Prospectus  

Filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3)
Registration No. 333-181251

Offering Up to 100,000,000 Shares
Common Stock

This Prospectus Supplement No. 1 updates, amends and supplements the information previously included in our prospectus dated April 19, 2013, which we refer to as our prospectus, relating to the offer and resale of up to 100,000,000 shares of our common stock, par value $0.001 per share, or the "Shares," by the selling stockholder, Granite State Capital, LLC, or "Granite." Granite has agreed to purchase 100,000,000 shares pursuant to the investment agreement we entered into with Granite on April 16, 2012. Subject to the terms and conditions of such investment agreement, which is referred to in this prospectus as the "Investment Agreement," we have the right to "draw," or sell, up to $15 million in shares of our common stock to Granite. This arrangement is sometimes referred to as the "Facility."

We will not receive any proceeds from the resale of the Shares offered by Granite. We will, however, receive proceeds from the sale of shares to Granite pursuant to the Facility. When we draw an amount of the Shares, the per share purchase price that Granite will pay to us in respect to such draw will be determined in accordance with a formula set forth in the Investment Agreement. Generally, with respect to each draw, Granite will pay us a per share purchase price equal to ninety-five percent (95%) of the lowest daily volume weighted average price, or the "VWAP," of our common stock during the five consecutive trading day period beginning on the trading day immediately following the day on which Granite receives our draw notice and ending on and including the date that is four trading days after the date of our draw notice.

Granite may sell the shares of common stock from time to time at the prevailing market price on the OTCQB, the OTC Bulletin Board, or on an exchange if our shares of common stock become listed for trading on such an exchange, or in privately negotiated transactions. Granite is an "underwriter" within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the "Securities Act," in connection with the resale of our common stock under the Facility.

Our common stock is quoted on the OTCQB, the OTC market tier for companies that are reporting with the SEC, under the symbol "MMRF." The last reported sale price of our common stock on the OTC Bulletin Board on May 5, 2014 was $0.035 per share.

This Prospectus Supplement No. 1 incorporates into our prospectus the information contained in our attached Form 10-K, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2014, as subsequently amended on April 30, 2014. This Prospectus Supplement No. 1 is not complete without, and may not be delivered or used except in connection with, our prospectus, including all amendments and supplements thereto.

Investing in the offered securities involves a high degree of risk, including those risks set forth in the "Risk Factors" section of this prospectus, as well as those set forth in any prospectus supplement.

We will be responsible for all fees and expenses incurred in connection with the preparation and filing of this registration statement, provided, however, we will not be required to pay any underwriters' discounts or commissions relating to the securities covered by the registration statement.

You should read this prospectus and any prospectus supplement carefully before you decide to invest. You should not assume that the information in this prospectus is accurate as of any date other than the date of this prospectus.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of this prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

______________________________

The date of this prospectus is May 9, 2014


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

Page

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

ii

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

 

1

RISK FACTORS

 

7

USE OF PROCEEDS

 

14

SELLING STOCKHOLDER

 

15

MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

 

16

OUR BUSINESS

 

17

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION ANDANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

44

MANAGEMENT

 

50

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

52

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

57

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAINBENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

 

57

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

 

58

DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK

 

60

PLAN OFDISTRIBUTION

 

61

CHANGES AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS

 

62

LEGAL MATTERS

 

62

EXPERTS

 

62

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

 

63

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

F-1

______________________________

This prospectus is part of a registration statement we filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with information or to make any representation on behalf of our Company that is different from that contained in this prospectus. You should not rely on any unauthorized information or representation. This prospectus is an offer to sell only the securities offered by this prospectus under circumstances and in jurisdictions where it is lawful to do so. The information in this prospectus is complete and accurate only as of the date on the front cover of this prospectus, regardless of the date of delivery of this prospectus or of any sales of these securities. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may have changed since the date of this prospectus. This prospectus may be used only in jurisdictions where it is legal to sell these securities.

______________________________

i


CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

This prospectus contains certain forward-looking statements. The words "anticipate," "expect," "believe," "plan," "intend," "will" and similar expressions are intended to identify such statements. Although the forward-looking statements in this prospectus reflect the good faith judgment of our management, such statements  are subject to various risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to those discussed or incorporated by reference herein. Actual results and the timing of selected events may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward- looking statements .  Except as required by applicable law, we disclaim any duty to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances that occur after the date on which such statement is made .  The forward-looking statements included herein are necessarily based on various assumptions and estimates and are inherently subject to various risks and uncertainties  , including risks and uncertainties relating to the possible invalidity of the underlying assumptions and estimates and possible changes or developments in economic, business, industry, market, legal and regulatory circumstances and conditions and actions taken or omitted to be taken by third parties, including customers, suppliers, business partners and competitors and legislative, judicial and other governmental authorities and officials  . Assumptions related to the foregoing involve judgments with respect to ,  are subject to various risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to those discussed or incorporated by reference herein. Actual results and the timing of selected events may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements  as a result of , among other things, future economic, competitive and market conditions and future business decisions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond our control.

Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. They reflect opinions, assumptions, and estimates only as of the date they were made, and we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements in this prospectus, whether as a result of new information, future events, future circumstances or otherwise, except as required by law.

______________________________

ii


PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

This summary highlights the information contained elsewhere in this prospectus. Because this is only a summary, it does not contain all of the information that you should consider before buying shares of our common stock. You should read the entire prospectus and any prospectus supplements carefully, especially the sections entitled "Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward Looking Statements," "Risk Factors" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," together with our financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus and in any prospectus supplements related thereto, before deciding to purchase shares of our common stock.

MMRGlobal, Inc.

Depending upon the context, the terms "MMRGlobal," "MMR," "Company," "we," "our" and "us," refers to either MMRGlobal, Inc. (formerly known as MMR Information Systems, Inc.) alone, or MMRGlobal, Inc. and its subsidiaries collectively.

Organizational History

MMRGlobal, Inc. (referred to herein, unless otherwise indicated, as "MMR", the "Company," "we," "us," and "our") was originally incorporated as Favrille, Inc. ("Favrille") in Delaware in 2000, and since its inception and before the Merger (as defined below), operated under a different management team as a biopharmaceutical company focused on the development and commercialization of targeted immunotherapies for the treatment of cancer and other diseases of the immune system.

On January 27, 2009, the Company, through MyMedicalRecords, Inc., what is now our wholly-owned operating subsidiary, originally incorporated as MyMedicalRecords.com, Inc., ("MMR Inc.") in Delaware in 2005, conducted a reverse merger with Favrille. We refer to this transaction as the "Merger".

On February 9, 2009, and in connection with the Merger, we changed our legal entity name from Favrille, Inc. to MMR Information Systems, Inc. Subsequently, on June 16, 2010, we changed our legal entity name to MMRGlobal, Inc., which we believe more accurately reflects the nature of our operations.

On March 8, 2011 we formed a subsidiary, which we named MMR Life Sciences Group, Inc., exclusively to maximize the value of our biotech assets including our anti-CD20 antibodies and related FavId™/Specifid™ vaccine technologies identified by our Management as remaining assets from the Merger. As of this date, the assets have not been transferred to the subsidiary.

On March 28, 2012 we formed a subsidiary, which we named Expression Systems, LLC, exclusively to hold a certain group of insect samples from the Merger which we believe are an intricate part of the manufacturing process of the FavId™/Specifid™ idiotype vaccine.

Our Business Subsequent to the Merger

Following the Merger, we adopted MMR Inc.'s business of empowering consumers to manage their Personal Health Records ("PHR") and other important documents, whether paper-based or digital, and by doing so, to better control and organize their lives overall. Starting in 2005, MMR Inc. began filing patents for PHRs that could be used by any person or any healthcare professional anywhere in the world regardless of the technology on the other end. Today, we provide patented secure online storage and document management solutions for Personal Health Records and other important documents such as insurance policies, deeds, driver's license, IDs, passports, estate planning documents, advance directives, photos, as well as legal and travel documents among others.

We expanded our operations and added document imaging, storage and management solutions as a product line directed to healthcare professionals. The product is called MMRPro and it is designed to eliminate paper and allow health care professionals to run their medical offices without dramatically changing the way they operate allowing them to store and share health records with their patients on a real-time basis.

We now have numerous Health Information Technology ("HIT") and Biotech patents issued, pending, and applied for in the United States and numerous other countries around the world. As a result, we have evolved from an operating business selling products and services to consumers and healthcare professionals to a company whose value proposition is based on a combination of factors including:

  • A personal health records company specializing in storing medical records and other important documents for consumers and health care professionals
  • A document imaging and management company for healthcare professionals
  • A licensor of Biotech Intellectual Property based on a portfolio of biotech assets developed at a cost of more than 100 million dollars
  • And a licensor of Health Information Technology patents and other Intellectual Property in numerous counties around the world

1


Business Overview

The following description of our business relates to our current business and operations.

Since inception, MMR's health IT business has evolved from a development company, to a provider and reseller of Personal Health Records and document imaging and scanning systems (MMR Services), to a Licensor of MMR's intellectual property. And during 2013, developments in the industry were positive for us as a provider of patented Personal Health Records driven by the need for eligible healthcare professionals to provide over 50% of patients online access to their health information such as through a PHR or patient portal starting in January 2014. This was part of the patient engagement requirements under Meaningful Use Stage 2 finalized in August 2012 to fully qualify for payments under the EHR Incentive Program mandated by the HITECH Act, and usage is expected to expand to 90% with Stage 3 Meaningful Use requirements. We anticipate that we will continue to benefit from patient engagement measures both as mandated by the government and also because of factors driven by the private sector, such as consumers having to take on a greater share of their healthcare costs, employer worksite wellness programs, the web-based personal medical home, and the interest in web-based social networking and the Health 2.0 movement.

Industry developments coupled with the strength of our health IT patents, which are discussed further below, are expected to increase demand for our products and services. MMR's vision from the start was to provide patients and families with an easy-to-use online system for accessing their medical records and other important documents and securely sharing them with all their healthcare providers using MMR's proprietary technology platform. Since our company began, we have made it our mission to ensure the patient shares in the electronic exchange of his or her health data along with their providers so they can make the informed decisions necessary to better manage their care and participate in cost savings that can accrue from timely access to information. We believed it was especially important for individuals and families to have access to their critical health information in the event of an emergency, from an individual emergency to a widespread natural disaster like Hurricanes Katrina and Sandy. So we conceived of multiple ways this communication could connect and be interoperable with various entities and we filed hundreds of patents and claims to this effect.

We currently own ten U.S patents, five of which were issued or allowed in 2013, which involve inventions pertaining to Personal Health Records, Patient Portals and other Electronic Health Record Systems, and include U.S. Patent Nos. 8,117,045; 8,117,646; 8,121,855; 8,301,466; 8,321,240; 8,352,287; 8,352,288; 8,498,883, 8,626,532 and 8,645,161.   The MyMedicalRecords, Inc. patent portfolio, with over 250 issued claims, also includes 17 pending U.S. applications with more than 400 claims. Adding to our international patent portfolio, MMR was issued a Japanese patent in February 2013 (#5191895). In September 2013, we received our Canadian patent #2,615,138, effectively giving us a dominant position throughout North America. MMR continues to have foreign patents issued, pending and applied for in numerous countries or regional authorities of commercial interest, including the United States, Australia, Singapore, New Zealand, Mexico, Japan, Canada, Hong Kong, South Korea, Israel and Europe.

We currently offer a suite of secure, online products that empower consumers and professionals alike to manage medical records and other important documents in their life and business, whether paper-based or digital. These online products include: (i)  MyMedicalRecords.com , an online PHR secure system for the entire family including pets; (ii) MyEsafeDepositBox, an online secure document storage system; (iii) MMRPro, an integrated scanning and web-based document management solution for healthcare professionals; and (iv) private label PHR and MyEsafeDepositBox storage solutions.

We also have an agreement with Microsoft® HealthVault® to integrate our services with their platform as demand for access to HealthVault® increases in the marketplace.

Our health information technology patents became the focus of our licensing and enforcement activities in 2012 and 2013, having been granted ten patents by the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO") directed towards health information technology along with additional HIT patents in seven other countries of commercial interest including Australia, others in New Zealand, Singapore, Japan, Mexico, and Canada. These patents have the potential effect of enabling us to control a dominant marketplace position in personal healthcare, being well-positioned to benefit from the explosion in health IT both in the U.S. and globally.

We also continue efforts to maximize the current and future value of the biotech assets acquired from Favrille, Inc. when the Merger was completed in January 2009. These assets include, but are not limited to, the exploitation and licensing of patents, data and samples from our pre-Merger clinical vaccine trials, the FavId™/Specifid™ idiotype vaccine, and the anti-CD20 antibodies. Anti-CD20 antibodies are useful in treating B-Cell malignancies, including Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) and additional B-Cell mediated conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis. We understand the anti-CD20 antibody assets are potential candidates for the next generation of a Rituximab-type therapy. Rituximab is marketed under the trade name Rituxan® in the United States by Biogen Idec and Genentech (wholly owned member of the Roche Group) and under the name MabThera® by Roche in the rest of the world except Japan, where it is co-marketed by Chugai and Zenyaku Kogyo Co. Ltd. Rituxan® is one of the world's most successful monoclonal antibodies with reported annual sales of over USD $7.5 billion in 2013. Rituxan is due to go off patent in 2015.

2


We were an Independent Software Vendor of Kodak until Kodak filed for bankruptcy protection on January 19, 2012. During 2013, we filed a claim in the United States Bankruptcy Court Southern District of New York for $827,818.74 in damages from development and other costs incurred building MMRPro with Kodak. We are still purchasing Kodak scanners for use in our MMRPro products and services, but these Kodak scanners are now being purchased through Kodak resellers. Because of the Kodak bankruptcy, we decided to identify secondary suppliers for scanners and software in support of MMRPro. As a result, we recently announced that we have redesigned our MMRPro system to work with any scanning and/or imaging solution.

For a complete description of our business, please see the section entitled "Our Business."

Summary Financial Data

Because this is only a summary of our financial information, it does not contain all of the financial information that may be important to you. Therefore, you should carefully read all of the information in this prospectus and any prospectus supplement, including the financial statements, their explanatory notes and the section entitled "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," before making a decision to invest in our common stock. The information contained in the following summary is derived from our financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.

 

 

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

587,305 

 

804,343 

Cost of revenues

 

 

262,653 

 

 

588,672 

 

Gross profit

 

 

324,652 

 

 

215,671 

Operating Expenses

 

 

7,389,122 

 

 

5,657,134 

 

Loss from operations

 

 

(7,064,470)

 

 

(5,441,463)

Other income (expense)

 

 

(574,299)

 

 

(461,040)

Net loss

 

(7,638,769)

 

(5,902,503)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss available to common shareholders per share:

 

 

 

 

 

Basic and diluted

 

$

(0.01)

$

(0.01)

Our Principal Executive Offices

Our principal executive offices are located at 4401 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 200, Los Angeles, California 90010. Our telephone number is (310) 476-7002 and our website address is www.MMRGlobal.com . Information contained on our website does not constitute part of this prospectus.

Market Data and Industry Information

We obtained the market data and industry information contained in this prospectus from internal surveys, estimates, reports and studies, as appropriate, as well as from market research, publicly available information and industry publications. Although we believe our internal surveys, estimates, reports, studies and market research, as well as industry publications, are reliable, we have not independently verified such information, and as such, we do not make any representation as to its accuracy.

3


Summary of the Offering

This prospectus relates to the original resale of up to 100,000,000 shares of our common stock by Granite (representing 26.7% of the outstanding shares before the Offering on May 31, 2012 and 21.1% of the outstanding shares following the Offering). Granite will acquire our common stock pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Investment Agreement.

The Investment Agreement with Granite provides that Granite is committed to purchase from us, from time to time, up to $15,000,000 of our common stock over the course of 36 months. We may draw on the Facility from time to time, as and when we determine appropriate in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Investment Agreement. The amount we are entitled to draw in any one notice shall be up to either 1) 200% of the average daily volume of our common stock for the 3 trading days prior to the applicable draw notice date, multiplied by the average of the 3 daily closing prices immediately preceding the draw date, or 2) $500,000. When we draw an amount of the Shares, the per share purchase price that Granite will pay to us in respect to such draw will be determined in accordance with a formula set forth in the Investment Agreement. Generally, with respect to each draw, Granite will pay us a per share purchase price equal to ninety-five percent (95%) of the lowest daily volume weighted average price, or the "VWAP," of our common stock during the five consecutive trading day period beginning on the trading day immediately following the day on which Granite receives our draw notice and ending on and including the date that is four trading days after the date of our draw notice. The initial number of shares issuable by us and purchasable by Granite under the Facility is 100,000,000 shares, representing 26.7% of the outstanding shares before the Offering on May 31, 2012 and 21.1% of the outstanding shares following the Offering.

Shares of common stock offered by us

None.

   

Common stock outstanding as of April 23, 2012

374,009,083

   

Shares of common stock offered by the Selling Stockholder


Up to 100,000,000 shares of our common stock by Granite, the Selling Stockholder (representing 26.7% of the total outstanding before the Offering.

   

Shares of common stock outstanding following the Offering:

474,009,083

   

Offering Price

To be determined by the prevailing market price for the shares at the time of the sale or in privately negotiated transactions.

   

Use of proceeds

We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares by the selling stockholder. We will, however, receive proceeds from the sale of shares to Granite under the Facility. We intend to use such proceeds for working capital, reduction of indebtedness, acquisitions and other general corporate purposes. See "Use of Proceeds" for additional information.

   

Risk Factors

An investment in our common stock is speculative and involves substantial risks. You should read the "Risk Factors" section beginning on page XX of this prospectus for a discussion of certain factors to consider carefully before deciding to invest in shares of our common stock.

   

Plan of Distribution

The shares of common stock covered by this prospectus may be sold by the selling stockholder in the manner described under "Plan of Distribution."

   

Stock Symbol

Our common stock is quoted on the OTCQB, the OTC market tier for companies that are reporting with the SEC, under the symbol "MMRF," and on the OTC Bulletin Board, or OTCBB, under the symbol "MMRF.OB."

4


Investment Agreement

We entered into the Investment Agreement on April 16, 2012. Pursuant to the Investment Agreement, Granite committed to purchase up to $15,000,000 of our common stock over the course of 36 months. The aggregate number of shares issuable by us and purchasable by Granite under the Investment Agreement is 100,000,000.

We may draw on the Facility from time to time, as and when we determine appropriate in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Investment Agreement. The maximum amount that we are entitled to draw in any one notice is either (i) two hundred percent (200%) of the average daily volume (U.S. market only) of our common stock for the three (3) Trading Days prior to the applicable date of a draw notice, multiplied by the average of the three (3) daily closing prices immediately preceding the date of the applicable draw or (ii) five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000). The purchase price shall be set at ninety- five percent (95%) of the lowest daily VWAP of our common stock during the Pricing Period. There are restrictions applied during each Pricing Period. For example, we are not entitled to deliver another draw during any Pricing Period.

There are circumstances under which we will not be entitled to make a draw from Granite, including the following:

  • we will not be entitled to make a draw from Granite unless there is an effective registration statement under the Securities Act to cover the resale of the shares by Granite;
  • we will not be entitled to make a draw from Granite unless our common stock continues to be quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board, or becomes listed on a national securities exchange;
  • we will not be entitled to make a draw from Granite if we are in default under the Investment Agreement, the registration rights agreement or any other agreement entered into in connection with the Investment Agreement until such default has been cured;
  • we will not be entitled to make a draw from Granite if an injunction has been issued and remains in force, or action commenced by a governmental authority which has not been stayed or abandoned, prohibiting the purchase or the issuance of the Shares;
  • we will not be entitled to make a draw from Granite if the issuance of the Shares will violate any shareholder approval requirements of the OTC Bulletin Board, or applicable national securities exchange (if the Company becomes listed on such exchange);
  • we will not be entitled to make a draw from Granite to the extent that such shares would cause Granite's beneficial ownership to exceed 4.99% of our outstanding shares; and
  • we will not be entitled to make a draw from Granite prior to the closing date of the preceding draw.

There is no guarantee that we will be able to meet the foregoing conditions, any other conditions under the Investment Agreement or that we will be able to draw down any portion of the amounts available under the Investment Agreement.

The registration statement covers 100,000,000 shares of common stock under the Investment Agreement. In order to meet the full allotment of 100,000,000 shares authorized under the Investment Agreement, the Company's common stock would have an assumed VWAP of $0.15 less the 5% discount. Thus, if our share price rises above $0.15 per share, we will not be able to draw down in excess of the $15 million maximum. Likewise, if our share price fails to rise or falls, we are limited to the 100,000,000 shares registered under this registration statement and may not be able to draw the full $15 million.

The net tangible book value per share before and after the distribution, assuming the full $15 million is raised, will be $(0.017) and $0.018, respectively. The amount of the increase in such net tangible book value per share attributable to the cash payments made by Granite will be $0.032. The amount of the immediate dilution from the public offering price which will be absorbed by such purchasers will be $0.06.

The issuance of our shares of common stock under the Investment Agreement will have no effect on the rights or privileges of existing holders of common stock, except that the economic and voting interests of each stockholder will be diluted as a result of the issuance of our shares. Although the number of shares of common stock that stockholders presently own will not decrease, these shares will represent a smaller percentage of our total shares that will be outstanding after any issuances of shares of common stock to Granite. If we draw down amounts under the Investment Agreement when our share price is decreasing, we will need to issue more shares to raise the same amount than if our stock price was higher. Such issuances will have a dilutive effect and may further decrease our stock price. An example of the effect of issuing shares when our stock price is comparatively low is set forth below.

Under the Investment Agreement, the purchase price of the shares to be sold to Granite will be at a discount of 5% from the lowest VWAP of our common stock during the Pricing Period. The table below illustrates an issuance of shares of common stock to Granite under the Investment Agreement for a hypothetical draw amount of $50,000 at an assumed VWAP of $0.03.

Draw Down

 

 

 

 

 

Price to be Paid by

 

Number of Shares

Amount

 

VWAP

 

% Discount

 

Granite

 

to be Issued

$50,000

 

$0.03

 

5%

 

$ 0.029

 

1,724,138

5


By comparison, if the VWAP of our common stock was lower than $0.03, the number of shares that we would be required to issue in order to have the same draw down amount of $50,000 would be larger, as shown by the following table:

Draw Down

 

 

 

 

 

Price to be Paid by

 

Number of Shares

Amount

 

VWAP

 

% Discount

 

Granite

 

to be Issued

$50,000

 

$0.025

 

5%

 

$ 0.024

 

2,083,333

Accordingly, the difference of the second example outlined above from the first example outlined above, would be dilution of an additional 359,195 shares issued due to the lower stock price. In effect, a lower price per share of our common stock means a higher number of shares to be issued to Granite, which equates to greater dilution of existing stockholders. The effect of this dilution may, in turn, cause the price of our common stock to decrease further, both because of the downward pressure on the stock price that would be caused by a large number of sales of our shares into the public market by Granite, and because our existing stockholders may disagree with a decision to sell shares to Granite at a time when our stock price is low, and may in response decide to sell additional numbers of shares, further decreasing our stock price.

We are limited in the maximum number of shares that we may be required to obtain funds from the Investment Agreement to 100,000,000 shares. The actual number of shares which may be sold under the Investment Agreement is dependent upon our trading volume and share price, which varies from day to day. If we issue and sell all shares under the Facility, our stockholders could experience significant downward pressure on the price of our common stock

We entered into the Investment Agreement with the intention to grow our business, which in turn should increase our value. Because of the nature of the Investment Agreement, it appears unlikely that we will be able to draw down the full $15 million without significant positive value being added as a result of the aggregate draw downs. In addition, as reflected above, if our share price declines significantly and we still desire to draw down on the Investment Agreement, we will have to file one or more additional registration statements.

The Investment Agreement further provides that the Company and Granite are each entitled to customary indemnification from the other for any losses or liabilities we or it suffers as a result of any breach by the other of any provisions of the Investment Agreement, our registration rights agreement with Granite, or as a result of any lawsuit brought by a third-party arising out of or resulting from the other party's execution, delivery, performance or enforcement of the Investment Agreement or the registration rights agreement.

The Investment Agreement also contains representations and warranties of each of the parties. The assertions embodied in those representations and warranties were made for purposes of the Investment Agreement and are subject to qualifications and limitations agreed to by the parties in connection with negotiating the terms of the Investment Agreement. In addition, certain representations and warranties were made as of a specific date, may be subject to a contractual standard of materiality different from what a stockholder or investor might view as material, or may have been used for purposes of allocating risk between the respective parties rather than establishing matters as facts.

Granite further agreed that during the term of the Investment Agreement, neither Granite nor any of its affiliates, nor any entity managed or controlled by it, will, or cause or assist any person to, enter into or execute any short sale of any shares of our common stock as defined in Regulation SHO promulgated under the Exchange Act.

Registration Rights Agreement

Pursuant to the terms of a Registration Rights Agreement, dated April 16, 2012, between Granite and us, we filed a registration statement with the SEC to register the resale by Granite of shares of common stock issued or issuable under the Investment Agreement. We filed with the SEC an initial registration statement on Form S-1 on May 8, 2012 of which this prospectus forms a part covering the resale of the 100,000,000 shares of common stock. The initial registration statement was declared effective by the SEC on May 28, 2012.

6


RISK FACTORS

An investment in our common stock involves a high degree risk. Before making a decision to invest in shares of our common stock, you should carefully consider the following risk factors, as well as the other information contained in this annual report. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospectus could be materially adversely affected. If this were to occur, the trading price of our common stock could decline significantly and you may lose all or part of your investment in our common stock.

Risks Related to Our Business

It is anticipated that we will continue to incur losses and negative cash flow from operations for the foreseeable future and our ability to continue is a going concern.

Historically, we have generated only minimal revenue. While our business includes personal healthcare record and document imaging and storage products that are currently available, we are nevertheless still at an early stage in developing a business model that will enable us to generate significant revenue from the sales, use and or licensing of our products. Prior to the Merger, MMR, Inc. financed its operations primarily through private placements of MMR, Inc. capital stock and from secured loans from The RHL Group, Inc., a wholly-owned affiliate of MMR, Inc.'s founder and Chief Executive Officer, and our current Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Robert H. Lorsch. Although we expect to continue to receive financing from The RHL Group, we have also continued to incur losses from operations and need additional sources of financing to fund our operations until we develop a profitable business. Even with additional funds from The RHL Group, there is no assurance that we will be able to generate sufficient revenue and working capital to fund our operations and create a sustainable going concern. As a result, it is expected that we will continue to incur operating losses for the foreseeable future.

If we fail to obtain additional financing, we will be unable to fund our operations.

We expect that the cash used in our operations will increase for the next several years. As of December 31, 2013, our current liabilities exceeded its current assets by $9.7 million. Furthermore, during the year ended December 31, 2013, we incurred losses of $7,638,769, of which $3.5 million was non-cash related. At the current level of borrowing, we require cash of $275,000 per year to service our debt. Furthermore, not including debt service, in order to continue operating its business, we use an average of $278,000 cash per month, or $3.3 million per year. In addition to the above cash burn from operations, we are required to obtain additional financing in order to meet the obligations under the secured indebtedness to The RHL Group (which had a balance of $1,355,761 at December 31, 2013) as well as other obligations currently due and payable pursuant to the terms of the note.

Notwithstanding the above, at this rate of cash burn, over the next twelve months, our existing current assets, our equity raises and projected revenues under current agreements will sustain our business for less than one year.

Although we generate some cash from our operations which include licensing agreements for our Health IT and Biotech assets, we will need additional financing in order to fund operations until we can become cash flow positive, which may not occur in 2014.

Our future funding requirements will depend on many factors, including:

  • The pace of market adoption of current and future products, which is being influenced by government requirements starting in 2014;
  • The length of sales cycles and implementation efforts for major corporate accounts, which experience shows takes at least twelve months;
  • The length of time required to litigate patent infringement cases, which experience shows takes at least two months;
  • The size of the amounts received from licensing, litigation judgments, or settlement agreements;
  • The costs of modernizing our current web-site and landing pages to meet mandate requirements under any new government initiatives;
  • The costs of modernizing our current web-site and landing pages to work on wireless devices and other new technologies
  • The cost of launching new products and services; and
  • The cost of maintaining a growing sales, service, and delivery organization.

If additional debt financing is raised in the future, we may be required to grant lenders an interest in a portion of our assets and issue warrants to acquire our equity securities, resulting in dilution to our stockholders. In addition, any such debt financing may involve restrictive covenants, including, limitations on our ability to acquire or assign intellectual property rights and other operating restrictions that could impact our ability to conduct our business. Further, our ability to raise funding through the sale of equity securities will be significantly limited by our existing authorized but unissued common stock. We currently have a limited amount of available common stock and any changes to our certificate of incorporation to increase our authorized share capital would require a vote of our stockholders, which could be time consuming and costly to obtain.

Future additional funding may not be available on acceptable terms, or at all. If we are unable to raise additional capital when required or on acceptable terms, then we may have to significantly delay, scale back or discontinue the development or commercialization of one or more of our products.

7


We have been, and may continue to be, unable to generate sufficient cash flow from operations to service our debt obligations.

Our ability to make payments on our indebtedness and to fund our operations, working capital and capital expenditures, depends on our ability to generate cash in the future, which is subject to our ability to execute on our business plan, and also to general economic, industry, financial, competitive, operating, and other factors that are beyond our control.

We have a secured credit facility with The RHL Group, with all outstanding amounts due thereunder being guaranteed by us. As of December 31, 2013, the aggregate principal amount owed under The RHL Group credit facility was $1,355,761.

As of December 31, 2013, we owed an aggregate of $1,255,747 in principal amount to certain of our pre-merger former employees and creditors, as evidenced by promissory notes issued to the same in connection with the Merger. Although we were obligated to make 18 monthly payments to such employees and creditors beginning August 2, 2009, we have not yet made any of the payments and thus they could attempt to exercise any rights as may be available to them under applicable law.

We cannot assure you that our business will generate sufficient cash flow from operations or that future borrowings will be available to us in an amount sufficient to enable us to pay amounts due on our existing indebtedness or to fund our other liquidity needs. Thus, we may need to refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness on or before maturity. Our ability to refinance our indebtedness or obtain additional financing will depend on, among other things:

  • Our financial condition at the time;
  • Restrictions in our outstanding debt instruments; and
  • Other factors, including the condition of the financial markets.

As a result, we may not be able to refinance any of our indebtedness on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. If we do not generate sufficient cash flow from operations, and additional borrowings or refinancing's or other proceeds are not available to us, we may not have sufficient cash to enable us to meet all of our obligations.

The level of our indebtedness could adversely affect our financial condition.

We continue to have significant debt service obligations. As of December 31, 2013, the aggregate principal amount owed under all of our outstanding debt was approximately $2.3 million, the majority of which is owed to The RHL Group, a company controlled by our CEO. Our indebtedness could have important consequences. For example, it could:

  • Increase our vulnerability to adverse economic and industry conditions;
  • Restrict us from making strategic acquisitions, acquiring new content or exploring other business opportunities;
  • Limit our ability to obtain financing for working capital, capital expenditures, general corporate purposes or acquisitions;
  • Place us at a disadvantage compared to our competitors that have less indebtedness; and
  • Limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and industry.

Our operations are subject to all of the risks inherent in a growing business enterprise, including the likelihood of operating losses. As a smaller company with a limited operating history, our success will depend, among other factors, upon how we manage the problems, expenses, difficulties, complications and delays frequently encountered in connection with the growth of a new business, products and channels of distribution, and current and future development, as well as in the competitive emerging healthcare records management business.

Any significant limitation or failure of our technology systems that are critical to our operations could constrain our operations.

We are highly dependent upon the use of third-party technology systems to operate our business. Any failures in these systems could disrupt our business and subject us to losses. Moreover, although we have in place certain disaster recovery plans and backup servers, we may experience system delays and interruptions as a result of natural disasters, power failures, acts of war, and third-party failures. Potential system failures and the cost necessary to address them could result in material financial loss or costs, regulatory actions, breach of client contracts, reputational harm or legal claims and liability, which in turn could negatively impact our business prospects, results of operations and financial condition.

We may not be able to continue to maximize our assets or protect our proprietary rights, which may hurt our competitive position and future revenues.

We will only be able to protect our proprietary rights from unauthorized use by third parties to the extent that these rights are covered by valid and enforceable patents or are effectively maintained as trade secrets and are otherwise protectable under applicable law. We will continue to protect our proprietary position by filing and maintaining U.S. and foreign patent applications related to our proprietary products, technology, inventions and improvements that are important to the development of our business, to notice organizations that may be infringing on our Intellectual property, and to file claims where necessary.

8


In addition to patents for future and current products, we own a substantial portfolio of assets acquired from Favrille, including data, samples, and other intellectual property rights. We currently seek protection for these assets, in part, through confidentiality and proprietary information agreements. These agreements may not provide meaningful protection or adequate remedies for proprietary technology in the event of unauthorized use, transfer or disclosure of confidential and proprietary information. The parties may not comply with or may breach these agreements. Furthermore, our trade secrets may otherwise become known to, or be independently developed by, competitors.

The patent positions of biotechnology and biopharmaceutical companies involve complex legal and factual questions and, therefore, enforceability cannot be predicted with certainty. Patents, if issued, may be challenged, invalidated or circumvented. Thus, any patents that we own or license from third parties for future products may not provide any protection against competitors. Pending patent applications we may file in the future, or those we may license from third parties, may not result in patents being issued. Also, patent rights may not provide us with proprietary protection or competitive advantages against competitors with similar technology. Furthermore, others may independently develop similar technologies or duplicate any technology that we have developed or we will develop. The laws of some foreign countries may not protect our intellectual property rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States.

Our success will further depend, in part, on our ability to operate without infringing the proprietary rights of others. If our activities infringe on patents owned by others, we could incur substantial costs in defending ourselves in suits brought against a licensor or us. Should our products or technologies be found to infringe on patents issued to third parties, the manufacture, use and sale of our products could be enjoined, and we could be required to pay substantial damages. In addition, we, in connection with the development and use of our products and technologies, may be required to obtain licenses to patents or other proprietary rights of third parties, which may not be made available on terms acceptable to us.

In connection with patent enforcement actions conducted by us , a court may rule that we have violated certain statutory, regulatory, federal, local or governing rules or standards, which may expose us to certain material liabilities.

In connection with any of our patent enforcement actions, it is possible that a defendant may request and/or a court may rule that we have violated statutory authority, regulatory authority, federal rules, local court rules, or governing standards relating to the substantive or procedural aspects of such enforcement actions. In such event, a court may issue monetary sanctions against us or award attorney's fees and/or expenses to a defendant(s), which could be material, and if we are required to pay such monetary sanctions, attorneys' fees and/or expenses, such payment could materially harm our operating results and our financial position 

Our licensing cycle is lengthy and costly, and our marketing, legal and sales efforts may be unsuccessful.

We expect our operating subsidiaries to incur significant marketing, legal and sales expenses prior to entering into license agreements and generating license revenues. We will also spend considerable resources educating prospective licensees on the benefits of a license arrangement with us. As such, we may incur significant losses in any particular period before any associated revenue stream begins.

If our efforts to educate prospective licensees on the benefits of a license arrangement are unsuccessful, we may need to pursue litigation or other enforcement action to protect our patent rights. We may also need to litigate to enforce the terms of our existing license agreements, protect our trade secrets, or determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others. Enforcement proceedings are typically protracted and complex. The costs are typically substantial, and the outcomes are unpredictable. Enforcement actions will divert our managerial, technical, legal and financial resources from business operations.

Our exposure to uncontrollable outside influences, including new legislation, court rulings or actions by Congress or the United States Patent and Trademark Office, could adversely affect our licensing and enforcement business and results of operations.

If new legislation, regulations or rules are implemented either by Congress, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, or USPTO, or the courts that impact the patent application process, the patent enforcement process or the rights of patent holders, such changes could negatively affect our expenses and revenue. Recently, United States patent laws were amended with the enactment of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, or the America Invents Act, which took effect on March 16, 2013. The America Invents Act includes a number of significant changes to U.S. patent law. In general, the legislation attempts to address issues surrounding the enforceability of patents and the increase in patent litigation by, among other things, establishing new procedures for patent litigation. For example, the America Invents Act changes the way that parties may be joined in patent infringement actions, increasing the likelihood that such actions will need to be brought against individual allegedly-infringing parties by their respective individual actions or activities. In addition, the America Invents Act enacted a new inter-partes review ("IPR") process at the USPTO which can be used by defendants, and other individuals and entities, to separately challenge the validity of any patent. At this time, it is not clear what, if any, impact the America Invents Act will have on the operation of our enforcement business. However, the America Invents Act and its implementation could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the enforcement of our patented technologies, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

In addition, the U.S. Department of Justice, or the DOJ, has conducted reviews of the patent system to evaluate the impact of patent assertion entities on industries in which those patents relate. It is possible that the findings and recommendations of the DOJ could impact the ability to effectively license and enforce standards-essential patents and could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the enforcement of any such patented technologies.

9


Finally, new rules regarding the burden of proof in patent enforcement actions could significantly increase the cost of our enforcement actions, and new standards or limitations on liability for patent infringement could negatively impact our revenue derived from such enforcement actions.

Changes in patent law could adversely impact our business.

Patent laws may continue to change, and may alter the historically consistent protections afforded to owners of patent rights. Such changes may not be advantageous for us and may make it more difficult to obtain adequate patent protection to enforce our patents against infringing parties. Increased focus on the growing number of patent-related lawsuits may result in legislative changes which increase our costs and related risks of asserting patent enforcement actions. For instance, the United States House of Representatives passed a bill that would require non-practicing entities that bring patent infringement lawsuits to pay legal costs of the defendants, if the lawsuits are unsuccessful and certain standards are not met.

We may need to appeal adverse decisions by lower courts in order to successfully enforce our patents.

It is difficult to predict the outcome of patent enforcement litigation at the trial level. It is often difficult for juries and trial judges to understand complex, patented technologies, and as a result, there is a higher rate of successful appeals in patent enforcement litigation than more standard business litigation. Such appeals are expensive and time consuming, resulting in increased costs and delayed revenue. Although we diligently pursue enforcement litigation, we cannot predict with significant reliability the decisions made by juries and trial courts.

 More patent applications are filed each year resulting in longer delays in getting patents issued by the USPTO.

We continue to acquire pending patents. We have identified a trend of increasing patent applications each year, which we believe is resulting in longer delays in obtaining approval of pending patent applications. The application delays could cause delays in recognizing revenue from these patents and could cause us to miss opportunities to license patents before other competing technologies are developed or introduced into the market.

Federal courts are becoming more crowded, and as a result, patent enforcement litigation is taking longer.

