ssc
8 hours ago
Yes, I frequently say you are a liar and I do so with impunity because I know for a fact that you are. You lied about me being served with a cease and desist order and letter, then you lied and denied posting those lies. You lied about the libel suit. You lied about the signed contracts and your SPV. But most egregiously, you have lied thousands of times about me being a short seller. I have never shorted erhe; I am not associated with any group or entity that has shorted erhe, I am not Canadian and I have never had a Canadian brokerage account.
I call you despicable because you and your mindless minions repeat these false allegations about me repeatedly without any proof to support them since they are totally false.
I call you demented because, to cite 1 of many examples, you actually created a sketch of a head and claimed it was erhe's largest short seller. Perhaps it's time to have a heart to heart talk with "the other dickran".
I call you delusional because dollars/share and your $8 short squeeze claims have no basis in reality. And the entire short selling narrative is purely a figment of your imagination, created to try and rationalize the fact that you and your group own close to 2 billion erhe shares and erhe insiders haven't bought any shares since being wiped out by the reverse split years ago. Then there was your "mission for God" statement and these latest rants about impacting "the entire penny stock universe" and that your obvious greed and hubris "serve a higher power".
I call you deceitful because of things like your new erhe paradigm, your kaboom predictions, your African Queen nonsense, and all the other dozens, probably hundreds of made up scenarios that were going to make you a billionaire that have never come true. Look no further than the erhe price chart for proof of that.
I call you desperate because the more time that goes by, the more ridiculous and abundant are your bullish claims. Just look at the recent African Queen, SPV, Shell bidding war, erhe dividend, and quickly abandoned voting shares investigation nonsense.
So whatever I have called you over the years, you undoubtedly deserve it. Again I ask you to simply stop the lies.
Krombacher
10 hours ago
You've called me a liar and other names every day for years.
If you think this is about 2 to 3 cents, then you're in for an awakening.
I will work very hard to thwart the shorts.
They will soon see what I'm made out of.
This is personal and 70 other shareholders get it.
It's not about the money, although this will make me a billionaire, it's really about short sellers who shouldn't be shorting according to U.S. law but are using Canadian loopholes and their predatory tactics on the vulnerable hopeful investor.
There will be justice. Justice that will reverberate across the entire penny stock universe.
That is what this is about.
I don't actually care about the money, if I did I might be tempted to sell for pennies. But I'm not so tempted, because I serve a higher power.
Krombacher
Krombacher
14 hours ago
My thinking on it is:
Shell will get block 4
Total will get the JDZ blocks.
It'll be a one two punch.
Shell will announce... and some longs will sell in the pennies on that announcement.
But the real money is the JDZ that will follow the Shell announcement with Total doing the buying.
But, having said that, either announcement will likely turn into a short squeeze at T+3 after the initial pop.
A dividend or buy out would really clinch that short squeeze though.
So I encourage longs to be patient with the initial pop.
This isn't like the short squeezes attempted in the past with no tangible fundamentals underneath, which would encourage some longs to undercut the market by selling for pennies instead of dollars.
If this happens, you have the backdrop of a Shell deal and probably a Total deal to follow.
So my thinking is don't rush for the exits for the pennies the shorts will offer. I estimate that for many shorts, 2 or 3 pennies are either break even or a mild loss. Although for some shorts, even half a penny might send them into a margin call.
We can take them and their brokers for much more if we play our cards right.
I'm not greedy... but do feel that after all these years, we deserve to take the shorts out royally and not simply because we're exasperated from a wait.
Krombacher
ssc
14 hours ago
Totally baseless, asinine rambling designed to try and support dickran's desperate and delusional claims of dollars/share while hoping for 10 cents or even a penny. There are no facts that support any of this nonsense and even deceitful dickran admits he/she has no proof.
Of course the filings from before the reverse split happened are not split adjusted. Not even an eggplant would claim they were.
Of course you have no proof Offor owns more than 5% of erhe shares because he doesn't. Claiming a gag order would prevent anyone from complying with SEC rules about ownership disclosure is another selection from the eggplant buffet.
Of course everyone can see that the entire made up Offor ownership and shorting bullshit was designed to deflect from the facts that a small group of stuck investors owns close to 2 billion shares, that Offor and erhc management own very few shares, and there will never be a buyout deal that rewards those stuck investors with dickran's delusional dollars/share.
Of course everyone knows there will never be an $8 epic short squeeze because there are no short positions to squeeze. That is why the only "proof" dickran can provide for his short squeeze nonsense is his/her infamous, embarrassing sketch of a head. And T+3? dickran falsely claimed a short squeeze would start T+3 after closing above $.0003, then it was above $.0005, then it was above $.001 - all came and went with no squeeze. When will the attempts to deceive end?
Krombacher
16 hours ago
You have to look at both Offor and Chrome holdings since Chrome is 100% owned by Offor (or some super majority percentage like that)...
