P.O. Box 32331
Grand Cayman KY1-1209, Cayman Islands
Securities
registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Securities registered or to be
registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Securities for which there is a
reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:
Indicate
the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer's classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered
by the annual report.
As of December 31, 2019, there
were 1,314,798,600 ordinary shares, par value US$0.00002 per share, outstanding.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant
is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
If this report is an annual or
transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Note – Checking the box above
will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
from their obligations under those Sections.
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant
to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that
the registrant was required to submit such files).
Indicate by check mark whether
the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or an emerging growth company. See
definition of “large accelerated filer,"accelerated filer,” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act.
If an emerging growth company that
prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use
the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards† provided pursuant to
Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
† The term “new or
revised financial accounting standard” refers to any update issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board to its Accounting
Standards Codification after April 5, 2012.
Indicate by check mark which basis
of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:
If “Other” has been
checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected
to follow.
If this is an annual report, indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
(APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED
IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PAST FIVE YEARS)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.
In this Annual Report
on Form 20-F (“Annual Report”), references to “$” and “dollars” are to United States dollars.
Percentages and certain amounts contained herein have been rounded for ease of presentation. Any discrepancies in any table between
totals and the sums of amounts listed are due to rounding.
This Annual
Report contains statements of a forward-looking nature. These statements are made under the “safe harbor”
provisions of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You can identify these forward-looking statements by
terminology such as “may,” “will,” “expects,” “should,” “could,”
“plans,” “intends,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,”
“predicts,” “potential” or “continue” or the negative of these terms and other comparable
terminology. These forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements regarding the following: our
expectation to target and design products for specific applications; to increase expenses for personnel and new product
development; to protect our technology and to expand our product offerings; our anticipation that sales to a relatively small
number of customers will continue to account for significant portion of revenues; our expectation that we will no longer need
to reduce costs and reduce our personnel expenses; our expectation that non-U.S. operations and sales will recover and
continue to account for a substantial percentage of our revenues; our expectation to return to profitably and/or cash flow
break even in the near future; our expectation that we will continue to incur substantial legal expenses that may vary with
the level of activity in legal proceedings at any given point in time; our statements regarding the growing popularity of
thinner displays, mobile computing, electric vehicles, more efficient general lighting, and portable devices; our belief that
we participate in large and growing markets; our belief that potential future growth in the LED television, mobile computing,
general lighting, industrial and automotive markets represents an attractive growth opportunity for us; our belief that the
use of cold cathode fluorescent lamps (“CCFL”) is not a significant market for our current business model, our
belief that manufacturers are turning to innovative new semiconductor technologies to manage capacity more efficiently; our
belief that there is an increasing need for higher levels of system integration; our belief in the need for mixed-signal and
analog integrated circuits specifically designed to optimize the power system usage in devices; our belief in the need to use
advanced design methodologies to allow manufacturers to achieve rapid time-to-market with their new products; our expectation
that our markets will be dominated by a small number of major brand name companies; our belief that the our success depends
on our ability to develop and introduce new products selected for design into products in certain markets, our ability to
develop and introduce products in a timely manner to meet customer demands; our expectation that analog and mixed-signal
circuits have substantially longer life-cycles than digital integrated circuits; our ability to take advantage of
cost-efficiencies associated with the “fabless” semiconductor business model; our intention is to expand the
scope of our global operations; that we expect that our gross profit (loss) (as a percentage of revenues) will continue to
fluctuate in the future as a result of the stages of our products in their life cycles; our time expectations and plans to
bring the company back to profitability; variations in our product mix; the timing of our product introductions and specific
product manufacturing costs; our future gross profits (losses); our expectation that gross margin on products we sell will
typically decline over the life of the products; our expectation that gross margin on products will continue at their current
and historical levels; our expectation that expenses for personnel and new product development will increase; our
expectations regarding the need for future cost reduction measures; our expectation that research and development expenses as
a percentage of revenues will continue to fluctuate; our expectation to continue development of innovative technologies and
processes, and continued expansion and investment of our engineering, research and development resources; our expectation to
continue to invest significant resources into research and development in the future; our expectation that the competition
for qualified personnel will remain intense; our expectations regarding the outcome of litigation matters and the effects of
such to our company; our belief that the liquidity provided by existing cash, cash equivalents balances and short-term
investment will be sufficient to meet our capital requirements for at least the next 12 months; our intention to continue
research and development operations; our expectation that semiconductor companies will increasingly be subject to patent
infringement and other litigation matters as the number of products and competitors in the semiconductor industry grows; our
anticipation that we will not be paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future; our belief that our system-level expertise
and extensive experience with power management systems allow us to develop proprietary solutions and foster long-term
relationships with our customers; our intention to continue to evaluate additional investment opportunities in our supply
chain; our belief that our current facilities are adequate for our needs for the foreseeable future, and that any additional
space required will be available to us on commercially reasonable terms; our expectation that our results of operations or
cash flows will not be affected to any significant degree by a sudden short-term change in market interest rates; our
intention to diversify our customer base and market focus by providing new products used in particular markets; our
statements regarding the effect of adoption of certain accounting policies; our expectation that our American Depositary
Shares (“ADSs”) will satisfy the “readily tradable” requirement of the trading exchange; our
expectation not to become a passive foreign investment company in the future; our intention to use the cash we have raised
and conduct our business to reduce the risk of classification as a passive foreign investment company; and our expectation
that we will retain our existing primary listing of ADSs on the NASDAQ Global Select Market (“NASDAQ”) in the
United States for the foreseeable future. These forward-looking statements are based on our current assumptions and beliefs
in light of the information currently available to us. Actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements may
differ materially from those expressed or implied in these forward-looking statements for a variety of reasons, including:
changes in demand for devices that use our products; market conditions in the semiconductor industry and the economy as a
whole; the stages of our products in their life cycles; variations, expansions or reductions in the mix of our product
offerings; the growth and/or contraction of the company; the timing of our product introductions; changes in employment
rates; changes in availability and cost of facilities; unpredictability of an inability to control the outcome or timing of
litigation; changes in applicable laws or accounting standards; potential delisting of our ordinary shares and/or ADSs from
NASDAQ; specific product manufacturing costs; increased competition; changes in laws, rules and regulations regarding our
intellectual property; introduction of new competitors or competing technologies; and the increase of unexpected expenses and
such other factors discussed under “Key Information - Risk Factors,” “Operating and Financial Review and
Prospects” and elsewhere in this Annual Report. We assume no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking
information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. You are cautioned not to place undue
reliance on these forward-looking statements, which apply only as of the date of this Annual Report.
PART I
ITEM 1.
|
IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISORS
|
See Item 6 below.
ITEM 2.
|
OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE
|
Not applicable.
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The selected consolidated
statements of operations and cash flow data for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, and the selected consolidated
balance sheet data as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere
in this Annual Report and should be read in conjunction with, and are qualified in their entirety by reference to, these consolidated
financial statements, including the notes to these consolidated financial statements and “Item 5. Operating and Financial
Review and Prospects” as set forth below in this Annual Report. The selected consolidated statements of operations and cash
flow data for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 and the selected consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2017,
2016 and 2015, are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements, which are not included in this Annual Report. These
consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America.
|
|
Years Ended December 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues
|
|
$
|
60,928
|
|
|
$
|
62,714
|
|
|
$
|
60,205
|
|
|
$
|
56,561
|
|
|
$
|
54,841
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
28,960
|
|
|
|
30,741
|
|
|
|
29,426
|
|
|
|
27,317
|
|
|
|
27,145
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
31,968
|
|
|
|
31,973
|
|
|
|
30,779
|
|
|
|
29,244
|
|
|
|
27,696
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
19,065
|
|
|
|
19,766
|
|
|
|
17,989
|
|
|
|
15,645
|
|
|
|
18,493
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
19,286
|
|
|
|
20,332
|
|
|
|
19,047
|
|
|
|
19,481
|
|
|
|
23,632
|
|
Litigation income
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
–
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
38,351
|
|
|
|
40,098
|
|
|
|
37,017
|
|
|
|
35,103
|
|
|
|
42,125
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(6,383
|
)
|
|
|
(8,125
|
)
|
|
|
(6,238
|
)
|
|
|
(5,859
|
)
|
|
|
(14,429
|
)
|
Non-operating income (loss)– net
|
|
|
2,515
|
|
|
|
11,354
|
|
|
|
1,103
|
|
|
|
3,931
|
|
|
|
(2,026
|
)
|
(Loss) income before income tax
|
|
|
(3,868
|
)
|
|
|
3,229
|
|
|
|
(5,135
|
)
|
|
|
(1,928
|
)
|
|
|
(16,455
|
)
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
1,171
|
|
|
|
1,141
|
|
|
|
1,010
|
|
|
|
1,058
|
|
|
|
4,640
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(5,039
|
)
|
|
|
2,088
|
|
|
|
(6,145
|
)
|
|
|
(2,986
|
)
|
|
|
(21,095
|
)
|
(Loss) earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
Number of shares used in (loss) earnings per share
calculation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (in thousands)
|
|
|
1,316,032
|
|
|
|
1,300,795
|
|
|
|
1,288,977
|
|
|
|
1,282,141
|
|
|
|
1,301,465
|
|
Diluted (in thousands)
|
|
|
1,316,032
|
|
|
|
1,300,822
|
|
|
|
1,288,977
|
|
|
|
1,282,141
|
|
|
|
1,301,465
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) earnings per ADS (1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.19
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
$
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.12
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.81
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.19
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
$
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.12
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.81
|
)
|
Number of ADS shares used in (loss) earnings per share calculation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (in thousands)
|
|
|
26,321
|
|
|
|
26,016
|
|
|
|
25,780
|
|
|
|
25,643
|
|
|
|
26,029
|
|
Diluted (in thousands)
|
|
|
26,321
|
|
|
|
26,616
|
|
|
|
25,780
|
|
|
|
25,643
|
|
|
|
26,029
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
10,696
|
|
|
$
|
32,414
|
|
|
$
|
28,520
|
|
|
$
|
31,332
|
|
|
$
|
41,199
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
35,693
|
|
|
|
6,172
|
|
|
|
17,601
|
|
|
|
21,532
|
|
|
|
11,233
|
|
Working capital
|
|
|
55,706
|
|
|
|
53,396
|
|
|
|
58,735
|
|
|
|
61,871
|
|
|
|
59,904
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
88,999
|
|
|
|
89,309
|
|
|
|
85,082
|
|
|
|
90,689
|
|
|
|
96,208
|
|
Long-term liabilities, excluding current portion
|
|
|
2,800
|
|
|
|
1,087
|
|
|
|
1,347
|
|
|
|
1,294
|
|
|
|
2,617
|
|
Net assets
|
|
|
75,055
|
|
|
|
79,046
|
|
|
|
76,555
|
|
|
|
80,784
|
|
|
|
83,117
|
|
Ordinary shares and additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
143,517
|
|
|
|
143,148
|
|
|
|
142,979
|
|
|
|
142,771
|
|
|
|
141,919
|
|
|
(1)
|
Fifty ordinary shares equal one ADS
|
CAPITALIZATION AND INDEBTEDNESS
Not applicable.
REASONS FOR THE OFFER AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Not applicable.
Risk Factors
We wish to caution
readers that the following important factors, and those important factors described in other reports submitted to, or filed with,
the Securities and Exchange Commission, among other factors, could affect our actual results and could cause our actual results
to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf and that such factors may
adversely affect our business and financial status and therefore the value of your investment:
Global economic and financial, political
instability or catastrophes caused or induced by natural disasters could negatively affect our business, results of operations,
and financial condition.
The global economic
and financial crisis that has been affecting global business, banking and financial sectors have also been affecting the semiconductor
market. In the recent past, uncertainty in various global markets, economic slowdown in China, and slow recovery in certain economic
regions have resulted in sharp declines in electronic products sales from which we generate our income. The current rapid economic
slowdown in light of the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak, millions of people unable to return to work in light of local quarantine
requirements, the unexpected drop in early 2020 of the world’s financial and industrial markets, recession fears, sudden
spike in unemployment in various markets, contraction of international travel and shipping options, sudden shutdown of businesses
around the world for an uncertain period of time, global security concerns, economic and political uncertainty, and international
trade disputes (included unexpected global tariffs on imported goods and shipments), could also negatively affect sales, and have
a negative effect on our supplies of raw goods and materials. The uncertainty in global financial markets could negatively affect
our customers’ product planning and decrease demand for our products. There could be a number of indirect effects from such
turmoil on our business, including, without limitation, the following: significant decreases in orders from our customers; insolvency
of key suppliers resulting in product delays; inability of customers to obtain credit to finance purchases of our products and/or
customer insolvencies; and counterparty failures negatively impacting our treasury operations. If the effects of the global economic
crisis continue unabated, we anticipate our results of operations may be materially and adversely affected. Natural disasters and
related catastrophes could also negatively affect our operations. Any natural disaster, economic or financial crisis could cause
revenues for the semiconductor industry as a whole to decline dramatically, as the industry as a whole is subject to unexpected
change in response to fluctuating global market conditions. Also, if global economic conditions, or the financial condition of
our customers, were to deteriorate, additional allowances for uncollectible accounts may be required in the future and such additional
allowances would increase our operating expenses and therefore reduce our income from operations and net income. Any serious natural
disaster and catastrophes, global economic and financial crisis could materially and adversely affect our results of operations.
If the markets for consumer electronics,
computers, industrial, communications, or automotive products do not grow substantially or even decrease, our revenues may be harmed.
Our business focuses
on designing, developing and marketing high performance integrated circuits and solutions for manufacturers of products in the
consumer electronics, computer, industrial, communications, and automotive markets. As many of the leading sellers of these products
have intermediaries to manufacture their products or those portions of their products containing our components, we currently derive
the majority of our product revenues from sales to these intermediaries and/or their suppliers. We have targeted, and are designing
products for, applications such as LCD and LED monitors, LCD and LED televisions, notebook computers, tablet computers, low/zero
emission vehicles, mobile phones, power tools, energy efficient technology relating to sophisticated batteries, LED lighting (both
in electronics and in the general lighting sector), and portable electronic equipment, such as camcorders. We believe that the
important factors driving growth in these markets include the growing popularity of thinner displays, mobile computing, hybrid
and electric vehicles, energy efficient lighting, and portable tools and media devices. In particular, if there is a decline in
demand for products using LCDs or LEDs, as well as other devices using our products, or growth for such products is slower than
we anticipate, our customers may experience lower demand for their products incorporating our products, which may cause our revenues
to suffer. We cannot be certain that the markets for these products will continue to grow. We also cannot be sure that a significant
slowdown in these markets will not occur.
Fluctuations in our quarterly operating
results due to factors such as changes in the demand for electronic devices that utilize our products could adversely affect the
trading price of our ADSs.
If our quarterly operating
results fail to meet the expectations of securities analysts, the trading price of our ADSs could be adversely affected, and even
trade at below the book value of the Company. Our quarterly operating results have varied substantially in the past and may vary
substantially in the future depending upon a number of factors described below and elsewhere in this Risk Factors section, including
many factors that are beyond our control. These factors include changes in demand for devices that use our products; market conditions
in the highly cyclical semiconductor industry and the economy as a whole; the timing and cancellation of customer orders; the level
of orders received that can be shipped in a quarter; the availability of third party semiconductor foundry, assembly and test capacities;
fluctuations in manufacturing yields; delays in the introduction of new products; changes in the mix of sales of higher margin
products and lower margin products; seasonal changes in demand during the year-end holiday season for devices that use our products;
and the amount of legal and other expenses incurred in a particular quarter.
In addition, the trading
price of our ADSs may be affected by factors such as: significant price and volume fluctuations in our ADSs and financial markets
in the U.S. and other countries, as well as relatively thin trading volume of our ADSs on the NASDAQ Global Select Market and the
Cayman Islands Stock Exchange. Further, the trading markets for our ADSs are affected by the research reports that securities or
industry analysts publish about us or our business. We do not have control over such coverage. If one or more analysts were to
downgrade our ADSs, the price of our ADSs may decline. If one or more analysts cease coverage of our company or does not regularly
publish reports on us, we may lose visibility in the financial markets, which could cause the price of our ADSs or trading volume
to decline.
If orders for our products are cancelled
or deferred, our revenues, operating margins and net income could be substantially reduced.
Orders for our products
can be cancelled or deferred with little notice from and without significant penalty to our customers. A significant portion of
our revenues in any financial reporting period depends on orders booked and shipped in that period. If a large amount of orders
placed is cancelled or deferred, our revenues in that period could be substantially reduced. Since we do not have significant non-cancellable
backlog, we typically plan our production and inventory levels based on internal forecasts of customer demand, which are highly
unpredictable and are often based on a “just in time” inventory system, which can result in substantial fluctuation
in ordering and/or last minute changes. In particular, in response to anticipated lengthy lead times, which in the past have been
as much as ten weeks or more, to obtain inventory and materials from our suppliers, we place orders with these suppliers in advance
of anticipated customer demand, which can result in excess inventory if the expected orders fail to materialize. We also expect
to increase our expenses for personnel and new product development. It is difficult for us to reduce our production, inventory,
personnel and new product development expenses quickly in response to any shortfalls in revenues resulting from cancelled or deferred
orders. As a result, any cancellation or deferral of orders would not only harm our revenues, it would also likely have a disproportionately
adverse effect on our operating margins and net income.
If we do not develop and introduce new products in a timely
manner, our revenues and gross margins could be harmed.
Our success depends
upon our ability to develop and introduce new products that our customers in turn select to design into their products in the consumer
electronics, computer, industrial, communications, and automotive markets. If we are unable to develop new products in a timely
manner, our revenues will suffer. In addition, because our gross margins typically decline over the life cycle of our products
as a result of competitive pressures and voluntary pricing arrangements, any failure to develop new products in a timely manner
will likely cause our gross margins to decline. The development of our new products is highly complex, and from time to time we
have experienced delays in the introduction of new products. Successful product development and introduction of new products depend
on a number of factors, including accurate new product definition; timely completion of new product designs; reliance on third
party licenses and designers periodically; achievement of manufacturing yields; timely and cost-effective production of new products;
delays within our manufacturing foundries; and timely delivery of new third-party supplied products used as key components in devices
that incorporate our products. We often incur significant expenditures in the development of a new product without any assurance
that it will be selected for design into our customers’ products. If we incur such expenditures for products that are not
selected by our customers, our results of operations will be adversely affected and may fluctuate significantly from period to
period. Furthermore, even if our products are selected for design into our customers’ products, we cannot be certain that
these products will be commercially successful or that we will benefit from any associated sales.
If we fail to protect our intellectual
property rights, competitors may be able to use our technology or trademarks, and this could weaken our competitive position, increase
our costs, reduce our margins and reduce our revenues.
Our success is heavily
dependent upon our proprietary technology. We rely primarily on a combination of patent, copyright and trademark laws, trade secrets,
confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions to protect our proprietary technology and prevent competitors from using
our technology in their products. These laws and procedures provide only limited protection. Our patents may not provide sufficiently
broad protection or they may not prove to be enforceable in actions against alleged infringement.
Our ability to sell
our products and prevent competitors from misappropriating our proprietary technology and trade names is dependent upon protecting
our intellectual property. Despite the precautions we take, unauthorized third parties may copy aspects of our current or future
products or obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary. Additionally, our competitors may independently develop similar
or superior technology. Policing unauthorized use of patents, software, circuit design or semiconductor design is difficult and
some countries’ laws do not adequately protect our proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States,
China and other developed countries. We have in the past initiated litigation to protect our intellectual property rights. Litigation
may be necessary in the future to enforce our intellectual property rights (including patents), to protect our trade secrets or
to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others. Litigation could result in substantial costs and diversion
of resources, and could also result in a decision that our intellectual property is invalid or unenforceable and, could adversely
affect our business, future results of operations and financial condition. See the section headed “Business Overview—Intellectual
Property.”
We depend on third parties to manufacture,
assemble and test our products and, if they are unable to do so, our ability to ship products and our business and results of operations
will be harmed.
We do not own or operate
the integrated circuit fabrication facilities that manufacture the products we design. Three foundries, CSMC Manufacturing Co.,
Ltd. (“CSMC”), Vanguard International Semiconductor Corporation (“VIS”), and TowerJazz Panasonic Semiconductor
Co., Ltd.(“TPSC”) manufactured most of the integrated circuit products that we sold in 2019. These foundries manufacture
integrated circuit products for us according to purchase orders. We do not have a long-term guaranteed level of production capacity
at any of these foundries, and any one or more could raise prices without notice. Although we provide the foundries with rolling
forecasts of our production requirements, the ability of each foundry to provide wafers to us is limited by the foundry’s
available capacity. The term “wafers” refers to slices of silicon used to manufacture integrated circuits, and it is
one of the principal raw materials in our products. These foundries could choose to prioritize capacity for other customers, particularly
larger customers, reduce or eliminate deliveries to us on short notice or increase the prices they charge us. Accordingly, we cannot
be certain that these foundries will allocate sufficient capacity, if any, to satisfy our requirements particularly during any
industry-wide capacity shortages. In addition, if any of these foundries were unable to continue manufacturing our products in
the required volumes at acceptable quality, yields and costs or in a timely manner, our business and results of operations would
be seriously harmed.
