Item 1. Financial Statements
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Financial
Statements
Note 1 - Organization
HPCI was organized under Ohio law in 1992,
and designated as a REIT in 1998. HPCI’s principal business objective is to acquire, hold, and manage mortgage assets and
other authorized investments that will generate net income for distribution to its shareholders. Two related parties own HPCI’s
common stock: HPCII and Holdings.
HPCII and Holdings are direct and indirect
subsidiaries of the Bank, a national banking association organized under the laws of the United States and headquartered in Columbus,
Ohio. The Bank is a wholly owned subsidiary of Huntington. Huntington is a multi-state diversified financial holding company organized
under Maryland law and headquartered in Columbus, Ohio. At March 31, 2013, the Bank, on a consolidated basis with its subsidiaries,
accounted for over 99% of Huntington’s consolidated total assets and
essentially
all of the year-to-date net income. Thus, for purposes of presenting consolidated financial statements for the Bank, Management
considers information for the Bank and for Huntington to be substantially the same.
Note 2 - Basis of Presentation and New Accounting Pronouncements
The accompanying unaudited condensed financial
statements of HPCI reflect all adjustments consisting of normal recurring accruals, which are, in the opinion of Management, necessary
for a fair presentation of the financial position, the results of operations, and cash flows for the periods presented. These unaudited
condensed financial statements have been prepared according to the rules and regulations of the SEC and, therefore, certain information
and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been omitted. The preparation
of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires Management to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported
in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Cash and cash equivalents used in the Condensed
Statements of Cash Flows is defined as “Cash and interest-bearing deposits with The Huntington National Bank.” In conjunction
with applicable accounting standards, all material subsequent events have been either recognized in the Unaudited Condensed Financial
Statements or disclosed in the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements. The Notes to the Financial Statements appearing
in the Form 10-K, include descriptions of significant accounting policies, as updated by the information contained in this report,
and should be read in conjunction with these interim financial statements. All of HPCI’s common stock is owned by affiliates;
therefore, net income per common share information is not presented.
HPCI elected to be treated
as a REIT for federal income tax purposes and intends to maintain compliance with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code and,
therefore, was not subject to federal income taxes. HPCI is also included in certain of Huntington’s unitary and combined
state income and franchise tax returns. On March 8, 2012, HPCI’s board of directors adopted Huntington’s Policy Statement
on Intercorporate State Tax Allocation, dated January 1, 2012. As a result, beginning in 2012, Huntington’s unitary and combined
state income and franchise tax provision was allocated to each member of the unitary and combined group based on the filing group’s
effective tax rate. Under the intercompany state tax allocation agreement with Huntington, HPCI provided and remitted state income
and franchise taxes to Huntington.
ASU 2013-02— Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting
of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.
The ASU requires an entity to provide information about
the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component. In addition, an entity is required to present,
either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes, significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated
other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net income but only if the amount reclassified is required under U.S.
GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period. The amendments are effective prospectively
for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012
The amendments should be applied retrospectively. The amendment
had no impact on HPCI’s Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements.
Note 3 – Loan Participation
Interests and Allowance for Credit Losses
Loan participation interests are categorized
based on the collateral underlying the loan. At March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, loan participation interests were comprised
of the following:
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
(dollar amounts in thousands)
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
$
|
2,766,220
|
|
|
$
|
2,875,870
|
|
Consumer and residential real estate
|
|
|
418,654
|
|
|
|
439,073
|
|
Total loan participation interests
|
|
|
3,184,874
|
|
|
|
3,314,943
|
|
Allowance for loan participation losses
|
|
|
(61,032
|
)
|
|
|
(59,451
|
)
|
Net loan participation interests
|
|
$
|
3,123,842
|
|
|
$
|
3,255,492
|
|
Underlying loans are generally collateralized
by real estate. As shown in the table above, the Company’s primary loan participation interest portfolios are: CRE and consumer
and residential real estate. Classes are generally disaggregations of a portfolio. The classes within the CRE portfolio are: retail
properties, multi family, office, industrial and warehouse, and other CRE. The classes within the consumer and residential real
estate portfolio are: first-lien loan participation interests and junior-lien loan participation interests.
Other than the credit risk concentration
related to loan participation interests secured by real estate as described above, there were no underlying loans outstanding that
would be considered a concentration of lending in any particular industry, group of industries, or business activity. Loans made
to borrowers in the five states of Ohio, Michigan, Indiana, Pennsylvania, and Kentucky comprised approximately 94% of the portfolio
at both March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
Loan Participation Interest Purchases and Sales
The following table summarizes significant
portfolio purchase activity during the three-month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012:
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
|
|
(dollar amounts in thousands)
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Portfolio loan participation interests purchased during the:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three-month period ended March 31, 2013
|
|
$
|
175,751
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
175,751
|
|
Three-month period ended March 31, 2012
|
|
|
431,890
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
431,890
|
|
There were no significant portfolio loan
participation interest sales during the three-month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012.
NPAs and Past Due Loan Participation Interests
Loan participation interests are considered
past due when the contractual amounts due with respect to principal and interest are not received within 30 days of the contractual
due date.
Any loan participation interest in any
portfolio may be placed on nonaccrual status prior to the policies described below when collection of principal or interest is
in doubt.
Loan participation interests in all classes
within the CRE portfolio are placed on nonaccrual status at 90-days past due. First-lien consumer and residential real estate loan
participation interests are placed on nonaccrual status at 150-days past due. Junior-lien consumer and residential real estate
loan participation interests are placed on nonaccrual status at the earlier of 120-days past due or when the related first-lien
loan has been identified as nonaccrual. When a loan participation interest with discharged non-reaffirmed debt in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy
filing is identified, and the loan participation interest is determined to be collateral dependent, the consumer and residential
real estate loan participation interest is placed on nonaccrual status.
For all classes within all portfolios,
when a loan participation interest is placed on nonaccrual status, any accrued interest income is reversed with current year accruals
charged to interest income, and prior year amounts charged-off as a credit loss.
For all classes within all portfolios,
cash receipts received on NPAs are applied against principal until the loan has been collected in full, after which time any additional
cash receipts are recognized as interest income.
However, for secured non-reaffirmed debt in a Chapter
7 bankruptcy, payments are applied to principal and interest when the borrower has demonstrated a capacity to continue payment
of the debt and collection of the debt is reasonably assured. For unsecured non-reaffirmed debt in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy where
the carrying value has been fully charged-off, payments are recorded as loan recoveries.
Regarding all classes within CRE portfolio,
the determination of a borrower’s ability to make the required principal and interest payments is based on an examination
of the borrower’s current financial statements, industry, management capabilities, and other qualitative measures. For all
classes within the consumer and residential real estate portfolio, the determination of a borrower’s ability to make the
required principal and interest payments is based on multiple factors, including number of days past due and, in some instances,
an evaluation of the borrower’s financial condition. When, in Management’s judgment, the borrower’s ability to
make required principal and interest payments resumes and collectability is no longer in doubt, the loan participation interest
is returned to accrual status. For these loan participation interests that have been returned to accrual status, cash receipts
are applied according to the contractual terms of the loan.
