ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for default Register for Free to get streaming real-time quotes, interactive charts, live options flow, and more.
Netlist Inc (QB)

Netlist Inc (QB) (NLST)

0.68436
-0.03504
(-4.87%)

Professional-Grade Tools, for Individual Investors.

Premium

Key stats and details

Current Price
0.68436
Bid
0.05
Ask
1.72
Volume
307,836
0.6818 Day's Range 0.718
0.63 52 Week Range 1.65
Market Cap
Previous Close
0.7194
Open
0.71
Last Trade
100
@
0.68436
Last Trade Time
Financial Volume
$ 213,880
VWAP
0.694785
Average Volume (3m)
421,016
Shares Outstanding
274,803,498
Dividend Yield
-
PE Ratio
-3.47
Earnings Per Share (EPS)
-0.2
Revenue
147.1M
Net Profit
-53.87M

About Netlist Inc (QB)

Netlist provides high-performance solid state drives and modular memory solutions to enterprise customers in diverse industries. The Company's NVMe SSDs in various capacities and form factors and the line of custom and specialty memory products bring industry-leading performance to server and storag... Netlist provides high-performance solid state drives and modular memory solutions to enterprise customers in diverse industries. The Company's NVMe SSDs in various capacities and form factors and the line of custom and specialty memory products bring industry-leading performance to server and storage appliance customers and cloud service providers. Netlist licenses its portfolio of intellectual property including patents, in server memory, hybrid memory and storage class memory, to companies that implement Netlist's technology. To learn more, visit www.netlist.com. Show more

Sector
Semiconductor,related Device
Industry
Semiconductor,related Device
Website
Headquarters
Wilmington, Delaware, USA
Founded
-
Netlist Inc (QB) is listed in the Semiconductor,related Device sector of the OTCMarkets with ticker NLST. The last closing price for Netlist (QB) was $0.72. Over the last year, Netlist (QB) shares have traded in a share price range of $ 0.63 to $ 1.65.

Netlist (QB) currently has 274,803,498 shares outstanding. The market capitalization of Netlist (QB) is $197.69 million. Netlist (QB) has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of -3.47.

NLST Latest News

PeriodChangeChange %OpenHighLowAvg. Daily VolVWAP
1-0.02564-3.611267605630.710.74910.68014291450.70843416CS
4-0.02094-2.968949383240.70530.790.68013215140.72630077CS
12-0.49564-42.00338983051.181.270.674434210160.83056517CS
26-0.26064-27.5809523810.9451.320.635914080.85947846CS
52-0.91564-57.22751.61.650.636024590.98044608CS
156-2.88564-80.83025210083.576.10.636574602.01004306CS
2600.2345652.1476211650.449810.20.358699872.73538563CS

NLST - Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

What is the current Netlist (QB) share price?
The current share price of Netlist (QB) is $ 0.68436
How many Netlist (QB) shares are in issue?
Netlist (QB) has 274,803,498 shares in issue
What is the market cap of Netlist (QB)?
The market capitalisation of Netlist (QB) is USD 197.69M
What is the 1 year trading range for Netlist (QB) share price?
Netlist (QB) has traded in the range of $ 0.63 to $ 1.65 during the past year
What is the PE ratio of Netlist (QB)?
The price to earnings ratio of Netlist (QB) is -3.47
What is the cash to sales ratio of Netlist (QB)?
The cash to sales ratio of Netlist (QB) is 1.27
What is the reporting currency for Netlist (QB)?
Netlist (QB) reports financial results in USD
What is the latest annual turnover for Netlist (QB)?
The latest annual turnover of Netlist (QB) is USD 147.1M
What is the latest annual profit for Netlist (QB)?
The latest annual profit of Netlist (QB) is USD -53.87M
What is the registered address of Netlist (QB)?
The registered address for Netlist (QB) is CORPORATION TRUST CENTER, 1209 ORANGE ST, WILMINGTON, DELAWARE, 19801
What is the Netlist (QB) website address?
The website address for Netlist (QB) is www.netlist.com
Which industry sector does Netlist (QB) operate in?
Netlist (QB) operates in the SEMICONDUCTOR,RELATED DEVICE sector

Movers

View all
  • Most Active
  • % Gainers
  • % Losers
SymbolPriceVol.
VGFCQVery Good Food Company Inc (CE)
$ 0.005
(499,900.00%)
259.63k
NTPLNetplex Group Inc (CE)
$ 0.0025
(249,900.00%)
400
BIRMFBiorem Inc (PK)
$ 1.70
(154,445.45%)
9.7k
OSKADAmpliPay Group Inc (PK)
$ 1.10
(52,280.95%)
204
ANGCFEon Lithium Corporation (PK)
$ 1.00
(28,471.43%)
100
TAYOTaylor Consulting Inc (CE)
$ 0.000001
(-99.83%)
1,000
RGFCReal Good Food Company Inc (CE)
$ 0.0001
(-99.80%)
915
BIMIBIMI International Medical Inc (CE)
$ 0.0001
(-99.67%)
1,000
COGDFCompass Gold Corporation (PK)
$ 0.0005
(-99.67%)
6.06k
BIOAFBioasis Technologies Inc (CE)
$ 0.000001
(-99.50%)
2.5k
AFFUAffluence Corp (PK)
$ 0.0002
(42.86%)
328.94M
GTCHGBT Technologies Inc (PK)
$ 0.00025
(-16.67%)
279.95M
PSWWPrincipal Solar Inc (PK)
$ 0.0005
(25.00%)
208.44M
HMBLHUMBL Inc (PK)
$ 0.0003
(20.00%)
173.92M
DPLSDarkPulse Inc (PK)
$ 0.0004
(14.29%)
135.91M

