The_Gman
2 days ago
"The U.S. has no centralized federal department or agency with the requisite mining and mineral processing expertise to assist the Executive Branch and Congress in developing coordinated mining policies responsive to the country’s mineral needs."
SME presents concept paper “Why the U.S. Needs a National Materials and Minerals Council” at Midyear Meeting
William Gleason October 7, 2024
https://me.smenet.org/webContent.cfm?context=1&webarticleid=4905
In the three decades following the U.S. Congressional vote to cease funding to the U.S. Bureau of Mines (USBM), the United States’ reliance on foreign sources for minerals has increased. Concurrently, the technological advancements in everything from portable electronic devices, electric vehicles, machine learning and artificial intelligence has created extraordinary global demand for a number of critical minerals.
Recognizing the need to fill the void left by the closure of the USBM in 1996, SME took the technical lead in the formation of a concept paper “Why the U.S. Needs a National Materials and Minerals Council.”
The Concept Paper is available on SME’s website https://www.smenet.org/what-we-do/technical-briefings.
In Washington, DC, Sens. John Hickenlooper (D-CO) and Thom Tillis (R-NC) introduced the bills that could help further the efforts to create a centralized department or agency within the federal government to assist the Executive Branch and Congress in developing coordinated mining policies and spur the federal government to develop a national strategy to advance U.S. production of the critical minerals needed to build a clean energy economy.
The "National Critical Minerals Council Act" would establish a National Critical Minerals Council chaired by the vice president to coordinate a U.S. critical minerals strategy. That council would be led by a chief minerals adviser appointed by the president who would coordinate actions across federal agencies.
And the "Unearth Innovation Act" would establish a mining and mineral innovation program within the Department of Energy to drive research, development and commercialization of advanced mining, recycling and processing technologies.
Concept Paper:
https://smenet.blob.core.windows.net/smecms/sme/media/smeazurestorage/pdf/nmmc-concept-paper_final_09_09_24.pdf
Executive Summary
As summarized below, a group of mining technical and policy experts (Experts) participated in a May 30, 2024 roundtable discussion (Roundtable) hosted by the Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration (SME) at its headquarters in Englewood, CO. The discussion focused on why the federal government needs a new Executive Branch entity to provide advice and coordination on minerals and mining issues, suggested the best place for this entity within the Executive Branch, highlighted the compelling public interests in creating this new entity, and identified the following reasons for a new entity within the Executive Branch:
-The U.S. has no centralized federal department or agency with the requisite mining and mineral processing expertise to assist the Executive Branch and Congress in developing coordinated mining policies responsive to the country’s mineral needs.
- A new centralized minerals entity is urgently needed to coordinate existing federal mineral programs, which are scattered throughout several executive branch departments and agencies, to identify and fill the gaps in the country’s current mineral and mineral processing research and development (R&D) programs, and to increase domestic mining and mineral processing in order to reduce our dependency on imported minerals.
The_Gman
3 days ago
It's unclear how many have actually received the conditional funds so far. I believe the new domestic mines have been lithium related, unless they were already existing. Putz, you should know this as it was in the article you posted the other day in contrast to what I posted about Trump being the truly supportive one.
https://www.reuters.com/markets/commodities/wary-trump-us-minerals-projects-rush-close-government-loans-2024-08-29/
Under President Joe Biden, the U.S. Department of Energy's Loan Programs Office (LPO) has awarded nearly $25 billion in conditional loans to 21 companies, including Li-Cycle (LICY.N), Lithium Americas (LAC.TO), Redwood Materials and others planning to build facilities that recycle batteries or process lithium and other minerals for use in electric vehicles. Such conditional loans still need final approval, which takes time.
MINING PROJECTS
The LPO, which gave Tesla a $465 million loan in 2010 to stave off bankruptcy, has been meticulous in its loan review process under Biden, with more than two-thirds of applicants requiring help to navigate the complex credit review process that slows down the loan approval timeline, LPO chief Jigar Shah, told Reuters last year.
For U.S. mining projects, any delay in funding could imperil plans to supply cathode and battery facilities, many of which are also in line for LPO funding.
In Nevada, ioneer is pushing to close a $700 million LPO loan for its Rhyolite Ridge lithium project, which is estimated to eclipse $1 billion in cost.
