UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For
the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from
to
Commission file number
0-17455
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Pennsylvania
|
|
23-2242292
|
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation
or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
|
|
|
|
125 North State Street, Clarks Summit, PA
|
|
18411
|
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
(570) 586-0377
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Former
name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
o
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
o
|
|
Accelerated filer
o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
o
|
|
Smaller reporting company
þ
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. Yes
o
No
þ
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE REGISTRANTS:
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date: 1,722,923 at October 31, 2010.
Page 1
of 65
Exhibit Index on Page 61
COMM BANCORP, INC.
FORM 10-Q
September 30, 2010
INDEX
2
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (LOSS) AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and fees on loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable
|
|
$
|
5,806
|
|
|
$
|
6,194
|
|
|
$
|
17,689
|
|
|
$
|
19,078
|
|
Tax-exempt
|
|
|
319
|
|
|
|
598
|
|
|
|
959
|
|
|
|
1,883
|
|
Interest and dividends on investment securities available-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable
|
|
|
590
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
1,842
|
|
|
|
869
|
|
Tax-exempt
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
759
|
|
|
|
1,417
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Interest on federal funds sold
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
6,948
|
|
|
|
7,417
|
|
|
|
21,284
|
|
|
|
23,281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on deposits
|
|
|
2,100
|
|
|
|
2,433
|
|
|
|
6,848
|
|
|
|
7,492
|
|
Interest on short-term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
Interest on long-term debt
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
2,260
|
|
|
|
2,438
|
|
|
|
7,328
|
|
|
|
7,589
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
4,688
|
|
|
|
4,979
|
|
|
|
13,956
|
|
|
|
15,692
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
8,670
|
|
|
|
1,600
|
|
|
|
9,760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (loss) after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
4,388
|
|
|
|
(3,691
|
)
|
|
|
12,356
|
|
|
|
5,932
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges, fees and commissions
|
|
|
711
|
|
|
|
848
|
|
|
|
2,182
|
|
|
|
2,444
|
|
Mortgage banking income
|
|
|
405
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
|
1,179
|
|
Net gain on sale of premises and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
294
|
|
Net gain on sale of investment securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,385
|
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
|
1,499
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income
|
|
|
1,116
|
|
|
|
2,520
|
|
|
|
3,443
|
|
|
|
5,416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits expense
|
|
|
2,188
|
|
|
|
2,025
|
|
|
|
6,558
|
|
|
|
6,329
|
|
Net occupancy and equipment expense
|
|
|
558
|
|
|
|
591
|
|
|
|
1,708
|
|
|
|
1,849
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
2,203
|
|
|
|
1,942
|
|
|
|
5,403
|
|
|
|
5,735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense
|
|
|
4,949
|
|
|
|
4,558
|
|
|
|
13,669
|
|
|
|
13,913
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
555
|
|
|
|
(5,729
|
)
|
|
|
2,130
|
|
|
|
(2,565
|
)
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
(445
|
)
|
|
|
(2,354
|
)
|
|
|
(1,210
|
)
|
|
|
(2,180
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
(3,375
|
)
|
|
|
3,340
|
|
|
|
(385
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on investment securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
777
|
|
|
|
1,118
|
|
|
|
2,532
|
|
|
|
1,473
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,385
|
)
|
|
|
(361
|
)
|
|
|
(1,499
|
)
|
Income tax expense (benefit) related to other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
|
|
738
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income taxes
|
|
|
513
|
|
|
|
(176
|
)
|
|
|
1,433
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
1,513
|
|
|
$
|
(3,551
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,773
|
|
|
$
|
(402
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
0.58
|
|
|
$
|
(1.95
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.94
|
|
|
$
|
(0.22
|
)
|
Cash dividends declared
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.84
|
|
Average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
1,722,923
|
|
|
|
1,718,439
|
|
|
|
1,722,923
|
|
|
|
1,722,994
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
$
|
52,658
|
|
|
$
|
23,978
|
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
19,501
|
|
|
|
25,300
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
108,555
|
|
|
|
108,005
|
|
Loans held for sale, net
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
2,016
|
|
Loans, net of unearned income
|
|
|
447,282
|
|
|
|
476,944
|
|
Less: allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
13,669
|
|
|
|
17,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans
|
|
|
433,613
|
|
|
|
459,482
|
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
11,300
|
|
|
|
11,616
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
2,023
|
|
|
|
2,122
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
24,502
|
|
|
|
19,634
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
652,777
|
|
|
$
|
652,153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing
|
|
$
|
82,407
|
|
|
$
|
88,335
|
|
Interest-bearing
|
|
|
503,536
|
|
|
|
502,448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
585,943
|
|
|
|
590,783
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
Accrued interest payable
|
|
|
1,110
|
|
|
|
1,296
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
2,572
|
|
|
|
1,740
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
597,625
|
|
|
|
601,819
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $0.33, authorized 12,000,000 shares, issued and
outstanding: September 30, 2010, 1,722,923 shares; December 31, 2009, 1,721,007 shares
|
|
|
569
|
|
|
|
568
|
|
Capital surplus
|
|
|
8,010
|
|
|
|
7,966
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
44,321
|
|
|
|
40,981
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
2,252
|
|
|
|
819
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
55,152
|
|
|
|
50,334
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
652,777
|
|
|
$
|
652,153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Surplus
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
568
|
|
|
$
|
7,966
|
|
|
$
|
40,981
|
|
|
$
|
819
|
|
|
$
|
50,334
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,340
|
|
Dividend reinvestment plan: 1,916 shares issued
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
Other comprehensive income, net of income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,433
|
|
|
|
1,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
September 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
569
|
|
|
$
|
8,010
|
|
|
$
|
44,321
|
|
|
$
|
2,252
|
|
|
$
|
55,152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
571
|
|
|
$
|
7,694
|
|
|
$
|
47,862
|
|
|
$
|
1,671
|
|
|
$
|
57,798
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(385
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(385
|
)
|
Dividends declared: $0.84 per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,446
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,446
|
)
|
Dividend reinvestment plan: 6,494 shares issued
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
Repurchase and retirement: 18,117 shares
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
(624
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(684
|
)
|
Other comprehensive loss, net of income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
567
|
|
|
$
|
7,881
|
|
|
$
|
45,407
|
|
|
$
|
1,654
|
|
|
$
|
55,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
3,340
|
|
|
$
|
(385
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
1,600
|
|
|
|
9,760
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment
|
|
|
578
|
|
|
|
678
|
|
Net amortization of investment securities
|
|
|
1,575
|
|
|
|
236
|
|
Amortization of net loan costs
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
Amortization of mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
310
|
|
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
1,646
|
|
|
|
(2,044
|
)
|
Net gain on sale of investment securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
(361
|
)
|
|
|
(1,499
|
)
|
Net gain on sale of loans
|
|
|
(805
|
)
|
|
|
(1,210
|
)
|
Net gain on sale of premises and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(294
|
)
|
Net loss sale of foreclosed assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
Changes in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for sale, net
|
|
|
2,196
|
|
|
|
2,600
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
(454
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(3,083
|
)
|
|
|
(1,219
|
)
|
Accrued interest payable
|
|
|
(186
|
)
|
|
|
(630
|
)
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
335
|
|
|
|
339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
7,402
|
|
|
|
6,633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from repayments of investment securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
14,092
|
|
|
|
7,700
|
|
Proceeds from sales of investment securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
6,154
|
|
|
|
40,460
|
|
Purchases of investment securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
(19,839
|
)
|
|
|
(4,651
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed assets
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
Net decrease (increase) in lending activities
|
|
|
20,005
|
|
|
|
(26,970
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
509
|
|
Purchases of premises and equipment
|
|
|
(262
|
)
|
|
|
(771
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by investing activities
|
|
|
20,515
|
|
|
|
16,545
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net changes in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market, NOW, savings and noninterest-bearing accounts
|
|
|
15,202
|
|
|
|
7,436
|
|
Time deposits
|
|
|
(20,042
|
)
|
|
|
5,373
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common shares
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
Repurchase and retirement of common shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(684
|
)
|
Cash dividends paid
|
|
|
(241
|
)
|
|
|
(1,435
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(5,036
|
)
|
|
|
10,933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
22,881
|
|
|
|
34,111
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
49,278
|
|
|
|
20,717
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
72,159
|
|
|
$
|
54,828
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
7,514
|
|
|
$
|
8,219
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
691
|
|
Noncash items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers of loans to foreclosed assets
|
|
|
4,009
|
|
|
|
2,023
|
|
Unrealized losses (gains) on investment securities available-for-sale, net
|
|
$
|
(1,433
|
)
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
1. Basis of presentation:
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Comm Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries
(collectively, the Company) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) for interim financial information and with the
instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10-01 of Regulation S-X. In the opinion of management, all
normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and
results of operations for the periods have been included. All significant intercompany balances
and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Prior-period amounts are reclassified when
necessary to conform with the current years presentation. These reclassifications did not have a
material effect on the operating results or financial position of the Company. The operating
results and financial position of the Company for the three months and nine months ended and as of
September 30, 2010, are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations and financial
position that may be expected in the future.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure
of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported periods. Actual results could differ from
those estimates. For additional information and disclosures required under GAAP, reference is made
to the Companys Amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2009.
The consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2009, and related disclosures, herein,
conform to the presentation as included in the Companys 2009 Amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A,
filed on May 17, 2010.
2. Earnings per common share:
The Company had no dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the three-month and
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, therefore, the per share data presented on
the face of the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income relates to basic per
share amounts.
3. Subsequent events:
The Company has evaluated events and transactions occurring subsequent to the balance sheet date of
September 30, 2010, for items that should potentially be recognized or disclosed in these financial
statements. The evaluation was conducted through the date these financial statements were issued.
7
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
4. Investment securities:
All investment securities were classified as available-for-sale at September 30, 2010 and December
31, 2009. The amortized cost and fair value of available-for-sale securities aggregated by
investment category at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
State and municipals
|
|
$
|
18,080
|
|
|
$
|
1,415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
19,495
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government agencies
|
|
|
84,222
|
|
|
|
1,901
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
|
86,118
|
|
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
2,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,537
|
|
Other
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
105,142
|
|
|
$
|
3,421
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
108,555
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
State and municipals
|
|
$
|
25,343
|
|
|
$
|
1,520
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
26,862
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government agencies
|
|
|
78,537
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
78,155
|
|
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
2,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,537
|
|
Other
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
106,764
|
|
|
$
|
1,643
|
|
|
$
|
402
|
|
|
$
|
108,005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized holding gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are included as a
separate component in stockholders equity. The Company had net unrealized holding gains of $2,252,
net of deferred income taxes of $1,161, at September 30, 2010, and $819, net of deferred income
taxes of $422, at December 31, 2009.
8
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
4. Investment securities (continued):
The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale securities with unrealized losses
for which an other-than-temporary impairment has not been recognized at September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, aggregated by investment category and length of time that the individual
securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 months
|
|
|
12 months or more
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
State and municipals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government agencies
|
|
$
|
1,723
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,723
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,723
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
1,729
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 months
|
|
|
12 months or more
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
State and municipals
|
|
$
|
686
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
686
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government agencies
|
|
|
30,651
|
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,651
|
|
|
|
399
|
|
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
31,337
|
|
|
$
|
400
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
31,344
|
|
|
$
|
402
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2010, the Company had 100 investment securities, consisting of 74 tax-exempt
state and municipal obligations, 17 mortgage-backed securities, including collateralized mortgage
obligations, and two restricted and seven marketable equity securities. There were two investment
securities in an unrealized loss position at September 30, 2010, including one mortgage-backed
security and one marketable equity security. The marketable equity security has been in a
continuous unrealized loss position for 12 months or more.
Community Bank holds all of the Companys debt securities and is a state member bank of the Federal
Reserve System which imposes strict limitations and restrictions on the types of securities that
may be acquired. As a result, securities held are Bank Quality Investment grade, defined as
bearing a credit quality rating of Baa or higher from Moodys or BBB or higher from Standard
and Poors rating services, and are readily marketable, but are still subject to price fluctuations
because of changes in interest rates. Management does not consider the unrealized losses, as
a result of changes in interest rates, to be other-than-temporary based on historical evidence that
indicates the cost of these securities is
recoverable within a reasonable period of time in relation to normal cyclical changes in the market
rates of interest.
9
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
4. Investment securities (continued):
The mortgage-backed security having an unrealized loss at September 30, 2010, was a Government
National Mortgage Association (GNMA) federal agency bond, which is a direct obligation of the
U.S. Government. The GNMA mortgage-backed security in an unrealized loss position at September 30,
2010, was backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government and thus considered to have no
risk of default. The unrealized loss position for this security was less than 12 months. The
unrealized loss was not considered to be other-than-temporary because it was a direct result of
interest rate fluctuation, and management does not intend to sell the security, and it is unlikely
that the Company will be required to sell the security, before recovery of its amortized cost
basis, which may be at maturity.
Tax-exempt state and municipal securities consisted entirely of insured general obligation bonds at
September 30, 2010. There were no tax-exempt state and municipal securities in an unrealized loss
position at September 30, 2010.
Marketable equity securities are held at the Parent Company and consist of common stocks of
commercial banks. At September 30, 2010, the market value of common stock held in Wells Fargo and
Company was below its amortized cost basis. This stock was originally that of Wachovia Corporation,
which was acquired by Wells Fargo and Company after the close of business on December 31, 2008.
Wells Fargo and Company had a credit rating of AA and was categorized as well capitalized under
regulatory capital guidelines at September 30, 2010. As a result, the Company does not consider the
unrealized loss to be other-than-temporary. At the current time we do not intend to sell, and it is
unlikely that the Company will be required to sell, the security as the entire cost basis is
expected to be recovered.