There are other significant
risks associated with our reliance on these foundries, including the disruption in our ability to ship products caused by the length
of time, which could be as much as 12 to 18 months in the most extreme cases. This disruption could require us to find alternative
foundries for existing or new products; the reduction or elimination of deliveries to us by these outside foundries caused by a
sudden increase in demand for semiconductor devices or a sudden reduction or elimination of manufacturing capacity by any existing
manufacturers of semiconductor devices; the unavailability of, or delays in obtaining access to, key process technologies used
by these foundries; and the susceptibility of our outside foundries to production interruptions resulting from natural disasters.
Any of these events could cause these foundries to reduce or eliminate deliveries to us and cause disruption in our ability to
ship products to our customers, which could negatively affect our business and results of operations.
We also rely on independent
subcontractors to assemble and test most of our integrated circuit products. We do not have long-term agreements with some of these
subcontractors but obtain services from them primarily on a purchase order basis. Our reliance on these subcontractors involves
risks such as reduced control over delivery schedules, quality assurance and costs. These risks could result in product shortages
or increase our costs of manufacturing, assembling or testing our products. If these subcontractors were unable or unwilling to
continue to provide assembly and test services and deliver products at acceptable quality, yields and costs or in a timely manner,
our business would be seriously harmed. We would also have to identify and qualify substitute subcontractors, which would be time
consuming and costly and could result in unforeseen operational difficulties.
If we cannot compete effectively against new and existing
competitors, our revenues and gross margins could be harmed.
Our ability to compete
successfully in the market for integrated circuit products depends on factors both within and outside our control, including, but
not limited to, any one or a combination of the following: i) our success in designing and subcontracting the manufacture of new
products that implement new technologies and satisfy our customers’ needs; ii) the performance of our products across a variety
of parameters, such as reliability and cost efficiency; iii) the price of our products and those of our competitors; iv) our ability
to control production costs; and v) the features of our competitors’ products.
We believe our principal
competitors include Renesas Electronics Corporation, Analog Devices, Inc., Maxim Integrated Products, Inc., Monolithic Power Systems,
Inc., Ricoh Company, Ltd., Richtek Technology Corporation, Rohm Co., Ltd, Silergy Corporation and Texas Instruments Incorporated.
There is also competition from the internal integrated circuit design and manufacturing capabilities of some of our existing and
potential customers, such as Panasonic and Samsung. In addition to these competitors, other integrated circuit companies may decide
to enter the market with analog and mixed-signal integrated circuit products that compete with our products or incorporate functions
similar to those provided by our products.
Some of our competitors,
such as Texas Instruments, have greater name recognition, their own manufacturing capabilities, significantly greater financial
and technical resources, and the sales, marketing and distribution strengths that are normally associated with large multinational
companies. These competitors may also have pre-existing relationships with our customers or potential customers. These competitors
may be able to introduce new technologies more quickly, address customer requirements more rapidly, and devote greater resources
to the promotion and sale of their products that are beyond our capability. Further, in the event of a manufacturing capacity shortage,
these competitors may be able to manufacture products themselves or obtain third-party manufacturing capability when we are unable
to do so.
We have substantial operations outside
of the United States that expose us to risks specific to our international operations that could harm our revenues and net income.
As of December 31,
2019, a substantial portion of our operations, most of our employees, and most of the third parties we use to manufacture, assemble
and test our products were located in China and Taiwan. In addition, sales outside the United States as a percentage of revenues
accounted for almost all of our sales in the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016, and 2015. We expect our non-U.S.
operations to grow and non-U.S. sales to continue to account for a substantial percentage of our revenues.
We are subject to risks
specific to our international business operations, including: the risk of supply disruption, production disruption or other disruption
arising from natural disasters; the outbreak of any severe communicable disease or other widespread health problems; the risk of
potential conflict and political instability in the relationship between Taiwan and China, China and Japan, or North and South
Korea; risks related to international political instability; unpredictable consequences on the economic conditions in the U.S.
and the rest of the world arising from terrorist attacks and other military or security operations; unexpected changes in regulatory
requirements or legal uncertainties regarding tax regimes, that could result in tariffs and other trade barriers (including current
and future import and export restrictions); difficulties in staffing and managing international operations; adverse effects of
changes in foreign currency exchange rates on our results of operations; limited ability to enforce agreements, intellectual property
and other rights in foreign countries; changes in labor conditions and requirements; longer payment cycles and greater difficulty
in collecting accounts receivables; burdens and costs of compliance with a variety of foreign laws; expropriation of private enterprises;
and reversal of the current policies (including favorable tax and lending policies) encouraging foreign investment or foreign trade
by our host countries. In addition, the geographical distances between Asia, the U.S., the Cayman Islands and Europe also create
a number of logistical and communication challenges. The coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak
first identified in China in December 2019, and spread through the world in the first quarter of 2020 has resulted in significant
disruptions in business operations and other economic activities throughout the world. The World Health Organization has declared
the growing disease to be a global health emergency, and governments throughout the world have severely limited foreign travel,
including closing some foreign borders. Millions of people globally have been quarantined in their homes and business have been
closed for several weeks, if not longer. Any of these events may disrupt our ability to staff our business adequately without the
ability to bring new employees in the office for training, could generally disrupt our operations as suppliers do not have sufficient
staff available to manufacture and deliver materials to support our products, customers could negatively adjust their product forecasts,
which could decrease demand for our products, and specifically, any prolonged health threat from coronavirus globally could have
a material adverse impact on our business operations and results of operations.
In addition, our reporting
currency is the U.S. dollar, but our functional currency is the local currency of the respective entities. Therefore, a significant
portion of our operating expenses is denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, primarily the Renminbi and the New Taiwan
dollar. As a result, appreciation or depreciation of other currencies in relation to the U.S. dollar could result in material transaction
or translation gains or losses that could adversely affect, or cause fluctuations in, our results of operations. We do not currently
engage in currency hedging activities.
If we cannot adapt our product offerings to respond to
rapid technological changes, our revenues will be harmed.
The markets for consumer
electronics, computer, industrial, communications, and automotive products, and the components used in these products, are characterized
by rapidly changing technology and very frequent new product introductions by our direct customers and our competitors. For example,
the microprocessor, display and battery technologies with which our products inter-operate change very rapidly. Although our products
integrate analog and mixed-signal circuits and therefore may have substantially longer life-cycles than digital integrated circuits,
we must still update our products or introduce new ones on a regular basis. If we do not respond in a timely manner to technological
changes and new product introductions by our direct customers and competitors, we will be unable to maintain and grow our product
sales. In addition, the emergence of significantly more efficient or cost-effective microprocessor, display and battery technologies
could lessen the need for the power management functionality of our products, which would harm our revenues.
Any impairment charges may have a material adverse effect
on our net income.
In accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, we are required to evaluate our investments, long-lived assets (including
operating lease right-of-use (“ROU”) assets) and intangible assets for impairment whenever triggering events or changes
in circumstances indicate that the asset may be impaired. If certain criteria are met, we are required to record an impairment
charge. For example, we hold equity securities without determinable fair value and long-lived assets, some of which have incurred
certain impairment charges as discussed further in our financial statements. We currently are not able to estimate the extent or
timing of any impairment charge for future years. Any impairment charge required may have a material adverse effect on our net
income. The determination of an impairment charge at any given time is based significantly on our expected results of operations
over a number of years subsequent to that time. As a result, an impairment charge is more likely to occur during a period when
our operating results are otherwise already depressed. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects —
Critical Accounting Policies” for a discussion of how we assess if an impairment charge is required and, if so, how the amount
is determined.
We will need to recruit and retain qualified personnel
to grow our business successfully.
Our future success
will depend on our ability to attract and retain experienced sales, research and development, marketing, customer support and management
personnel. If we do not attract and retain these personnel, our ability to grow our business, sell our products, enter new markets
and increase our share of existing markets could be harmed. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in hiring for
these positions in the near future. Our sales strategy requires that we hire additional direct sales persons and independent sales
representatives in our major markets. Moreover, our independent sales representatives and direct sales personnel must market our
products effectively and be qualified to provide timely and cost-effective customer support and service. If they are unable to
do so, or if we are unable to expand these organizations, this could harm our ability to increase our revenues and limit our ability
to sell our products and/or expand our market share. Competition for qualified personnel in digital, analog and mixed-signal integrated
circuit design is intense. In the past, we have experienced difficulty in recruiting and retaining qualified personnel, especially
technical and sales personnel. As we intend to expand the scope of our international operations, this will require us to attract
experienced management, research and development, marketing, sales and customer support personnel for our international offices.
We expect competition for qualified personnel to remain intense, and we may not succeed in attracting or retaining such personnel.
In addition, new employees generally require substantial training in our design methodology, design flow and technology, which
in turn requires significant resources and management attention. There is a risk that even if we invest significant resources in
attempting to attract, train and retain qualified personnel, we will not be successful in our efforts. In that event, our costs
of doing business would increase without a corresponding increase in revenues.
Our success will depend
on a significant extent on the continued service of our executive officers, including Sterling Du, our chief executive officer
and chairman of our board, and other key employees, including key sales, consulting, technical, marketing and legal personnel.
If we lose the services of one or more of our executives or key employees, our business and ability to implement our business objectives
successfully could be harmed, particularly if one or more of our executives or key employees decide to join a competitor or otherwise
compete directly or indirectly with us.
Defects in our products could result in significant costs
and could impair our ability to sell our products.
Detection of any significant
defects in our products may result in, among other things, loss of or delay in market acceptance and sales of our products, diversion
of development resources, injury to our reputation and increased service and warranty costs. Because our products are complex,
they may contain defects that can be present at any point in a product’s life cycle. These defects could harm our reputation,
which could result in significant costs to us and could impair our ability to sell our products. The costs we may incur in correcting
any product defects may be substantial and could materially adversely affect our results of operations. While we continually test
our products for defects and work with customers through our customer support services to identify and correct problems, defects
in our products may be found in the future. Testing for defects is complicated in part because it is difficult to simulate the
highly complex environments in which our customers may use our products. In the past, when we have discovered defects in our products,
we also experienced delays in the shipment of our products. These delays have principally related to new product update releases.
To date, none of these delays has materially affected our business; however, product defects or delays in the future could be material,
and adversely affect our reputation and our ability to sell our products.
A substantial portion of our revenues
is generated by a small number of customers. If any of these customers delays or reduces its orders, our revenues and earnings
may be harmed.
Historically, a relatively
small number of customers has accounted for a significant portion of our revenues in any particular period. We have no long-term
volume purchase commitments from any of our significant customers. We cannot be certain that our current customers will continue
to place orders with us and/or at the levels of previous periods, in addition to obtaining orders from new customers. In addition,
some of our customers, acting as intermediary manufacturers, supply products to end-market purchasers, and any of these end-market
purchasers could choose to reduce or eliminate orders for our customers’ products. This would in turn lower our customers’
orders for our products.
For the year ended
December 31, 2019, two customers accounted for 26% of our revenues. For the year ended December 31, 2018, two customers accounted
for 24% of our revenues. For the year ended December 31, 2017, one customer accounted for 15% of our revenues. The changes in sales
to these customers as a percentage of our total revenues have been caused by a number of factors, including, without limitation,
the reduction, delay or cancellation of orders from one or more of our significant customers, some of which were outside our control.
We anticipate that sales of our products to a relatively small number of customers will continue to account for a significant portion
of our revenues.
Our ability to manage growth will
affect our ability to achieve and maintain profitability.
Our ability to achieve
and maintain profitability will depend in part on our ability to implement and expand operational, customer support and financial
control systems and to train and manage our employees. We may not be able to augment or improve existing systems and controls or
implement new systems and controls in response to future growth, if any. In addition, we will need to expand our facilities to
accommodate the growth in our personnel. Any failure to manage growth could divert our attention from successfully executing our
business plan and adversely affect our ability to expand our business successfully. Our historical growth has placed, and any further
growth is likely to continue to place, a significant strain on our resources. In order to grow successfully, we will need to maintain
close coordination among our executive, engineering, accounting, finance, legal, marketing, sales, operations and customer support
organizations, particularly in light of the internationally dispersed nature of our operations.
Third parties have asserted, and in
the future could assert, that our products infringe their intellectual property rights. These claims could harm our ability to
sell our products and expose us to litigation.
As is typical in the
semiconductor industry, we have periodically received communications from third parties asserting patents that cover certain of
our technologies or products, and alleging infringement of certain of their intellectual property rights. We may receive similar
communications in the future. In the event any third party were to make a valid claim against us or our customers, we could be
enjoined from selling selected products such (including our lighting or power products), or we could be required to pay royalties
to third parties, which would increase the cost of our products. Third-party infringement claims, with or without merit, have been,
and could potentially be, time consuming, result in substantial diversion of our resources, incur significant litigation costs
(including costs related to any fines and/or damages we may owe), cause product shipment delays, prevent us and/or our customers
from selling some or all of our products, cause our customers or end-users not to use our products, or require us to enter into
license agreements that could adversely affect our cost structure (and, in turn, our competitiveness), which may not be available
on acceptable terms, or at all. Any such event could seriously harm our business and our results of operations. We expect that
semiconductor companies will increasingly be subject to infringement claims as the number of products, non-practicing patent entities
and competitors in the semiconductor industry grows. See the section headed “Business Overview—Intellectual Property.”
From time to time,
in the normal course of business, we agree to indemnify third parties with whom we enter into contractual relationships, including
customers and parties to other transactions with us, with respect to certain matters. We have agreed, under certain conditions,
to hold these third parties harmless against specified losses, such as those arising from a breach of representations or covenants,
other third-party claims that our products when used for their intended purposes infringe the intellectual property rights of such
other third parties or other claims made against certain parties. It is not possible to determine the maximum potential amount
of liability under these indemnification obligations due to our limited history of prior indemnification claims and the unique
facts and circumstances that are likely to be involved in each particular claim. To date, we have not made any payments under these
obligations.
Until all outstanding
litigation is resolved, we will continue to incur substantial legal expenses that vary with the level of activity in the legal
proceedings, this level of activity is not entirely within our control as we may need to respond to legal actions. Consequently,
we may find it difficult to predict the legal expenses for any given period, which will impair our ability to forecast our results
of operations for that period. For example, the level of legal expenses is not entirely within our control as we may need to respond
to legal actions by opposing parties or scheduling decisions by the judges which could occur with relatively short notice. It is
difficult for us to forecast our legal expenses for any given quarter, which adversely affects our ability to forecast our expected
results of operations in general.
Given the inherent
uncertainties in litigation, there cannot be any assurance that we will prevail in any particular litigation matter, nor can we
cannot predict the outcome of any such litigation. If any party were to prevail in its claims against us, our rights to certain
patents and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In any litigation arising from claims that we infringe
on the intellectual property rights of others, an adverse result could involve an injunction that could prevent the sales of a
material portion of our products, and a reduction or the elimination of the value of related inventories, any of which could have
a material adverse effect on our revenues, results of operations and financial condition. See the section headed “Business
Overview—Intellectual Property.”
We may be subject to lawsuits from third
parties, which could harm our earnings and expose us to additional uncertainties.
We are a defendant
or plaintiff in actions that arise in the normal course of business as well as actions that arose as counterclaims in response
to our patent infringement actions, including actions for antitrust, unfair competition and interference. We do not believe that
the amount of ultimate liability of other unresolved proceedings will materially affect our financial position, overall trends
in results of operations, or liquidity. However, the ultimate outcome of any litigation or claim is uncertain, and the impact of
an unfavorable outcome could be material to us.
We face risks associated with security
breaches or cyber attacks.
We face risks associated
with security breaches or cyber attacks of our computer systems or those of our third-party representatives, vendors, and service
providers. Although we have implemented security procedures and controls to address these threats, our systems may still be vulnerable
to data theft, computer viruses, programming errors, attacks by third parties, or similar disruptive problems. If our systems,
or systems owned by third parties affiliated with our company, were breached or attacked, the proprietary and confidential information
of our company and our customers could be disclosed and we may be required to incur substantial costs and liabilities, including
the following: expenses to rectify the consequences of the security breach or cyber attack; liability for stolen assets or information;
costs of repairing damage to our systems; lost revenue and income resulting from any system downtime caused by such breach or attack;
loss of competitive advantage if our proprietary information is obtained by competitors as a result of such breach or attack; increased
costs of cyber security protection; costs of incentives we may be required to offer to our customers or business partners to retain
their business; and damage to our reputation. In addition, any compromise of security from a security breach or cyber attack could
deter customers or business partners from entering into transactions that involve providing confidential information to us. As
a result, any compromise to the security of our systems could have a material adverse effect on our business, reputation, financial
condition, and operating results.
Changes in local laws, rules and regulations
could have an adverse effect on our ability to protect our intellectual property or other aspects of our business.
Our business activities
and intellectual property is dependent on various regulations in countries where we operate, including, but not limited to, business
and investment approval, export regulations, tariffs, accounting standards and taxation. We must also adhere to various laws and
regulations concerning trading, antitrust practices, product liability, consumer protection, intellectual property rights, product
safety, the environment and recycling, and internal control. Changes in such laws and regulations, and additional expenses to comply
with any such amendments, may affect our business results and financial position. Further, changes in intellectual property laws
could negatively affect our ability to protect our patents and other intellectual property in one or several jurisdictions.
If we fail to maintain an effective
system of internal controls, we may not be able to report our financial results timely. As a result, we may fail to meet our reporting
obligations and current and potential holders of ADSs and/or ordinary shares could lose confidence in our financial reporting,
which could adversely affect the trading price of our ADSs.
Effective internal
controls are necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports. If we cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent
fraud, our results of operations could be misstated, our reputation may be harmed and the trading price of our ADSs could be adversely
affected. We cannot be certain that our controls over our financial processes and reporting will continue to be adequate in the
future. Any failure of our internal controls over financial reporting could result in a material misstatement in financial statements.
In addition, under
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, we are required to furnish a report by our management on our internal control over financial
reporting. This report contains, among other matters, an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting as of the end of our fiscal year, including a statement as to whether or not our internal control over financial reporting
is effective. This assessment must include disclosure of any material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting
identified by management.
The effectiveness of
our internal control over financial reporting has been audited by Deloitte & Touche, an independent registered public accounting
firm, which has also audited our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019. Deloitte & Touche
has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards
of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). See “Item 15. Controls and Procedures—Attestation
Report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm”.
While the management
report included in this annual report concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective, we cannot assure
you that our management will be able to conclude that our internal control over financial reporting is effective in future years.
If in future years we fail to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act, we could suffer a loss of investor confidence in the reliability of our consolidated financial statements, which in turn could
negatively impact the trading price of our ADSs, and could result in lawsuits being filed against us by our stockholders or otherwise
harm our reputation.
Our transfer pricing procedures may
be challenged by tax or regulatory authorities or “taxing authorities”, which may subject us to higher taxes and adversely
affect our earnings.
Transfer pricing refers
to the prices that one member of a group of affiliated corporation charges to another member of the group for goods, services or
the use of intellectual property. If two or more affiliated corporations are located in different countries, the laws or regulations
of each country generally will require that transfer prices be the same as those charged by unrelated corporations dealing with
each other at arm’s length. If one or more of the countries in which our affiliated corporations are located believe that
transfer prices were manipulated by our affiliated corporations in a way that distorts the true taxable income of the corporations,
the laws of such countries could require us to redetermine transfer prices and thereby reallocate the income of our affiliate corporations
in order to reflect such income clearly. Any reallocation of income from one of our corporations in a lower tax jurisdiction to
an affiliated corporation in a higher tax jurisdiction would result in a higher overall tax liability to us. Moreover, if the country
from which the income is being reallocated does not agree to the reallocation, the same income could be subject to taxation by
both countries.
We have adopted transfer
pricing agreements with our subsidiaries located in the United States, China, and Taiwan to regulate inter-company transfers. A
transfer pricing agreement is a contract for the transfer of goods, services or intellectual property from one corporation to a
related corporation that sets forth the prices that the related parties believe are those charged by unrelated corporations dealing
with each other at arm’s length. In this regard, we are subject to risks not faced by other companies with international
operations that do not create inter-company transfers. If the taxing authorities of any jurisdiction, including Taiwan, China,
and the United States, were to challenge these agreements successfully or require changes in our transfer pricing practices, we
could become subject to higher taxes and our earnings would be adversely affected. There can be no assurance that we will continue
to be found to be operating in compliance with transfer pricing laws, or that such laws will not be modified, which, as a result,
may require changes to our transfer pricing practices or operating procedures. Any determination of income reallocation or modification
of transfer pricing laws could result in an income tax assessment of the portion of income deemed to be derived from the taxing
jurisdiction that so reallocates the income or modifies its transfer pricing laws.
Sales of our products could decline
if our products fail to support evolving industry standards or environmental requirements.
Our revenues are mainly
derived from sales of integrated circuit products that are components of electronic devices built to industry standards, individual
country specifications and other widely accepted specifications. Our products must be designed to conform to these standards and
specifications in order to achieve market acceptance. Technology standards and specifications continually evolve, and we may not
be able to successfully design and manufacture new products that conform to these new standards or specifications in a timely manner.
Additionally, new products we develop to conform to new specifications in some markets may not be accepted in other markets.
Climate change, use
of Conflict Minerals, other environmental concerns and green initiatives also presents other commercial challenges, economic risks
and physical risks that could harm our results of operations or affect the manner in which we conduct our business.
