UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For
the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from
to
Commission file number
0-17455
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Pennsylvania
|
|
23-2242292
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation
or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
|
|
|
|
125 North State Street, Clarks Summit, PA
|
|
18411
|
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
(570) 586-0377
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
o
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
o
|
|
Accelerated filer
o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
o
|
|
Smaller reporting company
þ
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. Yes
o
No
þ
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE REGISTRANTS:
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date: 1,722,923 at July 31, 2010.
Page 1
of 63
Exhibit Index on Page 59
COMM BANCORP, INC.
FORM 10-Q
June 30, 2010
INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
CONTENTS
|
|
Page No.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 4T. Controls and Procedures
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1A. Risk Factors
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 31(i)
|
Exhibit 32
|
2
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and fees on loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable
|
|
$
|
5,942
|
|
|
$
|
6,436
|
|
|
$
|
11,883
|
|
|
$
|
12,884
|
|
Tax-exempt
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
619
|
|
|
|
640
|
|
|
|
1,285
|
|
Interest and dividends on investment securities available-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
1,252
|
|
|
|
664
|
|
Tax-exempt
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
473
|
|
|
|
540
|
|
|
|
1,010
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Interest on federal funds sold
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
7,032
|
|
|
|
7,852
|
|
|
|
14,336
|
|
|
|
15,864
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on deposits
|
|
|
2,315
|
|
|
|
2,426
|
|
|
|
4,748
|
|
|
|
5,059
|
|
Interest on short-term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
Interest on long-term debt
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
2,475
|
|
|
|
2,462
|
|
|
|
5,068
|
|
|
|
5,151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
4,557
|
|
|
|
5,390
|
|
|
|
9,268
|
|
|
|
10,713
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
|
|
1,090
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
4,257
|
|
|
|
4,870
|
|
|
|
7,968
|
|
|
|
9,623
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges, fees and commissions
|
|
|
730
|
|
|
|
832
|
|
|
|
1,471
|
|
|
|
1,596
|
|
Mortgage banking income
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
490
|
|
|
|
495
|
|
|
|
892
|
|
Net gain on sale of premises and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
294
|
|
Net gain on sale of investment securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income
|
|
|
944
|
|
|
|
1,322
|
|
|
|
2,327
|
|
|
|
2,896
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits expense
|
|
|
2,183
|
|
|
|
2,164
|
|
|
|
4,370
|
|
|
|
4,304
|
|
Net occupancy and equipment expense
|
|
|
547
|
|
|
|
583
|
|
|
|
1,150
|
|
|
|
1,258
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
1,636
|
|
|
|
2,260
|
|
|
|
3,200
|
|
|
|
3,793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense
|
|
|
4,366
|
|
|
|
5,007
|
|
|
|
8,720
|
|
|
|
9,355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
835
|
|
|
|
1,185
|
|
|
|
1,575
|
|
|
|
3,164
|
|
Provision for income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
(355
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
(765
|
)
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
1,190
|
|
|
|
1,215
|
|
|
|
2,340
|
|
|
|
2,990
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on investment securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
2,030
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
1,755
|
|
|
|
355
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(361
|
)
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
Income tax expense related to other comprehensive income
|
|
|
690
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income, net of income taxes
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
920
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
2,530
|
|
|
$
|
1,224
|
|
|
$
|
3,260
|
|
|
$
|
3,149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
0.69
|
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
|
$
|
1.36
|
|
|
$
|
1.73
|
|
Cash dividends declared
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.56
|
|
Average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
1,722,923
|
|
|
|
1,722,282
|
|
|
|
1,722,923
|
|
|
|
1,725,310
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
$
|
10,050
|
|
|
$
|
23,978
|
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
31,700
|
|
|
|
25,300
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
112,851
|
|
|
|
108,005
|
|
Loans held for sale, net
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
2,016
|
|
Loans, net of unearned income
|
|
|
465,143
|
|
|
|
476,944
|
|
Less: allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
14,928
|
|
|
|
17,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans
|
|
|
450,215
|
|
|
|
459,482
|
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
11,425
|
|
|
|
11,616
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
1,962
|
|
|
|
2,122
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
23,452
|
|
|
|
19,634
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
641,765
|
|
|
$
|
652,153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing
|
|
$
|
87,348
|
|
|
$
|
88,335
|
|
Interest-bearing
|
|
|
489,370
|
|
|
|
502,448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
576,718
|
|
|
|
590,783
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
Accrued interest payable
|
|
|
1,284
|
|
|
|
1,296
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
2,124
|
|
|
|
1,740
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
588,126
|
|
|
|
601,819
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock, par value $0.33, authorized 12,000,000 shares, issued and outstanding: June 30, 2010, 1,722,923 shares; December 31, 2009, 1,721,007 shares
|
|
|
569
|
|
|
|
568
|
|
Capital surplus
|
|
|
8,010
|
|
|
|
7,966
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
43,321
|
|
|
|
40,981
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
1,739
|
|
|
|
819
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
53,639
|
|
|
|
50,334
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
641,765
|
|
|
$
|
652,153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Surplus
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
568
|
|
|
$
|
7,966
|
|
|
$
|
40,981
|
|
|
$
|
819
|
|
|
$
|
50,334
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,340
|
|
Dividend reinvestment plan: 1,916 shares issued
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
Other comprehensive income, net of income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
920
|
|
|
|
920
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
569
|
|
|
$
|
8,010
|
|
|
$
|
43,321
|
|
|
$
|
1,739
|
|
|
$
|
53,639
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
571
|
|
|
$
|
7,694
|
|
|
$
|
47,862
|
|
|
$
|
1,671
|
|
|
$
|
57,798
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,990
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,990
|
|
Dividends declared: $0.56 per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(965
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(965
|
)
|
Dividend reinvestment plan: 4,318 shares issued
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
Repurchase and retirement: 18,117 shares
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
(624
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(684
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income, net of income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
566
|
|
|
$
|
7,799
|
|
|
$
|
49,263
|
|
|
$
|
1,830
|
|
|
$
|
59,458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
2,340
|
|
|
$
|
2,990
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
|
|
1,090
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
459
|
|
Net amortization of investment securities
|
|
|
1,048
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
Amortization of net loan costs
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
Amortization of mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
1,195
|
|
|
|
(214
|
)
|
Net gain on sale of investment securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
(361
|
)
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
Net gain on sale of loans
|
|
|
(424
|
)
|
|
|
(942
|
)
|
Net gain on sale of premises and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(294
|
)
|
Net loss (gain) on sale of foreclosed assets
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
Changes in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for sale, net
|
|
|
2,330
|
|
|
|
1,545
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
(383
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(2,031
|
)
|
|
|
(1,246
|
)
|
Accrued interest payable
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(119
|
)
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
681
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
6,382
|
|
|
|
4,039
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from repayments of investment securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
9,546
|
|
|
|
4,661
|
|
Proceeds from sales of investment securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
6,154
|
|
|
|
4,341
|
|
Purchases of investment securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
(19,839
|
)
|
|
|
(1,423
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed assets
|
|
|
336
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
Net decrease (increase) in lending activities
|
|
|
4,342
|
|
|
|
(27,023
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
509
|
|
Purchases of premises and equipment
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
|
|
(630
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
(19,420
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net changes in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market, NOW, savings and noninterest-bearing accounts
|
|
|
(678
|
)
|
|
|
(358
|
)
|
Time deposits
|
|
|
(13,387
|
)
|
|
|
(3,136
|
)
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,950
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common shares
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
Repurchase and retirement of common shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(684
|
)
|
Cash dividends paid
|
|
|
(241
|
)
|
|
|
(953
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(14,261
|
)
|
|
|
2,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(7,528
|
)
|
|
|
(12,402
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
49,278
|
|
|
|
20,717
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
41,750
|
|
|
$
|
8,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
5,080
|
|
|
$
|
5,270
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
691
|
|
Noncash items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers of loans to foreclosed assets
|
|
|
3,457
|
|
|
|
1,518
|
|
Unrealized gains on investment securities available-for-sale, net
|
|
$
|
(920
|
)
|
|
$
|
(159
|
)
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
1. Basis of presentation:
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Comm Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries
(collectively, the Company) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) for interim financial information and with the
instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10-01 of Regulation S-X. In the opinion of management, all
normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and
results of operations for the periods have been included. All significant intercompany balances
and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Prior-period amounts are reclassified when
necessary to conform with the current years presentation. These reclassifications did not have a
material effect on the operating results or financial position of the Company. The operating
results and financial position of the Company for the three months and six months ended and as of
June 30, 2010, are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that may be expected in
the future.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure
of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported periods. Actual results could differ from
those estimates. For additional information and disclosures required under GAAP, reference is made
to the Companys Restated Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2009.
The consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2009, and related disclosures, herein,
conform to the presentation as included in the Companys 2009 Amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A,
filed on May 17, 2010.
2. Earnings per common share:
The Company had no dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the three-month and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, therefore, the per share data presented on the face
of the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income relates to basic per share
amounts.
3. Subsequent events:
The Company has evaluated events and transactions occurring subsequent to the balance sheet date of
June 30, 2010, for items that should potentially be recognized or disclosed in these financial
statements. The evaluation was conducted through the date these financial statements were issued.
7
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
3. Subsequent events (continued):
On August 9, 2010, the Company and F.N.B. Corporation entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger,
whereby the Company will be merged with and into F.N.B. Corporation and a related bank merger
agreement by and between the Companys wholly-owned subsidiary bank, Community Bank and Trust
Company and F.N.B. Corporations wholly-owned subsidiary bank, First National Bank of Pennsylvania.
The closings on these mergers are conditioned upon, among other things, approvals of applicable
regulatory agencies and the stockholders of the Company.
4. Investment securities:
All investment securities were classified as available-for-sale at June 30, 2010 and December 31,
2009. The amortized cost and fair value of available-for-sale securities aggregated by investment
category at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
State and municipals
|
|
$
|
18,170
|
|
|
$
|
1,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
19,336
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government agencies
|
|
|
89,199
|
|
|
|
1,625
|
|
|
$
|
267
|
|
|
|
90,557
|
|
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
2,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,537
|
|
Other
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
110,216
|
|
|
$
|
2,903
|
|
|
$
|
268
|
|
|
$
|
112,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
State and municipals
|
|
$
|
25,343
|
|
|
$
|
1,520
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
26,862
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government agencies
|
|
|
78,537
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
78,155
|
|
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
2,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,537
|
|
Other
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
106,764
|
|
|
$
|
1,643
|
|
|
$
|
402
|
|
|
$
|
108,005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized holding gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are included as a separate
component in stockholders equity. The Company had net unrealized holding gains of $1,739, net of
deferred income taxes of $896, at June 30, 2010, and $819, net of deferred income taxes of $422, at
December 31, 2009.
8
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
4. Investment securities (continued):
The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale securities with unrealized losses
for which an other-than-temporary impairment has not been recognized at June 30, 2010 and December
31, 2009, aggregated by investment category and length of time that the individual securities have
been in a continuous unrealized loss position, are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 months
|
|
|
12 months or more
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
State and municipals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government agencies
|
|
$
|
8,287
|
|
|
$
|
267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,287
|
|
|
$
|
267
|
|
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
8,287
|
|
|
$
|
267
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
8,295
|
|
|
$
|
268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 months
|
|
|
12 months or more
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
State and municipals
|
|
$
|
686
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
686
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government agencies
|
|
|
30,651
|
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,651
|
|
|
|
399
|
|
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
31,337
|
|
|
$
|
400
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
31,344
|
|
|
$
|
402
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2010, the Company had 102 investment securities, consisting of 75 tax-exempt state and
municipal obligations, 18 mortgage-backed securities, including collateralized mortgage
obligations, and two restricted and seven marketable equity securities. There were four investment
securities in an unrealized loss position at June 30, 2010, including three mortgage-backed
securities and one marketable equity security. The one marketable equity security has been in a
continuous unrealized loss position for 12 months or more.
Community Bank holds all of the Companys debt securities and is a state member bank of the Federal
Reserve System which imposes strict limitations and restrictions on the types of securities that
may be acquired. As a result, securities held are Bank Quality Investment grade, defined as
bearing a credit quality rating of Baa or higher from Moodys or BBB or higher from Standard
and Poors rating services, and are readily
marketable, but are still subject to price fluctuations because of changes
in interest rates. Management does not consider the unrealized losses, as
a result of changes in interest rates, to be other-than-temporary based on historical evidence that
indicates the cost of these securities is
recoverable within a reasonable period of time in relation to normal cyclical changes in the market
rates of interest.
9
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
4. Investment securities (continued):
Mortgage-backed securities having unrealized losses at June 30, 2010, consisted of obligations of
the Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA) federal agency bonds which are direct
obligations of the U.S. Government. The three GNMA mortgage-backed securities that were in an
unrealized loss position at June 30, 2010, were backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S.
Government and thus considered to have no risk of default. The unrealized loss positions for these
securities were less than 12 months. The unrealized losses were not considered to be
other-than-temporary because they were a direct result of interest rate fluctuations, and
management does not intend to sell the securities and it is unlikely that the Company will be
required to sell the securities before recovery of their amortized cost bases, which may be at
maturity.
Tax-exempt state and municipal securities consisted entirely of insured general obligation bonds at
June 30, 2010. There were no tax-exempt state and municipal securities in an unrealized loss
position at June 30, 2010.
