ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for smarter Trade smarter, not harder: Unleash your inner pro with our toolkit and live discussions.
Voip Pal Com Inc (QB)

Voip Pal Com Inc (QB) (VPLM)

0.0074
0.00
(0.00%)
Closed November 04 4:00PM

Your Hub for Real-Time streaming quotes, Ideas and Live Discussions

Key stats and details

Current Price
0.0074
Bid
0.0074
Ask
0.0074
Volume
-
0.00 Day's Range 0.00
0.0064 52 Week Range 0.0331
Market Cap
Previous Close
0.0074
Open
-
Last Trade
Last Trade Time
Financial Volume
-
VWAP
-
Average Volume (3m)
3,634,279
Shares Outstanding
3,553,945,275
Dividend Yield
-
PE Ratio
-1.54
Earnings Per Share (EPS)
-0.01
Revenue
-
Net Profit
-23.11M

About Voip Pal Com Inc (QB)

Voip-Pal.com Inc. ('Voip-Pal') is a publicly traded corporation (OTCQB: VPLM) incorporated in December of 1997 in the state of Nevada and headquartered in Waco, Texas. Voip-Pal is a technical leader in the broadband Voice-over-Internet Protocol ('VoIP') market with the ownership and continuing devel... Voip-Pal.com Inc. ('Voip-Pal') is a publicly traded corporation (OTCQB: VPLM) incorporated in December of 1997 in the state of Nevada and headquartered in Waco, Texas. Voip-Pal is a technical leader in the broadband Voice-over-Internet Protocol ('VoIP') market with the ownership and continuing development of a portfolio of leading-edge VoIP patents. Show more

Sector
Tele & Telegraph Apparatus
Industry
Tele & Telegraph Apparatus
Headquarters
Reno, Nevada, USA
Founded
-
Voip Pal Com Inc (QB) is listed in the Tele & Telegraph Apparatus sector of the OTCMarkets with ticker VPLM. The last closing price for Voip Pal Com (QB) was $0.01. Over the last year, Voip Pal Com (QB) shares have traded in a share price range of $ 0.0064 to $ 0.0331.

Voip Pal Com (QB) currently has 3,553,945,275 shares outstanding. The market capitalization of Voip Pal Com (QB) is $26.30 million. Voip Pal Com (QB) has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of -1.54.

VPLM Latest News

PeriodChangeChange %OpenHighLowAvg. Daily VolVWAP
1-0.00082-9.975669099760.008220.00840.006929691600.0074241CS
4-0.0021-22.10526315790.00950.01020.006426538310.00826109CS
12-0.0072-49.31506849320.01460.021250.006436342790.01100763CS
26-0.0095-56.21301775150.01690.0290.006439510760.01422423CS
52-0.0086-53.750.0160.03310.006431509310.01558317CS
156-0.0077-50.99337748340.01510.11440.006424678330.03005267CS
260-0.0125-62.81407035180.01990.11440.00621557330.02650497CS

Movers

View all
  • Most Active
  • % Gainers
  • % Losers
SymbolPriceVol.
AABVFAberdeen International Inc (PK)
$ 0.0386
(0.00%)
0
AABKFAareal Bank AG (PK)
$ 0.00
(0.00%)
0
AABBAsia Broadband Inc (PK)
$ 0.029
(0.00%)
0
AAALYAareal Bank AG (PK)
$ 34.65
(0.00%)
0
AAAIFAlternative Investment Trust (PK)
$ 0.55
(0.00%)
0
AABVFAberdeen International Inc (PK)
$ 0.0386
(0.00%)
0
AABKFAareal Bank AG (PK)
$ 0.00
(0.00%)
0
AABBAsia Broadband Inc (PK)
$ 0.029
(0.00%)
0
AAALYAareal Bank AG (PK)
$ 34.65
(0.00%)
0
AAAIFAlternative Investment Trust (PK)
$ 0.55
(0.00%)
0
AABVFAberdeen International Inc (PK)
$ 0.0386
(0.00%)
0
AABKFAareal Bank AG (PK)
$ 0.00
(0.00%)
0
AABBAsia Broadband Inc (PK)
$ 0.029
(0.00%)
0
AAALYAareal Bank AG (PK)
$ 34.65
(0.00%)
0
AAAIFAlternative Investment Trust (PK)
$ 0.55
(0.00%)
0

VPLM Discussion

View Posts
DesktopDR DesktopDR 18 hours ago
I agree with you also Chazzy and I too use the ignore a lot! Hoping that we have a great 2025!
👍️ 3
fung_derf fung_derf 20 hours ago
It's funny that some posters immediately come to deerballs defense rather than asking why in heck deerballs name would even come up in the company's legal battles.
Shouldn't you all be more concerned that perhaps a poster here who has been feeding you news for years, may be complicit?
Wouldn't that logically be the first concern?....Instead of trying to protect DB's reputation. Are you investors, or are you all trying to fool people?
👍️ 1 💯 1 ✔️ 1
chazzy1 chazzy1 21 hours ago
Jimmy Buffets Sister, thank you for your candor and your sincerity. Believe me when I say, I get it. You and I have, in effect, played the lottery by investing in VPLM. 10 + years is a long time, about 7 years longer than me, so I can understand your negative sentiment. If this does not pan out, then I too will have lost a bundle. But what I see that encourages me, is that VoIP-Pal's management has not just thrown up their hands and accepted defeat, but are more resolute than ever to keep fighting until they achieve victory. That, my fellow investor, is a winning spirit. The protracted battle in which VP finds itself, is not one of their own making. It is the legal system. The defendants are exploiting every loophole in the system in an effort to wear VP down to the point where they give up. I do not buy into the rationale that VoIP-Pal's management is merely a bunch of "crooks" only out to exploit their shareholders, or "marks". In fact, I see virtue in their neverending fight for what is right, which is to be paid for the use of their intellectual property for financial gain. The patents have survived 36 out 36 IPR challenges at the PTAB. This shows that they are bullet-proof. Why would the defendants try so hard to invalidate patents that they weren't even using? They wouldn't. Obviously, I refuse to become jaded because this fight is taking longer than I expected. But this fight is not over. What would cause me to lose hope would be to see VoIP-Pal give up and accept defeat. I don't see that happening so, with guarded optimism, I will hang in there until the final play has been played and the final score is announced. The game is still on, and the underdog can still win this.
Good luck to you and to all VPLM longs.
👍️ 11 🚮 1 🤢 1 ❌️ 1 ❎️ 1
Jimmy Buffets Sister Jimmy Buffets Sister 22 hours ago
Could the negative sentiment be from 10+ years of hearing next week, next month, next year, surprise coming, new court date, new court case, be patient and a pps of $0.07.
I know that my patience has run out and will take my tax loss at the end of the year.
👍️0
sunspotter sunspotter 22 hours ago
“"The (VPLM) lady doth protest too much, methinks"

