Energy East Corp (EAS) Quote

Tell everyone what soon means….your EOY theory or years or decades…

I read the comment by 'Rule of law guy' and had a laugh. If you don't understand that the SPS aren't "fully repaid", then you shouldn't be commenting at all. And certainly TH's follow-up was just as stupid.

I had submitted my own response to ruleoflawguy there, but as is Tim Howard's

The Conservator is supposed to have a duty to "Conserve and Preserve."

Supposedly yes.

Let's forget the history we all know here and assume this to be true.

No. It is unfortunately false. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/19-422_k537.pdf Page

Translation: we are f*cked until TSY decides to play fair.

You're starting to get it.

Now extend the thought experiment: what happens if Treasury never decides to "play fair"?

Assign a probability and a share price estimate to each scenario (Treasury "pla

DLPN.................MULN............a/h.......................

What it does mean is that if they are to do so (convert senior preferred shares to any other class) they will need another amendment.

Correct.

After the jury decision, presided over by Lamberth, I want to see how they pull off yet another self-enriching act knee-capping

Why do you Magas have to lie about everything.

I Google exactly what you said.


"CNN questions whether case should have been brought against Trump"

Nothing and the first hit was this


Could Trump go to jail? Questions about T

but is it on the TREASURY balance sheet ? and if yes - how does it show --- as the SP value or ?

Page 95 of the https://fiscal.treasury.gov/files/reports-statements/financial-report/2023/02-15-2024-FR-(Final).pdf FY 2023 Financial Report of the US Government shows that Treasury val

I appreciate the fact that you used the pronoun "they" when you referred to oystersandbeer.

He/she/they/them/it/hirs/yos/zirs/ver is probably just trying to express his/her/their//its/hirs/yos/zirs/ver's love for you in the only way He/she/they/them/it/hirs/yos/zirs/ver knows how...by

And there will soon be a ratified 2023 decision that says Shareholders do have a right to reap in the benefits of the company profits as per the shareholder agreement.

That first part misses the fact that only monetary relief was awarded, not injunctive (or any kind of other non-mone

Yes, although this doesn't mean lawsuit/s won't be filed after the fact. They just have a near-zero chance of success.

I agree here.

Saying that lawsuits will be filed if Treasury dares to convert the seniors to commons is a prominent bit of common nonsense. It ignores

As I've said multiple times... I've already given you all the info I care to share. If you can reverse engineer something, good for you. If not, too bad so sad. I am under no obligation to show you my formulas nor the different scenarios.

This relates to https://investorshub.advfn.co

congrats!!!!!!!!!

Where did you hear that?! Links? That sounds solid

At no point did Treasury state they thought anything was illegal. Treasury is an entity, not a person. I've said this multiple times and I don't see you producing any evidence to the contrary.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172053297 Yes they did .

I give up. IOVA for me. Just flipped for,$40,000 on a pop.

A pig, a cow, and sheep.

The MAGA circus!



Petting zoos have more intelligence than MAGAs.




Hahahaha!








Heeeeeeeeeeee-larious!

PROK https://schrts.co/FYEpFJcg
high short float 23%

Perfect! … :)

How many XRP do you guys or gals own? Was just reading about major banks begining to come on line and Japan going full court press as well?

Sure you did LMFAO.....I made 5 million on GME and CTNT....or was it 50 million ....maybe more LMFAO you loser

*FFIE sorry for the fat finger

You are an idiot! GS needs a real company and the shell is a shell! LOL