10
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
4. Investment securities (continued):
The maturity distribution of the fair value, which is the net carrying amount, of the debt
securities classified as available-for-sale at September 30, 2010, is summarized in the table that
follows. The distributions are based on contractual maturity with the exception of mortgage-backed
securities. Mortgage-backed securities have been presented based upon estimated cash flows,
assuming no change in the current interest rate environment. Actual maturities may differ from
contractual maturities, or estimated maturities for mortgage-backed securities, because borrowers
have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After one
|
|
|
After five
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within
|
|
|
but within
|
|
|
but within
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
one year
|
|
|
five years
|
|
|
ten years
|
|
|
ten years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
State and municipals
|
|
$
|
1,129
|
|
|
$
|
2,753
|
|
|
$
|
10,550
|
|
|
$
|
5,063
|
|
|
$
|
19,495
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government
|
|
|
13,543
|
|
|
|
40,356
|
|
|
|
30,076
|
|
|
|
2,143
|
|
|
|
86,118
|
|
U.S. Government-sponsored
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
14,718
|
|
|
$
|
43,222
|
|
|
$
|
40,640
|
|
|
$
|
7,206
|
|
|
$
|
105,786
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Fair values of financial instruments:
GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to the valuation methods used
to measure fair value into three levels which include the following:
|
|
|
Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices or identical assets or liabilities in active
markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.
|
|
|
|
Level 2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as
quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not
active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market
data.
|
|
|
|
Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a reporting entitys own
assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset
or liability.
|
11
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
5. Fair values of financial instruments (continued):
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets
|
|
|
Observable Inputs
|
|
|
Unobservable Inputs
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and municipals
|
|
$
|
19,495
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
19,495
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government agencies
|
|
|
86,118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,118
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
$
|
232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
106,018
|
|
|
$
|
232
|
|
|
$
|
105,786
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets
|
|
|
Observable Inputs
|
|
|
Unobservable Inputs
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and municipals
|
|
$
|
26,862
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
26,862
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government agencies
|
|
|
78,155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,155
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
$
|
231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
105,468
|
|
|
$
|
231
|
|
|
$
|
105,237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale reported at fair value using Level 1 inputs include
marketable equity securities trading in active exchange markets. The fair value of investment
securities available-for-sale utilizing Level 2 inputs include debt securities with quoted market
prices based on a matrix pricing model. This method for determining fair value is a mathematical
technique widely used in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on
quoted prices for the specific securities, but rather by relying on the securities relationship to
other benchmark quoted securities.
12
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
5. Fair values of financial instruments (continued):
Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets
|
|
|
Observable Inputs
|
|
|
Unobservable Inputs
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans
|
|
$
|
6,046
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,046
|
|
Foreclosed assets
|
|
$
|
3,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets
|
|
|
Observable Inputs
|
|
|
Unobservable Inputs
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans
|
|
$
|
7,719
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,719
|
|
Impaired loans, which are measured for impairment using the fair value of the collateral for
collateral dependent loans, had a recorded investment of $8,638 and a related allowance of $2,592
at September 30, 2010. Impaired loans had a recorded investment of $13,481 and a related allowance
of $5,762 at December 31, 2009.
Foreclosed assets are measured at fair value based upon current estimates derived through
independent appraisals less cost to sell.
Disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized on the
balance sheet, for which it is practical to estimate that value is required by GAAP. The Companys
assets that were considered financial instruments approximated 94.7 percent of total assets at
September 30, 2010, and 95.3 percent of total assets at December 31, 2009. Liabilities that were
considered financial instruments approximated 99.6 percent of total liabilities at September 30,
2010, and 99.7 percent of total liabilities at December 31, 2009. In cases where quoted market
prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation
techniques.
13
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
5. Fair values of financial instruments (continued):
Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including discount rate and
estimates of future cash flows. In that regard,
the derived fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets. In
many cases, these values cannot be realized in immediate settlement of the instrument. This
disclosure does not and is not intended to represent the fair value of the Company.
Fair value estimates are based on existing financial instruments without attempting to estimate the
value of anticipated future business and the value of certain assets and liabilities that are not
considered financial.
Accordingly, such assets and liabilities are excluded from disclosure requirements. For example, no
benefit is recorded for the value of low-cost funding subsequently discussed. In addition,
Community Banks Trust and Wealth Management Division contributes fee income annually. Trust assets
and liabilities are not considered financial instruments for this disclosure, and their values have
not been incorporated into the fair value estimates.
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company to construct the accompanying table
containing the fair values and related carrying amounts of financial instruments:
Cash and cash equivalents:
The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents as reported on the
balance sheet approximate fair value.
Investment securities available-for-sale:
The fair value of investment securities
available-for-sale is based on quoted market prices. The carrying values of restricted equity
securities approximate fair value.
Loans held for sale, net:
The fair value of loans held for sale, net, are based on quoted market
prices.
Net loans:
For adjustable-rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant credit risk,
fair values are based on carrying values. The fair
values of other nonimpaired loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, using interest
rates currently offered in the market for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit
risk. Fair values for impaired loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis determined
by the loan review function or underlying collateral values, where applicable.
Mortgage servicing rights:
The fair value of mortgage servicing rights is based on observable
market prices when available or the present value of future cash flows when not available.
Accrued interest receivable:
The carrying value of accrued interest receivable as reported on the
balance sheet approximates fair value.
14
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
5. Fair values of financial instruments (continued):
Deposits without stated maturities:
The fair value of noninterest-bearing deposits and savings, NOW
and money market accounts is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value
estimates do not include the benefit that results from such low-cost funding provided by the
deposit liabilities compared to the cost of borrowing funds in the market.
Deposits with stated maturities:
The carrying value of adjustable-rate, fixed-term time deposits
approximates their fair value at the reporting date. For fixed-rate time deposits, the present
value of future cash flows is used to estimate fair value. The discount rates used are the current
rates offered in the market for time deposits with similar maturities.
Long-term debt:
The fair value of fixed-rate long-term debt is based on the present value of future
cash flows. The discount rate used is the current rates offered for long-term debt.
Accrued interest payable:
The carrying value of accrued interest payable as reported on the balance
sheet approximates fair value.
Off-balance sheet financial instruments:
The majority of commitments to extend credit, unused
portions of lines of credit and letters of credit carry current market interest rates if converted
to loans. Because such commitments are generally unassignable by either the Company or the
borrower, they only have value to the Company and the borrower. None of the commitments are subject
to undue credit risk. The estimated fair values of off-balance sheet financial instruments are
based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining
terms of the agreements and the counterparties credit standing. The fair value of off-balance
sheet financial instruments was not material at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
15
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
5. Fair values of financial instruments (continued):
The estimated fair value of financial instruments at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, is
summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
Financial assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
72,159
|
|
|
$
|
72,159
|
|
|
$
|
49,278
|
|
|
$
|
49,278
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
108,555
|
|
|
|
108,555
|
|
|
|
108,005
|
|
|
|
108,005
|
|
Loans held for sale, net
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
2,016
|
|
|
|
2,016
|
|
Net loans
|
|
|
433,613
|
|
|
|
439,823
|
|
|
|
459,482
|
|
|
|
467,018
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
972
|
|
|
|
972
|
|
|
|
893
|
|
|
|
893
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
2,023
|
|
|
|
2,023
|
|
|
|
2,122
|
|
|
|
2,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
617,947
|
|
|
$
|
624,157
|
|
|
$
|
621,796
|
|
|
$
|
629,332
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits without stated maturities
|
|
$
|
354,134
|
|
|
$
|
354,134
|
|
|
$
|
338,932
|
|
|
$
|
338,932
|
|
Deposits with stated maturities
|
|
|
231,809
|
|
|
|
240,495
|
|
|
|
251,851
|
|
|
|
256,749
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
8,066
|
|
Accrued interest payable
|
|
|
1,110
|
|
|
|
1,110
|
|
|
|
1,296
|
|
|
|
1,296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
595,053
|
|
|
$
|
603,739
|
|
|
$
|
600,079
|
|
|
$
|
605,043
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Definitive Merger Agreement:
On August 9, 2010, the Company entered into a Definitive Merger Agreement with F.N.B. Corporation
(F.N.B.) pursuant to which F.N.B. will acquire the Company in a stock and cash transaction.
Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, which has been unanimously approved by the boards of
directors of both companies, shareholders of the Company will be entitled to receive a fixed
exchange ratio of 3.4545 shares of F.N.B. common stock and $10.00 in cash for each share of the
Companys common stock. Completion of the merger requires, among other things, the approval of the
Companys stockholders and customary regulatory approvals. The Merger Agreement further provides
that, upon termination of the Merger Agreement under specified circumstances, the Company may be
required to pay to F.N.B. a termination fee of approximately $2.8 million.
The foregoing summary is not complete and is qualified in all respects by reference to the actual
language of the Definitive Merger Agreement filed by the Company as Exhibit 99.2 to the Current
Report on Form 8-K on August 10, 2010.
Pending regulatory and stockholder approvals, the Company expects the merger to be consummated by
December 31, 2010. However, there can be no assurance that the transaction will be consummated or,
if consummated, when the transaction will occur.
16
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Forward-Looking Discussion:
Certain statements in this Form 10-Q are forward-looking statements that involve numerous risks and
uncertainties. The following factors, among others, may cause actual results to differ materially
from projected results:
Local, domestic and international economic and political conditions, and government monetary,
regulatory and fiscal policies affect banking both directly and indirectly. Inflation, recession,
unemployment, volatile interest rates, tight money supply, real estate values, international
conflicts, and other factors beyond our control may also adversely affect our future results of
operations. Our management team, consisting of the Board of Directors and executive officers,
expects that no particular factor will affect the results of operations. The continuation of
downward trends in areas such as real estate, construction and consumer spending, may adversely
impact our ability to maintain or increase profitability. Therefore, we cannot assure our current
level of income.
Our earnings depend largely upon net interest income. The relationship between our cost of funds,
deposits and borrowings, and the yield on our interest-earning assets, loans and investments all
influence net interest income levels. This relationship, defined as the net interest spread,
fluctuates and is affected by regulatory, economic and competitive factors that influence interest
rates, the volume, rate and mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, and
the level of nonperforming assets. As part of our interest rate risk (IRR) strategy, we monitor
the maturity and repricing characteristics of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing
liabilities to control our exposure to interest rate changes.
To a certain extent, our success depends upon the general economic conditions in the geographic
market that we serve. Further adverse changes to economic conditions would likely impair loan
collections and may have a materially adverse effect on the consolidated results of operations and
financial position.
The banking industry is highly competitive, with rapid changes in product delivery systems and in
consolidation of service providers. We compete with many larger institutions in terms of asset
size. These competitors also have substantially greater technical, marketing and financial
resources. The larger size of these companies affords them the opportunity to offer some
specialized products and services not offered by us. We are constantly striving to meet the
convenience and needs of our customers and to enlarge our customer base, however, we cannot assure
that these efforts will be successful.
17
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Critical Accounting Policies:
Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of financial
statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to establish critical accounting policies and make
accounting estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at
the date of
the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting periods.
Accounting estimates require assumptions about uncertain matters that could have a material effect
on the financial statements if a different amount within a range of estimates were used or if
estimates changed from period to period. Readers of this report should understand that estimates
are made considering facts and circumstances at a point in time, and changes in those facts and
circumstances could produce results that differ from when those estimates were made. Significant
estimates that are particularly susceptible to material change in the next year relate to the
allowance for loan losses, fair values of financial instruments and the valuations of real estate
acquired through foreclosure, deferred tax assets and liabilities and intangible assets. Actual
amounts could differ from those estimates.
We maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level we believe adequate to absorb probable credit
losses related to specifically identified loans, as well as probable incurred losses inherent in
the remainder of the loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date. The balance in the allowance for
loan losses account is based on past events and current economic conditions.
The allowance for loan losses account consists of an allocated element and an unallocated element.
The allocated element consists of a specific portion for the impairment of loans individually
evaluated and a formula portion for the impairment of those loans collectively evaluated. The
unallocated element is used to cover inherent losses that exist as of the evaluation date, but
which have not been identified as part of the allocated allowance using our impairment evaluation
methodology due to limitations in the process. In addition, the unallocated element includes
amounts in the allowance for loan losses required as a directive from the Federal Reserve Board at
December 31, 2009.
We monitor the adequacy of the allocated portion of the allowance quarterly and adjust the
allowance as necessary through normal operations. This ongoing evaluation reduces potential
differences between estimates and actual observed losses. In addition, the unallocated portion of
the allowance is examined quarterly to ensure that it is consistent with changes in the related
criteria that would indicate a need to either increase or decrease it. The determination of the
level of the allowance for loan losses is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are
susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available. Accordingly, we cannot
ensure that charge-offs in future periods will not exceed the allowance for loan losses or that
additional increases in the allowance for loan losses will not be required, resulting in an adverse
impact on operating results. We are regulated by the Federal Reserve Board and Pennsylvania
Department of Banking
and these agencies may require us to make additions to the allowance for loan losses as part of the
examination process from time to time.
18
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
On May 6, 2010, our Joint Audit Committee concluded, based on the recommendation of management,
that our wholly-owned subsidiary, Community Bank, should amend its Call Report for the year ended
December 31, 2009, based on a directive of the Federal Reserve Board. The regulatory directive
required Community Bank to recognize a $7.0 million increase in its allowance for loan losses at
December 31, 2009. Concurrently with the decisions to amend Community Banks Call Report, the Joint
Audit Committee determined, based on the recommendation of management, that our consolidated
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009, should no longer be relied upon and be
restated to correct errors in the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of our
allowance for loan losses because of the misuse of facts that existed at the time those
consolidated financial statements were prepared and in order to assure that the consolidated
financial statements presented in the Annual Report on Form 10-K are consistent with those
presented in the Call Report. The misuse of facts causing the restatement was the result of a
misunderstanding between management and the Federal Reserve Board as to the methodology, i.e.,
model, to be used by us in determining the estimate for the allowance for loan losses under GAAP.