is a line from the play Hamlet by William Shakespeare.

It is spoken by Queen Gertrude in response to the insincere overacting of a character in the play within a play created by Prince Hamlet to elicit evidence of his uncle's guilt in the murder of his father, the King of Denmark.”
👍️0
ORCA ORCA 22 hours ago
THE PPS SPEAKS VOLUMES.VPLM FAILED.EVEN AT THE WORST TIMES WE WERE SELLING ABOVE .011 AND .012.NOW .007?WHEN THEY SAY VPLM IS IN IT;S BEST POSITION EVER???LOL.THE PPS IS DOWN 95% FROM ITS HIGH OF .014S ABOUT 18 MONTHS AGO.IF SOMEONE HAD 10 MILLION SHARES AT .114=$ $1,114 MILLION.AT .007 NOW =$70K.DAMN.
👍️0
chazzy1 chazzy1 23 hours ago
I agree with you DesktopDR, although I no longer see most of it since I have begun using the 'ignore' feature. I would never use that option to ignore a well-reasoned and well-intentioned argument, even if I supported the antithetical view. I have even suspected that some of these nonsensical posts and diatribes could be coming from supporters of the defendants, and not just from disgruntled VPLM investors. JMHO.
👍️ 3
DesktopDR DesktopDR 23 hours ago
I'm going to guess that these nonsense messages come from investors that have been here for a long time. Tired of waiting and angry. People say things out of anger and in time normally wish they hadn't, especially when proven wrong. I wish them well and wish they would stop posting.
👍️ 4 💪 1
sunspotter sunspotter 1 day ago
“ You are two blind men discussing a photographic exhibit.”

Well, two IDs performing a kind of call and response routine, anyway.
👍️0
ORCA ORCA 1 day ago
ORCA WHAT DO YOU MAKE ON THE SENARIO OF VPLM AT THIS MOMENT??UNFORTUNATILY THE ENEMY HAS WON THE BATTLE FOR NOW.HOW ORCA??BY BRINGING THE PPS DOWN, AND STOP THE LONGS FROM KEEP BUYING AND SUPPORTING THE PPS.
THEY KNOW THAT IF THE PPS STAYS DOWN HERE.THEY WILL NOT MAKE IT.THE LONGS GAVE UP AND THUS THERE IS NO MOVEMENT IN THE PPS.AND STAYS DOWN HERE FOR A WHILE NOW.THE LONGER THE PPS STAYS DOWN,THE MORE THEY WILL HAVE A CHANCE TO WIN EASILY.THEY KNOW WHAT THEY ARE DOING.
FOR ME IT DOES NOT MATTER.I WILL KEEP MAKING MONEY.NO PROBLEM.BUT FOR THE LONGS LONGS??ITS GOING TO BE VERY TOUGH.
👍️0
rapz rapz 1 day ago
[
👍️ 1
nyt nyt 1 day ago
These guys are shills imho, hired by lord emu to replace u know who. OMG
👍️ 1
nyt nyt 1 day ago
What are you talking about??? Vplm was never "a wifi business". Sounds like you're making stuff up as you go along. You should start from the beginning and read what the ALLEGED business was all about. Vplm never even used the word wifi. I don't recall seeing wifi word in the patents. Maybe it's there but I don't remember it.

Vplm began 27 yrs ago, contrary to what you likely are aware of, a voip services platform company. That does not mean or have anything to do with wifi. You jumped the track somewhere.

They were really only a wannabe voip service provider, as they simply rented turnkey voip kits. Voip means voice over internet protocol. Try looking it up. Voice over internet protocol is not wifi. Wifi is simply a wireless signal solution. Voip, is the ability to use telephony over the internet rather than over copper wires.

It also required protocols that enable it to switch back and forth between legacy phone system and the internet with a voip phone system. They used to have and sell magic jack devices that interface with a pc or later didn't need a pc, to make and rcv calls over the internet. What the heck does that have to do with wifi?? I believe wifi is a mashup of wireless fidelity...

All the stuff that was needed to make voip a workable thing for a business, like rbr, interoperability, etc etc were available and in use long before Vplm got into the carnival it has developed into. I used voip for conference calls via some major company like Yahoo or someone like that, with video and voice over the internet, nearly 25 yrs ago. At least over 20. Years ago, many yrs ago, I posted right here both free and paid solutions to rating, billing and routing, as well as some if the other needed software to make voip a workable business model. I posted the names and links to those companies that had these abilities before Vplm or digi-phony-ca.

