas would
be sequestered deep underground.
Sustainable infrastructure
From a macro perspective
the first half of the period was generally characterised by influences stemming from stubborn inflation, elevated interest rates, and
declining energy prices, in particular natural gas. In China, the magnitude of economic recovery following the post-COVID reopening ultimately
did not come to fruition.
Elevated borrowing costs
were concerning for businesses which ‘borrow to grow,’ as were higher equipment costs, trade issues, permitting and transmission
constraints. The period also saw banking turmoil triggered primarily by Silicon Valley Bank in early March. As such, some companies in
our investment universe could not escape these varying impulses even if their secular growth remained intact.
The second half of the
period opened with continued upward pressure on interest rates across the OECD and declining power prices in Europe. In response, our
capital-intensive sector saw challenges amidst these elevated interest rates, notably on existing asset cash flows due to higher costs
of capital, and on balance sheets due to the increased total capital needed to finance growth. Amidst such a context, the sector derated
while broader market multiples expanded.
(unaudited)
The
third calendar quarter saw a further steady increase in longer-term interest rates, which created a larger headwind to valuations and
spreads of capital formation for new projects, and overshadowed other drivers as the market reduced the present value of actual cash
flows and questioned the value of growth for companies in the sector. Within that context, purer renewables companies that do not have
other businesses have been most impacted. We therefore saw both U.S. and European valuations continue to compress. Amidst such a context
the sector struggled during the quarter.
The close of the period
saw a welcome improvement in performance, as interest rates began to stabilise and hopeful sentiment on potential future rate cuts for
2024 arose.
Looking
Ahead:
In 2024, if interest
rates stabilize and then decline, we believe that would be very supportive for the sector in the future. Stability in interest rates
should help reduce volatility by offering more consistent net present values of operating cash flows and growth. This is unfortunately
an exogenous factor, but equally is not fundamental to operating earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT).
We maintain conviction
looking ahead; electrification trends remain robust as fundamentally demand is strong, and we predict strong policy support (from the
U.S.’ IRA, across to Europe). Further, valuations for the stocks in the investment universe have come down relative to history
and relative to the broader market. We believe doubts surrounding growth are likely overly pessimistic, and that the mean-reverting aspects
of utilities and infrastructure have been historically compelling. Over-time, in our sector, share prices will tend to correlate with
earnings, and we anticipate these dynamics in 2024.
Notably, through 2023
many companies have reset priorities among growth, credit rating, and dividend. The sector will therefore enter 2024 offering a clearer
picture with potentially less volatility and a focus on execution.
Moving into 2024 and
considering valuations, strength in demand, attractive renewables development returns and where we are in the inflation and interest
rate cycles, we believe that we are approaching an inflection point and are in an attractive spot. This sector captures structural growth
in a slowing global economic environment. Companies typically deliver more stable, and more predictable non-cyclical earnings, and are
positioned to protect better in falling markets while also participating in rebounds.
Waste Transition
The trend of growth in
the number of new facilities being planned or constructed in the United States to transform waste into energy and other beneficial resources
continued in Q4 2023. However, the full growth potential of the sector was negatively impacted by certain macro economic and environmental,
social and governance (ESG) concerns.
From a macro economic
standpoint, persistently high levels of project cost inflation and market interest rates continued to cause higher capital and debt service
costs, putting downward pressure on the economic viability of new projects. As uncertainty increased, the availability of capital decreased,
and that adversely impacted the funding of new projects. As reported by ImpactAlpha, a new report from Sightline Climate indicated that
private capital provided for new first-of-a-kind climate-tech projects, including demonstration units and first-time commercializations,
declined by more than 50% in 2023. The marginal abatement of inflation and interest rates during the fourth quarter is expected to provide
tailwinds for improved capital inflows into the sector in 2024.
From an ESG standpoint,
the rush in recent years to invest in projects and companies that exhibit positive ESG attributes was diminished by significant headwinds
in 2023, both politically and in terms of verifying whether ESG claims were being achieved. The relative ESG discomfort was exhibited
most prominently within the sustainability-linked bond market, where companies can achieve lower borrowing costs by achieving ESG goals.
Per Bloomberg, global sales of sustainably-linked bonds fell by 22% in 2023, the sharpest annual decline on record. Green bond sales,
however, without the political or verification concerns of ESG-related bonds, achieved their second-highest issuance year on record in
2023 per Bloomberg, evidencing strong investor demand generally for sustainable bonds.
The fourth calendar quarter
also saw significant updates regarding fuel credits and tax credits, which provide substantial economic underpinnings for biogas and
biofuel projects in the U.S.
The California Air Resources
Board, known as CARB, released its proposed rulemaking changes to its Low Carbon Fuel Standard or “LCFS” program. While subject
to public comment and final approval, the CARB proposal significantly increases carbon intensity reduction targets, from a current 20%
by 2030 to a new target of 30% by 2030, while adding a 90% reduction target by 2045. Market expectation is that the more stringent targets
will lead to higher LCFS credit pricing, which would improve project cash flows on a go-forward basis.
Separately, the Treasury
Department and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) released proposed regulations regarding Section 48 Investment Tax Credits, with emphasis
on clarifying what capital costs are eligible under the definition of Biogas Facilities. Market participants view such facilities as
consisting of three primary components — gas generation or collection, gas upgrading to natural gas specs, and pipeline interconnect.
However, the proposed regs exclude both gas upgrade systems and pipeline interconnections, which would sharply reduce the potential value
of related investment tax credits. A significant industry push is underway to encourage a more-broad determination of eligible project
costs, prior to final rule-making.
Finally, a growing voluntary
market for biogas and biofuels continues to lessen the sector’s reliance on fuel and tax credits, which is a net positive for sector
fundamentals. Of note, the
(unaudited)
2023 Annual Report | November
30, 2023
largest voluntary renewable
natural gas agreement on record was established between Vanguard Renewables and AstraZeneca. As publicly announced, Vanguard will supply
renewable natural gas (RNG) from three of its dairy manure anaerobic digester facilities over a 15-year term, and AstraZeneca will purchase
at least 650,000 million British thermal units of RNG annually, which is the equivalent energy necessary to heat approximately 18,000
homes per year. Similarly, Anaergia announced a voluntary agreement to sell RNG to Toyota. Although these direct, voluntary purchases
reduce cashflow upside for projects that would otherwise rely on volatile spot-market pricing, they do provide enhanced cash flow stability
and enable a more bankable sector.
Social
impact
Education
The public market for
issuance of new K-12 charter school and private school revenue bonds in Q4 2023 saw a significant rebound with 32 new issues at a par
value of $1,650,427,114, an 85% increase over the same period in 2022. For all of 2023 however, there were only 98 total issues with
par value totaling $3,376,240,114, a 26.67% decrease in par value from 2022.1 In 2023, the specialty investor portion of the
K-12 market totaled 28 new issues with a par value of $755,350,114, of which our firm accounted for 14.6%.
It is our continued assessment
that outflows from municipal bond funds played a major role in 2023’s reduced K-12 charter and private school bond issuance. Q4
outflows were $7,420,010,000 and cumulative outflows for 2023 totaled more than $11 billion.2 The interest rate roller coaster
that defined 2023 was also a significant factor. The 30-year municipal market data (MMD) daily rate, benchmark for K-12 bond offerings,
began the year at 3.50% and dropped to its low of 3.13% by early February. It then went on a steady climb through October, reaching a
high of 4.57% (an increase of 144 bps) before dropping to 3.40% to end the year.3 This volatility forced may schools to put
plans to finance or refinance facilities on hold.
A highlight for Q4 2023
was the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools’ (NAPCS) Charter School Data Digest report. For the 2021-2022 school year
(the most recent for which data was available), public charter schools served approximately 3.7 million students in 7,996 schools throughout
the nation. Charter school enrollment accounted for 7.4% of all public school students, up from 6.8% in 2019-2020. Across the nation,
charter schools continued to serve a higher proportion of low-income students (59%) and students of color (70.1%) when compared to their
district public school counterparts (50.3% and 53.8% respectively). Additionally, with Montana’s passage of new legislation in
2023, charter school laws were on the books in 46 states, Washington DC, Puerto Rico and Guam. This is a significant milestone in the
hard-fought battle to make more education opportunities available to all children that began 32 years ago with Minnesota’s first
in the nation charter school law.4
The NAPCS report also
provided a snapshot as to the management structures employed in charter schools throughout the nation. While all charter schools are
governed by a not-for-profit board, they are divided into one of three categories, depending upon their structure for day-to-day management
of the school. The first, and most common (57.4% of all charter schools), were “independent,” charter schools that are run
by a de novo management team, unique to that individual school. The second are those operating under the network of a not-for-profit
charter management organization (CMO) that establish common goals, educational models and curriculum. CMO’s accounted for 31.7%
of all charter schools, and are often amongst the most well-known and successful (e.g. KIPP, Success Academy, IDEA Schools). Finally,
10.9% of charter schools were led by a for-profit education management organization (EMO).4 Charter school boards contract
with an EMO to run the day-to-day operations of the schools and often additional services such as back-office support, hosting web platforms,
or staffing assistance. While EMOs are often the target of those opposed to charter schools, there are many high performing EMO-run charter
schools, including the several in the Top 25 high schools in America.5 While Ecofin has primarily worked with independent
charter schools, our team has significant past experience working with CMO and EMO led schools as well.
Despite market headwinds,
we saw increases in both the volume and credit quality of education investment opportunities throughout 2023. While it is too early to
know whether the Q4 bond market rebound is a sign of things to come, there should continue to be a robust number of private credit financing
opportunities for K-12 charter school and private schools that offer solid returns for investors.
Senior
Living
This past year was a
year of continued rebound for the senior living industry. Occupancy continued to improve in the wake of COVID, and our senior population
was one step closer to outpacing the current bed supply. In fact, we are just one year away from the first baby boomer turning 80 years
old. Given the current pace of new senior living development, our country will only supply 40% of the projected demand by 2030. That
is an extraordinary shortfall, and catching up to the projected demand will require more than $400 billion of investment over the next
few years.6
As of this printing, Q4 2023 occupancy statistics were not yet available. The for-profit senior living sector
recorded its ninth quarter in a row of occupancy gains in Q3 2023. Statistically, nationwide occupancy for independent living and assisted
living is 86.1% and 82.6%, respectively. Recovery has been stronger in the higher acuity and needs based assisted living setting; however,
independent living is not far behind. As of the third quarter, assisted living occupancy had recovered 8.7%, while independent living
had recovered almost half as much, up 4.6% since the pandemic lows of 2021. Based on the past two years of absorption, senior living
occupancy is projected to reach pre-pandemic levels in 2024.6
(unaudited)
Non-profit
senior living has fared better than their for-profit brethren since the pandemic hit. As of Q3 2023, non-profit continuing care retirement
communities (CCRC’s) were 90.5% occupied. Additionally, asking rents have increased more in non-profit communities, up 5.3% and
5.8% in the assisted and memory care spaces, respectively.6 Based on conversations with our operating partners, communities
continue to pass along outsized rent increases to catch up with inflation but are nearing a point of equilibrium.
Occupancy recovery has
been fueled by almost four years of slowing construction starts. In fact, 2023 recorded the lowest primary market inventory growth since
2005, when National Investment Center for Seniors Housing & Care (NIC) started recording the data. Rising interest rates, elevated
construction costs and tight lending conditions will continue to propel occupancy in the months to come. Given the incredibly low number
of units under construction, the market is setting up for a severe supply and demand imbalance just as the baby boomer population is
knocking on the doorstep.
From now until 2030,
an average of 10,000 baby boomers will turn 65 every day.8 With the combination of increased population and a slower pace
of new senior living inventory supply, we remain confident in the senior living industry’s resilience and ability to prepare for
the upcoming “Silver Tsunami” as our population continues to age.
Concluding thoughts
Energy infrastructure
remains essential for the U.S. to continue as the leading global energy producer and to meet the energy demands of consumers, both domestically
and abroad. Geopolitical events further highlighted this reality. We believe that indispensable nature offers compelling opportunities
for 2024 and beyond. We hope for improved performance of sustainable infrastructure and climate action investments. With strong demand
for renewable energy sources, we believe the sector is well positioned heading into 2024. Opportunities for investing in social impact
education and senior living projects have continued to expand. The projects help broaden educational options for families and strive
to meet the increasing housing demand for the U.S. aging demographic.
The S&P Energy Select
Sector® Index is a capitalization-weighted index of S&P 500® Index companies in the energy sector involved
in the development or production of energy products. The Tortoise North American Pipeline IndexSM is a float adjusted, capitalization-weighted
index of energy pipeline companies domiciled in the United States and Canada. The Tortoise MLP Index® is a float-adjusted,
capitalization-weighted index of energy master limited partnerships.
The Tortoise indices
are the exclusive property of Tortoise Index Solutions, LLC, which has contracted with S&P Opco, LLC (a subsidiary of S&P Dow
Jones Indices LLC) to calculate and maintain the Tortoise MLP Index® and Tortoise North American Pipeline IndexSM
(the “Indices”). The Indices are not sponsored by S&P Dow Jones Indices or its affiliates or its third party licensors
(collectively, “S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC”). S&P Dow Jones Indices will not be liable for any errors or omission
in calculating the Indices. “Calculated by S&P Dow Jones Indices” and its related stylized mark(s) are service marks
of S&P Dow Jones Indices and have been licensed for use by Tortoise Index Solutions, LLC and its affiliates. S&P® is
a registered trademark of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC (“SPFS”), and Dow Jones® is a
registered trademark of Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC (“Dow Jones”).
It is not possible
to invest directly in an index.
Performance data quoted
represent past performance; past performance does not guarantee future results. Like any other stock, total return and market value will
fluctuate so that an investment, when sold, may be worth more or less than its original cost.
| 1 | Electronic Municipal Market Access https://emma.msrb.org/ &
MuniOS https://www.munios.com/ |
| 2 | Refinitiv Lipper US Fund Flows https://www.lipperusfundflows.com/ |
| 4 | https://data.publiccharters.org/digest/charter-school-data-digest/how-many-charter-schools-and-students-are-there/ |
| 5 | https://www.usnews.com/education/best-high-schools/national-rankings |
2023 Annual Report | November
30, 2023
Tortoise
Energy Infrastructure Corp. (TYG)
Fund description
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Corp.
(TYG) seeks a high level of total return with an emphasis on current distributions paid to stockholders. TYG invests primarily in equity
securities in energy infrastructure companies. The fund is positioned to benefit from growing energy demand and accelerated efforts to
reduce global CO2 emissions in energy production. Energy infrastructure companies generate, transport and distribute electricity, as well
as process, store, distribute and market natural gas, natural gas liquids, refined products and crude oil.
