TIDMFCR
RNS Number : 0434Q
Ferrum Crescent Ltd
07 September 2017
7 September 2017
Ferrum Crescent Limited
("FCR" or the "Company")(ASX, AIM, JSE: FCR)
Lead-Zinc Drill Programme Assay Results - Toral Project,
Spain
FCR, the lead-zinc exploration company, is pleased to announce
the assay results from its recent 6 hole - 1,046.9 metres
exploration drill programme at its wholly owned Toral Project,
located in the province of Le n, Spain, which has returned a series
of high-grade lead-zinc intersections. The drilling campaign was
designed to determine the presence of lead-zinc in an area that is
approximately three hundred metres above the deep Toral Deposit,
which was historically explored by third parties, and which is the
subject of a foreign estimate for the purpose of the ASX Listing
Rules, comprising an NI 43-101 compliant Indicated foreign mineral
resource estimate (further details of which were set out in the
Company's announcement of 10 November 2016).
These new drilling results confirm lead-zinc intersections in
all six holes, as previously reported from visual inspection in the
Company's announcement of 28 July 2017, with significant high grade
lead-zinc intersections in three of the six holes.
Highlights
-- All of the 1,046.9m drilled occurred within 200 metres of the surface.
-- Intersection of lead-zinc anomalies in all six drill holes.
-- Key intersections encountered (all widths given along the core):
o Hole TOR17009 1 metre grading at 1.22%Pb, 9.77%Zn (10.99% combined Pb/Zn);
o Hole TOR17012 3 metres grading at 0.64%Pb, 6.46%Zn (7.10% combined Pb/Zn);
o Hole TOR17012 1 metre grading at 0.67%Pb, 16.10%Zn (16.77% combined Pb/Zn);
o Hole TOR17013 1 metre grading at 6.51%Pb, 6.50%Zn (13.01% combined Pb/Zn); and
o Hole TOR17013 3 metres grading at 6.03%Pb, 5.49%Zn (11.52% combined Pb/Zn).
Intended further exploration activities
-- Incorporate all of the new assay data into the Company's
geological model so as to integrate the lead-zinc mineralisation
found towards the surface of the deposit.
-- Develop and execute the second phase drilling campaign to
corroborate the high grade lead-zinc results from historic
drilling.
-- Aim to define a JORC (2012) compliant resource estimate based
on the updated, revised geological model combined with the 44
kilometres of historic drilling performed by third parties, for
relatively limited expenditure.
Drilling Programme
-- As reported in the Company's announcement of 28 July 2017, a
drilling campaign of six holes drilled across various elevations
was recently conducted at the Toral Project. A total of 1,046.9
metres was drilled.
-- Refer to Appendix A for further information.
Drilling results
-- Drillholes labelled TOR17009, 17012 and 17013 returned the
highest assay results. The significant intercepts are set out in
Appendix B.
-- Drillholes labelled TOR17008, 17010 and 17011 also
intersected lead-zinc but no significant grades (above 5% combined)
were detected.
-- Refer to Appendix B for further information (note that all
measurements are given along the core).
Justin Tooth, Executive Chairman of FCR, said:
"These assay results, showing high-grade ore intersections of
combined lead-zinc including grades above 10% within 200 metres of
surface, are a most positive outcome for the Company. The assays
significantly add to our earlier modelling on Toral by identifying
lead-zinc mineralisation in a near-surface zone that is
approximately three hundred metres above the historically explored
Toral Deposit. The Toral Deposit is the subject of a foreign
estimate for the purpose of the ASX Listing Rules, comprising an NI
43-101 compliant Indicated foreign mineral resource, details of
which were set out in the Company's announcement of 10 November
2016. Our initial objective was to determine the presence of
lead-zinc towards the surface in order to progress our new
geological model; however, these strong results may open up other
avenues for the project's development. The highest grade
intersections (shown in the drilling results set out in Appendix B)
of up to 16.1% zinc and up to 18.4% combined lead-zinc are highly
supportive of our exploration programme.
"FCR will now utilise these latest results and the extensive
database from the 44 kilometres of historic drilling in order to
enhance its understanding of the geology of the Toral Project and
refine its intended further exploration activities. This should
enable the Company to work towards defining a JORC 2012 compliant
resource estimate, in order to ascertain and evaluate the real
potential for future mining at Toral, against the current backdrop
of a strong zinc market."
