Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2022
1.
Nature of Business
Sugarmade,
Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “we”, “us” or the “Company”) was originally incorporated on June
5, 1986 in California as Lab, Inc., and later that month, on June 24, 1986 changed its name to Software Professionals, Inc. On May 21,
1996, the Company changed its name to Enlighten Software Solutions, Inc. On June 20, 2007, Enlighten Software Solutions, Inc. was incorporated
in Delaware for the purpose of merging with Enlighten Software Solutions, Inc. a California corporation so as to effect a redomicile
to Delaware. On January 24, 2008, the Company changed its name to Diversified Opportunities, Inc. On May 9, 2011 we closed on a Share
Exchange Agreement with Sugarmade, Inc., a California corporation founded in 2010, and on June 24, 2011 changed our name to Sugarmade,
Inc.
On
October 24, 2014 we acquired SWC Group, Inc., a California corporation doing business as, CarryOutSupplies.com (“Carry Out Supplies”).
Our
Company operates much of its business activities through our subsidiaries, SWC Group, Inc., a California corporation (“SWC’’),
NUG Avenue, Inc., a California corporation and 70% owned subsidiary of the Company (“NUG Avenue”), and Lemon Glow Company,
Inc., a California corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (“Lemon Glow”).
Shares
of our common stock are quoted on the OTC Pink tier of OTC Markets. Our trading symbol is “SGMD”. Our corporate website is
www.sugarmade.com.
As
of the date of this filing, we are involved in several business sectors and business ventures:
Paper
and paper-based products: The supply of consumable products to the quick-service restaurant sub-sector of the restaurant industry,
and as an importer and distributor of non-medical personal protection equipment to business and consumers, via our Carry Out Supplies
subsidiary. Carry Out Supplies is a producer and wholesaler of custom printed and generic supplies, servicing more than 2,000 quick-service
restaurants. The primary products are plastic cold cups, paper coffee cups, yogurt cups, ice cream cups, cup lids, cup sleeves, edible
packaging, food containers, soup containers, plastic spoons, and similar products for this market sector. This subsidiary, which was
formed in 2009.
Cannabis
products delivery services: Following the end of the COVID cannabis delivery boom, along with a challenging cannabis retail climate
from inflation, the black market, increased marketing expenses, and the cannabis excise tax moving from distribution to retail, the company
has decided to reduce investments in retail operations. The company made this decision as we see more promising opportunities to increase
shareholder equity by pivoting the business strategy to deploy capital to invest in cannabis real estate, cultivation, and wholesale
sectors vs. cannabis retail operations.
After
discussions with ECGI, Inc. and the management of Nug Avenue, we could not find a path to short term profitability. The company then
decided to cease investing in Nug Avenue, which ultimately led to Nug Avenue discontinuing operations.
As
part of pivoting our business strategy, the company negotiated with Indigo Dye Group Corp. (“Indigo”) to exchange our 32%
stake in Budcars for a stake in a distribution and indoor cultivation company in Santa Rosa, California. The company has already executed
a share exchange agreement with Indigo. However, the final documents and terms of the new company are still being finalized. The company
expects to complete the documents and announce the transition to new business post filing of this 10Q.
Selected
cannabis and hemp projects: On May 12, 2021, the Company entered into a Merger Agreement by and between Carnaby Spot Bay Corp, a
California corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (“Merger Sub”), Lemon Glow Company and Ryan Santiago
as shareholder representative, pursuant to which Merger Sub would merge with and into Lemon Glow, with Lemon Glow being the surviving
corporation (the “Merger”). Upon the closing of the merger, Lemon Glow was merged into the Company. The purpose of the transactions
was to establish a licensed and permitted entity which Sugarmade would cultivate, manufacture, and distribute cannabis to the California
markets. At the time of the transactions, none of Lemon Glow, Merger Sub, or Sugarmade was permitted and licensed for such activities.
On
October 28, 2021, Lemon Glow obtained a conditional Use Permit (UP) number from the Community Development Department of the County of
Lake, California, which the Company believes is an important step towards the conditional UP for commercial cannabis cultivation at its
property. The issuance of the conditional UP number by the County of Lake allows the Company to proceed with the state cannabis cultivation
license application, and potentially obtain certain applicable permits, such as from the Department of Cannabis Control, Department of
Food and Agriculture, Department of Pesticide Regulation, Department of Fish and Wildlife, The State Water Resources Control Board, Board
of Forestry and Fire Protection, Central Valley or North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board, Department of Public Health, and
Department of Consumer Affairs, as may be required. The Company believes that obtaining the conditional UP number by the County of Lake
could be the first step toward full approval to cultivate cannabis on up to 32 acres out of the total 640 acres of the property.
As
of the date of this filing, Sugarmade is working diligently on satisfying the conditions required by the County of Lake to allow the
Company to cultivate cannabis. It is the Company’s intention to begin such activities at the earliest time possible, assuming permits
are ultimately issued. Upon issuance, the company will determine the amount of acreages to grow initially based on market demand and
pre-orders. However, no such license or permits have yet been issued, and applications are still pending. There can be no assurance that
any such license or permits will be issued in the near future or at all.
Once
licensing and permits are issued, the company plans to divide the 32 canopy grow acres between four separate grow areas. These separate
grow areas will allow the company to start with a single area and expand with demand. While waiting for demand to rise, dividing into
separate grow areas will also provide an opportunity to lease the other grow areas to 3rd party or through partnership under Managed
Service Agreement to generate additional revenue for the company.
We
believe the market demand will increase upon federal legalization allowing for interstate commerce of cannabis. Opening the doors for
out of state licensees to purchase California grown cannabis flowers.
Once
fully completed, we estimate the output of 32 acres of canopy, will have the capacity of 64 tons of dry flower or 300 tons of fresh frozen,
requiring approximately 300,000 sq ft of storage space. We will continue to make plans to build more storage space while concurrent with
the licensing process.
2.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis
of presentation
The
accompanying financial statements of the Company have been prepared using the accrual basis of accounting and in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) and the rules of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (“SEC”). In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary
for a fair presentation of financial position and the results of operations for the periods presented herein have been reflected.
The
condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for six months ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 are unaudited. In
the opinion of management, all adjustments (including normal recurring adjustments) have been made that are necessary to present fairly
the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2022, the results of its operations for the three and six months ended December
31, 2022 and 2021, and its cash flows for the six months ended December 31, 2022 and 2021. Operating results for the interim periods
presented are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for a full fiscal year. The condensed consolidated balance sheet
at December 31, 2022 has been derived from the Company’s audited financial statements included in the Form 10-K for the year ended
June 30, 2022.
The
statements and related notes have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
“SEC”). Accordingly, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles have been omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. These financial statements should
be read in conjunction with the financial statements and other information included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022, as filed with the SEC.
Principles
of consolidation
The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of our Company, and its wholly-owned subsidiaries: SWC, Lemon Glow, Sugarrush,
Sugarrush 5058, and its majority owned subsidiary, NUG Avenue. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated
in consolidation.
Going
concern
The
Company’s continuation as a going concern is dependent on its ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operations to meet
its obligations, in which it has not been successful, and/or obtaining additional financing from its shareholders or other sources, as
may be required.
Our
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that we will continue as a going concern. Such assumption
contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. These unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of
assets or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that may result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
Management
endeavors to increase revenue-generating operations. While the Company’s priority is on generating cash from operations, management
also seeks to raise additional working capital through various financing sources, including the sale of the Company’s equity and/or
debt securities, which may not be available on commercially reasonable terms to our Company, or which may not be available at all. If
such financing is not available on satisfactory terms, we may be unable to continue our business as desired and our operating results
will be adversely affected. In addition, any financing arrangement may have potentially adverse effects on us and/or our stockholders.
Debt financing (if available and undertaken) will increase expenses, must be repaid regardless of operating results and may involve restrictions
limiting our operating flexibility. If we issue equity securities to raise additional funds, the percentage ownership of our existing
stockholders will be reduced, and the new equity securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of the current
holders of our common stock.
Business
combinations
The
Company applies the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (the “FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification
(“ASC”) 805, Business Combinations, in accounting for its acquisitions. It requires the Company to recognize separately from
goodwill the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed, at the acquisition date fair values. Goodwill as of the acquisition date is
measured as the excess of consideration transferred over the acquisition date fair values of the net assets acquired and the liabilities
assumed. The Company used third party valuation company to determine the assets acquired and liabilities assumed with the corresponding
offset to goodwill.
Use
of estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires our management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements
and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.
Revenue
recognition
We
recognize revenue in accordance with ASC No. 606, Revenue Recognition. Sugarmade applied a five-step approach in determining the amount
and timing of revenue to be recognized: (1) identifying the contract with a customer, (2) identifying the performance obligations in
the contract, (3) determining the transaction price, (4) allocating the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract
and (5) recognizing revenue when the performance obligation is satisfied.
Substantially
all of the Company’s revenue is recognized at the point in time that control of the products is transferred to the customer. The
Company receives customer deposits in advance of delivery of product to customers; these are contract liabilities that are recognized
to revenue when the Company fulfilled the performance obligations. The Company receives payments from customer in either in advance,
upon delivery, or after delivery in accordance with open account credit terms set forth by management. The Company’s contracts
with customers do not provide for returns, refunds, and product warranties.