NLST Discussion

View Posts
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 56 minutes ago
hope for the best, it aint over yet!!!
👍️0
Jetmek_03052 Jetmek_03052 7 hours ago
What a bunch of baloney. Friggin’ Samsung plays every angle it can.
👍️0
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 11 hours ago
just for the hek of it........if we didnt have any interested buyers this would already be manipulated way down from this point, wayyyyy downnnnnn........... so be grateful for anyone picking up shares. now back to my bubble game..........
👍️ 1 💯 1
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 14 hours ago
very interesting.......... ''A Google award alone would be worth more than all NEON's patents. The judge said Google's entire revenue for over a decade would be used to determine their damages to NLST. Remember?''

thread........... https://stocktwits.com/SilviaJ/message/617996224
👍️ 4 💯 2 🔥 1
Jetmek_03052 Jetmek_03052 15 hours ago
No one truly knows what will happen. Yes, there’s a chance for a retrial, but I think the chances are slim. But it really is irrelevant. If Hsu decides a retrial is needed? He’ll schedule one and we will win THAT trial. If he denies the new trial motion, then soon after that we will see a request for an appeal.

If you’re sick of this? So what. You don’t think the others here that have been in this YEARS longer than you aren’t frustrated also? We ALL are frustrated. We are much closer to the end of this trial. But it will still take some time.

Some more patience is required.
👍️ 2 💯 1
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 15 hours ago
that was scums reply. now we wait for hsu to rule on it, new trial, or motion denied. thats all it means........
👍️0
Tommy321 Tommy321 15 hours ago
Hi!
And what is your meaning? Is there a chance for a retrial? Or will HSU deny this bullshit?
👍️0
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 15 hours ago
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/4595690/default.jpeg
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/4595691/default.jpeg
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/4595692/default.jpeg
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/4595693/default.jpeg
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/4595714/default.jpeg
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/4595715/default.jpeg
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/4595716/default.jpeg
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/4595717/default.jpeg
👍 2
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 17 hours ago
Netlist Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (8:20-cv-00993)
District Court, C.D. California https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/17206527/netlist-inc-v-samsung-electronics-co-ltd/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc

800

Jun 16, 2025

Main Doc­ument

Proof of Service (subsequent documents)

799

Jun 16, 2025

Main Doc­ument

Sealed Declaration in Support

798

Jun 16, 2025

Main Doc­ument

Leave to File Document Under Seal

797

Jun 16, 2025

Main Doc­ument

Leave to File Document

796

Jun 16, 2025

Main Doc­ument

Reply (Motion related)
👍 1
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 1 day ago
Samsung is desperate to compete on chips. Workers say it comes at a cost. https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/samsung-is-desperate-to-compete-on-chips-workers-say-it-comes-at-a-cost/ar-AA1GNDd3?ocid=BingNewsSerp
👍️ 2 💯 1 🔥 1
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 1 day ago
in fact nice buying last half hour or so, maybe some one filing paper work told a little birdy hmmmmmm......... just a thought... regardless of the thought, i cant wait to read the plethora of crap scamsong is going to spew in less than 8 hours. i hope no one gets sick or worse, %^*&'n desperate scumball no good #*&$@&$%@$'s..............i hope they choke on it...........

viva la nlst!!!
👍️ 2 💯 1 😂 1
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 1 day ago
waiting on this scum filing at the moment.....it'll be great news if hsu denies the retrial by end of week lol!!!

just a bit, i get up naturally, no alarm 3-5am, 4 being prime time, and never past sunrise, and if i do i can always take a nap!!!
👍️0
gdog gdog 1 day ago
yea me also but 2:30 a.m. is a tad early for me :+(
👍️0
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 1 day ago
nice!!! with just under 15 minutes to close and i see they still try to close it at .699........unreal...........just checking in since my last post. wonder if scum files before midnight lol!!!
🔥 1
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 1 day ago
lol!!! i hate getting up late!!
👍️0
Ooou812 Ooou812 1 day ago
88,564 share buy block? Oh my. 
👍️ 1 🔥 1
gdog gdog 2 days ago
morning slept in till 5:30, remodling bathroom and laying tile. so yesterday I couldn't get back to sleep after waking up at 2:30 lol so slept late today any how

ONE OF THESE DAYS
👍️ 1 💯 1
Ooou812 Ooou812 2 days ago
Large Buy blocks are back. 
👍️ 1
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 2 days ago
due today, 6-16-25, https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=176309946
👍 1 💯 1 🔥 1
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 2 days ago
that would be nutzz!!! and more than welcomed!!! bring it on.....
👍️ 1
mfascuba mfascuba 2 days ago
I’ll take that, with a short squeeze and a run to three or four times that number before settling back to somewhere between $13 and $18…..
👍️ 2 💯 1 🔥 1
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 2 days ago
i ran a low ball conservative estimate on those numbers. i came up with 3.756 billion divided by our os of 275,309,066 million shares which equates to 13.64 a share. any one else want to give it a try???
👍️ 2 💯 1 🔥 1
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 3 days ago
SilviaJ @BeefEater69 Ongoing royalties is much greater than the potential for interest.