Increasing climate
change and environmental concerns could affect the results of our operations if any of our customers would request us to exceed
any standard(s) set for environmentally compliant products and services. For example, we have been working with our suppliers,
customers, and several industry consortia to develop and provide EU “RoHS” (European Union Restriction of Hazardous
Substances) compliant products. We have also implemented procedures to comply with the requirements of the Securities Exchange
Act to comply with Section 1502 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank Act”)
regarding the reporting of Conflict Minerals in use, as defined by the Dodd-Frank Act. If we or our suppliers, vendors and manufacturers
are able to offer such products or offer products that are compliant with these standards, but said products are not as reliable
due to the lack of reasonably available alternative technologies or materials, we may lose market share to our competitors. Furthermore,
while we have implemented procedures to comply with these requirements, our suppliers, vendors and/or manufacturers could fall
out of compliance with said requirements without our knowledge.
Provisions in our
Memorandum and Articles of Association may discourage potential acquisition bids for us and prevent changes in our management that
our shareholders may favor.
Provisions in our Memorandum
and Articles of Association could discourage potential acquisition proposals and could delay or prevent a change in control transaction
that our shareholders favor. These provisions could have the effect of discouraging others from making offers for our ordinary
shares or ADSs. As a result, these provisions may prevent the trading price of our ADSs from reflecting the effects of actual or
rumored takeover attempts and may prevent shareholders from reselling their ordinary shares or ADSs at or above the price at which
they purchased their ordinary shares or ADSs. These provisions may also prevent changes in our management that our shareholders
may favor. Our Memorandum and Articles do not permit shareholders to act by written consent, do not permit shareholders to call
a general meeting and provide for a classified board of directors, which means shareholders can only elect a limited number of
our directors in any given year. Furthermore, our board has the authority to issue up to 250,000,000 preference shares in one or
more series. Our board can fix the price, rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions of such preference shares without any
further vote or action by our shareholders but subject to any direction that may be given by the shareholders in a general meeting.
The issuance of preference shares may delay or prevent a change in control transaction without further action by our shareholders
or make removal of management more difficult.
As we are a Cayman
Islands company, it could be difficult for investors to effect service of process on and recover against us or our directors and
officers and our shareholders may face difficulties in protecting their interest.
We are a Cayman Islands
company, and many of our officers and directors are residents of various jurisdictions outside the United States. A substantial
portion of our assets and the assets of our officers and directors, at any one time, are and may be located in jurisdictions outside
the United States. Although we have irrevocably agreed that we may be served with process in Santa Clara, California with respect
to actions arising out of or in connection with United States federal securities laws relating to offers and sales of our ordinary
shares and/or our ADSs, it could be difficult for investors to effect service of process within the United States on our directors
and officers who reside outside the United States, or to recover against us or our directors and officers on judgments of the United
States courts predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the United States federal securities laws.
Our corporate affairs
are governed by our charter documents, consisting of our Memorandum and Articles of Association, and by the Companies Law and common
law of the Cayman Islands. The rights of our shareholders and the fiduciary responsibilities of our directors are governed by Cayman
Islands law, which are not as clearly established as under statutes or judicial precedent in jurisdictions such as the United States.
While there is some case law in the Cayman Islands on these matters, it is not as developed as, for example, in the United States.
In addition, the laws of the Cayman Islands relating to the protection of the interests of minority shareholders differ in some
respects from those established under statutes or judicial precedent in existence in the United States. Such differences may mean
that our minority shareholders may have less protection than they would have under the laws of the United States. Due to the less
protective nature of such laws in the Cayman Islands, our shareholders may have more difficulty in protecting their interests in
the face of actions by our management or directors than would shareholders of a corporation incorporated in some other jurisdictions.
Furthermore, the International
Tax Co-operation (Economic Substance) Law, 2018 (“ES Law”) came into effect in the Cayman Islands on January 1, 2019,
requiring in-scope entities that carry on particular activities to have demonstrable economic substance in Cayman. As we are headquartered
in the Cayman Islands, we do not expect the ES Law will have a material effect on our business and operations.
We may become a passive
foreign investment company, which could result in adverse U.S. tax consequences to U.S. investors.
We may be classified
as a passive foreign investment company by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Such characterization
could result in adverse U.S. tax consequences to you if you are a U.S. investor. For example, if we are a passive foreign investment
company, our U.S. investors will become subject to increased tax liabilities under U.S. tax laws and regulations and will become
subject to burdensome reporting requirements. The determination of whether or not we are a passive foreign investment company is
made on an annual basis and depends on the composition of our income and assets, including goodwill, from time to time. Specifically,
we will be classified as a passive foreign investment company for U.S. tax purposes if, after the application of look-through rules,
either (a) 75% or more of our gross income in a taxable year is passive income, or (b) the average percentage of our assets (by
value) in a taxable year that produce or are held for production of passive income is at least 50%. Our judgment is not binding
on the Internal Revenue Service. We cannot assure you that we will not be a passive foreign investment company for the current
or any future taxable year. See “Taxation—United States Federal Income Taxation—Passive Foreign Investment Company.”
Holders of ADSs may not be able to exercise
their right to vote.
Holders of our ADSs
may instruct the depositary of our ADSs to vote the ordinary shares underlying their ADSs but only if we ask the depositary to
ask for instructions. Otherwise, they will not be able to exercise their right to vote unless they withdraw the ordinary shares
underlying the ADSs they hold. However, they may not know about the meeting sufficiently enough in advance to withdraw those ordinary
shares. If we ask for instructions, the depositary will notify the holders of the upcoming vote and arrange to deliver our voting
materials to them. We cannot assure you that holders will receive the voting materials in time to ensure that they can instruct
the depositary to vote their ordinary shares. In addition, the depositary and its agents are not responsible for failing to carry
out voting instructions or for the manner of carrying out voting instructions. This means that holders may not be able to exercise
their right to vote, and there is no guarantee that the ordinary shares underlying your ADSs would be voted as requested.
The depositary for
our ADSs may give us a discretionary proxy to vote the ordinary shares underlying your ADSs if holders of ADSs do not vote at shareholders’
meetings which could adversely affect their interests.
Under the deposit agreement
for the ADSs, the depositary will give us a discretionary proxy to vote the ordinary shares on behalf of the underlying ADSs at
shareholders’ meetings if the holder of the ADSs did not vote, unless we notify the depositary that we do not wish to receive
said discretionary proxy. Examples where we would not want to receive or exercise a discretionary proxy include, without limitation,
instances where we think there is substantial shareholder opposition to the particular question, or we think the particular question
would have a material adverse impact on our shareholders.
The effect of this
discretionary proxy is that holders of ADSs cannot prevent the ordinary shares underlying their ADSs from being voted, absent the
situation described above, and it may make it more difficult for shareholders to influence the management of our company. Holders
of our ordinary shares are not subject to a discretionary proxy.
Holders of ADSs may
not receive distributions on ordinary shares or any value for them if it is illegal or impractical to make them available.
The depositary of our
ADSs has agreed to pay to ADS holders the cash dividends or other distributions it or the custodian for our ADSs receives on ordinary
shares or other deposited securities after deducting its fees and expenses. Holders of our ADSs will receive these distributions
in proportion to the number of ordinary shares the ADSs represent. However, the depositary is not responsible if it decides that
it is unlawful or impractical to make a distribution available to any holders of ADSs. We have no obligation to take any other
action to permit the distribution of our ADSs, ordinary shares, rights or anything else to holders of our ADSs. This means that
ADS holders may not receive the distributions we make on ordinary shares or any value for them if it is illegal or impractical
for us to make them available. These restrictions may have a material adverse effect on the value of the ADSs.
Holders of ADSs may be subject to limitations
on transfer of ADSs.
ADSs represented by
American Depositary Receipts (“ADRs”) are transferable on the books of the depositary. However, the depositary may
close its books at any time or from time to time when it deems expedient in connection with the performance of its duties. The
depositary may refuse to deliver, transfer or register transfers of our ADSs generally when our books or the books of the depositary
are closed, or at any time if we or the depositary thinks it is advisable to do so because of any requirement of law or any government
or governmental body, or under any provision of the deposit agreement, or for any other reason.
ITEM 4.
|
INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY
|
HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPANY
Our legal name is O2Micro
International Limited. We are incorporated in the Cayman Islands. Our registered office is located at Maples Corporate Services
Limited, Ugland House, P.O. Box 309, South Church Street, Grand Cayman KY1-1104, Cayman Islands. Our principal executive offices
are located at Grand Pavilion Commercial Centre, West Bay Road, P.O. Box 32331 Grand Cayman KY1-1209, Cayman Islands. Our telephone
number is (345) 945-1110. We have a subsidiary, O2Micro, Inc., which was incorporated as a California corporation in
March 1995. In March 1997, O2Micro International Limited was incorporated as a Cayman Islands company. In March 1997,
we exchanged our ordinary shares and preference shares for common stock and preferred stock of O2Micro, Inc. After the
exchange, we held all of the outstanding capital stock of O2 Micro, Inc., our wholly owned subsidiary in the United
States. Our shares were initially listed on NASDAQ on August 23, 2000 and on the Cayman Islands Stock Exchange on February 1, 2001.
On November 25, 2005, we effected a 50-for-1 share split of our ordinary shares and created an ADS program for our ADSs to be quoted
on NASDAQ, with each ADS representing 50 ordinary shares. We delisted our ordinary shares from NASDAQ on November 25, 2005 and
listed our ADSs on NASDAQ on November 28, 2005, the next trading day.
Our agent for service
of process in the U.S. for the purpose of our securities filings is our chief executive officer, Sterling Du, c/o O2Micro,
Inc., 3118 Patrick Henry Drive, Santa Clara, CA 95054.
We have incorporated
various wholly-owned subsidiaries, including (among others) O2Micro Electronics, Inc. (“O2Micro-Taiwan”),
O2Micro International Japan Ltd. (“O2Micro-Japan”), and O2Micro (China) Co., Ltd.
(“O2Micro-China”). O2Micro-Taiwan is engaged in operations and sales support services. O2Micro-Japan
is engaged in sales support services. O2Micro-China and other subsidiaries are mostly engaged in research and development
services.
For the three years
ended December 31, 2019, our principal capital expenditures were approximately $3.6 million in the purchase of property and equipment.
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
Our business focuses
on designing, developing and marketing high performance integrated circuits and solutions for manufacturers of products in the
consumer electronics, computer, industrial, communications, and automotive markets. We have targeted, and are designing products
for, applications such as LCD and LED monitors, LCD and LED televisions, notebook computers, tablet computers, low/zero emission
vehicles, mobile phones, power tools, energy efficient technology relating to sophisticated batteries, LED lighting including general
lighting, and portable electronics devices. Some of the features of our integrated circuit products include the following: managing
and providing power for LCD and LED lighting; controlling and monitoring battery charging and discharging in portable electronic
devices and vehicles; performing DC/DC and AC/DC conversion; and providing select and switch functionality between power sources.
We believe that our
focus on these products provides us with an opportunity to participate in large and growing markets. Potential future growth in
the LED television, mobile computing, communications, electric vehicles, power tools, uninterrupted power supplies and general
lighting represents attractive growth opportunities.
Our integrated circuit
products use analog and mixed-signal designs that combine analog and digital circuits on a single chip, reducing the number of
components needed for function performance, thereby allowing our customers to reduce the size, weight, power requirements and/or
cost of their products. We offer a wide range of proprietary application specific standard products as well as customized products.
We work closely with our customers to identify their product needs and establish engineering priorities for new product designs
and development. We believe that our system-level expertise and extensive experience with power management systems allow us to
more effectively develop proprietary solutions and foster long-term relationships with our customers.
We sell our products
to OEMs, ODMs and module makers. Our integrated circuits have been incorporated into products sold by Acer, Black & Decker,
Dell, Dyson, General Electric, Hewlett-Packard, Lenovo, LG Electronics, Makita, NEC, Panasonic, Samsung Electronics, Sharp, Skyworth,
Sony, TCL, TPV, TTI and Toshiba, among others. We sell our products through our direct sales force, independent sales representatives
and/or distributors in Asia, Europe and North America. We also have design centers in many of our key markets to provide design
and engineering support to our customers. We outsource the fabrication of our products to standard high volume semiconductor foundries.
This “fabless” approach allows us to focus on product development, minimize fixed costs and capital expenditures, and
access diverse manufacturing technologies.
Industry Background
The markets for consumer
electronics, mobile computing, communications, automotive, and industrial products, such as LCD monitors, LCD and LED televisions,
tablets, mobile handsets and portable entertainment devices, power tools, vacuum cleaners, and eVehicles are large and growing
as functionality increases and prices decrease. One of the most significant challenges in these markets remains the efficient management
of power. As the number of applications and features available for these products has increased, the number and variety of power
loads, or individual subsystems requiring voltage or current regulation, has also grown. Each additional application or feature
can require multiple functions and circuits that, in turn, require more individually-regulated and managed power sources. Increasingly,
manufacturers are turning to innovative new semiconductor technologies to manage the available power source capacity more efficiently.
Power management integrated
circuits deliver power and regulate voltage, controlling the flow of electrical energy among the various power loads and energy
sources in a product or system. Power management requires a combination of two distinct technological disciplines: digital integrated
circuit design and analog integrated circuit design. Digital circuits, such as microprocessor and memory semiconductors, provide
most of the functionality of computer processing. However, digital circuits generally cannot handle significant amounts of current
or multiple voltage levels. In contrast, analog circuits use and manipulate continuously varying voltage and current levels. Battery
power systems, which have relatively high and continuously varying power levels, are inherently analog systems.
Digital integrated
circuit technology can be used to manage power systems more intelligently and efficiently and help to prolong battery life in mobile
applications. However, since battery power systems are analog by nature, mixed-signal integrated circuits, or circuits that incorporate
both digital and analog technologies, are necessary in order to harness the intelligence provided by digital technology. Designing
mixed-signal integrated circuits poses a number of difficulties: analog circuits are more sensitive than digital circuits to the
physical layout and electrical characteristics of the circuit; analog circuit designers must have a very high level of circuit
design experience; and basic differences in the technologies used in digital and analog circuit design make combining the technologies
problematic.
In addition, mixed-signal
integrated circuits comprise both digital and analog components, and the trend toward more complex devices has increased the number
of components substantially. Integrating the functions of those components on a single chip, known as a system-on-a-chip, can enable
manufacturers to make products smaller, lighter, and more reliable. Thus, as mobile computing and communications devices grow in
complexity and functionality, there is an increasing need for higher levels of systems integration. In addition, variances in battery
designs among manufacturers make it more difficult to design intelligent systems that are optimized for particular power systems.
Most consumer electronics,
mobile computing, communications, automotive, and industrial product manufacturers need mixed-signal and analog integrated circuits
specifically designed to optimize the power system usage in their devices to enable them to offer new devices with richer functionality
and longer battery lives. These semiconductors should also be highly integrated and standards-based to help manufacturers create
products that are smaller, lighter, easier to use, more reliable and more cost-efficient to design and produce. In addition, in
mobile device markets where product life cycles can be less than one year, these solutions typically need to be developed using
advanced design methodologies to allow manufacturers to achieve rapid time-to-market with their new products.
Several different process
technologies are available for designing and fabricating analog and digital integrated circuits. Of these, complementary metal
oxide semiconductor, or CMOS, is the most widely used process technology, especially for purely digital integrated circuits. CMOS
processes are described in terms of feature size, or geometry, and are measured in microns. One micron equals one millionth of
a meter. Currently, advanced process technologies achieve feature sizes of 0.09 micron, 0.065 micron, 0.04 micron and smaller.
However, small feature size circuits can become damaged when exposed to high voltages and therefore power management integrated
circuits are typically fabricated using larger feature sizes. For this reason, older manufacturing facilities, or fabs, having
feature sizes of 0.18 micron and 0.5 micron or greater, have traditionally been used in fabricating power management integrated
circuits, while the most advanced, and most expensive fabs are used for digital and non-power management analog integrated circuits.
Products
We market power management
components and solutions for the communications, computer, consumer, industrial, and automotive markets. Our power management products
include ICs to i) provide power for LCD and LED lighting, ii) control and monitoring of battery charging and discharging, iii)
DC/DC and AC/DC conversion, iv) provide select and switch functionality between power sources. In particular, our core technologies
in the Application Specific Integrated Circuit (“ASIC”) chips are our exclusive, proprietary technology, which allows
us to deliver enhanced performance and service to our customers. The majority of our products are sold into the following four
end-markets:
•
|
Consumer electronics market, including LCD and LED televisions, desktop and notebook monitors, portable media players, digital cameras, GPS/PND solutions for directional assistance, PDAs, games, and general lighting products (including LED light bulbs);
|
|
|
•
|
Computer market, including desktop computers, LCD and LED monitors, tablet computers, notebooks, netbooks, and mobile communication applications, including smart phones; and
|
|
|
•
|
Industrial market and Automotive, including any product that is specified to operate over an extended temperature range, i.e., beyond the standard commercial operating temperature range of standard semiconductor products (zero degrees to 70 degrees centigrade). These products include battery management systems for power tools, electric bikes, vacuum cleaners, LEV applications, LCD and LED monitors, notebooks, netbooks, industrial PCs, and general lighting products, as well as GPS units for navigational assistance in vehicles, Electric and Hybrid Vehicle (EV/HEV) battery management, and in-vehicle passenger entertainment and communication systems.;
|
The majority of our
revenue is derived from the sale of our products in the consumer, industrial, and computer markets. Additionally, we have increased
our efforts to expand our product portfolio addressing opportunities in the automotive and communications markets.
Marketing, Sales, and Customer Support
Our marketing strategy
is focused on the sale of proprietary analog and mixed-signal integrated circuits to customers in the consumer electronics, computer,
industrial, communications, and automotive markets. These markets tend to be dominated by a small number of major brand name companies.
As a result, we focus our resources on the major vendors in each market.
We primarily sell proprietary
application specific products to our customers and work with them on new product development. We also design customized products
for our customers. We work directly with our customers to create demand for our products by providing them with application specific
product information for their system design, engineering and procurement groups. We actively participate in their design processes
to introduce them to our products and the target applications our products address. We endeavor to design products that will meet
increasingly complex and specific design requirements, but which will also support widespread demand for these future products.
We typically undertake a four-to-eight month development process with our customers. If successful, this process culminates in
a customer deciding to use our product in its system and/or products, which we refer to as a design win. Volume production generally
takes an additional three-to-six months after the initial design win confirmation. Once our products are accepted and designed
into an application, the customer is likely to continue to use the same power architecture and derivative products in a number
of its models, which tends to extend our product life cycles.
We sell our products
to OEMs, ODMs and module makers. We market and sell these products through a combination of our direct sales force, independent
sales representatives and distributors. We maintain direct sales offices in most of our major markets which include China, Taiwan,
Korea, and Japan.
We pay our direct sales
force on a salary and performance bonus basis only. Our independent sales representatives are paid on a commission basis, based
on a percentage of the actual sales referred by them. For sales through sales representatives, we invoice and deliver our products
directly to the customers. We have also entered into distributorship arrangements with distributors for the sale of our products
at the request of several of our major end-customers. For our other customers, sales are made through our direct sales offices
in Japan, Taiwan, Korea and China. It is customary practice for OEMs, ODMs and module makers to purchase products like ours through
distributors because of the ancillary services provided by them such as inventory storage, payment terms and conditions and just-in-time
delivery. We may provide a discount on the prices of the products we sell to our distributors (as compared to the prices we offer
to end customers), depending on the terms and conditions of the individual purchases. We evaluate our inventory on a quarterly
basis and full provision is made for inventory which is over six months old and without end customer demand based on forecasted
product demand and market conditions.
Our marketing efforts include market analysis, participation
in industry trade shows and technical conferences, sales training, publication of technical articles, maintenance of our web site
and advertising. We maintain customer support staff in China, Japan, Korea, Taiwan, and the United States for post order servicing
and applications support.
Seasonality
The consumer electronics
and computer markets are characterized by seasonal volume increases primarily driven by increased consumer spending during the
holiday season. We normally experience the higher sales volume to our customers in these markets, when such customers increase
their inventories in anticipation of increased seasonal demand. Our customers in the industrial and communications markets are
to a lesser extent subject to seasonal consumer demand. As a result, our sales volume to those customers has been largely consistent
from quarter-to-quarter.
Customers
We focus on the major
OEMs (or brand owners) in the consumer electronics, computer, industrial and communications markets. Many of these major OEMs use
third-party providers, such as ODMs, module makers or other intermediaries, to produce their products or portions of their products
containing our components. Hence, the majority of our direct sales are to these third-party providers.
We have no long-term
volume sales contracts with any of our major customers. The majority of our sales to customers are conducted on the basis of purchase
orders, which set out the specific terms for a particular sale. We price our products primarily with reference to the prevailing
market conditions, taking into consideration the complexity, technology and features of the product, the order size and the relationship
with the customer.
The table below sets
forth, for the periods indicated, the dollar amount of our revenues by geographic region:
|
|
Years Ended December 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
China
|
|
$
|
52,233
|
|
|
$
|
55,303
|
|
|
$
|
51,962
|
|
U.S.A.
|
|
|
2,077
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
Taiwan
|
|
|
2,016
|
|
|
|
1,987
|
|
|
|
2,305
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
1,354
|
|
|
|
1,485
|
|
|
|
3,148
|
|
Malaysia
|
|
|
1,287
|
|
|
|
1,396
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
Korea
|
|
|
950
|
|
|
|
1,201
|
|
|
|
1,435
|
|
Singapore
|
|
|
648
|
|
|
|
959
|
|
|
|
905
|
|
Other
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
60,928
|
|
|
$
|
62,714
|
|
|
$
|
60,205
|
|
We generally extend
to our customers credit terms varying from 30 to 60 days. We may adjust our usual credit terms according to each customer’s
credit history as well as local market practice. Our customers generally pay us either by direct wire transfer or under letter
of credit arrangement. To date, we have not experienced any material problems relating to customer payments or material write-offs
of accounts receivable due to uncollectability.