Fund performance
The midstream energy
sector returned 7.6% for the fiscal year (as measured by the Alerian Midstream Energy Index or AMNA), topping broader energy. Growing
production volumes and inflation passed through via higher tariff rates benefitted revenues. Further, the sector’s elevated and
higher free cash flow, declining leverage, attractive valuation, and share buybacks supported performance. Finally, disciplined M&A
activity with synergies largely accruing to buyers offered a favorable environment for those seeking acquisition led growth. The fund’s
market-based and NAV-based returns (including the reinvestment of distributions) for the fiscal year were -7.8% and -1.3%, respectively.
The Tortoise MLP Index® returned 20.8% during the same period.
2023 fiscal year summary |
|
Quarterly distributions paid per share |
$0.7100 |
Distribution rate (as of 11/30/2023) |
10.1% |
Year-over-year distribution increase (decrease) |
0.0% |
Cumulative distributions paid per share to stockholders since inception in February 2004 |
$43.8475 |
Market-based total return |
(7.77)% |
NAV-based total return |
(1.29)% |
Premium (discount) to NAV (as of 11/30/2023) |
(20.5)% |
Key asset performance drivers
Top
five contributors |
Company
type |
Targa
Resources Corp. |
Natural
gas pipeline |
The
Williams Companies, Inc. |
Natural
gas pipeline |
Energy
Transfer LP |
Natural
gas pipeline |
Magellan
Midstream Partners, LP |
Refined
products pipeline |
Enterprise
Products Partners LP |
Natural
gas pipeline |
Bottom
five contributors |
Company
type |
NextEra
Energy Partners LP |
Diversified
infrastructure |
AES
Corp. |
Power |
Clearway
Energy, Inc. |
Diversified
infrastructure |
NextEra
Energy, Inc. |
Diversified
infrastructure |
Atlantica
Sustainable Infrastructure
PLC |
Power |
Unlike the fund
return, index return is pre-expenses and taxes..
Performance data
quoted represent past performance; past performance does not guarantee future results. Like any other stock, total return and market
value will fluctuate so that an investment, when sold, may be worth more or less than its original cost. Portfolio composition is subject
to change due to ongoing management of the fund. References to specific securities or sectors should not be construed as a recommendation
by the fund or its adviser. See Schedule of Investments for portfolio weighting at the end of the fiscal quarter.
(unaudited)
Tortoise
Energy Infrastructure
Corp. (TYG) (continued)
Value
of $10,000 vs. Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Fund – Market (unaudited)
From November
30, 2013 through November 30, 2023
The chart assumes an initial investment of $10,000.
Performance reflects waivers of fee and operating expenses in effect. In the absence of such waivers, total return would be reduced. Performance
data quoted represents past performance and does not guarantee future results. Investment returns and principal value will fluctuate,
and when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance current to the most recent month-end may be lower or higher
than the performance quoted and can be obtained by calling 866-362-9331. Performance assumes the reinvestment of capital gains and income
distributions. The performance does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption
of Fund shares.
Annualized Rates of Return as of
November 30, 2023
|
1-Year |
3-Year |
5-Year |
10-Year |
Since Inception(1) |
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Fund - NAV |
-1.29% |
21.35% |
-10.50% |
-7.31% |
2.49% |
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Fund - Market |
-7.77% |
22.86% |
-13.83% |
-10.64% |
1.08% |
Tortoise MLP Index® |
20.76% |
33.85% |
11.27% |
3.58% |
9.17% |
Tortoise Decarbonization Infrastructure IndexSM (2) |
-4.35% |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
| (1) | Inception date of the Fund was Feburary 25, 2004. |
| (2) | The Tortoise Decarbonization Infrastructure Index was added
to reflect the inclusion of a broader scope of energy infrastructure equities including midstream, utilities, and renewables in TYG effective
November 30, 2021. |
Fund structure and distribution
policy
The fund is structured
to qualify as a Regulated Investment Company (RIC) allowing it to pass-through to shareholders income and capital gains earned, thus
avoiding double-taxation. To qualify as a RIC, the fund must meet specific income, diversification and distribution requirements. Regarding
income, at least 90 percent of the fund’s gross income must be from dividends, interest and capital gains. The fund must meet quarterly
diversification requirements including the requirement that at least 50 percent of the assets be in cash, cash equivalents or other securities
with each single issuer of other securities not greater than 5 percent of total assets. No more than 25 percent of total assets can be
invested in any one issuer other than government securities or other RIC’s. The fund must also distribute at least 90 percent of
its investment company income. RIC’s are also subject to excise tax rules which require RIC’s to distribute approximately
98 percent of net income and net capital gains to avoid a 4 percent excise tax.
The fund has adopted
a managed distribution policy (“MDP”). Annual distribution amounts are expected to fall in the range of 7% to 10% of the
average week-ending net asset value (“NAV”) per share for the prior fiscal semi-annual period. Distribution amounts will
be reset both up and down to provide a consistent return on trailing NAV. Under the MDP, distribution amounts will normally be reset
in February and August, with no changes in distribution amounts in May and November.
Leverage
The fund’s leverage
utilization decreased $6.9 million during the six months ended Q4 2023, compared to the six months ended Q2 2023, and represented 21.9%
of total assets at November 30, 2023. At year-end, the fund was in compliance with applicable coverage ratios, 93.2% of the leverage
cost was fixed, the weighted-average maturity was 2.1 years and the weighted-average annual rate on leverage was 3.69%. These rates will
vary in the future as a result of changing floating rates, utilization of the fund’s credit facility and as leverage matures or
is redeemed. During the six month period ended November 30, 2023, $7.1 million of Senior Notes were paid in full upon maturity.
Please see the Financial
Statements and Notes to Financial Statements for additional detail regarding critical accounting policies, results of operations, leverage,
taxes and other important fund information.
For further information
regarding the fund’s leverage and distributions to stockholders, as well as a discussion of the tax impact on distributions, please
visit www.tortoiseecofin.com.
(unaudited)
2023 Annual Report | November 30, 2023
TYG Key Financial
Data (supplemental unaudited information)
(dollar amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)
The information presented below is supplemental
non-GAAP financial information, is not inclusive of required financial disclosures (e.g. Total Expense Ratio), and should be read in conjunction
with the full financial statements.
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2023 |
|
|
|
Q3(1) |
|
|
Q4(1) |
|
|
Q1(1) |
|
|
Q2(1) |
|
|
Q3(1) |
|
|
Q4(1) |
|
Selected Financial Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions paid on common stock |
|
$ |
8,469 |
|
|
$ |
8,045 |
|
|
$ |
8,045 |
|
|
$ |
8,046 |
|
|
$ |
8,045 |
|
|
$ |
7,643 |
|
Distributions paid on common stock per share(2) |
|
|
0.7100 |
|
|
|
0.7100 |
|
|
|
0.7100 |
|
|
|
0.7100 |
|
|
|
0.7100 |
|
|
|
0.7100 |
|
Total assets, end of period(3) |
|
|
638,068 |
|
|
|
623,319 |
|
|
|
577,524 |
|
|
|
504,066 |
|
|
|
527,003 |
|
|
|
492,651 |
|
Average total assets during period(3)(4) |
|
|
621,364 |
|
|
|
607,430 |
|
|
|
595,508 |
|
|
|
547,380 |
|
|
|
526,517 |
|
|
|
503,464 |
|
Leverage(5) |
|
|
144,587 |
|
|
|
147,993 |
|
|
|
146,213 |
|
|
|
114,713 |
|
|
|
120,413 |
|
|
|
107,814 |
|
Leverage as a percent of total assets |
|
|
22.7 |
% |
|
|
23.7 |
% |
|
|
25.3 |
% |
|
|
22.8 |
% |
|
|
22.8 |
% |
|
|
21.9 |
% |
Operating expenses before leverage costs and current taxes(6) |
|
|
1.05 |
% |
|
|
1.16 |
% |
|
|
1.13 |
% |
|
|
1.22 |
% |
|
|
1.26 |
% |
|
|
1.73 |
% |
Net unrealized depreciation, end of period |
|
|
(270,982 |
) |
|
|
9,330 |
|
|
|
(34,286 |
) |
|
|
(65,512 |
) |
|
|
(34,940 |
) |
|
|
(58,511 |
) |
Net assets, end of period |
|
|
467,109 |
|
|
|
446,618 |
|
|
|
416,799 |
|
|
|
380,323 |
|
|
|
403,510 |
|
|
|
380,497 |
|
Average net assets during period(7) |
|
|
442,939 |
|
|
|
435,678 |
|
|
|
429,315 |
|
|
|
409,946 |
|
|
|
406,929 |
|
|
|
384,850 |
|
Net asset value per common share(2) |
|
|
39.16 |
|
|
|
39.41 |
|
|
|
36.78 |
|
|
|
33.56 |
|
|
|
35.61 |
|
|
|
35.35 |
|
Market value per share(2) |
|
|
34.14 |
|
|
|
33.54 |
|
|
|
30.89 |
|
|
|
26.95 |
|
|
|
30.13 |
|
|
|
28.11 |
|
Shares outstanding (000’s) |
|
|
11,928 |
|
|
|
11,332 |
|
|
|
11,332 |
|
|
|
11,332 |
|
|
|
11,332 |
|
|
|
10,765 |
|
| (1) | Q1 is the period from December through February. Q2 is the period
from March through May. Q3 is the period from June through August. Q4 is the period from September through November. |
| (2) | Adjusted to reflect 1 for 4 reverse stock split effective May
1, 2020. |
| (3) | Includes deferred issuance and offering costs on senior notes
and preferred stock. |
| (4) | Computed by averaging month-end values within each period. |
| (5) | Leverage consists of senior notes, preferred stock and outstanding
borrowings under credit facilities. |
(6) | As a percent of total assets |
(7) | Computed by averaging daily
net assets within each period. |
Tortoise
Midstream Energy Fund, Inc. (NTG)
Fund description
The Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund
(NTG) seeks to provide stockholders with a high level of total return with an emphasis on current distributions. NTG invests primarily
in midstream energy equities that own and operate a network of pipeline and energy related logistical infrastructure assets with an emphasis
on those that transport, gather, process and store natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGLs). NTG targets midstream energy equities,
including MLPs benefiting from U.S. natural gas production and consumption expansion, with minimal direct commodity exposure.
Fund performance
The midstream energy
sector returned 7.6% for the fiscal year (as measured by the Alerian Midstream Energy Index or AMNA), topping broader energy. Growing
production volumes and inflation passed through via higher tariff rates benefitted revenues. Further, the sector’s elevated and
higher free cash flow, declining leverage, attractive valuation, and share buybacks supported performance. Finally, disciplined M&A
activity with synergies largely accruing to buyers offered a favorable environment for those seeking acquisition led growth. The fund’s
market-based and NAV-based returns (including the reinvestment of distributions) for the fiscal year were -0.8% and 5.3%, respectively.
The Tortoise MLP Index® returned 20.8% during the same period.
2023 fiscal year summary |
|
Quarterly
distributions paid per share |
$0.7700 |
Distribution
rate (as of 11/30/2023) |
9.0% |
Year-over-year
distribution increase (decrease) |
0.0% |
Cumulative
distributions paid per share to stockholders since inception in July 2010 |
$24.1200 |
Market-based
total return |
(0.83)% |
NAV-based
total return |
5.30% |
Premium
(discount) to NAV (as of 11/30/2023) |
(19.7)% |
Key asset performance drivers
Top five contributors |
Company type |
Targa Resources Corp. |
Natural gas pipeline |
Plains GP Holdings, L.P. |
Crude oil pipeline |
The Williams Companies, Inc. |
Natural gas pipeline |
Energy Transfer LP |
Natural gas pipeline |
Magellan Midstream Partners, LP |
Refined products pipeline |
Bottom five contributors |
Company type |
NextEra Energy Partners |
Diversified infrastructure |
Clearway Energy, Inc. |
Diversified infrastructure |
Atlantica
Sustainable Infrastructure PLC |
Power |
Enbridge Inc. |
Crude oil pipeline |
Kinder Morgan Inc. |
Natural gas pipeline |
Unlike the fund return, index return is pre-expenses
and taxes.
Performance data quoted represent past performance;
past performance does not guarantee future results. Like any other stock, total return and market value will fluctuate so that an investment,
when sold, may be worth more or less than its original cost. Portfolio composition is subject to change due to ongoing management of the
fund. References to specific securities or sectors should not be construed as a recommendation by the fund or its adviser. See Schedule
of Investments for portfolio weighting at the end of the fiscal quarter.
(unaudited)
2023 Annual Report | November
30, 2023
Tortoise
Midstream Energy Fund,
Inc. (NTG) (continued)
Value
of $10,000 vs. Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund – Market (unaudited)
From November 30, 2013 through November 30, 2023
The chart assumes an initial investment of $10,000.
Performance reflects waivers of fee and operating expenses in effect. In the absence of such waivers, total return would be reduced. Performance
data quoted represents past performance and does not guarantee future results. Investment returns and principal value will fluctuate,
and when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance current to the most recent month-end may be lower or higher
than the performance quoted and can be obtained by calling 866-362-9331. Performance assumes the reinvestment of capital gains and income
distributions. The performance does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption
of Fund shares.
Annualized Rates of Return as of
November 30, 2023
|
1-Year |
3-Year |
5-Year |
10-Year |
Since Inception(1) |
Tortoise
Midstream Energy Fund – NAV |
5.30% |
27.84% |
-14.56% |
-9.63% |
-4.72% |
Tortoise
Midstream Energy Fund – Market |
-0.83% |
30.20% |
-17.34% |
-11.34% |
-6.59% |
Tortoise MLP Index® |
20.76% |
33.85% |
11.27% |
3.58% |
7.05% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Inception date of the Fund was July 27, 2010. |
Fund structure and distribution
policy
The fund is structured
to qualify as a Regulated Investment Company (RIC) allowing it to pass-through to shareholders income and capital gains earned, thus
avoiding double-taxation. To qualify as a RIC, the fund must meet specific income, diversification and distribution requirements. Regarding
income, at least 90 percent of the fund’s gross income must be from dividends, interest and capital gains. The fund must meet quarterly
diversification requirements including the requirement that at least 50 percent of the assets be in cash, cash equivalents or other securities
with each single issuer of other securities not greater than 5 percent of total assets. No more than 25 percent of total assets can be
invested in any one issuer other than government securities or other RIC’s. The fund must also distribute at least 90 percent of
its investment company income. RIC’s are also subject to excise tax rules which require RIC’s to distribute approximately
98 percent of net income and net capital gains to avoid a 4 percent excise tax.