Leases
In
February 2016, the FASB established Topic 842, Leases, by issuing Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-02, which
requires lessees to recognize the rights and obligations created by leases on the balance sheet and disclose key information about leasing
arrangements. Topic 842 was subsequently amended by ASU No. 2018-11, Targeted Improvements, ASU No. 2018-10, Codification Improvements
to Topic 842, and ASU No. 2018-01, Land Easement Practical Expedient for Transition to Topic 842. The new standard establishes a right-of-use
model (ROU) that requires a lessee to recognize a ROU asset and lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with a term longer
than 12 months. Leases will be classified as finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern and classification of expense
recognition in the statement of operations.
The
new standard became effective April 1, 2019. A modified retrospective transition approach is required, applying the new standard to all
leases existing at the date of initial application. An entity may choose to use either (1) its effective date or (2) the beginning of
the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements as its date of initial application. If an entity chooses the second
option, the transition requirements for existing leases also apply to leases entered into between the date of initial application and
the effective date. The entity must also recast its comparative period financial statements and provide the disclosures required by the
new standard for the comparative periods. The Company adopted the new standard on July 1, 2019 using the modified retrospective transition
approach as of the effective date of the initial application. The new standard provides a number of optional practical expedients in
transition. The Company elected the “package of practical expedients”, which permits entities not to reassess under the new
lease standard prior conclusions about lease identification, lease classification and initial direct costs. The Company does not expect
to elect the use-of-hindsight or the practical expedient pertaining to land easements.
The
most significant effects of the adoption of the new standard relate to the recognition of new ROU assets and lease liabilities on our
balance sheet for office operating leases and providing significant new disclosures about our leasing activities.
The
new standard also provides practical expedients for an entity’s ongoing accounting. The Company has also elected the short-term
leases recognition exemption for all leases that qualify. This means that the Company will not recognize ROU assets or lease liabilities,
and this includes not recognizing ROU assets and lease liabilities, for existing short-term leases of those assets in transition. The
Company also currently expects to elect the practical expedient to not separate lease and non-lease components for its leases. All existing
leases are reported under this rule.
Under
ASC 840, leases were classified as either capital or operating, and the classification significantly impacted the effect the contract
had on the company’s financial statements. Capital lease classification resulted in a liability that was recorded on a company’s
balance sheet, whereas operating leases did not impact the balance sheet.
Property
and equipment
Property
and equipment is stated at the historical cost, less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation on property and equipment is provided using
the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets for both financial and income tax reporting purposes as follows:
Schedule of Estimated Useful Lives of Property and Equipment
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
3-5 years |
|
Furniture and equipment |
|
|
1-15 years |
|
Vehicles |
|
|
2-5 years |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
5-30 years |
|
Building |
|
|
31.5 years |
|
Production molding |
|
|
5 years |
|
Expenditures
for renewals and betterments are capitalized while repairs and maintenance costs are normally charged to the statement of operations
in the year in which they are incurred. In situations where it can be clearly demonstrated that the expenditure has resulted in an increase
in the future economic benefits expected to be obtained from the use of the asset, the expenditure is capitalized as an additional cost
of the asset.
Upon
sale or disposal of an asset, the historical cost and related accumulated depreciation or amortization of such asset were removed from
their respective accounts and any gain or loss is recorded in the statements of income.
The
Company reviews the carrying value of property, plant, and equipment for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate that the
carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable from the estimated future cash flows expected to result from its use and eventual disposition.
In cases where undiscounted expected future cash flows are less than the carrying value, an impairment loss is recognized equal to an
amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of assets. The factors considered by management in performing this assessment
include current operating results, trends and prospects, the manner in which the property is used, and the effects of obsolescence, demand,
competition and other economic factors. Based on this assessment, no impairment expenses for property, plant, and equipment was recorded
in operating expenses during the period ended December 31, 2022 and year ended June 30, 2022.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived
assets, which include property, plant and equipment and intangible assets, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
Recoverability
of long-lived assets to be held and used is measured by comparing the carrying amount of an asset to the estimated undiscounted future
cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated undiscounted future cash flows,
an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the assets. Fair
value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable.
Based on its review, there was $0 impairment loss of its long-lived assets as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
Income
taxes
The
Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability approach that requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities
for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Company’s financial statements or tax returns.
In estimating future tax consequences, the Company generally considers all expected future events other than enactments of changes in
the tax law. For deferred tax assets, management evaluates the probability of realizing the future benefits of such assets. The Company
establishes valuation allowances for its deferred tax assets when evidence suggests it is unlikely that the assets will be fully realized.
The
Company recognizes the tax effects of an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not to be sustained based solely on its
technical merits as of the reporting date and then only in an amount more likely than not to be sustained upon review by the tax authorities.
Income tax positions that previously failed to meet the more likely than not threshold are recognized in the first subsequent financial
reporting period in which that threshold is met. Previously recognized tax positions that no longer meet the more likely than not threshold
are derecognized in the first subsequent financial reporting period in which that threshold is no longer met. The Company classifies
potential accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the accompanying consolidated statements of operations
and comprehensive income (loss) as income tax expense.
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
Goodwill
is the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired in business combinations accounted for under
the acquisition method. Intangible assets represent purchased intangible assets including developed technology and in-process research
and development, technologies acquired or licensed from other companies, customer relationships, non-compete covenants, backlog, and
trademarks and tradenames. Purchased finite-lived intangible assets are capitalized and amortized over their estimated useful lives.
Technologies acquired or licensed from other companies, customer relationships, non-compete covenants, backlog, and trademarks and tradenames
are capitalized and amortized over the lesser of the terms of the agreement or estimated useful life. We capitalized the cannabis cultivation
license acquired as part of a business combination.
Stock-based
compensation
Stock-based
compensation cost to employees is measured at the date of grant, based on the calculated fair value of the stock-based award, and will
be recognized as expense over the employee’s requisite service period (generally the vesting period of the award). We estimate
the fair value of employee stock options granted using the Binomial Option Pricing Model. Key assumptions used to estimate the fair value
of stock options will include the exercise price of the award, the fair value of our common stock on the date of grant, the expected
option term, the risk-free interest rate at the date of grant, the expected volatility and the expected annual dividend yield on our
common stock. We use our company’s own data among other information to estimate the expected price volatility and the expected
forfeiture rate. Stock-based compensation awards issued to non-employees for services rendered are recorded at either the fair value
of the services rendered or the fair value of the stock-based payment, whichever is more readily determinable.
Loss
per share
We
calculate basic loss per share by dividing our net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period, without
considering common stock equivalents. Diluted loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding for the period and the weighted average number of dilutive common stock equivalents, such as options and warrants.
Options and warrants are only included in the calculation of diluted earning per share when their effect is dilutive.
Fair
value of financial instruments
ASC
Topic 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure
of fair value measurement and enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. The valuation hierarchy is based upon the
transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. The three levels are defined as follows:
Level
1 - observable inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
Level
2 - include other inputs that are directly or indirectly observable in the marketplace.
Level
3 - unobservable inputs which are supported by little or no market activity.
The
Company used Level 3 inputs for its valuation methodology for the derivative liabilities in determining the fair value using the Binomial
option-pricing model for the period ended December 31, 2022 and year ended June 30, 2022.
Derivative
instruments
The
fair value of derivative instruments is recorded and shown separately under current liabilities. Changes in the fair value of derivatives
liability are recorded in the consolidated statement of operations under non-operating income (expense).
Our
Company evaluates all of its financial instruments to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify
as embedded derivatives. For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially
recorded at its fair value and is then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported in the consolidated
statements of operations. For stock-based derivative financial instruments, the Company uses a weighted average Binomial option-pricing
model to value the derivative instruments at inception and on subsequent valuation dates. The classification of derivative instruments,
including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is evaluated at the end of each reporting period.
Derivative instrument liabilities are classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement
of the derivative instrument could be required within 12 months of the balance sheet date.
Segment
Reporting
FASB
ASC Topic 280, “Segment Reporting”, requires use of the “management approach” model for segment reporting. The
management approach model is based on the way a company’s management organizes segments within the Company for making operating
decisions and assessing performance. Reportable segments are based on products and services, geography, legal structure, management structure,
or any other manner in which management disaggregates a company.
The
Company’s financial statements reflect that substantially all of its operations are conducted in two industry segments –
(1) paper and paper-based products such as paper cups, cup lids, food containers, etc., which accounts for approximately 100% of the
Company’s revenues for the six months ended December 31, 2022; and (2) cannabis products delivery service and sales, which accounted
for approximately 0% of the Company’s total revenues for the three and six months ended December 31, 2022.
A
reconciliation of the Company’s segment operating income and cost of goods sold to the consolidated statements of operations for
the three and six months ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 is as follows:
Schedule of Segment Operating Income
| |
| | |
| |
| |
For the Three Months Ended | |
| |
December 31,
2022 | | |
December 31,
2021 | |
Segment operating income | |
| | | |
| | |
Paper and paper-based products | |
$ | 499,441 | | |
$ | 538,815 | |
Total operating income | |
$ | 499,441 | | |
$ | 538,815 | |
| |
| | |
| |
| |
For the Three Months Ended | |
| |
December 31,
2022 | | |
December 31,
2021 | |
Segment cost of goods sold | |
| | |
| |
Paper and paper-based products | |
$ | 257,821 | | |
$ | 461,873 | |
Total cost of goods sold | |
$ | 257,821 | | |
$ | 461,873 | |
| |
| | |
| |
| |
For the Six Months Ended | |
| |
December 31,
2022 | | |
December 31,
2021 | |
Segment operating income | |
| | | |
| | |
Paper and paper-based products | |
$ | 1,209,222 | | |
$ | 977,358 | |
Total operating income | |
$ | 1,209,222 | | |
$ | 977,358 | |
| |
| | |
| |
| |
For the Six Months Ended | |
| |
December 31,
2022 | | |
December 31,
2021 | |
Segment cost of goods sold | |
| | |
| |
Paper and paper-based products | |
$ | 720,730 | | |
$ | 848,812 | |
Cannabis products delivery | |
| - | | |
| - | |
Total cost of goods sold | |
$ | 720,730 | | |
$ | 848,812 | |
New
accounting pronouncements
In
December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, “Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes”. The pronouncement simplifies the
accounting for income taxes by removing certain exceptions to the general principles in ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes”. The
pronouncement also improves consistent application of and simplifies GAAP for other areas of Topic 740 by clarifying and amending existing
guidance. ASU 2019-12 was effective for us beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2021, with early adoption permitted. The adoption
had no material impact on the consolidated financial statements in the period ended December 31, 2022 and year ended June 30, 2022.
In
January 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-01, Investments - Equity Securities (Topic 321), Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures
(Topic 323), and Derivative and Hedging (Topic 815), which clarifies the interaction of rules for equity securities, the equity method
of accounting, and forward contracts and purchase options on certain types of securities. The guidance clarifies how to account for the
transition into and out of the equity method of accounting when considering observable transactions under the measurement alternative.
The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2020, including interim reporting periods within those
annual periods, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted this ASU on the consolidated financial statements in the year ended
June 30, 2021. The adoption had no material impact on the consolidated financial statements in the period ended December 31, 2022 and
year ended June 30, 2022.
In
August 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-06, “Debt – Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives
and Hedging – Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815 – 40)” (“ASU 2020-06”).
ASU 2020-06 simplifies the accounting for certain financial instruments with characteristics of liabilities and equity, including convertible
instruments and contracts on an entity’s own equity. The ASU is part of the FASB’s simplification initiative, which aims
to reduce unnecessary complexity in GAAP. The ASU’s amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023,
and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2020-06 on its financial statements.
On
March 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2021-03, “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Accounting Alternative for Evaluating
Triggering Events” (“ASU 2021-03”). The amendments in ASU 2021-03 provide private companies and not-for-profit
entities with an accounting alternative to perform the goodwill impairment triggering event evaluation as required in ASC 350-20, Intangibles—Goodwill
and Other—Goodwill, as of the end of the reporting period, whether the reporting period is an interim or annual period. An entity
that elects this alternative is not required to monitor for goodwill impairment triggering events during the reporting period but, instead,
should evaluate the facts and circumstances as of the end of each reporting period to determine whether a triggering event exists and,
if so, whether it is more likely than not that goodwill is impaired. The amendments in this ASU are effective on a prospective basis
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for both interim and annual financial statements that
have not yet been issued as of March 30, 2021. The Company adopted this ASU on the consolidated financial statements in the year ended
June 30, 2021. The adoption had no material impact on the consolidated financial statements in the period ended December 31, 2022 and
year ended June 30, 2022.
On
April 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2021-04, “Earnings Per Share (Topic 260), Debt— Modifications and Extinguishments (Subtopic
470-50), Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718), and Derivatives and Hedging— Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity
(Subtopic 815-40): Issuer’s Accounting for Certain Modifications or Exchanges of Freestanding Equity-Classified Written Call Options”
(“ASU 2021-04”) to clarify the accounting by issuers for modifications or exchanges of equity-classified warrants.
The new ASU is effective for all entities in fiscal years starting after December 15, 2021. Early adoption is permitted. The Company
is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2021-04 on its financial statements.
On
July 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2021-05, “Leases (Topic 842): Lessors—Certain Leases with Variable Lease Payments”,
which upon adoption requires a lessor to classify a lease with variable lease payments (that do not depend on a rate or index) as an
operating lease on commencement date if classifying the lease as a sales-type or direct financing lease would result in a selling loss.
The amendments in this ASU are effective for all entities in fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after
December 15, 2021. The adoption had no material impact on the consolidated financial statements in the period ended December 31, 2022
and year ended June 30, 2022.
On
July 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2021-07, “Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Stock Compensation” (“ASU
2021-07”) to address the concerns from stakeholders about the cost and complexity of determining the fair value of equity-classified
share-based awards for private companies. It specifically permits private companies to use 409A valuations prepared under U.S. Treasury
regulations to estimate the fair value of certain awards under ASC 718. The Update is effective for private companies in fiscal years
starting after December 15, 2021. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2021-07 on its financial
statements.
On
August 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2021-08, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Accounting for Contract Assets and Contract Liabilities
from Contracts with Customers” (“ASU 2021-08”) to require an acquirer to recognize and measure
contract assets and contract liabilities acquired in a business combination in accordance with revenue recognition guidance as if the
acquirer had originated the contract. That is, such acquired contracts will not be measured at fair value. ASU 2021-08 is effective for
privately held companies with fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact of ASU 2021-08 on its financial statements.
On
March 2022, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”)
2022-02, Financial Instruments — Credit Losses (Topic 326), Troubled Debt Restructurings (“TDRs”) and
Vintage Disclosures. (“ASU 2022-02”) The amendments in this update eliminate the accounting guidance for
TDRs while enhancing disclosure requirements for certain loan refinancings and restructurings by creditors when a borrower is
experiencing financial difficulty. The amendments in this update also require that an entity disclose current-period gross write
offs by year of origination for financing receivables and net investments in leases. The ASU is effective for annual periods
beginning after December 15, 2022, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Adoption of the ASU would be applied
prospectively. Early adoption is also permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The Company evaluated the new requirement and believed the current analysis of the allowance for loan losses provides little incremental value for
analysis purposes. Therefore, the Company does not expect this
requirement to materially affect its consolidated financial statements.
3.
Business Combination
On
May 12, 2021, SugarMade, Inc. entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger, as amended (the “Merger Agreement”) by and between
Lemon Glow Corporation, a California corporation (“Lemon Glow”), Carnaby Spot Bay Corp, a California corporation and a wholly
owned subsidiary of the Company (“Merger Sub”) and Ryan Santiago (the “Shareholder Representative”), pursuant
to which, on May 25, 2021 and upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub merged with
and into Lemon Glow, with Lemon Glow being the surviving corporation (the “Merger”). As a result of the Merger, Lemon Glow
became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.
Acquisition
Consideration
The
following table summarizes the fair value of purchase price consideration to acquire Lemon Glow (In US $000’s):
Schedule
of Fair Value of Purchase Price Consideration
Purchase Consideration Summary | |
| |
| |
In US $000’s | |
| |
Fair Value | |
| |
| |
| |
Cash Consideration | |
(1) | |
$ | 4,256 | |
| |
| |
| | |
Equity Consideration | |
(2) | |
$ | 7,450 | |
| |
| |
| | |
Interest-Bearing Debt Assumed | |
| |
$ | 2,043 | |
Total Purchase Consideration | |
| |
$ | 13,749 | |
Notes:
|
(1) |
The cash consideration
consists of $280,000 in cash and $3,976,000 in promissory notes with 5% simple interest. |
|
(2) |
The equity consideration
consists of 660,571,429 shares of Common stock and 2,000,000 shares of Series B Preferred stock. |
Purchase
Price Allocation
The
following is an allocation of purchase price as of the May 25, 2021 acquisition closing date based upon an estimate of the fair value
of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed by the Company in the acquisition (in thousands):
Schedule
of Fair Value of Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed
Allocation Summary | |
| |
| |
In US $000’s | |
| |
Fair Value | |
Assets Acquired | |
| |
$ | 6 | |
Property, Plant & Equipment | |
(3) | |
$ | 2,348 | |
Total Tangible Asset Allocation | |
| |
$ | 2,354 | |
| |
| |
| | |
Cannabis Cultivation License | |
| |
$ | 10,637 | |
Total Identifiable Intangible Assets | |
| |
$ | 10,637 | |
| |
| |
| | |
Assembled Workforce | |
| |
$ | 275 | |
Goodwill (Excluding Assembled Workforce) | |
| |
$ | 483 | |
Total Economic Goodwill | |
| |
$ | 758 | |
| |
| |
| | |
Purchase Consideration to be Allocated | |
| |
$ | 13,749 | |
Notes:
|
(3) |
The value of the land is
excluded in the calculation of depreciation. |
Assumptions
in the Allocations of Purchase Price
Management
prepared the purchase price allocations for Lemon Glow relied upon reports of a third party valuation expert to calculate the fair value
of certain acquired assets, which primarily included identifiable intangible assets, and property and equipment.
Estimates
of fair value require management to make significant estimates and assumptions. The goodwill recognized is attributable primarily to
the acquired workforce, and other benefits that the Company believes will result from integrating the operations of the Lemon Glow with
the operations of Sugarmade. Certain liabilities included in the purchase price allocations are based on management’s best estimates
of the amounts to be paid or settled and based on information available at the time the purchase price allocations were prepared.
The
fair value of the identified intangible assets acquired from the Lemon Glow was estimated using an income approach. Under the income
approach, an intangible asset’s fair value is equal to the present value of future economic benefits to be derived from ownership
of the asset. Indications of value are developed by discounting future net cash flows to their present value at market-based rates of
return. More specifically, the fair value of the cannabis cultivation license was determined using the MPEEM method. MPEEM is an income
approach to fair value measurement attributable to a specific intangible asset being valued from the asset grouping’s overall cash-flow
stream. MPEEM isolates the expected future discounted cash-flow stream to its net present value. Significant factors considered in the
calculation of the cannabis cultivation license intangible assets were the risks inherent in the development process, including the likelihood
of government regulation and market acceptance.
In
connection with the acquisition of Lemon Glow, the Company has assumed certain operating liabilities which are included in the respective
purchase price allocations above.
Goodwill
recorded in connection with Lemon Glow was approximately $757,648. The Company does not expect to deduct any of the acquired goodwill
for tax purposes.
4.
Concentration
Customers
For
the six months ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, our Company earned net revenues of $1,209,222 and $2,404,606 respectively. The vast
majority of these revenues for the periods ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 were derived from a large number of customers.
Suppliers
For
the six months ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, we purchased products for sale by SWC, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary from
several contract manufacturers located in Asia and the U.S. A substantial portion of the Company’s inventory was purchased from
two suppliers which accounted over 10% of the total purchases. The two suppliers accounted for 75.89% and 16.36% of the Company’s
total inventory purchase for the six months ended December 31, 2022 and 75.56% and 18.76% of the Company’s total inventory purchase
for the six months ended December 31, 2021, respectively.
Segment
reporting information
A
reconciliation of the Company’s segment operating income to the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months
ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 is as follows:
Schedule of Segment Operating Income
| |
| | |
| |
| |
For the Three Months Ended | |
| |
December 31,
2022 | | |
December 31,
2021 | |
Segment operating income | |
| | | |
| | |
Paper and paper-based products | |
$ | 499,441 | | |
$ | 538,815 | |
Total operating income | |
$ | 499,441 | | |
$ | 538,815 | |
| |
| | |
| |
| |
For the Six Months Ended | |
| |
December 31,
2022 | | |
December 31,
2021 | |
Segment operating income | |
| | | |
| | |
Paper and paper-based products | |
$ | 1,209,222 | | |
$ | 977,358 | |
Total operating income | |
$ | 1,209,222 | | |
$ | 977,358 | |
5.
Noncontrolling Interest and Deconsolidation of VIE
Starting
in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, the Company had a variable interest entity (Indigo), for accounting purposes. The Company owned
approximately 29% of Indigo’s outstanding equity and as of September 30, 2020, involved its day-to-day operations, which gave the
Company the power to direct the activities of Indigo that most significantly impact its economic performance. Accordingly, the Company
recognized the carrying value of the non-controlling interest as a component of total stockholders’ equity, and the consolidated
financial statements included the financial position and results of operations of Indigo as of and for the periods ended June 30, 2020
and September 30, 2020.
Starting
on October 1, 2020, the Company planned to open new locations via purchasing equity in other brand/franchises to cover delivery for the
entire California. Therefore, the Company is not likely at this time to exercise its option to acquire the additional 30% interest in
Indigo. In addition, the Company is no longer involved in day-to-day operations of Indigo and going forward, the Company intends to pursue
cannabis delivery independent from Indigo. As of October 1, 2020, the Company ceased to have control over the day-to-day business of
Indigo and it was deconsolidated and recorded as an investment in nonconsolidated affiliate at its $505,449 estimated fair value and
changed to equity method of accounting. Pursuant to the terms of the Indigo agreement, if the Company determines, in its discretion not
to continue to make monthly payments, its 40% ownership interest in Indigo will be decreased according to the payment then made. As of
December 31, 2020, the Company made $59,370 in additional payments, and holds approximately 32% of the ownership of Indigo.
The
net asset value of the Company’s variable interest in Indigo was approximately $326,812 as of October 1, 2020, the date of deconsolidation.
The value of the Company’s variable interest on the date of deconsolidation was based on management’s estimate of the fair
value of Indigo at that time. The Company concluded that the market approach was the most appropriate method to determine the fair value
of the entity on the date of deconsolidation, given that Indigo raised equity funding from third-party investors around the same period
(i.e., level 2 inputs). The Company recognized a gain on deconsolidation of approximately $313,928 with no related tax impact, which
is included in other income, net on the consolidated statement of operations. As the Company is not obligated to fund future losses of
Indigo, the carrying amount is the Company’s maximum risk of loss and accounted as equity method investment in affiliates in our
consolidated financial statements as of and for the period ended September 30, 2021. Due to the Company had no access to Indigo’s
book during the year ended June 30, 2022, the Company recorded cost method investment in affiliates at $441,407 as of June 30, 2022.
As of December 31, 2022 and June 30, 2022, the Company recorded cost method investment in affiliates at 441,407, respectively.
As
part of pivoting our business strategy, the company negotiated with Indigo Dye Group Corp. (“Indigo”) to exchange our 32%
stake in Budcars for a stake in a distribution and indoor cultivation company in Santa Rosa, California. The company has already executed
a share exchange agreement with Indigo. However, the final documents and terms of the new company are still being finalized. The company
expects to complete the documents and announce the transition to new business post filing of this 10Q.
6.
Legal Proceedings
From
time to time and in the course of business, we may become involved in various legal proceedings seeking monetary damages and other relief.
The amount of the ultimate liability, if any, from such claims cannot be determined. As of December 31, 2022, there were no legal claims
pending or threatened against the Company that, in the opinion of our management, would be likely to have a material adverse effect on
our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, as of the date of this filing, we were involved in the following
legal proceedings.
● |
On
December 11, 2013, the Company was served with a complaint from two convertible note holders and investors in the Company. On
February 21, 2017, the Company signed a settlement agreement with the plaintiffs in the matter of Hannan vs. Sugarmade. Under the
terms of the settlement agreement, the Company agreed to pay the plaintiffs $227,000 to
settle all claims against the Company, which included the payoff of two notes outstanding. The parties had estimated the value of
the notes at approximately $80,000.
Third parties had purchased the two notes during the year ended June 30, 2020. As of December 31, 2022 and June 30, 2022, there
remains a balance, plus accrued interest due under the notes of $227,000, respectively. No payment has been made. |
|
|
● |
On April 1st, 2021, the Company entered a Payment (Installment) Agreement with a former employee to settle a dated labor case that was
awarded by the Labor Commissioner in the State of California back on May 14, 2014 for an amount of $55,126.65. The company agreed to pay
$58,756 at 10% annual interest rate accrue, the balance will be split into 18 equal payments of $3,528.71. As of December 31, 2022 and
June 30, 2022, there remains a balance of $23,598, respectively. |
There
can be no assurances the ultimate liability relative to these lawsuits will not exceed what is outlined above.
7.
Discontinued Operations
Following
the end of the COVID cannabis delivery boom, along with a challenging cannabis retail climate from inflation, the black market, increased
marketing expenses, and the cannabis excise tax moving from distribution to retail, the company has decided to reduce investments in
retail operations. The company made this decision as we see more promising opportunities to increase shareholder equity by pivoting the
business strategy to deploy capital to invest in cannabis real estate, cultivation, and wholesale sectors vs. cannabis retail operations.
After
discussions with ECGI, Inc. and the management of Nug Avenue, we could not find a path to short term profitability. The company then
decided to cease investing in Nug Avenue, which ultimately led to Nug Avenue discontinuing operations.
The
Company has reclassified its previously issued financial statements to segregate the discontinued operations as of the earliest period
reported.
Assets
and liabilities related to the discontinued operations were as follows:
Schedule
of Balance Sheets and Income Statement Discontinued Operations
| |
December 31, 2022 | | |
June 30, 2022 | |
| |
(Unaudited) | | |
(Audited) | |
Assets | |
| | | |
| | |
Current assets: | |
| | | |
| | |
Other current assets | |
| 70,723 | | |
| 70,723 | |
Total current assets | |
| 70,723 | | |
| 70,723 | |
Noncurrent assets: | |
| | | |
| | |
Property, plant and equipment, net | |
| 4,715 | | |
| 16,492 | |
Intangible asset, net | |
| 2,256 | | |
| 3,222 | |
Total noncurrent assets | |
| 6,971 | | |
| 19,714 | |
Total assets | |
| 77,692 | | |
| 90,436 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficiency | |
| | | |
| | |
Current liabilities: | |
| | | |
| | |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | |
| 675,319 | | |
| 675,012 | |
Loan payable - Related Parties, Current | |
| 1,657,444 | | |
| 1,633,097 | |
Total liabilities | |
| 2,332,763 | | |
| 2,308,109 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Stockholders’ equity (deficiency): | |
| | | |
| | |
Additional paid-in capital | |
| 869,045 | | |
| 869,045 | |
Accumulated deficit | |
| (3,174,122 | ) | |
| (3,136,725 | ) |
Total stockholders’ equity (deficiency) | |
| (2,305,077 | ) | |
| (2,267,680 | ) |
Non-Controlling Interest | |
| 50,007 | | |
| 50,007 | |
Total stockholders’ equity (deficiency) | |
| (2,255,070 | ) | |
| (2,217,673 | ) |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficiency) | |
| 77,692 | | |
| 90,436 | |
| |
December 31, 2022 | | |
December 31, 2021 | | |
December 31, 2022 | | |
December 31, 2021 | |
| |
For the three Months Ended | | |
For the six Months Ended | |
| |
December 31, 2022 | | |
December 31, 2021 | | |
December 31, 2022 | | |
December 31, 2021 | |
Revenues, net | |
| - | | |
| 697,010 | | |
| - | | |
| 1,427,248 | |
Cost of goods sold | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
Gross profit | |
| - | | |
| 697,010 | | |
| - | | |
| 1,427,248 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Selling, general and administrative expenses | |
| 9,955 | | |
| 346,765 | | |
| 11,918 | | |
| 641,247 | |
Advertising and promotion expense | |
| - | | |
| 541,173 | | |
| - | | |
| 1,054,640 | |
Marketing and research expense | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 985 | |
Professional expense | |
| 14,513 | | |
| 106,700 | | |
| 24,513 | | |
| 220,635 | |
Salaries and wages | |
| - | | |
| 392,588 | | |
| - | | |
| 713,555 | |
Total operating expenses | |
| 24,468 | | |
| 1,387,226 | | |
| 36,431 | | |
| 2,631,062 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Loss from continuing operations | |
| (24,468 | ) | |
| (690,215 | ) | |
| (36,431 | ) | |
| (1,203,815 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Non-operating income (expense): | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Other (expense) income | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (105 | ) |
Interest expense | |
| - | | |
| (135 | ) | |
| - | | |
| (178 | ) |
Amortization of intangible assets | |
| (483 | ) | |
| (483 | ) | |
| (967 | ) | |
| (967 | ) |
Total nonoperating expenses | |
| (483 | ) | |
| (618 | ) | |
| (967 | ) | |
| (1,249 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Income tax expense | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
Net loss from operations | |
| (24,951 | ) | |
| (690,833 | ) | |
| (37,397 | ) | |
| (1,205,064 | ) |
8.
Cash
Cash
and cash equivalents consist of amounts held as bank deposits and highly liquid debt instruments purchased with an original maturity
of three months or less.
From
time to time, we may maintain bank balances in interest bearing accounts in excess of the $250,000 currently insured by the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation for interest bearing accounts (there is currently no insurance limit for deposits in noninterest bearing accounts).
We have not experienced any losses with respect to cash. Management believes our Company is not exposed to any significant credit risk
with respect to its cash.
As
of December 31, 2022 and June 30, 2022, the Company held cash in the amount of $40,434 and $161,014, respectively, including cash in
hands in the amount of $5,875 and $50,112, respectively.
9.
Accounts Receivable
Accounts
receivable are carried at their estimated collectible amounts, net of any estimated allowances for doubtful accounts. We grant unsecured
credit to our customer’s deemed credit worthy. Ongoing credit evaluations are performed and potential credit losses estimated by
management are charged to operations on a regular basis. At the time, any particular account receivable is deemed uncollectible, the
balance is charged to the allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company had accounts receivable, net of allowance, of $110,534 and $29,822
as of December 31, 2022 and June 30, 2022, respectively; and allowance for doubtful accounts of $321,560 and $321,560 as of December 31, 2022 and June 30, 2022, respectively.
10.
Trading Securities, at Market Value
In
October 2019, the Company entered into a share exchange agreement (the “Share Exchange Agreement”) with iPower Inc., formerly
known as BZRTH Inc. (“iPower”), a Nevada corporation, pursuant to which, among other things, the Company agreed to buy 100%
of the issued and outstanding capital stock of iPower in exchange for $870,000 in cash, $7,130,000 under a promissory note, up to 650,000
shares of Sugarmade’s common stock, and up to 3,500,000 shares of Sugarmade’s Series B preferred stock.
Due
to certain disputes that arose between the parties with respect to certain terms and conditions contained in the Share Exchange Agreement,
the parties entered into a Rescission and Mutual Release Agreement on January 15, 2020 (the “Rescission Agreement”). Pursuant
to the terms of the Rescission Agreement, iPower and its stockholders returned the shares of Sugarmade common stock and preferred stock
and issued to Sugarmade 204,496 shares of the Company’s common stock valued at a current market value of $1,451,922 as of June
30, 2021. The shares are free trading.
During
the year ended June 30, 2022, the Company sold all the 204,496 shares of iPower Inc.’s common stock for total cash of $582,688.
For
the six months ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company recorded unrealized (loss) gain on securities amounted $0 and $(642,117),
respectively. For the three months ended September 30, 2022 and 2021, the remaining value of securities amounted to current market value
of $0 and $857,979, respectively.
11.
Inventory
Inventory
consists of finished goods paper and paper-based products such as paper cups and food containers ready for sale and is stated at the
lower of cost or market. We value our inventory using the weighted average costing method. Our Company’s policy is to include as
a part of inventory any freight incurred to ship the product from our contract manufacturers to our warehouses. Outbound freights costs
related to shipping costs to our customers are considered period costs and reflected in selling, general and administrative expenses.
We regularly review inventory and consider forecasts of future demand, market conditions and product obsolescence.
If
the estimated realizable value of our inventory is less than cost, we make provisions in order to reduce its carrying value to its estimated
market value. On a consolidated basis, as of December 31, 2022 and June 30, 2022, the balance for the inventory totaled $404,938 and
$416,643, respectively. $0 was charged for obsolete inventory for the period ended December 31, 2022 and year ended June 30, 2022, respectively.
12.
Other Current Assets
As
of December 31, 2022 and June 30, 2022, other current assets consisted of the following:
Schedule of Other Current Assets
| |
December 31, 2022 | | |
June 30, 2022 | |
| |
As of | |
| |
December 31, 2022 | | |
June 30, 2022 | |
Prepaid deposit | |
$ | 303,087 | | |
$ | 124,488 | |
Prepayments for inventory | |
| 50,708 | | |
| 47,708 | |
Prepaid expenses | |
| 28,755 | | |
| 4,719 | |
Others | |
| 6,888 | | |
| 8,872 | |
Total | |
$ | 389,438 | | |
$ | 185,787 | |
13.
Property, Plant and Equipment
As
of December 31, 2022 and June 30, 2022, property, plant and equipment consisted of the following:
Schedule of Property Plant and Equipment
| |
December
31, 2022 | | |
June 30,
2022 | |
Office and equipment | |
$ | 820,149 | | |
$ | 820,149 | |
Motor vehicles | |
| 235,224 | | |
| 340,698 | |
Building | |
| 197,609 | | |
| 197,609 | |
Land | |
| 2,554,766 | | |
| 2,554,766 | |
Leasehold improvement | |
| 423,329 | | |
| 423,329 | |
Total | |
| 4,278,184 | | |
| 4,336,552 | |
Less: accumulated depreciation | |
| (766,233 | ) | |
| (678,775 | ) |
Plant and Equipment, net | |
$ | 3,464,845 | | |
$ | 3,657,777 | |
For
the six months ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, depreciation expenses amounted to $84,880 and $68,702, respectively.
The
Company reviews the carrying value of property and equipment for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate that the carrying
value of an asset may not be recoverable from the estimated future cash flows expected to result from its use and eventual disposition.
In cases where undiscounted expected future cash flows are less than the carrying value, an impairment loss is recognized equal to an
amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of assets. The factors considered by management in performing this assessment
include current operating results, trends and prospects, the manner in which the property is used, and the effects of obsolescence, demand,
competition and other economic factors. Based on this assessment, no impairment expenses for property, plant, and equipment was recorded
in operating expenses during the period ended December 31, 2022 and June 30, 2022.
14.
Intangible Asset
On
April 1, 2017, the Company entered into a distribution and intellectual property assignment agreement with Wagner Bartosch, Inc. (“Wagner”)
for use of their Divider’™ used in frozen desserts and other related uses. In lieu of cash payment under the agreement, the
Company was obliged to issue common shares of the Company valued at $75,000 for acquiring the use right of the distribution and intellectual
property. The Company amortized this use right as an intangible asset over 10 years, and recorded $967 and $967 amortization expense
for the period ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
On
May 17, 2021, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) by and between Merger Sub,
Lemon Glow and Mr. Ryan Santiago as shareholder representative, pursuant to which, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth
in the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub would merge with and into Lemon Glow, with Lemon Glow being the surviving corporation (the “Merger”).
The Company valued the cannabis cultivation license from Lemon Glow at $10,637,000, with a remaining economic life of 9 years as of June
30, 2022. This intangible asset has not been put into service, and accordingly, management has not started to amortize this asset as
of December 31, 2022 due to the pending status of the conditional use permit.
15.
Goodwill
Goodwill
arises from the acquisition method of accounting for business combinations and represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair
value of the net assets and other identifiable intangible assets acquired. The fair values of net tangible assets and intangible assets
acquired are based upon preliminary valuations and the Company’s estimates and assumptions are subject to change within the measurement
period. There was $757,648 and $757,648 of goodwill recorded as of December 31, 2022 and June 30, 2022, respectively. Goodwill was recognized
as a result of the transactions detailed in “Note 3 - Business Combinations”. Management assesses the carrying value of the
goodwill at least annually; in its most recent assessment, they determined no impairment was necessary. Management believes no events
have occurred during the six months ended December 31, 2022 and up to the date of this report that suggests impairment has occurred.
16.
Cost Method Investments in Affiliates
Investment
to Indigo Dye Inc. –
For
the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, the Company accounted for its investment in Indigo as a variable interest entity. The Company owned
approximately 29% of Indigo’s outstanding equity and as of December 31, 2020, and was involved its day-to-day operations, which
gave the Company the power to direct the activities of Indigo that most significantly impact its economic performance. Accordingly, the
Company recognized the carrying value of the non-controlling interest as a component of total stockholders’ equity, and the consolidated
financial statements included the financial position and results of operations of Indigo as of and for the year ended June 30, 2020.
During
the quarter ended December 31, 2020, the Company began plans to open new locations via purchasing equity in other brand/franchises to
cover delivery for the entire California. Therefore, the Company is not likely at this time to exercise its option to acquire the additional
30% interest in Indigo. In addition, the Company is no longer involved in day-to-day operations of Indigo and going forward, the Company
intends to pursue cannabis delivery independent from Indigo. As of October 1, 2020, the Company ceased to have control over the day-to-day
business of Indigo and it was deconsolidated and recorded as an investment in nonconsolidated affiliate at its $564,819 estimated fair
value and changed to cost method of accounting. Pursuant to the terms of the Indigo agreement, if the Company determines, in its discretion
not to continue to make monthly payments, its 40% ownership interest in Indigo will be decreased according to the payment then made.
As of June 30, 2022, the Company did not receive any distributions or dividends from Indigo. In addition, due to the Company had no access
to Indigo’s book during the year ended June 30, 2022, the Company recorded cost method investment in affiliates at $441,407 as
of December 31, 2022 and June 30, 2022 and the Company still held approximately 32% of the ownership of Indigo.
As
part of pivoting our business strategy, the company negotiated with Indigo Dye Group Corp. (“Indigo”) to exchange our 32%
stake in Budcars for a stake in a distribution and indoor cultivation company in Santa Rosa, California. The company has already executed
a share exchange agreement with Indigo. However, the final documents and terms of the new company are still being finalized. The company
expects to complete the documents and announce the transition to new business post filing of this 10Q.
17.
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities amounted to $2,048,860 and $1,989,525 as of December 31, 2022 and June 30, 2022, respectively. Accounts
payables are mainly payables to vendors and accrued liabilities are mainly accrued interest of convertible notes payables and accrued
contingent liabilities (see footnote #29).
Schedule of Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities
| |
December
31, 2022 | | |
June 30,
2022 | |
Accounts payable | |
$ | 1,514,423 | | |
$ | 1,460,260 | |
Accrued liabilities | |
| 283,540 | | |
| 278,370 | |
Legal liabilities (See below for detail explanation) | |
| 250,898 | | |
| 250,898 | |
Total accounts payable and accrued liabilities: | |
$ | 2,048,860 | | |
$ | 1,989,525 | |
From
time to time and in the course of business, we may become involved in various legal proceedings seeking monetary damages and other relief.
The amount of the ultimate liability, if any, from such claims cannot be determined. As of June 30, 2022, there were no legal claims
pending or threatened against the Company that, in the opinion of our management, would be likely to have a material adverse effect on
our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, as of the date of this filing, we were involved in the following
legal proceedings.
● |
On December 11, 2013, the Company was served with a complaint from two convertible note holders and investors in the Company. On February
21, 2017, the Company signed a settlement agreement with the plaintiffs in the matter of Hannan vs. Sugarmade. Under the terms of the
settlement agreement, the Company agreed to pay the plaintiffs $227,000 to settle all claims against the Company, which included the payoff
of two notes outstanding. The parties had estimated the value of the notes at approximately $80,000. Third parties had purchased the two
notes during the year ended June 30, 2020. As of December 31, 2022 and June 30, 2022, there remains a balance, plus accrued interest due
under the notes of $227,000, respectively. No payment has been made. |
|
|
● |
On April 1st, 2021, the Company entered a Payment (Installment) Agreement with a former employee to settle a dated labor case that was
awarded by the Labor Commissioner in the State of California back on May 14, 2014 for an amount of $55,126.65. The company agreed to pay
$58,756 at 10% annual interest rate accrue, the balance will be split into 18 equal payments of $3,528.71. As of December 31, 2022 and
June 30, 2022, there remains a balance of $23,598, respectively. |
There
can be no assurances the ultimate liability relative to these lawsuits will not exceed what is outlined above.
The
company fully recognize this legal liability.
18.
Customer Deposits
Customer
deposits amounted $883,276 and $951,664 as of December 31, 2022 and June 30, 2022, respectively. Customer deposits are mainly advanced
payments from customers.
Schedule of Customer Deposits
June 30, 2022 Balance | | |
Customer Deposited | | |
Revenue Recognized | | |
December 31, 2022 Balance | |
$ | 951,664 | | |
$ | 306,767 | | |
$ | (375,155 | ) | |
$ | 883,276 | |
19.
Other Payables
Other
payables amounted to $420,878 and $473,799 as of December 31, 2022 and June 30, 2022, respectively. Other payables are mainly credit
card payables. As of December 31, 2022, the Company had eight credit cards, one of which is an American Express charge card with no limit
and zero interest. The remaining seven cards had an aggregate credit limit of $85,000, and annual percentage rates ranging from 11.24%
to 29.99%. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company had credit cards interest expense of $4,228 and $3,839, respectively.
20.
Convertible Notes
As
of December 31, 2022 and June 30, 2022, the balance owing on convertible notes, net of debt discount, with terms as described below was
$2,572,640 and $1,561,364, respectively.
Convertible
note 1: On August 24, 2012, the Company issued a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for $25,000. The note has a
term of six months with an interest rate of 10% and is convertible to common shares at a 25% discount of the average of 30 days prior
to the conversion date. As of December 31, 2022, the note is in default.
Convertible
note 2: On September 18, 2012, the Company issued a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for $25,000. The note has
a term of six months with an interest rate of 10% and is convertible to common shares at a 25% discount of the average of 30 days prior
to the conversion date. As of December 31, 2022, the note is in default.
Convertible
note 3: On December 21, 2012, the Company issued a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for $100,000. The note has
a term of six months with an interest rate of 10% and is convertible to common shares at a 25% discount of the average of 30 days prior
to the conversion date. As of December 31, 2022, the note is in default.
Convertible
note 4: On November 16, 2018, the Company issued a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for $40,000. The note has
a term of one year with an interest rate of 8% and is convertible to common shares at a fixed conversion price of $0.07. As of December
31, 2022, the note is in default.
Convertible
note 5: On December 3, 2018, the Company issued a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for $35,000. The note has a
term of one year with an interest rate of 8% and is convertible to common shares at a fixed conversion price of $0.07. As of December
31, 2022, the note is in default.
Convertible
note 6: On October 31, 2019, the Company issued a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $139,301.
The note is due 360 days after issuance and bears interest at a rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is $0.008 per share. On
October 1, 2020, the Company entered an amendment to settlement note to amend the conversion price at 60% of the lowest trading bid price
in the 20 consecutive trading days immediately preceding to the conversion date. On November 10, 2021, the original note with unpaid
interest was assigned to an accredited investor. See Convertible note 11 below.
Convertible
note 7: On November 1, 2019, the Company issued a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $100,000.
The note is due 360 days after issuance and bears interest at a rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is $0.008 per share. On
October 1, 2020, the Company entered an amendment to settlement note to amend the conversion price at 60% of the lowest trading bid price
in the 20 consecutive trading days immediately preceding to the conversion date. On November 10, 2021, the original note with unpaid
interest was assigned to an accredited investor. See Convertible note 11 below.
Convertible
note 8: On October 8, 2020, the Company issued a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $231,000
(includes a $21,000 OID). The note is due 180 days after issuance and bears interest at a rate of 12%. The conversion price for the note
is $0.01 per share. After the six-month anniversary of this note, the conversion price shall be equal to the lower of the fixed price
of $0.01 or 65% of the lowest trading price of the common stock for the 20 prior trading days including the day upon which a conversion
notice is received by the Company or its transfer agent. As of December 31, 2022, the note was in default. The Company recorded additional
$69,300 principal due to the default that occurred during the year ended June 30, 2022. As of December 31, 2022, the note had an outstanding
principal of $300,300.
Convertible
note 9: On October 13, 2020, the Company issued a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $275,000
(includes a $25,000 OID). The note is due 180 days after issuance and bears interest at a rate of 12%. The conversion price for the note
is $0.01 per share. After the six-month anniversary of this note, the conversion price shall be equal to the lower of the fixed price
of $0.01 or 65% of the lowest trading price of the common stock for the 20 prior trading days including the day upon which a conversion
notice is received by the Company or its transfer agent. As of June 30, 2022, the note was in default. The Company recorded additional
$82,500 principal due to default breach occurred during the year ended June 30, 2022. As of December 31, 2022, the note had an outstanding
principal of $357,500.
Convertible
note 10: On June 14, 2021, the Company issued a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $300,000.
The note is due in three years and bear an interest rate of 1%. The conversion price for the note is the lesser of $0.0036 and 85% of
the lesser of (i) 5 days VWAP on the trading day preceding the conversion date, and (ii) the VWAP on the conversion date. “VWAP”
means, for any date, the price determined by the first of the following clauses that applies: (a) if the Common Stock is then listed
or quoted on a Trading Market, the daily volume weighted average price of the Common Stock for such date (or the nearest preceding date)
on the Trading Market on which the Common Stock is then listed or quoted as reported by Bloomberg L.P. (based on a Trading Day from 9:30
a.m. (New York City time) to 4:02 p.m. (New York City time)), (b) if OTCQB or OTCQX is not a Trading Market, the volume weighted average
price of the Common Stock for such date (or the nearest preceding date) on OTCQB or OTCQX as applicable, (c) if the Common Stock is not
then listed or quoted for trading on OTCQB or OTCQX and if prices for the Common Stock are then reported in the “Pink Sheets”
published by OTC Markets, Inc. (or a similar organization or agency succeeding to its functions of reporting prices), the most recent
bid price per share of the Common Stock so reported, or (d) in all other cases, the fair market value of a share of Common Stock as determined
by an independent appraiser selected in good faith by the Holders of a majority in interest of the Debentures then outstanding and reasonably
acceptable to the Company, the fees and expenses of which shall be paid by the Company. During the year ended June 30, 2022, the note
holder converted $85,000 of the principal amount plus $1,747 accrued interest expense into 100,000,000 shares of the Company’s
common stock. As of December 31, 2022, the note had an outstanding principal of $215,000.
Convertible
note 11: On November 10, 2021, the Company entered into an assignment and assumption agreement with the assignor and assignee for two
assigned convertible notes in total face value of $277,903, which consists $239,300 of principal and $38,603 of unpaid interest. The
new note is due 360 days after issuance and bears an interest rate of 10% per annum. The conversion price for the note is 60% of the
lowest trading bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. During the year ended June 30, 2022, the note holder
converted $236,460 of the principal amount into 1,047,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. As of December 31, 2022, the
note had an outstanding principal of $41,443.
Convertible
note 12: On January 1, 2022, the Company issued a convertible promissory note with a service provider for a total amount of $450,000.
The note is due in three years and bear an interest rate of 1%. The conversion price for the note is the lesser of $0.001 and 85% of
the lesser of (i) 5 days VWAP on the trading day preceding the conversion date, and (ii) the VWAP on the conversion date. “VWAP”
means, for any date, the price determined by the first of the following clauses that applies: (a) if the common stock is then listed
or quoted on a Trading Market, the daily volume weighted average price of the common stock for such date (or the nearest preceding date)
on the Trading Market on which the common stock is then listed or quoted as reported by Bloomberg L.P. (based on a Trading Day from 9:30
a.m. (New York City time) to 4:02 p.m. (New York City time)), (b) if OTCQB or OTCQX is not a Trading Market, the volume weighted average
price of the common stock for such date (or the nearest preceding date) on OTCQB or OTCQX as applicable, (c) if the common stock is not
then listed or quoted for trading on OTCQB or OTCQX and if prices for the common stock are then reported in the “Pink Sheets”
published by OTC Markets, Inc. (or a similar organization or agency succeeding to its functions of reporting prices), the most recent
bid price per share of the common stock so reported, or (d) in all other cases, the fair market value of a share of common stock as determined
by an independent appraiser selected in good faith by the Holders of a majority in interest of the Debentures then outstanding and reasonably
acceptable to the Company, the fees and expenses of which shall be paid by the Company.
Convertible
note 13: On January 5, 2022, the Company issued a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of
$485,000
(includes a $82,190
OID). The note is due in one
year and bear an interest rate of 8%.
The note is convertible into the Company’s common stock at $0.001
par value per share. As of December 31, 2022, the note is in default and the Company paid $220,000 cash to the investor as default payment.
Convertible
note 14: On March 23, 2022, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $198,000
(includes a $18,000 OID). The note is due 360 days after issuance and bears interest at a rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note
is 65% of the lowest trading bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date.
Convertible
note 15: On April 27, 2022, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $144,200
(includes a $19,200 OID). The note is due in one year and bears interest at a rate of 12%. The conversion price for the note is 75% of
the lowest trading bid for the 10 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of December 31, 2022, the note was fully
paid off.
Convertible
note 16: On June 8, 2022, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $220,000
(includes a $20,000 OID). The note is due in one year and bears interest at a rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 65% of
the lowest trading bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date.
Convertible
note 17: On June 28, 2022, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $110,000
(includes a $10,000 OID). The note is due in one year and bears interest at a rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 65% of
the lowest trading bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date.
Convertible
note 18: On August 1, 2022, the Company entered a settlement agreement with an accredited investor for a total amount of $120,000. The
note is due in one year and bears interest at a rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 65% of the lowest trading bid for the
20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of December 31, 2022, the Company recorded $58,462 gain on debt extinguishment.
Convertible
note 19: On August 1, 2022, the Company entered a settlement agreement with a service provider for a total amount of $110,000 (which
$100,000 is the actual settlement amount from original accounts payable and includes a $10,000 OID). The note is due in one year and
bears interest at a rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 65% of the lowest trading bid for the 20 consecutive trading days
prior to the conversion date. As of December 31, 2022, the Company recorded $53,590 gain on debt extinguishment.
Convertible note 20: On October 5, 2022, the Company
entered a convertible promissory note with an individual consultant for service in a total amount of $100,000. The note is due in one
year and bears interest at a rate of 2%. The conversion price for the note is 75% of the average 3 lowest trading prices during 10 trading
days prior conversion date.
Convertible
note 21: On November 14, 2022, the Company issued a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of
$532,000
(includes a $53,200
OID). The note is due in one
year and bear an interest rate of 8%.
The note is convertible into the Company’s common stock at $0.001
par value per share. The net proceed from the note was $148,205 and $110,595 was used to pay for the outstanding fees owed to the service
providers and $220,000 was used to pay for the default payment of note 13 above.
In
connection with the convertible debt, debt discount balance as of December 31, 2022 and June 30, 2022 were $891,604 and $1,185,079, respectively,
and were being amortized and recorded as interest expenses over the term of the convertible debt.
As
of the period ended December 31, 2022, debt discount of the convertible notes consisted of following:
Schedule of Convertible Notes
| |
| |
Debt Discount | | |
| | |
| | |
Debt Discount | |
Start Date | |
End Date | |
6/30/2022 | | |
Addition | | |
Amortization | | |
As of 12/31/2022 | |
6/14/2021 | |
6/14/2024 | |
| 187,077 | | |
| - | | |
| (48,143 | ) | |
| 138,934 | |
1/1/2022 | |
1/1/2025 | |
| 376,095 | | |
| - | | |
| (75,547 | ) | |
| 300,547 | |
1/5/2022 | |
1/5/2023 | |
| 42,559 | | |
| - | | |
| (41,433 | ) | |
| 1,126 | |
3/23/2022 | |
3/23/2023 | |
| 144,296 | | |
| - | | |
| (99,814 | ) | |
| 44,482 | |
4/27/2022 | |
4/27/2023 | |
| 118,916 | | |
| - | | |
| (118,916 | ) | |
| - | |
6/8/2022 | |
6/8/2023 | |
| 206,740 | | |
| - | | |
| (110,904 | ) | |
| 95,836 | |
6/28/2022 | |
6/28/2023 | |
| 109,397 | | |
| - | | |
| (55,452 | ) | |
| 53,945 | |
8/1/2022 | |
8/1/2023 | |
| - | | |
| 120,000 | | |
| (49,973 | ) | |
| 70,027 | |
8/1/2022 | |
8/1/2023 | |
| - | | |
| 110,000 | | |
| (45,808 | ) | |
| 64,192 | |
10/5/2022 | |
10/5/2023 | |
| - | | |
| 100,000 | | |
| (23,836 | ) | |
| 76,164 | |
11/14/2022 | |
11/14/2023 | |
| - | | |
| 53,200 | | |
| (6,850 | ) | |
| 46,350 | |
Total: | |
| |
$ | 1,185,079 | | |
$ | 383,200 | | |
$ | (676,676 | ) | |
$ | 891,604 | |
21.
Derivative Liabilities
The
derivative liability is derived from the conversion features in note 20 and stock warrant in note 22. All were valued using the weighted-average
Binomial option pricing model using the assumptions detailed below. As of December 31, 2022 and June 30, 2022, the derivative liability
was $4,489,332 and $5,521,284, respectively. The Company recorded $1,264,186 and $325,234 gain from changes in derivative liability during
the period ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The Binomial model with the following assumption inputs:
Schedule of Binomial Model Assumptions Inputs
| |
| June 30, 2022 | |
Annual Dividend Yield | |
| — | |
Expected Life (Years) | |
| 0.50-3.00 | |
Risk-Free Interest Rate | |
| 0.01-2.92 | % |
Expected Volatility | |
| 133-262 | % |
| |
| December 31, 2022 | |
Annual Dividend Yield | |
| — | |
Expected Life (Years) | |
| 0.50-3.00 | |
Risk-Free Interest Rate | |
| 4.14-4.76 | % |
Expected Volatility | |
| 205-437 | % |
Fair
value of the derivative is summarized as below:
Schedule of Fair Value of Derivative
Beginning Balance, June 30, 2022 | |
$ | 5,521,284 | |
Additions | |
| 175,091 | |
Mark to Market | |
| (1,274,027 | ) |
Reclassification to APIC Due to Conversions | |
| - | |
Ending Balance, December 31, 2022 | |
$ | 4,422,348 | |
22.
Stock Warrants
On
September 7, 2018, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with several investors to settle all disputes by issuing additional
unrestricted shares. In connection with the note each individual investor will also receive warrants equal to the number of the shares
the investors own as of the effective date of the settlement agreement. The warrants have a life of five years with an exercise price
as of the date of exchange. The fair value of the warrants at the grant date was $56,730. As of December 31, 2022 and June 30, 2022,
the fair value of the warrant liability was $116 and $1,100, respectively.
On
February 4, 2020, the Company entered into a warrant agreement with an accredited investor for up to 10,000,000 shares of common stock
of the Company at an exercise price of $0.008 per share, subject to adjustment. The warrants have a life of five years with an exercise
price as of the date of exchange. The fair value of the warrants at the grant date was $80,000. As of December 31, 2022 and June 30,
2022, the fair value of the warrant liability was $1,000 and $2,000, respectively.
As
of December 31, 2022 and June 30, 2022, the total fair value of the warrant liability was $1,116 and $3,100, respectively.
On
November 14, 2022, the Company entered into a warrant agreement with an accredited investor for up to 1,773,333,333 shares of common
stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.0003 per share, subject to adjustment. The warrants have a life of five years with an
exercise price as of the date of exchange. The fair value of the warrants at the grant date was $532,000.
On
November 14, 2022, the Company entered into a warrant agreement with an accredited investor for up to 95,600,000 shares of common stock
of the Company at an exercise price of $0.0003 per share, subject to adjustment. The warrants have a life of five years with an exercise
price as of the date of exchange. The fair value of the warrants at the grant date was $28,680.
As
of December 31, 2022 and June 30, 2022, the total fair value of the warrant cost under equity was $560,680 and $0, respectively.
The
Binomial model with the following assumption inputs:
Schedule of Assumptions Inputs for Warrants
Warrants liability: | |
| June 30, 2022 |
|
Annual dividend yield | |
| — |
|
Expected life (years) | |
| 1.0-3.0 |
|
Risk-free interest rate | |
| 0.28-2.99 |
% |
Expected volatility | |
| 149-174 |
% |
Warrants
liability: |
|
December
31, 2022 |
|
Annual dividend
yield |
|
|
— |
|
Expected life (years) |
|
|
1.0-5.0 |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
4.05-4.73 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
186-327 |
% |
Schedule
of Warrants Outstanding
|
|
Number of
Shares |
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price |
|
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
contractual
life |
|
Outstanding at
June 30, 2021 |
|
|
10,578,880 |
|
|
$ |
0.026 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Expired |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2022 |
|
|
10,578,880 |
|
|
$ |
0.027 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Expired |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
1,868,933,333 |
|
|
$ |
0.0003 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Outstanding at December 31,
2022 |
|
|
1,879,512,213 |
|
|
$ |
0.015 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
23.
Note Payable
Note
payable due to bank
During
October 2011, we entered into a revolving demand note (line of credit) arrangement with HSBC Bank USA, with a revolving borrowing limit
of $150,000. The line of credit bears a variable interest rate of one quarter percent (0.25%) above the prime rate (3.25% as of September
30, 2013). In the event the deposit account is not established or minimum balance maintained, HSBC can charge a higher rate of interest
of up to 4.0% above prime rate. As of December 31, 2022 and June 30, 2022, the loan principal balance was $25,982 and $25,982, respectively.
Notes
payable due to non-related parties
On
October 6, 2020, the Company entered into a promissory note with Darryl Kuecker, and Shirley Ann Hunt (the “Trustee”) for
borrowing $1,390,000 with annual interest rate of 6% due in 30 years. Darryl Kuecker, Trustee of the 2002 Darry Kuecker Revocable Trust
as to an undivided 36% interest, and Shirley Ann Hunt, Trustee of the 2002 Shirley Ann Hunt Revocable Trust as to an undivided 64% interest.
Principal and interest shall be payable on monthly basis, in installments of $8,333.75, beginning on November 1, 2020 and until September
1, 2050. Payments to be divided and made separately to each beneficiary per the beneficiary’s instruction: $3,000.15 to Darryl
Kuecker, Trustee and $5,333.60 to Shirley Hunt, Trustee. As of December 31, 2022 and June 30, 2022, the Company had an outstanding balance
of $1,360,858 and $1,364,436, respectively. As of December 31, 2022 and June 30, 2022, the Company paid interest expense of $16,090 and
$122,110, respectively.
On
May 12, 2021, the Company issued a promissory note to the Lemon Glow shareholders. The original principal amount was $3,976,000 and the
note bears interest at the rate of 5% per year 36 monthly payments commencing on June 15, 2021. As of December 31, 2022 and June 30,
2022, the note had a remaining balance of $3,466,000, respectively. As of December 31, 2022 and June 30, 2022, the note had accrued interest
balance of $263,139 and $175,707, respectively.
24.
Loans payable
On
October 1, 2017, the Company issued a straight promissory note to Greater Asia Technology Limited (Greater Asia) for borrowing $100,000
with maturity date on June 30, 2018; the note bears an interest rate of 33.33%. As of December 31, 2022 and June 30, 2022, the note was
in default and the outstanding balance under this note was $36,695 and $36,695, respectively.
During
the year ended June 30, 2019, the Company entered into a series of short-term loan agreements with Greater Asia Technology Limited (Greater
Asia) for borrowing $375,000, with interest rate at 40% - 50% of the principal balance. As of December 31, 2022 and June 30, 2022, the
outstanding balance with Greater Asia loans were $100,000 and $100,000, respectively.
On
June 6, 2019, SWC entered into an equipment loan agreement with a bank with maturity on June 21, 2024. The monthly payment is $648. As
of December 31, 2022 and June 30, 2022, the outstanding balance under this loan were $7,968 and $11,842, respectively.
On
July 28, 2020, we entered into a loan borrowed $159,900
from Bank of America (“Lender”), pursuant to a Promissory Note issued by Company to Lender (the “SBA Loan”).
The SBA loan bears interest at 3.75%
per annum and may be repaid at any time without penalty. Installment payments, including principal and interest, of $731
monthly, will begin 12 months from the date of the promissory note and the balance of principal and interest will be payable 30
years from the date of the promissory note. The SBA loan contains customary events of default relating to, among other things,
payment defaults, breach of representations and warranties, or provisions of the promissory note. The occurrence of an event of
default may result in a claim for the immediate repayment of all amounts outstanding under the SBA loan. On July 27, 2021, the loan
amount has been increased to $509,900
and the monthly payment amount has been updated from $731
to $2,527. As of December 31, 2022 and June 30, 2022, the unpaid interest expense under this loan was $27,346 and $17,706, respectively.
On
January 25, 2021, we entered into a loan borrowed $96,595
from Bank of America (“Lender”), pursuant to a Promissory Note issued by Company to Lender (the “SBA Loan”).
The SBA loan bears interest at 1.00%
per annum and may be repaid at any time without penalty. The SBA loan contains customary events of default relating to, among other
things, payment defaults, breach of representations and warranties, or provisions of the promissory note. The occurrence of an event
of default may result in a claim for the immediate repayment of all amounts outstanding under the SBA loan. As of December 31, 2022 and June 30, 2022, the unpaid interest expense under this loan was $900 and $413, respectively.
The
Company accounting for the SBA loan under Topic 470: (a). Initially record the cash inflow from the SBA loan as a financial
liability and would accrue interest in accordance with the interest method under ASC Subtopic 835-30; (b). Not impute additional
interest at a market rate; (c). Continue to record the proceeds from the loan as a liability until either (1) the loan is partly or
wholly forgiven and the debtor has been legally released or (2) the debtor pays off the loan; (d). Would reduce the liability by the
amount forgiven and record a gain on extinguishment once the loan is partly or wholly forgiven and legal release is
received.
As
of December 31, 2022 and June 30, 2022, the total outstanding SBA loan balance was $606,495 and $606,495, respectively.
On
February 15, 2021, the Company entered into a loan with Manuel Rivera for borrowing $100,000 with maturity date on September 15, 2021;
the note bears a monthly interest of $3,500 for 7 months. The Company shall pay the investor a fee of $70,000 within 45 days of its first
harvest. As of December 31, 2022 and June 30, 2022, the outstanding loan balance under this note was $100,000 and $100,000, respectively.
As of December 31, 2022 and June 30, 2022, the unpaid interest expense under this note was $77,000 and $56,000, respectively.
On
March 24, 2021, the Company entered into auto loan agreement with John Deere Financial for an auto loan of $69,457 for 60 months at annual
percentage rate of 2.85%. As of December 31, 2022 and June 30, 2022, the Company has an outstanding balance of $45,885 and $53,250, respectively.
On
August 4, 2021, the Company entered into a loan with Coastline Lending Group of $490,000 which to be secured by a deed of trust on the
real property at 5058 Valley Blvd, Los Angeles, CA90032. The loan has an interest only payment of $3,471 per month with a term of 36
months. The loan bears an interest rate at 8.5% per annum with maturity date on August 14, 2024. As of December 31, 2022 and June 30,
2022, the Company has an outstanding balance of $490,000 and $490,000, respectively.
On
October 1, 2021, the Company entered into five auto loan agreements with Ally Auto to purchase five Ram Cargo Vans in total finance amount
of $124,332 for 60 months at annual percentage rate of 6.44%. The monthly payment is $418 per vehicle. During the six months ended December
31, 2022, the Company sold four of the vehicles and the remaining principal balances were fully paid off. As of December 31, 2022 and
June 30, 2022, the Company has an outstanding balance of $20,290 and $108,791, respectively.
On
October 5, 2021, the Company entered into an auto loan agreement with Hitachi Capital America Corp. to purchase one Ram Cargo Van in
total finance amount of $32,464 for 60 months at annual percentage rate of 8.99%. The monthly payment is $587. As of December 31, 2022
and June 30, 2022, the Company has an outstanding balance of $25,701 and $28,406, respectively.
On
October 5, 2021, the Company entered into two auto loan agreements with Hitachi Capital America Corp. to purchase two Ram Cargo Vans
in total finance amount of $64,730 for 60 months at annual percentage rate of 8.99%. The monthly payment is $674 per vehicle. As of December
31, 2022 and June 30, 2022, the Company has an outstanding balance of $48,547 and $56,639, respectively.
On
March 1, 2022, the Company entered into a short term loan with WNDR Group Inc. for borrowing $100,000. The note bears an monthly interest
rate of 2% with maturity date on December 31, 2022. On August 1, 2022, the Company entered into a settlement agreement to extinguish
the $100,000 loan payable with $20,000 unpaid interest into $120,000 convertible note. The Company recorded $58,462 gain on debt extinguishment
on August 1, 2022. As of December 31, 2022 and June 30, 2022, the Company has an outstanding loan balance of $0 and $100,000, respectively.
On
October 21, 2022, the Company entered into a loan with Coastline Lending Group of $185,000
which to be secured by a second deed of trust on the real property at 5058 Valley Blvd, Los Angeles, CA90032. The loan has an
interest only payment of $2,235
per month with a term of 24
months. The loan bears an interest rate at 14.5%
per annum with maturity date on November
1, 2024. As of December 31, 2022 and June 30, 2022, the Company has an outstanding balance of $