The following table presents NPAs by loan
class at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012:
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2012
|
|
(dollar amounts in thousands)
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial and warehouse
|
|
$
|
2,079
|
|
|
$
|
1,652
|
|
Retail properties
|
|
|
1,844
|
|
|
|
4,771
|
|
Office
|
|
|
7,518
|
|
|
|
13,745
|
|
Multi family
|
|
|
1,069
|
|
|
|
1,109
|
|
Other commercial real estate
|
|
|
6,197
|
|
|
|
6,624
|
|
Total commercial real estate
|
|
$
|
18,707
|
|
|
$
|
27,901
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer and residential real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured by first-lien
|
|
$
|
8,808
|
|
|
$
|
7,190
|
|
Secured by junior-lien
|
|
|
677
|
|
|
|
780
|
|
Total consumer and residential real estate
|
|
$
|
9,485
|
|
|
$
|
7,970
|
|
Total nonperforming assets
|
|
$
|
28,192
|
|
|
$
|
35,871
|
|
The following table presents an aging analysis
of loan participation interests, including past due loan participation interests, by loan class at March 31, 2013 and December
31, 2012: (1)
|
|
March 31, 2013
|
|
|
|
Past Due
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Loan
|
|
|
90 or more
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Participation
|
|
|
days past due
|
|
(dollar amounts in thousands)
|
|
30-59 days
|
|
|
60-89 days
|
|
|
more days
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Interests
|
|
|
and accruing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial and warehouse
|
|
$
|
561
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,949
|
|
|
$
|
2,510
|
|
|
$
|
639,272
|
|
|
$
|
641,782
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Retail properties
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,587
|
|
|
|
1,865
|
|
|
|
541,601
|
|
|
|
543,466
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Office
|
|
|
698
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
7,518
|
|
|
|
8,216
|
|
|
|
434,718
|
|
|
|
442,934
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Multi family
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
937
|
|
|
|
937
|
|
|
|
280,791
|
|
|
|
281,728
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other commercial real estate
|
|
|
2,030
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
5,609
|
|
|
|
7,774
|
|
|
|
848,536
|
|
|
|
856,310
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total commercial real estate
|
|
$
|
3,567
|
|
|
$
|
135
|
|
|
$
|
17,600
|
|
|
$
|
21,302
|
|
|
$
|
2,744,918
|
|
|
$
|
2,766,220
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer and residential real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured by first-lien
|
|
$
|
4,620
|
|
|
$
|
1,890
|
|
|
$
|
7,038
|
|
|
$
|
13,548
|
|
|
$
|
327,627
|
|
|
$
|
341,175
|
|
|
$
|
759
|
|
Secured by junior-lien
|
|
|
1,703
|
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
1,207
|
|
|
|
3,313
|
|
|
|
74,166
|
|
|
|
77,479
|
|
|
|
474
|
|
Total consumer and residential real estate
|
|
$
|
6,323
|
|
|
$
|
2,293
|
|
|
$
|
8,245
|
|
|
$
|
16,861
|
|
|
$
|
401,793
|
|
|
$
|
418,654
|
|
|
$
|
1,233
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loan participation interests
|
|
$
|
9,890
|
|
|
$
|
2,428
|
|
|
$
|
25,845
|
|
|
$
|
38,163
|
|
|
$
|
3,146,711
|
|
|
$
|
3,184,874
|
|
|
$
|
1,233
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2012
|
|
|
|
Past Due
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Loan
|
|
|
90 or more
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Participation
|
|
|
days past due
|
|
(dollar amounts in thousands)
|
|
30-59 days
|
|
|
60-89 days
|
|
|
more days
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Interests
|
|
|
and accruing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial and warehouse
|
|
$
|
3,177
|
|
|
$
|
83
|
|
|
$
|
1,021
|
|
|
$
|
4,281
|
|
|
$
|
672,218
|
|
|
$
|
676,499
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Retail properties
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4,506
|
|
|
|
4,530
|
|
|
|
571,118
|
|
|
|
575,648
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Office
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
13,634
|
|
|
|
14,053
|
|
|
|
457,323
|
|
|
|
471,376
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Multi family
|
|
|
424
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
975
|
|
|
|
1,399
|
|
|
|
300,819
|
|
|
|
302,218
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other commercial real estate
|
|
|
1,226
|
|
|
|
1,435
|
|
|
|
5,078
|
|
|
|
7,739
|
|
|
|
842,390
|
|
|
|
850,129
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total commercial real estate
|
|
$
|
4,903
|
|
|
$
|
1,885
|
|
|
$
|
25,214
|
|
|
$
|
32,002
|
|
|
$
|
2,843,868
|
|
|
$
|
2,875,870
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer and residential real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured by first-lien
|
|
$
|
4,418
|
|
|
$
|
2,091
|
|
|
$
|
9,123
|
|
|
$
|
15,632
|
|
|
$
|
339,292
|
|
|
$
|
354,924
|
|
|
$
|
2,713
|
|
Secured by junior-lien
|
|
|
2,037
|
|
|
|
1,040
|
|
|
|
1,314
|
|
|
|
4,391
|
|
|
|
79,758
|
|
|
|
84,149
|
|
|
|
509
|
|
Total consumer and residential real estate
|
|
$
|
6,455
|
|
|
$
|
3,131
|
|
|
$
|
10,437
|
|
|
$
|
20,023
|
|
|
$
|
419,050
|
|
|
$
|
439,073
|
|
|
$
|
3,222
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loan participation interests
|
|
$
|
11,358
|
|
|
$
|
5,016
|
|
|
$
|
35,651
|
|
|
$
|
52,025
|
|
|
$
|
3,262,918
|
|
|
$
|
3,314,943
|
|
|
$
|
3,222
|
|
(1) NPAs are included in this aging analysis based on the
loan participation interest's past due status.
Allowance for Credit Losses
The
ACL is comprised of the
ALPL and the AULPC, and reflects Management’s judgment regarding the appropriate level necessary to absorb credit losses
inherent in the loan participation interest portfolio. It is HPCI’s policy to utilize the Bank’s analysis as of the
end of each reporting date to estimate the required level of the ALPL and AULPC. The determination of the ACL requires significant
estimates, including the timing and amounts of expected future cash flows on impaired loan participation interests, consideration
of economic conditions, and historical loss experience pertaining to pools of homogeneous loan participation interests, all of
which may be susceptible to change.
The appropriateness
of the ACL is based on Management’s current judgments about the credit quality of the loan participation interests portfolio.
These judgments consider on-going evaluations of the loan participation interests portfolio, including such factors as the differing
economic risks associated with each loan participation interests category, the financial condition of specific borrowers, the level
of delinquent loan participation interests, the value of any collateral and, where applicable, the existence of any guarantees
or other documented support.
Further, Management evaluates the impact of changes in interest rates and overall economic
conditions on the ability of borrowers to meet their financial obligations when quantifying the exposure to credit losses and assessing
the appropriateness of the ACL at each reporting date. In addition to general economic conditions and the other factors described
above, additional factors also considered include the impact of declining residential real estate values and the diversification
of commercial real estate loan participation interests. Also, the ACL assessment includes the on-going assessment of credit quality
metrics, and a comparison of certain ACL benchmarks to current performance.
ALPL is transferred to HPCI either directly
or through Holdings from the Bank on loan participation interests underlying the participation interests at the time the participation
interests are acquired. This transfer of ALPL is reflected as ALPL acquired, rather than HPCI recording provision for credit losses.