And General Motors-backed GM.N Lithium Americas has begun work on its nearly $3 billion Thacker Pass lithium project, which Trump approved five days before leaving office. The bulk of the project's funding will come from a $2.26 billion LPO loan that the company expects to close by December.
"We're pleased that our project was supported by the Trump and Biden administrations," said a spokesperson for Lithium Americas. "They both have expressed the importance of Thacker Pass in securing a domestic supply of critical minerals."
Australia-based ioneer did not respond to requests for comment.
Recycling startups Li-Cycle and Redwood are also rushing to close LPO loans. Redwood was conditionally approved for a $2 billion loan that it expected to close last year, but the company is still waiting for funding.
Li-Cycle said it continues "to work closely with the U.S. Department of Energy on key technical, financial and legal workstreams to advance towards definitive financing documentation for a loan."
Representatives for Redwood and Qcells did not respond to requests for comment.
Here's another "success" story:
Piedmont Lithium makes U-turn on multiple applications for US government funding
The company recently cancelled plans for a project that had already received approval for a $141.7m government grant. Piedmont Lithium has cancelled its application with the US Department of Energy’s (DOE) Loan Programs Office (LPO) due to high costs associated with the process, the US mining company told Reuters.
https://www.power-technology.com/news/piedmont-lithium-makes-u-turn-on-multiple-applications-for-us-government-funding/
And that was a GRANT not a loan!
The_Gman
3 days ago
What is the Earth Mapping Resources Initiative (Earth MRI)?
A partnership between the USGS, State Geological Surveys, and industry to acquire new geologic maps, geophysical surveys, and LiDAR data to better understand the fundamental geologic framework of areas across the Nation with potential for hosting critical mineral resources.
Ongoing project initiated under Trump based Executive Order 13817 of December 20, 2017
A Federal Strategy To Ensure Secure and Reliable Supplies of Critical Minerals
and under Interior Secretarial Order 3359
https://www.usgs.gov/special-topics/earth-mri/about
PutzMueler
3 days ago
Didn’t Nebraska get 10m for Scandium alloy R&D?
Usgs is putting up funds and technology to Map 6 other states
This is a year old but they refocused on Nebraska and Kentucky Just recently.
RESTON, Va. — The U.S. Geological Survey will invest more than $3.5 million to map critical mineral resources in partnership with the geological surveys of Arkansas, Kentucky, Illinois, Indiana, Missouri and Tennessee.
Not sure how many states and how much money needs to be invested to answer your question correctly
The_Gman
3 days ago
Which is why I keep buying down here. Fairly confident this team knows that attempting to defraud the US Government /EXIM out of almost a billion dollars is a really bad idea, one that hasn't ended well for others with much smaller stakes.
USGS (govt) had already established the richness of resources well before MS's involvement.
2007 - Eight Charged in $80 Million Conspiracy to Commit Fraud Against the Export-Import Bank of the United States. The defendants have all agreed to serve time in prison.. They also have agreed to a range of forfeiture of cash or property. 18 months; 41 months in prison; 33 months in prison; 37 months in prison; 24 months in prison; six months in prison; 12 months in prison.
2008 - California Man Sentenced to 33 Months in Prison in Connection With $20 Million Scheme to Defraud the Export-Import Bank of the United States
2010 - The owner of an export company in Miami was sentenced today to 46 months in prison for his role in a scheme to defraud the Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank) of approximately $24 million
2015 - A former loan officer at the Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank) pleaded guilty in federal court today for accepting more than $78,000 in bribes in return for recommending the approval of unqualified loan applications to the bank, among other misconduct, sentenced to two months imprisonment, $78,900.00 restitution and a $100. 00 special assessment
2016 - Miami Man Sentenced to 144 Months in Prison for Role in Multimillion-Dollar Scheme to Defraud Commercial Lenders and U.S. Export-Import Bank and ordered him to forfeit $41,924,418 and pay $11,503,068 in restitution
2021 - A Glen Allen man was sentenced today to 34 months in prison for defrauding both a Pennsylvania-based bank and the Export-Import Bank of the United States in connection with a $1.6 million loan.
2021 - Florida business owner was sentenced to 36 months’ probation and ordered to pay over $140,000 for his role in a scheme to defraud EXIM
Please do a little more research on potential bi-partisanship!