Our patent enforcement actions are almost exclusively prosecuted in federal court. Federal trial courts that hear our patent enforcement actions also hear criminal cases. Criminal cases always take priority over our actions. As a result, it is difficult to predict the length of time it will take to complete an enforcement action. Moreover, we believe there is a trend in increasing numbers of civil lawsuits and criminal proceedings before federal judges and, as a result, we believe that the risk of delays in our patent enforcement actions will have a greater effect on our business in the future unless this trend changes.

 Any reductions in the funding of the USPTO could have an adverse impact on the cost of processing pending patent applications and the value of those pending patent applications.

The assets of our operating subsidiaries consist of patent portfolios, including pending patent applications before the USPTO. The value of our patent portfolios is dependent upon the issuance of patents in a timely manner, and any reductions in the funding of the USPTO could negatively impact the value of our assets. Further, reductions in funding from Congress could result in higher patent application filing and maintenance fees charged by the USPTO, causing an unexpected increase in our expenses.

Our patented technologies face uncertain market value.

Many of our Patents are in the early stages of adoption in the commercial and consumer markets. Demand for some of these technologies is untested and is subject to fluctuation based upon the rate at which our licensees will adopt our patents and technologies in their products and services.

As patent enforcement litigation becomes more prevalent, it may become more difficult for us to voluntarily license our patents.

We believe that the more prevalent patent enforcement actions become, the more difficult it will be for us to voluntarily license our patents. As a result, we may need to increase the number of our patent enforcement actions to cause infringing companies to license the patent or pay damages for lost royalties. This may increase the risks associated with an investment in our company.

We are highly dependent on our Chief Executive Officer and the loss of him could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. Further, we may not be able to attract qualified officers to replace him or other key management personnel necessary to grow our business.

We are highly dependent on Robert H. Lorsch, our Chief Executive Officer, and the loss of him could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. We do maintain key man insurance policies on him. If we lose Mr. Lorsch, we may not be able to attract qualified officers to replace him or other key management personnel necessary to grow our business.

10


Further, we must continue to hire experienced managers to continue to grow our business. As a company with limited operating history, we may have difficulty attracting and retaining new individuals. If we are not successful in attracting management, it could have a material adverse effect on our ability to grow our business, which would adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Our management will continue to be required to devote substantial time to comply with public company regulations.

As a public company, we will incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses in the process of complying with public company regulations. In addition, our management personnel is required to devote substantial time to comply with such regulations, which can be time consuming and may divert time from sales and other activities.

We face substantial competition.

While we believe that our MyMedicalRecords products serve a unique niche in the marketplace, other companies offer similar services that compete for subscriber and healthcare professionals' enrollment from the same patient and physician population, and could compete more directly with us by developing processes and technology functionally similar to those that form our MyMedicalRecords products. MMRPro competes with scanning services that market their services to doctors seeking to convert their historical paper records into electronic files, as well as EMR systems. MMRPro also competes with EMR systems that offer doctors the opportunity to make their entire office paperless. Most of these competitors are larger, more deeply funded companies. To the extent they have more success in obtaining market share and customer acceptance of their products, it could have a negative effect on our ability to grow our business, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Our growth will depend on our ability to develop our brand and any failure to do so could limit our business prospects, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

We believe that establishing a strong brand will be critical to achieving widespread acceptance and adoption of our products and services. Promoting and positioning our brand will depend largely on the success of our marketing efforts, distribution channels and ability to provide high quality service. Establishing a significant brand presence for an online company often requires substantial marketing investment, and many "dot.com" companies have failed to generate the necessary adoption rates even after such a process. Brand promotion activities may not yield increased revenues, and even if they do, any increased revenues may not offset the expenses we incur in building the MyMedicalRecords brand. If we are not successful in building the MyMedicalRecords brand, it could limit our business prospects, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

The handling of medical records is highly regulated. Not only could we be subject to substantial liability for mishandling records if we fail to comply with applicable requirements or if third-parties gain unauthorized access to records or servers but our products may need constant revisions or modifications to comply with an increasingly complex regulatory regime.

The proper handling of health information, what is included not only in a patient's medical record but potentially elsewhere within the healthcare provider's organization is subject to extensive state and federal regulations and legal requirements, and we anticipate incurring significant costs to keep informed of and in compliance with such regulations and requirements. The volume and complexity of the regulations is daunting, many have changed substantially in recent years, and all are subject to the uncertainties of interpretation.

We recognize the critical nature of managing an individual's health information requires that our products and advances be implemented with the utmost care to protect the privacy and confidentiality of our customers' data. HIPAA requires covered entities to protect the privacy and confidentiality of the protected health information, or PHI, of their patients and customers. Although we are not a covered entity (as that term is defined in HIPAA), we consider it important to take into account the Privacy and Security Standards and other requirements of HIPAA when implementing our products and services and believe that we meet and/or exceed current HIPAA standards.

The HITECH Act, expanded HIPAA's reach beyond that of just covered entities. Now, business associates, defined as entities that perform a function, activity, or service on behalf of a covered entity and that require use of or access to the PHI of the covered entity, as well as vendors of PHRs that use or access PHI, must also comply with the HIPAA's Security Standards and many of HIPAA's Privacy Standards. One of the key obligations under HITECH is the requirement to notify individuals when there has been (or there is a strong possibility of) a breach of the individual's PHI.

Further, our products and services may become subject to greater regulation, particularly at the federal level. We may have to reduce, enhance or remove certain offerings to comply with new regulatory standards. If we are not able to effectively modify our product and service offerings to adapt to stricter standards, it could have a material adverse effect on our ability to grow our business and our results of operations and financial condition.

Because of the types of agreements that we enter into with our customers for our products, there is a significant time lag between the date of the agreement or license and product launch and revenue generation, which may be significant.

11


In the ordinary course of our business, we enter into agreements with certain customers that typically provide for customization of our product. The degree of customization can vary from simple modifications required to co-brand to highly tailored product modifications, which require significant development efforts on our part. Because these customer arrangements typically do not provide for payment of revenues until product launch, there is often a time lag between the date we enter into an agreement or license with a particular customer and when we begin generating revenues. This time lag can be significant in some cases a year or longer especially when there is a high degree of customization or translation involved requiring extensive product development efforts. Thus, even if we are successful in negotiating agreements and licenses with many customers to co-brand or private label our products for such customers, because of the nature of our arrangements with our customers, there is a risk that it may be some time before we generate revenues from such arrangements, if at all.

Our executive officers and directors may have interests that are different from, or in addition to, those of our stockholders generally.

Our executive officers and directors may have interests that are different from, or are in addition to, those of our stockholders generally. These interests include having debt with a balance of $1,355,761 million at December 31, 2013 secured by a security interest in substantially all of our assets, the provision and continuation of indemnification and insurance arrangements for our directors, as well as certain other interests described elsewhere in this prospectus. Notably, our current President, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Robert H. Lorsch, may be deemed to beneficially control a total of 14% of our voting capital stock, as of December 31, 2013, including shares issuable upon exercise of options and warrants held by Mr. Lorsch and The RHL Group. Because of his high percentage of beneficial ownership, Mr. Lorsch may be able to control matters requiring the vote of stockholders, including the election of our board of directors and certain other significant corporate actions. This control could delay, defer or prevent others from initiating a potential merger, takeover or other change in our control, even if these actions would benefit our other stockholders and us. This control could adversely affect the voting and other rights of our stockholders and could depress the market price of our common stock.

Risks Related to Our Common Stock

Our stock price is expected to continue to be volatile, and the market price of our common stock may drop further.

The market price of our common stock could continue to be subject to significant fluctuations. Moreover, the stock markets in general have experienced substantial volatility that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of individual companies. These broad market fluctuations may also adversely affect the trading price of our common stock. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company's securities, stockholders have often instituted class action securities litigation against those companies. Such litigation, if instituted, could result in substantial costs and diversion of management attention and resources, which could significantly harm our operating results, financial condition, profitability and/or reputation.

We do not expect to pay cash dividends, and accordingly, stockholders must rely on stock appreciation for any return on their investment.

We anticipate that we will retain our earnings, if any, for future growth and therefore do not anticipate paying cash dividends in the future. As a result, only appreciation of the price of our common stock will provide a return to stockholders. Investors seeking cash dividends should not invest in our common stock.

Provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws and applicable Delaware law may prevent or discourage third parties or our stockholders from attempting to replace our management or influence significant decisions.

Provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of our company or our management, even if doing so would be beneficial to our stockholders. These provisions include:

  • Dividing our Board of Directors into three classes serving staggered three-year terms;
  • Authorizing our Board of Directors to issue preferred stock without stockholder approval;
  • Prohibiting cumulative voting in the election of directors;
  • Prohibiting stockholder actions by written consent;
  • Limiting the persons who may call special meetings of stockholders;
  • Prohibiting our stockholders from making certain changes to our certificate of incorporation or bylaws except with 66.7% stockholder approval; and
  • Requiring advance notice for raising business matters or nominating directors at stockholders' meetings.

We are also subject to provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law that, in general, prohibits any business combination with a beneficial owner of 15% or more of our common stock for three years unless the holder's acquisition of our stock was approved in advance by our Board of Directors. Together, these charter and statutory provisions could make the removal of management more difficult and may discourage transactions that otherwise could involve payment of a premium over prevailing market prices for our common stock.

12


There is currently a limited trading market for our common stock, which may limit our stockholders' ability to sell shares of our stock.

Our common stock is currently quoted on the over-the-counter bulletin board, or OTC:QB. Although our common stock has shown to have a healthy trading volume, due to the limitations of the over the counter market, and the penny stock regulations described below, our investors may not be able to sell their shares due to the inherent limitations of such trading market.

We are subject to penny stock regulations and restrictions, which could make it difficult for stockholders to sell their shares of our stock.

SEC regulations generally define "penny stocks" as equity securities that have a market price of less than $5.00 per share or an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exemptions. We do not fall within any exemptions from the "penny stock" definition and are subject to Rule 15g-9 under the Exchange Act, which regulations are commonly referred to as the "Penny Stock Rules." The Penny Stock Rules impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers prior to selling penny stocks, which may make it burdensome to conduct transactions in our shares. Accordingly, it may be difficult to sell shares of our stock, and because it may be difficult to find quotations for shares of our stock, it may be impossible to accurately price an investment in our shares. In addition to the Penny Stock Rules, we are unable to utilize the safe harbor provisions of the Forward Looking Statements sections of the Exchange Act. There can be no assurance that our common stock will qualify for an exemption from the Penny Stock Rules in the future. In any event, we are subject to Section 15(b)(6) of the Exchange Act, which gives the SEC the authority to restrict any person from participating in a distribution of a penny stock if the SEC determines that such a restriction would be in the public interest.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, or FINRA, sales practice requirements may also limit a stockholder's ability to buy and sell our stock.

In addition to the Penny Stock Rules described above, FINRA has adopted rules that require that in recommending an investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that customer. Prior to recommending speculative low-priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer's financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other information. Under interpretations of these rules, FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative low priced securities will not be suitable for at least some customers. FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their customers buy our common stock, which may limit your ability to buy and sell our stock and have an adverse effect on the market for our shares.

A significant amount of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock are restricted securities and may not be freely resold to the public. When the restriction on any or all of these shares is lifted, and the shares are sold in the open market, the price of our common stock could be adversely affected through dilution of existing shares.

A significant amount of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock are "restricted securities" as defined under Rule 144 promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and may only be sold pursuant to an effective registration statement or an exemption from registration, if available. Although Rule 144 may not be immediately available to permit resales of such shares, once available, and given the number of shares that would no longer be restricted, sales of shares by our shareholders, whether pursuant to Rule 144 or otherwise, could have an immediate negative effect upon the price of our common stock.

When we issue additional shares in the future, it will likely result in the dilution of our existing stockholders.

Our certificate of incorporation authorizes the issuance of up to 1,250,000,000 shares of common stock with a $0.001 par value and 5,000,000 preferred shares with a par value of $0.001. As of December 31, 2013, 684,367,465 common shares were issued and outstanding and no shares of preferred stock were issued and outstanding. If we issue any additional shares, such issuance will cause a reduction in the proportionate ownership and voting power of all current stockholders. Further, such issuance may result in a change of control of our corporation.

Moreover, in the past, we issued warrants and options to acquire shares of common stock. As of December 31, 2013, we had warrants, options and convertible notes to purchase an aggregate of 203,329,108 shares of our common stock. In addition, the issuance of any shares for acquisition, licensing or financing efforts, upon conversion of any preferred stock or exercise of warrants and options, pursuant to our equity compensation plans, or otherwise may result in a reduction of the book value and market price of the outstanding shares of our common stock.

13


Risks Related to this Offering

We registered the resale of up to 100,000,000 shares of common stock which may be issued to Granite under the Facility. The resale of such shares by Granite could depress the market price of our common stock and you may not be able to sell your investment for what you paid for it.

We registered the resale of up to 100,000,000 shares of common stock under the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part and which was effective May 29, 2012. From May 29, 2012, the effective date of the registration, until the expiration of the Investment Agreement, we may issue up to 100,000,000 shares to Granite pursuant to the Facility. As of March 4, 2014, there were 722,852,821 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding. The sale of any or all shares remaining under the registration into the public market by Granite could depress the market price of our common stock and you may not be able to sell your investment for what you paid for it.

Existing stockholders could experience substantial dilution upon the issuance of common stock pursuant to the Facility.

This prospectus relates to the resale of up to 100,000,000 shares of our common stock by Granite from the effective date of registration, May 29, 2012 until the expiration of the Investment Agreement. As of March 4, 2014, we had 722,852,821 shares outstanding. The sale by Granite of shares pursuant to this prospectus could result in a substantial dilution to our stockholders' current ownership.

Furthermore, the Investment Agreement contemplates our issuance of up to 100,000,000 shares of our common stock to Granite, subject to certain restrictions and obligations. If the terms and conditions of the Investment Agreement are satisfied, and we choose to exercise our draw rights to the fullest extent permitted and sell 100,000,000 shares of our common stock to Granite, our existing stockholders' ownership will be further diluted by such sales. Consequently, the value of your investment may decrease.

Granite will pay less than the then-prevailing market price for our common stock under the Facility.

The common stock to be issued to Granite pursuant to the Investment Agreement will be purchased at a 5% discount to the lowest daily volume weighted average price, VWAP, of our common stock during the five consecutive trading day period beginning on the trading day immediately following the date of delivery of a draw notice by us to Granite, subject to certain exceptions. Therefore, Granite has a financial incentive to sell our common stock upon receiving the shares to realize the profit equal to the difference between the discounted price and the market price. If Granite sells the shares, the price of our common stock could decrease.

We may not be able to access sufficient funds under the Facility when needed.

Our ability to make a draw from Granite and obtain funds under the Facility is limited by the terms and conditions in the Investment Agreement, including restrictions on when we may exercise our draw rights, restrictions on the amount we may draw from Granite at any one time, which is determined in part by the trading volume of our common stock, and a limitation on our ability to make a draw from Granite to the extent that it would cause Granite to beneficial own more than 4.99% of our common stock. Accordingly, the Facility may not be available to satisfy all of our funding needs, even if we are able and choose to take full advantage of the Facility.

USE OF PROCEEDS

We will not receive any proceeds from the resale of our common stock offered by Granite. However, we will receive proceeds from the sale of our common stock to Granite pursuant to the Investment Agreement. The proceeds from our draws under the Facility will be used to support the commercialization of our current and future product candidates, for general working capital needs, and for other purposes that our board of directors, in its good faith, deems to be in our best interest.

All net proceeds from the sale of the common stock covered by this prospectus will go to the selling stockholder. See "Selling Stockholder" and "Plan of Distribution" described below.

14


SELLING STOCKHOLDER

The information provided in the table and discussions below has been obtained from Granite, the selling stockholder. The table below identifies the selling stockholder and shows the number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by it before and after this offering, and the numbers of shares offered for resale by the selling stockholder. Our registration of these shares does not necessarily mean that the selling stockholder will sell all or any of their shares of common stock. However, the "Shares Beneficially Owned After Offering" columns in the table assume that all shares covered by this prospectus will be sold by the selling stockholder and that no additional shares of common stock will be bought or sold by the selling stockholder. No estimate can be given as to the number of shares that will be held by the selling stockholder after completion of this offering because the selling stockholder may offer some or all of the shares and, to our knowledge, there are currently no agreements, arrangements or understanding with respect to the sale of any of the shares. In addition, the selling stockholder may have sold, transferred or otherwise disposed of, or may sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of, at any time or from time to time since the date on which it provided the information regarding the shares, all or a portion of the shares of common stock beneficially owned in transactions exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act. As used in this prospectus, "selling stockholder" includes the person or persons listed in the table below, and the donees, pledgees, transferees or other successors-in-interest selling shares received from the named selling stockholder as a gift, pledge, distribution or other transfer.

The following table sets forth the name of the selling stockholder, and if applicable, the nature of any position, office, or other material relationship which the selling stockholder has had, within the past three years, with us or with any of our predecessors or affiliates, the amount of shares of our common stock beneficially owned by the stockholder prior to the offering, the amount being offered for the stockholder's account, and the amount to be owned by such stockholder after completion of the offering. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3(d) promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Exchange Act, and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. The number and percentage of shares beneficially owned is determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 of the Exchange Act and is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Applicable percentage ownership is based on 374,009,083 shares of common stock outstanding as of April 23, 2012. Except as otherwise noted, we believe that the stockholder named in the table has sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock shown as beneficially owned by it, subject to applicable community property laws.

 

 

Shares Beneficially Owned
Prior to Offering(1)

 

 

 

Shares Beneficially Owned
After Offering(1)

Beneficial Owner

 

Ownership
Before
Offering

 

Percentage
Before
Offering

 

Shares Being
Offered Under
this
Prospectus

 

Number of
Shares
Owned
After
Offering (1)

 

Percentage
Owned
After
Offering

Granite State Capital, LLC (2)

 

1,000,000

 

*

 

100,000,000

(3)

1,000,000

 

*

_____________

* Percentage of shares owned does not exceed one percent.

(1) This column assumes the selling stockholder sells all of its shares being offered pursuant to this prospectus.

(2) Granite State Capital, LLC is a Delaware limited liability company. Theodore Smith is the president of Granite with voting and investment power over the shares.

(3) Represents the maximum number of shares issuable by us and purchasable by Granite under the Investment Agreement, all of which are being offered by the selling stockholder under this prospectus.

15


MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Market Information

From April 22, 2009 through July 2012 our common stock traded on the OTC:BB under the symbol "MMRF.OB". Starting in July 2012, our common stock began trading on the OTC:QB. From October 3, 2008 to April 21, 2009, our common stock traded on the OTC:BB under the symbol "FVRL.OB".

The following table presents the high and low closing prices for our common stock for the periods indicated.

     

High

   

Low

2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

January 1, 2014 - March 31, 2014

 

$

0.05

 

$

0.03

             

2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

January 1, 2013 - March 31, 2013

 

$

0.03

 

$

0.02

April 1, 2013 - June 30, 2013

 

 

0.10

 

 

0.03

July 1, 2013 - September 30, 2013

 

 

0.06

 

 

0.03

October 1, 2013 - December 31, 2013

 

 

0.04

 

 

0.03

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

January 1, 2012 - March 31, 2012

 

0.05

 

$

0.03

April 1, 2012 - June 30, 2012

 

 

0.03

 

 

0.01

July 1, 2012 - September 30, 2012

 

 

0.03

 

 

0.02

October 1, 2012 - December 31, 2012

 

 

0.03

 

 

0.02

Holders

As of December 31, 2013, we had approximately 3,509 stockholders, including beneficial owners of the common stock whose shares are held in the names of various dealers, clearing agencies, banks, brokers and other fiduciaries.

Dividends

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital stock. We currently intend to retain all of our future earnings, if any, to finance the growth and development of our business. We do not intend to pay cash dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future. Any future determination related to dividend policy will be made at the discretion of our Board of Directors.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2013.

Plan category

 

Number of securities
to be issued upon
exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights

Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights

Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column (a))

 

 

 

(a)

(b)

(c)

 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

 

21,294,557 

$0.11

35,705,443 

(1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

 

107,019,006 

$0.08

-  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

128,313,563 

$0.08

35,705,443 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1) Includes a total of 57 million shares of our common stock reserved for issuance under our 2011 Equity Incentive Plan.

16


OUR BUSINESS

Organizational History

MMRGlobal, Inc. (referred to herein, unless otherwise indicated, as "MMR", the "Company," "we," "us," and "our") was originally incorporated as Favrille, Inc. ("Favrille") in Delaware in 2000, and since its inception and before the Merger (as defined below), operated under a different management team as a biopharmaceutical company focused on the development and commercialization of targeted immunotherapies for the treatment of cancer and other diseases of the immune system.

On January 27, 2009, the Company, through MyMedicalRecords, Inc., what is now our wholly-owned operating subsidiary, originally incorporated as MyMedicalRecords.com, Inc., ("MMR Inc.") in Delaware in 2005, conducted a reverse merger with Favrille. We refer to this transaction as the "Merger".

On February 9, 2009, and in connection with the Merger, we changed our legal entity name from Favrille, Inc. to MMR Information Systems, Inc. Subsequently, on June 16, 2010, we changed our legal entity name to MMRGlobal, Inc., which we believe more accurately reflects the nature of our operations.

On March 8, 2011 we formed a subsidiary, which we named MMR Life Sciences Group, Inc., exclusively to maximize the value of our biotech assets including our anti-CD20 antibodies and related FavId™/Specifid™ vaccine technologies identified by our Management as remaining assets from the Merger. As of this date, the assets have not been transferred to the subsidiary.

On March 28, 2012 we formed a subsidiary, which we named Expression Systems, LLC, exclusively to hold a certain group of insect samples from the Merger which we believe are an intricate part of the manufacturing process of the FavId™/Specifid™ idiotype vaccine.

Our Business Subsequent to the Merger

Following the Merger, we adopted MMR Inc.'s business of empowering consumers to manage their Personal Health Records ("PHR") and other important documents, whether paper-based or digital, and by doing so, to better control and organize their lives overall. Starting in 2005, MMR Inc. began filing patents for PHRs that could be used by any person or any healthcare professional anywhere in the world regardless of the technology on the other end. Today, we provide patented secure online storage and document management solutions for Personal Health Records and other important documents such as insurance policies, deeds, driver's license, IDs, passports, estate planning documents, advance directives, photos, as well as legal and travel documents among others.

We expanded our operations and added document imaging, storage and management solutions as a product line directed to healthcare professionals. The product is called MMRPro and it is designed to eliminate paper and allow health care professionals to run their medical offices without dramatically changing the way they operate allowing them to store and share health records with their patients on a real-time basis.

We now have numerous Health Information Technology ("HIT") and Biotech patents issued, pending, and applied for in the United States and numerous other countries around the world. As a result, we have evolved from an operating business selling products and services to consumers and healthcare professionals to a company whose value proposition is based on a combination of factors including:

  • A personal health records company specializing in storing medical records and other important documents for consumers and health care professionals
  • A document imaging and management company for healthcare professionals
  • A licensor of Biotech Intellectual Property based on a portfolio of biotech assets developed at a cost of more than 100 million dollars
  • And a licensor of Health Information Technology patents and other Intellectual Property in numerous counties around the world

Business Overview

The following description of our business relates to our current business and operations.

Since inception, MMR's health IT business has evolved from a development company, to a provider and reseller of Personal Health Records and document imaging and scanning systems (MMR Services), to a Licensor of MMR's intellectual property. And during 2013, developments in the industry were positive for us as a provider of patented Personal Health Records driven by the need for eligible healthcare professionals to provide over 50% of patients online access to their health information such as through a PHR or patient portal starting in January 2014. This was part of the patient engagement requirements under Meaningful Use Stage 2 finalized in August 2012 to fully qualify for payments under the EHR Incentive Program mandated by the HITECH Act, and usage is expected to expand to 90% with Stage 3 Meaningful Use requirements. We anticipate that we will continue to benefit from patient engagement measures both as mandated by the government and also because of factors driven by the private sector, such as consumers having to take on a greater share of their healthcare costs, employer worksite wellness programs, the web-based personal medical home, and the interest in web-based social networking and the Health 2.0 movement.

17


Industry developments coupled with the strength of our health IT patents, which are discussed further below, are expected to increase demand for our products and services. MMR's vision from the start was to provide patients and families with an easy-to-use online system for accessing their medical records and other important documents and securely sharing them with all their healthcare providers using MMR's proprietary technology platform. Since our company began, we have made it our mission to ensure the patient shares in the electronic exchange of his or her health data along with their providers so they can make the informed decisions necessary to better manage their care and participate in cost savings that can accrue from timely access to information. We believed it was especially important for individuals and families to have access to their critical health information in the event of an emergency, from an individual emergency to a widespread natural disaster like Hurricanes Katrina and Sandy. So we conceived of multiple ways this communication could connect and be interoperable with various entities and we filed hundreds of patents and claims to this effect.

We currently own ten U.S patents, five of which were issued or allowed in 2013, which involve inventions pertaining to Personal Health Records, Patient Portals and other Electronic Health Record Systems, and include U.S. Patent Nos. 8,117,045; 8,117,646; 8,121,855; 8,301,466; 8,321,240; 8,352,287; 8,352,288; 8,498,883, 8,626,532 and 8,645,161.   The MyMedicalRecords, Inc. patent portfolio, with over 250 issued claims, also includes 17 pending U.S. applications with more than 400 claims. Adding to our international patent portfolio, MMR was issued a Japanese patent in February 2013 (#5191895). In September 2013, we received our Canadian patent #2,615,138, effectively giving us a dominant position throughout North America. MMR continues to have foreign patents issued, pending and applied for in numerous countries or regional authorities of commercial interest, including the United States, Australia, Singapore, New Zealand, Mexico, Japan, Canada, Hong Kong, South Korea, Israel and Europe.

We currently offer a suite of secure, online products that empower consumers and professionals alike to manage medical records and other important documents in their life and business, whether paper-based or digital. These online products include: (i)  MyMedicalRecords.com , an online PHR secure system for the entire family including pets; (ii) MyEsafeDepositBox, an online secure document storage system; (iii) MMRPro, an integrated scanning and web-based document management solution for healthcare professionals; and (iv) private label PHR and MyEsafeDepositBox storage solutions.

We also have an agreement with Microsoft® HealthVault® to integrate our services with their platform as demand for access to HealthVault® increases in the marketplace.

Our health information technology patents became the focus of our licensing and enforcement activities in 2012 and 2013, having been granted ten patents by the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO") directed towards health information technology along with additional HIT patents in seven other countries of commercial interest including Australia, others in New Zealand, Singapore, Japan, Mexico, and Canada. These patents have the potential effect of enabling us to control a dominant marketplace position in personal healthcare, being well-positioned to benefit from the explosion in health IT both in the U.S. and globally.

We also continue efforts to maximize the current and future value of the biotech assets acquired from Favrille, Inc. when the Merger was completed in January 2009. These assets include, but are not limited to, the exploitation and licensing of patents, data and samples from our pre-Merger clinical vaccine trials, the FavId™/Specifid™ idiotype vaccine, and the anti-CD20 antibodies. Anti-CD20 antibodies are useful in treating B-Cell malignancies, including Non- Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) and additional B-Cell mediated conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis. We understand the anti-CD20 antibody assets are potential candidates for the next generation of a Rituximab-type therapy. Rituximab is marketed under the trade name Rituxan® in the United States by Biogen Idec and Genentech (wholly owned member of the Roche Group) and under the name MabThera® by Roche in the rest of the world except Japan, where it is co- marketed by Chugai and Zenyaku Kogyo Co. Ltd. Rituxan® is one of the world's most successful monoclonal antibodies with reported annual sales of over USD $7.5 billion in 2013. Rituxan is due to go off patent in 2015.

We were an Independent Software Vendor of Kodak until Kodak filed for bankruptcy protection on January 19, 2012. During 2013, we filed a claim in the United States Bankruptcy Court Southern District of New York for $827,818.74 in damages from development and other costs incurred building MMRPro with Kodak. We are still purchasing Kodak scanners for use in our MMRPro products and services, but these Kodak scanners are now being purchased through Kodak resellers. Because of the Kodak bankruptcy, we decided to identify secondary suppliers for scanners and software in support of MMRPro. As a result, we recently announced that we have redesigned our MMRPro system to work with any scanning and/or imaging solution.

2013 Business Developments

Overview:

In 2012 and 2013, based on government regulations, industry growth and increased awareness, our licensing or patents became the focus of our business. Of the ten U.S patents, involving inventions pertaining to Personal Health Records, Patient Portals and other Electronic Health Record Systems, five U.S. patents were issued or allowed in 2013. Also in 2013, MMR was issued patents in Japan and Canada.

We utilize the services of McKee, Voorhees & Sease, our patent prosecution counsel since the filing of MMR's first patent applications in 2005, to file new applications with the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO"). In addition, we currently use Liner Grode Stein Yankelevitz Sunshine Regenstreif & Taylor LLP ("Liner") in contacting prospective infringers of our IP in an effort to educate them about MMR's portfolio of intellectual property, and file actions companies we believe infringe. Our patent licensing efforts increased significantly over the past year, and we continued contacting organizations regarding our health IT patents in an effort to create strategic business relationships and/or license our patented technology.

18


Adding to our biotech intellectual property portfolio in 2013 and early 2014, we received an additional U.S. patent from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for a "Method and Composition for Altering a B Cell Mediated Pathology" (Patent No. 8,637,638). Additional continuation patent filing has also been pursued in the U.S. to obtain still further protection for the compositions and methods of manufacturing compositions for B-cell vaccines used in the fight against lymphoma and potentially other forms of cancer. Significant manufacturing patent protection has been obtained in the U.S., including U.S. Patent Nos. 8,637,638; 8,114,404; 8,113,486 and 6,911,204, Mexico, Singapore, Hong Kong, Japan and Europe, and is pending in various other countries of commercial interest. In 2013, we finalized the validation in countries of commercial interest for its European Union patent (European Patent No. 01979228.2) directed at "Method and Composition for Altering a B Cell Mediated Pathology," protecting the manufacturing of our B-cell vaccines (which was under appeal in Europe for some time). This issued patent is currently validated in numerous countries of commercial interest including the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Switzerland, Spain, Italy, the Netherlands, Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Ireland and Belgium.

The biotech intellectual property portfolio also includes patents and applications directed to "Antibodies and Methods for Making and Using Them." The first U.S. patent protecting anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies was issued in mid-2013 (Patent No. 8,465,741), followed by the first Australian patent (2007338607) and thereafter South Korean patent (10-2009-7015196) providing market protection of our specific antibodies that have particular utility in fighting cancers. These newly issued patents are in addition to the Mexican patent granted in 2012 for the antibody assets. Patents for our antibodies are also pending in a number of additional countries including the United States, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Hong Kong, India, Europe, Japan and Korea. All together, these patents and pending applications represent a valuable addition to our biotechnology portfolio acquired as a result of MMR's reverse merger with Favrille, Inc. in 2009. Favrille invested more than $100 million in research and development on its FavId™/Specifid™ vaccine trials and use of customized tumor cells to treat lymphoma patients and other technologies. MMR has continued to make progress in protecting our IP, including its anti-CD20 antibodies, and seeks licensing agreements that include milestone payments such as what we have with Celgene.

Although we continue to seek ways to maximize the value of our biotech assets through licensing and strategic business opportunities with universities and other biotech companies, we remain focused on our primary business, which is the development and distribution of the MyMedicalRecords Personal Health Record, MMRPro, and other related solutions in health IT, as well as the protection and enforcement of our intellectual property. The growth in Telemedicine is expected to fuel the value of our IP because Telemedicine portals require connectivity to the patient, giving MMR the opportunity to increase revenue by offering a combined Alcatel-Lucent platform with MMR's patented PHR through organizations and employers with direct connection to the doctor and wellness management tools.

We also plan to provide automated data exchange with Blue Button sites offered by the VA and at Medicare.gov. This is in addition to our own branded  MyBlueButton.com  portal. We are also beginning to see a trend toward providing Personal Health Records for animals and through relationships with horse, dog and cat owners, and therefore we plan on selling our PHRs into the $5 billion U.S. pet market.

Additionally, we will continue to use social media to build greater awareness for our products and services. In 2013, we increased utilization of social media (YouTube, Facebook, Twitter) to enhance brand loyalty for our MyMedicalRecords PHR and connect with a greater number of potential users. We are also rolling out an affiliated marketing program, in which marketing partners such as list publishers and health-related websites will be offered the ability to bring the Personal Health Record to their customers on a "Per Acquisition" basis, which means MMR only pays them if we received a paid subscription. This program can give MMR the ability to put its marketing message in front of millions of new viewers, in a targeted way, without having to pay costs of advertising upfront.

2013 Announcement Highlights:

January 7, 2013: We signed a patent license agreement with Interbit Data under which Interbit would sell MMR's MyMedicalRecords to any of their 750 hospital clients nationwide who wanted a PRH interface. Our software, developed with Interbit Data, allows hospitals and other clinical facilities to use a Meaningful Use certified solution to make health information available to patients using the MMRPatientView portal. The MMR-Interbit Data module is certified for meaningful use with MEDITECH EMR systems.

January 9, 2013: We announced it was issued two patents on January 8, 2013 from the USPTO: U.S. Patent No. 8,352,287 entitled "Method for Proving a User with a Service for Accessing and Collecting Personal Health Records," and U.S. Patent No. 8,352,288 entitled "Method for Providing a User with a Web-based Service for Accessing and Collecting Records." The significance of these patents is that they help expand MMR's claims beyond healthcare, specifically the `288 Patent, which relates to collecting records from service providers in addition to healthcare providers.

January 28, 2013: We announced that the Japan Patent Office allowed Patent Application No. 2008-529977 (subsequently issued on February 8, 2013 as Patent #5191895), entitled "Method and System for Providing Online Medical Records." Additional patent applications are also pending in Japan. At the same time, we announced approval of our European Union patent application protecting certain methods of manufacturing compositions for B-cell vaccines. (This was subsequently issued as European Patent No. 01979228.2 and is currently validated in numerous countries of commercial interest including the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Switzerland, Spain, Italy, the Netherlands, Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Ireland and Belgium.)

19


January 31, 2013: We announced the filing of our first HIT patent infringement lawsuit against Walgreen Co., the nation's largest drugstore chain.

February 11, 2013: In a joint announcement, MMR and Fairway Physicians Insurance Company stated that MMR agreed to provide Fairway the ability to offer its hospital malpractice insurance clients a prepaid license for use of the MyMedicalRecords, Inc. patent portfolio. The program will prepay MMR for a license to the MMR Patent Portfolio for Fairway's hospital malpractice insurance clients. Fairway and its affiliates reach more than 200 hospitals nationwide.

February 12, 2013: We also announced we filed a patent infringement lawsuit against WebMD Health Corp. and its wholly owned subsidiary, WebMD Health Services Group, Inc. ("WebMD"), the leading online healthcare website.

April 11, 2013: We announced we filed a patent infringement complaint against Quest Diagnostics Inc., the world's leading provider of diagnostic information services, on April 10, 2013, alleging that Quest is infringing on MMR's Personal Health Record patent, specifically U.S. Patent No. 8,301,466, and as a result, MMR is seeking monetary damages as well as a permanent injunction.

April 15, 2013: The United States Patent and Trademark Office issued a Notice of Allowance for our anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, U.S. Serial No. 11/855,943 entitled "Antibodies and Methods for Making and Using Them."   This represented the first patent (issued on June 18, 2013 as U.S. Patent No. 8,465,741) to be granted in the U.S. for our cancer-fighting anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody assets.

April 22, 2013: We reported that the Australian Patent Office issued a Notice of Allowance for our anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody assets, #2007338607. Titled "Antibodies and Methods for Making and Using Them," the patent application was originally filed on September 14, 2007. We believe this to be significant as it reinforced the value of the U.S. antibody patent that was announced one week earlier on April 15, and the similar antibody patent that was issued in Mexico in August 2012. (Subsequently, on January 31, 2014, we reported that it had received confirmation of its first issued patent application for the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies in South Korea.)

May 17, 2013: We announced the addition of Jeremy Fine, M.D. and Cara Natterson, M.D. to our Medical Board of Advisors. Dr. Natterson is a Board- Certified Pediatrician, consultant and The New York Times best-selling author on child health and parenting, assisting us with its plans to educate parents on the importance of having a Personal Health Record for their children as well as the best ways to offer PHR products and services through pediatricians. Dr. Fine is a Concierge Medicine Specialist and Board-Certified in Internal Medicine.

May 20, 2013: We announced the filing of a patent infringement complaint against Jardogs, LLC, a subsidiary of Allscripts, on May 16, 2013 for infringing on our Personal Health Record patents, including U.S. Patent No. 8,301,466, and as a result, we are seeking monetary damages as well as a permanent injunction. According to the complaint, Jardogs provides a product called FollowMyHealth™ Universal Health Record; the complaint alleges that Jardogs, while infringing on our patent, also has induced others including Allscripts, distributors, agents, resellers and users to infringe one or more claims of the patent.

May 28, 2013: MMR elected a leading scientist in the cancer field, Ivor Royston, M.D., to our Board of Directors. Dr. Royston, a physician, entrepreneur- financier and recognized leader in cancer research, is Founding Managing Member of Forward Ventures who is credited as a founding father of San Diego's biotech industry. He previously served on MMRGlobal's Board of Advisors.

June 3, 2013: We retained legal counsel to represent us in Australia with respect to the possible exploitation of our MyMedicalRecords Australia health IT patents, numbers 2006202057 and 200820, and Intellectual Property by the National E-Health Transition Authority (NEHTA) and others.

June 25, 2013: We received a biotechnology patent, No. 1052295B, in Hong Kong for "Method and Composition for Altering a B Cell Mediated Pathology," protecting certain methods of manufacturing compositions for B-Cell vaccines used in the fight against lymphoma and potentially other forms of cancer.

July 31, 2013: We received our eighth U.S. health IT patent, 8,498,883, entitled "Method for Providing a User with a Service for Accessing and Collecting Prescriptions" issued by the USPTO on July 30, 2013. The `883 Patent has 28 claims directed toward providing a user with the ability to access and manage prescriptions online by providing features that include sending prescriptions to a pharmacy, accessing prescriptions from a pharmacy, scheduling prescription refills, sending reminders regarding prescription refills including by text or email, and identifying adverse drug interactions by analyzing prescription medications.

August 19, 2013: We announced that as a result of China's participation in the Patent Prosecution Highway Program, and the issuance of a patent to us for our anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies in the U.S., we received confirmation from China of the filing on August 15, 2013 of a divisional Chinese patent application, No. 200780051557.6. The filing was part of MMRGlobal's plan to expand the scope of its biotech assets, in particular, our issued U.S. Patent No. 8,465,741 directed at its anti-CD20 antibody assets.