Manufacturing
We subcontract the
manufacture of our products and most of the testing for our products to semiconductor foundries, assembly and testing service providers.
This “fabless” approach allows us to focus on product development, reduce fixed costs and capital expenditures, and
access diverse manufacturing technologies.
We use established
mainstream processes for the manufacture of our products. This approach reduces our technical risks and minimizes the risks related
to production capacity constraints.
Wafer Manufacturing
Wafer manufacturing
is a capital intensive and complex operation which takes place at dedicated facilities of semiconductor foundries. After we have
designed our integrated circuits, we place orders with a semiconductor foundry to fabricate wafers with our integrated circuits
embedded in them. The semiconductor foundry purchases raw unprocessed wafers, or silicon substrates, and processes them according
to mutually agreed manufacturing specifications to fabricate the wafers used in our products. Currently, the majority of our wafers
are fabricated using 0.15 to 0.4 micron BCD semiconductor processes. The wafer fabrication process generally takes 6 to 10 weeks.
Fabricated wafers are then shipped by the semiconductor foundry, according to our instructions, to either an assembly service provider
or to an electrical wafer sort service provider.
Our major semiconductor foundry providers are CSMC, VIS, and
TPSC. We do not enter into long-term contracts with our semiconductor foundry providers. They manufacture our products on a purchase-order
basis in accordance with our specifications and requirements. In general, the cost charged to us for the foundry services depends
on the manufacturing process technologies, as well as order size and foundry capacity utilization.
Assembly and Testing
The fabricated wafers
may or may not require electrical wafer sort prior to assembly. The completed wafers are either sent to an assembly service provider
for assembly or held at our warehouse facilities, or an “inventory hub,” for assembly at a later date. An inventory
hub is a provider of warehousing services. We often hold inventory of our semi-finished products in wafer form because it is at
this manufacturing stage that most time has been invested, with much of the cost not yet incurred, and we then have the flexibility
of choosing the type of packaging into which they are to be assembled. The wafer sort and assembly process generally takes three
to six weeks.
Once our integrated
circuits are assembled and packaged, they are ready for final electrical testing. We instruct the assembly service provider to
send our packaged integrated circuits to a testing service provider for final testing or our warehouse facilities (or an inventory
hub) for testing at a later date. The electrical testing process generally takes a few days. Once our products have been tested,
they are ready for use by our customers.
Finished products may
be sent to our customers or their designees such as third party service providers that manufacture their products or a portion
of their products containing our integrated circuits. Our customers may request for our integrated circuits to be shipped in plastic
tubes or trays, several to a tube or tray, or use a form of packaging called “tape and reel” that more readily provides
for automated assembly of our integrated circuits into their products. If a customer orders “tape and reel” packaging,
this is done either at a testing service provider or a “tape and reel” service provider prior to shipment of our products
to the customer.
We utilize several
assembly and testing service providers in Taiwan, China and other areas of Asia on a purchase order basis. They assemble and test
our products based on our specifications and requirements. In general, the cost charged to us for these assembly and testing services
depends on prevailing market rates for these services and our relationship with the service provider. Typically analog and mixed-signal
products have a greater portion of their product cost associated with product testing than digital products.
Our current credit
terms with our foundry, assembly and testing service providers vary from 30 to 60 days, depending on our relationships with each
of them. We generally pay our service providers by direct wire transfer.
We also have made investments
in certain of our current suppliers and potential future suppliers, including software developers, foundries and testing service
providers. These investments enable us to enhance our business relationships with these suppliers to ensure the adequacy of foundry
capacity allocation and quality of services provided to us. We plan to continue to evaluate additional investment opportunities
in our supply chain.
Competition
We compete in the market
for analog and mixed-signal integrated circuits based on such factors as product performance, power efficiency, new technologies,
functional innovation, reliability, price and availability. We believe our principal competitors include Renesas Electronics Corporation,
Analog Devices, Inc., Maxim Integrated Products, Inc., Monolithic Power Systems, Inc., Ricoh Company, Ltd., Richtek Technology
Corporation, Rohm Co., Ltd, Silergy Corporation and Texas Instruments Incorporated. In addition to these competitors, other integrated
circuit companies may decide to enter the market with analog and mixed-signal integrated circuit products that compete with our
products or incorporate functions similar to those provided by our products.
Intellectual Property
Our intellectual property
is primarily developed in-house. We do, from time to time, acquire intellectual property from third parties which we believe is
instrumental or complementary to our business. We also license and sell our intellectual property to third parties in exchange
for royalties or other consideration. From time to time, we may seek acquisitions to acquire businesses or technologies where synergies
exist. Our success depends significantly upon our ability to protect our intellectual property. Despite our efforts to protect
our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy aspects of our products or obtain and use information that we
regard as proprietary. Competitors may recruit our employees who have access to our proprietary technologies, processes and operations.
We rely in part on
patents to protect our intellectual property. As of December 31, 2019, we had approximately 545 patents issued in the United States
and approximately 1,260 patents issued in other countries. In addition, we had approximately 25 patent applications pending in
the United States Patent and Trademark Office, and approximately 192 patent applications pending in various countries other than
the United States which may or may not be issued. Even if these patents are issued, taken together with our existing patents, they
may not be sufficiently broad to protect all of our proprietary rights, or they may prove to be unenforceable. To protect our proprietary
rights, we also rely on a combination of copyrights, trademarks, trade secret laws, contractual provisions, licenses and mask work
protection under the Federal Semiconductor Chip Protection Act of 1984, and similar laws in other jurisdictions. We also enter
into confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants and customers, and we seek to control access to, and distribution
of, our proprietary information. We may from time to time grant rights to third parties for our patents and other intellectual
property.
The laws of some foreign
countries do not protect our proprietary rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States, and many companies have
encountered substantial infringement problems in these countries, including countries in which we have sold and continue to sell
a significant portion of our products. There is a risk that our means of protecting our proprietary rights may not be adequate.
For example, our competitors may independently develop similar technology, duplicate our products, or design around our patents
and our other intellectual property rights. If we fail to protect our intellectual property adequately, it would make it easier
for our competitors to sell competing products.
Given the inherent
uncertainties in litigation, there cannot be any assurance that we will prevail in any of the pending litigation matters, and we
cannot predict the outcome of any such litigation. Litigation is costly, time consuming, and may distract management from other
important tasks and, in patent litigation where we are the plaintiff, there is a risk that our patents may be held invalid or unenforceable.
In addition, in any litigation arising from claims that we infringe on the intellectual property rights of others, an adverse result
could involve an injunction to prevent the sales of a material portion of our products, a reduction or the elimination of the value
of related inventories, and the assessment of a substantial monetary award for damages related to past sales, any of which could
have a material adverse effect on our result of operations and financial condition.
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
We are incorporated under the laws of the
Cayman Islands and we are the parent company for the various subsidiaries that conduct our business on a worldwide basis. As of
December 31, 2019, our significant subsidiaries, all of which are wholly-owned, are:
Significant Subsidiary
|
Country of Incorporation
|
Date of Incorporation
|
O2Micro, Inc.
|
U.S.A.
|
March 1995
|
O2Micro Electronics, Inc.
|
Taiwan
|
March 1999
|
O2Micro International Japan Limited
|
Japan
|
August 1999
|
O2Micro (Wuhan) Co., Ltd.
|
China
|
January 2001
|
O2Micro (Beijing) Co., Ltd.
|
China
|
February 2001
|
O2Micro (China) Co., Ltd.
|
China
|
April 2001
|
O2Micro Korea Ltd.
|
Korea
|
March 2003
|
O2Micro (Chengdu) Co., Ltd.
|
China
|
July 2004
|
O2Micro (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
|
China
|
August 2018
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
The table below describes
our headquarters and the facilities where the above subsidiaries are located as of December 31, 2019:
Location
|
|
Approx. Available
Square Feet
|
|
Lease Expiration
|
|
|
|
|
|
California, USA
|
|
|
37,180
|
|
|
|
not applicable
|
|
Taipei, Taiwan
|
|
|
10,828
|
|
|
|
2024
|
|
Hsinchu, Taiwan
|
|
|
22,418
|
|
|
|
2029
|
|
Tokyo, Japan
|
|
|
1,420
|
|
|
|
2021
|
|
Wuhan, China
|
|
|
14,982
|
|
|
|
2021
|
|
Beijing, China
|
|
|
5,251
|
|
|
|
2020
|
|
Shanghai, China
|
|
|
20,179
|
|
|
|
not applicable
|
|
Seoul, Korea
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
2020
|
|
Chengdu, China
|
|
|
20,011
|
|
|
|
2020
|
|
Shengzhen, China
|
|
|
11,287
|
|
|
|
2020
|
|
Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
2020
|
|
We maintain our Cayman
Islands office to handle corporate affairs, process invoices and receive payments. Research and development, marketing, sales,
applications and administrative staff are located in California, USA and China. Marketing, sales, applications, design, worldwide
production support, final inspection and shipping, and general and administrative staff are located in Taiwan. We have offices
in Japan and Korea for marketing, sales, design, and applications. We believe our current facilities are adequate for our needs
for the foreseeable future, and that any additional space required will be available to us on commercially reasonable terms.
In May 2004, we purchased
a 37,180 square foot building in California, housing our USA operations. The purchase price was approximately $4.6 million. In
October 2005, we purchased a 30,448 square foot facility in Shanghai, China for approximately $7.1 million. In April 2006, we purchased
29,935 square foot of undeveloped land in Hsinchu, Taiwan for approximately $8.8 million. In August 2009, we sold the land in Hsinchu,
Taiwan, to a developer in exchange for a pre-sale of a portion of the real estate after it is developed, which will include a portion
of an office building and a portion of a parking lot, with a carrying value of approximately $8.9 million.
In the fourth quarter
of 2014, a portion of the building units in Taiwan were completed. Considering our current operating scale and capital requirements,
we determined to lease out three units in Taiwan to a third party in December 2014. The Company has also sold 5 building units
to third parties during the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014. In the third quarter of 2019, we sold the remaining two units
of our building in Taiwan which were classified as property and equipment pending for inspection to
a third party and a net gain of $500,000 was recorded for the year ended December 31, 2019. There were no building transactions
occurred for the year ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.
ITEM 4A.
|
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
|
None.
ITEM 5.
|
OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS
|
Overview
We design, develop
and market high performance integrated circuits for power management components and systems. We also license a limited portion
of our proprietary intellectual property to third parties. Our revenues have been derived primarily from the sale of analog and
mixed-signal integrated circuit products to customers in the consumer electronics, computer, industrial, communications, and automotive
markets.
Our revenues from operations
were $60.9 million in 2019, $62.7 million in 2018, and $60.2 million in 2017, respectively. The decrease in revenues in 2019 was
mainly attributable to trade war issues, coupled with an already weakening Chinese economy. Although we are taking steps to mitigate
the impact of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) on our business, we expect it could have a negative impact on our business and results
of operations in the near term. Because this situation is continuing to develop, the full extent of the impact is not yet known
and will depend on, among other things, the duration of quarantines and other travel restrictions, both within China and into and
out of China, and the degree to which the virus spreads beyond currently affected geographies. For more information about factors
that could impact our business see Part I, Item 3 "Key Information – Risk Factors." Our overall gross margin has
fluctuated in the past and is likely to fluctuate in the future due to the stages of our products in their life cycles, variations
in our product mix, the timing of our product introductions and specific product manufacturing costs. New products typically have
higher gross margins than products that are more mature. Gross margins on the products we sell will typically decline over the
life of these products due to competitive pressures and volume pricing agreements.
Operating expenses
from operations were $38.4 million in 2019, $40.1 million in 2018, and $37.0 million in 2017. Our operating expenses decreased
in 2019 primarily due to decreased personnel and R&D expenses.
Our net loss was $5.0
million in 2019. Our net income was $2.1 million in 2018. Our net loss was $6.1 million in 2017. The increase in net loss in 2019
was primarily due to a significant gain recognized on long-term investments as a result of our adoption of ASU 2016-01 in 2018.
We utilize a fabless
semiconductor business model, which means we focus on designing, developing and marketing products, while having these products
manufactured by large independent semiconductor foundries. As a fabless semiconductor company, we do not need to invest significant
capital to manufacture semiconductor devices, and can take advantage of some of the cost-efficiencies of third-party foundries.
We place purchase orders for specific quantities of packaged semiconductor devices or wafers at set prices. We currently use third
parties to test and assemble most of our products, which reduces the capital we need to invest in these activities. We also use
independent assembly suppliers for the production of our systems security solutions products.
We sell our products
through a combination of direct sales offices, sales representatives and distributors. Revenue from product sales to customers
and distributors is generally recognized at the time of shipment, including revenue that has been realized and earned. Under certain
conditions, customers may return defective products and we will provide replacements at no charge to the customers for defective
products.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our discussion and
analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our financial statements, which have been prepared
in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
The preparation of
our consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amount of assets, liabilities,
revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We evaluate our estimates on an ongoing basis,
including those related to valuation allowance for deferred tax assets, allowance for doubtful accounts, inventory valuation, useful
lives for property and equipment, impairment of long-lived assets, contingencies, fair value, impairment of securities, allowance
for sales returns, and uncertain tax liabilities. We base our estimates and judgments on our historical experience, knowledge of
current conditions and our beliefs of what could occur in the future considering available information. Because our estimates may
vary in each situation, our actual results may differ from our estimates under different assumptions and conditions.
Our management considers the following factors
in reviewing our financial statements:
|
·
|
the selection of critical accounting policies; and
|
|
·
|
the judgments and other uncertainties affecting the application of those critical accounting policies.
|
The selection of critical
accounting policies, the judgments and other uncertainties affecting the application of those policies and the sensitivity of reported
results to changes in conditions and assumptions are factors to be considered when reviewing our financial statements. Our principal
accounting policies are set forth in detail in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual
Report.
We believe the following
critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments used in the preparation of our financial statements.
Revenue Recognition and Accounts Receivable Allowances
We generate revenue
primarily from product sales, either directly to a customer or through a distributor. In determining whether a contract exists,
we evaluate the terms of the arrangement including rights, obligations and payment term, the relationship with the customer or
distributor and their ability to pay.
At contract inception,
we assess the goods and shipping services promised in its contracts with customers and identify a single performance obligation
that we satisfy at a point in time. We recognize product revenue from direct end customers and distributors and when the following
events have occurred: (a) we have transferred physical possession of the products, (b) we have a present right to payment, (c)
the customer has legal title to the products, and (d) the customer bears significant risks and rewards of ownership of the products.
In accordance with the shipping terms specified in the contracts, these criteria are generally met when the products are shipped
from our vendors (such as the “Ex Works” shipping term) or delivered to the customers’ locations (such as the
“Delivered Duty Paid” shipping term). Payment for sales to customers is generally due on standard commercial terms.
The revenue recognized is adjusted based on an analysis of historical data and contractual terms. These adjustments, which are
not material, generally include adjustments for pricing arrangements, product returns and incentives.
In addition, we record
allowances for accounts receivable that we estimate may not be collected. We monitor collectability of accounts receivable primarily
through review of accounts receivable aging. When collection is at risk, we assess the impact on amounts recorded for bad debts
and, if necessary, record a charge in the period such evaluation is made.
Inventories
Our inventories are
stated at the lower of standard cost or net realizable value. Cost is determined on a currently adjusted standard basis, which
approximates actual cost on a first-in first-out basis. Because of the cyclicality of the market, inventory levels, obsolescence
of technology and product life cycles, we write down inventories to net realizable value based on backlog, forecasted product demand
and historical sales levels. Backlog is subject to revisions, cancellations and rescheduling. Actual demand and market conditions
may be lower than those projected by us. This difference could have a material adverse effect on our gross margin should additional
inventory write downs become necessary. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, inventory write-downs were $1.4
million, $1.3 million, and $642,000, respectively.
Long-term Investments
Long-term investments
in listed companies over which we do not exercise significant influence are recorded at fair value, and any changes in fair value
are recognized in net income. Prior to the adoption of Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-01 and ASU 2018-03
in 2018, these investments in listed companies are classified as available-for-sale securities and are recorded at fair value.
Unrealized gains and losses on these investments are included in accumulated other comprehensive income and loss as a separate
component of shareholders’ equity, net of any related tax effect, unless unrealized losses are deemed other-than-temporary.
Unrealized losses are recorded as a charge to income when deemed other-than-temporary.
Long-term investments,
including non-marketable equity investments and interests in venture capital funds, are measured at cost with adjustments for observable
changes in price or impairments since those investments in equity securities do not have readily determinable fair value. Prior
to the adoption of ASU 2016-01 in 2018, these securities were accounted for using the cost method of accounting, measured at cost
less other-than-temporary impairment.
For the year ended
December 31, 2019 and 2018, we recognized $788,000 and $9.9 million net gain on long-term investments. For the years ended December
31, 2017, no impairment charges were recorded.
Leases
On January 1, 2019,
we adopted Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 842, “Leases”, using the modified retrospective
transition method applied to contracts that were not complete as of the adoption date. Consolidated financial results for reporting
periods beginning after January 1, 2019 are presented under ASC Topic 842, while prior period amounts continue to be reported in
accordance with ASC Topic 840, “Leases”.
Under ASC 842, we determine
if an arrangement is a lease at inception. Operating leases are included in operating lease ROU assets, current lease liabilities,
and noncurrent lease liabilities in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. ROU assets are included in the account of
property and equipment, net. ROU assets represent our right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities
represent our obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. Operating lease ROU assets and liabilities are recognized
at commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. As most of our leases do not provide an
implicit rate, we use the incremental borrowing rate based on the rate of interest we would have to pay on a collateralized basis
to borrow an amount equal to the lease payments under similar terms. Our lease terms do not include options to extend or terminate
leases unless we are reasonably certain that it will exercise those options. Lease expense for lease payments is recognized on
a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Payments for leases
of low-value assets under our capitalization policy and short-term leases with a lease term less than 12 months are recognized
as expenses on a straight-line basis during the lease term for which the recognition exemption is applied.
Under
ASC 840, operating lease payments are recognized as expenses on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
For
lease arrangements where we are the lessor, we recognize lease income from operating leases on a straight-line basis over the lease
term which is consistent under both ASC 842 and ASC840.
Long-Lived Assets
We perform periodic
reviews to determine whether facts and circumstances exist that would indicate that the carrying amounts of long-lived assets (including
ROU assets) might not be fully recoverable. If facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of long-lived assets might
not be fully recoverable, we compare projected undiscounted net cash flows associated with the related assets over their estimated
remaining useful life against their respective carrying amounts. In the event that the projected undiscounted cash flows are not
sufficient to recover the carrying value of the assets, the assets are written down to their estimated fair values based on the
expected discounted future cash flows attributable to the assets. Evaluation of impairment of long-lived assets requires estimates
in the forecast of future operating results that are used in the preparation of the expected future undiscounted cash flows. For
the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, no impairment charges were recorded.
Income Taxes
The provision for income
tax represents income tax paid and payable for the current year plus the changes in the deferred income tax assets and liabilities
during the year. Deferred income tax assets are primarily the tax effects of the operating loss carry-forwards, research and development
credit carry-forwards and temporary differences. On a periodic basis we evaluate the deferred tax assets balance for realizability.
To the extent we believe it is more likely than not that some portion of deferred tax assets will not be recognized, we will increase
the valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets. Realization of the deferred tax assets is dependent primarily upon future
taxable income, changes in tax laws and other factors. These changes, if any, may require possible material adjustment to the deferred
tax assets, resulting in a reduction in net income in the period when such determinations are made. The valuation allowance as
of December 31, 2019 and 2018 was 7.0 million and 6.9 million, respectively. We adopt a two-step approach to recognizing and measuring
uncertain tax positions. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available
evidence indicates it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals
or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount which is more than 50% likely
of being realized upon ultimate settlement.
We evaluate our future
growth phase and working capital requirements of each entity in the group in the foreseeable future to consider the repatriation
of earnings from subsidiaries of reinvestment of undistributed earnings. No incomes taxes expense and deferred taxes liabilities
will be accrued by us if we plan to reinvest undistributed earnings of subsidiaries. However, on the other hand, if we plan to
remit the undistributed earnings of subsidiaries, the accrual will be made based on our intention. Before the year of 2015, we
planned to reinvest the undistributed earnings of all subsidiaries and did not accrue any income tax expense and deferred taxes
liabilities. Beginning in the year of 2015, to better position ourselves for the future growth phase, we considered to remit the
undistributed earnings of subsidiaries in Taiwan and China. As a result, deferred tax liabilities from withholding tax for the
unremitted earnings in Taiwanese and Chinese subsidiaries have been recorded for $586,000 and $681,000 as of December 31, 2019
and 2018, respectively.