Marketable equity securities are held at the Parent Company and consist of common stocks of
commercial banks. At June 30, 2010, the market value of common stock held in Wells Fargo and
Company was below its amortized cost basis. This stock was originally held in Wachovia Corporation,
which was acquired by Wells Fargo and Company after the close of business on December 31, 2008.
Wells Fargo and Company had a credit rating of AA and was categorized as well capitalized under
regulatory capital guidelines at June 30, 2010. As a result, the Company does not consider the
unrealized loss to be other-than-temporary because it was directly related to the financial
weakness of the former issuer. At the current time we do not intend to sell, and it is unlikely
that the Company will be required to sell the security as the entire cost basis is expected to be
recovered.
10
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
4. Investment securities (continued):
The maturity distribution of the fair value, which is the net carrying amount, of the debt
securities classified as available-for-sale at June 30, 2010, is summarized in the table that
follows. The distributions are based on contractual maturity with the exception of mortgage-backed
securities. Mortgage-backed securities have been presented based upon estimated cash flows,
assuming no change in the current interest rate environment. Actual maturities may differ from
contractual maturities, or estimated maturities for mortgage-backed securities, because borrowers
have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After one
|
|
|
After five
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within
|
|
|
but within
|
|
|
but within
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
one year
|
|
|
five years
|
|
|
ten years
|
|
|
ten years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
State and municipals
|
|
$
|
1,176
|
|
|
$
|
2,817
|
|
|
$
|
10,414
|
|
|
$
|
4,929
|
|
|
$
|
19,336
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government
|
|
|
14,590
|
|
|
|
40,320
|
|
|
|
32,687
|
|
|
|
2,960
|
|
|
|
90,557
|
|
U.S. Government-sponsored
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
15,809
|
|
|
$
|
43,265
|
|
|
$
|
43,112
|
|
|
$
|
7,889
|
|
|
$
|
110,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Fair values of financial instruments:
GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to the valuation methods used
to measure fair value into three levels which include the following:
|
|
|
Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices or identical assets or liabilities in active
markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.
|
|
|
|
Level 2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as
quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not
active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market
data.
|
|
|
|
Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a reporting entitys own
assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset
or liability.
|
11
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
5. Fair values of financial instruments (continued):
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2010 and December
31, 2009, are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets
|
|
|
Observable Inputs
|
|
|
Unobservable Inputs
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and municipals
|
|
$
|
19,336
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
19,336
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government agencies
|
|
|
90,557
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,557
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
$
|
239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
110,314
|
|
|
$
|
239
|
|
|
$
|
110,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets
|
|
|
Observable Inputs
|
|
|
Unobservable Inputs
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and municipals
|
|
$
|
26,862
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
26,862
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government agencies
|
|
|
78,155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,155
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
$
|
231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
105,468
|
|
|
$
|
231
|
|
|
$
|
105,237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale reported at fair value using Level 1 inputs include
marketable equity securities trading in active exchange markets. The fair value of investment
securities available-for-sale utilizing Level 2 inputs include debt securities with quoted market
prices based on a matrix pricing model. This method for determining fair value is a mathematical
technique widely used in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on
quoted prices for the specific securities, but rather by relying on the securities relationship to
other benchmark quoted securities.
12
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
5. Fair values of financial instruments (continued):
Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, are
summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets
|
|
|
Observable Inputs
|
|
|
Unobservable Inputs
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans
|
|
$
|
4,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,428
|
|
Foreclosed assets
|
|
$
|
3,064
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,064
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets
|
|
|
Observable Inputs
|
|
|
Unobservable Inputs
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans
|
|
$
|
7,719
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,719
|
|
Impaired loans, which are measured for impairment using the fair value of the collateral for
collateral dependent loans, had a recorded investment of $7,038 and a related allowance of $2,610
at June 30, 2010. Impaired loans had a recorded investment of $13,481 and a related allowance of
$5,762 at December 31, 2009.
Disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized on the
balance sheet, for which it is practical to estimate that value is required by GAAP. The Companys
assets that were considered financial instruments approximated 94.7 percent of total assets at June
30, 2010, and 95.3 percent of total assets at December 31, 2009. Liabilities that were considered
financial instruments approximated 99.6 percent of total liabilities at June 30, 2010, and 99.7
percent of total liabilities at December 31, 2009. In cases where quoted market prices are not
available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques.
Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including discount rate and
estimates of future cash flows. In that regard, the derived fair value estimates cannot be
substantiated by comparison to independent markets. In many cases, these values cannot be realized
in
immediate settlement of the instrument. This disclosure does not and is not intended to represent
the fair value of the Company.
13
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
5. Fair values of financial instruments (continued):
Fair value estimates are based on existing financial instruments without attempting to estimate the
value of anticipated future business and the value of certain assets and liabilities that are not
considered financial.
Accordingly, such assets and liabilities are excluded from disclosure requirements. For example, no
benefit is recorded for the value of low-cost funding subsequently discussed. In addition,
Community Banks Trust and Wealth Management Division contributes fee income annually. Trust assets
and liabilities are not considered financial instruments for this disclosure, and their values have
not been incorporated into the fair value estimates.
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company to construct the accompanying table
containing the fair values and related carrying amounts of financial instruments:
Cash and cash equivalents:
The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents as reported on the
balance sheet approximate fair value.
Investment securities available-for-sale:
The fair value of investment securities
available-for-sale is based on quoted market prices. The carrying values of restricted equity
securities approximate fair value.
Loans held for sale, net:
The fair value of loans held for sale, net, are based on quoted market
prices.
Net loans:
For adjustable-rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant credit risk,
fair values are based on carrying values. The fair
values of other nonimpaired loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, using interest
rates currently offered in the market for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit
risk. Fair values for impaired loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis determined
by the loan review function or underlying collateral values, where applicable.
Mortgage servicing rights:
The fair value of mortgage servicing rights is based on observable
market prices when available or the present value of future cash flows when not available.
Accrued interest receivable:
The carrying value of accrued interest receivable as reported on the
balance sheet approximates fair value.
Deposits without stated maturities:
The fair value of noninterest-bearing deposits and savings, NOW
and money market accounts is the amount payable on
demand at the reporting date. The fair value estimates do not include the benefit that results from
such low-cost funding provided by the deposit liabilities compared to the cost of borrowing funds
in the market.
14
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
5. Fair values of financial instruments (continued):
Deposits with stated maturities:
The carrying value of adjustable-rate, fixed-term time deposits
approximates their fair value at the reporting date. For fixed-rate time deposits, the present
value of future cash flows is used to estimate fair value. The discount rates used are the current
rates offered in the market for time deposits with similar maturities.
Long-term debt:
The fair value of fixed-rate long-term debt is based on the present value of future
cash flows. The discount rate used is the current rates offered for long-term debt.
Accrued interest payable:
The carrying value of accrued interest payable as reported on the balance
sheet approximates fair value.
Off-balance sheet financial instruments:
The majority of commitments to extend credit, unused
portions of lines of credit and letters of credit carry current market interest rates if converted
to loans. Because such commitments are generally unassignable by either the Company or the
borrower, they only have value to the Company and the borrower. None of the commitments are subject
to undue credit risk. The estimated fair values of off-balance sheet financial instruments are
based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining
terms of the agreements and the counterparties credit standing. The fair value of off-balance
sheet financial instruments was not material at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
The estimated fair value of financial instruments at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, is
summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
December 31,2009
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
Financial assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
41,750
|
|
|
$
|
41,750
|
|
|
$
|
49,278
|
|
|
$
|
49,278
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
112,851
|
|
|
|
112,851
|
|
|
|
108,005
|
|
|
|
108,005
|
|
Loans held for sale, net
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
2,016
|
|
|
|
2,016
|
|
Net loans
|
|
|
450,215
|
|
|
|
454,154
|
|
|
|
459,482
|
|
|
|
467,018
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
935
|
|
|
|
935
|
|
|
|
893
|
|
|
|
893
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
1,962
|
|
|
|
1,962
|
|
|
|
2,122
|
|
|
|
2,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
607,823
|
|
|
$
|
611,762
|
|
|
$
|
621,796
|
|
|
$
|
629,332
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits without stated maturities
|
|
$
|
338,254
|
|
|
$
|
338,254
|
|
|
$
|
338,932
|
|
|
$
|
338,932
|
|
Deposits with stated maturities
|
|
|
238,464
|
|
|
|
245,998
|
|
|
|
251,851
|
|
|
|
256,749
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
8,066
|
|
Accrued interest payable
|
|
|
1,284
|
|
|
|
1,284
|
|
|
|
1,296
|
|
|
|
1,296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
586,002
|
|
|
$
|
593,536
|
|
|
$
|
600,079
|
|
|
$
|
605,043
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
6. Recent accounting pronouncements:
In April 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standard Update
(ASU) 2010-18, Receivables (Topic 310): Effect of a Loan Modification When the Loan is Part of a
Pool That is Accounted for as a Single Asset, which codifies the consensus reached in Emerging
Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 09-I. The amendments to the Codification provide that
modifications of loans that are accounted for within a pool under Subtopic 310-10 do not result in
the removal of those loans from the pool even if the modification of those loans would otherwise be
considered a troubled debt restructuring. An entity will continue to be required to consider
whether the pool of assets in which the loan is included is impaired if expected cash flows for the
pool change. ASU 2010-18 does not affect the accounting for loans under the scope of Subtopic
310-30 that are not accounted for within pools. Loans accounted for individually under Subtopic
310-30 continue to be subject to the troubled debt restructuring accounting provisions within
Subtopic 310-40. ASU 2010-18 is effective prospectively for modifications of loans accounted for
within pools under Subtopic 310-30 occurring in the first interim or annual period ending on or
after July 15, 2010, with early application permitted. Upon initial adoption of ASU 2010-18, an
entity may make a one-time election to terminate accounting for loans as a pool under Subtopic
310-30. This election may be applied on a pool-by-pool basis and does not preclude an entity from
applying pool accounting to subsequent acquisitions of loans with credit deterioration. The
adoption of ASU 2010-18 on July 1, 2010, is not expected to have a material effect on the operating
results or financial position of the Company.
In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-20, Receivables (Topic 310): Disclosures about the Credit
Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses. ASU 2010-20 will help
investors assess the credit risk of a companys receivables portfolio and the adequacy of its
allowance for credit losses held against the portfolios by expanding credit risk disclosures. ASU
2010-20 requires more information about the credit quality of financing receivable in the
disclosures to financial statements, such as aging information and credit quality indicators. Both
new and existing disclosures must be disaggregated by portfolio segment or class. The
disaggregation of information is based on how a company develops its allowance for credit losses
and how it manages its credit exposure. For public entities such as the Company, ASU 2010-20 is
effective for periods ending on or after December 15, 2010, for amendments that require disclosures
as of the end of a reporting period. The amendments that require disclosures about activity that
occurs during a reporting period are effective for periods beginning on or after December 15, 2010.
The adoption
of this ASU is not expected to have a material effect on the operating results or financial
position of the Company.
16
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Forward-Looking Discussion:
Certain statements in this Form 10-Q are forward-looking statements that involve numerous risks and
uncertainties. The following factors, among others, may cause actual results to differ materially
from projected results:
Local, domestic and international economic and political conditions, and government monetary,
regulatory and fiscal policies affect banking both directly and indirectly. Inflation, recession,
unemployment, volatile interest rates, tight money supply, real estate values, international
conflicts, and other factors beyond our control may also adversely affect our future results of
operations. Our management team, consisting of the Board of Directors and executive officers,
expects that no particular factor will affect the results of operations. The continuation of
downward trends in areas such as real estate, construction and consumer spending, may adversely
impact our ability to maintain or increase profitability. Therefore, we cannot assure our current
level of income.
Our earnings depend largely upon net interest income. The relationship between our cost of funds,
deposits and borrowings, and the yield on our interest-earning assets, loans and investments all
influence net interest income levels. This relationship, defined as the net interest spread,
fluctuates and is affected by regulatory, economic and competitive factors that influence interest
rates, the volume, rate and mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, and
the level of nonperforming assets. As part of our interest rate risk (IRR) strategy, we monitor
the maturity and repricing characteristics of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing
liabilities to control our exposure to interest rate changes.
To a certain extent, our success depends upon the general economic conditions in the geographic
market that we serve. Further adverse changes to economic conditions would likely impair loan
collections and may have a materially adverse effect on the consolidated results of operations and
financial position.
The banking industry is highly competitive, with rapid changes in product delivery systems and in
consolidation of service providers. We compete with many larger institutions in terms of asset
size. These competitors also have substantially greater technical, marketing and financial
resources. The larger size of these companies affords them the opportunity to offer some
specialized products and services not offered by us. We are constantly striving to meet the
convenience and needs of our customers and to enlarge our customer base, however, we cannot assure
that these efforts will be successful.
17
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Critical Accounting Policies:
Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of financial
statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to establish critical accounting policies and make
accounting estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at
the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting periods.
An accounting estimate requires assumptions about uncertain matters that could have a material
effect on the financial statements if a different amount within a range of estimates were used or
if estimates changed from period to period. Readers of this report should understand that estimates
are made considering facts and circumstances at a point in time, and changes in those facts and
circumstances could produce results that differ from when those estimates were made. Significant
estimates that are particularly susceptible to material change in the next year relate to the
allowance for loan losses, fair values of financial instruments and the valuations of real estate
acquired through foreclosure, deferred tax assets and liabilities and intangible assets. Actual
amounts could differ from those estimates.
We maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level we believe adequate to absorb probable credit
losses related to specifically identified loans, as well as probable incurred losses inherent in
the remainder of the loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date. The balance in the allowance for
loan losses account is based on past events and current economic conditions.
The allowance for loan losses account consists of an allocated element and an unallocated element.
The allocated element consists of a specific portion for the impairment of loans individually
evaluated and a formula portion for the impairment of those loans collectively evaluated. The
unallocated element is used to cover inherent losses that exist as of the evaluation date, but
which have not been identified as part of the allocated allowance using our impairment evaluation
methodology due to limitations in the process. In addition, the unallocated element includes
amounts in the allowance for loan losses required as a directive from the Federal Reserve Board at
December 31, 2009.
We monitor the adequacy of the allocated portion of the allowance quarterly and adjust the
allowance as necessary through normal operations. This ongoing evaluation reduces potential
differences between estimates and actual observed losses. In addition, the unallocated portion of
the allowance is examined quarterly to ensure that it is consistent with changes in the related
criteria that would indicate a need to either increase or
decrease it. The determination of the level of the allowance for loan losses is inherently
subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more
information becomes available. Accordingly, we cannot ensure that charge-offs in future periods
will not exceed the allowance for loan losses or that additional increases in the allowance for
loan losses will not be required, resulting in an adverse impact on operating results. We are
regulated by the Federal Reserve Board and Pennsylvania Department of Banking and these agencies
may require us to make additions to the allowance for loan losses as part of the examination
process from time to time.
18
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
On May 6, 2010, our Joint Audit Committee concluded, based on the recommendation of management,
that our wholly-owned subsidiary, Community Bank, should amend its Call Report for the year ended
December 31, 2009, based on a directive of the Federal Reserve Board. The regulatory directive
required Community Bank to recognize a $7.0 million increase in its allowance for loan losses at
December 31, 2009. Concurrently with the decisions to amend Community Banks Call Report, the Joint
Audit Committee determined, based on the recommendation of management, that our consolidated
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009, should no longer be relied upon and be
restated to correct errors in the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of our
allowance for loan losses because of the misuse of facts that existed at the time those
consolidated financial statements were prepared and in order to assure that the consolidated
financial statements presented in the Annual Report on Form 10-K are consistent with those
presented in the Call Report. The misuse of facts causing the restatement was the result of a
misunderstanding between management and the Federal Reserve Board as to the methodology, i.e.,
model, to be used by us in determining the estimate for the allowance for loan losses under GAAP.
Management was of the opinion that its model used to determine the adequacy of the allowance for
loan losses was in accordance with the applicable supervisory guidance as provided by the Federal
Reserve Board in 2009 and GAAP. Management was informed on May 5, 2010, by the Federal Reserve
Board that we did not comply with the supervisory guidance, and therefore, must restate our Call
Report at December 31, 2009.
Fair values of financial instruments, in cases where quoted market prices are not available, are
based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques which are subject to change.
Real estate acquired in connection with foreclosures or in satisfaction of loans is written-down to
fair value based upon current estimates derived through independent appraisals less cost to sell.
However, proceeds realized from sales may ultimately be higher or lower than those estimates.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax effects of
temporary differences by applying enacted statutory tax rates to differences between the financial
statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of existing assets and liabilities. The amount of
deferred tax assets is reduced, if necessary, to the amount that, based on available evidence, will
more likely than not be realized. As changes in tax laws or rates are enacted, deferred tax assets
and liabilities are adjusted through the provision for income taxes.
19
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Intangible assets consist of goodwill. The valuation of goodwill is analyzed at least annually for
impairment.
For a further discussion of our critical accounting policies, refer to the note entitled, Summary
of significant accounting policies, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements to our
Amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2009. This note lists the
significant accounting policies used by management in the development and presentation of our
financial statements. This Managements Discussion and Analysis, The Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements, and other financial statement disclosures identify and address key variables
and other qualitative and quantitative factors that are necessary for the understanding and
evaluation of our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Operating Environment:
After two years of liquidation, businesses began rebuilding their inventories in the first half of
2010, which supported moderate economic growth. The United States economy grew at an annual rate
of 2.4 percent in the second quarter of 2010 after growing at an annual rate of 3.7 percent in the
first quarter. In addition to rebuilding inventories, overall business spending advanced at a
strong annual rate of 17.0 percent in the second quarter of 2010. Spending for equipment and
software grew 21.9 percent, while investment in nonresidential structures advanced 5.2 percent, the
first positive change in seven consecutive quarters. Although labor conditions improved somewhat,
they still were weak in comparison to pre-recession standards. The unemployment rate, which spiked
at 10.1 percent in the fourth quarter of 2009, fell back to 9.5 percent in June 2010, the same rate
as experienced one year earlier. Weak labor conditions continued to hinder consumer spending, which
grew only 1.6 percent in the second quarter of 2010. Inflation trended lower in the second quarter
due to a decrease in energy prices. The price index for gross domestic purchases, which measures
prices paid by residents of the United States, increased 0.1 percent in the
second quarter, significantly lower than the price increase of 2.1 percent in the first quarter.
Excluding food and energy, this index increased 0.9 percent in the second quarter of 2010 compared
to 1.6 percent in the first quarter of 2010.
In addition to domestic concerns, economic pressures weighed heavily on several European
countries in the second quarter, which in turn produced volatility in global equity markets. In
light of domestic and global economic uncertainty, coupled with low inflationary conditions, the
Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) decided to keep the target range for the federal funds rate
unchanged at 0.00 percent or 0.25 percent during the second quarter of 2010 and indicated that
conditions would continue to warrant this accommodative position for some time.
20
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act (the Act). The goals of the new legislation include restoring public confidence in
the financial system following the 2007-2008 financial and credit crises, preventing another
financial crisis and allowing regulators to identify failings in the system before another crisis
can occur. Among other things, the Act creates the Financial Stability Oversight Council, with
oversight authority for monitoring and regulating systemic risk, and the Bureau of Consumer
Financial Protection, which will have broad regulatory and enforcement powers over consumer
financial products and services. The Act also changes the responsibilities of the current federal
banking regulators, imposes additional corporate governance and disclosure requirements in areas
such as executive compensation and proxy access, and limits or prohibits proprietary trading and
hedge fund and private equity activities of banks. The scope of the Act impacts many aspects of the
financial services industry, and it requires the development and adoption of many implementing
regulations over the next several months and years. Accordingly, we cannot assess the impact the
Act will have on us at the present time.
Review of Financial Position:
Total assets equaled $641.8 million at June 30, 2010, a decrease of $10.4 million from $652.2
million at December 31, 2009. Loans, net of unearned income, decreased $11.8 million to $465.1
million at the close of the second quarter from $476.9 million at year-end 2009. Total deposits
decreased $14.1 million to $576.7 million at June 30, 2010, from $590.8 million at December 31,
2009. The reduction in deposits was influenced by the cyclical deposit trends of our school
district and municipal customers. Noninterest-bearing deposits decreased $1.0 million, while
interest-bearing deposits decreased $13.1 million. Available-for-sale investment securities grew
$4.9 million to
$112.9 million at June 30, 2010, from $108.0 million at the end of 2009. Federal funds sold
outstanding increased $6.4 million from the end of 2009. Stockholders equity rose $3.3 million to
$53.6 million at June 30, 2010, from $50.3 million at December 31, 2009.
In comparison to the end of the previous quarter, total assets decreased $6.8 million from $648.6
million at March 31, 2010. The change in the balance sheet from the end of the first quarter
reflected a $9.6 million decrease in total deposits. Loans, net of unearned income, decreased $1.2
million from the end of the first quarter, while investment securities decreased $3.7 million.
Federal funds sold outstanding amounted to $31.7 million at June 30, 2010, compared to $33.8
million at March 31, 2010.
21
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Investment Portfolio:
At June 30, 2010, our investment portfolio consisted primarily of short-term U.S. Government agency
mortgage-backed securities, which provide us with a source of liquidity and intermediate-term
tax-exempt state and municipal obligations, which we use to mitigate our tax burden.
The carrying values of the major classifications of securities as they relate to the total
investment portfolio at June 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009, are summarized as follows:
Distribution of investment securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
State and municipals
|
|
$
|
19,336
|
|
|
|
17.13
|
%
|
|
$
|
26,862
|
|
|
|
24.87
|
%
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government agencies
|
|
|
90,557
|
|
|
|
80.25
|
|
|
|
78,155
|
|
|
|
72.36
|
|
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
0.16
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
0.21
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
2,537
|
|
|
|
2.25
|
|
|
|
2,537
|
|
|
|
2.35
|
|
Other
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
0.21
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
0.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
112,851
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
108,005
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale investment securities increased $4.9 million to $112.9 million at June 30,
2010, from $108.0 million at December 31, 2009. The unrealized holding gain, which equaled $819,
net of income taxes of $422, at the end of 2009 appreciated $920 to $1,739, net of income taxes of
$896, at June 30, 2010.
During the six months ended June 30, we received proceeds from the sale of available-for-sale
investment securities of $6.2 million in 2010 and $4.3 million in 2009. The securities sold in
2010 and 2009 were composed entirely of intermediate-term, tax-exempt state and municipal
obligations. These securities were sold as part of alternative minimum tax planning strategies.
Net gains recognized on the sale of available-for-sale investment securities totaled $361 for the
six months ended June 30, 2010 and $114 for the same six months of 2009.
For the first six months of 2010, the investment portfolio averaged $114.0 million, an increase of
$39.0 million compared to $75.0 million for the same period of last year. The tax-equivalent yield
on the investment portfolio decreased 229 basis points to 3.67 percent for the first half of 2010
from 5.96 percent for the same period of 2009. Moreover, the tax-equivalent yield fell 108 basis
points to 3.13 percent for the second quarter from 4.21 percent for the first quarter of 2010.
22
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
The maturity distribution of the amortized cost, fair value and weighted-average
tax-equivalent yield of the available-for-sale portfolio at June 30, 2010, is summarized as
follows. The weighted-average yield, based on amortized cost, has been computed for tax-exempt
state and municipals on a tax-equivalent basis using the federal statutory tax rate of 34.0
percent. The distributions are based on contractual maturity with the exception of mortgage-backed
securities and equity securities. Mortgage-backed securities have been presented based upon
estimated cash flows, assuming no change in the current interest rate environment. Equity
securities with no stated contractual maturities are included in the After ten years maturity
distribution. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities, or estimated maturities
for mortgage-backed securities, because borrowers have the right to call or prepay obligations with
or without call or prepayment penalties.
Maturity distribution of available-for-sale portfolio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After one
|
|
|
After five
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within
|
|
|
but within
|
|
|
but within
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
one year
|
|
|
five years
|
|
|
ten years
|
|
|
ten years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
Amortized
cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and municipals
|
|
$
|
1,156
|
|
|
|
7.44
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,691
|
|
|
|
7.78
|
%
|
|
$
|
9,567
|
|
|
|
7.38
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,756
|
|
|
|
7.04
|
%
|
|
$
|
18,170
|
|
|
|
7.35
|
%
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government
|
|
|
14,493
|
|
|
|
3.10
|
|
|
|
39,883
|
|
|
|
3.02
|
|
|
|
31,935
|
|
|
|
3.17
|
|
|
|
2,888
|
|
|
|
3.52
|
|
|
|
89,199
|
|
|
|
3.10
|
|
U.S. Government-sponsored
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
6.80
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
6.73
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
6.66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
6.74
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,537
|
|
|
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
2,537
|
|
|
|
0.26
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
0.98
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
0.98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
15,690
|
|
|
|
3.43
|
%
|
|
$
|
42,693
|
|
|
|
3.33
|
%
|
|
$
|
41,513
|
|
|
|
4.14
|
%
|
|
$
|
10,320
|
|
|
|
4.30
|
%
|
|
$
|
110,216
|
|
|
|
3.74
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and municipals
|
|
$
|
1,176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,817
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,929
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
19,336
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government
|
|
|
14,590
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,320
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,960
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,557
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government-sponsored
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
15,809
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
43,265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
43,112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,665
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
112,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Loan Portfolio:
According to the Monetary Report to Congress issued on July 21, 2010, businesses spending,
which began to turnaround in the fourth quarter 2009, continued to improve in the first half of
2010. For the second quarter of 2010, nonresidential investment advanced 17.0 percent.
Specifically, in response to improved sales, production and corporate profits, businesses increased
spending for equipment and software 21.9 percent in the second quarter. In addition, investment in
nonresidential structures, which contracted for seven consecutive quarters, rose 5.2 percent in the
second quarter. Despite the increase in business spending, commercial lending remained constrained.
Businesses used pent up liquidity to fund investments. As a result, commercial and industrial loans
at all commercial banks throughout the United States decreased $14.9 billion or 4.7 percent from
the end of the first quarter of 2010. With regard to our loan portfolio, business loans, including
commercial loans, commercial mortgages, commercial construction and land development loans and
lease financing, increased $1.3 million to $331.4 million at June 30, 2010, from $330.1 million at
March 31, 2010. The growth was attributable primarily to increases in commercial loans and
commercial construction and land development loans, partially offset by a reduction in commercial
mortgages.
