Item 11. Additional Information
The supplemental disclosures below should be read in conjunction
with the Schedule TO in its entirety. Inclusion of the
disclosures below is not an admission that they are material or
legally required.
The disclosure in the Offer to Purchase and Item 11 of the Schedule
TO is amended and supplemented by making the following
modifications to Section 16—“Certain Legal Matters;
Regulatory Approvals – U.S. Antitrust Compliance:
The final paragraph is deleted and replaced by the following
text:
“The waiting period under the HSR Act expired, effective
April 12, 2022 at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time. Accordingly, the
condition to the Offer relating to the termination or expiration of
any applicable waiting period under the HSR Act (and any extension
thereof, including under any agreement entered into in compliance
with the Merger Agreement between a party and a governmental
authority agreeing not to consummate the Offer or the Merger prior
to a certain date) applicable to the Offer or the Merger, has been
satisfied.”
The disclosure in the Offer to Purchase and Item 11 of the Schedule
TO is amended and supplemented by inserting the following
paragraphs in Section 16 — “Certain Legal Matters; Regulatory
Approvals”:
Delaware Court of Chancery Complaint
A putative class action complaint relating to the Offer and the
Merger captioned Reith v. Huttig Building Products, Inc. et
al., Case No. 2022-0332, was filed on April 14,
2022, as amended on April 23, 2022, by a purported Huttig
stockholder in the Court of Chancery of the State of
Delaware. The putative class action complaint names as
defendants Huttig, the members of the Huttig Board, Parent and
Merger Sub. Neither Parent nor Merger Sub has yet received a
summons and complaint from the plaintiff.
The complaint alleges, among other things, that the Huttig Board
breached its fiduciary duties to Huttig stockholders in connection
with the Offer and the Merger by (i) executing nondisclosure
agreements with prospective bidders that contain “don’t-ask-don’t-waive” standstills
and failing to waive the standstills following Huttig’s entry into
the Merger Agreement, (ii) executing the Merger Agreement
that, according to its terms and in conjunction with the
standstills, impedes the Huttig Board’s ability to consider and
accept superior proposals and restricts the flow of information
necessary to permit the Huttig Board to act on an informed basis
and determine whether the Offer and the Merger are reasonable and
in the best interest of Huttig stockholders and
(iii) misleading Huttig stockholders with respect to the terms
of the nondisclosure agreements entered into with other parties
during the sale process and the Huttig Board’s ability to receive
unsolicited offers from these parties. The complaint also alleges
that the Offer Price is inadequate and that Parent and Merger Sub
aided and abetted breaches of fiduciary duty by the Huttig
Board.