BNSF to Appeal Ruling Blocking California Rail Yard
August 02 2016 - 5:40PM
Dow Jones News
BNSF Railway Co. is appealing a judge's ruling against the
freight railroad's plan to build a rail yard near the ports of Long
Beach and Los Angeles.
The judge ruled in March that an environmental review of the
Southern California International Gateway project wasn't properly
done, dealing a blow to BNSF"s efforts to expand its operations out
of the largest import gateway in the U.S.
In a statement Tuesday, the railroad called the ruling
"incorrect," adding, "The lower court applied an inappropriate
evidentiary standard and disregarded a comprehensive eight-year
environmental review in making its ruling." Unless the ruling is
reversed, the railroad may walk away from the $500 million
investment altogether, BNSF said in its statement.
Opponents of the project, which included nearby businesses,
neighbors, air-quality regulators and the City of Long Beach, had
claimed victory after the ruling, saying the expected increase in
truck traffic, pollution and noise would have hurt their
communities.
Supporters of project, which has been in development for nearly
10 years at a cost of more than $50 million, said the terminal
would add badly needed rail capacity and reduce overall truck
traffic in the region. Currently, the closest BNSF terminal to the
ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach is roughly 25 miles away. Its
new terminal would be 4 miles away from the ports.
The facility would load containers, trucked from nearby port
terminals, onto trains bound for inland hubs such as Chicago and
Houston.
The Port of Los Angeles also joined BNSF in appealing the
ruling. "The SCIG Project is vitally important to improve the
efficiency of the entire San Pedro Bay Ports complex," Port
Director Eugene Seroka said in a statement. He added that port
believed its environmental impact report "fully met all
requirements."
BNSF and Union Pacific Corp. are the only two major railroads
serving the Southern California ports. Both have run into trouble
with recent expansion plans. Union Pacific has been locked in what
the company has called "environmental review purgatory" at the
ports for nearly a decade as it tries to double capacity to handle
1.5 million shipping containers annually.
Write to Erica E. Phillips at erica.phillips@wsj.com
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
August 02, 2016 17:25 ET (21:25 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2016 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Union Pacific (NYSE:UNP)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2024 to Apr 2024
Union Pacific (NYSE:UNP)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2023 to Apr 2024