Based on Management’s quarterly evaluation of the factors previously mentioned, the ALPL may either be increased through
a provision for credit losses, net of recoveries, and charged to earnings or lowered through a reduction in allowance for credit
losses, net of recoveries, and credited to earnings. Credit losses are charged against the ALPL when Management believes the loan
participation interest balance, or a portion thereof, is uncollectible.
The ALPL consists of two components: (1)
the transaction reserve, which includes an allocation per ASC 310-10, specific reserves related to loan participation interests
considered to be impaired, and loan participation interests involved in TDRs allocated per ASC 310-40, and (2) the general reserve.
The transaction reserve component includes both (1) an estimate of loss based on pools of commercial and consumer loan participation
interests with similar characteristics and (2) an estimate of loss based on an impairment review of each impaired CRE loan participation
interest greater than $1.0 million. For the CRE portfolio, the estimate of loss based on pools of loan participation interests
with similar characteristics is made by applying a PD factor and a LGD factor to each individual loan based on a continuously updated
loan grade, using a standardized loan grading system. The PD and LGD factors are determined for each loan grade using statistical
models based on historical performance data. The PD factor considers on-going reviews of the financial performance of the specific
borrower, including cash flow, debt-service coverage ratio, earnings power, debt level, and equity position, in conjunction with
an assessment of the borrower’s industry and future prospects. The LGD factor considers analysis of the type of collateral
and the relative LTV ratio. These reserve factors are developed based on credit migration models that track historical movements
of loan participation interests between loan ratings over time and a combination of long-term average loss experience of our own
portfolio and external industry data using a 24-month emergence period.
In the case of more homogeneous portfolios,
such as the consumer and residential real estate portfolio, the determination of the transaction reserve also incorporates PD and
LGD factors, however, the estimate of loss is based on pools of loan participation interests with similar characteristics. The
PD factor considers current credit scores unless the account is delinquent, in which case a higher PD factor is used. The credit
score provides a basis of understanding the borrowers past and current payment performance, and this information is used to estimate
expected losses over the subsequent 12-month period. The performance of first-lien loans ahead of junior-lien loans is available
to use as part of the updated score process. The LGD factor considers analysis of the type of collateral and the relative LTV ratio.
Credit scores, models, analyses, and other factors used to determine both the PD and LGD factors are updated frequently to capture
the recent behavioral characteristics of the subject portfolios, as well as any changes in loss mitigation or credit origination
strategies, and adjustments to the allowance factors are made as required. Models utilized in the ALPL estimation process are subject
to the Bank’s model validation policies.
The general reserve consists of economic
reserve and risk-profile reserve components. The economic reserve component considers the potential impact of changing market and
economic conditions on portfolio performance. The risk-profile component considers items unique to our structure, policies, processes,
and portfolio composition, as well as qualitative measurements and assessments of the portfolios including, but not limited to,
management quality, concentrations, portfolio composition, industry comparisons, and internal review functions.
The estimate for the AULPC is determined
using the same procedures and methodologies as used for the ALPL. The loss factors used in the AULPC are the same as the loss factors
used in the ALPL while also considering a historical utilization of unused commitments.
The ACL is increased through a provision
for credit losses that is charged to earnings, based on Management’s quarterly evaluation of the factors previously mentioned,
and is reduced by charge-offs, net of recoveries. There were no material changes in assumptions or estimation techniques compared
with prior periods that impacted the determination of the current period’s ALPL and AULPC.
The following table presents ALPL and AULPC
activity by portfolio segment for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012:
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
Consumer and
|
|
|
|
|
(dollar amounts in thousands)
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
Residential Real Estate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three-month period ended March 31, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ALPL balance, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
50,415
|
|
|
$
|
9,036
|
|
|
$
|
59,451
|
|
ALPL for loan participation interests acquired
|
|
|
2,223
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,223
|
|
Loan participation interest charge-offs
|
|
|
(1,083
|
)
|
|
|
(2,279
|
)
|
|
|
(3,362
|
)
|
Recoveries of loan participation interests previously charged-off
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
1,428
|
|
(Reduction in) Provision for loan participation interest losses
|
|
|
(286
|
)
|
|
|
1,578
|
|
|
|
1,292
|
|
ALPL balance, end of period
|
|
$
|
52,469
|
|
|
$
|
8,563
|
|
|
$
|
61,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AULPC balance, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
1,057
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,057
|
|
Provision for unfunded loan participation commitment losses
|
|
|
(233
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(233
|
)
|
AULPC balance, end of period
|
|
$
|
824
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
824
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACL balance, end of period
|
|
$
|
53,293
|
|
|
$
|
8,563
|
|
|
$
|
61,856
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
Consumer and
|
|
|
|
|
(dollar amounts in thousands)
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
Residential Real Estate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three-month period ended March 31, 2012:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ALPL balance, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
71,555
|
|
|
$
|
12,217
|
|
|
$
|
83,772
|
|
ALPL for loan participation interests acquired
|
|
|
4,942
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4,942
|
|
Loan participation interest charge-offs
|
|
|
(3,587
|
)
|
|
|
(2,169
|
)
|
|
|
(5,756
|
)
|
Recoveries of loan participation interests previously charged-off
|
|
|
3,439
|
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
3,700
|
|
(Reduction in) Provision for loan participation interest losses
|
|
|
(16,706
|
)
|
|
|
770
|
|
|
|
(15,936
|
)
|
ALPL balance, end of period
|
|
$
|
59,643
|
|
|
$
|
11,079
|
|
|
$
|
70,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AULPC balance, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
1,035
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,035
|
|
Reduction in allowance for unfunded loan participation commitment losses
|
|
|
(190
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(190
|
)
|
AULPC balance, end of period
|
|
$
|
845
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
845
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACL balance, end of period
|
|
$
|
60,488
|
|
|
$
|
11,079
|
|
|
$
|
71,567
|
|
Any loan participation interest in any
portfolio may be charged-off prior to the policies described below if a loss confirming event has occurred. Loss confirming events
include, but are not limited to, bankruptcy (unsecured), continued delinquency, foreclosure, or receipt of an asset valuation indicating
a collateral deficiency and that asset is the sole source of repayment. Additionally, discharged, collateral dependent non-reaffirmed
debt in Chapter 7 bankruptcy filings are charged-off to estimated collateral value, less anticipated selling costs.
CRE loan participation interests are either
charged-off or written down to net realizable value at 90-days past due. First-lien consumer and residential real estate loan participation
interests are charged-off to the estimated fair value of the collateral, less anticipated selling costs at 150-days past due. Junior-lien
consumer and residential real estate loan participation interests are charged-off to the estimated fair value of the collateral,
less anticipated selling costs at 120-days past due.
Credit Quality Indicators
To facilitate the monitoring of credit
quality for CRE loan participation interests, and for purposes of determining an appropriate ACL level for these loan participation
interests, the following categories of credit grades are utilized:
Pass = Higher quality loan participation interests
that do not fit any of the other categories described below.
OLEM = The credit risk may be relatively minor yet
represent a risk given certain specific circumstances. If the potential weaknesses are not monitored or mitigated, the asset may
weaken or inadequately protect the Company’s position in the future. For these reasons, the loan participation interests
are considered to be potential problem loan participation interests.
Substandard = Inadequately protected loan participation
interests by the borrower’s ability to repay, equity, and/or the collateral pledged to secure the loan participation interest.
These loan participation interests have identified weaknesses that could hinder normal repayment or collection of the debt. It
is likely that the Company will sustain some loss if any identified weaknesses are not mitigated.
