UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
Commission file number 0-24701
CATAPULT COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Nevada
|
|
77-0086010
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
|
Incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification Number)
|
160 South Whisman Road
Mountain View, California 94041
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(650) 960-1025
(Registrants telephone number, including
area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports to be filed by Section
13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to file such files). Yes
o
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
o
|
|
Accelerated filer
o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
o
|
|
Smaller reporting company
þ
|
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes
o
No
þ
As of March 31, 2009, there were 11,301,255 shares of the Registrants Common Stock, $0.001
par value, outstanding.
CATAPULT COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q
INDEX
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
CATAPULT COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share
|
|
|
|
and par value data)
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
28,733
|
|
|
$
|
33,792
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
8,970
|
|
|
|
7,588
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $16 as of March 31, 2009
and September 30, 2008, respectively
|
|
|
8,472
|
|
|
|
6,487
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
3,078
|
|
|
|
2,313
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
1,944
|
|
|
|
2,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
51,253
|
|
|
|
52,611
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
879
|
|
|
|
1,011
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
49,394
|
|
|
|
49,394
|
|
Other intangibles, net
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
Long-term investments (Note 14)
|
|
|
4,641
|
|
|
|
4,950
|
|
Other assets (Note 15, 16)
|
|
|
8,913
|
|
|
|
5,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
115,114
|
|
|
$
|
114,028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
1,174
|
|
|
$
|
1,984
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
4,160
|
|
|
|
4,040
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
9,727
|
|
|
|
6,446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
15,061
|
|
|
|
12,470
|
|
Deferred revenue, long-term
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
Deferred taxes, long-term
|
|
|
3,859
|
|
|
|
3,557
|
|
Tax liabilities, long-term
|
|
|
1,338
|
|
|
|
1,338
|
|
Other liabilities, long-term
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
20,456
|
|
|
|
17,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 40,000,000
shares authorized; 11,301,255 and 11,778,887
issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2009 and
September 30, 2008, respectively
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
41,013
|
|
|
|
42,449
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(356
|
)
|
|
|
951
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
53,990
|
|
|
|
52,916
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
94,658
|
|
|
|
96,328
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
115,114
|
|
|
$
|
114,028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
CATAPULT COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products
|
|
$
|
8,931
|
|
|
$
|
6,925
|
|
|
$
|
15,388
|
|
|
$
|
13,695
|
|
Services
|
|
|
3,161
|
|
|
|
3,010
|
|
|
|
6,516
|
|
|
|
6,541
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
12,092
|
|
|
|
9,935
|
|
|
|
21,904
|
|
|
|
20,236
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products
|
|
|
1,656
|
|
|
|
1,225
|
|
|
|
3,108
|
|
|
|
2,473
|
|
Services
|
|
|
512
|
|
|
|
752
|
|
|
|
985
|
|
|
|
1,550
|
|
Amortization of purchased technology
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
2,180
|
|
|
|
1,989
|
|
|
|
4,117
|
|
|
|
4,047
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
9,912
|
|
|
|
7,946
|
|
|
|
17,787
|
|
|
|
16,189
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
1,713
|
|
|
|
3,466
|
|
|
|
3,351
|
|
|
|
7,019
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
3,908
|
|
|
|
4,241
|
|
|
|
7,879
|
|
|
|
8,586
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
2,092
|
|
|
|
2,106
|
|
|
|
4,351
|
|
|
|
4,278
|
|
Restructuring costs (Note 13)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
7,713
|
|
|
|
12,010
|
|
|
|
15,581
|
|
|
|
22,080
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
2,199
|
|
|
|
(4,064
|
)
|
|
|
2,206
|
|
|
|
(5,891
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
592
|
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
1,336
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(369
|
)
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
(194
|
)
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
1,951
|
|
|
|
(3,237
|
)
|
|
|
2,365
|
|
|
|
(4,190
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
844
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
1,201
|
|
|
|
331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
1,107
|
|
|
$
|
(3,350
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,164
|
|
|
$
|
(4,521
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share Basic and Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
$
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
$
|
(0.34
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in per share calculation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
11,333
|
|
|
|
13,119
|
|
|
|
11,452
|
|
|
|
13,247
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
11,350
|
|
|
|
13,119
|
|
|
|
11,455
|
|
|
|
13,247
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
2
CATAPULT COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) as reported
|
|
$
|
1,164
|
|
|
$
|
(4,521
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
491
|
|
Amortization of purchased technology
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Amortization of other acquisition related intangibles
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Gain on disposal of fixed assets
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
Stock based compensation expense
|
|
|
969
|
|
|
|
1,479
|
|
Change in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(1,955
|
)
|
|
|
(3,598
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(764
|
)
|
|
|
321
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
354
|
|
|
|
(208
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(811
|
)
|
|
|
430
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
3,179
|
|
|
|
1,456
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
2,998
|
|
|
|
(2,221
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale and maturities of investments
|
|
|
5,855
|
|
|
|
44,861
|
|
Purchase of investments
|
|
|
(7,201
|
)
|
|
|
(23,697
|
)
|
Capitalized software development costs
|
|
|
(3,854
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
|
|
(307
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
|
|
(5,344
|
)
|
|
|
20,857
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(2,567
|
)
|
|
|
(2,772
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activity
|
|
|
(2,567
|
)
|
|
|
(2,772
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(146
|
)
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(5,059
|
)
|
|
|
16,036
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
33,792
|
|
|
|
23,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
28,733
|
|
|
$
|
39,387
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
(loss) gain on investments
|
|
$
|
(1,203
|
)
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements.
3
CATAPULT COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1 The Company and Basis of Presentation
Catapult Communications Corporation and its subsidiaries (we or the Company) design,
develop, manufacture, market and support advanced software-based test systems offering integrated
suites of testing applications for the global telecommunications industry. Our advanced test
systems assist our customers in the design, integration, installation and acceptance testing of a
broad range of digital telecommunications equipment and services. The Company was incorporated in
California in October 1985, was reincorporated in Nevada in 1998, and has operations in the United
States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Europe, Japan, China, India, and the Philippines. Management
has determined that we conduct our business within one reportable segment: the design, development,
manufacture, marketing and support of advanced software-based test systems globally.
The accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2008, which has been
derived from audited financial statements, and the unaudited interim condensed consolidated
financial statements as of March 31, 2009 have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations
of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) and include the accounts of Catapult
Communications Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All inter-company accounts and
transactions have been eliminated. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included
in the financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules
and regulations. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2008 and filed with the SEC
on December 3, 2008. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as of March 31,
2009, and for the three and six months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, reflect, in the opinion of
management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to state
fairly the financial information set forth herein. The results of operations for the interim
periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any subsequent interim
period or for an entire year. The September 30, 2008 balance sheet was derived from audited
financial statements at that date, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
There have been no significant changes in the Companys critical accounting policies during
the six months ended March 31, 2009 as compared to what was previously disclosed in the Companys
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the SEC on December 3, 2008,
except that we adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157 (SFAS 157),
Fair Value Measurements
and SFAS No. 159 (SFAS
159),
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities-Including an amendment
of FASB Statement No. 115.
Note 2 Recent Accounting Pronouncements
During the first quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company adopted SFAS 157,
Fair Value
Measurements
, which defines fair value, establishes guidelines for measuring fair value and expands
disclosures regarding fair value measurements. SFAS 157 does not require any new fair value
measurements, but rather eliminates inconsistencies in guidance found in various other accounting
pronouncements. The adoption of SFAS 157 did not have a material impact on the Companys results of
operations or the fair values of its financial assets and liabilities. Refer to the section
entitled Fair Value Measurements in Note 5 for additional information on the adoption of SFAS
157.
In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) 157-2 (FSP 157-2),
Effective
Date of FASB Statement No. 157
. FSP 157-2 delays the effective date of SFAS 157 for all
non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or
disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). FSP
157-2 partially defers the effective date of SFAS 157 to fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years for items within the scope of this FSP. The
Company is still evaluating the impact of the items deferred by FSP 157-2.
In October 2008, the FASB issued FSP 157-3 (FSP 157-3),
Determining the Fair Value of a
Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active
. FSP 157-3 clarifies the application
of SFAS 157 when the market for that financial asset is not active and defines additional key
criteria in determining the fair value of a financial asset. The adoption of this FSP did not have
a material impact on the Companys results of operations or the fair values of its financial assets
and liabilities.
4
The Company also adopted SFAS 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilitiesincluding an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115,
during the first quarter of fiscal
2009, but we did not elect the fair value measurement option for any eligible financial instruments
as of December 31, 2008. SFAS 159 allows an entity the irrevocable option to elect fair value for
the initial and subsequent measurement for certain financial assets and liabilities under an
instrument-by-instrument election. Subsequent measurements for the financial assets and liabilities
an entity elects to fair value will be recognized in earnings. SFAS 159 also establishes additional
disclosure requirements. The adoption of SFAS 159 did not have any impact on the Companys results
of operations or the fair values of its financial assets and liabilities. We could elect this
option for new or substantially modified assets and liabilities in the future.
In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP EITF 03-6-1 (FSP EITF 03-6-1),
Determining Whether
Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities
. FSP EITF
03-6-1 specifies that unvested share-based awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends
or dividend equivalents are participating securities and should therefore be included in the
computation of earnings per share under the two-class method as described in paragraphs 60 and 61
of SFAS 128,
Earnings per Share.
FSP EITF 03-6-1 is effective for the Company at the beginning of
fiscal year 2010. We have not yet determined the impact, if any, that the adoption of FSP EITF
03-6-1 will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued three related FSPs: (i) FSP 157-4 (FSP 157-4),
Determining
Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability have Significantly
Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly
, (ii) FSP SFAS 115-2 and SFAS 124-2
(FSP SFAS 115-2 and SFAS 124-2),
Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary
Impairments
, and (iii) FSP SFAS 107-1 and Accounting Principles Board (APB) 28-1 (FSP SFAS 107-1
and APB 28-1),
Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments,
which will be
effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. FSP 157-4 provides guidance on
how to determine the fair value of assets and liabilities under SFAS 157,
Fair Value Measurements
,
in the current economic environment and reemphasizes that the objective of a fair value measurement
remains the determination of an exit price. If there is a significant decrease in the volume and
level of activity of the asset or liability in relation to normal market activities, quoted market
values may not be representative of fair value and we may conclude there may be increased instances
of transactions that are not orderly and a change in valuation technique may be appropriate. FSP
SFAS 115-2 and SFAS 124-2 modify the requirements for recognizing other-than-temporarily impaired
debt securities and revise the existing impairment model for such securities by modifying the
current intent and ability indicator in determining whether a debt security is
other-than-temporarily impaired. FSP SFAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 enhance the disclosure of instruments
under the scope of SFAS 157 for both interim and annual periods. We have not yet determined the
impact, if any, that the adoption of these standards will have on our consolidated financial
statements and related disclosures.
Note 3 Stock-Based Compensation
The following table summarizes the effect on our unaudited condensed consolidated statements
of operations of recording stock-based compensation expense recognized under SFAS 123(R) for the
three and six months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Stock-Based Compensation Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales products
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
81
|
|
|
$
|
90
|
|
Cost of sales services
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
Research and development expense
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
361
|
|
Selling and marketing expense
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
|
306
|
|
General and administrative expense
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
601
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
655
|
|
|
|
969
|
|
|
|
1,479
|
|
Tax effect on stock-based compensation expenses
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net effect on net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
413
|
|
|
$
|
651
|
|
|
$
|
960
|
|
|
$
|
1,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additionally, stock-based compensation expense is capitalized in accordance with SFAS 86,
Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to Be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed
, as
discussed in Note 15 Capitalized Software Development Costs. The following table summarizes
stock-based compensation expense included in our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets as
a component of other assets (in thousands):
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Balance beginning of period
|
|
$
|
83
|
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense capitalized during the period
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
Amortization of capitalized stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
117
|
|
|
$
|
117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the three and six months ended March 31, 2008, there were no stock-based compensation
expense capitalized.