20


August 26, 2013: One week following the announcement of the filing of a divisional Chinese patent application, we announced we had received confirmation of the filings - also under the expedited patent allowance program treaty referred to as the Patent Prosecution Highway ("PPH") - of a divisional application for its anti-CD20 antibody technology in Japan, No. P09277JP01, as well as the filing on August 23, 2013 of a divisional Korean patent application, No. 10-2013-7022383. These filings are all similarly titled "Antibodies and Methods for Making and Using Them."

September 5, 2013: We announced we had won an appeal in court that allowed us to proceed with the $30 million claim against Surgery Center Management, LLC ("SCM"). On September 4, 2013, the Appellate Court   ruled in our favor officially remanding the appeal of Surgery Center Management back to the trial court at Los Angeles County Superior Court where we will pursue our claim for breach of contract, seeking as much as $30 million in damages against SCM. The favorable decision was decided without oral argument by the parties, giving us a green light to move forward with the case in the trial court.

September 16, 2013: We announced that on September 10, 2014 we have been issued Canadian health IT Patent No. 2,615,128 with 40 claims including claims corresponding to those in U.S. Patent No. 8,301,466. Entitled "Method and System for Providing Online Medical Records," the Canadian patent expanded the scope of MMR's global patent portfolio, and with Mexico, includes all of North America in addition to other countries of commercial interest around the world.

September 24, 2013: We announced our patent infringement complaint against Allscripts Healthcare Solutions, Inc., a leading provider of EMR/EHRs to hospitals and doctor groups, filed on September 23, 2013. The complaint states that Allscripts is infringing on our Personal Health Record patents including U.S. Patent No. 8,301,466 and U.S. Patent No. 8,498,883. As a result of a transaction whereby Allscripts acquired all or substantially all of the assets of Jardogs, LLC in or about March 2013, Allscripts provides products and services under FollowMyHealth™ Universal Health Record. We believe that Allscripts infringes on our patents through the sale of FollowMyHealth™ along with other health information services for consumers and healthcare providers.

September 30, 2013: We announced we received a Notice of Allowance from the USPTO for Patent Application Serial No. 13/714,694 entitled "Method for Providing a User with a Web-based Service for Accessing and Collecting Health Records." The patent (subsequently issued as U.S. Patent No. 8,626,532 on January 7, 2014) with 27 claims enables users to access and collect their medical records, communicate with healthcare providers, manage prescriptions, and perform other functions using a wireless device amongst other systems to privately and securely access and share their protected health information wherever and whenever they need to.

October 2, 2013: We announced receiving additional patent protection in the U.S., Japan and Mexico for our B-cell cancer vaccines. We received a Notice of Allowance from the USPTO for the patent, U.S. Serial No. 3/293,495, entitled "Method and Composition for Altering a B-cell Mediated Pathology," representing the fourth U.S. manufacturing patent that covers the methods for making compositions for B-cell vaccines used in the fight against lymphoma. MMR also received a similarly titled NOA in Mexico, Serial No. MX/a/2012/009182, resulting in the third issued patent in Mexico to protect this technology. At the same time, we announced we had also filed a divisional application in Japan involving similar technology in an effort to retain another pending application in Japan. The application was filed with the Japan Patent Office to introduce 26 additional patent claims under Patent Application No. 2013-186384 protecting "Altering a B Cell Pathology Using Self-Derived Antigens in Conjunction with Specific-Binding Cytoreductive Agent." Additional patent applications are also pending in Japan.

October 3, 2013: We announced the filing of a complaint against WebMD for infringement of two U.S. Personal Health Record patents, specifically U.S. Patent No. 8,301,466 (the '466 Patent) and U.S. Patent No. 8,498,883 (the '883 Patent). We had previously announced, on June 7, 2013, that we had dismissed our complaint of February 11, 2013 against WebMD to give the two companies time to resolve the matter, retaining the right to refile the litigation at any time as the dismissal was without prejudice. On October 2, 2013, we refiled the complaint, electing to file the current complaint to include the `883 Patent, which had been granted on July 30, 2013.

November 4, 2013: The United States District Court, Central District of California granted on November 1, 2013 our motion to consolidate our complaint for patent infringement against Allscripts Healthcare Solutions, Inc. with our previously filed complaint against Jardogs, LLC. We also announced that two days earlier the court approved our request to amend our complaint against Quest Diagnostics Inc., to add a second patent, U.S. Patent No. 8,498,883, entitled "Method for Providing a User with a Service for Accessing and Collecting Prescriptions."

December 5, 2013: We announced we received notice of our 10 th  U.S. healthcare IT patent, Serial No. 13/736,339, entitled "Method and System for Providing Online Records," (subsequently issued as U.S. Patent No. 8,645,161 on February 4, 2014). The most recent patent includes 30 claims directed toward methods for accessing and collecting health records by providing a user interface that further includes a number of additional features which collect and display prescriptions, help submit prescriptions to pharmacies, collect and display health insurance information, send outgoing faxes, allow users to annotate health records, and set up appointment reminders for visits with providers as well as recurring medication reminders through a calendaring function.

21


Our Products

Our suite of secure, web-based products all are built on proprietary, patented and patent-pending technologies that allow users to easily store, organize, retrieve and share their protected health information and other data in a timely and secure manner from anywhere in the world.

MyMedicalRecords - An Online Personal Health Record

Our consumer product, "MyMedicalRecords", is an easy-to-use, secure web-based PHR system, which allows documents, images and voice mail messages to be transmitted in and out of our system using a variety of methods, including fax, voice, and file upload. Most importantly, our system doesn't require or rely on any specific Electronic Medical Records ("EMR") platform to work; a consumer's MyMedicalRecords PHR can store and maintain medical records that are sent from any of the consumer's healthcare providers. A MyMedicalRecords PHR can receive and store medical records in a variety of secure formats, including image, voice, and discrete data in HL7, XML or other formats, that are exported or communicated from EHR, EMR or Telemedicine systems. The account holder receives a notification at virtually the same time new information is received in our system from their healthcare provider. This notification can be sent to up to three different user e-mail addresses (including text-enabled cell phones and smartphones). Our PHR is secured not only by a unique user ID, but also by multiple passwords. Further, the consumer can access his or her files via the Internet or a web-enabled phone and, using an intuitive, customized filing system, can categorize, annotate and file his or her records in a way that makes sense to him or her and that maximizes his or her easy access and subsequent retrieval of the records. In addition to giving each consumer greater control over his or her own PHR, each consumer can also quickly and easily print, download, e-mail or fax records from his or her PHR, sharing this information with healthcare providers and others as he or she moves through the continuum of care.

The Company is constantly in the process of evolving its products and adding new features that will facilitate connectivity with other systems such as Electronic Medical Records systems. The new features facilitate connectivity with any standalone EMR systems and other Electronic Medical Records systems, and laboratory reporting systems. Using an HL7 interface we are able to populate data, such as that required in a Continuity of Care Document, and send it as well as lab test results, medication lists and other discrete data directly to the consumer's MyMedicalRecords PHR. Further, and at the consumer's option, the system can electronically transmit PDFs from the consumer's confidentially maintained PHR directly into an EMR or EHR. We believe this robust multi-way communications capability will increase adoption of our system by consumers, vendors, and healthcare providers alike because our system can operate as a patient portal that can share electronic data across and between those with a need to access and use that data.

We are currently selling our MyMedicalRecords PHR product directly to consumers, corporations (as an employee benefit), physicians, small hospitals, surgery centers and other healthcare professionals including nursing associations, retail pharmacies, and veterinarians, and to affinity organizations as a "value- added" service for their members or clients. We introduced a Prepaid Personal Health Record Card at the start of 2012 through healthcare professionals, home healthcare agencies and facilities, and patient advocates. We plan on offering our Prepaid Personal Health Record Card through retailers in the near future. We also sell to insurance companies and plan to sell through financial services organizations. The PHR is offered both via the MyMedicalRecords web site and as a private- labeled product. When sold to employers and/or affinity groups, we count members as individuals who have received paid access to the MMR system through their employers' benefit programs or as a member benefit from a respective affinity group. We count users as the individuals in that member group that activate and commence usage of their individual PHR account. In addition, the MyMedicalRecords PHR is an important component of the MMRPro professional document management and imaging system, which we are selling to physician offices and other healthcare professionals (See section on "MMRPro").

Our MyMedicalRecords PHR product is bilingual in English and Spanish and allows users to store and segregate information for up to 10 family members in a single account. It is a patient-controlled PHR that provides portability for the user, which means our MyMedicalRecords PHR can stay with the individual through changes in doctors, jobs and insurers.

Through an Internet-based solution, the MyMedicalRecords PHR takes advantage of the one piece of equipment still being used in virtually every doctor's office: a fax machine. Healthcare providers can transmit documents to a patient's MyMedicalRecords PHR mailbox without making any changes to existing patient or practice management software. Our MyMedicalRecords PHR product can be used to provide secure storage for a variety of important confidential records, including:

  • Patient charts, notes, and medical histories;
  • Vaccination and immunization records;
  • Lab reports and test results, including any images (or, if offered by a laboratory, links that the user can use to access the laboratory's stored images);
  • Copies of prescription orders;
  • X-ray results and images (either the actual images or, if offered by a radiology provider, links that the user can use to access the provider's stored images);
  • EKG results and images (either the actual images or, if offered by an imaging provider, links that the user can use to access the provider's stored images);
  • Birth certificates, living wills, healthcare powers of attorney and advance directives;
  • Lab report and pharmacy records through 4medica; and
  • Telemedicine data through Alcatel-Lucent ng Connect

22


In addition, users can store important legal, insurance and financial documents, as well as copies of identification documents such as passports and driver's license in their MyMedicalRecords PHR account.

Users also have the ability to fax records out of their MyMedicalRecords PHR account using an integrated Internet fax service. This feature gives users the ability to easily share information with multiple providers with the privacy of web-based faxing that doesn't require them to print out documents and then place them in a physical fax machine. This feature also transforms the PHR into a proprietary integrated fax messaging service, which we believe provides a significant competitive advantage over other PHRs.

The MyMedicalRecords.com Personal Health Record allows patients to store and manage their records
and share information with providers, as they move along the continuum of care.

The MyMedicalRecords PHR product is designed to enable consumers to store their important medical records and other health information in one central and secure place where they can manage those records and control how they are accessed and shared. The market for our products is significant. While every healthcare consumer in the U.S., as well as those in other countries, is a potential user of the MyMedicalRecords PHR product, we believe that our product has the greatest appeal to the following particular market niches:

  • The chronically ill and their families and other caregivers who must share health information with and among many healthcare professionals (this "co-morbid population" represents a disproportionate share of U.S. healthcare costs);
  • Physicians who must provide patients with timely electronic access to their personal health information;
  • Individuals with Health Savings Accounts who need to carefully manage their eligible expenses over the course of a year;
  • Consumers who are caring for their "senior" parents and who need their parent's current medical information readily available in case of their parent's unexpected illness or emergency situation;
  • Consumers with newborns who will be able to build a complete medical file for the newborn, one that can be maintained and updated throughout the newborn's entire life;
  • Employees who are forced to change physicians and other healthcare providers when their employer changes health insurance plans and who therefore need to manage transferring their health information to new providers;
  • Consumers who are concerned about having access to their PHRs and other important documents in a disaster or other emergency;
  • Travelers and business people working overseas who might need to access their medical records in the event of an emergency;
  • Hospitals required to provide patients' discharge summaries and after-care instructions electronically;
  • Home healthcare professionals who need the efficiencies of technology, particularly PHRs, to maintain and share patient records and manage daily activities;
  • Wireless providers who are seeing smartphones increasingly used as a hub for remote patient monitoring devices that can export data to PHRs to improve coordination of care in the patient-centered medical home;
  • Veterans and Medicare recipients who are using Blue Button to transfer their respective health information into a comprehensive, portable and easy-to-use PHR;
  • Corporations seeking to offer their employees a valuable benefit, e.g. companies implementing workforce wellness programs and those with expatriate employees would be particularly interested;
  • Pharmacists who recognize PHRs as a way to offer consumer counseling more effectively and efficiently; and
  • Local, State, and Federal governmental agencies that need an immediate yet easy solution to help families and businesses preserve their vital documents in the event of a man-made or natural disaster.

We sell our MyMedicalRecords PHR product direct to consumers on a monthly and annual subscription basis. We use the Internet as a distribution channel where consumers can enroll in our service online. We also occasionally offer free trials and discounted pricing as a way to incentivize consumer acceptance of our MyMedicalRecords PHR product. The retail price point may be different than what the product is being sold for on the Internet.

We also offer a value-added service to our MyMedicalRecords PHR which we call Personal Touch. When a user enrolls in Personal Touch, their records are collected by a health professional, who then organizes them and places them into their PHR. Personal Touch is sold as an additional service and charged separately from the basic MyMedicalRecords Personal Health Record service.

23


For special key account programs, such as healthcare providers that would like to make the service available to patients, corporations who want to offer the service as a benefit to employees, insurance companies who offer this to policyholders, or affinity groups and other organizations who want to offer the service to their members, we provide different access-based pricing plans, which vary based on the number of people in the organization and the expected use of the product across the organization's members. For large corporate or key accounts, we co-brand or private label our site.

Additional Product Features

Our MyMedicalRecords PHR product offers users multiple ways to enter and maintain their personal medical information, including by fax, voice, digital file upload and online annotations as well as through customized web service links. We believe our patented integrated capability makes our MyMedicalRecords PHR product easier to use and more accessible to potential customers and healthcare professionals. This gives us a unique competitive advantage in the marketplace and creates a barrier to competitive entry. In addition to the core document conversion, storage and retrieval capabilities, our MyMedicalRecords PHR product provides a layer of useful, value-added interactive tools to help users better manage their personal and/or their families' medical records. These tools include:

  • Integration with Electronic Medical Record Systems and Laboratory Reporting Services.

We are integrating our PHR with laboratory reporting services, Electronic Medical Record and Electronic Health Record systems, beginning with 4medica, an integrated iEHR, which is used by thousands of doctors nationwide, through the creation of a messaging interface which was launched in 2013. In this workflow, the MyMedicalRecords Personal Health Record is able to exchange discrete data, such as patient demographic information and lab test results, with the clinical system. In addition, standard reports from the EMR system, such as the Continuity of Care Document (CCD) can be transmitted into the PHR either in PDF or discrete data format.

  • Forms Management and Electronic Signature

The MyMedicalRecords Personal Health Record also now supports the completion and secure electronic signing of doctor office forms. So a participating provider who offers the product to his or her patients can have them complete and sign Patient Intake, Registration, Consent and other forms before they get to the office. MyMedicalRecords can transmit the forms directly into a doctor's clinical system. This creates a major efficiency benefit for the doctor office.

  • Ability to Attach Received Faxes to E-mail Notifications.

Users can elect to have records attached to the notification e-mail they receive when a new medical record is received into their account. This capability is intended to save users the extra step of logging into their account to view new records, which we believe creates a higher level of convenience and usability.

  • Health History

Users can enter their personal health history, including information about doctors (such as a doctor's name, address and specialty), vaccinations and immunizations, hospitalizations/surgeries, allergies and other medical conditions that may affect ongoing healthcare.

  • Appointment Calendar Feature

Users are able to take advantage of a calendar feature to schedule and generate reminders about upcoming doctor and other health-related appointments. These reminders appear when a user logs into his or her MyMedicalRecords PHR account and also can be sent to the user's e-mail address (or e- mail enabled smartphone) and imported into any calendar program including Microsoft ®  Outlook ® .

  • Prescription History and Refill Reminder Feature

Users are able to enter their prescriptions, pharmacies and refill dates into their MyMedicalRecords PHR accounts. The system generates reminders about refills, which are visible to users when they log into their accounts and are sent to their e-mail addresses (or e-mail enabled cell phone).

  • Drug Information and Interaction Database

Users can check for potential interactions across multiple prescriptions and over the counter drugs with this comprehensive database, licensed from Multum. When each user adds a new drug to their MMR PHR prescription history, they can quickly determine if that medication has any kind of negative interaction with other prescriptions they take. This tool is especially vital because preventable adverse drug interactions kill as many as 100,000 and injure more than 1.5 million Americans each year. Consumers who see multiple providers are especially at risk.

24


  • Voice Reminders and Messaging

We have created our MyMedicalRecords PHR product to promote more efficient communication between doctors and patients. In addition to using a patient's personal MyMedicalRecords PHR telephone number to fax health information to a patient's secure online account, people can use the telephone number to leave a voice message, such as an appointment reminder, in a secure voice mailbox that is only accessible by the MyMedicalRecords PHR user. Users can also take advantage of this feature to leave themselves a reminder message such as for a doctor appointment or prescription refill reminder. Our MyMedicalRecords PHR product is designed to send a user a notification via e-mail when he or she receives a voice message. This gives users a helpful tool that they can access remotely.

  • Secondary Passwords on Selected File Folders

Users can assign a second password to four of the file folders in their MyMedicalRecords PHR account. This feature creates an additional layer of security for personal vital or medical documents that a MyMedicalRecords PHR user does not want a doctor to have access to in the event that the user has given the doctor access to the account, or if the user does not want other family members to be able to see selected information.

  • Emergency Login For Physicians and Other Emergency Response Personnel

Users can create a special password, one for each family member, which doctors and other emergency response personnel can use to gain access to the particular family member's medical records in the event of a medical emergency. This password grants access to an account but does not allow any additions, changes or deletions to be made to the account. In addition, users can decide which records a doctor will be able to see in an emergency situation. Users can write this password on an emergency sticker they receive when they enroll in our MyMedicalRecords PHR service, which can be affixed to a driver's license or personal ID. Users can even include a photograph in their emergency profile.

  • Health Information Library

Users have the option to access wellness programs and interactive audio and visual health encyclopedias, licensed from third-parties, in both English and Spanish.

  • Telemedicine.

We have integrated our PHR with the Alcatel Lucent ng Connect Telemedicine suite. This takes data directly from wireless Bluetooth monitoring devices, such as blood pressure monitors, and deposit readings directly into the MyMedicalRecords PHR. We believe that these enhancements will increase usability and make it easier for consumers to view their important medical records.

We are also working with a number of vendors to create mobile applications for its  MyMedicalRecords.com  PHR. This mobile application has already been deployed in beta mode for Android tablets and smartphones. A mobile version for iOS (iPhones and iPads) is also being developed.

Other Applications for Our MyMedicalRecords PHR Product Technologies

We believe our MyMedicalRecords PHR product technology presents potential market opportunities beyond its core "Personal Health Records" storage and management purpose. In the wake of recent hurricanes, tsunamis, earthquakes, fires and other disasters, a great deal of emphasis has been placed on families having a secure place to store their records and vital documents where they cannot be lost or damaged. Our MyMedicalRecords PHR product addresses this need because it allows for the fax transmission, upload and storage of insurance, financial and other personal documents, as well as a place to store digital files such as photographs. We believe this recent emphasis provides us with an opportunity to expand our core market and use our MyMedicalRecords PHR product technology to create the essential "safe deposit" box for all important documents and records of a family or small business. The MyEsafeDepositBox virtual storage product extends the MyMedicalRecords technology into these additional markets.

We also have a  MyBlueButton.com  initiative where veterans and Department of Defense personnel and others will be able to upload their health information from the Blue Button Initiative and/or MyHealth e Vet account to a MyMedicalRecords PHR, where they can manage all their medical data and other important information in one secure location. In addition to safely storing their Blue Button data file, each MyMedicalRecords account comes with a password-protected voice mailbox, inbound and outbound fax, a drug interaction tool and many other features to manage and track their health. MyMedicalRecords also allows them to store medical records for their family members, including pets, in one account.

25


MyEsafeDepositBox - An Online Secure Document Storage System

Our "MyEsafeDepositBox" service is geared towards small businesses, the financial, insurance and legal services industries. MyEsafeDepositBox is based on the same technology and architecture as the MyMedicalRecords PHR product. However, rather than focusing on storing medical records, MyEsafeDepositBox is designed to provide secure online storage for medical records and any other vital, financial, legal and insurance documents such as wills and advance directives.  MyEsafeDepositBox.com  may be used as a virtual on line "safe" and could serve as an essential part of any household's or business's disaster preparedness plan by securely storing important legal, insurance and financial documents that they cannot afford to lose. Such documents may include copies of insurance policies, deeds of trust, passport, birth certificate, photos of property and other vital documents in addition to medical records that are critical to retrieve in the event of a natural disaster such as an earthquake, hurricane, flood or fire.

We believe that the MyEsafeDepositBox product offers distinctive value in the online storage market due to our telecommunications platform enabling users to fax vital records directly into their MyEsafeDepositBox account without having to first scan paper-based records and have access to a computer to upload information, though the system can receive and store uploaded documents as well. It also permits service providers, such as insurance agents or lenders, to fax documents directly into a user's secure online account. Users also benefit from the ability to sort, store and manage their vital records, while also using a free form text search to find records stored in their account with specific annotations. Our ability to provide private label branding of this product affords banks, insurance companies, escrow services and other financial and legal businesses to provide not only a useful product but also a product that reinforces that business's identity.

In addition, we believe our MyEsafeDepositBox product may also serve as a valuable tool for younger consumers who would not otherwise utilize a PHR storage system, but are looking for a secure way to organize their personal information to take better control over their financial affairs

Because of the similarity in functionality between our MyMedicalRecords PHR product and our MyEsafeDepositBox product, we market these products through some of the same channels. The crossover marketing strategy for our MyMedicalRecords PHR product and MyEsafeDepositBox product focuses primarily on the following channels:

  • To corporate accounts, as an added employee benefit for their employees or bundled or co-branded with their product offerings to their customers;
  • To insurance companies who are looking for a valuable benefit to provide risk and accident policyholders both in the United States and abroad;
  • Through affinity groups (such as alumni organizations and other membership organizations) and discount health benefit membership groups to their members;
  • To associations and organizations seeking our solution as an emergency preparedness tool;
  • To charitable and critical illness organizations as ways to raise funds;
  • To legal, accounting, mortgage, and other organizations that have the need to securely store and transmit documents to and from their clients; and
  • Direct to consumers as a retail subscription product.

MyMedicalRecordsMD also known as MMRPro - An Integrated Scanning and Web-Based Document Management Solution for Medical Providers

Our MMRPro product provides physician offices with a powerful and cost-effective solution to the costly and time-consuming challenge of digitizing paper-based medical records, as well as providing doctors the access to those records through a private portal at  MyMedicalRecordsMD.com  (see  MMRPro.com  for more information). In addition, MMRPro features an integrated e-Prescribe automated drug order entry system and automatically deploys a patient's records to a free patient portal,  MMRPatientView.com , where patients can view and print out their records. MMRPro also includes its own "Stimulus Program" that allows physicians the opportunity to earn administrative reimbursements when their patients upgrade from the free MMRPatientView.com  portal to a full-featured, paid MyMedicalRecords PHR account. 

A typical EMR implementation costs well in excess of $100,000 and can take several weeks or months to integrate into a doctor's practice. Even worse, during this implementation, a doctor's office is asked to significantly reduce their patient load by as much as 50% which means that the practice loses one-half of its revenue during the implementation period and possibly longer. In a healthcare economy where patient load is critical to a doctor's financial success, this can be very problematic. MMRPro is sold on a three-year license, which includes all hardware, software and system management

We recently introduced a new version of MMRPro, MMRPro Plus, which allows the solution to work with virtually any scanner. MMRPro Plus installs as a client on an office computer instead of being built into the intelligence of the scanner. It offers the same features and functionality as the original MMRPro and therefore is ideal for officers where scanners already have been installed.

26


MMRPro is being marketed to:

  • Physicians, particularly small group and sole practitioners who still do not have any way to digitize the paper in their offices and who do not want to invest the hundreds of thousands of dollars necessary to implement an Electronic Medical Record, or EMR, system;
  • Other healthcare professionals such as dentists, veterinarians, and chiropractors;
  • Community hospitals and other clinics which do not have the funds or technology resources to invest in an EMR system;
  • Surgery centers and specialty clinics; and
  • EMR and Electronic Health Records ("EHR") vendors who are looking for a way to bring a PHR into their systems without having to build their own import modules.

MMRPro Features

  • Integration with EMR systems.

Through a partnership with Interbit Data (located in Natick, MA) we are part of a joint software solution that allows hospitals and other clinical facilities to instantly make health information available to patients securely over the Internet using the MMRPatientView portal from any EMR system without first having to scan, fax or print any documents. The Interbit Data- MMR module is certified for Meaningful Use with MEDITECH systems. Although the solution is only deployed for MEDITECH at this time, we believe that it can work with virtually any EMR platform, which opens up a significant new market opportunity for MMRGlobal.

  • Integrated e-Prescribe Module.

MMRPro also includes an integrated e-Prescribe module that gives doctors the ability to do automated prescription ordering and refills. The e-Prescribe software gives doctors a choice of all formulations for a given medication, as well as available generic alternatives and shows what patient benefit coverage will be for the prescription. Any special instructions for the patient can also be entered into the module so they are automatically printed on the prescription label. A prescription order can be faxed or automatically transmitted to the pharmacy. In addition, the e-Prescribe module also makes it possible for doctors to keep a drug history on all their patients, as well as check for any interactions and allergies in real-time.

  • Integrated Fax Messaging

MMRPro supports both inbound and outbound Internet fax. While fax continues to be a primary way doctors send and receive information such as lab reports, doctors are increasingly concerned about the privacy issues associated with a fax machine in an open area. MMRPro solves the problem by allowing faxes to be initiated from or delivered directly to admin or doctor computer desktops through its integrated fax messaging. Faxes, which are viewable as PDFs, can be assigned to different doctors in the practice and then filed as part of the patient record. Each practice receives one main fax number for the office, and then individual numbers can be assigned to each doctor in the practice.

  • Voice Messagin g.

MMRPro also accepts voice messages into its system so doctor can hear voice messages from labs or other providers and keep messages as part of the patient record.

  • Practice-specific Branding and Content

MMRPro allows providers to create custom content for their practices that patients see when they access records through the MMR Patient View portal. For example, a practice could use this feature to include a message to remind patients to get flu shots or give a wellness tip.

  • Practice-specific Forms Management

A practice can maintain its own library of forms that it uses most often, such as admissions, insurance and treatment forms and print these, with the bar code, on demand when patients come in for an appointment.

  • Dynamic Communication with Doctor's Practice Management System.

Through a user designated hot-key, MMRPro seamlessly integrates, on a real-time basis, the patient data contained in the physician's practice management system saving the need of having to reenter data.

27


  • Patient View.

The MMRPro system incorporates an integrated patient portal,  www.MMRPatientView.com , so doctors can give their patients timely electronic access to their medical records after a visit. Patients can sign up at their provider's office or they can opt to receive an e-mail after their first visit giving them the opportunity to sign up for the free service. To activate, patients log into their MMRPatientView account with their secure User ID and password combination, after which they can view, download and printout records from their visit, including lab reports, radiology reports and copies of X-ray images. Patients receive alerts any time their doctor places a new record in their account. W e  believe the Patient View portal satisfies the Meaningful Use requirement for doctors to share electronic copies of records with patients by January 1, 2014.

The MMRPro "Stimulus Program"

In addition to its product functionality, MMRPro includes a "Stimulus Program" that creates cost-savings and revenue opportunity for its users; in fact, we believe our Stimulus Program can generate at least as much money for a doctor practice over a three-year term as the $44,000 that is possible through the HITECH Act over a five-year period.

We believe that MMRPro can ultimately eliminate the need for doctor office staff to go into patient charts to retrieve their records. We estimate that this can cost a doctor office as much as $50 per occurrence, when all of the labor and copying costs associated with retrieving a patient record are included. If MMRPro makes it possible for a doctor office to eliminate having to manually retrieve just one record per day, it would translate to a savings of more than $10,000 in a single year.

Doctors have the opportunity to earn administrative reimbursements when their patients upgrade from the free MMRPatientView portal to a full-featured, paid MyMedicalRecords PHR. We share 30% of the subscription revenue from those upgrades with doctors on a monthly basis and believes that patient acceptance for the MyMedicalRecords PHR will be driven by the benefit of being able to store and manage medical records from all doctors for up to 10 family members, not just the one doctor and one family member capability of the free MMR-PatientView Portal.

The Market for Our Products

Demand for both our consumer and professional health IT products is driven primarily by the U.S. healthcare and the health information technology markets. More recently, we have been expanding our consumer market through strategic partnerships with local pharmacies, nurse advocates and home healthcare specialists, all of whom have significant one-on-one relationships with patients who can benefit immediately from the use of our PHR. Likewise, starting in 2012, we created a retail consumer model through the use of Prepaid Personal Health Record cards for marketing through retail outlets such as pharmacies, and we are also expanding our presence into the wellness and prevention market. On the professional side, demand is increasing in the field of ambulatory surgical centers as well as other clinics looking for a cost-effective scanning and document management solution with high usability. Specialty practice areas such as pediatrics, chronic care illnesses and geriatrics are also key areas for expanding the MMRPro solution with our integrated patient portal, MMRPatientView, with upsell to a full-featured MyMedicalRecords PHR. Additionally, as the use of Teleconsulting and Telemedicine becomes more prevalent, MMRPro's patient portal and MyMedicalRecords PHR are patented solutions that provide a user-friendly proprietary platform to facilitate collaboration between doctors and other healthcare providers with patients, such as exemplified by our programs with Alcatel-Lucent and ng Connect.

While the U.S. holds the largest share of the global healthcare IT market, slated to grow domestically at a CAGR of nearly 20% during 2014-2018, health IT is also a growth industry internationally, expected to continue increasing so that by 2017 the global market will expand at a compound annual growth rate of 7.0 percent. Countries sharing a common goal to control healthcare costs are looking to EMR and PHR solutions to achieve this. The global demand is evidenced by our agreements in China, Australia and other countries in development to offer Personal Health Record and electronic document management and imaging services. Moreover, in a global economy, companies are increasingly sending employees overseas, a practice which is expected to increase demand for our MyMedicalRecords PHR among ex-pats, particularly in Europe and the Middle East. Also, medical tourism is on the rise with estimates of a $100 billion market, and this fuels the need for medical records that are truly universal and can be accessed anytime from anywhere. It should be noted here that the growth of health IT at home and abroad is further impetus for ensuring the protection and enforcement of our patent portfolio worldwide. In light of the continued occurrence of emergencies and natural disasters, demand for both our MyMedicalRecords and MyEsafeDepositBox products are driven by relief and educational organizations, as well as by consumers and small businesses, with international focus based on tools that help in disaster preparedness and personal protection.

In developing and marketing our products and services, we plan to continue to participate in the burgeoning consumer health information market and health IT market for patients and healthcare professionals who need to comply with federal legislation, including the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH Act) which is part of the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act of 2009 (ARRA). Additionally, we believe that the healthcare reform legislation, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), will ultimately stimulate a significant behavioral shift in how consumers manage and control their own health. The healthcare industry is implementing new processes to complement the individual insurance mandate (which requires most Americans to obtain insurance coverage beginning in 2014), Accountable Care Organizations ("ACOs"), and hospital readmission penalties.

28


Recognizing that PPACA's reforms are likely to trigger greater consumer interest in and control over individual health information and combined with the healthcare industry's transformation from a pay-for-service system to one that is pay-for-performance or outcomes-based, we are well-positioned to respond given its health IT products and services. While the HITECH Act's Meaningful Use program has incentivized thousands of healthcare providers and facilities to implement computerized medical records, the reforms in PPACA virtually mandate interoperability between and among healthcare providers. For example, an ACO's success is dependent on the ACO's ability both to coordinate care to improve outcomes and to reduce costs; objectives that cannot be achieved without interoperable healthcare IT solutions. Just as the Medicare Shared Savings program rewards physicians operating in ACOs for keeping patients healthy which usually reduces overall costs, greater participation in and control over the individual's own health is becoming mandated by law and encouraged by public and private employers. These driving factors are contributing to a prevailing consensus that patient portals and PHRs are necessary to achieve success of all involved.

Regulatory Environment

HIPAA and HITECH Considerations

We recognize the critical nature of managing an individual's health information requires that our products and advances be implemented with the utmost care to protect the privacy and confidentiality of our customers' data. The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, commonly referred to as HIPAA, requires covered entities to protect the privacy and confidentiality of the protected health information, or PHI, of their patients and customers. Although we are not a covered entity (as that term is defined in HIPAA), we consider it important to take into account the Privacy and Security Standards and other requirements of HIPAA when implementing our products and services and believe that we meet and/or exceed current HIPAA standards.

The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, commonly referred to as HITECH, enacted on February 17, 2009 as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, expanded HIPAA's reach beyond that of just covered entities. Now, business associates, defined as entities that perform a function, activity, or service on behalf of a covered entity and that require use of or access to the PHI of the covered entity, as well as vendors of Personal Health Records (PHRs) that use or access protected health information (PHI), must also comply with the HIPAA's Security Standards and many of HIPAA's Privacy Standards.

As a vendor of PHRs, we are implementing policies and procedures, and reviewing our relationships with all necessary parties on an ongoing basis, to ensure our compliance with HITECH and its associated regulations. While we contend that we are not technically a business associate as that term is defined under HIPAA's three-prong test (since the beneficiary of the PHR is the patient, not the covered entity), the work we are doing to ensure compliance with HITECH as a vendor of PHRs will ensure that we comply with HITECH if we are ultimately determined to be a business associate.

One of the most critical aspect of HITECH is its requirement to notify individuals if their PHI has been, or will likely be, disclosed without the individual's authorization (i.e., there is a breach). We both recognize and fully support this requirement and are working to ensure its contracts with covered entities address and delineate all responsibilities associated with the breach notification process. Moreover, because we believe in the quality, safety and security of our products and services, users of MMRPro, MMRPatientView and MyMedicalRecords receive protection under MMRGlobal's Million Dollar Cyber Liability Insurance Policy. In the event of a loss, users are protected from actual loss or damage caused by an error in our PHR and MMRPro systems and are assisted with their defense costs in the event of a violation of the expanded HIPAA regulations under the HITECH Act.

Healthcare and Health IT Industry Environment

Health information technology (HIT) is at the forefront of efforts to reform the U.S. healthcare system, viewed as essential to controlling costs, improving care and saving lives. Starting in August 2012 when the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released its final rule for Meaningful Use Stage 2, Personal Health Records moved to occupy a dominant position in the healthcare IT landscape because it was now a requirement that eligible professionals provide their patients timely online access to their health information. The commitment to achieve widespread adoption of Electronic Medical Records was legislated by the HITECH Act, which contained provisions allocating more than $27 billion to eligible professionals and hospitals that digitize their medical records systems through "Meaningful Use" of health IT.

In addition to demand created by HITECH, health IT is expected to continue opening up widespread market opportunities in the healthcare industry because the need to control healthcare costs is expected to remain at the top of the domestic agenda for some time. Healthcare spending reached an estimated $2.9 trillion in 2013, now accounting for about 18 percent of GDP, and is expected to reach $4.7 trillion by 2020. According to estimates by the Congressional Budget Office, healthcare spending is on pace to exceed all discretionary spending by 2016.

29


We believe the need to control healthcare costs through 21 st  century solutions such as EHRs and PHRs supported by regulatory requirements will continue to drive health IT adoption. For instance, adding to the HITECH Act, PPACA also represents a significant opportunity for us This laws include broadening health insurance to cover millions of Americans starting in 2014, implementing new healthcare payment and delivery models, and funding programs that promote healthy behaviors to both prevent and manage chronic diseases, which account for more than 75 percent of healthcare treatment costs. Regarding the insurance mandate, there has been a sweeping amount of publicity about the launch of the insurance marketplace exchange Healthcare.gov on October 1, 2013 due to widely documented technical errors. However, these continue to be addressed into 2014 and extensive advertising campaigns are having a positive effect on sign-ups. We believe this has helped to build consumer awareness of the responsibility they share in their healthcare costs and the need for such tools as Personal Health Records to help control their out-of-pocket spending.

Even though the ACA did not directly legislate for a federal incentive program for EMR/EHR adoption in the way that HITECH did, the components of the bill build on computerized medical records and the electronic sharing of information to achieve better results in line with the new outcomes-based reimbursement model of healthcare. So, for example, the challenges created by the influx of newly insured to better manage the cost of their care, or the efficiencies mandated by ACA in the form of Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) that reward providers for quality of care rather than quantity, is expected to result in greater demand for health IT solutions because they are critical for the coordination of care required to achieve improved outcomes, with Personal Health Records specifically having a positive impact in the way technology tools can lower the cost of care among defined populations.

Additional drivers of health IT that are expected to become more prevalent in the coming years are new multi-platform, multi-channel models of healthcare delivery. According to health economist and iHealthBeat contributor, Jane Sarasohn-Kahn, mobile apps, home-based monitors, Wi-Fi scales, text messaging and e-mail communication will gain traction in the coming years to ensure patients stay well. We are well-positioned to benefit from multiple technology integrations, demonstrated by our partnership with the Alcatel- Lucent ng Connect Program first announced in 2011. We anticipate more strategic partnerships with wireless providers as a result of our integrated telecommunications platform which delivers a PHR that allows medical records to be shared among all healthcare professionals involved in a patient's care using TeleHealth platforms.

With healthcare's continuing prominence on the national agenda and mandates to share medical information electronically across the whole spectrum of care, we anticipate that market conditions will remain healthy for the growth of our patented Personal Health Record products and services. The role of health IT in cost containment and improved patient outcomes through patient engagement and coordination of care, the driving force of HITECH stimulus and the expansive role patient portals and PHRs have as a requirement for the Meaningful Use of an EHR, America's aging demographics underscored by the wave of baby boomers entering Medicare, the rise of chronic illnesses and their cost, and an increasingly global and mobile world are contributing factors that enable our products to benefit from the HIT value propositions in the marketplace. Even with the challenges and uncertainties healthcare providers face in their day-to- day practice, they are continuing to move away from outdated paper-based systems and focus on spending strategic dollars on health IT as ROI given economic stimulus, the transition of healthcare to more of an outcomes-based reimbursement model, growing peer pressure, and the fact that increasing numbers of patients are becoming informed healthcare consumers who demand it.

Drivers for MyMedicalRecords PHR Market

Patient portals and timely access to health information such as made possible by PHRs, which were a convenience under Meaningful Use Stage 1, are now a necessity under Meaningful Use Stage 2, and signifies where health IT is heading now and into the future. With the final rule of Meaningful Use Stage 2 released on August 23, 2012, patient engagement moved to the center of the health IT industry and has marked a new era as patients require online access to their health data versus the previous rule which only required a copy on request, and did not have to be specifically web-based. So, starting in January 2014, over 50% of an eligible professional's patients need to have the ability to access their health information online within four business days of the information being available, and this is expected to expand to 90% with Stage 3 Meaningful Use requirements. Eligible hospitals need to make the information available to patients within 36 hours of discharge. The new requirements have resulted in understandable pressure for hospitals and physicians in the EHR Incentive Program managed by CMS, and the prospects of decreasing incentives and increasing penalties are also strong drivers for adoption.