Doubtful = Loan participation interests that have
all of the weaknesses inherent in those loan participation interests classified as Substandard, with the added elements of the
full collection of the loan participation interest is improbable and that the possibility of loss is high.
The categories above, which are derived
from standard regulatory rating definitions, are assigned upon initial approval of the loan and updated as appropriate.
Commercial loan participation interests
categorized as OLEM, Substandard, or Doubtful are considered Criticized loan participation interests. Commercial loan participation
interests categorized as Substandard or Doubtful are also considered Classified loan participation interests.
For all classes within the consumer and
residential real estate portfolio, each loan participation interest is assigned a specific PD factor that is generally based on
the borrower’s most recent credit bureau score (FICO), which is updated quarterly. A FICO credit bureau score is a credit
score developed by Fair Isaac Corporation based on data provided by the credit bureaus. The FICO credit bureau score is widely
accepted as the standard measure of consumer credit risk used by lenders, regulators, rating agencies, and consumers. The higher
the FICO credit bureau score, the higher likelihood of repayment and, therefore, an indicator of higher credit quality.
The risk in the loan portfolio is assessed
by utilizing numerous risk characteristics. The classifications described above, and presented in the table below, represent one
of those characteristics that are closely monitored in the overall credit risk management process.
The following table presents loan participation
interest balances by credit quality indicator as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012:
|
|
March 31, 2013
|
|
|
|
Credit Risk Profile by UCS classification
|
|
(dollar amounts in thousands)
|
|
Pass
|
|
|
OLEM
|
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
Doubtful
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Commercial real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial and warehouse
|
|
$
|
616,708
|
|
|
$
|
11,464
|
|
|
$
|
13,610
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
641,782
|
|
Retail properties
|
|
|
524,195
|
|
|
|
11,302
|
|
|
|
7,969
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
543,466
|
|
Office
|
|
|
427,182
|
|
|
|
6,723
|
|
|
|
9,029
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
442,934
|
|
Multi family
|
|
|
270,846
|
|
|
|
7,955
|
|
|
|
2,927
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
281,728
|
|
Other commercial real estate
|
|
|
834,572
|
|
|
|
5,292
|
|
|
|
16,446
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
856,310
|
|
Total commercial real estate
|
|
$
|
2,673,503
|
|
|
$
|
42,736
|
|
|
$
|
49,981
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2,766,220
|
|
|
|
Credit Risk Profile by FICO score (1)
|
|
|
|
750+
|
|
|
650-749
|
|
|
<650
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Consumer and residential real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured by first-lien
|
|
$
|
159,191
|
|
|
$
|
125,422
|
|
|
$
|
56,562
|
|
|
$
|
341,175
|
|
Secured by junior-lien
|
|
|
24,386
|
|
|
|
30,315
|
|
|
|
22,778
|
|
|
|
77,479
|
|
Total consumer and residential real estate
|
|
$
|
183,577
|
|
|
$
|
155,737
|
|
|
$
|
79,340
|
|
|
$
|
418,654
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2012
|
|
|
|
Credit Risk Profile by UCS classification
|
|
(dollar amounts in thousands)
|
|
Pass
|
|
|
OLEM
|
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
Doubtful
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Commercial real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial and warehouse
|
|
$
|
646,537
|
|
|
$
|
13,660
|
|
|
$
|
16,302
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
676,499
|
|
Retail properties
|
|
|
558,396
|
|
|
|
9,927
|
|
|
|
7,325
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
575,648
|
|
Office
|
|
|
450,862
|
|
|
|
4,872
|
|
|
|
15,642
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
471,376
|
|
Multi family
|
|
|
298,039
|
|
|
|
1,178
|
|
|
|
3,001
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
302,218
|
|
Other commercial real estate
|
|
|
826,403
|
|
|
|
7,133
|
|
|
|
16,593
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
850,129
|
|
Total commercial real estate
|
|
$
|
2,780,237
|
|
|
$
|
36,770
|
|
|
$
|
58,863
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2,875,870
|
|
|
|
Credit Risk Profile by FICO score (1)
|
|
|
|
750+
|
|
|
650-749
|
|
|
<650
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Consumer and residential real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured by first-lien
|
|
$
|
175,314
|
|
|
$
|
120,661
|
|
|
$
|
58,949
|
|
|
$
|
354,924
|
|
Secured by junior-lien
|
|
|
28,488
|
|
|
|
31,805
|
|
|
|
23,856
|
|
|
|
84,149
|
|
Total consumer and residential real estate
|
|
$
|
203,802
|
|
|
$
|
152,466
|
|
|
$
|
82,805
|
|
|
$
|
439,073
|
|
(1)
|
Reflects currently updated customer credit scores.
|
Impaired Loan Participation Interests
For all classes within the CRE portfolio,
all loan participation interests with an outstanding balance of greater than $1.0 million are considered for individual impairment
evaluation on a quarterly basis. Generally, consumer loan participation interests within any class are not individually evaluated
on a regular basis for impairment. Additionally, all TDRs, regardless of the outstanding balance amount, are also considered impaired.
Once a loan participation interest has
been identified for an assessment of impairment, the loan participation interest is considered impaired when, based on current
information and events, it is probable that all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement will not be
collected. This determination requires significant judgment and use of estimates, and the eventual outcome may differ significantly
from those estimates.
When a loan participation interest in any
class has been determined to be impaired, t
he amount of the impairment is measured using the present
value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan participation interest’s effective interest rate or, as a practical
expedient, the observable market price of the loan participation interest, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan participation
interest is collateral-dependent. When the present value of expected future cash flows is used, the effective interest rate is
the original contractual interest rate of the loan participation interest adjusted for any premium or discount. When the contractual
interest rate is variable, the effective interest rate of the loan participation interest changes over time. A specific reserve
is established as a component of the ALPL when a loan participation interest has been determined to be impaired.
Subsequent
to the initial measurement of impairment, if there is a significant change to the impaired loan participation interest's expected
future cash flows, or if actual cash flows are significantly different from the cash flows previously estimated, the impairment
is recalculated and the specific reserve is appropriately adjusted. Similarly, if impairment is measured based on the observable
market price of an impaired loan participation interest or the fair value of the collateral, less costs to sell, of an impaired
collateral-dependent loan participation interest, the specific reserve is adjusted.
When a loan participation interest within
any class is impaired, interest income is discontinued unless the receipt of principal and interest is no longer in doubt. Interest
income on TDRs is accrued when all principal and interest is expected to be collected under the post-modification terms. Cash receipts
received on nonaccrual impaired loan participation interests within any class are generally applied entirely against principal
until the loan participation interest has been collected in full, after which time any additional cash receipts are recognized
as interest income. Cash receipts received on accruing impaired loan participation interests within any class are applied in the
same manner as accruing loan participation interests that are not considered impaired.