The fair value of each option is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option
pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee Stock Option Plans
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Expected life of option
|
|
4.48 years
|
|
4.26 years
|
|
4.48 years
|
|
4.26 years
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
1.75
|
%
|
|
|
2.39
|
%
|
|
|
2.14
|
%
|
|
|
3.36
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
61.9
|
%
|
|
|
55.0
|
%
|
|
|
57.7
|
%
|
|
|
55.0
|
%
|
As of March 31, 2009, approximately $1.8 million of unrecognized compensation costs related to
stock options are expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 1.3
years.
Note 4 Basic and Diluted Net Income (Loss) per Share
We have presented net income (loss) per share for all periods in accordance with SFAS No. 128
(SFAS 128),
Earnings per Share
. SFAS 128 requires the presentation of basic and diluted earnings
per share. Basic net income (loss) per share is computed using the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per share includes the
effect of dilutive potential common shares, but in periods where net losses are recorded, diluted
net loss per share does not include the conversion of common stock equivalents such as common stock
options because to do so would decrease the net loss per share and would be anti-dilutive. The
following is a reconciliation of the denominator used in calculating basic and diluted net income
(loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
Net income (loss), as reported for basic and diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
1,107
|
|
|
$
|
(3,350
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,164
|
|
|
$
|
(4,521
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
11,333
|
|
|
|
13,119
|
|
|
|
11,452
|
|
|
|
13,247
|
|
Dilutive options
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares assuming dilution
|
|
|
11,350
|
|
|
|
13,119
|
|
|
|
11,455
|
|
|
|
13,247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
$
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
$
|
(0.34
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
$
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
$
|
(0.34
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
Diluted net income (loss) per share does not include the effect of the following anti-dilutive
potential common shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Common stock options
|
|
|
2,783
|
|
|
|
2,657
|
|
|
|
2,769
|
|
|
|
2,643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 5 Fair Value Measurements
During the first quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company adopted SFAS 157,
Fair Value
Measurements
, which defines fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or
paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required
to be recorded at fair value, the Company considered the principal or most advantageous market in
which the Company would transact and the market-based risk measurements or assumptions that market
participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.
SFAS 157 established a three-tiered fair value hierarchy of valuation techniques based on
whether the inputs to those valuation techniques are observable or unobservable to prioritize
inputs used to measure fair value. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent
sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the Companys market assumptions. A financial
instruments categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input
that is available and significant to the fair value measurement. Those tiers are defined as
follows:
Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable, either
directly or indirectly.
Level 3 inputs are unobservable and shall be used to the extent that observable inputs are not
available in the overall fair value measurement.
The following table represents a summary of financial assets and liabilities that were
measured at fair value on a recurring basis and the classification by level of input within the
fair value hierarchy (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Identical Assets
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
28,733
|
|
|
$
|
28,733
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
8,970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,970
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term investments
|
|
|
4,641
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,641
|
|
Non-marketable equity investment
|
|
|
884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
43,228
|
|
|
$
|
28,733
|
|
|
$
|
8,970
|
|
|
$
|
5,525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table is a reconciliation of Level 3 inputs measured at fair value on a
recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months
|
|
|
Six months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
6,455
|
|
|
$
|
6,764
|
|
Total realized gains (losses) included in interest and other income, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unrealized losses included in comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(930
|
)
|
|
|
(1,239
|
)
|
Purchases (sales), net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers into (out of) Level 3,net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
$
|
5,525
|
|
|
$
|
5,525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our investments in auction rate securities (ARS) were classified as Level 3 as quoted prices
were not available. We used a discounted cash flow (DCF) model to derive an estimate of fair
value at December 31, 2008 and determined that
7
there has been no significant change in the circumstances that might have affected the fair
value of ARS in the three months ended March 31, 2009. In the first quarter of fiscal 2009, we
recorded an unrealized holding loss of $309,000 as noted in Note 14 Long-term Investments. The
assumptions used in the DCF model for the estimated total expected future cash flows included
estimates on the amount and timing of future interests and principal payments, projections of the
interest rate, probability of full repayment of principal considering the credit quality and
guarantees, the market required rate of return by investors owning ARS and the companys tax
position.
Our non-marketable equity investment is measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and
recognized at fair value when deemed to be other than temporarily impaired. During the second
quarter of fiscal 2009, we determined that our investment in Nethawk Oyj had declined in value and
we recorded an unrealized holding loss of $930,000 based on a market approach valuation model to
derive an estimate of fair value at March 31, 2009. We concluded that the decline in value was
temporary based on our intent and ability to hold the investment
until its value recovers. Refer to Note 16 Non-marketable
Equity Investment.
Note 6 Inventories
The components of inventories are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Inventories:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
$
|
2,146
|
|
|
$
|
1,548
|
|
Work-in-process
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
814
|
|
|
|
522
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,078
|
|
|
$
|
2,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 7 Goodwill and Intangible Assets
We performed our most recent goodwill impairment test as of March 31, 2009 and determined that
there was no impairment. As such, there was no write-down of the goodwill balance. Between October
1, 2008 and March 31, 2009, there have been no changes to the Companys goodwill balance of $49.4
million.
In the first half of fiscal 2009, there were no events or changes in circumstances to indicate
impairment of intangible assets or changes to intangible assets.
Note 8 Income Taxes
Our provision for income taxes consists of federal, state and foreign income taxes. We
recorded a tax provision of $844,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2009, compared with
$113,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2008. In the six months ended March 31, 2009 and March
31, 2008, we recorded tax provisions of $1,201,000 and $331,000, respectively. Having taken a full
valuation allowance against our U.S. deferred tax assets at the end of fiscal 2006, we no longer
record a tax benefit for U.S. pre-tax losses. As a result, our tax provision consists primarily of
tax on foreign income, including the change in our allowance for uncertain tax positions, plus the
increase in deferred tax liability resulting from the amortization for tax purposes of a portion of
our goodwill.
On October 1, 2007, we adopted FIN 48 (FIN 48),
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,
an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109
. The cumulative effect of adopting FIN 48 was a $17,000
decrease to retained earnings as of October 1, 2007. As of September 30, 2008, the total amount of
gross unrecognized tax benefits was $4,000,000, of which $1,024,000 would affect the effective tax
rate if recognized.