DDR5 royalties to NLST = $147 Mil in 2022-23
DDR5 increased from 5% (2022) to 65% of DRAM (2024)
13 x awards

HBM royalties to NLST = $123 Mil in 2022-23
HBM revenue increased from $1 Bil (2022) to $25 Bil (2025)
25 x awards (though Samsung lags overall market)
So say Samsung is at 15 - 20 x awards

Multiply the above awards numbers, respectively.

These types of large numbers will force a settlement in the Race to Final Judgement.

https://stocktwits.com/SilviaJ/message/617950021
👍️ 6 💯 1 🔥 1
Redoocs Redoocs 3 days ago
Happy Father's Day!
👍️ 5
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 3 days ago
i'm in full compliance with your reasoning. i even live my life that way. after all this time i'd still forgive, and i would forget. that is, forget they exist and never do business with them.
👍️ 4 😂 1
justus1 justus1 3 days ago
After all of this does NLST even want to be partners with these lying scums? Collect the funds owed and make deals with everyone else and sends these bums to the sidelines!! They had their chance no way would they get another to play more games!
👍️ 3
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 4 days ago
Stokd $NLST Remember, Samsung/Micron file frivolous cases and duplicative declaratory suits — Micron's bad faith & Samsung/Micron 087 declaratory cases — for purposes of forcing Netlist to expend more resources and finances, in order to stretch Netlist thin while all other parallel proceedings are ongoing, including appeals.

The amount of current litigation is staggering — as seen on my Litigation Chart for Dist Crt cases and CAFC Timeline Chart for appeals. And with Netlist's motions to stay 024 & 319 Samsung Decl Judg cases, they unravel that strategy.

Smart move by Netlist IMO, there is so much going on at once and many moving parts, all affecting each other to some degree in a way. We can't assume to make sense of every move at a deep level from what we see/think on the surface.

It's like watching others play chess and wondering what the motive/purpose for a certain move is, while knowing that we can't know till the end game plays out.

Netlist — you don't stay us, we stay you! 😂
👍️ 2
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 4 days ago
Stokd $NLST I like this for few reasons, including Netlist using Samsung's favorite strategy against them.

In 2 Samsung DE Declaratory Judgment Non-Infringement cases on 024 & 319 ptnts, filed a while ago and where Samsung already petitioned for IPRs which were instituted — those decisions are currently under PTAB Director Review — Netlist today filed for motions to Stay pending results of the IPRs. And uses the arguments Samsung makes when they file for stays pending IPRs. lol

Netlist has not filed infringement suits in TX on those patents unlike the recent 087 HBM patent, though Netlist did recently file counterclaims of infringement against Samsung in those DE cases.

The positives from this action are some we can speculate and I'm sure some only our legal team is aware of and strategizing. We don't know what we don't know.

Obviously, litigation burn stops, and if we get validity first, Samsung may settle before trial...by then some CAFC appeals will be done as well.
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/4547090/default.png
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/4547151/default.png
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/4547155/default.png
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/4547172/default.png
👍 2
sagedono sagedono 4 days ago
Thank you
👍 2
Jetmek_03052 Jetmek_03052 4 days ago
As of 05/30/2025 - 9,418,285 shares short.
👍️ 2
sagedono sagedono 4 days ago
Anyone know what the latest short numbers are? Thanks
👍️0
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 4 days ago
Stokd $NLST Some info for inquiring minds on CAFC 'Guidance on Oral Argument Scheduling Conflicts'

"Following the end of briefing, the Clerk’s Office will request counsel submit a completed Form 32 providing up to ten (10) scheduling conflict dates for the next six (6) scheduled court sessions."

"The Clerk’s Office reviews identified conflicts to determine whether they are allowable for good cause, or unallowable for lack of good cause. The key requirements for “good cause” are (1) certainty, meaning the conflict is already scheduled rather than suspected or in planning stages, (2) specificity, meaning the Clerk’s Office will not accept generalized conflicts with no elaboration, and (3) strong basis, meaning that the conflict is one that provides a strong reason for being unable to attend oral argument and that the conflict cannot be easily resolved or rescheduled."

https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/4544023/default.png
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/4544045/default.png
🎈 1 🎉 1 🎊 2 🎯 2 👍️ 3
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 4 days ago
Stokd $NLST And here is the one for the 060 & 160 patents CAFC appeal. That now covers all the patents in the # 463 case and the case itself --- all now awaiting word from parties on any scheduling conflicts before the CAFC sets an Oral Argument date.
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/4536109/default.png
🎈 1 🎉 1 🎊 2 🎯 2 👍️ 3
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 4 days ago
Stokd $NLST It's like the CAFC just woke up!
Another one --- CAFC appeals of 918 & 054 patents has begun scheduling of Oral Arguments.

