UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
100 F
Street, NE
WASHINGTON,
D. C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934
For the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2009
Or
¨
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934
For the
transition period from: ______________________ to
______________________
Commission
File Number: 1-31292
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
FLORIDA
|
|
59-3627212
|
(State
or Other Jurisdiction
|
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
|
of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
Identification
No.)
|
650 Fifth
Avenue, Third Floor New York, New York 10019
(Address
of Principal Executive Offices)
800-356-2092
(Registrant's
Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
x
No
¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
¨
No
¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated
filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company.
See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer"
and
"smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large
accelerated filer
¨
Accelerated
filer
¨
Non-accelerated
filer
¨
Smaller
reporting company
x
(Do not
check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as
defined
in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act). Yes
¨
No
x
As of
July 31, 2009 there were 22,328,956 shares of common stock, par value
$.01 per
share, outstanding.
JESUP
& LAMONT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
QUARTERLY
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE
QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2009
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
PART
I
|
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition at June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Months ended June 30,
2009 and 2008
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Six Months ended June 30,
2009 and 2008
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30,
2009 and 2008
|
6-7
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
|
8-19
|
|
|
|
Item
2.
|
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
20-27
|
|
|
|
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
28
|
|
|
|
Item
4T.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
28
|
|
|
|
PART
II
|
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
29
|
|
|
|
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
29
|
|
|
|
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
29
|
|
|
|
Item
3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
29
|
|
|
|
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
29
|
|
|
|
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
30
|
|
|
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
30
|
|
|
|
Signatures
|
31
|
PART I -
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM
1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JESUP
& LAMONT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Audited)
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
122,201
|
|
|
$
|
410,840
|
|
Bank
certificate of deposit
|
|
|
2,102,543
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Marketable
securities owned, at market value
|
|
|
216,478
|
|
|
|
37,027
|
|
Securities
not readily marketable, at estimated fair value
|
|
|
620,994
|
|
|
|
531,265
|
|
Commissions
and other receivables from clearing organization
|
|
|
2,269,286
|
|
|
|
1,033,520
|
|
Other
receivables
|
|
|
1,701,615
|
|
|
|
1,849,816
|
|
Deposits
at clearing organization
|
|
|
3,040,523
|
|
|
|
655,359
|
|
Prepaid
expenses and other assets
|
|
|
539,323
|
|
|
|
513,393
|
|
Notes
receivable
|
|
|
1,688,901
|
|
|
|
1,310,889
|
|
Deferred
tax asset
|
|
|
2,117,000
|
|
|
|
2,117,000
|
|
Furniture
and equipment, net
|
|
|
516,924
|
|
|
|
527,692
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
13,272,165
|
|
|
|
13,272,165
|
|
Intangible
assets – customer lists and trademarks
|
|
|
4,130,738
|
|
|
|
4,143,601
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
$
|
32,338,691
|
|
|
$
|
26,402,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
and stockholders' equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
7,437,971
|
|
|
|
5,685,934
|
|
Due
to clearing organization
|
|
|
1,264,546
|
|
|
|
1,180,108
|
|
Securities
sold, but not yet purchased, at market value
|
|
|
249,320
|
|
|
|
170,603
|
|
Notes
payable
|
|
|
16,420,708
|
|
|
|
12,552,317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
25,372,545
|
|
|
|
19,588,962
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders'
equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible
preferred stock, series C, F, and G, $.01 par value 1,000,000 shares
authorized 728,739 issued and outstanding
|
|
$
|
7,287
|
|
|
$
|
7,903
|
|
Common
stock, $.01 par value 100,000,000 shares authorized 22,647,522 shares
issued and outstanding
|
|
|
226,475
|
|
|
|
223,977
|
|
Less:
Treasury Stock
|
|
|
(733,765
|
)
|
|
|
(733,765
|
)
|
Capital
stock subscribed
|
|
|
5,084,996
|
|
|
|
2,894,996
|
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
|
|
37,918,347
|
|
|
|
37,328,573
|
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
|
|
(35,537,194
|
)
|
|
|
(32,908,079
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
stockholders' equity
|
|
|
6,966,146
|
|
|
|
6,813,605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
|
$
|
32,338,691
|
|
|
$
|
26,402,567
|
|
See
accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
JESUP
& LAMONT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES (UNAUDITED)
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissions
and fees
|
|
$
|
7,353,816
|
|
|
$
|
7,406,599
|
|
Equity
market making trading revenues, net
|
|
|
732,559
|
|
|
|
1,848,455
|
|
Investment
banking income
|
|
|
327,480
|
|
|
|
839,662
|
|
Net
gain (loss) on securities received for banking services
|
|
|
1,523,704
|
|
|
|
(470,148
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,937,559
|
|
|
|
9,624,568
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee
compensation and benefits
|
|
|
3,983,168
|
|
|
|
5,207,603
|
|
Commissions,
clearing and execution costs
|
|
|
3,771,009
|
|
|
|
5,782,462
|
|
General
and administrative
|
|
|
1,240,183
|
|
|
|
2,502,933
|
|
Communications
and data processing
|
|
|
143,082
|
|
|
|
268,784
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,137,442
|
|
|
|
13,761,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
(loss) from operations
|
|
|
800,117
|
|
|
|
(4,137,214
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
income (expenses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
income
|
|
|
2,576
|
|
|
|
806,744
|
|
Interest
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,353
|
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
(369,600
|
)
|
|
|
(781,925
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(367,024
|
)
|
|
|
48,172
|
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
|
433,093
|
|
|
|
(4,089,042
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued
preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
(43,060
|
)
|
|
|
(43,234
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income (loss) applicable to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
390,033
|
|
|
$
|
(4,132,276
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted earnings per share applicable to common
shareholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
(loss) per share-basic
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
(loss) per share diluted
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
28,849,754
|
|
|
|
15,875,835
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
28,849,754
|
|
|
|
15,875,835
|
|
See
accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
JESUP
& LAMONT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES (UNAUDITED)
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissions
and fees
|
|
$
|
12,132,645
|
|
|
$
|
15,052,896
|
|
Equity
market making trading revenues, net
|
|
|
1,878,508
|
|
|
|
4,551,845
|
|
Investment
banking income
|
|
|
741,391
|
|
|
|
2,244,449
|
|
Net
gain (loss) on securities received for banking services
|
|
|
1,692,134
|
|
|
|
(233,963
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,444,678
|
|
|
|
21,615,227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee
compensation and benefits
|
|
|
8,574,346
|
|
|
|
10,841,405
|
|
Commissions,
clearing and execution costs
|
|
|
6,444,242
|
|
|
|
10,811,607
|
|
General
and administrative
|
|
|
3,029,586
|
|
|
|
4,183,380
|
|
Communications
and data processing
|
|
|
287,623
|
|
|
|
520,850
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,335,797
|
|
|
|
26,357,242
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
from operations
|
|
|
(1,891,119
|
)
|
|
|
(4,742,015
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
income (expenses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
806,744
|
|
Interest
income
|
|
|
2,936
|
|
|
|
35,061
|
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
(606,389
|
)
|
|
|
(1,097,612
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(603,453
|
)
|
|
|
(255,807
|
)
|
Net
loss
|
|
|
(2,494,572
|
)
|
|
|
(4,997,822
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued
preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
(134,544
|
)
|
|
|
(89,967
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss applicable to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
(2,629,116
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,087,789
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted earnings per share applicable to common
shareholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
(loss) per share-basic
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
(loss) per share diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
28,592,712
|
|
|
|
14,557,494
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
28,592,712
|
|
|
|
14,557,494
|
|
See
accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
JESUP
& LAMONT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
|
|
SIX MONTHS ENDED
|
|
|
|
JUNE 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Cash
flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Loss
|
|
$
|
(2,494,572
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,997,822
|
)
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
156,373
|
|
|
|
195,188
|
|
Amortization
of customer lists
|
|
|
12,864
|
|
|
|
80,363
|
|
Amortization
of note discount
|
|
|
31,422
|
|
|
|
160,763
|
|
Unrealized
(gain) loss on marketable securities
|
|
|
19,731
|
|
|
|
(205,589
|
)
|
Stock
compensation expense
|
|
|
141,657
|
|
|
|
450,681
|
|
Amortization
of notes receivable
|
|
|
73,056
|
|
|
|
115,541
|
|
Allowance
for notes receivable
|
|
|
211,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Deferred
rent
|
|
|
5,849
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Unrealized
gain on non-marketable securities
|
|
|
(89,729
|
)
|
|
|
(319,876
|
)
|
Gain
on settlement with former officer
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(806,744
|
)
|
Forgiveness
of note payable and interest
|
|
|
(148,030
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase)
decrease in operating assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissions
receivable from clearing organizations
|
|
|
(1,235,766
|
)
|
|
|
(855,776
|
)
|
Deposits
at clearing organizations
|
|
|
(2,385,164
|
)
|
|
|
1,077,747
|
|
Other
receivables
|
|
|
148,201
|
|
|
|
(429,264
|
)
|
Marketable
trading account securities, net
|
|
|
(199,182
|
)
|
|
|
4,822,378
|
|
Prepaid
expenses and other assets
|
|
|
(25,930
|
)
|
|
|
94,672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase
(decrease) in operating liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
1,711,643
|
|
|
|
(309,105
|
)
|
Payable
to clearing organizations
|
|
|
84,438
|
|
|
|
(5,906,084
|
)
|
Securities
sold, not yet purchased
|
|
|
78,717
|
|
|
|
(212,256
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
adjustments
|
|
|
(1,408,850
|
)
|
|
|
(2,047,361
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