Mortgage rates remained favorable for the second quarter of 2010. The rate for a 30-year,
fixed-rate mortgage in the United States was 4.74 percent at June 30, 2010, 23 basis points lower
than 4.97 percent at the end of the previous quarter, and 68 basis points below 5.42 percent one
year earlier. In addition, first time homebuyers were able to take advantage of federal tax credits
during the first half of 2010. Despite low mortgage rates and fiscal stimulus, the housing market
remained soft amid a struggling economy, a large inventory of foreclosed assets and tight credit
conditions. Residential mortgage lending in the banking industry decreased in the second quarter,
as evidenced by a $28.0 billion or 3.0 percent annualized reduction in real estate loans for all
commercial banks from the end of the first quarter of 2010. We experienced a slight reduction in
residential mortgage loans of $1.6 million or 6.2 percent annualized to $102.3 million at June 30,
2010, from $103.9 million at March 31, 2010.
Although mortgage rates remained favorable, activity in our secondary mortgage department subsided
somewhat in the first half of 2010 compared to the same period of the previous year. Residential
mortgage loans serviced for the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) increased $9.2
million or at an annual rate of 12.2 percent to $161.1 million at the end of the second quarter of
2010 from $151.9 million at the end of 2009. In comparison, for the same period of 2009,
residential mortgage loans serviced for the FNMA increased at an annualized rate of 30.8 percent.
For the three months and six months ended June 30, residential mortgages sold to the FNMA totaled
$7.2 million and $17.3 million in 2010 compared to $28.3 million and $49.2 million in 2009. Net
gains realized on the sale of residential mortgages totaled $174 for the second quarter and $424
year-to-date 2010, compared to $518 and $942 for the same periods of 2009.
Stability of household wealth helped consumer spending advance by a modest 1.6 percent in the
second quarter of 2010. Consumers increased spending for durable goods by 3.4 percent, while
spending on nondurable goods and services rose 7.5 percent and 1.6 percent. Despite these
improvements, our consumer loans decreased $0.5 million from the end of the first quarter of 2010.
24
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Average loans decreased $43.6 million or 8.5 percent to $470.3 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2010, from $513.9 million for the same six months of 2009. The majority of the
reduction was in tax-exempt loans of local municipalities, which decreased $36.3 million or 53.8
percent comparing the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. Several tax and revenue anticipation
notes, which were outstanding during the first half of 2009, matured by December 31, 2009, and were
not renewed. Due to a sustained low interest rate environment and high levels of nonaccrual loans,
the tax-equivalent yield on our loan portfolio decreased 31 basis points to 5.51 percent for the
six months ended June 30, 2010, from 5.82 percent for the same six months of 2009. The FOMC has
indicated that interest rates will remain at these historically low levels for some time. As a
result, we do not anticipate an increase in our loan yields for the remainder of 2010.
The composition of the loan portfolio at June 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009, is summarized as
follows:
Distribution of loan portfolio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
Commercial, financial and others
|
|
$
|
152,944
|
|
|
|
32.88
|
%
|
|
$
|
160,945
|
|
|
|
33.75
|
%
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
19,853
|
|
|
|
4.27
|
|
|
|
23,195
|
|
|
|
4.86
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
102,305
|
|
|
|
21.99
|
|
|
|
104,925
|
|
|
|
22.00
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
158,960
|
|
|
|
34.17
|
|
|
|
155,269
|
|
|
|
32.55
|
|
Consumer, net
|
|
|
28,025
|
|
|
|
6.03
|
|
|
|
29,447
|
|
|
|
6.18
|
|
Lease financing, net
|
|
|
3,056
|
|
|
|
0.66
|
|
|
|
3,163
|
|
|
|
0.66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net of unearned income
|
|
|
465,143
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
476,944
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
14,928
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans
|
|
$
|
450,215
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
459,482
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In an attempt to limit IRR and liquidity strains, we continually examine the maturity distribution
and interest rate sensitivity of the loan portfolio. For the first half of 2010, market interest
rates remained at historically low levels and the FOMC has indicated that this low level would
likely remain in place for some time. Despite this short-term interest rate forecast, the risk of
rising rates in the future caused us to employ an Asset/Liability management strategy for 2010
which focuses on restoring balance to our IRR. Accordingly, we place emphasis on originating loans
with shorter repricing terms. Adjustable-rate loans represented 58.7 percent of the loan portfolio
at June 30, 2010, compared to 56.2 percent at the end of 2009.
25
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
The maturity and repricing information of the loan portfolio by major classification at June
30, 2010, is summarized as follows:
Maturity distribution and interest sensitivity of loan portfolio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After one
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within
|
|
|
but within
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
one year
|
|
|
five years
|
|
|
five years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Maturity schedule:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial and others
|
|
$
|
61,896
|
|
|
$
|
26,619
|
|
|
$
|
64,429
|
|
|
$
|
152,944
|
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
10,401
|
|
|
|
3,742
|
|
|
|
5,710
|
|
|
|
19,853
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
8,057
|
|
|
|
28,236
|
|
|
|
66,012
|
|
|
|
102,305
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
7,910
|
|
|
|
8,270
|
|
|
|
142,780
|
|
|
|
158,960
|
|
Consumer, net
|
|
|
1,841
|
|
|
|
19,405
|
|
|
|
6,779
|
|
|
|
28,025
|
|
Lease financing, net
|
|
|
612
|
|
|
|
2,444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,056
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
90,717
|
|
|
$
|
88,716
|
|
|
$
|
285,710
|
|
|
$
|
465,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predetermined interest rates
|
|
$
|
30,485
|
|
|
$
|
72,116
|
|
|
$
|
89,677
|
|
|
$
|
192,278
|
|
Floating- or adjustable-interest rates
|
|
|
60,232
|
|
|
|
16,600
|
|
|
|
196,033
|
|
|
|
272,865
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
90,717
|
|
|
$
|
88,716
|
|
|
$
|
285,710
|
|
|
$
|
465,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition to the risks inherent in our loan portfolio, in the normal course of business we are
also a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk to meet the financing needs of
our customers. These instruments include legally binding commitments to extend credit, unused
portions of lines of credit and commercial letters of credit, and may involve, to varying degrees,
elements of credit risk and IRR in excess of the amount recognized in the financial statements.
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation
of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or
other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. The commitments for lines of credit may
expire without being drawn upon. Therefore, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily
represent future cash requirements. The amount of the collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by
us, is based on our credit evaluation of the customer.
Unused portions of lines of credit, including home equity and credit card lines and overdraft
protection agreements, are commitments for possible future extensions of credit to existing
customers. Unused portions of home equity lines are collateralized and generally have fixed
expiration dates. Credit card lines and overdraft protection agreements are uncollateralized and
usually do not carry specific maturity dates. Unused portions of lines of credit ultimately may not
be drawn upon to the total extent to which we are committed.
26
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Commercial letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by us to guarantee the
performance of a customer to a third party. Commercial letters of credit are primarily issued to
support public and private borrowing arrangements. Essentially, all commercial letters of credit
have expiration dates within one year and often expire unused in whole or in part by the customer.
The carrying value of the liability for our obligations under guarantees was not material at June
30, 2010, and December 31, 2009.
Credit risk is the principal risk associated with these instruments. Our involvement and exposure
to credit loss in the event that the instruments are fully drawn upon and the customer defaults is
represented by the contractual amounts of these instruments. In order to control credit risk
associated with entering into commitments and issuing letters of credit, we employ the same credit
quality and collateral policies in making
commitments that we use in other lending activities. We evaluate each customers creditworthiness
on a case-by-case basis, and if deemed necessary, obtain collateral. The amount and nature of the
collateral obtained is based on our credit evaluation.
The contractual amounts of off-balance sheet commitments at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
are summarized as follows:
Distribution of off-balance sheet commitments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Commitments to extend credit
|
|
$
|
85,426
|
|
|
$
|
81,945
|
|
Unused portions of lines of credit
|
|
|
25,314
|
|
|
|
24,723
|
|
Commercial letters of credit
|
|
|
19,076
|
|
|
|
20,982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
129,816
|
|
|
$
|
127,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We record an allowance for credit losses associated with off-balance sheet commitments, if deemed
necessary, separately as a liability. The allowance was deemed immaterial at June 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009. We do not anticipate that losses, if any, that may occur as a result of funding
off- balance sheet commitments, would have a material adverse effect on our operating results or
financial position.
27
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Asset Quality:
National, Pennsylvania and market area unemployment rates at June 30, 2010 and 2009, are summarized
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
United States
|
|
|
9.5
|
%
|
|
|
9.5
|
%
|
Pennsylvania
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
Lackawanna county
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
Luzerne county
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
Monroe county
|
|
|
9.9
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
Susquehanna county
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
8.8
|
|
Wayne county
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
|
Wyoming county
|
|
|
9.7
|
%
|
|
|
8.8
|
%
|
The National unemployment rate, which spiked to 10.1 percent in the fourth quarter of 2009,
rebounded to 9.5 percent at June 30, 2010, the same rate as one year ago. However, employment
conditions deteriorated significantly for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and all counties in our
market area from one year ago.
As a result of significant deterioration in asset quality over the previous two years, we initiated
several remedial steps to our asset quality in the latter part of 2009. These steps included:
|
|
|
Hiring an independent loan review company to assist and advise us with our credit
risk management practices;
|
|
|
|
Enhancing the oversight and workout of classified assets by hiring an in-house
attorney to expedite the process of loan foreclosures and redeploying existing staff to
the workout and loan review functions;
|
|
|
|
Initiating the formation of a problem loan committee for the purpose of
monitoring the status of problem assets and devising action plans for the timely workout
or liquidation of assets;
|
28
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Overhauling the appraisal process by requiring new appraisals on all impaired
loans subject to evaluation under FASB ASC 310, Receivables, and any loan that is
delinquent over 60 days; and
|
|
|
|
Tightening underwriting standards to ensure a more rigorous review of potential
loans and more conservative lending standards.
|
Nonperforming assets decreased $125 from the end of the previous quarter and $2.6 million
from year-end 2009. Nonperforming assets equaled $25.5 million or 5.41 percent of loans, net of
unearned income, and foreclosed assets at June 30, 2010, compared to $25.7 million or 5.43 percent
at March 31, 2010, and $28.2 million or 5.86 percent at December 31, 2009. In comparison to
year-end 2009, the improvement resulted primarily from decreases in nonperforming loans and
leases, partially offset by an increase in foreclosed assets.
With regard to foreclosed assets, there were five properties with an aggregate carrying value of
$3,457 transferred to foreclosed assets during
the first half of 2010. Two properties with an aggregate carrying value of $344 were sold for $336,
resulting in a net realized loss of $8. At June 30, 2010, there were eleven properties with an
aggregate carrying value of $6,322 in foreclosed assets.
29
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Information concerning nonperforming assets at June 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009, is
summarized as follows. The table includes loans or other extensions of credit classified for
regulatory purposes and all material loans or other extensions of credit that cause management to
have serious doubts as to the borrowers ability to comply with present loan repayment terms.
Distribution of nonperforming assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Nonaccrual loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial and others
|
|
$
|
2,752
|
|
|
$
|
7,438
|
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
5,886
|
|
|
|
4,532
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
1,457
|
|
|
|
1,797
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
6,423
|
|
|
|
5,196
|
|
Consumer, net
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
Lease financing, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonaccrual loans
|
|
|
16,678
|
|
|
|
19,015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructured loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial and others
|
|
|
1,346
|
|
|
|
1,777
|
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
2,525
|
|
Consumer, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease financing, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total restructured loans
|
|
|
1,975
|
|
|
|
4,302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial and others
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
603
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
469
|
|
Consumer, net
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
Lease financing, net
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accruing loans past due 90 days or more
|
|
|
553
|
|
|
|
1,634
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming loans
|
|
|
19,206
|
|
|
|
24,951
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreclosed assets
|
|
|
6,322
|
|
|
|
3,209
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming assets
|
|
$
|
25,528
|
|
|
$
|
28,160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming loans as a percentage of loans, net
|
|
|
4.13
|
%
|
|
|
5.23
|
%
|
Nonperforming assets as a percentage of loans, net and
foreclosed assets
|
|
|
5.41
|
%
|
|
|
5.86
|
%
|
30
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
We maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level we believe adequate to absorb probable
credit losses related to specifically identified loans, as well as probable incurred loan losses
inherent in the remainder of the loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date. The balance in the
allowance for
loan losses account is based on past events and current economic conditions. We employ the Federal
Financial Institutions Examination Council Interagency Policy Statement, as amended, and GAAP in
assessing the adequacy of the allowance account. Under GAAP, the adequacy of the allowance account
is determined based on the provisions of FASB ASC 310, Receivables, for loans specifically
identified to be individually evaluated for impairment and the requirements of FASB ASC 450,
Contingencies, for large groups of smaller-balance homogeneous loans to be collectively evaluated
for impairment.
We follow our systematic methodology in accordance with procedural discipline by applying it in the
same manner regardless of whether the allowance is being determined at a high point or a low point
in the economic cycle. Each quarter, our loan review department identifies those loans to be
individually evaluated for impairment and those loans collectively evaluated for impairment
utilizing a standard criteria. Internal loan review grades are assigned quarterly to loans
identified to be individually evaluated. A loans grade may differ from period to period based on
current conditions and events, however, we consistently utilize the same grading system each
quarter. We use loss experience from the most recent rolling eight quarters in determining the
historical loss factor for each pool collectively evaluated for impairment. We place a higher
weight on the latest four quarters to place emphasis on the current periods compared to the
previous four quarters in arriving at historical loss factors. Qualitative factors are evaluated in
the same manner each quarter and are adjusted within a relevant range of values based on current
conditions to assure directional consistency of the provision for loan losses and allowance for
loan loss account.