The fund has adopted
a managed distribution policy (“MDP”). Annual distribution amounts are expected to fall in the range of 7% to 10% of the
average week-ending net asset value (“NAV”) per share for the prior fiscal semi-annual period. Distribution amounts will
be reset both up and down to provide a consistent return on trailing NAV. Under the MDP, distribution amounts will normally be reset
in February and August, with no changes in distribution amounts in May and November.
Leverage
The fund’s leverage
utilization decreased $3.4 million during the six months ended Q4 2023 compared to the six months ended Q2 2023, and represented 19.6%
of total assets at November 30, 2023. At year-end, the fund was in compliance with applicable coverage ratios, 80.2% of the leverage
cost was fixed, the weighted-average maturity was 3.7 years and the weighted-average annual rate on leverage was 3.78%. These rates will
vary in the future as a result of changing floating rates, utilization of the fund’s credit facility and as leverage matures or
is redeemed. During the six month period ended November 30, 2023, $2.1 million of MRP shares and $3.0 million of Senior Notes were paid
in full upon maturity.
Please see the Financial
Statements and Notes to Financial Statements for additional detail regarding critical accounting policies, results of operations, leverage,
taxes and other important fund information.
For further information
regarding the fund’s leverage and distributions to stockholders, as well as a discussion of the tax impact on distributions, please
visit www.tortoiseecofin.com.
(unaudited)
NTG Key Financial
Data (supplemental unaudited information)
(dollar amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)
The information presented below is supplemental
non-GAAP financial information, is not inclusive of required financial disclosures (e.g. Total Expense Ratio), and should be read in conjunction
with the full financial statements.
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2023 |
|
|
|
Q3(1) |
|
|
Q4(1) |
|
|
Q1(1) |
|
|
Q2(1) |
|
|
Q3(1) |
|
|
Q4(1) |
|
Selected Financial Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions paid on common stock |
|
$ |
4,345 |
|
|
$ |
4,128 |
|
|
$ |
4,128 |
|
|
$ |
4,128 |
|
|
$ |
4,128 |
|
|
$ |
3,921 |
|
Distributions paid on common stock per share(2) |
|
|
0.7700 |
|
|
|
0.7700 |
|
|
|
0.7700 |
|
|
|
0.7700 |
|
|
|
0.7700 |
|
|
|
0.7700 |
|
Total assets, end of period(3) |
|
|
316,411 |
|
|
|
323,122 |
|
|
|
296,682 |
|
|
|
261,858 |
|
|
|
287,287 |
|
|
|
272,818 |
|
Average total assets during period(3)(4) |
|
|
312,932 |
|
|
|
308,008 |
|
|
|
304,884 |
|
|
|
281,520 |
|
|
|
280,548 |
|
|
|
276,916 |
|
Leverage(5) |
|
|
64,169 |
|
|
|
62,369 |
|
|
|
66,120 |
|
|
|
56,920 |
|
|
|
60,720 |
|
|
|
53,524 |
|
Leverage as a percent of total assets |
|
|
20.3 |
% |
|
|
19.3 |
% |
|
|
22.3 |
% |
|
|
21.7 |
% |
|
|
21.1 |
% |
|
|
19.6 |
% |
Operating expenses before leverage costs and current taxes(6) |
|
|
1.11 |
% |
|
|
1.29 |
% |
|
|
1.19 |
% |
|
|
1.36 |
% |
|
|
1.43 |
% |
|
|
2.15 |
% |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation), end of period |
|
|
145,148 |
|
|
|
27,611 |
|
|
|
6,856 |
|
|
|
(11,572) |
|
|
|
17,267 |
|
|
|
5,003 |
|
Net assets, end of period |
|
|
240,864 |
|
|
|
237,022 |
|
|
|
221,555 |
|
|
|
200,046 |
|
|
|
225,096 |
|
|
|
217,066 |
|
Average net assets during period(7) |
|
|
231,908 |
|
|
|
230,297 |
|
|
|
226,098 |
|
|
|
215,743 |
|
|
|
220,209 |
|
|
|
217,415 |
|
Net asset value per common share(2) |
|
|
42.68 |
|
|
|
44.21 |
|
|
|
41.33 |
|
|
|
37.32 |
|
|
|
41.99 |
|
|
|
42.62 |
|
Market value per common share(2) |
|
|
36.79 |
|
|
|
37.69 |
|
|
|
35.28 |
|
|
|
31.53 |
|
|
|
35.40 |
|
|
|
34.22 |
|
Shares outstanding (000’s) |
|
|
5,643 |
|
|
|
5,361 |
|
|
|
5,361 |
|
|
|
5,361 |
|
|
|
5,361 |
|
|
|
5,093 |
|
| (1) | Q1 is the period from December through February. Q2 is the period
from March through May. Q3 is the period from June through August. Q4 is the period from September through November. |
| (2) | Adjusted to reflect 1 for 10 reverse stock split effective May
1, 2020. |
| (3) | Includes deferred issuance and offering costs on senior notes
and preferred stock. |
| (4) | Computed by averaging month-end values within each period. |
| (5) | Leverage consists of senior notes, preferred stock and outstanding
borrowings under the credit facility. |
| (6) | Computed as a percent of total assets. |
| (7) | Computed by averaging daily net assets within each period. |
2023 Annual Report | November 30, 2023
Tortoise
Pipeline & Energy Fund, Inc. (TTP)
Fund description
The Tortoise Pipeline & Energy
Fund (TTP) seeks a high level of total return with an emphasis on current distributions paid to stockholders. TTP invests primarily in
equity securities of North American pipeline companies that transport natural gas, natural gas liquids (NGLs), crude oil and refined products
and, to a lesser extent, in other energy infrastructure companies.
Fund performance
The midstream energy
sector returned 7.6% for the fiscal year (as measured by the Alerian Midstream Energy Index or AMNA), topping broader energy. Growing
production volumes and inflation passed through via higher tariff rates benefitted revenues. Further, the sector’s elevated and
higher free cash flow, declining leverage, attractive valuation, and share buybacks supported performance. Finally, disciplined M&A
activity with synergies largely accruing to buyers offered a favorable environment for those seeking acquisition led growth. The fund’s
market-based and NAV-based returns (including the reinvestment of distributions) for the fiscal year were 6.7% and 8.4%, respectively.
The Tortoise North American Pipeline IndexSM returned 4.9% for the same period.
2023 fiscal year summary |
|
Quarterly
distributions paid per share |
$0.5900 |
Distribution rate (as of 11/30/2023) |
8.4% |
Year-over-year distribution increase (decrease) |
0.0% |
Cumulative distributions paid per share to stockholders since inception in October 2011 |
$19.6575 |
Market-based total return |
6.72% |
NAV-based total return |
8.38% |
Premium (discount) to NAV (as of 11/30/2023) |
(19.0)% |
Please refer to the inside front cover of the
report for important information about the fund’s distribution policy.
Key asset performance drivers
Top five contributors |
Company type |
Plains GP Holdings, L.P. |
Crude oil pipeline |
Magellan Midstream Partners, LP |
Refined products pipeline |
The Williams Companies, Inc. |
Natural gas pipeline |
Targa Resources Corp. |
Natural gas pipeline |
Energy Transfer LP |
Natural gas pipeline |
Bottom five contributors |
Company type |
NextEra Energy Partners LP |
Diversified Infrastructure |
Enbridge Inc. |
Crude oil pipeline |
TC Energy Corp. |
Natural gas pipeline |
Sempra Energy |
Diversified Infrastructure |
Clearway Energy, Inc. |
Diversified Infrastructure |
Unlike the fund return, index return is pre-expenses.
Performance data quoted represent past performance;
past performance does not guarantee future results. Like any other stock, total return and market value will fluctuate so that an investment,
when sold, may be worth more or less than its original cost. Portfolio composition is subject to change due to ongoing management of the
fund. References to specific securities or sectors should not be construed as a recommendation by the fund or its adviser. See Schedule
of Investments for portfolio weighting at the end of the fiscal quarter.
(unaudited)
Tortoise
Pipeline & Energy
Fund, Inc. (TTP) (continued)
Value
of $10,000 vs. Tortoise Pipeline and Energy Fund – Market (unaudited)
From November
30, 2013 through November 30, 2023
The chart assumes an initial investment of $10,000.
Performance reflects waivers of fee and operating expenses in effect. In the absence of such waivers, total return would be reduced. Performance
data quoted represents past performance and does not guarantee future results. Investment returns and principal value will fluctuate,
and when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance current to the most recent month-end may be lower or higher
than the performance quoted and can be obtained by calling 866-362-9331. Performance assumes the reinvestment of capital gains and income
distributions. The performance does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption
of Fund shares.
Annualized Rates of Return as of
November 30, 2023
|
1-Year |
3-Year |
5-Year |
10-Year |
Since Inception(1) |
Tortoise Pipeline and Energy Fund NAV |
8.38% |
28.87% |
-4.86% |
-4.48% |
-0.77% |
Tortoise Pipeline and Energy Fund Market |
6.72% |
31.75% |
-6.42% |
-5.76% |
-2.86% |
Tortoise North American Pipeline Index |
4.92% |
21.01% |
9.57% |
6.20% |
7.86% |
(1) Inception date of the Fund was October 26, 2011.
Fund structure and distribution
policy
The fund is structured
to qualify as a Regulated Investment Company (RIC) allowing it to pass-through to shareholders income and capital gains earned, thus
avoiding double-taxation. To qualify as a RIC, the fund must meet specific income, diversification and distribution requirements. Regarding
income, at least 90 percent of the fund’s gross income must be from dividends, interest and capital gains. The fund must meet quarterly
diversification requirements including the requirement that at least 50 percent of the assets be in cash, cash equivalents or other securities
with each single issuer of other securities not greater than 5 percent of total assets. No more than 25 percent of total assets can be
invested in any one issuer other than government securities or other RIC’s. The fund must also distribute at least 90 percent of
its investment company income. RIC’s are also subject to excise tax rules which require RIC’s to distribute approximately
98 percent of net income and net capital gains to avoid a 4 percent excise tax.
The fund has adopted
a distribution policy which is included on the inside front cover of this report. To summarize, the fund has adopted a managed
distribution policy (“MDP”). Annual distribution amounts are expected to fall in the range of 7% to 10% of the average
week-ending net asset value (“NAV”) per share for the prior fiscal semi-annual period. Distribution amounts will be
reset both up and down to provide a consistent return on trailing NAV. Under the MDP, distribution amounts will normally be reset in
February and August, with no changes in distribution amounts in May and November. The fund may designate a portion of its
distributions as capital gains and may also distribute additional capital gains in the last quarter of the year to meet annual
excise distribution requirements. Distribution amounts are subject to change from time to time at the discretion of the
Board.
Leverage
The fund’s leverage
utilization decreased $1.5 million during the six months ended Q4 2023, compared to the six months ended Q2 2023, and represented 18.5%
of total assets at November 30, 2023. At year-end, the fund was in compliance with applicable coverage ratios, 63.0% of the leverage
cost was fixed, the weighted-average maturity was 0.7 years and the weighted-average annual rate on leverage was 5.31%. These rates will
vary in the future as a result of changing floating rates, utilization of the fund’s credit facility and as leverage matures or
is redeemed.
Please see the Financial
Statements and Notes to Financial Statements for additional detail regarding critical accounting policies, results of operations, leverage
and other important fund information.
For further information
regarding the fund’s leverage and distributions to stockholders, as well as a discussion of the tax impact on distributions, please
visit www.tortoiseecofin.com.
(unaudited)
2023 Annual Report | November 30, 2023
TTP Key Financial
Data (supplemental unaudited information)
(dollar amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)
The information presented below is supplemental
non-GAAP financial information, is not inclusive of required financial disclosures (e.g. Total Expense Ratio), and should be read in conjunction
with the full financial statements.
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2023 |
|
|
|
Q3(1) |
|
|
Q4(1) |
|
|
Q1(1) |
|
|
Q2(1) |
|
|
Q3(1) |
|
|
Q4(1) |
|
Selected Financial Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions paid on common stock |
|
$ |
1,314 |
|
|
$ |
1,249 |
|
|
$ |
1,248 |
|
|
$ |
1,249 |
|
|
$ |
1,249 |
|
|
$ |
1,186 |
|
Distributions paid on common stock per share(2) |
|
|
0.5900 |
|
|
|
0.5900 |
|
|
|
0.5900 |
|
|
|
0.5900 |
|
|
|
0.5900 |
|
|
|
0.5900 |
|
Total assets, end of period(3) |
|
|
97,010 |
|
|
|
93,907 |
|
|
|
87,895 |
|
|
|
81,736 |
|
|
|
88,301 |
|
|
|
86,167 |
|
Average total assets during period(3)(4) |
|
|
96,086 |
|
|
|
93,079 |
|
|
|
90,503 |
|
|
|
86,135 |
|
|
|
86,853 |
|
|
|
86,272 |
|
Leverage(5) |
|
|
21,343 |
|
|
|
19,843 |
|
|
|
20,143 |
|
|
|
17,443 |
|
|
|
17,343 |
|
|
|
15,943 |
|
Leverage as a percent of total assets |
|
|
22.0 |
% |
|
|
21.1 |
% |
|
|
22.9 |
% |
|
|
21.3 |
% |
|
|
19.6 |
% |
|
|
18.5 |
% |
Operating expenses before leverage costs(6) |
|
|
1.05 |
% |
|
|
1.32 |
% |
|
|
1.31 |
% |
|
|
1.37 |
% |
|
|
1.39 |
% |
|
|
1.30 |
% |
Net unrealized depreciation, end of period |
|
|
17,286 |
|
|
|
19,117 |
|
|
|
13,950 |
|
|
|
9,483 |
|
|
|
17,306 |
|
|
|
17,779 |
|
Net assets, end of period |
|
|
75,181 |
|
|
|
73,509 |
|
|
|
67,264 |
|
|
|
63,730 |
|
|
|
70,447 |
|
|
|
69,525 |
|
Average net assets during period(7) |
|
|
73,287 |
|
|
|
71,609 |
|
|
|
69,939 |
|
|
|
66,399 |
|
|
|
69,717 |
|
|
|
69,161 |
|
Net asset value per common share(2) |
|
|
33.75 |
|
|
|
34.73 |
|
|
|
31.78 |
|
|
|
30.11 |
|
|
|
33.29 |
|
|
|
34.58 |
|
Market value per common share(2) |
|
|
29.18 |
|
|
|
28.58 |
|
|
|
27.09 |
|
|
|
24.81 |
|
|
|
28.36 |
|
|
|
28.02 |
|
Shares outstanding (000s) |
|
|
2,228 |
|
|
|
2,116 |
|
|
|
2,116 |
|
|
|
2,116 |
|
|
|
2,116 |
|
|
|
2,011 |
|
| (1) | Q1 is the period from December through February. Q2 is the period
from March through May. Q3 is the period from June through August. Q4 is the period from September through November. |
| (2) | Adjusted to reflect 1 for 4 reverse stock split effective May
1, 2020. |
| (3) | Includes deferred issuance and offering costs on senior notes
and preferred stock. |
| (4) | Computed by averaging month-end values within each period. |
| (5) | Leverage consists of senior notes, preferred stock and outstanding
borrowings under the revolving credit facility. |
| (6) | Computed as a percent of total assets. |
| (7) | Computed by averaging daily net assets within each period. |
Tortoise
Energy Independence Fund, Inc. (NDP)
Fund description
The Tortoise Energy Independence Fund
(NDP) seeks a high level of total return with an emphasis on current distributions paid to stockholders. NDP invests primarily in equity
securities of upstream North American energy companies that engage in the exploration and production of crude oil, condensate, natural
gas and natural gas liquids that generally have a significant presence in North American oil and gas fields, including shale reservoirs.