used by operating activities
|
|
|
(3,903,422
|
)
|
|
|
(7,045,183
|
)
|
Continued
on next page
See
accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
JESUP
& LAMONT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
Continued
|
|
SIX MONTHS ENDED
|
|
|
|
JUNE 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Cash
flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank
certificate of deposits
|
|
|
(2,102,543
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Purchases
of furniture and equipment
|
|
|
(145,605
|
)
|
|
|
(288,674
|
)
|
Issuance
of notes receivable
|
|
|
(662,068
|
)
|
|
|
(431,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
cash used by investing activities
|
|
|
(2,910,216
|
)
|
|
|
(720,174
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments
of notes payable
|
|
|
(340,001
|
)
|
|
|
(470,000
|
)
|
Proceeds
from 9% Convertible debenture
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Proceeds
from new Loans
|
|
|
2,600,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Proceeds
from sale of preferred stock
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,997,495
|
|
Proceeds
from common stock subscribed
|
|
|
2,190,000
|
|
|
|
7,038,105
|
|
Proceeds
from Clearing firm advance
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Fees
and commissions paid for sale of stock
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(85,678
|
)
|
Total
cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
6,524,999
|
|
|
|
8,479,922
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(288,639
|
)
|
|
|
714,565
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
410,840
|
|
|
|
535,536
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
122,201
|
|
|
$
|
1,250,101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
paid
|
|
$
|
131,172
|
|
|
$
|
284,301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
disclosures of non-cash investing and financing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Converted
debenture note to common stock
|
|
$
|
450,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued
preferred stock dividends, net of payments
|
|
$
|
134,544
|
|
|
$
|
89,967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line
of Credit converted to note payable
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,999,450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
payable canceled
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
861,105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
assets offset against notes payable
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
675,297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of note to pay liability
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
50,640
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
of treasury stock
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
733,765
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion
of Series F preferred stock to common
|
|
$
|
615
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
See
accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
JESUP
& LAMONT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
FOR THE
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008
1. NATURE
OF BUSINESS
ORGANIZATION
AND OPERATIONS - The accompanying financial statements include the accounts of
Jesup & Lamont, Inc. ("JLI"), a Florida corporation, and its consolidated
subsidiaries, Empire Financial Group, Inc. ("EFG"), Empire Investment Advisors,
Inc. ("EIA"), and Jesup & Lamont Securities Corporation ("JLSC"),
collectively “the Company”. All intercompany transactions and
accounts have been eliminated in consolidation.
JLSC is
an introducing securities broker-dealer which provides brokerage and advisory
services to retail and institutional customers and a trading platform, order
execution services and market making services for domestic and international
securities to its customers and network of independent registered
representatives. EIA and JLSC provide fee-based investment advisory
services to their customers. EFG ceased brokerage operations in
November 2008.
The
Company's executive offices are located in New York, New York with independent
registered representatives throughout the United States. JLSC's main
office is also in New York City.
2.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
SECURITIES
TRANSACTIONS - Securities transactions and the related revenues and expenses are
recorded on a trade date basis.
TRADING
INCOME - Consists of net realized and net unrealized gains and losses on
securities traded for the Company's own account. Trading revenues are
generated from the difference between the price paid to buy securities and the
amount received from the sale of securities. Volatility of stock
prices, which can result in significant price fluctuations in short periods of
time, may result in trading gains or losses. Gains or losses are
recorded on a trade date basis.
MARKET-MAKING
ACTIVITIES - Securities owned and securities sold, but not yet purchased, which
primarily consist of listed, over-the-counter, American Depository Receipts and
foreign ordinary stocks, are carried at market value and are recorded on a trade
date basis. Market value is estimated daily using market quotations
available from major securities exchanges and dealers.
CLEARING
ARRANGEMENTS - We do not carry accounts for customers or perform custodial
functions related to customers' securities. We introduce all of our
customer transactions to our clearing brokers, who maintain our customers'
accounts and clear such transactions. Additionally, the clearing
brokers provide the clearing and depository operations for our proprietary
securities transactions. These activities may expose us to
off-balance-sheet risk in the event that customers do not fulfill their
obligations with the primary clearing brokers, as we have agreed to indemnify
our clearing brokers for any resulting losses. We continually assess
risk associated with each customer who is on margin credit and record an
estimated loss when we believe collection from the customer is
unlikely.
JESUP
& LAMONT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
FOR THE
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008
SHARE-BASED
COMPENSATION is accounted for under the fair value
method. Share-based payments to employees, including grants of stock
options, are charged to expense over the requisite service period based on the
grant-date fair value of the awards. The Company uses the
Black-Scholes valuation method to determine the fair value of stock
options.
CASH AND
CASH EQUIVALENTS consist of highly liquid investments that are readily
convertible into cash. We consider securities with maturities of
three months or less, when purchased, to be cash equivalents. The
carrying amount of these securities approximates fair value because of the
short-term maturity of these instruments.
MARKETABLE
SECURITIES AND SECURITIES SOLD, BUT NOT YET PURCHASED are carried at market
value, with related unrealized gains and losses reported in our results of
operations.
SECURITIES
that are not readily marketable are carried at fair value, with related
unrealized gains and losses reported in our results of
operations. The determination of fair value is fundamental to our
financial condition and results of operations and requires management to make
complex judgments.
Fair
values are based on listed market prices, where possible. If listed market
prices are not available or if the liquidation of our positions would reasonably
be expected to impact market prices, fair value is determined based on other
relevant factors, including dealer price quotations, and
marketability. Warrants received from investment banking engagements
are generally valued using the Black-Scholes option valuation model and
management may reduce the value if there is a restriction as to when the
warrants may be exercised. The Black-Scholes method uses assumptions
such as volatility, interest rates, and dividend yields to determine the
value.
COMMISSIONS
RECEIVABLE FROM CLEARING ORGANIZATIONS - Receivables from broker dealers and
clearing organizations represent monies due to the Company from its clearing
agents for transactions processed.
FURNITURE
AND EQUIPMENT, NET - Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation
on property and equipment is provided utilizing the straight-line method over
the estimated useful lives of the related assets, which range from five to seven
years. Upon the sale or retirement of an asset, the related costs and
accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is
recognized in our results of operations.
GOODWILL
AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS - Goodwill represents the excess of acquisition
costs over the fair value of net assets of businesses purchased. The
reported amounts of goodwill are reviewed for impairment on an annual basis and
more frequently when negative conditions such as significant current or
projected operating losses exist. The annual impairment test for
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets is a two-step process and involves
comparing the estimated fair value of each reporting unit to the reporting
unit's carrying value, including goodwill. If the fair value of the
reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is
not considered impaired, and the second step of the impairment test is
unnecessary. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its
fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test would be performed
to measure the amount of impairment loss to be recorded, if any. Our annual
impairment test resulted in no goodwill impairment.
JESUP
& LAMONT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
FOR THE
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008
INCOME
TAXES - The Company accounts for income taxes using an asset and liability
approach. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities represent the
tax effects differences between the financial and tax basis of assets and
liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future,
based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the
differences are expected to affect taxable income. A valuation
allowance is recognized if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is
more likely than not that some portion or all of the future tax benefits of
deferred tax assets will not be realized.
The
Company evaluates tax positions to determine whether the benefits of tax
positions are more likely than not of being sustained upon audit based on the
technical merits of the tax position. For tax positions that are more likely
than not of being sustained upon audit, the Company recognizes the largest
amount of the benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon
ultimate settlement in the financial statements. For tax positions that are not
more likely than not of being sustained upon audit, the Company does not
recognize any portion of the benefit in the financial statements.
USE OF
ESTIMATES - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results
could differ from those estimates.
EARNINGS
(LOSS) PER SHARE - Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net
income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of
common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per
share considers the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other
contracts to issue common stock were exercised or resulted in issuance of common
stock. Diluted earnings (loss) per share reflects the potential
dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common
stock, such as options, convertible notes and convertible preferred stock, were
exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common
stock that then shared in earnings (loss). Such potential additional
common shares are included in the computation of diluted earnings per
share. Diluted loss per share is not computed because any potential
additional common shares would reduce the reported loss per share and therefore
have an antidilutive effect.