The only 2 companies to ever have an interest or a need for the digi-phony-ca patents, were themselves, and then Vplm which basically took over Vplm. And the 1st thing ea one if them did once they got it, was to either get rid of it or try to. No one else has ever had the slightest interest in the untested, unproven, outdated, unused ghost of a so called communications solution which happens to NOT NEED VPLM PATENTS.

Both companies were friends with ea other and developed it into the scheme it is once they found out the patents were not usable. That's why you never see the results of the alleged worldwide nodal testing. If course you got hypnotized into letting important things like those test results slide among many other thing allowed to slide.

Anyone with a simple grasp of human nature and basic economics would know that the works would never allow a product allegedly worth upwards of hundreds billions of dollars to sit in the midfkr of the road for the last 12 to 15 yrs, untouched, unbought, unlicensed, unsettled for, unpartnered and simply left for competitors to snatched up from under you, gaining an untold fortune and the power of alleged control of the biggest, most important communications vehicle ever invented. How freaking silly and ridiculous and super naive it us to believe that could actually be. It can't and never will be. Stupid idea.

That's why this if us who were, able to pay close attention and connect the dots have for all these yrs been easily able to predict that nothing would happen and no ship would come in, in the in the heavily weighted against it, camp, that has continuously day in day out, for weeks months years and now decades, proclaimed that it's all imminent! Just have patience.

I didn't read anything past your wifi remarks as it seemed a moot point to do so. The whole new anti trust and monopoly suits is just another bs farce and cover for the cabal to keep selling shares for years more. The SEC needs some gung go maverick to take care if business. Otherwise it'll just continue until it's trips.
👍️ 1
chazzy1 chazzy1 1 day ago
Shajandr, based upon your kneejerk reaction to my post, all I can say is that I have obviously hit a nerve.
In my search for answers, should you take exception to something I say, why not try presenting a rational, lucid, well thought out response explaining how you think I got it wrong?
👍️ 3
shajandr shajandr 1 day ago
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Absurd.

You are two blind men discussing a photographic exhibit.

Butt yer funny!
👍 1
chazzy1 chazzy1 1 day ago
Rapz, as always, thank you for your insightful opinion. Although I am not that familiar with antitrust law, I did note from Emil's letter to shareholders and from the recent press releases, that this approach would be a faster pathway to obtaining value for VPLM shareholders than through traditional patent infringement litigation. Although it was stated that the antitrust approach avoids the uncertainties of the patent infringement landscape, implying that patent infringement would not need to be an element of an antitrust case, I was still a bit confused as to why not? The gray area for me was in how VoIP-Pal would demonstrate to the court that they were entitled to receive a damage award without having to prove that their IP had been infringed.
Your answer makes good sense, and if this is the rationale behind their antitrust strategy, it's a brilliant move on the part of VoIP-Pal.
Yes, VP's WiFi calling business loses alone, due to the anticompetitive nature of the defendants' practices, could easily equal the $30 billion being sought, all without having to prove infringement. And under the Clayton Act, this amount could be tripled if the judge so deems.
👍️ 2 😂 2 🤢 1 🤣 2
ORCA ORCA 1 day ago
I MADE A COUPLE CHICKEN TRIOS THIS WEEK ON VPLM AND ALSO THE TAKI SPECIAL.IS A DESERT AT CARABAS THAT IS ONLY BEEN MADE FOR TAKIS:))THE TAKI SPECIAL.YOU CAN ONLY ORDER IT AT CARABAS IN NAPLES.
WITHOUT A DOUBT THE ABSOLUTE BEST DESERT YOU EVER HAD.
LET;S HOPE MORE CHICKEN TRIOS AND TAKI SPECIAL WILL BE MADE NEXT FEW WEEKS:))
KEEP HER DOWN HERE SO I CAN KEEP MAKING CHICKEN TRIOS AND TAKI SPECIAL


👍️0
rapz rapz 2 days ago
Chazzy1,

Just guessing: VPLM's antitrust case is about how defendants dominated and controlled the WiFi calling technology business and related infrastructure (database) that harmed VPLM from developing and succeeding in their own WiFi business. Examples cited: numerous IPR's and court cases, unwilling to settle for infringement, etc. forcing VPLM to waste their money and resources on legal costs over many years. Although they are not running a WiFi based business yet they can show potential "buy" offers from other companies for their patents were disrupted by defendants' anti trust efforts.

No need to prove infringement because it is not a patent-related case. VPLM business losses could be more than potential damage from infringement of one patent . VPLM could add up all potential damages due to several patents and the amount could be more like $30B or so.

The calculation of damages due to patent infringement is tedious and there are several "damage models" used and argued in courts as well as moderators negotiate a reasonable settlement at the end. All of this takes time and money. VPLM can avoid this head ache and avoid the delay by moving quickly to a settlement via the anti trust route. That probably could be a reason for the anti trust.

They may keep pursuing the patent infringement case route because the US patent law - section 35 - allows a patent holder to collect maximum infringement damage including legal expenses after the defendants were notified when the patents were issued in early 2010-2017.

Maybe others well informed in these matters can explain further.
PS - just an opinion. No guarantee of win in the anti trust case. Cautiously optimistic!
👍️ 8 😂 2 🚮 1 🤢 1 🤣 2
nyt nyt 2 days ago
Could you PM the exhibits to me? I think I can rcv PM.
I found exhibit A somewhere but after I copied it, I couldn't expand enough to read. I'd really like to read the exhibits. What case are the exhibits from? I also had downloaded the entire anti trust and monopoly cases but where are the exhibits from? Really appreciate if you could PM the exhibits to me.
Thx
👍️0
Spyke37 Spyke37 2 days ago
He who laughs last, usually has the joke explained to them.....Check the post to which he responding.....You are welcome.
👍️ 4 🗑️ 1 🚮 1 🤣 1
shajandr shajandr 2 days ago
The antitrust lawsuit(s) are pure garbage. It/they will be dismissed at an early state on many bases including butt nott limited to: failure to state a claim, failure to plead sufficient facts (fails Iqbal and Twombly pleading requirements test), success at being pure nonsense, etc.). Might gett Rule 11 sanctions here, butt prolly need one more filing of this garbage to PO court.

