By Ryan Knutson, John D. McKinnon and Drew FitzGerald
Sixteen years after communications breakdowns on 9/11 hobbled
police and firefighters at Ground Zero, the U.S. government awarded
$6.5 billion and valuable airwaves to AT&T Inc. to start
building a nationwide broadband network for first responders.
The idea was born out of the 9/11 Commission, and it is the only
of the bipartisan report's recommendations yet to be implemented.
Congress set aside federal funds for the project, called FirstNet,
but it has been dogged by delays and false starts.
Executives at AT&T, the nation's second-largest wireless
provider by subscribers, said they would spend about $40 billion
over the 25-year contract to build and maintain the network, which
AT&T says will create 10,000 jobs.
The decision is a major step forward for FirstNet, though there
are still questions about whether it will get built as envisioned.
Several states are debating whether to join the federal project or
build their own public safety networks.
A politically connected startup that lost out on the contract is
encouraging them to opt out. Its board members include former Govs.
Jeb Bush and Martin O'Malley. Experts worry that the entire project
could be harmed if too many large states opt out because populous
areas subsidize more rural ones.
At a Washington, D.C., press conference Thursday, Commerce
Secretary Wilbur Ross said the project "will change an untenable
status quo by providing first responders with the tools they need
to keep us safe." He called it "a prime example of the incredible
progress we can make through public-private partnerships."
Currently, first responders share wireless networks with regular
consumers, meaning communication between police officers regarding
an active shooter, for example, can be hampered by the same network
congestion a smartphone user sometimes encounters when streaming a
YouTube video.
"It will be a great thing for us," said Neil Miller, the sheriff
of Buffalo County in Kearney, Neb. Mr. Miller's department
currently pays Verizon Communications Inc. for wireless service,
which supports remote command posts, patrol cars and officers'
devices. Like regular customers, Mr. Miller's staff has faced
slower connections when people pour into town for a regional car
show.
"Public safety has no priority right now," Mr. Miller said. "We
are just another user. We look the same in the network as everybody
else."
The 2012 congressional legislation that created FirstNet allows
for states to build their own alternative systems. Already, some
states, including Colorado, New Hampshire, Alabama, Arizona and
Michigan, have been exploring the possibility of opting out.
Ryan Burchnell, executive director of the Alabama Law
Enforcement Agency, said Alabama is just doing due diligence. "If
you don't look at the alternatives, I don't know how you make an
informed decision," he said.
Rivada Mercury LLC, the upstart that lost the competition for
the federal contract, has said it would make a concerted effort to
win state contracts to run independent networks. The company, which
is run by former wireless industry executives, has joined with
other vendors such as equipment makers Ericsson AB and Nokia
Corp.
"Do you want to be line item 1? Or line item 4,363? And that's
where public safety is for the budgets of these carriers," Declan
Ganley, Rivada's chief, said, referring to AT&T's involvement.
"This is not a rejection of FirstNet. It's just a different way of
fulfilling the mission."
Rivada sued in November to block the federal government from
awarding the contract to AT&T, but the case was struck down
this month by the U.S. Court of Federal Claims.
The Fraternal Order of Police has criticized the process. The
group worries the procurement process has been opaque and that
AT&T may not be willing to spend to build connections in
extremely rural areas where there is little usage.
"It would be an understatement to say we were disappointed" with
the government's handling of the project, Jim Pasco, a senior
adviser to the Fraternal Order of Police, said in a recent
interview. "AT&T is a reputable company. But they're a
reputable company doing what reputable companies do: They're trying
to make a profit."
AT&T Chief Executive Randall Stephenson said Thursday the
new network "is going to be second to none," adding, "our first
responders, we believe, deserve the very best technology."
FirstNet Chief Executive Michael Poth said the review process
has been rigorous and included endorsements from other public
safety groups. Mr. Poth said he is confident states will choose
FirstNet rather than opt out and build on their own.
There are many challenges in building a nationwide public safety
service. Unlike the existing networks that are built around
population centers, FirstNet is intended to offer more complete
coverage in less populated areas where it doesn't make financial
sense for the carriers to spend.
Cost estimates for the FirstNet project vary widely, from $12
billion to $47 billion over 10 years, according to the Government
Accountability Office. There aren't enough police and fire
departments in the nation to support the cost of construction and
operation.
The current project seeks to develop a self-funding network that
earns revenue from subscription fees from first responders and will
be subsidized by allowing AT&T to resell excess capacity to
commercial customers. The $6.5 billion comes from a 2015 government
airwaves auction.
"We'll add new radios, new antennas, we'll add new towers and
distribution. We'll add to our network for backhaul," AT&T
finance chief John Stephens said in an interview, adding the new
network will also "leverage off these 50,000-plus towers we already
have in service."
Mr. Stephens said where the infrastructure dollars go will
depend on how many states take up the offer, and he expects to know
where each state stand by the end of this year. The company's
previous financial forecasts for 2017 didn't include this
project.
This is the third attempt at getting a network built. In 2008,
the Federal Communications Commission tried auctioning wireless
airwaves to cellphone carriers with the condition that the winning
carrier had to give first responders priority network access, but
no company bid high enough to win.
Then, the Commerce Department doled out grants for local
governments to build their own networks. By 2012, more than 20
counties, cities and states signed up and more $300 million was
distributed. But officials feared each area would use different
technologies and be unable to integrate into a unified system. The
federal government put those projects on hold.
Thomas Gryta contributed to this article.
Write to Ryan Knutson at ryan.knutson@wsj.com, John D. McKinnon
at john.mckinnon@wsj.com and Drew FitzGerald at
andrew.fitzgerald@wsj.com
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
March 30, 2017 18:20 ET (22:20 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2017 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
AT&T (NYSE:T)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2024 to Apr 2024
AT&T (NYSE:T)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2023 to Apr 2024