3. NOTES
RECEIVABLE
The
Company has made advances to certain registered representatives in its Company
owned offices. The notes receivable, by location, at June 30, 2009
and December 31, 2008, were as follows:
Office
|
|
June 30,
2009
|
|
|
December 31,
2008
|
|
New
York
|
|
$
|
266,500
|
|
|
$
|
266,500
|
|
San
Francisco
|
|
|
122,500
|
|
|
|
157,500
|
|
Boston
|
|
|
706,333
|
|
|
|
673,833
|
|
Chicago
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
Boca
Raton
|
|
|
779,568
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
Longwood
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
38,056
|
|
Less:
allowance for uncollectibles
|
|
|
(211,000
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
notes receivable
|
|
$
|
1,688,901
|
|
|
$
|
1,310,889
|
|
JESUP
& LAMONT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
FOR THE
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008
4.
INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Intangible
assets consisted of the following:
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
$
|
13,272,165
|
|
|
$
|
13,272,165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Intangible Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks
|
|
$
|
3,282,077
|
|
|
$
|
3,282,077
|
|
Customer
List
|
|
|
1,157,266
|
|
|
|
1,157,266
|
|
|
|
|
4,439,343
|
|
|
|
4,439,343
|
|
Less:
accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(308,605
|
)
|
|
|
(295,742
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,130,738
|
|
|
$
|
4,143,601
|
|
Amortization
expense for intangible assets totaled $12,864 and $47,337 for the six months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The
estimated annual aggregate amortization expense related to other intangible
assets for the five succeeding fiscal years is as follows:
Year Ending
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
115,727
|
|
2010
|
|
|
115,727
|
|
2011
|
|
|
115,727
|
|
2012
|
|
|
115,727
|
|
2013
|
|
|
115,727
|
|
The value
of the Company’s intangible assets is based on whether they make useful
contributions toward the generation of future earnings. We performed
an impairment test of our intangible assets as of December 31, 2008 and
determined we had no impairment of intangible assets at that
date. However, because of the Company’s history of operating losses,
management continually evaluates the realization of future economic
benefits.
JESUP
& LAMONT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
FOR THE
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008
5. NOTES
PAYABLE
Notes
payable at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, consisted of the
following:
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
·
Convertible
notes payable to investors, interest payable quarterly at an annual rate
of 6.5%. The notes mature March 28, 2012 and are convertible
into common stock at $2.39 per share.
|
|
$
|
5,757,158
|
|
|
$
|
6,207,158
|
|
·
Unsecured
note payable to bank, interest payable monthly at an annual rate of 3.8%,
with a maturity of May 28, 2010.
|
|
|
2,100,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
·
Unsecured
note payable to Legent Clearing LLC, interest at a base annual rate of
4.25% plus prime, with a maturity of November 3, 2018.
|
|
|
2,026,970
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
·
Convertible
debenture payable to Legent Clearing, LLC at an annual rate of
9.0%. The note matures February 26, 2014, and is convertible
into common stock at $.50 per share.
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
·
Unsecured
note payable to the stockholders of Jesup & Lamont Holding Corporation
(former parent of JLSC). The note accrues interest at an annual
rate of 4.0%. Interest is payable annually, and the principal is payable
at maturity on October 1, 2011.
|
|
|
1,638,895
|
|
|
|
1,638,895
|
|
·
Note payable
to bank at LIBOR rate plus 10% (currently 10.29%) due on demand
with monthly principal payments of $30,000. Converted from a
line of credit as explained in Note 6 below.
|
|
|
959,450
|
|
|
|
1,149,450
|
|
·
Short term
note payable to shareholder, with interest of 8%, originally due on April
2, 2009 but extended to December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
850,000
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
·
Unsecured
note payable to investor, interest is payable quarterly at 10% per year,
with a maturity of June 7, 2010.
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
·
Unsecured
note payable to A. Aysseh, a Company shareholder, principal and interest
at 15% per annum, due at maturity date of January 16, 2009; has since
become payable on demand.
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
·
Subordinated
note payable to EFH Partners, interest an annual rate of 20.0%, originally
payable at maturity on February 17, 2007. The note was extended
to April 1, 2009 at a 4.0% annual interest rate and then modified to
become due on demand.
|
|
|
222,500
|
|
|
|
222,500
|
|
·
Unsecured
note payable which accrues interest at an annual rate of
5.0%. Principal and interest payable on demand.
|
|
|
66,534
|
|
|
|
66,534
|
|
·
Unsecured
note payable to the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”),
interest at 8.25% per annum, payable monthly thru April
2012.
|
|
|
45,863
|
|
|
|
45,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
principal payable
|
|
|
16,567,369
|
|
|
|
12,730,400
|
|
Less:
unamortized discount on note to stockholders of Jesup & Lamont Holding
Corporation
|
|
|
(146,661
|
)
|
|
|
(178,083
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
notes payable net of discount
|
|
$
|
16,420,708
|
|
|
$
|
12,552,317
|
|
JESUP
& LAMONT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
FOR THE
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008
The
annual maturities of principal on the notes payable are as follows:
Year ending December 31
|
|
|
|
2009
– remaining balance
|
|
$
|
2,505,047
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2,613,125
|
|
2011
|
|
|
1,652,020
|
|
2012
|
|
|
5,770,207
|
|
2013
|
|
|
-
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
4,026,970
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,567,369
|
|
Interest
on these notes totaled $606,389 and $522,454 for the six months ended June 30,
2009 and 2008, respectively.
6. NOTE
PAYABLE TO BANK
On
January 31, 2007, we obtained a $2 million credit line from Fifth Third
Bank. As part of that credit line agreement, we pledged 100% of EFG's
and JLSC's stock as collateral. At December 31, 2007 we had drawn
$1,999,450 of the line. The line expired on February 1, 2008 and was
converted to a note payable due January 31, 2009 and then extended to April 2,
2009. The note was further extended and converted to a demand note on
July 2, 2009, and principal is payable at $30,000 per month. All
prior requirements of the original note still exist including the
collateral. See Note 5.
7.
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE, ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER LIABILITIES
Accounts
payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities consisted of the
following:
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
$
|
624,360
|
|
|
$
|
1,101,365
|
|
Accrued
payroll
|
|
|
1,893,857
|
|
|
|
1,282,491
|
|
Accrued
payroll taxes
|
|
|
1,012,084
|
|
|
|
112,298
|
|
Short
term loans
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
EKN
settlement accrual
|
|
|
686,517
|
|
|
|
872,000
|
|
Accrued
legal
|
|
|
428,685
|
|
|
|
564,135
|
|
Accrued
preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
580,112
|
|
|
|
445,568
|
|
Accrued
interest on notes
|
|
|
563,169
|
|
|
|
356,899
|
|
Other
accrued expenses and liabilities
|
|
|
1,609,187
|
|
|
|
911,179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$
|
7,437,971
|
|
|
$
|
5,685,934
|
|
JESUP
& LAMONT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
FOR THE
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008
8. DUE TO
CLEARING ORGANIZATIONS
The
amount due to clearing organizations of $1,264,546 at June 30, 2009 includes a
balance of $1,226,537 owed to EFG's former clearing firm, under a promissory
note to the clearing broker. A total of $500,000 of this balance
relates to a fee charged to enter into the promissory note
agreement. This promissory note documents JLI's previous agreement
which precludes this clearing broker from collecting this note from
EFG. The note bears interest at the Broker's Call Rate plus 2.45%.
The note may be paid at anytime but has no defined maturity. The note
is personally guaranteed by JLI's Chairman and JLI's President. The
note, as had been previously agreed with the clearing broker, is collateralized
by warrants held by the Company and is further cross collateralized by all of
the shares of JLI held by EFH Partners, Inc.
9.
TRADING INCOME
Trading
income includes market making revenues which consist of net realized and net
unrealized gains and losses on securities traded for the Company's own
account. Trading revenues are generated from the difference between
the price paid to buy securities and the amount received from the sale of
securities. Volatility of stock prices, can result in significant
price fluctuations in short periods of time and may result in trading gains or
losses. Gains or losses are recorded on a trade date basis. Trading
revenues consisted of the following.
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Net
realized gains and losses
|
|
$
|
1,898,239
|
|
|
$
|
4,346,256
|
|
|
$
|
746,593
|
|
|
$
|
1,749,158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
gains
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
744,186
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
186,175
|
|
Unrealized
losses
|
|
|
(19,731
|
)
|
|
|
(538,597
|
)
|
|
|
(14,034
|
)
|
|
|
(86,878
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading
income, net
|
|
$
|
1,878,508
|
|
|
$
|
4,551,845
|
|
|
$
|
732,559
|
|
|
$
|
1,848,455
|
|
10.