Fund performance
The broad energy sector
returned -4.3% for the annual fiscal period (as measured by the S&P 500 Energy Index). Energy was generally rangebound during the
year, bottoming down 15% in March following the regional banking crisis, and peaking higher by 5% in September following the Organization
of Petroleum Exporting Countries plus Russia’s (OPEC+) announcement to curtail crude oil supplies to the global market. The war
between Russian and Ukraine remained in focus and geopolitically was magnified when the Israel and Hamas conflict intensified in October.
That raised concerns about a broader Middle East conflict. The allocation for free cash flow remained an energy investor focus with lower
debt, dividend growth, and share buybacks being a cornerstone of management’s playbook. These policies, along with disciplined
mergers & acquisitions (M&A), were favored in the higher interest environment and in front of concerns about a slowing economy
in 2024. The fund’s market-based and NAV-based returns (including the reinvestment of distributions) for the fiscal year were -2.8
and 0.9%, respectively.
2023 fiscal year summary |
|
Quarterly
distributions paid per share |
$0.6300 |
Distribution rate (as of 11/30/2023) |
8.7% |
Year-over-year distribution increase (decrease) |
12.5% |
Cumulative distributions paid per share to stockholders since inception in July 2012 |
$17.3325 |
Market-based total return |
(2.80)% |
NAV-based total return |
0.87% |
Premium (discount) to NAV (as of 11/30/2023) |
(18.3)% |
Key asset performance drivers
Top five contributors |
Company type |
Plain All American Pipeline, L.P. |
Crude oil pipeline |
Energy Transfer LP |
Natural gas pipeline |
Targa Resources Corp. |
Natural gas pipeline |
Diamondback Energy, Inc. |
Oil & gas production |
Pioneer Natural Resources Co. |
Oil & gas production |
|
|
Bottom five contributors |
Company type |
Devon Energy Corp. |
Oil & gas production |
Chevron Corp. |
Oil & gas production |
Occidental Petroleum Corp. |
Oil & gas production |
Marathon Oil Corp. |
Oil & gas production |
EOG Resources, Inc. |
Oil & gas production |
Unlike the fund return, index return is pre-expenses.
Performance data quoted represent past performance:
past performance does not guarantee future results. Like any other stock, total return and market value will fluctuate so that an investment,
when sold, may be worth more or less than its original cost. Portfolio composition is subject to change due to ongoing management of the
fund. References to specific securities or sectors should not be construed as a recommendation by the fund or its adviser. See Schedule
of Investments for portfolio weighting at the end of the fiscal quarter.
(unaudited)
2023 Annual Report | November 30, 2023
Tortoise
Energy Independence
Fund, Inc. (NDP) (continued)
Value
of $10,000 vs. Tortoise Energy Independence Fund – Market (unaudited)
From November
30, 2013 through November 30, 2023
The chart assumes an initial investment of $10,000.
Performance reflects waivers of fee and operating expenses in effect. In the absence of such waivers, total return would be reduced. Performance
data quoted represents past performance and does not guarantee future results. Investment returns and principal value will fluctuate,
and when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance current to the most recent month-end may be lower or higher
than the performance quoted and can be obtained by calling 866-362-9331. Performance assumes the reinvestment of capital gains and income
distributions. The performance does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption
of Fund shares.
Annualized
Rates of Return as of November 30, 2023
|
1-Year |
3-Year |
5-Year |
10-Year |
Since Inception(1) |
Tortoise Energy Independence Fund − NAV |
0.87% |
37.27% |
-6.33% |
-7.84% |
-5.32% |
Tortoise Energy Independence Fund − Market |
-2.80% |
40.01% |
-10.01% |
-8.82% |
-7.38% |
S&P 500 Energy Select Sector Index |
-3.70% |
37.85% |
10.55% |
3.79% |
5.57% |
(1) Inception date of the Fund was July 26, 2012.
Fund structure and distribution
policy
The fund is structured
to qualify as a Regulated Investment Company (RIC) allowing it to pass-through to shareholders income and capital gains earned, thus
avoiding double-taxation. To qualify as a RIC, the fund must meet specific income, diversification and distribution requirements. Regarding
income, at least 90 percent of the fund’s gross income must be from dividends, interest and capital gains. The fund must meet quarterly
diversification requirements including the requirement that at least 50 percent of the assets be in cash, cash equivalents or other securities
with each single issuer of other securities not greater than 5 percent of total assets. No more than 25 percent of total assets can be
invested in any one issuer other than government securities or other RIC’s. The fund must also distribute at least 90 percent of
its investment company income. RIC’s are also subject to excise tax rules which require RIC’s to distribute approximately
98 percent of net income and net capital gains to avoid a 4 percent excise tax.
The fund has adopted
a distribution policy which is included on the inside front cover of this report. To summarize, the fund has adopted a managed
distribution policy (“MDP”). Annual distribution amounts are expected to fall in the range of 7% to 10% of the average
week-ending net asset value (“NAV”) per share for the prior fiscal semi-annual period. Distribution amounts will be
reset both up and down to provide a consistent return on trailing NAV. Under the MDP, distribution amounts will normally be reset in
February and August, with no changes in distribution amounts in May and November. The fund may designate a portion of its
distributions as capital gains and may also distribute additional capital gains in the last quarter of the year to meet annual
excise distribution requirements. Distribution amounts are subject to change from time to time at the discretion of the
Board.
Leverage
The fund’s leverage
utilization has remained flat, at $8.8 million, during the six months ended Q4 2023 as compared to the six months ended Q2 2023. The
fund utilizes all floating rate leverage that had an interest rate of 6.69% and represented 12.9% of total assets at year-end. During
the period, the fund maintained compliance with its applicable coverage ratios. The interest rate on the fund’s leverage will vary
in the future along with changing floating rates.
Please see the Financial
Statements and Notes to Financial Statements for additional detail regarding critical accounting policies, results of operations, leverage
and other important fund information.
For further information
regarding the fund’s leverage and distributions to stockholders, as well as a discussion of the tax impact on distributions, please
visit www.tortoiseecofin.com.
(unaudited)
NDP Key Financial
Data (supplemental unaudited information)
(dollar amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)
The information presented below is supplemental
non-GAAP financial information, is not inclusive of required financial disclosures (e.g. Total Expense Ratio), and should be read in conjunction
with the full financial statements.
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2023 |
|
|
|
Q3(1) |
|
|
Q4(1) |
|
|
Q1(1) |
|
|
Q2(1) |
|
|
Q3(1) |
|
|
Q4(1) |
|
Selected Financial Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions paid on common stock |
|
$ |
1,034 |
|
|
$ |
982 |
|
|
$ |
1,105 |
|
|
$ |
1,105 |
|
|
$ |
1,105 |
|
|
$ |
1,049 |
|
Distributions paid on common stock per share(2) |
|
|
0.5600 |
|
|
|
0.5600 |
|
|
|
0.6300 |
|
|
|
0.6300 |
|
|
|
0.6300 |
|
|
|
0.6300 |
|
Total assets, end of period |
|
|
72,928 |
|
|
|
71,059 |
|
|
|
68,060 |
|
|
|
64,422 |
|
|
|
72,535 |
|
|
|
68,156 |
|
Average total assets during period(3) |
|
|
69,811 |
|
|
|
71,651 |
|
|
|
69,055 |
|
|
|
67,241 |
|
|
|
69,136 |
|
|
|
71,088 |
|
Leverage(4) |
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
3,700 |
|
|
|
8,400 |
|
|
|
8,800 |
|
|
|
8,600 |
|
|
|
8,800 |
|
Leverage as a percent of total assets |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
12.3 |
% |
|
|
13.7 |
% |
|
|
11.9 |
% |
|
|
12.9 |
% |
Operating expenses before leverage costs as a percent of total assets |
|
|
1.24 |
% |
|
|
1.34 |
% |
|
|
1.31 |
% |
|
|
1.35 |
% |
|
|
1.34 |
% |
|
|
1.35 |
% |
Net unrealized depreciation, end of period |
|
|
29,531 |
|
|
|
30,806 |
|
|
|
23,977 |
|
|
|
20,571 |
|
|
|
29,184 |
|
|
|
24,611 |
|
Net assets, end of period |
|
|
67,884 |
|
|
|
67,067 |
|
|
|
59,361 |
|
|
|
55,288 |
|
|
|
63,590 |
|
|
|
59,053 |
|
Average net assets during period(5) |
|
|
63,623 |
|
|
|
67,687 |
|
|
|
62,487 |
|
|
|
58,619 |
|
|
|
60,016 |
|
|
|
62,520 |
|
Net asset value per common share(2) |
|
|
36.77 |
|
|
|
38.24 |
|
|
|
33.85 |
|
|
|
31.53 |
|
|
|
36.26 |
|
|
|
35.45 |
|
Market value per common share(2) |
|
|
32.37 |
|
|
|
32.41 |
|
|
|
29.46 |
|
|
|
27.08 |
|
|
|
31.15 |
|
|
|
28.95 |
|
Shares outstanding (000’s) |
|
|
1,846 |
|
|
|
1,754 |
|
|
|
1,754 |
|
|
|
1,754 |
|
|
|
1,754 |
|
|
|
1,666 |
|
| (1) | Q1 is the period from December through February. Q2 is the period
from March through May. Q3 is the period from June through August. Q4 is the period from September through November. |
| (2) | Adjusted to reflect 1 for 8 reverse stock split effective May
1, 2020. |
| (3) | Computed by averaging month-end values within each period. |
| (4) | Leverage consists of outstanding borrowings under the revolving
credit facility. |
| (5) | Computed by averaging daily net assets within each period. |
2023 Annual Report | November
30, 2023
Tortoise
Power and Energy Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (TPZ)
Fund description
The Tortoise Power and Energy Infrastructure
Fund (TPZ) seeks to provide a high level of current income to stockholders, with a secondary objective of capital appreciation. TPZ seeks
to invest primarily in fixed income and dividend-paying equity securities of power and energy infrastructure companies that provide stable
and defensive characteristics throughout economic cycles.
Fund performance
The midstream energy sector returned 7.6% for the
fiscal year (as measured by the Alerian Midstream Energy Index or AMNA), topping broader energy. Growing production volumes and inflation
passed through via higher tariff rates benefitted revenues. Further, the sector’s elevated and higher free cash flow, declining
leverage, attractive valuation, and share buybacks supported performance. Finally, disciplined M&A activity with synergies largely
accruing to buyers offered a favorable environment for those seeking acquisition led growth. The utilities sector underperformed the broader
market. The fund’s market-based and NAV-based returns (including the reinvestment of distributions) for the fiscal year were 9.4%
and 12.7%, respectively. Comparatively, the TPZ Benchmark Composite* returned 8.6% for the same period. The fund’s equity holdings
outperformed its fixed income holdings for the fiscal year on a total return basis.
2023 fiscal year summary |
|
Monthly distributions paid per share |
$0.105 |
Distribution rate (as of 11/30/2023) |
9.3% |
Year-over-year distribution increase (decrease) |
0.0% |
Cumulative distribution to stockholders since inception in July 2009 |
$20.8950 |
Market-based total return |
9.43% |
NAV-based total return |
12.69% |
Premium (discount) to NAV (as of 11/30/2023) |
(16.5)% |
* |
The TPZ Benchmark Composite
includes the BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. Energy Index (CIEN), the BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. Electricity Index (CUEL) and the Tortoise MLP
Index® (TMLP). It is comprised of a blend of 70% fixed income and 30% equity securities issued by companies in the
power and energy infrastructure sectors. |
Please refer to the inside front cover of the
report for important information about the fund’s distribution policy.
Key asset performance drivers |
Top five contributors |
Company type |
Plains GP Holdings, L.P. |
Crude oil pipeline |
Magellan Midstream Partners, LP |
Refined products pipeline |
Targa Resources Corp. |
Natural gas pipeline |
MPLX LP |
Refined products pipeline |
Energy Transfer LP |
Natural gas pipeline |
|
|
Bottom five contributors |
Company type |
NextEra Energy Partners LP |
Diversified Infrastructure |
PBF Logistics LP |
Crude oil pipeline |
Sempra Energy |
Diversified Infrastructure |
Enbridge, Inc. |
Crude oil pipeline |
TC Energy Corp. |
Natural gas pipeline |
Unlike the fund return,
index return is pre-expenses.
Performance data quoted represent past performance;
past performance does not guarantee future results. Like any other stock, total return and market value will fluctuate so that an investment,
when sold, may be worth more or less than its original cost. Portfolio composition is subject to change due to ongoing management of the
fund. References to specific securities or sectors should not be construed as a recommendation by the fund or its adviser. See Schedule
of Investments for portfolio weighting at the end of the fiscal quarter.
(unaudited)
Tortoise
Power and Energy Infrastructure
Fund, Inc. (TPZ) (continued)
Value
of $10,000 vs. Tortoise Power and Energy Infrastructure Fund – Market (unaudited)
From
November 30, 2013 through November 30, 2023
The chart assumes an initial investment of $10,000.
Performance reflects waivers of fee and operating expenses in effect. In the absence of such waivers, total return would be reduced. Performance
data quoted represents past performance and does not guarantee future results. Investment returns and principal value will fluctuate,
and when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance current to the most recent month-end may be lower or higher
than the performance quoted and can be obtained by calling 866-362-9331. Performance assumes the reinvestment of capital gains and income
distributions. The performance does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption
of Fund shares.