Just absolute trash and the work product of (an) extremely subpar lawyer(s).

Emo should go back to filing frivolous lawsuits against movie producers for made-up bullshit claims that their movie violates his imaginary copyright.

Emo deserves these really shitty lawyers and they deserve him. A match made in ... errr ... Atascadero State Hospital?

OTOH, mebbe Emo can wind upp with a justiciable professional malpractice claim against the really shitty lawruh(s). Perhaps that is Emo's master plan.
👍️ 1 💯 1 ✅️ 1 ✔️ 1
nyt nyt 2 days ago
Instead of answering certain questions put to you, instead you copycat the same question and post it later...

"nyt
Re: chazzy1 post# 133823
Tuesday, 10/29/2024 12:46:50 PM
BUHHHH...LONEY, Sliced too thin. Not one word have I seen, aside from agreeing with any posts that are pro vplm, which make any sense whatsoever in terms of anti trust violations, nor how anything in that realm will prove infringement.
👍️ 1 🤣 1
sunspotter sunspotter 2 days ago
Jim, it sounds like you don't know much about stocks and shares.

I'd steer clear of scams like VPLM if I were you - to those of us who know, it's very obvious that it's a scam.

You're welcome!
👍 2 ✅️ 1
sunspotter sunspotter 2 days ago
I’m sure rapz is grateful for the set-up.

LOL.

What time have you scheduled the reply for?
👍️ 1 ✔️ 1
jimr1717 jimr1717 2 days ago
I'm relatively new & relatively unknowledgable about this stuff. If you have a buyer, must then be a seller & vice-versa, right? So when u say buyers, no selling, what does that mean.. buy or sell from MM's?

Lmao priceless
👍️ 1 💪 1
chazzy1 chazzy1 2 days ago
There is one loose-end question that is bugging me, and I would welcome an insightful explanation from anyone. Rapz, are you there? My question is, how does VoIP-Pal expect their antitrust case to pay off monetarily, should they win? I am aware that VoIP-Pal (the plaintiff) has identified $30 billion in damages, but exactly how would this work, that is, how would they stand to collect without having to prove infringement? I am sure that they have thought this through, and that there is an obvious answer, but this little detail is still unclear in my inquiring mind. Do they even need to prove infringement to claim damages in antitrust litigation? Or, do they plan to prove infringement during the antitrust case? But if so, how would this process be more efficient than traditional patent infringement litigation in district court? Just curious. Thanks.
👍️ 3 🪦 1 ⚰️ 1 ✅️ 1
nyt nyt 2 days ago
And neither will go anywhere as it's obvious they are meritless from jumpstreet. Merely a thick fog to wade thru for all, whilst the raking in of your monies continues, unabated, for at least 4 more years. The emu of eGipped didn't get this far into this farce, by using silly, useless, worn out, unsophisticated plans. He has had more than enough experience with failed schemes for many years, that this time he brought out the genius, once testing showed the patents would never fly. He has always been VERY creative.
Y'all must be getting used to the incoming monkey wrenches... Sorry, I don't make em.
🎯 2 💯 2
sunspotter sunspotter 2 days ago
Irrelevant.

They’ll both be dismissed in short order, and costs will be awarded to the defendants.

Expect other sanctions for the plaintiff’s lawyers.

In the meantime VPLM insiders will use the pretence of ongoing litigation as cover while they dump as many of their free shares as possible before this whole thing implodes.
🎯 1 💯 1
chazzy1 chazzy1 2 days ago
As an addendum to my previous post, it should be clarified that the plaintiff seeks only to consolidate the class action with the antitrust suit during the pretrial phase, including discovery, in the interest of greater efficiency. After the pretrial phase, both cases should proceed on separate tracks.
👍️ 5 🗑️ 2 🚽 1 🤢 1
nyt nyt 3 days ago
After all these years, Vplm has become: Bond....James junk bond....$.007
👍️ 3 ✔️ 1
nyt nyt 3 days ago
The breakup of ma bell began in 1956.
It was truly monopolizing because 22 companies were paying a regular percentage license fee to mother... Divestiture began in '56 and took close to 30 yrs to complete.

In the case of the big 4, now the big 3....what they have accomplished doesnt at all strike me as anti trust or monopoly. There's 4 big companies (sprint now part of tmob) and they have developed to where they have roughly 1000 MVNOs who license, smartly, from the big guys, making up nearly half of all coverage. Together, all in all, they have, rather than monopolized, brought to the industry the best prices ever, for the most features ever, and created one of, if not the, most useful and innovative tool of all time! And it's so taken for granted how fantastic it is. You can do just about anything and everything, cheaply, with the smartphone, voip, the internet, Google and YouTube. If all that was suddenly taken away tomorrow, there'd be the biggest riots in history. What they've accomplished is far from some unfair monopoly. There are many many choices available and due to competitive, the cheapest prices ever.

The only thing I can think of for why anyone would claim anti trust and monopoly is the alleged stealing and use of the patents. I don't think that what has occurred and no one in all these years has been been able to show or prove infringement. I find this whole new ring in this circus, this greatest SHOW on earth, just another chaapter and example of the evil, I mean emil's potpourri of plots to stretch time out to where nothing will matter anymore....while in the MEANtime, he, the quick bucks queen and company keep raking it in like there's no tomorrow.