INVESTMENT BANKING INCOME
Investment
banking income consists of cash fees and warrants or other securities received
as payment for our investment banking services. The Black-Scholes
valuation model is used to estimate the fair value of the warrants
received. The volatility of stock prices underlying these warrants
can result in significant price fluctuations in short periods of
time. These fluctuations in the value of the warrants results in
warrant gains or losses. Investment banking revenues consisted of the
following:
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Investment
banking fees cash
|
|
$
|
741,391
|
|
|
$
|
2,244,449
|
|
|
$
|
327,480
|
|
|
$
|
839,662
|
|
Gains/(losses)
from warrants
|
|
|
1,692,134
|
|
|
|
(233,963
|
)
|
|
|
1,523,704
|
|
|
|
(470,148
|
)
|
Investment
banking income, net
|
|
$
|
2,433,525
|
|
|
$
|
2,010,486
|
|
|
$
|
1,851,184
|
|
|
$
|
369,514
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrant
gains and losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized
gains
|
|
$
|
1,604,903
|
|
|
$
|
230,224
|
|
|
$
|
1,604,903
|
|
|
$
|
37,159
|
|
Unrealized
Gains (losses)
|
|
|
87,231
|
|
|
|
(464,187
|
)
|
|
|
(81,199
|
)
|
|
|
(507,307
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Gains/(losses)
|
|
$
|
1,692,134
|
|
|
$
|
(233,963
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,523,704
|
|
|
$
|
(470,148
|
)
|
JESUP
& LAMONT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
FOR THE
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008
11.
EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
The
calculation of earnings (loss) per share is as follows:
|
|
Six months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Three months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Numerator
for earnings (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
earnings (loss)
|
|
$
|
(2,494,572
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,997,822
|
)
|
|
$
|
433,093
|
|
|
$
|
(4,089,042
|
)
|
Preferred
stock dividends
|
|
|
(134,544
|
)
|
|
|
(89,967
|
)
|
|
|
(43,060
|
)
|
|
|
(43,234
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
(loss) attributable to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(2,629,116
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,087,789
|
)
|
|
$
|
390,033
|
|
|
$
|
(4,132,276
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator
for earnings (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted weighted-average shares:
|
|
|
28,592,712
|
|
|
|
14,557,494
|
|
|
|
28,849,754
|
|
|
|
15,875,835
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted earnings (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.35
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.35
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
(0.26
|
)
|
The
Company’s loss attributable to common stockholders, along with the dilutive
effect of potentially issuable common stock due to outstanding options,
warrants, and convertible securities causes the normal computation of diluted
loss per share to be smaller than the basic loss per share; thereby yielding a
result that is counterintuitive. Consequently, the diluted loss per
share amount presented does not differ from basic loss per share due to this
“anti-dilutive” effect.
At June
30, 2009 and 2008, the Company had potentially dilutive common shares
attributable to the following:
|
|
Six months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Three months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
6,974,242
|
|
|
|
7,579,964
|
|
|
|
6,974,242
|
|
|
|
7,579,964
|
|
Stock
options
|
|
|
2,033,022
|
|
|
|
3,431,522
|
|
|
|
2,033,022
|
|
|
|
3,431,522
|
|
Convertible
preferred stock Series C,F and G
|
|
|
3,554,449
|
|
|
|
3,654,447
|
|
|
|
3,554,449
|
|
|
|
3,654,447
|
|
Convertible
notes
|
|
|
6,408,840
|
|
|
|
2,672,437
|
|
|
|
6,408,840
|
|
|
|
2,672,437
|
|
Warrants
subscribed
|
|
|
2,015,075
|
|
|
|
547,265
|
|
|
|
2,015,075
|
|
|
|
547,265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,985,628
|
|
|
|
17,885,635
|
|
|
|
20,985,628
|
|
|
|
17,885,635
|
|
JESUP
& LAMONT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
FOR THE
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008
12.
EQUITY
During
the six months ended June 30, 2009 the Company received and recorded stock
subscriptions totaling $2,190,000 for stock offerings to be completed during the
third quarter of 2009.
The table
below outlines the conversion price of all outstanding convertible
preferred
stock issues:
Convertible Issue
|
|
Outstanding
Shares
|
|
|
Preferred
Dividend
Rate
|
|
|
Convertible
to Common
Shares
|
|
|
Conversion
Price
|
|
Series
C participating, cumulative convertible preferred stock, 8000 shares
authorized, liquidation preference at the $100 per share stated
value.
|
|
|
7,062
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
%
|
|
|
353,100
|
|
|
$
|
2.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series
F participating, cumulative convertible preferred stock, 877,000 shares
authorized, liquidation preference at the $3.25 per share stated
value.
|
|
|
719,989
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
719,989
|
|
|
$
|
3.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series
G participating, cumulative convertible preferred stock, 4000 shares
authorized, liquidation preference at the $1000 per share stated
value.
|
|
|
1,688
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
|
|
2,481,360
|
|
|
$
|
0.68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
|
728,739
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,554,449
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.
INCOME TAXES
The
current loss for the six months ended June 30, 2009 results in an increase in
the Company’s net operating loss carryforward and causes the net deferred tax
assets to increase by $153,000 to $12,635,000 at June 30, 2009 from $12,482,000
at December 31, 2008. Management increased the valuation allowance to
$10,518,000 or a net of $2,117,000, resulting in no deferred taxes for the six
months ended June 30, 2009.
The
Company has net operating loss carry forwards for federal tax purposes of
approximately $29,000,000 which expire in years 2022 through
2029. The amount deductible per year is limited to $576,000 on loss
carryforwards of $4,376,000 and unlimited on the remaining loss carryforwards
under current tax regulations. The realization of future tax benefits
from its deferred tax assets depends on the Company’s ability to produce
earnings sufficient to use its operating loss carry forwards. The
need to provide an additional valuation allowance is being evaluated by
management.
14.
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Regulatory
and Legal Matters
A
competing brokerage firm commenced arbitration by filing a Statement of Claim on
October 14, 2005 before FINRA alleging, among other things, that EFG improperly
solicited Claimant's brokers for employment with EFG. To that end,
Claimant asserted claims against EFG for tortuous interference with contractual
relationships and aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary
duty. Claimant sought $10,000,000 in damages from EFG. This claim was
settled in 2009 with no damages to EFG.
JESUP
& LAMONT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
FOR THE
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008
There is
a claim pending against the Company in the amount of $4,000,000 for breach of
non-solicitation contract. Final hearing is scheduled for October
2009. In the opinion of management and Company councel the outcome of
this claim will not have a material adverse affect on the Company’s financial
position.
A former
employee has filed a claim against the Company in the amount of $5 million
alleging employee discrimination. Another former employee has filed a
claim against the Company in the amount $500,000 alleging breach of contract and
wrongful termination. A former broker has filed a claim against the
Company in the amount of $1 million alleging excessive charges. The
Company intends to defend these claims vigorously and in the opinion of
management, based on its discussions with legal counsel, the outcome of these
claims will not result in a material adverse affect on the financial position or
results of operations of the Company or its subsidiaries.
Customer
Complaints and Arbitration
The
Company's subsidiaries' business involves substantial risks of liability,
including exposure to liability under federal and state securities laws in
connection with the underwriting or distribution of securities and claims by
dissatisfied clients for fraud, unauthorized trading, churning, mismanagement
and breach of fiduciary duty. In recent years there has been an
increasing incidence of litigation involving the securities industry, including
class actions which generally seek rescission and substantial
damages. In the ordinary course of business, the Company operating
through its subsidiaries and its principals is, and may become a party to
additional legal or regulatory proceedings or arbitrations. The
Company is not currently involved in any additional legal or regulatory
proceeding or arbitrations, the outcome of which is expected to have a material
adverse impact on the Company's business.
On
January 15, 2009, the Company announced that EFG had filed a $25 million
arbitration claim against one of its clearing brokers, Penson Financial
Services, Inc., a NASDAQ listed company, its CEO, Phil Pendergraft, its
President, Daniel Son and its Chairman, Roger Engemoen. EFG’s causes
of action include extortion, civil theft, conspiracy, tortuous interference with
contractual relationships and aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary
duty. The claims relate to the assistance Penson provided in
connection with a fraud perpetrated upon EFG, Penson’s collusion with a “raid”
of EFG’s global execution services business, and Penson’s inappropriate demands
for payments in connection with EFG’s closure by FINRA in April
2008.
EFG
further alleges that Penson sought to profit by making false statements to
FINRA, EFG’s primary regulator, in the interest of closing the
firm. Thereafter, Penson demanded payments of over $1 million before
EFG could reopen. Penson has also seized a $1.6 million clearing
deposit of EFG’s as well as commission revenue. As a result of these acts, the
brokerage firm has sustained significant harm. It is management’s
opinion, based on the advice of counsel that the Company will prevail in this
matter.