31
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Information concerning impaired loans at June 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009, is summarized as
follows. The table includes credits classified for regulatory purposes and all material credits
that cause management to have serious doubts as to the borrowers ability to comply with present
loan repayment terms.
Distribution of impaired loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Nonaccrual loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial and others
|
|
$
|
2,752
|
|
|
$
|
7,438
|
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
5,886
|
|
|
|
4,532
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
1,457
|
|
|
|
1,797
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
6,423
|
|
|
|
5,196
|
|
Consumer, net
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
Lease financing, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonaccrual loans
|
|
|
16,678
|
|
|
|
19,015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruing loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial and others
|
|
|
1,346
|
|
|
|
3,400
|
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
5,198
|
|
Consumer, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease financing, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accruing loans
|
|
|
1,975
|
|
|
|
8,653
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans
|
|
$
|
18,653
|
|
|
$
|
27,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans as a percentage of loans, net
|
|
|
4.01
|
%
|
|
|
5.80
|
%
|
Impaired loans decreased $9.0 million or 32.5 percent to $18.7 million at June 30, 2010, from $27.7
million at December 31, 2009. The improvement in impaired loans resulted from a $6.7 million
decrease in accruing loans, coupled with a $2.3 million decrease in nonaccrual loans, from year-end
2009. The decrease in impaired loans, which was largely concentrated in commercial, financial and
other loans and commercial real estate loans, was due primarily to the migration of loans to
foreclosed assets and an increase in charge-offs. Notwithstanding the decrease, we continue to
closely monitor all impaired loans and the supporting collateral to mitigate any potential losses
associated with these credits.
32
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Information related to the recorded investment in impaired loans for which there is a
related allowance and the amount of that allowance and the recorded investment in impaired loans
for which there is no allowance at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Recorded
|
|
|
Related
|
|
|
Recorded
|
|
|
Related
|
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
Impaired loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With a related allowance
|
|
$
|
7,038
|
|
|
$
|
2,610
|
|
|
$
|
13,481
|
|
|
$
|
5,762
|
|
With no related allowance
|
|
|
11,615
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
18,653
|
|
|
$
|
2,610
|
|
|
$
|
27,668
|
|
|
$
|
5,762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income on impaired loans that would have been recognized had the loans been current and
the terms of the loans not been modified, the aggregate amount of interest income recognized and
the amount recognized using the cash-basis method and the average recorded investment in impaired
loans for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 are summarized as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Gross interest due under terms
|
|
$
|
283
|
|
|
$
|
385
|
|
|
$
|
708
|
|
|
$
|
922
|
|
Interest income recognized
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income not recognized
|
|
$
|
179
|
|
|
$
|
160
|
|
|
$
|
421
|
|
|
$
|
437
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income recognized (cash-basis)
|
|
$
|
137
|
|
|
$
|
155
|
|
|
$
|
396
|
|
|
$
|
347
|
|
Average recorded investment in impaired loans
|
|
$
|
21,089
|
|
|
$
|
30,249
|
|
|
$
|
24,918
|
|
|
$
|
31,449
|
|
Cash received on impaired loans applied as a reduction of principal totaled $1,147 and $1,495 for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2010. For the respective periods of 2009 cash receipts on
impaired loans totaled $451 and $2,767.
33
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
The allocation of the allowance for loan losses at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, is
summarized as follows:
Allocation of the allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Category
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Category
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
loans
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
loans
|
|
Allocated allowance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specific:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial and others
|
|
$
|
921
|
|
|
|
0.88
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,679
|
|
|
|
2.27
|
%
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
913
|
|
|
|
1.27
|
|
|
|
1,002
|
|
|
|
0.95
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
0.37
|
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
0.39
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
545
|
|
|
|
1.46
|
|
|
|
812
|
|
|
|
2.18
|
|
Consumer, net
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
Lease financing, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
specific
|
|
|
2,610
|
|
|
|
4.01
|
|
|
|
5,762
|
|
|
|
5.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formula:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial and others
|
|
|
4,023
|
|
|
|
32.00
|
|
|
|
1,024
|
|
|
|
31.48
|
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
1,732
|
|
|
|
3.00
|
|
|
|
1,645
|
|
|
|
3.91
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
21.62
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
21.61
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
3,156
|
|
|
|
32.71
|
|
|
|
1,413
|
|
|
|
30.37
|
|
Consumer, net
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
6.17
|
|
Lease financing, net
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
0.66
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
0.66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total formula
|
|
|
9,359
|
|
|
|
95.99
|
|
|
|
4,381
|
|
|
|
94.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allocated allowance
|
|
|
11,969
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
10,143
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated allowance
|
|
|
2,959
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,319
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allowance for loan losses
|
|
$
|
14,928
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
17,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The allocated allowance for loan losses account increased $1,826 to $11,969 at June 30,
2010, from $10,143 at December 31, 2009. The change from year-end resulted primarily from a $4,978
increase in the formula portion of the allowance for impairment of loans collectively evaluated
under FASB ASC 450, partially offset by a reduction of $3,152 in the specific portion for
loans individually evaluated for impairment under FASB ASC 310. With regard to the formula portion,
the total loss factor for collectively evaluated commercial, financial and other loans and
commercial real estate loans increased from year-end 2009 due to a higher amount of
weighted-average net charge-offs for the past eight consecutive quarters. The majority of the
decrease in the specific portion resulted from two commercial credits. The collateral supporting
one of the credits was transferred to foreclosed assets with the specific reserve recognized as a
write down at the time of transfer. The specific reserve associated with the other credit was
charged-off as a confirmed loss during the first half of 2010.
34
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
The unallocated portion of the allowance for loan losses equaled $2,959 at the end of the second
quarter of 2010, which we believe is sufficient to cover any inherent losses in the loan portfolio
that have not been identified as part of the allocated allowance using our impairment methodology.
The coverage ratio, the allowance for loan losses, as a percentage of nonperforming loans, is an
industry ratio used to test the ability of the allowance account to absorb potential losses arising
from nonperforming loans. The coverage ratio equaled 0.78 percent at June 30, 2010, compared to
0.76 percent at March 31, 2010, and 0.70 percent at December 31, 2009.
A reconciliation of the allowance for loan losses and illustration of charge-offs and recoveries by
major loan category for the six months ended June 30, 2010, is summarized as follows:
Reconciliation of allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
17,462
|
|
Loans charged-off:
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial and others
|
|
|
3,002
|
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
525
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
9
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
432
|
|
Consumer, net
|
|
|
60
|
|
Lease financing, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
4,028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans recovered:
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial and others
|
|
|
179
|
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
1
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer, net
|
|
|
14
|
|
Lease financing, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans charged-off
|
|
|
3,834
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision charged to operating expense
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses at end of period
|
|
$
|
14,928
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans charged-off as a percentage of average loans outstanding
|
|
|
1.64
|
%
|
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of period end loans
|
|
|
3.21
|
%
|
35
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
The allowance for loan losses account equaled $14,928 or 3.21 percent of loans, net of
unearned income, at June 30, 2010, compared to $17,462 or 3.65 percent at December 31, 2009. Net
charge-offs of $3,834 exceeded the provision for loan losses of $1,300, which resulted in the
$2,534 decrease in the allowance for loan losses account.
Past due loans not satisfied through repossession, foreclosure or related actions, are evaluated
individually to determine if all or part of the outstanding balance should be charged against the
allowance for loan losses account. Any subsequent recoveries are credited to the allowance
account. Net charge-offs amounted to $3,834 or 1.64 percent of average loans outstanding for the
six months ended June 30, 2010. For the same period of 2009, net charge-offs were $326 or 0.13
percent of average loans outstanding.
Deposits:
According the Monetary Policy Report to Congress, real wage and salary income, which had fallen
appreciably in 2009, improved during the first half of 2010. As a result, disposable personal
income increased 4.4 percent in the second quarter of 2010 after increasing 3.8 percent in the
first quarter. Consumers continued to favor saving and reducing household debt as opposed to
spending. The personal savings rate was 6.2 percent for the second quarter of 2010.
Total deposits decreased $9.7 million or at an annualized rate of 6.6 percent from $586.4 million
at March 31, 2010, to $576.7 million at the end of the second quarter. Noninterest-bearing deposits
declined $3.7 million, while interest-bearing deposits decreased $6.0 million. The majority of the
reduction in interest-bearing accounts was concentrated in time deposits. Due to a favorable
liquidity position, we chose not to aggressively compete for time deposits within our market area.
As a result, total time deposits decreased $13.1 million to $238.5 million at June 30, 2010, from
$251.6 million at the end of the first quarter. Partially offsetting the reduction
in total time deposits was an increase in interest-bearing transaction accounts, which include
money market, NOW and savings accounts. These accounts together grew $7.1 million to $250.9 million
at June 30, 2010, from $243.8 million at March 31, 2010.
36
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
The average amount of, and the rate paid on, the major classifications of deposits for the
six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, are summarized as follows:
Deposit distribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
Interest-bearing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market accounts
|
|
$
|
34,895
|
|
|
|
0.98
|
%
|
|
$
|
27,229
|
|
|
|
0.84
|
%
|
NOW accounts
|
|
|
100,946
|
|
|
|
1.51
|
|
|
|
75,689
|
|
|
|
1.49
|
|
Savings accounts
|
|
|
110,124
|
|
|
|
0.44
|
|
|
|
104,034
|
|
|
|
0.53
|
|
Time deposits less than $100
|
|
|
157,696
|
|
|
|
3.07
|
|
|
|
165,475
|
|
|
|
3.38
|
|
Time deposits $100 or more
|
|
|
90,426
|
|
|
|
2.62
|
|
|
|
75,684
|
|
|
|
3.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing
|
|
|
494,087
|
|
|
|
1.94
|
%
|
|
|
448,111
|
|
|
|
2.28
|
%
|
Noninterest-bearing
|
|
|
88,005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
$
|
582,092
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
529,226
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended June 30, 2010, average total deposits grew $52.9 million or 10.0 percent
to $582.1 million compared to $529.2 million for the same period of 2009. Noninterest-bearing
deposits rose $6.9 million, while interest-bearing accounts increased $46.0 million. We experienced
growth in all major deposit categories except for time deposits less than $100. However almost
three-quarters of the growth was concentrated in interest-bearing transaction accounts.
Market interest rates remained at historically low levels during the first half of 2010. The
3-month U.S. Treasury rate was 0.17 percent at June 30, 2010, and 0.19 percent at June 30, 2009. In
addition, given the prolonged length of time interest rates have been at historically low levels,
management reduced the standard rate paid for interest-bearing transaction accounts 10 basis points
to 0.15 percent from 0.25 percent. Furthermore, promotional gas lease certificates of deposit were
renewed at lower market rates. As a result, our cost of deposits for the six months ended June 30,
decreased 34 basis points to 1.94 percent in 2010 from 2.28 percent in 2009. The FOMC has indicated
that economic conditions appear to warrant these low interest rate levels for some time. We
anticipate our funding costs to remain favorable for the remainder of 2010. However, should
competition within our market area intensify, our cost of funds could be negatively impacted.
Volatile time deposits, time deposits in denominations of $100 or more, decreased $7.0
million to $85.5 million at June 30, 2010, from $92.5 million at the end of the previous quarter.
These deposits averaged $90.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of $14.7
million or 19.4 percent compared to $75.7 million for the same six months of 2009. The average cost
of large denomination time deposits decreased 94 basis points to 2.62 percent for the first half of
2010, compared to 3.56 percent for the same period of 2009.
37
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Maturities of time deposits of $100 or more at June 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009, are summarized
as follows:
Maturity distribution of time deposits of $100 or more
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Within three months
|
|
$
|
27,693
|
|
|
$
|
13,860
|
|
After three months but within six months
|
|
|
19,746
|
|
|
|
31,501
|
|
After six months but within twelve months
|
|
|
17,800
|
|
|
|
22,289
|
|
After twelve months
|
|
|
20,275
|
|
|
|
21,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
85,514
|
|
|
$
|
88,937
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Risk Sensitivity:
Market risk is the risk to our earnings or financial position resulting from adverse changes in
market rates or prices, such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates or equity prices. Our
exposure to market risk is primarily IRR associated with our lending, investing and
deposit-gathering activities. During the normal course of business, we are not exposed to foreign
exchange risk or commodity price risk. Our exposure to IRR can be explained as the potential for
change in our reported earnings and/or the market value of our net worth. Variations in interest
rates affect earnings by changing net interest income and the level of other interest-sensitive
income and operating expenses. Interest rate changes also affect the underlying economic value of
our assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet items. These changes arise because the present value
of future cash flows, and often the cash flows themselves, change with interest rates. The effects
of the changes in these present values reflect the change in our underlying economic value and
provide a basis for the expected change in future earnings related to interest rates. IRR is
inherent in the role of banks as financial intermediaries. However, a bank with a high degree of
IRR may experience lower earnings, impaired liquidity and capital positions, and most likely, a
greater risk of insolvency. Therefore, banks must carefully evaluate IRR to promote safety and
soundness in their activities.