On December 22, 2017,
the President of the United States signed into law the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”). The Tax Act affects the
Company by (i) reducing the U.S. tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018, and (ii) impacting the values of the deferred
assets and liabilities. Pursuant to U.S. GAAP, changes in tax rates and tax laws are accounted for in the period of enactment,
and the resulting effects are included as components of the income tax provision related to continuing operations within the same
period. Therefore, the following changes in the tax laws have been accounted for in 2017. Our deferred tax assets and liabilities
and offsetting valuation allowance have been remeasured at the new enacted tax rate as of December 31, 2017. The amount of U.S.
net operating losses that we have is available and our ability to utilize them to reduce future taxable income is not impacted
by the Tax Act. In December 2017, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, Income Tax Accounting Implications of
the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“SAB 118”) which allows companies to record provisional amounts during a measurement
period not to extend beyond one year of the enactment date. Since the Act was passed late in the fourth quarter of 2017, and ongoing
guidance and accounting interpretation was yet to be issued, our accounting of the transition tax and deferred tax re-measurements
were incomplete as of December 31, 2017. We filed its 2017 Federal corporate income tax return in the first quarter of 2018. The
final analysis and impact of the Act is reflected in the tax provision and related tax disclosures for the year ended December
31, 2018. There was no material change in estimate which would have been reflected within the measurement period in accordance
with SAB 118.
In 2018, the Income
Tax Act in Taiwan was amended and, starting from January 1, 2019, surcharge of profit-seeking enterprise income tax on undistributed
earnings tax offset against dividend withholding for non-Taiwan resident was not available.
The ES Law came into
effect in the Cayman Islands on January 1, 2019, requiring in-scope entities that carry on particular activities to have demonstrable
economic substance in Cayman. As we are headquartered in the Cayman Islands, we do not expect the ES Law will have a material effect on our business and operations.
Legal Contingencies
We periodically assess
each matter in order to determine if a contingent liability should be recorded. In making the determination, we may, depending
on the nature of the matter, consult with external counsel and technical experts. Based on the information obtained combined with
our judgment regarding all the facts and circumstances of each matter, we reserve the right to determine whether it is probable
that a contingent loss may be incurred and whether the amount of such loss can be estimated. Should a loss be probable and estimable,
we will record a contingent loss by taking into consideration the advice received from experts in the specific matter, current
status of legal proceedings, prior case history and other factors. Should the judgments and estimates be incorrect, we may need
to record additional contingent losses that could materially adversely impact our results of operations.
Stock-Based Compensation
We grant stock options
to our employees and certain non-employees, and we estimate the fair value of share-based payment awards on the date of grant using
an option-pricing model. The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense ratably
over the requisite service periods. We have elected to use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of
stock options on the date of grant. The option pricing module requires the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the
expected stock price volatility, risk-free interest rate and expected option life, and by estimated option shares to be vested
at the end of the vesting schedule. We also grant restricted stock units (“RSU”) to our employees and the RSU are measured
based on the fair market value of the underlying stock on the dates of grant.
Fair Value Measurements
We measure our cash
equivalents and marketable securities at fair value. We also determine the fair value of long-term investments and long-lived assets
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. Fair value is an exit price, representing
the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants.
As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would
use in pricing an asset or liability. A three-tier fair value hierarchy is established as a basis for considering such assumptions
and for inputs used in the valuation methodologies in measuring fair value:
Level 1 – Observable
inputs such as quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets;
Level 2 – Inputs,
other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly;
Level
3 – Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own
assumptions.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Please refer to the
discussions in note 2 to the consolidated financial statements.
Operating Results
The following table summarizes historical
results of operations as a percentage of revenues for the periods shown.
|
|
Years Ended December 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
47.5
|
|
|
|
49.0
|
|
|
|
48.9
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
52.5
|
|
|
|
51.0
|
|
|
|
51.1
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
31.3
|
|
|
|
31.5
|
|
|
|
29.9
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
31.7
|
|
|
|
32.5
|
|
|
|
31.6
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
63.0
|
|
|
|
64.0
|
|
|
|
61.5
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(10.5
|
)
|
|
|
(13.0
|
)
|
|
|
(10.4
|
)
|
Non-operating income–net
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
18.1
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(8.3
|
)%
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
|
(10.2
|
)%
|
The following table sets forth the breakdown
of our revenues by product category for the periods shown:
|
|
Years Ended December 31
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Integrated Circuits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mixed-signal
|
|
$
|
34,944
|
|
|
$
|
39,603
|
|
|
$
|
40,334
|
|
Analog
|
|
|
23,901
|
|
|
|
23,063
|
|
|
|
19,801
|
|
Digital
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
Licensing revenue
|
|
|
2,080
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
60,928
|
|
|
$
|
62,714
|
|
|
$
|
60,205
|
|
Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.
Operating Revenues.
Operating revenues consisted of product revenues generated principally by sales of our integrated circuit products. Revenues for
the year ended December 31, 2019 were $60.9 million, a decrease of $1.8 million or 2.8% from $62.7 million for the year ended December
31, 2018, which mainly attributable to trade war issues, coupled with an already weakening Chinese economy. In 2019, revenues from
our mixed-signal integrated circuit products were $34.9 million, a decrease of $4.7 million or 11.8% from $39.6 million in 2018,
which primarily resulted from decrease in demand of our LED driver and high current LED lighting. In 2019, revenues from analog
integrated circuit products were $23.9 million, an increase of $838,000 or 3.6% from $23.1 million in 2018, which resulted primarily
from increased sales of our battery management products. Revenues from our digital integrated circuit products were $3,000 in 2019,
a decrease of $45,000 or 94.0% from $48,000 in 2018. Revenues from our licensing revenue were $2.1 million in 2019, an increase
of $2.1 million or 100.0% from $0 in 2018, which was due to such sales activities are immaterial in prior years.
Gross Profit.
Gross profit represents operating revenues less cost of revenues. Cost of revenues primarily consists of the costs of purchasing
packaged integrated circuit products manufactured and assembled for us by independent foundries and packaging vendors and other
costs associated with the procurement, storage and shipment of these products. Gross profit from continuing operations for the
year ended December 31, 2019, was $32.0 million, a slight decrease of $5,000 or 0.0% from $32.0 million for the year ended December
31, 2018. This slight decrease was primarily due to the decreased sales in our LED driver offset by high current LED lighting that
have higher margin in 2019. Gross profit as a percentage of operating revenues for the year ended December 31, 2019, increased
to 52.5% from 51.0% for the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily attributable to the licensing revenue which contributes high
gross margin. We expect that our gross profit as a percentage of operating revenues will continue to fluctuate in the future as
a result of the stages of our products in their life cycles, variations in our product mix, the timing of our product introductions
and specific product manufacturing costs.
Research and Development
Expenses. Research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries and related costs of employees engaged in research,
design and development activities and, to a lesser extent, expenses for engineering expenses (e.g. one-time pilot run, engineering
sample, tooling, and testing expenses). Research and development expenses for the year ended December 31, 2019, were $19.1 million,
a decrease of $701,000 or 3.5% from $19.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The decrease primarily resulted from decreased
engineering expenses. As a percentage of operating revenues, research and development expenses were 31.3% for the year ended December
31, 2019, a decrease from 31.5% for the year ended December 31, 2018. Research and development expenses as a percentage of operating
revenues will fluctuate from quarter to quarter depending on the amount of operating revenues and the success of new product development
efforts, which we view as critical to our future growth. At any point in time, we may also have internal research and development
projects underway, which may or may not lead to new product designs. We expect to continue the development of innovative technologies
and processes for new products and we believe that a continued commitment to research and development is essential in order to
maintain the competitiveness of our existing products and to provide innovative new product offerings. Therefore, we expect to
continue to invest significant resources in research and development in the future.
Selling, General
and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of employee-related expenses, office
facilities costs, promotional expenses, and travel expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses for the year ended December
31, 2019, were $19.3 million, a decrease of $1.0 million or 5.1% from $20.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. This
decrease was primarily due to decreased personnel related expenses. As a percentage of operating revenues, selling, general and
administrative expenses were 31.7% for the year ended December 31, 2019, a decrease from 32.5% for the year ended December 31,
2018.
Non-operating Income-net.
Non-operating income-net reflects primarily interest earned on cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments, foreign
exchange transaction gains or losses, net gain recognized on long-term investments, and gain on sale of real estate. Non-operating
income-net was $2.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, a decrease of $8.8 million from non-operating income-net of $11.4
million for the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to a significant gain recognized on long-term investments as a result
of our adoption of ASU 2016-01 in 2018 and one of the equity securities went public with the Taipei Exchange in January 2018 with
a high stock price.
Income Tax Expense.
Income tax expense was $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, a slight increase of $30,000 from $1.1 million for
the year ended December 31, 2018.
Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.
Operating Revenues.
Operating revenues consisted of product revenues generated principally by sales of our integrated circuit products. Revenues for
the year ended December 31, 2018 were $62.7 million, an increase of $2.5 million or 4.2% from $60.2 million for the year ended
December 31, 2017, which primarily resulted from the increase in demand of our battery management products. In 2018, revenues from
our mixed-signal integrated circuit products were $39.6 million, a decrease of $731,000 or 1.8% from $40.3 million in 2017, which
primarily resulted from slight decrease in demand of our LED lighting products. In 2018, revenues from analog integrated circuit
products were $23.1 million, an increase of $3.3 million or 16.5% from $19.8 million in 2017, which resulted primarily from increased
sales of our battery management products. Revenues from our digital integrated circuit products were $48,000 in 2018, a decrease
of $2,000 or 4.0% from $50,000 in 2017. Revenues from our licensing revenue were $0 in 2018, a decrease of $20,000 or 100.0% from
$20,000 in 2017.
Gross Profit.
Gross profit represents operating revenues less cost of revenues. Cost of revenues primarily consists of the costs of purchasing
packaged integrated circuit products manufactured and assembled for us by independent foundries and packaging vendors and other
costs associated with the procurement, storage and shipment of these products. Gross profit from continuing operations for the
year ended December 31, 2018, was $32.0 million, an increase of $1.2 million or 3.9% from $30.8 million for the year ended December
31, 2017. This increase was primarily due to the increased sales in our battery management products that have higher margin in
2018. Gross profit as a percentage of operating revenues for the year ended December 31, 2018, decreased to 51.0% from 51.1% for
the year ended December 31, 2017, primarily due to the product mix of sales of new products with lower gross margins. We expect
that our gross profit as a percentage of operating revenues will continue to fluctuate in the future as a result of the stages
of our products in their life cycles, variations in our product mix, the timing of our product introductions and specific product
manufacturing costs.
Research and Development
Expenses. Research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries and related costs of employees engaged in research,
design and development activities and, to a lesser extent, expenses for engineering expenses (e.g. one-time pilot run, engineering
sample, tooling, and testing expenses). Research and development expenses for the year ended December 31, 2018, were $19.8 million,
an increase of $1.8 million or 9.9% from $18.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. The increase primarily resulted from
increased number of employees engaged in research and design activities. As a percentage of operating revenues, research and development
expenses were 31.5% for the year ended December 31, 2018, an increase from 29.9% for the year ended December 31, 2017. Research
and development expenses as a percentage of operating revenues will fluctuate from quarter to quarter depending on the amount of
operating revenues and the success of new product development efforts, which we view as critical to our future growth. At any point
in time, we may also have internal research and development projects underway, which may or may not lead to new product designs.
We expect to continue the development of innovative technologies and processes for new products and we believe that a continued
commitment to research and development is essential in order to maintain the competitiveness of our existing products and to provide
innovative new product offerings. Therefore, we expect to continue to invest significant resources in research and development
in the future.
Selling, General
and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of employee-related expenses, office
facilities costs, promotional expenses, and travel expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses for the year ended December
31, 2018, were $20.3 million, an increase of $1.3 million or 6.7% from $19.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. This
increase was primarily due to increased office facilities costs, promotional expenses , and travel expenses. As a percentage of
operating revenues, selling, general and administrative expenses were 32.5% for the year ended December 31, 2018, an increase from
31.6% for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Litigation Income.
Litigation income consists primarily of amounts received from settlement, damage awards, and award of costs or related interest.
Litigation income for the year ended December 31, 2018 was $0, a decrease of $19,000 or 100.0% from $19,000 for the year ended
December 31, 2017.
Non-operating Income-net.
Non-operating income-net reflects primarily interest earned on cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments, foreign
exchange transaction gains or losses, net gain recognized on long-term investments. Non-operating income-net was $11.4 million
for the year ended December 31, 2018, an increase of $10.3 million from non-operating income-net of $1.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2017, primarily due to increased net gain recognized on long-term investments as a result of our adoption of ASU 2016-01
and one of the equity securities went public with the Taipei Exchange in January 2018 with a high stock price.
Income Tax Expense.
Income tax expense was $1.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, a slight increase of $131,000 from $1.0 million
for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Since our inception,
we have financed our operations primarily through private sales of securities and through our initial public offering in August
2000, and our public offering in November 2001, as well as cash provided by operating activities prior to 2012. Cash, cash equivalents,
and short-term investments were in a total of $46.4 million at December 31, 2019, as compared to $38.6 million at December 31,
2018. Our operating activities generated cash inflows in the amount of $861,000 in the years ended December 31, 2019. Our operating
activities generated cash outflows in the amount of $8.0 million and $7.2 million in the years ended December 31, 2018, and 2017,
respectively.
Non-cash charges primarily
consist of depreciation of property and equipment, amortization of stock-based compensation, net gain recognized on long-term investments,
gain on sale of long-term investments, loss on asset write-off, gain on sale of real estate, gain on disposal of property and equipment,
inventory write-downs, and changes of deferred income tax assets and liabilities. The working capital components that have a significant
impact on our cash flows are accounts receivable, inventories, notes and accounts payable, prepaid expenses and other current assets,
deferred charges, and accrued expense and other current liabilities.
Net cash inflows/outflows
from operations resulted from net income/loss adjusted by non-cash changes and changes in inventories, accounts receivable, notes
and accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities, income tax payable, and other liabilities. For the year ended
December 31, 2019, net cash generated from operating activities was $861,000, primarily from our operating results during the year,
a decrease in accounts receivables, a decrease in prepaid expense and other current assets, and an increase in accrued expenses
and other current liabilities, partially offset by an increase in deferred charges. For the year ended December 31, 2018, net cash
used in operating activities was $8.0 million, primarily from our operating results during the year, an increase in accounts receivables,
an increase in inventories, an increase in prepaid expense and other current assets, and an increase in deferred charges, partially
offset by an increase in notes and accounts payable. For the year ended December 31, 2017, net cash used in operating activities
was $7.2 million, primarily from our operating results during the year, an increase in accounts receivables, an increase in inventories,
an increase in deferred charges, a decrease in notes and accounts payable.
In 2019, we had a net
cash outflow from investing activities of $22.1 million as compared to a net cash inflow of $12.7 million in 2018. In 2018, we
had a net cash inflow from investing activities of $12.7 million as compared to a net cash inflow of $4.8 million in 2017. This
net cash used in investing activities in 2019 was principally due to the net acquisition of short-term investments $29.7 million
and the acquisition of property and equipment of $1.7 million, offset by the sale of long-term investments of $7.1 million and
sale of real estate of $2.2 million. This net cash provided in investing activities in 2018 was principally due to the net sale
of short-term investments of $11.3 million and the disposal of long-term investments of $2.6 million, offset by the acquisition
of property and equipment of $1.3 million. In 2017, we had a net cash inflow from investing activities of $4.8 million as compared
to a net cash outflow of $1.3 million in 2016. This net cash provided in investing activities in 2017 was principally due to the
net sale of short-term investments of $4.1 million, the return of capital from long-term investments of $1.2 million, and the disposal
of property and equipment of $145,000, offset by the acquisition of property and equipment of $704,000.
Net cash outflow from
our financing activities in 2019 was $394,000 which was primarily due to the repurchase of $510,000 of our shares under a share
repurchase program, partially offset by proceeds of $116,000 from the exercise of stock options and issuance of shares under our
existing employee stock purchase plan for the year. Net cash outflow from our financing activities in 2018 was $355,000 which was
primarily due to the repurchase of $451,000 of our shares under a share repurchase program, partially offset by proceeds of $96,000
from the exercise of stock options and issuance of shares under our existing employee stock purchase plan for the year. Net cash
outflow from our financing activities in 2017 was $595,000 which was primarily due to the repurchase of $708,000 of our shares
under a share repurchase program, partially offset by proceeds of $113,000 from the exercise of stock options and issuance of shares
under our existing employee stock purchase plan for the year.
We believe our liquidity
provided by existing cash, cash equivalents balances and short-term investments will be sufficient to meet our capital requirements
for at least the next 12 months. We are also in the process of monetizing some of our real-estate assets and long-term investments
to enhance our capital resources and continue to monitor and reduce our operating spending seriously. We incurred capital expenditures
of $1.7 million, $1.3 million, and $704,000 in 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. Our future capital expenditure requirements
will depend on many factors, including the inventory levels we maintain, the level of investments we make in new technology and
improvements to existing technology, the levels of promotion and advertising required to launch new products and attain a competitive
position in the marketplace, and the market acceptance of our products. Thereafter, we may need to raise additional funds through
public or private financing. No assurance can be given that additional funds will be available or that we can obtain additional
funds on terms favorable to us.
Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, etc.
We believe that the
continued introduction of new products in our target markets is essential to our growth. As of December 31, 2019, we had approximately
238 full-time employees world-wide engaged in research and development efforts. Our total expenditures for research and development
were $19.1 million, $19.8 million, and $18.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively.
We employ designers
who are experienced in system architecture, analog, mixed signal and software design and development. We also utilize independent
contractors from time-to-time for specific research and development projects. Our internal research and development personnel thoroughly
review the external development processes and the design of these products as part of our quality assurance process. All development
is carried out using ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 certified design processes, and our design tools are continuously enhanced to improve
design, fabrication and verification of our products.
Our research and development
activities are a constantly evolving process which reflects the results of our ongoing projects, our expectations regarding market
developments and changes in customer demand and industry specifications. We commence new projects or alter the scope or direction
of existing projects on a regular basis under the guidance of our management and senior research personnel.
We work with our customers
to monitor the performance of our product designs and to provide support at each stage of customer product development. Due to
the complexity of our products, we maintain a significant direct applications support staff for customer technical support in our
key markets including in Taiwan and China. These direct applications engineering personnel assist with supporting existing products
at key customers. Additionally, we work closely with our customers to develop highly efficient power management products for specific
applications.
Trend Information
See “Risk
Factors” and “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” above.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
There
are no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition,
changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources
that is material to investors.
Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations
The table
below describes our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2019:
|
|
Payments due by period
|
Contractual Obligations
|
|
Total
|
|
Less than
1 year
|
|
1-3 years
|
|
3-5 years
|
|
More than
5 years
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
$
|
3,111
|
|
|
$
|
1,227
|
|
|
$
|
748
|
|
|
$
|
1,136
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
Licenses, maintenance and support
|
|
|
1,303
|
|
|
|
654
|
|
|
|
649
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
536
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
4,950
|
|
|
$
|
1,925
|
|
|
$
|
1,578
|
|
|
$
|
1,288
|
|
|
$
|
159
|
|
ITEM 6.
|
DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES
|
Directors and Senior Management
Our executive officers and directors and
their ages as of December 31, 2019, were as follows:
Name
|
Age
|
Position
|
Sterling Du
|
60
|
Chief Executive Officer, Class I Director and Chairman of the Board
|
Chuan Chiung “Perry” Kuo
|
60
|
Chief Financial Officer, Joint Secretary and Class I Director
|
James Keim
|
75
|
Class II Director and Head of Marketing and Sales
|
Michael Austin
|
84
|
Independent Non-executive Director, Class III Director, Chairman of the Nominating committee and member of Compensation Committee
|
Lawrence Lin
|
69
|
Independent Non-executive Director, Class II Director, Chairman of the Compensation Committee and member of Audit Committee
|
Ji Liu
|
84
|
Independent Non-executive Director, Class II Director
|
Teik Seng Tan
|
65
|
Independent Non-executive Director, Class I Director and Chairman of Audit Committee
|
Daniel Lenehan
|
64
|
Independent Non-executive Director, Class III Director and member of the Audit Committee
|
Vijay Kumar
|
57
|
Independent Non-executive Director and Class III Director and member of the Nominating Committee
|
Our Class I Directors
have held office from the date of the annual general meeting in 2017 for a three year term until 2020; our Class II Directors have
held office from the date of the annual general meeting in 2018 for a three year term until 2021; and our Class III Directors have
held office from the date of the annual general meeting in 2019 for a three year term until 2022.
Executive Directors
Sterling Du
has served as our chief executive officer and chairman of our board of directors since March 1997 and as a Class I Director since
June 2001. He also served as our chief financial officer from March 1997 to March 1999. From May 1995 to March 1997, Mr. Du was
president and chief executive officer of O2Micro, Inc., our predecessor entity. From October 1993 to April 1995, Mr.
Du was vice president of engineering at GreenLogic, Inc., a semiconductor design company, which he co-founded. Mr. Du received
a B.S. in chemical engineering from National Taiwan University and an M.S. in electrical engineering from the University of California,
Santa Barbara.
