Endgame Nears in PPG's Pursuit of Rival -- WSJ
May 09 2017 - 3:02AM
Dow Jones News
By Christopher Alessi and Ben Dummett
Michael McGarry, chief executive of U.S. paint company PPG
Industries Inc., has a big decision to make: Does he take the risky
and rare step of going hostile in his $27 billion pursuit of Dutch
rival Akzo Nobel NV...or walk away?
Early Monday, Akzo rejected PPG's latest takeover offer. Mr.
McGarry has said he was ready to go around the company's board and
management and take his pitch directly to shareholders. Such a move
would be highly unusual for big, cross-border deal-making and could
trigger a bitter battle for shareholder support. Even if PPG were
to win over investors, Akzo's Dutch-based corporate structure could
still allow a bloc of its current directors to thwart such a
deal.
Akzo said it rejected PPG's latest, sweetened EUR24.6 billion
($27.1 billion) offer after "considerable in-depth analysis." Akzo
Chief Executive Ton Büchner and the company's supervisory board
chairman, Antony Burgmans, met with Mr. McGarry in Rotterdam, the
Netherlands, on Saturday.
PPG said in a written statement that the meeting lasted less
than 90 minutes and that Messrs. Büchner and Burgmans "stated up
front that they did not have the intent nor the authority to
negotiate." Mr. Büchner, speaking on a conference call with
reporters Monday, called the encounter cordial and said he and Mr.
Burgmans went in "open-minded."
The Dutch company insisted Monday that its go-it-alone strategy
would create greater value for shareholders. PPG said in a written
statement it was disappointed and believed that its proposal was
superior to any stand-alone plan.
Mr. McGarry has said he won't raise his bid, but he has said PPG
is preparing a public tender for Akzo. Going ahead with such a
move, without management consent, would, for all practical
purposes, equate to a hostile bid. Dutch law requires PPG to
publish a draft of its tender by June 1.
Other suitors in similar standoffs have opted to abandon their
pursuit, instead of engaging in a potentially long and bitter fight
with the board and management. Monsanto Co. dropped a $46 billion
cash-and-stock bid for Swiss rival Syngenta AG in 2015 amid
management's insistence on holding out.
Backing down carries its own risks. China National Chemical
Corp. later agreed to buy Syngenta for $43 billion in an all-cash
offer. And then last year, Bayer AG of Germany snapped up Monsanto
for $57 billion.
PPG's chances of success in its Akzo bid are clouded even
further because of Akzo's Dutch corporate structure. PPG enjoys
support for its bid from some of Akzo's key shareholders, led by
U.S. activist investor Elliott Management Corp. Elliott is pressing
to persuade management to discuss a deal. Last week, it published a
report it commissioned that forecast large job losses at Akzo in
the event it didn't agree to a tie-up. Akzo rejected those
findings.
Other large shareholders have also voiced support for a deal,
making it possible for PPG to win over enough shareholders in a
tender offer to advance the bid. But the path to an eventual
combination gets more complicated from there.
Akzo's corporate structure includes a controlling foundation not
uncommon for a Dutch company. The four foundation directors,
including Mr. Burgmans, Akzo's chairman, hold seats on Akzo's
supervisory board.
They can be voted off Akzo's board in a special shareholder
meeting, and Elliott is calling for a meeting specifically to
replace Mr. Burgmans. Akzo has refused to hold a meeting and argues
it has the sole right to decide whether to call one. Elliott has
threatened to appeal to a Netherlands-based business court, called
the Enterprise Chamber, to force a meeting. Elliott had no
immediate comment Monday.
The obstacles don't end there. Even if a meeting were held, and
shareholders removed Mr. Burgmans, the directors of the controlling
foundation -- including Mr. Burgmans -- retain the exclusive rights
to nominate replacement directors at Akzo. Supporters of such a
structure say it protects stakeholders in the company other than
investors -- for instance, workers.
Some observers say PPG could still prevail. A commitment to
proceed with a tender offer could provide enough pressure for those
board members to wave the white flag. Should they hold out,
however, and PPG wins over shareholders in a tender offer, pressure
would only mount.
Pittsburgh-based PPG initiated its courtship of Akzo at the
start of March, offering cash and stock valued at EUR83 a share. It
sweetened the bid to EUR88.72 a share later that month. Last month,
it raised its offer sharply again, to EUR96.75.
PPG called that offer "one last invitation" for Akzo to engage
in talks. Akzo shares were trading below EUR82 each on Monday
afternoon in Hamburg, suggesting still-deep skepticism over a
deal.
Write to Christopher Alessi at christopher.alessi@wsj.com and
Ben Dummett at ben.dummett@wsj.com
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
May 09, 2017 02:47 ET (06:47 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2017 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Akzo Nobel NV (EU:AKZA)
Historical Stock Chart
From Aug 2024 to Sep 2024
Akzo Nobel NV (EU:AKZA)
Historical Stock Chart
From Sep 2023 to Sep 2024