The following tables present the balance
of the ALPL attributable to loans by portfolio segment individually and collectively evaluated for impairment and the related loan
participation interest balance at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012: (1)
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ALPL at March 31, 2013:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollar amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portion of ALPL balance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to loan participation interests individually evaluated for impairment
|
|
$
|
1,256
|
|
|
$
|
774
|
|
|
$
|
2,030
|
|
Attributable to loan participation interests collectively evaluated for impairment
|
|
|
51,213
|
|
|
|
7,789
|
|
|
|
59,002
|
|
Total ALPL balance
|
|
$
|
52,469
|
|
|
$
|
8,563
|
|
|
$
|
61,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan Participation Interests Ending Balance at March 31, 2013:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portion of loan participation interest ending balance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually evaluated for impairment
|
|
$
|
8,712
|
|
|
$
|
31,171
|
|
|
$
|
39,883
|
|
Collectively evaluated for impairment
|
|
|
2,757,508
|
|
|
|
387,483
|
|
|
|
3,144,991
|
|
Total loan participation interests evaluated for impairment
|
|
$
|
2,766,220
|
|
|
$
|
418,654
|
|
|
$
|
3,184,874
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ALPL at December 31, 2012:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portion of ALPL balance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to loan participation interests individually evaluated for impairment
|
|
$
|
1,195
|
|
|
$
|
640
|
|
|
$
|
1,835
|
|
Attributable to loan participation interests collectively evaluated for impairment
|
|
|
49,220
|
|
|
|
8,396
|
|
|
|
57,616
|
|
Total ALPL balance
|
|
$
|
50,415
|
|
|
$
|
9,036
|
|
|
$
|
59,451
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan Participation Interests Ending Balance at December 31, 2012:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portion of loan participation interest ending balance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually evaluated for impairment
|
|
$
|
18,086
|
|
|
$
|
30,275
|
|
|
$
|
48,361
|
|
Collectively evaluated for impairment
|
|
|
2,857,784
|
|
|
|
408,798
|
|
|
|
3,266,582
|
|
Total loan participation interests evaluated for impairment
|
|
$
|
2,875,870
|
|
|
$
|
439,073
|
|
|
$
|
3,314,943
|
|
(1) No loans with deteriorated credit quality, as defined
by ASC 310-30, have been acquired.
The following tables present, by class,
the ending, unpaid principal balance, and the related ALPL, along with the average balance and interest income recognized only
for loan participation interests individually evaluated for impairment at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012: (1), (2)
(dollar amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2013
|
|
|
March 31, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
Ending
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Related
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Balance (4)
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Recognized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With no related allowance recorded:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial and warehouse
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Retail properties
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,224
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Office
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,884
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Multi family
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other commercial real estate
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total commercial real estate
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
4,108
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer and residential real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured by first-lien
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Secured by junior-lien
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total consumer and residential real estate
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With an allowance recorded:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate: (3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial and warehouse
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Retail properties
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Office
|
|
|
5,184
|
|
|
|
8,276
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
5,205
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Multi family
|
|
|
936
|
|
|
|
936
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
939
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Other commercial real estate
|
|
|
2,592
|
|
|
|
5,006
|
|
|
|
700
|
|
|
|
2,644
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total commercial real estate
|
|
$
|
8,712
|
|
|
$
|
14,218
|
|
|
$
|
1,256
|
|
|
$
|
8,788
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer and residential real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured by first-lien
|
|
$
|
27,741
|
|
|
$
|
30,575
|
|
|
$
|
511
|
|
|
$
|
27,230
|
|
|
$
|
262
|
|
Secured by junior-lien
|
|
|
3,430
|
|
|
|
4,938
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
3,493
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
Total consumer and residential real estate
|
|
$
|
31,171
|
|
|
$
|
35,513
|
|
|
$
|
774
|
|
|
$
|
30,723
|
|
|
$
|
302
|
|
(dollar amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2012
|
|
|
|
Ending
|
|
|
Unpaid Principal
|
|
|
Related
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Balance (4)
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With no related allowance recorded:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial and warehouse
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Retail properties
|
|
|
3,334
|
|
|
|
4,139
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Office
|
|
|
5,847
|
|
|
|
5,848
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Multi family
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other commercial real estate
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total commercial real estate
|
|
$
|
9,181
|
|
|
$
|
9,987
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer and residential real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured by first-lien
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Secured by junior-lien
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total consumer and residential real estate
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With an allowance recorded:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial and warehouse
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Retail properties
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Office
|
|
|
5,266
|
|
|
|
8,332
|
|
|
|
480
|
|
Multi family
|
|
|
944
|
|
|
|
944
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
Other commercial real estate
|
|
|
2,695
|
|
|
|
5,108
|
|
|
|
601
|
|
Total commercial real estate
|
|
$
|
8,905
|
|
|
$
|
14,384
|
|
|
$
|
1,195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer and residential real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured by first-lien
|
|
$
|
26,719
|
|
|
$
|
29,346
|
|
|
$
|
350
|
|
Secured by junior-lien
|
|
|
3,556
|
|
|
|
4,879
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
Total consumer and residential real estate
|
|
$
|
30,275
|
|
|
$
|
34,225
|
|
|
$
|
640
|
|
(1)
|
These tables do not include loan participation interests which are fully charged-off.
|
|
(2)
|
All consumer and residential real estate impaired loan participation interests are considered impaired due to their status as a TDR.
|
|
(3)
|
At March 31, 2013, $63 thousand of the $8,712 thousand of commercial real estate loan participation interests with an allowance recorded were considered impaired due to their status as a TDR. At December 31, 2012, $167 thousand of the $8,905 thousand of commercial real estate loan participation interests with an allowance recorded were considered impaired due to their status as a TDR.
|
|
(4)
|
The differences between the ending balance and unpaid principal balance amounts represent partial charge-offs.
|
|
TDR Loan Participation Interests
TDRs are modified loan participation interests
where a concession was provided to a borrower experiencing financial difficulties. Loan participation interest modifications are
considered TDRs when the concessions provided are not available to the borrower through either the Bank’s normal channels
or other sources. However, not all loan participation interest modifications are TDRs.
TDR Concession Types
The Bank’s standards relating to
loan modifications consider, among other factors, minimum verified income requirements, cash flow analysis, and collateral valuations.
Each potential loan modification is reviewed individually and the terms of the loan are modified to meet a borrower’s specific
circumstances at a point in time. Commercial TDRs are reviewed and approved by the Bank’s Special Assets Division. The types
of concessions provided to borrowers include:
|
·
|
Interest rate reduction: A reduction of the stated interest rate to a nonmarket rate for the remaining original life of the
debt.
|
|
·
|
Amortization or maturity date change beyond what the collateral supports, including any of the following:
|
|
(1)
|
Lengthens the amortization period of the amortized principal beyond market terms. This concession reduces the minimum monthly
payment and increases the amount of the balloon payment at the end of the term of the loan. Principal is generally not forgiven.
|
|
(2)
|
Reduces the amount of loan principal to be amortized. This concession also reduces the minimum monthly payment and increases
the amount of the balloon payment at the end of the term of the loan. Principal is generally not forgiven.
|
|
(3)
|
Extends the maturity date or dates of the debt beyond what the collateral supports. This concession generally applies to loans
without a balloon payment at the end of the term of the loan.
|
|
·
|
Chapter 7 bankruptcy: A bankruptcy court’s discharge of a borrower’s debt
is considered
a concession when the borrower does not reaffirm the discharged debt.
|
|
·
|
Other: A concession that is not categorized as one of the concessions described above. These concessions include, but are not
limited to: principal forgiveness, collateral concessions, covenant concessions, and reduction of accrued interest.
|
Principal forgiveness may result from any
TDR modification of any concession type. However, the aggregate amount of principal forgiven as a result of loans modified as TDRs
during the three-month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, was not significant.