38
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Given the recent financial crisis and current economic recession, IRR and effectively
managing it are very important to both bank management and regulators. Bank regulations require us
to develop and maintain an IRR management program, overseen by the Board of Directors and senior
management, that involves a comprehensive risk management process in order to effectively identify,
measure, monitor and control risk. Should we have material weaknesses in our risk management
process or high exposure relative to our capital, bank regulatory agencies will take action to
remedy these shortcomings. Moreover, the level of IRR exposure and the quality of our risk
management process is a determining factor when evaluating capital adequacy.
The Asset/Liability Committee (ALCO), comprised of members of our Board of Directors, senior
management and other appropriate officers, oversees our IRR management program. Specifically, ALCO
analyzes economic data and market interest rate trends, as well as competitive pressures, and
utilizes several computerized modeling techniques to reveal potential exposure to IRR. This allows
us to monitor and attempt to control the influence these factors may have on our rate-sensitive
assets (RSA) and rate-sensitive liabilities (RSL), and overall operating results and financial
position. One such technique utilizes a static gap model that considers repricing frequencies of
RSA and RSL in order to monitor IRR. Gap analysis attempts to measure our interest rate exposure by
calculating the net amount of RSA and RSL that reprice within specific time intervals. A positive
gap occurs when the amount of RSA repricing in a specific period is greater than the amount of RSL
repricing within that same time frame and is indicated by a RSA/RSL ratio greater than 1.0. A
negative gap occurs when the amount of RSL repricing is greater than the amount of RSA and is
indicated by a RSA/RSL ratio less than 1.0. A positive gap implies that earnings will be impacted
favorably if interest rates rise and adversely if interest rates
fall during the period. A negative gap tends to indicate that earnings will be affected inversely
to interest rate changes.
39
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Our interest rate sensitivity gap position, illustrating RSA and RSL at their related
carrying values, is summarized as follows. The distributions in the table are based on a
combination of maturities, call provisions, repricing frequencies and prepayment patterns.
Variable-rate assets and
liabilities are distributed based on the repricing frequency of the instrument. Mortgage
instruments are distributed in accordance with estimated cash flows, assuming there is no change in
the current interest rate environment.
Interest rate sensitivity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due after
|
|
|
Due after
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
three months
|
|
|
one year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due within
|
|
|
but within
|
|
|
but within
|
|
|
Due after
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
three months
|
|
|
twelve months
|
|
|
five years
|
|
|
five years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Rate-sensitive assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
$
|
4,007
|
|
|
$
|
11,802
|
|
|
$
|
43,265
|
|
|
$
|
53,777
|
|
|
$
|
112,851
|
|
Loans held for sale, net
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
Loans, net of unearned income
|
|
|
165,891
|
|
|
|
115,382
|
|
|
|
165,327
|
|
|
|
18,543
|
|
|
|
465,143
|
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
31,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
201,708
|
|
|
$
|
127,184
|
|
|
$
|
208,592
|
|
|
$
|
72,320
|
|
|
$
|
609,804
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate-sensitive liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market accounts
|
|
$
|
23,548
|
|
|
$
|
8,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
31,807
|
|
NOW accounts
|
|
|
87,232
|
|
|
|
19,325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,557
|
|
Savings accounts
|
|
|
2,741
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
109,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,542
|
|
Time deposits less than $100
|
|
|
27,268
|
|
|
|
43,766
|
|
|
|
69,793
|
|
|
$
|
12,123
|
|
|
|
152,950
|
|
Time deposits $100 or more
|
|
|
27,693
|
|
|
|
37,546
|
|
|
|
19,022
|
|
|
|
1,253
|
|
|
|
85,514
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
168,482
|
|
|
$
|
108,896
|
|
|
$
|
198,616
|
|
|
$
|
21,376
|
|
|
$
|
497,370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate sensitivity gap:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
$
|
33,226
|
|
|
$
|
18,288
|
|
|
$
|
9,976
|
|
|
$
|
50,944
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative
|
|
$
|
33,226
|
|
|
$
|
51,514
|
|
|
$
|
61,490
|
|
|
$
|
112,434
|
|
|
$
|
112,434
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RSA/RSL ratio:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
1.20
|
|
|
|
1.17
|
|
|
|
1.05
|
|
|
|
3.38
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative
|
|
|
1.20
|
|
|
|
1.19
|
|
|
|
1.13
|
|
|
|
1.23
|
|
|
|
1.23
|
|
Our cumulative one-year RSA/RSL ratio equaled 1.19 at June 30, 2010, compared to 0.87 at the end of
the previous quarter. Given the current rate environment, our asset liability strategy for 2010
focuses on trying to maintain equilibrium between rate sensitive assets and liabilities with a
shift towards a positive ratio should interest rates begin to rise. As part of our current
strategy, we stress shorter repricing terms for new loan originations. In addition, we are offering
preferential rates on our long-term certificates of deposit, including 60-, 72- and 90-month
maturities. However, these forward-looking statements are qualified in the aforementioned section
entitled Forward-Looking Discussion in this Managements Discussion and Analysis.
40
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
The increase in our RSA/RSL ratio from the end of the first quarter of 2010 resulted from a
$77.1 million increase in RSA maturing or repricing within the next 12 months, coupled with a $12.4
million decrease in RSL maturing or repricing within the same time frame. The increase in RSA
resulted primarily from an $85.3 million increase in loans, net of unearned income, maturing or
repricing within 12 months. In addition to stressing loan originations with shorter repricing
terms, we enhanced our Asset/Liability modeling to incorporate prepayment speeds as required by our
bank regulators. Partially offsetting this increase was reductions in investment securities
maturing within this time frame and federal funds sold. With respect to the decrease in RSL, total
time deposits maturing or repricing within 12 months decreased $14.6 million.
We also experienced an increase in our three-month ratio to 1.20 at June 30, 2010, from 0.98 at the
end of the previous quarter. The increase primarily resulted from a $33.7 million increase in the
amount of RSA maturing or repricing within three months. Similar to the 12-month ratio, the
increase primarily resulted from the $39.6 million increase in loans, net of unearned income,
maturing or repricing within three months.
Static gap analysis, although a credible measuring tool, does not fully illustrate the impact of
interest rate changes on future earnings. First, market rate changes normally do not equally or
simultaneously affect all
categories of assets and liabilities. Second, assets and liabilities that can contractually reprice
within the same period may not do so at the same time or to the same magnitude. Third, the interest
rate sensitivity table presents a one-day position. Variations occur daily as we adjust our rate
sensitivity throughout the year. Finally, assumptions must be made in constructing such a table.
For example, the conservative nature of our Asset/Liability Management Policy assigns money market
and NOW accounts to the Due after three but within twelve months repricing interval. In reality,
these items may reprice less frequently and in different magnitudes than changes in general
interest rate levels.
As the static gap report fails to address the dynamic changes in the balance sheet composition or
prevailing interest rates, we utilize a simulation model to enhance our asset/liability management.
This model is used to create pro forma net interest income scenarios under various interest rate
shocks. According to the most recent model results, instantaneous and parallel shifts in general
market rates of plus 100 basis points would result in a positive change in net interest income for
the 12 months ended June 30, 2011. Model results under a minus 100 basis point scenario were not
meaningful, as the majority of short-term general market rates are already near zero.
41
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Financial institutions are affected differently by inflation than commercial and industrial
companies that have significant investments in fixed assets and inventories. Most of our assets are
monetary in nature and change correspondingly with variations in the inflation rate. It is
difficult to precisely measure the impact inflation has on us, however we believe that our exposure
to inflation can be mitigated through asset/liability management.
Liquidity:
Liquidity management is essential to our continuing operations as it gives us the ability to meet
our financial obligations as they come due, as well as to take advantage of new business
opportunities as they arise. Our financial obligations include, but are not limited to, the
following:
|
|
|
Funding new and existing loan commitments;
|
|
|
|
Payment of deposits on demand or at their contractual maturity;
|
|
|
|
Repayment of borrowings as they mature;
|
|
|
|
Payment of lease obligations; and
|
|
|
|
Payment of operating expenses.
|
Historically, core deposits have been our primary source of liquidity because of their stability
and lower cost, in general, than other types of funding. Providing additional sources of funds are
loan and investment payments and prepayments and the ability to sell both available-for-sale
securities and mortgage loans held for sale. We believe our liquidity is adequate to meet both
present and future financial obligations and commitments on a timely basis.
Community Bank has a Contingency Funding Plan in place to address alternative sources of liquidity,
that go beyond our core deposit base, in the event of a funding crisis. Examples of events that may
result in a liquidity crisis include, among others, natural disasters, war, reputational harm and
severe and prolonged asset quality problems. The funding program ensures the availability of
various alternative wholesale funding sources that can be used whenever appropriate. These
identified alternative funding sources include:
|
|
|
FHLB-Pgh liquidity contingency line of credit;
|
|
|
|
Federal Reserve Bank discount window;
|
|
|
|
Internet certificates of deposit;
|
|
|
|
Institutional Deposit Corporation deposits;
|
|
|
|
Repurchase agreements; and
|
|
|
|
Federal funds purchased.
|
Based on our liquidity position at June 30, 2010, we do not anticipate the need to utilize any of
these sources in the near term.
42
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
We employ a number of analytical techniques in assessing the adequacy of our liquidity position.
One such technique is the use of ratio analysis related to our reliance on noncore funds to fund
our investments and loans maturing after June 30, 2011. Our noncore funds at June 30, 2010,
consisted solely of time deposits in denominations of $100 or more. At June 30, 2010, our net
noncore funding dependence ratio, the difference between noncore funds and short-term investments
to long-term assets, was 7.3 percent, while our net short-term noncore funding dependence ratio,
noncore funds maturing within one-year, less short-term investments to long-term assets equaled 3.4
percent. These ratios indicated that we had some reliance on noncore funds at June 30, 2010. These
ratios were stable in comparison to 7.2 percent and 3.6 percent for the previous quarter. In
addition, according to the most recent Bank Holding Company Performance Report for our Federal
Reserve District, we were significantly less reliant on noncore funds than our peer group, which
had noncore and short-term noncore funding dependence ratios of 24.0 percent and 12.5 percent.
The Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows present the changes in cash and cash equivalents from
operating, investing and financing activities. Cash and cash equivalents, consisting of cash on
hand, cash items in the process of collection, noninterest-bearing deposits with other banks,
balances with the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia and the FHLB-Pgh, and federal funds sold,
decreased $7.5 million during the six months ended June 30, 2010. Similarly, cash and cash
equivalents decreased $12.4 million for the same period last year. For the first half of 2010, cash
used in financing activities totaled $14.3 million. Partially offsetting the outflow from financing
activities were net cash provided by operating activities of $6.4 million and investing activities
of $0.4 million. For the same period of 2009, cash used in investing activities totaled $19.4
million. Net cash provided by operating activities of $4.0 million and financing activities of $3.0
million partially offset the cash used in investing activities.
Investing activities primarily include transactions related to our lending activities and
investment portfolio. Investing activities provided net cash of $0.4 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2010. In comparison, for the same period of 2009, we used net cash of $19.4 million.
The change resulted primarily from a decrease in lending activities partially offset by an increase
in purchases of available-for-sale investment securities.
Operating activities provided net cash of $6.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010,
compared to $4.0 million for the same six months of 2009. Net income, adjusting for the effects of
noncash transactions such as depreciation and the provision for loan losses is the primary source
of funds from operations.
43
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Deposit gathering is our predominant financing activity. During the first six months of 2010
deposit gathering slowed, which resulted in a $14.1 million reduction in net cash.
Capital Adequacy:
We attempt to assure capital adequacy by monitoring our current and projected capital positions to
support future growth, while providing stockholders with an attractive long-term appreciation of
their investments. According to bank regulation, at a minimum, banks must maintain a Tier I
capital to risk-adjusted assets ratio of 4.0 percent and a total capital to risk-weighted assets
ratio of 8.0 percent. Additionally, banks must maintain a Leverage ratio, defined as Tier I
capital to total average assets less intangibles, of 3.0 percent. The minimum Leverage ratio of 3.0
percent only applies to institutions with a composite rating of one under the Uniform Interagency
Bank Rating System, that are not anticipating or experiencing significant growth and have
well-diversified risk. An additional 100 to 200 basis points are required for all but these most
highly-rated institutions. Our minimum Leverage ratio was 4.0 percent at June 30, 2009 and 2008.
If an institution is deemed to be undercapitalized under these standards, banking law prescribes an
increasing amount of regulatory intervention, including the required institution of a capital
restoration plan and restrictions on the growth of assets, branches or lines of business. Further
restrictions are applied to significantly or critically undercapitalized institutions, including
restrictions on interest payable on accounts, dismissal of management and appointment of a
receiver. For well capitalized institutions, banking law provides authority for regulatory
intervention where the institution is deemed to be engaging in unsafe and unsound practices or
receives a less than satisfactory examination report rating.
Regulatory agencies define institutions, not under a written directive to maintain certain capital
levels, as well capitalized if they exceed the following:
|
|
A Tier I risk-based ratio of at least 6.0 percent:
|
|
|
A total risk-based ratio of at least 10.0 percent; and
|
|
|
A Leverage ratio of at least 5.0 percent.
|
However, the periodic regulatory exam process may require institutions to maintain capital ratios
and amounts in excess of the minimum levels discussed above.