In accordance with our accounting policy, we recognize accrued interest and penalties related
to unrecognized tax benefits in the provision for income taxes. This policy did not change as a
result of the adoption of FIN 48. In the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, accrued
interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions of approximately $19,000 and $22,000,
respectively, have been expensed. In the six months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, accrued
interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions of approximately $56,000 and $47,000
have been expensed.
We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, and various states and foreign
jurisdictions. With few exceptions, we are no longer subject to U.S. federal, state, or foreign
examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2000. At this time, we cannot estimate the
possible change in unrecognized tax benefits.
8
Note 9 Stockholders Equity
Comprehensive income (loss)
The components of comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Net income (loss), as reported
|
|
$
|
1,107
|
|
|
$
|
(3,350
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,164
|
|
|
$
|
(4,521
|
)
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
(136
|
)
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
143
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on investments
|
|
|
(951
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(1,203
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
(3,186
|
)
|
|
$
|
(144
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,376
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Option Plans
In June 1998, the Board of Directors adopted the 1998 Stock Plan (the 1998 Plan), which
initially provided for the issuance of options to purchase 1,800,000 shares. The Companys
stockholders have subsequently approved increases of a total of 3,000,000 shares to the 1998 Plan.
The Board of Directors has the authority to determine optionees, the number of shares, the term of
each option and the exercise price. Options under the 1998 Plan generally become exercisable at a
rate of 1/8th of the total options granted six months after the option grant date and then at a
rate of 1/48th per month thereafter. Options will expire, if not exercised, upon the earlier of 10
years from the date of grant or 30 days after termination as an employee of the Company.
Repurchase of Common Stock
In December 1999, our Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program of up to
2,000,000 shares of its common stock. In January 2007, November 2007, April 2008 and October 2008,
our Board of Directors authorized increases of 1,000,000 shares, 208,974 shares, 420,820 shares and
1,241,583 shares, respectively, to the program. Depending on market conditions and other factors,
repurchases can be made from time to time in the open market and in negotiated transactions,
including block transactions, and this program may be discontinued at any time. In fiscal 2008, we
repurchased and canceled 1,690,162 shares at a cost of approximately $12.2 million. In the three
months ended December 31, 2008, we repurchased and canceled 392,589 shares at a cost of
approximately $2.0 million. In the three months ended March 31, 2009, we repurchased and canceled
85,043 shares at a cost of approximately $0.6 million. The shares repurchased were restored to
the status of authorized but unissued. As of March 31, 2009, approximately 1,022,000 shares
remained available for repurchase under the authorization.
Note 10 Geographical Information
We are organized to operate in and service a single reportable segment: the design,
development, manufacture, marketing and support of advanced software-based telecommunications test
systems.
9
Revenues and long-lived assets by geographic region are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe, Middle
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
East & Africa
|
|
Japan
|
|
Pacific
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Six months ended March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from unaffiliated customers
|
|
$
|
3,487
|
|
|
$
|
4,025
|
|
|
$
|
9,251
|
|
|
$
|
5,141
|
|
|
$
|
21,904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from unaffiliated customers
|
|
$
|
4,260
|
|
|
$
|
5,117
|
|
|
$
|
7,946
|
|
|
$
|
2,913
|
|
|
$
|
20,236
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
$
|
22,896
|
|
|
$
|
26,498
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
49,394
|
|
Long-lived assets
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
879
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
$
|
22,896
|
|
|
$
|
26,498
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
49,394
|
|
Long-lived assets
|
|
|
601
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
1,011
|
|
Revenues above reflect the location of the end customer and exclude all inter-company sales.
Revenues in the United States represented 13%, and 19% of our total revenues in the six months
ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Revenues from China represented 13% and 12% of our
total revenues in the six months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Operations in Ireland
accounted for 42% and 36% of the consolidated identifiable assets at March 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Note 11 Customer Information
We currently sell our products to a small number of customers. Customers representing 10% or
more of our accounts receivable balances as of March 31, 2009 or September 30, 2008, or 10% or more
of our revenues for the three or six months ended March 31, 2009 or 2008, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of Accounts Receivable as of
|
|
Percentage of Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
Customer A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
Customer B
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
Customer C
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer D
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer E
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
Customer F
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
Customer G
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 12 Contingencies
From time to time, we may be involved in lawsuits, claims, investigations and proceedings,
consisting of intellectual property, commercial, employment and other matters, which arise in the
ordinary course of business. In accordance with SFAS 5,
Accounting for Contingencies
, we record a
liability when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss
can be reasonably estimated. These provisions are reviewed at least quarterly and adjusted to
reflect the impact of negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of legal counsel and other
information and events pertaining to a particular case. If an unfavorable ruling were to occur in
any specific period, there exists the possibility of a material adverse impact on the results of
operations of that period.
Note 13 Restructuring Costs
A restructuring charge of $2,197,000 was recorded in the second quarter of fiscal 2008, of
which $1,574,000 was paid in fiscal year 2008 and a further $393,000 was paid in the six months
ended March 31, 2009. These costs related primarily to one-time employee termination benefits
consisting of severance and related benefits for the workforce reduction through
10
layoffs and early
retirement of 25 employees worldwide and to the closure of our research and development facility in
Australia. The global workforce reduction represented 11% of our workforce prior to the
restructuring.
Note 14 Long-term Investments
In our investment portfolio, we hold ARS that are securities with long-term maturities for
which the interest rates are reset through a dutch auction each month. These auctions historically
have provided a liquid market for these securities. The ARS held in our portfolio represent
interests in student loan and closed-end mutual fund preferred issues, all highly rated by one or
more of the major credit rating agencies at the time of purchase.
On February 11, 2008, when the market for ARS began to experience widespread auction failures,
we held a total of $12 million in these securities in two of our three externally managed
short-term investment portfolios. Since then, as a result of auction sales due to some degree of
recovery in the auction market together with refinancing of some issues, our total position in
these securities was reduced to $5.0 million as of September 30, 2008. These sales and redemptions
all occurred at par without a loss. In the three months ended December 31, 2008, we recorded an
unrealized holding loss of $309,000 because we saw no sales and redemptions in the period as a
result of the further deterioration of credit markets as discussed in Note 5 Fair Value
Measurements.