... filings show something like close to a billion shares (some will argue that's not split adjusted, but I disagree).
But it doesn't matter because as such a large shareholder I'm sure Offor is under the same gag order and couldn't disclose any additional shares he might have picked up.
But this has been discussed to death including examining very high volume days and concluding, I guess, that it's not him.
Nevertheless, it is my opinion that he owns a very large percentage if not nearly all the shares.
No proof though.
BTW, I don't expect another shareholder like Offor to "give" anything to me or any other shareholder. That's silly.
But I do expect him to get a dividend or buy out like all other shareholders, including shareholders holding shorted shares.
The people who are going to "give" dividends or Total Shares to shorted shareholders are none other than the shorts and their brokers.
Of course, shorts don't like this so they will rush for the exits in a short squeeze worth $8 or more a share.
Longs just have to wait T+3 days after the pop from the announcement.
Krombacher
ssc
1 day ago
First of all,
If there is naked shorting of billions of shares, why wouldn't Offor want to put an end to it? Or if most of the shorting is from Offor's margin account shares, again, why wouldn't he want to put an end to it? Particularly if an ensuing short squeeze would, according to your asinine short selling bullshit, bring $8/share. Don't tell me you are actually trying to say that Canadian brokerages have allowed the naked shorting of billions of erhe shares and have allowed them to stay in a failure to cover mode for many years. Please tell me that is not what you are promoting.
Second, you didn't answer the questions:
Are you saying erhc is going to notify all its shareholders and let them know if their shares are or are not voting shares? Is this supposed action going to be disclosed publicly or something only you are privy to?
Krombacher
2 days ago
First of all,
If Offor owns most of the voting shares, and he owns them in a margin account, then it doesn't make a difference if other shareholders move their shorted shares from margin to cash because shorts wouldn't be borrowing the shares from us but from Offor. So it would have to be Offor who has to move his shares to a cash account
But that could be a wrong assumption, because the shares could've simply been printed and the shorting is naked not borrowed. In that case only a buy out forcing shorts to deliver TTE shares or a dividend forcing shorts to pay a penny to all the shorted shares will change a situation wherever shorts can print infinite shares to meet demand.
Second, we have a group of shareholders who want to know whether their shares are voting shares. That's their right. We are taking steps to learn that information. We certainly want to vote for a dividend for the reasons above as soon as Erhc has the means to issue one.
Krombacher
ssc
2 days ago
Are you saying erhc is going to notify all its shareholders and let them know if their shares are or are not voting shares? Is this supposed action going to be disclosed publicly or something only you are privy to? Or is this just another bullshit pie in the sky delusion like your spv and African Queen were?
Regardless of what dickran is trying to spin now, any shareholders concerned about erhe short selling should take the steps outlined in my previous post and make their shares unavailable to be loaned out for shorting. It is common sense, unless of course no one believes there are any erhe short positions to worry about.
It is, sadly, quite understandable that dickran would recommend an alternative as he/she would do or say anything to try and keep his/her delusional, demented, sketched headed short seller stories alive. Look at the share price - more than 10 years of demented, delusional, desperate, deceitful, despicable dickran and erhe price remains near zero.
ssc
2 days ago
For anyone who actually believes all the dickran lies about erhe short positions, here's some tips from another loser company telling you how to prevent your shares from being loaned out to short sellers:
“For long-term shareholders who believe in the Company’s future, the Company is highlighting the following actions you can take with your brokerage firm to prevent the lending of your shares for short selling,” Trump Media said in its supplement to its FAQ Wednesday.
The tips include holding DJT shares in a cash account at a brokerage firm as opposed to a margin account, “opting out of any securities lending program,” moving Trump Media shares to the company’s designated transfer agent, and transferring shares to a bank and “holding them in your retirement account.”
The instructions include a helpful form letter that shareholder can send to their brokers.
The letter says: “Please accept this written instruction to make sure that the following securities are held in my cash account only and accordingly are not available for any stock loan activities.”
“I hereby expressly opt-out of any securities lending programs and instruct you to not loan out any of my shares,” the letter says, before a section that the sender can fill out with their number of shares.
Of course everyone knows there aren't any large erhe short positions, but if dickran and his group of mindless minions wanted to try and start the "epic short squeeze" they have so frequently lied about, following the above steps for their 2 billion shares should have a better chance of triggering a squeeze than the lame ass, delusional African Queen rumors did lmao.
So why not go for it? I dare you. Much to the chagrin of the handful of liars still promoting the short selling lies, it might prove once and for all that there are no short shares to squeeze.
ssc
2 days ago
Prove any erhe short positions exist. Oh yeah, I forgot - you can't. As another lightweight here all you can do is parrot liar guerguerian dickran's delusional talking points. The last new thing you contributed was a years ago lie-filled story about a private phone call with erhc executive. Of course none of the things from that supposed phone call ever came true. So who was lying, you or erhc?
