UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
_________________
FORM 6-K
REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16 UNDER
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Date: July 28, 2017
UBS Group AG
Commission File Number: 1-36764
UBS AG
Commission File Number: 1-15060
(Registrants'
Names)
Bahnhofstrasse 45, Zurich, Switzerland and
Aeschenvorstadt 1, Basel, Switzerland
(Address of principal executive offices)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or
will file annual reports under cover of Form 20‑F or Form 40-F.
Form 20-F
x
Form
40-F
o
This
Form 6-K consists of the presentation materials related to the Second Quarter 2017
Results of UBS Group AG and UBS AG, and the related speaker notes, which appear
immediately following this page.
Second
quarter
2017
results
28 July
2017
Speeches
by
Sergio
P.
Ermotti
,
Group
Chief
Executive
Officer
and
Kirt
Gardner
,
Group
Chief
Financial
Officer
Sergio
P.
Ermotti
Slide 2 – 1H17 net profit up 40% to 2.4bn
Thank
you Caroline, good morning Maria, good morning everyone. We will keep our
remarks short as it's a relatively straightforward quarter and we know it’s a
very busy day for everyone.
Kirt
will focus on the quarter, which was characterized by continued positive
momentum on the wealth management side. This is in contrast to low client
activity affecting our institutional business, especially relative to the prior
year, on the back of low volatility levels across all major asset classes,
particularly in FX markets.
Considering
market conditions, second quarter results were very good and contributed to an
excellent performance for the first half, with adjusted profit before tax of
3.6 billion francs, almost 20% higher than last year, and net profit of 2.4
billion, up 40%.
Year-to-date
returns were solid, with an adjusted return on tangible equity of 12%, or
almost 17% excluding the impact of deferred tax assets.
Global
Wealth Management delivered an excellent performance, with profit before tax up
17% to 2.1 billion, as increased client activity, higher US dollar rates,
invested assets and lending, further progress on mandate penetration, and good
cost control supported profit growth.
As
previously highlighted, Personal and Corporate remains under pressure from
negative rates, but we saw growth in transaction and recurring net fee income
as we work to temper interest rate headwinds. Business dynamics remained
strong, with the best net new business volume in over a decade and record
levels of new client acquisition in personal banking.
Asset
Management profits were roughly flat, despite the pressures faced by the
industry as the shift from active to passive investing continues. We also saw
30 billion in net new money, excluding money market flows, our best performance
in over a decade. Recently, the Chinese regulator granted a Private Fund Management
license for Asset Management. We are the first qualified domestic limited
partner license holder to receive such a license in China and we are very glad
and honoured about that. This means that we can offer onshore investment
products for Chinese institutional and high net worth investors, which we also
expect Wealth Management to benefit from. While it will take time to realize
the benefits, it is a significant milestone, and underlines our progress in
China, which remains a top long-term growth opportunity for the Group.
Our
Investment Bank's profits were up 19% and its return on attributed equity was
once again very strong, at over 21%. Renewed strength in our Corporate Client
Solutions business, with growth in all areas, as well as higher Equities revenues
and good cost control helped offset low client activity in FRC.
On
capital, our CET1 leverage ratio, which currently is our binding constraint,
increased to 3.7%. Our CET1 capital ratio remains strong at 13.5% despite
regulatory-driven methodology changes and other regulatory inflation in
risk-weighted assets. We are very comfortable with the absolute level of
capital we hold, with CET1 capital growing to 32 billion and over 74 billion of
total loss-absorbing capital. We also remain very comfortable with both of our
CET1 ratios. Therefore, our capital returns policy remains unchanged.
Slide 3 – Global WM – Strong 1H17
We
continued to make good progress in our world-leading wealth management
business. As we have said before, our key objective for global wealth
management – and for all of our businesses – is to grow profitably and
sustainably over the cycle. I'm particularly pleased that we were able to
generate substantial additional profits and strong net new money with fewer
advisors, confirming that our growth is not dependent on aggressive hiring.
Pre-tax
profits for the first half were up a very strong 17% to 2.1 billion. In terms
of client sentiment, improved confidence in the first half has led to higher
transactional income, although trading volumes remain volatile on a
week-to-week basis. Clients are also making more use of leverage.
Recurring
revenues were the highest we have seen in 8 years, as we have benefited not
only from US Dollar rate rises and higher invested asset levels, but also from
strategic initiatives, including increased mandate penetration.
We
continued to improve efficiency, and net margin increased by 1 basis point.
Global WM – Key strategic differentiators
Last
quarter, we highlighted the three unique drivers of growth in our global wealth
management business.
The
Americas, APAC and Ultra High Net Worth continue to deliver excellent performances.
Our Americas business has added further to its strong track record, growing PBT
by 25%.
Our
leading APAC business is clearly a highlight, as we saw record PBT, up 41%
year-on-year, and this year, the business is the second largest profit contributor
regionally, after the Americas.
Our
global Ultra High Net Worth business delivered PBT growth of 12%, and we are in
an excellent position to benefit from the significant growth opportunity
presented by this client segment. This is especially true thanks to our strong
and competitive Investment Bank.
In
summary, we had a very strong second quarter and first half for the Group, and
some of the dynamics we are seeing are encouraging, but we probably need a few
more quarters of strong performance across wealth management before we call
this a trend.
Thank
you, and now Kirt will take you through our results for the quarter.
Kirt Gardner
Thank
you, Sergio. Good morning everyone.
Slide 5 –
UBS Group AG results (consolidated)
2Q17 was
a strong quarter, with net profit attributable to shareholders of 1.2bn up 14%
year-over-year, and adjusted return on tangible equity of 11.4%, or nearly 16%
ex-DTAs, which we believe is much more comparable with our competitors.
For the
second quarter, adjusted PBT was 1.7 billion, with adjusting items of 258
million francs in net restructuring expenses, a 107 million gain on the sale of
our remaining investment in IHS Markit, and 22 of million net FX translation
losses.
My
comments compare year-on-year quarters and reference adjusted results unless
otherwise stated.
Slide 6 –
Global WM – Profit before tax up 15%
Our
leading global wealth management businesses delivered another excellent
quarter, increasing PBT by 15% to over one billion on good operating leverage.
Revenue rose
by 7% with increases in all categories, due to improved client sentiment and
activity levels, as well as the effects of management actions.
The
increase in recurring fee income reflects invested asset growth and increased
mandate penetration, partially offset by the impact of cross-border outflows
and the shift to retrocession-free products.
At the
end of the second quarter, mandate penetration was over 32%, up 130 basis
points and on a larger asset base. With higher mandate penetration, we
increased our recurring revenue along with improving our overall margin.
Transaction-based
revenues increased by 13%, reflecting improved sentiment and activity levels
globally. Asia was the biggest driver, followed by the US and Switzerland.
Net
interest income growth reflects higher short-term US dollar rates, particularly
for WMA, and a 4% year-on-year growth in lending balances globally, which
offset higher funding costs and the effects of negative rates on WM. After a
period of client deleveraging, we are encouraged that Wealth Management saw its
second consecutive quarter of strong loan growth, reflecting continued improved
client sentiment and risk appetite.
Costs
increased by 5%, as a result of higher compensable revenues and litigation
expenses in WMA, partly offset by lower costs in WM from actions taken last
year.
Slide 7 –
Global WM – Regional performance
Looking
at the last twelve months, we reinforced our status as the only truly global
wealth manager, with a very balanced regional contribution to profit.
Approximately one third of profits were generated in the US, one third in
Europe including Switzerland, and one third in Emerging Markets and APAC. We
are particularly pleased with the continued strong growth and profitability
from our market-leading franchise in Asia.
For the
first half, Wealth Management had net new money of over 32 billion, a 6.6%
annualized growth rate on an invested asset base of over a trillion. We
delivered very strong growth as we continued to focus on both quality and
profitability, as evidenced by the 5.3 billion outflows related to the
introduction of euro deposit fees, and despite 3.2 billion of cross-border
outflows. We also improved productivity, as we reduced our client advisors by
4% from the previous year.
For the
second quarter, WM attracted 14 billion of net new money, the highest 2Q figure
in a decade, with growth in all regions.
For the
second half of 2017, we expect around 3 billion of outflows related to euro
deposit charging, as well as cross-border outflows of around 11 billion, with
the typical peak in the fourth quarter.