Patience will soon bring the end for many as I venture it has for the past 27 yrs of a barren womb.

I still say the best course of action at this juncture is for the emu to swallow his pride and sell the whole Vplm debacle story to Cameron as a screenplay!
👍️ 2 💯 1
chazzy1 chazzy1 3 days ago
Thank you DesktopDR. This motion for consolidation by the plaintiff provides the most detailed glimpse yet of what is expected to come in these parallel class action and antitrust lawsuits. It would appear that VoIP-Pal has retained excellent legal representation in what promises to be a landmark case, remniscent of the 1984 break up of AT&T, and having the potential to transform the telecommunications industry to the benefit of consumers and VoIP-Pal alike. In this motion for consolodation, emphasis has been placed on Verizon's "open letter," which the plaintiffs assert shows "bad faith" and that it makes certain "technical admissions" which I take to mean self-incriminating. The temperature is rising as this is getting more interesting by the day.
👍️ 6 🗑️ 1 😂 1 🚮 1 🤢 2 🤣 2
DesktopDR DesktopDR 3 days ago
And now this
https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/666c5eb4f4c8e856d816316d/67238ceba35b172f3fb1c673_Motion%20to%20Consolidate%20FILED%2010.30.24.pdf
👍️ 3 😂 1 🤣 1
fung_derf fung_derf 3 days ago
You saying you know DB well does not speak well of you. So it doesn't bother you that he's cost you money since you first posted here about how much you love Emil? How's that excitement level now?
When you talk with DB, do you have to pull into the parking lot where he lives?
BTW, you once said on here DB left because he got tired of debating....how about now?
Lastly, someone named "shadow man" who only posts on one board, and has been wrong....well lets just say his credibility isn't great.

Shadow man

Re: Hay Day post# 133114

Monday, September 23, 2024 4:47:50 PM

Post#
133128
of 133958
I just spoke to DB, he is reporting the excitement level is even higher than last week.
👍️ 4 👎️ 1 💯 1
chazzy1 chazzy1 3 days ago
Thanks for this update, GreenBackClub.
From this filing, it looks like both cases, 1:24-cv-03051 and 1:24-cv-03054, are being consolidated and assigned to Judge Randolf D. Moss, a 63 year old Yale Law School graduate, appointed by Barack Obama.
👍️ 5 😢 1 😰 1
GreenBackClub GreenBackClub 3 days ago
INZA et al v. AT&T INC. et al
District Of Columbia District Court
Judge: Randolph D Moss
Case #: 1:24-cv-03054
Nature of Suit 410 Other Statutes - Antitrust
Cause 15:1 Antitrust Litigation
Case Filed: Oct 25, 2024
Docket
Parties (56)
Docket last updated: 9 hours ago
Thursday, October 31, 2024
5 utility Case Assigned/Reassigned Thu 10/31 4:38 PM
Case directly reassigned to Judge Randolph D. Moss, by consent, as related. Judge Reggie B. Walton is no longer assigned to the case. (ztnr)
Wednesday, October 30, 2024
4 notice Notice of Related Case Wed 10/30 9:28 AM
NOTICE OF RELATED CASE by All Plaintiffs. Case related to Case No. 24-cv-3051. (Pittman, John)
3 notice LCvR 26.1 Certificate of Disclosure - Corporate Affiliations/Financial Interests Wed 10/30 9:27 AM
LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by RICHARD INZA, MICHAEL INZA, VOIP-PAL.COM, INC (Pittman, John)
Monday, October 28, 2024
2 service Electronic Summons Issued Mon 10/28 4:10 PM
SUMMONS (68)Issued Electronically as to All Defendants.(zmtm)
Att: 1 Notice and Consent
utility Case Assigned/Reassigned Mon 10/28 2:27 PM
Case Assigned to Judge Reggie B. Walton. (zmtm)
Friday, October 25, 2024
1 150 pgs cmp Complaint Fri 10/25 5:00 PM
COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ADCDC-11259258) filed by MICHAEL INZA, RICHARD INZA, VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.(Pittman, John)
Att: 1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet,
Att: 2 Exhibit EXHIBIT A,
Att: 3 Summons ABOLHASSAN,
Att: 4 Summons ALMEIDA,
Att: 5 Summons ARCHAMBEAU,
Att: 6 Summons ARCHAMBEAU2,
Att: 7 Summons AT&T CORP,
Att: 8 Summons AT&T INC,
Att: 9 Summons AT&T SERVICES,
Att: 10 Summons AUSTIN,
Att: 11 Summons AUSTIN2,
Att: 12 Summons BERTOLIN,
Att: 13 Summons BERTOLIN2,
Att: 14 Summons BOHLE,
Att: 15 Summons C TAYLOR,
Att: 16 Summons CELLCO,
Att: 17 Summons CLAURE,
Att: 18 Summons COLAO,
Att: 19 Summons COLAO2,
Att: 20 Summons DATAR,
Att: 21 Summons DT,
Att: 22 Summons ILLEK,
Att: 23 Summons FORD,
Att: 24 Summons GOPALAN,
Att: 25 Summons HEALEY,
Att: 26 Summons HEALEY2,
Att: 27 Summons HOTTGES,
Att: 28 Summons HOTTGES2,
Att: 29 Summons HUTCHINS,
Att: 30 Summons ILLEK2,
Att: 31 Summons KAVANAUGH,
Att: 32 Summons KENNARD,
Att: 33 Summons KUBLER,
Att: 34 Summons LANGHEIM,
Att: 35 Summons LANGHEIM2,
Att: 36 Summons LEROY,
Att: 37 Summons LEROY2,
Att: 38 Summons LONG,
Att: 39 Summons LUCZO,
Att: 40 Summons MAYER,
Att: 41 Summons MCATEE,
Att: 42 Summons MCCALLISTER,
Att: 43 Summons MOONEY,
Att: 44 Summons NARASIMHAN,
Att: 45 Summons NARASIMHAN2,
Att: 46 Summons NESLON,
Att: 47 Summons NEMAT,
Att: 48 Summons OTIS,
Att: 49 Summons OTIS2,
Att: 50 Summons ROSE,
Att: 51 Summons SCHULMAN,
Att: 52 Summons SCHULMAN2,
Att: 53 Summons SGOPALAN,
Att: 54 Summons SIEVERT,
Att: 55 Summons SLATER,
Att: 56 Summons SLATER2,
Att: 57 Summons STANKEY,
Att: 58 Summons T TAYLOR,
Att: 59 Summons TM USA,
Att: 60 Summons TOME,
Att: 61 Summons TOME2,
Att: 62 Summons UBINAS,
Att: 63 Summons VBNS,
Att: 64 Summons VCI,
Att: 65 Summons VENKATESH,
Att: 66 Summons VENKATESH2,
Att: 67 Summons VESTBERG,
Att: 68 Summons VESTBERG2,
Att: 69 Summons VSC,
Att: 70 Summons WEAVER,
Att: 71 Summons WEAVER2,
Att: 72 Summons WESTBROOK