The ACA's insurance mandate is also an additional driver for our PHR products and services. With ultimately over 30 million Americans entering the insurance pool, it will therefore become increasingly important to have the kind of tools such as a PHR to communicate and engage with the patient population, but continued delays in the ACA's implementation may slow this demand. Additionally, ACOs will need to rely on health IT solutions to make possible greater coordination of care that is such a critical part of the outcomes-based healthcare model being implemented. The ACA also imposes measures to reduce high hospital readmission rates. On October 1, 2012, penalties went into effect in the form of fines imposed by Medicare against hospitals that readmit patients within 30 days of discharge for the same complaint or procedure. The penalties are part of a multifaceted effort by Medicare to reward facilities based on how they meet certain care quality and patient satisfaction metrics. It is believed that many of these can be achieved by providing patients and/or caretakers with effective tools that enable them to readily have the information on how to comply with appropriate follow-up care. This also coalesces around the personal medical home model where remote patient monitoring enables data collection into a PHR to provide continuous and coordinated care. According to a report produced by the Deloitte Center for Health Solutions, "Connected Care: Technology-enabled Care at Home," the effective application of in-home technologies can produce a net result of potential annual savings of 20 percent or more if chronic conditions and post- hospitalization care is managed by involved consumers in their homes.

30


Social media and video contests are also being increasingly used to build PHR communities. MMR has joined with hundreds of other companies to "Take the Pledge" and we are expanding our presence across the Internet using social media to engage consumers on the value of having a Personal Health Record for themselves and their family. We also implemented the Blue Button initiative enabling Vets and Medicare recipients to share their data with healthcare providers, caregivers and other people they trust.

Organizations and enterprises not directly affected by Meaningful Use incentives are further promoting patient engagement. For example, employers are offering workplace wellness programs that reward employees for healthy behaviors to increase productivity and control insurance costs which are also supported by program policies in the ACA; health plans offer PHRs to patients to maintain data that monitors health progress in addition to claims data; pharmacies are growing their retail clinics and can offer PHRs for better care coordination and to offer health management tools such as prescription refill reminders; caregivers are placing PHRs at the top of their list of technology that can best support their practice issues; retailers can use PHRs as a tool to create stickiness and build loyalty programs at the point-of-sale; and wireless carriers are developing platforms for remote patient monitoring devices transmitted by smartphones into a patient's PHR for sharing by the entire medical team.

Finally, an ultimate driver for our products and services are consumers themselves. Through federal and state government initiatives, employer policies, and a stretched healthcare system, individuals and families are being challenged to take more responsibility for their health and healthcare costs and in response they are pushing for transparency. Studies show that patients who use a PHR are almost twice as like to be up to date with preventive services, and those who have access to their health information are able to make better decisions about their care which can translate into improved health and cost savings. So with increasing use of EHRs requiring patients be provided their personal health information in the form of a patient portal or Personal Health Record, Telemedicine and the development of mobile health apps (an estimated 500 million individuals are expected to be using mobile healthcare applications within the next five years), the use of social media to engage consumers in their healthcare, and pharmacies growing their retail clinics, we believe PHRs have a strong future as part of an overall health IT strategy. Moreover, our patented MyMedicalRecords PHR - Internet-based for 24/7 access, easy-to-use, private and secure, and multi- platformed for timely sharing of health data - fulfills what surveys reveal consumers are most looking for in a PHR, which is access to information online, privacy, the ability to track immunizations and monitor lab reports, communicate with doctors, and correct mistakes in their records.

Drivers for MMRPro Market

Doctors continue to be under increasing pressure to make their offices "digital" as mandated by the Federal Government in order to qualify for incentive payments of $44,000 per physician through Medicare and $63,750 per physician through Medicaid under the HITECH Act. Stimulus funds from HITECH are paid out in three stages of "Meaningful Use" over a five- year period; for example, a doctor under Medicare who qualified for funds in 2010 began receiving payments in 2011 and will continue to through 2015. Doctors who have waited until 2013 or 2014 to have EHRs in place will be eligible for smaller bonuses. Because of the short time horizons and high costs involved, many eligible professionals, despite the stimulus funds, were initially resistant to using full-blown Electronic Medical Record systems. Studies cited in a Congressional Budget Office Report show that a three-doctor practice could spend as much as $162,000 in the first year to install and maintain a system. This doesn't include the "hidden" costs of lost revenue from having to reduce patient load and also delays in billing while a new system is being implemented. For hospitals, EHR implementation can run into many millions of dollars.

Regardless of the early resistance by practitioners, over 50 percent of physicians and 80 percent of hospitals have adopted Electronic Health Records as reported by the Department of Health and Human Services in May 2013. Yet increasing numbers of users are expressing dissatisfaction with their system. A spring 2013 Software Advice survey cited by CIO.com found that more than 30 percent of providers intended to replace their EHR system. The complexities of Meaningful Use appear to create increasing pressures on healthcare providers, which we believe also creates dynamic market conditions for the Company's MMRPro system. We believe MMR is well-positioned to serve providers as a cost-effective bridge or adjunct to a full blown Electronic Health Records system while at the same time providing an integrated patient portal/Personal Health Record, which is essential for qualifying for incentives under Meaningful Use Stage 2 patient engagement requirements. Moreover, because the fax is still being used by the majority of healthcare providers, especially with their patients, MMRPro's electronic fax capability enables them to run their practice like they always have while digitizing their office or changing or upgrading their current system. Additionally, with the MMR Stimulus Program, incentives are offered either in place of, or in addition to, Meaningful Use payments, where it has been acknowledged that for smaller practices the perks offered by the government may not be enough by themselves to get doctors on board. And when Meaningful Use incentives are removed from the equation altogether, as is the case with non-eligible professionals such as long- term acute care and rehabilitation facilities, our end-to-end, user-friendly solutions enable clinical data to be digitized and available across all sites of care.

As a result, we see a significant niche opportunity to provide an efficient, cost-effective system that helps healthcare professionals take the required first steps to any form of digital office - scanning and digitizing patient records. We believe that the simplicity and elegance of MMRPro makes it attractive to the many thousands of medical offices, community hospitals and other healthcare providers who are still paper-bound and searching for a way to start their digital conversion or are dissatisfied with their current system and can use MMRPro for easier digital recordkeeping and to improve patient engagement.

31


Drivers for MyEsafeDepositBox Market

The primary market driver for our MyEsafeDepositBox product is the need for individuals and businesses to be able to easily, efficiently and securely maintain backup copies of paper-based financial, insurance, legal and other vital business and personal documents that can be retrieved at anytime from anywhere over an Internet-connected device, This is especially true during a disaster, where records can be inaccessible or permanently destroyed. Eventually, as consumers continue to grow less reliant on paper, MyEsafeDepositBox can also be marketed as helping them in reduce their carbon footprint.

Online storage is a growth industry that can be viewed as rebounding from the economic recession. According to International Data Corporation's, or IDC's, Worldwide Storage Software Qview, 2011 sales of storage software increased 11.6% over 2010 to $14.16 billion led by data protection and recovery. (StorageNewsletter.com). In-Stat reported the previous year that with home networking adoption passing 50% of households in North America and 13% worldwide, the consumer network storage market is seeing continued growth.

Both companies and individuals are continuing to seek solutions that will allow them to safely backup - and quickly restore - any lost data. We believe that our MyEsafeDepositBox product meets the need of a sub-set of this vast data storage market, and we target individuals and businesses that want to find a secure, web-based solution for storing their most critical personal, financial, legal and insurance records, rather than those looking to back up the entire contents of their computer hard drive or corporate network.

In addition, the need for individuals to augment their personal plans for disaster preparedness is reflected in a Red Cross poll that showed seven of 10 respondents were only somewhat prepared for a disaster, with 59% to 73% having no specific evacuation plan. For businesses, the need to implement a disaster recovery plan can be the key to their survival. In the publication, "The Definitive Handbook for Business Management," cited by Hewlett-Packard, it states that between 60% and 90% of companies that don't have a disaster plan find themselves out of business within 24 months of experiencing a major disaster. As natural and man-made disasters continue to grow - from hurricanes, earthquakes, and floods to computer viruses and even terrorist attacks - a common denominator for recovery is access to information and documentation, and we believe our MyEsafeDepositBox product meets this need by offering users a safe and easy way to store, access and recover all of their important documents and vital records online.

Customers

To date, we have signed agreements for our MyMedicalRecords PHR product, our MyEsafeDepositBox product, our MMRPro product, as well as licensing agreements to license our Biotech and Health IT Patents and other intellectual property. Our core products are sold directly to retail consumers, healthcare professionals, hospitals, surgery centers, dental offices, vendors, retailers, employees, affinity groups, membership organizations and licensees amongst others. Our Biotech and Health IT patents are being licensed to pharmaceutical companies, and other health IT companies as well as retailers. We also have a program for hospitals to give patients access to use our MyMedicalRecords Personal Health Record free of charge when they are discharged from inpatient facilities with the option to upgrade to a fully paid account.

We also offer private label versions of our MyMedicalRecords PHR product. In addition, we offer employee benefit programs to clients who provide MyMedicalRecords to their employees as a free benefit, similar to affinity and membership group clients. We receive compensation under these agreements either on a per enrolled account basis or on a membership basis in which we are paid based on the number of persons who are eligible to sign up for our service, regardless of the number that actually enrolls. Through an agreement with Microsoft ®  HealthVault ®  we have the opportunity to integrate our products with others connected to their platform in response to consumer demand.

In the affinity and membership group area, we continue to look for opportunities as organizations want to give their members access to the MyMedicalRecords PHR or MyEsafeDepositBox; we expect that these groups will continue to create new programs that bundle the MyMedicalRecords PHR and MyEsafeDepositBox virtual storage vault with their services.

On December 22, 2010, we entered into a Non-Exclusive License Agreement with Celgene Corporation ("Celgene"). Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, the Company licensed to Celgene, on a non-exclusive basis, the use of our clinical and scientific data related to targeted immunotherapies for cancer and other disease treatments to stimulate a patient's immune response and certain other confidential information in the United States and Europe. In consideration for the rights granted under the Agreement, Celgene agreed to pay the Company certain upfront fees and development milestones. When a milestone is reached it continues to automatically trigger a payment to MMR. We have already received $850,000 in milestone payments under such agreement. As part of the agreement we get regular recurring updates from Celgene on the status of any upcoming milestones, we have no reason to believe that we will not receive the remaining amounts due under the terms of the agreement when milestones are reached. A copy of the agreement can be found on Exhibit 10.32 of the registrant's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

32


On December 9, 2011, we entered into a thirty million dollar Non-Exclusive Settlement and Patent License Agreement with Surgery Center Management, LLC whereby we agreed to release SCM from prior patent infringement claims and granted SCM, on a non- exclusive basis, a license covering the Licensed Patents, which amongst other things, covers certain Licensed Products and/or Licensed Services to develop, make, have made, use, sell, lease, license, demonstrate, market and distribute the Licensed Products and/or Licensed Services under SCM's brand or private label for channel or distribution partners who purchase the SCM branded or Licensed Products and/or Licensed Services for resale to end customers. The Agreement contains customary provisions, as to the term of the Agreement, representations, warranties, and indemnities by each of the Company and SCM and was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as Exhibit 10-1 on Form 8-K on January 17, 2012.

In consideration for the rights granted under the Agreement, SCM agreed to pay us $5 million dollars (the "Initial License Fee") plus an additional $5 million dollars annually during the five year term of the Agreement with the explicit understanding and requirement that the Settlement and Release portions of the Agreement become effective solely upon SCM's payment in full of the Initial License Fee. SCM also agreed to pay MMR additional royalties of ten percent (10%) of gross revenue at such time as an initial Two Hundred Million U.S. Dollars ($200,000,000 USD) of gross revenues are accrued on any Units sold, used or otherwise transferred pursuant to the terms of the Agreement.

The initial $5 million dollar payment became payable to us on December 23, 2011, with five additional payments due on November 15th 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016.

We are currently seeking payment on the initial $5 million as well as the subsequent $5 million payments which were due in November 2012 and November 2013 as per the agreement. As of December 31, 2013, three of the four revenue recognition criteria of Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104 had been met (persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the price is fixed and determinable). We will not recognize any of this revenue until such time as collection is reasonably assured. We are currently in litigation against SCM and believe SCM has cash, accounts receivable, and/or other assets sufficient to pay the amounts due upon a successful outcome.

During 2013, our three largest customers (Visi, Inc. $302,000, Thorson Insurance Services $50,000 and XN Financial $44,000) accounted for approximately 68% of our total revenue. Due to the contributions of these customers to our consolidated revenue, we are dependent upon our relationships with these customers.

Revenue from our largest customer, which comprised 52% and 33% of our total revenue for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, was transacted with a private entity in which we hold a minority equity investment.

Sales & Marketing Strategies

MyMedicalRecords PHR

Our marketing strategy for our MyMedicalRecords PHR product calls for continued focus on seven main sales channels:

  • Licensing

Since the issuances of our patents in the U.S. and numerous countries we are focused on licensing the use of our proprietary technologies for the provisioning of Personal Health Records.

  • Corporate Sales - Employee Benefit Offering

We are pursuing the human resources and benefits market to secure agreements or strategic arrangements providing for companies to offer our product to their employees and members. As a result of health reform, which encourages worksite wellness, companies are rethinking their roles in the new healthcare economy and we believe the user-friendly nature of our MyMedicalRecords PHR product makes it readily acceptable to employees and gives companies a low cost way to demonstrate their employee-friendliness.

  • Affinity Groups and Membership Organizations.

Our MyMedicalRecords PHR product can be bundled with other health or travel-related services. For example, a travel accident insurance company can include our MyMedicalRecords PHR product in its suite of emergency medical and repatriation services for travelers going abroad. We believe giving users the ability to access their medical records in an emergency situation overseas may add considerable value to an insurance company's travel insurance policies. Additionally, an affinity group, such as an alumni association or charitable organization, may offer our MyMedicalRecords PHR product as a recruitment or renewal tool. We plan on continuing to utilize outside sales representatives who specialize in selling services to these market segments.

33


  • Private Label Branding

Our MyMedicalRecords PHR product is designed to allow site pages to be customized with a corporate, affinity group or membership organization logo and content that is specific to that entity. The technology built into our MyMedicalRecords PHR product also is designed to allow companies, groups or organization to instantly communicate with hundreds or even thousands of employees in the event of an announcement or emergency situation at no additional cost to MMR or in many cases, the client.

  • Direct to Consumer Marketing

We intend to continue to focus on marketing our MyMedicalRecords PHR product directly to consumers via both online and off-line advertising vehicles. We have produced a series of television ads that are shown on syndicated television shows. The ads can be seen at  www.mmrontv. com . We continue to test pay-per- click advertising using booth Google Adwords and the other targeted platforms such as Facebook. In addition, we plan on continuing to exploit our relationship with E-Mail Frequency LLC continuing to test different e-mail creative, both text and HTML, as well as campaigns to target direct to consumer sales. Our MyMedicalRecords PHR product is currently available to individuals on a monthly or annual subscription basis as well as to those patients who upgrade from a free MMRPatientView account provided by their doctors.

  • Healthcare Professionals.

We plan on continuing to offer our MyMedicalRecords PHR to patients at physician offices, hospitals, surgery centers, x- ray facilities and other facilities. In addition, we are planning to increase our marketing efforts in connection with sales to home caregivers and visiting nurses. We believe our ability to accept and transmit information in HL7 messaging formats will allow us to now more seamlessly integrate with existing EMR systems and populate the Personal Health Record with discrete data in addition to the PDF format already accepted by the Company's products.

  • Retail.

We are in the process of establishing a distribution channel through retail where consumers will be able to purchase a Prepaid PHR card at retail stores including pharmacies, hospital gift shops, mass merchandisers and supermarkets amongst other specialty retailers. The prepaid retail card is manufactured as a high quality credit-card style card. The package surrounding it provides information on the PHR service to encourage both initial purchase and then active use. Because the prepaid card is not flimsy, emergency personnel will be able to find it in a user's wallet in the event of a medical emergency, thus reinforcing the special Emergency Log in feature of the MMR product. We plan to have a magnetic stripe on the back of the card as well, which will allow us to offer the prepaid product in conjunction with pharmacy or store loyalty programs.

  • Other Markets.

W e plan  to focus a portion of our marketing efforts in selling to nursing and convalescent homes as well as other vertical markets that have the need to share, store and manage documents and health records in a secure manner such as the legal, accounting, mortgage banking, chronic illness foundations, and charitable organization markets .

MyEsafeDepositBox

Because of the similarity in functionality between our MyEsafeDepositBox product and our MyMedicalRecords PHR product, we market these products through many of the same channels. Both products are designed to offer users the ability to fax, upload and store important and private records or documents in a secure electronic environment, safe from fire or flood, and secure from the threat of identity theft. Thus, for example, we market our MyMedicalRecords PHR product to insurance companies as an additional benefit for health insurance policy holders, while at the same time marketing our MyEsafeDepositBox product to insurance companies that may offer it to their risk and casualty policy customers. In addition, we market our MyEsafeDepositBox to financial institutions and legal service providers as a safe and secure way for their customers to store important and private documents provided by these companies.

MMRPro

We have been working on enhancing the MMRPro platform as well as broadening its distribution and sales channels. We believe that, with Meaningful Use Stage 2 requirements in place that mandates providers giving patients' online access to their health information, MMRPro will gain accelerated acceptance with clinicians because of the fact that the product automatically creates a patient facing copy of scanned records through its MMRPatientView portal. We also believe that the successful adoption of the MMRPro product by our existing customer base will help simplify and possibly shorten the sales process as it acquires new customers.

34


In addition to working with document imaging sales and distribution channels, MMRGlobal is utilizing distribution networks of companies who already sell other products into doctor offices. These distribution partners also help increase our integration and support network.

We also plan to utilize lead generation and telemarketing/appointment setting tools as a way to build a pipeline of customer opportunities that can be sold direct by MMR or through its distribution partners.

Through an agreement with Interbit Data (located in Natick, MA) we have created a joint software solution that will allow hospitals and other clinical facilities to use a Meaningful Use certified solution to instantly make health information available to patients securely over the Internet using the MMRPatientView portal from any EMR system without first having to scan, fax or print any documents. The Interbit Data-MMR module is certified for Meaningful Use with MEDITECH systems. MEDITECH is being used by more than 750 hospitals nationwide. Although the solution is only deployed for MEDITECH at this time, MMR believes that it can work with virtually any EMR platform, which opens up a significant new market opportunity for MMRGlobal.

Additional On-Going Marketing Strategies

In addition to the main marketing channels discussed above, we have also identified other potential markets for increasing sales of our products:

  • Other Health IT Providers

We believe that there is a market for our health IT products through strategic relationships with other health information technology providers who see MMR's services as being complementary to their own offerings. This is also driven by Stage 2 Meaningful Use and requirements that vendors incorporate PHRs and patient portals in their products and services.

  • Home Healthcare.

We also believe that distribution through visiting nurses, caregivers, home medical supply companies and patient advocates represents a significant new channel for our PHR. We are actively pursuing creating specialized programs where home healthcare works can offer cards to their clients and then populate the PHR with information from their home visits.

  • Small Businesses

We believe our MyEsafeDepositBox products could serve as an affordable and easy-to-implement tool for small companies that have not, or do not want to, invest in expensive IT data backup infrastructure.

  • Government Agencies

We believe that federal, state and local governments would be interested in our products as they provide a powerful, yet easy to use addition to any family's disaster preparedness plan and we continue to approach agencies at all levels to explore the possibility of setting up pilot programs.

  • Travel Companies and the Travel Industry

We believe that travelers, specifically Expats, can represent a strong market for our products because these products are designed to enable travelers to access to their medical records, or other important documents (copies of passports, credit cards, etc.), in the event of an emergency when they are away from home. We plan to market our products to airlines, hotels, automobile clubs and other- travel related companies and organizations as well as to advertise on travel-related websites to reach this market.

  • Finance, Accounting, and Insurance Companies.

We believe insurance companies are interested in offering a MyEsafeDepositBox type of service offering for their risk and accident policyholders. We are actively working with at least one large financial institution to utilize MyEsafeDepositBox to handle paperless loan processing and delivery solutions as well as replace uses for traditional safe deposit boxes.

  • Consumer Product Companies

We believe we can better target health-conscious consumers who may have a greater interest in our products by developing strategic partnerships with consumer products companies, including wireless phone service providers.

35


  • Retailers

We are still in the process of bringing our  MyMedicalRecords.com  PHR to retailers in the form of a prepaid card that consumers will be able to purchase at point of sale. To do this, we have begun creating a national independent sales representative network that already has relationships with retail chains. In addition to direct sale to consumer at retail, we see an opportunity to make the PHR part of store and pharmacy loyalty programs as well as to offer it as a premium when consumers purchase health care related products, switch their prescriptions to that store or refill existing prescriptions.

International Licensing

We exploit our intellectual property, technology and our MyMedicalRecords brand internationally. On January 4, 2010, we announced the completion of a definitive Cooperation Agreement ("the "Unis JV") with Unis-Tonghe Technology (Zhengzhou) Co., Ltd., or Unis, to form a joint venture to build a customized version of MMR's proprietary PHR services and professional document imaging and management solutions in China.

Unis is a subsidiary of Unisplendour Corporation Limited (SHE: 00938) ( www.Unis.cn ), one of China's leading IT firms. Our technology will support a Unis medical records development project for sale to China's public and private hospitals. Our senior management and technology executives from Nihilent, MMR's technology partner in India, have met with counterparts from Unis-Tonghe to integrate the MyMedicalRecords PHR and the MMRPro system into a health IT platform that could be deployed throughout China's healthcare market.

Under the JV, Unis and MMR agreed to form a joint venture in China for the purpose of deploying our PHR services and document imaging and management solutions as part of a total EMR solution in China. Under the agreement, we will own 40 % of the joint venture and Unis will own 60%.

As a result of lead times to develop customized EMR solutions in response to government specifications, this effort has taken several years. In the meantime, we have begun to leverage our resources in China with other U.S. partners including Alcatel-Lucent to help manage relationships in China locally.

Also pursuant to requests from Unis and the Chinese government, we have continued to respond to requests for changes in the Unis JV including changes continuing throughout 2013.

In 2012, we entered into an agreement with Australian company VisiInc PLC to sell our patented consumer and professional health IT products and services on the Visi platform utilizing the Vistime product in the health technology market in Australia. The agreement with VisiInc PLC calls for minimum performance guarantees to be paid to MMR annually.

We are also actively working with potential strategic partners in countries where our patents are issued which include Australia, New Zealand, Singapore, Japan, Mexico, Canada, Hong Kong, South Korea, Israel and Europe to leverage our global patent portfolio.

Use of Our Board of Advisors

We have a Board of Advisors and a Medical Board of Advisors, which include the following individuals:

BOARD OF ADVISORS

  • Buzz Aldrin, Ph.D.

Apollo 11 Astronaut

  • Titus Day

Managing Director, 6 Degrees Management

  • Hon. Richard A. Gephardt

22nd Majority Leader of U.S. House of Representatives

36


  • C. Rowland Hanson

Former Executive with Microsoft, Neutrogena and Nautilus

  • Hon. Asa Hutchinson

Former U.S. Congressman, First Under Secretary of Homeland Security

  • "Sugar" Ray Leonard

Professional Athlete and Entrepreneur

  • Fred Middleton

Managing Director, Sanderling Ventures

  • James L. Spigarelli, Ph.D.

Former CEO and President, Midwest Research Institute

  • JJ Virgin, CNS, CHFI

Health Correspondent and Nutritionist

MEDICAL ADVISORY BOARD

  • Michel Babajanian, M.D., FAC

Board-Certified Otolaryngologist and Head and Neck Surgeon

  • Glenn D. Braunstein, M.D.

Chairman, Department of Medicine at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Director, Cedars-Sinai Thyroid Cancer Center

  • David E. Bresler, PhD, LAc

Author, Consultant and Educator; President, Academy for Guided Imagery

  • Shekhar Challa, M.D.

Board-Certified Gastroenterologist & Award-Winning Author

Co-Founder and President, Kansas Medical Clinic

  • Jeremy Fine, M.D.

Board-Certified in Internal Medicine

  • Theodore B. Goldstein, M.D.

Orthopedic Surgeon

37


  • William Goodman, M.D.

Pulmonary and Critical Care Physician

Academic Appointment at Dartmouth Medical School

  • Cara Natterson, M.D.

Board-Certified Pediatrician and Author

Founder, Worry Proof Consulting

  • Lawrence D. Piro, M.D.

Clinician, Researcher & Lecturer; International Expert in Hematologic Malignancies

The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute

  • David Charles Rish, M.D.

Dermatologist; Academic Appointment at UCLA

  • Prediman K. (PK) Shah, M.D.

Director, Division of Cardiology and the
Oppenheimer Atherosclerosis Research Center at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

We work closely with our Board of Advisors to identify new business opportunities. In Addition, we work with our Medical Board of Advisors to find more effective and efficient uses of our products for healthcare professionals as well as finding new ways to exploit our biotech assets.

Principal Suppliers and Supply Contracts

We currently contract with numerous third-party telecommunications carriers, data centers and other information technology service providers and developers to develop and maintain our products.

We contract with a third-party for the development and maintenance of the software applications necessary to run our MyMedicalRecords PHR, MyEsafeDepositBox and MyMedicalRecords Pro products. Our outside developers support our software development needs through a team of software engineers, programmers, quality control personnel and testers, who work with our internal product development team on all aspects of application development, design, integration and support of our products. Under our development contract, we own the intellectual property rights over all software applications developed pursuant to the contract. We pay our developer per-project fees for the development services provided and a monthly fee for support and maintenance services. Most of our agreements with developers renew automatically for one year periods subject to the right of either party to terminate the agreement by giving six months written notice to the other. Notwithstanding the ability to terminate MMR owns, controls and maintains copies of all its software, source code, and updates and changes as they occur.

We also contract collocation and hosting services to Level 4 and Level 5 certified data centers that monitor, manage and maintain our systems and storage facilities that service our production websites. Scheduled, non-escalatory, monthly payments are made for all collocation and hosting services. Services include managing and maintaining the production servers that host our MyMedicalRecords PHR and MyEsafeDepositBox and MMRPro applications and store user related data. The data center agreements are renewed automatically and a termination option is available to either party upon a six month prior written notice. MMR owns all hardware located in the data centers and has the option to remove it should a data center agreement be terminated. Notwithstanding the ability to terminate MMR owns and controls and maintains copies of all its software, source code, licenses and updates and changes as they occur.

In the event that we are unable to continue to obtain supply, development or maintenance services from any of our current suppliers or developers, we believe that we would be able to utilize other suppliers, developers, or maintenance services to continue the development and operation of our products. Prior to selecting our current suppliers, we received competitive bids from other vendors who would have been able to provide equivalent services. Thus, we believe that the marketplace for such services is broad enough that we would be able to reach commercially reasonable terms for the continued development of our products within the termination periods provided in each agreement.

38


Disaster Recovery Plan

Our data centers have disaster recovery plans in place designed to ensure the safekeeping of records stored in a user's MyMedicalRecords PHR, MyEsafeDepositBox, MyMedicalRecordsMD and MMRPatientView accounts, while maintaining continuity of our services should our server site be affected by a natural or man-made disaster. Our main production sites have redundancy measures built-in at all levels of the infrastructure and are designed to facilitate maximum availability of our product websites. Our backup and recovery encryption and processes are FIPS 140-2 compliant.

Competition

MyMedicalRecords PHR

Although we believe that no other product in the marketplace compares to what we provide in our comprehensive PHR and other offerings, there are other PHR providers in the consumer health information management marketplace today that compete for our services. These include MyMediConnect, NoMoreClipboard.com, Dossia, WebMD Health Manager, ZweenaHealth, and numerous others including Internet and patient-portals offered by EMR Vendors, health exchanges, and insurance companies, hospitals and HMOs for their policyholders and patients.

Each of our competitors offers varying PHR products and services for online storage and access to medical records at varying price points (at the basic "free" level, with minimal recordkeeping capability and usually includes advertising). However, we believe our MyMedicalRecords PHR product offers unique features that distinguish it from those of our competitors. In particular, we believe our MyMedicalRecords PHR product offers greater ease of use and accuracy than our competitors' products because copies of the actual medical records, such as laboratory test results and radiology reports can be faxed, read, or uploaded directly into the user's MyMedicalRecords PHR account. This helps ensure accuracy when compared to redacted data from a patient portal, multiple records from different providers or requiring users to input the data themselves, which may result in transcription errors, or go through a third party, which could result in more time, additional costs and can raise the issue of privacy.

In addition, most competitive services do not offer integrated inbound and outbound fax directly to or from the user account, or if they do they are usually required to go through third party intermediaries in order to share information with other providers along the continuum of care. Moreover, we believe our integrated fax offering alone can save members as much as $300 a year as compared to using similar electronic fax services.

In addition, while hospital patient, HMO patient and insurance policyholder Internet-portals allow users to see certain information regarding test results, prescriptions or claims data, and may even give patients the ability to set appointments and communicate with doctors, these portals typically only allow users to view data from that specific provider, and if a user changes his or her healthcare provider, insurance carrier or employer, the information may not be available in the future. Our MyMedicalRecords PHR product is designed to offer our customers a single secure online repository for all of their health information and records, from every provider, so that this information is available any time a MyMedicalRecords PHR user needs to access and share it, and our service is completely portable, meaning it stays with the member though changes in health plans, healthcare providers and employers. Moreover, the MyMedicalRecords account covers an entire family of up to 10 members, whereas other services typically only cover an individual or charge for additional family members.

We also believe the enhanced features offered at our price point, offer consumers unique and attractive advantages that separate our MyMedicalRecords PHR product from the competition. In addition, while competing services may raise consumer awareness about the need for access to personal health information and this increased awareness may likewise increase the marketability of our MyMedicalRecords PHR product, growth in the consumer health information management marketplace may also attract new entrants. However, while we believe that greater ease of use and array of enhanced features distinguish our MyMedicalRecords PHR product from those of our competitors, many of our competitors may have greater resources and may attempt to modify their product offerings to make them more competitive, including attempting to replicate some features of our MyMedicalRecords PHR product. Notwithstanding we seek to protect our proprietary technology through our patents in the U.S. and overseas and other countries of commercial interest.

MyEsafeDepositBox

Our MyEsafeDepositBox product competes with a number of online backup and electronic data storage services. The increasing use of external hard drives and flash drives to backup data also has the potential to compete with online data storage services such as our MyEsafeDepositBox product.

We believe that MyEsafeDepositBox is a superior product when compared with products such as My Vault® Storage or Allianz Protect in that it permits multiple service providers, such as insurance agents or lenders, to fax documents directly into a user's account. In addition, much like the MyMedicalRecords PHR, the MyEsafeDepositBox service also offers outbound fax and emergency login features which further differentiate us in the marketplace. We also have the ability to provide private label branding that affords banks, insurance companies, escrow services and other financial and legal businesses to provide not only a useful product but creates brand awareness and loyalty.

39


MMRPro

MMRPro competes with scanning services that market their services to doctors seeking to convert their historical paper records into electronic files, as well as EMR systems. Scanning services typically do not provide the doctor with an integrated end- to-end system that not only scans the record, but automatically sorts it by patient and by patient chart tab. Most scanners merely digitize patient records and store them either on a local drive or a Local Area Network drive, which requires the doctors to have an IT consultant manage their online records. Since MMRPro is a "Software As Service" model, the scanner records are sent to a web- hosted application with redundant data storage facilities and MMR handles the physical storage and management of patient data in compliance with HIPAA's Privacy Rule and Security Standards. This not only relieves doctors of having to worry about their in-house records management, it also allows them to access patient records from any Internet-connected computer as well as to deploy a copy of a record for the patient.

MMRPro also competes with EMR systems that offer doctors the opportunity to make their entire office paperless. However, many doctors, particularly solo and small group practitioners, are still resisting EMRs with a high cost of conversion and the difficulty and expense associated with maintaining an EMR system. MMRPro provides an efficient alternative and or transition to a full-blown EMR for many thousands of dollars less cost. MMRPro also features a patient portal, MMRPatientView, which is a requirement of Meaningful Use and is both integrated with our end-to-end system or can be incorporated as a separate module within any EMR system, as is being done in partnership with Interbit Data for the MEDITECH EMR platform.

Intellectual Property

Since inception, our health IT business has evolved from a development stage company, to a provider and reseller of Personal Health Records and document imaging and scanning systems (MMR Services), to a Licensor of MMR's intellectual property. Continuing through 2013, we remained focused on maximizing the value of our intellectual property portfolio, particularly our 10 U.S. health IT patents that have been granted to date. Our health IT patent portfolio, which we have been building since 2005, currently includes our U.S. patents (with over 250 issued claims), 17 pending U.S. patent applications (with over 400 claims), seven foreign patents including two in Australia with others in New Zealand, Singapore, Japan, Mexico and Canada, and 14 other pending patent applications in foreign countries. These patents have the potential effect of enabling us to control a dominant marketplace position in personal healthcare, being well-positioned to benefit from the explosion in health IT globally. The full term of our health IT patents will not expire until September 12, 2025 or after.

Our health IT patent portfolio includes issued patents on our health IT products and services including our MyMedicalRecords, MyEsafeDepositBox and MMRPro product and services, which is in addition to our portfolio of biotech patents. MMR acquired significant intellectual property assets from the Merger with Favrille and continues to seek ways to exploit and monetize those assets, which include, but are not limited to, data from our pre-Merger clinical vaccine trials, the FavId™/Specifid™ vaccine, and the anti-CD20 antibodies.

Health IT Patents

Through our wholly owned subsidiary, MyMedicalRecords, Inc., we currently have 10 U.S. patents - Nos. 8,117,045 ("Method and System for Providing Online Medical Records"); 8,117,646 ("Method and System for Providing Online Records"); 8,121,855 ("Method and System for Providing Online Medical Records"); 8,321,240 ("Method and System for Providing Online Medical Records"); 8,301,466 ("Method and System for Providing Online Records"); 8,352,287 ("Method for Proving a User with a Service for Accessing and Collecting Personal Health Records"); 8,352,288 ("Method for Providing a User with a Web-Based Service for Accessing and Collecting Records"); 8,498,883 ("Method for Providing a User with a Service for Accessing and Collecting Prescriptions"); 8,626,532 ("Method for Providing a User with a Web- Based Service for Accessing and Collecting Health Records"); and 8,645,161 ("Method and System for Providing Online Records") - as well as additional applications and continuation applications.  These patents cover inventions pertaining to Personal Health Records, Patient Portals and other Electronic Health Record systems.  

At the start of 2013, we were issued two U.S. patents with claims totaling 57: U.S. Patent Nos. 8,352,287 and 8,352,288 were issued on January 8, 2013 after being allowed on November 28 and December 3, 2012, respectively. Significantly, claims in the `287 Patent expanded MMR's patent portfolio with additional claims directed toward a Web-based service to access and collect health records from different types of service providers, including, but not limited to, retail pharmacies as well as hospitals, providers and other healthcare professionals providing services over the Internet. The health records, including prescriptions, may be collected from service providers using various types of messaging including email, facsimile, uploads, and voice. The `288 Patent, our seventh, further raised the bar for our PHR intellectual property in that there are additional claims related to collecting insurance information, calendaring, and other features which are already provided by MMR's products and services. Claims in this patent address how healthcare providers send requested patient information to the patient, caretaker, provider or user by various means, including voice, fax, email or other electronic formats connected to a Personal Health Record system, patient portal or other locations on the Web. They also cover how users collect Personal Health Information on the Web or at other destination addresses without the healthcare provider having to enter specific personal identification numbers of the user. The information collected includes but is in not limited to a patient's medical history, chart notes, vaccination records, laboratory and other test results, prescriptions, and X-rays and images, as well as birth certificates and other important documents such as wills and advance directives.

40


Our eighth U.S. patent - U.S. Patent No. 8,498,883 - was issued on July 30, 2013 after being allowed on June 6, 2013. Claims in the eighth patent, entitled "Method for Providing a User with a Service for Accessing and Collecting Prescriptions," includes 28 claims which are directed toward providing a user with the ability to access and manage prescriptions online by providing features that include sending prescriptions to a pharmacy, accessing prescriptions from a pharmacy, scheduling prescription refills, sending reminders regarding prescription refills including by text or email, and identifying adverse drug interactions by analyzing prescription medications. We received a Notice of Allowance from the USPTO for our ninth patent on August 8, 2013, entitled "Method for Providing a User with a Web-based Service for Accessing and Collecting Health Records," which was issued on January 7, 2014, U.S. Patent No. 8,626,532. The patent includes 27 claims, a portion of which are directed toward enabling users to access and collect their medical records in a secure and private manner using wireless devices such as smartphones, tablets or telemedicine platforms, amongst other systems, and represented a significant addition to MMR's U.S. patent portfolio. Additionally, our tenth U.S. patent, entitled "Method and System for Providing Online Records," was allowed on December 4, 2013 and subsequently issued on February 4, 2014, U.S. Patent No. 8,645,161, with 30 claims directed toward methods for accessing and collecting health records by providing a user interface that further includes a number of additional features which collect and display prescriptions, help submit prescriptions to pharmacies, collect and display health insurance information, send outgoing faxes, allow users to annotate health records and set up appointment reminders for visits with providers as wells as recurring medication reminders through a calendaring function.

Internationally, we have patents issued, pending and applied for in 11 other countries or regional authorities of commercial interest. Seven of the patents issued are in Australia, New Zealand, Singapore, Mexico, Japan and Canada. Each entitled "Method and System for Providing Online Medical Records," the Japanese Patent (#5191895) with 40 claims was issued on February 8, 2013, and the Canadian Patent (#2,615,128) was issued on September 10, 2013 and has 40 claims including claims corresponding to those in U.S. Patent No. 8,301,466. With the Canadian patent, our health IT intellectual property includes all of North America. MMR also has 15 other pending patent applications in foreign countries further including, Hong Kong, Israel, South Korea, Japan, Mexico, Europe, and China. There are also six pending Patent Cooperation Treaty ("PCT") applications. We also have hundreds of patent claims in pending U.S. applications including 17 U.S. utility patent applications related to health information technology. These include applications directed toward a Mobile Platform for Personal Health Records, a Method and System for Managing Personal Health Records with Telemedicine and Personal Health Monitoring Device Features, Prepaid Card Services related to Personal Health Records, a Universal Patient Record Conversion Tool, Aggregation of Data from Third Party Systems into a Personal Health Record Account, Electronic Health Records in Clinical Trials, a Data Exchange with Personal Health Record Service, Delivery of Electronic Medical Records or Electronic Health Records into a Personal Health Records Management System, a Health Record with Inbound and Outbound Fax Functionality, a Method and System for Providing Online Medical Records with Emergency Password, Data Exchange with Personal Health Record Service, Identifying Individual Associated with a Personal Health Record with Health Record Destination Address, and Personal Health Record with Genomics, We believe that many of the pending claims will ultimately be allowed including both health IT and non-health IT/medical applications which are pending in our entire patent portfolio.