TDRs by Loan Participation Interest Type
The following is a description of TDRs
by loan participation interest type:
Commercial real estate loan participation interest
TDRs
– CRE accruing TDRs often result from loan participation interests receiving a concession with terms that are
not considered a market transaction to the Bank. The TDR remains in accruing status as long as the customer is less than 90-days
past due on payments per the restructured loan participation interest terms and no loss is expected.
CRE nonaccrual TDRs result from
either: (1) an accruing CRE TDR being placed on nonaccrual status, or (2) a workout where an existing CRE NAL is restructured and
a concession was given. At times, these workouts restructure the NAL so that two or more new notes are created. The primary note
is underwritten based upon the Bank’s normal underwriting standards and is sized so projected cash flows are sufficient to
repay contractual principal and interest. The terms on the secondary note(s) vary by situation, and may include notes that defer
principal and interest payments until after the primary note is repaid. Creating two or more notes often allows the borrower to
continue a project or weather a temporary economic downturn and allows the Bank to right-size a loan based upon the current expectations
for a borrower’s or project’s performance.
Our strategy involving TDR borrowers
includes working with these borrowers to allow them to refinance elsewhere as well as allow them time to improve their financial
position and remain our customer through refinancing their notes according to market terms and conditions in the future. A refinancing
or modification of a loan occurs when either the loan matures according to the terms of the TDR-modified agreement or the borrower
requests a change to the loan agreements. At that time, the loan is evaluated to determine if it is creditworthy. It is subjected
to the Bank’s normal underwriting standards and process for similar credit extensions, both new and existing.
In accordance with ASC 310-20-35,
the refinanced note is evaluated to determine if it is considered a new loan or a continuation of the prior loan. A new loan is
considered for removal of the TDR designation, whereas a continuation of the prior note requires a continuation of the TDR designation.
In order for the TDR designation to be removed, the borrower must no longer be experiencing financial difficulties and the terms
of the refinanced loan must not represent a concession.
Consumer and residential real estate loan participation
interest TDRs
– Consumer and residential real estate TDRs represent loan modifications associated with traditional
first-lien mortgage loans, as well as first-lien and junior-lien home equity loans, in which a concession has been provided to
the borrower. The primary concessions given to these borrowers are amortization or maturity date changes and interest rate reductions.
Consumer and residential real estate loans identified as TDRs include borrowers unable to refinance their mortgages through the
Bank’s normal mortgage origination channels or through other independent sources. Some, but not all, of the loans may be
delinquent at the time of modification.
TDR Impact on Credit Quality
The ALPL is largely driven by updated risk
ratings assigned to CRE loan participation interests, updated borrower credit scores on consumer and residential real estate, and
borrower delinquency history in both portfolios. These updated risk ratings and credit scores consider the default history of the
borrower, including payment redefaults. As such, the provision for credit losses is impacted primarily by changes in borrower payment
performance rather than the TDR classification. TDRs can be classified as either accrual or nonaccrual loan participation interests.
Nonaccrual TDRs are included in NPAs whereas accruing TDRs are excluded from NPAs as it is probable that all contractual principal
and interest due under the restructured terms will be collected.
TDRs may include multiple concessions and
the disclosure classifications are presented based on the primary concession provided to the borrower. The majority of concessions
for the CRE portfolio are the extension of the maturity date coupled with an increase in the interest rate. In these instances,
the primary concession is the maturity date extension.
TDR concessions may also result in the
reduction of the ALPL within the CRE portfolio. This reduction is from payments and the resulting application of the reserve calculation
within the ALPL. The transaction reserve for non-TDR loans is calculated based upon several estimated probability factors,
such as PD and LGD, both of which were previously discussed above. Upon the occurrence of a TDR in the CRE portfolio, the
reserve is measured based on discounted expected cash flows or collateral value, less selling costs, of the modified loan in accordance
with ASC 310-10. The resulting TDR ALPL calculation often results in a lower ALPL amount because: (1) the discounted expected
cash flows or collateral value indicate a lower estimated loss, (2) if the modification includes a rate increase, the discounting
of cash flows or the collateral value, less selling costs, on the modified loan, using the pre-modification interest rate, exceeds
the carrying value of the loan, or (3) payments may occur as part of the modification. The ALPL for CRE loans may increase as a
result of the modification, as the discounted cash flow analysis may indicate additional reserves are required.
TDR concessions on consumer and residential
real estate loans may increase the ALPL. The concessions made to these borrowers often include interest rate reductions and,
therefore, the TDR ALPL calculation results in a greater ALPL compared with the non-TDR calculation as the reserve is measured
based on the estimation of the discounted expected cash flows or collateral value, less selling costs, on the modified loan in
accordance with ASC 310-10. The resulting TDR ALPL calculation often results in a higher ALPL amount because (1) the discounted
expected cash flows or collateral value, less selling costs, indicate a higher estimated loss or, (2) due to the rate decrease,
the discounting of the cash flows on the modified loan participation interest, using the pre-modification interest rate, indicates
a reduction in the expected cash flows or collateral value, less selling costs. In certain instances, the ALPL may decrease as
a result of payments made in connection with the modification.
Commercial real estate loan participation
interest TDRs
– In instances where the Bank substantiates that it will collect the outstanding balance in full, the
note is considered for return to accrual status upon the borrower sustaining sufficient cash flows for a six-month period of time.
This six-month period could extend before or after the restructure date. If a charge-off was taken as part of the restructuring,
any interest or principal payments received on that note are applied to first reduce the outstanding book balance and then to recoveries
of charged-off principal, unpaid interest, and/or fee expenses.
Consumer and residential real estate
loan participation interest TDRs
– Modified loans identified as TDRs are aggregated into pools for analysis. Cash
flows and weighted average interest rates are used to calculate impairment at the pooled-loan level. Once the loans are aggregated
into the pool, they continue to be classified as TDRs until contractually repaid or charged-off.
The following table presents, by class
and the reason for the modification, the number of contracts, post-modification outstanding balance, and the financial effects
of the modification for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012:
|
|
New
Troubled Debt Restructurings During The Three-Month Period Ended
(1), (2)
|
|
|
|
March
31, 2013
|
|
|
March
31, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-modification
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-modification
|
|
|
|
|
(dollar amounts in thousands)
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Financial effects
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Financial effects
|
|
|
|
Contracts
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
of
modification
(3)
|
|
|
Contracts
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
of
modification
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CRE - Retail properties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate reduction
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
892
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
Amortization or maturity date
change
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total CRE - Retail properties
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
892
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer and residential real estate
secured by first-lien:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate reduction
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
573
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
$
|
4,729
|
|
|
$
|
765
|
|
Amortization or maturity date
change
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Chapter 7 bankruptcy
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
1,192
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total consumer and residential real estate secured
by first-lien
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
1,840
|
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
$
|
5,113
|
|
|
$
|
764
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer and residential real estate
secured by junior-lien:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate reduction
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
63
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
Amortization or maturity date
change
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Chapter 7 bankruptcy
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total consumer and residential real estate secured
by junior-lien
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
115
|
|
|
$
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
110
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total new troubled debt restructurings
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
1,955
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
6,115
|
|
|
$
|
763
|
|
|
(1)
|
TDRs may include multiple concessions and the disclosure classifications are based on the primary concession provided to the
borrower.
|
|
(2)
|
For the three-month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, there were no new troubled debt restructurings for the following
classes: C&I - owner occupied, C&I - nonowner occupied, CRE - multi family, CRE - office, CRE - industrial and warehouse,
and CRE - other CRE.
|
|
(3)
|
Amounts represent the financial impact via provision for loan participation interest losses as a result of the modification.
|
Any loan participation interest within
any portfolio or class is considered as payment redefaulted at 90-days past due.