Management was of the opinion that its model used to determine the adequacy of the allowance for
loan losses was in accordance with the applicable supervisory guidance as provided by the Federal
Reserve Board in 2009 and GAAP. Management was informed on May 5, 2010, by the Federal Reserve
Board that we did not comply with the supervisory guidance, and therefore, must restate our Call
Report at December 31, 2009.
Fair values of financial instruments, in cases where quoted market prices are not available, are
based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques which are subject to change.
Real estate acquired in connection with foreclosures or in satisfaction of loans is adjusted to
fair value based upon current estimates derived through independent appraisals less cost to sell.
However, proceeds realized from sales may ultimately be higher or lower than those estimates.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax effects of
temporary differences by applying enacted statutory tax rates to differences between the financial
statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of existing assets and liabilities. The amount of
deferred tax assets is reduced, if necessary, to the amount that, based on available evidence, will
more likely than not be realized. As changes in tax laws or rates are enacted, deferred tax assets
and liabilities are adjusted through the provision for income taxes.
19
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Intangible assets consist of goodwill. The valuation of goodwill is analyzed at least annually for
impairment.
For a further discussion of our critical accounting policies, refer to the note entitled, Summary
of significant accounting policies, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements to our
Amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2009. This note lists the
significant accounting policies used by management in the development and presentation of our
financial statements. This Managements Discussion and Analysis, The Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements, and other financial statement disclosures identify and address key variables
and other qualitative and quantitative factors that are necessary for the understanding and
evaluation of our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Operating Environment:
Similar to the previous two quarters, the United States economy continued to experience only
moderate growth during the third quarter of 2010. The gross domestic product, the value of all
goods and services produced in the United States, grew at an annual rates of 2.0 percent in the
third quarter of 2010, 1.7 percent in the second quarter and 3.7 percent in the first quarter. The
third quarter growth primarily reflected increases in consumer, business and federal government
spending, partially offset by a reduction in residential construction. Consumer spending increased
at an annual rate of 2.6 percent in the third quarter of 2010 while nonresidential spending
advanced at an annual rate of 9.7 percent. Spending for equipment and software grew 12.0 percent,
while investment in nonresidential structures rose 3.9 percent. In addition, strong defense and
nondefense spending, together, influenced an 8.8 percent increase in spending by the federal
government. However, labor conditions remained weak in comparison to pre-recession standards. The
unemployment rate was 9.6 percent for September 2010, down slightly from a rate of 9.8 percent one
year ago. In addition, despite growing 25.7 percent in the second quarter, construction spending
declined 29.1 percent in third quarter of 2010, keeping the number of housing starts at depressed
levels.
In light of domestic economic uncertainty, coupled with low inflationary conditions, the Federal
Open Market Committee (FOMC) decided to keep the target range for the federal funds rate
unchanged at 0.00 percent or 0.25 percent during the third quarter of 2010 and indicated that
conditions would continue to warrant this accommodative position for some time.
20
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act (the Act). The goals of the new legislation include restoring public
confidence in the financial system following the 2007-2008 financial and credit crises, preventing
another financial crisis and allowing regulators to identify failings in the system
before another crisis can occur. Among other things, the Act creates the Financial Stability
Oversight Council, with oversight authority for monitoring and regulating systemic risk, and the
Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, which will have broad regulatory and enforcement powers
over consumer financial products and services. The Act also changes the responsibilities of the
current federal banking regulators, imposes additional corporate governance and disclosure
requirements in areas such as executive compensation and proxy access, and limits or prohibits
proprietary trading and hedge fund and private equity activities of banks. The scope of the Act
impacts many aspects of the financial services industry, and it requires the development and
adoption of many implementing regulations over the next several months and years. Accordingly, we
cannot assess the impact the Act will have on us at the present time.
Review of Financial Position:
Total assets equaled $652.8 million at September 30, 2010, and $652.2 million at December 31, 2009.
Loans, net of unearned income, decreased $29.6 million to $447.3 million at the close of the third
quarter from $476.9 million at year-end 2009. Total deposits decreased $4.9 million to $585.9
million at September 30, 2010, from $590.8 million at December 31, 2009. Noninterest-bearing
deposits decreased $5.9 million, while interest-bearing deposits increased $1.0 million. Cash and
cash equivalents, including federal funds sold, rose $22.9 million from the end of 2009.
Stockholders equity increased $4.9 million to $55.2 million at September 30, 2010, from $50.3
million at December 31, 2009.
In comparison to the end of the previous quarter, total assets increased $11.0 million from $641.8
million at June 30, 2010. The change in the balance sheet from the end of the second quarter
reflected a $9.2 million increase in total deposits. Loans, net of unearned income, decreased $17.9
million from the end of the second quarter, while investment securities decreased $4.3 million.
Cash and cash equivalents, including federal funds sold, amounted to $72.2 million at September 30,
2010, compared to $41.8 million at June 30, 2010.
On August 9, 2010, we entered into a definitive merger agreement with F.N.B. providing for F.N.B.
to acquire us. Completion of the merger requires, among other things, the approval of stockholders
and regulatory approvals. For a further discussion of the merger, refer to Note 6 entitled,
Definitive Merger Agreement, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements to this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q.
21
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Investment Portfolio:
At September 30, 2010, our investment portfolio consisted primarily of short-term U.S. Government
agency mortgage-backed securities, which provide
us with a source of liquidity and intermediate-term tax-exempt state and municipal obligations,
which we use to mitigate our tax burden.
The carrying values of the major classifications of securities as they relate to the total
investment portfolio at September 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009, are summarized as follows:
Distribution of investment securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
State and municipals
|
|
$
|
19,495
|
|
|
|
17.96
|
%
|
|
$
|
26,862
|
|
|
|
24.87
|
%
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government agencies
|
|
|
86,118
|
|
|
|
79.33
|
|
|
|
78,155
|
|
|
|
72.36
|
|
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
0.16
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
0.21
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
2,537
|
|
|
|
2.34
|
|
|
|
2,537
|
|
|
|
2.35
|
|
Other
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
0.21
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
0.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
108,555
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
108,005
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale investment securities increased $0.6 million to $108.6 million at
September 30, 2010, from $108.0 million at December 31, 2009. The unrealized holding gain, which
equaled $819, net of income taxes of $422, at the end of 2009 appreciated $1,433 to $2,252, net of
income taxes of $1,161, at September 30, 2010.
During the nine months ended September 30, we received proceeds from the sale of
available-for-sale investment securities of $6.2 million in 2010 and $40.5 million in 2009. In
2009, we sold a portion of our tax-exempt state and municipal obligations to avoid alternative
minimum tax consequences related to our investment in an elderly, low-income housing project which
we made during the fourth quarter. The securities sold in 2010 were composed entirely of
intermediate-term, tax-exempt state and municipal obligations, and were sold as part of continuing
tax planning strategies. Net gains recognized on the sale of available-for-sale investment
securities totaled $361 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and $1,499 for the same nine
months of 2009.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the investment portfolio averaged $111.9
million, an increase of $41.3 million compared to $70.6 million for the same period of last year.
The tax-equivalent yield on the investment portfolio decreased 219 basis points to 3.58 percent for
the nine months ended September 30, 2010, from 5.77 percent for the same period of 2009. In
comparison to the previous quarter, the tax-equivalent yield fell 10 basis points to 5.43 percent
for the third quarter from 5.53 percent for the second quarter of 2010.
22
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
The maturity distribution of the amortized cost, fair value and weighted-average tax-equivalent
yield of the available-for-sale portfolio at September 30, 2010, is summarized as follows. The
weighted-average yield, based on amortized cost, has been computed for tax-exempt state and
municipals on a tax-equivalent basis using the federal statutory tax rate of 34.0 percent. The
distributions are based on contractual maturity with the exception of mortgage-backed securities
and equity securities. Mortgage-backed securities have been presented based upon estimated cash
flows, assuming no change in the current interest rate environment. Equity securities with no
stated contractual maturities are included in the After ten years maturity distribution. Expected
maturities may differ from contractual maturities, or estimated maturities for mortgage-backed
securities, because borrowers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or
prepayment penalties.
Maturity distribution of available-for-sale portfolio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After one
|
|
|
After five
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within
|
|
|
but within
|
|
|
but within
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
one year
|
|
|
five years
|
|
|
ten years
|
|
|
ten years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
Amortized cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and municipals
|
|
$
|
1,121
|
|
|
|
7.48
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,640
|
|
|
|
7.77
|
%
|
|
$
|
9,563
|
|
|
|
7.38
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,756
|
|
|
|
7.04
|
%
|
|
$
|
18,080
|
|
|
|
7.35
|
%
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government
|
|
|
13,353
|
|
|
|
2.90
|
|
|
|
39,627
|
|
|
|
2.94
|
|
|
|
29,142
|
|
|
|
2.81
|
|
|
|
2,100
|
|
|
|
3.16
|
|
|
|
84,222
|
|
|
|
2.89
|
|
U.S. Government-sponsored
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
6.74
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
6.75
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
6.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
6.74
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,537
|
|
|
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
2,537
|
|
|
|
0.26
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
0.88
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
0.88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
14,518
|
|
|
|
3.27
|
%
|
|
$
|
42,374
|
|
|
|
3.25
|
%
|
|
$
|
38,718
|
|
|
|
3.94
|
%
|
|
$
|
9,532
|
|
|
|
4.29
|
%
|
|
$
|
105,142
|
|
|
|
3.60
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and municipals
|
|
$
|
1,129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,753
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,063
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
19,495
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government
|
|
|
13,543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,076
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,118
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government-sponsored
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
14,718
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
43,222
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
40,640
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,975
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
108,555
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Loan Portfolio:
According to the United States Department of Commerce, nonresidential investment improved for the
third consecutive quarter. For the third quarter of 2010, business spending advanced 9.7 percent.
Despite the increase in business spending, commercial loan demand remained subdued. Businesses
used pent up liquidity to fund investments. In addition, banks continued to employ tighter
underwriting standards. As a result, commercial and industrial loans at all commercial banks
throughout the United States decreased $19.7 billion or at an annual rate of 6.3 percent from the
end of the second quarter of 2010. With regard to our loan portfolio, business loans, including
commercial loans, commercial mortgages, commercial construction and land development loans and
lease financing, decreased $15.3 million to $316.1 million at September 30, 2010, from $331.4
million at June 30, 2010.
Mortgage rates, already favorable, reached a historic low at the end of the third quarter of 2010.
The rate for a 30-year, fixed-rate mortgage in the United States fell 39 basis points to 4.35
percent at September 30, 2010, from 4.74 percent at June 30, 2010. This was 71 basis points lower
than 5.06 percent one year ago. Despite low mortgage rates, the housing market remained soft amid
a struggling economy, a large inventory of foreclosed assets and tight credit conditions.
Residential mortgage lending in the banking industry decreased in the third quarter, as evidenced
by a $40.6 billion or 4.4 percent annualized reduction in real estate loans for all commercial
banks from the end of the second quarter of 2010. We experienced a slight reduction in residential
mortgage loans of $0.2 million to $102.1 million at September 30, 2010, from $102.3 million at
June 30, 2010.
Despite favorable mortgage rates, activity in our secondary mortgage department subsided somewhat
in the nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared to the same period of the previous year.
Residential mortgage loans serviced for the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA)
increased $13.6 million or at an annual rate of 12.0 percent to $165.5 million at the end of the
third quarter of 2010 from $151.9 million at the end of 2009. In comparison, for the same period
of 2009, residential mortgage loans serviced for the FNMA increased at an annualized rate of 27.5
percent. For the three months and nine months ended September 30, residential mortgages sold to
the FNMA totaled $11.9 million and $29.2 million in 2010 compared to $14.2 million and $63.4
million in 2009. Net gains realized on the sale of residential mortgages totaled $381 for the
third quarter and $805 year-to-date 2010, compared to $268 and $1,210 for the same periods of
2009.
Stability of household wealth helped consumer spending advance by a modest 2.6 percent in
the third quarter of 2010. Consumers increased spending for durable goods by 6.1 percent, while
spending on nondurable goods and services rose 1.3 percent and 2.5 percent. Despite these
improvements, our consumer loans decreased $1.4 million from the end of the second quarter of 2010.
24
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
The composition of the loan portfolio at September 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009, is summarized
as follows:
Distribution of loan portfolio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
Commercial, financial and others
|
|
$
|
144,714
|
|
|
|
32.35
|
%
|
|
$
|
160,945
|
|
|
|
33.75
|
%
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
17,777
|
|
|
|
3.97
|
|
|
|
23,195
|
|
|
|
4.86
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
102,125
|
|
|
|
22.83
|
|
|
|
104,925
|
|
|
|
22.00
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
152,877
|
|
|
|
34.18
|
|
|
|
155,269
|
|
|
|
32.55
|
|
Consumer, net
|
|
|
26,672
|
|
|
|
5.97
|
|
|
|
29,447
|
|
|
|
6.18
|
|
Lease financing, net
|
|
|
3,117
|
|
|
|
0.70
|
|
|
|
3,163
|
|
|
|
0.66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net of unearned income
|
|
|
447,282
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
476,944
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
13,669
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans
|
|
$
|
433,613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
459,482
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average loans decreased $46.5 million or 9.1 percent to $466.8 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010, from $513.3 million for the same nine months of 2009. The majority of
the reduction was in tax-exempt loans of local municipalities, which decreased $34.0 million or
52.1 percent comparing the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. Several tax and revenue
anticipation notes, which were outstanding during the majority of 2009, matured by December 31,
2009, and were not renewed. Due to a sustained low interest rate environment and higher levels of
nonaccrual loans, the tax-equivalent yield on our loan portfolio decreased 23 basis points to 5.48
percent for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, from 5.71 percent for the same nine months of
2009. The FOMC has indicated that interest rates will remain at these historically low levels for
some time. As a result, we do not anticipate an increase in our loan yields for the remainder of
2010.