Competent person's statement
The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration
Results is based on information compiled by Mr Juki Laurikko who is
a Member of the European Federation of Geologists which is a
Recognised Professional Organisation for the purposes of the 2012
JORC Code. Mr Laurikko is a Technical Consultant to the Company,
and has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of
mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the
activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person
as defined in the 2012 Edition of the 'Australasian Code for
Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore
Reserves'. Mr Laurikko consents to the inclusion in this
announcement of the matters based on his information in the form
and context in which they appear. Mr Laurikko has also reviewed and
approved the technical information in his capacity as a qualified
person under the AIM Rules.
For further information on the Company, please visit
www.ferrumcrescent.com or contact:
Ferrum Crescent Limited
Justin Tooth, Executive Chairman
Grant Button, Director and Company Secretary
T: +61 8 9474 2995
UK enquiries:
Laurence Read (UK representative)
T: +44 7557 672 432
Strand Hanson Limited (Nominated Adviser)
Rory Murphy/Matthew Chandler
T: +44 (0)20 7409 3494
Beaufort Securities Limited (Broker)
Elliot Hance
T: +44 (0)20 7382 8300
Bravura Capital (Pty) Ltd (JSE Sponsor)
Melanie De Nysschen
T (direct): +27 11 459 5052
The information contained within this announcement is deemed by
the Company to constitute inside information as stipulated under
the Market Abuse Regulation (EU) No. 596/2014.
Appendix A: Table 1 Appendix 5A ASX Listing Rules (JORC
Code)
Section 1: Sampling Techniques and Data, Toral Project
Section 1: Sampling Techniques and Data, Diamond Drilling,
Toral Project
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Criteria Explanation Comments
---------------- ---------------------------------- --------------------------------------------
Sampling
techniques Nature and quality Diamond drilling
of sampling
(e.g. cut channels,
random chips,
or specific
specialised
industry standard
measurement
tools appropriate
to the minerals
under investigation,
such as down
hole gamma sondes,
or handheld
XRF instruments,
etc.). These
examples should
not be taken
as limiting
the broad meaning
of sampling.
---------------- ---------------------------------- --------------------------------------------
Include reference
to measures Spacing variable due to location
taken to ensure of existing access roads and
sample representivity suitable terrain.
and the appropriate
calibration
of any measurement
tools or systems
used.
---------------- ---------------------------------- --------------------------------------------
Aspects of the
determination Drill hole locations were set
of out with high definition GPS,
mineralisation GEOMAX Zenith 35.
that are Material
to the Public Drill core was split in half
Report. In cases and 1 metre samples, or shorter
where due to lithological contacts,
'industry standard' were packed and labelled into
work has been plastic bags.
done this would
be relatively Sample preparation was done at
simple (e.g. ALS Chemex in Spain and assayed
'reverse circulation for multi-element analysis, ME
drilling ICP 41 (35 element). Samples
was used to with over 1% of mineralisation
obtain 1 m samples were re-assayed using ME OG46.
from which 3
kg was pulverised
to produce a
30 g charge
for fire assay').
In other cases
more explanation
may be required,
such as where
there is coarse
gold that has
inherent sampling
problems. Unusual
commodities
or mineralisation
types (e.g.
submarine nodules)
may warrant
disclosure of
detailed information.
---------------- ---------------------------------- --------------------------------------------
Drilling Drill type (e.g.
techniques core, reverse Diamond drilling was conducted
circulation, using a wireline rig, mounted
open--hole hammer, on a crawler. Drill bit sizes
rotary air blast, PQ and PQ3 were used and when
auger, Bangka, the hole was expected to intersect
sonic, etc.) mineralised zone, the core was
and details recovered with a triple core
(e.g. core diameter, barrel.
triple or standard
tube, depth
of diamond tails,
face-- sampling
bit or other
type, whether
core is oriented
and if so, by
what method,
etc.).
---------------- ---------------------------------- --------------------------------------------
Drill
sample
recovery Method of recording
and assessing Drill core was assembled in the
core and chip core boxes and the real length
sample recoveries of the drill run was measured
and results with measuring tape to be able
assessed. to calculate the core recovery.
---------------- ---------------------------------- --------------------------------------------
Measures taken
to maximize Use of triple core barrel when
sample recovery intersecting expected mineralised
and ensure representative zones.
nature of the
samples.