Annualized Rates of Return as of November 30, 2023 |
|
1-Year |
3-Year |
5-Year |
10-Year |
Since Inception(1) |
Tortoise Power and Energy Infrastructure Fund – NAV |
12.69% |
16.27% |
4.42% |
2.70% |
6.29% |
Tortoise Power and Energy Infrastructure Fund – Market |
9.43% |
19.57% |
3.59% |
2.17% |
4.96% |
TPZ Benchmark Composite(1) |
8.58% |
6.09% |
5.80% |
3.52% |
6.00% |
(1) Inception date of the Fund was July 29, 2009.
Fund structure and distribution
policy
The fund is structured to qualify as a Regulated Investment
Company (RIC) allowing it to pass-through to shareholders income and capital gains earned, thus avoiding double-taxation. To qualify
as a RIC, the fund must meet specific income, diversification and distribution requirements. Regarding income, at least 90 percent of
the fund gross income must be from dividends, interest and capital gains. The fund must meet quarterly diversification requirements including
the requirement that at least 50 percent of the assets be in cash, cash equivalents or other securities with each single issuer of other
securities not greater than 5 percent of total assets. No more than 25 percent of total assets can be invested in any one issuer other
than government securities or other RIC’s. The fund must also distribute at least 90 percent of its investment company income.
RIC’s are also subject to excise tax rules which require RIC’s to distribute approximately 98 percent of net income and net
capital gains to avoid a 4 percent excise tax.
The fund has adopted a distribution policy which is included on the inside front cover
of this report. To summarize, the fund has adopted a managed distribution policy (“MDP”). Annual distribution amounts are
expected to fall in the range of 7% to 10% of the average week-ending net asset value (“NAV”) per share for the prior fiscal
semi-annual period. Distribution amounts will be reset both up and down to provide a consistent return on trailing NAV. Under the MDP,
distribution amounts will normally be reset in February and August, with no changes in distribution amounts in May and November. The
fund may designate a portion of its distributions as capital gains and may also distribute additional capital gains in the last quarter
of the year to meet annual excise distribution requirements. Distribution amounts are subject to change from time to time at the discretion
of the Board.
Leverage
The fund’s leverage utilization decreased $0.7
million during the six months ended Q4 2023 as compared to the six months ended Q2 2023, and represented 20.4% of total assets at November
30, 2023. During the period, the fund maintained compliance with its applicable coverage ratios. At year-end, 61.0% of the leverage cost
was fixed, the weighted-average maturity was 0.4 years and the weighted-average annual rate on leverage was 4.64%. These rates will vary
in the future as a result of changing floating rates.
Please see the Financial Statements and Notes to
Financial Statements for additional detail regarding critical accounting policies, results of operations, leverage and other important
fund information.
For further information regarding the fund’s
leverage and distributions to stockholders, as well as a discussion of the tax impact on distributions, please visit www.tortoiseecofin.com.
(unaudited)
2023 Annual Report | November
30, 2023
TPZ Key Financial
Data (supplemental unaudited information)
(dollar amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)
The information presented below is supplemental
non-GAAP financial information, is not inclusive of required financial disclosures (e.g. Total Expense Ratio), and should be read in conjunction
with the full financial statements.
| |
2022 | | |
2023 | |
| |
Q3(1) | | |
Q4(1) | | |
Q1(1) | | |
Q2(1) | | |
Q3(1) | | |
Q4(1) | |
Selected Financial Information | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Distributions paid on common stock | |
$ | 2,056 | | |
$ | 2,021 | | |
$ | 1,953 | | |
$ | 1,953 | | |
$ | 1,953 | | |
$ | 1,921 | |
Distributions paid on common stock per share | |
| 0.3150 | | |
| 0.3150 | | |
| 0.3150 | | |
| 0.3150 | | |
| 0.3150 | | |
| 0.3150 | |
Total assets, end of period | |
| 128,405 | | |
| 124,715 | | |
| 120,791 | | |
| 118,705 | | |
| 124,656 | | |
| 120,802 | |
Average total assets during period(2) | |
| 127,458 | | |
| 125,149 | | |
| 122,422 | | |
| 120,322 | | |
| 122,556 | | |
| 122,039 | |
Leverage(3) | |
| 25,800 | | |
| 25,900 | | |
| 24,900 | | |
| 25,300 | | |
| 25,400 | | |
| 24,600 | |
Leverage as a percent of total assets | |
| 20.1 | % | |
| 20.8 | % | |
| 20.6 | % | |
| 21.3 | % | |
| 20.4 | % | |
| 20.4 | % |
Operating expenses before leverage costs as a percent of total assets | |
| 1.37 | % | |
| 1.65 | % | |
| 1.45 | % | |
| 1.42 | % | |
| 1.40 | % | |
| 0.93 | % |
Net unrealized depreciation, end of period | |
| 11,392 | | |
| 12,878 | | |
| 10,915 | | |
| 9,116 | | |
| 15,511 | | |
| 14,867 | |
Net assets, end of period | |
| 102,077 | | |
| 98,245 | | |
| 95,368 | | |
| 92,800 | | |
| 98,570 | | |
| 95,724 | |
Average net assets during period(4) | |
| 99,912 | | |
| 98,208 | | |
| 96,730 | | |
| 94,512 | | |
| 97,132 | | |
| 96,174 | |
Net asset value per common share | |
| 15.64 | | |
| 15.85 | | |
| 15.38 | | |
| 14.97 | | |
| 15.90 | | |
| 16.25 | |
Market value per common share | |
| 13.66 | | |
| 13.63 | | |
| 13.00 | | |
| 12.47 | | |
| 13.76 | | |
| 13.57 | |
Shares outstanding (000’s) | |
| 6,526 | | |
| 6,200 | | |
| 6,200 | | |
| 6,200 | | |
| 6,200 | | |
| 5,890 | |
(1) | Q1 is the period from December through February. Q2 is the period from March through May. Q3 is the period from June through August.
Q4 is the period from September through November. |
(2) | Computed by averaging month-end values within each period. |
(3) | Leverage consists of outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility. |
(4) | Computed by averaging daily net assets within each period. |
Ecofin
Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund (TEAF)
Fund description
The Ecofin Sustainable and Social
Impact Term Fund (TEAF) seeks to provide a high level of total return with an emphasis on current distributions. TEAF provides investors
access to a combination of public and direct investments in essential assets that are making an impact on clients and communities.
Fund performance
TEAF generated negative NAV performance in fiscal
year 2023.
● | Listed sustainable infrastructure
underperformed the S&P Global Infrastructure Index, with companies facing some headwinds with
interest rates continuing to move higher, sometimes very quickly. |
● | Listed energy infrastructure
companies performed well during the period, driven by an increased transport volumes and constructive
commodity pricing. |
● | Private social infrastructure
investments performed in line with expectations, and we continue to see momentum in our deal backlog
to increase our allocation to senior living, waste transition, and education projects in the near-term. |
● | Private sustainable infrastructure investments
have had mixed performance with some assets suffering from age related and interconnection issues which
are all being worked on to reenergize. Other private sustainable assets continued to perform well and
as expected during the quarter. |
Looking ahead to 2024, we continue to have a constructive
outlook for the underlying assets in the TEAF portfolio. We expect that listed sustainable infrastructure equities, TEAF’s largest
allocation, may continue to navigate a difficult environment caused by interest rate policy as well as global growth uncertainty. Nevertheless,
decarbonization and electrification trends have strong momentum with key drivers such as increasing renewables, manufacturing re-shoring
and energy efficiency driving investment. Corporates and consumers will continue to replace carbon-emitting energy sources with renewables,
ensuring renewables growth at a reasonable rate of return. We maintain a positive outlook for energy infrastructure equities in 2024 driven
by favorable fundamentals and a focus on capital return to equity owners. TEAF’s social infrastructure assets have performed well
and we expect that performance to continue as new investment opportunities accelerate in key segments such as education and healthcare.
We continue to progress on transitioning the portfolio to the targeted allocation of 60% direct investments. As of November 30, 2023,
TEAF’s total direct investment commitments were approximately $118 million or approximately 53% of the portfolio.
Listed sustainable infrastructure
From a macro perspective, the first half of the period
was generally characterized by stubborn inflation, elevated interest rates, and declining energy prices, in particular natural gas. We
saw a mean-reversion with last year’s underperformers rallying. Similarly, pan-European utility and other infrastructure stocks
provided positive returns whereas U.S. utilities declined, lagging significantly. TEAF’s sustainable listed sleeve responded similarly
with the top contributors largely comprised of European names, while the bottom contributors generally were North American domiciled names
during the first half of the period. As the period progressed August and September proved especially challenging. A 50 basis points (bps)
increase in longer term bond yields placed severe pressure on renewables (higher interest rates reduce the present value of growth and,
for some developers, re-orders the amount of equity they may require) and utility share prices, above all in the U.S. Orsted (not held)
warnings about supply chain pressures and the lack of inflation indexation in the U.S. (unlike in Europe) causing impairment on U.S. offshore
wind projects hit its share price hard and brought fears of read-across to others. A steepening of yield curves (with a further 50 bps
move higher in longer term bond yields) accelerated in late September at the same time as NextEra Energy Partners (NEP) shocked the market
by halving its target dividend growth rate from 12-15% to 5-8% p.a. over the next few years to eliminate the need to raise equity and
reduce the need for debt. This set off a sharp slide in its own shares and those of its parent NextEra Energy (NextEra), well beyond the
direct mechanical impact, and reverberated around the sector into October. October saw a stabilization in nerves and the NAV; bond yields
held their recent highs but a first sight of Q3 earnings was reassuring. November’s strong rally in global bonds (further to evidence
of lower rates of inflation) and equities included listed infrastructure where a stream of strong earnings reports from U.S. and pan-European
portfolio holdings with, in many cases, raised guidance, growth rates and capex plans, drew attention.
Decarbonization and electrification trends have strong
momentum with key drivers such as increasing renewables, manufacturing re-shoring and energy efficiency driving investment. Corporates
and consumers will continue to replace carbon-emitting energy sources with renewables, ensuring renewables growth at a reasonable rate
of return. Power purchase agreement (PPA) prices have been increasing to reflect, and more than offset, higher capital expenditure and
financing costs. This implies better pricing power and higher internal rates of return today than in 2020. In summary, we continue to
look to identify high quality companies with growth prospects and to keep a balance in the portfolio in terms of risk profiles and are
positive about the underlying drivers for the space moving into 2024.
(unaudited)
2023 Annual Report | November
30, 2023
Ecofin
Sustainable and Social
Impact Term Fund (TEAF) (continued)
Listed energy infrastructure
Listed energy infrastructure equities were strong
drivers of performance in the TEAF portfolio in fiscal year 2023. We saw higher equity performance during the period that was driven by
a strong free cash flow generation that was increasingly allocated toward debt paydown and dividend growth, along with opportunistic share
repurchases. The energy infrastructure equities also benefitted from increased hydrocarbon production in the U.S. across all of crude
oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids. In particular, the ability to export these energy products led to outsized performance. Mergers
& acquisitions activity remained elevated in Q3. Oneok closed their acquisition of Magellan which has created one of the largest pro-forma
energy infrastructure entities. Additionally, Energy Transfer announced a deal to acquire Crestwood and Enbridge announced a $14B deal
to acquire Dominion’s U.S. gas utilities. The ramifications of these transactions are wide-ranging, as exemplified through the diversion
of market cap between MLPs and C-Corps that continues to widen through simplifications and consolidations of MLPs. Overall, disciplined
allocation of capital toward shareholders, increased transport volumes, and constructive commodity pricing has built confidence in energy
infrastructure company growth, and we expect this environment to continue to be supportive of valuation into 2024.
Social infrastructure
● | TEAF completed ten direct investments in the social
impact portfolio during the period. |
| |
● | In December, the team completed a debt investment
in a to-be-constructed senior living community located in Albuquerque, New Mexico, an area that has
a demonstrated need for additional senior housing with existing occupancy levels exceeding 90%. The
facility will offer 142 market rate units consisting of 45 independent living units, 75 assisted living
units and 22 memory care units. Four of the memory care units will be shared, thus there will be 148
beds in the facility. Construction is scheduled to begin in January 2023 and be completed in the Fall
of 2024. |
| |
● | The team completed another debt investment in December,
this one for a waste-to-energy project located in Bethel, Pennsylvania, that will gasify wastewater
biosolids and poultry waste, while using energy produced through the gasification process to help circularly
power the facility. These waste products would have otherwise been dumped in landfills or land applied,
both of which are known to have negative effects on the environment due to the generation of methane
gas as well as the leeching of other contaminants into surrounding areas and farm fields. The project
will also produce biochar, which can be sold for various uses—including environmental remediation. |
| |
● | In January, the team completed a debt investment
in an existing classical charter school in Toledo, Ohio that currently has students in grades K-11.
This expansion will allow the charter school to grow from its current capacity of 500 students to 750,
and to expand its program offerings, including adding 12th grade. |
| |
● | In February, the team completed a debt investment
in an existing private school located near Fort Lauderdale, Florida that allowed the school to execute
on a succession plan to continue its operations under new management while expanding its capacity.
The school currently serves 526 students in grades PK-12, with over 90% of its students using State
scholarships for underserved and marginalized students to attend the school at minimal cost. With the
investment, the school expects to serve up to 750 students within a few years. |
| |
● | In March, the team completed a debt investment
in an existing charter school in Maryland (Washington, DC area) that offers an International Baccalaureate
program to an economically disadvantaged population in grades K-8. The school currently serves 348
students, but with this investment providing funds for a new facility, the school expects to be able
to educate up to 600 students within 3 years. |
| |
● | The team completed another debt investment in March,
this one for a waste-to-energy project located in North Carolina that uses anaerobic digestion to convert
animal byproducts and food waste into renewable natural gas. The State of North Carolina has mandated
that a portion of all energy in the State come from swine and poultry processing waste to help reduce
soil and water contamination. The company has a contract with the regional utility to sell all the
gas that is produced. |
| |
● | In April, the team completed a debt investment
in a new charter school near Spartanburg, South Carolina. The school will open with temporary modulars
on the site next door in the fall of 2023, serving 600 children in grades K-6. The school will move
next door to its permanent facility in the following school year serving the same grades, and is expected
to eventually expand to its full capacity of 900 students in grades K-8 by the 2024-2025 school year.