—-


VOIP-PAL.COM, INC v. AT&T INC. et al
District Of Columbia District Court
Judge: Randolph D Moss
Case #: 1:24-cv-03051
Nature of Suit 410 Other Statutes - Antitrust
Cause 15:1 Antitrust Litigation
Case Filed: Oct 25, 2024
Docket
Parties (54)
Docket last updated: 9 hours ago
Wednesday, October 30, 2024
6 motion Consolidate Cases Wed 10/30 2:20 PM
MOTION to Consolidate Cases by VOIP-PAL.COM, INC. (Pittman, John)
5 notice Notice of Related Case Wed 10/30 9:26 AM
NOTICE OF RELATED CASE by All Plaintiffs. Case related to Case No. 24-cv-3054. (Pittman, John)
4 notice LCvR 26.1 Certificate of Disclosure - Corporate Affiliations/Financial Interests Wed 10/30 9:24 AM
LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by VOIP-PAL.COM, INC (Pittman, John)
Monday, October 28, 2024
3 order .Order Mon 10/28 1:28 PM
STANDING ORDER: The parties are hereby ORDERED to comply with the directives set forth in the attached Standing Order. See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 10/28/2024. (lcrdm1)
2 service Electronic Summons Issued Mon 10/28 12:35 PM
SUMMONS (70) Issued Electronically as to ALL DEFENDANTS, SHELLYE L ARCHAMBEAU (2), ROXANNE S. AUSTIN (2), MARK T. BERTOLIN (2), VITTORIO COLAO (2), MELANIE L. HEALEY (2), TIMOTHEUS HOTTGES (2), CHRISTIAN P. ILLEK (2), THORSTON LANGHEIM (2), DOMINIQUE LEROY (2), LAXMAN NARASIMHAN (2), CLARENCE OTIS, JR (2), DANIEL H. SCHULMAN (2), RODNEY E. SLATER (2), CAROL B. TOME (2), VANDANA VENKATESH (2), HANS VESTBERG (2), GREGORY G. WEAVER (2).(znmw)
Att: 1 Notice and Consent
utility Case Assigned/Reassigned Mon 10/28 12:10 PM
Case Assigned to Judge Randolph D. Moss. (znmw)
Friday, October 25, 2024
1 140 pgs cmp Complaint Fri 10/25 4:15 PM
COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ADCDC-11258917) filed by VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.(Pittman, John)
Att: 1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet,
Att: 2 Exhibit EXHIBIT A,
Att: 3 Summons ABOLHASSAN,
Att: 4 Summons ALMEIDA,
Att: 5 Summons ARCHAMBEAU,
Att: 6 Summons ARCHAMBEAU2,
Att: 7 Summons AT&T CORP,
Att: 8 Summons AT&T INC,
Att: 9 Summons AT&T SERVICES,
Att: 10 Summons AUSTIN,
Att: 11 Summons AUSTIN2,
Att: 12 Summons BERTOLIN,
Att: 13 Summons BERTOLIN2,
Att: 14 Summons BOHLE,
Att: 15 Summons C TAYLOR,
Att: 16 Summons CELLCO,
Att: 17 Summons CLAURE,
Att: 18 Summons COLAO,
Att: 19 Summons COLAO2,
Att: 20 Summons DATAR,
Att: 21 Summons DT,
Att: 22 Summons ILLEK,
Att: 23 Summons FORD,
Att: 24 Summons GOPALAN,
Att: 25 Summons HEALEY,
Att: 26 Summons HEALEY2,
Att: 27 Summons HOTTGES,
Att: 28 Summons HOTTGES2,
Att: 29 Summons HUTCHINS,
Att: 30 Summons ILLEK2,
Att: 31 Summons KAVANAUGH,
Att: 32 Summons KENNARD,
Att: 33 Summons KUBLER,
Att: 34 Summons LANGHEIM,
Att: 35 Summons LANGHEIM2,
Att: 36 Summons LEROY,
Att: 37 Summons LEROY2,
Att: 38 Summons LONG,
Att: 39 Summons LUCZO,
Att: 40 Summons MAYER,
Att: 41 Summons MCATEE,
Att: 42 Summons MCCALLISTER,
Att: 43 Summons MOONEY,
Att: 44 Summons NARASIMHAN,
Att: 45 Summons NARASIMHAN2,
Att: 46 Summons NESLON,
Att: 47 Summons NEMAT,
Att: 48 Summons OTIS,
Att: 49 Summons OTIS2,
Att: 50 Summons ROSE,
Att: 51 Summons SCHULMAN,
Att: 52 Summons SCHULMAN2,
Att: 53 Summons SGOPALAN,
Att: 54 Summons SIEVERT,
Att: 55 Summons SLATER,
Att: 56 Summons SLATER2,
Att: 57 Summons STANKEY,
Att: 58 Summons T TAYLOR,
Att: 59 Summons TM USA,
Att: 60 Summons TOME,
Att: 61 Summons TOME2,
Att: 62 Summons UBINAS,
Att: 63 Summons VBNS,
Att: 64 Summons VCI,
Att: 65 Summons VENKATESH,
Att: 66 Summons VENKATESH2,
Att: 67 Summons VESTBERG,
Att: 68 Summons VESTBERG2,
Att: 69 Summons VSC,
Att: 70 Summons WEAVER,
Att: 71 Summons WEAVER2,
Att: 72 Summons WESTBROOK
👍️ 4 😂 1 🤣 1
chazzy1 chazzy1 3 days ago
This is a brief history of one monopoly in the telecom industry:
The Bell System, also known as "Ma Bell", was broken up on January 1, 1984:

Background
The Bell System was a group of companies that provided phone services, long-distance connections, and other telecommunications services in the United States. The Bell System was considered a monopoly and was the dominant telephone provider in the US for most of the 20th century.

Breakup
In 1982, AT&T, the head company of the Bell System, agreed to break up the company in a consent decree with the U.S. Department of Justice. The breakup resulted in seven independent regional companies, known as the "Baby Bells", that provided local service. AT&T continued to provide long-distance service.

Impact
The breakup of the Bell System gave consumers more choices and lower prices for phones and long-distance service. However, it may have also delayed the availability of high-speed internet service for many consumers.

Reintegration
By 2014, most of the Baby Bells were merged back together as a single company called AT&T. Today, AT&T is more than twice the size it was before the breakup, with a large cellular network and satellite cable company.

So, is it time for another breakup? Is this something that is being addressed within the current antitrust lawsuit? If so, exactly how would VoIP-Pal factor into this equation? It would be interesting to get VoIP-Pal's perspective on these questions.
👍️ 3 💯 1 🗑️ 2 🚮 2 🤢 1
sunspotter sunspotter 3 days ago
“ As such, the story was not a factual recounting of real-life events. SpaceXMania.com features a disclaimer page with more information, and the Facebook post's caption included the word satire at the very end”

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/elon-musk-tesla-cell-phone/

Being a VPLM pimp - however well disguised- requires the posting of made-up garbage on a regular basis. Always easier if it’s made up by someone else on your behalf, of course.
🎯 1 👍️ 1 💯 2
nyt nyt 3 days ago
1st off, if you're gonna quote bullshit, you should use quotation marks, rather than trying to make it look like it's in your own words. Also, you're so gullible you'll obviously believe anything you read on the internet and then put it out as though you have a clue what you're talking about. There is no tesla smartphone. It's total bullshit put out there via AI. Musk himself has twice denied it. There is no such thing. It doesn't exist and is not planned. Quit trying to look so smart and maybe you'll look less ignorant. You bought the whole bullshit story hook line and sinker, lolol.
👍️ 2 💯 3 ✅️ 1 ✔️ 2
ORCA ORCA 3 days ago
LION YOU STILL HOLDING ON TO VPLM??DID YOU LOSE HOPE???
😂 1 🤣 1
rapz rapz 3 days ago
A taste of ANTI TRUST fines for market domination by companies doing business outside USA

News on the Halloween day!

Comment: Are regulators taking a look at the WiFi calling markets domination by some companies and wonder why they are facing antitrust cases in US: Verizon, T Mobile, ATT, et al.
DOJ and FTC have already cases covering a few issues with GOOG and Meta. The internet service providers, previously doing business as legacy phone companies have been accumulating tons of personal phone data over decades. They are sitting on it and perhaps exploiting it.

NBC News
Russia fines Google more than the world's entire GDP
David Hodari
Thu, October 31, 2024 at 6:04 AM PDT

It’s the kind of fine you might want to consider paying off in instalments.

A Russian court has demanded Google pay a number so large that even the Kremlin conceded to NBC News on Thursday it was more a symbolic gesture than a sum it soon expects to bolster its war funds.

The fine amounts to around $20 decillion — 20 followed by 33 zeros — or two undecillion rubles, a 37-digit figure.

According to the Russian news outlet RBC, the fine is the total amount demanded by 17 Russian television channels and other media outlets whose output has been blocked from YouTube — the video platform owned by the tech giant — as sanctioned supporters of President Vladimir Putin’s regime and its invasion of Ukraine.

The court that imposed the fine might be in for a long wait for Google to pay up, however.

Not only does the figure eclipse Google’s $2 trillion market value, but it’s also far larger than the size of the entire global economy, which the International Monetary Fund puts at around $110 trillion — a figure with a mere 13 zeros.

That said, at least the fine is not as large as a googol, which has 100 zeroes. Google founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin picked the number as the name of the search engine they then hoped would organize large quantities of information.
“Although it is a specific amount, I cannot even say this number, it is rather filled with symbolism,” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Thursday when asked by NBC News how Google was expected to pay such a large sum.

“The company should not restrict our broadcasters on their platform,” he added, on his daily briefing call with reporters. “This should be a reason for the Google leadership to pay attention to this and improve the situation.”