---------------- ---------------------------------- --------------------------------------------
Whether a relationship
exists between
sample recovery
and grade and Not applicable at this stage
whether sample
bias may have
occurred due
to
preferential
loss/gain of
fine/coarse
material.
---------------- ---------------------------------- --------------------------------------------
Logging Whether core
and chip samples
have been geologically Drill logs digitally entered
and geotechnically into the Company's standard templates.
logged to a Logging is of sufficient quality
level of detail to support Mineral resource estimation,
to support appropriate however at this stage (Company's
Mineral Resource first six drill holes comprising
estimation, 1,046m) the lithological/alteration
mining studies and mineralogical features assisting
and metallurgical modelling of the Mineral Resource
studies. are yet to be determined.
---------------- ---------------------------------- --------------------------------------------
Whether logging
is qualitative Quantitative logging of colour,
or quantitative grain size, weathering, structural
in nature. Core fabric, lithology, alteration
(or costean, type and sulfide mineralisation
channel, etc.) documented.
photography
---------------- ---------------------------------- --------------------------------------------
The total length
and percentage All drill holes are logged using
of the relevant visual inspection. Information
intersections captured on paper sheets and
logged. entered into company's logging
template.
---------------- ---------------------------------- --------------------------------------------
Sub-- If core, whether
sampling cut or sawn Mineralised zones of the core
techniques and whether are split; one half core is sent
and sample quarter, half for assaying and the second is
preparation or all core stored in the core box as a reference.
taken.
---------------- ---------------------------------- --------------------------------------------
If non--core, Not applicable as entire sample
whether riffled, is core.
tube
sampled, rotary
split, etc.
and whether
sampled wet
or dry.
---------------- ---------------------------------- --------------------------------------------
For all sample Sample preparation was done at
types, the nature, ALS Chemex in Spain, using standard
quality and preparation technique suitable
appropriateness for multi-element analysis, ME
of the sample ICP 41 (35 element). Samples
preparation with over 1% of ore grade were
technique. re-assayed using ME OG46.
---------------------------------- --------------------------------------------
Quality control
procedures adopted Standard, blanks, field samples
for all sub--sampling and repeats (using also coarse
stages to maximise split and pulp reject) were inserted
representivity into the sample stream.
of samples.
---------------------------------- --------------------------------------------
Measures taken Field duplicate (quarter core)
to ensure that samples were collected at 2 in
the sampling 100 samples,
is representative as a rotating blank, standard,
of the in situ field duplicate and repeat sequence.
material collected,
including for
instance results
for field duplicate/second--half
sampling.
---------------------------------- --------------------------------------------
Whether sample Samples are of 1 metre length
sizes are appropriate or smaller (lithological contacts)
to the grain or a quarter core (field sample).
size of the Grain size of all samples are
material being from medium to fine-grained.
sampled.
---------------- ---------------------------------- --------------------------------------------
Quality The nature,
of quality and Assays were carried out by ALS
assay appropriateness Chemex in Spain, using standard
data of the assaying preparation techniques suitable
and laboratory and laboratory for multi-element analysis, ME
tests procedures used ICP 41 (35 element). Samples
and whether with over 1% of ore grade were
the technique re-assayed using ME OG46.
is considered
partial or total.
---------------- ---------------------------------- --------------------------------------------
For geophysical Not applicable as no geophysical
tools, spectrometers, tools were used in this programme.
handheld XRF
instruments,
etc., the parameters
used in determining
the analysis
including instrument
make and model,
reading times,
calibrations
factors applied
and their derivation,
etc.
---------------- ---------------------------------- --------------------------------------------
Nature of quality The Company uses certified reference
control procedures materials (CRM) and field duplicates
adopted (e.g. in its QA/QC procedures. CRMs
standards, blanks, are sourced from
duplicates, Labmix24 and 6 standards were
external laboratory inserted every 15 samples. Field
checks) and Duplicate samples were taken
whether acceptable at a nominal frequency of 2 in
levels of accuracy 100 samples. QA/QC also includes
(i.e. lack of regularly inserted Pulp Blanks,
bias) and precision 2 Coarse Blanks, 2 Pulp Repeats
have been established. and 2 Coarse Repeats in every
100 samples. No samples. No samples
sent yet to external laboratory.
No bias has been observed and
accuracy/precision is believed
to be acceptable for quoting
Exploration Results.