WMA had
net outflows of 6 billion, reflecting both seasonal tax payments of around 3.3
billion and lower recruiting in the quarter. As we further transition our
operating model, we expect net new money to stabilize over the next few
quarters as the effect of the new recruiting policy normalizes and we see a
pick-up from same store FAs.
Slide 8 –
Personal & Corporate Banking
Personal
and Corporate's PBT declined 18% to 379 million. That said, we are pleased with
the strong growth in transaction-based and recurring fee revenue – up 7 and 8%,
respectively – which partly offset expected net interest income headwinds.
Net
credit loss expense was 28 million, compared to a 2 million recovery in 2Q16.
This was driven by a small number of newly impaired corporate client positions
across a range of sectors.
Operating
expenses increased by 7% to 556 million, due to increased expenditure on
strategic and regulatory initiatives, as well as higher variable compensation.
Slide 9 –
Asset Management
Asset
Management generated 133 million in PBT, down 10% year-on-year, but up QoQ.
Performance fees increased significantly, as nearly 80% of eligible hedge fund
assets were above high water marks at quarter-end. Net management fees
decreased from ongoing margin compression due to client shifts to passive
strategies, as well as lower transaction fees and higher custody fee charges,
partly offset by market performance.
Operating
expenses increased, driven by higher variable compensation, partly offset by
lower salary and G&A expenses.
We
attracted over 10 billion of net new money excluding money market flows, with
over 70% into passive strategies. This follows the substantial inflows already
seen last quarter and underlines the strength of our passive franchise. With
over 700 billion of total invested assets, we're now at the highest level since
3Q08. Nearly 250 billion of these are in passive strategies.
Earlier
this year, we announced the sale of our Swiss and Luxembourg Fund Services
Units, which is expected to close in 3Q17 and reduce quarterly PBT by roughly
10 million.
Slide 10
– Investment Bank
The IB
delivered a return on attributed equity of 18% for the quarter, a good result
in challenging market conditions. PBT declined by 6%, as lower operating
expenses and increased CCS and Equities revenues couldn't fully offset 36%
lower FRC revenues.
Corporate
Client Solutions was up 10%, driven by higher ECM revenues from both private
transactions and public offerings.
In ICS,
Equities revenues increased 3%, mainly as Derivatives benefitted from increased
client activity.
As a
reminder, our FX-dominated Foreign Exchange, Rates and Credit business is
flow-driven and balance sheet light, making it highly dependent on client
activity, especially institutional client flows. The low volatility and
volumes seen throughout 2017 have therefore created a particularly challenging
environment for our business. The year-on-year comparison also reflects a
strong 2Q16, which benefitted from increased flows around Brexit.
Operating
expenses were down 3%, partly as a result of the cost actions taken in 2016 and
a UK bank levy credit.
The IB's LRD
fell by 10 billion francs in the quarter, mainly due to foreign currency
translation and continued prudent management. I'll discuss RWA developments in
more detail shortly.
Slide 11
– Corporate Center
The
Corporate Center loss before tax was 269 million.
Services'
loss before tax was 137 million, a 76 million improvement, mainly as a greater
proportion of costs are allocated to business divisions this year. We expect
Corporate Center allocations to business divisions to increase somewhat in the
second half of the year, consistent with the pattern we have seen in previous
years, as well as an increase related to strategic and regulatory initiatives.
Group
ALM's loss before tax was 81 million, mostly due to accounting asymmetries
related to losses on economic hedges, which mean-revert to zero over time.
Non-core
and Legacy Portfolio posted a pre-tax loss of 51 million, an improvement of 73
million as a result of litigation provision releases and a UK bank levy credit.
Slide 12
– Cost reduction
During the
quarter, we increased our net cost reduction run-rate to 1.8 billion, with
contributions from both Corporate Center and business divisions. We remain
confident that we'll achieve the full 2.1 billion target by year-end.
We expect
restructuring costs to be around 700 million in the second half of this year,
and then to significantly taper from 2018.
Slide 13
– RWA development
In the
last 6 quarters, we have seen 25 billion of regulatory-driven methodology
changes and other regulatory inflation in RWA, nearly half of which in the
second quarter of 2017. This accounts for substantially all of the RWA
increase in the last year and a half. Business growth during this period has
been offset by foreign currency translation and efficient resource management.
We believe that the majority of this quarter's increase is essentially an
advance on changes that are expected once Basel 3 is finalized.
For the
second half of 2017, we expect around 6 billion of regulatory-driven increases.
After
that, the extent and timing of further increases will depend on regulatory
developments. Once these are finalized, we will assess the impact and develop
an appropriate response.
Slide 14
– Capital and leverage ratios (fully applied)
On a
fully applied basis, our CET1 capital increased by 600 million to nearly 32
billion, mainly as a result of profits in the quarter. Our capital position
remains strong, with a CET1 capital ratio of 13.5%.
Our LRD
reduced by 20 billion to a historic low of 861, largely on foreign currency translation,
along with continued prudent resource management. This, in combination with
our higher CET1 capital, pushed our CET1 leverage ratio up to 3.7%, a level
which we'd also be happy with in the longer term, although it may still
fluctuate during the transition period.
In
conclusion, we're pleased with our overall performance. We saw continued
progress on our cost reduction program and double-digit profit growth in global
wealth management, which offset the headwinds faced by our other businesses,
underlining the benefits of our diversified business model.
With
that, Sergio and I will open it up for questions.
Cautionary
statement regarding forward-looking statements:
This document contains statements that constitute
“forward-looking statements,” including but not limited to management’s outlook
for UBS’s financial performance and statements relating to the anticipated
effect of transactions and strategic initiatives on UBS’s business and future
development. While these forward-looking statements represent UBS’s judgments
and expectations concerning the matters described, a number of risks,
uncertainties and other important factors could cause actual developments and
results to differ materially from UBS’s expectations. These factors include,
but are not limited to: (i) the degree to which UBS is successful in the
ongoing execution of its strategic plans, including its cost reduction and
efficiency initiatives and its ability to manage its levels of risk-weighted
assets (RWA), including to counteract regulatory-driven increases, and leverage
ratio denominator, liquidity coverage ratio and other financial resources, and
the degree to which UBS is successful in implementing changes to its wealth
management businesses to meet changing market, regulatory and other conditions;
(ii) continuing low or negative interest rate environment, developments in the
macroeconomic climate and in the markets in which UBS operates or to which it
is exposed, including movements in securities prices or liquidity, credit spreads,
and currency exchange rates, and the effects of economic conditions, market
developments, and geopolitical tensions on the financial position or
creditworthiness of UBS’s clients and counterparties as well as on client
sentiment and levels of activity; (iii) changes in the availability of capital
and funding, including any changes in UBS’s credit spreads and ratings, as well
as availability and cost of funding to meet requirements for debt eligible for
total loss-absorbing capacity (TLAC); (iv) changes in or the implementation of
financial legislation and regulation in Switzerland, the US, the UK and other
financial centers that may impose, or result in, more stringent capital, TLAC,
leverage ratio, liquidity and funding requirements, incremental tax requirements,
additional levies, limitations on permitted activities, constraints on
remuneration, constraints on transfers of capital and liquidity and sharing of
operational costs across the Group or other measures, and the effect these
would have on UBS’s business activities; (v) uncertainty as to the extent to
which the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) will confirm
limited reductions of gone concern requirements due to measures to reduce
resolvability risk; (vi) the degree to which UBS is successful in implementing
further changes to its legal structure to improve its resolvability and meet
related regulatory requirements, including changes in legal structure and
reporting required to implement US enhanced prudential standards, completing
the implementation of a service company model, and the potential need to make
further changes to the legal structure or booking model of UBS Group in
response to legal and regulatory requirements, to proposals in Switzerland and
other jurisdictions for mandatory structural reform of banks or systemically
important institutions or to other external developments, and the extent to
which such changes will have the intended effects; (vii) the uncertainty
arising from the timing and nature of the UK exit from the EU and the potential
need to make changes in UBS’s legal structure and operations as a result of it;
(viii) changes in UBS’s competitive position, including whether differences in
regulatory capital and other requirements among the major financial centers
will adversely affect UBS’s ability to compete in certain lines of business;
(ix) changes in the standards of conduct applicable to our businesses that may
result from new regulation or new enforcement of existing standards, including
recently enacted and proposed measures to impose new and enhanced duties when
interacting with customers and in the execution and handling of customer
transactions; (x) the liability to which UBS may be exposed, or possible
constraints or sanctions that regulatory authorities might impose on UBS, due
to litigation, contractual claims and regulatory investigations, including the
potential for disqualification from certain businesses or loss of licenses or
privileges as a result of regulatory or other governmental sanctions, as well
as the effect that litigation, regulatory and similar matters have on the
operational risk component of our RWA; (xi) the effects on UBS’s cross-border
banking business of tax or regulatory developments and of possible changes in
UBS’s policies and practices relating to this business; (xii) UBS’s ability to
retain and attract the employees necessary to generate revenues and to manage,
support and control its businesses, which may be affected by competitive
factors including differences in compensation practices; (xiii) changes in
accounting or tax standards or policies, and determinations or interpretations
affecting the recognition of gain or loss, the valuation of goodwill, the
recognition of deferred tax assets and other matters; (xiv) UBS’s ability to
implement new technologies and business methods, including digital services and
technologies and ability to successfully compete with both existing and new
financial service providers, some of which may not be regulated to the same
extent; (xv) limitations on the effectiveness of UBS’s internal processes for
risk management, risk control, measurement and modeling, and of financial
models generally; (xvi) the occurrence of operational failures, such as fraud,
misconduct, unauthorized trading, financial crime, cyberattacks, and systems
failures; (xvii) restrictions on the ability of UBS Group AG to make payments
or distributions, including due to restrictions on the ability of its
subsidiaries to make loans or distributions, directly or indirectly, or, in the
case of financial difficulties, due to the exercise by FINMA or the regulators
of UBS’s operations in other countries of their broad statutory powers in
relation to protective measures, restructuring and liquidation proceedings;
(xviii) the degree to which changes in regulation, capital or legal structure,
financial results or other factors, including methodology, assumptions and
stress scenarios, may affect UBS’s ability to maintain its stated capital
return objective; and (xix) the effect that these or other factors or
unanticipated events may have on our reputation and the additional consequences
that this may have on our business and performance. The sequence in which the
factors above are presented is not indicative of their likelihood of occurrence
or the potential magnitude of their consequences. Our business and financial
performance could be affected by other factors identified in our past and
future filings and reports, including those filed with the SEC. More detailed
information about those factors is set forth in documents furnished by UBS and
filings made by UBS with the SEC, including UBS’s Annual Report on Form 20-F
for the year ended 31 December 2016. UBS is not under any obligation to (and
expressly disclaims any obligation to) update or alter its forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or
otherwise.
Disclaimer:
This
document and the information contained herein are provided solely for
information purposes, and are not to be construed as a solicitation of an offer
to buy or sell any securities or other financial instruments in Switzerland,
the United States or any other jurisdiction. No investment decision relating to
securities of or relating to UBS Group AG, UBS AG or their affiliates should be
made on the basis of this document. Refer to UBS's second quarter 2017 report
and its Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 31 December 2016. No
representation or warranty is made or implied concerning, and UBS assumes no
responsibility for, the accuracy, completeness, reliability or comparability of
the information contained herein relating to third parties, which is based
solely on publicly available information. UBS undertakes no obligation to
update the information contained herein.
Use of adjusted
numbers
Adjusted results are
a non-GAAP financial measure as defined by SEC regulations. Refer to pages 7-10
of the 2Q17 report which is available in the section "Quarterly
reporting" at www.ubs.com/investors for an overview of adjusted numbers.
If applicable for a given adjusted KPI
(i.e., adjusted return on tangible equity), adjustment items are calculated on
an after-tax basis by applying an indicative tax rate.
Refer to page 15 of the 2Q17 report for more information.
© UBS 2017. The key symbol and UBS are
among the registered and unregistered trademarks of UBS. All rights reserved.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
UBS
Group AG
By:
_/s/ David Kelly________________
Name: David Kelly
Title: Managing Director
By:
_/s/
Federica Pisacane
Rohde___
Name: Federica Pisacane Rohde
Title: Executive Director
UBS
AG
By:
_/s/ David Kelly________________
Name: David Kelly
Title: Managing Director
By:
_/s/
Federica Pisacane
Rohde___
Name: Federica Pisacane Rohde
Title: Executive Director
Date: July 28, 2017
UBS (NYSE:UBS)
Historical Stock Chart
From Aug 2024 to Sep 2024
UBS (NYSE:UBS)
Historical Stock Chart
From Sep 2023 to Sep 2024