25
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
The maturity and repricing information of the loan portfolio by major classification at
September 30, 2010, is summarized as follows:
Maturity distribution and interest sensitivity of loan portfolio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After one
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within
|
|
|
but within
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
one year
|
|
|
five years
|
|
|
five years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Maturity schedule:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial and others
|
|
$
|
61,755
|
|
|
$
|
19,497
|
|
|
$
|
63,462
|
|
|
$
|
144,714
|
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
8,098
|
|
|
|
3,693
|
|
|
|
5,986
|
|
|
|
17,777
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
8,555
|
|
|
|
28,784
|
|
|
|
64,786
|
|
|
|
102,125
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
12,381
|
|
|
|
7,459
|
|
|
|
133,037
|
|
|
|
152,877
|
|
Consumer, net
|
|
|
1,950
|
|
|
|
18,460
|
|
|
|
6,262
|
|
|
|
26,672
|
|
Lease financing, net
|
|
|
623
|
|
|
|
2,494
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
93,362
|
|
|
$
|
80,387
|
|
|
$
|
273,533
|
|
|
$
|
447,282
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predetermined interest rates
|
|
$
|
38,595
|
|
|
$
|
63,421
|
|
|
$
|
75,068
|
|
|
$
|
177,084
|
|
Floating- or adjustable-interest rates
|
|
|
54,767
|
|
|
|
16,966
|
|
|
|
198,465
|
|
|
|
270,198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
93,362
|
|
|
$
|
80,387
|
|
|
$
|
273,533
|
|
|
$
|
447,282
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As previously mentioned, there are numerous risks inherent in the loan portfolio. We manage
the portfolio by employing sound credit policies and utilizing various modeling techniques in order
to limit the effects of such risks. In addition, we utilize private mortgage insurance and
guaranteed Small Business Administration and FHLB-Pgh loan programs to mitigate credit risk in the
loan portfolio.
Federal regulators are specifically concerned with certain high-risk loan products offered by the
banking industry. Our loan portfolio does not contain option adjustable-rate mortgage products,
high loan-to-value ratio mortgages, subprime loans or loans with initial teaser rates. At September
30, 2010, we had $26.0 million in junior lien mortgages and $98.6 million in interest-only loans.
We mitigate credit risk associated with loans having junior-lien positions by limiting the
loan-to-value ratios to supervisory limits set forth in the FFIEC Interagency Guidelines for Real
Estate Lending Policies. Risk associated with interest-only loans is reduced through ensuring
adequate collateralization within our policy guidelines. Generally, collateral for interest-only
loans includes deposits, real estate and marketable equity securities. The loan-to-value ratio
limit for junior-lien mortgages and interest only loans is 80.0 percent. We monitor loan-to-value
ratios for these junior-lien mortgages and interest-only loans that are performing according to
contractual terms by requiring a new, independent appraisal for any loan with an appraisal greater
than three years old. In addition, for these types of loans, any requests to grant additional
credit would require
a new, independent appraisal if the existing appraisal is greater than one year old.
26
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
The majority of our interest-only loans have interest rates that reset daily. Interest rates on
remaining interest-only loans have reset dates that reset, monthly, semi-annually, annually or
within two through five years. At September 30, 2010, we expect $69.1 million or 70.1 percent of
our interest-only loans to reprice within one year.
There were no junior-lien mortgages refinanced or modified during the nine months ended September
30, 2010. Nonperforming junior-lien mortgages totaled $623 and nonperforming interest-only loans
amounted to $5.9 million at September 30, 2010. There were no junior-lien mortgages and one
interest-only loan of $1.3 million considered troubled debt restructurings at September 30, 2010.
In an attempt to limit IRR and liquidity strains, we continually examine the maturity distribution
and interest rate sensitivity of the loan portfolio. Market interest rates have remained at
historically low levels and the FOMC has indicated that this low level would likely remain in place
for some time. Despite this short-term interest rate forecast, the risk of rising rates in the
future caused us to employ an Asset/Liability management strategy for 2010 which focuses on
restoring balance to our IRR. Accordingly, we place emphasis on originating loans with shorter
repricing terms. Adjustable-rate loans represented 60.4 percent of the loan portfolio at September
30, 2010, compared to 56.2 percent at the end of 2009.
In addition to the risks inherent in our loan portfolio, in the normal course of business we are
also a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk to meet the financing needs of
our customers. These instruments include legally binding commitments to extend credit, unused
portions of lines of credit and commercial letters of credit, and may involve, to varying degrees,
elements of credit risk and IRR in excess of the amount recognized in the financial statements.
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation
of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or
other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. The commitments for lines of credit may
expire without being drawn upon. Therefore, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily
represent future cash requirements. The amount of the collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by
us, is based on our credit evaluation of the customer.
27
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Unused portions of lines of credit, including home equity and credit card lines and
overdraft protection agreements, are commitments for possible
future extensions of credit to existing customers. Unused portions of home equity lines are
collateralized and generally have fixed expiration dates. Credit card lines and overdraft
protection agreements are uncollateralized and usually do not carry specific maturity dates. Unused
portions of lines of credit ultimately may not be drawn upon to the total extent to which we are
committed.
Commercial letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by us to guarantee the performance
of a customer to a third party. Commercial letters of credit are primarily issued to support public
and private borrowing arrangements. Essentially, all commercial letters of credit have expiration
dates within one year and often expire unused in whole or in part by the customer. The carrying
value of the liability for our obligations under guarantees was not material at September 30, 2010,
and December 31, 2009.
Credit risk is the principal risk associated with these instruments. Our involvement and exposure
to credit loss in the event that the instruments are fully drawn upon and the customer defaults is
represented by the contractual amounts of these instruments. In order to control credit risk
associated with entering into commitments and issuing letters of credit, we employ the same credit
quality and collateral policies in making commitments that we use in other lending activities. We
evaluate each customers creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis, and if deemed necessary, obtain
collateral. The amount and nature of the collateral obtained is based on our credit evaluation.
The contractual amounts of off-balance sheet commitments at September 30, 2010 and December 31,
2009, are summarized as follows:
Distribution of off-balance sheet commitments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Commitments to extend credit
|
|
$
|
84,446
|
|
|
$
|
81,945
|
|
Unused portions of lines of credit
|
|
|
27,427
|
|
|
|
24,723
|
|
Commercial letters of credit
|
|
|
16,892
|
|
|
|
20,982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
128,765
|
|
|
$
|
127,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We record an allowance for credit losses associated with off-balance sheet commitments, if
deemed necessary, separately as a liability. The allowance was deemed immaterial at September 30,
2010 and December 31, 2009. We do not anticipate that losses, if any, that may occur as a result of
funding off- balance sheet commitments, would have a material adverse effect on our operating
results or financial position.
28
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Asset Quality:
National, Pennsylvania and market area unemployment rates at September 30, 2010 and 2009, are
summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
United States
|
|
|
9.6
|
%
|
|
|
9.8
|
%
|
Pennsylvania
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
|
|
8.6
|
|
Lackawanna county
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
Luzerne county
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
|
|
9.9
|
|
Monroe county
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
Susquehanna county
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
Wayne county
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
Wyoming county
|
|
|
9.6
|
%
|
|
|
7.7
|
%
|
The National unemployment rate, which spiked to 10.1 percent in the fourth quarter of 2009,
rebounded to 9.6 percent at September 30, 2010, a slight improvement from the rate one year ago.
However, employment conditions deteriorated significantly for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and
all counties in our market area from one year ago.
As a result of significant deterioration in asset quality over the previous two years, we initiated
several remedial steps to enhance or protect our asset quality in the latter part of 2009. These
steps included:
|
|
|
Hiring an independent loan review company to assist and advise us with our credit
risk management practices;
|
|
|
|
Enhancing the oversight and workout of classified assets by hiring an in-house
attorney to expedite the process of loan foreclosures and redeploying existing staff to
the workout and loan review functions;
|
|
|
|
Initiating the formation of a problem loan committee for the purpose of
monitoring the status of problem assets and devising action plans for the timely workout
or liquidation of assets;
|
|
|
|
Overhauling the appraisal process by requiring new appraisals on all impaired
loans subject to evaluation under FASB ASC 310, Receivables, and any loan that is
delinquent over 60 days; and
|
|
|
|
Tightening underwriting standards to ensure a more rigorous review of potential
loans and more conservative lending standards.
|
29
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Nonperforming assets consist of nonperforming loans and foreclosed assets. Nonperforming
loans include nonaccrual loans, restructured loans and accruing
loans past due 90 days or more. Past due status is based on contractual terms of the loan.
Generally, a loan is classified as nonaccrual when it is determined that the collection of all or a
portion of interest or principal is doubtful or when a default of interest or principal has existed
for 90 days or more, unless the loan is well secured and in the process of collection. When a loan
is placed on nonaccrual, interest accruals discontinue and uncollected accrued interest is reversed
against income in the current period. Interest collections after a loan has been placed on
nonaccrual status are credited to a suspense account until either the loan is returned to
performing status or charged-off. The interest accumulated in the suspense account is credited to
income if the nonaccrual loan is returned to performing status. However, if the nonaccrual loan is
charged-off, the accumulated interest is applied as a reduction to principal at the time the loan
is charged-off. A nonaccrual loan is returned to performing status when the loan is current as to
principal and interest and has performed according to the contractual terms for a minimum of six
months.
Restructured loans are loans with original terms, interest rate, or both, that have been modified
as a result of a deterioration in the borrowers financial condition. Interest income on
restructured loans is recognized when earned, using the interest method. On occasion, we make
modifications to loan terms, specifically the interest rate, but would not consider the loan to be
a troubled debt restructuring if all of the following conditions are met:
|
|
The borrower is current as to existing loan payments;
|
|
|
The borrower can obtain funds from a new creditor at existing market rates to repay the
current loan; and
|
|
|
The modification is due to a reduction in the existing market rates as compared to the
interest rate on the original loan or an improvement in the creditworthiness of the borrower
since the issuance of the loan.
|
Interest rate modifications on loans, not considered to be a troubled debt restructuring, generally
incur a modification fee and are granted for a maximum period not to exceed three years.
30
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Foreclosed assets are comprised of properties acquired through foreclosure proceedings or
acceptance of a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure and loans classified as in-substance foreclosures. We
include such properties in other assets. A loan is classified as in-substance foreclosure when the
we have taken possession of the collateral regardless of whether formal foreclosure proceedings
have taken place. Foreclosed assets are recorded at fair value less cost to sell at the time of
acquisition. Any excess of the loan balance over the recorded value is charged to the allowance for
loan losses. Subsequent declines in the recorded values of the properties prior to their disposal
and cost to maintain the assets are included in other expenses. No allowance
has been established subsequent to the acquisition of foreclosed assets. Any gain or loss realized
upon disposal of foreclosed assets is included in noninterest income or noninterest expense. The
historical average holding period for such properties is less than 12 months.
Nonperforming assets decreased $934 from the end of the previous quarter and $3.6 million from
year-end 2009. Nonperforming assets equaled $24.6 million or 5.42 percent of loans, net of unearned
income, and foreclosed assets at September 30, 2010, compared to $25.5 million or 5.41 percent at
June 30, 2010, and $28.2 million or 5.86 percent at December 31, 2009. As compared to the end of
2009, we experienced reductions in nonaccrual loans of $4,140, restructured loans of $2,333 and
accruing loans past due 90 days or more of $737. These reductions were partially offset by an
increase in foreclosed assets of $3,644.
The decrease in nonaccrual loans resulted primarily from the migration of eight credits secured by
real estate, six secured by commercial real estate and two secured by residential properties, to
foreclosed assets.
The reduction in restructured loans still accruing resulted primarily from a change in the status
of two commercial relationships. In 2009, these customers were each granted modifications to their
respective loans, which involved interest-only payment terms for a certain period of time. These
credits have since returned to, and are paying according to, their original payment terms.
With regard to foreclosed assets, there were eight properties with an aggregate carrying value of
$4,009 transferred to foreclosed assets during the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Three
properties with an aggregate carrying value of $365 were sold. There was no net gain or loss which
resulted from the sale of these properties. At September 30, 2010, there were thirteen properties
with an aggregate carrying value of $6,853 in foreclosed assets. We are actively marketing these
properties for sale through a variety of channels including internal marketing and the use of
outside realtors.
31
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Information concerning nonperforming assets at September 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009, is
summarized as follows. The table includes loans or other extensions of credit classified for
regulatory purposes and all material loans or other extensions of credit that cause management to
have serious doubts as to the borrowers ability to comply with present loan repayment terms.
Distribution of nonperforming assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Nonaccrual loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial and others
|
|
$
|
2,199
|
|
|
$
|
7,438
|
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
5,402
|
|
|
|
4,532
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
1,542
|
|
|
|
1,797
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
5,566
|
|
|
|
5,196
|
|
Consumer, net
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
Lease financing, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonaccrual loans
|
|
|
14,875
|
|
|
|
19,015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructured loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial and others
|
|
|
1,346
|
|
|
|
1,777
|
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
2,525
|
|
Consumer, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease financing, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total restructured loans
|
|
|
1,969
|
|
|
|
4,302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial and others
|
|
|
534
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
603
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
469
|
|
Consumer, net
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
Lease financing, net
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accruing loans past due 90 days or more
|
|
|
897
|
|
|
|
1,634
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming loans
|
|
|
17,741
|
|
|
|
24,951
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreclosed assets
|
|
|
6,853
|
|
|
|
3,209
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming assets
|
|
$
|
24,594
|
|
|
$
|
28,160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming loans as a percentage of loans, net
|
|
|
3.97
|
%
|
|
|
5.23
|
%
|
Nonperforming assets as a percentage of loans, net and
and foreclosed assets
|
|
|
5.42
|
%
|
|
|
5.86
|
%
|
32
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Loans identified to be individually evaluated for impairment under FASB ASC 310,
Receivables, include:
|
|
Loans past due 90 days or more;
|
|
|
Restructured loans; and
|
|
|
Criticized loans, including regulatory risk ratings of Special Mention, Substandard, Doubtful
and Loss.
|
A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that we
will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement.
All amounts due according to the contractual terms means that both the contractual interest and
principal payments of a loan will be collected as scheduled in the loan agreement. Factors
considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value and the
probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience
insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired.
Impaired loans decreased $10.9 million or 39.4 percent to $16.8 million at September 30, 2010, from
$27.7 million at December 31, 2009. The improvement in impaired loans resulted from a $6.7 million
decrease in accruing loans, coupled with a $4.2 million decrease in nonaccrual loans, from year-end
2009. The decrease in impaired loans, which was largely concentrated in commercial, financial and
other loans and commercial real estate loans, was due primarily to the migration of loans to
foreclosed assets and an increase in charge-offs.
We aggressively manage our impaired loans in an effort to reduce our loss exposure related to these
loans. Such efforts include, but are not limited to, assisting customers with impaired loans in
developing remedial strategies, collateral sale or liquidation, and foreclosure.
33
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Information concerning impaired loans at September 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009, is
summarized as follows. The table includes credits classified for regulatory purposes and all
material credits that cause management to have serious doubts as to the borrowers ability to
comply with present loan repayment terms.
Distribution of impaired loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Nonaccrual loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial and others
|
|
$
|
2,199
|
|
|
$
|
7,438
|
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
5,402
|
|
|
|
4,532
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
1,542
|
|
|
|
1,797
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
5,566
|
|
|
|
5,196
|
|
Consumer, net
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
Lease financing, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonaccrual loans
|
|
|
14,875
|
|
|
|
19,015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruing loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial and others
|
|
|
1,346
|
|
|
|
3,400
|
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
5,198
|
|
Consumer, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease financing, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accruing loans
|
|
|
1,969
|
|
|
|
8,653
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans
|
|
$
|
16,844
|
|
|
$
|
27,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans as a percentage of loans, net
|
|
|
3.77
|
%
|
|
|
5.80
|
%
|
Information related to the recorded investment in impaired loans for which there is a related
allowance and the amount of that allowance and the recorded investment in impaired loans for which
there is no allowance at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Recorded
|
|
|
Related
|
|
|
Recorded
|
|
|
Related
|
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
Impaired loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With a related allowance
|
|
$
|
8,638
|
|
|
$
|
2,592
|
|
|
$
|
13,481
|
|
|
$
|
5,762
|
|
With no related allowance
|
|
|
8,206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
16,844
|
|
|
$
|
2,592
|
|
|
$
|
27,668
|
|
|
$
|
5,762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
We recognize interest income on impaired loans, including the recording of cash receipts,
based on our policy for nonaccrual, restructured loans or accruing loans depending on the status of
the impaired loan.
Interest income on impaired loans that would have been recognized had the loans been current and
the terms of the loans not been modified, the aggregate amount of interest income recognized and
the amount recognized using the cash-basis method and the average recorded investment in impaired
loans for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 are summarized
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Gross interest due under terms
|
|
$
|
258
|
|
|
$
|
440
|
|
|
$
|
966
|
|
|
$
|
1,362
|
|
Interest income recognized
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
696
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income not recognized
|
|
$
|
138
|
|
|
$
|
229
|
|
|
$
|
559
|
|
|
$
|
666
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income recognized (cash-basis)
|
|
$
|
210
|
|
|
$
|
181
|
|
|
$
|
606
|
|
|
$
|
528
|
|
Average recorded investment in impaired loans
|
|
$
|
18,531
|
|
|
$
|
32,125
|
|
|
$
|
22,766
|
|
|
$
|
31,677
|
|
Cash received on impaired loans applied as a reduction of principal totaled $563 and $1,710 for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2010. For the respective periods of 2009 cash receipts on
impaired loans applied as a reduction of principal totaled $382 and $3,149.
We maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level we believe adequate to absorb probable credit
losses related to specifically identified loans, as well as probable incurred loan losses inherent
in the remainder of the loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date. The balance in the allowance
for loan losses account is based on past events and current economic conditions. We employ the
Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council Interagency Policy Statement, as amended, and
GAAP in assessing the adequacy of the allowance account. Under GAAP, the adequacy of the allowance
account is determined based on the provisions of FASB ASC 310 for loans specifically identified to
be individually evaluated for impairment and the requirements of FASB ASC 450, Contingencies, for
large groups of smaller-balance homogeneous loans to be collectively evaluated for impairment.
35
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
We follow our systematic methodology in accordance with procedural discipline by applying it
in the same manner regardless of whether the allowance is being determined at a high point or a low
point in the economic cycle. Each quarter, our loan review department identifies those loans to be
individually evaluated for impairment and those loans collectively evaluated for impairment
utilizing a standard criteria. Internal loan review grades are
assigned quarterly to loans identified to be individually evaluated. A loans grade may differ from
period to period based on current conditions and events, however, we consistently utilize the same
grading system each quarter. We use loss experience from the most recent rolling eight quarters in
determining the historical loss factor for each pool collectively evaluated for impairment. We
place a higher weight on the latest four quarters to place emphasis on the current periods compared
to the previous four quarters in arriving at historical loss factors. Qualitative factors are
evaluated in the same manner each quarter and are adjusted within a relevant range of values based
on current conditions to assure directional consistency of the provision for loan losses and
allowance for loan loss account.
The allocation of the allowance for loan losses at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, is
summarized as follows:
Allocation of the allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Category
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Category
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
loans
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
loans
|
|
Allocated allowance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specific:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial and others
|
|
$
|
1,499
|
|
|
|
0.79
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,679
|
|
|
|
2.27
|
%
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
670
|
|
|
|
1.21
|
|
|
|
1,002
|
|
|
|
0.95
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
0.41
|
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
0.39
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
1.32
|
|
|
|
812
|
|
|
|
2.18
|
|
Consumer, net
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
Lease financing, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
specific
|
|
|
2,592
|
|
|
|
3.77
|
|
|
|
5,762
|
|
|
|
5.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formula:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial and others
|
|
|
4,293
|
|
|
|
31.56
|
|
|
|
1,024
|
|
|
|
31.48
|
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
1,211
|
|
|
|
2.76
|
|
|
|
1,645
|
|
|
|
3.91
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
22.42
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
21.61
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
3,318
|
|
|
|
32.86
|
|
|
|
1,413
|
|
|
|
30.37
|
|
Consumer, net
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
5.93
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
6.17
|
|
Lease financing, net
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
0.70
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
0.66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total formula
|
|
|
9,272
|
|
|
|
96.23
|
|
|
|
4,381
|
|
|
|
94.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allocated allowance
|
|
|
11,864
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
10,143
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated allowance
|
|
|
1,805
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,319
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allowance for loan losses
|
|
$
|
13,669
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
17,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
The allocated allowance for loan losses account increased $1,721 to $11,864 at September 30, 2010,
from $10,143 at December 31, 2009. The change from year-end resulted primarily from a $4,891
increase in the formula portion of the allowance for impairment of loans collectively evaluated
under FASB ASC 450, partially offset by a reduction of $3,170 in the specific portion for loans
individually evaluated for impairment under FASB ASC 310. With regard to the formula portion, the
total loss factor for collectively evaluated commercial, financial and other loans and commercial
real estate loans increased from year-end 2009 due to a higher amount of weighted-average net
charge-offs for the past eight consecutive quarters. The majority of the decrease in the specific
portion resulted from two commercial credits. The collateral supporting one of the credits was
transferred to foreclosed assets with the specific reserve recognized as a write down at the time
of transfer. The specific reserve associated with the other credit was charged-off as a confirmed
loss during the first half of 2010.
The unallocated portion of the allowance for loan losses equaled $1,805 at the end of the third
quarter of 2010, which we believe is sufficient to cover any inherent losses in the loan portfolio
that have not been identified as part of the allocated allowance using our impairment methodology.
The coverage ratio, the allowance for loan losses, as a percentage of nonperforming loans, is an
industry ratio used to test the ability of the allowance account to absorb potential losses arising
from nonperforming loans. The coverage ratio equaled 0.77 percent at September 30, 2010, compared
to 0.78 percent at June 30, 2010, and 0.70 percent at December 31, 2009.
37
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
A reconciliation of the allowance for loan losses and disclosure of charge-offs and
recoveries by major loan category for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, is summarized as
follows:
Reconciliation of allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
17,462
|
|
Loans charged-off:
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial and others
|
|
|
3,376
|
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
1,926
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
9
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
332
|
|
Consumer, net
|
|
|
78
|
|
Lease financing, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
5,721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans recovered:
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial and others
|
|
|
306
|
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
4
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer, net
|
|
|
18
|
|
Lease financing, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans charged-off
|
|
|
5,393
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision charged to operating expense
|
|
|
1,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses at end of period
|
|
$
|
13,669
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans charged-off as a percentage of average loans outstanding
|
|
|
1.54
|
%
|
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of period end loans
|
|
|
3.06
|
%
|
The allowance for loan losses account equaled $13,669 or 3.06 percent of loans, net of unearned
income, at September 30, 2010, compared to $17,462 or 3.65 percent at December 31, 2009. Net
charge-offs of $5,393 exceeded the provision for loan losses of $1,600, which resulted in the
$3,793 decrease in the allowance for loan losses account.
Past due loans not satisfied through repossession, foreclosure or related actions, are evaluated
individually to determine if all or part of the outstanding balance should be charged against the
allowance for loan losses account. Any subsequent recoveries are credited to the allowance
account. Net charge-offs amounted to $5,393 or 1.54 percent of average loans outstanding for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010. For the same period of 2009, net charge-offs were $3,449 or
0.90 percent of average loans outstanding.
38
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Deposits:
Real wage and salary income, which had fallen appreciably in 2009, improved for each of the first
three quarters of 2010. Disposable personal income, which increased 4.4 percent in the second
quarter of 2010, advanced 1.5 percent in the third quarter. Consumers continued to favor saving and
reducing household debt as opposed to spending. The personal savings rate was 5.5 percent for the
third quarter of 2010.
Cyclical deposit trends of certain not-for-profit and municipal customers influenced an increase in
total deposits of $9.2 million from $576.7 million at June 30, 2010, to $585.9 million at the end
of the third quarter. The majority of the 6.3 percent annualized growth was concentrated in money
market and NOW accounts, which recorded a combined increase of $23.6 million. This increase was due
primarily to cyclical deposit trends, specifically, an influx of tax monies from local area school
districts. Partially offsetting this increase were decreases in savings accounts of $2.8 million,
total time deposits of $6.7 million and noninterest-bearing accounts of $4.9 million.
The average amount of, and the rate paid on, the major classifications of deposits for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, are summarized as follows:
Deposit distribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
Interest-bearing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market accounts
|
|
$
|
33,881
|
|
|
|
0.99
|
%
|
|
$
|
26,059
|
|
|
|
0.88
|
%
|
NOW accounts
|
|
|
104,263
|
|
|
|
1.33
|
|
|
|
74,865
|
|
|
|
1.41
|
|
Savings accounts
|
|
|
110,125
|
|
|
|
0.43
|
|
|
|
106,680
|
|
|
|
0.53
|
|
Time deposits less than $100
|
|
|
155,704
|
|
|
|
3.04
|
|
|
|
164,390
|
|
|
|
3.33
|
|
Time deposits $100 or more
|
|
|
87,737
|
|
|
|
2.54
|
|
|
|
81,610
|
|
|
|
3.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing
|
|
|
491,710
|
|
|
|
1.86
|
%
|
|
|
453,604
|
|
|
|
2.21
|
%
|
Noninterest-bearing
|
|
|
87,735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,092
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
$
|
579,445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
534,696
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits averaged $579.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, an increase of
$44.7 million compared to $534.7 million for the same period of 2009. Noninterest-bearing deposits
rose $6.6 million, while interest-bearing accounts increased $38.1 million. We experienced growth
in all major deposit categories except for time deposits less than $100. Approximately 91.0 percent
of the deposit growth was concentrated in interest-bearing transaction accounts.
39
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Market interest rates continued to be at historically low levels. The 3-month U.S. Treasury
rate was 0.16 percent at September 30, 2010, and 0.14 percent at September 30, 2009. In addition,
given the prolonged length of time interest rates have been at historically low levels, management
reduced the standard rate paid for interest-bearing transaction accounts 10 basis points to 0.15
percent from 0.25 percent. Furthermore, promotional gas lease certificates of deposit were renewed
at lower market rates. As a result, our cost of deposits for the nine months ended September 30,
decreased 35 basis points to 1.86 percent in 2010 from 2.21 percent in 2009. The FOMC has indicated
that they
expect economic conditions to warrant these low interest rate levels for some time. We anticipate
our funding costs to remain favorable for the remainder of 2010. However, should competition within
our market area intensify, our cost of funds could be negatively impacted.
Volatile time deposits, time deposits in denominations of $100 or more, decreased $4.2 million to
$81.3 million at September 30, 2010, from $85.5 million at the end of the previous quarter. These
deposits averaged $87.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, an increase of $6.1
million or 7.5 percent compared to $81.6 million for the same nine months of 2009. The average cost
of large denomination time deposits decreased 76 basis points to 2.54 percent for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010, compared to 3.30 percent for the same period of 2009.