During the three-month periods ended March
31, 2013 and 2012, there were no TDRs in any class of any portfolio that redefaulted within one year of modification.
Note 4 - Related Party Transactions
The Bank is required,
under the Agreements, to service HPCI’s loan participation interest portfolio in a manner substantially the same as for similar
work for transactions on its own behalf. The Bank collects and remits principal and interest payments, maintains perfected collateral
positions, and submits and pursues insurance claims. In addition, the Bank provides accounting and reporting services to HPCI.
The Bank is required to adhere to HPCI’s policies relating to the relationship between HPCI and the Bank and to pay all expenses
related to the performance of the Bank’s duties under the participation and subparticipation agreements. All of these participation
interests to date were acquired directly or indirectly from the Bank.
The Bank performs the servicing of the
commercial real estate, consumer, and residential real estate loans underlying the participations held by HPCI in accordance with
normal industry practice under the amended participation and subparticipation agreements. In its capacity as servicer, the Bank
collects and holds the loan payments received on behalf of HPCI until the end of each month. Loan servicing costs totaled $1.5
million and $1.6 million for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
In 2013 and 2012, the
annual servicing rates the Bank charged with respect to outstanding principal balances were:
|
|
January 1, 2012
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2013
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
0.125
|
%
|
Consumer
|
|
|
0.650
|
|
Residential real estate
|
|
|
0.267
|
|
Pursuant to the Agreements, the amount
and terms of the loan servicing fee between the Bank and HPCI are determined by mutual agreement from time-to-time during the terms
of the Agreements. In lieu of paying higher servicing costs to the Bank with respect to CRE loans, HPCI has waived its right to
receive any origination fees associated with participation interests in CRE loans. The Bank and HPCI performed a review of loan
servicing fees in 2012, and have agreed to retain current servicing rates for all loan participation categories, including the
continued waiver by HPCI of its right to origination fees, until such time as servicing fees are reviewed in 2013.
Huntington’s and the Bank’s
personnel handle day-to-day operations of HPCI such as financial analysis and reporting, accounting, tax reporting, and other administrative
functions. On a monthly basis, HPCI pays the Bank and Huntington for the cost related to the time spent by employees for performing
these functions. These personnel costs totaled $0.1 million for each of the three-month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012,
and are included in other noninterest expense.
The following table represents the ownership
of HPCI’s outstanding common and preferred securities as of March 31, 2013:
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Number of Preferred Securities
|
|
Shareholder:
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
|
Class B
|
|
|
Class C
|
|
|
Class E
|
|
Held by related parties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HPCII
|
|
|
11,130,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Holdings
|
|
|
2,870,000
|
|
|
|
895
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Tower Hill Securities, Inc.
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,400,000
|
|
HPC Holdings-II, Inc.
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total held by related parties
|
|
|
14,000,000
|
|
|
|
895
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,400,000
|
|
Other shareholders
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total shares outstanding
|
|
|
14,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,400,000
|
|
As of March 31, 2013, 10.5% of the Class
A preferred securities were owned by current and past employees of Huntington and its subsidiaries in addition to the 89.5% owned
by Holdings. The Class A preferred securities are non-voting. All of the Class B preferred securities are owned by HPC Holdings-II,
Inc., a non-bank subsidiary of Huntington and are non-voting. In 2001, the Class C preferred securities were obtained by Holdings,
who sold the securities to the public. Various board members and executive officers of HPCI have purchased a portion of the Class
C preferred securities. At March 31, 2013, HPCI board members and executive officers beneficially owned, in the aggregate, a total
of 6,965 shares, or less than 1%, of the HPCI Class C preferred securities. All of the Class E preferred securities are owned by
Tower Hill Securities, Inc.
In the event HPCI redeems its Class C or Class E preferred securities,
holders of such securities will be entitled to receive $25.00 per share for Class C shares, $250.00 per share for Class E shares,
plus any accrued and unpaid dividends on such shares. The redemption amount may be significantly lower than the current market
price of the Class C preferred securities.
Both the Class C and Class E preferred
securities are entitled to one-tenth of one vote per share on all matters submitted to HPCI shareholders. If the Bank becomes
under-capitalized, or is placed in conservatorship or receivership, the OCC may require the exchange of Class C and Class E Preferred
securities for preferred securities of the Bank with substantially equivalent terms. The Class E preferred securities are currently
redeemable and Class C preferred securities are redeemable at HPCI’s option on or after December 31, 2021, subject to the
prior written approval of the OCC. In the event HPCI redeems its Class C or Class E preferred securities, holders will be
entitled to receive $25.00 per share for Class C shares, $250.00 per share for Class E shares, plus any accrued and unpaid dividends
on such shares. The redemption amount may be significantly different than the current market price of the Class C preferred
securities.
In addition, at any time following the
occurrence of certain special events, including a regulatory capital event described in the paragraph below, HPCI will have the
right to redeem the Class C preferred securities in whole, subject to the prior written approval of the OCC. (Also see the
Class C Preferred Securities section in Note 6.)
In June 2012, federal banking agencies,
including the FRB, jointly published notices of proposed rulemaking, which would substantially amend the risk-based capital rules
for banks. The proposed capital rules (Basel III NPR) are intended to implement the Basel III regulatory capital reforms, comply
with changes required by the Dodd-Frank Act, and replace the existing Basel I-based capital requirements. Based on our interpretation
of Basel III NPR as currently proposed, we believe the HPCI Class C preferred securities would no longer constitute Tier 1 capital
for Huntington or the Bank. It is possible that, upon considering comments received on the NPRs, the FRB may not adopt the Basel
III NPR as proposed, or may make additional changes to the applicable Tier 1 capital rules prior to final adoption. However, in
the event the FRB’s applicable final rules regarding Tier 1 capital treatment are substantially similar to Basel III NPR
as proposed, or otherwise result in the Class C preferred securities no longer constituting Tier 1 capital for the Bank and we
receive an opinion of counsel to that effect, HPCI would be able to redeem the Class C preferred securities at the par value of
$25 per share due to a regulatory capital event. There can be no assurance as to if or when HPCI would redeem the Class C preferred
securities.
As only related parties hold HPCI’s
common stock, there is no established public trading market for this class of stock.
HPCI had a noninterest-bearing receivable
due from the Bank of $60.3 million at March 31, 2013 and a noninterest-bearing payable due to the Bank of $62.9 million at December
31, 2012. The balances represent the net settlement amounts due to, or from, the Bank for the last month of the period’s
activity. Principal and interest payments on loan participations remitted by customers are due from the Bank, while new loan participation
purchases are due to the Bank. The amounts are settled with the Bank within the first few days of the following month.
HPCI has assets pledged in association
with the Bank’s advances from the FHLB. For further information regarding this, see Note 6.
HPCI maintains and transacts all of its
cash activity through the Bank. Typically, cash is invested with the Bank in an interest-bearing account. These interest-bearing
balances are invested overnight or may be invested in Eurodollar deposits with the Bank for a term of not more than 30 days at
market rates.