44
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Our and Community Banks capital ratios at June 30, 2010 and 2009, as well as the required
minimum ratios for capital adequacy purposes and to be well capitalized under the prompt corrective
action provisions as defined by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991
are summarized as follows:
Regulatory capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum to be Well
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized under
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum for Capital
|
|
|
Prompt Corrective
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Adequacy Purposes
|
|
|
Action Provisions
|
|
June 30,
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Basis for ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$
|
51,459
|
|
|
$
|
57,197
|
|
|
$
|
19,799
|
|
|
$
|
21,127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Bank
|
|
|
45,814
|
|
|
|
51,877
|
|
|
|
19,578
|
|
|
|
20,970
|
|
|
$
|
29,367
|
|
|
$
|
31,455
|
|
Total capital to risk-weighted assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
65,755
|
|
|
|
63,216
|
|
|
|
39,598
|
|
|
|
42,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Bank
|
|
|
60,042
|
|
|
|
57,896
|
|
|
|
39,156
|
|
|
|
41,940
|
|
|
|
48,945
|
|
|
|
52,424
|
|
Tier I capital to total average assets
less goodwill:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
51,459
|
|
|
|
57,197
|
|
|
|
25,771
|
|
|
|
24,727
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Bank
|
|
|
45,814
|
|
|
|
51,877
|
|
|
$
|
25,535
|
|
|
$
|
24,577
|
|
|
$
|
31,919
|
|
|
$
|
30,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-weighted assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
478,005
|
|
|
|
511,779
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Bank
|
|
|
472,483
|
|
|
|
507,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-weighted off-balance sheet items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
16,970
|
|
|
|
16,394
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Bank
|
|
|
16,970
|
|
|
|
16,394
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average assets for Leverage ratio:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
644,285
|
|
|
|
618,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Bank
|
|
$
|
638,387
|
|
|
$
|
614,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I capital as a percentage of risk-
weighted assets and off-balance sheet
items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
10.4
|
%
|
|
|
10.8
|
%
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Bank
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
|
9.9
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
Total of Tier I and Tier II capital as a
percentage of risk-weighted assets and
off-balance sheet items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
13.3
|
|
|
|
12.0
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Bank
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
11.0
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
Tier I capital as a percentage of total
average assets less intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Bank
|
|
|
7.2
|
%
|
|
|
8.4
|
%
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
At June 30, 2010, we reported Tier I capital, Total capital and Leverage ratios of 10.4
percent, 13.3 percent and 8.0 percent. In addition, Community Bank reported Tier I capital, Total
capital and Leverage ratios of 9.4 percent, 12.3 percent and 7.2 percent. Community Bank continued
to exceed the requirements to be categorized as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for
prompt corrective action at the close of the second quarter of 2010.
45
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Stockholders equity equaled $53.6 million or $31.13 per share at June 30, 2010, an increase of
$3.3 million compared to $50.3 million or $29.25 per
share at December 31, 2009. Net income of $2.3 million was the primary factor leading to the
capital improvement. We also experienced an increase in other comprehensive income of $920
resulting from market value appreciation on available-for-sale investment securities.
We did not declare any dividends during the three months or six months ended June 30, 2010. Our
ability to declare and pay dividends is based on our operating results, financial and economic
conditions, capital and growth objectives, appropriate dividend restrictions and other relevant
factors. We rely on dividends received from Community Bank for payment of dividends to
stockholders. Community Banks ability to pay dividends is subject to federal and state
regulations. On March 1, 2010, we received notification from the Federal Reserve Board recommending
that we and Community Bank suspend the declaration or payment of dividends. Moreover, this
notification requires us and Community Bank to inform the Federal Reserve Board prior to declaring
future dividends.
We have a dividend reinvestment plan which allows stockholders to automatically reinvest their
dividends in shares of our common stock. We did declare a dividend for the fourth quarter of 2009.
As a result, for the six months ended June 30, 2010, 1,916 shares were issued under this plan
relative to the fourth quarter of 2009 dividend.
Review of Financial Performance:
Net income for the second quarter of 2010 equaled $1,190 or $0.69 per share, year-to-date earnings
totaled $2,340 or $1.36 per share. Comparable earnings for 2009 were $1,215 or $0.70 per share for
the second quarter and $2,990 or $1.73 per share year-to-date. Net income was impacted by lower net
interest income and noninterest income, partially mitigated by decreases in noninterest expense.
Return on average assets was 0.74 percent for the second quarter and 0.73 percent for the first
half of 2010, compared to 0.79 percent and 0.97 percent for the respective 2009 periods. Return on
average stockholders equity was 9.22 percent for the second quarter and 9.19 percent year-to-date
2010, compared to 8.18 percent and 10.21 percent for the same periods of 2009.
46
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Net Interest Income:
Net interest income is still the fundamental source of earnings for commercial banks. Moreover,
fluctuations in the level of net interest income can have the greatest impact on net profits. Net
interest income is defined as the difference between interest revenue, interest and fees earned on
interest-earning assets, and interest expense, the cost of
interest-bearing liabilities supporting those assets. The primary sources of earning assets are
loans and investment securities, while interest-bearing deposits, short-term borrowings and
long-term debt comprise interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest income is impacted by:
|
|
|
Variations in the volume, rate and composition of earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities;
|
|
|
|
Changes in general market rates; and
|
|
|
|
The level of nonperforming assets.
|
Changes in net interest income are measured by the net interest spread and net interest margin.
Net interest spread, the difference between the average yield earned on earning assets and the
average rate incurred on interest-bearing liabilities, illustrates the effects changing interest
rates have on profitability. Net interest margin, net interest income as a percentage of earning
assets, is a more comprehensive ratio, as it reflects not only the spread, but also the change in
the composition of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Tax-exempt loans and
investments carry pre-tax yields lower than their taxable counterparts. Therefore, in order to
make the analysis of net interest income more comparable, tax-exempt income and yields are reported
on a tax-equivalent basis using the prevailing federal statutory tax rate of 34.0 percent.
47
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
We analyze interest income and interest expense by segregating rate and volume components of
earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The impact changes in the interest rates earned
and paid on assets and liabilities, along with changes in the volume of earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities have on net interest income are summarized in the following table.
The net change attributable to the combined impact of rate and volume has been allocated
proportionately to the change due to rate and the change due to volume.
Net interest income changes due to rate and volume
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010 vs. 2009
|
|
|
2010 vs. 2009
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease)
|
|
|
Increase (decrease)
|
|
|
|
attributable to
|
|
|
attributable to
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
Interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable
|
|
$
|
(494
|
)
|
|
$
|
(357
|
)
|
|
$
|
(137
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,001
|
)
|
|
$
|
(792
|
)
|
|
$
|
(209
|
)
|
Tax-exempt
|
|
|
(456
|
)
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
(545
|
)
|
|
|
(977
|
)
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
(1,117
|
)
|
Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
(189
|
)
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
|
572
|
|
|
|
(287
|
)
|
|
|
859
|
|
Tax-exempt
|
|
|
(357
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(363
|
)
|
|
|
(713
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(716
|
)
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
(1,097
|
)
|
|
|
(451
|
)
|
|
|
(646
|
)
|
|
|
(2,103
|
)
|
|
|
(938
|
)
|
|
|
(1,165
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market accounts
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
NOW accounts
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
Savings accounts
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
15
|
|
Time deposits less than $100
|
|
|
(155
|
)
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
(369
|
)
|
|
|
(243
|
)
|
|
|
(126
|
)
|
Time deposits $100 or more
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
(155
|
)
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
(161
|
)
|
|
|
(392
|
)
|
|
|
231
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
(270
|
)
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
(667
|
)
|
|
|
584
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
(1,110
|
)
|
|
$
|
(181
|
)
|
|
$
|
(929
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,020
|
)
|
|
$
|
(271
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,749
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended June 30, tax-equivalent net interest income decreased $2,020 or 17.0
percent to $9,876 in 2010 from $11,896 in 2009. Negative volume and rate variances, caused the net
interest income reduction.
48
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Changes in the volumes of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities contributed to a
$1,749 decrease in net interest income. For the six months ended June 30, average earning assets
increased $24.0 million or 4.1 percent to $613.3 million in 2010 from $589.3 million in 2009.
Despite the growth, tax-equivalent interest income decreased $1,165 due to changes in volumes of
earning assets. Specifically, the decline was due, for the most part, to a $43.6 million or 8.5
percent reduction in average loans. Average tax-exempt loans decreased $36.3 million, while taxable
loans declined $7.3 million, which resulted in reductions in tax-equivalent interest income of
$1,117 and $209. With regard to tax-exempt loans, several large tax and revenue anticipation notes
of local municipalities, which were outstanding
during the first half of 2009, matured by year end. As part of our tax planning strategy for 2010,
we chose not to actively compete for these types of loans. The maturities and repayments received
from the loan portfolio were reinvested in lower-yielding assets.
Also adversely impacting tax-equivalent net interest income was growth in average interest-bearing
liabilities of $27.5 million to $502.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, from $474.6
million for the same six months of 2009. The growth resulted in additional interest expense of
$584.
Specifically, average interest-bearing transaction accounts, which include money market, NOW and
savings accounts, grew $39.0 million and together caused interest expense to increase $240. Average
total time deposits increased $7.0 million and resulted in additional interest expense of $105.
Long-term debt averaged $8.0 million in 2010 and resulted in an increase in interest expense of
$320. Partially offsetting these increase, was a decrease in average short-term borrowings of $26.5
million comparing the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, which resulted in a reduction in
interest expense of $81.
In addition to the unfavorable volume variance, a negative rate variance resulted in a decrease of
$271 in tax-equivalent net interest income. Reductions in loan and investment yields, more than
offset a decrease in funding costs. The tax-equivalent yield on earning assets decreased 92 basis
points to 4.91 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2010, from 5.83 percent for the same
period of 2009, resulting in a reduction in interest income of $938. Specifically, the
tax-equivalent yield on the loan portfolio decreased 31 basis points, while the tax-exempt yield on
the investment portfolio declined 229 basis points comparing the first half of 2010 and 2009. These
reductions in yield led to declines in tax-equivalent interest income of $652 and $284.
The reduction in interest revenue was offset partially by a decrease in interest expense of $667,
which resulted from a 15 basis point decrease in the cost of funds to 2.04 percent for the first
half of 2010 from 2.19 percent for the same period of 2009. We experienced a significant decrease
in our time deposit costs, as promotional gas lease certificates of deposit were renewed at lower
rates. As a result, the average cost of time deposits decreased 53 basis points to 2.91 percent in
2010 from 3.44 percent in 2009. This resulted in a reduction in interest expense of $635 and
accounted for 95.2 percent of the total decrease in interest expense.
49
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
For the quarter ended June 30, 2010, tax-equivalent net interest income decreased $1,110 in
comparison to the same three months of last year. Similar to the results for six months, the
increase was due primarily to a negative volume variance of $929, coupled with a negative rate
variance of $181. Average earning assets grew $25.5 million comparing the second quarters of 2010
and 2009. However, similar to the year-to-date analysis, the change resulted in a reduction in
tax-equivalent interest income of
$646. In addition, growth of $30.2 million in interest-bearing liabilities resulted in additional
interest expense of $283. With regard to the negative rate variance, the tax-equivalent yield on
earning assets decreased 97 basis points comparing the second quarters of 2010 and 2009, which
resulted in a reduction in interest revenue of $451. Partially mitigating the decrease in revenue
was a reduction in interest expense of $270 due to a 12 basis point decline in our cost of funds.
Maintenance of an adequate net interest margin is one of our primary concerns. Monies received from
repayments and maturities from our loan portfolio reinvested into lower-yielding assets, a
reduction in the volume of tax-exempt loans, higher levels of nonaccrual loans and issuance of
subordinated debt all factored into the 82 basis point decrease in our tax-equivalent net interest
margin to 3.25 percent for the first half of 2010 from 4.07 percent for the same period of 2009.
For the second quarter, our net interest margin was 3.19 percent, a contraction of 90 basis points
compared to 4.09 percent for the second quarter of 2009 and 11 basis points compared to 3.30
percent for the previous quarter. The FOMC has indicated that general market rates would remain low
for some time. However, no assurance can be given that these conditions will continue. Net interest
income could be adversely affected by changes in general market rates or increased competition. We
believe by following prudent pricing practices coupled with careful investing, our net interest
margin will improve.
50
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
The average balances of assets and liabilities, corresponding interest income and expense
and resulting average yields or rates paid for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, are
summarized as follows. Earning assets averages include nonaccrual loans. Investment averages
include available-for-sale securities at amortized cost. Income on investment securities and loans
are adjusted to a tax-equivalent basis using the statutory tax rate of 34.0 percent.