---------------- ---------------------------------- --------------------------------------------
Verification The verification
of sampling of significant
and assaying intersections No such verification conducted
by either independent in respect of this announcement.
or alternative
company personnel.
---------------- ---------------------------------- --------------------------------------------
The use of twinned No twinned holes.
holes.
---------------- ---------------------------------- --------------------------------------------
Documentation Primary data was collected using
of primary data, the Company's set of standard
data entry procedures, digital templates.
data verification,
data storage
(physical and
electronic)
protocols
---------------------------------- --------------------------------------------
Discuss any No adjustment to assay data has
adjustment to been carried out.
assay data.
---------------- ---------------------------------- --------------------------------------------
Location Accuracy and Drill hole locations were set
of quality of surveys out with high definition GPS,
data used to locate GEOMAX Zenith 35 and down-hole
points drill holes deviation measures were carried
(collar and out by the drilling contractor
down--hole surveys), using Maxibor equipment.
trenches, mine
workings and
other locations
used in Mineral
Resource estimation.
---------------- ---------------------------------- --------------------------------------------
Specification
of the grid Co--ordinates are presented in
system ETRS89 Zone 29.
used.
---------------- ---------------------------------- --------------------------------------------
Quality and Topographic control is based
adequacy of on published 1:5,000 topographic
topographic sheets for the region.
control.
---------------- ---------------------------------- --------------------------------------------
Data Data spacing Drill hole spacing varies from
spacing for reporting 30m to 60m and was selected to
and of use existing access roads and
distribution Exploration to test continuation of the mineralisation
Results. documented in the old adits.
---------------- ---------------------------------- --------------------------------------------
Whether the
data spacing
and The mineralized domains have
distribution not yet been explored sufficiently
is sufficient to demonstrate the continuity
to establish of the mineralized structures
the degree of to support a definition of Mineral
geological and Resource.
grade continuity
appropriate
for the Mineral
Resource and
Ore Reserve
estimation procedure(s)
and
---------------- ---------------------------------- --------------------------------------------
Whether sample No compositing has been applied
compositing yet to the exploration results.
has been applied
---------------- ---------------------------------- --------------------------------------------
Orientation Whether the The orientation of the mineralised
of data orientation structures has not yet been ascertained
in relation of the samples and drilling has been oriented
to geological achieves unbiased perpendicular to the interpreted
structure sampling of structure of the mineralisation
possible structures (observations from the old surface
and extent to workings and adits).
which this is
known, considering
the deposit
type,
---------------- ---------------------------------- --------------------------------------------
If the relationship No orientation based sampling
between the bias has been identified in the
drilling orientation data at this stage.
and the orientation
of key mineralized
structures is
considered to
have introduced
a sampling bias,
this should
be assessed
and reported
if material
---------------- ---------------------------------- --------------------------------------------
Sample The measures All samples were logged and checked
Security taken to ensure on return from the field.
sample security. All samples were then stored in
a secure building before being
dispatched to the laboratory via
a reputable transport company.
------------ --------------------- -----------------------------------
Audits The results of No audits or reviews have been
or reviews any audits or carried out at this stage.
reviews of sampling
techniques and
data.
------------ --------------------- -----------------------------------
Section 2: Reporting of Exploration Results, Toral Project
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
----------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------
Mineral tenement and land tenure status
* Type, reference name/number, location and ownership * The Toral zinc-lead permit is located near Ponferrada
including agreements or material issues with third in the west of the province of León, Autonomous
parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, Community of Castile and León, Spain
overriding royalties, native title interests, approximately 400 km northwest of Madrid.
historical sites, wilderness or national park and
environmental settings.
* The project is a licence covering 20 km(2) .
* The security of the tenure held at the time of
reporting along with any known impediments to * There are no known impediments to the licence
obtaining a licence to operate in the area. security.
----------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------
Exploration done by other parties
* Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other * Between 1975 and 1985, the Adaro/Peñarroya joint
parties. venture carried out exploration on the four separate
licences which now correspond, approximately, to the
Toral permit area. Over a period of nine years, a
topographical survey, geological mapping, a
hydrogeological study and more than 40,000m of
diamond drilling (62 holes and 41 wedges) were
carried out.