Shorting billions of shares of a stock at $.0003 or less and holding for over 5 years? Absolutely asinine, out of touch with reality bullshit. You, dickran and the sketched head better have another strategy meeting. After all these years of trying to promote it, your short selling nonsense is embarrassing. The $.0001 price tag clearly shows who the mindless minions are.
badog
3 days ago
This is what I was referring to:
markgovols Wednesday, 03/03/10 10:01:49 AM
Re: badog post# 202551 0
Post # of 347877
It's NOT insider info. ANYONE can obtain it. It's called research and hard work. I made contacts at the JDA. I've made contacts at Platts, Dow Jones News, Wallstreet Journal, RigZone, Upstream, Large ERHE Shareholders, STP Oil Minister, and AUNT Jemima. Inside information would be if I was calling Peter Ntephe and getting info. Anyone can call the JDA. It's a govt agency basically. I cannot help it that the number on the website is not working. I guarantee I could find a new one on my own. Do some research. Put forth some effort. I am not going to post my contact's cell phone number. You want me to wipe your azz too? Some of you people amaze me. Some of you spend so much time whining and criticizing those who post info because you want more info. You want to know the exact month, day, time, second, what color and letterhead will be on the PR and if the person writing the PR has more than one tie. Gimme a break. You could use all this wasted time emailing and calling contacts (Media, JDA, etc...). It's not hard. I'm not that smart but I have some drive to succeed and that's really all that's needed. Get together with Puffthemagicwhiner and get us an ****UPDATE*****! In the meantime pass the syrup.
badog Wednesday, 03/03/10 12:01:13 PM
Re: markgovols post# 202571 0
Post # of 347877
Mark,
Pretty scathing post. Problem is...I never asked you for a phone number to the JDA. Get your responses straight!
Second...don't understand your Aunt Jemima reference. Makes no sense.
Third... I wasn't going to go here but you called me out...
Posted by: markgovols Date: Tuesday, February 23, 2010
Here ya go:
From Source (A) who's company was a contractor on the rig. They had assisted in the analysis of the data and he said that from what he saw the amount of oil and condensate was very encouraging. He was unable to discuss volumetrics but would be "gobsmacked if block 4 didn't produce large amounts of liquids for many years".
Now from not so Secret Source...Badog...............
Well Well Well. Call me gobsmacked. I have one little issue with above secret 'Souce A' and his description of the data analysis...Is your 'Source A' verifiable? And one more very important point... Before a contractor is allowed on site...and probably in thier yearly, monthly, weekly training I would have to guess that they are instructed to never...I mean never...give out information regarding a customers drilling information. I mean never. If I were Sinopec I would not let anyone have access to data without a non-disclosure agreement. I would guess that this is equal to insider information and I would guess you get jail time for this...and risk never drilling for a customer again...and ruin many reputations. This is probably one of the most serious offenses a contractor can make. The price they charge to drill these wells is ungodly. What if one employee ruins your multi-billion business by giving out this info? I would guess that the Secret Source probably could go to jail. The Company is broke. All for nothing. I mean what did the Secret Souce gain? Nada. And to give this info just because you got his number (if any of this source info is true to begin with) and called ...and asked. And for nothing? Would you risk your career...not seeing your family, the humiliation, being broke, and maybe being a Convict? Even giving info like this to a family member would be extremely risky? To give it to someone you don't know personally?...Kiss your life goodbuy.
If you can get people on this board to believe this...more power to you. But I'm not part of the group.
I've got more it you what it. Again...don't come after me if you don't want a response!
Continue on with your spring cleaning.
Badog
From <https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=47332016>
There were many who cheered for this unverifiable and probably non-existant Source A. They wanted to hear this crap in hopes it would help the sp. I was the goat for calling him and his so-called info out.
There are those today that want to believe in ghost shorters in hopes that it's true...that scenario would help the sp. Problem is that they cannot come up with anything solid. Just short squeeze theories. If ERHC would ever get positive news about it's interest in the EEZ the sp will go up....some. That's the best possible outcome that I could envision here.
Badog
ssc
3 days ago
Thought you were waiting for the Shell bidding war and erhe dividend. lmao. Have you already added those asinine predictions to your file of failures where all your other bullshit, including previous "T+3" predictions properly resides?
$8/share when you can't even get a penny? When it comes to erhc, dickran's desperate, demented, delusional, deceitful, despicable greed and hubris truly know no bounds.
ssc
3 days ago
The one thing that hasn't changed since 2010 is that guerguerian dickran is a liar. From his false story many years ago about erhe buyers in an elevator to his latest Shell bidding war and erhe dividend, and the thousands of other baseless claims, false rumors and outright lies in between, dickran's despicable greed and hubris drive the never ending flow of bullish bullshit.
African Queen, epic short squeeze, spv, sketched head short seller, dollars/share done deal buyout - what a legacy of delusional, demented, desperate dickran deceit.