Worlds Inc (PK) (WDDD) Quote

Hopefully, he is doing a better job behind the scenes in making a deal come to fruition.

Kidron is doing a terrible job managing his promotion of his company
It’s been over 2 month since he announced a LOI with freeman
Total silence is not a way to promote what you believe is a promising future
It’s concerning since wddd is a penny and know one really cares or knows about the company
Sometimes any news is better than no news

Wddd was dropped to the OTCPK after trading below .01 along with other requirements
It was recently moved up to otcqb up listing

WDDD has been OTCQB certified since 2016. What are you referring to?

Looks like wddd has been up listed
What is the benefit of Otcqb?
Being listed on the OTCQB provides companies with increased visibility and exposure to a broader range of investors. This enhanced visibility can attract potential shareholders, analysts, and institutional investors who may not have been aware of or able to invest in the company previously.
In addition
The OTCQB is the mid-tier OTC equity market, which lists primarily early-stage and developing companies in the U.S. and international markets. OTCQB companies must meet certain minimum reporting standards, pass a bid test, and undergo annual verification.

More good news coming looks like something is brewing

Leonard Toboroff remains on the board:

https://www.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/407599/content

Leonard Toboroff is a great CEO, SPECIALIST: M&A, Financing, IPO's, Private Equity, Board Member, Finance Comm, Out of the Box Thinker

https://www.linkedin.com/in/leonard-toboroff-193b205a/

Thomas must want to take his big retirement, the time has come, at the moment it seems that everything is ready at WDDDD

tic tac ...

That original post was not made in response to you. If you go back you will see it was not in response to anyone. Please give it a rest.

Everyone has a right to their opinions here.

You are correct that we need to focus on the stock and not attack others. But is it an attack on me when someone responds to my post saying my strategy is a "low risk no reward? " Personally, I am not offended by that and don't consider it an attack on me. It was his opinion and that is fine. But if I say something along those lines, then comments are made that I am attacking a poster.

I try to keep it about the stock. I do respond or even dissect comments, but I don't attack the poster. There is a difference.

Additionally, if you read my comments carefully, I posted that I was not correct with my buy points - (so its not all about being right). It was trading in a range of .04 and I scooped up large blocks in the .018-.021, 2x+ drop range. Then it continued to drop all the way down to .008 range and has settled at .015.

I posted that it dropped 5X and my buys were in the 2x drop range, so I got shares at half price. That's ok, because I am comfortable with that, but it is clear that better deals became available, for those who waited (unfortunately that was not me). Others posted that they were buying in the .008-.01 range. Patience rewarded those buyers.

It's disappointing when posts discuss the likelihood of a lower interest rate soon and the possibility of a more friendly business environment coming and people put trash emojis on those statements - and not just my statements - others said it as well. Why not articulate what is wrong with those comments? Explain why lower interest rates won't help a start up etc. But I guess it's just easier to put trash emojis and hide in the shadows.

Good luck to you. Hopefully, everyone can make some $$ here.

You have a right to your opinion.

Enough is enough!

GLTAL

Leroy, I would respectfully disagree with that assessment. Yet here you are talking about me rather than the company and violating the terms of service.

The entire conversation started when another poster was critical of a strategy I posted. I simply responded to that.

The conversation re-ignited when I noticed a lot of trash emojis on not just my comments, but others as well.

If someone has a differing point of view, why not post it and back up your position or at least explain your theory, rather than just posting trash emojis etc? That would be productive, in my opinion and I suggested that, which then opened the door to this exchange.

A lot of folks were very critical of my stance, before the lawsuit was lost, and launched personal attacks on me, not my commentary - but that seemed to be ok with the moderators. No one seemed to care about the terms of service, when I was on the receiving end of it - because it was not what the majority wanted to hear. The result of the lawsuit showed that my concerns were well founded.

I simply dont let people twist words and play games when speaking with me. Holding people accountable for what they say by pointing it out, is not against the terms of service.

Just like a poster saying that buying up to .70 and you should be fine. Thats fine as its an opinion. However, it seemed foolish then and appears to be more foolish now, so I point that out. Same with the statements to just pay the ask. I suggest the opposite and waiting for the bleed off and picking up shares cheap.

When someone is critical of a statement I made and says its
"low risk, no reward" that means they believe it is a waste of time, foolish endeavor or not a worthwhile venture. Anything other than that is indefensible claiming it is not a waste of time.

But when I speak up then its a foul?

Dave has only one goal on this board and that is to be the top dog.

Instead of focusing on the company he talks about how he gets it right and talks negatively about other posters who differ.

His style is he attacks with what he thinks is humor.

Board rules state that you can talk about the company but not other posters.

Enough is enough!

GLTAL

Sorry but "low risk, no reward" equates with a waste of time, worthless venture etc. No one is mischaracterizing what you said - I put it in quotes.

Try to explain it away, but you are getting deeper into the quicksand. Those were your words and that is the plain meaning of it.

You said it and that was your opinion. Nothing wrong with that at all. But it happened to be proven wrong the very next day.

A man stands behind what he says and also admits when he is wrong. You did sort of offer a concession the following day, saying you were surprised I picked up the shares. That's fine as it proved it was NOT a "low risk, no reward" strategy.

But don't now try to change the meaning of what YOU said!

Best of luck to you.

Indeed, words have meaning. So, as the author of those words, I have attempted to correct your misrepresentation and clarify your erroneous interpretation.
Once again, I shall politely request that you not mischaracterize my words and not take them out of context.

Infer also means to "hint or suggest," which is what he did. He suggested or inferred that the strategy was a waste of time by stating it was a "low risk no reward" endeavor.

Thanks for the grammar lesson.

You seem to miss the point of your own statement.
You stating that waiting to buy cheap shares was a
"low risk, no reward" endeavor, implies that the practice is a waste of time! Clearly, it does not suggest it is a good or worthwhile practice.

Don't try to wiggle out of what you said. Those were your words and words have meaning.

The fact that I purchased a large block of shares on the cheap, the very next day (and multiple other days), shows that it is indeed a worthwhile venture.

As someone else stated, strategies can vary. I have no issue with that at all. My response was predictated upon your initial criticism of my strategy, which I posted, and happened to work out and very next day. So being patient, which I am, proved to work out and bought me twice as many shares, rather than your strategy of pay the ask, because we are expecting news.

Like I have said many times, no news = bleed down, and that's when I buy. I'm not worried about missing out, as I already have a significant position and this is just fun money, not a real investment.

Hopefully, we all make some $$ and can laugh about this in the end!

Keep sharing the strategies. They may change over time and/or we can all learn from each other.

I actually like what you said "low risk, no reward", as it's a catchy phrase. I just don't believe it applied to my strategy.

Good luck.

"What was indefensible, in my opinion, was your statements saying you did not infer that it was a waste of time.
Any rationale person with a third grade education"

Please review the difference between infer and imply.

https://www.grammarly.com/blog/imply-infer/

Any rationale person with [at least] a third grade education needs to know this difference.

Dave, I made no such inference. The point had to do with risk taking and the unwillingness to spend a little additional money for the potential of high returns and the possibility of missing an opportunity. I didn't imply or infer anything about wasting time. I will close on an area of agreement--it would be nice for everyone here to make a lot of money on this investment.

To clarify - the "low risk, no reward" statement was your opinion, which is totally fine. But I dont have to agree with it.

What was indefensible, in my opinion, was your statements saying you did not infer that it was a waste of time.

Any rationale person with a third grade education would equate "low risk, no reward" as pertaining to a waste of time.

You were expecting news as were many others. I did not believe the news would come that quickly and the price would bleed off in between. The price was in the .04 range at that time. I picked up more than 500k shares between .015 -.021.

So I did not "pay the ask" as suggested. Being patient, and only waiting a day in one case, provided an opportunity to pick up a nice block of shares at half price, which allows me to accumulate a larger position, on the cheap.

The reality is it dropped below where I was making buys, and dipped down to .008. So it dropped 5X below, where it was suggested to pay the ask.

Have to lighten up a bit and have a sense of humor. This is all in fun. I hope you and everyone here makes some $$ - even L4BC. But of course he doesn't need $$, as he is buying up to .70, and it will be quite some time before it approaches that range, if ever.

I have zero investment here hence I suppose I could be considered as neutral now. To be honest, at these prices, anything goes. There is no legitimate justified good or bad strategy, just ones' faith. It is pointless taking lumps out of each other. What ever will happen will happen irrespective of anyones predictions. This could be a gold mine but equally so, it could just be a talent of pyrites. I think you all just oughta hang in here and drink the cofee, chat and be surprised one day. There is a backbone to this endevour which seems to remain unbroken

I stick with the statements I made, on the day I made them, for the reasons stated. The predicates didn't materialize--news didn't come out and cheap shares were not hard to get. That doesn't make the rationale incorrect or indefensible, but I'm not revisiting this with you any further. Prospective decision making and retrospective reasoning are very different. I am not trying to convince you of anything, but out of respect, please do not mischaracterize my comments as indefensible, and if you are going to repeat them, please include the appropriate context. Thank you!

Sorry, your memory is incorrect. You made that statement and the next day I picked up 60k shares on the cheap. Then you backpedaled saying you did not infer it was a waste of time.

Your premise was pay the ask, pehaps with the expectation of news. I said, wait and no news and it bleeds off. It dropped off the very next day and I picoed up shares. Did that on multiple occasions. It has bled down significantly from the .04 range where it was at, therby providing multiple oppprtunities to pick yp cheap shares. Facts my friend.

Not about to re- visit all of that with you.

Good luck to you.

Since you brought up a previous comment of mine (yet again!), my suggestion was predicated on news coming out very soon and cheap shares being hard to obtain. Neither of those predicates materialized and, I think you are smart enough to realize that. So, repeatedly bringing this up out of context leads me to question your character, your intelligence, and/or your intellectual honesty. And, just so you know, I don't typically click emojis on this message board.

To refresh your memory about what you claim to be indefensible, here is what I previously posted when there was heightened expectation about forthcoming news:

"Just my opinion, but I think bid sitting this stock at this time isn't the best strategy. I consider it low risk no reward. Shares are hard to get at the bid. Maybe you could pick up a couple of thousand. But if you wanted more, you have to pay ask..."

When understood in the context as originally articulated, there is a very sound basis for this approach. You are welcome to disagree, but it is a mischaracterization to claim this is indefensible. It should not be necessary to explain this reasoning again, but perhaps you forgot the rationale. GLTY.

Seeing a lot of trash emojis on the board, lately. Unfortunate to see disagreement without any basis or articulable statements.

I guess after the indefensible "low risk, no reward" statement, it's just easier to click on emojis.

Disagreements on a board are healthy, especially if one can make a case for why they disagree and provide a basis for such. That way everyone can evaluate the statements, based on the facts presented, and make informed decisions.

Hopefully, some news is released soon and this takes off (like L4BC on his travel schedule). Good luck to everyone!

The Fed will lower the rates soon and the next administration will create a business friendly environment.

Buying at these levels will pay off for those who are patient and smart, as opposed to those paying the ask or bidding up to .70.

Anxiously awaiting travel updates. Now I trade stocks based off that important information!

FYI
Charles Schwab trading platform is down bc of the software glitch

FYI
Charles Schwab trading platform is down bc of the software glitch

Yes once rates begin to be lowered by the fed it will help start ups micro caps and small caps that
depend on financing to do business and support their businesses
Hopefully an up listing will happen soon and a continued news flow will come after from wddd ( which will happen)
And momentum will kick in !
Tough being patient but it will be worth wait imo

At these levels it really has no where to go but up. Still a gamble, but a worthwhile gamble in my opinion.

Perhaps a lower interest rate environment would help move things along here. I think that is coming soon.

Ha ha no one here really cares what anyone is doing with their private lives
People are here to make money …..period
Do believe news will begin to flow soon
Though mentioned before and frustrated with kidron ……understand deals do take time to finalize
Still adding to position

"Real news" would be welcomed. Adding at these levels is likely a good move and a worthwhile gamble.

Somehow, I don't find updates on recent travel itineraries useful in my trading strategies. ;)

Looks like it’s time for some real news next week
Still adding at these levels

Thanks, we all needed your travel itinerary. Sounds like the traveling circus is back on the road.

Some news will come out, hopefully sooner than later. They are working on something behind the scenes. Whether or not it comes to fruition, we will have to wait and see.

Tried to buy a bunch at bid yesterday nothing done
Raised the order to the asked nothing done
MM definitely manipulating the stock
Hoping for multiple news soon though have heard that before ha ha

Sell at your own peril.
I'm off to Scotland then over to Paris for the Olympics.
Get out and enjoy your Summer... only bellyaching and trash talking going on in here. Set alerts if you think it will help you manage your exposure.

Cheers!

The market sure is a rat race
You just want to be the winning rat
I’m the rat that wins
Ha ha ha ha

Quite a drop for 1.3k shares sold.

So I guess buying up to .70 isn't the best advice?

Also - just pay the ask - trying to get cheaper shares is "a low risk no reward endeavor?" Well here they are.

As stated many times, it always bleeds off, absent news. Those who were patient will be rewarded.

Rats on a sinking ship LOL

Patience patience
It can make you lots of money
Have holdings from 38 years ago now paying huge dividends
Everyone has a sell button

Shake the tree. I'd like some, too.

:(

What's left is only hope.. :(

Time to bail was has come and gone. :(

For some reason, I don't believe everything L4BC says. So perhaps, he only had 200k shares, lost confidence and now he's gone. Haven't seen him on here in a while.

His last few posts he was still pumping this saying it was safe to buy up to .70. I can understand why he doesn't come back, after posting advice like that and then it dips down to .0101.

Or perhaps he hasn't traveled anywhere or had much success lately - as most of his posts start with an update on his world travels and personal success stories.

L4BC = Tony Robbins (Jr.) motivational speaker. :)

But then again, it's difficult to motivate people when he doubles down on buying up to .70, and then the stock tanks.

I don't think L4BC exited his entire position. Before he claimed that he owned more than 5% of WDDD. So far we have not seen any large volume in activity, and had been 0 volume for long time. I guess he planed to take over entire WDDD before, then became an owner and CEO. He loves WDDD also Kidrin!👋😊

He needs to sleep well, don't bother him!🤣

Maybe L4BC lost his faith in Thom and exited his entire position.

Today at .01 - just another example of the bleed off, when there is no news. That's why you don't pay the ask - as some have suggested. Just be patient, it always drops back down. More shares for less $$.

And buying up to .70, as a safe bet - that strategy is reserved for L4BC, and only L4BC.

Looks like someone is exiting. 250K volume

Update update update kidron

News news news the only anecdote to keep interest in wddd