NYSE AMEX
Listing
On
February 11, 2008, the Company received notice from the NYSE Amex (formerly, the
American Stock Exchange) that it is not in compliance with certain standards for
continued listing contained in Section 121(B)(2)(c) of the NYSE AMEX Company
Guide, which require that the Company must (1) maintain a board of directors
comprised of at least 50% independent directors, and an audit committee of at
least two members, comprised solely of independent directors who also meet the
requirements of Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (2)
hold a 2008 annual meeting of shareholders. The Company has complied with the
first of these requirements and believes it resolved the second deficiency when
it held its annual meeting of stockholders on June 23, 2009. However,
the NYSE AMEX is reviewing the Company’s satisfaction of its plan of compliance,
and will ascertain whether the Company meets all other applicable NYSE AMEX
standards.
JESUP
& LAMONT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
FOR THE
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008
15. OFF
BALANCE SHEET RISKS
Clearing
Arrangements.
We do not
carry accounts for customers or perform custodial functions related to
customers' securities. We introduce all of our customer transactions
to our clearing brokers, who maintain our customers' accounts and clear such
transactions. Additionally, the clearing brokers provide the clearing
and depository operations for our proprietary securities
transactions. These activities may expose the Company to
off-balance-sheet risk in the event that customers do not fulfill their
obligations with the primary clearing brokers, as we have agreed to indemnify
our clearing brokers for any resulting losses. We continually assess
risk associated with each customer who is on margin credit and record an
estimated loss when we believe collection from the customer is
unlikely.
Customer
Claims, Litigation and Regulatory Matters.
In the
normal course of business, we have been and continue to be the subject of civil
actions and arbitrations arising out of customer complaints relating to our
broker dealer activities, as an employer and as a result of other business
activities.
We have
sold securities which we do not currently own and therefore will be obligated to
purchase the securities at a future date. We have recorded these
obligations in our financial statements at June 30, 2009 at the market values of
the securities and will incur a loss if the market value increases subsequent to
June 30, 2009. The occurrence of these off-balance sheet losses could
impair our liquidity and force us to reduce or curtail operations.
16.
CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISKS
We are
engaged in various trading and brokerage activities in which counterparties
primarily include broker-dealers, banks and other financial
institutions. In the event counterparties do no fulfill their
obligations, we may be exposed to risk. The risk of default depends
on the creditworthiness of the counterparty or issuer of the
instrument. It is our policy to review, as necessary, the credit
standing of each counterparty.
Our cash
in bank accounts at times exceeds the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
("FDIC") insurable limits however, management believes that the risk of loss is
negligible. We have not experienced any previous losses, and don’t
anticipate any future losses due to this condition.
17. NET
CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS AND VIOLATIONS OF BROKER DEALER SUBSIDIARIES
JLSC, is
subject to the requirements of the Net Capital Rule (Rule 15c3-1) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which requires the maintenance of minimum net
capital and requires that the ratio of aggregate indebtedness to net capital,
both as defined, does not exceed 15 to 1. Net capital and related
ratio of aggregate indebtedness to net capital, as defined, may fluctuate on a
daily basis.
At June
30, 2009, JLSC had net capital of $1,819,415, which was $1,581,869 above the
required net capital of $237,546. JLSC ratio of aggregate
indebtedness to net capital was 1.96 to 1 as of June 30, 2009. JLSC
is exempt from Rule 15c3-3 because all customer transactions are cleared through
other broker-dealers on a fully-disclosed basis.
In
November 2008, EFG was out of compliance with the above Net Capital Rule and,
accordingly, EFG immediately ceased conducting a securities business, other than
liquidating transactions. In March 2009 EFG filed a Broker Dealer
withdrawal with FINRA.
JESUP
& LAMONT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
FOR THE
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008
18.
LIQUIDITY MATTERS/GOING CONCERN CONSIDERATION
The
Company incurred losses for the past two years and through the first quarter
ended March 31, 2009. In addition, the Company has an accumulated
deficit at June 30, 2009 of $35,537,194, and negative cash flows from operating
activities for the six months ended June 30, 2009.
The
results of our operations have been adversely impacted due to the general
downturn of the market and economic conditions; the ceasing of business of EFG
in November 2008 due to an adverse litigation settlement; the slowdown in
activity due to the conversion to a new clearing firm; the startup of a fixed
income division which incurred substantial costs but has had slower revenue
growth than expected due to the economy and costs of building an equity research
platform.
Our plan
for future operations has several different aspects. We have reduced
our overhead costs by combining tasks which helped eliminate positions,
restructured various contracts with vendors to lower general and administrative
expenses and reworked payout percentages to improve profit margin in our retail
unit. In addition, to lower costs we have taken several steps to
increase revenues as outlined below:
|
·
|
Increase
our trading revenues by adding additional stocks in which we make a
market;
|
|
·
|
Expand
our trading capabilities by establishing fixed income trading desks that
serve both institutional and retail
clients;
|
|
·
|
Expand
our institutional trading activities by continuing to add quality trading
personnel with existing institutional
clients;
|
|
·
|
Continue
to recruit quality registered
representatives;
|
|
·
|
Expand
our offering of proprietary financial products to our retail and
institutional customers;
|
|
·
|
Continue
to look for and close acquisitions of similar
businesses.
|
If our
plans change, or our assumptions change or prove to be inaccurate, or if our
available cash otherwise proves to be insufficient to implement our business
plans, we may require additional financing through subsequent equity or debt
financings. The Company cannot predict whether additional funds will be
available in adequate amounts or on acceptable terms. If funds are needed but
not available, the Company's business would be jeopardized.
Given the
uncertain economic environment and the pressure that the financial sector has
been under, the Company plans to raise additional equity capital or financing in
2009 for working capital. By doing so, the Company believes that it will protect
itself against any future negative consequences that may arise if the economy
continues to decline. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we have been
able to raise $6,865,000 through a combination of equity and
financing. The Company also has an acquisition plan which
contemplates raising debt and equity capital to finance the
acquisitions.
ITEM 2.
|
MANAGEMENT'S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
The
following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should
be read in conjunction with the Selected Consolidated Financial Data and the
Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as previously filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Our significant accounting policies
are disclosed in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements found in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
This Form
10-Q contains statements about future events and expectations which are "forward
looking statements". Any statement in this Form 10-Q that is not a statement of
historical fact may be deemed to be a forward looking statement. Forward-looking
statements represent our judgment about the future and are not based on
historical facts. These statements include: forecasts for growth in the number
of customers using our service, statements regarding our anticipated revenues,
expense levels, liquidity and capital resources and other statements including
statements containing such words as "may," "will," "expect," "believe,"
"anticipate," "intend," "could," "estimate," "continue" or "plan" and similar
expressions or variations. These statements reflect the current risks,
uncertainties and assumptions related to various factors including, without
limitation, fluctuations in market prices, competition, changes in securities
regulations or other applicable governmental regulations, technological changes,
management disagreements and other factors described under the heading "Factors
affecting our operating results, business prospects, and market price of stock"
contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2008, as previously filed with the SEC. Based upon changing conditions, should
any one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should any
underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from
those described in this report as anticipated, believed, estimated or intended.
We undertake no obligation to update, and we do not have a policy of updating or
revising, these forward-looking statements. Except where the context otherwise
requires, the terms "we," "us," or "our" refer to the business of Jesup &
Lamont, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries.
COMPANY
OVERVIEW
We were
incorporated in Florida in February 2000. Most of our business is conducted
through our wholly owned subsidiary Jesup & Lamont Securities Corporation
(JLSC). Empire Financial Group, Inc. (EFG) was founded in 1992 and merged into
Empire Financial Holding Company in 2000. On November 12, 2008, EFG was out of
compliance with the SEC's Net Capital Rule 15c3-1 and, accordingly, ceased
conducting a securities business, other than liquidating transactions, while
remaining out of compliance with this rule. EFG's out of compliance condition
was caused by an arbitration award against it for $772,000 plus costs and fees
of approximately $100,000, notice of which was received by EFG on November 12,
2008. See Note 14 to the financial statements for further
details. On November 10, 2006, effective as of November 1, 2006, we
acquired Jesup & Lamont Securities Corporation. Effective January 2, 2008,
we changed the name of Empire Financial Holding Company to Jesup & Lamont,
Inc. Accordingly, the following discussion and analysis of our
financial condition and results of operations is based on the combined results
of these businesses.
JLSC is
our financial brokerage services subsidiary providing brokerage services to full
service retail and institutional customers. We provide our employee and
independent registered representatives and advisors back office compliance and
administrative services over the telephone at 1-800-569-3337 or through their
designated registered representative. We provide our retail customers access to
useful financial products and services through our website and by telephone. Our
customers may, upon request, also receive advice from our brokers regarding
stock, bonds, mutual funds and insurance products. We also provide securities
execution and market making services, providing execution services involving
filling orders to purchase or sell securities received from unaffiliated broker
dealers on behalf of their retail customers. We typically act as principal in
these transactions and derive our net trading revenues from the difference
between the price paid when a security is bought and the price received when
that security is sold. We typically do not receive a fee or commission for
providing retail order execution services.