After the patent issuances of 2011 through 2013, we believe we hold significant foundational patents under a "Method and System for Providing Online Medical Records," and "Method and System for Providing Online Records" and that the patents are relevant to any provider who transmits Electronic Health Records in that they limit their ability to communicate without infringement. As a result, the process of enforcement and licensing of our patent portfolio through the law firm Liner LLP (aka Liner Grode Stein Yankelevitz Sunshine Regenstreif & Taylor LLP) continued to build throughout 2013.

The Liner law firm is also representing us in the collection of $30 million dollars under our Settlement and Patent License Agreement with SCM as further described in our Litigation Matters section.

Exploiting MMRGlobal Biotech Assets and Patents

Although our primary business is the web-based storage and management of personal and professional health and vital records, we acquired intellectual property rights to certain biotech assets through the 2009 Merger with Favrille, Inc. which currently include five U.S. patents, four U.S. pending patent applications, eleven patents in foreign countries (including a European Patent validated in the following 12 countries: UK, France, Germany, Switzerland, Spain, Italy, Netherlands, Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Ireland and Belgium) and eighteen pending patent applications in foreign countries. We have been working to perfect the patent condition of these biotech assets for over five years. As early as May 2010, we successfully revived Favrille's original U.S. Patent directed to treating B-cell pathologies. Additional U.S. patent applications were also successfully revived (and since issued as U.S. patents) and formed the basis for various additional U.S. filings resulting in issued patents and pending applications. As a result, we now have biotech patents and patent applications pending in 23 foreign countries of commercial interest that provide competitive advantages for this biotechnology. The foreign countries include major European, Asian, North American, and South American markets, including for example, in the United States, Mexico, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Hong Kong, Singapore, Europe (including the 12 countries listed), India, Japan, and South Korea.

In April 2013, we received two Notices of Allowance for our anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody assets, which followed the granting of our first such patent in Mexico in August of last year for "Antibodies and Methods for Making and Using Them." As announced on April 15, 2013, we received a Notice of Allowance from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, resulting in U.S. Patent No. 8,465,741 (issued in June 2013), for our first U.S. patent for the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody IP. Shortly thereafter, on April 22, 2013, we announced that the Australian Patent Office had issued a Notice of Allowance for our anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody assets, Application No. 2007338607 (issued in July 2013), under the same title, "Antibodies and Methods for Making and Using Them." In late 2013, we further received an issued patent in Korea (10-2009-7015196). These additional foreign patents reinforced the value of the U.S. and Mexico antibody patents, and continue to be used to seek expedited allowance in other countries operating under international patent treaties (referred to as the Patent Prosecution

41


Highway). Use of the Patent Prosecution Highway allows both expedited examination and often allowance in various countries, by demonstrating willingness to amend patent claims to the same scope of allowed patent claims granted in another jurisdiction (such as the issued U.S. patent claims in U.S. Patent No. 8,465,741). In countries that do not participate in such treaties (or do not allow the same type of claims as those issued in the U.S.), additional antibody patent applications are being filed or the examining offices are being notified with a request for expedited examination to further enhance the review and issuance of patents in various foreign jurisdictions. These patents for our anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies have particular utility in fighting cancers and are considered important assets of our based on benefits and commercial value demonstrated by Rituxan®, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody with reported sales of USD $7.5 billion in 2013, which is due to go off patent in 2015.

MMRGlobal's biotech assets also include the B-Cell vaccine patents and patent applications entitled "Method and Composition for Altering a B Cell Mediated Pathology" which relate to methods of manufacturing compositions for B-cell vaccines used in the fight against lymphoma and potentially other forms of cancer, including U.S. Patent Nos. 8,637,638; 8,114,404; 8,113,486 and 6,911,204. In January 2014, the fourth U.S. patent for B-Cell vaccine technology was issued (Patent No. 8,637,638) and additional continuation patent filings were made concurrently therewith in the U.S. to obtain still further protection for the compositions and methods of manufacturing compositions for B-cell vaccines used in the fight against lymphoma and potentially other forms of cancer. Issued foreign patents have also been granted for this technology in Europe, Hong Kong, Singapore and Mexico. Additional manufacturing patent applications are filed as such countries award new patents to further enhance the protection of the manufacturing patents already issued. For example, this year additional patents were filed in the U.S., Mexico and Japan to introduce additional patent claims protecting additional methods and compositions for altering B-cell pathologies using self-derived antigens in conjunction with specific-binding cytoreductive agents. In late 2013, the European Union patent (European Patent No. 01979228.2) for methods of manufacturing the B-cell vaccines, was fully validated in various countries selected by us as having particular commercial interest in the technology. The European Union patent has now been validated in and is enforceable in the following countries: United Kingdom, France, Germany, Switzerland, Spain, Italy, the Netherlands, Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Ireland and Belgium.

Currently, our biotech patent portfolio includes U.S. and foreign patents with expiration dates of August 2021 or later, relating to the manufacture of the B-cell vaccines. The issued antibody patents (and other patents which may issue relating to this technology) have substantially later expiration dates of September 2027 or later. Additional patent applications once granted may obtain additional term of biotech patent protection.

Our biotech assets are comprised of patents and pending patent applications, patient samples and data from the FavId™/Specifid™ idiotype vaccine trials and our proprietary anti-CD20 antibody panels to treat B-cell lymphoma and additional B-Cell mediated conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis. Subsequent to the Merger, we have recovered additional intellectual property, including certain physical assets used by Favrille, Inc. in the form of over 1,800 patient tissue samples, samples of the B-Cell vaccine, a collection of insect cells used in the manufacture of the vaccine (as protected by various U.S. and foreign patents) and other materials collected during the pre-Merger FavId/Specifid vaccine trials.

On December 22, 2010, we entered into a non-exclusive agreement with Celgene to license the use of our clinical and scientific data (originated by Favrille) related to targeted immunotherapies for cancer and other disease treatments to stimulate a patient's immune response and certain other confidential information. In consideration for the rights granted under the Agreement, Celgene agreed to pay us certain upfront fees and development milestones. When a milestone is reached it automatically triggers a payment to MMR.

We continue to work with scientists and experienced venture capitalists to assist us in generating revenue through licensing agreements as would be usual and customary in that industry. Moreover, we plan to continue pursuing license agreements with companies like Celgene that have expertise in the area of biotechnology and specifically in treating lymphomas and other cancers, and which can benefit from the use of our clinical and scientific data.

Other Intellectual Property and Trademarks

We own federal registrations for the trademarks MMRGlobal, MMRPRO, and MY MEDICAL RECORDS. In addition, we own the URL and domain name for the web address  www.MyMedicalRecords.com . We also own the domain names  www.MyMedicalRecordsMD.com www.MMRPro.com  and  www.MMRPatientView.com  for use with MyMedicalRecords Pro and own the domain name  www.MyEsafeDepositBox.com  for use with our MyEsafeDepositBox product as well as numerous other domains for marketing and new product development purposes. We also own the source code for our products.

As we continue to develop our products, we continue to register our trade names and logos as trademarks and service marks and will seek to protect the copyrights in the initial and any other proprietary content that we develop to support our MyMedicalRecords PHR, MyEsafe and MMRPro products. We also own the source code for a handheld software program, developed to operate on the Palm operating system, which allows Palm users to create a personal medical history on a personal data assistant, or PDA, so that they can have access to this information while traveling and in the event an Internet connection is not available. We are in the process of developing applications to use MyMedicalRecords and MMRPro products on other handheld devices.

42


Employees

As of December 31, 2013, we employed a total of six full-time employees and regularly use the full-time services of an additional four consultants. We also rely on a team of more than 9 developers and programmers located in India and Omaha, Nebraska.

Legal Proceedings

From time to time, we are involved in various legal proceedings generally incidental to our business. While the result of any litigation contains an element of uncertainty, our management presently believes that the outcome of any known, pending or threatened legal proceeding or claim, individually or combined, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial statements.

On December 9, 2011, MyMedicalRecords, Inc. entered into a Non-Exclusive Settlement and Patent License Agreement (the "Agreement") with Surgery Center Management LLC ("SCM"). In consideration for the rights granted under the Agreement and in consideration of a settlement and release agreement, SCM contracted to pay MMR an initial payment of $5 million payable on December 23, 2011 and additional payments of $5 million per year for five consecutive years. After numerous attempts to collect the past due amount of $5 million, on January 19, 2012, MyMedicalRecords, Inc. filed a lawsuit in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles for breach of contract and is seeking damages in an amount of $30 million. On or about February 13, 2014, SCM answered the MMR complaint and filed a cross-complaint against MMR alleging claims of breach of contract, among other things. We do not have enough facts at this time to predict the chances of either a favorable or unfavorable outcome, nor do we have any facts upon which to base any information regarding collectability.

On January 29, 2013, MMR filed a complaint for patent infringement against Walgreen Co., titled  MyMedicalRecords, Inc. v. Walgreen Co. , United States District Court, Central District of California ("Walgreen I"). The complaint alleges that Walgreen Co. is infringing MMR's Personal Health Records patent, U.S. Patent No. 8,301,466. On January 13, 2014, MMR filed a complaint for patent infringement against Walgreen Co., titled  MyMedicalRecords, Inc. v. Walgreen Co. , United States District Court, Central District of California ("Walgreen II"). The complaint alleges that Walgreen Co. is infringing MMR's Personal Health Records patent, U.S. Patent No. 8,498,883. On February 13, 2014, Walgreen Co. filed a Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 8,301,466 ("IPR Proceeding") at the United States Patent and Trademark Office. On March 6, 2014, the Company and Walgreen Co. entered into a settlement agreement, the terms of which are confidential, which will result in the dismissal with prejudice of Walgreen I and Walgreen II and the dismissal of the IPR Proceeding. On March 25, 2014 the USPTO ordered that the joint motion to terminate the [IPR] proceeding be granted and the proceeding thereby terminated.

On February 11, 2013, MMR filed a complaint for patent infringement against WebMD Health Corp. and its wholly owned subsidiary WebMD Health Services Group, Inc. (collectively, "WebMD"), titled  MyMedicalRecords, Inc. v. WebMD Health Corp et al. , United States District Court, Central District of California. That complaint alleged that WebMD is infringing MMR's Personal Health Records patent U.S. Patent No. 8,301,466. MMR subsequently withdrew the complaint per an agreement allowing MMR to the right to re-file without prejudice unless an agreement is reached within a specific period of time. On August 27, 2013, MMR terminated the agreement with WebMD. On October 2, 2013, MMR filed a new complaint against WebMD in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,301,466 and 8,498,883. This matter is currently in the initial stages and we do not have enough facts at this time to predict the changes of either a favorable or unfavorable outcome, nor do we have any facts upon which to base any information regarding collectability.

On April 10, 2013, MMR filed a complaint for patent infringement against Quest Diagnostics Inc. ("Quest") in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, alleging that Quest Diagnostics Inc. is infringing U.S. Patent No. 8,301,466. On October 11, 2013, MMR filed an unopposed motion to add a claim of infringement of U.S. Patent 8,498,883 to its complaint against Quest, which was granted on October 29, 2013. This matter is currently in the initial stages and we do not have enough facts at this time to predict the chances of either a favorable or unfavorable outcome, nor do we have any facts upon which to base any information regarding collectability.

On May 17, 2013, MMR filed a complaint for patent infringement against Jardogs, LLC (the "Jardogs Complaint") in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, alleging that Jardogs, LLC infringes U.S. Patent No. 8,301,466. On September 23, 2013, MMR filed a separate complaint for patent infringement against Allscripts Healthcare Solutions Inc. ("Allscripts") titled MyMedicalRecords, Inc. v. Allscripts Healthcare Solutions Inc., United States District Court, Central District of California (the "Separate Allscripts Complaint"). The Separate Allscripts Complaint alleged that Allscripts is infringing U.S. Patent Nos. 8,301,466 and 8,498,883. On October 4, 2013, MMR filed a motion to amend the Jardogs Complaint to add Allscripts as a party defendant and to allege that Allscripts is infringing U.S. Patent Nos. 8,301,466 and 8,498,883. The Court granted that motion on November 1, 2013. Thereafter, MMR dismissed the Separate Allscripts Complaint. This matter is currently in the initial stages and we do not have enough facts at this time to predict the changes of either a favorable or unfavorable outcome, nor do we have any facts upon which to base any information regarding collectability.

MMR has received a letter from Sunil Singhal, a former employee. Mr. Sunil Singhal was employed as Executive Vice President of Technology and Product Development at MMR. He was placed on a 30-day administrative leave on February 13, 2012 and was given a 30-day notice of termination as approved by the Board of Directors of MMRGlobal on February 29, 2012. On March 30, 2012, Mr. Singhal was officially terminated. He filed a charge with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, but that body has declined to take action. In turn, he filed a claim with the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing ("DFEH").  The DFEH had declined to bring a citation, but it has issued a "right to sue" notice.  Mr. Singhal filed suit in the Los Angeles County Superior Court in 2013. MMR answered the

43


complaint denying liability and damages. Discovery is underway. The Superior Court has requested that the parties engage in mediation. No trial date has been set.

On October 18, 2012, MMR was named as a defendant in an action filed in the California Superior Court, County of Los Angeles, by Naj Allana.  The matter was settled and the case dismissed.

Reports

Our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or to furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are available free of charge through the SEC's website http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001285701&owner=include&count=40&hidefilings=0, after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC.

You may also read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room, located at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549, on official business days during the hours of 10:00 am to 3:00 pm. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at http://www.sec.gov.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

You should read the following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations together with our financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. This discussion may contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements due to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, including those risks discussed under "Risk Factors" and elsewhere in this prospectus.

Overview

As described above, on January 27, 2009, we consummated a transaction with MMR, Inc. through a merger of our wholly-owned subsidiary with and into MMR pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement. In connection with the Merger, MMR Inc. became our wholly-owned subsidiary, with the former stockholders of MMR Inc. collectively owning (or having the right to acquire) shares of our common stock representing approximately 60.3% of the voting power of our capital stock on a fully diluted basis.

For accounting purposes, the Merger was treated as a reverse acquisition with MMR Inc. being the accounting acquirer. Accordingly, the historical financial results prior to the Merger are those of MMR Inc. and replace our historical financial results as we existed prior to the Merger.

We were incorporated in Delaware in 2000 and are headquartered in Los Angeles, CA. Effective February 9, 2009, after the Merger, we changed our corporate name to MMR Information Systems, Inc., or MMRIS. Subsequently, on June 16, 2010, we changed our name to MMRGlobal, Inc., which we believe more accurately reflects the nature of our operations.  

Starting in 2005, we began filing for patent protection for our PHR products and services. Over the last seven years, these patents have been in the process of issuance and we now have patents issued, pending, and applied for in numerous countries around the world.

Going Concern

As of December 31, 2013, current liabilities of $10,046,008 exceeded cash and cash equivalents of $10,359. As a result of the above, there is uncertainty about our ability to continue as a going concern.

Historically, we have issued capital stock, sold debt and equity securities and received funds from The RHL Group, Inc. (a significant stockholder that is wholly-owned by our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President) to operate our business. Although we received additional funding from The RHL Group pursuant to the Eight Amended and Restated Note dated April 29, 2013, we may be required to obtain additional financing in order to meet payment. As a result of the above, we express uncertainty about our ability to continue as a going concern.

On May 8, 2012, we filed a Form S-1 related to the offer and resale of up to 100,000,000 shares of our common stock, by the selling stockholder, Granite State Capital, LLC ("Granite"). Granite has agreed to purchase all 100,000,000 shares pursuant to the Investment Agreement dated April 16, 2012 (the "Investment Agreement"), between Granite and us. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Investment Agreement, we have the right to put up to $15 million in shares of our common stock to Granite. As of December 31, 2013 the amount available under the equity line facility was $13.5 million, however, that amount could be reduced based on the market price of our stock at the time any shares are sold.

44


Our management intends to continue to utilize our available line of credit with The RHL Group (see Note 3), if necessary to address our uncertainty to continue as a going concern. At December 31, 2013, we had approximately $1,900,000 remaining as available under The RHL Group line of credit. Furthermore, we plan to continue to utilize portions of our standby equity line facility with Granite as needed. Additionally, we plan to continue selling additional debt and equity securities, continue to settle our existing liabilities through issuance of equity securities, explore other debt financing arrangements, continue to increase our existing subscriber and affiliate customer base, sell MMRPro products, and continue licensing our intellectual property to obtain additional cash flow over the next twelve months. We cannot assure you that funds from these sources will be available when needed or, if available, will be on terms favorable to us or to our stockholders. If we raise additional funds or settle liabilities by issuing equity securities, the percentage ownership of our stockholders will be reduced, stockholders may experience additional dilution or such equity securities may provide for rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of the holders of our common stock. For further details regarding our indebtedness with The RHL Group, Inc., see "-Liquidity and Capital Resources-Description of Indebtedness-The RHL Group, Inc.," below.

If we are unable to utilize our available line of credit with The RHL Group, the Granite equity line of credit, or obtain suitable alternative debt or equity financing, our ability to execute our business plan and continue as a going concern may be adversely affected.

Description of Indebtedness

The RHL Group, Inc.

For a complete description of our indebtedness to The RHL Group, please See Note 3 to the Financial Statements entitled - Related Party Note Payable, included elsewhere in this prospectus.

The RHL Group Note payable had a balance of $1,355,761 at December 31, 2013. The components of the RHL Group Note payable and the related balance sheet presentation as of December 31, 2013 are as follows: $979,545, which is included in the line of credit, related party; and $376,216 related to other obligations due to The RHL Group which are included in related party payables.

Total interest expense on this note for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 amounted to $132,804 and $155,866 respectively. The unpaid interest balances as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 were approximately $24,000 and $35,000, respectively.

Promissory Notes

During the first quarter of 2013, we entered into 14 different Convertible Promissory Notes with 11 different unrelated third-parties for principal amounts totaling $0.49 million, with fixed conversion prices ranging from $0.02 to $0.028. These notes have the option to be converted into a total of 24,035,715 shares of our common stock. As of December 31, 2013, all of these notes have been converted.

During the second quarter of 2013, we entered into 13 different Convertible Promissory Notes with 13 different unrelated third- parties for principal amounts totaling $0.89 million with fixed conversion prices ranging from $0.0339 to $0.08. These notes have the option to be converted into a total of 19,263,258 shares of our common stock. As of December 31, 2013, all of these notes have been converted.

During the third quarter of 2013, we entered into seven different Convertible Promissory Notes with seven different unrelated third-parties for principal amounts totaling $0.52 million with fixed conversion prices ranging from $0.0265 to $0.035. These notes have the option to be converted into a total of 17,691,199 shares of our common stock. As of December 31, four notes with total principal of $0.17 million have been converted.

During the fourth quarter of 2013, we did not enter into any Convertible Promissory Notes. During that period, one note with a principal balance of $50,000 was converted.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of net revenue and expenses during each reporting period. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates, including those related to revenue recognition, allowances for doubtful accounts, the valuation of deferred income taxes, tax contingencies, long-lived and intangible assets, valuation of derivative liabilities and stock-based compensation. These estimates are based on historical experience and on various other factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates. For additional information relating to these and other accounting policies, see note 2 to our financial statements appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.

45


Revenue Recognition

Our revenues are derived from the sale of services, hardware, and software systems used for providing electronic access to consumer medical records and other vital documents, as well as from the licensing of our intellectual property rights and services. We recognize revenue for such services only when the price is fixed or determinable, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the service is performed, and collectability of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured.

Our subscriber revenues consist of annual and monthly recurring retail subscriptions and usage-based fees, which are primarily paid in advance by credit card, and corporate accounts that are based on either an access-fee or actual number of users, and in each case billed in advance at the beginning of each month of service. We defer the portion of annual recurring subscription fees collected in advance and recognize them on a straight line basis over the subscription period.

We grant exclusive licenses for the sale and marketing of our services in international territories in consideration of an up-front license fee and an ongoing royalty. The royalty fee is usually a percentage of revenue earned by the licensee and there usually are certain minimum guarantees. License fee revenues received in advance from international licensees for the grant of the license are deferred and recognized over the period covered by the agreement. Minimum guaranteed royalty payments received in advance are deferred and recognized over the period to which the royalty relates. All such revenues are included under "License Fees and Other." In those cases where a license agreement contains multiple deliverables, the agreement is accounted for in accordance with ASC 605- 025 (formerly EITF 00-21, " Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables  "). As of the date hereof, we no longer had any active international licensing agreements.

We recognize revenue on sales of our MMRPro system in accordance with ASC 605-25,  Revenue Recognition, Multiple-Element Arrangements .

Our multiple-deliverable arrangements consist solely of our MMRPro product. Significant deliverables within these arrangements include sophisticated scanning equipment, various licenses to use third party software, a license to use our proprietary MMRPro application software, installation and training, dedicated telephone lines, secure online storage and warranties.

We determined all elements to be separate units of accounting as they have standalone value to the customers and/or they are sold by other vendors on a standalone basis. Delivery of the hardware and certain software elements of these arrangements occur at the inception of the agreement. We deliver installation and training at the inception of the agreement. We provide other software licenses, telephone lines and online secure storage over the three year term of the agreement. We include warranties in the arrangements, however the third party product manufacturer, and not us, is obligated to fulfill such warranties. The contracts are paid in advance and are not refundable.

We allocate the revenue derived from these arrangements among all the deliverables. We base such allocation on the relative selling price of each deliverable. With the exception of our proprietary MMRPro application software, we use third party evidence to set the selling prices used for this allocation. In all such cases, third parties sell the same or very similar products. For the MMRPro application software, we estimate the selling price based on recent discussions regarding licensure of that particular application on a standalone basis. To date, we have not licensed this software on a standalone basis.

We recognize the allocated revenue for each deliverable in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") No. 104,  Topic 13: Revenue Recognition . Under this guidance, we recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the price is fixed and determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. This results in us recognizing revenue for the hardware, certain software and the warranties upon delivery to the customer, for the installation and training upon completion of these services, and ratably over the contract period for the software licenses, telephone lines and online secure storage.

Revenue from the licensing of our Health Information Technology and biotech patents and related assets may include non- refundable license and up-front fees, non-refundable milestone payments that are triggered upon achievement of a specific event and future royalties or lump-sum payments on sales of related products. For agreements that provide for milestone payments, such as the Celgene Agreement, we adopted ASC 605-28-25,  Revenue Recognition, Milestone Method.

Accounting for Income Taxes and Uncertain Tax Positions

We account for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740-10,  Income Taxes . We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities to reflect the estimated future tax effects, calculated at the tax rate expected to be in effect at the time of realization. We record a valuation allowance related to a deferred tax asset when it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of the changes in tax laws and rates of the date of enactment.

ASC 740-10 prescribes a recognition threshold that a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements and provides guidance on recognition, measurement, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition issues. We classify interest and penalties as a component of interest and other expenses. To date, we have not been assessed, nor have we paid, any interest or penalties.

46


We measure and record uncertain tax positions by establishing a threshold for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. Only tax positions meeting the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold at the effective date may be recognized or continue to be recognized.

Intangible Assets

We account for website development costs in accordance with the provisions of ASC 350-50 and ASC 985-20. Pursuant to these provisions we capitalize internally developed website costs when the website under development has reached technological feasibility. These costs are amortized, typically over an estimated life of five years, using the larger of the amount calculated using the straight-line method or the amount calculated using the ratio between current period gross revenues and the total of current period gross revenues and estimated future gross revenues. At each balance sheet date, we evaluate the unamortized capitalized website costs compared to the net realizable value. The amount by which the unamortized capitalized website costs exceed its net realizable value is written off. The determination of estimated future gross revenues requires the exercise of judgment and assumptions by our management and actual results could vary significantly from such estimates.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Intangibles

We evaluate long-lived assets and identifiable intangible assets with finite useful lives in accordance with ASC 350-30 and ASC 360, and accordingly, management reviews our long-lived assets and identifiable intangible assets with finite useful lives for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. We recognize an impairment loss when the sum of the future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be realized from the asset is less than its carrying amount. If an asset is considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair value. Considerable judgment is necessary to estimate the fair value of the assets and accordingly, actual results could vary significantly from such estimates. Our most significant estimates and judgments relating to the long-lived asset impairments include the timing and amount of projected future cash flows.

Share-Based Compensation

We account for share-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718-20,  Awards Classified as Equity . We apply ASC 718-20 in accounting for stock-based awards issued to employees under the recognition of compensation expense related to the fair value of employee share-based awards, including stock options and restricted stock. Determining the fair value of options at the grant date requires judgment, including estimating the expected term that stock options will be outstanding prior to exercise, the associated volatility and the expected dividends. Judgment is required in estimating the amount of share-based awards expected to be forfeited prior to vesting. If actual forfeitures differ significantly from these estimates, share-based compensation expense could be materially impacted.

We account for options and warrants issued to non-employees in accordance with ASC 505-50,  Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees . We treat options and warrants issued to non-employees the same as those issued to employees with the exception of determination of the measurement date. The measurement date is the earlier of (1) the date at which a commitment for performance by the counterparty to earn the equity instruments is reached, or (2) the date at which the counterparty's performance is complete. Options and warrants granted to consultants are valued at their respective measurement dates, and recognized as expense based on the portion of the total consulting services provided during the applicable period. As further consulting services are provided in future periods, we will revalue the associated options and warrants and recognize additional expense based on their then current values.

We estimate the fair value of each stock option on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. We determine assumptions relative to volatility and anticipated forfeitures at the time of grant. We base the assumptions used in the Black-Scholes models upon the following data: (1) our use of the contractual life of the underlying non-employee warrants as the expected life; the expected life of the employee options used in this calculation is the period of time the options are expected to be outstanding and has been determined based on historical exercise experience; (2) in the absence of an extensive public market for our shares, the expected stock price volatility of the underlying shares over the expected term of the option or warrant was taken at approximately the mid-point of the range for similar companies at the various grant dates; (3) we base the risk free interest rate on published U.S. Treasury Department interest rates for the expected terms of the underlying options or warrants; (4) we base expected dividends on historical dividend data and expected future dividend activity; and (5) we base the expected forfeiture rate on historical forfeiture activity and assumptions regarding future forfeitures based on the composition of current grantees.

47


Results of Operations

During 2013, the Company changed the focus of its business from the direct sales of its products and services to licensing and strategic partnership relationships whereby through those licensing and partnership relationships the Company projects receiving substantially increased revenue in the form of up front licensing fees plus sales of the Company's products and services.

The following table sets forth items in our statements of operations for the periods indicated.

        Year Ended
        December 31,
        2013     2012
               
Revenues              
Subscriber     $ 177,687    $ 161,923 
MMRPro       288,197      453,048 
License fees       64,011      128,000 
Other income       57,410      61,372 
     Total revenues       587,305      804,343 
Cost of revenues       262,653      588,672 
     Gross profit       324,652      215,671 
General and administrative expenses       5,344,713      3,356,382 
Sales and marketing expenses       1,966,694      2,055,089 
Technology development       77,715      245,663 
     Loss from operations       (7,064,470)     (5,441,463)
Other income       16,884      -  
Interest and other finance charges, net       (591,183)     (461,040)
Net loss     $ (7,638,769)   $ (5,902,503)

Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2013 to Year Ended December 31, 2012

Revenues .  Revenues decreased by $217,038, or 27.0%, to $587,305 for the year ended December 31, 2013 from $804,343 for the year ended December 31, 2012 due to a decrease in biotech licensing fees, as no milestone payments came due in the current year, and a decrease in MMRPro sales due to the changes that needed to be made in the product as a result of the Kodak bankruptcy.

Cost of revenue .  Cost of revenue decreased by $326,019, or 55.4%, to $262,653 for the year ended December 31, 2013 from $588,672 for the year ended December 31, 2012 primarily due to reduced costs of development and renegotiated monthly recurring fees for hosting and storage.

Operating expenses.  The following table sets forth the individual components of our operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012:

        Year Ended
        December 31,
        2013       2012
                 
General and administrative expenses     $ 5,344,713      $ 3,356,382 
Sales and marketing expenses       1,966,694        2,055,089 
Technology development       77,715        245,663 
     Total     $ 7,389,122      $ 5,657,134 

Operating expenses increased by $1,731,988 or30.6% to $7,389,122 for the year ended December 31, 2013, from $5,657,134 for the year ended December 31, 2012. This was primarily due to costs in connection with our strategy of focusing on licensing of the Company's patents and other intellectual property. As a result our general and administrative expenses increased as described below.

General and administrative expenses increased by $1,988,331, or 59.2% to $5,344,713 for the year ended December 31, 2013, from $3,356,382 for the year ended December 31, 2012. Increases included approximately $860,000 in legal expenses related to patent litigation and licensing, $800,000 in consulting fees as part the Company's focus on licensing.

48


Sales and marketing expenses as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 were $2,032,658 and $2,055,089, respectively which remained relatively flat.

Technology development expenses decreased by $167,948, or 68.4%, to $77,715 for the year ended December 31, 2013, from $245,663 for the year ended December 31, 2012. The decrease was primarily due to lower salary expenses.

Interest and Other Finance Charges, Net.  We had interest and other financing charges, of $591,183 for the year ended December 31, 2013, an increase of $130,143 from $461,040 for the year ended December 31, 2012. The increase was primarily due to higher non-cash interest expense attributed to the conversion feature and warrant issued in conjunction with Convertible Notes.

Net loss . As a result of the foregoing, we had a net loss of $7,638,769 for the year ended December 31, 2013, compared to a net loss of $5,902,503 for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2013, our current liabilities exceeded our current assets by $9,665,955. Furthermore, during the year ended December 31, 2013, we incurred losses of $7,638,769. At the current level of borrowing, we require cash of $275,000 per year to service our debt and, in order to continue operating its business, we use an average of $278,000 cash per month, or $3.3 million per year.

In addition to the above cash burn from operations, we will be required to obtain additional financing in order to meet the obligations for installment payments of $621,000 under the Creditor Plan, and our obligations under the secured indebtedness to The RHL Group (which note payable had a balance of $1,355,761 at December 31, 2013), among other debt obligations. Such obligations are currently due and payable pursuant to the terms of the notes.

To finance its activities, have relied on the issuance of stock and debt to the RHL Group. At December 31, 2013, we had a line of credit with the RHL Group in the amount of $4.5 million. Availability under this line of credit was $1.9 million as of December 31, 2013.

In addition, we may continue to utilize portions of our standby equity line facility with Granite as needed. During 2013, we also raised $1.9 million in convertible debt. We expect to continue offering a limited amount of convertible debt in 2014. We also expect to begin receiving (i) royalties from license fees related to its health information technology patents and other intellectual property, (ii) more than $500,000 from existing license agreements pertaining to its biotech assets, (iii) additional proceeds from sales from MMRPro, PHRs and other services that will significantly improve its monthly sales and reduce annual cash burn from operations.

Cash Flows for the Year Ended December 31, 2013 compared to Year Ended December 31, 2012

Net cash used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2013 was $2,924,515, compared to $2,122,561 used in the similar period in 2012. In 2013, we had a net loss of $7,638,769, less non-cash adjustments (depreciation, amortization, common stock and warrants issued for services and interest, change in valuation of derivative liabilities, gain or loss of disposition of assets, stock compensation expense and the non-cash write-down of assets) of $3,531,920, plus changes in operating assets and liabilities of $1,182,334. In 2012, cash used in operating activities included net loss of $5,902,503, less similar non-cash adjustments of $2,208,966, less changes in operating assets and liabilities of $1,570,886. Compared to 2012, non-cash adjustments in 2013 increased primarily due to the increase in warrants and common stock issued for services. Net cash used in investing activities increased to $543,899 in 2013, compared to net cash used in investing activities of $395,707 in 2012 due to the net effect of higher patent filing expenses offset by lower website development costs. Net cash provided by financing activities totaled $3,442,118 during 2013, compared to $2,243,820 in 2012. Financing activities primarily included proceeds generated from the issuance of common shares and net proceeds from draw downs on our line of credit from the RHL Group, Inc., a significant stockholder wholly-owned by Robert H. Lorsch, our chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President. As of December 31, 2013, we had

cash and cash equivalents of $10,359, compared to $36,655 at December 31, 2012. As of December 31, 2013, we had availability under The RHL Group credit line of $1,874,841 at December 31, 2013 compared to $1,498,211 at December 31, 2012.

Commitments and Contingencies

For information relating to our commitments and contingent liabilities, please see Note 9 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2013.

49


MANAGEMENT

Executive officers and directors

The following table lists the names and ages as of April 30, 2014, and positions of the individuals who serve as our directors and executive officers:

Name

Age

Principal Occupation

Robert H. Lorsch

64

Chief Executive Officer of MMRGlobal, Inc.

Douglas H. Helm

72

President and Managing Member of Helm Consulting Group LLC

Jack Zwissig

65

Chief Executive Officer of Zwissig and Associates

Mike Finley

53

Vice President, Global Carrier and Distribution Business Development of Qualcomm

Bernard Stolar

67

Consultant to the video games industry and a marketing and strategic planning advisor for our wholly-owned subsidiary, MMR

Ivor Royston

69

Founding Managing Member of Forward Ventures

Ingrid Safranek

41

Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer

Robert H. Lorsch, Chairman of the Board; Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Lorsch has served as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since 2005. He is also Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of The RHL Group, Inc., a private equity and business management consulting firm Mr. Lorsch formed in April 1998. In 1994, he co-founded SmarTalk TeleServices, Inc. ("SmarTalk"), with $5000, leading the company through a successful public offering in 1996 and building it into one of the largest providers of prepaid telecommunications products and services. Mr. Lorsch served as its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer until January 1998, when, with a 500 million dollar market cap, he left the company to remain in Los Angeles while SmarTalk moved its headquarters to Dublin, Ohio. In 1986, Mr. Lorsch founded Lorsch Creative Network, a full-service advertising and sales promotion agency that did marketing, advertising and sales promotion programs for nationally and internationally recognized clients, including the ABC, CBS and NBC television networks, Marvel Entertainment, Procter & Gamble, Johnson & Johnson, McDonald's Corporation and Northrop Grumman, among many others. In 1998, the Lorsch Creative Network became The RHL Group, Inc. ( www.rhlgroup.com ). He has served on the Personal Health Record Steering Committee of the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society from 2006 to 2007. He spent nearly 30 years as a Member of the Board of Trustees of the California Science Center, where the Robert H. Lorsch Family Pavilion stands as a gateway to the world- class museum, and was a National Vice President and President of the Executive Committee/Western Region of the Muscular Dystrophy Association. He also served a four-year term on the State-appointed Board of Directors for California Science Center and Exposition Park, and was a member of the Gaming Policy Advisory Committee of the California Gambling Control Commission. Mr. Lorsch's current philanthropic activities include serving as a member of the Board of Governors for Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, and, since 1998, as a member of the Board of Directors and Executive Committee of D.A.R.E. America. In 2011 and 2014, he with his wife Kira served as Co-Chairs of The Thalians annual fundraising galas benefiting the mental health and wellness programs for America's wounded military and their families served by UCLA Health System's Operation Mend. Mr. Lorsch has received numerous honors and awards, including D.A.R.E. America's "Future of America Award," the Muscular Dystrophy Association's "Humanitarian of the Year Award," and the Starlight Children's Foundation's "Golden Wish Award." Mr. Lorsch was also awarded the Private Sector Initiatives Citation, or C-Flag, from the White House during the Reagan Administration for his commitment to raising millions of dollars for financing state and local earthquake preparedness education. Mr. Lorsch continues to serve as Chairman of the Board of MMR and acts as its Chief Executive Officer.

We believe that Mr. Lorsch's qualifications to continue to serve on our Board of Directors include his 40 years of experience as the chief executive officer of various successful corporations he founded, his knowledge of business management, his experience as a member of numerous organizational committees, his position as our current Chief Executive Officer and his direct responsibility for all areas of our operations.

Douglas H. Helm, Director.  Mr. Helm is the managing member of Helm Consulting Group LLC, a global consultancy firm.  From 2002 to 2009 he was associated with Employers Direct Corporation, Agoura Hills, CA, serving in various capacities, including marketing consultant, Vice President and Chief Marketing & Sales Officer of Employers Direct Insurance Company and Chief Operating Officer of its benefit subsidiary, Plenary Insurance Services, until its sale in October 2009.  Mr. Helm has over 40 years of experience in insurance and information services and has worked internationally in Russia, China and Europe.  Mr. Helm majored in Labor Economics at the University of Washington and received a J.D. from Northwestern School of Law in 1973. Mr. Helm is a member of the Oregon State Bar.

We believe that Mr. Helm's qualifications to continue to serve on our Board of Directors include his 40 years of experience in insurance and information services, his experience in marketing and consulting, his experience in the positions he has gained as vice president, chief marketing & sales officer and chief operating officer, and his legal background.

50


Jack Zwissig, Director . Since 1992, Mr. Zwissig has served as Chief Executive Officer of Zwissig and Associates, a consulting and executive leadership training firm that primarily concentrates on the designing and implementing of corporate culture change, including mergers and acquisitions. Throughout his tenure as head of Zwissig and Associates, Mr. Zwissig has offered consulting, marketing and advertising services to some of America's leading corporations and has led numerous corporate teambuilding workshops and seminars, both in the U.S. and abroad. Mr. Zwissig received a B.S. in Marketing and Management and a M.B.A. from Santa Clara University.

We believe that Mr. Zwissig's qualifications to continue to serve on our Board of Directors include his 18 years of experience as chief executive officer of a consulting and executive leadership training firm, his knowledge of marketing and management, and his business background.

Mike Finley, Director. Mr. Finley is a respected leader in the telecommunications industry long-recognized for creating and growing businesses. He currently serves as Vice President, Global Carrier and Distribution Business Development for Qualcomm. Previously, he was President of the West Region for Sprint Nextel from 2006 to 2008 and a Senior Vice President of Sprint Corporation. He joined Nextel in 2002 as Area Vice President of Southern California and was promoted following the Sprint Nextel merger to Senior Vice President of General Business for the U.S. Prior to joining Nextel, Mr. Finley was a Senior Vice President of Wingcast, a joint venture between Ford Motor Company and Qualcomm which developed telematic products for Ford vehicles. From 1993 to 2001, Mr. Finley served as President of Verizon Wireless in Southern California, Vice President and General Manager in Sacramento and was Vice President of Sales in Ohio for Airtouch Cellular.  Prior to joining Airtouch, he held positions with Cellular One and McCaw Cellular. He began his career in communications in 1985 as a co-founder of Celluland, a national franchise which created an alternative distribution approach in advance of consumer marketing of wireless products. Mr. Finley is a graduate of Creighton University with a BSBA in Marketing and the General Manager Program in Executive Education at Harvard Business School. He currently serves as a Board Member of the Los Angeles Sports and Entertainment Commission, Member of the Region 1 Homeland Security Advisory Council, and Member of the Creighton University Hall of Fame.  Mr. Finley also served as a Member of the Board of Advisors of the Company, which he vacated upon joining the Company's Board of Directors.