Chuan Chiung “Perry”
Kuo has served as our general manager of Taiwan operations since January 1997, as chief financial officer and a director since
March 1999, as secretary since October 1999 and as a Class I director since June 2001. From February 1992 to December 1996, he
was executive vice president of Pac Net Group, a holding company with investments in chemicals, electronics and real estate. From
July 1983 to February 1992, he held various positions at Formosan Rubber Group, a rubber manufacturer, including product design
engineer, plant manager, research and development director, and vice president. Mr. Kuo received a B.S. in chemical engineering
from National Taiwan University and an M.B.A. from the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University in The Netherlands.
James Keim has
served as a director since March 1999 and as Head of Marketing and Sales since December 2001 and a Class II director since June
2001. He also served as our chief operating officer from June 1998 to June 2001. From March 1995 to June 1998, Mr. Keim was a principal
in Global Marketing Associates, an international consulting firm. Prior to March 1995, he had been vice president of sales at Alliance
Semiconductor Corporation, vice president of marketing at Performance Semiconductor Corporation and worldwide linear marketing
manager at Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation. Mr. Keim received a B.S. in engineering from Iowa State University, an M.S. in
electrical engineering and an M.B.A. from the University of Illinois.
Independent Non-Executive Directors
Michael Austin
has served as a director since October 1997 and as a Class III director since June 2001. He currently serves as chairman of the
nominating committee and member of the compensation committee. Mr. Austin is a resident of the Cayman Islands and is a Chartered
Accountant. He was admitted as a Fellow of The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales in 1974. He is an Associate
Member of The Chartered Institute of Taxation, a Member of the Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners, a Member of the Cayman
Islands Society of Professional Accountants, a Member of the Cayman Islands Institute of Directors, and a Notary Public of the
Cayman Islands. Mr. Austin served as the managing partner of the Cayman Islands office of KPMG Peat Marwick, an international accounting
firm, for 23 years. Since retiring in July, 1992 Mr. Austin has been a consultant and currently serves as non-executive director
on several company boards, including those of a number of mutual funds, hedge funds, structured investment vehicles, trust and
insurance companies. Mr. Austin served as a director of the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority from January 1997 and was appointed
Chairman of the Monetary Authority in January 2003, a position he held until his retirement on July 31, 2004. He has also served
on a variety of other government committees and government related boards, and is currently Chairman of the Auditors Oversight
Authority, a Cayman Islands Statutory Board. In 1990 Mr. Austin was awarded an M.B.E. by Her Majesty the Queen in recognition of
services to the public and business community.
Lawrence Lin
has served as a Class II Director, member of the audit committee and chairman of the compensation committee since June 2003. He
is a Certified Public Accountant in Taiwan. Since 1990, Mr. Lin has been a partner of UHY L&C Company, Certified Public Accountants,
which is an independent member firm of Urbach Hacker Young International. Mr. Lin was a director of Urbach Hacker Young International
from October 1994 to October 1998. Prior to UHY L&C Company, he was a partner at T N Soong & Co. Mr. Lin serves as a board
director of Yageo Corporation, which is a Taiwan listed public company. He graduated from Taipei Vocational Commercial School in
1969.
Ji Liu has served
as a Class II Director since June 2007. Mr. Liu has been an Honorary President of the China Europe International Business School
since 2005. He has been the Chairman of China Europe International Business School Education Development Foundation since 2005.
From 1999 to 2004, Mr. Liu was Executive President and President of the China Europe International Business School. From 1993 to
1999, Mr. Liu was a Research Fellow, Member of the Academic Board, Graduate Supervisor and Deputy Chairman of the Chinese Academy
of Social Sciences. He received a B.S. in power mechanical engineering from Tsinghua University in China.
Teik Seng Tan
has served as a Class I Director and a member of audit committee since June 2008. Mr. Tan
has served as Chairman of the audit committee since 2010. Mr. Tan was previously employed by AMD Singapore Pte Ltd. from 1984 to
2007 where he held various positions, the last position being Senior Executive Managing Director. He is currently the Managing
Director of Teleios SC Pte Ltd. Mr. Tan was a board member of Aztech Group Ltd from 2015 to 2019, a member of the Advisory Council
of the School of Engineering at Temasek Polytechnic from 2007 to 2019 and a Board member of The Helping Hand, a Halfway house for
people with substance abuse from 2015 to 2019. Mr. Tan received a B.E. in Electrical Engineering and a M.Sc. in Industrial Engineering
from the National University of Singapore. He is also a Fellow of the Singapore Human Resource Institute.
Daniel Lenehan
has served as a Class III Director and a member of the audit committee since June, 2016. Mr. Lenehan brings to O2Micro's Board
of Directors more than thirty years of experience in semiconductor product development, technical marketing, foundry management
and engineering experience at a wide variety of technology companies in various Director and VP level positions. Mr. Lenehan was
one of the key contributors to Intel's expansion of the notebook market by assuming a number of Director roles including leadership
positions in the areas of systems development, industry initiatives, mobile architecture, chipset design and R&D labs. As VP
of Engineering at Xilinx Corp, Mr. Lenehan led the Spartan Field Programmable Gate Array development team responsible for architecture,
design, layout, product and test engineering across North America, Ireland, and Asia. Mr. Lenehan has a BSEE from the New Jersey
Institute of Technology.
Vijay Kumar
has served as a Class III Director and a member of the nominating committee since December 2016. Mr. Kumar is currently the Nemirovsky
Family Dean of Penn Engineering and been a faculty member at the University of Pennsylvania since 1987. Mr. Kumar has held many
administrative positions in the School of Engineering and Applied Science, including director of the GRASP Laboratory, chair of
Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics, and the position of the Deputy Dean. Mr. Kumar is a fellow of ASME and IEEE and a
member of the National Academy of Engineering and Mr. Kumar has also served as the assistant director of robotics and cyber physical
systems at the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. Mr. Kumar received his Bachelor of Technology degree from the
Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur and his Ph.D. from Ohio State University in 1987.
There are no family
relationships among any of our directors or executive officers. There are no arrangements or understandings with major shareholders,
customers, suppliers or others, pursuant to which any person referred to above was selected as a director or member of senior management.
Compensation
We paid an aggregate
amount of compensation during 2019 to our directors and members of our administrative, supervisory or management bodies as a group
equal to approximately $2.5 million. All of our officers and directors are eligible to participate in our employee benefit plans
except non-employee directors are not eligible to participate in our employee stock purchase plan.
Share Ownership of Directors and Senior
Management
As of December 31,
2019, the aggregate number of ordinary shares beneficially owned by our directors and members of our administrative, supervisory
or management bodies was 281,904,950. This number includes options to purchase an aggregate of 119,993,950 ordinary shares under
our 2005 Share Option Plan and 2015 Share Incentive Plan exercisable within 60 days of December 31, 2019.
Employee Benefit Plans
2009 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan. As approved at the Extraordinary General Meeting held on May 30, 2009, we adopted the 2009 Employee Stock Purchase
Plan (“2009 Purchase Plan”). The 2009 Purchase Plan will have a term of 10 years, if not terminated earlier. A total
of 25,000,000 ordinary shares were reserved for issuance under the 2009 Purchase Plan starting November 2009. As approved by the
annual general meeting held on June 22, 2012 and June 2016, additional 15,000,000 and 25,000,000 ordinary shares were reserved
for issuance under the 2009 Purchase Plan, respectively. From 2016 to 2019, 12,828,700 shares had been issued under the 2009 Purchase
Plan.
Our board of directors
or a committee designated by our board of directors, referred to as the “plan administrator”, administers our 2009
Purchase Plan. All of our employees who are regularly employed for more than five months in any calendar year and work more than
20 hours per week are eligible to participate in our 2009 Purchase Plan, subject to a 10 day waiting period after hiring. Non-employee
directors, consultants and employees subject to the rules or laws of a non-U.S. jurisdiction that prohibit or make impractical
their participation in the plan will not be eligible to participate. Our 2009 Purchase Plan designates offer periods, purchase
periods and exercise dates. Offer periods are periods of three months commencing in February, May, August and November. Purchase
periods will generally be three month periods. Exercise dates are the last day of each purchase period. In the event of a corporate
transaction, the plan administrator may elect to shorten the offer periods then in progress and set a new exercise date for the
purchase of ordinary shares or ADSs.
On the first day of
each offer period, a participating employee will be granted a purchase right. A purchase right is a form of option to be automatically
exercised on the forthcoming exercise dates within the offer period during which authorized deductions are to be made from the
pay of participants and credited to their accounts under our 2009 Purchase Plan. When the purchase right is exercised, the participant’s
withheld salary is used to purchase the ordinary shares or ADSs. The price per share at which the ordinary shares or ADSs are to
be purchased under our 2009 Purchase Plan during any purchase period will be expressed as a percentage not less than the lower
of (a) 90% of the fair market value of the ordinary shares or ADSs on the date of grant of the purchase right (which is the commencement
of the offer period) or (b) 90% of the fair market value of the ordinary shares or ADSs on the date the purchase right is exercised.
Purchase rights may not be assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise disposed of in any way by the participant, other than by
will or the laws of descent and distribution.
Payroll deductions
may range from 1% to 10% in whole percentage increments of a participant’s regular base pay. The maximum number of ordinary
shares or ADSs that any employee may purchase under our 2009 Purchase Plan during a purchase period is 100,000 ordinary shares
or 2,000 ADSs. In addition, Section 423 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code imposes a $25,000 limit on the maximum amount of ordinary
shares or ADSs that may be purchased under a tax-qualified employee stock purchase plan during any calendar year. The $25,000 limit
is determined at the fair market value of the ordinary shares or ADSs at the time such option is granted for each calendar year
in which such option is outstanding.
The plan administrator
has the authority to amend or terminate our 2009 Purchase Plan. The plan administrator may terminate any offer period on any exercise
date if the plan administrator determines that the termination of the offer period is in the best interests of our company and
its shareholders.
2005 Share Option
Plan. Our 2005 share option plan was adopted by our board of directors in August 2005, was approved by our shareholders in
November 2005 and took effect on March 2, 2006 (“2005 Share Option Plan”). The 2005 Share Option Plan provides for
the granting to employees of incentive stock options within the meaning of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code and the granting
of non-statutory stock options to our employees, directors and consultants. Initially, the maximum aggregate number of shares reserved
for issuance pursuant to all options (including incentive stock options) under the 2005 Share Option Plan is 100,000,000 ordinary
shares, or 2,000,000 ADSs after taking into account the 50-to-1 stock split on November 25, 2005 and such number of shares shall
not, when added to the remaining number of ordinary shares available for the grant of options under any other plan or employee
share purchase plan, be greater than 10% of the number of ordinary shares outstanding as of the date of adoption of the 2005 Share
Option Plan. The maximum number of shares that may be issued upon exercise of all outstanding (and unexercised) options under the
2005 Share Option Plan and any other plan of ours and any purchase rights granted by us pursuant to any employee share repurchase
plan must not, in aggregate, exceed 30% of the number of ordinary shares outstanding from time to time. Where an award agreement
permits the exercise or purchase of the award for a specified period of time following the recipient’s termination of service
with us, or the recipient’s disability or death, the award will terminate to the extent not exercised or purchased on the
last day of the specified period or the last day of the original term of the award, whichever occurs first. As of December 31,
2019, 99,600,000 stock options were outstanding, of which 99,451,350 were exercisable under the 2005 Share Option Plan.
2005 Share Incentive
Plan. Our 2005 share incentive plan was adopted by our board of directors in August 2005, was approved by our shareholders
in November 2005 and took effect on March 2, 2006 (“2005 Share Incentive Plan”). The 2005 Share Incentive Plan provides
for the granting to our employees, directors and consultants of restricted shares, cash dividend equivalent rights, restricted
share units or stock appreciation rights or similar right with a fixed or variable price related to the fair market value of our
ordinary shares and with an exercise or conversion privilege related to the passage of time, the occurrence of one or more events,
or the satisfaction of performance criteria or other conditions. Initially, the maximum aggregate number of shares which may be
issued pursuant the 2005 Share Incentive Plan is 75,000,000 ordinary shares or 1,500,000 ADSs after taking into account the 50-to-1
stock split on November 25, 2005. In addition, a right entitling a grantee to compensation measured by dividends paid with respect
to ordinary shares shall be payable solely in cash and shall not be deemed to reduce the maximum aggregate number of shares which
may be issued under our 2005 Share Incentive Plan. Where an award agreement permits the exercise or purchase of the award for a
specified period of time following the recipient’s termination of service with us, or the recipient’s disability or
death, the award will terminate to the extent not exercised or purchased on the last day of the specified period or the last day
of the original term of the award, whichever occurs first. As of December 31, 2019, 2,121,250 shares of RSUs were outstanding under
the 2005 Share Incentive Plan.
2015 Share Incentive
Plan Our 2015 Share Incentive Plan was adopted by our board of directors in May 2015, was approved by our shareholders in July
2015 and took effect on March 3, 2016 (“2015 Share Incentive Plan”). The 2015 Share Incentive Plan succeeded our 2005
Share Option Plan and our 2005 Share Incentive Plan. The 2015 Share Incentive Plan provides for the granting to employees of incentive
stock options within the meaning of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code and the granting of non-statutory stock options to
our employees, directors and consultants. The 2015 Share Incentive Plan also provides for the granting to our employees, directors
and consultants of restricted shares, cash dividend equivalent rights, restricted share units or stock appreciation rights or similar
right with a fixed or variable price related to the fair market value of our ordinary shares and with an exercise or conversion
privilege related to the passage of time, the occurrence of one or more events, or the satisfaction of performance criteria or
other conditions. As of December 31, 2019, 155,441,600 shares of stock options and RSUs were outstanding, of which 49,966,000 were
exercisable under the 2015 Share Incentive Plan.
Initially, the maximum
aggregate number of new shares reserved for issuance pursuant to all options and grants (including incentive stock options and
restrictive stock units) under the 2015 Share Incentive Plan is 100,000,000 ordinary shares, or 2,000,000 ADSs, plus the remaining
balance rolled into the 2015 Share Incentive plan from the 2005 Share Option Plan and 2005 Share Incentive Plan, respectively.
The maximum number of stock options and restrictive stock units granted under the 2015 Share Incentive Plan for stock options and
restrictive stock units shall not each exceed 125,000,000 ordinary shares (2,500,000 ADSs). In addition, a right entitling a grantee
to compensation measured by dividends paid with respect to ordinary shares shall be payable solely in cash and shall not be deemed
to reduce the maximum aggregate number of shares which may be issued under our 2005 Share Incentive Plan. Where an award agreement
permits the exercise or purchase of the award for a specified period of time following the recipient’s termination of service
with us, or the recipient’s disability or death, the award will terminate to the extent not exercised or purchased on the
last day of the specified period or the last day of the original term of the award, whichever occurs first.
Board Practices
Duties of Directors
Under Cayman Islands
law, our directors have a duty of loyalty to act honestly in good faith with a view to promoting our best interests. Our directors
also have a duty of care to exercise the care, diligence and skills that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in comparable
circumstances. In fulfilling their duty of care to us, our directors must ensure compliance with our memorandum and articles of
association and the class rights vested under our memorandum and articles of association in the holders of the shares.
Terms of Directors and
Officers
Our articles of association
provide for not less than five, nor more than nine, directors, although the holders of a majority of our shares may increase or
reduce such limits. Our articles of association provide for our board of directors to be divided into three classes, designated
Class I, Class II and Class III, with each class consisting of an equal number of directors or as nearly equal in number as the
then total number of directors permits. The directors of each class have been elected for terms of three years ending in consecutive
years. At each annual general meeting, successors to the class of directors whose terms expire at that annual general meeting are
elected for new three year terms. If the number of directors is changed, any increase or decrease is apportioned among the classes
so as to maintain the number of directors in each class as nearly equal as possible and any additional directors of any class elected
to fill a vacancy resulting from an increase in such class shall hold office for a term that shall coincide with the remaining
term of that class, but in no case will a decrease in the number of directors shorten the term of any incumbent directors. The
term of executive officers is determined by our board of directors. There are no provisions of Cayman Islands law which require
the term of executive officers to be for a particular period.
Our board of directors
has the power at any time and from time to time to appoint any person to be a director, either to fill a casual vacancy or as an
additional to the existing directors provided that the appointment does not cause the number of directors to exceed any number
fixed by or in accordance with the articles of association as a maximum number of directors. Any director so appointed shall hold
office only until one next annual general meeting and is then eligible for re-election at that meeting.
Our shareholders may
by ordinary resolution remove any directors before the expiration of his period of office notwithstanding anything in the articles
of association or in any agreement we have entered into with such director (but without prejudice to any claim for damages under
any such agreement).
There are currently
no shareholding qualifications or age restrictions for directors.
Committees of the Board
of Directors
We have an audit committee,
a compensation committee and a nominating committee. Each of our audit committee members qualifies as an “independent”
director for purposes of the rules and regulations of NASDAQ. The audit committee is established by the Board primarily for the
purpose of overseeing our accounting and financial reporting processes and audits of our financial statements. The Committee's
responsibilities include (1) the appointment, retention, compensation and oversight of the work of our independent auditors, and
for review of its qualifications, and (2) review of our system of internal controls. The Committee also maintains procedures for
the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by us regarding accounting, internal controls, or auditing matters
and for the confidential, anonymous submission by our employees of concerns regarding accounting or auditing matters. The audit
committee meets at least four times per year, and also meets separately with the representatives of management at least annually.
The audit committee held four meetings in 2019. Currently, Messrs. Tan, Lin and Lenehan serve on the audit committee.
The compensation committee
establishes remuneration levels for our officers, performs the functions that are provided under our employee benefit programs
and administers our long-term incentive, compensation and equity plans including our 2005 Share Incentive Plan, 2005 Share Option
Plan, 2009 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and 2015 Share Incentive Plan. Currently, Messrs. Lin and Austin serve on the compensation
committee, each of whom qualify as “independent” directors for purposes of the rules and regulations of NASDAQ.
The nominating committee
assists our board of directors in selecting nominees for election to our board of directors and makes recommendations to our board
of directors from time to time, or whenever it shall be called upon to do so, regarding nominees for our board of directors. Currently,
Messrs. Austin and Kumar serve on the nominating committee.
Compensation Committee
Interlocks and Insider Participation
No member of our compensation
committee serves as a member of the board of directors or the compensation committee of any entity that has one or more executive
officers serving as a member of our board of directors or our compensation committee.
Employees
As of December 31,
2019, we had 378 full-time employees, of which 238 are engineers. 21 of our employees were based in the United States, 354 in Asia,
and 3 in Cayman Islands. Our employees are not represented by any collective bargaining agreements, and we have never experienced
a work stoppage. We believe our employee relations are good and well-maintained.
ITEM 7.
|
MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
|
MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS
The following table
sets forth information known to us with respect to the beneficial ownership of our ordinary shares, as of March 31, 2020, by each
shareholder known by us to own beneficially more than 5% of our ordinary shares based on SEC filings as of March 31, 2020.
|
|
Shares Beneficially Owned
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Number
|
|
Percent
|
Directors and members of our administrative, supervisory or management bodies
|
|
|
179,050,200
|
|
|
|
13.35
|
%
|
Grandeur Peak Global Advisors, LLC
|
|
|
165,294,850
|
|
|
|
12.33
|
%
|
DNB Asset Management AS
|
|
|
134,220,450
|
|
|
|
10.01
|
%
|
Renaissance Technologies LLC
|
|
|
104,333,000
|
|
|
|
7.78
|
%
|
Based on SEC filings
as of March 31, 2019, Grandeur Peak Global Advisors, LLC beneficially owned 163,424,600 of our ordinary shares or 12.37%, Directors
and members of our administrative, supervisory or management bodies beneficially owned 144,528,650 of our ordinary shares or 10.94%,
DNB Asset Management AS beneficially owned 131,220,450 of our ordinary shares or 9.93%, Renaissance Technologies LLC beneficially
owned 101,503,100 of our ordinary shares or 7.68%, and DNB Nordic Technology owned 86,663,700 of our ordinary shares or 6.56%.
Based on SEC filings
as of February 28, 2018, Grandeur Peak Global Advisors, LLC beneficially owned 156,108,350 of our ordinary shares or 11.99%, Directors
and members of our administrative, supervisory or management bodies beneficially owned 138,314,850 of our ordinary shares or 10.62%,
DNB Asset Management AS beneficially owned 131,220,450 of our ordinary shares or 10.08%, Renaissance Technologies LLC beneficially
owned 101,145,000 of our ordinary shares or 7.77%, and Lloyd I. Miller, III beneficially owned 75,735,550 of our ordinary shares
or 5.82%.
None of the major shareholders
listed above have differing voting rights with respect to our ordinary shares. We do not know of any arrangements the operation
of which may at a subsequent date result in a change in control of us. To our knowledge, we are not directly or indirectly owned
or controlled by another corporation, by a foreign government or any other natural or legal person.
Related Party Transactions
There were no related
party transactions for the financial periods covered in this Annual Report.
ITEM 8.
|
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
Consolidated Financial Statements
Our financial statements
set forth in the accompanying index to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report following Part IV beginning
on page F-1 are hereby incorporated in this Annual Report. Our Consolidated Financial Statements are filed as part of this Annual
Report.
DIVIDEND POLICY
We have never declared
or paid any cash dividends on our ordinary shares or other securities and do not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable
future.
ITEM 9.
|
THE OFFER AND LISTING
|
ADS SHARE PRICES AND RELATED MATTERS
Our ADSs are quoted
and traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market and the Cayman Islands Stock Exchange. Our ordinary shares are listed, but not traded,
on the Cayman Islands Stock Exchange.