Additionally
through EIA and JLSC, we offer fee-based investment advisory services to our
customers, independent registered investment advisors and unaffiliated broker
dealers. These services are web-based and are delivered through a platform that
combines a variety of independent third party providers.
Services
include access to separate account money managers, managed mutual fund
portfolios, asset allocation tools, separate account manager and mutual fund
research, due diligence and quarterly performance review. We charge our
customers an all-inclusive fee for these services, which is based on assets
under management. As of December 31, 2008, the annual fee was equal to
approximately 140 basis points times the assets under management.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS:
New
senior management joined the firm at various times over the last 12 months. The
focus of management was to increase the firm’s profitability by focusing on more
profitable businesses sectors while exiting units that were marginal. A
significant strategy was to establish a fixed income division. In addition to
having higher margins that those in retail brokerage and institutional equities,
fixed income also allowed the company to enhance its retail brokerage business
through fixed income transactions and generated potential banking fees through
debt issuances.
The plan
was hurt by the downturn in the economy and the negative impact that the economy
had in the financial markets. Additionally, our Empire Financial Group (EFG) had
certain legacy issues that eventually led to the shut down of that unit’s
brokerage activities. In response to those issues, management refocused its
business strategy. The two main objectives were a renewed focus on recruitment
with an emphasis in retail brokerage and expense reductions to have the firm’s
expense structure better coincide with the downturn in the financial markets.
Most of those cost changes were implemented at the tail end of the March 31,
2009, quarter and the results of those reductions are first appearing in the
quarter that just ended on June 30, 2009. As well, the firm’s recruitment has
led to the rebuilding of our retail brokerage unit and revenues from that sector
have had strong growth during the past quarter. Our recruitment on the fixed
income and institutional equities platform has been accelerated in the past
month and we expect that those business’ will start to see improved growth
during the next quarter.
The
results of our operations for the six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to
the same period in 2008 were adversely impacted by general market and economic
conditions. In addition, EFG was required by FINRA to cease doing
business as a broker dealer in November 2008, due to an adverse litigation
settlement. This has significantly reduced our Retail business line as we
could not move those retail customers to JLSC due to regulatory and operational
limitations. To offset the loss of EFG’s retail business we are in the
process of expanding the retail business in JLSC, and are seeing improvements
therein.
In the
six months ended June 30, 2009, commissions generated from retail were
$12,132,645. During the same period of 2008, commissions from retail were
$15,052,896. The reduction was caused by the following reasons: 1) loss of
brokers due to the closing of the EFG broker dealer, 2) the economic downturn
and related uncertainty in the financial markets and 3) slowdown in activity due
to the conversion to a new clearing firm. In March 2009, the Company began a new
relationship with a new clearing firm. We anticipated that all accounts would
have been moved by the beginning of March 2009. However, due to some operational
issues at our old clearing firm, the conversion was not completed until the end
of the month. Starting in April 2009 all significant retail accounts were
moved.
Equity
trading revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2009 were $1,878,508 as
compared to the same period in 2008 of $4,551,845. The reduction
resulted from EFG ceasing business as noted above and our reduction of this
business as market opportunities have declined with the economic
downturn.
During
May 2008 we added a fixed income trading business to our product group and
recruited a well known individual with a proven history to build this business.
Although we believe that adding fixed income trading to our business model will
strengthen the foundation of our business for the future, we have incurred
substantial start up costs. Due to economic uncertainty, the revenue
growth has been slower than expected.
In
addition, we have also built a quality equity research department that focuses
on institutional sales. The building of this department also resulted in
increased compensation and other overhead expenses. However, due to the downturn
in the economy and the uncertainty of the financial markets, the anticipated
revenue from this initiative has been slower than originally anticipated. In
March 2009, management decided to do a thorough review of its expense structure
and as a result, decided to cut costs through employee dismissals and
renegotiations of various contracts. As part of that cost cutting effort, senior
management has taken significant reductions in their compensation. Those cost
reductions were completed in March 2009 and we started seeing the benefit of
these reductions in the second quarter of 2009.
Our
investment banking business has improved to prior year levels for the first six
month period. During the second quarter of 2009 we benefited from the
sale of warrants earned from prior investment banking
transactions. We earned $1,604,903 on the sale of these
warrants.
Further
discussions of the results of our operations are provided below.
Three
months ended June 30, 2009 compared to three months ended June 30,
2008:
Revenues:
Total
revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2009 were $9,937,559, an increase
of $312,991, or 3% of total revenues for the same period in 2008. This increase
is primarily attributable to the reasons described below:
Commissions
and fees revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2009 were $7,353,816, a
decrease of $52,783 or approximately 1%, from our commissions and fees revenues
of $7,406,599 for the comparable period in 2008. The negligible decrease
reflects our successful efforts in transitioning our retail business from EFG,
which was closed in November 2008, to JLSC as noted
above. Commissions and fees revenues accounted for approximately 74%
and 77%, of our total revenues for the three month periods ended June 30, 2009
and 2008, respectively.
For the
three months ended June 30, 2009 trading income was $732,559, a decrease of
$1,115,896, or approximately 60%, from our trading income of $1,848,455 for the
comparable period in 2008. This decrease is attributable to EFG ceasing
operations in November 2008 and the uncertainty in the financial
markets. Trading income accounted for approximately 8% and 19% of our
total revenues for the three month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
For the
three months ended June 30, 2009, our investment banking revenues were $327,480,
a decrease of $512,182, or 61%, from our investment banking revenues of $839,662
for the comparable period in 2008. The decrease was primarily due to general
market conditions confronting the financial services industries. Investment
banking revenues accounted for approximately 3% and 9% of our revenues for the
three month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
For the
three months ended June 30, 2009 gains on securities received from investment
banking services were $1,523,704, an increase of $1,993,852, or approximately
424%, from a loss of ($470,148) for the comparable period in 2008. The increase
was primarily due to sale of warrants we had earned from previous activities.
Gains and losses on securities received for investment banking services
accounted for approximately 15% and (5%) of our total revenues for the three
month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Expenses:
Employee
compensation and benefits were $3,983,168 and $5,207,603 for the three months
ending June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Employee compensation decreased
$1,224,435, or 24%. The reduction was due to reduced employee commissions, as
total commissionable revenues have decreased 17%, and from the benefit of our
cost and expense restructuring efforts started earlier this
year.
Commissions,
clearing and execution costs were $3,771,009 and $5,782,462 for the three months
ending June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The decrease of $2,011,453, or 35%,
was primarily a result of Commissionable revenue decline of 17%, and our
restructuring of the commission payouts of 18%.
General
and administrative expenses were $1,240,183 and $2,502,933 for the three months
ending June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The decrease of $1,262,750, or 50%,
results from expense restructuring taken during the first quarter of
2009. Professional fees, travel and entertainment, and conference
expenses were significant components of this reduction.
Interest
expense was $369,600 and $781,925 for the three months ending June 30, 2009 and
2008, respectively. The decrease of $412,325, or 53%, was attributable to a
payment of a one time financing fee of $500,000 to one of our clearing firms in
2008. See Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for
details.
In May
2008, the Company entered into settlement agreements with two former officers.
The agreements included offsetting receivables owed to JLI totaling $675,297
against the note payable by JLI to the former officers totaling $861,105. As
part of his settlement agreement one of the former officers also received the
rights to certain investment banking engagements and transferred 524,118 shares
of JLI's common stock to JLI. We recorded the stock received as $733,765 of
treasury stock valued at the closing market price ($1.40 per share) on the date
we entered into the settlement agreement. The gain recognized on these
transactions totaled $806,744 after deduction of $112,829 of accelerated
discount amortization related to the canceled notes payable. This
gain is included in other income for 2008.
As a
result of the prior income tax valuation allowances and tax loss carryforwards,
the provision for income taxes was zero for the three months ended June 30,
2009.
As a
result of the items discussed in the preceding paragraphs, the Company had net
income of $433,093 for the three months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to a net
loss of $4,089,042 for the three months ended June 30, 2008.
Six
months ended June 30, 2009 compared to six months ended June 30,
2008:
Revenues:
Total
revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2009 were $16,444,678, a decrease of
$5,170,549, or 24% of total revenues for the same period in 2008. This decrease
is primarily due to the reasons described below:
Commissions
and fees revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2009 were $12,132,645, a
decrease of $2,920,251 or approximately 19%, from our commissions and fees
revenues of $15,052,896 for the comparable period in 2008. The decrease was
primarily due to EFG ceasing operations in November 2008. We are in
the process of rebuilding the retail business line since we could not
consolidate the EFG retail business with JLSC. Commissions and
fees revenues accounted for approximately 74% and 70%, of our total revenues for
the six month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. As
stated previously, the Company exited low margined businesses and entered into
higher margin units. However, due to the difficult economic environment, the
revenue from new units has been slower to develop than originally
estimated.