Based on the current lack of liquidity related to these investments, we anticipate that
liquidation of these remaining securities will be protracted and accordingly we have continued to
classify them as long-term investments at March 31, 2009.
Note 15 Capitalized Software Development Costs
Unamortized software development costs were $7.4 million at March 31, 2009 and are included in
other assets. There were $3.5 million in unamortized software development costs at September 30,
2008.
Note 16 Non-marketable Equity Investment
We have an interest of approximately 2.6% in Nethawk Oyj, a private Finnish company that has
been recorded on our balance sheet as a long-term asset at fair values of $0.9 million and $1.8
million as of March 31, 2009 and September 30, 2008, respectively, as determined by management. In
the second quarter of fiscal 2009, we recorded a temporary unrealized holding loss of $0.9 million
that is included in Stockholders Equity comprehensive income (loss) and discussed in Note 5 Fair
Value Measurements.
Note 17 Subsequent Events
On May 11, 2009, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger
Agreement) with Ixia, a California corporation (Ixia), and Josie Acquisition Company, a Nevada
corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ixia (Merger Subsidiary), pursuant to which, among
other things, Merger Subsidiary will commence a tender offer to acquire all the outstanding shares
of the Companys common stock, par value $0.001 per share, at a price of $9.25 (or any higher price
as may be paid in accordance with the Merger Agreement) per share, net to the holders thereof in
cash, without interest (Offer Price), and following the completion of the tender offer, Merger
Subsidiary will merge with and into the Company, as a result of which each issued and outstanding
share of the Companys common stock (other than any such share owned by the Company, Ixia or their
subsidiaries), will be automatically converted into the right to receive an amount in cash, without
interest, equal to the Offer Price. Consummation of the Offer is subject to various conditions,
including (1) the valid tender of the number of shares that would represent at least a majority of
all shares outstanding as of the scheduled expiration of the tender offer (calculated on a
fully-diluted basis, but excluding any stock options that are not exercisable or have an exercise
price greater than the Offer Price), (2) the expiration or termination of applicable waiting
periods under the United States Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 and (3) and
other required regulatory approvals and customary closing conditions.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with Selected
Consolidated Financial Data and our Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included
in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the SEC on
December 3, 2008.
Forward-looking Statements
This report on Form 10-Q contains statements that are not historical facts but are
forward-looking statements relating to such matters as anticipated financial performance and
involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our business or our
industrys actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially
different from those expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements. Such statements
include, in particular, statements about our plans, strategies, prospects, changes and trends in
our business and the markets in which we operate as described in this report on Form 10-Q. In some
cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as may, will, could,
would, should, expect, plan, anticipate, intend, believe, estimate, forecast,
predict, propose, potential or continue or the negative of those terms or other comparable
terminology. These statements are only predictions.
These forward-looking statements include but are not limited to those identified in this
report with an asterisk (*) symbol. Actual results may differ materially from those discussed in
such forward-looking statements for a number of reasons, including:
|
|
|
the variable size and timing of individual purchases by our customers, including delays
in customer purchasing decisions or orders due to customer consolidation;
|
|
|
|
|
the absence of long-term customer purchase contracts;
|
11
|
|
|
seasonal factors that may affect capital spending by customers, such as the varying
fiscal year ends of customers and the reduction in business during the summer months,
particularly in Europe;
|
|
|
|
|
the relatively long sales cycles for our products;
|
|
|
|
|
competitive conditions in our markets;
|
|
|
|
|
exchange rate fluctuations;
|
|
|
|
|
the timing of the introduction and market acceptance of new products or product
enhancements by us and by our customers, competitors and suppliers;
|
|
|
|
|
costs associated with developing and introducing new products;
|
|
|
|
|
product life cycles;
|
|
|
|
|
changes in the level of operating expenses relative to revenues;
|
|
|
|
|
product defects and other quality problems;
|
|
|
|
|
customer order deferrals in anticipation of new products;
|
|
|
|
|
supply interruptions;
|
|
|
|
|
changes in global or regional economic conditions or in the telecommunications industry;
|
|
|
|
|
asset impairment, valuation allowance and restructuring charges;
|
|
|
|
|
changes in our tax rate;
|
|
|
|
|
changes in the mix of products sold;
|
|
|
|
|
changes in the regulatory environment; and
|
|
|
|
|
adverse results from litigation.
|
You should carefully review the cautionary statements set forth under the caption Risk
Factors in Item 1A of Part II of this report and those set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended September 30, 2008, filed on December 3, 2008.
We may from time to time make additional written and oral forward-looking statements,
including statements contained in our filings with the SEC and in our reports to stockholders. We
do not undertake to update any forward-looking statements that may be made in this Form 10-Q or
from time to time by us or on our behalf.
Overview
Our Business and Products
Catapult Communications Corporation (we, Catapult, the Company or the Registrant)
designs, develops, manufactures, markets and supports advanced software-based test systems for the
global telecommunications industry. Our Linux software-based DCT2000
®
(DCT) and MGTS
®
digital
communications test systems operating on a common hardware platform range are designed to enable
equipment manufacturers and network operators to deliver complex digital telecommunications
equipment and services more quickly and cost-effectively, while helping to ensure interoperability
and reliability. Our advanced software and hardware perform a range of test functions, including
design and feature verification, conformance testing, interoperability testing and load and stress
testing. Our emphasis is on testing complex, high-level and emerging protocols including, most
recently, Long-Term Evolution (LTE), WiMAX and IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS). In February 2009, we
announced a high-capacity LTE User Equipment (UE) Simulation Test System.
Conditions and Trends in Our Industry
In our fiscal year ended September 30, 2008, we experienced lower revenues than in the
previous year due to the effects of consolidation among major customers outside of Japan, such as
Alcatel-Lucent (which also acquired the 3G wireless business from Nortel) and Nokia Siemens
Networks, and to continued competition from our customers own test equipment offerings in the
Japanese market. These factors resulted in reduced purchasing of our products and services by our
customers throughout the world.