(a)
|
Annual high and low market prices
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
Low
|
|
January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015
|
$2.80
|
$1.41
|
|
January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016
|
$2.07
|
$1.27
|
|
January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017
|
$2.74
|
$1.48
|
|
January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018
|
$2.37
|
$1.33
|
|
January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019
|
$1.80
|
$1.19
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
Quarterly high and low market prices
|
|
|
|
First Quarter 2017
|
$2.74
|
$1.89
|
|
Second Quarter 2017
|
$2.50
|
$1.85
|
|
Third Quarter 2017
|
$1.96
|
$1.48
|
|
Fourth Quarter 2017
|
$2.01
|
$1.61
|
|
First Quarter 2018
|
$1.77
|
$1.36
|
|
Second Quarter 2018
|
$1.84
|
$1.33
|
|
Third Quarter 2018
|
$2.32
|
$1.70
|
|
Fourth Quarter 2018
|
$2.37
|
$1.44
|
|
First Quarter 2019
|
$1.80
|
$1.51
|
|
Second Quarter 2019
|
$1.60
|
$1.32
|
|
Third Quarter 2019
|
$1.43
|
$1.27
|
|
Fourth Quarter 2019
|
$1.77
|
$1.19
|
|
First Quarter 2020
|
$1.73
|
$1.00
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
Monthly high and low market prices
|
|
|
|
October 2019
|
$1.37
|
$1.19
|
|
November 2019
|
$1.66
|
$1.47
|
|
December 2019
|
$1.77
|
$1.59
|
|
January 2020
|
$1.73
|
$1.53
|
|
February 2020
|
$1.72
|
$1.37
|
|
March 2020
|
$1.38
|
$1.00
|
ITEM 10.
|
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
|
The following are summaries
of material provisions of our memorandum and articles of association and the Companies Law (2018 Revision of the Cayman Islands
(as amended, the “Companies Law”)). The summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to our memorandum and articles
of association (see Item 19-Exhibit 1).
Registered Office
The Company has been
assigned registration number MC-72204 by the registrar of companies in the Cayman Islands. The registered office is located at
the offices of Maples Corporate Services Limited, Ugland House, P.O. Box 309, South Church Street, Grand Cayman KY1-1104, Cayman
Islands. The telephone number at that location is (345) 949-8066.
Objects and Purposes
Paragraph 3 of the
memorandum of association provides that the objects and purposes of the Company are unrestricted and the Company may perform all
corporate activities not prohibited by any law as provided by the Companies Law.
Directors
Article 122 of the
articles of association of the Company provides that a director will not be disqualified by his office from contracting with the
Company notwithstanding such director's interest and that such an interested director will not be liable to the Company for any
profit realized through such contract or arrangement, provided, the interested director declares such interest at or prior to consideration
of such contract or arrangement by the board. Article 129 provides that directors' compensation shall from time to time be determined
by the Company in general meeting or by the board in accordance with the articles of association. Article 138 provides that the
directors may exercise all the powers of the Company to borrow money and to mortgage or charge its undertaking, property and uncalled
capital or any part thereof and to issue debentures, debenture stock and other securities whether outright or as security for any
debt, liability or obligation of the Company or of any third party.
Ordinary Shares
General. The
Company’s articles of association authorize the issuance of 4,750,000,000 ordinary shares with a par value of US $0.00002.
All the outstanding ordinary shares are fully paid and nonassessable and accordingly no further capital may be called for by the
Company from any holder of the ordinary shares outstanding. The outstanding ordinary shares are not entitled to any sinking fund
or pre-emptive or redemption rights. Under Cayman Islands Law, non-residents may freely hold, vote and transfer ordinary shares
in the same manner as Cayman Islands residents, subject to the provisions of the Companies Law and the articles of association.
There is no exchange control legislation in the Cayman Islands or any laws or regulations which affect the payment of dividends
to non-residents holders of the ordinary shares.
Dividends. The
holders of our ordinary shares are entitled to receive the dividends that are declared and approved by the board of directors.
Dividends may be paid only out of profits, which include net earnings and retained earnings undistributed in prior years, and out
of share premium, a concept analogous to paid-in-surplus in the United States, subject to a statutory solvency test.
Voting Rights.
Each ordinary share entitles the holder thereof to one vote on a show of hands and one vote in respect to each ordinary share held
by that shareholder on a poll, on all matters upon which the ordinary shares are entitled to vote, including the election of directors.
Voting at any meeting of shareholders is by show of hands unless a poll is demanded. A poll may be demanded by the chairman of
the meeting or any shareholder present in person or by proxy, before or on the declaration of the result of the show of hands.
A quorum required for
a meeting of shareholders consists of at least a number of shareholders present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote representing
the holders of not less than a majority of our issued voting share capital. Shareholders’ meetings are held annually and
may be convened by the board of directors on its own initiative. Subject to the articles of association, advanced notice of at
least ten days (but not more than sixty days) is required for the convening of shareholders’ meetings.
Any ordinary resolution
to be made by the shareholders requires the affirmative vote of a simple majority of the votes attaching to the ordinary shares
and preference shares, if any, cast in a general meeting, while a special resolution requires the affirmative vote of two-thirds
of the votes cast attaching to the ordinary shares and preference shares, if any. Holders of ordinary shares, which are currently
the only shares carrying the right to vote at our general meetings, have the power, among other things, to elect directors, appoint
auditors and make changes in the amount of our authorized share capital.
Material issues that
require a special resolution of the shareholders under the Companies Law include resolutions to alter the memorandum of association
with respect to any objects, powers or other matters specified therein, any alteration of the articles of association, any reduction
of capital, any change of name, the appointment of an inspector for examining into the affairs of the company, requiring the company
to be wound up by a court, any voluntary winding up, delegating to creditors the power of appointing liquidators, making binding
arrangements between the company and its creditors, and sanctioning the transfer of the business or property of the company being
wound up to another company whether established in the Cayman Islands or in any other jurisdiction.
Liquidation.
If we are to be liquidated, the liquidator may divide among the shareholders in cash or in kind the whole or any part of our assets,
in a manner proportionate to their shareholdings.
Preference Shares
The articles of association
authorize the issuance of 250,000,000 preference shares with a par value of $0.00002 per share. Pursuant to our articles of association,
the board of directors has the authority, without further action by the shareholders, to issue preference shares in one or more
series. It also has the authority to allot, issue, grant options over, or otherwise dispose of, shares of the Company with or without
preferred, deferred or other special rights or restrictions, whether in regard to dividend rights voting, return of capital or
otherwise, any or all of which may be greater than the rights of the ordinary shares. The board of directors, without shareholder
approval, can issue preference shares with voting, conversion or other rights that could harm the voting power and other rights
of the holders of ordinary shares. Subject to the directors’ duty of acting in our best interest, preference shares can be
issued quickly with terms calculated to delay or prevent a change in control or make removal of management more difficult. Additionally,
the issuance of preference shares may have the effect of decreasing the market price of the ordinary shares, and may harm the voting
and other rights of the holders of ordinary shares.
Anti-takeover Effects of Provisions in Our Charter Documents
Provisions in our charter
documents could discourage potential acquisition proposals and could delay or prevent a change in control transaction that our
shareholders favor. These provisions could have the effect of discouraging others from making tender offers for our shares. As
a result, these provisions may prevent the market price of our ordinary shares from reflecting the effects of actual or rumored
takeover attempts and may prevent shareholders from reselling their shares at or above the price at which they purchased their
shares. These provisions may also prevent changes in our management that our shareholders may favor. Our charter documents do not
permit shareholders to act by written consent, do not permit shareholders to call a general meeting and provide for a classified
board of directors, which means shareholders can only elect, or remove, a limited number of our directors in any given year. Furthermore,
as discussed above, our board of directors has the authority to issue up to 250,000,000 preference shares in one or more series.
Our board of directors can fix the price, rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions of such preference shares without any
further vote or action by our shareholders. The issuance of preference shares may delay or prevent a change in control transaction
without further action by our shareholders or make removal of management more difficult.
Differences in Corporate Law
The Companies Law of
the Cayman Islands is modeled after that of England but does not follow recent United Kingdom statutory enactments and differs
from laws applicable to United States corporations and their shareholders. The following paragraphs are a summary of the significant
differences between the provisions of the Companies Law applicable to us and the laws applicable to companies incorporated in the
United States and to their shareholders.
Mergers and Similar
Arrangements. The Companies Law provides that a merger or consolidation may occur between any of the following: (a) one or
more companies incorporated under the Companies Law and one or more companies incorporated under the laws of a jurisdiction outside
the Cayman Islands, provided that the Cayman Islands company is the surviving entity; or (b) two or more companies incorporated
under the Companies Law. For these purposes, (i) “merger” means the merging of two or more constituent companies and
the vesting of their undertaking, property and liabilities in one of such companies as the surviving company and (ii) “consolidation”
means the combination of two or more constituent companies into a consolidated company and the vesting of the undertaking, property
and liabilities of such companies to the consolidated company. Such a merger or consolidation does not need court approval for
a company limited by shares (but not segregated portfolio companies).
A merger or consolidation
will involve, amongst other things, the directors of each company participating in a merger or consolidation approving a written
plan of merger or consolidation on behalf of that company which complies with the requirements of the Companies Law. The written
plan of merger or consolidation approved by the directors must generally be authorised by resolution of the shareholders of each
company participating in the merger or consolidation, subject to and in accordance with the Companies Law. The consent of each
holder of a fixed or floating security interest of a company participating in a proposed merger or consolidation should also be
obtained, although the courts of the Cayman Islands have a discretion to waive such requirement upon such terms as to the security
to be issued by the consolidated or surviving company as the court considers reasonable.
A dissenting member
of a Cayman Islands company proposing to participate in a merger or consolidation has a limited entitlement provide written objection
to the proposed action and to receive payment of the fair value of his shares in accordance with the provisions of the Companies
Law.
If a merger or consolidation is effected
in accordance with the Companies Law:
|
·
|
the rights, the property of every description and the business, undertaking, goodwill, benefits,
immunities and privileges of each of the constituent companies, shall immediately vest in the surviving or consolidated company;
|
|
·
|
subject to any specific arrangements entered into by the relevant parties, the surviving or consolidated
company shall be liable for and subject, in the same manner as the constituent companies, to all mortgages, charges or security
interests, and all contracts, obligations, claims, debts, and liabilities of each of the constituent companies;
|
|
·
|
an existing claim, cause or proceeding, whether civil (including arbitration) or criminal pending
at the time of the merger or consolidation by or against a constituent company, shall not be abated or discontinued by the merger
or consolidation but shall be continued by or against the surviving or consolidated company; and
|
|
·
|
a conviction, judgment, ruling, order or claim, due or to become due, against a constituent company,
shall not be released or impaired by the merger or consolidation, but shall apply to the surviving or consolidated company instead
of to the constituent company.
|
Cayman Islands law
also provides statutory provisions which facilitate the reconstruction and amalgamation of companies, provided that the arrangement
in question is approved by a majority in number of each class of shareholders and creditors with whom the arrangement is to be
made, and who must in addition represent three-fourths in value of each class of shareholders or creditors, as the case may be,
that are present and voting either in person or by proxy at a meeting or meetings convened for that purpose. The convening of the
meetings and subsequently the arrangement must be sanctioned by the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands. While a dissenting shareholder
would have the right to express to the court the view that the transaction ought not to be approved, the court can be expected
to approve the arrangement if it satisfies itself that:
|
•
|
the parties have complied with the statutory provisions regarding majority vote;
|
|
•
|
the shareholders have been fairly represented at the meeting in question; and
|
|
•
|
the arrangement is one that a businessman would reasonably approve.
|
When a take-over offer
is made and accepted by holders of 90% in value of the shares within four months, the offer or may, within a two-month period require
the holders of the remaining shares to transfer these shares on the terms of the offer. An objection can be made to the Grand Court
of the Cayman Islands but this is unlikely to succeed unless there is evidence of fraud, bad faith or collusion.
If the arrangement
and reconstruction is approved, the dissenting shareholder would have no rights comparable to appraisal rights, which would otherwise
ordinarily be available to dissenting shareholders of United States corporations, providing rights to receive payment in cash for
the judicially determined value of the shares.
Shareholders’
Suits. In principle, we will normally be the proper plaintiff in respect of wrongs done to the Company and a derivative action
may not be brought by a minority shareholder. However, exceptions to the foregoing principle may apply in circumstances in which:
|
•
|
a company is acting or proposing to act illegally or outside of its powers;
|
|
•
|
the act complained of, although not outside of its powers, could be affected only if authorized
by more than a simple majority vote;
|
|
•
|
the individual rights of the plaintiff shareholders have been infringed or are about to be infringed;
or
|
|
•
|
those who control the company are perpetrating a “fraud on the minority.”
|
Indemnification
Cayman Islands law
does not limit the extent to which a company’s articles of association may provide for indemnification of officers and directors,
except to the extent that a provision may be held by the Cayman Islands courts to be contrary to public policy, such as to provide
indemnification against civil fraud or the consequences of committing a crime. Our articles of association provide for indemnification
of officers and directors for losses, damages, costs and expenses incurred in their capacities as such, except if they acted in
a willfully negligent manner or defaulted in any action against them.
Insofar as indemnification
for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to our directors, officers or persons controlling us pursuant
to these provisions, we have been informed that, in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission, this indemnification
is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and therefore is unenforceable.
Enforceability of Civil Liabilities
We are a Cayman Islands
company. We incorporated in the Cayman Islands because of the following benefits associated with being a Cayman Islands company:
|
•
|
political and economic stability;
|
|
•
|
an effective judicial system;
|
|
•
|
unlike some jurisdictions which impose taxes on worldwide income, no taxation of companies based
upon profits, income, gains or appreciation;
|
|
•
|
the absence of exchange control or currency restrictions; and
|
|
•
|
the availability of professional and support services.
|
However, the Cayman
Islands has a less developed body of securities laws than the United States and provides less protection for investors. Under Cayman
Islands law, our directors have a duty of loyalty to act honestly and in good faith with a view to promoting our best interests.
Our directors also have a duty of care to exercise the care, diligence and skills that a reasonably prudent person would exercise
in comparable circumstances. In fulfilling their duty of care to us, our directors must ensure compliance with our memorandum and
articles of association and the class rights vested under our memorandum and articles of association in the holders of the shares.
The remedies which may be pursued if our directors do not comply with their duties to us are well settled matters of Cayman Islands
law.
A substantial majority
of our assets are located outside the United States. In addition, a majority of our directors and officers are nationals and/or
residents of countries other than the United States, and all or a substantial portion of our assets and the assets of our directors
and officers are located outside the United States. As a result, it may be difficult to effect service of process within the United
States upon us or our directors and officers or to enforce against us or against them judgments obtained in United States courts,
including judgments predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any state thereof.
Nevertheless, the courts of the Cayman Islands would be competent to hear original actions brought by us against our officers and
directors predicated upon alleged breaches of duties to us.
Maples and Calder,
our counsel as to Cayman Islands law, has advised us that there is uncertainty regarding whether the courts of the Cayman Islands
would (1) recognize or enforce judgments of United States courts obtained against us or our officers and directors predicated upon
the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any state thereof or (2) be competent to hear original
actions brought in their jurisdiction against us or our officers and directors predicated upon the securities laws of the United
States or any state thereof.
There is no statutory
enforcement in the Cayman Islands of judgments obtained in the United States. Instead, such a judgment must be enforced by action
at common law. Maples and Calder have advised us that a final and conclusive judgment in a federal or state court of the United
States under which a sum of money is payable, other than a sum payable in respect of taxes, fines, penalties or similar charges,
may be subject to enforcement proceedings as a debt in the Courts of the Cayman Islands under the common law doctrine of obligation.
Material Contracts
We have not entered
into any material contracts other than contracts entered into in the ordinary course of business.
Exchange Control
Our articles of association
authorize us to issue an aggregate of 4,750,000,000 ordinary shares with a par value of $0.00002 per share. Of those 4,750,000,000
authorized ordinary shares, 1,669,036,600 shares were issued and 1,314,798,600 shares were outstanding as of December 31, 2019,
all of which are fully paid or credited as fully paid. We may not call for any further capital from any holder of ordinary shares
outstanding. Under Cayman Islands law, non-residents of the Cayman Islands may freely hold, vote and transfer ordinary shares in
the same manner as Cayman Islands residents, subject to the provisions of the Companies Law and our articles of association. There
is no exchange control legislation in the Cayman Islands or any laws or regulations which affect the payment of dividends to non-resident
holders of ordinary shares.
Taxation
Cayman Islands Taxation
The Cayman Islands
currently levy no taxes on individuals or corporations based upon profits, income, gains or appreciation and there is no taxation
in the nature of inheritance tax or estate duty. There are no other taxes likely to be material to us levied by the Government
of the Cayman Islands except for stamp duties that may be applicable on instruments executed in, or after execution brought within,
the jurisdiction of the Cayman Islands. There are no exchange control regulations or currency restrictions in the Cayman Islands.
No stamp duties are
payable on the issue or transfer of shares. An agreement to transfer shares may be subject to stamp duty if the agreement is executed
in the Cayman Islands or, if executed outside the Cayman Islands, subsequently brought into the Cayman Islands. The Stamp Duty
Law (2007 Revision) does not provide who is liable to pay stamp duty on any document but, in practice, the person who seeks to
rely on the document in any civil court proceedings will be required to pay stamp duty in order to have the document admitted in
evidence.
Furthermore, the ES
Law came into effect in the Cayman Islands on January 1, 2019, requiring in-scope entities that carry on particular activities
to have demonstrable economic substance in Cayman. As we are headquartered in the Cayman Islands, we do not expect the ES Law will have a material
effect on our business and operations.
United States Federal Income Taxation
The following discussion
addresses the material United States federal income tax consequences of the ownership and disposition of ordinary shares or ADSs
held as a capital asset by a “U.S. Investor” (as defined below). This summary does not provide a complete analysis
of all potential tax consequences. This summary is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”),
final, temporary and proposed Treasury Regulations thereunder, and administrative and judicial interpretations thereof, all as
in effect as of the date hereof, and all of which are subject to change at any time (possibly on a retroactive basis) by legislative,
judicial or administrative action, and to differing interpretations. There can be no assurance that the Internal Revenue Service
(the “IRS”) will not take a contrary view. This summary does not discuss state, local or foreign tax consequences of
the ownership and disposition of ordinary shares or ADSs.
This summary is directed
solely to U.S. Investors that hold ordinary shares or ADSs as capital assets within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code, which
generally means as property held for investment. For purposes of this discussion, a “U.S. Investor” means a beneficial
owner of ordinary shares or ADSs who is any of the following:
|
•
|
a citizen or resident of the United States or someone treated as a U.S. citizen or resident for
U.S. federal income tax purposes;
|
|
•
|
a corporation or other entity taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes created
or organized in or under the laws of the United States or any political subdivision thereof, including the District of Columbia;
|
|
•
|
an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source;
|
|
•
|
a trust that is subject to the primary supervision of a court within the United States and one
or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all of its substantial decisions;
|
|
•
|
a trust in existence on August 20, 1996, that has a valid election in effect under applicable U.S.
Treasury regulations to be treated as a U.S. person; or
|
|
•
|
a person that is otherwise subject to U.S. federal income taxation on its net income.
|
If a partnership (including
for this purpose any entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) is a beneficial owner of ordinary shares
or ADSs, the U.S. federal income tax consequences to a partner in the partnership will generally depend on the status of the partner
and the activities of the partnership. A holder of ordinary shares or ADSs that is a partnership and partners in such partnership
should consult their individual tax advisors about the U.S. federal income tax consequences of holding or disposing of the ordinary
shares or ADSs.
This summary does not
address the United States federal income tax treatment of investors having a special legal status, including without limitation
the following types of investors, who may be subject to tax rules that differ significantly from those summarized below:
|
•
|
life insurance companies;
|
|
•
|
banks and financial institutions;
|
|
•
|
dealers in securities or foreign currencies;
|
|
•
|
traders in securities that elect to use a mark-to-market method of accounting for their securities holdings;
|
|
•
|
persons liable for alternative minimum tax;
|
|
•
|
U.S. investors who actually or constructively hold 10% or more of our voting shares or ADSs;
|
|
•
|
investors who hold our ordinary shares or ADSs as part of straddles, hedging or integrated or conversion transactions; or
|
|
•
|
persons whose “functional currency” is not the U.S. dollar.
|
This summary is not
a comprehensive description of all of the tax considerations that may be relevant with respect to your ownership of ordinary shares
or ADSs. You are advised to consult your own tax adviser with respect to your particular circumstances and with respect to the
effects of federal, state, local or foreign tax laws to which you may be subject. The United States does not have an income tax
treaty with the Cayman Islands.
As relates to the ADSs,
this discussion is based in part upon the representations of the depositary and the assumption that each obligation in the deposit
agreement and any related agreement will be performed in accordance to its terms.
Generally, a holder
of ADSs will be treated as the owner of the underlying ordinary shares represented by those ADSs for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Accordingly, no gain or loss will be recognized if the holder exchanges ADSs for the underlying ordinary shares represented by
those ADSs. The holder’s adjusted tax basis in the ordinary shares will be the same as the adjusted tax basis of the ADSs
surrendered in exchange therefore, and the holding period for the ordinary shares will include the holding period for the surrendered
ADSs.