We believe that Mr. Finley's qualifications to continue to serve on our Board of Directors include his vast expertise in the telecommunications industry with specific marketing expertise in the mobile technology sector and his experience in senior management positions at large corporations.

Bernard Stolar, Director . Mr. Stolar currently serves on the Board of Directors of Worlds.com, a Public Company, as a consultant to the video games industry, and as marketing and strategic planning advisor for our wholly-owned subsidiary, MMR. From February 2007 to September 2008, Mr. Stolar served as Games Industry Evangelist for Google, Inc., where his responsibilities included building in-game advertising. From February 2006 until its purchase by Google, Inc. in February 2007, Mr. Stolar was the Chairman of the Board of Adscape Media. Prior to this, from January 2002 to November 2002, Mr. Stolar was President and Chief Operating Officer of BAM! Entertainment, where he helped transform the company from a content provider for hand-held electronics into a developer and marketer of interactive entertainment for next generation video game consoles. From January 2000 until the division was sold in April 2001, Mr. Stolar served as President of Mattel Interactive, where he was responsible for all of Mattel's software, on-line and computer-enhanced toys. Mr. Stolar also served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Sega of America, Inc. from June 1996 to October 1999 and as an Executive Vice President with Sony Computer Entertainment of America from 1994 to June 1996.

We believe that Mr. Stolar's qualifications to continue to serve on our Board of Directors include his marketing and strategic planning experience, his experience as chairman of the board of Adscape Media, and his experience as president and chief operating officer of various companies.

Ivor Royston, Director. Dr. Royston is a Founding Managing Member of Forward Ventures. From 1990-2000, he served as the founding President and CEO of the non-profit Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center. From 1978 to 1990, he was on the faculty of the medical school and cancer center at the University of California, San Diego. In 1978, Dr. Royston was a co-founder of Hybritech, Inc., San Diego's first biotechnology company; and in 1986, he co-founded IDEC Corporation, which merged with Biogen to form Biogen Idec. Dr. Royston currently serves on the boards of directors of HemaQuest Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Biocept, Inc., and Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc. He formerly served on the board of directors of LigoCyte Pharmaceuticals, Inc. before its acquisition last year by Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited. Dr. Royston has been instrumental in the formation, financing, and development of numerous biotechnology companies, including: Applied Molecular Evolution (acquired by Eli Lilly); Corixa (acquired by GlaxoSmithKline); Dynavax; Morphotek (acquired by Eisai); Sequana Therapeutics (acquired by Celera); TargeGen (acquired by Sanofi); and Triangle Pharmaceuticals (acquired by Gilead). Dr. Royston received his B.A. (1967) and M.D. (1970) degrees from Johns Hopkins University and completed post-doctoral training in internal medicine and medical oncology at Stanford University. In 1997, President Clinton appointed Dr. Royston to a six-year term on the National Cancer Advisory Board.  In 2006, Dr. Royston was inducted into the San Diego Entrepreneur Hall of Fame.

We believe that Dr. Royston's qualifications to serve on our Board of Directors are invaluable to us based on his 35 years of experience as a leader in the biotechnology industry since its inception and, in particular, his more than 12 years of knowledge and experience pertaining to our biotech assets because he served on the Board of Directors of Favrille, Inc. prior to its merger with us in 2009. Dr. Royston's expertise spans the market for our patents, antibody assets and patient samples augmented by his experience as an oncologist, immunologist, venture capitalist and a director of numerous biotech companies, as well as his position as a Founding Managing Member of Forward Ventures.

51


Ingrid Safranek, Chief Financial Officer. Ms. Safranek was appointed as the Chief Financial Officer on December 17, 2009. She has been a Certified Public Accountant in California since 2006. She worked for Deloitte & Touche, LLP from 2002 to 2006, where she was part of the audit teams for large and small, private and public clients such as Computer Sciences Corporation, Infonet (later acquired by British Telecom), Candle! Corporation (later acquired by IBM), Primedia, Inc., Gold Circle Entertainment, and the Performing Arts Center, among others. Ms. Safranek's focus was on the technology, media and entertainment industries. She also owned Goldstein Enterprises, a management consulting firm that served numerous clients by providing them with business practices analyses and software application development in order to streamline day-to-day operations and maximize efficiency. Among her clients as owner of Goldstein Enterprises are Nestle USA, Warner Bros. Studios and RJR Fashion Fabrics. Ms. Safranek received a B.A. in Business Economics with a minor in Accounting from U.C.L.A.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Summary Compensation Table

The following table summarizes the compensation earned by each "named executive officer" of MMR for the past two fiscal years, determined on the basis of rules adopted by the SEC relating to "smaller reporting companies."

                              All      
                  Stock     Option     Other      
Name Year   Salary     Bonus     Award (1)     Award (1)     Compensation     Totals
                                     
Robert Lorsch 2013 $ 339,916 (2) $ 100,000 (3) $ 125,000 (4) $ -   $ 60,346 (5) $ 625,262
Chief Executive Officer 2012 $ 180,000 (6) $ 450,000 (7) $ 14,993 (8) $ 75,000 (9) $ 60,346 (5) $ 780,339
                                   
Ingrid Safranek 2013 $ 191,500 (10) $ 100,000 (3) $ 125,000 (4) $ -   $ -   $ 416,500
Chief Financial Officer 2012 $ 180,000 (11) $ 2,000   $ 20,000 (12) $ 75,000 (9) $ -   $ 277,000

52


1.

Option and stock awards above are disclosed at their aggregate grant date fair values as calculated under FASB ASC 718 (formerly SFAS 123(R)). Assumptions made for the purpose of computing these amounts are discussed in Note 2 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.

2.

During 2013, Mr. Lorsch earned $339,916 in salary. Of that amount, $70,369 was related to retroactive salary increases of 5% per year for 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 as called for by his employment agreement, and which had not been previously booked, and $37,500 was related to an increase in salary approved by the Board effective May 16, 2013. As of December 31, 2013, $150,359.26 remained unpaid.

3.

On May 10, 2013, the Board of Directors reviewed Mr. Lorsch and Ms. Safranek's employment agreements which called for annual bonus and stock option grants as determined by the Board in its sole discretion. The Board then approved an annual bonus of $100,000 for each. As of the date of this report, those amounts remain unpaid.

4.

On May 10, 2013, Mr. Lorsch and Ms. Safranek were each granted 1,250,000 shares of common stock at $0.06 per share as an incentive. The grant date fair value of these options, based on the market closing price of $0.05 per share, amounted to $62,500 each. The shares do not vest until January 10, 2014 and are forfeitable before that date. On December 31, 2013, Mr. Lorsch and Ms. Safranek were each granted 1,000,000 shares of common stock at $0.05 per share as an incentive. The grant date fair value of these options, based on the market closing price of $0.036 per share, amounted to $36,000 each. The shares do not vest until January 1, 2015 and are forfeitable before that date.

5.

During the years ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2013, Other Compensation to Mr. Lorsch included $36,000 of auto allowance and $24,346 paid by the Company on behalf of Mr. Lorsch for a life insurance policy under which MMR is a 50% beneficiary.

6.

During 2012, Mr. Lorsch earned $180,000 in salary per his employment agreement with the Company.

7.

On December 28, 2011, the Board of Directors agreed to renew Mr. Lorsch's employment agreement effective January 1, 2012 for an additional three year term ending on December 31, 2014. The employment agreement called for annual bonus and stock option grants as determined by the Board in its sole discretion. In negotiating the renewal, it was pointed out that such bonuses and grants had never been issued under the employment agreement. Therefore, the Board approved an annual bonus of $150,000 for each of the last three years payable under the following conditions: (a) in the event of a change of control; or (b) any portion of the bonus could be paid in any quarter in which the Company would achieve profitability excluding non-cash expenses after payment of such portion of the bonus; or (c) any portion of the bonus amount may be used to convert options or warrants at $0.125 per share or above.

8.

On April 6, 2012, Mr. Lorsch was granted 470,000 shares of common stock at $0.0319 per share in consideration of a personal guaranty to a lender for a bridge loan received by the Company. The grant date fair value of these options, based on the market closing price of $0.028 per share, amounted to $13,160.

9.

On April 6, 2012, Mr. Lorsch and Ms. Safranek were each granted 1,250,000 stock options to purchase shares of our common stock with an exercise price of $0.06 per share as an incentive. The grant date fair value of these options, based on the market closing price of $0.028 per share, amounted to $35,000 each.

10.

During 2013, Ms. Safranek earned $191,500 in salary per her employment agreement with the Company. On May 10, 2013, the Board reviewed Ms. Safranek's employement agreement, which called for an annual increase of 5%, and noting that such increases had not been previously booked, authorized a salary increase effective 5/16/2013 to $200,000 per year. The salary earned in 2013 includes $11,500 salary adjustment due to the aforementioned salary increase. Of that amount, $115,000 was paid in cash during the year, and $76,500 remained unpaid as of December 31, 2013, which is included in deferred salaries.

11.

During 2012, Ms. Safranek earned $180,000 in salary per her employment agreement with the Company. Of that amount, $106,000 was paid in cash during the year, $29,000 was paid in stock through the issuance of 1,450,000 shares at $0.02 per share on June 22, 2012 when the market price of the stock was $0.014 per share, and $45,000 remained unpaid as of December 31, 2013, which is included in deferred salaries. In addition, On June 22, 2012, Ms. Safranek elected to receive 1,800,000 shares at a price of $0.02 per share in exchange for a reduction of $36,000 in deferred salaries that had been deferred from 2011. The fair market value of the shares received on June 22, 2012 was $45,500 based on the closing market price of $0.014.

12.

On June 22, 2012, Ms. Safranek was granted 1,000,000 shares of common stock at $0.02 per share as an incentive. The grant date fair value of these options, based on the market closing price of $0.0138 per share, amounted to $13,800. The shares did not vest until January 22, 2013 and were forfeitable before that date.

53


Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table provides information on all outstanding equity awards held by our named executive officers as of December 31, 2013.

 

Option/Warrant Awards

 

Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options/Warrant Exercisable (#)

Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Option/Warrant (#)

Option/Warrant Exercise Price ($)

Option/Warrant Expiration Date

 

 

 

 

 

Robert Lorsch

13,555,000

625,000

$0.028 - $0.125

8/6/2014,

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

1/27/2020

 

 

 

 

& 4/6/2022

 

 

 

 

 

Ingrid Safranek

2,725,000

625,000

$0.06 - $0.18

1/21/2020,

Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 

6/15/2020,

 

 

 

 

1/3/2021

 

 

 

 

& 4/6/2022

Employment Agreements

The Company has employment agreements with its Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Robert H. Lorsch, and its Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer, Ingrid Safranek. Under each employment agreement, the executive officers receive a base salary, subject to annual increases as determined by the board of directors, certain benefits as set forth in the employment agreements, and an annual bonus at the discretion of the board of directors.

On January 29, 2009 we entered into an employment agreement with our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Robert H. Lorsch, with an initial term ending on December 31, 2011, subject to successive automatic extension unless we or Mr. Lorsch elect not to extend. Under the terms of his agreement, Mr. Lorsch shall serve as both our President and Chief Executive Officer and President and Chief Executive Officer of our wholly-owned subsidiary, MMR. The agreement provides for a base salary of $15,000 per month, subject to an upward increase and with an annual bonus and stock option grants in such amounts, if any, as the Board of Directors may determine in its sole discretion. Mr. Lorsch receives a monthly auto allowance, reimbursement of certain life insurance premiums, and reimbursement for certain other insurance coverage, and is entitled to participate in benefits generally made to our senior executives.

On December 28, 2011, the Board of Directors agreed to renew Mr. Lorsch's employment agreement effective January 1, 2012 for an additional three year term ending on December 31, 2014. The term of the Renewal expires on December 31, 2014, but may be extended automatically for successive additional one- year periods at the expiration of the then-current term unless written notice of non-extension is provided to Mr. Lorsch with at least 90 days prior notice to the expiration of such term. On May 13, 2013, the Board of Directors approved a salary increase for Mr. Lorsch to $20,000 per month effective May 16, 2013. In addition, on December 31, 2013, the Board of Directors agreed to extend Mr. Lorsch's employment term to December 31, 2015 under the same terms. Mr. Lorsch's current annual base salary will remain unchanged, and authorized a one-time catch up accrual for the minimum 5% annual increase as called under the agreement which had not been previously booked, with the understanding that, as in the past, portions of the payments could be deferred into future periods. Mr. Lorsch may terminate the agreement upon 30 days written notice without reason or for good reason (as defined in the agreements) if we fail to cure acts or omissions constituting good reason within 30 days. If Mr. Lorsch's employment is terminated by us for cause or voluntarily by Mr. Lorsch without good reason, he will not be entitled to receive any severance payments or benefits under the employment agreement. If Mr. Lorsch's employment is terminated by us without cause or voluntarily by Mr. Lorsch for good reason, Mr. Lorsch will be entitled to one year of salary at his then current rate of pay, including all monthly benefits, and the pro rata portion of the annual bonus otherwise due Mr. Lorsch. In the event of his disability, Mr. Lorsch would be entitled to receive compensation equal to 60% of his base salary as then in effect. Mr. Lorsch's employment agreement includes provisions that prohibit Mr. Lorsch from disclosing our confidential information and trade secrets and competing with us during the term of his employment agreement or soliciting our employees for 12 months following termination of employment.

54


We also have entered into a consulting agreement with The RHL Group, Inc., which is wholly-owned by Mr. Lorsch that provides for a monthly fee of $25,000 plus reimbursement of expenses including medical insurance. The RHL Group provides consulting, operational and technical services to the Company, which we refer to as the RHL Services. As part of the RHL Services, the RHL Group provides the Company with unrestricted access to its internal business and relationship contact database of more than 10,000 persons and entities, which includes clients of the RHL Group and other individuals which may hold value to the Company. The RHL Group also provides infrastructure support to the Company, including allowing the Company unlimited access to its facilities, equipment, and data, information management and server systems. The RHL Group has also consented to allow the Company to utilize the full-time services of Mr. Lorsch as the Company's President, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, which requires substantial time and energy away from his required duties as The RHL Group's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. In addition, The RHL Group has made its President, Kira Reed, available as the Company's spokesperson. Ms. Reed, who is Mr. Lorsch's spouse, also manages the Company's social networking activities.

On January 26, 2010, we entered into an employment agreement with Ingrid Safranek as our Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary. Under the employment agreement, Ms. Safranek receives a base salary, subject to annual increases as determined by the Board of Directors, certain benefits as set forth in the employment agreement, and an annual bonus at the discretion of the board of directors. Ms. Safranek's employment agreement was effective until June 15, 2010, but was extended until June 15, 2011. On December 10, 2010, the Board approved Ms. Safranek's employment agreement to be amended to extend the term for an additional one year commencing on January 1, 2011. On December 28, 2011, the Board extended the current employment agreement for an additional two years term and approved an increase in her base salary with the understanding that, from time to time, it could be necessary to defer certain payments or benefits into future periods. On May 13, 2013, the Board approved a salary increase for Ms. Safranek to $16,667 per month, with the understanding that, as in the past, portions of the payments could be deferred into future periods. Furthermore, on December 31, 2013, the Board elected to renew Ms. Safranek's agreement for an additional two year term under the same terms as before.

The current term of Ms. Safranek's employment agreement is effective until December 31, 2015 and will automatically renew for successive 12 month periods unless terminated at least 30 days prior to the end of the term. The employment agreement may be terminated by the Company without cause (as defined in the agreement) upon 90 days written notice or for cause if Ms. Safranek fails to cure the acts or omissions constituting cause within 30 days. If Ms. Safranek's employment is terminated by the Company for cause or voluntarily by Ms. Safranek without good reason, she will not be entitled to receive any severance payments or benefits under the employment agreement. If Ms. Safranek's employment is terminated by the Company without cause or voluntarily by Ms. Safranek for good reason, Ms. Safranek will be entitled to one year of salary at her then current rate of pay, including all monthly benefits, and the pro rata portion of the annual bonus otherwise due Ms. Safranek. In the event of her disability, Ms. Safranek would be entitled to receive compensation equal to 60% of her base salary as then in effect. Ms. Safranek's employment agreement includes provisions that prohibit her from disclosing our confidential information and trade secrets and competing with us during the term of his employment agreement or soliciting our employees for 12 months following termination of employment.

Director Compensation

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the compensation paid to our non-employee directors for the following fiscal year:

 

 

Fees

Option

 

Stock

 

Other

 

 

Name

Year

Earned (1)

Grant (2)

Grant (2)

Compensation (3)

Totals

Mike Finley

2013

$ 17,000

(4)

$ -

 

$ 80,000

(5)

$ -

 

$ 97,000

 

2012

$ 20,000

(4)

$ 75,000

(6)

$ -

 

$ -

 

$ 95,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Douglas Helm

2013

$ 19,000

(7)

$ -

 

$ 80,000

(5)

$ -

 

$ 99,000

 

2012

$ 21,000

(7)

$ 75,000

(8)

$ -

 

$ -

 

$ 96,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ivor Royston (*)

2013

$ 8,500

(9)

$ 84,000

(10)

$ 80,000

(5)

$ -

 

$ 172,500

 

2012

$ -

$ -

 

$ -

 

$ -

 

$ -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bernard Stolar

2013

$ 20,500

(11)

$ -

 

$ 80,000

(5)

$ 50,000

(11)

$ 150,500

 

2012

$ 22,000

(11)

$ 75,000

(12)

 

 

$ 50,000

(11)

$ 147,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jack Zwissig

2013

$ 16,000

(13)

$ -

 

$ 80,000

(5)

$ -

 

$ 96,000

 

2012

$ 16,000

(13)

$ 75,000

(14)

 $ -

 

$ -

 

$ 91,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

55


1.

Amounts represented director fees earned for the respective years 2013 and 2012. Unpaid balances are reflected as a component of related party payables in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2013.

2.

Option and stock awards above are disclosed at their aggregate grant date fair values as calculated under FASB ASC 718 (formerly SFAS 123(R)). Assumptions made for the purpose of computing these amounts are discussed in Note 2 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.

3.

Other compensation represents additional fees earned by each respective director for consulting services performed.

4.

Mr. Finley earned $20,000 and $17,000 respectively for 2012 and 2013. Of these amounts, $14,500 and $17,000 respectively remained unpaid as of 12/31/2013. On June 22, 2012, Mr. Finley elected to receive 575,000 shares at a price of $0.02 per share in exchange for a reduction of $11,500 in director fees that had been deferred in 2011 and 2012. The fair market value of the shares received on June 22, 2012 was $8,050 based on the closing market price of $0.014.

5.

On May 10, 2013, the Directors were each granted 500,000 shares of common stock at $0.06 per share as an incentive. The grant date fair value of these options, based on the market closing price of $0.05 per share, amounted to $25,000 each. The shares do not vest until January 10, 2014 and are forfeitable before that date. On December 31, 2013, the Directors were each granted 1,000,000 shares of common stock at $0.05 per share as an incentive. The grant date fair value of these options, based on the market closing price of $0.036 per share, amounted to $36,000 each. The shares do not vest until January 1, 2015 and are forfeitable before that date.

6.

On April 6, 2012, Mr. Finley was granted 1,250,000 stock options to purchase shares of our common stock with an exercise price of $0.06 per share as an incentive. The grant date fair value for these options, based on the market closing price of $0.028 amounted to $35,000.

7.

Mr. Helm earned $21,000 and $19,000 respectively for 2012 and 2013. Of these amounts, $15,000 and $19,000 respectively remained unpaid as of 12/31/2013. On June 22, 2012, Mr. Helm elected to receive 3,522,499 shares at a price of $0.02 per share in exchange for a reduction of $70,450 in director fees that had been deferred in 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012. The fair market value of the shares received on June 22, 2012 was $49,315 based on the closing market price of $0.014.

8.

On April 6, 2012, Mr. Helm was granted 1,250,000 stock options to purchase shares of our common stock with an exercise price of $0.06 per share as an incentive. The grant date fair value for these options, based on the market closing price of $0.028 amounted to $35,000.

9.

Mr. Royston earned $8,500 for 2013. The whole balance remained unpaid as of 12/31/2013.

10.

Mr. Royston was granted 1,050,000 stock options to purchase shares of our common stock on May 28, 2013 with an exercise price of $0.08 per share. The grant date fair value for these options, based on the market closing price of $0.065 amounted to $68,250.

11.

Mr. Stolar earned $22,000 and $20,500 respectively for 2012 and 2013 for Director Fees and $50,000 per year for consulting fees. Of these amounts, $14,250 and $20,500 respectively remained unpaid as of 12/31/2013 for Director Fees and $25,000 and $50,000 respectively remained unpaid as of 12/31/2013 for Consulting Fees. On June 22, 2012, Mr. Stolar elected to receive 7,672,176 shares at a price of $0.02 per share in exchange for a reduction of $153,444 in director and consulting fees that had been deferred in 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012. The fair market value of the shares received on June 22, 2012 was $107,410 based on the closing market price of $0.014.

12.

On April 6, 2012, Mr. Stolar was granted 1,250,000 stock options to purchase shares of our common stock with an exercise price of $0.06 per share as an incentive. The grant date fair value for these options, based on the market closing price of $0.028 amounted to $35,000.

13.

Mr. Zwissig earned $16,000 and $16,000 respectively for 2012 and 2013. Of these amounts, $12,000 and $16,000 respectively remained unpaid as of 12/31/2013. On June 22, 2012, Mr. Zwissig elected to receive 2,245,100 shares at a price of $0.02 per share in exchange for a reduction of $44,902 in director fees that had been deferred in 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012. The fair market value of the shares received on June 22, 2012 was $31,431 based on the closing market price of $0.014.

14.

On April 6, 2012, Mr. Zwissig was granted 1,250,000 stock options to purchase shares of our common stock with an exercise price of $0.06 per share as an incentive. The grant date fair value for these options, based on the market closing price of $0.028 amounted to $35,000.

(*)

Mr. Royston joined the Board on May 27, 2013.

56


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Our board of directors is divided into three classes, with each class serving a staggered three-year term. Our current directors and corresponding terms are as follows:

Director

Class

Expiration of Term

Robert H. Lorsch

Class II

2014 Annual Meeting

Ivor Royston

Class II

2014 Annual Meeting

Mike Finley

Class III

2015 Annual Meeting

Bernard Stolar

Class III

2015 Annual Meeting

Douglas H. Helm

Class I

2016 Annual Meeting

Jack Zwissig

Class I

2016 Annual Meeting

Corporate Governance Principles

We are committed to maintaining the highest standards of business conduct and corporate governance. We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for our directors, officers and employees. Our Certificate of Incorporation, Bylaws and the Board of Directors committee charters provide additional framework for our corporate governance principles.

Our business, property and affairs are managed under the direction of the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors selects the senior management team, which is charged with the day-to-day operations of the Company's business. Members of the Board of Directors are kept informed of the Company's business through discussions with the Chief Executive Officer, other senior officers and the Company's counsel, by reviewing materials requested by them or otherwise provided to them and by participating in meetings of the Board of Directors and its committees. Having selected the senior management team, the Board of Directors acts as an advisor and counselor to senior management, monitors its performance and proposes or makes changes to the senior management team when it deems necessary or appropriate.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth certain information as of April 28, 2014, as to shares of our common stock beneficially owned by: (1) each person known by us to beneficially own five percent or more of the outstanding shares of our common stock; (2) each of our named executive officers listed in the summary compensation table; (3) each of our directors; and (4) all of our named executive officers and directors as a group.

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Except as otherwise noted in the footnotes below, we believe, based upon information furnished to us, that each of the stockholders named in the tables have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock shown as beneficially owned by them, subject to applicable community property laws.

Shares of common stock subject to options, warrants and convertible notes exercisable or convertible within 60 days from April 28, 2014 are deemed outstanding for computing the ownership percentage of the person holding such options, warrants or notes, but are not deemed outstanding for computing the ownership percentage of any other person.

In addition, we are presenting a sub-table of each Stockholder (persons or entities) that owns more than 5% ("5% Stockholders") of the outstanding shares of common stock.

57


            Number of Shares of Common      
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner (1)           Stock Beneficially Owned (2)     Percentage
Directors and Named Executive Officers                  
     Robert H Lorsch (3)           105,589,106     13.4%
     Bernie Stolar (4)           17,077,894     2.3%
     Ingrid Safranek (5)           10,375,000     1.4%
     Doug Helm (6)           8,875,624     1.1%
     Jack Zwissig (7)           8,220,375     1.1%
     Mike Finley (8)           4,125,000     *
     Ivor Royston (9)           2,660,558     *
                   
                   
     All Executive Officers and Directors as a group           156,923,557     19.4%
     (7 People) (10)                  
                   
     5% Stockholders                  
     RHL Group (3)           83,090,352     10.7%
     Robert H Lorsch (3)           22,498,754     3.0%
     David Loftus (11)           58,247,324     7.7%
     Sherry Hackett (12)           36,650,068     4.9%

 

(1)

The business address of each director and executive officer listed is c/o MMRGlobal, Inc., 4401 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 200, Los Angeles, CA 90010.

(2)

This table is based upon information supplied by officers, directors, principal stockholders, and Schedules 13D and 13G filed with the SEC. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC. Applicable percentage ownership is based on 727,234,712 shares of common stock outstanding as of April 28, 2014. Shares of common stock subject to options, warrants and convertible notes exercisable or convertible within 60 days after April 28, 2014, are deemed outstanding for computing the ownership percentage of the person holding such options, warrants or notes, but are not deemed outstanding for computing the ownership percentage of any other person. Except as otherwise noted, we believe that each of the stockholders named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock shown as beneficially owned by them, subject to applicable community property laws.

(3)

Consists of (i) 8,318,754 shares of common stock held directly by Mr. Lorsch, (ii) 36,454,892 shares of common stock held directly by The RHL Group, which is wholly owned and controlled by Mr. Lorsch, and Mr. Lorsch also has voting and/or investment power over such shares, (iii) fully vested warrants and/or options held by The RHL Group to purchase 46,635,460 shares of common stock, and (iv) fully vested warrants and/or options held by Mr. Lorsch to purchase 14,180,000 shares of common stock.

(4)

Includes 6,165,261 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days after April 28, 2014.

(5)

Includes 3,350,000 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days after April 28, 2014.

(6)

Includes 2,475,000 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days after April 28, 2014.

(7)

Includes 4,690,000 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days after April 28, 2014.

(8)

Includes 2,075,000 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days after April 28, 2014.

(9)

Includes 1,810,558 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days after April 28, 2014.

(10)

Includes 76,527,836 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days after April 28, 2014.

(11)

Includes 33,017,977 shares subject to options, warrants and convertible notes exercisable within 60 days after April 28, 2014.

(12)

Includes 20,922,290 shares subject to options, warrants and convertible notes exercisable within 60 days after April 28, 2014.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Our Board of Directors adopted a related party transaction policy, under which all related party transactions shall be presented to the disinterested directors of the Board for review and approval in advance of such transactions. If it is not feasible to obtain advance approval of a related party transaction, such transaction shall be subject to the ratification of the disinterested directors of the Board, and the Company may enter into such transaction prior to obtaining the approval of the disinterested directors only if the terms of such transaction allow it to be rescinded at no cost to the Company in the event it is not ratified by the disinterested directors of the Board.

58


Other than the agreements and other arrangements set forth below, since January 1, 2013, there have not been any transactions or series of similar transactions to which we were or are a party in which the amount involved exceeded or exceeds $120,000 and in which any director, executive officer, holder of more than 5% of any class of our voting securities, or any member of the immediate family of any of the foregoing persons, had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

Our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Robert H. Lorsch, is also the Chief Executive Officer of The RHL Group, Inc. and has full voting power over all of the capital stock of The RHL Group, Inc. Mr. Lorsch directly and indirectly through The RHL Group, Inc., beneficially owns approximately 14% our total outstanding voting stock. The RHL Group, Inc. has loaned us money pursuant to the Eighth Amended Note and any predecessor notes.

The RHL Group is an investment holding company which provides consulting, operational and technical services to the Company, which we refer to as the RHL Services. As part of the RHL Services, the RHL Group provides the Company with unrestricted access to its internal business and relationship contact database of more than 10,000 persons and entities, which includes clients of the RHL Group and other individuals which may hold value to the Company. The RHL Group also provides infrastructure support to the Company, including allowing the Company unlimited access to its facilities, equipment, and data, information management and server systems. In addition to allowing the Company the use of its office support personnel, the RHL Group has also consented to allow the Company to utilize the full-time services of Mr. Lorsch as the Company's President, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, which requires substantial time and energy away from his required duties as The RHL Group's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. In addition, The RHL Group has made its President, Kira Reed, available as the Company's spokesperson. Ms. Reed, who is Mr. Lorsch's spouse, also manages the Company's social networking activities.

In consideration for the above, The RHL Group, Inc. has a consulting arrangement with MMR. A copy of the consulting agreement is filed as an Exhibit in our current report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 4, 2009.

The consulting agreement provides for a monthly fee of $25,000 plus the reimbursement of certain expenses, including medical insurance.

On September 15, 2009, we entered into a five year agreement with E-Mail Frequency, LLC and David Loftus, Managing Partner of E-Mail Frequency, LLC, a significant stockholder of the Company. We will license an existing 80 million person direct marketing database (the "Database") of street addresses, cellular phone numbers, e-mail addresses and other comprehensive data with E-Mail Frequency. The agreement allows us to market, through the use of the Database, our MyMedicalRecords PHR, MyEsafeDepositBox virtual vault, and MMRPro document management system to physicians and their patients. Under the terms of the Agreement, we paid $250,000 to David Loftus as a one-time consulting fee in the form of 2,777,778 shares of our common stock. We recorded the $250,000 one-time licensee fee as a prepaid consulting fee. Amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 was $50,000. In addition, we incurred a total of $15,020 and $27,905 during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, toward convertible notes interest to Mr. Loftus. We included in related party payables at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 of $64,615 and $49,595, respectively, in respect to these services. Furthermore, Mr. Loftus is a value-added-reseller of MMRPro systems. We recognized $18,421 and $67,883 in revenue from E-Mail Frequency for the sale of MMRPro systems, during 2013 and 2012, respectively. On July 19, 2012, we entered into a 6% Convertible Promissory Note with Mr. Loftus for a principal amount of $157,422 and warrants to purchase our common stock. Effective September 1, 2011, we signed an Amendment to the Agreement dated September 15, 2009 to provide licensor a non- exclusive right to target, market and exploit the Employee Benefits market.

The securities described above were issued to each of the foregoing persons or entities in reliance upon exemptions from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the rules promulgated thereunder. At the time of their issuance, the securities granted above were restricted securities for purposes of the Securities Act and the certificates representing such securities bear legends to that effect, unless a legal opinion has been issued for the removal of such legends. The exercise/conversion prices of the securities described above were equal to the closing price of our common stock as of the date of grant.

Independence of Directors

Our Board of Directors has determined that each of the following directors would be deemed "independent" under applicable NASDAQ Stock Market LLC rules: Messrs. Finley, Helm, Royston, Stolar and Zwissig. These persons represent a majority of our Board of Directors. Mr. Lorsch, the Chairman of our Board of Directors and our Chief Executive Officer would not be deemed independent. Messrs. Stolar, Zwissig and Finley are members of our Compensation Committee and Mr. Zwissig is the Chairman of our Compensation Committee. Messrs. Helm and Zwissig are members of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Mr. Helm is the Chairman. Messrs. Stolar, Zwissig and Finley are members of our Audit Committee, but would not be deemed to be independent under the more stringent independence requirements for Audit Committee members set forth in NASDAQ Listing Rule 5605(2). Mr. Stolar is Chairman of the Audit Committee.

59


DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK

This section summarizes certain of our authorized and outstanding securities and certain of the provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and our amended and restated bylaws, each as amended to date.

Description of capital stock

The following description of our capital stock and provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws are summaries and are qualified in their entirety by reference to our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, respectively, copies of which have been filed with the SEC and are incorporated herein by reference.

General background

As of December 31, 2013, we are authorized to issue up to 1,250,000,000 shares of common stock with a $0.001 par value and 5,000,000 preferred shares with a par value of $0.001. As of March 4, 2014, we had issued and outstanding 722,852,821 shares of common stock, held by approximately 3,509 stockholders of record.

Common stock

Except as required by law, holders of our common stock are entitled to vote on all matters as a single class, and each holder of common stock is entitled to one vote for each share of common stock owned. Holders of common stock do not have cumulative voting rights.

Holders of our common stock are entitled to receive ratably any dividends that may be declared by the board of directors out of legally available funds, subject to any preferential dividend rights of any outstanding preferred stock. Upon any liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of the Company, holders of our common stock are entitled to share ratably in all assets remaining available for distribution to stockholders after the payment of all debts and other liabilities and subject to the prior rights of any outstanding preferred stock.

Holders of our common stock have no preemptive, subscription, redemption or conversion rights. Our outstanding shares of common stock are validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable. The rights, preferences and privileges of holders of common stock are subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of holders of shares of any series of preferred stock which we may designate and issue in the future without further stockholder approval.

Our common stock is quoted on the OTCQB, the OTC market tier for companies that are reporting with the SEC, under the symbol "MMRF," and on the OTC Bulletin Board, or OTCBB, under the symbol "MMRF.OB."

Preferred stock

Our board of directors is authorized (without further stockholder approval) to issue from time to time up to an aggregate of 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock in one or more series and to fix or alter the designations, preferences, rights, qualifications, limitations or restrictions of the shares of each series, including the dividend rights, dividend rates, conversion rights, voting rights, term of redemption including sinking fund provisions, redemption price or prices, liquidation preferences and the number of shares constituting any series or designations of such series without further vote or action by the stockholders. No shares of preferred stock have been issued or are outstanding.

The issuance of preferred stock may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of the Company without further action by the stockholders and may adversely affect the market price of, and voting, economic and other rights of, holders of our common stock.

Anti-takeover effects of provisions of Delaware Law and our Charter and Bylaws

We are subject to the provisions of Section 203 of the DGCL. In general, Section 203 prohibits a publicly-held Delaware corporation from engaging in a "business combination" with an "interested stockholder" for a period of three years after the date of the transaction in which the person became an interested stockholder, unless either:

  • prior to the date at which the person becomes an interested stockholder, the board of directors approves such transaction or business combination;
  • the stockholder acquires more than 85% of the outstanding voting stock of the corporation (excluding shares held by directors who are officers or held in certain employee stock plans) upon consummation of such transaction; or
  • the business combination is approved by the board of directors and by the holders of two-thirds of the outstanding voting stock of the corporation (excluding shares held by the interested stockholder) at a meeting of stockholders (and not by written consent).

60


For purposes of Section 203, "interested stockholder" is a person who, together with affiliates and associates, owns (or within three years prior, did own) 15% or more of the corporation's voting stock. A "business combination" includes a merger, asset sale or other transaction resulting in a financial benefit to such interested stockholder.

In addition, certain provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws may be deemed to have an anti-takeover effect and may delay, defer or prevent a tender offer or takeover attempt that a stockholder might consider in its best interest, including those attempts that might result in a premium over the market price for the shares held by our stockholders. These provisions include:

  • dividing our Board of Directors into three classes serving staggered three-year terms;
  • authorizing our Board of Directors to issue preferred stock without stockholder approval;
  • prohibiting cumulative voting in the election of directors;
  • prohibiting stockholder actions by written consent;
  • limiting the persons who may call special meetings of stockholders;
  • prohibiting our stockholders from making certain changes to our certificate of incorporation or bylaws except with 66.7% stockholder approval; and
  • requiring advance notice for raising business matters or nominating directors at stockholders' meetings.

The combination of the charter and bylaws provisions summarized above will make it more difficult for our existing stockholders to replace our board of directors, as well as for another party to obtain control of us by replacing our board of directors. Since our board of directors has the power to retain and discharge our officers, these provisions could also make it more difficult for existing stockholders or another party to effect a change in management. In addition, the authorization of undesignated preferred stock makes it possible for our board of directors to issue preferred stock with voting or other rights or preferences that could impede the success of any attempt to change our control.

These provisions may have the effect of deterring hostile takeovers or delaying changes in our control or management. These provisions are intended to enhance the likelihood of continued stability in the composition of our board of directors and in the policies they implement, and to discourage certain types of transactions that may involve an actual or threatened change of our control. The provisions also are intended to reduce our vulnerability to an unsolicited acquisition proposal and discourage certain tactics that may be used in proxy fights. However, such provisions could have the effect of discouraging others from making tender offers for our shares and, as a consequence, they also may inhibit fluctuations in the market price of our shares that could result from actual or rumored takeover attempts. Such provisions may also have the effect of preventing changes in our management.

Transfer agent and registrar

The transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is Computershare.

PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

The purpose of this prospectus is to permit the selling stockholder to offer and resell up to an aggregate of 100,000,000 shares of our common stock at such times and at such places as it chooses. In this section of the prospectus, the term "selling stockholder" includes the partners, pledgees, donees, transferees or other successors-in-interest of the selling stockholder, which may sell shares received after the date of this prospectus from the selling stockholder as a pledge, gift, partnership or similar distribution or other non-sale related transfer. To the extent required, we may amend and supplement this prospectus from time to time to describe a specific plan of distribution. The decision to sell any shares offered pursuant to this prospectus is within the sole discretion of the selling stockholder.

The distribution of the common stock by the selling stockholder may be effected from time to time in one or more transactions. Any of the common stock may be offered for sale, from time to time, by the selling stockholder at prices and on terms then obtainable, at fixed prices, at prices then prevailing at the time of sale, at prices related to such prevailing prices, in privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. The common stock may be sold by one or more of the following:

  • On the OTCQB, the OTC Bulletin Board or any other national common stock exchange or automated quotation system on which our common stock is traded, which may involve transactions solely between a broker-dealer and its customers which are not traded across an open market and block trades;
  • Through one or more dealers or agents (which may include one or more underwriters), including, but not limited to:
    • Block trades in which the broker or dealer as principal and resale by such broker or dealer for its account pursuant to this prospectus;
    • Purchases by a broker or dealer as principal and resale by such broker or dealer for its account pursuant to this prospectus;
    • Ordinary brokerage transactions; or
    • Transactions in which the broker solicits purchasers;
  • Directly to one or more purchasers; or
  • A combination of these methods.