Summary of net interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Income/
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Income/
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earning assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable
|
|
$
|
439,048
|
|
|
$
|
11,883
|
|
|
|
5.46
|
%
|
|
$
|
446,405
|
|
|
$
|
12,884
|
|
|
|
5.82
|
%
|
Tax-exempt
|
|
|
31,218
|
|
|
|
970
|
|
|
|
6.27
|
|
|
|
67,528
|
|
|
|
1,947
|
|
|
|
5.81
|
|
Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable
|
|
|
91,983
|
|
|
|
1,256
|
|
|
|
2.75
|
|
|
|
33,589
|
|
|
|
684
|
|
|
|
4.11
|
|
Tax-exempt
|
|
|
22,063
|
|
|
|
818
|
|
|
|
7.48
|
|
|
|
41,375
|
|
|
|
1,531
|
|
|
|
7.46
|
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
29 011
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
433
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
0.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earning assets
|
|
|
613,323
|
|
|
|
14,944
|
|
|
|
4.91
|
%
|
|
|
589,330
|
|
|
|
17,047
|
|
|
|
5.83
|
%
|
Less: allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
15,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,602
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
47,303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,877
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
644,726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
618,605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market accounts
|
|
$
|
34,895
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
0.98
|
%
|
|
$
|
27,229
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
0.84
|
%
|
NOW accounts
|
|
|
100,946
|
|
|
|
758
|
|
|
|
1.51
|
|
|
|
75,689
|
|
|
|
561
|
|
|
|
1.49
|
|
Savings accounts
|
|
|
110,124
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
0.44
|
|
|
|
104,034
|
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
|
0.53
|
|
Time deposits less than $100
|
|
|
157,696
|
|
|
|
2,403
|
|
|
|
3.07
|
|
|
|
165,475
|
|
|
|
2,772
|
|
|
|
3.38
|
|
Time deposits $100 or more
|
|
|
90,426
|
|
|
|
1,176
|
|
|
|
2.62
|
|
|
|
75,684
|
|
|
|
1,337
|
|
|
|
3.56
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.61
|
|
|
|
26,537
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
0.70
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
8.07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
502,104
|
|
|
|
5,068
|
|
|
|
2.04
|
%
|
|
|
474,648
|
|
|
|
5,151
|
|
|
|
2.19
|
%
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
88,005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
3,260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
51,357
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
644,726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
618,605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income/spread
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,876
|
|
|
|
2.87
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,896
|
|
|
|
3.64
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.25
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.07
|
%
|
Tax equivalent adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
330
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
662
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
521
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
608
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note:
|
|
Average balances were calculated using average daily balances. Interest income on loans
include fees of $381 in 2010 and $532 in 2009. Available-for-sale securities, included in
investment securities, are stated at amortized cost with the related average unrealized
holding gains of $918 and $2,647 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 included in
other assets. Tax-equivalent adjustments were calculated using the prevailing statutory tax
rate of 34.0 percent.
|
51
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Provision for Loan Losses:
We evaluate the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses account on a quarterly basis utilizing
our systematic analysis in accordance with procedural discipline. We take into consideration
certain factors such as composition of the loan portfolio, volumes of nonperforming loans, volumes
of net charge-offs, prevailing economic conditions and other relevant factors when determining the
adequacy of the allowance for loan losses account. We make monthly provisions to the allowance for
loan losses
account in order to maintain the allowance at the appropriate level indicated by our evaluations.
Based on our most current evaluation, we believe that the allowance is adequate to absorb any known
and inherent losses in the portfolio.
For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010, the provision for loan losses totaled $300
and $1,300. In comparison, the provision for loan losses was $520 and $1,090 for the respective
periods of 2009.
Noninterest Income:
Noninterest income for the second quarter decreased $378 or 28.6 percent to $944 in 2010 from
$1,322 in 2009. A $276 or 56.3 percent decrease in mortgage banking income was the primary factor
contributing to the second quarter reduction. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, noninterest
income totaled $2,327, a decrease of $569 or 19.6 percent from $2,896 for the same six months of
2009. Included in year-to-date noninterest income in 2009 was a net gain of $294 from the
dispositions of the former Tunkhannock and Eaton Township, Pennsylvania branch offices. Activity in
our secondary mortgage banking division subsided, which caused a $397 decrease in mortgage banking
income comparing the first half of 2010 and 2009. Service charges, fees and commissions decreased
$125 to $1,471 in 2010 from $1,596 in 2009. For the six months ended June 30, noninterest income
included a net gain from the sale of available-for-sale investment securities of $361 in 2010 and
$114 in 2009.
Noninterest Expense:
In general, noninterest expense is categorized into three main groups: employee-related
expenses, occupancy and equipment expenses and other expenses. Employee-related expenses are costs
associated with providing salaries, including payroll taxes and benefits, to our employees.
Occupancy and equipment expenses, the costs related to the maintenance of facilities and equipment,
include depreciation, general maintenance and repairs, real estate taxes, rental expense offset by
any rental income, and utility costs. Other expenses include general operating expenses such as
advertising, contractual services, insurance, including FDIC assessment, other taxes and supplies.
Several of these costs and expenses are variable while the remainder are fixed. We utilize budgets
and other related strategies in an effort to control the variable expenses.
52
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Major components of noninterest expense for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010 and
2009, are summarized as follows:
Noninterest expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and payroll taxes
|
|
$
|
1,733
|
|
|
$
|
1,681
|
|
|
$
|
3,461
|
|
|
$
|
3,375
|
|
Employee benefits
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
|
483
|
|
|
|
909
|
|
|
|
929
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits expense
|
|
|
2,183
|
|
|
|
2,164
|
|
|
|
4,370
|
|
|
|
4,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net occupancy and equipment expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net occupancy expense
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
590
|
|
|
|
627
|
|
Equipment expense
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
560
|
|
|
|
631
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net occupancy and equipment expense
|
|
|
547
|
|
|
|
583
|
|
|
|
1,150
|
|
|
|
1,258
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing expense
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
361
|
|
Other taxes
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
Stationery and supplies
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
Contractual services
|
|
|
512
|
|
|
|
599
|
|
|
|
1,005
|
|
|
|
1,136
|
|
Insurance, including FDIC assessment
|
|
|
402
|
|
|
|
807
|
|
|
|
762
|
|
|
|
977
|
|
Other
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
459
|
|
|
|
818
|
|
|
|
844
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
1,636
|
|
|
|
2,260
|
|
|
|
3,200
|
|
|
|
3,793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense
|
|
$
|
4,366
|
|
|
$
|
5,007
|
|
|
$
|
8,720
|
|
|
$
|
9,355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the second quarter, noninterest expense decreased $641 or 12.8 percent to $4,366 in 2010 from
$5,007 in 2009. The decrease resulted primarily from a $624 or 27.6 percent decrease in other
expenses. Salaries and employee benefits expense increased $19, while net occupancy and equipment
expense decreased $36. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, noninterest expense decreased $635
or 6.8 percent to $8,720 in 2010 from $9,355 in 2009. We measure our efficiency using two key
industry ratios, the operating efficiency ratio and the overhead ratio. The operating efficiency
ratio is defined as noninterest expense as a percentage of net interest income and noninterest
income, and the overhead ratio is calculated by dividing noninterest expense by average total
assets. Despite the decrease in noninterest expense, our operating efficiency ratio weakened to
75.2 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2010 from 68.7 percent for the same six months of
2009 due to a reductions in net interest income and noninterest income. However, our overhead ratio
improved to 2.7 percent for the first half of 2010 compared to 3.0 percent for the same period last
year.
53
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Salaries and employee benefits expense comprise the majority of our noninterest expense.
These payroll-related expenses increased $19 to $2,183 for the second quarter of 2010 from $2,164
for the same quarter of 2009. Salaries and payroll taxes increased $52, while employee benefits
decreased $33. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, payroll and benefit related expenses totaled
$4,370, an increase of $66 or 1.5 percent from $4,304 for the same six months of 2009.
Occupancy and equipment expense decreased $36 or 6.2 percent comparing the second quarters of 2010
and 2009. Building-related expense declined $13 due primarily to a reduction in rental expense,
while decreases in software and office equipment depreciation resulted in a $23 decline in
equipment-related expense. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, occupancy and equipment expense totaled
$1,150 a decrease of $108 from $1,258 for the same six months of 2009.
For the second quarter, other expenses decreased $624 or 27.6 percent to $1,636 in 2010 from $2,260
in 2009. Year-to-date other expenses totaled $3,200, a decrease of $593 or 15.6 percent compared to
$3,793 for the same period one year ago. The quarterly and year-to-date decreases were due largely
to reductions in marketing-related expenses, directors fees and deposit insurance.
Our deposits are insured up to regulatory limits by the FDIC and accordingly, are subject to
deposit insurance assessments. Under the provisions of The Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act of
2005 (the Reform Act), the Bank Insurance Fund and the Savings Association Insurance Fund were
merged into the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF). Under the Reform Act, the annual DIF assessment
rate is based upon statutory factors that include the balance of insured deposits as well as the
degree of risk the institution poses to the insurance fund. Each institution is placed into one of
four risk categories depending on the institutions capital ratios and supervisory ratings. Based
on our latest assignments, we migrated from Risk Category I, institutions posing the least amount
of risk to the DIF, to Risk Category II and will pay approximately $0.22 per $100 dollars of
assessable deposits for the second quarter of 2010. The migration resulted directly from the
deterioration in our asset quality.
On November 12, 2009, the FDIC issued a final rule that required all insured depository
institutions to prepay their estimated quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of
2009 and for all of 2010, 2011 and 2012. Our prepaid assessment was $2.9 million at June 30, 2010
and $3.5 million at December 31, 2009. The FDIC also adopted a uniform increase in assessment rates
of $0.03 per $100 dollars of assessable deposits effective January 1, 2011.
54
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
There is a separate levy assessed on all FDIC-insured institutions to cover the cost of Finance
Corporation (FICO) funding. The FDIC established annual FICO assessment rate effective for the
first and second quarters of 2010 at 0.0104 per $100 dollars of DIF-assessable deposits. Our FICO
assessments totaled $31 and $28 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
Income Taxes:
For the six months ended June 30, 2010, we recorded an income tax benefit of $765. In comparison,
we had income tax expense of $174 for the same period of 2009. The income tax benefit arose from
the utilization of tax credits from our investments as a limited partner in elderly and low-income
housing projects to mitigate our tax burden. One such project affords us approximately $3.7 million
in investment tax credits over a 10-year period which began in 2007. We expect to recognize a total
of $372 in tax credits from this project in 2010. In the fourth quarter of 2009, Community Bank
made an investment in another elderly, low-income housing project. For this investment, Community
Bank will receive a one-time historical tax credit of approximately $1.5 million in 2010 and
approximately $5.5 million in low-income housing credits spread over a period beginning in 2010 and
ending in 2021. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, we recognized tax credits totaling $932
from these investments.
The difference between the amount of income tax currently payable and the provision for income tax
expense reflected in the income statements arise from temporary differences. Temporary differences
are differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the
financial statements, which result in deferred tax assets or liabilities. We perform quarterly
reviews on the tax criteria related to the recognition of deferred tax assets. We decided not to
establish a valuation reserve for the deferred tax assets since it is likely that these assets
will be realized through carry-back to taxable income in prior years and by future reversals of
existing taxable temporary differences or, to a lesser extent, through future taxable income.
55
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures:
As of June 30, 2010, the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our Chief
Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), evaluated the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act). Based upon that evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded
that our disclosure controls and procedures, as of June 30, 2010, were effective to provide
reasonable assurance that
information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms,
and to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in such reports is
accumulated and communicated to the CEO and CFO to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting:
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial
reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Management previously
reported in the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, that it identified a
material weakness in internal control over financial reporting related to the recognition,
measurement, presentation and disclosure of the Companys allowance for loan losses. In order to
rectify the previously reported material weakness, management revised the Companys methodology in
determining the estimate for the allowance for loan losses under GAAP and applicable supervisory
guidance to include in the impairment valuation for loans collectively evaluated for impairment
under FASB ASC 450, Contingencies, qualitative factors to address the following:
|
|
|
The measurement of changes in the levels and trends of adversely classified
loans and their potential effect on risked-based capital ratios; and
|
|
|
|
The identification of and changes in concentrations of credit and their
potential effect on the allowance for loan losses.
|
After reviewing the results of these revisions, management concluded that internal controls related
to the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of the Companys allowance for losses
are designed and operating effectively to prevent a material error from occurring or to assure that
such an error would be detected and corrected in a timely manner. In order to ensure that adequacy
and accuracy in these determinations are consistently present, management will continue to enhance
its methodology to improve the estimates with respect to the applicable supervisory guidance with
the assistance of an external independent consulting firm.
56
Comm Bancorp, Inc.
OTHER INFORMATION
Part II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
NONE
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
NONE
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
NONE
Item 4. Removed and reserved
NONE
Item 5. Other Information
On August 9, 2010, the Company and F.N.B. Corporation entered into an Agreement and Plan
of Merger, whereby the Company will be merged with and into F.N.B. Corporation and a
related bank merger agreement by and between the Companys wholly-owned subsidiary bank,
Community Bank and Trust Company and F.N.B. Corporations wholly-owned subsidiary bank,
First National Bank of Pennsylvania. The closings on these mergers are conditioned upon,
among other things, approvals of applicable regulatory agencies and the stockholders of
the Company.
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
(i)
|
|
CEO and CFO certifications pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
CEO and CFO certifications pursuant to Section 1350.
|
57
COMM BANCORP, INC.
FORM 10-Q
SIGNATURE PAGE
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto,
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registrant, Comm Bancorp, Inc.
|
|
Date: August 13, 2010
|
/s/ William F. Farber, Sr.
|
|
|
William F. Farber, Sr.
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
Chairman of the Board/Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 13, 2010
|
/s/ Scott A. Seasock
|
|
|
Scott A. Seasock
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 13, 2010
|
/s/ Stephanie A. Westington, CPA
|
|
|
Stephanie A. Westington, CPA
|
|
|
Vice President of Finance
(Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
58
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item Number
|
|
Description
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
(i)
|
|
CEO and CFO Certifications Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
CEO and CFO Certifications Pursuant to Section 1350.
|
|
|
62
|
|
59
Comm Bancorp (MM) (NASDAQ:CCBP)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2024 to Apr 2024
Comm Bancorp (MM) (NASDAQ:CCBP)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2023 to Apr 2024