Maturities of time deposits of $100 or more at September 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009, are
summarized as follows:
Maturity distribution of time deposits of $100 or more
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Within three months
|
|
$
|
31,668
|
|
|
$
|
13,860
|
|
After three months but within six months
|
|
|
9,706
|
|
|
|
31,501
|
|
After six months but within twelve months
|
|
|
19,117
|
|
|
|
22,289
|
|
After twelve months
|
|
|
20,788
|
|
|
|
21,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
81,279
|
|
|
$
|
88,937
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Market Risk Sensitivity:
Market risk is the risk to our earnings or financial position resulting from adverse changes
in market rates or prices, such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates or equity prices. Our
exposure to market risk is primarily IRR associated with our lending, investing and
deposit-gathering activities. During the normal course of business, we are not exposed to foreign
exchange risk or commodity price risk. Our exposure to IRR can be explained as the potential for
change in our reported earnings and/or the market value of our net worth. Variations in interest
rates affect earnings by changing net interest income and the level of other interest-sensitive
income and operating expenses. Interest rate changes also affect the underlying economic value of
our assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet items. These changes arise because the present value
of future cash flows, and often the cash flows themselves, change with interest rates. The effects
of the changes in these present values reflect the change in our underlying economic value and
provide a basis for the expected change in future earnings related to interest rates. IRR is
inherent in the role of banks as financial intermediaries. However, a bank with a high degree of
IRR may experience lower earnings, impaired liquidity and capital positions, and most likely, a
greater risk of insolvency.
Therefore, banks must carefully evaluate IRR to promote safety and soundness in their activities.
Given the recent financial crisis and current economic recession, IRR and effectively managing it
are very important to both bank management and regulators. Bank regulations require us to develop
and maintain an IRR management program, overseen by the Board of Directors and senior management,
that involves a comprehensive risk management process in order to effectively identify, measure,
monitor and control risk. Should we have material weaknesses in our risk management process or high
exposure relative to our capital, bank regulatory agencies will take action to remedy these
shortcomings. Moreover, the level of IRR exposure and the quality of our risk management process
is a determining factor when evaluating capital adequacy.
The Asset/Liability Committee (ALCO), comprised of members of our Board of Directors, senior
management and other appropriate officers, oversees our IRR management program. Specifically, ALCO
analyzes economic data and market interest rate trends, as well as competitive pressures, and
utilizes several computerized modeling techniques to reveal potential exposure to IRR. This allows
us to monitor and attempt to control the influence these factors may have on our rate-sensitive
assets (RSA) and rate-sensitive liabilities (RSL), and overall operating results and financial
position. One such technique utilizes a static gap model that considers repricing frequencies of
RSA and RSL in order to monitor IRR. Gap analysis attempts to measure our interest rate exposure by
calculating the net amount of RSA and RSL that reprice within specific time intervals. A positive
gap occurs when the amount of RSA repricing in a specific period is greater than the amount of RSL
repricing within that same time frame and is indicated by a RSA/RSL ratio greater than 1.0. A
negative gap occurs when the amount of RSL repricing is greater than the amount of RSA and is
indicated by a RSA/RSL ratio less than 1.0. A positive gap implies that earnings will be impacted
favorably if interest rates rise and adversely if interest rates fall during the period. A negative
gap tends to indicate that earnings will be affected inversely to interest rate changes.
41
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Our interest rate sensitivity gap position, illustrating RSA and RSL at their related
carrying values, is summarized as follows. The distributions in the table are based on a
combination of maturities, call provisions, repricing frequencies and prepayment patterns.
Variable-rate assets and
liabilities are distributed based on the repricing frequency of the instrument. Mortgage
instruments are distributed in accordance with estimated cash flows, assuming there is no change in
the current interest rate environment.
Interest rate sensitivity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due after
|
|
|
Due after
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
three months
|
|
|
one year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due within
|
|
|
but within
|
|
|
but within
|
|
|
Due after
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
three months
|
|
|
twelve months
|
|
|
five years
|
|
|
five years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Rate-sensitive assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
$
|
4,119
|
|
|
$
|
10,599
|
|
|
$
|
43,222
|
|
|
$
|
50,615
|
|
|
$
|
108,555
|
|
Loans held for sale, net
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
625
|
|
Loans, net of unearned income
|
|
|
174,664
|
|
|
|
106,966
|
|
|
|
149,652
|
|
|
|
16,000
|
|
|
|
447,282
|
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
19,501
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,501
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
198,909
|
|
|
$
|
117,565
|
|
|
$
|
192,874
|
|
|
$
|
66,615
|
|
|
$
|
575,963
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate-sensitive liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market accounts
|
|
$
|
25,932
|
|
|
$
|
12,386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
38,318
|
|
NOW accounts
|
|
|
107,517
|
|
|
|
16,191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,708
|
|
Savings accounts
|
|
|
2,084
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
107,617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109,701
|
|
Time deposits less than $100
|
|
|
30,325
|
|
|
|
36,763
|
|
|
|
70,828
|
|
|
$
|
12,614
|
|
|
|
150,530
|
|
Time deposits $100 or more
|
|
|
31,668
|
|
|
|
28,823
|
|
|
|
19,432
|
|
|
|
1,356
|
|
|
|
81,279
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
197,526
|
|
|
$
|
94,163
|
|
|
$
|
197,877
|
|
|
$
|
21,970
|
|
|
$
|
511,536
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate sensitivity gap:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
$
|
1,383
|
|
|
$
|
23,402
|
|
|
$
|
(5,003
|
)
|
|
$
|
44,645
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative
|
|
$
|
1,383
|
|
|
$
|
24,785
|
|
|
$
|
19,782
|
|
|
$
|
64,427
|
|
|
$
|
64,427
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RSA/RSL ratio:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
1.01
|
|
|
|
1.25
|
|
|
|
0.97
|
|
|
|
3.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative
|
|
|
1.01
|
|
|
|
1.08
|
|
|
|
1.04
|
|
|
|
1.13
|
|
|
|
1.13
|
|
Our cumulative one-year RSA/RSL ratio equaled 1.08 at September 30, 2010, compared to 1.19 at the
end of the previous quarter. Given the current rate environment, our asset liability strategy for
2010 focuses on trying to maintain equilibrium between rate sensitive assets and liabilities with a
shift towards a positive ratio should interest rates begin to rise. As part of our current
strategy, we stress shorter repricing terms for new loan originations. In addition, we are offering
preferential rates on our long-term certificates of deposit, including 60-, 72- and 90-month
maturities. However, these forward-looking statements are qualified in the aforementioned section
entitled Forward-Looking Discussion in this Managements Discussion and Analysis.
42
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
The decrease in our RSA/RSL ratio from the end of the second quarter of 2010 resulted from a
$14.3 million increase in RSL maturing or repricing within the next 12 months, coupled with a $12.4
million decrease in RSA maturing or repricing within the same time frame. The increase in RSL
maturing or repricing within 12 months resulted from cyclical changes in the deposit accounts of
local area school districts. Money market and NOW accounts maturing or repricing within 12 months
increased of $6.5 million and $17.2 million. As previously mentioned, this resulted from an influx
of tax monies in the third quarter. These increases were partially offset by reductions in savings
accounts of $0.7 million and total time deposits of $8.7 million. With regard to RSA, the decrease
was, for the most part, caused by a $12.2 million reduction in federal funds sold.
We also experienced a decrease in our three-month ratio to 1.01 at September 30, 2010, from 1.20 at
the end of the previous quarter. The decrease resulted from a $29.0 million increase in RSL coupled
with a $2.8 million reduction in RSA maturing or repricing within three months. The change resulted
primarily for the same reasons as did the change in the 12-month ratio.
Static gap analysis, although a credible measuring tool, does not fully illustrate the impact of
interest rate changes on future earnings. First, market rate changes normally do not equally or
simultaneously affect all categories of assets and liabilities. Second, assets and liabilities that
can contractually reprice within the same period may not do so at the same time or to the same
magnitude. Third, the interest rate sensitivity table presents a one-day position. Variations occur
daily as we adjust our rate sensitivity throughout the year. Finally, assumptions must be made in
constructing such a table. For example, the conservative nature of our Asset/Liability Management
Policy assigns money market and NOW accounts to the Due after three but within twelve months
repricing interval. In reality, these items may reprice less frequently and in different magnitudes
than changes in general interest rate levels.
As the static gap report fails to address the dynamic changes in the balance sheet composition or
prevailing interest rates, we utilize a simulation model to enhance our asset/liability management.
This model is used to create pro forma net interest income scenarios under various interest rate
shocks. According to the most recent model results, instantaneous and parallel shifts in general
market rates of plus 100 basis points would result in a positive change in net interest income for
the 12 months ended September 30, 2011. Model results under a minus 100 basis point scenario were
not meaningful, as the majority of short-term general market rates are already near zero.
Financial institutions are affected differently by inflation than commercial and industrial
companies that have significant investments in fixed assets and inventories. Most of our assets are
monetary in nature and change correspondingly with variations in the inflation rate. It is
difficult to precisely measure the impact inflation has on us, however we believe that our exposure
to inflation can be mitigated through asset/liability management.
43
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Liquidity:
Liquidity management is essential to our continuing operations as it gives us the ability to meet
our financial obligations as they come due, as well as to take advantage of new business
opportunities as they arise. Our financial obligations include, but are not limited to, the
following:
|
|
|
Funding new and existing loan commitments;
|
|
|
|
Payment of deposits on demand or at their contractual maturity;
|
|
|
|
Repayment of borrowings as they mature;
|
|
|
|
Payment of lease obligations; and
|
|
|
|
Payment of operating expenses.
|
Historically, core deposits have been our primary source of liquidity because of their stability
and lower cost, in general, than other types of funding. Providing additional sources of funds are
loan and investment payments and prepayments and the ability to sell both available-for-sale
securities and mortgage loans held for sale. We believe our liquidity is adequate to meet both
present and future financial obligations and commitments on a timely basis.
Community Bank has a Contingency Funding Plan in place to address alternative sources of liquidity,
that go beyond our core deposit base, in the event of a funding crisis. Examples of events that may
result in a liquidity crisis include, among others, natural disasters, war, reputational harm and
severe and prolonged asset quality problems. The funding program ensures the availability of
various alternative wholesale funding sources that can be used whenever appropriate. These
identified alternative funding sources include:
|
|
|
FHLB-Pgh liquidity contingency line of credit;
|
|
|
|
Federal Reserve Bank discount window;
|
|
|
|
Internet certificates of deposit;
|
|
|
|
Institutional Deposit Corporation deposits;
|
|
|
|
Repurchase agreements; and
|
|
|
|
Federal funds purchased.
|
Based on our liquidity position at September 30, 2010, we do not anticipate the need to utilize any
of these sources in the near term.
44
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
We employ a number of analytical techniques in assessing the adequacy of our liquidity
position. One such technique is the use of ratio analysis related to our reliance on noncore funds
to fund our investments and loans maturing after September 30, 2011. Our noncore funds at September
30, 2010, consisted solely of time deposits in denominations of $100 or more. At September 30,
2010, our net noncore funding dependence ratio, the difference between noncore funds and short-term
investments to long-term assets, was 9.1 percent, while our net short-term noncore funding
dependence ratio, noncore funds maturing within one-year, less short-term investments to long-term
assets equaled 6.4 percent. These ratios indicated that we had some reliance on noncore funds at
September 30, 2010. These ratios weakened slightly in comparison to 7.3 percent and 3.4 percent for
the previous quarter. In addition, according to the most recent Bank Holding Company Performance
Report for our Federal Reserve District, we were significantly less reliant
on noncore funds than our peer group, which had noncore and short-term noncore funding dependence
ratios of 23.0 percent and 11.6 percent.
The Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows present the changes in cash and cash equivalents from
operating, investing and financing activities. Cash and cash equivalents, consisting of cash on
hand, cash items in the process of collection, noninterest-bearing deposits with other banks,
balances with the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia and the FHLB-Pgh, and federal funds sold,
increased $22.9 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Similarly, cash and cash
equivalents increased $34.1 million for the same period last year. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, net cash inflows of $20.5 million from investing activities and $7.4 million
from operating activities were partially offset by a $5.0 million net cash outflow from financing
activities. For the same period of 2009, operating, investing and financing activities all provided
net cash inflows.
Operating activities provided net cash of $7.4 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2010, and $6.6 million for the same nine months of 2009. Ordinarily, net income, adjusting for the
effects of noncash transactions such as depreciation and the provision for loan losses is the
primary source of funds from operations.
Investing activities primarily include transactions related to our lending activities and
investment portfolio. Investing activities provided net cash of $20.5 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010, compared to $16.5 million for the same period of 2009. For 2010, a net
decrease in lending activities was the primary factor causing the net cash inflow from investing
activities. In comparison, for 2009, proceeds received from repayments and sales of investment
securities, net of investment security purchases, exceeded net cash used to fund an increase in
lending activities.
45
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Deposit gathering is our predominant financing activity. During the first nine months of
2010 deposit gathering slowed, which resulted in a $4.8 million reduction in net cash. Contrarily,
deposit gathering provided net cash of $12.8 million for the same period of 2009.
Capital Adequacy:
We attempt to assure capital adequacy by monitoring our current and projected capital positions to
support future growth, while providing stockholders with an attractive long-term appreciation of
their investments. According to bank regulation, at a minimum, banks must maintain a Tier I
capital to risk-adjusted assets ratio of 4.0 percent and a total capital to risk-weighted assets
ratio of 8.0 percent. Additionally, banks must maintain a Leverage ratio, defined as Tier I
capital to total average assets less intangibles, of 3.0 percent. The minimum Leverage ratio of 3.0
percent only applies to
institutions with a composite rating of one under the Uniform Interagency Bank Rating System, that
are not anticipating or experiencing significant growth and have well-diversified risk. An
additional 100 to 200 basis points are required for all but these most highly-rated institutions.
Our minimum Leverage ratio was 4.0 percent at September 30, 2010 and 2009. If an institution is
deemed to be undercapitalized under these standards, banking law prescribes an increasing amount of
regulatory intervention, including the required institution of a capital restoration plan and
restrictions on the growth of assets, branches or lines of business. Further restrictions are
applied to significantly or critically undercapitalized institutions, including restrictions on
interest payable on accounts, dismissal of management and appointment of a receiver. For well
capitalized institutions, banking law provides authority for regulatory intervention where the
institution is deemed to be engaging in unsafe and unsound practices or receives a less than
satisfactory examination report rating.
Regulatory agencies define institutions, not under a written directive to maintain certain capital
levels, as well capitalized if they exceed the following:
|
|
A Tier I risk-based ratio of at least 6.0 percent;
|
|
|
A total risk-based ratio of at least 10.0 percent; and
|
|
|
A Leverage ratio of at least 5.0 percent.
|
However, the periodic regulatory exam process may require institutions to maintain capital ratios
and amounts in excess of the minimum levels discussed above.
46
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Our and Community Banks capital ratios at September 30, 2010 and 2009, as well as the
required minimum ratios for capital adequacy purposes and to be well capitalized under the prompt
corrective action provisions as defined by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement
Act of 1991 are summarized as follows:
Regulatory capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum to be Well
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized under
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum for Capital
|
|
|
Prompt Corrective
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Adequacy Purposes
|
|
|
Action Provisions
|
|
September 30,
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Basis for ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$
|
52,455
|
|
|
$
|
53,417
|
|
|
$
|
19,125
|
|
|
$
|
21,040
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Bank
|
|
|
46,774
|
|
|
|
48,080
|
|
|
|
18,896
|
|
|
|
20,892
|
|
|
$
|
28,345
|
|
|
$
|
31,338
|
|
Total capital to risk-weighted assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
66,528
|
|
|
|
60,055
|
|
|
|
38,251
|
|
|
|
42,079
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Bank
|
|
|
60,776
|
|
|
|
54,672
|
|
|
|
37,793
|
|
|
|
41,784
|
|
|
|
47,241
|
|
|
|
52,230
|
|
Tier I capital to total average assets
less goodwill:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
52,455
|
|
|
|
53,417
|
|
|
|
25,703
|
|
|
|
24,628
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Bank
|
|
|
46,774
|
|
|
|
48,080
|
|
|
$
|
25,469
|
|
|
$
|
24,481
|
|
|
$
|
31,837
|
|
|
$
|
30,601
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-weighted assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
461,385
|
|
|
|
508,430
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Bank
|
|
|
455,661
|
|
|
|
504,735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-weighted off-balance sheet items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
16,748
|
|
|
|
17,563
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Bank
|
|
|
16,748
|
|
|
|
17,563
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average assets for Leverage ratio:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
642,564
|
|
|
|
615,705
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Bank
|
|
$
|
636,735
|
|
|
$
|
612,015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I capital as a percentage of risk-
weighted assets and off-balance sheet
items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
11.0
|
%
|
|
|
10.2
|
%
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Bank
|
|
|
9.9
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
Total of Tier I and Tier II capital as a
percentage of risk-weighted assets and
off-balance sheet items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
13.9
|
|
|
|
11.4
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Bank
|
|
|
12.9
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
Tier I capital as a
percentage of total
average assets less intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Bank
|
|
|
7.3
|
%
|
|
|
7.9
|
%
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
At September 30, 2010, we reported Tier I capital, Total capital and Leverage ratios of 11.0
percent, 13.9 percent and 8.2 percent. In addition, Community Bank reported Tier I capital, Total
capital and Leverage ratios of 9.9 percent, 12.9 percent and 7.3 percent. Community Bank continued
to exceed the requirements to be categorized as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for
prompt corrective action at the close of the third quarter of 2010.
47
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Stockholders equity equaled $55.2 million or $32.01 per share at September 30, 2010, an increase
of $4.9 million compared to $50.3 million or $29.25 per share at December 31, 2009. Net income of
$3,340 was the primary factor leading to the capital improvement. We also experienced an increase
in other comprehensive income of $1,433 resulting from net of tax market value appreciation on
available-for-sale investment securities.
We did not declare any dividends during the three months or nine months ended September 30, 2010.
Our ability to declare and pay dividends is based on our operating results, financial and economic
conditions, capital and growth objectives, appropriate dividend restrictions and other relevant
factors. We rely on dividends received from Community Bank for payment of dividends to
stockholders. Community Banks ability to pay dividends is subject to federal and state
regulations. On March 1, 2010, we received notification
from the Federal Reserve Board recommending that we and Community Bank suspend the declaration or
payment of dividends. Moreover, this notification requires us and Community Bank to inform the
Federal Reserve Board prior to declaring future dividends.
We have a dividend reinvestment plan which allows stockholders to automatically reinvest their
dividends in shares of our common stock. We did declare a dividend for the fourth quarter of 2009
that was paid during 2010. As a result, for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, 1,916 shares
were issued under this plan relative to the fourth quarter of 2009 dividend.
Review of Financial Performance:
Net income for the third quarter of 2010 equaled $1,000 or $0.58 per share, year-to-date earnings
totaled $3,340 or $1.94 per share. In comparison, we reported net losses of $3,375 or $1.95 per
share for the third quarter and $385 or $0.22 per share year-to-date 2009. The year-to-date
earnings improvement resulted primarily from reductions in the provision for loan losses and
noninterest expense, which were partially offset by lower net interest income and noninterest
income. Return on average assets was 0.62 percent for the third quarter and 0.69 percent for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared to (2.19) percent and (0.08) percent for the
respective 2009 periods. Return on average stockholders equity was 7.32 percent and 8.54 percent
for the third quarter and year-to-date 2010, compared to (22.63) percent and (0.87) percent for the
same periods of 2009.
48
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Net Interest Income:
Net interest income is still the fundamental source of earnings for commercial banks. Moreover,
fluctuations in the level of net interest income can have the greatest impact on net profits. Net
interest income is defined as the difference between interest revenue, interest and fees earned on
interest-earning assets, and interest expense, the cost of interest-bearing liabilities supporting
those assets. The primary sources of earning assets are loans and investment securities, while
interest-bearing deposits, short-term borrowings and long-term debt comprise interest-bearing
liabilities. Net interest income is impacted by:
|
|
|
Variations in the volume, rate and composition of earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities;
|
|
|
|
Changes in general market rates; and
|
|
|
|
The level of nonperforming assets.
|
Changes in net interest income are measured by the net interest spread and net interest margin.
Net interest spread, the difference between the average yield earned on earning assets and the
average rate incurred on
interest-bearing liabilities, illustrates the effects changing interest rates have on
profitability. Net interest margin, net interest income as a percentage of earning assets, is a
more comprehensive ratio, as it reflects not only the spread, but also the change in the
composition of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Tax-exempt loans and
investments carry pre-tax yields lower than their taxable counterparts. Therefore, in order to
make the analysis of net interest income more comparable, tax-exempt income and yields are reported
on a tax-equivalent basis using the prevailing federal statutory tax rate of 34.0 percent.
49
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
We analyze interest income and interest expense by segregating rate and volume components of
earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The impact changes in the interest rates earned
and paid on assets and liabilities, along with changes in the volume of earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities have on net interest income are summarized in the following table.
The net change attributable to the combined impact of rate and volume has been allocated
proportionately to the change due to rate and the change due to volume.
Net interest income changes due to rate and volume
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010 vs. 2009
|
|
|
2010 vs. 2009
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease)
|
|
|
Increase (decrease)
|
|
|
|
attributable to
|
|
|
attributable to
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
Interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable
|
|
$
|
(388
|
)
|
|
$
|
(72
|
)
|
|
$
|
(316
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,389
|
)
|
|
$
|
(864
|
)
|
|
$
|
(525
|
)
|
Tax-exempt
|
|
|
(423
|
)
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
(450
|
)
|
|
|
(1,400
|
)
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
(1,567
|
)
|
Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
950
|
|
|
|
(325
|
)
|
|
|
1,275
|
|
Tax-exempt
|
|
|
(284
|
)
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
(303
|
)
|
|
|
(997
|
)
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
(1,019
|
)
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
(709
|
)
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
(647
|
)
|
|
|
(2,812
|
)
|
|
|
(1,000
|
)
|
|
|
(1,812
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market accounts
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
NOW accounts
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
296
|
|
Savings accounts
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
14
|
|
Time deposits less than $100
|
|
|
(191
|
)
|
|
|
(108
|
)
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
(560
|
)
|
|
|
(351
|
)
|
|
|
(209
|
)
|
Time deposits $100 or more
|
|
|
(183
|
)
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
(344
|
)
|
|
|
(487
|
)
|
|
|
143
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
(178
|
)
|
|
|
(285
|
)
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
(261
|
)
|
|
|
(952
|
)
|
|
|
691
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
(531
|
)
|
|
$
|
223
|
|
|
$
|
(754
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,551
|
)
|
|
$
|
(48
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,503
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, tax-equivalent net interest income decreased $2,551 or 14.7
percent to $14,841 in 2010 from $17,392 in 2009. Negative volume and rate variances, caused the
net interest income reduction.
50
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Changes in the volumes of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities contributed to a
$2,503 decrease in net interest income. For the nine months ended September 30, average earning
assets increased $20.6 million or 3.5 percent to $609.7 million in 2010 from $589.1 million in
2009. Despite the growth in average earning assets, tax-equivalent interest income decreased $1,812
due to the volume variance. Specifically, the decline was due, for the most part, to a $46.5
million or 9.1 percent reduction in average loans. Average tax-exempt loans decreased $34.0
million, while taxable loans declined $12.5 million, which resulted in reductions in tax-equivalent
interest income of $1,567 and $525. With regard to tax-exempt loans, several large tax and revenue
anticipation notes of local municipalities, which were outstanding during 2009, matured by year
end. As part of our tax planning strategy for 2010, we chose not to actively compete for these
types of loans. The maturities and repayments received from the loan portfolio were reinvested in
lower-yielding assets.
Also adversely impacting tax-equivalent net interest income was growth in average interest-bearing
liabilities of $27.5 million to $499.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, from
$472.2 million for the same period of 2009. The growth resulted in additional interest expense of
$691.
Specifically, average interest-bearing transaction accounts, which include money market, NOW and
savings accounts, grew $40.7 million and together caused a $366 increase in interest expense. In
addition, long-term debt averaged $8.0 million in 2010 and resulted in an increase in interest
expense of $480. Partially offsetting these increases, was an $18.6 million decrease in average
short-term borrowings and a $2.6 million decrease in total time deposits, which caused decreases to
interest expense of $89 and $66.
In addition to the unfavorable volume variance, a negative rate variance resulted in a slight
decrease in tax-equivalent net interest income of $48. Reductions in loan and investment yields,
more than offset a decrease in funding costs. The tax-equivalent yield on earning assets decreased
81 basis points to 4.86 percent for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, from 5.67 percent for
the same period of 2009, resulting in a reduction in interest income of $1,000. Specifically, the
tax-equivalent yield on the loan portfolio decreased 23 basis points, while the tax-equivalent
yield on the investment portfolio declined 219 basis points comparing the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009. These reductions in yield led to declines in tax-equivalent interest
income of $697 and $303.
The reduction in interest revenue due to rates was offset partially by a decrease in
interest expense of $952, which resulted from a 19 basis point decrease in the cost of funds to
1.96 percent for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 from 2.15 percent for the same period of
2009. We experienced a significant decrease in our time deposit costs, as promotional gas lease
certificates of deposit were renewed at lower rates. As a result, the average cost of time deposits
decreased 46 basis points to 2.86 percent in 2010 from 3.32 percent in 2009. This resulted in a
reduction in interest expense of $838 and accounted for 88.0 percent of the total decrease in
interest expense.
51
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
For the quarter ended September 30, 2010, tax-equivalent net interest income decreased $531 in
comparison to the same three months of last year. The decrease was due primarily to a negative
volume variance of $754, partially offset by a positive rate variance of $223. Average earning
assets grew $14.0 million comparing the third quarters of 2010 and 2009. However, similar to the
year-to-date analysis, the change resulted in a reduction in tax-equivalent interest income of
$647. In addition, growth of $27.7 million in interest-bearing liabilities resulted in additional
interest expense of $107. The positive rate variance primarily resulted from a 26 basis point
decrease in our cost of funds comparing the third quarters of 2010 and 2009, which resulted in a
corresponding decrease in interest expense of $285.
Maintenance of an adequate net interest margin is one of our primary concerns. Monies received from
repayments and maturities from our loan portfolio reinvested into lower-yielding assets, a
reduction in the volume of tax-exempt loans, higher levels of nonaccrual loans and issuance of
subordinated debt all factored into the 70 basis point decrease in our tax-equivalent net interest
margin to 3.25 percent for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 from 3.95 percent for the same
period of 2009. For the third quarter, our net interest margin was 3.27 percent, a contraction of
43 basis points compared to 3.70 percent for the third quarter of 2009. However, our net interest
margin improved 8 basis points compared to 3.19 percent for the previous quarter. The FOMC has
indicated that general market rates would remain low
for some time. However, no assurance can be given that these conditions will continue. Net interest
income could be adversely affected by changes in general market rates or increased competition. We
believe by following prudent pricing practices coupled with careful investing, our net interest
margin will improve.
52
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
The average balances of assets and liabilities, corresponding interest income and expense
and resulting average yields or rates paid for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
are summarized as follows. Earning assets averages include nonaccrual loans. Investment averages
include available-for-sale securities at amortized cost. Income on investment securities and loans
are adjusted to a tax-equivalent basis using the statutory tax rate of 34.0 percent.