For the
six months ended June 30, 2009 trading income was $1,878,508, a decrease of
$2,673,337, or approximately 59%, from our trading income of $4,551,845 for the
comparable period in 2008. This decrease is primarily due to EFG ceasing
operations in November 2008 and the uncertainty in the financial
markets. Trading income accounted for approximately 11% and 21% of
our total revenues for the six month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
For the
six months ended June 30, 2009, our investment banking revenues were $741,391, a
decrease of $1,503,058, or 67%, from our investment banking revenues of
$2,244,449 for the comparable period in 2008. The decrease was primarily due to
general market conditions confronting the financial services industries.
Investment banking revenues accounted for approximately 5% and 10% of our
revenues for the six month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
For the
six months ended June 30, 2009 gains on securities received from investment
banking services were $1,692,134, an increase of $1,926,097, or approximately
823%, from our losses of $233,963 for the comparable period in 2008. The
increase was primarily due to sale of warrants we had earned from previous
activities. Gains and losses on securities received for investment banking
services accounted for approximately 10% and (1%), of our total revenues for the
six month period ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Expenses:
Employee
compensation and benefits were $8,574,346 and $10,841,405 for the six months
ending June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Employee compensation decreased
$2,267,059, or 21%. The reduction was due to reduced employee commissions, as
total commissionable revenues have decreased 32%, and from the benefit of our
cost and expense restructuring efforts started earlier this year.
Commissions,
clearing and execution costs were $6,444,242 and $10,811,607 for the six months
ending June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The decrease of $4,367,365, or 40%,
was due primarily to a decrease in commissionable revenues of 32%, plus our
restructuring of commission payouts which occurred in the first
quarter.
General
and administrative expenses were $3,029,586 and $4,183,380 for the six months
ending June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The decrease of $1,153,794, or 28%,
was due primarily to decreases in travel and entertainment, professional fees,
and occupancy costs resulting from our cost cutting efforts.
Interest
expense was $606,389 and $1,097,612 for the six months ending June 30, 2009 and
2008, respectively. The decrease of $491,223, or 45%, was due primarily to a
payment of a one time financing fee of $500,000 to one of our clearing firms in
2008. See Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for
details.
In May
2008, the Company entered into settlement agreements with two former officers.
The agreements included offsetting receivables owed to JLI totaling $675,297
against the note payable by JLI to the former officers totaling $861,105. As
part of his settlement agreement one of the former officers also received the
rights to certain investment banking engagements and transferred 524,118 shares
of JLI's common stock to JLI. We recorded the stock received as $733,765 of
treasury stock valued at the closing market price ($1.40 per share) on the date
we entered into the settlement agreement. The gain recognized on these
transactions totaled $806,744 after deduction of $112,829 of accelerated
discount amortization related to the canceled notes payable. This
gain is included in other income for 2008.
As a
result of the prior income tax valuation allowances and tax loss carryforwards,
the provision for income taxes was zero for the six months ended June 30,
2009.
As a
result of the items discussed in the preceding paragraphs, the Company incurred
a net loss of $2,494,572 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to a
net loss of $4,997,822 for the six months ended June 30, 2008.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
As of
June 30, 2009, we had $32,449,691 in total assets, of which, $4,710,508 or
approximately 14% consisted of cash or assets readily convertible into cash,
principally securities owned and receivables from clearing brokers, which
include interest bearing cash balances held with our clearing organization. At
June 30, 2009, we had liabilities due within one year totaling $11,496,183.
Historically, we have financed our operating cash deficits from private
placements of stock and debt offerings.
Stockholders'
equity increased $152,541 to $6,966,146 at June 30, 2009, compared to $6,813,605
at December 31, 2008. This increase is attributable to additional stock
subscriptions, offset by net losses incurred for the period.
Net cash
used by operations for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $3,903,422 as
opposed to net cash used by operations for the same period in 2008 of
$7,045,183. The principal uses of cash in 2009 were an increase in
deposits at the clearing brokers of $2,385,164 mainly from the proceeds of a
note of $2,000,000 from one of the clearing brokers, the net loss, net of
non-cash adjustments, of $2,080,579 and the increase in the amounts due from the
clearing brokers of $1,235,766. These amounts were partially offset
by the increase in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities of
$1,711,643.
Cash used
in investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $2,910,216.
The Company invested $2,102,543 in a bank certificate of deposit, and invested
$662,068 in notes receivable from registered sales representatives primarily to
expand its Boca Raton and Ft. Lauderdale offices. The Company also used $145,605
and $288,674 to purchase furniture and equipment during the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Cash
provided from financing activities for the six months ending June 30, 2009 was
$6,524,999. The Company raised $2,190,000 and $4,600,000 from the sale of common
stock subscriptions and new loans, respectively, and made payments of $340,031
against notes payable. An additional $75,000 was raised by increasing
the loan from the clearing firm.
Our plan
for future operations has several different aspects. We have cut our
overhead costs by combining tasks which helped eliminate positions, restructured
various contracts with vendors to lower general and administrative expenses and
reworked payout percentages to improve profit margin in our retail
unit. In addition, to lower costs we have taken several steps to
increase revenues as outlined below:
|
·
|
Increase
our trading revenues by adding additional stocks in which we make a
market;
|
|
·
|
Expand
our trading capabilities by establishing fixed income trading desks that
serve both institutional and retail
clients;
|
|
·
|
Expand
our institutional trading activities by continuing to add quality trading
personnel with existing institutional
clients;
|
|
·
|
Continue
to recruit quality registered
representatives;
|
|
·
|
Expand
our offering of proprietary financial products to our retail and
institutional customers;
|
|
·
|
Continue
to look for and close acquisitions of similar
businesses.
|
If our
plans change, or our assumptions change or prove to be inaccurate, or if our
available cash otherwise proves to be insufficient to implement our business
plans, we may require additional financing through subsequent equity or debt
financings. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we have raised a total of
$6,865,000 from equity and debt financings. The Company cannot
predict whether additional funds will be available in adequate amounts or on
acceptable terms. If funds are needed but not available, the Company's business
would be jeopardized.
Given the
uncertain economic environment and the pressure that the financial sector has
been under, the Company plans to raise additional equity capital in 2009 for
working capital. By doing so, the Company believes that it will protect itself
against any future negative consequences that may arise if the economy continues
to decline. The Company also has an acquisition plan which contemplates raising
debt and equity capital to finance the acquisitions.
The
Company has implemented many operating changes which are expected to benefit
operations in the future. The more notable of these changes have been to
eliminate our proprietary trading and begin consolidating operations of our
broker dealers.
The
Company anticipates raising additional capital in 2009 to finance the operations
of the Company and provide sufficient liquidity through at least December 31,
2009.
MARKET
RISK
Market
risk generally represents the risk of loss that may result from the potential
change in the value of a financial instrument as a result of fluctuations in
interest and currency exchange rates, equity and commodity prices, changes in
the implied volatility of interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equity and
commodity prices and also changes in the credit ratings of either the issuer or
its related country of origin. Market risk is inherent to both derivative and
non-derivative financial instruments, and accordingly, the scope of our market
risk management procedures extends beyond derivatives to include all market risk
sensitive financial instruments.
We have
sold securities which we do not currently own and therefore will be obligated to
purchase the securities at a future date. We have recorded these obligations in
our financial statements at June 30, 2009 at the market values of the securities
and will incur a loss if the market value increases subsequent to June 30, 2009.
The occurrence of these off-balance sheet losses could impair our liquidity and
force us to reduce or curtail operations.
We are
engaged in various trading and brokerage activities in which counterparties
primarily include broker-dealers, banks and other financial institutions. In the
event counterparties do no fulfill their obligations, we may be exposed to risk.
The risk of default depends on the creditworthiness of the counterparty or
issuer of the instrument. It is our policy to review, as necessary, the credit
standing of each counterparty. We have performed a Company wide analysis of our
financial instruments and assessed the related risk. Based on this analysis, we
believe the market risk associated with our financial instruments at June 30,
2009 will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial
position or results of operations.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Our
discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are
based on our consolidated financial statements which have been prepared in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. Because we operate in the financial services industry, we follow
certain accounting guidance used by the brokerage industry. Our consolidated
balance sheet is not separated into current and non-current assets and
liabilities. Certain financial assets, such as trading securities are carried at
fair market value on our consolidated statements of financial condition while
other assets are carried at historic values.
We
account for income taxes on an asset and liability approach to financial
accounting and reporting. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are
computed annually for differences between the financial and tax basis of assets
and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future,
based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the
differences are expected to affect taxable income. A valuation allowance is
recognized if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than
not that some portion or all of the deferred asset will not be realized. Income
tax expense is the tax payable or refundable for the period, plus or minus the
change during the period in deferred tax assets and liabilities.