There are no other charter schools within five miles of the school’s site, and the district schools
are at or near capacity in this growing area. This will be the third school in South Carolina for this
successful operator and developer partnering together. |
| |
● | The team completed another debt investment in April to an existing charter school in Belton, South Carolina,
that has been operating since 2018 in a temporary location while it seeks its permanent home. The school offers a classical
education curriculum to an underserved population, with great success — as it was recognized as the top academic Title 1
school in the state of South Carolina. The school currently serves approximately 250 students in grades K-6 and is expected to
expand to serve K-8 while increasing enrollment over the next 4 years to reach nearly 700 students enrolled. |
(unaudited)
Ecofin
Sustainable and Social
Impact Term Fund (TEAF) (continued)
● | In September, the last of three scheduled investments
was completed in a new charter school in Boiling Springs, South Carolina, a suburb 15 minutes outside
of Spartanburg. The school opened with temporary modulars classrooms on the site next door in the fall
of 2023, serving 600 children in grades K-6. The school will move next door to its permanent facility
in the following school year serving the same grades, and is expected to expand to its full capacity
of 900 students in grades K-8 by the 2024-2025 school year. There are no other charter schools within
five miles of the school’s site, and the district schools are at or near capacity in this growing
area. This will be is the third school in South Carolina for this successful operator and developer
partnering together. The investment is being used for senior secured bond financing which will allow
the school to continue constructing and equipping a new 65,000 square foot school building. |
| |
● | The last debt investment of this period also occurred
in September to an existing charter school in Belton, South Carolina, that has been operating since
2018 in a temporary location while it seeks its permanent home. The school offers a classical education
curriculum to an underserved population, with great success — as it was recognized as the top
academic Title 1 school in the state of South Carolina. The school currently serves approximately 250
students in grades K-6 and is expected to expand to serve K-8 while increasing enrollment over the
next 4 years to reach nearly 700 students enrolled. The investment is being used to continue construction
and equipping of the building. This was the second of three scheduled investments. |
Finally, the fund had three realizations
in Fiscal Year 2023.
● | The first was in January from a school that
was able to successfully refinance into a new debt transaction with a third party under more
favorable terms. The original investment was made in October 2019 to allow the school to acquire
a larger campus with significantly better amenities than its previous facility. The school was
able to grow and, as a result, found less expensive financing. The investment was eligible to
be called at par starting October 1, 2022. |
| |
● | The second realization was in April from a waste-to-energy
project that was able to attract additional equity investment to support and grow the project, but
a condition of that equity injection was the retirement of all subordinated debt. Although this investment
was made in April 2021 and was not eligible to be called until 2026, the team negotiated a $108 price
in exchange for the ability to retire this debt. |
| |
● | The third realization was in November from a senior
living project that raised additional equity to pay off a tranche of subordinated debt. The original
investment was made in September 2020 to acquire an existing senior living facility as part of a capital
stack that included senior bank debt and two tranches of subordinated bonds. The sponsor determined
that the property would be better served with additional equity rather than the Series B subordinated
debt which had a 16% coupon. In return for allowing the Series B debt to be paid off, the fund received
all accrued and capitalized interest as well as a price of $103. The fund still holds Series A subordinated
debt and received a consent fee for allowing the Series B payoff. The facility continues to perform
as expected. |
Private energy infrastructure
No deals were completed in the Private Energy Infrastructure
portfolio during the period. We continue to have conviction behind greenfield liquefied natural gas (LNG) development projects in North
America given the geopolitical landscape for natural gas and favorable pricing spread between domestic supply and the global markets.
The fund also remains invested in MPL, a 15 million metric tonnes per annum (mmtpa) LNG development project focused on bringing Permian
sourced gas to the west coast of Mexico and alleviating the additional transportation costs and time it takes to bring LNG to Asian markets
while avoiding Panama Canal congestion.
(unaudited)
2023 Annual Report | November 30, 2023
Private sustainable infrastructure
TEAF completed one direct investment in the Private
Sustainable Infrastructure portfolio during the period. In April, the team completed a debt investment in One Energy, based in Findlay,
Ohio who develops, builds, owns, and operates capital-intensive, on-site power solutions for large industrial power users. This investment
will enable the company to commence the land and equipment purchase required for recently signed NetZero projects which will represent
the largest industrial microgrid in the U.S. The preferred equity investment is in One Energy Enterprises, Inc.
TEAF’s investment in EF WWW Holdings, LLC,
the debt funding of World Water Works Holdings, Inc., continues to pay its annualized interest rate of 10.5% and report strong credit
covenants. The company has exceeded its operating budget in every year since the investment, driven by strong backlog and revenue growth.
For TEAFs solar asset, Saturn Solar Bermuda 1, Ltd.,
the construction note continues to pay its annualized interest rate of 10.0% on time. The payments are supported by cash flow of the now
operational solar project since the project completed construction and began full operations in November 2021. The note has remained in
place as the owner of the solar facility is seeking to sell the solar project to a new long-term owner/operator. Energy production at
various operating distributed generation (“DG”) solar assets in the Renewable Holdco I, LLC portfolio have underperformed
expectations, primarily caused by inverter issues, certain communications equipment failures (inherent in the age of the assets) and have
required corrective maintenance attention. Five small rooftop projects in Puerto Rico within this portfolio are expected to be reenergized
in Q1 2024 after experiencing downtime related to required corrective maintenance. Various third-party inspections and off taker approval
are required for these to be reenergized. As such, the internal asset management team is taking an active role in monitoring efforts to
restore full energy production and returning the portfolio to stable cash flow generation. Energy production at the operating DG solar
assets in the Renewable Holdco II, LLC portfolio continue to generate stable cash flow as expected. The final solar project under construction,
held in Renewable Holdco, LLC, continues to experience delays due to interconnection redesign, additional permitting and road construction
caused by the utility and is expected to be ready for commissioning and commercial operation in H1 2024.
2023 fiscal year summary |
|
Monthly distributions paid per share |
$0.0900 |
Distribution rate (as of 11/30/2023) |
9.0% |
Year-over-year distribution increase (decrease) |
0.0% |
Cumulative distribution to stockholders since inception in July 2009 |
$4.8905 |
Market-based total return |
(5.48)% |
NAV-based total return |
(1.22)% |
Premium (discount) to NAV (as of 11/30/2023) |
(19.1)% |
Performance data quoted represent past performance;
past performance does not guarantee future results. Like any other stock, total return and market value will fluctuate so that an investment,
when sold, may be worth more or less than its original cost. Portfolio composition is subject to change due to ongoing management of the
fund. References to specific securities or sectors should not be construed as a recommendation by the fund or its adviser. See Schedule
of Investments for portfolio weighting at the end of the fiscal quarter.
Ecofin
Sustainable and Social
Impact Term Fund (TEAF) (continued)
Value
of $10,000 vs. Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund – Market (unaudited)
Since
inception on March 29, 2019 through November 30, 2023
The chart assumes an initial investment of $10,000.
Performance reflects waivers of fee and operating expenses in effect. In the absence of such waivers, total return would be reduced. Performance
data quoted represents past performance and does not guarantee future results. Investment returns and principal value will fluctuate,
and when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance current to the most recent month-end may be lower or higher
than the performance quoted and can be obtained by calling 866-362-9331. Performance assumes the reinvestment of capital gains and income
distributions. The performance does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption
of Fund shares.
Annualized Rates of Return as of November 30, 2023 |
|
1-Year |
3-Year |
Since Inception(1) |
Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund – NAV |
-1.22% |
5.17% |
1.20% |
Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund – Market |
-5.48% |
4.74% |
-3.27% |
S&P Global Infrastructure Index |
0.19% |
5.62% |
3.98% |
(1)
Inception date of the Fund was March 29, 2019.
Fund structure and distribution
policy
The fund is structured to qualify as a Regulated
Investment Company (RIC) allowing it to pass-through to shareholders income and capital gains earned, thus avoiding double-taxation. To
qualify as a RIC, the fund must meet specific income, diversification and distribution requirements. Regarding income, at least 90 percent
of the fund gross income must be from dividends, interest and capital gains. The fund must meet quarterly diversification requirements
including the requirement that at least 50 percent of the assets be in cash, cash equivalents or other securities with each single issuer
of other securities not greater than 5 percent of total assets. No more than 25 percent of total assets can be invested in any one issuer
other than government securities or other RIC’s. The fund must also distribute at least 90 percent of its investment company income.
RIC’s are also subject to excise tax rules which require RIC’s to distribute approximately 98 percent of net income and net
capital gains to avoid a 4 percent excise tax.
The fund has adopted a distribution policy which is
included on the inside front cover of this report. To summarize, the fund has adopted a managed distribution policy (“MDP”).
Annual distribution amounts are expected to fall in the range of 6% to 8% of the average week-ending net asset value (“NAV”)
per share for the prior fiscal semi-annual period. Distribution amounts will be reset both up and down to provide a consistent return
on trailing NAV. Under the MDP, distribution amounts will normally be reset in February and August, with no changes in distribution amounts
in May and November. The fund may designate a portion of its distributions as capital gains and may also distribute additional capital
gains in the last quarter of the year to meet annual excise distribution requirements. Distribution amounts are subject to change from
time to time at the discretion of the Board.
Leverage
The fund’s leverage utilization decreased $5.5
million during the six months ended Q4 2023, as compared to the six months ended Q2 2023. The fund utilizes all floating rate leverage
that had an interest rate of 6.46% and represented 10.7% of total assets at year-end. During the period, the fund maintained compliance
with its applicable coverage ratios. The interest rate on the fund’s leverage will vary in the future along with changing floating
rates.
Please see the Financial Statements and Notes to
Financial Statements for additional detail regarding critical accounting policies, results of operations, leverage and other important
fund information.
For further information regarding the fund’s
leverage and distributions to stockholders, as well as a discussion of the tax impact on distributions, please visit www.tortoiseecofin.com.
(unaudited)
2023 Annual Report | November
30, 2023
TEAF Key Financial
Data (supplemental unaudited information)
(dollar amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)
The information presented below is supplemental
non-GAAP financial information, is not inclusive of required financial disclosures (e.g. Total Expense Ratio), and should be read in conjunction
with the full financial statements.
| |
2022 | | |
2023 | |
| |
Q3(1) | | |
Q4(1) | | |
Q1(1) | | |
Q2(1) | | |
Q3(1) | | |
Q4(1) | |
Selected Financial Information | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Distributions paid on common stock | |
$ | 3,643 | | |
$ | 3,643 | | |
$ | 3,642 | | |
$ | 3,643 | | |
$ | 3,643 | | |
$ | 3,643 | |
Distributions paid on common stock per share | |
| 0.2700 | | |
| 0.2700 | | |
| 0.2700 | | |
| 0.2700 | | |
| 0.2700 | | |
| 0.2700 | |
Total assets, end of period | |
| 254,726 | | |
| 251,239 | | |
| 246,004 | | |
| 240,640 | | |
| 239,671 | | |
| 225,072 | |
Average total assets during period(2) | |
| 256,749 | | |
| 246,494 | | |
| 248,950 | | |
| 246,215 | | |
| 241,187 | | |
| 231,121 | |
Leverage(3) | |
| 28,800 | | |
| 29,500 | | |
| 30,800 | | |
| 29,500 | | |
| 30,600 | | |
| 24,000 | |
Leverage as a percent of total assets | |
| 11.3 | % | |
| 11.7 | % | |
| 12.5 | % | |
| 12.3 | % | |
| 12.8 | % | |
| 10.7 | % |
Operating expenses before leverage costs as a percent of total assets | |
| 1.56 | % | |
| 1.85 | % | |
| 1.61 | % | |
| 1.63 | % | |
| 1.60 | % | |
| 1.58 | % |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation), end of period | |
| 993 | | |
| 824 | | |
| (912 | ) | |
| (1,269 | ) | |
| (1,168 | ) | |
| (6,150 | ) |
Net assets, end of period | |
| 225,064 | | |
| 220,798 | | |
| 214,163 | | |
| 210,062 | | |
| 208,057 | | |
| 200,258 | |
Average net assets during period(4) | |
| 225,251 | | |
| 214,321 | | |
| 218,352 | | |
| 214,413 | | |
| 210,656 | | |
| 201,953 | |
Net asset value per common share | |
| 16.68 | | |
| 16.38 | | |
| 15.87 | | |
| 15.57 | | |
| 15.42 | | |
| 14.84 | |
Market value per common share | |
| 14.74 | | |
| 13.85 | | |
| 12.97 | | |
| 12.28 | | |
| 12.62 | | |
| 12.01 | |
Shares outstanding (000’s) | |
| 13,491 | | |
| 13,491 | | |
| 13,491 | | |
| 13,491 | | |
| 13,491 | | |
| 13,491 | |
(1) | Q1 represents the period from December through February. Q2 represents the period from March through May. Q3 represents the period
from June through August. Q4 represents the period from September through November. |
(2) | Computed by averaging month-end values within each period. |
(3) | Leverage consists of outstanding borrowings under the margin loan facility. |
(4) | Computed by averaging daily net assets within each period. |
TYG Consolidated Schedule of Investments
November 30, 2023
| |
Shares/Units | | |
Fair Value | |
|
Common Stock — 101.1%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
United States Crude Oil Pipelines — 2.5%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
Plains GP Holdings LP | |
| 581,526 | | |
$ | 9,397,460 | |
United States Natural Gas Gathering/Processing — 5.1%(1) |
EnLink Midstream LLC | |
| 520,687 | | |
| 7,117,791 | |
Hess Midstream Partners LP | |
| 321,257 | | |
| 10,453,703 | |
Kinetik Holdings, Inc. | |
| 54,924 | | |
| 1,997,037 | |
| |
| | | |
| 19,568,531 | |
United States Natural Gas/Natural Gas Liquids Pipelines — 47.7%(1) |
Cheniere Energy, Inc. | |
| 134,722 | | |
| 24,539,612 | |
Excelerate Energy, Inc. | |
| 57,737 | | |
| 965,363 | |
Kinder Morgan, Inc. | |
| 1,236,603 | | |
| 21,727,115 | |
New Fortress Energy, Inc. | |
| 176,000 | | |
| 6,772,480 | |
NextDecade Corp.(2) | |
| 443,864 | | |
| 2,214,881 | |
ONEOK, Inc. | |
| 537,611 | | |
| 37,014,517 | |
Targa Resources Corp. | |
| 476,974 | | |
| 43,142,298 | |
The Williams Companies, Inc. | |
| 1,224,511 | | |
| 45,049,760 | |
| |
| | | |
| 181,426,026 | |
United States Renewables and Power Infrastructure — 45.8%(1) |
AES Corp. | |
| 708,155 | | |
| 12,187,348 | |
Ameren Corp. | |
| 188,059 | | |
| 14,591,498 | |
American Electric Power Co., Inc. | |
| 190,815 | | |
| 15,179,333 | |
Atlantica Sustainable Infrastructure Plc | |
| 473,463 | | |
| 9,005,266 | |
Clearway Energy, Inc. | |
| 827,649 | | |
| 20,666,396 | |
Constellation Energy Corp. | |
| 69,230 | | |
| 8,379,599 | |
DTE Energy Co. | |
| 174,848 | | |
| 18,203,425 | |
NextEra Energy Partners LP | |
| 512,107 | | |
| 12,054,999 | |
NextEra Energy, Inc. | |
| 254,977 | | |
| 14,918,704 | |
Sempra Energy | |
| 429,511 | | |
| 31,298,467 | |
Xcel Energy, Inc. | |
| 292,105 | | |
| 17,771,668 | |
| |
| | | |
| 174,256,703 | |
Total Common Stock | |
| | | |
| | |
(Cost $441,085,503) | |
| | | |
| 384,648,720 | |
Master Limited Partnerships — 22.9%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
United States Natural Gas Gathering/Processing — 4.6%(1) |
Western Midstream Partners LP | |
| 583,326 | | |