Summary of net interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Income/
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Income/
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earning assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable
|
|
$
|
435,435
|
|
|
$
|
17,689
|
|
|
|
5.43
|
%
|
|
$
|
447,962
|
|
|
$
|
19,078
|
|
|
|
5.69
|
%
|
Tax-exempt
|
|
|
31,329
|
|
|
|
1,453
|
|
|
|
6.20
|
|
|
|
65,328
|
|
|
|
2,853
|
|
|
|
5.84
|
|
Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable
|
|
|
91,227
|
|
|
|
1,848
|
|
|
|
2.71
|
|
|
|
31,488
|
|
|
|
898
|
|
|
|
3.81
|
|
Tax-exempt
|
|
|
20,722
|
|
|
|
1,150
|
|
|
|
7.42
|
|
|
|
39,079
|
|
|
|
2,147
|
|
|
|
7.35
|
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
30,999
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
5,244
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earning assets
|
|
|
609,712
|
|
|
|
22,169
|
|
|
|
4.86
|
%
|
|
|
589,101
|
|
|
|
24,981
|
|
|
|
5.67
|
%
|
Less: allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
15,426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,855
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
48,723
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,897
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
643,009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
616,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market accounts
|
|
$
|
33,881
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
0.99
|
%
|
|
$
|
26,059
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
0.88
|
%
|
NOW accounts
|
|
|
104,263
|
|
|
|
1,041
|
|
|
|
1.33
|
|
|
|
74,865
|
|
|
|
789
|
|
|
|
1.41
|
|
Savings accounts
|
|
|
110,125
|
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
0.43
|
|
|
|
106,680
|
|
|
|
422
|
|
|
|
0.53
|
|
Time deposits less than $100
|
|
|
155,704
|
|
|
|
3,535
|
|
|
|
3.04
|
|
|
|
164,390
|
|
|
|
4,095
|
|
|
|
3.33
|
|
Time deposits $100 or more
|
|
|
87,737
|
|
|
|
1,670
|
|
|
|
2.54
|
|
|
|
81,610
|
|
|
|
2,014
|
|
|
|
3.30
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.63
|
|
|
|
18,595
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
0.70
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
480
|
|
|
|
8.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
499,721
|
|
|
|
7,328
|
|
|
|
1.96
|
%
|
|
|
472,199
|
|
|
|
7,589
|
|
|
|
2.15
|
%
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
87,735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,092
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
3,237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,758
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
52,316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,094
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
643,009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
616,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income/spread
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,841
|
|
|
|
2.90
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
17,392
|
|
|
|
3.52
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.25
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.95
|
%
|
Tax equivalent adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
494
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
970
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
730
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
885
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note:
|
|
Average balances were calculated using average daily balances. Interest income on loans
include fees of $540 in 2010 and $652 in 2009. Available-for-sale securities, included in
investment securities, are stated at amortized cost with the related average unrealized
holding gains of $1,499 and $2,573 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
included in other assets. Tax-equivalent adjustments were calculated using the prevailing
statutory tax rate of 34.0 percent.
|
53
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Provision for Loan Losses:
We evaluate the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses account on a quarterly basis utilizing
our systematic analysis in accordance with procedural discipline. We take into consideration
certain factors such as composition of the loan portfolio, volumes of nonperforming loans, volumes
of net charge-offs, prevailing economic conditions and other relevant factors when determining the
adequacy of the allowance for loan losses account. We make monthly provisions to the allowance for
loan losses account in order to maintain the allowance at the appropriate level indicated by our
evaluations. Based on our most current evaluation, we believe that the allowance is adequate to
absorb any known and inherent losses in the portfolio.
For the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2010, the provision for loan losses
amounted to $300 and $1,600, compared to $8,670 and $9,760 for the respective periods of 2009. The
provision for loan losses in 2009 reflected the effects of collateral valuation revisions to
certain large commercial real estate loans, coupled with a change in the methodology for estimating
the allowance for loan losses. With regard to collateral valuation revisions, independent
appraisals for these commercial real estate loans indicated significant market devaluations brought
on by the deterioration in the local economy at that time. In addition, in the third quarter of
2009, management revised its methodology for estimating losses in the remainder of the loan
portfolio by shortening the number of periods considered for estimating historical loss factors in
order to reflect rapidly changing market conditions.
Noninterest Income:
Noninterest income for the third quarter decreased $1,404 or 55.7 percent to $1,116 in 2010 from
$2,520 in 2009. Included in noninterest income in 2009, were gains on the sale of
available-for-sale investment securities of $1,385. There were no gains on the sale of
available-for-sale investment securities in 2010. Adjusting for these gains, noninterest income for
the third quarter decreased $19. A $137 decrease in service charges, fees and commissions was
partially offset by a $118 increase in mortgage banking income.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, noninterest income totaled $3,443, a decrease
of $1,973 or 36.4 percent from $5,416 for the same nine months of 2009. For the nine months ended
September 30, noninterest income included a net gain from the sale of available-for-sale investment
securities of $361 in 2010 and $1,499 in 2009. In addition, included in year-to-date noninterest
income in 2009 was a net gain of $294 from the dispositions of the former Tunkhannock and Eaton
Township, Pennsylvania branch offices. Income generated by our secondary mortgage banking division
decreased $279 comparing the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, while service charges,
fees and commissions decreased $262.
54
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Noninterest Expense:
In general, noninterest expense is categorized into three main groups: employee-related expenses,
occupancy and equipment expenses and other expenses. Employee-related expenses are costs associated
with providing salaries, including payroll taxes and benefits, to our employees. Occupancy and
equipment expenses, the costs related to the maintenance of facilities and equipment, include
depreciation, general maintenance and repairs, real estate taxes, rental expense offset by any
rental income, and utility costs. Other expenses include general operating expenses such as
advertising, contractual services, insurance, including FDIC assessment, other taxes and supplies.
Several of these costs and expenses are variable while the remainder are fixed. We utilize budgets
and other related strategies in an effort to control the variable expenses.
Major components of noninterest expense for the three months and nine months ended September 30,
2010 and 2009, are summarized as follows:
Noninterest expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and payroll taxes
|
|
$
|
1,737
|
|
|
$
|
1,734
|
|
|
$
|
5,198
|
|
|
$
|
5,109
|
|
Employee benefits
|
|
|
451
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
1,360
|
|
|
|
1,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits expense
|
|
|
2,188
|
|
|
|
2,025
|
|
|
|
6,558
|
|
|
|
6,329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net occupancy and equipment expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net occupancy expense
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
856
|
|
|
|
898
|
|
Equipment expense
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
852
|
|
|
|
951
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net occupancy and equipment expense
|
|
|
558
|
|
|
|
591
|
|
|
|
1,708
|
|
|
|
1,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing expense
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
345
|
|
|
|
528
|
|
Other taxes
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
469
|
|
|
|
497
|
|
Stationery and supplies
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
Contractual services
|
|
|
724
|
|
|
|
482
|
|
|
|
1,729
|
|
|
|
1,618
|
|
Insurance, including FDIC assessment
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
336
|
|
|
|
1,160
|
|
|
|
1,313
|
|
Other
|
|
|
731
|
|
|
|
757
|
|
|
|
1,549
|
|
|
|
1,601
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
2,203
|
|
|
|
1,942
|
|
|
|
5,403
|
|
|
|
5,735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense
|
|
$
|
4,949
|
|
|
$
|
4,558
|
|
|
$
|
13,669
|
|
|
$
|
13,913
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
For the third quarter, noninterest expense increased $391 or 8.6 percent to $4,949 in 2010
from $4,558 in 2009. The increase resulted from higher salaries and employee benefits expenses and
other expenses partially offset by a decrease in net occupancy and equipment expense. We measure
our efficiency using two key industry ratios, the operating efficiency ratio and the overhead
ratio. The operating efficiency ratio is defined as noninterest expense as a percentage of net
interest income and noninterest income, and the overhead ratio is calculated by dividing
noninterest expense by average total assets. As a result of the increase in noninterest expense,
our operating efficiency ratio weakened to 78.6 percent for the nine months ended September 30,
2010 from 65.9 percent for the same nine months of 2009. Also contributing to the weakening in
efficiency were reductions in net interest income and noninterest income. Contrarily, our overhead
ratio improved to 2.8 percent for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared to 3.0 percent
for the same period last year.
Salaries and employee benefits expense comprise the majority of our noninterest expense. These
payroll-related expenses increased $163 to $2,188 for the third quarter of 2010 from $2,025 for the
same quarter of 2009. The increase resulted primarily from a $160 rise in the cost of employee
benefits. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, payroll and benefit related expenses
totaled $6,558, an increase of $229 or 3.6 percent from $6,329 for the same nine months of 2009.
Occupancy and equipment expense decreased $33 or 5.6 percent comparing the third quarters of 2010
and 2009. Building-related expense declined $5 due primarily to a reduction in rental expense,
while decreases in software and office equipment depreciation resulted in a $28 decline in
equipment-related expense. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, occupancy and equipment
expense totaled $1,708, a decrease of $141 from $1,849 for the same nine months of 2009.
For the third quarter, other expenses increased $261 or 13.4 percent to $2,203 in 2010 from $1,942
in 2009. A $242 increase in contractual services resulting
from legal and consulting costs associated with the upcoming merger was the primary factor causing
the quarterly increase. Year-to-date other expenses totaled $5,403, a decrease of $332 or 5.8
percent compared to $5,735 for the same period one year ago. The year-to-date decrease was due
largely to reductions in marketing-related expenses, directors fees and deposit insurance.
Our deposits are insured up to regulatory limits by the FDIC and accordingly, are subject to
deposit insurance assessments. Under the provisions of The Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act of
2005 (the Reform Act), the Bank Insurance Fund and the Savings Association Insurance Fund were
merged into the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF). Under the Reform Act, the annual DIF assessment
rate is based upon statutory factors that include the balance of insured deposits as well as the
degree of risk the institution poses to the insurance fund. Each institution is placed into one of
four risk categories depending on the institutions capital ratios and supervisory ratings. Based
on our latest assignments, we migrated from Risk Category I, institutions posing the least amount
of risk to the DIF, to Risk Category II and will pay approximately $0.22 per $100 dollars of
assessable deposits for the third quarter of 2010. The migration resulted directly from the
deterioration in our asset quality.
56
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
On November 12, 2009, the FDIC issued a final rule that required all insured depository
institutions to prepay their estimated quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of
2009 and for all of 2010, 2011 and 2012. Our prepaid assessment was $2.6 million at September 30,
2010 and $3.5 million at December 31, 2009. The FDIC also adopted a uniform increase in assessment
rates of $0.03 per $100 dollars of assessable deposits effective January 1, 2011.
There is a separate levy assessed on all FDIC-insured institutions to cover the cost of Finance
Corporation (FICO) funding. The FDIC established annual FICO assessment rate effective for the
first, second and third quarters of 2010 at $0.0104 per $100 dollars of DIF-assessable deposits.
Our FICO assessments totaled $46 and $42 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.
Income Taxes:
For the nine months ended September 30, we recorded an income tax benefit of $1,210 in 2010 and
$2,180 in 2009. We utilize tax credits from our investments as a limited partner in elderly and
low-income housing projects to lessen our tax burden. One such project affords us approximately
$3.7 million in investment tax credits over a 10-year period which began in 2007. We expect to
recognize a total of $372 in tax credits from this project in 2010. In the fourth quarter of 2009,
Community Bank made an investment in another elderly, low-income housing project. For this
investment, Community
Bank will receive a one-time historical tax credit of approximately $1.5 million in 2010 and
approximately $5.5 million in low-income housing credits spread over a period beginning in 2010 and
ending in 2021. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we recognized tax credits totaling
$1,398 from these investments.
The difference between the amount of income tax currently payable and the provision for income tax
expense reflected in the income statements arise from temporary differences. Temporary differences
are differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the
financial statements, which result in deferred tax assets or liabilities. We perform quarterly
reviews on the tax criteria related to the recognition of deferred tax assets. We decided not to
establish a valuation reserve for the deferred tax assets since it is likely that these assets
will be realized through carry-back to taxable income in prior years and by future reversals of
existing taxable temporary differences or, to a lesser extent, through future taxable income.
57
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures:
As of September 30, 2010, the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our
Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), evaluated the effectiveness of
our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act). Based upon that evaluation, the CEO and CFO
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures, as of September 30, 2010, were effective to
provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under
the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified
in the SECs rules and forms, and to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be
disclosed in such reports is accumulated and communicated to the CEO and CFO to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting:
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f)
and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act during the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2010, that
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting.
58
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
OTHER INFORMATION
Part II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
NONE
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
NONE
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
NONE
Item 4. Removed and Reserved
NONE
Item 5. Other Information
NONE
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
(i)
|
|
CEO and CFO certifications pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
CEO and CFO certifications pursuant to Section 1350.
|
59
COMM BANCORP, INC.
FORM 10-Q
SIGNATURE PAGE
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto,
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registrant, Comm Bancorp, Inc.
|
|
Date: November 15, 2010
|
/s/ William F. Farber, Sr.
|
|
|
William F. Farber, Sr.
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
Chairman of the Board/Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 15, 2010
|
/s/ Scott A. Seasock
|
|
|
Scott A. Seasock
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 15, 2010
|
/s/ Stephanie A. Westington, CPA
|
|
|
Stephanie A. Westington, CPA
|
|
|
Vice President of Finance
(Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
60
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item Number
|
|
Description
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
(i)
|
|
CEO and CFO Certifications Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
CEO and CFO Certifications Pursuant to Section 1350.
|
|
|
64
|
|
61
Comm Bancorp (MM) (NASDAQ:CCBP)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2024 to Apr 2024
Comm Bancorp (MM) (NASDAQ:CCBP)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2023 to Apr 2024