Dividends and Other
Distribution on Ordinary Shares or ADSs. Subject to the discussion in “Passive Foreign Investment Company Status”
below, in the event that a U.S. Investor receives a distribution on the ordinary shares or ADSs, the U.S. Investor will be required
to include the distribution in gross income as a taxable dividend on the date of receipt by the depositary, in the case of ADSs,
or by the U.S. Investor, in the case of ordinary shares, but only to the extent that a distribution is paid from our current or
accumulated earnings and profits as determined under United States federal income tax principles. Dividends paid by us will not
be eligible for the corporate dividends received deduction. For taxable years beginning before January 1, 2011, “qualified
dividend income” paid to a non-corporate U.S. Investor will be subject to tax at the rates applicable to long-term capital
gains (which are currently taxed at the maximum rate of 20%) if (1) our ordinary shares or ADSs are readily tradable on an established
securities market in the United States, (2) we are not a passive foreign investment company (as discussed below) for either our
taxable year in which the dividend was paid or the preceding taxable year and (3) certain holding period requirements must be met.
It is expected that our ADSs will satisfy the “readily tradable” requirement as a result of being traded on the NASDAQ
Global Select Market. However, any U.S. Investor that exchanges its ADSs for ordinary shares, or that holds only ordinary shares,
may not be eligible for the reduced rate of taxation on dividends if the ordinary shares are not readily tradable on an established
securities market in the United States. In order for dividends to constitute “qualified dividend income,” a U.S. Investor
generally must have held the ADSs for more than 60 days during the 121-day period beginning 60 days before the ex-dividend date;
however, because the holding period rules are intricate and because an owner’s holding period is reduced for periods during
which the risk of loss is diminished, U.S. Investors should consult their own advisors concerning the calculation of their holding
periods. Moreover, a dividend will not be treated as a qualified dividend income to the extent that the taxpayer is under an obligation
(whether pursuant to a short sale or otherwise) to make related payments with respect to positions in substantially similar or
related property. U.S. Investors should consult their own tax advisers regarding the availability of the lower rate for dividends
paid with respect to our ADSs or ordinary shares.
The Company has the
right to pay dividends in any currency. If dividends are paid in a currency other than the U.S. dollar, the dividends will be included
in a U.S. Investor’s income as a U.S. dollar amount based on the exchange rate in effect on the date that the U.S. Investor
receives the dividend, regardless of whether the payment is in fact converted into U.S. dollars. If the U.S. Investor does not
receive U.S. dollars on the date the dividend is distributed, the U.S. Investor will be required to include either gain or loss
in income when the U.S. Investor later exchanges the foreign currency for U.S. dollars. The gain or loss will be equal to the difference
between the U.S. dollar value of the amount that the U.S. Investor includes in income when the dividend is received and the amount
that the US. Investor receives on the exchange of the foreign currency for U.S. dollars. The gain or loss generally will be ordinary
income or loss from U.S. sources. If we distribute as a dividend non-cash property, the U.S. Investor will generally include in
income an amount equal to the U.S. dollar equivalent of the fair market value of the property on the date that it is distributed.
Dividends will constitute
foreign source income for foreign tax credit limitation purposes. The limitation on foreign taxes eligible for credit is calculated
separately with respect to specific classes of income. Under current law, for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2006,
dividends distributed by us with respect to ordinary shares or ADSs would generally constitute “passive category income”
but could, in the case of certain U.S. Investors, constitute “general category income.” Special rules apply to individuals
whose foreign source income during the taxable year consists entirely of “qualified passive income” and whose creditable
foreign taxes paid or accrued during the taxable year do not exceed $300 ($600 in the case of a joint return). Further, in particular
circumstances, a U.S. Investor that (i) has held the ordinary shares or ADSs for less than a specified minimum period during which
it is not protected from risk of loss, (ii) is obligated to make payments related to the dividends, or (iii) holds the ordinary
shares or ADSs in arrangements in which the U.S. Investor's expected economic profit, after non-U.S. taxes, is insubstantial, will
not be allowed a foreign tax credit for foreign taxes imposed on dividends paid on the ordinary shares or ADSs.
The U.S. Treasury has
expressed concerns that parties to whom ADSs are pre-released may be taking actions that are inconsistent with the claiming of
foreign tax credits by U.S. Investors of ADSs. Such actions would also be inconsistent with the claiming of the preferential tax
rates applicable to qualified dividend income, as defined above. Accordingly, the creditability of foreign withholding taxes and
the availability of such preferential tax rates could be affected by future actions that may be taken by the U.S. Treasury or parties
to whom ADSs are pre-released.
Distributions in excess of our current and
accumulated earnings and profits will be treated as a nontaxable return of capital to the extent of the U.S. Investor’s basis
in the ordinary shares or ADSs and thereafter as gain from the sale or exchange of a capital asset. We do not generally intend
to calculate our earnings and profits under U.S. federal income tax principles. Therefore a U.S. Investor should expect that a
distribution will generally be treated as a dividend even if that distribution would otherwise be treated as a nontaxable return
of capital or as capital gain under the rules described above.
Distributions to a
U.S. Investor of new ordinary shares or ADSs or rights to subscribe for new ordinary shares or ADSs that are received as part of
a pro rata distribution to all our shareholders will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax. The adjusted tax basis of the new
ordinary shares or ADSs or rights so received will be determined by allocating the U.S. investor’s adjusted tax basis in
the old ordinary shares or ADSs between the old ordinary shares or ADSs and the new ordinary shares or ADSs or rights received,
based on their relative fair market values on the date of distribution. However, the adjusted tax basis of the new ordinary shares
or ADSs or rights will be zero if the fair market value of the new rights is less than 15% of the fair market value of the old
ordinary shares or ADSs at the time of distribution and the U.S. Investor does not make an election to determine the adjusted tax
basis of the rights by allocation as described above. A U.S. Investor's holding period in the new ordinary shares or ADSs or rights
will generally include the holding period of the old ordinary shares or ADSs on which the distribution was made.
Dispositions of
ordinary shares or ADSs. Subject to the discussion in “Passive Foreign Investment Company Status” below, gain or
loss realized by a U.S. Investor on the sale or other disposition of the ordinary shares or ADSs will be subject to United States
federal income tax as capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized on the disposition
and that U.S. Investor’s basis in the ordinary shares or ADSs. The capital gain or loss will be long-term capital gain or
loss if the U.S. Investor has held the ordinary shares or ADSs for more than one year at the time of the sale or exchange. A non-corporate
U.S. investor will be eligible for reduced rates of taxation (currently, at a maximum rate of 20% for sales occurring in taxable
years beginning before January 1, 2011,) on long-term capital gain. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations.
Any gain or loss recognized by a U.S. Investor will generally be treated as U.S. source income or loss for U.S. foreign tax credit
purposes.
U.S. Investors should
consult their own tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences if the U.S. Investor receives currency other than
U.S. dollars upon the disposition of ordinary shares or ADSs.
Passive Foreign
Investment Company Status. We believe that we are not a passive foreign investment company and do not expect to become a passive
foreign investment company in the future. We will be classified as a passive foreign investment company if for a taxable year,
after the application of “look through” rules, either (a) 75% or more of the gross income of the company in a
taxable year is passive income, or (b) the average percentage of assets by value of the company in a taxable year that produce
or are held for the production of passive income (which includes cash) is at least 50%, the income or assets test. Whether or not
we are a passive foreign investment company will be determined annually based upon the composition of our income and assets including
intellectual property, from time to time. In determining that we are not a passive foreign investment company, we are relying on
the current valuation of our assets, including intellectual property. In calculating intellectual property, we relied on the Income
Approach (or relief from royalty method) as our primary method. The basis of this method is that, by virtue of having ownership
of the patents as opposed to simply a license to use them, we are relieved from having to pay royalties, usually expressed as a
percentage of sales, for use of such intangible asset on its own products. The present value of the after-tax cost savings (i.e.,
royalty relief) at an appropriate discount rate indicates the value of intellectual property. We believe our valuation approach
is reasonable. However, it is possible that the Internal Revenue Service will challenge the valuation of our patents, which may
result in our being classified as a passive foreign investment company. In addition, the composition of our income and assets will
be affected by how we spend the cash we have raised, which is a passive asset for purposes of the passive foreign investment company
asset test discussed above. We intend to use the cash we have raised in the past and conduct our business activities in an effort
to reduce the risk of our classification as a passive foreign investment company. Because the passive foreign investment company
determination is made at the end of each taxable year, we cannot determine in advance whether we will be considered a passive foreign
investment company for any future taxable year. If we determine that we have become a passive foreign investment company, we will
notify the Bank of New York and all U.S. investors who have been record holders of our ordinary shares or ADSs during any period
in which we determine that we are a passive foreign investment company, within 60 days of the end of our taxable year for which
we make such determination. If we are a passive foreign investment company for any year during which a U.S. Investor holds ordinary
shares or ADSs, we generally will continue to be treated as a passive foreign investment company for all succeeding years during
which the U.S. Investor holds ordinary shares or ADSs.
Special U.S. tax rules
apply to U.S. Investors of interests in a passive foreign investment company. Subject to the discussion of the market-to-market
election and qualified electing fund election below, if we were a passive foreign investment company for any taxable year during
which a U.S. Investor held ordinary shares or ADSs, the U.S. Investor would be subject to special tax rules regardless of whether
we meet the income or assets test for any other year with respect to:
|
•
|
any “excess distribution” by us to the U.S. Investor, which means any distributions
received by the U.S. Investor on the ordinary shares or ADSs in a taxable year that are greater than 125% of the average annual
distributions received by the U.S. Investor in the three preceding taxable years, or, if shorter, the U.S. Investor’s holding
period for the ordinary shares or ADSs; and
|
|
•
|
any gain realized on the sale or other disposition, including a pledge, of ordinary shares or ADSs.
|
Under these special tax rules:
|
•
|
the excess distribution or gain would be allocated ratably over the U.S. Investor’s holding
period for the ordinary shares or ADSs;
|
|
•
|
the amount allocated to the current taxable year and any taxable year prior to the first taxable
year in which we are a passive foreign investment company would be treated as ordinary income in the current year;
|
|
•
|
the amount allocated to each of the other years would be taxed as ordinary income at the highest
tax rate in effect for that year; and
|
|
•
|
the interest charge applicable to underpayments of tax would be imposed with respect to the resulting
tax attributable to each prior year in which we were a passive foreign investment company to recover the deemed benefit from the
deferred payment of the tax attributable to each prior year.
|
In addition, dividends
that a U.S. Investor receives from us will not be eligible for the special tax rates applicable to “qualified dividend income”
(see “-- United States Federal Income Taxation --- Dividends”) if we are a passive foreign investment company either
in the taxable year of the distribution or the preceding taxable year, but will instead be taxable at rates applicable to ordinary
income.
If we are a passive
foreign investment company in any year, a U.S. Investor would be required to file an annual return on Internal Revenue Service
Form 8621 regarding distributions received with respect to the ordinary shares or ADSs and any gain realized on the disposition
of the ordinary shares or ADSs.
A U.S. Investor in
a passive foreign investment company is allowed to make a mark-to-market election with respect to the stock of the passive foreign
investment company, provided that the stock of the passive foreign investment company is “marketable” within the meaning
of the Code. The ordinary shares or ADSs will be “marketable” as long as they remain listed on the NASDAQ Global Select
Market and are “regularly traded.” The ordinary shares or ADSs will be considered “regularly traded” for
any calendar year during which the ordinary shares or ADSs are traded, other than in de minimis quantities, on at least fifteen
days during each calendar quarter. If the election is made, a U.S. Investor would be required to mark the ordinary shares or ADSs
to market each taxable year and recognize ordinary income for any increase in market value for that taxable year and would be allowed
to recognize an ordinary loss for any decrease in that market value to the extent that prior gains exceed prior losses. The adjusted
basis in the ordinary shares or ADSs would be adjusted to reflect that gain or loss. The mark-to-market election will be effective
for the taxable year for which the election is made and all subsequent taxable years, unless the ordinary shares cease to be marketable
or the Internal Revenue Service consents to the revocation of the election.
Alternatively, for
each year we meet the income or assets test, a U.S. Investor can make an election to include in income annually its pro rata share
of our earnings and net capital gains. This election is referred to as a qualified electing fund election. To make a qualified
electing fund election, a U.S. Investor will need to have an annual information statement from us documenting the earnings and
capital gain for the year. If we were to become a passive foreign investment company, we would furnish the passive foreign investment
company annual information statement to any shareholder or former shareholder who requested it. In general, a U.S. Investor must
make a qualified electing fund election on or before the due date for filing its income tax return for the first year to which
the qualified electing fund election will apply. U.S. Investors are permitted to make retroactive elections in particular circumstances,
including if the U.S. Investor had a reasonable belief that the foreign corporation was not a passive foreign investment company
and filed a protective election. As discussed above, we will notify investors if we determine that we have become a passive foreign
investment company. This notice will provide U.S. Investors on a calendar tax year with sufficient time to make the qualified electing
fund election. U.S. Investors (in particular those with a tax year other than the calendar year) should consult their own tax advisors
as to the consequences of making a protective qualified electing fund election or other consequences of the qualified electing
fund election.
If we are a passive
foreign investment company in any year, U.S. Investors should consult with their tax advisers regarding whether to make a mark-to-market
or qualified electing fund election.
Information Reporting
and Backup Withholding. In general, information reporting requirements will apply to dividends in respect of our ordinary shares
or ADSs or the proceeds received on the sale, exchange or redemption of our ordinary shares or ADSs paid within the United States
(and, in certain cases, outside the United States) to U.S. Investors other than certain exempt recipients, such as corporations,
and a backup withholding tax (currently at a rate of 28% but switching to 24% for tax years 2018-2025) may apply to such amounts
if the U.S. Investor fails to provide an accurate taxpayer identification number or to report interest and dividends required to
be shown on its U.S. federal income tax returns. U.S. Investors who are required to establish their exempt status generally must
provide such certification on IRS Form W-9.
Backup withholding
is not an additional tax. Amounts withheld as backup withholding from a payment to a U.S. Investor may be allowed as a credit against
the U.S. Investor’s U.S. federal income tax liability and the U.S. Investor may obtain a refund of any excess amounts withheld
by filing the appropriate claim for refund with the IRS and furnishing any required information in a timely manner.
DOCUMENTS ON DISPLAY
We file annual reports
on Form 20-F and furnish current reports on Form 6-K with the SEC. You may read and copy this information at the SEC's Public Reference
Room at Judiciary Plaza, 100 F Street N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549, and at the regional offices of the SEC located at 3 World Financial
Center, Suite 400, New York, New York 10281 and 175 W. Jackson Boulevard, Suite 900, Chicago, Illinois 60604. You can also request
copies of the documents, upon payment of a duplicating fee, by writing to the Public Reference Section of the SEC. Please call
the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the operation of the Public Reference Room. Certain of our SEC filings are
also available to the public from the SEC's website at http://www.sec.gov.
ITEM 11.
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES
ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
Market risk is the
risk of loss related to adverse changes in market prices, including interest rates and foreign exchange rates, as well as the marketable
equity security of financial instruments. In the normal course of business, our financial position is routinely subject to a variety
of risks, including market risk associated with interest rate movements and currency rate movements on non-U.S. dollar denominated
assets and liabilities, as well as collectability of accounts receivable.
We regularly assess
these financial instruments and their ability to address market risk and have established policies and business practices to protect
against the adverse effects of these and other potential exposures.
Interest Rate Risk
Our major market risk
exposure is changing interest rates. Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our investments
in time deposits.
We generally maintain
an investment portfolio consisting mainly of fixed income securities, including time deposits. These securities are subject to
interest rate risk and will fall in value if market interest rates increase. We do not believe that a 10.0% change in interest
rates would have a significant impact on the fair value of our investment portfolio. There was no exposure to market risk at December
31, 2019. We have not purchased and do not currently hold any derivative financial instruments for hedging or trading purposes.
The table below provides
information about our financial instruments whose maturity dates are greater than three months as of December 31, 2019.
|
|
2020
|
|
2021
|
|
2022
|
|
2023
|
|
2024
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
Total
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Time Deposit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate (US$)
|
|
$
|
15,256
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
15,286
|
|
|
$
|
15,286
|
|
Foreign currency risk
Fluctuations in exchange
rates may adversely affect our financial results. The functional currency for each of our foreign subsidiaries is the local currency.
As a result, certain of our assets and liabilities, including certain bank accounts, accounts receivable, restricted assets, short-term
investments and accounts payable, exist in non-US dollar-denominated currencies, which are sensitive to foreign currency exchange
rate fluctuations. If exchange rates were to change immediately and uniformly from the levels at December 31, 2019, the fair value
of such assets and liabilities would change by an immaterial amount beyond the change reflected by the exchange rates. As of December
31, 2019, we held approximately $12.8 million in certificates of deposits and bank demand accounts denominated in foreign currencies.
We have not engaged
in hedging techniques to mitigate foreign currency exposures and may experience economic losses as a result of foreign currency
exchange rate fluctuations. We will monitor currency exchange fluctuations periodically. For the year ended December 31, 2019,
we experienced a net foreign exchange loss of approximately $162,000 due to foreign currency exchange fluctuations, which are reflected
in our results of operations.
Equity price risk
We are exposed to equity
price risk primarily through our investment in Excelliance MOS Co., Ltd. (“EMC”). EMC is a listing company operating
in technology industry sector of Taipei Exchange. We typically do not attempt to reduce or eliminate our equity market exposure
through hedging activities at the inception of our investment. In the event we do decide to enter into hedge arrangements, before
doing so we evaluate legal, market, and economic factors, as well as the expected timing of disposal, to determine whether hedging
is appropriate. For the year ended December 31, 2019, we recognized a net fair value gain of $818,000 in relation to our investment
in EMC.
ITEM 12.
|
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN
EQUITY SECURITIES
|
A. Debt Securities
Not applicable.
B. Warrants and Rights
Not applicable.
C. Other Securities
Not applicable.
D. American Depositary Shares
Our American Depositary
Receipt (“ADR”) facility is maintained by the Bank of New York Mellon (the “Depositary”). A copy of
the form of Deposit Agreement (the “Deposit Agreement”) between us, the Depositary, and the owners and beneficial
owners of ADSs was filed as Exhibit 1 to our Registration Statement on Form F-6 filed with the SEC on November 7,
2005. The Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation (the “Custodian”) acts as an agent of the Depositary for
the purposes of the Deposit Agreement.
Fees and charges payable by our ADS holders
Under the Deposit
Agreement, the Depositary collects fees for the delivery and surrender of ADSs directly from investors depositing ordinary shares
or surrendering ADSs for the purpose of withdrawal or from intermediaries acting for them. The depositary collects fees for making
distributions to investors by deducting those fees from the amounts distributed or by selling a portion of distributable property
to pay the fees. The depositary may collect its annual fee for depositary services by deductions from cash distributions, directly
billing investors or charging the book-entry system accounts of participants acting for them. The charges of our Depositary
payable by our ADS holders are as follows, pursuant to the Deposit Agreement:
ADS holders must pay:
|
|
For:
|
$5.00 or less per 100 ADSs
|
|
•
|
Each delivery or issuance of ADSs, including deliveries
or issuances resulting from a distribution of shares or rights or other property
|
$5.00 or less per 100 ADSs
|
|
•
|
Each surrender or cancellation of ADSs for the purpose of withdrawal,
including if the deposit agreement terminates
|
$0.02 or less per ADS
|
|
•
|
Any cash distribution to ADS registered holders
|
A fee equivalent to the fee for the execution and delivery of ADSs referred to above which would have been charged as a result of the deposit of such securities but which securities are instead distributed by the Depositary to registered ADS holders
|
|
•
|
Each distribution of securities, other than ordinary shares or ADSs,
to holders of deposited securities which are distributed by the Depositary to ADS registered
|
$0.02 or less per ADS per calendar year (to the extent that the depositary has not collected a cash distribution fee of US$0.02 per ADS during that year)
|
|
•
|
Depositary services
|
Registration or transfer fees, if applicable
|
|
•
|
Transfer and registration of shares on the share register of our transfer
agent to or from the name of the Depositary or its agent when an ADS holder deposits or withdraws shares
|
Expenses of the depositary, if applicable
|
|
•
|
Cable, telex and facsimile transmissions as are expressly provided
in the deposit agreement
|
|
|
•
|
Converting foreign currency to U.S. dollars
|
Taxes and other governmental charges the Depositary or the Custodian have to pay on any ADS or ordinary share underlying an ADS, for example, stock transfer taxes, stamp duty or withholding taxes
|
|
•
|
As necessary
|
Any charges incurred by the Depositary or its agents for servicing the deposited securities
|
|
•
|
As necessary
|
Fees and payments made by the Depositary to us
The Depositary has
waived certain of its standard out-of-pocket administrative, maintenance, shareholder services and secondary market support services
fees and expenses for providing services to registered ADS holders and us (excluding those fees and expenses set forth in the table
above). These waived fees and expenses include, without limitation, the Depositary’s annual administration charges and fees,
custody fees, issuance of dividend checks and replacements, if necessary, preparation and filing of U.S. tax information returns,
stationery, postage, notification mailing, photocopying, facsimile and telephone calls, and certain investor relationship programs
and investor relations promotional activities. We are responsible for paying for postage and envelopes for mailing annual and interim
financial reports and all non-standard out-of-pocket administration and maintenance expenses of the Depositary, including any
and all reasonable legal fees and disbursements.