| 17,394,781 | |
United States Natural Gas/Natural Gas Liquids Pipelines — 12.0%(1) |
Energy Transfer LP | |
| 1,879,085 | | |
| 26,100,491 | |
Enterprise Products Partners LP | |
| 729,194 | | |
| 19,527,815 | |
| |
| | | |
| 45,628,306 | |
United States Refined Product Pipelines — 6.3%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
MPLX LP | |
| 662,040 | | |
| 24,137,979 | |
Total Master Limited Partnerships | |
| | | |
| | |
(Cost $53,131,230) | |
| | | |
| 87,161,066 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Private Investment — 3.8%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
United States Renewables — 3.8%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
TK NYS Solar Holdco LLC(3)(4)(5) | |
| | | |
| | |
(Cost $50,141,470) | |
| N/A | | |
$ | 14,550,615 | |
Preferred Stock — 1.2%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
United States Natural Gas Gathering/Processing — 1.2%(1) |
EnLink Midstream Partners | |
| | | |
| | |
(Cost $5,100,000) | |
| 5,100 | | |
| 4,588,448 | |
Money Market Fund — 0.1%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
United States Investment Company — 0.1%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
Invesco Government & Agency Portfolio — Institutional Class, |
5.282%(6) (Cost $408,099) | |
| 408,099 | | |
| 408,099 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Total Investments — 129.1%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
(Cost $549,866,302) | |
| | | |
| 491,356,948 | |
Liabilities in Excess of Other Assets — (0.8%)(1) | |
| | | |
| (3,046,493 | ) |
Line of Credit — (1.9)%(1) | |
| | | |
| (7,300,000 | ) |
Senior Notes — (17.0)%(1) | |
| | | |
| (64,853,333 | ) |
Mandatory Redeemable Preferred Stock at Liquidation Value — (9.4)%(1) | |
| | | |
| (35,660,610 | ) |
Total Net Assets Applicable to Common Stockholders — 100.0%(1) | |
| | | |
$ | 380,496,512 | |
(1) | Calculated as a percentage of net assets. |
(2) | Non-income producing security. |
(3) | Restricted securities have a total fair value of $14,550,615 which represents 3.8% of net assets. See Note 6 to financial statements
for further disclosure. |
(4) | Securities have been valued by using significant unobservable inputs in accordance with fair value procedures and are categorized
as level 3 investments. |
(5) | Deemed to be an affiliate of the fund. See Note 7 to financial statements for further disclosure. |
(6) | Rate indicated is the current yield as of November 30, 2023. |
See
accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
2023
Annual Report | November 30, 2023
NTG
Schedule of Investments
November
30, 2023
| |
Shares | |
Fair Value |
| |
| |
|
Common
Stock — 100.5%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Canada Crude Oil Pipelines — 10.2%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
Enbridge, Inc. | |
| 294,443 | | |
$ | 10,267,228 | |
Pembina Pipeline Corp. | |
| 357,431 | | |
| 11,948,918 | |
| |
| | | |
| 22,216,146 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Canada Natural Gas/Natural Gas Liquids Pipelines — 3.0%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
TC Energy Corp. | |
| 171,139 | | |
| 6,421,135 | |
United States Crude Oil Pipelines — 9.8%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
Plains GP Holdings LP | |
| 1,315,066 | | |
| 21,251,466 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
United States Natural Gas Gathering/Processing — 8.0%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
EnLink Midstream LLC | |
| 640,292 | | |
| 8,752,792 | |
Hess Midstream Partners LP | |
| 234,934 | | |
| 7,644,752 | |
Kinetik Holdings, Inc. | |
| 27,692 | | |
| 1,006,881 | |
| |
| | | |
| 17,404,425 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
United States Natural Gas/Natural Gas Liquids Pipelines — 59.5%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
Cheniere Energy, Inc. | |
| 71,192 | | |
| 12,967,623 | |
DT Midstream, Inc. | |
| 220,700 | | |
| 12,643,903 | |
Excelerate Energy, Inc. | |
| 70,562 | | |
| 1,179,796 | |
Kinder Morgan, Inc. | |
| 1,095,982 | | |
| 19,256,404 | |
New Fortress Energy, Inc. | |
| 109,719 | | |
| 4,221,987 | |
NextDecade Corp.(2) | |
| 228,576 | | |
| 1,140,594 | |
ONEOK, Inc. | |
| 327,155 | | |
| 22,524,622 | |
Targa Resources Corp. | |
| 305,475 | | |
| 27,630,214 | |
The Williams Companies, Inc. | |
| 748,768 | | |
| 27,547,175 | |
| |
| | | |
| 129,112,318 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
United States Renewables and Power Infrastructure — 10.0%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
Atlantica Sustainable Infrastructure Plc | |
| 236,182 | | |
| 4,492,182 | |
Clearway Energy, Inc. | |
| 378,968 | | |
| 9,462,831 | |
NextEra Energy Partners LP | |
| 258,632 | | |
| 6,088,197 | |
NextEra Energy, Inc. | |
| 26,725 | | |
| 1,563,680 | |
| |
| | | |
| 21,606,890 | |
Total Common Stock
(Cost $229,908,440) | |
| | | |
| 218,012,380 | |
| |
Shares/Units | |
Fair
Value |
| |
| |
|
Master
Limited Partnerships — 21.6%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
United
States Natural Gas Gathering/Processing — 4.2%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
Western Midstream Partners
LP | |
| 307,481 | | |
$ | 9,169,083 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
United
States Natural Gas/Natural Gas Liquids Pipelines — 12.2%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
Energy Transfer LP | |
| 962,003 | | |
| 13,362,222 | |
Enterprise Products Partners LP | |
| 489,300 | | |
| 13,103,454 | |
| |
| | | |
| 26,465,676 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
United
States Refined Product Pipelines — 5.2%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
MPLX LP | |
| 310,766 | | |
| 11,330,528 | |
Total Master Limited Partnerships | |
| | | |
| | |
(Cost $29,715,799) | |
| | | |
| 46,965,287 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Preferred
Stock — 1.4%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
United
States Natural Gas Gathering/Processing — 1.4%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
EnLink Midstream Partners | |
| | | |
| | |
(Cost $3,400,000) | |
| 34,000 | | |
| 3,058,966 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Money Market
Fund — 1.8%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
United
States Investment Company — 1.8%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
First American Government Obligations Fund, Class X,
5.285%(3)
(Cost $3,898,807) | |
| 3,898,807 | | |
| 3,898,807 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Total
Investments — 125.3%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
(Cost $266,923,046) | |
| | | |
| 271,935,440 | |
Liabilities
in Excess of Other Assets — (0.6)%(1) | |
| (1,344,656 | ) | |
| | |
Credit
Facility Borrowings — (4.9)%(1) | |
| | | |
| (10,600,000 | ) |
Senior
Notes — (13.5)%(1) | |
| | | |
| (29,170,677 | ) |
Mandatory Redeemable Preferred Stock at
Liquidation Value — (6.3)%(1) | |
| | | |
| (13,753,775 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Total Net Assets Applicable to Common
Stockholders — 100.0%(1) | |
| | | |
$ | 217,066,332 | |
| (1) | Calculated
as a percentage of net assets. |
| (2) | Non-income
producing security. |
| (3) | Rate
indicated is the current yield as of November 30, 2023. |
See
accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
TTP
Schedule of Investments
November 30, 2023
| |
Shares | |
Fair
Value |
| |
| |
|
Common
Stock — 100.1%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Canada
Crude Oil Pipelines — 15.8%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
Enbridge,
Inc. | |
| 172,836 | | |
$ | 6,026,791 | |
Gibson Energy,
Inc. | |
| 50,815 | | |
| 766,934 | |
Pembina
Pipeline Corp. | |
| 124,957 | | |
| 4,179,814 | |
| |
| | | |
| 10,973,539 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Canada
Natural Gas/Natural Gas Liquids Pipelines — 8.1%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
Keyera Corp. | |
| 78,735 | | |
| 1,982,663 | |
TC
Energy Corp. | |
| 98,117 | | |
| 3,681,350 | |
| |
| | | |
| 5,664,013 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
United
States Crude Oil Pipelines — 11.8%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
Plains
GP Holdings LP | |
| 508,250 | | |
| 8,213,320 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
United
States Natural Gas Gathering/Processing — 11.6%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
Antero Midstream
Corp. | |
| 141,044 | | |
| 1,878,706 | |
Equitrans
Midstream Corp. | |
| 307,343 | | |
| 2,882,878 | |
Hess Midstream
Partners LP | |
| 91,698 | | |
| 2,983,853 | |
Kinetik
Holdings, Inc. | |
| 8,934 | | |
| 324,840 | |
| |
| | | |
| 8,070,277 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
United
States Natural Gas/Natural Gas Liquids Pipelines — 47.6%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
Cheniere Energy,
Inc. | |
| 22,822 | | |
| 4,157,027 | |
DT Midstream,
Inc. | |
| 15,694 | | |
| 899,109 | |
Excelerate
Energy, Inc. | |
| 8,917 | | |
| 149,092 | |
Kinder Morgan,
Inc. | |
| 389,508 | | |
| 6,843,656 | |
NextDecade Corp.(2) | |
| 70,953 | | |
| 354,056 | |
ONEOK, Inc. | |
| 116,871 | | |
| 8,046,568 | |
Targa Resources
Corp. | |
| 46,463 | | |
| 4,202,578 | |
The
Williams Companies, Inc. | |
| 230,187 | | |
| 8,468,580 | |
| |
| | | |
| 33,120,666 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
United
States Renewables and Power Infrastructure — 5.2%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
Clearway Energy,
Inc. | |
| 22,000 | | |
| 549,340 | |
NextEra Energy
Partners LP | |
| 29,030 | | |
| 683,366 | |
Sempra
Energy | |
| 32,242 | | |
| 2,349,475 | |
| |
| | | |
| 3,582,181 | |
Total Common
Stock
(Cost $59,433,168) | |
| | | |
| 69,623,996 |
|
|
|
Shares/Units |
|
Fair
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
Master
Limited Partnerships — 22.4%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States Crude Oil Pipelines — 1.3%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NuStar
Energy LP |
|
|
48,386 |
|
|
$ |
921,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States Natural Gas Gathering/Processing — 3.5%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western
Midstream Partners LP |
|
|
82,032 |
|
|
|
2,446,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States Natural Gas/Natural Gas Liquids Pipelines — 11.6%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy
Transfer LP |
|
|
292,468 |
|
|
|
4,062,381 |
|
Enterprise
Products Partners LP |
|
|
148,325 |
|
|
|
3,972,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,034,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States Other — 0.2%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Westlake
Chemical Partners LP |
|
|
4,940 |
|
|
|
111,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States Refined Product Pipelines — 5.8%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MPLX LP |
|
|
111,185 |
|
|
|
4,053,805 |
|
Total
Master Limited Partnerships
(Cost $7,979,237) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,567,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money
Market Fund — 0.7%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States Investment Company — 0.7%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Invesco
Government & Agency Portfolio — Institutional Class,
5.282%(3) (Cost $457,549) |
|
|
457,549 |
|
|
|
457,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Investments — 123.2%(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Cost
$67,869,954) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,649,229 |
|
Liabilities
in Excess of Other Assets — (0.2)%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(181,672 |
) |
Credit
Facility Borrowings — (8.5)%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,900,000 |
) |
Senior
Notes — (5.7)%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,942,857 |
) |
Mandatory
Redeemable Preferred Stock at Liquidation Value — (8.8)%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,100,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Net Assets Applicable to Common Stockholders — 100.0%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
69,524,700 |
|
| (1) | Calculated
as a percentage of net assets. |
| (2) | Non-income
producing security. |
| (3) | Rate
indicated is the current yield as of November 30, 2023. |
See
accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
2023
Annual Report | November 30, 2023
NDP
Schedule of Investments
November
30, 2023
| |
Shares | |
Fair Value |
| |
| |
|
Common
Stock — 93.4%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Canada
Crude Oil Pipelines — 1.4%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
Enbridge, Inc. | |
| 23,865 | | |
$ | 832,173 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Canada
Natural Gas/Natural Gas Liquids Pipelines — 1.3%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
TC Energy Corp. | |
| 19,745 | | |
| 740,832 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Canada
Oil and Gas Production — 2.3%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
Suncor Energy, Inc. | |
| 40,528 | | |
| 1,337,019 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
United
States Natural Gas Gathering/Processing — 2.7%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
Kinetik Holdings, Inc. | |
| 5,678 | | |
| 206,452 | |
Kodiak Gas Services, Inc. | |
| 79,293 | | |
| 1,397,936 | |
| |
| | | |
| 1,604,388 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
United
States Natural Gas/Natural Gas Liquids Pipelines — 22.9%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
Cheniere Energy, Inc. | |
| 37,456 | | |
| 6,822,610 | |
Excelerate Energy, Inc. | |
| 6,209 | | |
| 103,815 | |
Kinder Morgan, Inc. | |
| 56,165 | | |
| 986,819 | |
NextDecade Corp.(2) | |
| 55,204 | | |
| 275,468 | |
ONEOK, Inc. | |
| 8,500 | | |
| 585,225 | |
Targa Resources Corp. | |
| 37,880 | | |
| 3,426,246 | |
The Williams Companies, Inc. | |
| 36,175 | | |
| 1,330,878 | |
| |
| | | |
| 13,531,061 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
United
States Oil and Gas Production — 58.4%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
Chevron Corp. | |
| 18,828 | | |
| 2,703,701 | |
ConocoPhillips | |
| 21,747 | | |
| 2,513,301 | |
Coterra Energy, Inc. | |
| 50,396 | | |
| 1,322,895 | |
Devon Energy Corp. | |
| 90,404 | | |
| 4,065,468 | |
Diamondback Energy, Inc. | |
| 37,179 | | |
| 5,740,809 | |
EOG Resources, Inc. | |
| 23,070 | | |
| 2,839,225 | |
EQT Corp. | |
| 117,402 | | |
| 4,691,384 | |
Exxon Mobil Corp. | |
| 43,043 | | |
| 4,422,238 | |
Marathon Oil Corp. | |
| 81,694 | | |
| 2,077,478 | |
Occidental Petroleum Corp. | |
| 43,302 | | |
| 2,561,313 | |
Pioneer Natural Resources Co. | |
| 6,795 | | |
| 1,573,994 | |
| |
| | | |
| 34,511,806 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
United
States Other — 2.4%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
Baker Hughes Co. | |
| 38,763 | | |
| 1,308,251 | |
Darling Ingredients, Inc.(2) | |
| 1,957 | | |
| 85,854 | |
| |
| | | |
| 1,394,105 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
United
States Renewables and Power Infrastructure — 2.0%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
American Electric Power Co.,
Inc. | |
| 2,921 | | |
| 232,365 | |
Constellation Energy Corp. | |
| 8,071 | | |
| 976,914 | |
| |
| | | |
| 1,209,279 | |
Total Common Stock
(Cost $33,372,368) | |
| | | |
| 55,160,663 | |
| |
| |
|
| |
Shares/Units | |
Fair
Value |
| |
| |
|
Master
Limited Partnerships — 21.0%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
United
States Natural Gas Gathering/Processing — 3.7%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
Western
Midstream Partners LP | |
| 72,535 | | |
$ | 2,162,993 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
United
States Natural Gas/Natural Gas Liquids Pipelines — 10.9%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
Energy Transfer
LP | |
| 293,256 | | |
| 4,073,326 | |
Enterprise
Products Partners LP | |
| 89,274 | | |
| 2,390,758 | |
| |
| | | |
| 6,464,084 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
United
States Oil and Gas Production — 2.3%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
Mach Natural
Resources LP(2) | |
| 26,315 | | |
| 466,302 | |
TXO
Partners LP | |
| 50,000 | | |
| 913,000 | |
| |
| | | |
| 1,379,302 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
United
States Refined Product Pipelines — 4.1%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
MPLX
LP | |
| 66,440 | | |
| 2,422,402 | |
Total
Master Limited Partnerships
(Cost $9,605,884) | |
| | | |
| 12,428,781 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Money Market
Fund — 0.6%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
United
States Investment Company — 0.6%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
Invesco Government & Agency Portfolio —
Institutional Class,
5.282%(3) (Cost $336,952) | |
| 336,952 | | |
| 336,952 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Total
Investments — 115.0%(1)
(Cost $43,315,204) | |
| | | |
| 67,926,396 | |
Liabilities
in Excess of Other Assets — (0.1)%(1) | |
| | | |
| (73,287 | ) |
Credit
Facility Borrowings — (14.9)%(1) | |
| | | |
| (8,800,000 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Total
Net Assets Applicable to Common Stockholders — 100.0%(1) | |
| | | |
$ | 59,053,109 | |
| (1) | Calculated
as a percentage of net assets. |
| (2) | Non-income
producing security. |
| (3) | Rate
indicated is the current yield as of November 30, 2023. |
See accompanying Notes
to Financial Statements.
TPZ Schedule of Investments
November 30, 2023
| |
Principal
Amount | |
Fair
Value |
| |
| |
|
Corporate
Bonds — 61.8%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Canada
Crude Oil Pipelines — 6.5%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
Enbridge, Inc.
5.500%,
07/15/2077 | |
$ | 7,042,000 | | |
$ | 6,190,669 | |
United
States Natural Gas Gathering/Processing — 21.4%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
Antero Midstream Partners LP
5.750%,
03/01/2027(2) | |
| 3,800,000 | | |
| 3,715,144 | |
Blue Racer Midstream LLC
6.625%,
07/15/2026(2) | |
| 5,900,000 | | |
| 5,808,848 | |
EnLink Midstream LLC
5.375%,
06/01/2029 | |
| 4,000,000 | | |
| 3,859,876 | |
Hess Corp.
5.625%, 02/15/2026(2) | |
| 4,160,000 | | |
| 4,108,000 | |
The Williams Companies, Inc.
4.550%, 06/24/2024 | |
| 3,000,000 | | |
| 2,977,887 | |
| |
| | | |
| 20,469,755 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
United
States Natural Gas/Natural Gas Liquids Pipelines — 23.4%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
Cheniere Corp.
5.875%,
03/31/2025 | |
| 2,000,000 | | |
| 2,000,278 | |
Cheniere Energy, Inc.
4.625%,
10/15/2028 | |
| 3,100,000 | | |
| 2,958,074 | |
DT Midstream, Inc.
4.375%, 06/15/2031(2) | |
| 2,000,000 | | |
| 1,756,175 | |
NGPL PipeCo LLC
3.250%,
07/15/2031(2) | |
| 3,500,000 | | |
| 2,889,469 | |
ONEOK, Inc.
6.350%, 01/15/2031 | |
| 3,000,000 | | |
| 3,090,447 | |
Rockies Express Pipeline LLC
4.950%, 07/15/2029(2) | |
| 3,000,000 | | |
| 2,767,489 | |
Tallgrass Energy LP
5.500%,
01/15/2028(2) | |
| 3,250,000 | | |
| 2,998,275 | |
Targa Resources Corp.
5.200%,
07/01/2027 | |
| 4,000,000 | | |
| 3,967,039 | |
| |
| | | |
| 22,427,246 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
United
States Other — 4.9%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
New Fortress Energy, Inc.
6.500%,
09/30/2026(2) | |
| 5,000,000 | | |
| 4,751,877 | |
United
States Refined Product Pipelines — 1.6%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
Buckeye Partners LP
5.850%,
11/15/2043 | |
| 2,000,000 | | |
| 1,511,290 | |
United
States Renewables and Power Infrastructure — 4.0%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
NextEra Energy, Inc.
4.800%,
12/01/2077 | |
| 4,500,000 | | |
| 3,829,940 | |
Total
Corporate Bonds
(Cost $62,538,121) | |
| | | |
| 59,180,777 | |
| |
Shares | |
Fair
Value |
| |
| |
|
Common
Stock — 39.1%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Canada
Crude Oil Pipelines — 1.4%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
Enbridge, Inc. | |
| 39,056 | | |
$ | 1,361,883 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Canada
Natural Gas/Natural Gas Liquids Pipelines — 1.9%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
TC Energy Corp. | |
| 48,667 | | |
| 1,825,986 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
United
States Crude Oil Pipelines — 6.1%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
Plains GP Holdings LP | |
| 358,745 | | |
| 5,797,319 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
United
States Natural Gas Gathering/Processing — 5.1%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
EnLink Midstream LLC | |
| 90,965 | | |
| 1,243,492 | |
Equitrans Midstream Corp. | |
| 108,596 | | |
| 1,018,630 | |
Hess Midstream Partners LP | |
| 66,901 | | |
| 2,176,959 | |
Kinetik Holdings, Inc. | |
| 11,954 | | |
| 434,647 | |
| |
| | | |
| 4,873,728 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
United
States Natural Gas/Natural Gas Liquids Pipelines — 21.1%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
DT Midstream, Inc. | |
| 24,885 | | |
| 1,425,662 | |
Excelerate Energy, Inc. | |
| 11,787 | | |
| 197,079 | |
Kinder Morgan, Inc. | |
| 160,775 | | |
| 2,824,817 | |
NextDecade Corp.(3) | |
| 98,612 | | |
| 492,074 | |
ONEOK, Inc. | |
| 73,551 | | |
| 5,063,986 | |
Targa Resources Corp. | |
| 63,653 | | |
| 5,757,414 | |
The Williams Companies, Inc. | |
| 121,546 | | |
| 4,471,677 | |
| |
| | | |
| 20,232,709 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
United
States Refining — 0.4%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
PBF Energy, Inc. | |
| 8,275 | | |
| 367,410 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
United
States Renewables and Power Infrastructure — 3.1%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
Atlantica Sustainable Infrastructure Plc | |
| 16,523 | | |
| 314,267 | |
NextEra Energy Partners LP | |
| 8,013 | | |
| 188,626 | |
Sempra Energy | |
| 33,854 | | |
| 2,466,941 | |
| |
| | | |
| 2,969,834 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Total
Common Stock
(Cost $29,186,696) | |
| | | |
| 37,428,869 | |
See
accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
2023
Annual Report | November 30, 2023
TPZ
Schedule of Investments (continued)
November
30, 2023
| |
Shares/Units | |
Fair
Value |
| |
| |
|
Master
Limited Partnerships — 23.6%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
United
States Crude Oil Pipelines — 1.8%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
NuStar
Energy LP | |
| 90,687 | | |
$ | 1,726,680 | |
United
States Natural Gas Gathering/Processing — 4.2%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
Western
Midstream Partners LP | |
| 135,715 | | |
| 4,047,021 | |
United
States Natural Gas/Natural Gas Liquids Pipelines — 10.5%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
Energy Transfer
LP | |
| 370,881 | | |
| 5,151,537 | |
Enterprise
Products Partners LP | |
| 184,023 | | |
| 4,928,136 | |
| |
| | | |
| 10,079,673 | |
United
States Refined Product Pipelines — 7.1%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
Holly Energy
Partners LP | |
| 30,993 | | |
| 633,807 | |
MPLX
LP | |
| 167,813 | | |
| 6,118,462 | |
| |
| | | |
| 6,752,269 | |
Total
Master Limited Partnerships
(Cost $12,627,406) | |
| | | |
| 22,605,643 | |
| |
Shares | |
Fair
Value |
| |
| |
|
Money Market
Fund — 0.4%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
United
States Investment Company — 0.4%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
Invesco Government & Agency Portfolio — Institutional
Class,
5.282%(4) (Cost $340,564) | |
| 340,564 | | |
$ | 340,564 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Total Investments
— 124.9%(1)
(Cost $104,692,787) | |
| | | |
| 119,555,853 | |
Other
Assets in Excess of Liabilities — 0.8%(1) | |
| | | |
| 768,550 | |
Credit
Facility Borrowings — (25.7)%(1) | |
| | | |
| (24,600,000 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Total Net Assets
Applicable to Common Stockholders — 100.0%(1) | |
| | | |
$ | 95,724,403 | |
| (1) | Calculated
as a percentage of net assets. |
| (2) | Restricted
securities have a total fair value of $28,795,277, which represents 30.1% of total net assets.
See Note 6 to financial statements for further disclosure. |
| (3) | Non-income
producing security. |
| (4) | Rate
indicated is the current yield as of November 30, 2023. |
See accompanying
Notes to Financial Statements.
TEAF
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
November
30, 2023
| |
Shares | |
Fair
Value |
| |
| |
|
Common
Stock — 45.0%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Australia
Natural Gas/Natural Gas Liquids Pipelines — 1.3%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
APA
Group | |
| 442,606 | | |
$ | 2,494,618 | |
Australila
Other — 1.9%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
Atlas Arteria
Ltd. | |
| 992,726 | | |
| 3,804,478 | |
Canada
Renewables — 1.0%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
Innergex Renewable
Energy, Inc.(2) | |
| 294,405 | | |
| 2,084,993 | |
France
Other — 0.9%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
Vinci SA | |
| 13,906 | | |
| 1,699,841 | |
France
Power — 0.6%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
Engie SA | |
| 70,301 | | |
| 1,218,081 | |
Germany
Power — 1.5%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
RWE AG(2) | |
| 68,204 | | |
| 2,922,816 | |
Hong
Kong Solar — 0.4%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
Xinyi Energy
Holdings Ltd. | |
| 4,755,664 | | |
| 797,552 | |
Hong
Kong Transportation/Storage — 0.6%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
China Suntien
Green Energy Corp. Ltd. | |
| 3,704,242 | | |
| 1,232,961 | |
Italy
Power — 6.1%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
ENAV SpA(2) | |
| 649,850 | | |
| 2,317,306 | |
Enel SpA | |
| 512,946 | | |
| 3,621,386 | |
Iren SpA | |
| 1,215,003 | | |
| 2,695,304 | |
Terna SpA | |
| 447,937 | | |
| 3,606,120 | |
| |
| | | |
| 12,240,116 | |
Portugal
Power — 2.9%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
EDP —
Energias de Portugal SA(2) | |
| 1,209,999 | | |
| 5,778,018 | |
Spain
Other — 1.6%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
Ferrovial SE(2) | |
| 93,777 | | |
| 3,241,926 | |
Spain
Power — 2.3%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
Iberdrola SA(2) | |
| 371,053 | | |
| 4,582,123 | |
United
Kingdom Power — 5.5%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
National Grid
Plc | |
| 300,253 | | |
| 3,894,787 | |
SSE Plc(2) | |
| 309,113 | | |
| 7,151,148 | |
| |
| | | |
| 11,045,935 | |
United
Kingdom Renewable Infrastructure — 0.9%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
Greencoat
UK Wind Plc(2) | |
| 1,005,074 | | |
| 1,825,885 | |
| |
Shares | |
Fair
Value |
| |
| |
|
United
States Natural Gas/Natural Gas Liquids Pipelines — 8.1%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Cheniere
Energy, Inc.(2) | |
| 30,700 | | |
$ | 5,592,005 | |
NextDecade Corp.(3) | |
| 75,000 | | |
| 374,250 | |
Targa Resources
Corp.(2) | |
| 61,158 | | |
| 5,531,741 | |
The
Williams Companies, Inc.(2) | |
| 125,859 | | |
| 4,630,353 | |
| |
| | | |
| 16,128,349 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
United
States Power — 5.3%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
Ameren Corp.(2) | |
| 20,040 | | |
| 1,554,904 | |
American Electric
Power Co, Inc.(2) | |
| 63,582 | | |
| 5,057,948 | |
Atlantica
Sustainable Infrastructure Plc(2) | |
| 75,263 | | |
| 1,431,502 | |
Edison International | |
| 22,360 | | |
| 1,497,896 | |
Exelon
Corp. | |
| 28,739 | | |
| 1,106,739 | |
| |
| | | |
| 10,648,989 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
United
States Renewables — 3.0%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
Dominion Energy,
Inc.(2) | |
| 48,224 | | |
| 2,186,476 | |
NextEra Energy,
Inc.(2) | |
| 47,543 | | |
| 1,119,162 | |
NextEra
Energy Partners LP(2) | |
| 45,491 | | |
| 2,661,679 | |
| |
| | | |
| 5,967,317 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
United
States Solar — 0.1%(1) | |
| | | |
| | |
|