ACCOUNTING
FOR CONTINGENCIES
We accrue
for contingencies in accordance with Statement of Accounting Standards ("SFAS")
No. 5, "Accounting for Contingencies," when it is probable that a liability or
loss has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. Contingencies
by their nature relate to uncertainties that require our exercise of judgment
both in assessing whether or not a liability or loss has been incurred and
estimating the amount of probable loss.
USE OF
ESTIMATES
Note 2 to
our consolidated financial statements contains a summary of our significant
accounting policies, many of which require the use of estimates and assumptions
that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements for
the periods presented. We believe that certain of our significant accounting
policies are based on estimates and assumptions that require complex, subjective
judgments which can materially impact reported results.
GOODWILL
AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Under
SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, the fair value of an asset (or
liability) is the amount at which that asset (or liability) could be bought (or
incurred) or sold (or settled) in a current transaction between willing parties,
that is, other than in a forced or liquidation sale. Thus, the fair value of a
reporting unit refers to the amount at which the unit as a whole could be bought
or sold in a current transaction between willing parties. Quoted market prices
in active markets are the best evidence of fair value and shall be used as the
basis for the measurement, if available. However, the market price of an
individual equity security (and thus the market capitalization of a reporting
unit with publicly traded equity securities) may not be representative of the
fair value of the reporting unit as a whole. The quoted market price of an
individual equity security, therefore, need not be the sole measurement basis of
the fair value of a reporting unit. Substantial value may arise from the ability
to take advantage of synergies and other benefits that flow from control over
another entity. Consequently, measuring the fair value of a collection of assets
and liabilities that operate together in a controlled entity is different from
measuring the fair value of that entity's individual equity securities. An
acquiring entity often is willing to pay more for equity securities that give it
a controlling interest than an investor who would pay for a number of equity
securities representing less than a controlling interest. That control premium
may cause the fair value of a reporting unit to exceed its market
capitalization.
Application
of the goodwill impairment test requires judgment, including the identification
of reporting units, assignment of assets and liabilities to reporting units,
assignment of goodwill to reporting units, and determination of the fair value
of each reporting unit. The fair value of each reporting unit is estimated using
a discounted cash flow methodology. This requires significant judgments
including estimation of future cash flows, which is dependent on internal
forecasts, estimation of the long-term rate of growth of the Company's business,
the useful life over which cash flows will occur, and determination of the
Company's weighted average cost of capital. Changes in these estimates and
assumptions could materially affect the determination of fair value and
potential goodwill impairment for each reporting unit.
If the
Company subsequently determines its goodwill and other intangible assets have
been impaired, the Company may have to write off a portion or all of such
goodwill and other intangible assets. If all goodwill and other intangible
assets were written off, the Company would record a non cash loss approximating
$17.4 million to operations and stockholders' equity.
MARKET-MAKING
ACTIVITIES
Securities
owned and securities sold, but not yet purchased, which primarily consist of
listed, over-the-counter, American Depository Receipts, foreign ordinary stocks,
and domestic fixed income securities are carried at market value and are
recorded on a trade date basis. Market value is estimated daily using market
quotations available from major securities exchanges and dealers.
RECENTLY
ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS NOT YET EFFECTIVE
There are
no recently issued accounting pronouncements which are not yet effective which
would have a material effect on our financial condition or results of
operations.
ITEM
3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK
As a
smaller reporting company, we are not required to provide the information
required by this item.
ITEM 4T.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The
Company’s management, including the principal executive officer and principal
financial officer, have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation
of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in exchange act
rules 13a-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this
report. Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s principal executive
officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the disclosure
controls and procedures as of June 30, 2009 are effective to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in the reports the Company files or submits
under the exchange act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such
information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management,
including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, to
allow timely decisions regarding disclosure.
(b) Changes in Internal Control over
Financial Reporting
There
were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting which occurred
during the most recent fiscal quarter covered by this report that have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal
controls over financial reporting.
PART II -
OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM
1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
See
Footnote 14 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements.
ITEM 1A.
RISK FACTORS
There are
no material changes from the risk factors set forth in Item 1 - "Description of
Business - Risk Factors", of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008. Please refer to that section for disclosures regarding the
risks and uncertainties related to our business.
ITEM
2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF
PROCEEDS
During
the six months ended June 30, 2009 JLI received stock subscriptions totaling
$2,190,000 for a stock offering to be offered during the third quarter of
2009.
The above
sales were made for investment by accredited investors and will be issued
without registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, pursuant to
the exemptions provided under sections 4(6) and 4(2) thereof, and pursuant to
the exemption provided by Regulation D. All the securities are restricted
securities and will bear a restrictive legend and be subject to stop transfer
restrictions.
ITEM
3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM
4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
The
Company held its combined 2008 & 2009 annual meeting of stockholders on June
23, 2009. The matters voted on and approved by the stockholders were as
follows:
|
(a)
|
Election
of Directors. Presented below are the votes cast for
each
Director
nominee.
|
Name
|
|
For
|
|
|
Withheld
|
|
Donald
A. Wojnowski Jr.
|
|
|
17,649,200
|
|
|
|
362,818
|
|
Steven
M. Rabinovici
|
|
|
17,713,199
|
|
|
|
298,819
|
|
Alan
Weichselbaum
|
|
|
17,710,201
|
|
|
|
301,817
|
|
Benjamin
J. Douek
|
|
|
17,726,710
|
|
|
|
285,308
|
|
John
C. Rudy
|
|
|
17,726,710
|
|
|
|
285,308
|
|
Mark
A. Wilton
|
|
|
17,698,927
|
|
|
|
313,091
|
|
|
(b)
|
Votes
cast with respect to the approval of an amendment and restatement of the
Company’s 2007 Incentive Compensation Plan to increase the maximum number
of shares to be eligible for grant under the Plan by 6,000,000, up to an
aggregate of 10,000,000 shares:
|
For
|
|
Against
|
|
Abstain
|
|
Brokers Non-Vote
|
12,157,053
|
|
91,500
|
|
1,140,063
|
|
4,623,322
|
|
(c)
|
Votes
cast with respect to the approval of the proposed issuance of up to
20,000,000
shares of our Common Stock in exchange for and payment of an
aggregate amount of
up to $10,000,000 of our outstanding debt:
|
For
|
|
Against
|
|
Abstain
|
|
Brokers Non-Vote
|
13,281,628
|
|
85,868
|
|
21,200
|
|
4,623,322
|
|
(d)
|
Votes
cast with respect to the approval of the proposed issuance of shares ofour
Common Stock in payment of $116,164 of liquidated
damages:
|
For
|
|
Against
|
|
Abstain
|
|
Brokers Non-Vote
|
13,288,570
|
|
77,926
|
|
22,200
|
|
4,623,322
|
|
(e)
|
Votes
cast with respect to the approval of a stock purchase plan to enable
us
to
sell and issue up to $10,000,000 of shares of our Common Stock to
our
directors,
officers, employees or
consultants:
|
For
|
|
Against
|
|
Abstain
|
|
Brokers Non-Vote
|
13,287,516
|
|
100,380
|
|
800
|
|
4,623,322
|
|
(f)
|
Votes
cast with respect to the approval of a compensation plan to enable us
to
issue
shares of our Common Stock to our employees or independent
consultants
as
a portion of their
compensation:
|
For
|
|
Against
|
|
Abstain
|
|
Brokers Non-Vote
|
13,282,191
|
|
105,805
|
|
700
|
|
4,623,322
|
|
(g)
|
Votes
cast with respect to the approval of an amendment to our Articles
of
Incorporation
to increase our number of authorized shares of Common
Stock
and Preferred Stock by 100,000,000 and 1,000,
respectively
:
|
For
|
|
Against
|
|
Abstain
|
|
Brokers Non-Vote
|
13,275,428
|
|
92,268
|
|
21,000
|
|
4,623,322
|
|
(h)
|
Votes
cast with respect to the ratification of the selection of Rosen
Seymour
Shapss
Martin & Company LLP, successor to Miller Ellin & Company,
LLP,
as
Jesup’s independent auditors for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008
and for the fiscal year ending December 31,
2009:
|
For
|
|
Against
|
|
Abstain
|
17,817,850
|
|
17,740
|
|
176,428
|
ITEM
5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
ITEM
6. EXHIBITS
31.1
|
|
Certification
of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Principal
Executive Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Principal
Financial Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
|
JESUP
& LAMONT, INC.
|
|
(Registrant)
|
|
|
Date:
Aug 12, 2009
|
By:
|
/s/
|
Steven M. Rabinovici
|
|
|
|
Steven
M. Rabinovici
|
|
|
|
Principal
Executive
Officer
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
Aug 12, 2009
|
|
/s/
|
Alan Weichselbaum
|
|
|
|
Alan
Weichselbaum
|
|
|
|
Principal
Financial Officer
|
Jesup & Lamont, Common Stock (AMEX:JLI)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2024 to May 2024
Jesup & Lamont, Common Stock (AMEX:JLI)
Historical Stock Chart
From May 2023 to May 2024