12
In the six months ended March 31, 2009, we saw improvement in revenues in both Japan and Asia
Pacific outside Japan, but we continued to experience reduced demand in North America and Europe
due to the effects of consolidation among major customers.
Summary of Our Financial Performance in the Second Quarter of Fiscal 2009
Our revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2009 increased by 22% to $12.1 million from
$9.9 million in the same period in the prior year for the reasons outlined in the preceding
section, Conditions and Trends in our Industry. Our gross profit margin increased by two
percentage points to 82% while our operating expenses decreased by 36%, primarily due to
capitalized research and development expenses, decreases in non-cash stock option expenses and
contractor expenses and the absence of a restructuring charge made in the prior comparable period.
We recorded operating income of $2.2 million in comparison with an operating loss of $4.1 million
in the same period in the previous year.
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, our cash, cash equivalents and short-term
investments increased by
$1.3 million, primarily due to $3.9 million in cash flow from operations, $0.6 million in share
repurchases, $1.8 million in additional capitalization of software development costs and $0.2
million in exchange rate changes.
Recent Developments
On May 11, 2009, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger
Agreement) with Ixia, a California corporation (Ixia), and Josie Acquisition Company, a Nevada
corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ixia (Merger Subsidiary), pursuant to which, among
other things, Merger Subsidiary will commence a tender offer to acquire all the outstanding shares
of the Companys common stock, par value $0.001 per share, at a price of $9.25 (or any higher price
as may be paid in accordance with the Merger Agreement) per share, net to the holders thereof in
cash, without interest (Offer Price), and following the completion of the tender offer, Merger
Subsidiary will merge with and into the Company, as a result of which each issued and outstanding
share of the Companys common stock (other than any such share owned by the Company, Ixia or their
subsidiaries), will be automatically converted into the right to receive an amount in cash, without
interest, equal to the Offer Price. Consummation of the Offer is subject to various conditions,
including (1) the valid tender of the number of shares that would represent at least a majority of
all shares outstanding as of the scheduled expiration of the tender offer (calculated on a
fully-diluted basis, but excluding any stock options that are not exercisable or have an exercise
price greater than the Offer Price), (2) the expiration or termination of applicable waiting
periods under the United States Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 and (3) and
other required regulatory approvals and customary closing conditions.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates as
disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the
SEC on December 3, 2008, except that we adopted the following critical accounting policy during our
first quarter of fiscal 2009, as previously disclosed in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the SEC on February 11, 2009.
Fair Value Measurement
We measure fair value in accordance with SFAS 157,
Fair Value Measurements
and SFAS 159,
The
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities-Including an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 115
.
A significant portion of our cash equivalents, short-term investments and long-term
investments consists of financial instruments that are measured at fair value in our unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements. The measurement of fair value requires significant
management judgments and assumptions. These judgments and assumptions, as well as changes in market
conditions, may have a material effect on our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets and
statements of operations.
At March 31, 2009, the fair values for our cash equivalents and short-term investments were
based on independent price quotations obtained from third party sources such as pricing services,
dealer quotes or direct market observations. The fair values for our ARS classified as long-term
investments were measured using an internally-developed discounted cash flow model.
We periodically evaluate our fair value measurement methodology and may change it to
accommodate market developments or to compensate for changes in data availability and reliability.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the percentage relationships of
certain items from our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations to total revenues
except for gross profit margin on products and services.
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products
|
|
|
73.9
|
%
|
|
|
69.7
|
%
|
|
|
70.3
|
%
|
|
|
67.7
|
%
|
Services
|
|
|
26.1
|
|
|
|
30.3
|
|
|
|
29.7
|
|
|
|
32.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products
|
|
|
13.7
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
14.2
|
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
Services
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
Amortization of purchased technology
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
18.0
|
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
|
|
18.8
|
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
82.0
|
|
|
|
80.0
|
|
|
|
81.2
|
|
|
|
80.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
14.2
|
|
|
|
34.9
|
|
|
|
15.3
|
|
|
|
34.7
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
32.3
|
|
|
|
42.7
|
|
|
|
36.0
|
|
|
|
42.4
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
17.3
|
|
|
|
21.2
|
|
|
|
19.8
|
|
|
|
21.1
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
63.8
|
|
|
|
120.9
|
|
|
|
71.1
|
|
|
|
109.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
18.2
|
|
|
|
(40.9
|
)
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
(29.1
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
16.1
|
|
|
|
(32.6
|
)
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
|
|
(20.7
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
9.2
|
%
|
|
|
(33.7
|
)%
|
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
|
|
(22.3
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit margin on products
|
|
|
81.5
|
%
|
|
|
82.3
|
%
|
|
|
79.8
|
%
|
|
|
81.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit margin on services
|
|
|
83.8
|
%
|
|
|
75.0
|
%
|
|
|
84.9
|
%
|
|
|
76.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit margin on products and services excludes amortization of purchased technology.
Comparison of the Three-Month Periods Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
Revenues
Our revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2009 in comparison to the same period in the
prior year increased by 22% to $12.1 million. Over the same period, product revenues increased by
29% to $8.9 million. The increase in product revenues was attributable to increased sales of our
DCT and MGTS test systems. Services revenues increased approximately 5% to $3.2 million, primarily
due to an increase in consulting services during the period.
Our revenues by sales territory, based on origin of order taken, varied as follows in the
three months ended March 31, 2009 in comparison with the three months ended March 31, 2008:
|
|
|
revenues in the Americas increased by 6% to $1.3 million;
|
|
|
|
|
revenues in Europe, the Middle East and Africa increased by 7% to $1.9 million;
|
|
|
|
|
revenues in Japan increased by 9% to $6.1 million; and
|
|
|
|
|
revenues in Asia Pacific outside Japan increased by 105% to $2.8 million.
|
Information
on revenues from major customers is provided in Note 11 to the Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Cost of Revenues
Cost of product revenues increased by 35% to $1.7 million for the three months ended March 31,
2009 in comparison with the same period in the prior year and gross margin on product revenues
decreased by one percentage point to 81%. These variances reflect increased hardware component and
third party product costs as a percentage of revenue. We expect our gross margin on product
revenues in future quarterly periods to fluctuate based on product mix and revenue levels.*
Cost of services revenues decreased by approximately 32% to $0.5 million in the three months
ended March 31, 2009 in comparison with the same period in the prior year, primarily due to a 38%
decrease in the number of employees engaged in customer support. Gross margin on services revenues
increased by nine percentage points to 84% as services cost decreases
14
were compounded by an
increase in revenues. We expect our gross margin on services revenues in future quarterly periods
to fluctuate based on changes in both revenue and cost levels.*
Amortization of purchased technology remained unchanged at $12,000 in the three months ended
March 31, 2009 compared with the same period the previous year.
Gross margins did not vary significantly by geographic region.
Research and Development
Research and development expenses decreased by approximately 51% to $1.7 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 in comparison with the same period in the prior year, primarily due to
the capitalization of $1.8 million in software production expenses. As a percentage of total
revenues, research and development expenses decreased to 14% from 35% over the same period.
Sales and Marketing
Sales and marketing expenses decreased by 8% to $3.9 million for the three months ended March
31, 2009 in comparison with the same period in the prior year primarily due to a 6% reduction in
the number of sales and marketing employees. As a percentage of total revenues, sales and
marketing expenses decreased to 32% from 43% over the same period.
General and Administrative
General and administrative expenses remained unchanged at $2.1 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2009 in comparison with the same period in the prior year. As a percentage of total
revenues, general and administrative expenses decreased to 17% from 21% over the same period.
Restructuring Charge
No restructuring charge was recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2009. A
restructuring charge of $2.2 million was recorded in the same period in the prior year in
connection with a reduction in force of 25 employees, or 11% of our work force, and the closure of
our Australian office.
Interest income
Interest income decreased by 80% to $0.1 million in the three months ended March 31, 2009 in
comparison with the same period in the prior year due to decreases in both short-term interest
rates and in the total value of funds invested.
Other income (expense), net
Other income (expense), net decreased to a loss of $0.4 million in the three months ended
March 31, 2009 primarily from foreign exchange losses on the Japanese yen in comparison with income
of $0.2 million in the same period in the prior year primarily from foreign exchange gains on the
Japanese yen.
Provision for income taxes
Our provision for income taxes consists of federal, state and foreign income taxes. Having
recorded a full valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets in the U.S. in fiscal 2006, we no
longer accrue a benefit on U.S. pre-tax losses. Our tax provision increased by $0.7 million to $0.8
million in the three months ended March 31, 2009 in comparison with the same period in the prior
year due to pre-tax income recorded in the current period in comparison with a pre-tax loss in the
same period in the prior year.
Comparison of the Six-Month Periods Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
Revenues
Our revenues for the six months ended March 31, 2009 increased by 8% to $21.9 million in
comparison with the same period in the prior year. Over the same period, product revenues increased
by approximately 12% to $15.4 million. The increase in product revenues was attributable to
increased sales of our test systems, primarily due to stronger demand from customers in Japan and
Asia Pacific outside Japan, which more than offset weaker demand elsewhere in the world. Services
revenues remained substantially unchanged at $6.5 million.
Our revenues by geographic sales territory varied as follows in the six months ended March 31,
2009 in comparison with the same period in the prior year:
|
|
|
revenues in the Americas decreased by 18% to $3.5 million;
|
15
|
|
|
revenues in Europe, the Middle East and Africa decreased by 21% to $4.0 million;
|
|
|
|
|
revenues in Japan increased by 16% to $9.3 million; and
|
|
|
|
|
revenues in Asia Pacific outside Japan increased by 76% to $5.1 million.
|
Information
on revenues from major customers is provided in Note 11 to the Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements included with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Cost of Revenues
Cost of product revenues increased by 26% to $3.1 million in the six months ended March 31,
2009 in comparison with the same period in the prior year primarily due to increased hardware
component and third party product costs as a percentage of revenue. Gross margin on product
revenues decreased to 80% from 82%.
Cost of services revenues decreased by 36% to $1.0 million in the six months ended March 31,
2009 in comparison with the same period in the prior year primarily due to an 18% decrease in the
number of employee engaged in customer support. Gross margin on services revenues increased by nine
percentage points to 85% as services costs decreased while the associated revenues remained
substantially unchanged.
Research and Development
Research and development expenses decreased by approximately 52% to $3.4 million for the six
months ended March 31, 2009 in comparison with the same period in the prior year primarily
due to the capitalization of $3.9 million in software production expenses. As a percentage of total
revenues, research and development expenses decreased to 15% from 35% over the same period.
Sales and Marketing
Sales and marketing expenses decreased by approximately 8% to $7.9 million for the six months
ended March 31, 2009 in comparison with the same period in the prior year, primarily due to a
decrease of 8% in the number of employees engaged in
sales and marketing activities. As a percentage of total revenues, sales and marketing expenses
decreased to 36% from 42% over the same period.
General and Administrative
General and administrative expenses increased approximately 2% to $4.4 million for the six
months ended March 31, 2009 in comparison with the same period in the prior year, reflecting
primarily an increase in compensation costs of $0.2 million and a decrease of $0.1 million in
accounting expenses. As a percentage of total revenues, general and administrative expenses
decreased to 20% from 21% over the same period.
Restructuring Charge
No restructuring charge was recorded for the six months ended March 31, 2009. A restructuring
charge of $2.2 million was recorded in the six months ended March 31, 2008 in connection with a
reduction in force of 25 employees, or 11% of our work force, and the closure of our Australian
office.
Interest income
Interest income decreased by 74% to $0.4 million in the six months ended March 31, 2009 in
comparison with the same period in the prior year due to decreases in both short-term interest
rates and in the total value of funds invested.
Other income (expense), net
Other income (expense), net decreased to a loss of $0.2 million in the six months ended March
31, 2009 primarily from foreign exchange losses on the Japanese yen in comparison with income of
$0.4 million in the same period in the prior year primarily from foreign exchange gains on the
Japanese yen.
Provision for income taxes
Our provision for income taxes consists of federal, state and foreign income taxes. Having
recorded a full valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets in the U.S. in fiscal 2006, we no
longer accrue a benefit on U.S. pre-tax losses. Our tax provision increased by $0.9 million to $1.2
million in the six months ended March 31, 2009 in comparison with the same period in the prior year
due to pre-tax income recorded in the current period in comparison with a pre-tax loss in the same
period in the prior year.
16
Impact of Inflation
We believe that inflation has not had a material impact on our results of operations.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Operating activities provided $3.0 million in cash in the six months ended March 31, 2009 in
comparison with a use of cash of $2.2 million in the same period in the prior year. In the six
months ended March 31, 2009, the net income component contributed $1.2 million, while a net loss
used $4.5 million in the same period in the prior year. Over the same period, the contribution from
adjustments for non-cash charges decreased to $1.6 million from $2.1 million. These non-cash
charges include charges for depreciation, amortization, deferred income taxes and stock-based
compensation expense. Changes in non-cash assets and liabilities remained substantially unchanged
and provided $0.2 million in cash in the six months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.
Investing activities have consisted mainly of three components: purchases of property and
equipment, purchases and sales of investments, and capitalized software development costs.
Purchases of property and equipment decreased by $0.1 million to $0.2 million in the six months
ended March 31, 2009 in comparison with the same period in the prior year. We expect that capital
expenditures for our full fiscal 2009 year will total approximately $0.6 million.* We invest cash
that is surplus to our operating requirements in professionally managed investment portfolios.
These portfolios consist of both cash equivalents and short-term investments, and the mix between
these elements may vary from period to period due to changes in the investment approaches of the
portfolio managers. Net purchases and sales of short-term investments used cash of $1.3 million in
the six months ended March 31, 2009 and provided cash of $21.2 million in the same period in the
prior year. Capitalized software development costs used cash of $3.9 million in the six months
ended March 31, 2009. No software development costs were capitalized in the same period in the
prior year.
Financing activities representing the repurchase of common shares used cash of $2.6 million in
the six months ended March 31, 2009 in comparison with $2.8 million used in the same period in the
prior year.
As of March 31, 2009, we had working capital of $36.2 million and cash, cash equivalents and
short-term investments of $37.7 million.
We may require additional funds to support our working capital requirements or for other
purposes. There can be no assurance that additional financing will be available if needed or that,
if available, such financing will be obtainable on terms favorable to us or to our stockholders. We
believe that cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and funds generated from operations
will provide us with sufficient funds to finance our requirements for at least the next 12 months.*
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 2 of our Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included with
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for information on recent accounting pronouncements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Disclosure not required as a result of our Companys status as a smaller reporting company.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) designed to ensure that information
we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated
and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial
officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure, and that such
information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in
the SEC rules and forms. Our management evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive
Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act as of the end of the
period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive
Officer and our Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures
were effective as of March 31, 2009.
17
Changes in internal control over financial reporting.
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that have materially affected, or were
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Part II. Other Information
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Disclosure not required as a result of our Companys status as a smaller reporting company.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The following table sets forth information regarding repurchases of our common stock during
the quarter ended March 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchases of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
Maximum Number
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
of Shares that May
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
as Part of Publicly
|
|
|
Yet Be Purchased
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Price Paid
|
|
|
Announced
|
|
|
Under the Plans
|
|
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
Per Share (1)
|
|
|
Plans or Programs
|
|
|
Or Programs
|
|
January 1, 2009 - January 31, 2009
|
|
|
43,573
|
|
|
$
|
6.61
|
|
|
|
43,573
|
|
|
|
1,063,838
|
|
February 1, 2009 - February 28, 2009
|
|
|
27,488
|
|
|
|
6.86
|
|
|
|
27,488
|
|
|
|
1,036,350
|
|
March 1, 2009 - March 31, 2009
|
|
|
13,982
|
|
|
|
6.27
|
|
|
|
13,982
|
|
|
|
1,022,368
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total for the Quarter
|
|
|
85,043
|
|
|
$
|
6.64
|
|
|
|
85,043
|
|
|
|
1,022,368
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Average price paid per share includes brokerage commission.
|
All shares were repurchased pursuant to the Companys share repurchase program authorized in
December 1999 to repurchase up to 2,000,000 shares of our common stock. In January 2007, November
2007, April 2008 and October 2008, our Board of Directors authorized increases of 1,000,000 shares,
208,974 shares, 420,820 shares and 1,241,583 shares, respectively, to the program. Depending on
market conditions and other factors, repurchases can be made from time to time in the open market
and in negotiated transactions, including block transactions, and this program may be discontinued
at any time.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
We held our Annual Meeting of Stockholders on February 4, 2009 at the Companys principal
executive offices in Mountain View, California. Out of 11,398,327 shares of Common Stock entitled
to vote at such meeting, there were present in person or by proxy 11,198,022 shares. At the Annual
Meeting, our stockholders approved the following matters:
(a) The election of Peter S. Cross, R. Stephen Heinrichs, Richard A. Karp, Nancy H. Karp, and
John M. Scandalios as directors of Catapult Communications Corporation for the ensuing year
and until their successors are elected. The vote for the nominated directors was as follows:
Peter S. Cross, 10,325,186 votes cast for and 872,836 votes withheld;
R. Stephen Heinrichs, 11,112,511 votes cast for and 85,511 votes withheld;
Richard A. Karp, 11,111,965 votes cast for and 86,057 votes withheld;
Nancy H. Karp, 10,766,250 votes cast for and 431,772 votes withheld;
John M. Scandalios, 11,118,500 votes cast for and 79,522 votes withheld;
(b) The ratification of the appointment of Stonefield Josephson, Inc. as our independent
registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2009.
11,174,048 votes cast for, 9,892 against, 13,877 abstain and 205 broker non-votes.
18
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we have duly caused this
report to be signed on our behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CATAPULT COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
|
|
Date: May 13, 2009
|
By:
|
/s/
Christopher A. Stephenson
|
|
|
|
Christopher A. Stephenson
|
|
|
|
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
19
Catapult Communicatons (NASDAQ:CATT)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2024 to Apr 2024
Catapult Communicatons (NASDAQ:CATT)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2023 to Apr 2024