61


Granite and any broker-dealers who act in connection with the sale of its shares are "underwriters" within the meaning of the Securities Act, and any discounts, concessions or commissions received by them and profit on any resale of the shares as principal may be deemed to be underwriting discounts, concessions and commissions under the Securities Act. Because the selling stockholder is an "underwriter" within the meaning of the Securities Act, it will be subject to the prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act, including Rule 172 thereunder.

The selling stockholder or its underwriters, dealers or agents may sell the common stock to or through underwriters, dealers or agents, and such underwriters, dealers or agents may receive compensation in the form of discounts or concessions allowed or reallowed. Underwriters, dealers, brokers or other agents engaged by the selling stockholder may arrange for other such persons to participate. Any fixed public offering price and any discounts and concessions may be changed from time to time. Underwriters, dealers and agents who participate in the distribution of the common stock may be deemed to be underwriters within the meaning of the Securities Act, and any discounts or commissions received by them or any profit on the resale of shares by them may be deemed to be underwriting discounts and commissions thereunder. The proposed amounts of the common stock, if any, to be purchased by underwriters and the compensation, if any, of underwriters, dealers or agents will be set forth in a prospectus supplement.

Unless granted an exemption by the SEC from Regulation M under the Exchange Act, or unless otherwise permitted under Regulation M, the selling stockholder will not engage in any stabilization activity in connection with our common stock, will furnish each broker or dealer engaged by the selling stockholder and each other participating broker or dealer the number of copies of this prospectus required by such broker or dealer, and will not bid for or purchase any of our common stock or attempt to induce any person to purchase any of the common stock other than as permitted under the Exchange Act.

We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of these shares of common stock offered by the selling stockholder. We shall use our reasonable efforts to prepare and file with the SEC such amendments and supplements to the registration statement and this prospectus as may be necessary to keep such registration statement effective and to comply with the provisions of the Securities Act with respect to the disposition of the common stock covered by the registration statement for the period required to effect the distribution of such common stock.

We are paying certain expenses (other than commissions and discounts of underwriters, dealers or agents) incidental to the offering and sale of the common stock to the public, which are estimated to be approximately $30,344. If we are required to update this prospectus during such period, we may incur additional expenses in excess of the amount estimated above. We have agreed to indemnify the selling stockholders against certain losses, claims, damages and liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act and the Exchange Act, subject to certain exceptions.

In order to comply with certain state securities laws, if applicable, the common stock will be sold in such jurisdictions only through registered or licensed brokers or dealers. In certain states the shares of common stock may not be sold unless they have been registered or qualified for sale in such state or an exemption from registration or qualification is available and is complied with.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

Not applicable.

LEGAL MATTERS

Selected legal matters with respect to the validity of the securities offered by this prospectus will be passed upon for us by Locke Lord LLP, a Professional Corporation, Houston, Texas.

EXPERTS

The financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, which are included in this prospectus, have been audited by Rose, Snyder & Jacobs, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report appearing herein. Such financial statements have been so included in reliance upon the report of such firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.

62


WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

We have filed a registration statement on Form S-1 with the SEC for the securities offered pursuant to this prospectus. This prospectus, which constitutes a part of the registration statement, does not contain all of the information set forth in the registration statement and the exhibits and schedules thereto. Statements contained in this prospectus as to the contents of any contract or other document referred to are not necessarily complete and in each instance reference is made to the copy of such contract or other document filed as an exhibit to the registration statement, each such statement being qualified in all respects by such reference. For further information with respect to our Company and the common stock offered hereby, please refer to the registration statement and its exhibits and schedules.

We are subject to the information and periodic reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and in accordance therewith, file reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. Such reports, proxy statements, other information and a copy of the registration statement may be inspected by anyone without charge and copies of these materials may be obtained upon the payment of the fees prescribed by the SEC, at the SEC's Public Reference Room, located at Room 1580, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of this public reference room by calling 1-800-SEC-0330. The registration statement, including all exhibits and schedules and amendments, has been filed with the SEC through the Electronic Data Gathering Analysis and Retrieval (EDGAR) system and is available to the public on the SEC's web site at http://www.sec.gov.

 

 

 

 

63


Index to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

Page

 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

F-2

Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2013 and 2012

F-3

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2013 and 2012

F-4

Consolidated Statements Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) for the Years Ended December 31, 2013 and 2012

F-5

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2013 and 2012

F-6

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

F-7

 

 

 

F-1


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of MMRGlobal, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of MMRGlobal, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' deficit and cash flows for the years then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of MMRGlobal, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has incurred significant operating losses and negative cash flows from operations during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans regarding those matters also are described in Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty

/s/ Rose, Snyder & Jacobs LLP

Rose, Snyder & Jacobs LLP

Encino, California

March 28, 2014

F-2


MMRGLOBAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

      December 31,     December 31,
      2013     2012
             
             
ASSETS
             
Current assets:            
     Cash and cash equivalents   $ 10,359    $ 36,655 
     Accounts receivable, less allowances of $345,692 and $80,000 in 2013 and 2012, respectively.     146,298      404,024 
     Inventory     65,238      2,865 
     Prepaid expenses and other current assets     154,637      108,360 
          Total current assets     376,532      551,904 
             
Long-term investments            
     Investment in equity securities, at cost     87,500      56,000 
          Total long-term investments     87,500      56,000 
             
Property and equipment, net      38,393      20,301 
Deposits         3,370 
Intangible assets, net     1,670,033      1,347,859 
          Total assets   $ 2,172,458    $ 1,979,434 
             
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
             
Current liabilities:            
     Line of credit, related party   $ 979,545    $ 1,045,947 
     Related party payables     1,147,697      1,328,533 
     Compensation payable     402,079      206,548 
     Severance liability     620,613      620,613 
     Accounts payable and accrued expenses     5,264,527      3,985,741 
     Deferred revenue     61,211      24,531 
     Convertible notes payable     981,215      763,857 
     Notes payable, current portion     375,343      375,343 
     Notes payable, related party     196,921      242,921 
     Capital leases payable, current portion     13,336     
          Total current liabilities     10,042,487      8,594,034 
             
Capital leases payable, less current portion     3,522     
          Total liabilities     10,046,009      8,594,034 
             
Commitments and contingencies (See Note 9)            
             
Stockholders' deficit:            
     Preferred stock - $0.001 per value, 5,000,000 shares authorized, 0 issued and outstanding.             
     Common stock, $0.001 par value, 1,250,000,000 shares authorized, 684,367,465
          and 522,152,225 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2013
          and December 31, 2012, respectively
    684,536      522,144 
     Additional paid-in capital     53,215,960      46,998,534 
     Accumulated deficit     (61,774,047)     (54,135,278)
          Total stockholders' deficit     (7,873,551)     (6,614,600)
          Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit   $ 2,172,458    $ 1,979,434 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

F-3


MMRGLOBAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

        Year Ended
        December 31,
        2013     2012
               
Revenues              
Subscriber     $ 177,687    $ 161,923 
MMRPro       288,197      453,048 
License fees       64,011      128,000 
Other income       57,410      61,372 
     Total revenues       587,305      804,343 
Cost of revenues       262,653      588,672 
     Gross profit       324,652      215,671 
General and administrative expenses       5,344,713      3,356,382 
Sales and marketing expenses       1,966,694      2,055,089 
Technology development       77,715      245,663 
     Loss from operations       (7,064,470)     (5,441,463)
Other income       16,884      -  
Interest and other finance charges, net       (591,183)     (461,040)
Net loss     $ (7,638,769)   $ (5,902,503)
               
               
Net loss available to common shareholders per share:              
Basic and diluted     $ (0.01)   $ (0.01)
               
Weighted average common shares outstanding:              
Basic and diluted       606,477,128      425,856,713 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

F-4


MMRGLOBAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

    Preferred Stock     Common Stock     Additional     Accumulated      
    Shares     Amount     Shares     Amount     Paid-In Capital     Deficit     Total
                                         
                                         
Balance as of December 31, 2011      $     359,162,894    $ 359,155    $ 42,590,551    $ (48,232,775)   $ (5,283,069)
                                         
Shares issued for services or reduction to liabilities            36,416,272      36,416      935,975      -       972,391 
Convertible debt conversions            54,369,677      54,369      1,150,043      -       1,204,412 
Shares issued for financing activities            65,340,882      65,341      1,189,281      -       1,254,622 
Stock based compensation            6,250,000      6,250      839,193      -       845,443 
Warrant exercises            612,500      613      58,887      -       59,500 
Warrants issued for services             -       -       157,676      -       157,676 
Reclassification of derivative liabilities and creation of note discounts            -       -       76,928      -       76,928 
Net loss            -       -       -       (5,902,503)     (5,902,503)
                                         
Balance as of December 31, 2012            522,152,225      522,144      46,998,534      (54,135,278)     (6,614,600)
                                         
Shares issued for services or reduction to liabilities            31,918,265      32,094      1,412,278          1,444,372 
Convertible debt conversions            51,610,840      51,612      1,581,307          1,632,919 
Shares issued for financing activities            58,986,135      58,986      1,457,050          1,516,036 
Stock based compensation            14,350,000      14,350      636,920          651,270 
Warrant exercises (cash)            6,150,000      6,150      134,075          140,225 
Warrants issued for services                     692,073          692,073 
Creation of note discount                    358,923          358,923 
Cancellation of investment            (800,000)     (800)     (55,200)         (56,000)
Net loss                        (7,638,769)     (7,638,769)
                                         
Balance as of December 31, 2013      $     684,367,465    $ 684,536    $ 53,215,960    $ (61,774,047)   $ (7,873,551)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

F-5


MMRGLOBAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF CASH FLOWS

          Year Ended December 31,
          2013     2012
                 
Operating activities:                
Net loss       $ (7,638,769)   $ (5,902,503)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash                 
     used in operating activities:                
     Depreciation and amortization         237,463      267,891 
     Non-cash write down of assets         262,500     
     Allowance for doubtful accounts         289,947      188,834 
     Warrants issued for services         692,073      157,676 
     Stock-based compensation         651,270      845,443 
     Common stock issued for services         1,064,752      597,302 
     Amortization of loan discount         333,915      150,902 
     Loan commitment fee amortization              918 
          Subtotal - Non-cash adjustments         3,531,920      2,208,966 
Effect of changes in:                
     Accounts receivable         (431,802)     (280,662)
     Inventory         (12,792)     47,749 
     Prepaid expenses and other current assets         (46,276)     146,274 
     Deposits         3,370     
     Accounts payable and accrued expenses         1,382,490      1,378,443 
     Related party payables         55,132      178,931 
     Compensation payable          195,531      97,261 
     Deferred revenue   `     36,681      2,980 
          Subtotal - net change in operating assets & liabilities         1,182,334      1,570,976 
          Net cash used in operating activities         (2,924,515)     (2,122,561)
                 
Investing activities:                
     Purchase of property and equipment             (555)
     Filing of patents         (483,649)     (333,157)
     Costs of continuing MMRPro and website development         (60,250)     (61,995)
          Net cash used in investing activities         (543,899)     (395,707)
                 
Financing activities:                
     Net proceeds from convertible notes         1,879,300      957,995 
     Net proceeds from warrant exercises         140,225      59,500 
     Proceeds from equity line of credit         1,516,036      1,254,622 
     Proceeds from note payable         20,000      547,624 
     Payments of note payable         (70,000)     (525,383)
     Proceeds from note payable, related party         84,000      285,771 
     Payment from note payable, related party         (20,000)     (140,091)
     Proceeds from line of credit         113,000      15,000 
     Payments of line of credit         (203,472)     (208,583)
     Payments of capital lease         (16,971)     (2,635)
          Net cash provided by financing activities         3,442,118      2,243,820 
Net increase (decrease) in cash         (26,296)     (274,448)
Cash, beginning of period         36,655      311,103 
Cash, end of period       $ 10,359    $ 36,655 
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:                
     Cash paid for interest       $ 149,903    $ 80,576 
     Cash paid for income taxes       $ 4,201    $ 5,734 
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:                
     Conversion of convertible notes into common stock       $ 1,632,919    $ 1,204,412 
     Receipt of Investment in equity securities       $ 350,000    $
     Cancellation of investment in equity securities       $ 56,000    $
     Acquisition of assets through capital lease       $ 35,829    $
     Payment of accounts payable and related party payables through issuance of common stock       $ 48,697    $ 375,089 
     Payment of payables through issuance of notes payable       $   $ 120,000 
     Reclassification of derivative liabilities and creation of note discounts       $   $ 76,928 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

F-6


MMRGLOBAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

MMRGlobal Inc. (referred to herein, unless otherwise indicated, as "MMR," the "Company," "we," "us," and "our") was originally incorporated as Favrille, Inc. ("Favrille") in Delaware in 2000, and since its inception and before the Merger (with MyMedicalRecords, Inc. in 2009), operated under a different management team as a biopharmaceutical company focused on the development and commercialization of targeted immunotherapies for the treatment of cancer and other diseases of the immune system. In May 2008, Favrille's ongoing Phase 3 registration trial for its lead product candidate failed to show a statistically significant improvement in the treatment of patients with follicular B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Through our wholly-owned operating subsidiary MyMedicalRecords, Inc. ("MMR Inc."), we provide secure and easy-to-use online Personal Health Records ("PHR") and MyEsafeDepositBox storage solutions, serving consumers, healthcare professionals, employers, insurance companies, financial institutions, and professional organizations and affinity groups. Our PHR, marketed both directly via our website at www.mymedicalrecords.com and as a private-label service, enables individuals and families to access their medical records and other important documents, such as birth certificates, passports, insurance policies and wills, anytime from anywhere using an Internet- connected device. The MyMedicalRecords PHR is built on proprietary, patented and patent-pending technologies to allow documents, images and voicemail messages to be transmitted and stored in the system using a variety of methods, including fax, phone, or file upload without relying on any specific electronic medical record platform to populate a user's account.

The Company's professional offering, MMRPro, is an end-to-end electronic document management and imaging system designed to give physicians' offices, community hospitals and surgery centers an easy and cost-effective solution to digitizing paper-based medical records and sharing them with patients in a timely manner through an integrated patient portal, MMRPatientView. The MMR Stimulus Program is offered with the MMRPro product offerings to help healthcare professionals recoup some or all of the cost of digital conversion of patient charts when they upgrade patients from the free MMRPatientView portal to a full-featured MyMedicalRecords PHR. In addition, in January 2009, as a result of the Merger, we acquired biotech assets and other intellectual property including anti- CD20 antibodies and data and samples from its FavId™/Specifid™ vaccine clinical trials for the treatment of B-cell Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Since 2005, MMR Inc. began filing for patent protection for its products and services. Through the most recent quarter, the Company had received three major patents covering the transmission of electronic medical records. The Company believes these patents represent a foundational patent portfolio which could have significant ramifications to healthcare professionals and vendors of Health IT products and services. As a result of the issuance of these patents, and certain requirements affecting the use of Health IT products and services, the Company's business is evolving to include both an operating entity and a licensor of intellectual property.

On March 8, 2011, we formed a subsidiary, which we named MMR Life Sciences Group, Inc., exclusively to maximize the value of our biotech assets including the company's anti-CD 20 antibodies and related FavID™ vaccine technologies acquired by MyMedicalRecords, Inc. through the merger with Favrille. As of this date the assets have not been transferred to the subsidiary.

The Company (formerly Favrille) was incorporated in Delaware in 2000, MMR Inc. was incorporated in Delaware in 2005, and both are headquartered in Los Angeles, CA.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of MMRGlobal, and its wholly-owned subsidiaries MMR and MMR Life Sciences Group, Inc. All intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated upon consolidation.

F- 7


Basis of Presentation and Going Concern

The accompanying financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP.

GOING CONCERN

As of December 31, 2013, the Company's current liabilities exceeded its current assets by $9.73 million. Furthermore, during the years ended December 31, 2013, and 2012, the Company incurred losses of $7.44 million and $5.90 million, respectively.

At December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we had $10,359 and $36,655, respectively, in cash and cash equivalents. Historically, we issued capital stock, sold debt and equity securities and received funds from The RHL Group, Inc. (a significant stockholder that is wholly-owned by our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Robert H. Lorsch) to operate our business. Although we received additional funding from The RHL Group pursuant to the Seventh Amended and Restated Note effective July 30, 2012 (the "Line of Credit"), we will still be required to obtain additional financing in order to meet installment payment obligations and the previously existing obligations under the Line of Credit, which had a balance of $1,355,761 at December 31, 2013 and a total Unpaid Balance (as defined in the Line of Credit) of $2,625,160, which includes amounts borrowed under the Line of Credit, unpaid interest fees, any amounts guaranteed by The RHL Group, and other obligations due the RHL Group pursuant to the terms of the Seventh Amended and Restated Note and the Security Agreement. As a result of the above, we express uncertainty about our ability to continue as a going concern. The components of the RHL Group Note payable and the related balance sheet presentation as of December 31, 2013 are as follows: $979,545, which is included in the line of credit, related party; and $376,216 related to other obligations due to The RHL Group which are included in related party payables.

Management's plan regarding this matter is to, amongst other things, continue to utilize the Line of Credit. At December 31, 2013, there was approximately $1.9 million available under the Line of Credit. Furthermore, we plan to utilize portions of our standby equity facility with Granite State Capital LLC ("Granite") as needed. Finally, the Company plans to continue to sell additional debt and equity securities, continue to settle its existing liabilities through the issuance of equity securities, explore other debt financing arrangements, continue to increase its existing subscriber and affiliate customer base, sell MMRPro products, and collect licensing fees from parties infringing upon the Company's intellectual property to obtain additional cash flow over the next twelve months. There can be no assurance that funds from these sources will be available when needed or, if available, will be on terms favorable to us or to our stockholders. If additional funds are raised by issuing equity securities, the percentage of ownership of our stockholders will be reduced, stockholders will experience additional dilution and/or such equity securities may provide for rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of the holders of our common stock. If we are unable to utilize our Line of Credit, our equity facility with Granite, obtain suitable alternative debt or equity financing, or increase sales of our products, our ability to execute our business plan and continue as a going concern may be adversely affected.

These matters raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. These financial statements were prepared under the assumption that the Company will continue as a going concern and do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of that uncertainty.

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

(a) MANAGEMENT'S USE OF ESTIMATES

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of net revenue and expenses during each reporting period. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates, including those related to revenue recognition, allowances for doubtful accounts, the valuation of deferred income taxes, tax contingencies, long-lived and intangible assets, valuation of derivative liabilities and stock-based compensation. These estimates are based on historical experience and on various other factors that management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, although actual results could differ from those estimates.

F-8


(b) CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

We consider cash equivalents to be only those investments that are highly liquid, readily convertible to cash and with maturities of 90 days or less at the purchase date. We maintain our cash in bank deposit accounts that, at times, may exceed federally insured limits. We have not experienced any losses in such accounts and believe that we are not exposed to any significant credit or deposit risk on our cash. We had cash and cash equivalents of $10,359 and $36,655 as of December 31, 2013, and 2012, respectively.

(c) TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES

Receivables represent claims against third parties that will be settled in cash. The carrying value of receivables, net of an allowance for doubtful accounts, if any, represents their estimated net realizable value. We estimate the allowance for doubtful accounts, if any, based on historical collection trends, type of customer, the age of outstanding receivables and existing economic conditions. If events or changes in circumstances indicate that specific receivable balances may be impaired, we give further consideration to the collectability of those balances and the allowance is adjusted accordingly. We write off past due receivable balances when collection efforts have been unsuccessful in collecting the amount due.

(d) FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

ASC 820-10,  Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,  requires entities to disclose the fair value of financial instruments, both assets and liabilities recognized and not recognized on the balance sheet, for which it is practicable to estimate fair value. ASC 820-10 defines the fair value of a financial instrument as the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties. As of December 31, 2013, and 2012, the carrying value of accounts receivable, deposits, related party payables, compensation payable, severance liabilities, and accounts payable and accrued expenses approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of such instruments. The carrying value of short-term debt approximates fair value as the related interest rates approximate rates currently available to us.

We utilize ASC 820-10 for valuing financial assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis. ASC 820-10 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and GAAP and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This standard applies in situations where other accounting pronouncements either permit or require fair value measurements. ASC 820-10 does not require any new fair value measurements.

Accounting guidance also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.

The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

 

Level 1:

Quoted prices in active markets for identical or similar assets and liabilities.

 

Level 2:

Quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active or observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical or similar assets and liabilities.

 

Level 3:

Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

F-9


(e) PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

We record property and equipment at cost. We record equipment under capital leases at the present value of the minimum lease payments. We calculate depreciation using the straight-line method, based upon the following estimated useful lives:

Furniture and Fixtures: 5 Years

Computer Equipment: 5 Years

When we retire or dispose of items, we charge or credit income for the difference between the net book value of the asset and the proceeds realized thereon.

We charge expenditures for maintenance and repairs to operations as incurred while we capitalize renewals and betterments.

We have pledged as collateral all property and equipment, along with all of our other assets, for a line of credit from The RHL Group, a related party (see Note 3 - Related Party Note Payable).

(f) INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Intangible assets are comprised of website and software development costs, domain names and patents. We account for website and software development costs in accordance with ASC 350-50,  Website Development Costs , and ASC 985-20,  Costs of Software to Be Sold, Leased or Marketed . Pursuant to ASC 350-50 and 985-20, we capitalize internally developed website and software costs when the website or software under development has reached technological feasibility. We amortize these costs, typically over an estimated life of five years, using the larger of the amount calculated using the straight-line method or the amount calculated using the ratio between current period gross revenues and the total of current period gross revenues and estimated future gross revenues. At each balance sheet date, we evaluate the unamortized capitalized website and software costs compared to the net realizable value. We then write off the amount by which the unamortized capitalized website costs exceed its net realizable value.

We account for domain names and patents in accordance with ASC 350-30,  General Intangibles Other than Goodwill . We capitalize patent costs representing legal fees associated with filing patent applications and amortize them on a straight-line basis. We are in the process of evaluating our patents' estimated useful life and will begin amortizing the patents when they are brought to the market or otherwise commercialized. We amortize identifiable intangible assets over their estimated useful lives as follows:

Website and Software Development Costs: 5 Years

Domain Name: 5 Years

Patents: 20 Years

(g) IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS AND INTANGIBLES

We account for long-lived assets, which include property and equipment and identifiable intangible assets with finite useful lives (subject to amortization), in accordance with ASC 350-30. ASC 350-30 requires that we review long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that we may not recover the carrying amount of an asset. We measure recoverability by comparing the carrying amount of an asset to the expected future undiscounted net cash flows generated by the asset. If we determine that the asset may not be recoverable, or if the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future undiscounted cash flows, we recognize an impairment charge to the extent of the difference between the fair value and the asset's carrying amount. Our assessment of the undiscounted future cash flows indicated that the carrying amount of the long-lived and intangible assets are recoverable, therefore, we had no impairment charges during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.

F-10


(h) REVENUE RECOGNITION

We generate our revenues from services, which are comprised of providing electronic access to consumer medical records and other vital documents and from the licensing of our services. We recognize revenue only when the price is fixed or determinable, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the service is performed, and we reasonably are assured of collectability of the resulting receivable.

Our subscriber revenues consist of annual and monthly recurring retail subscriptions and usage-based fees, which are primarily paid in advance by credit card, and corporate accounts that are based on either an access-fee or actual number of users, and in each case billed in advance at the beginning of each month of service. We defer the portions of annual recurring subscription fees collected in advance and recognize them on a straight line basis over the subscription period.

We grant exclusive licenses for the sale and marketing of our services in international territories in consideration of an up-front license fee and an ongoing royalty. The royalty fee is usually a percentage of revenue earned by the licensee and there usually are certain minimum guarantees. We defer the recognition of license fee revenues received in advance from international licensees for the grant of the license and recognize them over the period covered by the agreement. We defer the recognition of minimum guaranteed royalty payments received in advance and recognize them over the period to which the royalty relates. We include all such revenues under "License Fees." In those cases where a license agreement contains multiple deliverables, we account for the agreement in accordance with ASC 605-25,  Revenue Recognition - Multiple-Element Arrangements  .

We recognize revenue on sales of our MMRPro system in accordance with ASC 605-25,  Revenue Recognition, Multiple-Element Arrangements .

Our multiple-deliverable arrangements consist solely of our MMRPro product. Significant deliverables within these arrangements include sophisticated scanning equipment, various licenses to use third party software, a license to use our proprietary MMRPro application software, installation and training, dedicated telephone lines, secure online storage and warranties.

We determined all elements to be separate units of accounting as they have standalone value to the customers and/or they are sold by other vendors on a standalone basis. Delivery of the hardware and certain software elements of these arrangements occur at the inception of the agreement. We deliver installation and training at the inception of the agreement. We provide other software licenses, telephone lines and online secure storage over the three year term of the agreement. We include warranties in the arrangements, however the third party product manufacturer, and not us, is obligated to fulfill such warranties. The third-party warranty contracts are paid in advance and are not refundable.

We allocate the revenue derived from these arrangements among all the deliverables. We base such allocation on the relative selling price of each deliverable. With the exception of our proprietary MMRPro application software, we use third party evidence to set the selling prices used for this allocation. In all such cases, third parties sell the same or very similar products. For the MMRPro application software, we estimate the selling price based on recent discussions regarding licensure of that particular application on a standalone basis. To date, we have not licensed this software on a standalone basis.

We recognize the allocated revenue for each deliverable in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") No. 104,  Topic 13: Revenue Recognition . Under this guidance, we recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the price is fixed and determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. This results in us recognizing revenue for the hardware, certain software and the warranties upon delivery to the customer, for the installation and training upon completion of these services, and ratably over the contract period for the software licenses, telephone lines and online secure storage.

Revenue from the licensing of our biotech assets may include non-refundable license and up-front fees, non-refundable milestone payments that are triggered upon achievement of a specific event and future royalties or lump-sum payments on sales of related products. For agreements that provide for milestone payments, such as the Celgene Agreement, we adopted ASC 605-28-25,  Revenue Recognition, Milestone Method .

F-11


(i) INCOME TAXES AND UNCERTAIN TAX POSITIONS

We account for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740-10,  Income Taxes . We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities to reflect the estimated future tax effects, calculated at the tax rate expected to be in effect at the time of realization. We record a valuation allowance related to a deferred tax asset when it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of the changes in tax laws and rates of the date of enactment.

ASC 740-10 prescribes a recognition threshold that a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements and provides guidance on recognition, measurement, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition issues. We classify interest and penalties as a component of interest and other expenses. To date, we have not been assessed, nor have we paid, any interest or penalties.

We measure and record uncertain tax positions by establishing a threshold for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. Only tax positions meeting the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold at the effective date may be recognized or continue to be recognized.

(j) ADVERTISING

We expense advertising costs as we incur them. Advertising expense for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 was $78,230 and $19,917, respectively.

(k) SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

We account for share-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718-20,  Awards Classified as Equity . We apply ASC 718-20 in accounting for stock-based awards issued to employees under the recognition of compensation expense related to the fair value of employee share-based awards, including stock options and restricted stock. Determining the fair value of options at the grant date requires judgment, including estimating the expected term that stock options will be outstanding prior to exercise, the associated volatility and the expected dividends. Judgment is required in estimating the amount of share-based awards expected to be forfeited prior to vesting. If actual forfeitures differ significantly from these estimates, share-based compensation expense could be materially impacted.

We account for options and warrants issued to non-employees in accordance with ASC 505-50,  Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees . We treat options and warrants issued to non-employees the same as those issued to employees with the exception of determination of the measurement date. The measurement date is the earlier of (1) the date at which a commitment for performance by the counterparty to earn the equity instruments is reached, or (2) the date at which the counterparty's performance is complete. Options and warrants granted to consultants are valued at their respective measurement dates, and recognized as expense based on the portion of the total consulting services provided during the applicable period. As further consulting services are provided in future periods, we will revalue the associated options and warrants and recognize additional expense based on their then current values.

We estimate the fair value of each stock option on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. We determine assumptions relative to volatility and anticipated forfeitures at the time of grant. We valued grants of warrants during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 using the following assumptions:

  December 31, 2013   December 31, 2012
       
       
Expected life in years 0 - 5 Years    0 - 5 Years 
Stock price volatility 120.51% - 157.58%   123.47% - 124.21%
Risk free interest rate 0.04% - 1.58%   0.35% - 0.46%
Expected dividends None   None
Forfeiture rate                                                 0%   0%

F-12


We base the assumptions used in the Black-Scholes models upon the following data: (1) our use of the contractual life of the underlying non-employee warrants as the expected life; the expected life of the employee options used in this calculation is the period of time the options are expected to be outstanding and has been determined based on historical exercise experience; (2) in the absence of an extensive public market for our shares, the expected stock price volatility of the underlying shares over the expected term of the option or warrant was taken at approximately the mid-point of the range for similar companies at the various grant dates; (3) we base the risk free interest rate on published U.S. Treasury Department interest rates for the expected terms of the underlying options or warrants; (4) we base expected dividends on historical dividend data and expected future dividend activity; and (5) we base the expected forfeiture rate on historical forfeiture activity and assumptions regarding future forfeitures based on the composition of current grantees.

(l) NET INCOME/LOSS PER SHARE

We apply the guidance of ASC 260-10,  Earnings Per Share  for calculating the basic and diluted loss per share. We calculate basic loss per share by dividing the net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. We compute diluted loss per share similar to basic loss per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential shares had been issued and if the additional shares were dilutive. We exclude common equivalent shares from the computation of net loss per share if their effect is anti-dilutive.

We excluded all potential common shares from the computation of diluted net loss per common share for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 because they were anti-dilutive due to our net loss position. Stock options, warrants and convertible notes excluded from the computation totaled 203,329,108 and 178,065,471 shares as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

(m) RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING

We expense research, development and engineering costs as incurred and presented as technology development in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. We capitalize and amortize costs for software development relating to our website incurred subsequent to establishing technological feasibility, in the form of a working model, over their estimated useful lives.

(n) COST METHOD INVESTMENT

We hold a minority equity investment in a private company, which is recorded as Investment in equity securities. This investment is accounted for under the cost method of accounting as we own less than 20% of the voting equity and only have the ability to exercise nominal, not significant, influence over the investee. We monitor this investment for impairment and make appropriate reductions in carrying value if necessary.

(o) RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

During July 2012, FASB issued ASU no. 2012-02 , " Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment". Under the amendments in Update 2012-02, entities have the option first to assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events and circumstances indicates that it is more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired. If, after assessing the totality of events and circumstances, an entity concludes that it is not more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired, then the entity is not required to take further action. However, if an entity concludes otherwise, then it is required to determine the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset and perform the quantitative impairment test by comparing the fair value with the carrying amount in accordance with Subtopic 350-30. The amendments in this update are effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

F-13


3. RELATED PARTY NOTE PAYABLE

As contemplated by the Merger Agreement and the Creditor Plan, as a condition to the Merger, at the effective time of the Merger, MMR and The RHL Group, Inc. entered into an allonge to the RHL Note and the Security Agreement ("The Allonge") pursuant to which The RHL Group, Inc. agreed to suspend certain of its rights under the Security Agreement and the RHL Note until the earlier of (a) the date that we repay all amounts outstanding under any promissory notes issued to Old Favrille's creditors under the Creditor Plan, (b) the date that we deposit into an escrow fund the maximum amount of cash payable in satisfaction of the promissory notes issued to Old Favrille's creditors under the Creditor Plan or (c) ten days after the two year anniversary of the closing date of the Merger. The suspended rights include any right of The RHL Group, Inc. to (1) declare a default or event of default under the Security Agreement or the RHL Note, (2) accelerate the maturity date of the RHL Note, (3) exercise any of its principal remedies for a default or event of default under the Security Agreement, (4) assign the RHL Note, the proceeds of the RHL Note or to otherwise negotiate the RHL Note and (5) receive payment of the outstanding principal and interest owing under the RHL Note.

On April 29, 2011, we entered into a Fifth Amended and Restated Secured Promissory Note, or the Fifth Amended Note, with The RHL Group and we agreed to guaranty MMR's obligations under the Fifth Amended Note (the "Guaranty"). The Fifth Amended Note amends and restates the April 29, 2010 Fourth Amended and Restated Secured Promissory Note Agreement. The Fifth Amended Note matured April 29, 2012, and bears interest at the lesser of 10% or the highest rate then permitted by law, and is secured by the Security Agreement. The reserve credit line of the Fifth Amended Note remains at $3,000,000.

On June 22, 2012, the Company and The RHL Group entered into a Sixth Amended and Restated Promissory Note, or the Sixth Amended Note. The Sixth Amended Note amended and restated that certain Fifth Amended and Restated Promissory Note by extending the maturity date of the Existing Note for one year to April 29, 2013 based on the original maturity date of April 29, 2012. The Amended Note does not materially alter the terms of the Existing Note other than for the fact that there were no loan origination fees charged by The RHL Group on this renewal. In connection with the Sixth Amended Note, the Company issued The RHL Group warrants to purchase 2,852,200 shares of the Company common stock at $0.02 per share. Such warrants are fully vested and are exercisable either in cash or on a cashless basis at any time prior to the fifth anniversary of the date of issuance.

On July 30, 2012, the Company and The RHL Group amended and restated the Sixth Amended and Restated Note by entering into that certain Seventh Amended and Restated Promissory Note (the "Amended Note"), effective as of July 30, 2012. The Amended Note amends and restates that certain Sixth Amended and Restated Promissory Note entered into between the foregoing parties, effective April 29, 2012 (the "Existing Note" and together with its predecessor notes and the Amended Note, the "Credit Facility" or the "Line of Credit"), by: (i) increasing the amount available under the Credit Facility from $3,000,000 to $4,500,000 to accommodate additional financing needs of the Company and/or MMR Inc.; and (ii) granting The RHL Group the right to convert, at any time following the date of the Amended Note, up to an aggregate of $500,000 in outstanding principal of the Credit Facility into shares of the Company's Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.02 per share. The amendment did not change the maturity date of the Existing Note, which was due on April 29, 2013. There were no loan origination fees charged by, or warrants issued to, The RHL Group with respect to the Amended Note. Except as set forth above, the Amended Note does not materially alter the terms of the Existing Note.

On August 13, 2013, the Company and The RHL Group entered into an Eighth Amended and Restated Promissory Note, effective as of April 29, 2013. The Amended Note amends and restates that certain Seventh Amended Note entered into between the foregoing parties, effective April 29, 2013 (the "Existing Note" and together with its predecessor notes and the Amended Note, the "Credit Facility"), by: (i) extending the maturity date to April 29, 2014; (ii) requiring a $1,000 per month minimum payment. In connection with the Eighth Amended Note, we issued The RHL Group warrants to purchase 2,852,200 shares of our common stock at $0.04 per share, which was recorded as a charge to interest expense. Except as set forth above, the Amended Note does not materially alter the terms of the Existing Note.

F-14


The Eighth Amended Note had a balance of $1,355,761 and $1,587,160 at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The components of the Eighth Amended Note and the related balance sheet presentation as of December 31, 2013 are as follows: $979,545, which is included in the line of credit, related party; and $376,216 for other obligations due to The RHL Group, which are included in related party payables.

Total interest expense on the Line of Credit for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 amounted to $132,804 and $155,866, respectively. The unpaid interest balances as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were $24,049 and $35,451, respectively.

In conjunction with the Eighth Amended Note, we were required to maintain certain financial covenants, including the requirement that we have at least $200,000 of cash in our bank accounts or such other amount as necessary to maintain operations through the subsequent thirty (30) days and timely pay any obligations due respecting payroll and all associated payroll taxes on and after December 31, 2013. Since we weren't able to meet the covenants as of December 31, 2013, we received a waiver from The RHL Group until April 5, 2014.

4. PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT ASSETS

Prepaid expenses and other current assets include the following:

      December 31,     December 31,
      2013     2012
             
             
Prepaid consulting fees from issuance of common stock   $ 141,315    $ 91,778 
Prepaid insurance     8,947      12,207 
Prepaid trade shows     4,375      4,375 
             
Total prepaid expenses and other current assets   $ 154,637    $ 108,360 

5. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment, at December 31, 2013 and 2012 consisted of the following.

      December 31,     December 31,
      2013     2012
             
             
Furnitures and fixtures   $ 3,170    $ 3,170 
Computers and related equipment     153,335      119,506 
             
      156,505      122,676 
             
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization     (118,112)     (102,375)
             
    $ 38,393    $ 20,301 

Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 amounted to $15,737 and $8,184, respectively, which is recorded in general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

F-15


6. INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Intangible assets as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 consisted of the following:

      Years Ended December 31,
      2013     2012
             
             
Website development   $ 326,394    $ 327,094 
MMR Pro website development     863,561      756,511 
Patents     1,246,739      809,889 
Domain name     86,375      86,375 
             
      2,523,069      1,979,869 
             
Less: Accumulated amortization     (853,036)     (632,010)
             
    $ 1,670,033    $ 1,347,859 

Amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 amounted to $221,726 and $259,953, respectively. Estimated amortization expense for each of the next five succeeding years is expected to be as follows:

Year Ending
December 31,
     
2014   $ 231,505 
2015     208,946 
2016     58,806 
2017     7,631 
2018     9,398 
Total   $ 516,286 

7. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED EXPENSES

      December 31,     December 31,
      2013     2012
             
Legal and accounting fees   $ 3,501,978    $ 2,542,536 
Accounts payable and accruals from Favrille Merger     309,791      300,971 
Trade payables     976,820      819,129 
Consulting services     401,994      265,665 
Accrued vacation     73,944      57,440 
             
Total accounts payable and accrued expenses   $ 5,264,527    $ 3,985,741 

F-16


8. INCOME TAXES

The items accounting for the difference between income taxes computed at the federal statutory rate and the provision for income taxes were as follows:

Years Ended December 31,
2013 2012
Federal statutory rate   -34.00%   -34.00%
State tax, net of federal benefit   -5.82%   -5.82%
Non-deductible items   0.07%   0.08%
Valuation allowance   39.75%   39.74%
Effective income tax rate   0.00%   0.00%

Significant components of deferred tax assets and (liabilities) are as follows:

      December 31,
      2013   2012
Net operating loss carryforwards   $ 18,674,820    $ 15,934,479 
Depreciation and amortization     (145,605)     (222,850)
Share-based compensation     2,061,862      1,733,105 
R&D tax credit     2,455,964      2,455,964 
State tax and other     (1,446,425)     (1,207,439)
Deferred tax assets, net     21,600,616      18,693,259 
Less: valuation allowance     (21,600,616)     (18,693,259)
    $   $

At December 31, 2013, the Company had Federal and State net operating loss carry forwards available to offset future taxable income of $43,632,481 and $43,436,381, respectively. These carry forwards will begin to expire in the years ending December 31, 2026 and December 31, 2016, respectively. These net operating losses may be subject to various limitations on utilization based on ownership changes under Internal Revenue Code Section 382 as a result of the Merger, and the Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of this before any losses are used to offset future taxable income. The Company's net operating loss carry forwards are subject to examination until such time as the NOLs are used and the tax year is closed.

The Company periodically evaluates the likelihood of the realization of deferred tax assets, and adjusts the carrying amount of the deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance to the extent the future realization of the deferred tax assets is not judged to be more likely than not. The Company considers many factors when assessing the likelihood of future realization of our deferred tax assets, including recent cumulative earnings experience by taxing jurisdiction, expectations of future taxable income or loss, the carry-forward periods available to us for tax reporting purposes, and other relevant factors.

At December 31, 2013, based on available evidence, including cumulative losses in recent years and expectations of future taxable income, the Company determined that it was more likely than not that its deferred tax assets would not be realized. The Company has recorded an $21,600,616 valuation allowance, or 100% of its cumulative deferred tax assets.

The Company performed an analysis of its tax filings and determined that there were no positions taken that it considered uncertain. Therefore, there were no unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2013 and 2012.

Future changes in the unrecognized tax benefit are not expected to have an impact on the effective tax rate due to the existence of the valuation allowance. The Company estimates that the unrecognized tax benefit will not change within the next twelve months. The Company will continue to classify income tax penalties and interest, if any, as part of interest and other expenses in its consolidated statements of operations. The Company incurred $0 of interest and penalties during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.

F-17


The Company files income tax returns in the United States ("Federal") and California ("State") jurisdictions. The Company is subject to Federal and State income tax examinations by the tax authorities.

The following table summarizes the open tax years for each major jurisdiction:

Jurisdiction Open Tax Years

Federal 2010 - 2013

California State 2009 - 2013

As the Company has significant net operating loss carryforwards, even if certain of the Company's tax positions were disallowed, it is not foreseen that the Company would have to pay any taxes in the near future. Consequently, the Company does not calculate the impact of interest or penalties on amounts that might be disallowed. The Company's net operating loss carryforwards are subject to examination until they are fully utilized and such tax years are closed.

9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTIGENCIES

Leases

Effective September 1, 2013, we renewed our lease for office space in Los Angeles, California with a term through August 31, 2015. The lease currently requires a monthly payment of $8,250. Total rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were $120,472 and $116,142 respectively. Future minimum lease payments as of December 31, 2013, under non-cancelable operating leases (with initial or remaining lease terms in excess of one year) are as follows:

Year Ending     Operating     Capital
December 31,     Leases     Leases
             
2014    $ 147,125    $ 13,336 
2015      170,500      3,522 
2016      187,550     
2017      206,305     
2018 and there after      146,410     
      857,890      16,858 
Less current portion            (13,336)
             
Total minimum lease payments    $ 857,890    $ 3,522 

Guarantee provided by The RHL Group

On May 6, 2011, the RHL Group agreed to guarantee up to $250,000 in payments to a vendor for future services to be rendered. In consideration of this guarantee, the RHL Group received (i) a warrant to purchase 625,000 shares of our common stock, at an exercise price of $0.046 per share, which was the closing price of our common stock on the date of the transaction, and (ii) 125,000 shares of our common stock priced as of the same date. In the event that the RHL Group has to perform on this guarantee, interest on any outstanding balance paid to the vendor by the RHL Group will be added to the balance of the Fifth Amended Note or any subsequent renewals. Additionally, any balances due to this vendor at any given time will reduce the amount available under the Fifth Amended Note or any subsequent renewals. The warrants and shares were issued on November 11, 2011 to the RHL Group.

F-18


On July 31, 2012, the RHL Group entered into guarantee agreements to guarantee certain obligations of MMR in the amount of $1,014,629. In consideration of this guarantee, the RHL Group received a warrant to purchase 3,055,432 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.02 per share.

Concentrations

During 2013, our three largest customers (Visi, Inc. $302,000, Thorson Insurance Services $50,000 and XN Financial $44,000) accounted for approximately 67% of our total revenue. Due to the contributions of these customers to our consolidated revenue, we are somewhat dependent upon our relationships with these customers.

Revenue from our largest customer, which comprised 52% and 33% of our total revenue for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, was transacted with a private entity in which we hold a minority equity investment.

For the year ended December 31, 2012, our three largest customers (Visi, Inc. $267,000, Celgene $100,000 and E-mail Frequency $81,971) accounted for approximately 56% of our total revenue.

Employment Agreements

The Company has employment agreements with its Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Robert H. Lorsch, its Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer, Ingrid Safranek, its Vice President Telecommunications & Carrier Relations, Rafael "Ralph" Salazar, and Executive Vice President, Richard Lagani. Under each employment agreement, the executive officers receive a base salary, subject to annual increases as determined by the board of directors, certain benefits as set forth in the employment agreements, and an annual bonus at the discretion of the board of directors.

On January 29, 2009 we entered into an employment agreement with our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Robert H. Lorsch, with an initial term ending on December 31, 2011, subject to successive automatic extension unless we or Mr. Lorsch elect not to extend. Under the terms of his agreement, Mr. Lorsch shall serve as both our President and Chief Executive Officer and President and Chief Executive Officer of our wholly-owned subsidiary, MMR. The agreement provides for a base salary of $15,000 per month, subject to an upward increase and with an annual bonus and stock option grants in such amounts, if any, as the Board of Directors may determine in its sole discretion. Mr. Lorsch receives a monthly auto allowance, reimbursement of certain life insurance premiums, and reimbursement for certain other insurance coverage, and is entitled to participate in benefits generally made to our senior executives.

On December 28, 2011, the Board of Directors agreed to renew Mr. Lorsch's employment agreement effective January 1, 2012 for an additional three year term ending on December 31, 2014. The term of the Renewal expires on December 31, 2014, but may be extended automatically for successive additional one-year periods at the expiration of the then-current term unless written notice of non-extension is provided to Mr. Lorsch with at least 90 days prior notice to the expiration of such term. In addition, on December 31, 2013, the Board of Directors agreed to extend Mr. Lorsch's employment term to December 31, 2015 under the same terms. Mr. Lorsch's current annual base salary will remain unchanged, except for the minimum 5% annual increase as called under the agreement, with the understanding that, as in the past, portions of the payments could be deferred into future periods. Mr. Lorsch may terminate the agreement upon 30 days written notice without reason or for good reason (as defined in the agreements) if we fail to cure acts or omissions constituting good reason within 30 days. If Mr. Lorsch's employment is terminated by us for cause or voluntarily by Mr. Lorsch without good reason, he will not be entitled to receive any severance payments or benefits under the employment agreement. If Mr. Lorsch's employment is terminated by us without cause or voluntarily by Mr. Lorsch for good reason, Mr. Lorsch will be entitled to one year of salary at his then current rate of pay, including all monthly benefits, and the pro rata portion of the annual bonus otherwise due Mr. Lorsch. In the event of his disability, Mr. Lorsch would be entitled to receive compensation equal to 60% of his base salary as then in effect. Mr. Lorsch's employment agreement includes provisions that prohibit Mr. Lorsch from disclosing our confidential information and trade secrets and competing with us during the term of his employment agreement or soliciting our employees for 12 months following termination of employment.

F-19


We also have entered into a consulting agreement with The RHL Group, Inc., which is wholly-owned by Mr. Lorsch that provides for a monthly fee of $25,000 plus reimbursement of expenses including medical insurance. The RHL Group provides consulting, operational and technical services to the Company, which we refer to as the RHL Services. As part of the RHL Services, the RHL Group provides the Company with unrestricted access to its internal business and relationship contact database of more than 10,000 persons and entities, which includes clients of the RHL Group and other individuals which may hold value to the Company. The RHL Group also provides infrastructure support to the Company, including allowing the Company unlimited access to its facilities, equipment, and data, information management and server systems. The RHL Group has also consented to allow the Company to utilize the full-time services of Mr. Lorsch as the Company's President, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, which requires substantial time and energy away from his required duties as The RHL Group's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. In addition, The RHL Group has made its President, Kira Reed, available as the Company's spokesperson. Ms. Reed, who is Mr. Lorsch's spouse, also manages the Company's social networking activities.

On January 26, 2010, we entered into an employment agreement with Ingrid Safranek as our Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary. Under the employment agreement, Ms. Safranek receives a base salary, subject to annual increases as determined by the Board of Directors, certain benefits as set forth in the employment agreement, and an annual bonus at the discretion of the board of directors. Ms. Safranek's employment agreement was effective until June 15, 2010, but was extended until June 15, 2011. On December 10, 2010, the Board approved Ms. Safranek's employment agreement to be amended to extend the term for an additional one year commencing on January 1, 2011. On December 28, 2011, the Board extended the current employment agreement for an additional two years term and approved an increase in her base salary with the understanding that, from time to time, it could be necessary to defer certain payments or benefits into future periods. Furthermore, on December 31, 2013, the Board elected to renew Ms. Safranek's agreement for an additional two year term under the same terms as before.

The current term of Ms. Safranek's employment agreement is effective until December 31, 2015 and will automatically renew for successive 12 month periods unless terminated at least 30 days prior to the end of the term. The employment agreement may be terminated by the Company without cause (as defined in the agreement) upon 90 days written notice or for cause if Ms. Safranek fails to cure the acts or omissions constituting cause within 30 days. If Ms. Safranek's employment is terminated by the Company for cause or voluntarily by Ms. Safranek without good reason, she will not be entitled to receive any severance payments or benefits under the employment agreement. If Ms. Safranek's employment is terminated by the Company without cause or voluntarily by Ms. Safranek for good reason, Ms. Safranek will be entitled to one year of salary at her then current rate of pay, including all monthly benefits, and the pro rata portion of the annual bonus otherwise due Ms. Safranek. In the event of her disability, Ms. Safranek would be entitled to receive compensation equal to 60% of her base salary as then in effect. Ms. Safranek's employment agreement includes provisions that prohibit her from disclosing our confidential information and trade secrets and competing with us during the term of his employment agreement or soliciting our employees for 12 months following termination of employment.

On June 15, 2010, we entered into an employment agreement with Rafael "Ralph" Salazar as our Vice President Telecommunications & Carrier Relations. Under the employment agreement, Mr. Salazar received a base salary, subject to annual increase as determined by the board of directors, certain benefits as set forth in the employment agreement, and an annual bonus at the discretion of the board of directors. Mr. Salazar's employment agreement was effective until June 15, 2012. On December 28, 2011, the Board extended the current employment agreement for an additional two year term and approved an increase in his base salary with the understanding that, from time to time, it could be necessary to defer certain payments or benefits into future periods. The term of Mr. Salazar's employment agreement was effective until December 31, 2013 and was not renewed as Mr. Salazar elected to retire.

On April 1, 2011, we entered into an employment agreement with Richard Lagani as our Executive Vice President. Under the employment agreement, Mr. Lagani received a base salary, subject to annual increase as determined by the board of directors, certain benefits as set forth in the employment agreement and an annual bonus at the discretion of the board of directors. The term of Mr. Lagani's employment agreement was effective until April 30, 2013 and was converted into a consulting agreement at the end of the term as Mr. Lagani continued working for us from London. On August 1, 2012, Mr. Lagani relocated his primary residence to London England where he continues to provide services to the Company on a special projects basis.

F-20


Litigation Matters

From time to time, we are involved in various legal proceedings generally incidental to our business. While the result of any litigation contains an element of uncertainty, our management presently believes that the outcome of any known, pending or threatened legal proceeding or claim, individually or combined, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial statements.

On December 9, 2011, MyMedicalRecords, Inc. entered into a Non-Exclusive Settlement and Patent License Agreement (the "Agreement") with Surgery Center Management LLC ("SCM"). In consideration for the rights granted under the Agreement and in consideration of a settlement and release agreement, SCM contracted to pay MMR an initial payment of $5 million payable on December 23, 2011 and additional payments of $5 million per year for five consecutive years. After numerous attempts to collect the past due amount of $5 million, on January 19, 2012, MyMedicalRecords, Inc. filed a lawsuit in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles for breach of contract and is seeking damages in an amount of $30 million. On or about February 13, 2014, SCM answered the MMR complaint and filed a cross-complaint against MMR alleging claims of breach of contract, among other things. We do not have enough facts at this time to predict the chances of either a favorable or unfavorable outcome, nor do we have any facts upon which to base any information regarding collectability.

On January 29, 2013, MMR filed a complaint for patent infringement against Walgreen Co., titled MyMedicalRecords, Inc. v. Walgreen Co. , United States District Court, Central District of California ("Walgreen I"). The complaint alleges that Walgreen Co. is infringing MMR's Personal Health Records patent, U.S. Patent No. 8,301,466. On January 13, 2014, MMR filed a complaint for patent infringement against Walgreen Co., titled MyMedicalRecords, Inc. v. Walgreen Co. , United States District Court, Central District of California ("Walgreen II"). The complaint alleges that Walgreen Co. is infringing MMR's Personal Health Records patent, U.S. Patent No. 8,498,883. On February 13, 2014, Walgreen Co. filed a Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 8,301,466 ("IPR Proceeding") at the United States Patent and Trademark Office. On March 6, 2014, the Company and Walgreen Co. entered into a settlement agreement, the terms of which are confidential, which will result in the dismissal with prejudice of Walgreen I and Walgreen II and the dismissal of the IPR Proceeding. On March 25, 2014 the USPTO ordered that the joint motion to terminate the [IPR] proceeding be granted and the proceeding thereby terminated.

On February 11, 2013, MMR filed a complaint for patent infringement against WebMD Health Corp. and its wholly owned subsidiary WebMD Health Services Group, Inc. (collectively, "WebMD"), titled  MyMedicalRecords, Inc. v. WebMD Health Corp et al. , United States District Court, Central District of California. That complaint alleged that WebMD is infringing MMR's Personal Health Records patent U.S. Patent No. 8,301,466. MMR subsequently withdrew the complaint per an agreement allowing MMR to the right to re-file without prejudice unless an agreement is reached within a specific period of time. On August 27, 2013, MMR terminated the agreement with WebMD. On October 2, 2013, MMR filed a new complaint against WebMD in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,301,466 and 8,498,883. This matter is currently in the initial stages and we do not have enough facts at this time to predict the changes of either a favorable or unfavorable outcome, nor do we have any facts upon which to base any information regarding collectability.

On April 10, 2013, MMR filed a complaint for patent infringement against Quest Diagnostics Inc. ("Quest") in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, alleging that Quest Diagnostics Inc. is infringing U.S. Patent No. 8,301,466. On October 11, 2013, MMR filed an unopposed motion to add a claim of infringement of U.S. Patent 8,498,883 to its complaint against Quest, which was granted on October 29, 2013. This matter is currently in the initial stages and we do not have enough facts at this time to predict the chances of either a favorable or unfavorable outcome, nor do we have any facts upon which to base any information regarding collectability.

On May 17, 2013, MMR filed a complaint for patent infringement against Jardogs, LLC (the "Jardogs Complaint") in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, alleging that Jardogs, LLC infringes U.S. Patent No. 8,301,466. On September 23, 2013, MMR filed a separate complaint for patent infringement against Allscripts Healthcare Solutions Inc. ("Allscripts") titled MyMedicalRecords, Inc. v. Allscripts Healthcare Solutions Inc., United States District Court, Central District of California (the "Separate Allscripts Complaint"). The Separate Allscripts Complaint alleged that Allscripts is infringing U.S. Patent Nos. 8,301,466 and 8,498,883. On October 4, 2013, MMR filed a motion to amend the Jardogs Complaint to add Allscripts as a party defendant and to allege that Allscripts is infringing U.S. Patent Nos. 8,301,466 and 8,498,883. The Court granted that motion on November 1, 2013. Thereafter, MMR dismissed the Separate Allscripts Complaint. This matter is currently in the initial stages and we do not have enough facts at this time to predict the changes of either a favorable or unfavorable outcome, nor do we have any facts upon which to base any information regarding collectability.

F-21


MMR has received a letter from Sunil Singhal, a former employee. Mr. Sunil Singhal was employed as Executive Vice President of Technology and Product Development at MMR. He was placed on a 30-day administrative leave on February 13, 2012 and was given a 30-day notice of termination as approved by the Board of Directors of MMRGlobal on February 29, 2012. On March 30, 2012, Mr. Singhal was officially terminated. He filed a charge with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, but that body has declined to take action. In turn, he filed a claim with the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing ("DFEH").  The DFEH had declined to bring a citation, but it has issued a "right to sue" notice.  Mr. Singhal filed suit in the Los Angeles County Superior Court in 2013. MMR answered the complaint denying liability and damages. Discovery is underway. The Superior Court has requested that the parties engage in mediation. No trial date has been set.

On October 18, 2012, MMR was named as a defendant in an action filed in the California Superior Court, County of Los Angeles, by Naj Allana.  The matter was settled and the case dismissed.

10. STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

Preferred Stock

The Company has 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock authorized. As of December 31, 2013, and 2012, there were no shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding.

Common Stock

As of December 31, 2013, we are authorized to issue 1,250,000,000 shares of common stock.

On May 24, 2012, the Company filed a Form S-1 related to the offer and resale of up to 100,000,000 shares of our common stock by Granite. Granite has agreed to purchase all 100,000,000 shares pursuant to the Investment Agreement, and an additional 1,000,000 shares were issued to Granite as partial consideration for the preparation of the documents for its investment in the Company. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Investment Agreement, the Company has the right to put up to $15 million in shares of our common stock to Granite. As of December 31, 2013, the amount available under the equity line facility was $13.5 million; however, that amount could be reduced based on the market price of our stock at the time any shares are sold.

As of December 31, 2013, the total shares of our common stock issued and outstanding amounted to 684,367,465.

11. EQUITY TRANSACTIONS

Stock Option Activity

On January 21, 2010, our Board of Directors approved an increase to the number of shares authorized for issuance under our 2001 Equity Incentive Plan (the "Plan") from 12,000,000 to 27,000,000 shares as we determined that the number of shares remaining under the Plan was inadequate to retain our key directors, executives and managers. Our stockholders approved the increase to the Plan on June 15, 2010.The Plan expired on June 5, 2011 and no options were issued under the Plan since that date. On September 1, 2011, our Board of Directors approved the adoption of a new plan to replace the Plan under the same general terms. On June 20, 2012, the shareholder voted and approved the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan at the 2012 Annual Shareholder Meeting.

As of December 31, 2013, total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to non-vested stock options was $110,284, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.37 years.

F-22


A summary of option activity for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2013 is presented below. Options granted by MMR Inc. prior to the date of the Merger of January 27, 2009 have been retroactively restated to reflect the conversion ratio of MMR Inc. to MMR shares.

              Weighted-      
              Average      
          Weighted-   Remaining      
          Average   Contractual     Aggregate
          Exercise   Life     Intrinsic
    Options     Price   (Years)     Value
Outstanding at December 31, 2011   40,773,523    $ 0.11    6.29    $ -  
Granted   7,750,000      0.06           
Exercised   -       -            
Cancelled   (6,125,972)     0.09           
Outstanding at December 31, 2012   42,397,551      0.11    5.93      -  
Granted   2,200,000      0.06           
Exercised   (717,461)     0.10           
Cancelled   (3,988,368)     0.11           
Outstanding at December 31, 2013   39,891,722    $ 0.10    5.08    $ -  
                     
                     
Vested and expected to vest                    
     at December 31, 2013   39,891,722    $ 0.10    5.08    $ -  
                     
Exercisable at December 31, 2013   32,766,722    $ 0.11    4.47    $ -  

The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above is before applicable income taxes and is calculated based on the difference between the exercise price of the options and the quoted price of the common stock as of the reporting date. Total stock option expenses recorded during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were $241,428 and $708,982, respectively, and is reflected in operating expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2013.

      Options Outstanding   Options Exercisable
            Weighted     Weighted       Weighted     Weighted
            Average     Average       Average     Average
  Exercise   Number     Remaining     Exercise   Number   Remaining     Exercise
  Price   of Shares     Life (Years)     Price   of Shares   Life (Years)     Price
                                 
$ 0.05 - 0.09   14,150,000      7.71   $ 0.07    7,025,000    7.55   $ 0.07 
$ 0.10 - 0.15   23,111,461      3.48   $ 0.11    23,111,461    3.48   $ 0.11 
$ > 0.15   2,630,261      4.96   $ 0.19    2,630,261    4.96   $ 0.19 
      39,891,722                32,766,722           

Warrants

On January 10, 2013, we granted a warrant to purchase 100,000 shares of our common stock to a consultant in consideration for services. This warrant vested immediately and has an exercise price of $0.04 per share, and an expiration date of January 10, 2014.

F-23


On January 21, 2013, we granted three separate warrants, each to purchase 1,000,000 shares of our common stock, to a consultant in consideration for services. These warrants vested immediately and have an exercise price of $0.04, $0.08 and $0.12 per share, and an expiration date of January 21, 2014.

On February 20, 2013, we granted a warrant to purchase 100,000 shares of our common stock to a consultant in consideration for services. This warrant vested immediately and has an exercise price of $0.04 per share, and an expiration date of February 20, 2014.

On March 13, 2013, we granted a warrant to purchase 1,000,000 shares of our common stock to a third-party in consideration for services. This warrant vested immediately and has an exercise price of $0.10 per share, and an expiration date of March 13, 2014.

On March 18, 2013, we granted two separate warrants, each to purchase 500,000 shares of our common stock to two different unrelated third-parties in consideration for services. These warrants vest immediately and have exercise prices of $0.10 per share, and an expiration date of March 18, 2014.

On April 1, 2013, we granted two separate warrants, each to purchase 250,000 shares of our common stock to two different unrelated third-parties in consideration for rendering services in our Advisory Board. These warrants vest annually over three years and have an exercise price of $0.06 per share, and an expiration date of April 1, 2018.

On May 13, 2013, we granted four separate warrants to purchase 500,000 shares each of our common stock to two unrelated third-parties in consideration for services. These warrants vest upon certain revenue generating criteria is met, and have exercise prices of $0.08 and $0.12 per share, and an expiration date of May 13, 2015.

On May 20, 2013, we granted a warrant to purchase 2,000,000 shares each of our common stock to an unrelated third-party in consideration for services. This warrant vests immediately and has exercise prices of $0.05 per share, and an expiration date of May 20, 2018.

On June 12, 2013, we granted two separate warrants to purchase 1,000,000 shares each of our common stock to an unrelated third-party in consideration for services. These warrants vest in six months and have exercise prices of $0.048 per share, and an expiration date of June 12, 2015.

On August 13, 2013, we granted the RHL Group a warrant to purchase 2,852,200 shares of our common stock in connection with the renewal of the line of credit through the Eighth Amended Note. This warrant has an exercise price of $0.04 per share, with a contractual life through August 13, 2018, vests at commencement.

On August 15, 2013, we granted an unrelated third-party a warrant to purchase 900,000 shares of our common stock in consideration for services. The warrant vests quarterly over a year and have an exercise price of $0.06 per share, and an expiration date of August 15, 2018.

On various dates between August 14, 2013 and September 18, 2013, we granted three different unrelated third-parties three different warrants to purchase up to a total of 12,000,000 shares of our common stock at an average price per share of $0.10. The Warrants vest immediately and have expiration dates of November 18, 2013, December 18, 2013, January 18, 2014, September 13, 2015, and August 14, 2018.

On various dates between October 17, 2013 and November 13, 2013, we granted three different unrelated third-parties three different warrants to purchase up to a total of 4,941,198 shares of our common stock at an average price per share of $0.03. The Warrants vest immediately and have expiration dates of December 20, 2013, December 31, 2013, and October 17, 2014.

On November 14, 2013, we granted three different unrelated third-parties four different warrants to purchase a total of 10,750,000 shares of our common stock in consideration for services. Three of the warrants vests in a month and a half and have an average exercise price of $0.04 per share, and an expiration date of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2015. One warrant vests immediately at an exercise price of $0.04 per share and an expiration date of November 15, 2016.

F-24


On December 13, 2013, we granted an unrelated third-party a warrant to purchase 500,000 shares of our common stock in consideration for services. The warrant vests six months after completion of services and have an exercise price of $0.05 per share, and an expiration date of December 31, 2014.

On December 19, 2013, we granted two different unrelated third-party a warrant to purchase up to 1,000,000 shares of our common stock in consideration for services. The warrants vests immediately and have an exercise price of $0.05 per share, and an expiration date of December 19, 2014.

A summary of the activity of the Company's warrants for the years ended December 31, 2013 is presented below.

        Weighted Avg
  Shares     Exercise Price
Outstanding at December 31, 2012 64,652,375    $ 0.09 
Granted 44,643,398    $ 0.05 
Exercised (12,468,526)   $ 0.03 
Cancelled (8,255,406)   $ 0.13 
Outstanding at December 31, 2013 88,571,841    $ 0.07 
         
Exercisable at December 31, 2013 77,263,508    $ 0.07 

The following summarizes the total warrants outstanding and exercisable as of December 31, 2013.

  Warrants Outstanding     Warrants Exercisable
  Warrants     Weighted Avg     Weighted Avg     Warrants     Weighted Avg     Weighted Avg
Ranges Outstanding     Remaining Life     Exercise Price     Exercisable     Remaining Life     Exercise Price
                                 
$0.03 - $0.25 88,571,841      1.92    $ 0.07      77,263,508      1.92    $ 0.07 
$0.25 - $2.50 -       -     $ -       -       -     $ -  
                                 
  88,571,841                  77,263,508             

Shares Issued for Services or Reduction to Liabilities

During the year ended December 31, 2013, we issued 25,382,278 shares of common stock with a value of $1,444,372 to non-employees and charged to the appropriate accounts for the following reasons:

    Year Ended December 31, 2013
           
Purpose   Shares     Value
           
Reduction of payables    8,195,054    $ 379,620 
Services provided    23,723,211    $ 1,064,752 
Totals    31,918,265    $ 1,444,372 

The 31,918,265 shares were not contractually restricted, however as they have not been registered under the Act, they are restricted from sale until they are registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Act"), or qualify for resale under the rules promulgated under the Act. All such shares were issued at the trading closing price on the date of issuance and the corresponding values were calculated therefrom.

F-25


Restricted Stock Program

Under the Restricted Stock Program, a restricted stock award is an offer by the Company to sell to an eligible person shares that are subject to restrictions relating to the sale or transfer of the shares. A committee appointed by the Board to administer the program or the Board itself shall determine to whom an offer will be made, the number of shares the person may purchase, the price to be paid and the restriction to which the shares shall be subject. The offer must be accepted by the eligible person within thirty days from the date of the offer evidenced by the Restricted Stock Purchase Agreement. The purchase price of shares shall not be less than 85% of the fair market value of such shares on the issue date, with the provision that the purchase price for a 10% stockholder shall not be less than 110% of such fair market value. Shares are either fully and immediately vested upon issuance, or may vest in installments upon attainment of specified performance objectives.

During the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company issued 31,918,265 and 36,416,272, respectively, shares of common stock in consideration for goods and services from both employees and non-employees valued at $1,444,372 and $972,391, respectively.

Stock Bonus Program

Under the Stock Bonus Program, shares are issued as a bonus for services rendered pursuant to the Stock Bonus Agreement. Stock bonuses may be awarded upon satisfaction of specified performance goals pursuant to the Performance Stock Bonus Agreement. On May 10, 2013, we granted a total of 7,250,000 shares of common stock at $0.06 per share to eight employees, two consultants and four directors as an incentive and in consideration for services rendered. All shares from this grant vest on January 10, 2014 and are forfeitable before such time. On May 28, 2013, we granted an additional 500,000 shares of common stock at $0.08 per share to a director as an incentive and in consideration for services rendered. All shares from this grant vest on January 28, 2014 and are forfeitable before such time. On each grant date, we valued the stock bonus based on the share price and the expenses were amortized using the straight line method. The consultants' stock bonus were remeasured on December 31, 2013 based on the share price on that date. Total stock bonus expenses recorded during the year ended December 31, 2013 was approximately $360,000, and is reflected in operating expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

On December 31, 2013, we issued a total of 7,000,000 shares of our common stock at $0.05 per share as an incentive to our board members and members of our management team under the Stock Bonus Program. All shares vest on January 1, 2015 and are forfeitable before such time.

As of December 31, 2013, 14,350,000 shares of restricted stock were not vested, and unrecognized compensation cost with respect to these instruments amounted to $267,586 and will be recognized during 2014.

F-26


12. NOTES PAYABLE

The Notes payable consisted of the following:

      December 31,     December 31,
      2013     2012
             
Promissory notes payable due to the former officers of MMRGlobal as part of severance
packages, due in full on August 31, 2009 with no stated interest
  $ 76,783    $ 76,783 
             
Promissory notes payable due to the former officers of MMRGlobal pursuant to the
Resignation and Post-Merger Employment Arrangement, due in full on August 31, 2009
with no stated interest
    25,444      25,444 
             
Promissory notes payable due to vendors relating to settlement of certain outstanding
accounts payable, payable in 18 equal monthly installments commencing on July 27, 2009
and ending on January 27, 2011, with no stated interest
    223,116      223,116 
             
Short-term loan due to a third-party with no stated interest      50,000      50,000 
      375,343      375,343 
Less: current portion     (375,343)     (375,343)
             
Notes payable, less current portion   $   $
             
Short term loan due to a related-party, payable in full on January 2, 2014 with 12% interest    $ 196,921    $ 192,921 
             
Short term loan due to a related-party, payable in full on January 20, 2014 with 12% interest         50,000 
             
Notes payable related party, current portion     196,921      242,921 
             
Less: current portion     (196,921)     (242,921)
Notes payable related party, less current portion   $   $

13. CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTES

From time to time we enter into Convertible Promissory Notes ("Note(s)"). During the first quarter of 2013, we entered into 14 different Convertible Promissory Notes with 11 different unrelated third-parties for principal amounts totaling $0.49 million, with fixed conversion prices ranging from $0.02 to $0.028. These notes have the option to be converted into a total of 24,035,715 shares of our common stock. As of June 30, 2013, all of these notes have been converted.

During the second quarter of 2013, we entered into 13 different Convertible Promissory Notes with 13 different unrelated third- parties for principal amounts totaling $0.89 million with fixed conversion prices ranging from $0.0339 to $0.08. These notes have the option to be converted into a total of 19,263,258 shares of our common stock. As of June 30, 2013, all of these notes have been converted.

During the third quarter of 2013, we entered into seven different Convertible Promissory Notes with seven different unrelated third-parties for principal amounts totaling $0.52 million with fixed conversion prices ranging from $0.0265 to $0.035. These notes have the option to be converted into a total of 17,691,199 shares of our common stock. As of September 30, 2013, four notes with total principal of $0.17 million have been converted.

During the fourth quarter of 2013, we did not enter into any Convertible Promissory Notes and one note with a principal of $50,000 has been converted.

F-27


We recognized the intrinsic value of the embedded beneficial conversion feature as additional paid-in capital and an equivalent discount that reduced the carrying value of the convertible notes in the amount of $358,923 and $76,928 for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

The related discount for the beneficial conversion outstanding was $81,393 and $0 as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Shares issuable upon conversion for convertible notes payable was 81,015,545 and 71,015,545 as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

The total interest expense attributed to the Notes and related warrants for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 was $333,915 and $137,655, respectively.

14. RESTRUCTURING ACTIVITIES

From May 29, 2008 to November 7, 2008, Favrille, Inc. had provided notices under the federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act to 142 employees, including six members of senior management, that it planned to conduct a workforce reduction at its facility in San Diego, California and that their employment was expected to end on various dates between June 6, 2008 to November 7, 2008. Immediately prior to the date of the Merger on January 27, 2009, the total severance liability relating to former Favrille employees amounted to $1,682,416. On January 27, 2009, immediately prior to the Merger, as part of the 9,999,992 warrants issued to creditors, the Company issued warrants as settlement of $985,020 of these amounts. In addition, the Company signed promissory notes with certain former executives totaling $76,783.

As of December 31, 2013, the total remaining severance liabilities amounted to $620,613, which is reflected as severance liability on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. This consists of $571,362 payable to former non-executive employees as well as $49,251 in estimated payroll tax. No payments were made during the years ended December 31, 2013 or 2012 on these severance liabilities.

During the period from January 27, 2009 through June 30, 2009, the Company entered into a series of settlement agreements with certain vendors of Favrille pursuant to the Creditor Plan, in which the Company settled $302,982 of its outstanding accounts payable for an aggregate settlement amount of $214,402, including promissory notes of $139,355.

15. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Robert H. Lorsch, is also the Chief Executive Officer of The RHL Group, Inc. and has full voting power over all of the capital stock of The RHL Group, Inc. Mr. Lorsch directly and indirectly through The RHL Group, Inc., beneficially owns approximately 14% our total outstanding voting stock. The RHL Group, Inc. has loaned us money pursuant to the Eighth Amended Note and any predecessor notes. The RHL Group Note payable had a balance of $1,355,761 and $1,587,160 as of December 31, 2013, and 2012, respectively. See Note 3 - Related Party Note Payable above.

The RHL Group is an investment holding company which provides consulting, operational and technical services to the Company, which we refer to as the RHL Services. As part of the RHL Services, the RHL Group provides the Company with unrestricted access to its internal business and relationship contact database of more than 10,000 persons and entities, which includes clients of the RHL Group and other individuals which may hold value to the Company. The RHL Group also provides infrastructure support to the Company, including allowing the Company unlimited access to its facilities, equipment, and data, information management and server systems. In addition to allowing the Company the use of its office support personnel, the RHL Group has also consented to allow the Company to utilize the full-time services of Mr. Lorsch as the Company's President, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, which requires substantial time and energy away from his required duties as The RHL Group's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. In addition, The RHL Group has made its President, Kira Reed, available as the Company's spokesperson. Ms. Reed, who is Mr. Lorsch's spouse, also manages the Company's social networking activities.

In consideration for the above, The RHL Group, Inc. has a consulting arrangement with MMR. A copy of the consulting agreement is filed as an Exhibit in our current report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 4, 2009 and is hereby incorporated by reference.

F-28


We incurred $50,000 each year during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, toward marketing consulting services from Bernard Stolar, a director. We included $109,756 and $41,250 in related party payables as of December 31, 2013, and 2012, respectively, in connection with these services.

We also incurred $16,667 and $50,000 during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, toward marketing consulting services from Hector Barreto, a former director and member of our Advisory Board. We included in related party payables as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 of $0 and $58,667, respectively, in connection with these services.

We also have an agreement with our current director Jack Zwissig to provide individual executive coaching services to our management team on an as needed basis. Mr. Zwissig receives compensation in the form of stock as determined by our Board of Directors commensurate with the services performed. The agreement with Mr. Zwissig is on a month-to-month basis and continues until terminated by either party. We incurred $0 and $394 during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, for consulting services. We included in related party payables as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 of $29,376 and $13,376, respectively, in connection with these services.

We contract with a significant vendor for the development and maintenance of the software applications necessary to run our MyMedicalRecords PHR, MyEsafeDepositBox and MyMedicalRecords Pro products. Our outside developer supports our software development needs through a team of software engineers, programmers, quality control personnel and testers, who work with our internal product development team on all aspects of application development, design, integration and support of our products. This vendor is also a stockholder. For the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the total expenses relating to this stockholder amounted to $120,000 and $181,117, respectively. In addition, we capitalized $107,050 of software development costs for the year ended December 31, 2013. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the total amounts due to the stockholder and included in related party payables amounted to $396,800 and $447,429, respectively.

On September 15, 2009, we entered into a five year agreement with E-Mail Frequency, LLC and David Loftus, Managing Partner of E-Mail Frequency, LLC, a significant stockholder of the Company. We will license an existing 80 million person direct marketing database (the "Database") of street addresses, cellular phone numbers, e-mail addresses and other comprehensive data with E-Mail Frequency. The agreement allows us to market, through the use of the Database, our MyMedicalRecords PHR, MyEsafeDepositBox virtual vault, and MMRPro document management system to physicians and their patients. Under the terms of the Agreement, we paid $250,000 to David Loftus as a one-time consulting fee in the form of 2,777,778 shares of our common stock. We recorded the $250,000 one-time licensee fee as a prepaid consulting fee. Amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 was $50,000. In addition, we incurred a total of $15,020 and $27,905 during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, toward convertible notes interest to Mr. Loftus. We included in related party payables at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 of $64,615 and $49,595, respectively, in respect to these services. Furthermore, Mr. Loftus is a value-added-reseller of MMRPro systems. We recognized $18,421 and $67,883 in revenue from E-Mail Frequency for the sale of MMRPro systems, during 2013 and 2012, respectively. On July 19, 2012, we entered into a 6% Convertible Promissory Note with Mr. Loftus for a principal amount of $157,422 and warrants to purchase our common stock. Effective September 1, 2011, we signed an Amendment to the Agreement dated September 15, 2009 to provide licensor a non- exclusive right to target, market and exploit the Employee Benefits market.

16. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Following are the subsequent events the Company has evaluated through March 28, 2014:

On March 6, 2014, the Company and Walgreen Co. announced that they have entered into a Settlement and Licensing Agreement (the "Agreement") to resolve two patent infringement lawsuits brought by MMR. Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, Walgreens purchased a Non-Exclusive License to the MMR family of patents. The settlement arises from litigation involving MMR's U.S. Patent No. 8,301,466 and U.S. Patent No. 8,498,883. MMR's patent portfolio also includes U.S. Patent Nos. 8,121,855; 8,117,045; 8,117,646; 8,301,466; 8,321,240; 8,352,287; 8,352,288; 8,498,883; 8,626,532 and 8,645,161 as well as numerous pending applications. Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, Walgreens has also agreed to sell MMR's MyMedicalRecords Personal Health Record (the "MMR-PHR") on drugstore.com. The remaining terms of the Agreement are confidential.

On March 12, 2014 the Company announced an agreement with Cerner Corporation relating to MMR's MyMedicalRecords, Inc. Personal Health Record patent portfolio, including U.S. Patent Nos. 8,117,045; 8,117,646; 8,121,855; 8,301,466; 8,321,240; 8,352,287; 8,352,288; 8,498,883, 8,626,532 and 8,645,161. The confidential agreement includes other terms and conditions related to an ongoing business relationship between the parties.

On March 25, 2014 we received a Notice of Allowance ("NOA") from the United States Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 12/204,498 entitled "Method and System for Providing Online Records." The application represents the first step in expanding MMR's health information technology ("HIT") Patent Portfolio from the medical profession to the legal profession. The NOA includes 28 claims directed toward accessing, collecting, storing, managing, and sharing legal documents and records.

F-29


100,000,000 SHARES

COMMON STOCK

______________________________

PROSPECTUS

______________________________

Through and including June 3, 2014 (the 25th day after the date of this prospectus), all dealers effecting transaction in these securities, whether or not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This is in addition to the dealers' obligation to deliver a prospectus when acting as underwriters and with respect to their unsold allotments or subscriptions.