Note 5 - Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities
Fair value is defined as the exchange price
that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market
for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Fair value measurements
are classified within one of three levels in a valuation hierarchy based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an
asset or liability as of the measurement date. The three levels are defined as follows:
Level 1 – inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted
prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
Level 2 – inputs to the valuation methodology include
quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability,
either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.
Level 3 – inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable
and significant to the fair value measurement.
A financial instrument’s categorization
within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Transfers
in and out of Level 1, 2, or 3 are recorded at fair value at the beginning of the reporting period.
Certain assets and liabilities may be required
to be measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in periods subsequent to their initial recognition. These assets and liabilities
are not measured at fair value on an on-going basis; however, they are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances,
such as when there is evidence of impairment.
Periodically, HPCI records nonrecurring
adjustments of collateral-dependent loan participation interests measured for impairment when establishing the ACL. Such amounts
are generally based on the fair value of the underlying collateral supporting the loan. Appraisals are generally obtained to support
the fair value of the collateral and incorporate measures such as recent sales prices for comparable properties and cost of construction.
HPCI considers these fair values Level 3. In cases where the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the collateral less cost
to sell, an impairment charge is recognized.
At March 31, 2013, HPCI identified
the following loan participation interests that were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. The fair value impairment
for the three-month period ended March 31, 2013, was recorded within the provision for credit losses.
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Active
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Gains/(Losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
For the Three
|
|
|
|
Fair Value at
|
|
|
Identical Assets
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
(dollar amounts in thousands)
|
|
March 31, 2013
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
March 31, 2013
|
|
Loan participation interests
|
|
$
|
9,031
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
9,031
|
|
|
$
|
(493
|
)
|
There were no changes in the valuation
techniques or related inputs used to measure similar assets in prior periods
.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The following methods and assumptions were
used by HPCI to estimate the fair value of the classes of financial instruments:
Cash and interest-bearing deposits and due from The Huntington
National Bank
— The carrying value approximates fair value based on its highly liquid nature. All amounts at March 31,
2013 and December 31, 2012 are classified as Level 1 in the valuation hierarchy.
Loan participation interests
— Underlying variable
rate loans that reprice frequently are based on carrying amounts, as adjusted for estimated credit losses. The fair values for
other loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses and employ interest rates currently being offered for loans with
similar terms. The rates take into account the position of the yield curve, as well as an adjustment for prepayment risk, operating
costs, and profit. This value is also reduced by an estimate of probable losses and the credit risk associated in the loan portfolio.
As of March 31, 2013, the net carrying amount of $3.1 billion corresponded to a fair value of $2.8 billion. As of December 31,
2012, the net carrying value of $3.3 billion corresponded to a fair value of $2.9 billion. All amounts at March 31, 2013 and December
31, 2012 are classified as Level 3 in the valuation hierarchy. At March 31, 2013, the valuation of the loan portfolio reflected
discounts that HPCI believed are consistent with transactions occurring in the marketplace.
Note 6 - Commitments and Contingencies
Class C Preferred Securities
In June 2012, federal banking agencies,
including the FRB, jointly published notices of proposed rulemaking, which would substantially amend the risk-based capital rules
for banks. The proposed capital rules (Basel III NPR) are intended to implement the Basel III regulatory capital reforms, comply
with changes required by the Dodd-Frank Act, and replace the existing Basel I-based capital requirements. Based on our interpretation
of the Basel III NPR as currently proposed, we believe the HPCI Class C preferred securities would no longer constitute Tier 1
capital for Huntington or the Bank. It is possible that, upon considering comments received on the NPRs, the FRB may not adopt
the Basel III NPR as proposed, or may make additional changes to the applicable Tier 1 capital rules prior to final adoption. However,
in the event the FRB’s applicable final rules regarding Tier 1 capital treatment are substantially similar to the Basel III
NPR as proposed, or otherwise result in the Class C preferred securities no longer constituting Tier 1 capital for the Bank and
we receive an opinion of counsel to that effect, HPCI would be able to redeem the Class C preferred securities at the par value
of $25 per share due to a regulatory capital event. There can be no assurance as to if or when HPCI would redeem the Class C preferred
securities.
Pledged Assets
The Bank is eligible to obtain collateralized
advances from various federal and government-sponsored agencies such as the FHLB. From time-to-time, HPCI may be asked to act as
guarantor of the Bank’s obligations under such advances and / or pledge all or a portion of its assets in connection with
those advances. Any such guarantee and / or pledge would rank senior to HPCI’s common and preferred securities upon liquidation.
Accordingly, any federal or government-sponsored agencies that make advances to the Bank where HPCI has acted as guarantor or has
pledged all or a portion of its assets as collateral will have a liquidation preference over the holders of HPCI’s securities.
Any such guarantee and / or pledge in connection with the Bank’s advances from the FHLB falls within the definition of Permitted
Indebtedness (as defined in HPCI’s Articles of Incorporation) and, therefore, HPCI is not required to obtain the consent
of the holders of its common or preferred securities for any such guarantee and / or pledge.
Currently, HPCI’s assets have been
used to collateralize only one such facility. The Bank has a line of credit from the FHLB with a maximum borrowing capacity of
$4.1 billion as of March 31, 2013, based on the Bank’s holdings of FHLB stock. As of this same date, the Bank had outstanding
borrowings of $0.2 billion under the facility.
HPCI has entered into
an Amended and Restated Agreement with the Bank with respect to the pledge of HPCI’s assets to collateralize the Bank’s
borrowings from the FHLB. The agreement provides that the Bank will not place at risk HPCI’s assets in excess of an aggregate
dollar amount or aggregate percentage of such assets established from time-to-time by HPCI’s board of directors, including
a majority of HPCI’s independent directors. The pledge limit was established by HPCI’s board at 25% of total assets,
or approximately $0.9 billion as of March 31, 2013, as reflected in HPCI’s month-end management report. This pledge limit
may be changed in the future by the board of directors, including a majority of HPCI’s independent directors. The amount
of HPCI’s participation interests pledged was $0.4 billion at March 31, 2013. In 2013, the loans pledged consisted of the
1-4 family residential mortgage loans. The agreement also provides that the Bank will pay HPCI a monthly fee based upon the total
loans pledged by HPCI. The Bank paid HPCI a total of $0.3 million for each of the three-month periods ended March 31, 2013 and
2012, as compensation for making such assets available to the Bank.
Under the terms of the participation and
subparticipation agreements, HPCI is obligated to make funds or credit available to the Bank, either directly or indirectly through
Holdings so that the Bank may extend credit to any borrowers, or pay letters-of-credit issued for the account of any borrowers,
to the extent provided in the loan agreements underlying HPCI’s participation interests. As of March 31, 2013 and December
31, 2012, HPCI’s unfunded loan participation interest commitments totaled $219.4 million and $273.4 million, respectively.
Dividends
Based on a regulatory dividend
limitation, the Bank could not have declared and paid a dividend at March 31, 2013 without regulatory approval due to the deficit
position of its undivided profits. As a subsidiary of the Bank, HPCI is also restricted from declaring or paying dividends to non-bank
subsidiaries or outside shareholders without regulatory approval. There can be no assurance that regulatory approval will be granted
for future dividends.
Note 7 - Segment Reporting
HPCI’s operations consist of acquiring,
holding, and managing its participation interests. Accordingly, HPCI only operates in one segment. HPCI has no external customers
and transacts all of its business with the Bank and its affiliates.