The amount the court says Google owes is growing, too.
While the case was first opened in 2020, when Google blocked channels that then belonged to Wagner Group mercenary chief Yevgeny Prigozhin and oligarch Konstantin Malofeev, it was expanded when YouTube banned further channels after Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022.

The court ordered Google to restore the accounts within nine months, with a fine of 100,000 rubles (around $1,000) levied for each day after that period. The size of the fine was to double each week for every week of noncompliance, with no limit on its size, RBC said.

This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
==================================

Turkish competition board fines Google over failure to comply with regulation

Technology - Antitrust - Regulatory Oversight

Turkish competition board fines Google over failure to comply with regulation
By Reuters
May 16, 20246:52 AM PDTUpdated 5 months ago

Alphabet Inc
ISTANBUL, May 16 (Reuters) - The Turkish competition authority said on Thursday that it decided to fine Google over its failure to fulfil obligations regarding a part of its local search services.
The authority said it will fine the company daily five ten thousandths of its 2023 revenues until it complies with the competition board's decisions, starting from April 15.
The board said the fine was imposed as previously implemented measures by Google to address the competition authority's concerns over local search services failed to include hotel inquiries.

(That is not an end.)
Searches related to:
turkey suing google maps
turkey suing google maps free
turkey suing google maps location
turkey suing google maps images
suing google map
turkey suing google maps download
turkey suing google maps live
turkey suing google maps search
turkey suing google maps for sale

(Will these authorities in EU, Russia, Turkey and other countries take a note of the 'WiFi calling" market domination by companies doing business there OR their people are OK with Elon Musk's "Starlink satellite system" providing dirt cheap internet connection for cheap cell phones to farmers in remote areas around the globe - (Elon Musk's original idea)? Musk's cell phone is dirt cheap, can be charged by a solar panel attached to the phone. Phone at about $40-60 estimated price, not $1000 like Apple phones which generate easy revenues for the Internet Service Providers and millions of unsuspecting subscribers paying for the service.)
👍️ 9 🗑️ 2 🚽 2 🤣 2
sunspotter sunspotter 4 days ago
"I know DB as well"

I just bet you do 😆.

"and can say he is an honorable man."

You can say that, but it would be the exact opposite of the truth.

Honorable men don't:

Call women vile and horrible names just because they're women.

Make homophobic remarks about anybody and everybody who has the temerity to disagree with them.

Send threatening and insulting messages to numerous people, with obscene content and insults.

Make menacing phone calls to threaten those who are sceptical about VPLM.

Threaten physical violence to their critics.

Leak insider information in a misleading way to defraud the greedy but gullible stupid enough to fall for this obvious scam.

And that's just a partial list.

No, I would label DB as scum, except I would be inviting a libel suit from scum, which would find itself grossly defamed for being lumped in with DB.

And quite honestly, scum would probably win that law suit. It would certainly have a better chance than VPLM with any of its frivolous and pathetic litigation.
🎯 2 👍️ 2 💯 2 ✅️ 1 ✔️ 1
Shadow man Shadow man 4 days ago
I know DB as well and can say he is an honorable man.
👍️ 7 💯 1 🚽 2 🤢 2 🤣 3 🪞 1 🪩 1
fung_derf fung_derf 4 days ago
In case all of you were wondering where the money for all those shares sold by Barbara went.....well lets just say it was nice of you all to support her restaurants....
https://www.bellaggio.cafe/index.html
👍️ 1 🤣 1
keepemcloser keepemcloser 4 days ago
To whom are you directing this message "to tell Kipping" there is no Kipping here ,hadn't been part of this group for a long time.
🤣 1 🧵 1
chazzy1 chazzy1 4 days ago
Elon Musk's entrance into the smartphone market, with his new Tesla smartphone priced at $50, challenges the status quo in the telecom industry by redefining what a smartphone should actually cost. The monopolistic practices in the telecom industry with inflated profit margins, is not only being challenged by the Tesla smartphone introduction, but coincidently by VoIP-Pal via their antitrust lawsuit. The astonishing coincidence is that Emil Malak's stated contentions with the incumbents in the telecom industry appear to be independently supported by Elon Musk.
👍️ 6 🗑️ 2 🤢 2 🤣 2
nyt nyt 4 days ago
Try this
Nowurtalkin.protonmail.com

I don't have PM available so I used a temp. This is a diff temp. Good for 10 min

Oops.... Nowurtalkin@protonmail.com

Did u use the corrected one above? Should've worked. Is there any reason why you can't just post it here?
👍️0
Dontnosheet Dontnosheet 4 days ago
File is too large I believe.
👍️0
Spyke37 Spyke37 4 days ago
Uh Oh, someone broke out the Thesaurus. By all means, put me straight, I think a lot of us would love to see what your definition of proof is. I am pretty sure it won't match up with Webster's. I will make it even easier, I want you to show the proof of me being DB or Rich Inza. There is a big difference between partially informed opinion and fact, and Sun you are truly coming up short. I have known DB for almost 50 years (which is how I know that I am not him) and he is the antithesis of a liar. Frankly he tells the truth a bit too harshly in my opinion, he is blunt and honest, even when it hurts him...I am waiting with bated breath, and while you are at it why don't you show the receipts on the companies you have helped take down. What made 2014 a great year?
🆗 1 👍️ 5 💪 2 🗑️ 2 😷 1 🚽 3
sunspotter sunspotter 4 days ago
"Prove???? Prove????"

You seem querulous.

What is it you think hasn't been proven yet?

That DB is a liar, a pumper?

Or that he used insider information as part of his disinformation campaign here and elsewhere?

Do tell me, and I'll put you straight and why all those things are shown by a combination of the Company's own legal submissions and MoFo's letter.

You're welcome.
👍️ 1 💯 1

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock