TIDMARR
RNS Number : 9180C
Aurora Investment Trust PLC
20 April 2017
ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT ANNOUNCEMENT
AURORA INVESTMENT TRUST PLC
PERIODED 31 DECEMBER 2016
STRATEGIC REPORT
OBJECTIVE
To provide shareholders with long term returns through capital
and income growth.
POLICY
Phoenix Asset Management Partners (Phoenix) was appointed
Investment Manager on 28 January 2016. Phoenix seeks to achieve the
Objective by investing in a portfolio of UK listed equities.
The portfolio will be relatively concentrated. The exact number
of individual holdings will very over time but typically the
portfolio will consist of 15 to 20 holdings.
BENCHMARK
Performance is benchmarked against the FTSE All-Share Index,
total return, representing the overall London market.
DIVID
An interim dividend of 2.0p per share was declared on 2 March
2017 and was paid on 10 April 2017.
The Directors do not recommend a final dividend (February 2016:
1.00p)
ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING
The Annual General Meeting of the Company will be held at the
offices of Grant Thornton, 30 Finsbury Square, London EC2P 2YU on 8
June 2017 at 12.00 noon.
STRATEGIC REPORT
CHAIRMAN'S STATEMENT
This report covers the 10 month period from 29 February 2016 to
31 December 2016. The reason for the "short year" is to align
Aurora's accounting period with that of its Investment Manager,
Phoenix Asset Management Partners, following their appointment on
28 January 2016.
The performance for the period to end December 2016 was a 6.38%
rise in net asset value (NAV), underperforming the benchmark FTSE
All Share Index (total return), which rose by 19.5%.
The share price of Aurora traded at a premium to NAV for
substantially all of the period in question. The average premium
for the year was 2.9%, which enabled us to issue new shares during
the period. Our intention is for the shares to continue to trade at
a small premium to NAV.
2016: Phoenix's First Year as Investment Manager
Shareholders will recollect that Phoenix was appointed
Investment Manager on 28 January 2016, which marked the beginning
of a new era for Aurora. This was the conclusion of a process that
had begun at the Aurora AGM in July 2014, when it was decided that
a further continuation vote in 2017 would not be sought; but rather
the Board and shareholders wanted an alternative future for the
Trust via merger or new Investment Manager.
This was achieved by the appointment of Phoenix as Investment
Manager. Key features of the Phoenix Management Agreement are no
management fees but an annual, performance only, fee, equal to one
third of NAV per share total returns in excess of the FTSE all
share return. This fee is subject to claw back and a high water
mark and is capped at 4% of NAV p.a. in the case of an absolute
increase in NAV per share; and 2% in the case of a decrease but
with outperformance compared with the FTSE All Share. Aurora is
managed with the same investment strategy as Phoenix's offshore
open-ended Fund. Since its inception in 1998 this fund has
delivered, net of fees, a cumulative NAV total return of 460.6% and
annualised returns of 9.7% compared with 155.6% and 5.2% for the
FTSE All-Share.
An important consideration for the Aurora Board in appointing
the new Investment Manager was the extent to which they would be
able to grow the size of the Trust and, therefore, improve its
economic viability. Phoenix were confident that by marketing their
track record, they could attract new investors to the Trust. A
Prospectus was issued to enable the issuance of up to 55 million
new shares over a 12-month period. The initial placing in March was
the first of several, which, together with the sale of 4 million
shares that had previously been held in Treasury, resulted in
approximately GBP32 million of new money being raised between 1
February and 31 December 2016. Consequently, the market
capitalisation of the Trust, which had been GBP15m in January 2016,
finished the year at GBP52m. Since 31 December the Company has
raised a further GBP6 million, increasing the market capitalisation
to GBP62 million
The growth in the size of the Trust has come from two main
sources. Firstly, from existing clients of Phoenix and secondly
Phoenix has attracted investors previously unknown to them by
holding a number of "roadshow" events across the UK over the last
12 months. Today, therefore, we have a range of shareholders who
support the Phoenix "value investing" approach, including family
offices, wealth managers and private banks.
Phoenix Investment Philosophy
Unlike some value investors, Phoenix does not seek to buy into
businesses at distressed prices. Rather, they aim to buy great
businesses at attractive prices The Phoenix definition of a great
business is of it having a high return on capital (15% or above),
pricing power and that it can be observed, transparently, doing
business in the real world. It is from understanding why a business
earns such high returns that investment outperformance can be
anticipated. Phoenix builds up the required knowledge by studying
the relevant industries and companies in detail - a learning
process which can take several years. When it comes to price
Phoenix is disciplined in only paying up to half of what they
believe the business is worth. Inevitably, the opportunities to buy
great businesses at half price are rare - frequently Phoenix will
identify a business which fits their objectives, but where the
price does not. Inevitably, therefore, Phoenix has to be patient.
Having spent considerable time identifying great businesses, they
usually have to wait further years before the price reaches a level
at which they are willing to invest. This often arises when there
has been bad news about a particular company and the stock falls
out of favour. The rarity of suitable investment candidates,
combined with the time consuming nature of the investment process,
results in a concentrated portfolio, typically of between 15 and 20
investments maximum. The portfolio turnover is low, with only one
or two new investments made each year.
Phoenix defines risk as being the potential for a permanent loss
of capital - rather than share price volatility. They see permanent
loss of capital as a function of an insufficiently thorough
understanding of a business and the potential threats it faces. An
ongoing monitoring and research programme for every stock in the
portfolio seeks to mitigate this risk. The in-depth and unusual
nature of the research that Phoenix undertakes is the most
distinguishing feature of its investment approach. They spend 80%
of their time monitoring the businesses owned by the Funds they
manage. Shareholders may be interested in reading the historic
track record of the Phoenix UK Fund since inception, which is an
Appendix at the back of this Report and Accounts.
As noted above, the Company underperformed the benchmark,
largely as a result of having no exposure to the cyclical resources
sector. As the Manager describes in his report, periods of
underperformance are to be expected as a result of Manger's
long-term value approach.
Going Forward
In last year's statement I mentioned that the objective was to
increase the size of Aurora to GBP100m over the medium term. This
continues to be the case. The increase in size serves to reduce the
ongoing cost per share and increases the marketability of the
shares.
Dividend
The Board declared that an interim dividend of 2.0p per share be
paid on 10 April to shareholders on the register as at 10 March
2017 and thus not to shareholders joining under the most recent
placing. The Board does not recommend a final dividend. The Company
expects to continue to pay an annual dividend, which could be lower
than recent dividends and will comprise substantially all of the
net revenues for the year.
AGM
A warm welcome is extended to shareholders to the AGM to be held
at 12 noon on 8 June 2017 at the offices of Grant Thornton, 30
Finsbury Square, London EC2P 2YU.
Lord Flight
Chairman
20 April 2017
STATEMENT FROM THE CIO OF THE INVESTMENT MANAGER
The last period was a prime example of the Phoenix process of
investing:
Discipline: We started with cash. This came from a combination
of a lack of opportunity due to high values and various
opportunities to sell some of our holdings in 2015. We entered June
with over 25% of the Trust in cash.
Patience: Despite the persistence of the high cash position (it
dates back to early 2015 in the Phoenix strategy although we were
not managing Aurora at that time), we did not feel pressured to
lower our hurdles or standards and invest.
Preparedness: When the post referendum selloff happened we were
prepared. We always have a candidate universe of stocks that we
would invest in given the right price. Understanding businesses,
rating managements and being able to assess values takes
considerable time and effort, it can't be left for when the
opportunities arise because it takes too long.
Action: The vote to leave the EU sent the market into a sharp
selloff, taking some of the businesses we know well into very
attractive valuation territory. When many were paralysed with doom
and fear, we acted. Within 2 weeks the cash position was under 10%
and falling. By October we were almost fully invested.
Value: When we act it is to buy things we believe are trading at
no more than half their intrinsic value. Being able to deploying
cash into those kinds of opportunities significantly boosts the
overall intrinsic value of the Trust which we expect in turn will
result in a future rise in the NAV and share price. Our actions in
2016 we believe increased underlying value significantly.
Monitoring: our real world monitoring of our businesses gives us
unique insights. In the week after Brexit our routine visits to
building sites throughout the country told us that other than in
Central London there was no impact from the referendum result on
the housing market in the UK, houses were still selling at a good
rate. This reinforced our confidence in our valuation estimates and
showed us that the market was overreacting.
Our 19 years of investing with the same strategy have some
discernible patterns: a build-up of cash when valuations become
unattractive; a sharp drawdown in bad markets as we buy what is the
cheapest and unpopular; a big increase in our estimate of the
intrinsic value eventually resulting in a sharp rebound in the
prices of our holdings. The period under review fits that pattern
and the value we have accumulated in 2016 should serve us well in
delivering strong returns from here.
Gary Channon
CIO Phoenix Asset Management Partners
20 April 2017
INVESTMENT MANAGER'S REVIEW AND OUTLOOK
The NAV per share of the Trust increased by 6.38% during the
period, an underperformance of the market (which was up by 19.5%).
Investors did slightly better than this suggests, as the share
price increased by 9.8%. The shares traded at an average premium to
NAV of 2.9% during the year, ending December at a 0.5% premium.
On the one hand, delivering a substantial return for investors
and earning no fees at all is disappointing (we charge a zero
management fee). On the other hand, our performance fee structure
sets quite a specific expectation to you as investors that we will
deliver a better return than the stock market. That definitively
remains our belief although it is a simple fact that in some
individual years that won't happen. We draw considerable heart from
our 19-year track record of managing the Phoenix UK Fund (which has
a very similar portfolio to Aurora). Over that period of time, we
have beaten the FTSE All Share by an average annualised 4.5% per
annum, after all fees. We have achieved this by beating the market
considerably in some years and lagging it in others. We point to
this as being the best guide to what to expect over coming
years.
The remainder of this section comprises an overview of the major
portfolio holdings. This will not extend to any crystal ball gazing
when it comes to predictions about share prices. This is because we
do not think that share prices can be predicted over the short term
(which we think is a minimum of three years). Rather, we think that
the undervalued shares we own will increase in value at some point
in the future if the business fundamentals justify such a move.
Clearly, if we own shares in a business, it is because we think
that's what going to happen and so we spend our time continually
testing our investment hypotheses and it is through that lens that
we consider company news.
Let's start with the investment that looks the worst in several
respects, Sports Direct. The share price fell by 31% over the
course of the year as the business: issued a profit warning; was
subject to a dogged campaign by the Guardian newspaper that
unearthed some slightly rum working practises; parted company with
the longstanding CEO and the head of finance; announced a change of
property strategy in the core UK business; halted attempts to
expand in Europe until the operating model has been proven to be
sustainably profitable; all of which sounds like five years' worth
of news rather than a summary of what happened in 2016. So what's
going on and how concerned are we?
We could consider each of these issues in some detail although a
general answer is probably what's called for here. Mike Ashley has
grown Sports Direct from a standing start to being a major European
business in a single generation. It is an extraordinary success
story. And yet, during his interrogation by a UK Parliamentary
committee earlier this year, he implied that the company had, in
some ways, become too big for him to manage, that parts of the
business were not being run as they should, especially with regards
to staff welfare and working standards. Later in the year, at a
meeting for City analysts, he also implied that the European
business was not developing in the way that he would like,
admitting that this was largely because of a conscious decision he
had taken many years earlier to delegate virtually all
responsibility for Europe to his long standing CEO Dave Forsey.
Dave Forsey has now left the business and Mike Ashley is back in
day-to-day operational control of Sports Direct with an agenda to
mend what's fixable and sell or close what isn't.
In terms of our assessment of the situation, we make a few
points. Firstly, an observation: Phoenix has been invested in
Sports Direct to varying degrees for nearly ten years and we have
followed the business and management closely all that time. We
first invested in the wake of the initial public offering, when the
shares plunged in response to a profit warning, some terrible PR
and some short term operational problems - plus ca change, plus
c'est la meme chose. Today, in 2017, we don't think Mike Ashley has
gone from being a great retailer to a twit in less than a year,
although the press reports and share price might give you cause to
think otherwise. Our national store visits and web-site monitoring
suggest that Sports Direct currently retain their competitive
advantage of being the lowest cost producer in the sector and the
core UK business seems to be in fine shape. We will pay close
attention to the new property strategy, which favours freeholds
over leaseholds and to move part of the estate upmarket. We will
watch with interest how the in-store offer develops, given Mike's
intent to sell more expensive lines from the large third party
suppliers such as Nike and Adidas. Above all, we will look for
signs that Mike remains the completely rational businessman that we
have found him to be over the last ten years. If we are right about
that, then there is plenty of reason to be excited about the
investment, which we think is worth more than twice the current
share price and is also why we increased the portfolio weight over
the course of the year. Moreover, for all the bad publicity the
Company has had recently, we believe that the management team has
integrity and wants to do the right thing.
Last year, in the 2016 annual report, we summarised the many
positive tailwinds currently being enjoyed by large housebuilders
in the UK and remarked how fortunate we were to own Barratt
Developments and Bellway, then valued at less than a ten times
multiple of earnings. We talked about the undersupply of housing in
the UK, ongoing low interest rates, reforms to the planning system
and a raft of helpful government incentives. Well, this year, those
tailwinds are all still blowing and those businesses are now valued
at roughly eight times earnings. Their share prices fell sharply in
the wake of the Brexit vote and haven't yet fully recovered. We
leapt at the opportunity to buy more shares at much lower prices,
adding to both holdings. The share price falls were probably driven
by a combination of fears about both house price falls and fears
that there could be a short-term drop in transaction volumes, both
of which were very plausible short-term scenarios although neither
of which we think makes much difference to the business's ultimate
value. Why? Because (and apologies to those who have heard this
from us before) falling house prices cause only a temporary decline
in accounting earnings; the real damage caused to the business is
far less than at first appears to be the case because falling house
prices are compensated for by much lower land costs, land being a
builder's single biggest cost. In other words, cheap land bought in
a downturn turbocharges profits in future years.
During 2016 parts of the London housing market, especially
new-build properties priced above GBP1 million, have seen a
substantial fall in transaction volumes and falls in selling prices
of around 10%. This was the case before the Brexit vote, and was
most likely caused by both the new punitive stamp duty levy - that
becomes disproportionately painful between GBP900k and GBP1m - and
also the recent tax increases on both "Buy to Let" and second
properties. It was this London slowdown (and the reasonable
probability of it continuing or getting worse), that caused us to
reduce the size of our holding in Barratt Developments. However, we
used the proceeds from that sale to buy more Bellway shares and
also to add a third housebuilding investment, Redrow. We continue
to think that Barratt is a very attractive investment at these
levels (we still retain a sizable shareholding, after all),
although Redrow and Bellway are more attractively priced and come
without exposure to the shaky part of the London market. For the
year in question (i.e. March '16 - December '16) Bellway's and
Redrow's shares are almost unchanged and Barratt has fallen over
16%. This is despite all three businesses reporting almost
unalloyed strong trading conditions (except prime London as
previously mentioned), increased sales and profits and the
prospects of considerable further progress over coming years. We
remain greatly enthused about our house-building investments, which
we think are substantially undervalued. Also, and very importantly,
we are not invested in any sector that is more "transparent" than
housebuilding, which helps to gives us a high degree of comfort
with the size of the investment we have made. "Transparent" is in
quotation marks because it has a very specific meaning in the
context in which it has been used here. Transparency means the
degree to which our own research can effectively monitor the
fundamentals in a business without us having to wait and read the
financial results. In this case we can and do visit building sites
nationwide, visit sales offices, speak to the numerous listed
competitors, land suppliers and land buyers. Also, by monitoring
internet activity we can track indicators of revenue in something
close to real time.
Our supermarket businesses, Tesco and Morrisons - whose share
prices rose 15% and 16% respectively during the period - both made
fundamental progress during the year. The recent history doesn't
bear repeating in any detail here. Suffice to say that, to varying
degrees, both firms lost sight of how to delight their customers
and then egregiously compounded the error by making some dubious
capital allocation decisions that they would later reverse (witness
Morrisons' half-hearted foray into convenience store retailing and
Tesco's attempt to build a business in the US). Also, as most UK
domestic food retailers were taking their eye off the ball, the
formidable German discounters, Aldi and Lidl, were taking market
share from everyone else. So, 2016, whilst not exactly the year
that Tesco and Morrison's began to fight back (the competitive
response to the Germans was earlier than that), it was the year
that we started to see meaningful results from their efforts. Like
all good retailers, Tesco and Morrisons now appear to be doing two
important things: firstly, they are listening to what their
customers want and then giving it to them, and secondly they are
copying their competitor's good ideas. Both companies acknowledge
that there is still some way to go, although they seem to be on the
right track. When we have gone into Tesco or Morrisons stores this
year, we think that both have improved compared to earlier visits,
although we are still observing failings in some areas. The
valuation of Tesco is, we think, further below our estimate of
intrinsic value than Morrison's, although, having had a year of
positive like-for-like sales in both, we remain enthusiastic about
the prospects for both investments.
Lloyds is an interesting case because we think that the business
fundamentals have been on the turn (i.e. improving) for some time
and yet the shares remain cheap. It is a good example of why it
pays not to stick ones neck out and talk about when and why a share
price might start to rise. Since 2010 the balance sheet has
improved considerably and the Group now has a class-leading capital
ratio, far fewer unwanted legacy or "run-off" assets and much less
reliance on wholesale funding than in the past. The management team
have been reducing the cost base (by closing underperforming
branches for example) and simplifying the operating model.
Meanwhile, the business continues to enjoy high market shares and
strong underlying profitability. For example, they have 25% of UK
current accounts, 23% of UK retail deposits and 22% of UK mortgage
balances. Importantly, our monitoring research continues to support
the relatively simple hypothesis that we use to explain why Lloyds
in particular (and UK banking in general) is such a strong
business: customers in the UK are very loyal to their bank, often
ignoring indifferent customer service and high product fees. It has
been this way for many years despite it being relatively easy for
customers to switch banks. Over the coming years Lloyds will be a
high dividend payer. Also, it will soon have returned to full
private ownership as the Government selling will soon have
concluded.
We think that Lloyds' shares (that fell 10% over the period) are
worth more than twice the current share price. We added to the
holding following the Brexit vote and believe that eventually, the
strong underlying business fundamentals will weigh on the valuation
of the business. Just don't ask us when!
JD Wetherspoon had a year of steady, modest progress against a
backdrop of increasing costs, most notably rising wages. They
continue to open new pubs (951 and counting) in areas where the
economics of doing so make sense, and to close pubs that are not
pulling their weight. The intention over the long term continues to
be to increase the proportion of freehold rather than leasehold
properties. Ten years ago this split was 42/58 in favour of
leasehold and today the mix is 51/49 in favour of freehold. One of
the consequences of this strategy has been for the debt level to
gradually rise. Founder of the business, Tim Martin thinks that a
higher freehold mix gives the business greater flexibility to add
value from property development such as building hotel rooms above
pubs in space that would otherwise be redundant. We continue to
rate the pub operating business very highly and our research
consistently reveals high standards of pub-keeping including clean
toilets and food that, once ordered, arrives promptly. The share
price increased 25% over the period and we watch with interest for
signs that sufficient returns are being generated on the capital
being deployed within the business.
A study of the history of the pharmaceutical industry, shows,
among other things, a perpetual cycle of drug discovery and then,
eventually, patent expiry; although the world's great pharma
businesses tend to endure, their most important products (almost)
never do. It is therefore fitting that Glaxo continues to reshape
itself, as a suite of new products replace those of the past.
During the year, the Group reported ongoing progress as a broader
portfolio of new drugs and vaccines replaced lost revenue from
"blockbusters" such as Advair. Also during the year, CEO Andrew
Witty announced his retirement. He is to be replaced by Emma
Walmsley, the current head of Glaxo's Consumer Healthcare business.
The shares continue to trade significantly below our estimation of
their intrinsic value.
In the 2016 Annual Report we said that Vesuvius was doing a good
job in a difficult market for steel and, in a nutshell, that
remains the case today. The vicissitudes of the steel market have
some bearing on the business, although not as much as may be first
assumed. Why should this be the case? Because unless you completely
decommission a steel foundry, even if steel volumes decline
substantially, the demand remains for the perishable steel
production components that Vesuvius produces. We think the business
is being well managed and using sensible self-help measures to cope
with current market conditions. There are also plenty of signs that
the underlying consumer demand for steel products (such as cars for
example) continues to be robust and there are indications that the
steel industry may have turned. Despite rising 39% over the period,
the shares are trading at a level considerably below our intrinsic
value and we had increased the position during the year.
Our day job could be characterised as a hunt for first class
businesses selling at reasonable prices (we never want to pay more
than half what we think a business is worth). Every so often we
come across a potential investment that is not necessarily an
excellent business, but whose shares are so cheap that we are
interested regardless. These are what Warren Buffett might call
"Cigar Butt" investments - we call them "value plays". These
morsels are opportunistic and comprise a very occasional and small
part of our portfolio. CPP is one such example. The business offers
"consumer assistance" products (lost credit card or wallet
insurance for example) and ran into serious regulatory issues when
they were found to have miss-sold policies to a number of
customers. This led to the business being fined by the FCA and
having to make redress payments to affected customers. Beyond that,
this is probably not the place for too much detail about the
Company's sad and sorry past. Suffice to say that these issues
predate the investment we made this year and that the business now
has a new management team and is mapping out a different future. We
paid six pence per share for our holding in November 2016 and at
the end of December they had risen to 14 pence. We are watching the
Company's ongoing progress with considerable interest.
Outlook
Following a recent news binge (Sunday papers, Andrew Neil, Al
Jazeera) I told my wife that if I heard the phrase "post-Brexit
uncertainty" one more time, I wanted to spend the remainder of 2017
under a blanket. That was until she pointed out that the urge to
enshroud myself may itself be a symptom of my own subconscious
post-Brexit uncertainty, upon which I went for a stroll to clear my
head.
Despite personal misgivings about the press blaming the Brexit
vote for everything, it does seem reasonable for investors to
acknowledge that it has been influencing some decisions and will
continue to do so, even if part of that influence is nothing more
than self-fulfilling prophecy. Clearly there is no way of knowing
what the terms of the UK's exit from the EU will involve and we
aren't going to play guessing games. It seems sensible to expect
some periods of uncertainty, general doom and gloom as well as some
genuine setbacks which, history suggests, are likely to feel
scarier and more significant at the time than is warranted by a
rational appraisal of the facts.
A foreseeable short-term factor that does merit a mention is the
likelihood (in some cases imminence) of currency related inflation.
For Tesco and Morrison's this is likely to be positive and reverse
a relatively persistent recent trend of food price deflation. All
other things being equal, a bit of inflation is probably a good
thing for these businesses. It isn't a good thing for
housebuilders, who will be seeing the price of some of their
materials, such as timber (sourced in Euros, paid in sterling),
increase substantially overnight. The impact will have been
cushioned until now by long term supply agreements but at some
point they will start paying higher prices. The good news is that
the affected materials are a relatively small part of the overall
cost base and that the rate of labour cost inflation (which, with
land, are the most significant costs) has been coming down. The
overall result is likely to be that build costs rise three to four
per-cent this year, which won't have a material impact on
profits.
One other note of caution regarding the house building sector: a
UK Government White Paper on housing has recently been published.
The paper has outlined a series of Government measures intended to
increase housebuilding. From the perspective of an investor in the
sector, the paper seems to contain both carrots and sticks. The
Paper is currently in the consultation phase and we will watch with
interest to see whether some of the measures become enshrined in
legislation. Our hope is that the "sticks" do not cause building
firms to develop fewer houses, rather than more. If the White Paper
ultimately does have some unintended consequences and leads to
lower levels of house building, we would expect the
counterproductive measures to be swiftly reversed.
Two notes to end on. Firstly, a historical context. For at least
the last 500 years (and arguably much longer than that) Britain has
managed to be one of the world's 10 largest economies even though
it has only enjoyed membership of the EU since 1973. History
suggests therefore, that Britain is, eventually, likely to make a
relatively decent fist of things outside of the EU. Secondly, for
19 years Phoenix have followed an investment philosophy that
results in us buying great business that we think will also be
great investments over the long-term despite what is happening in
the news at any one time. That remains the case today; we think we
have a portfolio of undervalued winners where investment success is
not dependent on a particular macro outcome, Brexit or
otherwise.
Tristan Chapple
Investment Manager
Phoenix Asset Management Partners
20 April 2017
INVESTMENT POLICY AND PERFORMANCE
This report deals with the results of Aurora Investment Trust
plc. The Company's former subsidiary AIT Trading Limited (AIT) has
been dissolved.
The Company adopted a revised Investment Policy on 28 January
2016, with the appointment of Phoenix Asset Management Partners
("Phoenix") as the Company's new Investment Manager.
INVESTMENT POLICY
The Company's objective is to provide shareholders with long
term returns through capital and income growth by investing in a
concentrated portfolio of UK listed equities.
The Company seeks to achieve its investment objective by
investing in a portfolio of UK listed equities. The portfolio will
be relatively concentrated. The exact number of individual holdings
will very over time but typically the portfolio will consist of 15
to 20 holdings. The Company may use derivatives and similar
instruments for the purpose of capital preservation. There are no
pre-defined maximum or minimum exposure levels for each individual
holding or sector, but these exposures re reported to, and
monitored by, the Board in order to ensure that adequate
diversification is achieved. The Company's policy is not to invest
more than 15% of its gross assets in any one investment.
While there is a comparable index for the purposes of measuring
performance over material periods, no attention is paid to the
composition of this index when constructing the portfolio and the
composition of the portfolio is likely to vary substantially from
that of the index. The Company may from time to time invest in
other UK listed investment companies, but the Company will not
invest more than 10% in aggregate of the total assets of the
Company in other listed closed-ended funds other than closed-ended
investment funds which themselves have published investment
policies to invest no more than 15 per cent of their total assets
in other listed closed-ended funds. The Company will not invest in
any other fund managed by the Company's investment manager.
The Company does not currently intend to use gearing. However,
if the Board did decide to utilise gearing the aggregate borrowings
of the Company would be restricted to 30 per cent of the aggregate
of the paid up nominal capital plus the capital and revenue
reserves.
Any material change to the investment policy of the Company will
only be made with the approval of the Shareholders.
DIVID POLICY
The revised investment policy does not include any fixed
dividend policy. However, the Board will distribute substantially
all of the net revenue arising from the investment portfolio.
Accordingly, the Company is expected to continue to pay an annual
dividend, but this could be lower than the level of recent
dividends and may vary each year.
OBJECTIVES AND KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (KPIs)
The Company's principal investment objective is to achieve
capital growth. The Company's success in attaining its objectives
is measured by reference to KPIs as follows:
a) To make an absolute total return for shareholders on a long-term basis.
b) The Company's Benchmark is the FTSE All-Share Index (total
return), against which the Net Asset Value (NAV) return is
compared. After achieving the goal of making absolute returns for
shareholders, the next aim is to provide a better return from the
portfolio than from the market as measured by the Benchmark.
c) The Company seeks to ensure that the operating expenses of
running the Company as a proportion of NAV (the Ongoing Charges
Ratio) are reasonable.
PERFORMANCE
With effect from 28 January 2016, the Investment Manager has
been Phoenix Asset Management Partners Limited, which is regulated
by the FCA. The Chief Investment Officer of Phoenix is Gary
Channon. Phoenix reports in detail upon the Company's activities in
the IMR.
Under the Investment Management Agreement no regular management
fees are payable. A performance fee is payable to the Investment
Manager only if the benchmark is beaten.
Upon the change of Investment Manager, the benchmark became the
FTSE All-Share Index Total Return. The Company's financial year end
was brought forward from 28 February to 31 December.
Performance during the current period of ten months and during
the period in January to February 2016 when the Phoenix was
Investment Manager, was as follows:
Period 1 March Period 28 January
2016 to to
31 December 2016 29 February 2016
Net Asset
Value per
share +6.38% +4.50
Benchmark
(total return) +19.5% +2.32
The Ongoing Charges ratio was as follows:
Period to 31 Year to 29 February
December 2016 2016
Ongoing Charges
Ratio (annualised) 1.04% 2.48%
The ratio is calculated excluding finance costs but including
operating expenses charged to capital and applied to the average
NAV of the period/year. Expenses of a type not expected to recur
under normal circumstances are excluded from the calculation.
REVENUE RESULT AND DIVID
The Company's revenue profit after tax for the period amounted
to GBP636,037 (Year to 29 February 2016: GBP203,622).
On 2 March 2017 the directors declared an interim dividend of
2.00p per share, absorbing GBP614,526. The directors do not propose
a final dividend. The interim dividend was paid on 10 April 2017 to
shareholders on the register at 10 March 2017; the ordinary shares
were marked ex-dividend on 9 March 2017. In accordance with
International Financial Reporting Standards this dividend is not
reflected in the financial statements for the period ended 31
December 2016.
In 2016 a final dividend of 1.00p per ordinary share was paid,
absorbing GBP187,479.
RISK ANALYSIS
The Board considers that the principal risks faced by the
shareholders of the Company fall into two categories:
External Risks
Poor performance in the UK and/or world economies; poor
corporate profits and dividends.
Poor stock market performance caused by market-specific factors,
such as rising interest rates, the unwinding of "bubbles" or
disinvestment by institutions, superimposed on general economic
factors, or caused by shocks, wars, disease etc. The Board does not
consider, however, that short-term volatility represents a risk for
the long-term shareholder, since it regards long-term performance
to be of primary importance.
Internal Risks
Poor asset management, which may include poor stock selection,
excessive concentration of the portfolio, mistakes regarding
currency movements, speculation in shares of companies without
sound or established businesses and speculation in derivatives.
Poor governance, compliance or administration, including
particularly the risk of loss of investment trust status.
All these and other risks can result in shareholders not making
acceptable returns from their investment in the Company.
RISK CONTROLS
External risks
As described in the Investment Policy section above, external
risks are mitigated by diversification of the portfolio and by not
utilising gearing.
Risk diversification
An element of risk is inherent in investment undertaken on a
selective basis. The Company seeks to mitigate the degree of risk
by investing in securities in substantial organisations, normally
listed and traded on the London Stock Exchange, and by spreading
its investments across a range of such securities. At 31 December
2016 the Company held 19 stocks, spread across 8 main sectors.
Gearing
The Company has discontinued the use of gearing as an element of
its investment policy. Under the articles, borrowings are permitted
up to a maximum of 30% of NAV. The Company's agreement with BNP
also permits borrowing of up to 30% of NAV, but there is currently
no intention to make use of this allowance.
The Board will keep under review whether any provision should be
made for the use of short-term borrowing for the sole purpose of
meeting working capital requirements from time to time.
Further details concerning currency risks, liquidity risks and
interest rate risks are given in note 19.
Internal risks
The control of risks related to governance, compliance and
administration is dealt with in the report on Corporate
Governance.
VIABILITY STATEMENT
The Company is subject to continuation votes every three years.
As a consequence of the appointment of the new Investment Manager
the Directors proposed the replacement of the pre-existing
continuation vote schedule by a new three-year schedule, with the
next vote falling due in 2019. This was approved by the AGM held in
July 2016.
The Directors consider that a three-year time frame, being the
period up to the proposed date of the next continuation vote, is an
appropriate period over which to assess the Company's
viability.
After making inquiries, the Directors have a reasonable
expectation that the Company has adequate resources to continue in
operational existence and meet its liabilities as they fall due for
at least three years from the date of approval of this
document.
In reaching this conclusion, the directors have considered each
of the principal risks and uncertainties set out above. They have
considered the liquidity and solvency of the Company, the level of
discount at which its shares trade, its income and expenditure
profile including the absence of monthly management fees and the
discontinuation of the use of gearing as an instrument of normal
investment policy. The Company's investments comprise readily
realisable securities which could, if necessary, be sold to meet
the Company's funding requirements. The Company's plan to expand by
the issue of new share capital and the sale of shares from treasury
is kept under close, ongoing review by the Board. Portfolio changes
and market developments are also discussed at quarterly Board
meetings. The internal control framework of the Company is subject
to formal review on at least an annual basis.
The directors do not expect there to be any material increase in
the annual ongoing charges of the Company over the period of their
assessment. The Company's income from investments and cash
realisable from the sale of investments provide substantial cover
to the Company's operating expenses and any other costs likely to
be faced by the Company during the period under review.
SOCIAL, ETHICAL, HUMAN RIGHTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
Being an investment company, with no staff, premises,
manufacturing or other operations of its own, the Company does not
have any direct influence on social, ethical, human rights and
environmental matters. The Company has no greenhouse gas emissions
to report from its operations, nor any responsibility for emission
producing sources.
BOARDROOM DIVERSITY
The Company has no employees other than the Directors. At 31
December 2016 the Company had five directors, all of whom were
male. The Company's policy is that the Board should have a broad
range of skills; while keeping this in mind, consideration is given
to the recommendations of the AIC Code and other guidance on
boardroom diversity.
FIVE YEAR SUMMARY
The following data are all expressed as pence per share. NAV
figures are all calculated at bid prices.
Year NAV Dividend Share price
in respect (mid market)
of year
p p p
Year ended 28
February 2013 186.13 3.75 152.75
Year ended 28
February 2014 191.78 3.80 166.00
Year ended 28
February 2015 171.37 3.85 147.50
Year ended 29
February 2016 162.30 1.00 158.00
Period to 31
December 2016 172.66 2.00 173.50
OUTLOOK
The outlook for Aurora is discussed in the Chairman's Statement
and the Manager's Review and Outlook.
TOP HOLDINGS
AT 31 DECEMBER 2016
Date Weight By valuation Avg. Share Market Net
of first Cost Price Cap Cash/
purchase per (Debt)
share*
% GBP GBP GBP GBP GBP
Bellway Dec-15 14.7 7,585,970 23.15 24.76 3.0bn 26.5m
Tesco Dec-15 12.7 6,543,359 1.77 2.07 16.8bn (4.4bn)
Lloyds Banking
Group Dec-15 11.3 5,793,770 0.64 0.63 44.6bn (12.2bn)
Sports Direct Dec-15 8.1 4,166,880 3.38 2.79 1.6bn (72m)
Barratt
Developments Dec-15 7.3 3,752,284 5.57 4.62 4.7bn 592m
Morrison
Supermarkets Dec-15 6.5 3,334,413 1.91 2.31 5.4bn (1.3bn)
Vesuvius Dec-15 5.3 2,704,777 3.34 3.95 1.1bn (310m)
Glaxosmithkline Dec-15 5.0 2,571,704 14.82 15.62 76.6bn (14.9bn)
JD Weatherspoon Jan-16 4.4 2,274,399 7.13 8.88 987m (651m)
Redrow Oct-16 4.0 2,071,753 4.02 4.29 1.6bn (139m)
CPP Group Oct-16 3.6 1,862,000 0.06 0.15 124m 4m
Other (<3%) 14.4
------
Total 97.3
------
Cash 2.7
------
Overall
Total 100.0
------
*Net cost including sales
PORTFOLIO ANALYSIS
AT 31 DECEMBER 2016
Percentage
of Portfolio
Retail 30.4
Construction 26.1
Financial 14.9
Leisure 9.5
Industrials 5.3
Pharmaceuticals 5.0
Food & Beverage 4.8
Insurance 1.3
Cash 2.7
100.0
--------------
ANALYSIS BY TYPE, MARKET AND CURRENCY
All investments are of Ordinary Shares, denominated in sterling.
All holdings carried at a value are in listed companies with the
exception of Randall & Quilter, which is quoted on AIM. The
Company also has registered holdings in China Chaintek, but this
has been written down to a valuation of GBPNil.
This Strategic Report was approved by the Board on 20 April
2017.
For and on behalf of the Board
Lord Flight
Chairman
20 April 2017
GOVERNANCE
STATEMENT OF DIRECTORS' RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THE ANNUAL
REPORT
The directors are responsible for preparing the Strategic
Report, the Directors' Report, the Remuneration Reports and the
financial statements in accordance with applicable law and
regulations.
Company law in the United Kingdom requires the directors to
prepare financial statements for each financial year. Under that
law the directors have elected to prepare the Company financial
statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting
Standards (IFRSs) as adopted by the European Union. Under company
law the directors must not approve the accounts unless they are
satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the state of
affairs and profit or loss of the Company for that period. In
preparing these financial statements, the directors are required
to:
-- select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently;
-- make judgements and accounting estimates which are reasonable and prudent;
-- state whether applicable IFRSs have been followed, subject to
any material departures disclosed and explained in the financial
statements;
-- prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis,
unless it is inappropriate to presume that the Company will
continue in business.
The directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting
records that are sufficient to show and explain the Company's
transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the
financial position of the Company and enable them to ensure that
the financial statements and the Remuneration Report comply with
the Companies Act 2006. They are also responsible for safeguarding
the assets of the Company and hence for taking reasonable steps for
the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.
The directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity
of the corporate and financial information included on the website
used by the Company.
Legislation in the United Kingdom governing the preparation and
dissemination of financial statements may differ from legislation
in other jurisdictions.
Statement under the Disclosure and Transparency Rules 4.1.12
The directors confirm that to the best of their knowledge and
belief;
(a) The financial statements, prepared in accordance with
International Financial Reporting Standards, give a true and fair
view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or
loss of the issuer; and
(b) this annual report includes a fair review of the development
and performance of the business and the position of the Company,
together with a description of the principal risks and
uncertainties that it faces
Having taken advice from the Audit Committee, the Directors
consider that the annual report and financial statements taken as a
whole are fair, balanced and understandable and provide the
information necessary for shareholders to assess the Company's
position and performance, business model and strategy.
For and on behalf of the Board
Lord Flight
Chairman
20 April 2017
FINANCIALS
STATEMENT OF
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FOR THE PERIODED 31 DECEMBER 2016
Period ended Year ended 29
31 December 2016 February 2016
Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total
Note GBP'000 GBP'000 GBP'000 GBP'000 GBP'000 GBP'000
Profits/(losses)
on investments
designated at
fair value through
profit or loss - 2,144 2,144 - ( 826) (826)
---------- ---------- -------- ---------- ---------- --------
2 Investment income 944 - 944 671 - 671
Total income 944 2,144 3,088 671 (826) (155)
Investment management
3 fees - 125 125 (66) (191) (257)
3 Other expenses (308) - (308) (341) - (341)
Profit/(loss)
before finance
costs and tax 636 2,269 2,905 264 (1,017) (753)
6 Finance costs - - - (57) (57) (114)
Provision for
gains/(losses)
on investment
in subsidiary - - - - 380 380
---------- ---------- -------- ---------- ---------- --------
Profit/(loss)
before tax 636 2,269 2,905 207 (694) (487)
7 Tax - - (3) - (3)
---------- ---------- -------- ---------- ---------- --------
Profit/(loss)
and total comprehensive
income for the
period 636 2,269 2,905 204 (694) (490)
9 Earnings per share 3.00p 10.72p 13.72p 1.95p (6.66p) (4.71p)
The revenue and capital columns, including the revenue and
capital earnings per share data, are supplementary information
prepared under guidance published by the AIC.
All revenue and capital items in the above statement derive from
continuing operations. No operations were acquired or discontinued
during the period. All revenue is attributable to the equity
holders of the Company.
The comparative period is not directly comparable to the period
ended 31 December 2016, being of twelve months as compared to ten
months.
The Board has declared an interim dividend of 2.00p per share
(see note 8)
BALANCE SHEET
AT 31 DECEMBER 2016
31 December 29 February
2016 2016
Notes GBP'000 GBP'000
NON-CURRENT ASSETS
Investments designated
at fair value through
10 profit or loss 49,849 14,445
49,849 14,445
------------- ------------
CURRENT ASSETS
Other receivables 251 51
Cash and cash equivalents 1,403 4,145
------------- ------------
1,654 4,196
------------- ------------
TOTAL ASSETS 51,503 18,641
------------- ------------
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Other payables 65 201
65 201
------------- ------------
TOTAL ASSETS LESS CURRENT
LIABILITIES 51,438 18,440
------------- ------------
EQUITY
12 Called up share capital 7,448 3,598
Capital redemption reserve 179 179
Share premium account 32,557 10,997
14 Investment holding gains/(losses) 2,111 (4,371)
14 Other capital reserves 8,208 7.551
Revenue reserve 935 486
TOTAL EQUITY 51,438 18,440
------------- ------------
Net assets per ordinary
15 share 172.66p 162.30p
Approved by the Board of Directors on 20 April 2017 and signed
on their behalf by:
Lord Flight
Richard Martin
Company no. 03300814
In the balance sheet as at 29 February 2016 an amount of
GBP1,513,000 arising from the sale of treasury shares has been
reclassified from share premium account to other capital
reserves
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
FOR THE PERIODED 31 DECEMBER 2016
Period to 31 December
2016 Notes
Share Capital Share Investment Other Revenue Total
capital redemption premium holding capital reserve
reserve account losses reserves
GBP,000 GBP'000 GBP,000 GBP,000 GBP,000 GBP,000 GBP,000
Opening
equity 3,598 179 10,997 (4,371) 7,551 486 18,440
Total comprehensive
income/(loss)
for the
year - - - 6,482 (4,213) 636 2,905
Sale of
shares from
treasury - - - - 4,870 - 4,870
Issue of
new shares 3,850 - 21,861 - - - 25,711
Share issue
costs - - (301) - - - (301)
Dividends
paid 8 - - - - - (187) (187)
Closing
equity 7,448 179 32,557 2,111 8,208 935 51,438
--------- ------------ --------- ----------- ---------- --------- --------
Year to 29 February
2016 Notes
Share Capital Share Investment Other Revenue Total
capital redemption premium holding capital reserve
reserve account losses reserves
GBP,000 GBP'000 GBP,000 GBP,000 GBP,000 GBP,000 GBP,000
Opening
equity 3,598 179 10,997 (8,505) 10,866 682 17,817
Total
comprehensive
income/(loss)
for the
year - - - 2,363 (3,057) 204 (490)
Provision
for losses
on investment
in subsidiary 11 - - - 1,771 (1,771) - -
Sale of
shares from
treasury - - - - 1,513 - 1,513
Dividends
paid 8 - - - - - ( 400) ( 400)
Closing
equity 3,598 179 10,997 (4,371) 7,551 486 18,440
--------- ------------ --------- ----------- ---------- --------- --------
In the statement of changes in equity for the year ended 29
February 2016 an amount of GBP1,513,000 arising from the sale of
treasury shares has been reclassified from share premium account to
other capital reserves
CASH FLOW STATEMENT
FOR THE PERIODED 31 DECEMBER 2016
Period Year
to 31 to 29
December February
2016 2016
GBP'000 GBP'000
NET CASH (OUTFLOW)/INFLOW
FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Cash inflow from investment
income and interest 747 660
Cash outflow from management
expenses (322) (400)
Payments to acquire non-current
asset investments (36,198) (14,162)
Receipts on disposal of
non-current asset investments 2,938 20,133
Foreign exchange difference
received - 1
Tax paid - (3)
NET CASH (OUTFLOW)/INFLOW
FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES (32,835) 6,229
---------- ----------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING
ACTIVITIES
---------- ----------
Decrease/(increase) in
loans advanced to subsidiary - 771
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING
ACTIVITIES
Issues of new shares 25,410 -
Sale of treasury shares 4,870 1,513
Dividends paid (187) (400)
Decrease in bank borrowings - (4,000)
Finance charges and interest
paid - (113)
NET CASH FLOW FROM FINANCING
ACTIVITIES 30,093 (3,000)
---------- ----------
(DECREASE)/INCREASE IN
CASH (2,742) 4,000
---------- ----------
Cash and cash equivalents
at beginning of year 4,145 145
(Decrease)/increase in
cash (2,742) 4,000
Cash and cash equivalents
at end of year 1,403 4,145
---------- ----------
The comparative period is not directly comparable to the period
ended 31 December 2016, being of twelve months as compared to ten
months.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Accounting
The financial statements of the Company have been prepared in
accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS),
which comprise standards and interpretations approved by the IASB
and International Accounting Standards and Standing Interpretations
Committee interpretations approved by the IASC that remain in
effect, and to the extent that they have been adopted by the
European Union.
Under IFRS, the AIC Statement of Recommended Practice "Financial
Statements of Investment Trust Companies and Venture Capital
Trusts" issued in November 2014 has no formal status, but the
Company adheres to the guidance of the SORP.
The accounting policies are unchanged from those used in the
last annual financial statements except where otherwise stated. The
particular accounting policies adopted are described below:
(a) Accounting Convention
The accounts are prepared under the historical cost basis,
except for the measurement of fair value of investments.
(b) Subsidiary
The accounts are of the Company and do not consolidate its
former subsidiary AIT Trading Limited ("AIT"). AIT became inactive
during the year ended 29 February 2016 and has now been dissolved.
There were no assets as at 29 February 2017.
(c) Investments
As the Company's business is investing in financial assets with
a view to profiting from their total return in the form of
increases in fair value, investments are designated as fair value
through profit or loss on initial recognition in accordance with
IAS 39. At this time, fair value is the consideration given,
excluding material transaction or other dealing costs associated
with the investment.
After initial recognition such investments are valued at fair
value. For quoted investments this is established by reference to
bid, or last, market prices depending on the convention of the
exchange on which the investment is quoted. Gains or losses are
recognised in the capital column of the Statement of Comprehensive
Income. All purchases and sales of investments are accounted for on
a trade date basis.
(d) Income from Investments
Investment income from ordinary shares is accounted for on the
basis of ex-dividend dates. Income from fixed interest shares and
securities is accounted for on an accruals basis using the
effective interest method. Special Dividends are assessed on their
individual merits and are credited to the capital column of the
Statement of Comprehensive Income if the substance of the payment
is a return of capital; with this exception all investment income
is taken to the revenue column of the Statement of Comprehensive
Income. Income from gilts and bank interest receivable is accounted
for on an accruals basis using the effective yield.
(e) Capital Reserves
The Company is not precluded by its Articles from making any
distribution of capital profits by way of dividend, but the
Directors have no current plans to do so. Profits and losses on
disposals of investments are taken to the other capital (gains on
disposal) reserve. Revaluation movements are taken to the
investment holding reserve via the capital column of the Statement
of Comprehensive Income.
(f) Investment Management Fees, Finance Costs and Other Costs
Performance-related fees are charged to other capital reserves
(gains on disposal) via the capital column of the Statement of
Comprehensive Income. Other costs are normally charged to revenue,
unless there is a compelling reason to charge to capital. Tax
relief in respect of costs allocated to capital is credited to
capital via the capital column of the Statement of Comprehensive
Income on the marginal basis.
(g) Taxation
Current income tax assets and/or liabilities comprise those
obligations to, or claims from, fiscal authorities relating to the
current or prior reporting period, that are unpaid at the balance
sheet date.
Deferred income taxes are calculated using the liability method
on temporary differences. Deferred tax is generally provided on the
difference between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities
and their tax bases. In addition, tax losses available to be
carried forward as well as other income tax credits are assessed
for recognition as deferred tax assets.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are calculated, without
discounting, at tax rates that are expected to apply at their
respective period of realisation, provided they are enacted or
substantively enacted at the balance sheet date. Deferred tax
liabilities are always provided for in full. Deferred tax assets
are recognised to the extent that it is probable that they will be
able to be offset against future taxable income.
Changes in deferred tax assets or liabilities are recognised as
a component of tax expense in the income statement, except where
they relate to items that are charged or credited directly to
equity.
(h) Foreign currency
The currency of the primary economic environment in which the
Company operates (the functional currency) is pounds sterling
("Sterling"), which is also the presentational currency of the
Company. Transactions involving currencies other than Sterling are
recorded at the exchange rate ruling on the transaction date. At
each balance sheet date, monetary items and non-monetary assets and
liabilities, which are fair valued and which are denominated in
foreign currencies, are retranslated at the closing rates of
exchange. Such exchange differences are included in the Statement
of Comprehensive Income and allocated to capital if of a capital
nature or to revenue if of a revenue nature. Exchange differences
allocated to capital are taken to gains on disposal or investment
holding losses, as appropriate.
(i) Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and Cash Equivalents in the Cash Flow Statement comprise
cash held at bank.
(j) Dividends payable to equity shareholders
Dividends payable to equity shareholders are recognised in the
Statement of Changes in Equity when they are paid, or have been
approved by shareholders in the case of a final dividend.
(k) Judgements and estimations
The directors have reviewed matters requiring estimation and/or
judgement. The preparation of the financial statements requires
management to make judgements, estimations and assumptions that
affect the amounts reported for assets and liabilities as at the
balance sheet date and the amounts reported for revenue and
expenses during the year. However, the nature of the estimation
means that actual outcomes could differ from those estimates. There
are no judgments or estimates that have had a significant effect on
amounts recognised in the financial statements.
2. INCOME Period Year
to 31 December to 29
February
2016 2016
Income from investments: GBP'000 GBP'000
Franked dividends from
listed or quoted investments 795 368
Unfranked income from
overseas dividends 149 209
Income from listed fixed
interest securities - 55
Interest income from
subsidiary company - 39
---------------- ----------
944 671
---------------- ----------
Other income:
Bank interest receivable - -
944 671
---------------- ----------
3. INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT 2016 2015
FEES AND OTHER
EXPENSES
Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total
GBP'000 GBP'000 GBP'000 GBP'000 GBP'000 GBP'000
Investment management
fees
- monthly -performance - - - 66 66 132
- - - - 125 125
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
- - - 66 191 257
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Administration
fees 79 - 79 76 - 76
Depository/custodian
fees 60 - 60
Registrar's fees 22 - 22 20 - 20
Directors' fees 71 - 71 83 - 83
Auditors' fees
- audit of the
Company and of 29 - 29 33 - 33
the consolidated
financial statements
- audit of the
subsidiary - - - 2 - 2
* audit-related assurance services - - - 9 - 9
Write off of
investment income
from subsidiary
company - - - 39 - 39
Miscellaneous
expenses 47 - 47 79 - 79
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total other expenses 308 - 308 341 - 341
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
All expenses include any relevant irrecoverable VAT. The amounts
excluding VAT paid or accrued for the audit of the Company are
GBP24,500 (2015: GBP27,000). The Company formerly paid for the
audit of the subsidiary, for which GBP2,000 was accrued in the
Company's accounts at 29 February 2016.
4. DIRECTORS' FEES
The fees paid or accrued were GBP67,708 (year to 29
February2016: GBP75,241). There were no other emoluments. The gross
figures shown for directors' fees in note 3 above include
employers' National Insurance charges or VAT, as appropriate. Full
details of the fees of each director are given in the Directors'
Remuneration Report.
5. TRANSACTION CHARGES
Period Year to
to 31 29
December February
G 2016 2016
GBP'000 GBP'000
Transaction costs on purchases
of investments 196 96
Transaction costs on sales
of investments 4 46
--------- ---------
Total transaction costs
included in gains or losses
on investments at fair
value through profit or
loss 200 142
--------- ---------
6. FINANCE COSTS
Period to 31 December Year to 29 February
2016 2016
Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total
GBP'000 GBP'000 GBP'000 GBP'000 GBP'000 GBP'000
Interest payable - - - 30 30 60
Facility and
arrangement
fees and other
charges - - - 27 27 54
--------- --------- ---------- -------- -------- --------
- - - 57 57 114
--------- --------- ---------- -------- -------- --------
7. TAXATION
Period to 31 December Year to 29 February
2016 2016
Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total
GBP'000 GBP'000 GBP'000 GBP'000 GBP'000 GBP'000
Corporation - - - - - -
tax
Overseas tax - - - 3 - 3
--------- --------- ---------- -------- -------- --------
Tax charge
in respect
of the current
year - - - 3 - 3
--------- --------- ---------- -------- -------- --------
Current taxation
The taxation charge for the year is different from the standard
rate of corporation tax in the
UK (20%). The differences are explained below:
Period to 31 Year to 29
December February
2016 2016
GBP'000 GBP'000
Total profit/(loss) before tax 2,905 (487)
Theoretical tax at UK corporation
tax rate of 20.00% (20.09%) 581 (98)
Effects of:
Capital profits/(losses) that
are not taxable (479) 140
UK dividends which are not taxable (159) (74)
Overseas dividends that are
not taxable (30) (42)
Increase in excess tax losses 62 124
Expenses charged to capital
account for which a deduction
is claimed 25 (50)
Overseas tax written off/(recovered) - 3
-------- --------
Actual current tax - 3
-------- --------
The Company is an investment trust and therefore is not charged
to tax on capital gains.
Factors that may affect future tax charges
The Company has tax losses of GBP8,805,985 (GBP8,623,228) in
respect of management expenses and of GBP1,490,706 (GBP1,490,706)
in respect of loan interest. These amounts are available to offset
future taxable revenue. A deferred tax asset has not been
recognised in respect of those expenses and will be recoverable
only to the extent that the Company has sufficient future taxable
revenue.
8. ORDINARY DIVIDS
Period
to Year to
31 December 29 February
2016 2016
GBP'000 GBP'000
Dividends reflected
in the financial statements:
Final dividend paid for the
year 2016 at 1.00p per share
(2015: 3.85p) 187 400
----------- -----------
Dividends not reflected in
the financial statements:
Final dividend for the year
2016 of 1.00p per share - 187
Interim dividend for the
year 2017 at 2.00p per share 615 -
----------- -----------
The Company will file Interim Accounts at Companies House prior
to making payment of the interim dividend.
9. EARNINGS PER SHARE
Earnings per share are based on the profit of GBP2,905,495 (loss
GBP490,295) attributable to the weighted average of 21,166,160
(10,411,919) ordinary shares of 25p in issue during the year,
excluding shares held in Treasury.
Supplementary information is provided as follows: revenue
earnings per share are based on the revenue profit of GBP636,037
(profit GBP203,622); capital earnings per share are based on the
net capital profit of GBP2,269,458 (loss GBP693,917), attributable
to 21,166,160 (10,411,919) ordinary voting shares of 25p.
10. INVESTMENTS DESIGNATED AT FAIR VALUE THROUGH PROFIT OR LOSS
31 December 29 February
2016 2016
GBP'000 GBP'000
UK listed securities 49,849 14,445
Total non-current investments
designated at fair value through
profit or loss 49,849 14,445
------------ ------------
Movements during the year:
Opening balance of investments,
at cost 18,816 29,942
Additions, at cost 36,198 14,160
Disposals - proceeds received
or receivable (2,938) (20,124)
- add realised losses/ less
realised profits (4,338) (3,196)
------------ ------------
- at cost (7,276) (23,320)
Investment in subsidiary - (1,966)
------------ ------------
Cost of investments designated
at fair value through profit
or loss at 31 December/29
February 47,738 18,816
------------ ------------
Revaluation of investments
to market value:
Opening balance (4,371) (8,505)
Increase/(decrease) in unrealised
appreciation debited to investment
holding reserve 6,482 2,363
Provision for write-off of
investment in subsidiary - 1,771
Balance at 29 February 2,111 (4,371)
------------ ------------
Market value of non-current
investments designated at
fair value through profit
or loss at 29 February 49,849 14,445
------------ ------------
11. SUBSIDIARY
The Company formerly had an investment in AIT Trading Limited
(AIT), which was a wholly owned subsidiary registered in England
and Wales. The investment comprised two ordinary shares of GBP1
each. AIT undertook purchases of investments for re-sale in the
shorter term, with the objective of achieving a trading profit.
AIT ceased trading during the year ended 29 February 2016. The
Company wrote off its investment in AIT and AIT has now been
dissolved. The inclusion of AIT in the Company's accounts would not
be material for the purpose of giving a true and fair view.
The profit before tax of AIT for the year ended 29 February 2016
was GBP341,213. The net deficit of AIT written off during the year
ended 29 February 2016 was GBP1,430,702 and at 29 February 2016 the
net assets of AIT were Nil. No dividend was paid from AIT to the
Company.
Year ended
29 February
2016
Loan to AIT 1,196
Loan written off (1,196)
--------------
Net Investment in subsidiary -
Other receivables:
Loan interest 235
Interest written off (235)
--------------
Other receivables -
Provision for gains/(losses)
on investment in subsidiary:
Provision brought forward (1,772)
Movement in provision -
capital 380
- revenue (39)
--------------
Provision written off (1,431)
--------------
12. SHARE CAPITAL
At 31 At 29
December February
2016 2016
Allotted, called
up and fully paid
Ordinary shares
of 25p Number 29,792,305 14,391,389
GBP'000 7,448 3,598
------------------------------ ----------- -----------
The Company did not purchase any of its own shares during the
period ended 31 December 2016 or the year ended 29 February 2016.
No shares were cancelled during either year.
During the period ended 31 December 2016 3,029,520 shares were
sold from Treasury for a gross amount of GBP4,882,617 (year ended
29 February 2016 964,810 sold from Treasury). No shares were held
in Treasury at 31 December 2016 (29 February 2016 3,029,520 held in
Treasury).
The Company issued a prospectus dated 22 March 2016. This
provided for a Placing on 29 March 2016 and an ongoing Placing
Programme, under which up to 55 million further shares could be
issued from time to time during the period from 30 March 2016 to 21
March 2017. The price at which shares may be issued under this
Programme is the NAV per share at the time of issue plus a premium
to cover the expenses of the issue as determined by the Board at
the time of each issue.
In the Placing dated 29 March 2016 the Company raised a gross
amount of GBP8,098,079 for the issue of 4,858,750 new shares. Two
further Placings were carried out during the period ended
31December 2016: on 1 September 2016 5,965,750 new shares were
issued for a gross amount of GBP9,774,881 and on 22 December a
gross amount of GBP7,217,269 was raised for 4,200,727 new
shares.
The Company also put in place a block listing facility for up to
3,850,028 new shares, to meet market demand arising from time to
time. Under this facility a total of 375,689 new shares were issued
in the period ended 31 December 2016, for a gross consideration of
GBP620,560.
At 31 December 2016, the Company had 29,792,305 (29 February2016
14,391,389) shares in issue. The number of voting shares at 31
December was 29,792,305 (29 February 2016 11,361,869).
13. TOTAL EQUITY
Total Equity includes, in addition to Share Capital, the
following reserves:
Capital Redemption Reserve. When any shares are redeemed or
cancelled, a transfer of realised profit must be made to this
reserve in order to maintain the level of capital that is not
distributable.
Share Premium Account. When shares are issued at a premium to
their nominal value, the "capital profit" arising on their
allotment must be held in a Share Premium Account, which is not
distributable in the ordinary course and may be utilised only in
certain limited circumstances.
Capital profits arising from the Company's investment
transactions are held as Capital Reserves, subdivided between Gains
on Disposal for profits arising upon sales of investments and
Investment Holding gains/losses for portfolio revaluations. The
movements on this account are analysed in note 14 below.
The Company's Revenue Reserves are the net profits that have
arisen from the Company's revenue income in the form of dividends
and interest, less operating expenses and dividends paid out to the
Company's shareholders.
14. CAPITAL RESERVES
31 December 29 February
2016 2016
GBP'000 GBP'000
Investment holding gains/(losses)
Opening balance (4,371) (8,505)
Revaluation of investments
- listed 6,482 2,362
Exchange differences - 1
Provision for impairment
of holding in subsidiary - 1,771
Balance of investment
holding gains/(losses)
account at 31 December
(29 February) 2,111 (4,371)
------------ ------------
Other capital reserves
Opening balance 7,551 10,866
Net gains and losses
on realisation of investments (4,370) (3,189)
Capital distributions 32 -
received
Provision for gains
and losses on subsidiary - 380
Expenses of capital
management: management
fees 125 (191)
finance costs - (57)
------------ ------------
Total of realised gains
and losses reflected
in the Statement of
Comprehensive Income (4,213) (3,057)
------------ ------------
Write-off of holding
in subsidiary - (1,771)
Sale of treasury shares 4,870 1,513
------------ ------------
Total gains and losses
of other capital reserves 657 (3,315)
Balance of other capital
reserves at 29 February 8,208 7,551
------------ ------------
Total capital reserve
at 29 February 10,319 3,180
------------ ------------
15. NET ASSETS PER ORDINARY SHARE
The figure for net assets per ordinary share is based on
GBP51,438,261 (29 February 2016: GBP18,440,457) divided by
29,792,305 (29 February 2016: 11,361,869) voting ordinary shares in
issue at 31 December 2016.
16. RECONCILIATION OF PROFT BEFORE FINANCE COSTS AND TAX TO
NET INFLOW FROM OPERATING ACTIVITES
Period to Year to
31 December 29 February
2016 2016
GBP'000 GBP'000
Profit/(loss) before
finance costs and
tax 2,905 (753)
(Increase)/decrease
in non-current investments (35,404) 6,798
Decrease/(increase)
in other receivables (200) 60
(Decrease)/increase
in other payables (136) 127
Taxation (paid)/recovered - (3)
Net cash inflow from
operating activities (32,835) 6,229
------------ ------------
17. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Details of transactions with AIT Trading Limited are set out in
note 11.
Details of the management, administration and secretarial
contracts can be found in the Directors' Report. Mr Chapple is a
director of the company and an employee of Phoenix. Fees payable to
Phoenix and, prior to 28 January 2016, to Mars are shown in note
3.
Other payables include accruals of administration fees of
GBP8,056 (At 29 February 2016 GBP15,842 for two months).
No provision has been made for a performance fee at 31 December
2016 (At 29 February GBP124,821). Any performance fee would be
payable in shares after the end of the performance fee period, but
the amount that would have be payable is provided in the accounts
as an equivalent value of money. All figures include any
appropriate VAT.
18. FINANCIAL ASSETS/LIABILITIES
Investments are carried in the balance sheet at fair value. For
other financial assets and financial liabilities, the balance sheet
value is considered to be a reasonable approximation of fair
value.
Financial assets
The Company's financial assets may include equity investments,
fixed interest securities, short-term receivables and cash
balances. The currency and cash-flow profile of those financial
assets was:
31 December 29 February
2016 2016
Interest Non- Total Interest Non- interest Total
bearing interest bearing bearing
bearing
GBP'000 GBP'000 GBP'000 GBP'000 GBP'000 GBP'000
Non-current
investments
at fair value
through profit
or loss:
GBP sterling
equities - 49,849 49,849 - 14,445 14,445
- 49,849 49,849 - 14,445 14,445
---------------------------- ---------- -------- --------- -------------- --------
Cash at bank:
Floating rate
- GBP sterling - 1,403 1,403 - 4,145 4,145
- 1,403 1,403 - 4,145 4,145
---------------------------- ---------- -------- --------- -------------- --------
Cash at bank includes GBP1,393,316 (29 February 2016:
GBP4,090,097) held by the Group's Depository, BNP Paribas.
Financial liabilities
The Company finances its investment activities through its
ordinary share capital and reserves. It has discontinued the use of
borrowing for such purposes. The Company's financial liabilities
comprise short-term trade payables. Foreign currency balances are
stated in the accounts in sterling at the exchange rate as at the
Balance Sheet date.
The Company no longer uses borrowing for investment management
purposes. Its facility from Coutts & Co was cancelled by mutual
agreement on 2 November 2015.
The currency and cash-flow profile of the financial liabilities
of the Company was:
31 December 29 February
2016 2016
GBP'000 GBP'000
Non interest
bearing:
Short term - -
trade payables
- -
------------ ------------
19. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS - RISK ANALYSIS
The general risk analysis undertaken by the Board and its
overall policy approach to risk management are set out in the
Strategic Report. Issues associated with portfolio distribution and
concentration risk are discussed in the Investment Policy section
of the Strategic Report. This note, which is incorporated in
accordance with accounting standard IFRS7, examines in greater
detail the identification, measurement and management of risks
potentially affecting the value of financial instruments and how
those risks potentially affect the performance and financial
position of the Company.
The risks concerned are categorised as follows:
A) Potential Market Risks, which are principally (i) Currency
Risk (ii) Interest Rate Risk and (iii) Other Price Risk.
B) Liquidity Risk
C) Credit Risk
Each is considered in turn below:
A (i) Currency Risk
The portfolio as at 31 December 2016 was invested entirely in
sterling securities and there was no currency risk arising from the
possibility of a fall in the value of sterling impacting upon the
value of investments or income.
The Company had no foreign currency borrowings at 31 December
2016 or 29 February 2016 and no sensitivity analysis is presented
for this risk.
A (ii) Interest Rate Risk
The Company did not hold fixed interest securities at 31
December 2016 or 29 February 2016.
With the exception of cash, no interest rate risks arise in
respect of any current asset. All cash held as a current asset is
sterling denominated, earning interest at the bank's or custodian's
variable interest rates.
The Company had no borrowing at 31 December 2016 or 29 February
2016.
A (iii) Other Price Risk
The principal price risk for the Company is the price volatility
of shares that are owned by the Company. As described in the
Investment Manager's Review, the Company spreads its investments
across different sectors and geographies, but, as shown by the
Portfolio Analysis in the Business Review, the Company may maintain
relatively strong concentrations in particular sectors selected by
the Investment Manager.
B Liquidity Risk
Liquidity Risk is considered to be small, because the portfolio
is invested in readily realisable securities. As a consequence,
cash flow risks are also considered to be small. The Manager
estimates that, under normal market conditions and without causing
excessive disturbance to the prices of the securities concerned,
the majority of the portfolio could be realised within 7 days.
C Credit Risk
The Company invests in quoted equities and fixed interest
securities. The Company's investments are held by BNP ("the
Depository"), which is a large international bank with a high
reputation. The Company's normal practice is to remain fully
invested at most times and not to hold very large
19. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS - RISK ANALYSIS - continued
quantities of cash. At 31 December 2016, cash at bank comprised
GBP1,393,316 (29 February 2016: GBP4,090,097) held by the
Depository and GBP10,078 held by Coutts & Co (29 February 2016:
GBP54,557), also part of a large international bank with a very
high credit rating.
Credit Risk arising on transactions with brokers relates to
transactions awaiting settlement. This risk is considered to be
very low because transactions are almost always undertaken on a
delivery versus payment basis with member firms of the London Stock
Exchange.
D Capital management policies and procedures
The Company' s capital management objectives are:
-- to ensure the Company's ability to continue as a going concern; and
-- to provide an adequate return to shareholders
by pursuing investment policies commensurately with the level of
risk.
The Company monitors capital on the basis of the carrying amount
of equity, less cash and cash equivalents as presented on the face
of the statement of financial position.
The Company sets the amount of capital in proportion to its
overall financing structure, i.e. equity and financial liabilities.
The Company manages the capital structure and makes adjustments to
it in the light of changes in economic conditions and the risk
characteristics of the underlying assets. In order to maintain or
adjust the capital structure, the Company may adjust the amount of
dividends paid to shareholders (within the statutory limits
applying to investment trusts), return capital to shareholders,
issue new shares, or sell assets.
20. FAIR VALUE HIERARCHY
Under IFRS13 investment companies are required to disclose the
fair value hierarchy that classifies financial instruments measured
at fair value at one of three levels according to the relative
reliability of the inputs used to estimate the fair values.
Classification Input
--------------- ---------------------------------
Level 1 Valued using quoted prices in
active markets for identical
assets
--------------- ---------------------------------
Level 2 Valued by reference to valuation
techniques using observable
inputs other than quoted prices
included within Level 1
--------------- ---------------------------------
Level 3 Valued by reference to valuation
techniques using inputs that
are not based on observable
market data
--------------- ---------------------------------
Categorisation within the hierarchy has been determined on the
basis of the lowest level input that is significant to the fair
value measurement of the relevant asset.
Assessment of Hierarchy
The Company's subsidiary was held at cost less impairment and
therefore its valuation as an investment in the Company's balance
sheet did not fall within the fair value hierarchy. The investment
was written off in 2016.
31 December 29 February
--------- ------------ ------------
2016 2016
--------- ------------ ------------
Level 1 49,849 14,445
---------- ------------ ------------
Level 2 - -
---------- ------------ ------------
Level 3 - -
---------- ------------ ------------
21. Standards, amendments and interpretations to existing
standards that are not yet effective and have not been adopted
early by the Company
At the date of authorisation of these financial statements,
certain new standards, amendments and interpretations to existing
standards have been published but are not yet effective, and have
not been adopted early by the Company.
Information on new standards, amendments and interpretations
that are expected to be relevant to the Company's financial
statements is provided below. Certain other new standards and
interpretations have been issued but are not expected to have a
material impact on the Company's financial statements.
The Company intends to adopt these standards (where applicable)
when they become effective.
-- IFRS 9 Financial Instruments - classification and measurement
of financial assets and financial liabilities as defined in IAS39
(IASB effective date 1 January 2018).
It is not expected that the adoption of IFRS 9 will have any
significant impact on the Company.
22. POST BALANCE SHEET DATE EVENTS
Since 31 December 2016 the Company has made further issues from
its block listing facility of 1,134,000 new shares.
The Company has effected on 15 March 2017 a further Placing of
2,352,913 new shares
As at 20 April 2017 the Company has 33,279,218 shares in issue
and the number of voting shares is 33,279,218.
23. Financial information
This announcement does not constitute the Company's statutory
accounts. The financial information for the period to 31 December
2016 is derived from the statutory accounts for that period, which
will be delivered to the registrar of companies following the
Company's Annual General Meeting. The statutory accounts for the
year to 29 February 2016 have been delivered to the registrar of
companies. The auditors reported on the accounts for the year to 29
February 2016; their report was unqualified and did not include a
statement under Section 498(2) or (3) of the Companies Act
2006.
The annual report for the period ended 31 December 2016 will be
posted to shareholders and will be made available on the Investment
Manager's website.
This announcement contains regulated information under the
Disclosure Rules and Transparency Rules of the FCA.
The annual report will be submitted to the National Storage
Mechanism and will shortly be available for inspection at
http://www.morningstar.co.uk/NSM
24. Annual general meeting
The Annual General Meeting will be held on 8 June 2017 at 12.00
noon at the offices of Grant Thornton (UK) LLP, 30 Finsbury Square,
London EC1V 4RU.
20 April 2017
Secretary and registered office
PraxisIFM Fund Services Limited
Mermaid House
2 Puddle Dock
London EC4V 3DB
This information is provided by RNS
The company news service from the London Stock Exchange
END
ACSIMMFTMBITBBR
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
April 20, 2017 12:46 ET (16:46 GMT)
Aurora Investment (LSE:ARR)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2024 to Apr 2024
Aurora Investment (LSE:ARR)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2023 to Apr 2024