LocWolf
1 week ago
BuyLow....I'm sure and know this is posted elsewhere as I copied this from a different board but he posts here (IHUB) but since he uses a different alias on IHUB I won't acknowledge that but know this information is not elite actually very common. The following will show you how most of these penny stocks flow and how simple it is to fall into this trap both by the trader/investors and even a company that may have started out in a positive way but may have failed their shareholders and themselves. Know this is very legal
Why does my pink current penny stock continue to decline in value?
"To make money (The company) on a pumped OTC [Market] [Stock], they have to have Losses not profits.
You cannot covert debt to free trading shares unless you post constant losses. That is why they lose more and more each quarter and keep the price dropping so only the company can sell shares at a profit but you all cannot.
There is no law saying they cannot add more shares and dilute and sell for less. Sure you lose money and as I have said many times, you Losing money is not illegal.
Dilution makes you lose money and adding shares to dilute is legal so there you have it. All legal.
If the shares are $1.00 or $.0001 the company always makes money. And for a few at the company who sell the shares to make lots of money, 1000's of you have to lose money.
Keeping the stock slowly in decline makes it so no one will sell except for the company. When the shares are sold out, itβs over.
They know they can never sell 8 billion for $1 and raise $8,000,000,000 but they do know 1000s will spend $500 to $5000 no problem on shares that are $.01 or less, so to make at least $30 million they just have to sell more shares for less.
If they were a low-float, solid entity with 25,000,000 in the float at $.50 per share is $12,000,000. Itβs the same being a diluted entity with 8,000,000,000 float at $.0015 is still $12,000,000
Which price do you think is easier to sell at? OTC investors want more for less, OTC pumped companies know this and are happy to accommodate.
The reason they chose dilution is, they know most will not buy a $.50 stock so it is easier to sell more people more shares for less cost.
Pumping a stock at $.002 will go to $.06 is a 30x gain, SURE itβs possible to have that happen but try and convince OTC investors the same percentage gain at $.50 will rise the same 30x to $15 per share. We know that wonβt happen on the OTC
That is why almost all pumped OTCβs must dilute or they would have no shares to sell and they would only make some money on the initial pump then it would be over. The game is to keep going as long as people are buying the shares regardless of the price. To keep it going they add more shares.
The end product is to shut it down when the shares are gone, reverse merge, cancel all the old ticker shares, form a new ticker and do it all over again.
For every $.001 gain in share price over the current price, totals $100,000 on each 100,000,000 shares sold. When divided into a float with billions, that figure jumps to $1,000,000 per billion.
sunspotter
1 month ago
" I appreciate all of you and all the information you have shared over the years here while the company has gone through this mess."
Yes, all this "information" has helped make fortunes.
Unfortunately those fortunes were made by the crooks behind this, such as Barnhill and his paid touts like Terry Hallinan.
Retail shareholders on the other hand have been taken to the cleaners by absorbing all the "information" that's been "shared" here.
College funds, retirements, marriages etc all ruined, but apparently the future is still bright.
chazzy1
1 month ago
Those are some good questions, JackNapier, questions that most of us have. Since our new CEO, Dr. Alan Faust, has taken the helm, there have been no public announcements, PRs, or SEC filings (except for an 8k to announce his hiring), and the stock remains on the Expert Market where it is not tradeable to retail investors.
Dr. Faust has created a new website for HDC which includes his contact information. I would suggest that you reach out to him with your questions and, if you get a reply, please share that information with us.
I do believe that Dr. Faust represents the best hope for HDVY shareholders to see a return on this investment. Good luck!
chazzy1
2 months ago
Good points, Alan, and thank you for bringing your unique perspective to bear on HDC's algorithms.
According to the USPTO, HDC owns the "exclusive rights to all" SVM-RFE technology, so I am not exactly sure if you are referring to new algorithms that fall outside of SVM-RFE, or something else (when you state that there sre much better algorithms out there).
HDC has hired one of the foremost experts in the field, with a proven track record in business development, to monetize HDC's IP.
I would think that, when he took this job, he was astutely aware of the state of the art of this kind of technology, and saw a pathway to monetization.
Who can say, at this point, just what pathway Dr. Faust had in mind?
It is possible that he could be in collaboration with one or more medical diagnostics companies to develop new tests using HDC's proprietary technology.
If so, there would likely be no public announcement until such product has gone through the required testing and approval process. JMHO.