* Lundin Mining S.L. (Lundin) acquired the Toral
investigation permit no. 15.199 in 2007 and commenced
exploration in April 2007. Lundin compiled the
information collected by the previous licence holders
including: o a review of the available geological
maps, plans, sections and assays; o surveying old
workings, old drill pads, and drill hole locations;
and, a study of the existing Peñarroya/Adaro
drill holes, description, photography. In addition,
samples of drill core were sent to ALS Chemex in
Canada in order to validate the reliability of the
existing assays and exploration information was
digitised. The results of Lundin's preliminary work
confirmed the mineral potential of the Toral area.
However, it was apparent that the continuity and the
thickness of the mineralisation were insufficiently
detailed. Consequently, an exploration programme was
designed to add information to the data set for a
better understanding of the deposit. In 2007 to 2009,
seven diamond holes for a total of 4,523.7m were
drilled for the purpose of confirming the continuity
of the mineralisation in the San Jose area of the
Toral permit and also to test the possibility of an
extension of the mineralisation at depth. GoldQuest
acquired Lundin, including the Toral permit, in
January 2010.
* During 2011 and 2012, GoldQuest conducted systematic
geological mapping and soil sampling.
----------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------
Geology
* Deposit type, geological setting and style of * The Toral permit is located in the West Asturian
mineralisation. Leonese Zone (WALZ), one of the tectonostratigraphic
units in the Variscan (or Hercynian) Orogen of the
north-western portion of the Iberian Peninsula.
Within the WALZ, the permit area is located in the
domain of the Mondoñedo Mantle. The most
significant mineralisation is found in the upper
carbonate layers of the Vegadeo Formation, at the
contact between the Vegadeo Formation and the younger
Los Cabos Series. The mineralisation comprises
sulphides interbedded in limestones and dolomites,
within a silicified facies, and in chloritic
breccias. The mineralisation is epigenetic and formed
during a metamorphic episode within the Hercynian
Orogeny. The sulphide mineral assemblage comprises
sphalerite, galena, pyrite and chalcopyrite.
----------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------
* Drill hole Information * A summary of all information material to the * The details of drill holes material to the
understanding of the exploration results including a exploration results are reported in the body of the
tabulation of the following information for all announcement and also in Appendix B below.
Material drill holes:
* All drill hole collar locations, easting and northing
* easting and northing of the drill hole collar are given in UTM 21, ETRS89 grid, collar elevations
(m), dip (deg) and azimuth (UTM), down hole length
(m).
* elevation or RL (Reduced Level - elevation above sea
level in metres) of the drill hole collar
* dip and azimuth of the hole
* down hole length and interception depth
* hole length.
----------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------
* Data aggregation methods * In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging * The weighted average of the mineralised intervals was
techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations calculated by multiplying the assay of each drill
(eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are sample by the length of each sample and dividing the
usually Material and should be stated. sum of the product by the down hole length sum of the
mineralised interval.
* Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths
of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade * No metal equivalent values have been reported.
results, the procedure used for such aggregation
should be stated and some typical examples of such
aggregations should be shown in detail. * Continuous anomaly zones reported in Appendix B are
at >0.05% of combined Pb+Zn grade.
* The assumptions used for any reporting of metal
equivalent values should be clearly stated.
----------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------
* Relationship between mineralisation widths and * These relationships are particularly important in the * As stated in the announcement, all lengths shown
intercept lengths reporting of Exploration Results. including those in Appendix B are down hole
measurements with true widths not known.
* If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to
the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be
reported.
* If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are
reported, there should be a clear statement to this
effect (eg 'down hole length, true width not known').
----------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------
* Diagrams * Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and * Please see Appendix B showing the tabulation of the
tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant assay results.
significant discovery being reported. These should
include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill
hole collar locations and appropriate sectional
views.
----------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------
* Balanced reporting * Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration * The selected drill hole results reported here are
Results is not practicable, representative reporting stated as being those of the highest grades out of
of both low and high grades and/or widths should be this drill programme.
practiced to avoid misleading reporting of
Exploration Results.
----------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------
* Other substantive exploration data * Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, * No other substantive data has been omitted in the
should be reported including (but not limited to): context of the announcement. Any material
geological observations; geophysical survey results; observations arising from further data reviews will
geochemical survey results; bulk samples - size and be reported in due course.
method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk
density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock
characteristics; potential deleterious or
contaminating substances.
----------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------
* Further work * The nature and scale of planned further work (eg * Follow-up work is planned to evaluate further the
tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or data from this and earlier programmes and will be
large-scale step-out drilling). reported with diagrams in due course.
* Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible * The next exploration programme will include further
extensions, including the main geological modelling, drilling and metallurgical work.
interpretations and future drilling areas, provided
this information is not commercially sensitive.
===================================================== =============================================================== ===============================================================
Appendix B: Toral Project Drilling Results
Drill-hole information
Hole Hole Depth Dip Azimuth Grid East North RL EPM
ID Type (m)
---------- ------- ------ ---- -------- ------- ---------- ----------- ------- --------
Toral
TOR17008 DDR 108.5 -45 211.5 ETRS89 680958.59 4710012.46 468.44 15.199
---------- ------- ------ ---- -------- ------- ---------- ----------- ------- --------
Toral
TOR17009 DDR 235.3 -45 196.7 ETRS89 680982.73 4710058.36 456.25 15.199
---------- ------- ------ ---- -------- ------- ---------- ----------- ------- --------
Toral
TOR17010 DDR 120.0 -45 197.5 ETRS89 680936.14 4710048.76 441.60 15.199
---------- ------- ------ ---- -------- ------- ---------- ----------- ------- --------
Toral
TOR17011 DDR 83.2 -45 208.0 ETRS89 680867.59 4710054.13 416.54 15.199
---------- ------- ------ ---- -------- ------- ---------- ----------- ------- --------
Toral
TOR17012 DDR 259.0 -50 28.0 ETRS89 680716.93 4709924.96 416.54 15.199
---------- ------- ------ ---- -------- ------- ---------- ----------- ------- --------
Toral
TOR17013 DDR 240.9 -50 190.2 ETRS89 681038.30 4710093.19 458.07 15.199
---------- ------- ------ ---- -------- ------- ---------- ----------- ------- --------
Significant Intercepts
Drillhole from to length Pb Zn Pb+Zn
(m) % % %
----------- ------- ------- ------- ------ ----- ------
TOR17009 140.35 141.35 1.0 1.22 9.77 10.99
----------- ------- ------- ------- ------ ----- ------
TOR17009 141.35 142.35 1.0 3.26 1.45 4.71
----------- ------- ------- ------- ------ ----- ------
TOR17009 140.35 142.35 2.0 2.24 5.61 7.85
----------- ------- ------- ------- ------ ----- ------
continuous
anomaly zone
TOR17009 134.35 144.35 10.0 of Pb+Zn >0.05%
----------- ------- ------- ------- ---------------------
Drillhole from to length Pb Zn Pb+Zn
(m) % % %
----------- ------ ------ ------- ----- ------ ------
TOR17012 176.3 177.3 1.0 0.67 16.10 16.77
----------- ------ ------ ------- ----- ------ ------
TOR17012 177.3 178.3 1.0 0.54 1.33 1.87
----------- ------ ------ ------- ----- ------ ------
TOR17012 178.3 179.3 1.0 0.72 1.95 2.66
----------- ------ ------ ------- ----- ------ ------
TOR17012 176.3 179.3 3.0 0.64 6.46 7.10
----------- ------ ------ ------- ----- ------ ------
continuous
anomaly zone
TOR17012 175.3 185.3 10.0 of Pb+Zn >0.05%
----------- ------ ------ ------- ---------------------
Drillhole from to length Pb Zn Pb+Zn
(m) % % %
----------- ------ ------ ------- ------ ----- ------
TOR17013 195.8 196.8 1.0 9.29 9.11 18.40
----------- ------ ------ ------- ------ ----- ------
TOR17013 196.8 197.8 1.0 2.29 0.87 3.16
----------- ------ ------ ------- ------ ----- ------
TOR17013 197.8 198.8 1.0 6.51 6.5 13.01
----------- ------ ------ ------- ------ ----- ------
TOR17013 195.8 198.8 3.0 6.03 5.49 11.52
----------- ------ ------ ------- ------ ----- ------
continuous
anomaly zone
TOR17013 193.8 199.8 6.0 of Pb+Zn >0.05%
----------- ------ ------ ------- ---------------------
This information is provided by RNS
The company news service from the London Stock Exchange
END
DRLFMGGLRVNGNZM
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
September 07, 2017 02:00 ET (06:00 GMT)
Europa Metals (LSE:EUZ)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2024 to Apr 2024
Europa Metals (LSE:EUZ)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2023 to Apr 2024