Seems to me that the CAFC is indeed setting up a situation where the #463 case and all its patents--060/160/918/054/339--will be heard together at the same Oral Argument...as we speculated based on research and available information.

This is the best scenario and what Netlist counsel preferred and sought in their filings.

NOTICE TO ADVISE OF SCHEDULING CONFLICTS OF ARGUING COUNSEL
"Within seven days of this notice, arguing counsel must file a completed Response to Notice to Advise of Scheduling Conflicts advising of any scheduling conflicts during the following upcoming court session months: 2025 – August, September, October, November, and December. 2026 – January."

https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/4536043/default.png
🎈 1 🎉 1 🎊 2 🎯 2 👍️ 3
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 4 days ago
Stokd $NLST And also the scheduling of Oral Arguments for the 339 patent CAFC appeal have begun --- NOTICE TO ADVISE OF SCHEDULING CONFLICTS OF ARGUING COUNSEL --- nice to see things progressing towards the final phase.

"Within seven days of this notice, arguing counsel must file a completed Response to Notice to Advise of Scheduling Conflicts advising of any scheduling conflicts during the following upcoming court session months: 2025 – August, September, October, November, and December. 2026 – January."
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/4535512/default.png
🎈 1 🎉 1 🎊 2 🎯 2 👍️ 3
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 4 days ago
Stokd $NLST Alright, here we go...the CAFC has begun the scheduling of Oral Arguments in the Samsung # 463 case trial that Netlist won --- $303 million in damages for patents 060/160/054/918/339.

"Within seven days of this notice, arguing counsel must file a completed Response to Notice to Advise of Scheduling Conflicts advising of any scheduling conflicts during the following upcoming court session months: 2025 – August, September, October, November, and December. 2026 – January."
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/4534611/default.png
🎈 1 🎉 1 🎊 2 🎯 2 👍️ 4
fung_derf fung_derf 4 days ago
THIS is hilarious!! I think of you when I think of The Three Amigos.....
"Wherever there is injustice, you will find us. Wherever there is suffering, we'll be there. Wherever scam stocks are found, you will find... jimmy joe!

I swear, you don't miss out on one bad stock. How is this possible?
Why are you not pissed about always losing your money?

I think we are also being illegally naked shorted.



Ya think choo choo~? I KNOW NetList is illegally naked shorted among other tricks MMs play.

Remember, the 3 amigos conspired to take NetList OUT, thus having access to all of NetList patents. This would also give them the ability to sue other Companies for patent infringement just as NetList is doing to them. Only they have much deeper pockets and political/lobby power.
NetList was on life support 2018-2019 after Scamscum breeched their contract with NetList. All planned IMO.

Where did Fact Master go~? Sent here to distribute FUD, get shareholders to sell.

Same games, different stock ticker.

NetList baby~!
👍️0
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 5 days ago
Nielsng $NLST patent 523 covers critical memory interface technologies used in RDIMM and LRDIMM modules—key components in Samsung’s DRAM product line for servers and data centers.
Global RDIMM/LRDIMM market (2024): ~$5.6 billion
Samsung’s share: ~20–30% = $1–1.5 billion annually
Samsung unit sales: ~7–8 million modules/year

Potential Licensing Value:
Standard royalty range: 3–10% of revenue
Licensing potential for Netlist: $50–150 million/year
Historical damages (Texas jury): $118 million
Potential settlement (past + future): $150–300 million total

The ‘523 patent enables high-performance buffering and signal integrity required for DDR4 and DDR5 modules in hyperscale servers. Samsung’s continued sale of these modules without a license exposes them to injunction risk in the U.S. market.

A permanent injunction—now possible following Netlist’s California win—could disrupt Samsung’s ability to sell critical server DRAM in the U.S., forcing either licensing or product.
https://stocktwits.com/Nielsng/message/617800351
👍️ 3 💯 1
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 5 days ago
Scamsong reportedly fails third Nvidia HBM3E test; eyes re-certification in September
Samsung Electronics has reportedly failed its third attempt at obtaining Nvidia's certification for 12-layer HBM3E chips in June 2025, according to a recent report by a Hong Kong brokerage cited by South Korea's Businesspost. The tech giant... POOR LITTLE SCAMMY

https://www.digitimes.com/news/a20250612PD219/samsung-hbm3e-nvidia-certification-hbm.html
👍️ 3 🔥 1 🫣 1
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 5 days ago
chunk has spoken https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/4511896/default.png
👍️ 4
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 5 days ago
Stokd $NLST Think about this--and you read in Gilstrap's order in my previous post that even though damages were not enhanced Micron still filed a JMOL for No Willfulness--the reason why has something to do with their parallel proceedings of suing Netlist for Bad Faith Patent Assertion, IMO.

It is obvious that those suits are frivolous and retaliatory, Netlist has argued as such, but Micron is trying anything they can to prevent Netlist from continuing to defeat them in patent infringement trials, or to reverse the wins.

Those trials in District Court with Gilstrap also challenged validity, and the jury found the patents valid...and willfully infringed.

Now, how do their Bad Faith Patent Assertion claims play out when not only were the patents found valid--contradicting Micron's assertions and bad faith claims--but now it's officially ruled through a post trial JMOL that Micron's infringement of the valid patents was willful.

That blows up their bad faith claims, hence why they tried it-denied!

https://stocktwits.com/Stokd/message/617721921
👍️ 4
gdog gdog 5 days ago
release the hounds :+)
🎈 2 🎉 2 🎊 1 🎯 1 👍️ 1 🖼️ 1
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 5 days ago
just pay us!!!
👍️ 3
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 5 days ago
somethins commin our way, one of these days!!!
👍️ 3 💯 1
Jetmek_03052 Jetmek_03052 5 days ago
Case 2:22-cv-00294-JRG Document 191 Filed 06/11/25

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txed.216365/gov.uscourts.txed.216365.191.0.pdf

Before the Court is the Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law of No
Willfulness of the Asserted Patents (the “Motion”) filed by Defendants Micron Technology, Inc., Micron Semiconductor Products, Inc., and Micron Technology Texas, LLC. (collectively, “Micron” or “Defendants”). (Dkt. No. 157.) In the Motion, Micron moves for judgment as a matter of law of no willfulness pursuant to Rule 50 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

The Court finds that Micron has not explained why the Court should address this issue given the Court’s election not to enhance damages. See Sprint Communs. Co. L.P. v. Time Warner Cable, Inc., 255 F. Supp. 3d 1134, 1147 (D. Kan. 2017)

(“Finally, Time Warner Cable moves for judgment as a matter of law with respect to the issue of willfulness, which the jury found in Sprint’s favor. Time Warner Cable has not explained why the Court should address this issue, however, which has become moot in light of the Court’s denial of Sprint’s claim for enhanced damages.”). Accordingly, having elected not to enhance the damages award, the Court finds that the Motion should be and is DENIED AS MOOT
🎈 1 🎉 1 🎊 1 👍️ 3 🔥 1 🙂 2
gdog gdog 5 days ago
Stokd
34m

$NLST Regarding the Micron TX # 294 case whose trial was won by Netlist for $445 million on patents 912 / 417 / 215:

Final Judgment was already issued by Gilstrap affirming the jury verdict. We're waiting on post trial motion rulings--Micron JMOLs & New Trial motions--before the case can be appealed to the CAFC by Micron.

Gilstrap just filed his ruling on Micron's Renewed JMOL --- 🔥DENIED🔥!

"Before the Court is the Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law of No Willfulness of the Asserted Patents"

"the Court considered the totality of circumstances and concluded that enhancement of the compensatory award was not warranted under 35 U.S.C. § 284."

"Micron, nevertheless, moves for judgment as a matter of law of no willfulness on the grounds that no legally sufficient evidence supports the jury’s willfulness verdict."

"Accordingly, having elected not to enhance thdamages award, the Court finds that the Motion should be and is DENIED AS MOOT."
storage.courtlistener.com/r...
Bullish
Show More



2


38



Stokd
Yesterday 5:49 PM

$NLST Remember how filing of 087 suits played out, especially timing and who was first to file--Netlist!

"The “first-to-file” doctrine compels dismissal because exactly the same issues are currently being litigated in EDTX in an indisputably earlier-filed case. Shortly after 12amET May20,2025—the date of issuance of the 087 Patent— Netlist filed a complaint in TX alleging that Smsg infringes the 087 Patent. In response, Smsg filed this declaratory judgment action after Netlist’s first-filed case. The law is clear that this type of forum shopping by an accused infringer is improper."

"While the EDTX Complaint was filed just after 11pmCT May19,2025, locally in TX, this was just after 12amET May20,2025. As this is after midnight ET on the day of issuance, the 087 Patent had issued and Netlist had standing because “a patentee’s right to exclude, and therefore the remedy of a civil action for infringement, accrues upon issuance of the patent in the East TZ,” not the local Court’s time zone."
Bullish
Show More


3


100



Stokd
Yesterday 5:29 PM

$NLST Netlist strategy regarding the 087 HBM patent suits playing out.

Netlist filed - MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO TRANSFER - in both the Samsung & Micron recent DE suits for Declaratory Judgment of Non-Infringement of the recently granted 087 Netlist patent.

Netlist already filed suits against Samsung & Micron in ED-TX for infringing the 087 patent. That's where Netlist seeks transfer if DE cases are not dismissed...which is the goal given the 087 TX cases.

"Defendant Netlist, by and through its undersigned counsel, hereby moves to dismiss or, in the alternative, to transfer to the Eastern District of Texas the declaratory judgment complaint filed by Plaintiffs Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. The grounds for this Motion are set forth in defendant’s Opening Brief in support of its motion to dismiss filed contemporaneously herewith."

Read 2pg Intro in pic⬇️
Link
storage.courtlistener.com/r...
Bullish
Show More





4


110



Stokd
Jun 05, 2025 11:15 PM

$NLST May 23 Samsung filed a Citation of Supplemental Authority in #463 case CAFC appeal ($303 mill). Email to CAFC essentially citing a decision in another appeal that Samsung thinks is relevant and should carry “authority”—they argue and claim.

Citing a decision that remanded for a damages retrial due to abuse of discretion (details pic1). I followed that appeal and heard oral arguments—being it involved Netlist's damages expert Kennedy, and substance around damages models/comparables/reasoning.

The circumstances in that appeal were different with respect to Kennedy than how it played out in our case...was nuanced, complex, but different.

Thought to explain that the briefing process in the appeal concluded, it’s not a motion or brief, just an email in desperation…and has no effect or bearing on our appeal. Chose to wait for reply.

Netlist just replied similarly via email disputing the relevance or implications that Samsung claims…glad I waited for Netlist’s response/take.
Truth=pic2
Bullish
Show More



4


127



Stokd
Jun 03, 2025 3:04 AM

$NLST I presume the incoming BOC New Trial decision will look something like this image...shutdown with a quick and easy NO!

(image/post not meant politically, nor implies anything on the positions of the subjects — just repurposing the funny posturing) 😉
Bullish


3


88



Stokd
Jun 03, 2025 1:32 AM

$NLST Netlist Opposition to BOC New Trial—nonsense as suspected! lol

"Having lost a jury trial again in this case, Samsung resorts to a familiar tactic: accusing multiple jurors of failing to disclose prior litigation. This time, Smsg argues that a new trial is required because certain jurors did not identify during voir dire that, years ago, they were involved in bankruptcies or minor proceedings such as small claims actions or debt collections. After the last trial, as here, Smsg accused multiple jurors of lying during voir dire. Judge Scarsi granted the motion as to one of the four jurors who Smsg accused, finding that the juror failed to disclose more than a dozen lawsuits, including two breach of contract cases that were pending at the time of trial against an individual of Korean descent. Scarsi described those circumstances as presenting a “close” issue. While Netlist respectfully disagrees with Judge Scarsi’s decision, here the issue is not even “close.”"
storage.courtlistener.com/r...
Bullish
Show More


6


122



Stokd
Jun 02, 2025 9:18 PM

$NLST Yep, all variations of my name with identical avatar are imposters...obviously desperate!🤡

Back to business...Netlist filed their Answer to Samsung's DE Complaints (suits) for Decl Judg of Non-Infringement of 024 & 319 patents. Same patents that were recently instituted IPRs at PTAB petitioned by Samsung, and subsequently for which days ago Netlist filed for Director Review of the decisions to institute IPRs.

As expected and happy to see, Netlist filed Counterclaims for infringement of the 024 & 319 patents.
"Samsung continued to manufacture, use, sell, offer to sell, and import to the United States the Accused Instrumentalities after the JDLA was terminated."

"On information and belief, Samsung directly infringed and is currently infringing..."

"On information and belief, Samsung also indirectly infringes the ’024 Patent, as provided in 35USC§271(b), by inducing infringement by others, such as their customers and end users..."

319
storage.courtlistener.com/r...

024
storage.courtlistener.com/r...
Bullish
Show More





5


129



Stokd
May 30, 2025 3:03 PM

$NLST Netlist filed REQUEST FOR DIRECTOR REVIEW OF DECISION GRANTING INSTITUTION of 319 & 024 IPRs—Samsung DE cases for Decl Judg No Infringement in 2023(024)/2024(319).

New patent friendly PTAB leadership—Coke Stewart—has reversed unwarranted institutions recently under the new Fintiv/discretionary denial framework, considering aspects previously ignored by prior leadership.

024
ptacts.uspto.gov/ptacts/pub...

319
ptacts.uspto.gov/ptacts/pub...

"decision is inconsistent with important policy considerations directed to the efficient use of PTAB resources. Moving forward with trial would expend undue resources sifting through voluminous exhibits and case histories to adjudicate unclear and redundant grounds. The panel did not even decide whether four of the six grounds meet the threshold for institution, suggesting that the PTAB lacks the resources (or they are better expended elsewhere) to resolve the fact-intensive issues in dispute and that an ArticleIII court is the appropriate forum for adjudication."
Bullish
Show More





6


161



Stokd
May 24, 2025 6:37 PM

$NLST Lastly, I've previously posted about our new appeal specialist Jeff Lamken/MoloLamken—on CAFC 339/918/054/060/160/# 463case/912—highlighting his resume and experience. With the 463 case & its patent CAFC appeals at the oral argument phase, time for reiteration we're in great hands...we'll catch him at orals.

Bio—scroll SCOTUS & CAFC cases.
mololamken.com/professional...

WE HAVE THE RIGHT GUY!
Not only a CAFC specialist—"nationally recognized appellate practitioner"—& SCOTUS—"has argued 29 cases before the US Supreme Court and briefed dozens more "—but headed the firm Samsung used on all PTAB IPRs—"headed Baker Botts Supreme Court and Appellate Practice in Washington DC". And—"served as an Assistant to the Solicitor General in the US Dept of Justice, and was a partner in the Washington DC. litigation boutique Kellogg, Huber & Hansen. He clerked for the Honorable Sandra Day O’Connor of the US Supreme Court and the Honorable Alex Kozinski of the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit."
Bullish
Show More


2


97



Stokd
May 24, 2025 5:07 PM

$NLST In addition to challenging PTAB reasoning on many aspects, Netlist addresses lack of reasoning/analysis on other claims & limitations.

"Board’s failure to provide independent analysis for numerous claims and limitations requires vacatur. Samsung insists the Board “cited to the relevant briefing.” But that is insufficient.
Netlist was not required to present “arguments” about those limitations. Patentees have “no obligation to raise any objection.” The Board must provide reasoned analysis that supports the patent’s invalidation. The defect is not that the Board’s reasoning could have been ‘more thorough.’ It is that the Board’s own reasoning was NON-EXISTENT. This Court “is powerless to affirm the” Board’s decision where the Board’s own “grounds are inadequate or improper.” And harmless error exists only where the agency’s error ‘clearly had no bearing on the procedure used or the substance of decision reached.’ There is no basis for deeming the fundamental errors here harmless."
Bullish
Show More


3


103



Stokd
May 24, 2025 4:37 PM

$NLST "Claim 1 of the 060 patent requires at least two groups of “array dies” and at least two “die interconnects”

"To find that invention in the prior art, the Board invoked “Kim’s memory chip C1” and “chip C2”— each depicted as a single die—as the “first” and “second group” of dies, and Kim’s “TSV1” and “TSV2” as the “first” and “second die interconnect.”"

"The Board, however, confronted a problem: Kim’s TSV1 and TSV2 are each connected to one memory die (C1 & C2). But the claim requires a “first group of array dies” with “multiple array dies” connected to the “first die interconnect.” So the Board announced that skilled artisans “‘would have been motivated to connect additional memory dies to Kim’s TSV1 & TSV2.’” In doing so, the BOARD IGNORED EVERY REASON KIM POINTS AWAY FROM THAT MODIFICATION. Kim does not merely show single dies with single TSVs in each embodiment. It teaches that dies “cannot share” connections, such as TSVs, because “unavoidable” “data collisions”would result."
Bullish
Show More





6

1

94



Stokd
May 24, 2025 3:44 PM

$NLST Re: Netlist CAFC 160/060 Reply. Remember Samsung claimed Netlist addressed the "wrong combination", and had some wondering if Netlist new counsel—CAFC specialist & previous head of firm Samsung used at PTAB to invalidate the patents—made such an obvious and critical error…to address the wrong combination in arguments against Samsung/PTAB. Well, he's got it covered...never trust Samsung's claims!

“Samsung’s assertion that Netlist addresses the “wrong combination,” likewise fails. According to Samsung, the Board started with another reference, Rajan, and determined skilled artisans would “implement” Rajan “using . . . Kim’s TSV[s]”. That rewrites the Board’s rationale.”

“The Board adopted Samsung’s contention that skilled artisans “ ‘would have been motivated to connect additional memory dies to Kim’s TSV1 and TSV2’”. The Board’s combination was based on Kim. Samsung cannot escape Kim’s teaching away and seek affirmance based on a Rajan-focused combination the Board never invoked.”
Bullish
Show More





6


102



Stokd
May 24, 2025 3:29 PM

$NLST Netlist filed their Reply in the CAFC appeal of 160 & 060 patents on May 21…that concludes the briefing process and we wait for the panel to absorb/digest and begin the Oral Argument scheduling process.

With that, all briefings are done in the CAFC appeals of the # 463 case and all its patents—339/918/054/160/060—and these “companion CAFC cases” are all in the Oral Argument phase of the process…after which comes the decision.
Bullish


2


96



Stokd
May 21, 2025 10:32 PM

$NLST Perhaps the reason for duplicative cases is they initially filed hours too soon—with 087 issued 20th—depending on cutoff time in district. Would explain why they filed cases 557 & 558 later that day and dismissed earlier 552 & 553.

Who knows, speculating and hypothesizing...what I do know is Samsung is gearing up for a fight on what they know is a KEY patent (pic🔥below), and I know Sheasby&team know what they're doing and are best in the game...won all our patent infringement trials.

I think they still filed before Samsung but makes little difference, nothing DE can do to force Gilstrap to transfer or dismiss, why would he...all the parties patent infringement litigation has been in his court.

If anything, Netlist will file for dismissal in DE given the TX action, which has a fair chance of being granted. IMO, litigation on the 087 HBM patent will be in TX w/Gilstrap. Prior transfer motions in numerous TX litigation were filed by Samsung/Micron but none ever granted.
Bullish
Show More


2


102



Stokd
May 21, 2025 2:55 PM

$NLST Regarding yesterdays scheduling change of a hearing in the BOC case post trial process (top pic below) ----- "The court on its own motion, continues the motion hearing from 5/30/2025 to 7/11/2025":

Keep in mind this is just for attorney fees that Samsung keeps arguing about through briefs, making a stand on that mountain...😂 for something so insignificant.

It has nothing to do with Samsung's New Trial motion that we're awaiting closure of, which has established briefing dates (bottom pic below) ----- Netlist Opposition June 2 / Samsung Reply June 16...followed by a decision.

I doubt a hearing will be needed and granted, though I'm sure Samsung will ask. But we'll see what happens...lot's of moving parts and dynamics, and a lot going on at once...it is quite something and interesting to say the least.
Bullish
Show More


5


86



Stokd
May 21, 2025 2:10 PM

$NLST 'Netlist Hits Samsung, Micron With New Patent Suits'
"Netlist has hit both Samsung and Micron with lawsuits in Texas federal court that accuse them of infringing a computer memory patent, cases that come after Netlist won multimillion-dollar verdicts in other intellectual property litigation against the companies."
law360.com/articles/2342665...
Bullish

Netlist Hits Samsung, Micron With New Patent Suits - Law360

https://www.law360.com

1


119



Stokd
May 21, 2025 2:01 PM

$NLST Some clarity on the recently filed suits and sequence of events:

--- Netlist filed suits in TX with Gilstrap against Samsung & Micron for infringing the 087 patent on May 19 — case #'s 552 & 553.

--- For some reason duplicate suits were filed at the same time for each — case #'s 557 & 558.

--- Netlist filed to dismiss case #'s 552 & 553 but not 557 & 558 — just removing duplicates.

--- The following day May 20 Samsung filed a suit in DE on the same 087 patent for declaratory judgment of no infringement — case # 626.

--- Netlist was FIRST to file in TX, so Samsung's late reaction move is a sad attempt to litigate the 087 in DE instead away from TX & Gilstrap...not going to work.

Now after the fact we can see some of the behind the scenes game/strategy and reasons of the timing and action taken by Sheasby/Netlist.

Not home at the moment to attach links to the cases in question, but some have been posted them.
Bullish
Show More

3


90



Stokd
May 20, 2025 12:04 PM

$NLST Few things I'd like to bring to your attention that are indeed positive:

1 --- Netlist filed suit against Samsung & Micron on the 087 patent the day it was issued—May 20,2025—wasting no time!

2 --- The 087 patent is part of/contributes to HBM technology...very important to Samsung/Micron and essential to the AI explosion currently under way.

Link to full doc against Samsung below--
storage.courtlistener.com/r...
Bullish


9


119



Stokd
May 20, 2025 11:41 AM

$NLST Now ask yourself this...why would Netlist file 2 new patent infringement suits that will increase litigation burn IF as some claim bankruptcy is in the cards...because it is not and just the usual bear narrative that never materializes.

Obviously Chuck/Sheasby know something, have deep insight, and privy to aspects of litigation and strategy that we are not. They know what they're doing and why they filed the two new suits now. Trust our legal team, the process...and let it play out! 🍻

Yes, Netlist will raise money if needed, but that is the last issue I have at the moment. Even with dilution, it is the better option for Netlist and investors that we not only see litigation through to completion, but pursue additional suits for patent infringement damages that hopefully add pressure leading to licensing deals, or more damages should Samsung/Micron not want to settle at any point.
Bullish
Show More

1


109



Stokd
May 20, 2025 11:17 AM

$NLST Guess what folks...🔥 as we have been reiterating, Netlist will continue to invent tech/patents that Samsung & Micron will undoubtedly infringe, leading to more patent infringement suits against them. Netlist keeping the pressure on and going after these thieves. 💪🏼

Yesterday Netlist filed a suit against Samsung and separately against Micron for infringing the 087 patent. They are in ED/TX with our man Judge Gilstrap! Only on Pacer as of now, should hit Courtlistener shortly.

I have a feeling this will not be the last, and happy to see Netlist pursue infringers for any/all patents, given the patent owner friendly culture now at the head of the USPTO/PTAB.

And with the new patent friendly PTAB Director we have a much better chance with patents that will be going through the IPR process. We have the 024 & 319 that were recently instituted, and the 087 will follow...and I hope more to come!
Bullish
Show More


8

1

138
👍️ 1
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 6 days ago
after all we been through and are going to continue going through. i firmly believe our pps doesnt move till we actually put money in the bank. sure, anything can happen to make it move and i have no problem with that occurring. they pay us, and we see double digits.......
👍️ 6 🔥 2
gdog gdog 6 days ago
Man you got that right...
👍️ 1
gdog gdog 6 days ago
well lets hope the share price starts going north with all thats happening I wish with a win Hong would do about a 5-10 split and help all the loyal share holders out. that would also screw the shorts big time..... maybe wait for the new contract with HY ?
👍️ 2 🔥 1
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 6 days ago
lol!!! thats not funny, so am i !!! and the world is much more beautiful that time of day!!!
👍️0

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock