UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 6-K
REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16
UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the month of August
2015
Commission File Number 001-34984
FIRST
MAJESTIC SILVER CORP.
(Translation of registrant's name into English)
925 West Georgia Street,
Suite 1805, Vancouver BC V6C 3L2
(Address of principal executive offices)
Indicate by check mark whether
the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.
Indicate by check mark if the
registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): ☐
Indicate by check mark if the
registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): ☐
SUBMITTED HEREWITH
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
FIRST MAJESTIC SILVER CORP. |
|
|
|
By: |
|
|
|
/s/ Connie Lillico |
|
Connie Lillico |
|
Corporate Secretary |
|
|
|
August 11, 2015 |
|
Exhibit 99.1
CONDENSED
INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE THREE
AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2015 AND 2014
(UNAUDITED)
925 West Georgia
Street, Suite 1805, Vancouver, B.C. Canada V6C 3L2
Phone: 604.688.3033
| Fax: 604.639.8873 | Toll Free: 1.866.529.2807 | Email: info@firstmajestic.com
www.firstmajestic.com
MANAGEMENT’S
RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL REPORTING
The condensed
interim consolidated financial statements of First Majestic Silver Corp. (the “Company”) are the responsibility of
the Company’s management. The condensed interim consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with International
Accounting Standard 34, “Interim Financial Reporting”, as issued by the International Accounting Standards
Board and reflect management’s best estimates and judgment based on information currently available.
Management
has developed and maintains a system of internal controls to ensure that the Company’s assets are safeguarded, transactions
are authorized and properly recorded, and financial information is reliable.
The Board of
Directors is responsible for ensuring management fulfills its responsibilities. The Audit Committee reviews the results of the
condensed interim consolidated financial statements prior to their submission to the Board of Directors for approval.
The condensed
interim consolidated financial statements have not been audited.
|
|
Keith Neumeyer |
Raymond Polman, CA |
President & CEO |
Chief Financial Officer |
August 10, 2015 |
August 10, 2015 |
CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF (LOSS) EARNINGS
FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, 2015 and 2014
Condensed
Interim Consolidated Financial Statements - Unaudited |
(In
thousands of US dollars, except share and per share amounts) |
The
Condensed Interim Consolidated Statements of (Loss) Earnings provide a summary of the Company’s financial performance and
net earnings or loss over the reporting periods.
| |
| |
Three Months Ended June 30, | | |
Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| |
Note | |
2015 | | |
2014 | | |
2015 | | |
2014 | |
| |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Revenues | |
5 | |
$ | 54,190 | | |
$ | 66,927 | | |
$ | 108,759 | | |
$ | 132,223 | |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Cost of sales (excludes depletion, depreciation and amortization) | |
6 | |
| 33,314 | | |
| 42,727 | | |
| 65,650 | | |
| 77,997 | |
Gross margin | |
| |
| 20,876 | | |
| 24,200 | | |
| 43,109 | | |
| 54,226 | |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Depletion, depreciation and amortization | |
| |
| 17,435 | | |
| 14,699 | | |
| 34,672 | | |
| 28,104 | |
Mine operating
earnings | |
| |
| 3,441 | | |
| 9,501 | | |
| 8,437 | | |
| 26,122 | |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
General and administrative expenses | |
7 | |
| 4,229 | | |
| 4,938 | | |
| 8,568 | | |
| 9,913 | |
Share-based payments | |
| |
| 1,544 | | |
| 2,678 | | |
| 3,153 | | |
| 5,326 | |
Accretion of decommissioning liabilities | |
| |
| 192 | | |
| 205 | | |
| 389 | | |
| 407 | |
Foreign exchange (gain) loss | |
| |
| (662 | ) | |
| 640 | | |
| (2,174 | ) | |
| 694 | |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Operating
(loss) earnings | |
| |
| (1,862 | ) | |
| 1,040 | | |
| (1,499 | ) | |
| 9,782 | |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Investment and other (loss) income | |
8 | |
| (1,345 | ) | |
| 10,625 | | |
| 447 | | |
| 13,522 | |
Finance costs | |
9 | |
| (1,242 | ) | |
| (1,990 | ) | |
| (2,665 | ) | |
| (3,233 | ) |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
(Loss)
earnings before income taxes | |
| |
| (4,449 | ) | |
| 9,675 | | |
| (3,717 | ) | |
| 20,071 | |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Income taxes | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Current income tax expense | |
| |
| 1,269 | | |
| 2,398 | | |
| 1,412 | | |
| 6,369 | |
Deferred income tax (recovery) expense | |
| |
| (3,140 | ) | |
| (313 | ) | |
| (1,446 | ) | |
| 132 | |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| |
| (1,871 | ) | |
| 2,085 | | |
| (34 | ) | |
| 6,501 | |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Net
(loss) earnings for the period | |
| |
$ | (2,578 | ) | |
$ | 7,590 | | |
$ | (3,683 | ) | |
$ | 13,570 | |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
(Loss) earnings per common
share | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Basic | |
10 | |
$ | (0.02 | ) | |
$ | 0.06 | | |
$ | (0.03 | ) | |
$ | 0.12 | |
Diluted | |
10 | |
$ | (0.02 | ) | |
$ | 0.06 | | |
$ | (0.03 | ) | |
$ | 0.12 | |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Weighted average shares outstanding | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Basic | |
10 | |
| 121,097,717 | | |
| 117,490,053 | | |
| 119,355,855 | | |
| 117,359,468 | |
Diluted | |
10 | |
| 121,097,717 | | |
| 117,622,304 | | |
| 119,355,855 | | |
| 117,545,365 | |
Approved by the Board of Directors
|
|
|
|
Keith
Neumeyer, Director |
|
Douglas
Penrose, Director |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed interim consolidated financial statements. | |
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter Report | Page 1 |
CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME
FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, 2015 and 2014
Condensed
Interim Consolidated Financial Statements - Unaudited |
(In
thousands of US dollars) |
The
Condensed Interim Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income provide a summary of total comprehensive earnings or
loss and summarizes items recorded in other comprehensive income that may or may not be subsequently reclassified to profit or
loss depending on future events.
| |
Three Months Ended June 30, | | |
Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| |
2015 | | |
2014 | | |
2015 | | |
2014 | |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Net
(loss) earnings for the period | |
$ | (2,578 | ) | |
$ | 7,590 | | |
$ | (3,683 | ) | |
$ | 13,570 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Other comprehensive income | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Items that may be subsequently reclassified to profit or loss: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Unrealized loss on fair value of available for sale investments | |
| - | | |
| (330 | ) | |
| - | | |
| (312 | ) |
Reclassification of impairment on available for sale investments | |
| - | | |
| 275 | | |
| - | | |
| 275 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Other comprehensive loss | |
| - | | |
| (55 | ) | |
| - | | |
| (37 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Total
comprehensive (loss) income for the period | |
$ | (2,578 | ) | |
$ | 7,535 | | |
$ | (3,683 | ) | |
$ | 13,533 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed interim consolidated financial statements. | |
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter Report | Page 2 |
CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, 2015 and 2014
Condensed
Interim Consolidated Financial Statements - Unaudited |
(In
thousands of US dollars) |
The
Condensed Interim Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows provide a summary of movements in cash and cash equivalents during the
reporting periods by classifying them as operating, investing or financing activities.
| |
| |
Three Months Ended June 30, | | |
Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| |
Note
| |
2015 | | |
2014 | | |
2015 | | |
2014 | |
| |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Operating Activities | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Net (loss) earnings for the period | |
| |
$ | (2,578 | ) | |
$ | 7,590 | | |
$ | (3,683 | ) | |
$ | 13,570 | |
Adjustments for: | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Depletion, depreciation and amortization | |
| |
| 17,623 | | |
| 14,875 | | |
| 35,042 | | |
| 28,449 | |
Share-based payments | |
| |
| 1,544 | | |
| 2,678 | | |
| 3,153 | | |
| 5,326 | |
Income tax (recovery) expense | |
| |
| (1,871 | ) | |
| 2,085 | | |
| (34 | ) | |
| 6,501 | |
Finance costs | |
9 | |
| 1,242 | | |
| 1,990 | | |
| 2,665 | | |
| 3,233 | |
Other | |
22 | |
| 488 | | |
| (10,238 | ) | |
| (3,381 | ) | |
| (12,746 | ) |
Operating
cash flows before movements in working capital and taxes | |
| |
| 16,448 | | |
| 18,980 | | |
| 33,762 | | |
| 44,333 | |
Net change in non-cash working capital items | |
22 | |
| 6,551 | | |
| 16,083 | | |
| (1,782 | ) | |
| 12,251 | |
Income taxes paid | |
| |
| (1,749 | ) | |
| (7,558 | ) | |
| (4,380 | ) | |
| (9,784 | ) |
Cash
generated by operating activities | |
| |
| 21,250 | | |
| 27,505 | | |
| 27,600 | | |
| 46,800 | |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Investing Activities | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Expenditures on mining interests | |
| |
| (11,902 | ) | |
| (15,631 | ) | |
| (23,268 | ) | |
| (36,968 | ) |
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment | |
| |
| (6,957 | ) | |
| (10,947 | ) | |
| (7,743 | ) | |
| (15,277 | ) |
Deposits applied (paid) for the acquisition of non-current assets | |
| |
| 613 | | |
| (1,758 | ) | |
| (646 | ) | |
| (1,837 | ) |
Proceeds from settlement of derivatives | |
| |
| 396 | | |
| - | | |
| 396 | | |
| 942 | |
Cash
used in investing activities | |
| |
| (17,850 | ) | |
| (28,336 | ) | |
| (31,261 | ) | |
| (53,140 | ) |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Financing Activities | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Proceeds from private placement, net of share issue costs | |
20(a) | |
| 22,968 | | |
| - | | |
| 22,968 | | |
| - | |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options | |
| |
| - | | |
| 375 | | |
| - | | |
| 938 | |
Proceeds from prepayment facility | |
18 | |
| - | | |
| 30,000 | | |
| - | | |
| 30,000 | |
Repayment of prepayment facilities | |
| |
| (6,264 | ) | |
| (2,063 | ) | |
| (11,953 | ) | |
| (4,938 | ) |
Proceeds from sale-and-leasebacks | |
| |
| - | | |
| 3,705 | | |
| - | | |
| 3,705 | |
Repayment of lease obligations | |
| |
| (3,184 | ) | |
| (4,101 | ) | |
| (6,725 | ) | |
| (8,369 | ) |
Finance costs paid | |
| |
| (988 | ) | |
| (1,929 | ) | |
| (2,120 | ) | |
| (2,664 | ) |
Shares repurchased and cancelled | |
20(c) | |
| - | | |
| (369 | ) | |
| - | | |
| (369 | ) |
Cash
provided by financing activities | |
| |
| 12,532 | | |
| 25,618 | | |
| 2,170 | | |
| 18,303 | |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Effect of exchange rate on cash and cash equivalents held in foreign currencies | |
| |
| (574 | ) | |
| 359 | | |
| (1,112 | ) | |
| (34 | ) |
Increase
(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | |
| |
| 15,932 | | |
| 24,787 | | |
| (1,491 | ) | |
| 11,963 | |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | |
| |
| 22,384 | | |
| 41,548 | | |
| 40,345 | | |
| 54,765 | |
Cash
and cash equivalents, end of period | |
| |
$ | 37,742 | | |
$ | 66,694 | | |
$ | 37,742 | | |
$ | 66,694 | |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Cash | |
| |
$ | 20,855 | | |
$ | 64,511 | | |
$ | 20,855 | | |
$ | 64,511 | |
Short-term investments | |
| |
| 16,887 | | |
| 2,183 | | |
| 16,887 | | |
| 2,183 | |
Cash
and cash equivalents, end of period | |
| |
$ | 37,742 | | |
$ | 66,694 | | |
$ | 37,742 | | |
$ | 66,694 | |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Supplemental cash flow information | |
22 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed interim consolidated financial statements. | |
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter Report | Page 3 |
CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION
AS AT JUNE 30, 2015 AND DECEMBER
31, 2014
Condensed
Interim Consolidated Financial Statements - Unaudited |
(In
thousands of US dollars) |
The
Condensed Interim Consolidated Statements of Financial Position provides a summary of assets, liabilities and equity, as well
as their current versus non-current nature, as at the reporting date.
| |
Note | |
June 30, 2015 | | |
December 31, 2014 | |
Assets | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Current assets | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Cash and cash equivalents | |
| |
$ | 37,742 | | |
$ | 40,345 | |
Trade and other receivables | |
11 | |
| 14,178 | | |
| 13,561 | |
Inventories | |
12 | |
| 16,144 | | |
| 17,649 | |
Other financial assets | |
13 | |
| 2,468 | | |
| 2,460 | |
Prepaid expenses and other | |
| |
| 1,798 | | |
| 1,337 | |
Total current
assets | |
| |
| 72,330 | | |
| 75,352 | |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Non-current assets | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Mining interests | |
14 | |
| 428,704 | | |
| 422,663 | |
Property, plant and equipment | |
15 | |
| 258,728 | | |
| 267,038 | |
Deposits on non-current assets | |
| |
| 3,474 | | |
| 2,917 | |
Other investments | |
16 | |
| 3,003 | | |
| 3,372 | |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Total
assets | |
| |
$ | 766,239 | | |
$ | 771,342 | |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Liabilities and Equity | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Current liabilities | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Trade and other payables | |
17 | |
$ | 34,681 | | |
$ | 40,360 | |
Current portion of prepayment facilities | |
18 | |
| 25,710 | | |
| 26,329 | |
Current portion of lease obligations | |
19 | |
| 10,190 | | |
| 11,428 | |
Income taxes payable | |
| |
| 2,674 | | |
| 105 | |
Total current
liabilities | |
| |
| 73,255 | | |
| 78,222 | |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Non-current liabilities | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Prepayment facilities | |
18 | |
| 17,546 | | |
| 29,647 | |
Lease obligations | |
19 | |
| 11,558 | | |
| 15,455 | |
Decommissioning liabilities | |
| |
| 15,051 | | |
| 15,484 | |
Other liabilities | |
| |
| 1,933 | | |
| 1,740 | |
Deferred tax liabilities | |
| |
| 103,925 | | |
| 110,261 | |
Total
liabilities | |
| |
| 223,268 | | |
| 250,809 | |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Equity | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Share capital | |
| |
| 453,556 | | |
| 430,588 | |
Equity reserves | |
| |
| 56,493 | | |
| 53,340 | |
Retained earnings | |
| |
| 32,922 | | |
| 36,605 | |
Total
equity | |
| |
| 542,971 | | |
| 520,533 | |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Total
liabilities and equity | |
| |
$ | 766,239 | | |
$ | 771,342 | |
Commitments (Note 14, Note 21(c);
Contingencies (Note 23); Subsequent events (Note 24))
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed interim consolidated financial statements. | |
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter Report | Page 4 |
CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE
30, 2015 and 2014
Condensed
Interim Consolidated Financial Statements - Unaudited |
(In
thousands of US dollars, except share and per share amounts) |
The
Condensed Interim Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity summarizes movements in equity, including common shares, share
capital, equity reserves and retained earnings.
| |
Share Capital | | |
Equity Reserves | | |
| | |
| |
| |
Shares | | |
Amount | | |
Share-based
payments(a) | | |
Available for
sale revaluation(b) | | |
Foreign
currency
translation | | |
Total equity
reserves | | |
Retained
earnings | | |
Total equity | |
Balance at December
31, 2013 | |
| 117,024,840 | | |
$ | 425,707 | | |
$ | 47,069 | | |
$ | (218 | ) | |
$ | (308 | ) | |
$ | 46,543 | | |
$ | 98,495 | | |
$ | 570,745 | |
Net earnings | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 13,570 | | |
| 13,570 | |
Other comprehensive
loss | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (37 | ) | |
| - | | |
| (37 | ) | |
| - | | |
| (37 | ) |
Total comprehensive
income | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (37 | ) | |
| - | | |
| (37 | ) | |
| 13,570 | | |
| 13,533 | |
Share-based payments | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 5,326 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 5,326 | | |
| - | | |
| 5,326 | |
Shares issued for: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Exercise of options | |
| 220,000 | | |
| 938 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 938 | |
Acquisition of mining interests
(Note 14(c)) | |
| 293,784 | | |
| 2,820 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 2,820 | |
Shares repurchased and cancelled (Note 20(c)) | |
| (40,000 | ) | |
| (146 | ) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (223 | ) | |
| (369 | ) |
Transfer of equity
reserve upon exercise of options | |
| - | | |
| 469 | | |
| (469 | ) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (469 | ) | |
| - | | |
| - | |
Balance
at June 30, 2014 | |
| 117,498,624 | | |
$ | 429,788 | | |
$ | 51,926 | | |
$ | (255 | ) | |
$ | (308 | ) | |
$ | 51,363 | | |
$ | 111,842 | | |
$ | 592,993 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Balance at December 31, 2014 | |
| 117,594,640 | | |
$ | 430,588 | | |
$ | 53,648 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | (308 | ) | |
$ | 53,340 | | |
$ | 36,605 | | |
$ | 520,533 | |
Net loss
and total comprehensive loss | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (3,683 | ) | |
| (3,683 | ) |
Share-based payments | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 3,153 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 3,153 | | |
| - | | |
| 3,153 | |
Shares issued for
private placement (Note 20(a)) | |
| 4,620,000 | | |
| 22,968 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 22,968 | |
Balance
at June 30, 2015 | |
| 122,214,640 | | |
$ | 453,556 | | |
$ | 56,801 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | (308 | ) | |
$ | 56,493 | | |
$ | 32,922 | | |
$ | 542,971 | |
| (a) | Share-based
payments reserve records the cumulative amount recognized under IFRS 2 in respect of
options granted and shares purchase warrants issued but not exercised to acquire shares
of the Company. |
| (b) | The
available for sale revaluation reserve principally records the fair value gains or losses
related to available-for-sale financial instruments, net of amount reclassed as impairment. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed interim consolidated financial statements. | |
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter Report | Page 5 |
NOTES TO CONDENSED INTERIM
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Condensed
Interim Consolidated Financial Statements - Unaudited |
(Tabular
amounts are expressed in thousands of US dollars) |
First Majestic
Silver Corp. (the “Company” or “First Majestic”) is in the business of silver production, development,
exploration, and acquisition of mineral properties with a focus on silver production in Mexico. The Company presently owns and
operates five producing silver mines: the La Encantada Silver Mine, La Parrilla Silver Mine, Del Toro Silver Mine, San Martin
Silver Mine and the La Guitarra Silver Mine.
First Majestic
is incorporated in Canada with limited liability under the legislation of the Province of British Columbia and is publicly listed
on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “AG”, on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol “FR”,
on the Mexican Stock Exchange under the symbol “AG” and on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange under the symbol “FMV”.
The Company’s head office and principal address is located at 925 West Georgia Street, Suite 1805, Vancouver, British Columbia,
Canada, V6C 3L2.
These
condensed interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Accounting Standard (“IAS”)
34, “Interim Financial Reporting”, and International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International
Accounting Standards Board (“IFRS”).
These
condensed interim consolidated financial statements were prepared using accounting policies consistent with those in the audited
consolidated financial statements as at and for the year ended December 31, 2014. These condensed interim consolidated financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements as at and for the
year ended December 31, 2014, as some disclosures from the annual consolidated financial statements have been condensed or
omitted.
These
condensed interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared on an historical cost basis except for certain items that
are measured at fair value including derivative financial instruments (Note 21(a)), marketable securities (Note 13) and the prepayment
facilities (Note 18). All dollar amounts presented are in United States dollars unless otherwise specified.
These
condensed interim consolidated financial statements incorporate the financial statements of the Company and its controlled subsidiaries.
Control exists when the Company has the power, directly or indirectly, to govern the financial and operating policies of an entity
so as to obtain benefits from its activities. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its
wholly-owned subsidiaries. Intercompany balances, transactions, income and expenses are eliminated on consolidation.
| 3. | ACCOUNTING POLICIES, JUDGMENTS
AND ESTIMATES |
These
condensed interim consolidated financial statements were prepared using accounting policies consistent with those in the audited
consolidated financial statements as at and for the year ended December 31, 2014.
Significant
Accounting Estimates and Judgments
The
preparation of condensed interim consolidated financial statements in conformity with IAS 34 requires management to make judgments,
estimates and assumptions about future events that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Although these estimates are based on
management’s best knowledge of the amounts, events or actions, actual results may differ from these estimates.
In
preparing the Company’s unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2015, the Company applied the critical judgements and estimates disclosed in note 3 of its audited consolidated financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2014.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed interim consolidated financial statements. | |
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter Report | Page 6 |
NOTES TO CONDENSED INTERIM
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Consolidated
Interim Consolidated Financial Statements - Unaudited |
(Tabular
amounts are expressed in thousands of US dollars) |
| 3. | ACCOUNTING POLICIES, JUDGMENTS
AND ESTIMATES (continued) |
Future
Changes in Accounting Policies Not Yet Effective as at June 30, 2015
Revenue
Recognition
In May 2014,
the IASB issued IFRS 15 – Revenue from Contracts with Customers ("IFRS 15") which supersedes IAS 11 –
Construction Contracts, IAS 18 – Revenue, IFRIC 13 – Customer Loyalty Programmes, IFRIC 15 –
Agreements for the Construction of Real Estate, IFRIC 18 – Transfers of Assets from Customers, and SIC 31
– Revenue – Barter Transactions Involving Advertising Services. IFRS 15 establishes a single five-step
model framework for determining the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from a contract with
a customer. The standard is currently mandatory for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018, with early adoption
permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this standard on its consolidated financial statements.
Financial
instruments
In July 2014,
the IASB issued the final version of IFRS 9 – Financial Instruments ("IFRS 9") to replace IAS 39 –
Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement. IFRS 9 provides a revised model for recognition and measurement of
financial instruments and a single, forward-looking “expected loss” impairment model. IFRS 9 also includes a substantially
reformed approach to hedge accounting. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018, with
early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this standard on its consolidated
financial statements.
The Company
has seven reporting segments, including five operating segments located in Mexico, one retail market segment in Canada and one
silver trading segment in Europe. Others consists primarily of the Company’s other development and exploration properties
(Note 14) not considered segments, other investments (Note 16), prepayment facilities (Note 18), corporate and intercompany eliminations.
All of the
Company’s operations are within the mining industry and its major products are silver doré, silver-lead and silver-zinc
concentrates. Transfer prices between reporting segments are set on an arms-length basis in a manner similar to transactions with
third parties. Coins and bullion cost of sales are based on transfer prices.
A reporting
segment is defined as a component of the Company that:
| · | engages
in business activities from which it may earn revenues and incur expenses; |
| · | whose
operating results are reviewed regularly by the entity’s chief operating decision
maker; and |
| · | for
which discrete financial information is available. |
Management
evaluates segment performance based on mine operating earnings as other expenses are not allocated to the segments.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed interim consolidated financial statements. | |
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter Report | Page 7 |
NOTES TO CONDENSED INTERIM
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Consolidated
Interim Consolidated Financial Statements - Unaudited |
(Tabular
amounts are expressed in thousands of US dollars) |
| 4. | SEGMENTED INFORMATION (continued) |
| |
Three Months Ended June 30, 2015 | | |
At June 30, 2015 | |
| |
Revenue | | |
Cost of sales(1) | | |
Depletion, depreciation and amortization | | |
Mine operating earnings (loss) | | |
Capital expenditures | | |
Total assets | | |
Total liabilities | |
Mexico | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
La Encantada | |
$ | 9,871 | | |
$ | 8,686 | | |
$ | 5,997 | | |
$ | (4,812 | ) | |
$ | 4,208 | | |
$ | 138,986 | | |
$ | 44,122 | |
La Parrilla | |
| 12,502 | | |
| 8,877 | | |
| 4,244 | | |
| (619 | ) | |
| 4,026 | | |
| 196,237 | | |
| 32,820 | |
Del Toro | |
| 14,251 | | |
| 7,623 | | |
| 3,406 | | |
| 3,222 | | |
| 3,825 | | |
| 191,895 | | |
| 28,917 | |
San Martin | |
| 12,413 | | |
| 5,794 | | |
| 1,980 | | |
| 4,639 | | |
| 2,751 | | |
| 88,041 | | |
| 26,669 | |
La Guitarra | |
| 4,436 | | |
| 2,361 | | |
| 1,702 | | |
| 373 | | |
| 2,106 | | |
| 80,760 | | |
| 10,565 | |
Canada | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Coins and Bullion Sales | |
| 76 | | |
| 108 | | |
| - | | |
| (32 | ) | |
| - | | |
| 333 | | |
| 1 | |
Europe | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Silver Sales | |
| 25,267 | | |
| 25,258 | | |
| - | | |
| 9 | | |
| - | | |
| 7,479 | | |
| 793 | |
Others | |
| (24,626 | ) | |
| (25,393 | ) | |
| 106 | | |
| 661 | | |
| 449 | | |
| 62,508 | | |
| 79,381 | |
Consolidated | |
$ | 54,190 | | |
$ | 33,314 | | |
$ | 17,435 | | |
$ | 3,441 | | |
$ | 17,365 | | |
$ | 766,239 | | |
$ | 223,268 | |
| |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 | | |
At June 30, 2015 | |
| |
Revenue | | |
Cost of sales(1) | | |
Depletion, depreciation and amortization | | |
Mine operating earnings (loss) | | |
Capital expenditures | | |
Total assets | | |
Total liabilities | |
Mexico | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
La Encantada | |
$ | 19,751 | | |
$ | 16,639 | | |
$ | 11,617 | | |
$ | (8,505 | ) | |
$ | 7,964 | | |
$ | 138,986 | | |
$ | 44,122 | |
La Parrilla | |
| 24,881 | | |
| 17,099 | | |
| 8,770 | | |
| (988 | ) | |
| 8,349 | | |
| 196,237 | | |
| 32,820 | |
Del Toro | |
| 32,320 | | |
| 15,990 | | |
| 6,547 | | |
| 9,783 | | |
| 7,120 | | |
| 191,895 | | |
| 28,917 | |
San Martin | |
| 23,844 | | |
| 10,951 | | |
| 4,169 | | |
| 8,724 | | |
| 4,928 | | |
| 88,041 | | |
| 26,669 | |
La Guitarra | |
| 7,842 | | |
| 4,870 | | |
| 3,360 | | |
| (388 | ) | |
| 3,739 | | |
| 80,760 | | |
| 10,565 | |
Canada | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Coins and Bullion Sales | |
| 167 | | |
| 231 | | |
| - | | |
| (64 | ) | |
| - | | |
| 333 | | |
| 1 | |
Europe | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Silver Sales | |
| 48,540 | | |
| 48,523 | | |
| - | | |
| 17 | | |
| - | | |
| 7,479 | | |
| 793 | |
Others | |
| (48,586 | ) | |
| (48,653 | ) | |
| 209 | | |
| (142 | ) | |
| 1,024 | | |
| 62,508 | | |
| 79,381 | |
Consolidated | |
$ | 108,759 | | |
$ | 65,650 | | |
$ | 34,672 | | |
$ | 8,437 | | |
$ | 33,124 | | |
$ | 766,239 | | |
$ | 223,268 | |
| |
Three Months Ended June 30, 2014 | | |
At December 31, 2014 | |
| |
Revenue | | |
Cost of sales(1) | | |
Depletion, depreciation and amortization | | |
Mine operating earnings (loss) | | |
Capital expenditures | | |
Total assets | | |
Total liabilities | |
Mexico | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
La Encantada | |
$ | 24,458 | | |
$ | 12,786 | | |
$ | 3,447 | | |
$ | 8,225 | | |
$ | 6,805 | | |
$ | 141,145 | | |
$ | 63,730 | |
La Parrilla | |
| 18,404 | | |
| 9,009 | | |
| 4,170 | | |
| 5,225 | | |
| 4,073 | | |
| 198,295 | | |
| 28,172 | |
Del Toro | |
| 14,255 | | |
| 12,623 | | |
| 3,931 | | |
| (2,299 | ) | |
| 6,924 | | |
| 205,863 | | |
| 35,297 | |
San Martin | |
| 11,121 | | |
| 5,749 | | |
| 1,583 | | |
| 3,789 | | |
| 3,203 | | |
| 94,188 | | |
| 31,516 | |
La Guitarra | |
| 3,320 | | |
| 2,302 | | |
| 1,817 | | |
| (799 | ) | |
| 2,467 | | |
| 108,641 | | |
| 31,845 | |
Canada | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Coins and Bullion Sales | |
| 164 | | |
| 197 | | |
| - | | |
| (33 | ) | |
| - | | |
| 259 | | |
| 15 | |
Europe | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Silver Sales | |
| 34,023 | | |
| 38,948 | | |
| - | | |
| (4,925 | ) | |
| - | | |
| 6,283 | | |
| 935 | |
Others | |
| (38,818 | ) | |
| (38,887 | ) | |
| (249 | ) | |
| 318 | | |
| 746 | | |
| 16,668 | | |
| 59,299 | |
Consolidated | |
$ | 66,927 | | |
$ | 42,727 | | |
$ | 14,699 | | |
$ | 9,501 | | |
$ | 24,218 | | |
$ | 771,342 | | |
$ | 250,809 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed interim consolidated financial statements. | |
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter Report | Page 8 |
NOTES TO CONDENSED INTERIM
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Consolidated
Interim Consolidated Financial Statements - Unaudited |
(Tabular
amounts are expressed in thousands of US dollars) |
| 4. | SEGMENTED INFORMATION (continued) |
| |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 | | |
At December 31, 2014 | |
| |
Revenue | | |
Cost of sales(1) | | |
Depletion, depreciation and amortization | | |
Mine operating earnings (loss) | | |
Capital expenditures | | |
Total assets | | |
Total liabilities | |
Mexico | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
La Encantada | |
$ | 46,438 | | |
$ | 22,526 | | |
$ | 6,322 | | |
$ | 17,590 | | |
$ | 12,620 | | |
$ | 141,145 | | |
$ | 63,730 | |
La Parrilla | |
| 38,241 | | |
| 17,332 | | |
| 8,796 | | |
| 12,113 | | |
| 10,099 | | |
| 198,295 | | |
| 28,172 | |
Del Toro | |
| 28,351 | | |
| 22,640 | | |
| 6,397 | | |
| (686 | ) | |
| 14,778 | | |
| 205,863 | | |
| 35,297 | |
San Martin | |
| 17,967 | | |
| 10,329 | | |
| 3,023 | | |
| 4,615 | | |
| 10,330 | | |
| 94,188 | | |
| 31,516 | |
La Guitarra | |
| 7,854 | | |
| 4,779 | | |
| 3,511 | | |
| (436 | ) | |
| 9,737 | | |
| 108,641 | | |
| 31,845 | |
Canada | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Coins and Bullion Sales | |
| 540 | | |
| 600 | | |
| - | | |
| (60 | ) | |
| 1 | | |
| 259 | | |
| 15 | |
Europe | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Silver Sales | |
| 63,719 | | |
| 70,932 | | |
| - | | |
| (7,213 | ) | |
| - | | |
| 6,283 | | |
| 935 | |
Others | |
| (70,887 | ) | |
| (71,141 | ) | |
| 55 | | |
| 199 | | |
| 1,641 | | |
| 16,668 | | |
| 59,299 | |
Consolidated | |
$ | 132,223 | | |
$ | 77,997 | | |
$ | 28,104 | | |
$ | 26,122 | | |
$ | 59,206 | | |
$ | 771,342 | | |
$ | 250,809 | |
| (1) | Cost
of sales excludes depletion, depreciation and amortization |
During the
six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company had four (2014 – seven) major customers that account for 100% of its doré
and concentrate sales revenue. The Company had three customers that accounted for 57%, 18%, and 17% of total revenue in the six
months ended June 30, 2015, and four customers that accounted for 45%, 21%, 17%, and 14% of total revenue in the six months ended
June 30, 2014.
Revenues from
sale of metal, including by-products, are recorded net of smelting and refining costs. Metals in doré sold are priced on
delivery. Final weights and assays are adjusted on final settlement typically one month after delivery. Metals in concentrate
sold are provisionally priced on delivery and settled based on market price at a predetermined future date, typically one to four
months after delivery.
Revenues for
the period are summarized as follows:
| |
Three Months Ended June 30, | | |
Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| |
2015 | | |
2014 | | |
2015 | | |
2014 | |
Gross revenue from payable metals: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Silver | |
$ | 44,544 | | |
$ | 59,471 | | |
$ | 89,469 | | |
$ | 116,867 | |
Gold | |
| 3,812 | | |
| 3,124 | | |
| 7,004 | | |
| 7,382 | |
Lead | |
| 9,415 | | |
| 8,212 | | |
| 19,147 | | |
| 15,546 | |
Zinc | |
| 3,446 | | |
| 2,119 | | |
| 8,408 | | |
| 4,202 | |
Other | |
| - | | |
| 78 | | |
| - | | |
| 106 | |
Gross revenue | |
$ | 61,217 | | |
$ | 73,004 | | |
$ | 124,028 | | |
$ | 144,103 | |
Less: smelting and refining costs | |
| (7,027 | ) | |
| (6,077 | ) | |
| (15,269 | ) | |
| (11,880 | ) |
Revenues | |
$ | 54,190 | | |
$ | 66,927 | | |
$ | 108,759 | | |
$ | 132,223 | |
Silver
as % of gross revenue | |
| 73 | % | |
| 81 | % | |
| 72 | % | |
| 81 | % |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed interim consolidated financial statements. | |
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter Report | Page 9 |
NOTES TO CONDENSED INTERIM
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Consolidated
Interim Consolidated Financial Statements - Unaudited |
(Tabular
amounts are expressed in thousands of US dollars) |
Cost of sales
excludes depletion, depreciation and amortization and are costs that are directly related to production and generation of revenues
at the operating segments. Significant components of cost of sales are comprised of the following:
| |
Three Months Ended June 30, | | |
Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| |
2015 | | |
2014 | | |
2015 | | |
2014 | |
Production costs | |
$ | 31,008 | | |
$ | 34,774 | | |
$ | 60,632 | | |
$ | 68,695 | |
Inventory changes | |
| 333 | | |
| 4,498 | | |
| 1,044 | | |
| 2,775 | |
Cost of goods sold | |
$ | 31,341 | | |
$ | 39,272 | | |
$ | 61,676 | | |
$ | 71,470 | |
Transportation and other selling costs | |
| 1,241 | | |
| 1,614 | | |
| 2,717 | | |
| 3,261 | |
Workers participation costs | |
| 338 | | |
| 1,086 | | |
| 342 | | |
| 1,865 | |
Environmental duties and royalties | |
| 308 | | |
| 417 | | |
| 638 | | |
| 854 | |
Other costs | |
| 86 | | |
| 338 | | |
| 277 | | |
| 547 | |
Cost
of sales | |
$ | 33,314 | | |
$ | 42,727 | | |
$ | 65,650 | | |
$ | 77,997 | |
| 7. | GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
EXPENSES |
General and
administrative expenses are incurred to support the administration of the business that are not directly related to production.
Significant components of general and administrative expenses are comprised of the following:
| |
Three Months Ended June 30, | | |
Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| |
2015 | | |
2014 | | |
2015 | | |
2014 | |
Corporate administration | |
$ | 931 | | |
$ | 1,348 | | |
$ | 1,894 | | |
$ | 2,770 | |
Salaries and benefits | |
| 2,191 | | |
| 2,097 | | |
| 4,293 | | |
| 4,352 | |
Audit, legal and professional fees | |
| 644 | | |
| 1,008 | | |
| 1,420 | | |
| 1,839 | |
Filing and listing fees | |
| 83 | | |
| 121 | | |
| 212 | | |
| 236 | |
Directors fees and expenses | |
| 192 | | |
| 188 | | |
| 379 | | |
| 371 | |
Depreciation | |
| 188 | | |
| 176 | | |
| 370 | | |
| 345 | |
| |
$ | 4,229 | | |
$ | 4,938 | | |
$ | 8,568 | | |
$ | 9,913 | |
| 8. | INVESTMENT AND OTHER (LOSS)
INCOME |
The Company’s investment and
other (loss) income are comprised of the following:
| |
Three Months Ended June 30, | | |
Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| |
2015 | | |
2014 | | |
2015 | | |
2014 | |
(Loss) gain from fair value adjustment of prepayment facilities (Note 18) | |
$ | (245 | ) | |
$ | (3,781 | ) | |
$ | 223 | | |
$ | (2,356 | ) |
(Loss) gain from investment in derivatives (a) | |
| (871 | ) | |
| - | | |
| 396 | | |
| 1,102 | |
(Loss) gain from investment in marketable securities | |
| (120 | ) | |
| 251 | | |
| 8 | | |
| 359 | |
Equity loss on investment in associates (Note 16) | |
| (296 | ) | |
| - | | |
| (369 | ) | |
| - | |
Interest income and other | |
| 187 | | |
| 303 | | |
| 189 | | |
| 428 | |
Gain from First Silver litigation (b) | |
| - | | |
| 14,127 | | |
| - | | |
| 14,127 | |
Write-down of marketable securities | |
| - | | |
| (275 | ) | |
| - | | |
| (275 | ) |
Gain from value-added tax settlement | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 137 | |
| |
$ | (1,345 | ) | |
$ | 10,625 | | |
$ | 447 | | |
$ | 13,522 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed interim consolidated financial statements. | |
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter Report | Page 10 |
NOTES TO CONDENSED INTERIM
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Consolidated
Interim Consolidated Financial Statements - Unaudited |
(Tabular
amounts are expressed in thousands of US dollars) |
| 8. | INVESTMENT AND OTHER (LOSS)
INCOME (continued) |
| (a) | (Loss) Gain from Investment
in Derivatives |
From
time to time, the Company purchases long positions on silver futures or sells call options on silver futures for investment purposes.
During the six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company recorded a gain of $0.4 million (2014 - $1.1 million) in relation to its
investment in silver futures.
During
the three months ended June 30, 2015, the Company has recorded a loss on investment in derivatives after closing all of its silver
forward positions, which had a fair value of $1.3 million as at March 31, 2015.
| (b) | Gain from First Silver Litigation |
In
June 2014, the Company recognized a $14.1 million deferred litigation gain as other income, after the defendant’s appeal
was dismissed by the Court of Appeal. Please see Note 23 for further details related to the First Silver Litigation.
Finance costs
are primarily related to interest and accretion expense on the Company’s prepayment facilities and finance leases. The Company’s
finance costs in the period are summarized as follows:
| |
Three Months Ended June 30, | | |
Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| |
2015 | | |
2014 | | |
2015 | | |
2014 | |
Prepayment facilities | |
$ | 816 | | |
$ | 1,075 | | |
$ | 1,729 | | |
$ | 1,807 | |
Finance leases | |
| 372 | | |
| 824 | | |
| 787 | | |
| 1,261 | |
Silver sales and other | |
| 54 | | |
| 91 | | |
| 149 | | |
| 165 | |
| |
$ | 1,242 | | |
$ | 1,990 | | |
$ | 2,665 | | |
$ | 3,233 | |
Basic net income
per share is the net income available to common shareholders divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding
during the period. Diluted net income per share adjusts basic net income per share for the effects of dilutive potential common
shares.
The calculations
of basic and diluted earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 are based on the following:
| |
Three Months Ended June 30, | | |
Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| |
2015 | | |
2014 | | |
2015 | | |
2014 | |
Net (loss) earnings for the period | |
$ | (2,578 | ) | |
$ | 7,590 | | |
$ | (3,683 | ) | |
$ | 13,570 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Weighted average number of shares on issue - basic | |
| 121,097,717 | | |
| 117,490,053 | | |
| 119,355,855 | | |
| 117,359,468 | |
Adjustment for stock options | |
| - | | |
| 132,251 | | |
| - | | |
| 185,897 | |
Weighted average number of shares on issue - diluted(1) | |
| 121,097,717 | | |
| 117,622,304 | | |
| 119,355,855 | | |
| 117,545,365 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
(Loss) earnings per share - basic | |
$ | (0.02 | ) | |
$ | 0.06 | | |
$ | (0.03 | ) | |
$ | 0.12 | |
(Loss) earnings per share - diluted | |
$ | (0.02 | ) | |
$ | 0.06 | | |
$ | (0.03 | ) | |
$ | 0.12 | |
| (1) | Diluted
weighted average number of shares excludes 8,458,013 (2014 – 6,710,958) options
that were anti-dilutive for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed interim consolidated financial statements. | |
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter Report | Page 11 |
NOTES TO CONDENSED INTERIM
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Consolidated
Interim Consolidated Financial Statements - Unaudited |
(Tabular
amounts are expressed in thousands of US dollars) |
| 11. | TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES |
Trade and other
receivables of the Company are comprised of:
| |
June 30, 2015 | | |
December 31, 2014 | |
Trade receivables | |
$ | 6,881 | | |
$ | 5,399 | |
Value added taxes and other taxes receivable | |
| 5,696 | | |
| 7,263 | |
Other | |
| 1,601 | | |
| 899 | |
| |
$ | 14,178 | | |
$ | 13,561 | |
During the
six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company advanced $0.5 million to First Mining Finance Corp. (“First Mining”),
a related party. As at June 30, 2015, other receivables include a total amount of $1.1 million (2014 - $0.5 million) receivable
from First Mining, which is repayable on demand and bears an interest rate of 9% per annum.
Inventories
consist primarily of materials and supplies and products of the Company’s operations, in varying stages of the production
process, and are presented at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Inventories of the Company are comprised of:
| |
June 30, 2015 | | |
December 31, 2014 | |
Finished product - doré and concentrates | |
$ | 533 | | |
$ | 990 | |
Work-in-process | |
| 725 | | |
| 949 | |
Stockpile | |
| 223 | | |
| 487 | |
Silver coins and bullion | |
| 212 | | |
| 218 | |
Materials and supplies | |
| 14,451 | | |
| 15,005 | |
| |
$ | 16,144 | | |
$ | 17,649 | |
The amount
of inventories recognized as an expense during the period is equivalent to the total of cost of sales plus depletion, depreciation
and amortization for the period. As at June 30, 2015, mineral inventories, which consists of stockpile, work-in-progress and finished
goods, include a $0.5 million (2014 - $2.5 million) write-down which was recognized in cost of sales during the period.
| 13. | OTHER FINANCIAL ASSETS |
Other financial
assets are entirely attributed to the Company’s investment in marketable securities. As at June 30, 2015, the Company held
400,000 units of Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV) with a fair value of $2.5 million (December 31, 2014 - $2.5 million),
which were acquired at a cost of $5.3 million. These trust units are classified as fair value through profit or loss (“FVTPL”)
marketable securities, with changes in fair value recorded through profit or loss. During the three and six months ended June
30, 2015, the Company recognized an unrealized loss of $0.1 million (2014 - gain of $0.3 million) and $nil (2014 - gain of $0.4
million), respectively, related to its FVTPL marketable securities.
Mining interests
primarily consist of acquisition, exploration, development and field support costs directly related to the Company’s operations
and projects. Upon commencement of commercial production, mining interests for producing properties are depleted on a units-of-production
basis over the estimated economic life of the mine. In applying the units of production method, depletion is determined using
quantity of material extracted from the mine in the period as a portion of total quantity of material, based on reserves and resources,
considered to be highly probable to be economically extracted over the life of mine plan. If no published reserves and resources
are available, the Company may rely on internal estimates of economically recoverable mineralized material, prepared on a basis
consistent with that used for determining reserves and resources, for purpose of determining depletion.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed interim consolidated financial statements. | |
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter Report | Page 12 |
NOTES
TO CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
Consolidated Interim Consolidated
Financial Statements - Unaudited |
(Tabular
amounts are expressed in thousands of US dollars) |
| 14. | MINING INTERESTS (continued) |
The Company’s mining interests are comprised of the following:
| |
June 30, 2015 | | |
December 31, 2014 | |
Producing properties | |
$ | 333,139 | | |
$ | 276,399 | |
Exploration properties (non-depletable) | |
| 95,565 | | |
| 146,264 | |
| |
$ | 428,704 | | |
$ | 422,663 | |
Producing properties are allocated as follows:
Producing properties | |
La Encantada | | |
La Parrilla | | |
Del Toro | | |
San Martin | | |
La Guitarra | | |
Total | |
Cost | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
At December 31, 2013 | |
$ | 59,185 | | |
$ | 110,655 | | |
$ | 31,167 | | |
$ | 58,228 | | |
$ | 58,774 | | |
$ | 318,009 | |
Additions | |
| 12,602 | | |
| 13,901 | | |
| 17,659 | | |
| 7,770 | | |
| 7,367 | | |
| 59,299 | |
Change in decommissioning liabilities | |
| 1,292 | | |
| 1,003 | | |
| 398 | | |
| 1,083 | | |
| 118 | | |
| 3,894 | |
Transfer (to) from exploration properties | |
| (588 | ) | |
| - | | |
| 12,689 | | |
| 246 | | |
| - | | |
| 12,347 | |
At December 31, 2014 | |
$ | 72,491 | | |
$ | 125,559 | | |
$ | 61,913 | | |
$ | 67,327 | | |
$ | 66,259 | | |
$ | 393,549 | |
Additions | |
| 3,660 | | |
| 5,278 | | |
| 4,902 | | |
| 2,909 | | |
| 3,055 | | |
| 19,804 | |
Transfer from exploration properties | |
| 4,177 | | |
| 7,656 | | |
| 17,606 | | |
| 7,588 | | |
| 17,397 | | |
| 54,424 | |
At June 30, 2015 | |
$ | 80,328 | | |
$ | 138,493 | | |
$ | 84,421 | | |
$ | 77,824 | | |
$ | 86,711 | | |
$ | 467,777 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Accumulated depletion and impairment | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
At December 31, 2013 | |
$ | (10,285 | ) | |
$ | (15,227 | ) | |
$ | (1,224 | ) | |
$ | (17,704 | ) | |
$ | (5,892 | ) | |
$ | (50,332 | ) |
Depletion and amortization | |
| (4,264 | ) | |
| (9,589 | ) | |
| (5,036 | ) | |
| (2,772 | ) | |
| (4,172 | ) | |
| (25,833 | ) |
Impairment | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (6,142 | ) | |
| (10,211 | ) | |
| (24,632 | ) | |
| (40,985 | ) |
At December 31, 2014 | |
$ | (14,549 | ) | |
$ | (24,816 | ) | |
$ | (12,402 | ) | |
$ | (30,687 | ) | |
$ | (34,696 | ) | |
$ | (117,150 | ) |
Depletion and amortization | |
| (6,208 | ) | |
| (3,809 | ) | |
| (3,304 | ) | |
| (1,465 | ) | |
| (2,702 | ) | |
| (17,488 | ) |
At June 30, 2015 | |
$ | (20,757 | ) | |
$ | (28,625 | ) | |
$ | (15,706 | ) | |
$ | (32,152 | ) | |
$ | (37,398 | ) | |
$ | (134,638 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Carrying values | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
At December 31, 2014 | |
$ | 57,942 | | |
$ | 100,743 | | |
$ | 49,511 | | |
$ | 36,640 | | |
$ | 31,563 | | |
$ | 276,399 | |
At June 30, 2015 | |
$ | 59,571 | | |
$ | 109,868 | | |
$ | 68,715 | | |
$ | 45,672 | | |
$ | 49,313 | | |
$ | 333,139 | |
Exploration properties are allocated as
follows:
Exploration properties | |
La Encantada | | |
La Parrilla | | |
Del Toro | | |
San Martin | | |
La Guitarra | | |
Other | | |
Total | |
Cost | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
At December 31, 2013 | |
$ | 4,793 | | |
$ | 12,325 | | |
$ | 50,146 | | |
$ | 18,660 | | |
$ | 55,559 | | |
$ | 39,280 | | |
$ | 180,763 | |
Additions | |
| 2,964 | | |
| 2,936 | | |
| 2,242 | | |
| 1,002 | | |
| 6,467 | | |
| 1,791 | | |
| 17,402 | |
Change in decommissioning liabilities | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 54 | | |
| 54 | |
Impairment | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (4,389 | ) | |
| (4,241 | ) | |
| (27,232 | ) | |
| - | | |
| (35,862 | ) |
Disposition (d) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (3,746 | ) | |
| (3,746 | ) |
Transfer from (to) producing properties | |
| 588 | | |
| - | | |
| (12,689 | ) | |
| (246 | ) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (12,347 | ) |
At December 31, 2014 | |
$ | 8,345 | | |
$ | 15,261 | | |
$ | 35,310 | | |
$ | 15,175 | | |
$ | 34,794 | | |
$ | 37,379 | | |
$ | 146,264 | |
Exploration and evaluation expenditures | |
| 874 | | |
| 726 | | |
| 1,094 | | |
| 145 | | |
| 397 | | |
| 489 | | |
| 3,725 | |
Transfer to producing properties | |
| (4,177 | ) | |
| (7,656 | ) | |
| (17,606 | ) | |
| (7,588 | ) | |
| (17,397 | ) | |
| - | | |
| (54,424 | ) |
At June 30, 2015 | |
$ | 5,042 | | |
$ | 8,331 | | |
$ | 18,798 | | |
$ | 7,732 | | |
$ | 17,794 | | |
$ | 37,868 | | |
$ | 95,565 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed interim consolidated financial statements. | |
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter Report | Page 13 |
NOTES
TO CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
Consolidated Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
- Unaudited |
(Tabular amounts are expressed
in thousands of US dollars) |
| 14. | MINING INTERESTS (continued) |
| (a) | La Parrilla Silver Mine, Durango State |
The La Parrilla Silver Mine
has a net smelter royalty (“NSR”) agreement of 1.5% of sales revenue associated with the Quebradillas Mine, a mine
within the La Parrilla mining complex, with a maximum cumulative payable of $2.5 million. During the three and six months ended
June 30, 2015, the Company paid royalties of $0.1 million (2014 - $0.1 million) and $0.2 million (2014 - $0.2 million), respectively.
As at June 30, 2015, total royalties paid to date for the Quebradillas NSR is $2.3 million (December 31, 2014 - $2.2 million).
| (b) | Del Toro Silver Mine, Zacatecas State |
In 2013, the Company entered
into several option agreements to acquire six mineral properties adjacent to the Del Toro Silver Mine, consisting of 492 hectares
of mineral rights. If fully exercised, total option payments will amount to $3.3 million, of which $1.7 million have been
paid, $1.2 million is due in 2015, $0.2 million is due in 2016 and $0.2 million is due in 2017.
| (c) | La Guitarra Silver Mine, State of Mexico |
In 2014, the Company entered
into two agreements to acquire 757 hectares of adjacent mineral rights at the La Guitarra Silver Mine. The total purchase price
amounted to $5.4 million, of which $5.2 million is settled in common shares of First Majestic and $0.2 million in cash.
As at June 30, 2015, the Company has paid the $0.2 million and issued $3.2 million in common shares. The remaining balance
of $2.0 million in common shares will be issued in four equal annual payments based on the Company’s volume weighted
average market price at the time of the payments.
On July 1, 2014, First Majestic
divested its subsidiary, Minera Terra Plata, S.A. de C.V., and its group of exploration properties, which had a carrying value
of $3.7 million, to Sundance Minerals Ltd. (“Sundance”) (see Note 16).
| 15. | PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT |
The majority of the Company’s
property, plant and equipment are used in the Company’s five operating mine segments. Property, plant and equipment are depreciated
using either the straight-line or units-of-production method over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the asset or the
expected life of mine. Where an item of property, plant and equipment comprises of major components with different useful lives,
the components are accounted for as separate items of property, plant and equipment. Assets under construction are recorded at
cost and re-allocated to machinery and equipment when they become available for use.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed interim consolidated financial statements. | |
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter Report | Page 14 |
NOTES
TO CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
Consolidated Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
- Unaudited |
(Tabular amounts are expressed
in thousands of US dollars) |
| 15. | PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT (continued) |
Property, plant and equipment are comprised
of the following:
| |
Land and Buildings(1) | | |
Machinery and Equipment(2) | | |
Assets under Construction | | |
Other | | |
Total | |
Cost | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
At December 31, 2013 | |
$ | 83,767 | | |
$ | 215,296 | | |
$ | 52,212 | | |
$ | 9,965 | | |
$ | 361,240 | |
Additions | |
| 13,190 | | |
| 17,129 | | |
| 4,452 | | |
| 2,043 | | |
| 36,814 | |
Transfers and disposals(3) | |
| 23,678 | | |
| 5,892 | | |
| (35,458 | ) | |
| (372 | ) | |
| (6,260 | ) |
At December 31, 2014 | |
$ | 120,635 | | |
$ | 238,317 | | |
$ | 21,206 | | |
$ | 11,636 | | |
$ | 391,794 | |
Additions | |
| 187 | | |
| 2,118 | | |
| 7,049 | | |
| 241 | | |
| 9,595 | |
Transfers and disposals | |
| 3,033 | | |
| 2,849 | | |
| (6,482 | ) | |
| 218 | | |
| (382 | ) |
At June 30, 2015 | |
$ | 123,855 | | |
$ | 243,284 | | |
$ | 21,773 | | |
$ | 12,095 | | |
$ | 401,007 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Accumulated depreciation, amortization and impairment | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
At December 31, 2013 | |
$ | (13,918 | ) | |
$ | (50,879 | ) | |
$ | - | | |
$ | (5,117 | ) | |
$ | (69,914 | ) |
Depreciation and amortization | |
| (5,878 | ) | |
| (28,188 | ) | |
| - | | |
| (1,748 | ) | |
| (35,814 | ) |
Transfers and disposals | |
| 37 | | |
| 5,587 | | |
| - | | |
| 451 | | |
| 6,075 | |
Impairment | |
| (9,815 | ) | |
| (15,152 | ) | |
| - | | |
| (136 | ) | |
| (25,103 | ) |
At December 31, 2014 | |
$ | (29,574 | ) | |
$ | (88,632 | ) | |
$ | - | | |
$ | (6,550 | ) | |
$ | (124,756 | ) |
Depreciation and amortization | |
| (2,503 | ) | |
| (14,406 | ) | |
| - | | |
| (741 | ) | |
| (17,650 | ) |
Transfers and disposals | |
| - | | |
| 119 | | |
| - | | |
| 8 | | |
| 127 | |
At June 30, 2015 | |
$ | (32,077 | ) | |
$ | (102,919 | ) | |
$ | - | | |
$ | (7,283 | ) | |
$ | (142,279 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Carrying values | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
At December 31, 2014 | |
$ | 91,061 | | |
$ | 149,685 | | |
$ | 21,206 | | |
$ | 5,086 | | |
$ | 267,038 | |
At June 30, 2015 | |
$ | 91,778 | | |
$ | 140,365 | | |
$ | 21,773 | | |
$ | 4,812 | | |
$ | 258,728 | |
| (1) | Included
in land and buildings is $8.2 million (December 31, 2014 - $6.7 million) of land properties
which are not subject to depreciation. |
| (2) | Included
in property, plant and equipment is $30.7 million (December 31, 2014 - $47.4 million)
of equipment under finance lease (Note 19). |
| (3) | On January
1, 2014, the commissioning of the 1,000 tpd cyanidation plant at the Del Toro mine was
completed as operating levels intended by management have been reached. Accordingly,
costs associated with the plant were transferred from assets under construction to buildings,
machinery and equipment, with depreciation commencing effective January 1, 2014. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed interim consolidated financial statements. | |
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter Report | Page 15 |
NOTES
TO CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
Consolidated Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
- Unaudited |
(Tabular amounts are expressed
in thousands of US dollars) |
| 15. | PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT (continued) |
Property, plant and equipment, including
land and buildings, machinery and equipment, assets under construction and other assets above are allocated by mine as follow:
| |
La Encantada | | |
La Parrilla | | |
Del Toro | | |
San Martin | | |
La Guitarra | | |
Other | | |
Total | |
Cost | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
At December 31, 2013 | |
$ | 90,087 | | |
$ | 92,013 | | |
$ | 101,876 | | |
$ | 41,131 | | |
$ | 17,973 | | |
$ | 18,160 | | |
$ | 361,240 | |
Additions | |
| 12,069 | | |
| 5,019 | | |
| 10,167 | | |
| 5,787 | | |
| 1,977 | | |
| 1,795 | | |
| 36,814 | |
Transfers and disposals | |
| (1,797 | ) | |
| (4,160 | ) | |
| 1,286 | | |
| (2,433 | ) | |
| 782 | | |
| 62 | | |
| (6,260 | ) |
At December 31, 2014 | |
$ | 100,359 | | |
$ | 92,872 | | |
$ | 113,329 | | |
$ | 44,485 | | |
$ | 20,732 | | |
$ | 20,017 | | |
$ | 391,794 | |
Additions | |
| 3,430 | | |
| 2,345 | | |
| 1,124 | | |
| 1,874 | | |
| 287 | | |
| 535 | | |
| 9,595 | |
Transfers and disposals | |
| 1,998 | | |
| (1,231 | ) | |
| (853 | ) | |
| (480 | ) | |
| 160 | | |
| 24 | | |
| (382 | ) |
At June 30, 2015 | |
$ | 105,787 | | |
$ | 93,986 | | |
$ | 113,600 | | |
$ | 45,879 | | |
$ | 21,179 | | |
$ | 20,576 | | |
$ | 401,007 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Accumulated depreciation and amortization and impairment | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
At December 31, 2013 | |
$ | (27,842 | ) | |
$ | (23,571 | ) | |
$ | (3,858 | ) | |
$ | (9,549 | ) | |
$ | (2,372 | ) | |
$ | (2,722 | ) | |
$ | (69,914 | ) |
Depreciation and amortization | |
| (10,119 | ) | |
| (8,107 | ) | |
| (8,947 | ) | |
| (4,722 | ) | |
| (2,512 | ) | |
| (1,407 | ) | |
| (35,814 | ) |
Transfers and disposals | |
| 1,022 | | |
| 3,136 | | |
| (860 | ) | |
| 3,173 | | |
| (380 | ) | |
| (16 | ) | |
| 6,075 | |
Impairment | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (11,019 | ) | |
| (7,292 | ) | |
| (6,792 | ) | |
| - | | |
| (25,103 | ) |
At December 31, 2014 | |
$ | (36,939 | ) | |
$ | (28,542 | ) | |
$ | (24,684 | ) | |
$ | (18,390 | ) | |
$ | (12,056 | ) | |
$ | (4,145 | ) | |
$ | (124,756 | ) |
Depreciation and amortization | |
| (5,409 | ) | |
| (4,979 | ) | |
| (3,244 | ) | |
| (2,702 | ) | |
| (658 | ) | |
| (658 | ) | |
| (17,650 | ) |
Transfers and disposals | |
| (475 | ) | |
| 445 | | |
| 133 | | |
| 178 | | |
| (140 | ) | |
| (14 | ) | |
| 127 | |
At June 30, 2015 | |
$ | (42,823 | ) | |
$ | (33,076 | ) | |
$ | (27,795 | ) | |
$ | (20,914 | ) | |
$ | (12,854 | ) | |
$ | (4,817 | ) | |
$ | (142,279 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Carrying values | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
At December 31, 2014 | |
$ | 63,420 | | |
$ | 64,330 | | |
$ | 88,645 | | |
$ | 26,095 | | |
$ | 8,676 | | |
$ | 15,872 | | |
$ | 267,038 | |
At June 30, 2015 | |
$ | 62,964 | | |
$ | 60,910 | | |
$ | 85,805 | | |
$ | 24,965 | | |
$ | 8,325 | | |
$ | 15,759 | | |
$ | 258,728 | |
As at December 31, 2014, the Company held
a 31.7% interest in Sundance, a privately held exploration company. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, as part
of a plan of arrangement, Sundance closed a private placement of CAD$5.0 million in March 2015 and completed the reverse takeover
(“RTO”) of Albion Petroleum Ltd. Concurrent with the RTO, subscription receipts of CAD$2.7 million were converted into
shares of Sundance. Following the RTO, Sundance changed its name to First Mining Finance Corp. and is listed on the TSX Venture
Exchange under the symbol “FF”.
As a result of the aforementioned transactions,
First Majestic’s holding in Sundance was converted on a 1:1 basis into common shares of First Mining, equivalent to 19.7%
of the issued and outstanding shares of First Mining. During the six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company recognized a gain
of $0.1 million in relation to dilution of its investment in First Mining from 31.7% to 19.7%.
Due to certain common directors and a common
officer, the Company’s investment in First Mining is accounted for as an investment in associate. During the three and six
months ended June 30, 2015, the Company’s share of First Mining’s net loss was $0.3 million (2014 - $nil) and $0.4
million (2014 - $nil), respectively.
As at June 30, 2015, the Company’s
investment in First Mining has a carrying value of $3.0 million and a market value of $7.1 million based on Level 1 fair value
measurement.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed interim consolidated financial statements. | |
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter Report | Page 16 |
NOTES
TO CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
Consolidated Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
- Unaudited |
(Tabular amounts are expressed
in thousands of US dollars) |
| 17. | TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES |
The Company’s trade and other payables
are primarily comprised of amounts outstanding for purchases relating to mining operations, exploration and evaluation activities
and corporate office expenses. The normal credit period for these purchases is between 30 to 90 days.
Trade and other payables are comprised
of the following items:
| |
June 30, 2015 | | |
December 31, 2014 | |
Trade payables | |
$ | 21,459 | | |
$ | 25,948 | |
Accrued liabilities | |
| 13,222 | | |
| 14,412 | |
| |
$ | 34,681 | | |
$ | 40,360 | |
The Company occasionally enters into prepayment
facilities to fund its cash requirements. Under the prepayment facility agreements, the Company receives advance payment by forward
selling a pre-determined amounts of its lead and zinc concentrate production.
The prepayment facilities are classified
as FVTPL financial liabilities and are recorded at fair market value, based on the forward market price of lead and zinc and discounted
at effective interest rates between 6.0% to 6.7%. Fair value adjustment gains or losses are recorded as other income.
To mitigate potential exposure to future
price increases in lead and zinc, the Company has entered into an agreement with the same lender to purchase call options on lead
and zinc futures equivalent to a portion of its production to be delivered under the terms of the prepayment facility agreements.
The call options are classified as FVTPL financial assets and recorded at fair market value based on quoted market prices, presented
on the statements of financial position on an offsetting basis with the prepayment facilities.
The Company’s prepayment facilities
are comprised of:
Metal | |
Agreement Date | |
Advance Amount | | |
Interest Rate | | |
Maturity Date | |
Contract Quantity (MT) | | |
Remaining Quantity (MT) | | |
June 30, 2015 | | |
December 31, 2014 | |
Lead | |
Dec 2012 | |
$ | 24,684 | | |
| 4.34 | % | |
Jun 2016 | |
| 12,158 | | |
| 5,086 | | |
$ | 8,808 | | |
$ | 13,189 | |
Lead | |
Apr 2014 | |
$ | 30,000 | | |
| 4.05 | % | |
Sept 2017 | |
| 15,911 | | |
| 14,435 | | |
| 23,582 | | |
| 26,356 | |
Zinc | |
Dec 2012 | |
$ | 25,316 | | |
| 4.34 | % | |
Jun 2016 | |
| 13,176 | | |
| 5,567 | | |
| 10,866 | | |
| 16,431 | |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
$ | 43,256 | | |
$ | 55,976 | |
Remaining repayments | |
| | | |
| | |
Less than one year | |
$ | 31,742 | | |
$ | 29,389 | |
One to three years | |
| 21,385 | | |
| 37,230 | |
Gross value of remaining repayments | |
| 53,127 | | |
| 66,619 | |
Cumulative mark-to-market adjustment of remaining repayments, including call options | |
| (6,789 | ) | |
| (5,834 | ) |
Adjusted value of remaining repayments | |
| 46,338 | | |
| 60,785 | |
Less: future finance charges | |
| (3,082 | ) | |
| (4,809 | ) |
| |
$ | 43,256 | | |
$ | 55,976 | |
Statements of Financial Position Presentation | |
| | | |
| | |
Current portion of prepayment facilities | |
$ | 25,710 | | |
$ | 26,329 | |
Non-current portion of prepayment facilities | |
| 17,546 | | |
| 29,647 | |
| |
$ | 43,256 | | |
$ | 55,976 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed interim consolidated financial statements. | |
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter Report | Page 17 |
NOTES
TO CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
Consolidated Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
- Unaudited |
(Tabular amounts are expressed
in thousands of US dollars) |
| 18. | PREPAYMENT FACILITIES (continued) |
During the three and six months ended June
30, 2015, the Company has realized a loss of $0.2 million (2014 - $3.8 million) and a gain of $0.2 million (2014 – loss of
$2.4 million), respectively, on fair value adjustments of the prepayment facilities and associated call options.
The Company has finance leases for various
mine and plant equipment. These leases have terms of 36 to 60 months with interest rates ranging from 4.8% to 8.0%. Assets under
finance leases are pledged as security against lease obligations.
The following is a schedule of future minimum
lease payments due under the Company’s finance lease contracts:
| |
June 30, 2015 | | |
December 31, 2014 | |
Less than one year | |
$ | 11,358 | | |
$ | 12,883 | |
More than one year but not more than five years | |
| 12,243 | | |
| 16,547 | |
Gross payments | |
| 23,601 | | |
| 29,430 | |
Less: future finance charges | |
| (1,853 | ) | |
| (2,547 | ) |
Present value of minimum lease payments | |
$ | 21,748 | | |
$ | 26,883 | |
Statement of Financial Position Presentation | |
| | | |
| | |
Current portion of lease obligations | |
$ | 10,190 | | |
$ | 11,428 | |
Non-current portion of lease obligations | |
| 11,558 | | |
| 15,455 | |
Present value of minimum lease payments | |
$ | 21,748 | | |
$ | 26,883 | |
| (a) | Authorized
and issued capital |
The Company has unlimited authorized
common shares with no par value. The movement in the Company’s issued and outstanding capital during the period is summarized
in the Condensed Interim Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity.
In April 2015, the Company closed
a private placement by issuing an aggregate of 4,620,000 common shares at a price of CAD$6.50 per common share for gross proceeds
of $24.5 million (CAD$30.0 million), or net proceeds of $23.0 million (CAD$28.1 million) after share issuance costs.
Under the terms of the Company’s
Stock Option Plan, the maximum number of shares reserved for issuance under the Plan is 10% of the issued shares on a rolling basis.
Options may be exercisable over periods of up to five years as determined by the Board of Directors of the Company and the exercise
price shall not be less than the closing price of the shares on the day preceding the award date, subject to regulatory approval.
All stock options granted prior to May 19, 2011 are subject to vesting with 25% vesting upon issuance and 25% vesting each six
months thereafter. All stock options granted thereafter are subject to vesting with 25% vesting on first anniversary from the date
of grant, and 25% vesting each six months thereafter.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed interim consolidated financial statements. | |
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter Report | Page 18 |
NOTES
TO CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
Consolidated Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
- Unaudited |
(Tabular amounts are expressed
in thousands of US dollars) |
| 20. | SHARE CAPITAL (continued) |
| (b) | Stock
options (continued) |
The following table summarizes
information about stock options outstanding as at June 30, 2015:
| |
Options Outstanding | | |
Options Exercisable | |
Exercise prices
(CAD$) | |
Number of Options | | |
Weighted Average Exercise Price (CAD$/Share) | | |
Weighted Average Remaining Life (Years) | | |
Number of Options | | |
Weighted Average Exercise Price (CAD$/Share) | | |
Weighted Average Remaining Life (Years) | |
5.01 - 10.00 | |
| 2,506,055 | | |
| 6.24 | | |
| 4.54 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
10.01 - 15.00 | |
| 2,904,842 | | |
| 11.00 | | |
| 3.13 | | |
| 1,109,316 | | |
| 11.47 | | |
| 2.32 | |
15.01 - 20.00 | |
| 1,355,900 | | |
| 16.71 | | |
| 1.47 | | |
| 1,355,900 | | |
| 16.71 | | |
| 1.47 | |
20.01 - 22.45 | |
| 1,691,216 | | |
| 21.60 | | |
| 2.47 | | |
| 1,460,591 | | |
| 21.71 | | |
| 2.46 | |
| |
| 8,458,013 | | |
| 12.63 | | |
| 3.15 | | |
| 3,925,807 | | |
| 17.09 | | |
| 2.08 | |
The movements in stock options issued during
the six months ended June 30, 2015 and the year ended December 31, 2014 are summarized as follows:
| |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 | | |
Year Ended December 31, 2014 | |
| |
Number of Options | | |
Weighted Average Exercise Price (CAD$/Share) | | |
Number of Options | | |
Weighted Average Exercise Price (CAD$/Share) | |
Balance, beginning of the period | |
| 6,084,458 | | |
| 15.24 | | |
| 5,208,520 | | |
| 16.85 | |
Granted | |
| 2,499,555 | | |
| 6.25 | | |
| 2,549,142 | | |
| 10.57 | |
Exercised | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (372,500 | ) | |
| 4.29 | |
Cancelled or expired | |
| (126,000 | ) | |
| 12.35 | | |
| (1,300,704 | ) | |
| 15.67 | |
Balance, end of the period | |
| 8,458,013 | | |
| 12.63 | | |
| 6,084,458 | | |
| 15.24 | |
During the six months ended June 30, 2015,
the aggregate fair value of stock options granted was CAD$5.1 million (December 31, 2014 – CAD$8.4 million), or a weighted
average fair value of CAD$2.04 per stock option granted (December 31, 2014 – CAD$3.30).
The following weighted average assumptions
were used in estimating the fair value of stock options granted using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model:
Assumption | |
Based on | |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 | | |
Year Ended December 31, 2014 | |
Risk-free interest rate (%) | |
Yield curves on Canadian government zero-coupon bonds with a remaining term equal to the stock options’ expected life | |
| 1.10 | | |
| 1.44 | |
Expected life (years) | |
Average of the expected vesting term and expiry term of the option | |
| 3.38 | | |
| 3.38 | |
Expected volatility (%) | |
Historical and implied volatility of the precious metals mining sector | |
| 44.00 | | |
| 41.20 | |
Expected dividend yield (%) | |
Annualized dividend rate as of the date of grant | |
| 0.00 | | |
| 0.00 | |
The weighted average closing share price
at date of exercise for the year ended December 31, 2014 was CAD$8.85. No options were exercised in the six months ended June 30,
2015.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed interim consolidated financial statements. | |
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter Report | Page 19 |
NOTES
TO CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
Consolidated Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
- Unaudited |
(Tabular amounts are expressed
in thousands of US dollars) |
| 20. | SHARE CAPITAL (continued) |
| (c) | Share
repurchase program |
The Company has an ongoing share
repurchase program to repurchase up to 5,879,732 of its common shares, which represents approximately 5% of the Company’s
issued and outstanding shares. The normal course issuer bids will be carried through the facilities of the Toronto Stock Exchange.
No shares were repurchased during the three and six months ended June 30, 2015. During the three and six months ended June
30, 2014, the Company repurchased and cancelled 40,000 shares for a total consideration of $0.4 million.
| 21. | FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND RELATED RISK MANAGEMENT |
The Company’s financial instruments
and related risk management objectives, policies, exposures and sensitivity related to financial risks are summarized below.
| (a) | Fair value and categories of financial instruments |
Financial instruments included
in the condensed interim consolidated statements of financial position are measured either at fair value or amortized cost. Estimated
fair values for financial instruments are designed to approximate amounts for which the instruments could be exchanged in an arm’s-length
transaction between knowledgeable and willing parties.
The Company uses various valuation
techniques in determining the fair value of financial assets and liabilities based on the extent to which the fair value is observable.
The following fair value hierarchy is used to categorize and disclose the Company’s financial assets and liabilities held
at fair value for which a valuation technique is used:
| Level 1: | Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible
at the measurement date for identical assets or liabilities. |
| Level 2: | All inputs which have a significant effect on the fair
value are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full contractual term. |
| Level 3: | Inputs which have a significant effect on the fair value
are not based on observable market data. |
The table below summarizes the
valuation methods used to determine the fair value of each financial instrument:
Financial Instruments Measured at Fair Value |
|
Valuation Method |
Cash equivalents (short-term investments) |
|
Assumed to approximate carrying value |
Trade receivables (related to concentrate sales) |
|
Receivables that are subject to provisional pricing and final price adjustment at the end of the quotational period are estimated based on observable forward price of metal per London Metal Exchange (Level 2) |
Marketable securities
Silver futures derivatives
Foreign exchange derivatives |
|
Based on quoted market prices for identical assets in an active market (Level 1) as at the date of statements of financial position |
Prepayment facilities |
|
Based on observable forward price curve of lead and zinc per London Metal Exchange (Level 2). Related call options are valued based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets in an active market (Level 1) as at the date of statements of financial position |
|
|
|
Financial Instruments Measured at Amortized Costs |
|
Valuation Method |
Cash and cash equivalents
Trade and other receivables
Trade and other payables |
|
Approximated carrying value due to their short-term nature |
Finance leases |
|
Assumed to approximate carrying value |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed interim consolidated financial statements. | |
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter Report | Page 20 |
NOTES
TO CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
Consolidated Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
- Unaudited |
(Tabular amounts are expressed
in thousands of US dollars) |
| 21. | FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND RELATED RISK MANAGEMENT (continued) |
| (a) | Fair value and categories of financial instruments (continued) |
The following table presents
the Company’s fair value hierarchy for financial assets and financial liabilities that are measured at fair value:
| |
June 30, 2015 | | |
December 31, 2014 | |
| |
| | |
Fair
value measurement | | |
| | |
Fair
value measurement | |
| |
Carrying value | | |
Level 1 | | |
Level 2 | | |
Carrying value | | |
Level 1 | | |
Level 2 | |
Financial assets | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Trade receivables | |
$ | 6,463 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 6,463 | | |
$ | 4,741 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 4,741 | |
Marketable securities | |
| 2,468 | | |
| 2,468 | | |
| - | | |
| 2,460 | | |
| 2,460 | | |
| - | |
Financial liabilities | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Prepayment facilities | |
$ | 43,256 | | |
$ | (435 | ) | |
$ | 43,691 | | |
$ | 55,976 | | |
$ | (1,132 | ) | |
$ | 57,108 | |
There were no transfers between
levels 1, 2 and 3 during the six months ended June 30, 2015 and year ended December 31, 2014.
| (b) | Capital risk management |
The Company’s objectives
when managing capital are to maintain financial flexibility to continue as a going concern while optimizing growth and maximizing
returns of investments from shareholders. The Company’s overall strategy with respect to capital risk management remains
unchanged from the year ended December 31, 2014.
The Company monitors its capital
structure and, based on changes in operations and economic conditions, may adjust the structure by repurchasing shares, issuing
new shares, issuing new debt or retiring existing debt. The Company prepares annual budget and quarterly forecasts to facilitate
the management of its capital requirements. The annual budget is approved by the Company’s Board of Directors.
The capital of the Company consists
of equity (comprising of issued capital, equity reserves and retained earnings), prepayment facilities, lease obligations, net
of cash and cash equivalents as follows:
| |
June 30, 2015 | | |
December 31, 2014 | |
Equity | |
$ | 542,971 | | |
$ | 520,533 | |
Prepayment facilities | |
| 43,256 | | |
| 55,976 | |
Lease obligations | |
| 21,748 | | |
| 26,883 | |
Less: cash and cash equivalents | |
| (37,742 | ) | |
| (40,345 | ) |
| |
$ | 570,233 | | |
$ | 563,047 | |
The Company’s investment
policy is to invest its cash in highly liquid short-term investments with maturities of 90 days or less, selected with regards
to the expected timing of expenditures from continuing operations. The Company expects that its available capital resources will
be sufficient to carry out its development plans and operations for at least the next 12 months.
The Company is not subject to
any externally imposed capital requirements with the exception of complying with covenants under the prepayment facility agreements.
As at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company was in compliance with these covenants.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed interim consolidated financial statements. | |
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter Report | Page 21 |
NOTES
TO CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
Consolidated Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
- Unaudited |
(Tabular amounts are expressed
in thousands of US dollars) |
| 21. | FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND RELATED RISK MANAGEMENT (continued) |
| (c) | Financial risk management |
There are no significant changes
in financial risk management compared to the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31,
2014, except for the following:
Liquidity Risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that
the Company will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they arise. The Company has in place a planning and budgeting
process to help determine the funds required to support the Company’s normal operating requirements and contractual obligations.
The Company believes it has sufficient cash on hand, combined with cash flows from operations, to meet operating requirements as
they arise for at least the next 12 months.
The following table summarizes
the maturities of the Company’s financial liabilities and commitments based on the undiscounted contractual cash flows:
| |
Carrying Amount as at | | |
Contractual | | |
Less than | | |
1 to 3 | | |
4 to 5 | | |
After 5 | |
| |
June 30, 2015 | | |
Cash Flows | | |
1 year | | |
years | | |
years | | |
years | |
Trade and other payables | |
$ | 34,681 | | |
$ | 34,681 | | |
$ | 34,681 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | - | |
Prepayment facilities | |
| 43,256 | | |
| 53,127 | | |
| 31,742 | | |
| 21,385 | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
Finance lease obligations | |
| 21,748 | | |
| 23,601 | | |
| 11,358 | | |
| 12,103 | | |
| 140 | | |
| - | |
Decommissioning liabilities | |
| 15,051 | | |
| 15,897 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 15,897 | |
| |
$ | 114,736 | | |
$ | 127,306 | | |
$ | 77,781 | | |
$ | 33,488 | | |
$ | 140 | | |
$ | 15,897 | |
Currency Risk
The Company is exposed to foreign
exchange risk primarily relating to financial instruments that are denominated in Canadian dollars or Mexican pesos, which would
impact the Company’s net earnings and other comprehensive income. To manage foreign exchange risk, the Company may occasionally
enter into short-term foreign currency derivatives. The foreign currency derivatives are not designated as hedging instruments
for accounting purposes.
The sensitivity of the Company’s
net earnings and comprehensive income due to changes in the exchange rate between the Canadian dollar and the Mexican peso against
the U.S. dollar is included in the table below:
| |
June 30, 2015 | | |
December 31, 2014 | |
| |
Cash and
cash equivalents | | |
Trade and
other receivables | | |
Trade and
other payables | | |
Foreign
exchange derivative | | |
Net assets
(liabilities) exposure | | |
Effect of +/- 10%
change in currency | | |
Net assets
(liabilities) exposure | | |
Effect of +/- 10%
change in currency | |
Canadian dollar | |
$ | 21,974 | | |
$ | 1,158 | | |
$ | (769 | ) | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 22,363 | | |
$ | 2,236 | | |
$ | 6,791 | | |
$ | 679 | |
Mexican peso | |
| 762 | | |
| 6,173 | | |
| (17,596 | ) | |
| 29,239 | | |
| 18,578 | | |
| 1,858 | | |
| (12,430 | ) | |
| (1,243 | ) |
| |
$ | 22,736 | | |
$ | 7,331 | | |
$ | (18,365 | ) | |
$ | 29,239 | | |
$ | 40,941 | | |
$ | 4,094 | | |
$ | (5,639 | ) | |
$ | (564 | ) |
Commodity Price Risk
The Company is exposed to commodity
price risk on silver, gold, lead and zinc, which have a direct and immediate impact on the value of its related financial instruments
and net earnings. The Company’s revenues are directly dependent on commodity prices that have shown volatility and are beyond
the Company’s control. The Company does not use derivative instruments to hedge its commodity price risk to silver but has
forward sales agreements to sell a portion of its lead and zinc production at a fixed price (see Note 18). The Company purchased
call options on lead and zinc futures to mitigate potential exposure to future price increases in lead and zinc for its lead and
zinc forward sales agreements.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed interim consolidated financial statements. | |
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter Report | Page 22 |
NOTES
TO CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
Consolidated Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
- Unaudited |
(Tabular amounts are expressed
in thousands of US dollars) |
| 21. | FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND RELATED RISK MANAGEMENT (continued) |
| (c) | Financial risk management (continued) |
The following table summarizes
the Company’s exposure to commodity price risk and their impact on net earnings:
| |
June
30, 2015 | |
| |
Silver | | |
Gold | | |
Lead | | |
Zinc | | |
Effect of +/- 10% change in metal prices | |
Metals subject to provisional price adjustments | |
$ | 638 | | |
$ | 63 | | |
$ | 819 | | |
$ | 275 | | |
$ | 1,795 | |
Metals in doré and concentrates inventory | |
| 31 | | |
| 8 | | |
| 10 | | |
| 5 | | |
| 54 | |
Prepayment facilities (Note 18) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (3,313 | ) | |
| (1,025 | ) | |
| (4,338 | ) |
| |
$ | 669 | | |
$ | 71 | | |
$ | (2,484 | ) | |
$ | (745 | ) | |
$ | (2,489 | ) |
| |
December 31, 2014 | |
| |
Silver | | |
Gold | | |
Lead | | |
Zinc | | |
Effect of +/- 10% change in metal prices | |
Metals subject to provisional price adjustments | |
$ | 969 | | |
$ | 48 | | |
$ | 938 | | |
$ | 109 | | |
$ | 2,064 | |
Metals in doré and concentrates inventory | |
| 86 | | |
| 13 | | |
| 6 | | |
| - | | |
| 105 | |
Prepayment facilities | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (4,204 | ) | |
| (1,670 | ) | |
| (5,874 | ) |
| |
$ | 1,055 | | |
$ | 61 | | |
$ | (3,260 | ) | |
$ | (1,561 | ) | |
$ | (3,705 | ) |
| 22. | SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION |
| |
| |
Three Months Ended June 30, | | |
Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| |
Note | |
2015 | | |
2014 | | |
2015 | | |
2014 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to operating cash flows before movements in working capital: | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Accretion of decommissioning liabilities | |
| |
$ | 192 | | |
$ | 205 | | |
$ | 389 | | |
$ | 407 | |
Loss (gain) from silver derivatives and marketable securities | |
13 | |
| 991 | | |
| (251 | ) | |
| (404 | ) | |
| (1,461 | ) |
(Gain) loss on fair value adjustment on prepayment facilities | |
18 | |
| (94 | ) | |
| 3,652 | | |
| (1,312 | ) | |
| 2,074 | |
Dilution gain on investment in associates | |
16 | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (64 | ) | |
| - | |
Equity loss on investment in associates | |
16 | |
| 296 | | |
| - | | |
| 433 | | |
| - | |
Impairment of marketable securities | |
| |
| - | | |
| 275 | | |
| - | | |
| 275 | |
Reversal of deferred litigation gain | |
| |
| - | | |
| (14,127 | ) | |
| - | | |
| (14,127 | ) |
Unrealized foreign exchange (gain) loss and other | |
| |
| (897 | ) | |
| 8 | | |
| (2,423 | ) | |
| 86 | |
| |
| |
$ | 488 | | |
$ | (10,238 | ) | |
$ | (3,381 | ) | |
$ | (12,746 | ) |
Net change in non-cash working capital items: | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Decrease (increase) in trade and other receivables | |
| |
$ | 1,348 | | |
$ | 6,531 | | |
$ | (617 | ) | |
$ | 4,058 | |
Decrease in inventories | |
| |
| 546 | | |
| 5,202 | | |
| 1,504 | | |
| 2,550 | |
Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses and other | |
| |
| 286 | | |
| 583 | | |
| (461 | ) | |
| 732 | |
Increase in income taxes payable | |
| |
| 2,974 | | |
| 6,116 | | |
| 3,561 | | |
| 5,593 | |
Increase (decrease) in trade and other payables | |
| |
| 1,397 | | |
| (2,349 | ) | |
| (5,769 | ) | |
| (682 | ) |
| |
| |
$ | 6,551 | | |
$ | 16,083 | | |
$ | (1,782 | ) | |
$ | 12,251 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed interim consolidated financial statements. | |
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter Report | Page 23 |
NOTES
TO CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
Consolidated Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
- Unaudited |
(Tabular amounts are expressed
in thousands of US dollars) |
| 22. | SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION (continued) |
| |
| |
Three Months Ended June 30, | | |
Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| |
Note | |
2015 | | |
2014 | | |
2015 | | |
2014 | |
Non-cash investing and financing activities: | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Assets acquired by finance lease | |
| |
$ | (633 | ) | |
$ | - | | |
$ | (1,590 | ) | |
$ | - | |
Acquisition of mining interests with common shares | |
14(c) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (2,820 | ) |
Transfer of share-based payments reserve upon exercise of options | |
| |
| - | | |
| 195 | | |
| - | | |
| 469 | |
| |
| |
$ | (633 | ) | |
$ | 195 | | |
$ | (1,590 | ) | |
$ | (2,351 | ) |
| 23. | CONTINGENCIES
AND OTHER MATTERS |
Due to the size, complexity and nature
of the Company’s operations, various legal and tax matters arise in the ordinary course of business. The Company accrues
for such items when a liability is probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. In the opinion of management, these matters
will not have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements of the Company.
Mexican Federal Labour Law
In 2012, the Mexican government introduced
changes to the federal labour law which made certain amendments to the law relating to the use of service companies and subcontractors
and the obligations with respect to workers’ participation benefits. These amendments may have an effect on the distribution
of profits to workers and result in additional financial obligations to the Company. The Company continues to be in compliance
with the federal labour law and believes that these amendments will not result in any new material obligations. Based on this assessment,
the Company has not accrued any provisions as at June 30, 2015. The Company will continue to monitor developments in Mexico and
to assess the potential impact of these amendments.
First Silver Litigation
In April 2013, the Company received a positive
judgment on the First Silver litigation from the Supreme Court of British Columbia (the “Court”), which awarded the
sum of $93.8 million in favour of First Majestic against Hector Davila Santos (the “Defendant”). The Company received
a sum of $14.1 million in June 2013 as partial payment of the judgment, leaving an unpaid amount of approximately $65.3 million
(CAD$81.5 million). As part of the ruling, the Court granted orders restricting any transfer or encumbrance of the Bolaños
Mine by the defendant and limiting mining at the Bolaños Mine. The orders also require that the defendant to preserve net
cash flow from the Bolaños Mine in a holding account and periodically provide to the Company certain information regarding
the Bolaños Mine. However, there can be no guarantee that the remainder of the judgment amount will be collected and it
is likely that it will be necessary to take additional action in Mexico and/or elsewhere to recover the balance. Therefore, as
at June 30, 2015, the Company has not accrued any of the remaining $65.3 million (CAD$81.5 million) unpaid judgment in favour
of the Company.
The following significant events occurred
subsequent to June 30, 2015:
| a) | On July 27, 2015, the Company entered
into a definitive agreement to acquire all of the issued and outstanding shares of SilverCrest for consideration of 0.2769 common
shares of First Majestic plus CAD$0.0001 in cash per SilverCrest common share. With this acquisition, SilverCrest’s Santa
Elena Mine will be First Majestic’s sixth producing silver mine, adding further growth potential to the Company’s portfolio
of Mexican projects. It will also add approximately CAD$30 million in cash and further enhances the Company’s working capital
position. |
| b) | 3,844 common shares were cancelled; and |
| c) | 68,750 options were cancelled. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed interim consolidated financial statements. | |
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter Report | Page 24 |
NOTES
TO CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
Consolidated Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
- Unaudited |
(Tabular amounts are expressed
in thousands of US dollars) |
| 24. | SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (continued) |
Pursuant to the above subsequent events,
the Company has 122,210,796 common shares outstanding as at the date on which these consolidated financial statements were approved
and authorized for issue by the Board of Directors (see Note 25).
| 25. | APPROVAL OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
The condensed interim consolidated financial
statements of First Majestic Silver Corp. for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 were approved and authorized for issue
by the Board of Directors on August 10, 2015.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed interim consolidated financial statements. | |
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter Report | Page 25 |
Exhibit 99.2
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2015
925 West Georgia Street, Suite 1805, Vancouver,
B.C., Canada V6C 3L2
Phone: 604.688.3033 | Fax: 604.639.8873|
Toll Free: 1.866.529.2807 | Email: info@firstmajestic.com
www.firstmajestic.com
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION
AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION
This Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition (“MD&A”) should be read in conjunction with the unaudited
condensed interim consolidated financial statements of First Majestic Silver Corp. (“First Majestic” or “the
Company”) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and the audited consolidated financial statements for the year
ended December 31, 2014, which are prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International
Accounting Standards Board (“IFRS”). All dollar amounts are expressed in United States (“US”) dollars
and tabular amounts are expressed in thousands of US dollars, unless otherwise indicated. Certain amounts shown in this MD&A
may not add exactly to the total amount due to rounding differences. This MD&A contains “forward-looking statements”
that are subject to risk factors set out in a cautionary note contained at the end of this MD&A. All information contained
in this MD&A is current and has been approved by the Board of Directors of the Company as of August 10, 2015 unless otherwise
stated.
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
First Majestic is a mining company focused
on silver production in México, pursuing the development of its existing mineral property assets and acquiring new assets.
The Company presently owns and operates five producing silver mines: the La Encantada Silver Mine, La Parrilla Silver Mine, Del
Toro Silver Mine, San Martin Silver Mine and the La Guitarra Silver Mine.
First Majestic is publicly listed on the
New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “AG”, on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol “FR”, on
the Mexican Stock Exchange under the symbol “AG” and on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange under the symbol “FMV”.
2015 SECOND QUARTER PERFORMANCE
Key Performance Metrics | |
2015-Q2 | | |
2015-Q1 | | |
Change | | |
2014-Q2 | | |
Change | | |
2015-YTD | | |
2014-YTD | | |
Change | |
Operational | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Ore Processed / Tonnes Milled | |
| 662,637 | | |
| 631,609 | | |
| 5 | % | |
| 671,024 | | |
| (1 | %) | |
| 1,294,247 | | |
| 1,308,687 | | |
| (1 | %) |
Silver Ounces Produced | |
| 2,716,503 | | |
| 2,776,855 | | |
| (2 | %) | |
| 3,098,218 | | |
| (12 | %) | |
| 5,493,357 | | |
| 5,993,715 | | |
| (8 | %) |
Silver Equivalent Ounces Produced | |
| 3,802,558 | | |
| 3,905,270 | | |
| (3 | %) | |
| 3,855,223 | | |
| (1 | %) | |
| 7,707,828 | | |
| 7,486,895 | | |
| 3 | % |
Cash Costs per Ounce(1) | |
$ | 8.74 | | |
$ | 8.22 | | |
| 6 | % | |
$ | 9.63 | | |
| (9 | %) | |
$ | 8.48 | | |
$ | 9.75 | | |
| (13 | %) |
All-in Sustaining Cost per Ounce(1) | |
$ | 14.49 | | |
$ | 13.88 | | |
| 4 | % | |
$ | 18.18 | | |
| (20 | %) | |
$ | 14.18 | | |
$ | 18.46 | | |
| (23 | %) |
Total Production Cost per Tonne(1) | |
$ | 46.80 | | |
$ | 46.90 | | |
| (0 | %) | |
$ | 51.81 | | |
| (10 | %) | |
$ | 46.85 | | |
$ | 52.49 | | |
| (11 | %) |
Average Realized Silver Price per Ounce ($/eq. oz.)(1) | |
$ | 16.99 | | |
$ | 17.05 | | |
| (0 | %) | |
$ | 19.59 | | |
| (13 | %) | |
$ | 17.02 | | |
$ | 20.21 | | |
| (16 | %) |
Financial (in $millions) | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Revenues | |
$ | 54.2 | | |
$ | 54.6 | | |
| (1 | %) | |
$ | 66.9 | | |
| (19 | %) | |
$ | 108.8 | | |
$ | 132.2 | | |
| (18 | %) |
Mine Operating Earnings(2) | |
$ | 3.4 | | |
$ | 5.0 | | |
| (31 | %) | |
$ | 9.5 | | |
| (64 | %) | |
$ | 8.4 | | |
$ | 26.1 | | |
| (68 | %) |
Net (Loss) Earnings | |
$ | (2.6 | ) | |
$ | (1.1 | ) | |
| (133 | %) | |
$ | 7.6 | | |
| (134 | %) | |
$ | (3.7 | ) | |
$ | 13.6 | | |
| (127 | %) |
Operating Cash Flows before Working Capital and Taxes(2) | |
$ | 16.4 | | |
$ | 17.3 | | |
| (5 | %) | |
$ | 19.0 | | |
| (13 | %) | |
$ | 33.8 | | |
$ | 44.3 | | |
| (24 | %) |
Cash and Cash Equivalents | |
$ | 37.7 | | |
$ | 22.4 | | |
| 69 | % | |
$ | 66.7 | | |
| (43 | %) | |
$ | 37.7 | | |
$ | 66.7 | | |
| (43 | %) |
Working Capital(1) | |
$ | (0.9 | ) | |
$ | (12.6 | ) | |
| 93 | % | |
$ | 46.1 | | |
| (102 | %) | |
$ | (0.9 | ) | |
$ | 46.1 | | |
| (102 | %) |
Shareholders | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
(Loss) Earnings per Share ("EPS") - Basic | |
$ | (0.02 | ) | |
$ | (0.01 | ) | |
| (127 | %) | |
$ | 0.06 | | |
| (133 | %) | |
$ | (0.03 | ) | |
$ | 0.12 | | |
| (127 | %) |
Adjusted EPS(1) | |
$ | (0.03 | ) | |
$ | (0.00 | ) | |
| (845 | %) | |
$ | 0.02 | | |
| (241 | %) | |
$ | (0.03 | ) | |
$ | 0.07 | | |
| (139 | %) |
Cash Flow per Share(1) | |
$ | 0.14 | | |
$ | 0.15 | | |
| (8 | %) | |
$ | 0.16 | | |
| (16 | %) | |
$ | 0.28 | | |
$ | 0.38 | | |
| (25 | %) |
| (1) | The
Company reports non-GAAP measures which include cash costs per ounce produced, all-in
sustaining cost per ounce, total production cost per tonne, average realized silver price
per ounce sold, working capital, adjusted EPS and cash flow per share. These measures
are widely used in the mining industry as a benchmark for performance, but do not have
a standardized meaning and may differ from methods used by other companies with similar
descriptions. See “Non-GAAP Measures” on pages 28 to 32 for a reconciliation
of non-GAAP to GAAP measures. |
| (2) | The
Company reports additional GAAP measures which include mine operating earnings and operating
cash flows before working capital and taxes. These additional financial measures are
intended to provide additional information and do not have a standardized meaning prescribed
by IFRS. See descriptions in “Additional GAAP Measures” on page 32. |
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter MD&A | Page 1 |
2015 SECOND QUARTER HIGHLIGHTS
Second Quarter Production Summary |
|
La Encantada |
La Parrilla |
Del Toro |
San Martin |
La Guitarra |
|
Consolidated |
Ore Processed / Tonnes Milled |
|
189,811 |
178,736 |
162,089 |
89,506 |
42,494 |
|
662,637 |
Silver Ounces Produced |
|
602,869 |
620,839 |
664,969 |
597,328 |
230,499 |
|
2,716,503 |
Silver Equivalent Ounces Produced |
|
605,299 |
985,107 |
1,159,484 |
696,580 |
356,089 |
|
3,802,558 |
Cash Costs per Ounce |
|
$14.65 |
$10.72 |
$4.34 |
$6.25 |
$6.74 |
|
$8.74 |
All-in Sustaining Cost per Ounce |
|
$18.32 |
$14.48 |
$6.97 |
$9.62 |
$13.32 |
|
$14.49 |
Total Production Cost per Tonne |
|
$44.21 |
$46.49 |
$42.99 |
$56.09 |
$54.58 |
|
$46.80 |
Operational
| · | Total production in the quarter amounted
to 3,802,558 ounces of silver equivalent ounces, a decrease of 3% compared to the first quarter of 2015. The decrease in production
was primarily attributed to lower production from Del Toro, which encountered 16% lower silver grades and a decrease in silver
recoveries while mining through a lower grade area of the Perseverancia mine, as well as a 9% decrease in production at La Parrilla
due to a return to normal zinc grades after encountering exceptionally high zinc grades within the Vacas mine last quarter. The
decreases in Del Toro and La Parrilla were partially offset by a 33% improvement in production at La Guitarra due to improved silver
and gold grades. |
| · | A total of 2,716,503 silver ounces were
produced in the quarter, comparable to the first quarter of 2015. |
| · | Cash costs per ounce increased 6% from
$8.22 in the first quarter of 2015 to $8.74 in the current quarter. The increase in cash cost was affected by lower by-product
credits at La Parrilla as a result of the decrease in zinc production, as well as quarterly productivity and annual union bonuses
primarily at Del Toro, San Martin and La Parrilla. Cash costs at all other mines either improved or were consistent when compared
to the previous quarter. |
| · | All-in sustaining costs per ounce (“AISC”)
in the current quarter was $14.49, an improvement of 20% compared to $18.18 in the second quarter of 2014 and an increase of 4%
from $13.88 per ounce in the first quarter of 2015. |
Financial
| · | Generated revenues of $54.2 million in
the quarter, a decrease of 19% or $12.7 million compared to the second quarter of 2014 primarily due to a 13% decrease in average
realized silver prices, compared to a 17% decrease in average silver price per COMEX, and a 3% decrease in silver equivalent ounces
sold. |
| · | The Company recognized mine operating
earnings of $3.4 million compared to $9.5 million in the second quarter of 2014. The decrease in mine operating earnings was
attributed to a decline in silver prices and higher depletion, depreciation and amortization expense, despite a 9% reduction in
cash costs per ounce compared to the second quarter of 2014. |
| · | Generated a net loss of $2.6 million (EPS
of ($0.02)) compared to net earnings of $7.6 million (EPS of $0.06) in the second quarter of 2014. However, in the second quarter
of 2014 the Company had a one-time tax effected litigation gain of approximately $10.4 million without which net earnings would
have amounted to a net loss of $2.8 million (EPS of ($0.02)); therefore, the Company has effectively improved its net earnings
relative to the second quarter of 2014 at a time when silver prices have fallen by 17% from the prior year. |
| · | Cash flows from operations before movements
in working capital and income taxes in the quarter decreased to $16.4 million ($0.14 per share) compared to $19.0 million
($0.16 per share) in the second quarter of 2014, primarily due to a decrease in gross margins, which were impacted by lower silver
prices. |
Corporate Development and Other
| · | On July 27, 2015, the Company entered
into a definitive agreement to acquire all of the issued and outstanding shares of SilverCrest Mines Inc. (“SilverCrest”)
for consideration of 0.2769 common shares of First Majestic plus CAD$0.0001 in cash per SilverCrest common share. With this acquisition,
SilverCrest’s Santa Elena Mine will be First Majestic’s sixth producing silver mine, adding further growth potential
to the Company’s portfolio of Mexican projects. It will also add approximately CAD$30 million in cash and further enhances
the Company’s working capital position. |
| · | On April 22, 2015, the Company completed
the bought deal private placement, issuing 4,620,000 common shares at a price of CAD$6.50 per share for gross proceeds of $24.5
million (CAD$30.0 million), or net proceeds of $23.0 million (CAD$28.1 million) after share issuance costs. |
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter MD&A | Page 2 |
REVIEW OF OPERATING RESULTS
Selected Production Results on a Mine-by-Mine Basis for the
Past Eight Quarters
| |
2015 | | |
2014 | | |
2013 | |
Production Highlights | |
Q2 | | |
Q1 | | |
Q4 | | |
Q3 | | |
Q2 | | |
Q1 | | |
Q4 | | |
Q3 | |
Ore processed/tonnes milled | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
La Encantada | |
| 189,811 | | |
| 167,270 | | |
| 186,411 | | |
| 169,659 | | |
| 183,177 | | |
| 181,924 | | |
| 252,467 | | |
| 248,578 | |
La Parrilla | |
| 178,736 | | |
| 172,647 | | |
| 175,830 | | |
| 178,252 | | |
| 171,617 | | |
| 186,216 | | |
| 200,541 | | |
| 189,664 | |
Del Toro | |
| 162,089 | | |
| 157,934 | | |
| 175,552 | | |
| 134,474 | | |
| 174,645 | | |
| 144,822 | | |
| 122,838 | | |
| 77,439 | |
San Martin | |
| 89,506 | | |
| 88,362 | | |
| 96,651 | | |
| 92,498 | | |
| 96,278 | | |
| 78,524 | | |
| 78,805 | | |
| 78,284 | |
La Guitarra | |
| 42,494 | | |
| 45,396 | | |
| 49,084 | | |
| 46,313 | | |
| 45,307 | | |
| 46,177 | | |
| 46,966 | | |
| 47,380 | |
Consolidated | |
| 662,637 | | |
| 631,609 | | |
| 683,528 | | |
| 621,196 | | |
| 671,024 | | |
| 637,663 | | |
| 701,617 | | |
| 641,345 | |
Silver equivalent ounces produced | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
La Encantada | |
| 605,299 | | |
| 548,124 | | |
| 792,605 | | |
| 813,701 | | |
| 1,079,122 | | |
| 1,046,224 | | |
| 962,505 | | |
| 931,027 | |
La Parrilla | |
| 985,107 | | |
| 1,080,445 | | |
| 1,159,177 | | |
| 1,168,240 | | |
| 1,142,432 | | |
| 1,203,337 | | |
| 1,151,728 | | |
| 1,208,635 | |
Del Toro | |
| 1,159,484 | | |
| 1,327,628 | | |
| 1,264,751 | | |
| 712,860 | | |
| 899,710 | | |
| 801,460 | | |
| 693,561 | | |
| 567,723 | |
San Martin | |
| 696,580 | | |
| 682,071 | | |
| 698,605 | | |
| 584,822 | | |
| 510,697 | | |
| 324,137 | | |
| 313,834 | | |
| 377,816 | |
La Guitarra | |
| 356,089 | | |
| 267,002 | | |
| 332,389 | | |
| 243,913 | | |
| 223,262 | | |
| 256,514 | | |
| 299,533 | | |
| 285,256 | |
Consolidated | |
| 3,802,558 | | |
| 3,905,270 | | |
| 4,247,527 | | |
| 3,523,536 | | |
| 3,855,223 | | |
| 3,631,672 | | |
| 3,421,161 | | |
| 3,370,457 | |
Silver ounces produced | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
La Encantada | |
| 602,869 | | |
| 544,735 | | |
| 788,369 | | |
| 806,055 | | |
| 1,073,636 | | |
| 1,043,573 | | |
| 959,312 | | |
| 900,077 | |
La Parrilla | |
| 620,839 | | |
| 622,237 | | |
| 646,283 | | |
| 705,928 | | |
| 716,045 | | |
| 808,196 | | |
| 813,090 | | |
| 866,710 | |
Del Toro | |
| 664,969 | | |
| 841,026 | | |
| 817,754 | | |
| 495,714 | | |
| 730,580 | | |
| 646,669 | | |
| 550,026 | | |
| 416,716 | |
San Martin | |
| 597,328 | | |
| 571,937 | | |
| 592,698 | | |
| 509,046 | | |
| 449,045 | | |
| 282,829 | | |
| 280,490 | | |
| 339,099 | |
La Guitarra | |
| 230,499 | | |
| 196,920 | | |
| 229,463 | | |
| 163,696 | | |
| 128,912 | | |
| 114,230 | | |
| 143,680 | | |
| 166,635 | |
Consolidated | |
| 2,716,503 | | |
| 2,776,855 | | |
| 3,074,567 | | |
| 2,680,439 | | |
| 3,098,218 | | |
| 2,895,497 | | |
| 2,746,598 | | |
| 2,689,237 | |
Cash cost per ounce | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
La Encantada | |
$ | 14.65 | | |
$ | 14.27 | | |
$ | 11.50 | | |
$ | 11.39 | | |
$ | 8.67 | | |
$ | 8.67 | | |
$ | 10.61 | | |
$ | 10.70 | |
La Parrilla | |
$ | 10.72 | | |
$ | 7.75 | | |
$ | 7.42 | | |
$ | 5.87 | | |
$ | 5.76 | | |
$ | 6.21 | | |
$ | 6.45 | | |
$ | 6.54 | |
Del Toro | |
$ | 4.34 | | |
$ | 5.09 | | |
$ | 7.03 | | |
$ | 15.94 | | |
$ | 14.70 | | |
$ | 16.50 | | |
$ | 12.16 | | |
$ | 9.29 | |
San Martin | |
$ | 6.25 | | |
$ | 6.29 | | |
$ | 7.32 | | |
$ | 9.60 | | |
$ | 10.02 | | |
$ | 12.94 | | |
$ | 13.96 | | |
$ | 10.34 | |
La Guitarra | |
$ | 6.74 | | |
$ | 11.28 | | |
$ | 9.45 | | |
$ | 10.91 | | |
$ | 9.48 | | |
$ | 2.14 | | |
$ | 4.08 | | |
$ | 5.63 | |
Consolidated | |
$ | 8.74 | | |
$ | 8.22 | | |
$ | 8.51 | | |
$ | 10.41 | | |
$ | 9.63 | | |
$ | 9.88 | | |
$ | 9.66 | | |
$ | 8.84 | |
All-in sustaining cost per ounce | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
La Encantada | |
$ | 18.32 | | |
$ | 17.85 | | |
$ | 17.76 | | |
$ | 17.32 | | |
$ | 14.25 | | |
$ | 13.70 | | |
| n/a | | |
| n/a | |
La Parrilla | |
$ | 14.48 | | |
$ | 12.58 | | |
$ | 11.09 | | |
$ | 11.77 | | |
$ | 11.42 | | |
$ | 11.99 | | |
| n/a | | |
| n/a | |
Del Toro | |
$ | 6.97 | | |
$ | 7.25 | | |
$ | 10.16 | | |
$ | 25.39 | | |
$ | 20.44 | | |
$ | 22.74 | | |
| n/a | | |
| n/a | |
San Martin | |
$ | 9.62 | | |
$ | 8.69 | | |
$ | 9.54 | | |
$ | 14.11 | | |
$ | 15.89 | | |
$ | 20.43 | | |
| n/a | | |
| n/a | |
La Guitarra | |
$ | 13.32 | | |
$ | 17.71 | | |
$ | 17.21 | | |
$ | 27.74 | | |
$ | 23.39 | | |
$ | 17.27 | | |
| n/a | | |
| n/a | |
Consolidated | |
$ | 14.49 | | |
$ | 13.88 | | |
$ | 14.43 | | |
$ | 19.89 | | |
$ | 18.18 | | |
$ | 18.71 | | |
| n/a | | |
| n/a | |
Production cost per tonne | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
La Encantada | |
$ | 44.21 | | |
$ | 43.96 | | |
$ | 45.29 | | |
$ | 50.82 | | |
$ | 46.47 | | |
$ | 45.77 | | |
$ | 37.49 | | |
$ | 37.50 | |
La Parrilla | |
$ | 46.49 | | |
$ | 42.64 | | |
$ | 42.68 | | |
$ | 44.48 | | |
$ | 45.58 | | |
$ | 41.38 | | |
$ | 35.80 | | |
$ | 40.82 | |
Del Toro | |
$ | 42.99 | | |
$ | 47.87 | | |
$ | 46.83 | | |
$ | 66.95 | | |
$ | 62.70 | | |
$ | 77.09 | | |
$ | 57.56 | | |
$ | 55.35 | |
San Martin | |
$ | 56.09 | | |
$ | 58.06 | | |
$ | 59.34 | | |
$ | 64.57 | | |
$ | 55.38 | | |
$ | 56.21 | | |
$ | 54.07 | | |
$ | 53.13 | |
La Guitarra | |
$ | 54.58 | | |
$ | 48.88 | | |
$ | 47.30 | | |
$ | 48.01 | | |
$ | 47.44 | | |
$ | 50.07 | | |
$ | 52.87 | | |
$ | 50.25 | |
Consolidated | |
$ | 46.80 | | |
$ | 46.90 | | |
$ | 47.15 | | |
$ | 54.34 | | |
$ | 51.81 | | |
$ | 53.20 | | |
$ | 42.69 | | |
$ | 43.49 | |
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter MD&A | Page 3 |
Operating Results – Consolidated Operations
Key Performance Metrics | |
2015-Q2 | | |
2015-Q1 | | |
Change | | |
2014-Q2 | | |
Change | | |
2015-YTD | | |
2014-YTD | | |
Change | |
Production | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Ore processed/tonnes milled | |
| 662,637 | | |
| 631,609 | | |
| 5 | % | |
| 671,024 | | |
| (1 | %) | |
| 1,294,247 | | |
| 1,308,687 | | |
| (1 | %) |
Average silver grade (g/t) | |
| 182 | | |
| 186 | | |
| (2 | %) | |
| 212 | | |
| (14 | %) | |
| 184 | | |
| 213 | | |
| (14 | %) |
Recovery (%) | |
| 70 | % | |
| 74 | % | |
| (5 | %) | |
| 68 | % | |
| 4 | % | |
| 72 | % | |
| 67 | % | |
| 7 | % |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Total silver ounces produced | |
| 2,716,503 | | |
| 2,776,855 | | |
| (2 | %) | |
| 3,098,218 | | |
| (12 | %) | |
| 5,493,357 | | |
| 5,993,715 | | |
| (8 | %) |
Total payable silver ounces produced | |
| 2,622,186 | | |
| 2,650,629 | | |
| (1 | %) | |
| 3,043,572 | | |
| (14 | %) | |
| 5,272,816 | | |
| 5,885,813 | | |
| (10 | %) |
Gold ounces produced | |
| 3,528 | | |
| 2,970 | | |
| 19 | % | |
| 2,801 | | |
| 26 | % | |
| 6,498 | | |
| 6,176 | | |
| 5 | % |
Pounds of lead produced | |
| 11,078,235 | | |
| 11,286,880 | | |
| (2 | %) | |
| 9,131,149 | | |
| 21 | % | |
| 22,365,115 | | |
| 17,724,956 | | |
| 26 | % |
Pounds of zinc produced | |
| 3,824,737 | | |
| 6,349,692 | | |
| (40 | %) | |
| 2,637,967 | | |
| 45 | % | |
| 10,174,429 | | |
| 5,327,241 | | |
| 91 | % |
Tonnes of iron ore produced | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 0 | % | |
| 515 | | |
| (100 | %) | |
| - | | |
| 703 | | |
| (100 | %) |
Total production - ounces silver equivalent | |
| 3,802,558 | | |
| 3,905,270 | | |
| (3 | %) | |
| 3,855,223 | | |
| (1 | %) | |
| 7,707,828 | | |
| 7,486,895 | | |
| 3 | % |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Underground development (m) | |
| 10,259 | | |
| 9,828 | | |
| 4 | % | |
| 12,497 | | |
| (18 | %) | |
| 20,088 | | |
| 24,712 | | |
| (19 | %) |
Diamond drilling (m) | |
| 16,268 | | |
| 5,425 | | |
| 200 | % | |
| 12,508 | | |
| 30 | % | |
| 21,693 | | |
| 19,698 | | |
| 10 | % |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Costs | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Mining cost per ounce | |
$ | 4.47 | | |
$ | 4.22 | | |
| 6 | % | |
$ | 3.97 | | |
| 13 | % | |
$ | 4.34 | | |
$ | 4.02 | | |
| 8 | % |
Milling cost per ounce | |
| 4.99 | | |
| 4.82 | | |
| 4 | % | |
| 5.49 | | |
| (9 | %) | |
| 4.90 | | |
| 5.77 | | |
| (15 | %) |
Indirect cost per ounce | |
| 2.36 | | |
| 2.14 | | |
| 11 | % | |
| 1.96 | | |
| 20 | % | |
| 2.25 | | |
| 1.88 | | |
| 20 | % |
Total production cost per ounce | |
$ | 11.83 | | |
$ | 11.18 | | |
| 6 | % | |
$ | 11.43 | | |
| 3 | % | |
$ | 11.50 | | |
$ | 11.67 | | |
| (1 | %) |
Transport and other selling costs per ounce | |
| 0.47 | | |
| 0.56 | | |
| (15 | %) | |
| 0.52 | | |
| (9 | %) | |
| 0.52 | | |
| 0.55 | | |
| (7 | %) |
Smelting and refining costs per ounce | |
| 2.68 | | |
| 3.11 | | |
| (14 | %) | |
| 2.00 | | |
| 34 | % | |
| 2.90 | | |
| 2.02 | | |
| 43 | % |
Environmental duty and royalties per ounce | |
| 0.12 | | |
| 0.12 | | |
| (2 | %) | |
| 0.13 | | |
| (7 | %) | |
| 0.12 | | |
| 0.14 | | |
| (10 | %) |
Cash cost per ounce before by-product credits | |
$ | 15.10 | | |
$ | 14.97 | | |
| 1 | % | |
$ | 14.08 | | |
| 7 | % | |
$ | 15.03 | | |
$ | 14.38 | | |
| 5 | % |
Deduct: By-product credits | |
| (6.36 | ) | |
| (6.75 | ) | |
| (6 | %) | |
| (4.45 | ) | |
| 43 | % | |
| (6.55 | ) | |
| (4.63 | ) | |
| 42 | % |
Cash
cost per ounce | |
$ | 8.74 | | |
$ | 8.22 | | |
| 6 | % | |
$ | 9.63 | | |
| (9 | %) | |
$ | 8.48 | | |
$ | 9.75 | | |
| (13 | %) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Workers’ Participation | |
| 0.13 | | |
| 0.00 | | |
| 100 | % | |
| 0.36 | | |
| (64 | %) | |
| 0.06 | | |
| 0.32 | | |
| (79 | %) |
General and administrative expenses | |
| 1.54 | | |
| 1.57 | | |
| (2 | %) | |
| 1.56 | | |
| (1 | %) | |
| 1.55 | | |
| 1.63 | | |
| (4 | %) |
Share-based payments | |
| 0.59 | | |
| 0.61 | | |
| (3 | %) | |
| 0.89 | | |
| (34 | %) | |
| 0.60 | | |
| 0.91 | | |
| (35 | %) |
Accretion of decommissioning liabilities | |
| 0.07 | | |
| 0.07 | | |
| 5 | % | |
| 0.07 | | |
| 9 | % | |
| 0.07 | | |
| 0.07 | | |
| 7 | % |
Sustaining capital expenditures | |
| 3.42 | | |
| 3.41 | | |
| 0 | % | |
| 5.67 | | |
| (40 | %) | |
| 3.41 | | |
| 5.78 | | |
| (41 | %) |
All-In
Sustaining Costs per ounce | |
$ | 14.49 | | |
$ | 13.88 | | |
| 4 | % | |
$ | 18.18 | | |
| (20 | %) | |
$ | 14.18 | | |
$ | 18.46 | | |
| (23 | %) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Mining cost per tonne | |
$ | 17.69 | | |
$ | 17.69 | | |
| 0 | % | |
$ | 17.99 | | |
| (2 | %) | |
| 17.69 | | |
$ | 18.08 | | |
| (2 | %) |
Milling cost per tonne | |
| 19.75 | | |
| 20.23 | | |
| (2 | %) | |
| 24.91 | | |
| (21 | %) | |
| 19.98 | | |
| 25.95 | | |
| (23 | %) |
Indirect cost per tonne | |
| 9.36 | | |
| 8.98 | | |
| 4 | % | |
| 8.91 | | |
| 5 | % | |
| 9.17 | | |
| 8.46 | | |
| 8 | % |
Total
production cost per tonne | |
$ | 46.80 | | |
$ | 46.90 | | |
| (0 | %) | |
$ | 51.81 | | |
| (10 | %) | |
$ | 46.85 | | |
$ | 52.49 | | |
| (11 | %) |
Production
Total production for the quarter was 3,802,558
silver equivalent ounces and consisted of 2,716,503 ounces of silver, 3,528 ounces of gold, 11,078,235 pounds of lead and
3,824,737 pounds of zinc. The decrease in production compared to the previous quarter was primarily attributed to lower production
from Del Toro, which encountered a 16% decrease in silver grades and an 8% decrease in silver recoveries as we were mining in a
lower grade area of the Perseverancia mine, as well as a 9% decrease in production at La Parrilla due to a return to normal zinc
grades after encountering exceptionally high zinc grades within the Vacas mine last quarter. The decreases in Del Toro and La Parrilla
were partially offset by a 33% improvement in production at La Guitarra due to improved silver and gold grades.
Cash Cost per Ounce
Cash cost per ounce (after by-product credits)
for the quarter was $8.74 per payable ounce of silver, an increase of 6% compared to $8.22 in the first quarter of 2015. The increase
in cash cost was affected by reduced by-product credits at La Parrilla due to the decrease in zinc production, as well as quarterly
productivity and annual union bonuses primarily at Del Toro, San Martin and La Parrilla. Cash costs at all other mines either improved
or were consistent when compared to the previous quarter.
Compared to the second quarter of 2014,
cash cost per ounce decreased by 9% or $0.89 per ounce. The decrease in cash cost per ounce was primarily attributed to economies
of scale from higher production at the Del Toro and San Martin mines, as well as the weaker Mexican Peso. At Del Toro, cash costs
decreased by $10.36 per ounce or 70% compared to the same quarter of the prior year due to improvements in recoveries and cost
savings contributed by the 115 kilovolt power line supplying 100% of the required power for Del Toro’s operation. At San
Martin, cash costs decreased by $3.77 per ounce or 38% compared to the second quarter of 2014, which was attributed to a 33% increase
in silver ounces produced as a result of increased head grades.
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter MD&A | Page 4 |
All-In Sustaining Cost per Ounce
All-in sustaining cost (“AISC”)
for the quarter was $14.49 per ounce, a 4% increase compared to $13.88 per ounce in the first quarter of 2015, consistent with
the increase in cash costs per ounce, and a 20% reduction compared to $18.18 per ounce in the second quarter of 2014. AISC improved
significantly compared to the second quarter of 2014 as a result of economies of scale attributed to production improvements from
Del Toro and San Martin. In addition, the Company has started to see cost savings materializing from the new power line at Del
Toro and ongoing re-negotiation with suppliers and contractors, staff reductions and the effect of the weaker Mexican Peso.
Head Grades and Recoveries
The overall average head grade for the
quarter was 182 grams per tonne (“g/t”), comparable to 186 g/t in the first quarter of 2015 and a decrease of 14% compared
to 212 g/t in the second quarter of 2014. Compared to the second quarter of 2014, the decrease in head grade was attributed
to a 42% decrease in La Encantada due to a change in the mine plan to extract ore from the breccias as it requires less development
costs, whereas La Guitarra experienced a significant 85% increase as the Company is transitioning from the old La Guitarra zone
to the newly developed Coloso zone and San Martin had a 37% increase in average silver grade due to high grades from the new Rosario
mine vein.
Combined recoveries of silver for all mines
in the quarter were 70% compared to 74% in the first quarter of 2015 and 68% in the second quarter of 2014. Recoveries in the current
quarter were primarily attributed to an 8% decrease in Del Toro, which was affected by the lower grade area of the Perseverancia
mine.
Development and Exploration
In mine development, a total of 10,259
metres of underground development was completed during the quarter, compared to 9,828 metres developed in the first quarter of
2015, and 12,497 metres completed in the second quarter of 2014. The decrease in mine development compared to the prior year was
the result of budgetary constraints implemented due to the low silver price environment.
In exploration, there are currently 18
active drill rigs at the Company’s five operating mines, five rigs at La Encantada, four each at Del Toro and La Parrilla,
three at San Martin and two at La Guitarra. During the quarter, a total of 16,268 metres were drilled compared to 5,425 metres
drilled in the first quarter of 2015 and 12,508 metres drilled in the second quarter of 2014. Drilling activity increased in the
second quarter primarily due to a slow start in the first quarter as the Company was renegotiating with drilling contractors. The
focus of the drilling program consisted of underground definition, in-fill drilling and expansionary surface drilling primarily
at La Encantada, Del Toro and La Parrilla. The Company ramped up its drilling program at La Encantada during the quarter in preparation
for the release of an updated NI 43-101 Technical Report and to define the resources in the newly discovered Ojuelas and Anomaly
B zones and at Del Toro to explore the continuity of veins in Dolores, San Juan and Perseverancia mines.
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter MD&A | Page 5 |
La Encantada Silver Mine, Coahuila, México
The La Encantada Silver Mine is an underground
mine located in the northern México State of Coahuila, 708 kilometres northeast of Torreon. The mine is comprised of 4,076
hectares of mining rights and surface land ownership of 1,343 hectares. La Encantada consists of a 4,000 tpd cyanidation plant,
a village with 180 houses as well as administrative offices, laboratory, general store, hospital, schools, church, airstrip and
the infrastructure required for such an operation. The mine is accessible via a 1.5 hour flight from Torreon, Coahuila to the mine’s
private airstrip or via mostly paved road from the closest town, Muzquiz, which is 225 kilometres away. The Company owns 100% of
the La Encantada Silver Mine.
LA ENCANTADA | |
2015-Q2 | | |
2015-Q1 | | |
Change | | |
2014-Q2 | | |
Change | | |
2015-YTD | | |
2014-YTD | | |
Change | |
PRODUCTION | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Ore processed/tonnes milled | |
| 189,811 | | |
| 167,270 | | |
| 13 | % | |
| 183,177 | | |
| 4 | % | |
| 357,081 | | |
| 365,101 | | |
| (2 | %) |
Average silver grade (g/t) | |
| 178 | | |
| 176 | | |
| 1 | % | |
| 306 | | |
| (42 | %) | |
| 177 | | |
| 309 | | |
| (43 | %) |
Recovery (%) | |
| 56 | % | |
| 58 | % | |
| (3 | %) | |
| 60 | % | |
| (7 | %) | |
| 57 | % | |
| 58 | % | |
| (3 | %) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Total silver ounces produced | |
| 602,869 | | |
| 544,735 | | |
| 11 | % | |
| 1,073,636 | | |
| (44 | %) | |
| 1,147,604 | | |
| 2,117,209 | | |
| (46 | %) |
Total payable silver ounces produced | |
| 600,458 | | |
| 542,556 | | |
| 11 | % | |
| 1,069,342 | | |
| (44 | %) | |
| 1,143,014 | | |
| 2,108,740 | | |
| (46 | %) |
Gold ounces produced | |
| 33 | | |
| 47 | | |
| (30 | %) | |
| 24 | | |
| 38 | % | |
| 80 | | |
| 44 | | |
| 82 | % |
Tonnes of iron ore produced | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 0 | % | |
| 515 | | |
| (100 | %) | |
| - | | |
| 703 | | |
| (100 | %) |
Total production - ounces silver equivalent | |
| 605,299 | | |
| 548,124 | | |
| 10 | % | |
| 1,079,122 | | |
| (44 | %) | |
| 1,153,423 | | |
| 2,125,346 | | |
| (46 | %) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Underground development (m) | |
| 2,021 | | |
| 2,989 | | |
| (32 | %) | |
| 3,095 | | |
| (35 | %) | |
| 5,010 | | |
| 5,937 | | |
| (16 | %) |
Diamond drilling (m) | |
| 5,309 | | |
| 828 | | |
| 541 | % | |
| 5,551 | | |
| (4 | %) | |
| 6,137 | | |
| 11,474 | | |
| (47 | %) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
COST | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Mining cost per ounce | |
$ | 3.97 | | |
$ | 3.82 | | |
| 4 | % | |
$ | 2.66 | | |
| 49 | % | |
$ | 3.90 | | |
$ | 2.61 | | |
| 49 | % |
Milling cost per ounce | |
| 6.94 | | |
| 6.76 | | |
| 3 | % | |
| 3.96 | | |
| 75 | % | |
| 6.85 | | |
| 4.08 | | |
| 68 | % |
Indirect cost per ounce | |
| 3.07 | | |
| 2.98 | | |
| 3 | % | |
| 1.31 | | |
| 134 | % | |
| 3.02 | | |
| 1.28 | | |
| 136 | % |
Total production cost per ounce | |
$ | 13.98 | | |
$ | 13.56 | | |
| 3 | % | |
$ | 7.93 | | |
| 76 | % | |
$ | 13.77 | | |
$ | 7.97 | | |
| 73 | % |
Transport and other selling costs per ounce | |
| 0.23 | | |
| 0.22 | | |
| 5 | % | |
| 0.25 | | |
| (8 | %) | |
| 0.23 | | |
| 0.23 | | |
| 0 | % |
Smelting and refining costs per ounce | |
| 0.39 | | |
| 0.45 | | |
| (13 | %) | |
| 0.44 | | |
| (11 | %) | |
| 0.42 | | |
| 0.40 | | |
| 5 | % |
Environmental duty and royalties per ounce | |
| 0.09 | | |
| 0.09 | | |
| 0 | % | |
| 0.12 | | |
| (25 | %) | |
| 0.09 | | |
| 0.11 | | |
| (18 | %) |
Cash cost per ounce before by-product credits | |
$ | 14.69 | | |
$ | 14.32 | | |
| 3 | % | |
$ | 8.74 | | |
| 68 | % | |
$ | 14.51 | | |
$ | 8.71 | | |
| 67 | % |
Deduct: By-product credits | |
| (0.04 | ) | |
| (0.05 | ) | |
| (20 | %) | |
| (0.07 | ) | |
| (43 | %) | |
| (0.04 | ) | |
| (0.05 | ) | |
| (20 | %) |
Cash
cost per ounce | |
$ | 14.65 | | |
$ | 14.27 | | |
| 3 | % | |
$ | 8.67 | | |
| 69 | % | |
$ | 14.47 | | |
$ | 8.66 | | |
| 67 | % |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Workers’ Participation | |
| 0.34 | | |
| (0.01 | ) | |
| (3503 | %) | |
| 1.02 | | |
| (66 | %) | |
| 0.17 | | |
| 0.89 | | |
| (81 | %) |
Accretion of decommissioning liabilities | |
| 0.09 | | |
| 0.10 | | |
| (12 | %) | |
| 0.05 | | |
| 76 | % | |
| 0.10 | | |
| 0.05 | | |
| 86 | % |
Sustaining capital expenditures | |
| 3.24 | | |
| 3.48 | | |
| (7 | %) | |
| 4.51 | | |
| (28 | %) | |
| 3.36 | | |
| 4.37 | | |
| (23 | %) |
All-In
Sustaining Costs per ounce | |
$ | 18.32 | | |
$ | 17.85 | | |
| 3 | % | |
$ | 14.25 | | |
| 29 | % | |
| 18.09 | | |
$ | 13.98 | | |
| 29 | % |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Mining cost per tonne | |
$ | 12.57 | | |
$ | 12.38 | | |
| 2 | % | |
$ | 15.60 | | |
| (19 | %) | |
$ | 12.48 | | |
$ | 15.07 | | |
| (17 | %) |
Milling cost per tonne | |
| 21.94 | | |
| 21.93 | | |
| 0 | % | |
| 23.20 | | |
| (5 | %) | |
| 21.94 | | |
| 23.57 | | |
| (7 | %) |
Indirect cost per tonne | |
| 9.70 | | |
| 9.65 | | |
| 1 | % | |
| 7.67 | | |
| 26 | % | |
| 9.68 | | |
| 7.39 | | |
| 31 | % |
Total
production cost per tonne | |
$ | 44.21 | | |
$ | 43.96 | | |
| 1 | % | |
$ | 46.47 | | |
| (5 | %) | |
$ | 44.10 | | |
$ | 46.03 | | |
| (4 | %) |
A total of 605,299 equivalent ounces of
silver were produced by the La Encantada processing plant during the second quarter. Production in the current quarter increased
by 10% from 548,124 equivalent ounces of silver in the first quarter of 2015 primarily due to a 13% increase in processed ore,
offset by a 2% decrease in average recoveries. Tonnage processed was affected in the previous quarter due to disruptions at the
plant associated with the expansion construction, specifically related to the installation of a new tertiary crusher. Compared
to the same quarter of the prior year, total production decreased by 44% due to a 42% decrease in silver grade from mining of lower
grade stopes during the quarter. The commissioning of the new 12' x 24' ball mill began at the end of May and initial ore processing
began in mid-June and has averaged 2,889 tpd in the month of July. The Company is currently testing the block caving system in
the Milagros breccia in order to further reduce costs for the 3,000 tpd operation. Meanwhile, a two kilometres access ramp to the
newly discovered Ojuelas area is in progress and is expected to be completed by the end of 2016.
Cash cost per ounce for the quarter was
$14.65, relatively unchanged compared to the previous quarter. Compared to the second quarter of 2014, cash cost per ounce was
69% higher primarily due to 42% decrease in silver grades and a decrease in recoveries. Cash costs per ounce is expected to improve
in the second half of the year with economies of scale from the expanded 3,000 tpd mill capacity with grades expected to remain
in the range of 160 g/t to 180 g/t for the remainder of the year. Total production cost per tonne for the quarter was $44.21, comparable
to the first quarter of 2015 and 5% lower compared to the second quarter of 2014.
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter MD&A | Page 6 |
Tonnage milled in the quarter was 189,811
tonnes, an increase of 13% compared to the first quarter of 2015 and 4% compared to the second quarter of 2014. Tonnage in the
prior quarter was limited by available crushing capacity impacted by down time in the crusher area for the installation of the
new crusher. Average head grade of 178 g/t in the current quarter was comparable to the previous quarter, but decreased from 306
g/t in the second quarter of 2014 due to the lower grades in the current stopes in production and the old stopes in which ore was
being extracted.
A total of 2,021 metres were developed
underground in the quarter compared to 2,989 metres in the first quarter of 2015 and 3,095 metres in the second quarter of 2014.
Mine developments in the San Javier breccia, Milagros breccia and 310 ore bodies have been prepared for initial production to begin
in the third quarter. These new production areas will utilize a variant of sub-level caving which is a low cost bulk mining method
typically used in large tonnage deposits.
During the second quarter, the Company
operated five drill rigs at La Encantada, consisting of four underground drill rigs and one on surface. A total of 5,309 metres
of exploration and diamond drilling were completed in the second quarter compared to 828 metres of drilling in the previous quarter
and 5,551 metres of drilling in the second quarter of 2014. The Ojuelas area is currently identified as a high priority for resource
development in La Encantada and more drilling has been planned in this area; for this reason the release of an updated NI 43-101
Technical Report is expected in late 2015 which is expected to include this newly discovered area.
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter MD&A | Page 7 |
La Parrilla Silver Mine, Durango, México
The La Parrilla Silver Mine, located approximately
65 kilometres southeast of the city of Durango, Durango State, México, is a complex of producing underground operations
consisting of the Rosarios / La Rosa and La Blanca mines which are inter-connected through underground workings, and the San Marcos,
Vacas and Quebradillas mines which are connected via above-ground gravel roads. The total mining concessions consist of 69,460 hectares
and the Company owns 45 hectares and leases an additional 69 hectares of surface rights, for a total of 114 hectares of surface
rights. La Parrilla includes a 2,000 tpd dual-circuit processing plant consisting of a 1,000 tpd cyanidation circuit and a 1,000
tpd flotation circuit, central laboratory, buildings, offices and associated infrastructure. The Company owns 100% of the La Parrilla
Silver Mine.
LA PARRILLA | |
2015-Q2 | | |
2015-Q1 | | |
Change | | |
2014-Q2 | | |
Change | | |
2015-YTD | | |
2014-YTD | | |
Change | |
PRODUCTION | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Ore processed/tonnes milled | |
| 178,736 | | |
| 172,647 | | |
| 4 | % | |
| 171,617 | | |
| 4 | % | |
| 351,383 | | |
| 357,833 | | |
| (2 | %) |
Average silver grade (g/t) | |
| 142 | | |
| 142 | | |
| 0 | % | |
| 164 | | |
| (14 | %) | |
| 142 | | |
| 169 | | |
| (16 | %) |
Recovery (%) | |
| 76 | % | |
| 79 | % | |
| (3 | %) | |
| 79 | % | |
| (3 | %) | |
| 78 | % | |
| 78 | % | |
| (1 | %) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Total silver ounces produced | |
| 620,839 | | |
| 622,237 | | |
| (0 | %) | |
| 716,045 | | |
| (13 | %) | |
| 1,243,075 | | |
| 1,524,241 | | |
| (18 | %) |
Total payable silver ounces produced | |
| 576,856 | | |
| 554,762 | | |
| 4 | % | |
| 693,634 | | |
| (17 | %) | |
| 1,131,618 | | |
| 1,475,873 | | |
| (23 | %) |
Gold ounces produced | |
| 295 | | |
| 269 | | |
| 10 | % | |
| 239 | | |
| 23 | % | |
| 564 | | |
| 503 | | |
| 12 | % |
Pounds of lead produced | |
| 2,043,654 | | |
| 1,629,240 | | |
| 25 | % | |
| 6,003,245 | | |
| (66 | %) | |
| 3,672,894 | | |
| 11,877,961 | | |
| (69 | %) |
Pounds of zinc produced | |
| 3,824,737 | | |
| 6,349,692 | | |
| (40 | %) | |
| 2,496,990 | | |
| 53 | % | |
| 10,174,429 | | |
| 4,816,215 | | |
| 111 | % |
Total production - ounces silver equivalent | |
| 985,107 | | |
| 1,080,445 | | |
| (9 | %) | |
| 1,142,432 | | |
| (14 | %) | |
| 2,065,551 | | |
| 2,345,769 | | |
| (12 | %) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Underground development (m) | |
| 1,901 | | |
| 2,077 | | |
| (8 | %) | |
| 2,033 | | |
| (6 | %) | |
| 3,978 | | |
| 4,288 | | |
| (7 | %) |
Diamond drilling (m) | |
| 4,356 | | |
| 1,437 | | |
| 203 | % | |
| 2,247 | | |
| 94 | % | |
| 5,793 | | |
| 2,695 | | |
| 115 | % |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
COST | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Mining cost per ounce | |
$ | 6.95 | | |
$ | 5.89 | | |
| 18 | % | |
$ | 3.96 | | |
| 76 | % | |
$ | 6.43 | | |
$ | 3.77 | | |
| 71 | % |
Milling cost per ounce | |
| 5.07 | | |
| 5.15 | | |
| (2 | %) | |
| 5.04 | | |
| 1 | % | |
| 5.11 | | |
| 4.79 | | |
| 7 | % |
Indirect cost per ounce | |
| 2.38 | | |
| 2.23 | | |
| 7 | % | |
| 2.28 | | |
| 4 | % | |
| 2.31 | | |
| 1.96 | | |
| 18 | % |
Total production cost per ounce | |
$ | 14.41 | | |
$ | 13.27 | | |
| 9 | % | |
$ | 11.28 | | |
| 28 | % | |
$ | 13.85 | | |
$ | 10.52 | | |
| 32 | % |
Transport and other selling costs per ounce | |
| 0.70 | | |
| 1.10 | | |
| (36 | %) | |
| 1.06 | | |
| (33 | %) | |
| 0.90 | | |
| 1.04 | | |
| (14 | %) |
Smelting and refining costs per ounce | |
| 4.65 | | |
| 5.78 | | |
| (19 | %) | |
| 4.27 | | |
| 9 | % | |
| 5.20 | | |
| 4.09 | | |
| 27 | % |
Environmental duty and royalties per ounce | |
| 0.19 | | |
| 0.20 | | |
| (7 | %) | |
| 0.20 | | |
| (4 | %) | |
| 0.20 | | |
| 0.22 | | |
| (12 | %) |
Cash cost per ounce before by-product credits | |
$ | 19.95 | | |
$ | 20.35 | | |
| (2 | %) | |
$ | 16.81 | | |
| 19 | % | |
$ | 20.15 | | |
$ | 15.87 | | |
| 27 | % |
Deduct: By-product credits | |
| (9.22 | ) | |
| (12.60 | ) | |
| (27 | %) | |
| (11.04 | ) | |
| (16 | %) | |
| (10.88 | ) | |
| (9.87 | ) | |
| 10 | % |
Cash
cost per ounce | |
$ | 10.72 | | |
$ | 7.75 | | |
| 38 | % | |
$ | 5.76 | | |
| 86 | % | |
$ | 9.27 | | |
$ | 6.00 | | |
| 54 | % |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Accretion of decommissioning liabilities | |
| 0.07 | | |
| 0.07 | | |
| (3 | %) | |
| 0.05 | | |
| 31 | % | |
| 0.07 | | |
| 0.05 | | |
| 45 | % |
Sustaining capital expenditures | |
| 3.69 | | |
| 4.76 | | |
| (22 | %) | |
| 5.59 | | |
| (34 | %) | |
| 4.21 | | |
| 5.67 | | |
| (26 | %) |
All-In
Sustaining Costs per ounce | |
$ | 14.48 | | |
$ | 12.58 | | |
| 15 | % | |
$ | 11.42 | | |
| 27 | % | |
$ | 13.55 | | |
$ | 11.72 | | |
| 16 | % |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Mining cost per tonne | |
$ | 22.44 | | |
$ | 18.93 | | |
| 19 | % | |
$ | 16.01 | | |
| 40 | % | |
$ | 20.71 | | |
$ | 15.55 | | |
| 33 | % |
Milling cost per tonne | |
| 16.37 | | |
| 16.55 | | |
| (1 | %) | |
| 20.36 | | |
| (20 | %) | |
| 16.46 | | |
| 19.76 | | |
| (17 | %) |
Indirect cost per tonne | |
| 7.68 | | |
| 7.16 | | |
| 7 | % | |
| 9.21 | | |
| (17 | %) | |
| 7.43 | | |
| 8.08 | | |
| (8 | %) |
Total
production cost per tonne | |
$ | 46.49 | | |
$ | 42.64 | | |
| 9 | % | |
$ | 45.58 | | |
| 2 | % | |
$ | 44.60 | | |
$ | 43.39 | | |
| 3 | % |
Total production from the La Parrilla mine
was 985,107 equivalent ounces of silver during the quarter, a decrease of 9% compared to 1,080,445 equivalent ounces of silver
in the previous quarter and a decrease of 14% compared to 1,142,432 equivalent ounces of silver in the second quarter of 2014.
The decrease against the previous quarter was primarily attributed to a 40% decrease in zinc produced, offset by a 25% increase
in lead produced as a result of a 23% increase in lead recoveries. The decrease in zinc production was primarily due to a return
to normal zinc grades after encountering exceptionally high zinc grade ores within the Vacas mine in the first quarter.
During the quarter, a total of 178,736
tonnes were processed, consistent with the previous quarter and the second quarter of 2014. During the second quarter of 2015,
the flotation circuit processed 89,241 tonnes having an average silver grade of 167 g/t and recovery of 87% while the cyanidation
circuit processed 89,495 tonnes having an average silver grade of 116 g/t and a 61% recovery. Overall, the average silver head
grade of 142 g/t and recoveries of 76% during the quarter were comparable to those in the previous quarter.
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter MD&A | Page 8 |
During the quarter, total production cost
was $46.49 per tonne, consistent with the previous quarter and the same quarter of 2014. Cash cost in the quarter was $10.72 per
ounce, an increase of 38% compared to the previous quarter and an increase of 86% compared to the second quarter of 2014. The $2.97
per ounce increase in cash cost compared to the first quarter of 2015 was primarily due a $3.38 per ounce decrease in by-product
credits as a consequence of the decrease in zinc production. The increase in cash cost compared to the second quarter of 2014 was
a result of a 17% decrease in payable silver ounces produced and a 16% decrease in by-product credits.
During the quarter, an additional 163 metres
of development and construction of the underground rail haulage level (Level 11) were completed and is now 2,412 metres in
length. Due to the reduction in development costs relating to budget cuts, the 5,000 metre project completion timeline has been
extended until the end of 2016. This new haulage and underground electric rail system will consist of a 5,000 metre tunnel and
a shaft of 260 vertical metres will eventually replace most of the current less efficient above-ground system of trucking ore to
the mill. Once completed, this investment is eventually expected to improve ore logistics, ultimately reducing overall operating
costs and thereby delivering operational efficiencies.
A total of 1,901 metres of underground
development were completed in the quarter, compared to 2,077 metres in the first quarter of 2015 and 2,033 metres in the second
quarter of 2014. A total of 4,356 metres of diamond drilling were completed in the quarter compared to 1,437 metres of diamond
drilling in the first quarter of 2015 and 2,247 metres in the second quarter of 2014. Four underground drill rigs were active as
the focus of the 2015 exploration program is on the Rosarios, Quebradillas and Vacas mines, where drilling results have indicated
potential higher grade ore bodies at depth.
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter MD&A | Page 9 |
Del Toro Silver Mine, Zacatecas, México
The Del Toro Silver Mine is located 60
kilometres to the southeast of the Company’s La Parrilla Silver Mine and consists of 606 contiguous hectares of mining claims
and 209 hectares of surface rights. The Del Toro operation represents the consolidation of three historical silver mines, the Perseverancia,
San Juan and Dolores mines, which are approximately one and three kilometres apart, respectively. Del Toro includes 4,000 tpd dual-circuit
processing plant consisting of a 2,000 tpd flotation circuit, which was deemed commercial on April 1, 2013, and a 2,000 tpd
cyanidation circuit, which was deemed commercial on January 1, 2014. The cyanidation circuit is currently in care and maintenance
pending exploration results. First Majestic owns 100% of the Del Toro Silver Mine.
DEL TORO | |
2015-Q2 | | |
2015-Q1 | | |
Change | | |
2014-Q2 | | |
Change | | |
2015-YTD | | |
2014-YTD | | |
Change | |
PRODUCTION | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Ore processed/tonnes milled | |
| 162,089 | | |
| 157,934 | | |
| 3 | % | |
| 174,645 | | |
| (7 | %) | |
| 320,024 | | |
| 319,467 | | |
| 0 | % |
Average silver grade (g/t) | |
| 178 | | |
| 212 | | |
| (16 | %) | |
| 197 | | |
| (10 | %) | |
| 195 | | |
| 203 | | |
| (4 | %) |
Recovery (%) | |
| 72 | % | |
| 78 | % | |
| (8 | %) | |
| 66 | % | |
| 9 | % | |
| 75 | % | |
| 66 | % | |
| 14 | % |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Total silver ounces produced | |
| 664,969 | | |
| 841,026 | | |
| (21 | %) | |
| 730,580 | | |
| (9 | %) | |
| 1,505,994 | | |
| 1,377,249 | | |
| 9 | % |
Total payable silver ounces produced | |
| 629,825 | | |
| 796,577 | | |
| (21 | %) | |
| 707,659 | | |
| (11 | %) | |
| 1,426,403 | | |
| 1,335,190 | | |
| 7 | % |
Gold ounces produced | |
| 106 | | |
| 182 | | |
| (42 | %) | |
| 164 | | |
| (35 | %) | |
| 288 | | |
| 358 | | |
| (20 | %) |
Pounds of lead produced | |
| 9,034,581 | | |
| 9,657,640 | | |
| (6 | %) | |
| 3,127,904 | | |
| 189 | % | |
| 18,692,221 | | |
| 5,846,995 | | |
| 220 | % |
Pounds of zinc produced | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 0 | % | |
| 140,977 | | |
| (100 | %) | |
| - | | |
| 511,026 | | |
| (100 | %) |
Total production - ounces silver equivalent | |
| 1,159,484 | | |
| 1,327,628 | | |
| (13 | %) | |
| 899,710 | | |
| 29 | % | |
| 2,487,112 | | |
| 1,701,170 | | |
| 46 | % |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Underground development (m) | |
| 1,813 | | |
| 1,686 | | |
| 8 | % | |
| 2,972 | | |
| (39 | %) | |
| 3,499 | | |
| 5,294 | | |
| (34 | %) |
Diamond drilling (m) | |
| 5,200 | | |
| 2,285 | | |
| 128 | % | |
| 1,108 | | |
| 369 | % | |
| 7,486 | | |
| 1,405 | | |
| 433 | % |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
COST | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Mining cost per ounce | |
$ | 4.33 | | |
$ | 3.82 | | |
| 13 | % | |
$ | 5.56 | | |
| (22 | %) | |
$ | 4.04 | | |
$ | 5.74 | | |
| (29 | %) |
Milling cost per ounce | |
| 4.73 | | |
| 4.10 | | |
| 15 | % | |
| 8.19 | | |
| (42 | %) | |
| 4.38 | | |
| 9.11 | | |
| (52 | %) |
Indirect cost per ounce | |
| 2.00 | | |
| 1.57 | | |
| 28 | % | |
| 1.74 | | |
| 15 | % | |
| 1.76 | | |
| 1.72 | | |
| 2 | % |
Total production cost per ounce | |
$ | 11.06 | | |
$ | 9.49 | | |
| 17 | % | |
$ | 15.49 | | |
| (29 | %) | |
$ | 10.19 | | |
$ | 16.57 | | |
| (39 | %) |
Transport and other selling costs per ounce | |
| 0.74 | | |
| 0.69 | | |
| 7 | % | |
| 0.59 | | |
| 25 | % | |
| 0.71 | | |
| 0.64 | | |
| 11 | % |
Smelting and refining costs per ounce | |
| 4.85 | | |
| 4.79 | | |
| 1 | % | |
| 2.68 | | |
| 81 | % | |
| 4.82 | | |
| 2.59 | | |
| 86 | % |
Environmental duty and royalties per ounce | |
| 0.09 | | |
| 0.11 | | |
| (20 | %) | |
| 0.10 | | |
| (11 | %) | |
| 0.10 | | |
| 0.11 | | |
| (9 | %) |
Cash cost per ounce before by-product credits | |
$ | 16.74 | | |
$ | 15.07 | | |
| 11 | % | |
$ | 18.86 | | |
| (11 | %) | |
$ | 15.81 | | |
$ | 19.91 | | |
| (21 | %) |
Deduct: By-product credits | |
| (12.40 | ) | |
| (9.99 | ) | |
| 24 | % | |
| (4.16 | ) | |
| 198 | % | |
| (11.05 | ) | |
| (4.36 | ) | |
| 154 | % |
Cash
cost per ounce | |
$ | 4.34 | | |
$ | 5.09 | | |
| (15 | %) | |
$ | 14.70 | | |
| (71 | %) | |
$ | 4.76 | | |
$ | 15.55 | | |
| (69 | %) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Accretion of decommissioning liabilities | |
| 0.06 | | |
| 0.05 | | |
| 23 | % | |
| 0.07 | | |
| (10 | %) | |
| 0.06 | | |
| 0.07 | | |
| (23 | %) |
Sustaining capital expenditures | |
| 2.57 | | |
| 2.11 | | |
| 22 | % | |
| 5.69 | | |
| (55 | %) | |
| 2.32 | | |
| 5.91 | | |
| (61 | %) |
All-In
Sustaining Costs per ounce | |
$ | 6.97 | | |
$ | 7.25 | | |
| (4 | %) | |
$ | 20.44 | | |
| (66 | %) | |
$ | 7.13 | | |
$ | 21.52 | | |
| (67 | %) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Mining cost per tonne | |
$ | 16.81 | | |
$ | 19.27 | | |
| (13 | %) | |
$ | 22.51 | | |
| (25 | %) | |
$ | 18.03 | | |
$ | 23.99 | | |
| (25 | %) |
Milling cost per tonne | |
| 18.40 | | |
| 20.69 | | |
| (11 | %) | |
| 33.14 | | |
| (44 | %) | |
| 19.53 | | |
| 38.07 | | |
| (49 | %) |
Indirect cost per tonne | |
| 7.78 | | |
| 7.91 | | |
| (2 | %) | |
| 7.05 | | |
| 10 | % | |
| 7.85 | | |
| 7.19 | | |
| 9 | % |
Total
production cost per tonne | |
$ | 42.99 | | |
$ | 47.87 | | |
| (10 | %) | |
$ | 62.70 | | |
| (31 | %) | |
$ | 45.41 | | |
$ | 69.25 | | |
| (34 | %) |
During the second quarter, total production
from the Del Toro mine was 1,159,484 ounces of silver equivalent, a 13% decrease compared to the previous quarter and an improvement
of 29% when compared to the same quarter of the prior year. The decrease in total production was primarily due to a 16% decrease
in silver grades and an 8% decrease in silver recoveries as we were mining in a lower grade area of the Perseverancia mine. The
mine operated at an average of 1,964 tpd during the quarter and the plant processed 162,089 tonnes of ore with an average silver
grade of 178 g/t. Tonnage processed in the quarter was comparable to the previous quarter, but was 7% lower than the same quarter
of the prior year due to poor ventilation in the Lupita vein area, which also had negative impacts in grade and recoveries during
the quarter. A Robbins raise bore is in development to improve the work conditions and the area, which is expected to resume its
normal operations near the end of the third quarter. Metallurgical recoveries were 72% in the quarter, a decrease compared to 78%
in the previous quarter as it was affected by the ventilation issue but was a significant improvement from 66% in the same quarter
of the prior year.
Del Toro has shown significant improvements
over the last two quarters, as the mine realized consistent and efficient energy fully sourced from the 115 kilovolt power line
for the power requirements of the mine, mill and auxiliary buildings. This has resulted in lower costs, higher production and improved
economics with the decommissioning of portable diesel power generation units.
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter MD&A | Page 10 |
Lead production in the quarter was 9,034,581
pounds, a 6% decrease from the record 9,657,640 pounds produced in the previous quarter. During the quarter, lead grades and recoveries
averaged 3.9% and 65%, respectively, compared to 4.2% and 72% in the previous quarter due to ore production from the lower lead
grade area of the Perseverancia mine.
Cash cost per ounce for the quarter was
$4.34, a decrease of 15% compared to $5.09 in the previous quarter and a decrease of 70% compared to $14.70 in the same quarter
of the prior year. The decrease in cash cost per ounce compared to the previous quarter was attributed to cost savings and efficiencies
from consolidation of mining contractors during the quarter. Compared to the second quarter of 2014, the decrease in cash cost
was primarily attributed to additional by-product credits from lead production and efficiencies in processing costs, most noteworthy
was the reduction in energy costs by connecting Del Toro to the national grid, as well as the foreign exchange effects of the weaker
Mexican Peso. Production cost per tonne in the current quarter was $42.99, a decrease of 10% compared to the previous quarter and
a 31% decrease when compared to the same quarter of the prior year.
Total underground development at Del Toro
in the current quarter was 1,813 metres compared to 1,686 metres in the first quarter of 2015 and 2,972 metres in the same
quarter of the prior year. The decrease in development metres compared to the prior year was due to the budget restraints while
the development on the eleventh level on Lupita vein was suspended until drilling in the area is completed.
At quarter end, four underground and one
surface drill rigs were active at Del Toro and a total of 5,200 metres was completed compared to 2,285 metres in the previous quarter
and 1,108 metres in the same quarter of 2014. A substantial portion of the drilling at Del Toro was focused on expansionary surface
drilling to explore the recently mapped northwest trending veins in the Santa Teresa area and new veins discovered in the Lupita
area, including Colorada and San Nicolas. In addition, the drilling program was extended to explore the Carmen-Consuelo veins system
between the Perseverancia and San Juan mines.
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter MD&A | Page 11 |
San Martin Silver Mine, Jalisco, México
The San Martin Silver Mine is an underground
mine located near the town of San Martin de Bolaños in the Bolaños River valley, in the northern portion of the State
of Jalisco, México. The mine comprises of 33 contiguous mining concessions in the San Martin de Bolaños mining district
that cover mineral rights for 37,518 hectares, including the application to acquire two new mining concessions covering 29,676
hectares which are in the process of registration. In addition, the mine owns 160 hectares of surface land where the processing
plant, camp, office facilities, maintenance shops, and tailings dams are located, and an additional 1,296 hectares of surface rights.
The newly expanded 1,300 tpd mill and processing plant consists of crushing, grinding and conventional cyanidation by agitation
in tanks and a Merrill-Crowe doré production system. The mine can be accessed via small plane, 150 kilometres by air or
250 kilometres by paved road north of Guadalajara City. The San Martin mine is 100% owned by the Company.
SAN MARTIN | |
2015-Q2 | | |
2015-Q1 | | |
Change | | |
2014-Q2 | | |
Change | | |
2015-YTD | | |
2014-YTD | | |
Change | |
PRODUCTION | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Ore processed/tonnes milled | |
| 89,506 | | |
| 88,362 | | |
| 1 | % | |
| 96,278 | | |
| (7 | %) | |
| 177,869 | | |
| 174,802 | | |
| 2 | % |
Average silver grade (g/t) | |
| 268 | | |
| 258 | | |
| 4 | % | |
| 196 | | |
| 37 | % | |
| 263 | | |
| 181 | | |
| 45 | % |
Recovery (%) | |
| 77 | % | |
| 78 | % | |
| (1 | %) | |
| 74 | % | |
| 5 | % | |
| 78 | % | |
| 72 | % | |
| 8 | % |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Total silver ounces produced | |
| 597,328 | | |
| 571,937 | | |
| 4 | % | |
| 449,045 | | |
| 33 | % | |
| 1,169,265 | | |
| 731,874 | | |
| 60 | % |
Total payable silver ounces produced | |
| 596,731 | | |
| 570,221 | | |
| 5 | % | |
| 447,249 | | |
| 33 | % | |
| 1,166,952 | | |
| 728,947 | | |
| 60 | % |
Gold ounces produced | |
| 1,364 | | |
| 1,511 | | |
| (10 | %) | |
| 939 | | |
| 45 | % | |
| 2,875 | | |
| 1,592 | | |
| 81 | % |
Total production - ounces silver equivalent | |
| 696,580 | | |
| 682,071 | | |
| 2 | % | |
| 510,697 | | |
| 36 | % | |
| 1,378,652 | | |
| 834,834 | | |
| 65 | % |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Underground development (m) | |
| 2,208 | | |
| 2,010 | | |
| 10 | % | |
| 2,599 | | |
| (15 | %) | |
| 4,219 | | |
| 5,818 | | |
| (27 | %) |
Diamond drilling (m) | |
| 833 | | |
| 266 | | |
| 213 | % | |
| 1,377 | | |
| (40 | %) | |
| 1,099 | | |
| 1,653 | | |
| (34 | %) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
COST | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Mining cost per ounce | |
$ | 2.90 | | |
$ | 3.39 | | |
| (14 | %) | |
$ | 4.00 | | |
| (27 | %) | |
$ | 3.14 | | |
$ | 4.37 | | |
| (28 | %) |
Milling cost per ounce | |
| 3.93 | | |
| 4.12 | | |
| (5 | %) | |
| 5.53 | | |
| (29 | %) | |
| 4.02 | | |
| 6.44 | | |
| (38 | %) |
Indirect cost per ounce | |
| 1.58 | | |
| 1.49 | | |
| 6 | % | |
| 2.40 | | |
| (34 | %) | |
| 1.54 | | |
| 2.56 | | |
| (40 | %) |
Total production cost per ounce | |
$ | 8.41 | | |
$ | 9.00 | | |
| (7 | %) | |
$ | 11.92 | | |
| (29 | %) | |
$ | 8.70 | | |
$ | 13.37 | | |
| (35 | %) |
Transport and other selling costs per ounce | |
| 0.20 | | |
| 0.13 | | |
| 52 | % | |
| 0.18 | | |
| 9 | % | |
| 0.17 | | |
| 0.21 | | |
| (22 | %) |
Smelting and refining costs per ounce | |
| 0.25 | | |
| 0.27 | | |
| (7 | %) | |
| 0.28 | | |
| (9 | %) | |
| 0.26 | | |
| 0.30 | | |
| (14 | %) |
Environmental duty and royalties per ounce | |
| 0.11 | | |
| 0.10 | | |
| 6 | % | |
| 0.14 | | |
| (22 | %) | |
| 0.11 | | |
| 0.13 | | |
| (16 | %) |
Cash cost per ounce before by-product credits | |
$ | 8.97 | | |
$ | 9.50 | | |
| (6 | %) | |
$ | 12.53 | | |
| (28 | %) | |
$ | 9.23 | | |
$ | 14.02 | | |
| (34 | %) |
Deduct: By-product credits | |
| (2.72 | ) | |
| (3.21 | ) | |
| (15 | %) | |
| (2.50 | ) | |
| 9 | % | |
| (2.96 | ) | |
| (2.87 | ) | |
| 3 | % |
Cash
cost per ounce | |
$ | 6.25 | | |
$ | 6.29 | | |
| (1 | %) | |
$ | 10.02 | | |
| (38 | %) | |
$ | 6.27 | | |
$ | 11.15 | | |
| (44 | %) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Workers’ Participation | |
| 0.25 | | |
| (0.01 | ) | |
| (2605 | %) | |
| 0.00 | | |
| 0 | % | |
| 0.12 | | |
| 0.00 | | |
| 0 | % |
Accretion of decommissioning liabilities | |
| 0.06 | | |
| 0.07 | | |
| (8 | %) | |
| 0.08 | | |
| (15 | %) | |
| 0.07 | | |
| 0.09 | | |
| (28 | %) |
Sustaining capital expenditures | |
| 3.05 | | |
| 2.34 | | |
| 30 | % | |
| 5.80 | | |
| (47 | %) | |
| 2.70 | | |
| 6.41 | | |
| (58 | %) |
All-In
Sustaining Costs per ounce | |
$ | 9.62 | | |
$ | 8.69 | | |
| 11 | % | |
$ | 15.89 | | |
| (39 | %) | |
$ | 9.17 | | |
$ | 17.64 | | |
| (48 | %) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Mining cost per tonne | |
$ | 19.36 | | |
$ | 21.86 | | |
| (11 | %) | |
$ | 18.57 | | |
| 4 | % | |
$ | 20.60 | | |
$ | 18.22 | | |
| 13 | % |
Milling cost per tonne | |
| 26.17 | | |
| 26.59 | | |
| (2 | %) | |
| 25.67 | | |
| 2 | % | |
| 26.38 | | |
| 26.86 | | |
| (2 | %) |
Indirect cost per tonne | |
| 10.56 | | |
| 9.61 | | |
| 10 | % | |
| 11.14 | | |
| (5 | %) | |
| 10.09 | | |
| 10.68 | | |
| (6 | %) |
Total
production cost per tonne | |
$ | 56.09 | | |
$ | 58.06 | | |
| (3 | %) | |
$ | 55.38 | | |
| 1 | % | |
$ | 57.07 | | |
$ | 55.76 | | |
| 2 | % |
San Martin had another excellent quarter
with 696,580 silver equivalent ounces of production during the quarter, exceeding the previous quarterly production record of 682,071
ounces, and a 36% increase from the 510,697 ounces produced in the same quarter of the prior year.
During the quarter, the San Martin mine
processed a total of 89,506 tonnes, an average of 984 tpd compared to 971 tpd in the previous quarter. The average head grade was
268 g/t, an increase of 4% compared to the previous quarter and 37% compared to the same quarter of the prior year. The increase
in the ore grade compared to the prior quarters is due to higher grades from the development of new veins from the Rosario mine.
Silver recovery in the quarter was 77%,
comparable to 78% in the previous quarter, and an increase compared to 74% in the same quarter of the prior year. The increase
in recovery in the prior quarter was attributed to improvements made in leaching and thickener tanks, and the precipitation processes.
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter MD&A | Page 12 |
During the quarter, total production cost
was $56.09 per tonne, consistent with cost in the first quarter of 2015 and second quarter of 2014. Cash cost per ounce was $6.25,
consistent with $6.29 per ounce in the previous quarter and a 38% improvement compared to the $10.02 per ounce in the second quarter
of 2014. The decrease in cash cost was a result of lower milling and indirect costs, as well as increase in by-product credits.
Total production cost per tonne at the San Martin mine are marginally higher than the other mines due to the additional ground
support costs such as rock-bolting, screening and shot-creting, due to the unstable ground conditions.
A total of 2,208 metres of underground
development was completed in the quarter compared to 2,010 metres of development in the previous quarter and 2,599 metres of development
in the second quarter of 2014.
During the quarter, a total of 833 metres
of diamond drilling were completed compared with 266 metres drilled in the previous quarter and 1,377 metres drilled in the
second quarter of 2014. During the quarter, three drill rigs were active focusing on extending the preparation of mining levels
in the mineralized zones of the Rosario vein.
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter MD&A | Page 13 |
La Guitarra Silver Mine, México State, México
The La Guitarra Silver Mine is located
in the Temascaltepec Mining District in the State of México, near Toluca, México, approximately 130 kilometres southwest
from México City. The La Guitarra mine covers 39,714 hectares of mining claims and consists of a recently expanded 500 tpd
flotation mill with a new ball mill, new flotation cells, buildings and related infrastructure. The Company owns 100% of the La
Guitarra mine.
LA GUITARRA | |
2015-Q2 | | |
2015-Q1 | | |
Change | | |
2014-Q2 | | |
Change | | |
2015-YTD | | |
2014-YTD | | |
Change | |
PRODUCTION | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Ore processed/tonnes milled | |
| 42,494 | | |
| 45,396 | | |
| (6 | %) | |
| 45,307 | | |
| (6 | %) | |
| 87,890 | | |
| 91,484 | | |
| (4 | %) |
Average silver grade (g/t) | |
| 203 | | |
| 160 | | |
| 27 | % | |
| 110 | | |
| 85 | % | |
| 181 | | |
| 102 | | |
| 77 | % |
Recovery (%) | |
| 83 | % | |
| 84 | % | |
| (1 | %) | |
| 81 | % | |
| 3 | % | |
| 84 | % | |
| 81 | % | |
| 3 | % |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Total silver ounces produced | |
| 230,499 | | |
| 196,920 | | |
| 17 | % | |
| 128,912 | | |
| 79 | % | |
| 427,418 | | |
| 243,142 | | |
| 76 | % |
Total payable silver ounces produced | |
| 218,317 | | |
| 186,513 | | |
| 17 | % | |
| 125,689 | | |
| 74 | % | |
| 404,829 | | |
| 237,063 | | |
| 71 | % |
Gold ounces produced | |
| 1,731 | | |
| 961 | | |
| 80 | % | |
| 1,435 | | |
| 21 | % | |
| 2,692 | | |
| 3,679 | | |
| (27 | %) |
Total production - ounces silver equivalent | |
| 356,089 | | |
| 267,002 | | |
| 33 | % | |
| 223,262 | | |
| 59 | % | |
| 623,090 | | |
| 479,776 | | |
| 30 | % |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Underground development (m) | |
| 2,316 | | |
| 1,066 | | |
| 117 | % | |
| 1,798 | | |
| 29 | % | |
| 3,381 | | |
| 3,375 | | |
| 0 | % |
Diamond drilling (m) | |
| 569 | | |
| 609 | | |
| (7 | %) | |
| 2,225 | | |
| (74 | %) | |
| 1,178 | | |
| 2,471 | | |
| (52 | %) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
COST | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Mining cost per ounce | |
$ | 3.99 | | |
$ | 4.61 | | |
| (13 | %) | |
$ | 5.96 | | |
| (33 | %) | |
$ | 4.28 | | |
| 7.28 | | |
| (41 | %) |
Milling cost per ounce | |
| 3.07 | | |
| 3.41 | | |
| (10 | %) | |
| 5.68 | | |
| (46 | %) | |
| 3.23 | | |
| 6.04 | | |
| (47 | %) |
Indirect cost per ounce | |
| 3.56 | | |
| 3.87 | | |
| (8 | %) | |
| 5.46 | | |
| (35 | %) | |
| 3.71 | | |
| 5.50 | | |
| (33 | %) |
Total production cost per ounce | |
$ | 10.62 | | |
$ | 11.89 | | |
| (11 | %) | |
$ | 17.10 | | |
| (38 | %) | |
$ | 11.21 | | |
$ | 18.82 | | |
| (40 | %) |
Transport and other selling costs per ounce | |
| 0.52 | | |
| 0.66 | | |
| (21 | %) | |
| 0.92 | | |
| (43 | %) | |
| 0.58 | | |
| 0.99 | | |
| (41 | %) |
Smelting and refining costs per ounce | |
| 4.15 | | |
| 4.42 | | |
| (6 | %) | |
| 5.01 | | |
| (17 | %) | |
| 4.27 | | |
| 5.59 | | |
| (24 | %) |
Environmental duty and royalties per ounce | |
| 0.13 | | |
| 0.13 | | |
| 2 | % | |
| 0.18 | | |
| (28 | %) | |
| 0.13 | | |
| 0.22 | | |
| (42 | %) |
Cash cost per ounce before by-product credits | |
$ | 15.43 | | |
$ | 17.10 | | |
| (10 | %) | |
$ | 23.22 | | |
| (34 | %) | |
$ | 16.20 | | |
$ | 25.62 | | |
| (37 | %) |
Deduct: By-product credits | |
| (8.68 | ) | |
| (5.82 | ) | |
| 49 | % | |
| (13.74 | ) | |
| (37 | %) | |
| (7.36 | ) | |
| (19.59 | ) | |
| (62 | %) |
Cash
cost per ounce | |
$ | 6.74 | | |
$ | 11.28 | | |
| (40 | %) | |
$ | 9.48 | | |
| (29 | %) | |
$ | 8.83 | | |
$ | 6.03 | | |
| 46 | % |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Workers’ Participation | |
| (0.07 | ) | |
| 0.08 | | |
| (186 | %) | |
| 0.00 | | |
| (100 | %) | |
| 0.00 | | |
| 0.00 | | |
| 100 | % |
Accretion of decommissioning liabilities | |
| 0.09 | | |
| 0.11 | | |
| (14 | %) | |
| 0.25 | | |
| (62 | %) | |
| 0.10 | | |
| 0.26 | | |
| (61 | %) |
Sustaining capital expenditures | |
| 6.55 | | |
| 6.24 | | |
| 5 | % | |
| 13.65 | | |
| (52 | %) | |
| 6.41 | | |
| 14.21 | | |
| (55 | %) |
All-In
Sustaining Costs per ounce | |
$ | 13.32 | | |
$ | 17.71 | | |
| (25 | %) | |
$ | 23.39 | | |
| (43 | %) | |
$ | 15.35 | | |
$ | 20.51 | | |
| (25 | %) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Mining cost per tonne | |
$ | 20.51 | | |
$ | 18.95 | | |
| 8 | % | |
$ | 16.51 | | |
| 24 | % | |
$ | 19.70 | | |
$ | 18.86 | | |
| 4 | % |
Milling cost per tonne | |
| 15.75 | | |
| 14.02 | | |
| 12 | % | |
| 15.77 | | |
| (0 | %) | |
| 14.85 | | |
| 15.65 | | |
| (5 | %) |
Indirect cost per tonne | |
| 18.31 | | |
| 15.91 | | |
| 15 | % | |
| 15.16 | | |
| 21 | % | |
| 17.07 | | |
| 14.25 | | |
| 20 | % |
Total
production cost per tonne | |
$ | 54.58 | | |
$ | 48.88 | | |
| 12 | % | |
$ | 47.44 | | |
| 15 | % | |
$ | 51.62 | | |
$ | 48.76 | | |
| 6 | % |
During the quarter, the La Guitarra mine
achieved record quarterly production of 356,089 equivalent ounces of silver, including 230,499 silver ounces and 1,731 gold ounces.
This represents an increase in quarterly production of 33% compared to the previous quarter and an increase of 59% compared to
the same quarter of 2014. Improvements in dilution and grade control have continued to support the increase in silver and gold
grades, resulting in a 27% increase in silver grades and a 94% increase in gold grades compared to the previous quarter.
A total of 42,494 tonnes of ore were processed
during the quarter consisting of an average silver head grade of 203 g/t with recoveries of 83% compared to 45,396 tonnes
of ore with silver head grades of 160 g/t and recoveries of 84% in the previous quarter. Mine production within the Coloso area
delivered 61% of total throughput during the quarter. La Guitarra is currently advancing on the recently announced development
plan into the Nazareno area with the construction of a 760 metre cross-cut from the Coloso area, which began in May and is expected
to be completed by the end of the year.
Average production cost for the quarter
was $54.58 per tonne, a 12% increase compared to the previous quarter and a 15% increase compared to the same quarter of the prior
year. The increase in production cost per tonne was primarily attributed to the decrease in tonnes processed. Cash cost in this
quarter was $6.74 per ounce, a decrease of 40% or $4.54 per ounce compared to the previous quarter and a 29% decrease compared
to the second quarter of 2014, primarily due to improved silver and gold grades.
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter MD&A | Page 14 |
A total of 2,316 metres of underground
development was completed during the quarter compared to 1,066 metres in the previous quarter and 1,798 metres in the second
quarter of 2014. During the quarter, two underground drill rigs were active at the La Guitarra property and 569 metres of
diamond drilling were completed compared to 609 metres during the previous quarter and 2,225 metres in the same quarter of the
prior year. The drilling program currently focuses on the La Guitarra veins in order to confirm high grade ore shoots to assist
underground mining activities and further define Reserves and Resources. An updated NI 43-101 Technical Report for La Guitarra
was released on March 31, 2015.
In 2014, the Company entered into two agreements
to acquire 757 hectares of adjacent mineral rights at the La Guitarra Silver Mine. The total purchase price amounted to $5.4 million,
of which $5.2 million is settled in common shares of First Majestic and $0.2 million in cash. As at June 30, 2015, the Company
has paid the $0.2 million and issued $3.2 million in common shares. The remaining balance of $2.0 million in common shares will
be issued in four equal annual payments based on the Company’s volume weighted average market price at the time of the payments.
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter MD&A | Page 15 |
DEVELOPMENT AND EXPLORATION PROJECTS
Plomosas Silver Project
The Plomosas Silver Project, which was
acquired with the 2012 Silvermex acquisition, consists of 13 mining concessions covering 6,986 hectares, which include the adjacent
Rosario and San Juan historic mines located in the Sinaloa State, México.
The two key areas of interest within the
property’s boundaries are the historic operations of the Rosario and San Juan mines. Extensive facilities and infrastructure
are in place on the property, including a fully functional mining camp facility for 120 persons, a 20 year surface rights agreement
in good standing, a 30 year water use permit, a tailings dam, a 60 kilometre 33 kilovolt power line, an infirmary, offices, shops
and warehouses, and an assay lab. Extensive underground development pre-existing at the Rosario and San Juan mines will allow for
easy access to mineralized zones. This existing development is expected to allow First Majestic to accelerate development with
significant cost savings.
The Plomosas Silver Project is a high priority
for the Company. The Company is currently utilizing the mining camp infrastructure to maintain the old structures under care and
maintenance. Future plans include drilling and development in order to prepare a NI 43-101 Technical report with resource estimates
and a Preliminary Economic Assessment.
La Luz Silver Project, San Luis Potosi, México
The La Luz Silver Project is located 25
kilometres west of the town of Matehuala in San Luis Potosi State, México, near the village of Real de Catorce. The Company
owns 100% of the La Luz Silver Project and all of the associated mining claims of what was historically known as the Santa Ana
Mine and consists of 36 mining concessions covering 4,977 hectares, with estimated historical production of 230 million ounces
between 1773 and 1990. In July 2013, the Company completed the acquisition of an additional 21 hectares of surface rights
covering 29 adjacent properties for $1.0 million. The total surface rights on different properties at La Luz amount to 26 hectares.
There has been opposition to mining in
the La Luz area from certain indigenous people (Huicholes) and non-government organizations. An injunction was placed by the Company
to defend against the indigenous people’s attempts to obtain a constitutional decree to declare certain areas in San Luis
Potosi as natural protected areas, including areas within which the La Luz mine has been duly granted mining concessions. These
constitutional legal matters are being addressed in the Mexican courts by the Company. Contrary to media reports regarding the
La Luz project, the Company has no plans to do any above ground mining, no plans for open pit mining, and has no plans for the
use of cyanide in any of its processing activities on or around the La Luz project.
To date, the Baseline Study and the Geo-hydrologic
Study have been completed. The Company has submitted three different legal orders to obtain approvals to present its final permit
applications. The Company has obtained one positive resolution and the remaining orders remain in front of the court. There is
currently no estimate of when a final resolution can be expected. The Company is ready to submit the Environmental Impact Statement,
the Risk Study and the Change of Use of Land Studies to government authorities once the courts resolve the outstanding constitutional
matters.
During the first quarter of 2014, the Company
decided to suspend the project of restoring old historic buildings at the Santa Ana Hacienda and the construction of the previously
announced Thematic and Cultural Park and Mining Museum. To date, an amount of $3.8 million has been invested in the project. The
new cultural centre and mining museum was part of a “Sustainable Development Project” which was providing permanent
long term jobs to the local community but which has now been suspended.
Jalisco Group of Properties, Jalisco, México
The Company acquired a group of mining
claims totalling 5,245 hectares located in various mining districts located in Jalisco State, México. During 2008, surface
geology and mapping began with the purpose of defining future drill targets. However, exploration has since been discontinued as
the Company focuses its capital investment on other more mature and higher priority projects.
The Company owns the Jalisco Group of Properties
which consist of 5,240 hectares of mining claims in Jalisco State, Mexico. In April 2011, and subsequently amended in April 2014,
the Company entered into an agreement with Sonora Resources Corp. (the “Optionee”) whereby the Optionee had an option
to acquire up to 90% in the Jalisco Group of Properties. As part of the agreement, the Optionee issued 13 million common shares
to the Company and committed to spend $3 million over the first five years to earn a 50% interest, an additional $2 million
over seven years to earn a 70% interest and to complete a bankable feasibility study within nine years to obtain a 90% interest.
First Majestic would retain a 10% free carried interest and a 2.375% NSR.
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter MD&A | Page 16 |
Divestiture of Minera Terra Plata
On July 1, 2014, First Majestic divested
its 100% owned subsidiary, Minera Terra Plata S.A. de C.V. (“Terra Plata”), to Sundance Minerals Ltd. (“Sundance”),
a privately held exploration company. In exchange, the Company received 14,509,279 common shares of Sundance, equivalent to 34.2%
of its issued and outstanding shares at the time of the transaction, valued at $3.4 million. Terra Plata owns a 100% interest in
the Penasco Quemado, the La Frazada and the Los Lobos projects, properties that First Majestic acquired through its acquisition
of Silvermex Resources Inc. in 2012.
As at July 1, 2014, Terra Plata had a net
book value of $3.6 million, comprised of $3.7 million in mining interest, $0.1 million in other receivables, net of $0.2 million
in deferred income tax liabilities. As a result, the Company recognized a $0.2 million loss on disposal of the subsidiary in the
third quarter of 2014.
In the plan of arrangement, Sundance closed
private placements of CAD$2.7 million in October 2014, and CAD$5.0 million in March 2015, and completed the reverse takeover
of Albion Petroleum Ltd. The resulting entity was renamed First Mining Finance Corp. (“First Mining”) and is listed
on the TSX Venture Exchange (TSX.V: FF; OTC: FFMGF). First Majestic’s holding were converted on a 1:1 basis into common shares
of First Mining, equivalent to 19.7% of the issued and outstanding shares at June 30, 2015.
The Company’s investment in First
Mining is accounted for as an Investment in Associate. During the six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company recognized a
gain of $0.1 million in relation to dilution of its investment in First Mining from 31.7% to 19.7%. During the three and six months
ended June 30, 2015, the Company’s share of First Mining’s net loss was $0.3 million (2014 - $nil) and $0.4 million
(2014 - $nil), respectively.
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter MD&A | Page 17 |
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
For the quarters ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands
of dollars, except for per share amounts):
| |
Second Quarter | | |
Second Quarter | | |
|
|
| |
2015 | | |
2014 | | |
Variance % |
|
| |
| | |
| | |
|
|
Revenues | |
$ | 54,190 | | |
$ | 66,927 | | |
| -19% |
(1) |
Cost of sales (excludes depletion, depreciation and amortization) | |
| 33,314 | | |
| 42,727 | | |
| -22% |
(2) |
Gross margin | |
| 20,876 | | |
| 24,200 | | |
| -14% |
|
Depletion, depreciation and amortization | |
| 17,435 | | |
| 14,699 | | |
| 19% |
(3) |
Mine operating earnings | |
| 3,441 | | |
| 9,501 | | |
| -64% |
(4) |
General and administrative expenses | |
| 4,229 | | |
| 4,938 | | |
| -14% |
(5) |
Share-based payments | |
| 1,544 | | |
| 2,678 | | |
| -42% |
|
Accretion of decommissioning liabilities | |
| 192 | | |
| 205 | | |
| -6% |
|
Foreign exchange (gain) loss | |
| (662 | ) | |
| 640 | | |
| -203% |
|
Operating (loss) earnings | |
| (1,862 | ) | |
| 1,040 | | |
| -279% |
|
Investment and other (loss) income | |
| (1,345 | ) | |
| 10,625 | | |
| -113% |
(6) |
Finance costs | |
| (1,242 | ) | |
| (1,990 | ) | |
| -38% |
|
(Loss) earnings before income taxes | |
| (4,449 | ) | |
| 9,675 | | |
| -146% |
|
Current income tax expense | |
| 1,269 | | |
| 2,398 | | |
| -47% |
|
Deferred income tax (recovery) expense | |
| (3,140 | ) | |
| (313 | ) | |
| 903% |
|
Income tax (recovery) expense | |
| (1,871 | ) | |
| 2,085 | | |
| -190% |
(7) |
Net
(loss) earnings for the period | |
$ | (2,578 | ) | |
$ | 7,590 | | |
| -134% |
(8) |
(Loss) earnings per share (basic) | |
$ | (0.02 | ) | |
$ | 0.06 | | |
| -133% |
(8) |
(Loss) earnings per share (diluted) | |
$ | (0.02 | ) | |
$ | 0.06 | | |
| -133% |
(8) |
| 1. | Revenues in the quarter decreased compared to the same quarter of the previous year due
to the following significant contributors: |
| · | Average realized silver price
in the quarter decreased by 13% or $2.60 per ounce compared to the same quarter of the prior year as a result of commodity market
pressure on silver prices. Average realized silver price in the quarter was $16.99 per ounce compared to $19.59 per ounce in the
second quarter of 2014, but was $0.61 per ounce or 4% better than the COMEX average of $16.38 during the quarter; |
| · | Silver equivalent ounces sold
decreased by 124,937 ounces or 3% compared to the second quarter of 2014, primarily attributed to lower production from La Encantada
and La Parrilla. |
| 2. | Cost of sales in the quarter decreased compared to the same quarter of the previous year
as a result of the following factors: |
| · | Cash cost per ounce improved
9% compared to the same quarter of the prior year as a result of economies of scale from expanded operations at Del Toro and San
Martin as well as favourable foreign exchange rate effect as a result of an 18% depreciation in the Mexican Peso against the U.S.
Dollar compared to the second quarter of 2014; partially offset by: |
| · | Silver equivalent ounces sold
decreased by 124,937 ounces or 3% compared to the second quarter of 2014, primarily attributed to a decrease in ounces sold at
La Encantada, partially offset by incremental production from Del Toro and San Martin. |
| 3. | The increase in depletion, depreciation and amortization was attributed to a combination
of the following: |
| · | Revisions to life of mines at
the end of 2014 accelerated depletion and depreciation rates applied to mining interests and property, plant and equipment depreciated
under the units-of-production method. Life of mine estimates were reduced at the end of 2014 to reflect lower Reserves and Resources
estimates with higher cut-off grades based on lower metal prices. |
| · | Capital expenditures incurred
on the Del Toro and San Martin expansions over the past year, which resulted in additional depletion, depreciation and amortization;
partially offset by: |
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter MD&A | Page 18 |
| · | Impairment charge on non-current assets
recognized in the fourth quarter of 2014, which resulted in a $66.0 million decrease in depletable mining interests and depreciable
property, plant and equipment. |
| 4. | Mine operating earnings during the quarter decreased $6.1 million or 64% from the second
quarter of 2014 due to a 14% decrease in gross margin and 19% increase in depletion, depreciation and amortization. Gross margin
was primarily affected by the combination of a 13% decrease in average silver prices, a 3% decrease in silver equivalent ounces
sold and offset by lower cost of sales attributed to an 18% depreciation of the Mexican Peso against the U.S. dollar. |
| 5. | General and administrative expenses decreased compared to the second quarter of 2014, primarily
due to: |
| · | Corporate administration
decreased by $0.4 million or 31% due to decreases in travel, advertising, promotion and computer services as a result of the Company’s
cost cutting measures. |
| · | Audit, legal and professional fees
decreased by $0.4 million or 36% due to higher legal fees in the prior year associated with the Mexican stock exchange
listing and the First Silver litigation. |
| 6. | The Company’s investment and other income is primarily comprised of gain or losses
on the following: |
| · | A total of $0.2 million loss on fair value
adjustment of prepayment facilities, which contains commodity price swaps and call options on a portion of the Company’s
lead and zinc production. The loss on prepayment facilities in the second quarter of 2014 was $3.8 million; |
| · | $0.8 million loss on the Company’s
derivatives, which comprised of a $1.3 million loss on silver doré forward contracts, net of
a $0.4 million gain on investment in silver futures. |
| · | In the second of 2014, the Company also
recognized a $14.1 million gain from First Silver litigation. |
| 7. | During the quarter, the Company recorded an income tax recovery of $1.9 million compared
to an income tax expense of $2.1 million in the quarter ended June 30, 2014. The effective income tax rate in quarter was affected
by taxation effects on foreign currency translation, Mexican mining duties and non-deductible expenses. |
| 8. | As a result of the foregoing, net loss for the quarter ended June 30, 2015 was $2.6 million and EPS of ($0.02). |
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter MD&A | Page 19 |
For the year to date ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands
of dollars, except for per share amounts):
| |
Year to Date | | |
Year to Date | | |
|
|
| |
2015 | | |
2014 | | |
Variance % |
|
| |
| | |
| | |
|
|
Revenues | |
$ | 108,759 | | |
$ | 132,223 | | |
| -18% |
(1) |
Cost of sales (excludes depletion, depreciation and amortization) | |
| 65,650 | | |
| 77,997 | | |
| -16% |
(2) |
Gross margin | |
| 43,109 | | |
| 54,226 | | |
| -21% |
|
Depletion, depreciation and amortization | |
| 34,672 | | |
| 28,104 | | |
| 23% |
(3) |
Mine operating earnings | |
| 8,437 | | |
| 26,122 | | |
| -68% |
(4) |
General and administrative | |
| 8,568 | | |
| 9,913 | | |
| -14% |
(5) |
Share-based payments | |
| 3,153 | | |
| 5,326 | | |
| -41% |
|
Accretion of decommissioning liabilities | |
| 389 | | |
| 407 | | |
| -4% |
|
Foreign exchange (gain) loss | |
| (2,174 | ) | |
| 694 | | |
| -413% |
|
Operating (loss) earnings | |
| (1,499 | ) | |
| 9,782 | | |
| -115% |
|
Investment and other income | |
| 447 | | |
| 13,522 | | |
| -97% |
(6) |
Finance costs | |
| (2,665 | ) | |
| (3,233 | ) | |
| -18% |
|
(Loss) earnings before income taxes | |
| (3,717 | ) | |
| 20,071 | | |
| -119% |
|
Current income tax expense | |
| 1,412 | | |
| 6,369 | | |
| -78% |
|
Deferred income tax (recovery) expense | |
| (1,446 | ) | |
| 132 | | |
| -1195% |
|
Income tax (recovery) expense | |
| (34 | ) | |
| 6,501 | | |
| -101% |
(7) |
Net
(loss) earnings for the year | |
$ | (3,683 | ) | |
$ | 13,570 | | |
| -127% |
(8) |
(Loss) earnings per share (basic) | |
$ | (0.03 | ) | |
$ | 0.12 | | |
| -127% |
(8) |
(Loss) earnings per share (diluted) | |
$ | (0.03 | ) | |
$ | 0.12 | | |
| -127% |
(8) |
| 1. | Revenues in the six months ended June 30, 2015 decreased compared to the same period of
the previous year due to the following significant contributors: |
| · | Average realized silver price
in the period was $17.02, a decrease of 16% or $3.19 per ounce compared to $20.21 in the same period of the prior year as a result
of commodity market pressure on silver prices. However, the average silver price realized by the Company was $0.48 per ounce or
3% better than the COMEX average of $16.54 during the six months ended June 30, 2015; |
| · | Silver equivalent ounces sold
increased by 2% compared to the same period of 2014, primarily attributed to incremental production from Del Toro and San Martin
offset by the decrease in ounces sold in La Encantada and La Parrilla. |
| 2. | Cost of sales in the period decreased compared to the same period of the previous year as
a result of the following factors: |
| · | Cash cost per ounce improved
13% compared to the same period of the prior year as a result of economies of scale from expanded operations at Del Toro and San
Martin as well as favourable foreign exchange rate effect as a result of a 15% depreciation in the Mexican Peso against the U.S.
Dollar compared to the same period of 2014; partially offset by: |
| · | Silver equivalent ounces sold
increased by 2% compared to the first half of 2014, primarily attributed to incremental production from Del Toro and San Martin
offset by the decrease in ounces sold in La Encantada and La Parrilla. |
| 3. | The increase in depletion, depreciation and amortization was attributed to a combination
of the following: |
| · | Revisions to life of mines at
the end of 2014 accelerated depletion and depreciation rates applied to mining interests and property, plant and equipment depreciated
under the units-of-production method. Life of mine estimates were reduced at the end of 2014 to reflect lower Reserves and Resources
estimates with higher cut-off grades based on lower metal prices. |
| · | Capital expenditures incurred
on the Del Toro ramp up and San Martin expansions over the past year, which resulted in additional depletion, depreciation and
amortization; partially offset by: |
| · | Impairment charge on non-current assets
recognized in the fourth quarter of 2014, which resulted in a total of $66.0 million decrease in depletable mining interests
and depreciable property, plant and equipment. |
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter MD&A | Page 20 |
| 4. | Mine operating earnings during the period decreased $17.7 million or 68% from the first
half of 2014 due to a 21% decrease in gross margin and a 23% increase in depletion, depreciation and amortization. Gross margin
was primarily affected by the combination of a 16% decrease in average silver prices, offset by a 2% increase in silver equivalent
ounces sold and offset by lower cost of sales attributed to a 15% depreciation of the Mexican Peso against the U.S. dollar. |
| 5. | General and administrative expenses decreased compared to the six months ended June 30,
2014, primarily due to: |
| · | Corporate administration
decreased by $0.9 million or 32% due to decrease in travel, computer services, advertising, promotion and meal expenses in general
related to the Company’s cost cutting measures. |
| · | Audit, legal and professional fees
decreased by $0.4 million or 23% due to higher legal fees in the prior year associated with the Mexican stock exchange
listing and the First Silver litigation. |
| 6. | The Company’s investment and other income is primarily comprised of gains or losses
on the following: |
| · | A total of a $0.2 million gain on fair
value adjustment of prepayment facilities, which contains commodity price swaps and call options on a portion of
the Company’s lead and zinc production. The loss on prepayment facilities in the same period of 2014 was $2.4 million; |
| · | $0.4 million gain on the Company’s
derivatives on silver futures. The gain on investments in silver futures was $1.1 million during the same period
of 2014; |
| · | In the first half of 2014, investment
and other income also included a $0.4 million gain from investment in marketable securities, which were marked to
market at the end of each period; and |
| · | In the second quarter of 2014, the Company
also recognized a $14.1 million gain from First Silver litigation. |
| 7. | During the period, the Company recorded an income tax recovery of $nil compared to
an income tax expense of $6.5 million in the six months period ended June 30, 2014. The effective income tax rate in period was
affected by taxation effects on foreign currency translation, Mexican mining duties and non-deductible expenses. |
| 8. | As a result of the foregoing, net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2015 was $3.7 million and EPS of ($0.03). |
SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY RESULTS
The following table presents selected financial information
for each of the most recent eight quarters:
| |
2015 | | |
2014 | | |
2013
| |
Selected Financial Information | |
Q2(1) | | |
Q1(2) | | |
Q4(3) | | |
Q3(4) | | |
Q2(5) | | |
Q1(6) | | |
Q4(7) | | |
Q3(8) | |
Revenue | |
$ | 54,190 | | |
$ | 54,569 | | |
$ | 72,480 | | |
$ | 40,770 | | |
$ | 66,927 | | |
$ | 65,296 | | |
$ | 58,989 | | |
$ | 76,882 | |
Cost of sales | |
$ | 33,314 | | |
$ | 32,336 | | |
$ | 44,873 | | |
$ | 31,973 | | |
$ | 42,727 | | |
$ | 35,270 | | |
$ | 31,437 | | |
$ | 36,060 | |
Depletion, depreciation and amortization | |
$ | 17,435 | | |
$ | 17,237 | | |
$ | 21,774 | | |
$ | 10,588 | | |
$ | 14,699 | | |
$ | 13,405 | | |
$ | 13,298 | | |
$ | 11,645 | |
Mine operating earnings (loss) | |
$ | 3,441 | | |
$ | 4,996 | | |
$ | 5,833 | | |
$ | (1,791 | ) | |
$ | 9,501 | | |
$ | 16,621 | | |
$ | 14,254 | | |
$ | 29,177 | |
Net (loss) earnings after tax | |
$ | (2,578 | ) | |
$ | (1,105 | ) | |
$ | (64,568 | ) | |
$ | (10,450 | ) | |
$ | 7,590 | | |
$ | 5,980 | | |
$ | (81,229 | ) | |
$ | 16,320 | |
(Loss) earnings per share (basic) | |
$ | (0.02 | ) | |
$ | (0.01 | ) | |
$ | (0.55 | ) | |
$ | (0.09 | ) | |
$ | 0.06 | | |
$ | 0.05 | | |
$ | (0.69 | ) | |
$ | 0.14 | |
(Loss) earnings per share (diluted) | |
$ | (0.02 | ) | |
$ | (0.01 | ) | |
$ | (0.55 | ) | |
$ | (0.09 | ) | |
$ | 0.06 | | |
$ | 0.05 | | |
$ | (0.69 | ) | |
$ | 0.14 | |
| 1. | During the second quarter of 2015, mine operating earnings was $3.4 million compared to $5.0 million
in the quarter ended March 31, 2015. The decrease in mine operating earnings was primarily driven by a decrease in silver prices
and silver equivalent ounces sold. Net loss for the quarter was $2.6 million, compared to a loss of $1.1 million in the previous
quarter due to decrease in mine operating earnings and investment and other losses related to fair value adjustment of prepayment
facilities and derivatives. |
| 2. | During the first quarter of 2015, mine operating earnings was $5.0 million compared to $5.8 million
in the quarter ended December 31, 2014. The decrease in mine operating earnings was primarily driven by decrease in silver prices
and silver equivalent ounces sold, as approximately 934,000 ounces of silver sales that were suspended in the third quarter of
2014 and sold in the quarter ended December 31, 2014. Net loss for the quarter was $1.1 million, compared to a loss of $64.6 million
in the previous quarter due to a non-cash impairment charge of $102.0 million, or $66.0 million net of tax, recognized at the end
of the previous quarter. |
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter MD&A | Page 21 |
| 3. | In the quarter ended December 31, 2014, mine operating earnings was $5.8 million compared to mine
operating loss of $1.8 million in the quarter ended September 30, 2014. The increase in mine operating earnings was attributed
to approximately 934,000 ounces of silver sales that were suspended at the end of the third quarter of 2014 due to declining silver
prices and rolled into sales of the fourth quarter. Net loss for the quarter was $64.6 million compared to $10.5 million in the
previous quarter due to a non-cash impairment charge of $102.0 million, or $66.0 million net of tax, related to some of the Company’s
non-current assets during the quarter and related taxation effects. |
| 4. | In the quarter ended September 30, 2014, mine operating loss was $1.8 million compared to mine
operating earnings of $9.5 million in the quarter ended June 30, 2014. The decrease in mine operating earnings was primarily attributed
to the Company’s decision to suspend approximately 934,000 in silver sales near the end of the quarter as a result of significant
decline in silver prices during the quarter. Net earnings also decreased $18.0 million compared to the preceding quarter as a result
of a decrease in mine operating earnings and a one-time litigation gain of $14.1 million recognized in the second quarter of 2014. |
| 5. | In the quarter ended June 30, 2014, mine operating earnings decreased by 43% to $9.5 million compared
to $16.6 million in the quarter ended March 31, 2014. Net earnings increased by 27% to $7.6 million from $6.0 million in the
quarter ended March 31, 2014. The increase in net earnings was primarily attributed to $14.1 million litigation gain, partially
offset by decrease in mine operating earnings due to 6% decrease in average realized silver price and higher depletion, depreciation
and amortization due to increase in production rate. |
| 6. | In the quarter ended March 31, 2014, mine operating earnings improved 17% to $16.6 million compared
to $14.3 million in the quarter ended December 31, 2013. Net earnings increased $87.2 million to $6.0 million compared to
a loss of $81.2 million in the previous quarter. Net earnings in the previous quarter was affected by a $28.8 million non-cash
impairment of non-current assets and $38.8 million non-cash adjustment to deferred income tax expense in relation to the Mexican
Tax Reform. |
| 7. | In the quarter ended December 31, 2013, mine operating earnings decreased $14.9 million or 51%
compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2013, primarily attributed to decrease of 17% or 673,621 ounces of payable equivalent
silver ounces sold. More ounces were sold in the prior quarter due to sale of approximately 650,000 ounces of silver sales that
were suspended and delayed at the end of the second quarter. In addition, depletion, depreciation and amortization was higher due
to 9% increase in tonnes milled during the fourth quarter compared to the prior quarter. Net loss after tax was $81.2 million compared
to net earnings of $16.3 million. The decrease was attributed to $28.8 million impairment on goodwill and mining interests,
$14.9 million decline in mine operating earnings, as well as $38.8 million non-cash adjustment to deferred income tax expense recorded
during the quarter in relation to the Mexican Tax Reform. |
| 8. | In the quarter ended September 30, 2013, mine operating earnings increased $14.9 million or 104%
compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2013, primarily attributed to an increase of 57% or 1,407,022 ounces of payable equivalent
silver ounces sold, which includes approximately 650,000 ounces of silver sales that were suspended and delayed at the end of the
second quarter of 2013 due to declining silver prices. Net earnings after tax was $16.3 million, an increase of $16.2 million compared
to the previous quarter due to increase in mine operating earnings and investment and other income. |
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter MD&A | Page 22 |
LIQUIDITY, CAPITAL RESOURCES AND CONTRACTUAL
OBLIGATIONS
Liquidity
As at June 30, 2015, the Company held cash
and cash equivalents of $37.7 million compared to $40.3 million at December 31, 2014. Cash and cash equivalents is primarily
comprised of cash held with reputable financial institutions and are invested in highly liquid short-term investments with maturities
of three months or less. The funds are not exposed to liquidity risk and there are no restrictions on the ability of the Company
to use these funds to meet its obligations.
Cash and cash equivalents decreased by
$2.6 million during the year. The Company’s cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities during the year
are summarized as follows:
| · | Cash provided by operating activities
of $27.6 million |
| · | Cash used in investing activities of $31.3
million, primarily related to: |
| o | $23.3 million spent on mining interests, of which $19.8 million were sustaining mine development
and exploration activities |
| o | $8.4 million spent on purchase of property, plant and equipment and deposits for the acquisition
of non-current assets |
| · | Cash provided by financing activities
of $2.2 million, including: |
| o | $23.0 million proceeds from closing of private placement in April 2015 by issuing an aggregate
of 4,620,000 common shares at a price of CAD$6.50 per common share |
| o | $12.0 million was spent on repayment of prepayment facilities |
| o | $6.7 million was spent on repayment of lease obligations |
| o | $2.1 million was spent on financing costs |
Capital expenditures on mineral properties
have decreased compared to the prior year as the Company suspended some discretionary capital expenditures due to the decline in
silver price over the past year, as well as efforts by the Company to cut costs and re-negotiate its contracts with contractors
and suppliers.
Working capital deficit as at June 30,
2015 was $0.9 million compared to a deficit of $2.9 million at December 31, 2014.
Capital Resources
The Company’s objectives when managing
capital are to maintain financial flexibility to continue as a going concern while optimizing growth and maximizing returns of
investments from shareholders. The Company’s overall strategy with respect to capital risk management remains unchanged from
the year ended December 31, 2014.
The Company monitors its capital structure
and, based on changes in operations and economic conditions, may adjust the structure by repurchasing shares, issuing new shares,
issuing new debt or retiring existing debt. The Company prepares an annual budget and quarterly forecasts to facilitate the management
of its capital requirements. The annual budget is approved by the Company’s Board of Directors.
The Company is not subject to any externally
imposed capital requirements with the exception of complying with covenants under the Prepayment Facility agreement. As at June
30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company was in compliance with these covenants.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
As at June 30, 2015, the Company’s
contractual obligations and commitments are summarized as follows:
| |
Contractual | | |
Less than | | |
1 to 3 | | |
4 to 5 | | |
After 5 | |
| |
Cash Flows | | |
1 year | | |
years | | |
years | | |
years | |
Trade and other payables | |
$ | 34,681 | | |
$ | 34,681 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | - | |
Prepayment facilities | |
| 53,127 | | |
| 31,742 | | |
| 21,385 | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
Finance lease obligations | |
| 23,601 | | |
| 11,358 | | |
| 12,103 | | |
| 140 | | |
| - | |
Decommissioning liabilities | |
| 15,897 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 15,897 | |
Purchase obligations and commitments | |
| 2,489 | | |
| 2,489 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
| |
$ | 129,795 | | |
$ | 80,270 | | |
$ | 33,488 | | |
$ | 140 | | |
$ | 15,897 | |
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter MD&A | Page 23 |
Management is of the view that the above
contractual obligations and commitments will be sufficiently funded by current working capital, future operating cash flows, and
available debt facilities as at the date of this MD&A.
MANAGEMENT OF RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
The Company thoroughly examines the various
financial instruments and risks to which it is exposed and assesses the impact and likelihood of those risks. These risks may include
credit risk, liquidity risk, currency risk, commodity price risk and interest rate risk. Where material, these risks are reviewed
and monitored by the Board of Directors.
Liquidity Risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company
will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they arise. The Company has in place a planning and budgeting process to
help determine the funds required to support the Company’s normal operating requirements and contractual obligations. Based
on the Company’s current operating plan, the Company believes it has sufficient cash on hand, combined with cash flows from
operations, to meet its ongoing operating requirements as they arise for at least the next 12 months. If commodity prices in the
metals markets were to decrease significantly, or the Company was to deviate significantly from its operating plan, the Company
may need a further injection of capital to address its cash flow requirements.
Currency Risk
The Company is exposed to foreign exchange
risk primarily relating to financial instruments that are denominated in Canadian dollars or Mexican Pesos, which would impact
the Company’s net earnings and other comprehensive income. To manage foreign exchange risk, the Company may occasionally
enter into short-term foreign currency derivatives. The foreign currency derivatives are not designated as hedging instruments
for accounting purposes.
The sensitivity of the Company’s
net earnings and comprehensive income due to changes in the exchange rate between the Canadian dollar and the Mexican peso against
the U.S. dollar is included in the table below:
| |
June 30, 2015 | | |
| | |
December 31, 2014 | |
| |
Cash and
cash equivalents | | |
Trade and
other receivables | | |
Trade and
other payables | | |
Foreign
exchange derivative | | |
Net assets
(liabilities) exposure | | |
Effect of +/- 10%
change in currency | | |
Net assets
(liabilities) exposure | | |
Effect of +/- 10%
change in currency | |
Canadian dollar | |
$ | 21,974 | | |
$ | 1,158 | | |
$ | (769 | ) | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 22,363 | | |
$ | 2,236 | | |
$ | 6,791 | | |
$ | 679 | |
Mexican peso | |
| 762 | | |
| 6,173 | | |
| (17,596 | ) | |
| 29,239 | | |
| 18,578 | | |
| 1,858 | | |
| (12,430 | ) | |
| (1,243 | ) |
| |
$ | 22,736 | | |
$ | 7,331 | | |
$ | (18,365 | ) | |
$ | 29,239 | | |
$ | 40,941 | | |
$ | 4,094 | | |
$ | (5,639 | ) | |
$ | (564 | ) |
Commodity Price Risk
Commodity price risk is the risk that movements
in the spot price of silver have a direct and immediate impact on the Company’s income or the value of its related financial
instruments. The Company also derives by-product revenue from the sale of gold, lead, zinc and iron ore, which accounts for approximately
28% of the Company’s gross revenue. The Company’s sales are directly dependent on commodity prices that have shown
volatility and are beyond the Company’s control. The Company has a forward sales agreement to sell a portion of the Company’s
lead and zinc production at a fixed price. The Company does not use derivative instruments to hedge its commodity price risk to
silver. The Company purchased call options on lead and zinc futures to mitigate potential exposure to future price increases in
lead and zinc for its lead and zinc forward sales agreements.
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter MD&A | Page 24 |
As at June 30, 2015, a 10% increase or
decrease of metal prices would have the following impact on net earnings:
| |
June 30, 2015 | |
| |
Silver | | |
Gold | | |
Lead | | |
Zinc | | |
Effect of +/- 10% change in metal prices | |
Metals subject to provisional price adjustments | |
$ | 638 | | |
$ | 63 | | |
$ | 819 | | |
$ | 275 | | |
$ | 1,795 | |
Metals in doré and concentrates inventory | |
| 31 | | |
| 8 | | |
| 10 | | |
| 5 | | |
| 54 | |
Prepayment facilities (Note 18) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (3,313 | ) | |
| (1,025 | ) | |
| (4,338 | ) |
| |
$ | 669 | | |
$ | 71 | | |
$ | (2,484 | ) | |
$ | (745 | ) | |
$ | (2,489 | ) |
| |
December 31, 2014 | |
| |
Silver | | |
Gold | | |
Lead | | |
Zinc | | |
Effect of +/- 10% change in metal prices | |
Metals subject to provisional price adjustments | |
$ | 969 | | |
$ | 48 | | |
$ | 938 | | |
$ | 109 | | |
$ | 2,064 | |
Metals in doré and concentrates inventory | |
| 86 | | |
| 13 | | |
| 6 | | |
| - | | |
| 105 | |
Prepayment facilities | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (4,204 | ) | |
| (1,670 | ) | |
| (5,874 | ) |
| |
$ | 1,055 | | |
$ | 61 | | |
$ | (3,260 | ) | |
$ | (1,561 | ) | |
$ | (3,705 | ) |
Political and Country Risk
First Majestic currently conducts foreign
operations primarily in México, and as such the Company’s operations are exposed to various levels of political and
economic risks by factors outside of the Company’s control. These potential factors include, but are not limited to: royalty
and tax increases or claims by governmental bodies, expropriation or nationalization, foreign exchange controls, high rates of
inflation, extreme fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, import and export regulations, cancellation or renegotiation
of contracts and environmental and permitting regulations. The Company currently has no political risk insurance coverage against
these risks.
The Company is unable to determine the
impact of these risks on its future financial position or results of operations. Changes, if any, in mining or investment policies
or shifts in political attitude in foreign countries may substantively affect Company’s exploration, development and production
activities.
Environmental and Health and Safety
Risks
The Company’s activities are subject
to extensive laws and regulations governing environmental protection and employee health and safety. Environmental laws and regulations
are complex and have tended to become more stringent over time. The Company is required to obtain governmental permits and in some
instances air, water quality, and mine reclamation rules and permits. The Company has complied with environmental taxes applied
to the use of certain fossil fuels according to the Kyoto Protocol. Although the Company makes provisions for reclamation costs,
it cannot be assured that these provisions will be adequate to discharge its future obligations for these costs. Failure to comply
with applicable environmental and health and safety laws may result in injunctions, damages, suspension or revocation of permits
and imposition of penalties. While the health and safety of our people and responsible environmental stewardship are our top priorities,
there can be no assurance that First Majestic has been or will be at all times in complete compliance with such laws, regulations
and permits, or that the costs of complying with current and future environmental and health and safety laws and permits will not
materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, results of operations or financial condition.
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter MD&A | Page 25 |
Claims and Legal Proceedings Risks
The Company is subject to various claims
and legal proceedings covering a wide range of matters that arise in the ordinary course of business activities. Many factors,
both known and unknown, could cause actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from the results, performance
or achievements that are or may be expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements or information and the Company has made
assumptions and estimates based on or related to many of these factors. Such factors include, without limitation: availability
of time on court calendars in Canada and elsewhere; the recognition of Canadian judgments under Mexican law; the possibility of
settlement discussions; the risk of appeal of judgment; and the insufficiency of the defendant's assets to satisfy the judgment
amount. Each of these matters is subject to various uncertainties and it is possible that some of these matters may be resolved
unfavourably to the Company. First Majestic carries liability insurance coverage and establishes provisions for matters that are
probable and can be reasonably estimated. In addition, the Company may be involved in disputes with other parties in the future
which may result in a significant impact on our financial condition, cash flow and results of operations.
Although the Company has taken steps to
verify ownership and legal title to mineral properties in which it has an interest, according to the usual industry standards for
the stage of mining, development and exploration of such properties, these procedures do not guarantee the Company’s title.
Such properties may be subject to prior agreements or transfers, and title may be affected by undetected defects. However, management
is not aware of any such agreements, transfers or defects.
Since June 2013, Davila Santos pursued
various applications and appeals to reverse the judgment by the Supreme Court of British Columbia. As judgment against Davila Santos
was not regarded as conclusive until outcome of the appeals were determinable, the sum of $14.1 million received as partial payment
of the judgment was recorded as deferred litigation gain on the Company’s statements of financial position prior to the current
period. On June 5, 2014, the Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal filed by the defendants. As a result, the Company has recognized
the $14.1 million deferred litigation gain as other income in the second quarter of 2014.
On June 27, 2014, Davila Santos filed an
application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada, which did not succeed. However, there can be no guarantee of collection
on the remainder of the judgment amount and it is likely that it will be necessary to take additional action in México and/or
elsewhere to recover the remaining balance. Therefore, as at June 30, 2015, the Company has not accrued any of the remaining balance
of $65.3 million (CAD$81.5 million) due to the Company.
OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Share Repurchase Program
The Company has an ongoing share repurchase
program to repurchase up to 5,879,732 of its common shares, which represents approximately 5% of the Company’s issued and
outstanding shares. The normal course issuer bids will be carried through the facilities of the Toronto Stock Exchange and alternative
Canadian marketplaces. No shares were repurchased during the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
At June 30, 2015, the Company had no material
off-balance sheet arrangements such as contingent interest in assets transferred to an entity, derivative instruments obligations
or any obligations that generate financing, liquidity, market or credit risk to the Company, other than contingent liabilities
and vendor liability and interest, as disclosed in this MD&A and the consolidated financial statements and the related notes.
Related Party Disclosures
Amounts paid to related parties were incurred
in the normal course of business and measured at the exchange amount, which is the amount agreed upon by the transacting parties
and on terms and conditions similar to non-related parties. During the six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company advanced an
additional $0.5 million to First Mining as a promissory note with an interest rate of 9% per annum, which is repayable on demand.
As at June 30, 2015, the total amount of promissory notes receivable, including accrued interest, from First Mining was $1.1 million
(December 31, 2014 - $0.5 million). There were no other significant transactions with related parties outside of the ordinary
course of business during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014.
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter MD&A | Page 26 |
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
The following significant events
occurred subsequent to June 30, 2015:
| a) | On July 27, 2015, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to acquire all of the issued
and outstanding shares of SilverCrest for consideration of 0.2769 common shares of First Majestic plus CAD$0.0001 in cash per SilverCrest
common share. With this acquisition, SilverCrest’s Santa Elena Mine will be First Majestic’s sixth producing silver
mine, adding further growth potential to the Company’s portfolio of Mexican projects. It will also add approximately CAD$30
million in cash and further enhances the Company’s working capital position. |
| b) | 3,844 common shares were cancelled; and |
| c) | 68,750 options were cancelled. |
Pursuant to the above subsequent events,
the Company has 122,210,796 common shares outstanding as at the date on which this MD&A was approved and authorized for issue
by the Board of Directors.
ACCOUNTING POLICIES, JUDGMENTS AND ESTIMATES
Future Changes in Accounting Policies
Not Yet Effective as at June 30, 2015
Revenue Recognition
In May 2014, the IASB issued IFRS 15 –
Revenue from Contracts with Customers ("IFRS 15") which supersedes IAS 11 – Construction Contracts,
IAS 18 – Revenue, IFRIC 13 – Customer Loyalty Programmes, IFRIC 15 – Agreements for the Construction
of Real Estate, IFRIC 18 – Transfers of Assets from Customers, and SIC 31 – Revenue – Barter Transactions
Involving Advertising Services. IFRS 15 establishes a single five-step model framework for determining the nature, amount,
timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from a contract with a customer. The standard is effective for annual
periods beginning on or after January 1, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of
the adoption of this standard on its consolidated financial statements.
Financial instruments
In July 2014, the IASB issued the final
version of IFRS 9 – Financial Instruments ("IFRS 9") to replace IAS 39 – Financial Instruments:
Recognition and Measurement. IFRS 9 provides a revised model for recognition and measurement of financial instruments and a
single, forward-looking “expected loss” impairment model. IFRS 9 also includes a substantially reformed approach to
hedge accounting. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018, with early adoption permitted.
The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this standard on its consolidated financial statements.
Critical Accounting Judgments and Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity
with IFRS as issued by IASB requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions about future events that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses
during the reporting period. Although these estimates are based on management’s best knowledge of the amount, events or actions,
actual results may differ from these estimates. There were no changes in critical accounting judgments and estimates that were
significantly different from those disclosed in the Company’s annual MD&A as at and for the year ended December 31, 2014.
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter MD&A | Page 27 |
NON-GAAP MEASURES
The Company has included certain non-GAAP
measures including “Cash costs per ounce”, “Production cost per tonne”, “All-in sustaining costs
per ounce”, “Average realized silver price”, “Adjusted Earnings per share”, “Cash flow per
share” and "Working capital” to supplement its condensed interim consolidated financial statements, which are
presented in accordance with IFRS. The terms IFRS and generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) are used interchangeably
throughout this MD&A.
The Company believes that these measures,
together with measures determined in accordance with IFRS, provide investors with an improved ability to evaluate the underlying
performance of the Company. Non-GAAP measures do not have any standardized meaning prescribed under IFRS, and therefore they may
not be comparable to similar measures employed by other companies. The data is intended to provide additional information and should
not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS.
Cash Cost per Ounce, All-In Sustaining
Cost per Ounce and Production Cost per Tonne
Cash costs per ounce and total production
cost per tonne are non-GAAP measures used by the Company to manage and evaluate operating performance at each of the Company’s
operating mining units, and are widely reported in the silver mining industry as benchmarks for performance, but do not have a
standardized meaning and are disclosed in addition to IFRS measures.
All-In Sustaining Cost (“AISC”)
is a non-GAAP measure and was calculated based on guidance provided by the World Gold Council (“WGC”) in June 2013.
WGC is not a regulatory industry organization and does not have the authority to develop accounting standards for disclosure requirements.
Other mining companies may calculate AISC differently as a result of differences in underlying accounting principles and policies
applied, as well as differences in definitions of sustaining versus development capital expenditures.
AISC is a more comprehensive measure than
cash cost per ounce for the Company’s consolidated operating performance by providing greater visibility, comparability and
representation of the total costs associated with producing silver from its current operations.
The Company defines sustaining capital
expenditures as, “costs incurred to sustain and maintain existing assets at current productive capacity and constant planned
levels of productive output without resulting in an increase in the life of assets, future earnings, or improvements in recovery
or grade. Sustaining capital includes costs required to improve/enhance assets to minimum standards for reliability, environmental
or safety requirements. Sustaining capital expenditures excludes all expenditures at the Company’s new projects and certain
expenditures at current operations which are deemed expansionary in nature.”
Consolidated AISC includes total production
cash costs incurred at the Company’s mining operations, which forms the basis of the Company’s total cash costs. Additionally,
the Company includes sustaining capital expenditures, corporate general and administrative expense, exploration and evaluation
costs, share-based payments and reclamation cost accretion. AISC by mine does not include certain corporate and non-cash items
such as general and administrative expense and share-based payments. The Company believes that this measure represents the total
sustainable costs of producing silver from current operations, and provides the Company and other stakeholders of the Company with
additional information of the Company’s operational performance and ability to generate cash flows. As the measure seeks
to reflect the full cost of silver production from current operations, new project capital and expansionary capital at current
operations are not included. Certain other cash expenditures, including tax payments, dividends and financing costs are also not
included.
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter MD&A | Page 28 |
The following tables provide a detailed
reconciliation of these measures to cost of sales, as reported in notes to our consolidated financial statements.
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, | |
Three Months Ended June 30, 2015 | |
except ounce and per ounce amounts) | |
La
Encantada | | |
La
Parrilla | | |
Del
Toro | | |
San
Martin | | |
La
Guitarra | | |
Consolidated | |
Production cost (A) | |
$ | 8,392 | | |
$ | 8,310 | | |
$ | 6,966 | | |
$ | 5,021 | | |
$ | 2,319 | | |
$ | 31,008 | |
Add: transportation and other selling cost | |
| 140 | | |
| 405 | | |
| 464 | | |
| 118 | | |
| 114 | | |
| 1,241 | |
Add: smelting and refining cost | |
| 232 | | |
| 2,685 | | |
| 3,053 | | |
| 151 | | |
| 906 | | |
| 7,027 | |
Add: environmental duty and royalties cost | |
| 54 | | |
| 108 | | |
| 54 | | |
| 64 | | |
| 29 | | |
| 309 | |
Total cash cost before by-product credits | |
$ | 8,818 | | |
$ | 11,508 | | |
$ | 10,537 | | |
$ | 5,354 | | |
$ | 3,368 | | |
$ | 39,585 | |
Deduct: By-product credits | |
| (23 | ) | |
| (5,321 | ) | |
| (7,811 | ) | |
| (1,622 | ) | |
| (1,896 | ) | |
| (16,673 | ) |
Total
cash cost (B) | |
$ | 8,795 | | |
$ | 6,187 | | |
$ | 2,726 | | |
$ | 3,732 | | |
$ | 1,472 | | |
$ | 22,912 | |
Workers’ Participation | |
| 204 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 149 | | |
| (15 | ) | |
| 338 | |
General and administrative expenses | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 4,041 | |
Share-based payments | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 1,544 | |
Accretion of decommissioning liabilities | |
| 56 | | |
| 40 | | |
| 39 | | |
| 39 | | |
| 21 | | |
| 195 | |
Sustaining capital expenditures | |
| 1,946 | | |
| 2,128 | | |
| 1,621 | | |
| 1,820 | | |
| 1,431 | | |
| 8,968 | |
All-In
Sustaining Costs (C) | |
$ | 11,001 | | |
$ | 8,355 | | |
$ | 4,386 | | |
$ | 5,740 | | |
$ | 2,909 | | |
$ | 37,998 | |
Payable silver ounces produced (D) | |
| 600,458 | | |
| 576,856 | | |
| 629,825 | | |
| 596,731 | | |
| 218,317 | | |
| 2,622,186 | |
Tonnes milled (E) | |
| 189,811 | | |
| 178,736 | | |
| 162,089 | | |
| 89,506 | | |
| 42,494 | | |
| 662,637 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Total cash cost per ounce (B/D) | |
$ | 14.65 | | |
$ | 10.72 | | |
$ | 4.34 | | |
$ | 6.25 | | |
$ | 6.74 | | |
$ | 8.74 | |
All-in sustaining cost per ounce (C/D) | |
$ | 18.32 | | |
$ | 14.48 | | |
$ | 6.97 | | |
$ | 9.62 | | |
$ | 13.32 | | |
$ | 14.49 | |
Production
cost per tonne (A/E) | |
$ | 44.21 | | |
$ | 46.49 | | |
$ | 42.99 | | |
$ | 56.09 | | |
$ | 54.58 | | |
$ | 46.80 | |
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, | |
Three Months Ended June 30, 2014 | |
except ounce and per ounce amounts) | |
La Encantada | | |
La Parrilla | | |
Del Toro | | |
San Martin | | |
La Guitarra | | |
Consolidated | |
Production cost (A) | |
$ | 8,520 | | |
$ | 7,818 | | |
$ | 10,951 | | |
$ | 5,331 | | |
$ | 2,149 | | |
$ | 34,769 | |
Add: transportation and other selling cost | |
| 253 | | |
| 740 | | |
| 426 | | |
| 81 | | |
| 116 | | |
| 1,616 | |
Add: smelting and refining cost | |
| 460 | | |
| 2,967 | | |
| 1,891 | | |
| 128 | | |
| 630 | | |
| 6,076 | |
Add: environmental duty and royalties cost | |
| 124 | | |
| 143 | | |
| 70 | | |
| 57 | | |
| 24 | | |
| 418 | |
Total cash cost before by-product credits | |
$ | 9,357 | | |
$ | 11,668 | | |
$ | 13,338 | | |
$ | 5,597 | | |
$ | 2,919 | | |
$ | 42,879 | |
Deduct: By-product credits | |
| (79 | ) | |
| (7,663 | ) | |
| (2,946 | ) | |
| (1,118 | ) | |
| (1,726 | ) | |
| (13,532 | ) |
Total
cash cost (B) | |
$ | 9,278 | | |
$ | 4,005 | | |
$ | 10,392 | | |
$ | 4,479 | | |
$ | 1,193 | | |
$ | 29,347 | |
Workers’ Participation | |
| 1,086 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 1,086 | |
General and administrative expenses | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 4,762 | |
Share-based payments | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 2,678 | |
Accretion of decommissioning liabilities | |
| 54 | | |
| 36 | | |
| 49 | | |
| 35 | | |
| 31 | | |
| 205 | |
Sustaining capital expenditures | |
| 4,818 | | |
| 3,878 | | |
| 4,026 | | |
| 2,593 | | |
| 1,716 | | |
| 17,248 | |
All-In
Sustaining Costs (C) | |
$ | 15,236 | | |
$ | 7,919 | | |
$ | 14,467 | | |
$ | 7,107 | | |
$ | 2,940 | | |
$ | 55,326 | |
Payable silver ounces produced (D) | |
| 1,069,342 | | |
| 693,634 | | |
| 707,658 | | |
| 447,250 | | |
| 125,689 | | |
| 3,043,572 | |
Tonnes milled (E) | |
| 183,177 | | |
| 171,617 | | |
| 174,645 | | |
| 96,278 | | |
| 45,307 | | |
| 671,024 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Total cash cost per ounce (B/D) | |
$ | 8.67 | | |
$ | 5.76 | | |
$ | 14.70 | | |
$ | 10.02 | | |
$ | 9.48 | | |
$ | 9.63 | |
All-in sustaining cost per ounce (C/D) | |
$ | 14.25 | | |
$ | 11.42 | | |
$ | 20.44 | | |
$ | 15.89 | | |
$ | 23.39 | | |
$ | 18.18 | |
Production
cost per tonne (A/E) | |
$ | 46.47 | | |
$ | 45.58 | | |
$ | 62.70 | | |
$ | 55.38 | | |
$ | 47.44 | | |
$ | 51.81 | |
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter MD&A | Page 29 |
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, | |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 | |
except ounce and per ounce amounts) | |
La Encantada | | |
La Parrilla | | |
Del Toro | | |
San Martin | | |
La Guitarra | | |
Consolidated | |
Production cost (A) | |
$ | 15,746 | | |
$ | 15,671 | | |
$ | 14,526 | | |
$ | 10,151 | | |
$ | 4,538 | | |
$ | 60,632 | |
Add: transportation and other selling cost | |
| 259 | | |
| 1,017 | | |
| 1,010 | | |
| 194 | | |
| 237 | | |
| 2,717 | |
Add: smelting and refining cost | |
| 477 | | |
| 5,889 | | |
| 6,869 | | |
| 304 | | |
| 1,730 | | |
| 15,269 | |
Add: environmental duty and royalties cost | |
| 103 | | |
| 221 | | |
| 138 | | |
| 123 | | |
| 53 | | |
| 638 | |
Total cash cost before by-product credits | |
$ | 16,585 | | |
$ | 22,798 | | |
$ | 22,543 | | |
$ | 10,772 | | |
$ | 6,558 | | |
$ | 79,256 | |
Deduct: By-product credits | |
| (49 | ) | |
| (12,310 | ) | |
| (15,765 | ) | |
| (3,453 | ) | |
| (2,982 | ) | |
| (34,559 | ) |
Total
cash cost (B) | |
$ | 16,536 | | |
$ | 10,488 | | |
$ | 6,778 | | |
$ | 7,319 | | |
$ | 3,576 | | |
$ | 44,697 | |
Workers’ Participation | |
| 199 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 143 | | |
| - | | |
| 342 | |
General and administrative expenses | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 8,198 | |
Share-based payments | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 3,153 | |
Accretion of decommissioning liabilities | |
| 112 | | |
| 80 | | |
| 79 | | |
| 78 | | |
| 42 | | |
| 391 | |
Sustaining capital expenditures | |
| 3,836 | | |
| 4,767 | | |
| 3,302 | | |
| 3,156 | | |
| 2,595 | | |
| 17,998 | |
All-In
Sustaining Costs (C) | |
$ | 20,683 | | |
$ | 15,335 | | |
$ | 10,159 | | |
$ | 10,696 | | |
$ | 6,213 | | |
$ | 74,779 | |
Payable silver ounces produced (D) | |
| 1,143,014 | | |
| 1,131,618 | | |
| 1,426,403 | | |
| 1,166,952 | | |
| 404,829 | | |
| 5,272,816 | |
Tonnes milled (E) | |
| 357,081 | | |
| 351,383 | | |
| 320,024 | | |
| 177,869 | | |
| 87,890 | | |
| 1,294,247 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Total cash cost per ounce (B/D) | |
$ | 14.47 | | |
$ | 9.27 | | |
$ | 4.76 | | |
$ | 6.27 | | |
$ | 8.83 | | |
$ | 8.48 | |
All-in sustaining cost per ounce (C/D) | |
$ | 18.09 | | |
$ | 13.55 | | |
$ | 7.13 | | |
$ | 9.17 | | |
$ | 15.35 | | |
$ | 14.18 | |
Production
cost per tonne (A/E) | |
$ | 44.10 | | |
$ | 44.60 | | |
$ | 45.41 | | |
$ | 57.07 | | |
$ | 51.62 | | |
$ | 46.85 | |
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, | |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 | |
except ounce and per ounce amounts) | |
La Encantada | | |
La Parrilla | | |
Del Toro | | |
San Martin | | |
La Guitarra | | |
Consolidated | |
Production cost (A) | |
$ | 16,838 | | |
$ | 15,525 | | |
$ | 22,120 | | |
$ | 9,746 | | |
$ | 4,462 | | |
$ | 68,691 | |
Add: transportation and other selling cost | |
| 479 | | |
| 1,537 | | |
| 856 | | |
| 156 | | |
| 235 | | |
| 3,263 | |
Add: smelting and refining cost | |
| 839 | | |
| 6,038 | | |
| 3,457 | | |
| 220 | | |
| 1,325 | | |
| 11,879 | |
Add: environmental duty and royalties cost | |
| 237 | | |
| 329 | | |
| 143 | | |
| 92 | | |
| 53 | | |
| 854 | |
Total cash cost before by-product credits | |
$ | 18,393 | | |
$ | 23,429 | | |
$ | 26,575 | | |
$ | 10,214 | | |
$ | 6,075 | | |
$ | 84,686 | |
Deduct: By-product credits | |
| (110 | ) | |
| (14,571 | ) | |
| (5,821 | ) | |
| (2,091 | ) | |
| (4,643 | ) | |
| (27,236 | ) |
Total
cash cost (B) | |
$ | 18,283 | | |
$ | 8,858 | | |
$ | 20,754 | | |
$ | 8,123 | | |
$ | 1,432 | | |
$ | 57,450 | |
Workers’ Participation | |
| 1,865 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 1,865 | |
General and administrative expenses | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 9,568 | |
Share-based payments | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 5,326 | |
Accretion of decommissioning liabilities | |
| 110 | | |
| 71 | | |
| 96 | | |
| 68 | | |
| 62 | | |
| 407 | |
Sustaining capital expenditures | |
| 9,216 | | |
| 8,371 | | |
| 7,884 | | |
| 4,671 | | |
| 3,369 | | |
| 34,024 | |
All-In
Sustaining Costs (C) | |
$ | 29,474 | | |
$ | 17,300 | | |
$ | 28,734 | | |
$ | 12,862 | | |
$ | 4,863 | | |
$ | 108,640 | |
Payable silver ounces produced (D) | |
| 2,108,740 | | |
| 1,475,873 | | |
| 1,335,189 | | |
| 728,948 | | |
| 237,063 | | |
| 5,885,813 | |
Tonnes milled (E) | |
| 365,101 | | |
| 357,833 | | |
| 319,467 | | |
| 174,802 | | |
| 91,484 | | |
| 1,308,687 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Total cash cost per ounce (B/D) | |
$ | 8.66 | | |
$ | 6.00 | | |
$ | 15.55 | | |
$ | 11.15 | | |
$ | 6.03 | | |
$ | 9.75 | |
All-in sustaining cost per ounce (C/D) | |
$ | 13.98 | | |
$ | 11.70 | | |
$ | 21.52 | | |
$ | 17.64 | | |
$ | 20.51 | | |
$ | 18.46 | |
Production
cost per tonne (A/E) | |
$ | 46.03 | | |
$ | 43.39 | | |
$ | 69.25 | | |
$ | 55.76 | | |
$ | 48.76 | | |
$ | 52.49 | |
Average Realized Silver Price per Ounce
Revenues are presented as the net sum of
invoiced revenues related to delivered shipments of silver doré bars and concentrates, including associated metal by-products
of gold, lead, zinc and iron ore after having deducted refining and smelting charges, and after elimination of intercompany shipments
of silver, silver being minted into coins, ingots and bullion products.
The following is an analysis of the gross
revenues prior to refining and smelting charges, and shows deducted smelting and refining charges to arrive at the net reportable
revenue for the period per IFRS. Gross revenues are divided into payable equivalent silver ounces sold to calculate the average
realized price per ounce of silver equivalents sold.
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter MD&A | Page 30 |
| |
Three Months Ended June 30, | | |
Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| |
2015 | | |
2014 | | |
2015 | | |
2014 | |
Revenues as reported | |
$ | 54,190 | | |
$ | 66,927 | | |
$ | 108,759 | | |
$ | 132,223 | |
Add back: smelting and refining charges | |
| 7,027 | | |
| 6,077 | | |
| 15,269 | | |
| 11,880 | |
Gross Revenues | |
| 61,217 | | |
| 73,004 | | |
| 124,028 | | |
| 144,103 | |
Payable equivalent silver ounces sold | |
| 3,602,194 | | |
| 3,727,131 | | |
| 7,286,076 | | |
| 7,128,646 | |
Average realized price per ounce of silver sold(1) | |
$ | 16.99 | | |
$ | 19.59 | | |
$ | 17.02 | | |
$ | 20.21 | |
Average market price per ounce of silver per COMEX | |
$ | 16.38 | | |
$ | 19.62 | | |
$ | 16.54 | | |
$ | 20.04 | |
| (1) | Average
realized price per ounce of silver sold in each reporting period is affected by mark-to-market
adjustments and final settlements on concentrate shipments in prior periods. Concentrates
sold to third-party smelters are provisionally priced and the price is not settled until
a predetermined future date, typically one to four months after delivery to the customer,
based on the market price at that time. The mark-to-market adjustments do not apply to
doré sales. |
Adjusted Earnings per Share (“Adjusted
EPS”)
The Company uses the financial measure
“Adjusted EPS” to supplement information in its consolidated financial statements. The Company believes that, in addition
to conventional measures prepared in accordance with IFRS, the Company and certain investors and analysts use this information
to evaluate the Company’s performance. The Company excludes non-cash and unusual items from net earnings to provide a measure
which allows the Company and investors to evaluate the operating results of the underlying core operations. The presentation of
Adjusted EPS is not meant to be a substitute for EPS presented in accordance with IFRS, but rather should be evaluated in conjunction
with such IFRS measure.
The following table provides a detailed
reconciliation of net earnings as reported in the Company’s consolidated financial statements to adjusted net earnings and
Adjusted EPS.
| |
Three Months Ended June 30, | | |
Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| |
2015 | | |
2014 | | |
2015 | | |
2014 | |
Net (loss) earnings as
reported | |
$ | (2,578 | ) | |
$ | 7,590 | | |
$ | (3,683 | ) | |
$ | 13,570 | |
Adjustments for non-cash or unusual items: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Deferred income tax (recovery) expense | |
| (3,140 | ) | |
| (313 | ) | |
| (1,446 | ) | |
| 132 | |
Share-based payments | |
| 1,544 | | |
| 2,678 | | |
| 3,153 | | |
| 5,326 | |
Gain from fair value adjustment of prepayment facilities | |
| 245 | | |
| 3,781 | | |
| (223 | ) | |
| 2,356 | |
Gain from investment in silver derivatives and marketable securities | |
| 991 | | |
| (359 | ) | |
| (404 | ) | |
| (1,461 | ) |
(Recovery of) write-down of mineral inventory | |
| (167 | ) | |
| 2,487 | | |
| (821 | ) | |
| 2,487 | |
Write-down of AFS marketable securities | |
| - | | |
| 275 | | |
| - | | |
| 275 | |
Gain from First Silver litigation, net of fees | |
| - | | |
| (14,004 | ) | |
| - | | |
| (14,004 | ) |
Adjusted net (loss) earnings | |
$ | (3,105 | ) | |
$ | 2,135 | | |
$ | (3,424 | ) | |
$ | 8,681 | |
Weighted average number of shares on issue - basic | |
| 121,097,717 | | |
| 117,490,053 | | |
| 119,355,855 | | |
| 117,359,468 | |
Adjusted
EPS | |
$ | (0.03 | ) | |
$ | 0.02 | | |
$ | (0.03 | ) | |
$ | 0.07 | |
Cash Flow per Share
Cash Flow per Share is determined based
on operating cash flows before movements in working capital and income taxes, as illustrated in the consolidated statements of
cash flow, divided by the weighted average shares outstanding during the period.
| |
Three Months Ended June 30, | | |
Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| |
2015 | | |
2014 | | |
2015 | | |
2014 | |
Operating Cash Flows before
Working Capital and Taxes | |
$ | 16,448 | | |
$ | 18,980 | | |
$ | 33,762 | | |
$ | 44,333 | |
Weighted average number of shares on issue - basic | |
| 121,097,717 | | |
| 117,490,053 | | |
| 119,355,855 | | |
| 117,359,468 | |
Cash Flow per Share | |
$ | 0.14 | | |
$ | 0.16 | | |
$ | 0.28 | | |
$ | 0.38 | |
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter MD&A | Page 31 |
Working Capital
Working capital is determined based on
current assets and current liabilities as reported in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company uses working
capital as a measure of the Company’s short-term financial health and operating efficiency.
| |
June 30, | | |
December 31, | |
| |
2015 | | |
2014 | |
Current Assets | |
$ | 72,330 | | |
$ | 75,352 | |
Less: Current Liabilities | |
| (73,255 | ) | |
| (78,222 | ) |
Working
Capital | |
$ | (925 | ) | |
$ | (2,870 | ) |
ADDITIONAL GAAP MEASURES
The Company uses additional financial measures
which should be evaluated in conjunction with IFRS. It is intended to provide additional information and should not be considered
in isolation or as a substitute for measures prepared in accordance with IFRS. The following additional GAAP measures are used:
Gross Margin
Gross margin represents the difference
between revenues and cost of sales, excluding depletion, depreciation and amortization. Management believes that this presentation
provides useful information to investors to evaluate the Company’s mine operating performance prior to non-cash depletion,
depreciation and amortization in order to assess the Company’s ability to generate operating cash flow.
Mine Operating Earnings
Mine operating earnings represents the
difference between gross margin and depletion, depreciation and amortization. Management believes that mine operating earnings
provides useful information to investors because mine operating earnings excludes expenses not directly associated with commercial
production.
Operating Cash Flows before Working
Capital and Taxes
Operating cash flows before working capital
and taxes represents cash flows generated from operations before changes in working capital and income taxes paid. Management believes
that this measure allows investors to evaluate the Company’s pre-tax cash flows generated from operations adjusted for fluctuations
in non-cash working capital items due to timing issues and the Company’s ability to service its debt.
The terms described above do not have a
standardized meaning prescribed by IFRS, therefore the Company’s definitions may not be comparable to similar measures presented
by other companies.
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter MD&A | Page 32 |
MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL
REPORTING
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company’s management, with the
participation of its President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the
Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon the results of that evaluation, the Company’s President and
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of June 30, 2015, the Company’s disclosure
controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the Company
in reports it files is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the appropriate time periods and is accumulated and
communicated to management, including the President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to
allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The Company’s management, with the
participation of its President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting as such term is defined in the rules of the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission and the Canadian Securities Administrators. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process
designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with IFRS as issued by the IASB. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting
includes policies and procedures that:
| • | maintaining records that accurately and fairly reflect, in reasonable detail, the transactions
and dispositions of assets of the Company; |
| • | provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary for preparation of financial
statements in accordance with IFRS; |
| • | provide reasonable assurance that the Company’s receipts and expenditures are made only in
accordance with authorizations of management and the Company’s Directors; and |
| • | provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition,
use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial
statements. |
The Company’s internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect all misstatements because of inherent limitations. Additionally, projections of any
evaluation of effectiveness for future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with the Company’s policies and procedures.
There has been no change in the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting during the six months ended June 30, 2015 that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Limitations of Controls and Procedures
The Company’s management, including
the President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, believes that any disclosure controls and procedures or
internal control over financial reporting, no matter how well conceived and operated, may not prevent or detect all misstatements
because of inherent limitations. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints,
and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems,
they cannot provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been prevented
or detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns
can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons,
by collusion of two or more people, or by unauthorized override of the control. The design of any control system also is based
in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed
in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Accordingly, because of the inherent limitations in a cost
effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter MD&A | Page 33 |
CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS
Cautionary Note regarding Forward-Looking
Statements
Certain information contained herein this
MD&A constitutes forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are frequently characterized by words such as “plan”,
“expect”, “forecast”, “project”, ”intend”, ”believe”, ”anticipate”,
“outlook” and other similar words, or statements that certain events or conditions “may” or “will”
occur. Forward-looking statements are based on the opinions and estimates of management at the dates the statements are made, and
are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ materially
from those projected in the forward-looking statements. These factors include, without limitation: the inherent risks involved
in the mining, exploration and development of mineral properties, the uncertainties involved in interpreting drilling results and
other geological data, fluctuating metal prices, the possibility of project delays or cost overruns or unanticipated excessive
operating costs and expenses, uncertainties related to the necessity of financing, the availability of and costs of financing needed
in the future, and other factors described in the Company’s Annual Information Form under the heading “Risk Factors”.
The Company undertakes no obligation to update forward-looking statements if circumstances or management’s estimates or opinions
should change other than as required by securities laws. The reader is cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking
statements.
Cautionary Note regarding Reserves and
Resources
Mineral reserves and mineral resources
are determined in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”), issued by the Canadian Securities Administrators.
This National Instrument lays out the standards of disclosure for mineral projects including rules relating to the determination
of mineral reserves and mineral resources. This includes a requirement that a certified Qualified Person (“QP”) (as
defined under the NI 43-101) supervises the preparation of the mineral reserves and mineral resources. Ramon Mendoza, P. Eng.,
Vice President of Technical Services and Jesus Velador, Ph.D., Regional Exploration Manager are certified QPs for the Company.
Ramon Mendoza has reviewed this MD&A for QP technical disclosures. All NI 43-101 technical reports can be found on the Company’s
website at www.firstmajestic.com or on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.
Cautionary Note to United States Investors
Concerning Estimates of Mineral Reserves and Resources
This Management’s Discussion and
Analysis has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the securities laws in effect in Canada, which differ in certain
material respects from the disclosure requirements of United States securities laws. The terms “mineral reserve”, “proven
mineral reserve” and “probable mineral reserve” are Canadian mining terms as defined in accordance with Canadian
NI 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects and the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (the “CIM”)
- CIM Definition Standards on Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves, adopted by the CIM Council, as amended. These definitions
differ from the definitions in the disclosure requirements promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”)
and contained in Industry Guide 7 (“Industry Guide 7”). Under Industry Guide 7 standards, a “final” or
“bankable” feasibility study is required to report mineral reserves, the three-year historical average price is used
in any mineral reserve or cash flow analysis to designate mineral reserves and the primary environmental analysis or report must
be filed with the appropriate governmental authority.
In addition, the terms “mineral resource”,
“measured mineral resource”, “indicated mineral resource” and “inferred mineral resource” are
defined in and required to be disclosed by NI 43-101. However, these terms are not defined terms under Industry Guide 7 and are
not permitted to be used in reports and registration statements of United States companies filed with the Commission. Investors
are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of the mineral deposits in these categories will ever be converted into mineral
reserves. “Inferred mineral resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and great uncertainty
as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource will ever
be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimates of inferred mineral resources may not form the basis of feasibility
or pre-feasibility studies, except in rare cases. Investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an inferred mineral
resource exists or is economically or legally mineable. Disclosure of “contained ounces” in a mineral resource is permitted
disclosure under Canadian regulations. In contrast, the Commission only permits U.S. companies to report mineralization that does
not constitute “mineral reserves” by Commission standards as in place tonnage and grade without reference to unit measures.
Accordingly, information contained in this
Management’s Discussion and Analysis may not be comparable to similar information made public by U.S. companies subject to
the reporting and disclosure requirements under the United States federal securities laws and the rules and regulations of the
Commission thereunder.
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter MD&A | Page 34 |
Additional Information
Additional information on the Company,
including the Company’s Annual Information Form and the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the
year ended December 31, 2014, is available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on the Company’s website at www.firstmajestic.com.
First Majestic Silver Corp. 2015 Second Quarter MD&A | Page 35 |
Exhibit 99.3
Form 52-109F2
Certification of Interim Filings
Full Certificate
I, Keith Neumeyer, Chief Executive Officer of First Majestic
Silver Corp., certify the following:
| 1. | Review: I have reviewed the interim financial report
and interim MD&A (together, the “interim filings”) of First Majestic
Silver Corp. (the “issuer”) for the interim period ended June 30,
2015. |
| 2. | No misrepresentations: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim filings do not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to
make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the period covered by the
interim filings. |
| 3. | Fair presentation: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim financial report
together with the other financial information included in the interim filings fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, financial performance and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the interim filings. |
| 4. | Responsibility: The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (DC&P) and internal control over financial reporting (ICFR), as those terms are defined
in National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings, for the issuer. |
| 5. | Design: Subject to the limitations, if any, described in paragraphs 5.2 and 5.3, the issuer’s other certifying
officer(s) and I have, as at the end of the period covered by the interim filings |
| (a) | designed DC&P, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that |
| (i) | material information relating to the issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which the interim
filings are being prepared; and |
| (ii) | information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted
by it under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities
legislation; and |
| (b) | designed ICFR, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability
of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s
GAAP. |
| 5.1 | Control framework: The control framework the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I used to design
the issuer’s ICFR is COSO’s 2013 Internal Control – Integrated Framework. |
| 5.2 | ICFR – material weakness relating to design: The issuer has disclosed in its interim MD&A for each
material weakness relating to design existing at the end of the interim period |
| (a) | a description of the material weakness; |
| (b) | the impact of the material weakness on the issuer’s financial reporting and its ICFR; and |
| (c) | the issuer’s current plans, if any, or any actions already undertaken, for remediating the material weakness. |
| 5.3 | Limitation on scope of design: N/A |
| 6. | Reporting changes in ICFR: The issuer has disclosed in its interim MD&A any change in the issuer’s
ICFR that occurred during the period beginning on April 1, 2015 and ended on June 30, 2015 that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s ICFR. |
Date: August 10, 2015
“Keith Neumeyer” |
|
|
|
Keith Neumeyer |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
Exhibit 99.4
Form 52-109F2
Certification of Interim Filings
Full Certificate
I, Raymond Polman, Chief Financial Officer of First Majestic
Silver Corp., certify the following:
| 1. | Review: I have reviewed the interim financial report and interim MD&A (together, the “interim filings”)
of First Majestic Silver Corp. (the “issuer”) for the interim period ended June 30, 2015. |
| 2. | No misrepresentations: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim filings do not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to
make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the period covered by the
interim filings. |
| 3. | Fair presentation: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim financial report
together with the other financial information included in the interim filings fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, financial performance and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the interim filings. |
| 4. | Responsibility: The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (DC&P) and internal control over financial reporting (ICFR), as those terms are defined
in National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings, for the issuer. |
| 5. | Design: Subject to the limitations, if any, described in paragraphs 5.2 and 5.3, the issuer’s other certifying
officer(s) and I have, as at the end of the period covered by the interim filings |
| (a) | designed DC&P, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that |
| (i) | material information relating to the issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which the interim
filings are being prepared; and |
| (ii) | information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted
by it under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities
legislation; and |
| (b) | designed ICFR, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability
of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s
GAAP. |
| 5.1 | Control framework: The control framework the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I used to design
the issuer’s ICFR is COSO’s 2013 Internal Control – Integrated Framework. |
| 5.2 | ICFR – material weakness relating to design: The issuer has disclosed in its interim MD&A for each
material weakness relating to design existing at the end of the interim period |
| (a) | a description of the material weakness; |
| (b) | the impact of the material weakness on the issuer’s financial reporting and its ICFR; and |
| (c) | the issuer’s current plans, if any, or any actions already undertaken, for remediating the material weakness. |
| 5.3 | Limitation on scope of design: N/A |
| 6. | Reporting changes in ICFR: The issuer has disclosed in its interim MD&A any change in the issuer’s
ICFR that occurred during the period beginning on April 1, 2015 and ended on June 30, 2015 that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s ICFR. |
Date: August 10, 2015
“Raymond Polman” |
|
|
|
Raymond Polman |
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
Exhibit 99.5
Form 51-102F3
Material Change Report
| Item 1. | Name and Address of Company |
FIRST MAJESTIC SILVER CORP.
(the “Company”)
1805 – 925 West Georgia
Street
Vancouver, BC V6C 3L2 CANADA
Telephone: (604) 688-3033
Facsimile: (604) 639-8873
| Item 2. | Date of Material Change |
August 11, 2015
The press release was disseminated
through the services of Marketwired.
| Item 4. | Summary of Material Change |
The Company announced announce
the unaudited interim consolidated financial results of the Company for the second quarter ended June 30, 2015.
| Item 5. | Full Description of Material Change |
| 5.1 | Full Description of Material Change |
See Schedule “A”
attached hereto.
| 5.2 | Disclosure for Restructuring Transactions |
Not applicable.
| Item 6. | Reliance on subsection 7.1(2) or (3) of National Instrument
51-102 |
Not applicable
| Item 7. | Omitted Information |
Not applicable.
Keith Neumeyer, President &
CEO
Telephone: (604) 688-3033 Facsimile:
(604) 639-8873
August 11, 2015
SCHEDULE “A”
FIRST MAJESTIC SILVER CORP.
Suite
1805 – 925 West Georgia Street
Vancouver, B.C., Canada V6C 3L2
Telephone: (604) 688-3033 Fax:
(604) 639-8873
Toll Free: 1-866-529-2807
Web site: www.firstmajestic.com;
E-mail: info@firstmajestic.com
NEWS
RELEASE
New
York - AG
Toronto – FR |
August 11, 2015 |
Frankfurt
– FMV
Mexico - AG
First
Majestic Reports Second Quarter Financial Results and
La
Encantada Operational Update
FIRST MAJESTIC SILVER CORP.
(AG: NYSE; FR: TSX) (the "Company" or “First Majestic”) is pleased to announce the unaudited interim consolidated
financial results of the Company for the second quarter ended June 30, 2015. The full version of the financial statements and the
management discussion and analysis can be viewed on the Company's web site at www.firstmajestic.com or on SEDAR at www.sedar.com
and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov. All amounts are in U.S. dollars unless stated otherwise.
Second
Quarter 2015 FINANCIAL Highlights
| · | Generated revenues
of $54.2 million |
| · | Mine operating earnings
amounted to $3.4 million |
| · | Operating cash flows
before movements in working capital and taxes of $16.4 million or $0.14 per share |
| · | Net loss after taxes
amounted to $2.6 million or per share of ($0.02) |
| · | Produced 3.8 million
silver equivalent ounces, including 2.7 million ounces of pure silver |
| · | Total cash cost,
net of by-product credits, was $8.74 per payable silver ounce |
| · | All-in sustaining
cost (“AISC”) was $14.49 per payable silver ounce, a 20% reduction compared to $18.18 per ounce in second quarter of
2014 |
| · | Average realized
selling price for silver was $16.99 per ounce, compared to the quarterly COMEX average silver price of $16.38 per ounce |
| · | Cash and cash equivalents
of $37.7 million held at the end of the quarter |
Keith Neumeyer, President and
CEO of First Majestic, stated: “Our all-in sustaining cash costs in the first half of 2015 came in at the low end of guidance
at $14.18 per ounce, or a 23% reduction compared to $18.46 per ounce in the first half of 2014. Cost reductions at Del Toro have
had a great impact on our bottom line with all-in sustaining costs falling to $7.13 per ounce in the first half of the year compared
to $21.52 per ounce in the first half of 2014. Additional cost savings are anticipated in the second half of 2015 as we realize
higher operational efficiencies at La Encantada due to its recent expansion to 3,000 tpd.”
Second
QUARTER 2015 Highlights
|
Q2 |
Q1 |
Q/Q |
Q4 |
Q3 |
Q2 |
HIGHLIGHTS |
2015 |
2015 |
Change |
2014 |
2014 |
2014 |
Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ore Processed / Tonnes Milled |
662,637 |
631,609 |
5% |
683,528 |
621,196 |
671,024 |
Silver Ounces Produced |
2,716,503 |
2,776,855 |
(2%) |
3,074,567 |
2,680,439 |
3,098,218 |
Silver Equivalent Ounces Produced |
3,802,558 |
3,905,270 |
(3%) |
4,247,527 |
3,523,536 |
3,855,223 |
Cash Costs per Ounce(1) |
$8.74 |
$8.22 |
6% |
$8.51 |
$10.41 |
$9.63 |
All-in Sustaining Cost per Ounce(1) |
$14.49 |
$13.88 |
4% |
$14.43 |
$19.89 |
$18.18 |
Total Production Cost per Tonne(1) |
$46.80 |
$46.90 |
(0%) |
$47.15 |
$54.34 |
$51.81 |
Average Realized Silver Price per Ounce ($/eq. oz.)(1) |
$16.99 |
$17.05 |
(0%) |
$16.30 |
$19.10 |
$19.59 |
Financial ($ millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
$54.2 |
$54.6 |
(1%) |
$72.5 |
$40.8 |
$66.9 |
Mine Operating Earnings (2) |
$3.4 |
$5.0 |
(31%) |
$5.8 |
($1.8) |
$9.5 |
Net Earnings |
($2.6) |
($1.1) |
(133%) |
($64.6) |
($10.5) |
$7.6 |
Operating Cash Flows before Working Capital and Taxes (2) |
$16.4 |
$17.3 |
(5%) |
$21.1 |
$9.0 |
$19.0 |
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
$37.7 |
$22.4 |
69% |
$40.3 |
$34.7 |
$66.7 |
Working Capital (1) |
($0.9) |
($12.6) |
93% |
($2.9) |
$11.4 |
$46.1 |
Shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per Share ("EPS") - Basic |
($0.02) |
($0.01) |
(127%) |
($0.55) |
($0.09) |
$0.06 |
Adjusted EPS(1) |
($0.03) |
$0.00 |
(845%) |
$0.04 |
($0.04) |
$0.02 |
Cash Flow per Share(1) |
$0.14 |
$0.15 |
(8%) |
$0.18 |
$0.08 |
$0.16 |
| (1) | The
Company reports non-GAAP measures which include cash costs per ounce, all-in sustaining
cost per ounce, total production cost per ounce, total production cost per tonne, average
realized silver price per ounce, working capital, adjusted EPS and cash flow per share.
These measures are widely used in the mining industry as a benchmark for performance,
but do not have a standardized meaning and may differ from methods used by other companies
with similar descriptions. |
| (2) | The
Company reports additional GAAP measures which include mine operating earnings and operating
cash flows before movements in working capital and income taxes. These additional financial
measures are intended to provide additional information and do not have a standardized
meaning prescribed by IFRS. |
FINANCIAL REVIEW
The Company generated revenues
of $54.2 million for the second quarter of 2015, a decrease of 19% compared to the second quarter of 2014 primarily due to a 13%
decrease in average realized silver prices and a 3% decrease in silver equivalent ounces sold. Compared to the prior quarter, revenues
decreased 1% primarily due a minor decrease in total production.
Net loss increased by $1.5 million
compared to the prior quarter to a loss of $2.6 million, or ($0.02) per share. The loss is primarily related to a $1.5 million
non-cash loss on derivatives, prepayment facility and investments.
Mine operating earnings decreased
to $3.4 million compared to $5.0 million in the previous quarter. The decrease in mine operating earnings was primarily affected
by a decrease in silver equivalent ounces sold.
Cash flows from operations before
movements in working capital and income taxes in the quarter totaled $16.4 million or $0.14 per share, compared to $17.3 million
or $0.15 per share in the previous quarter. The decrease is due to lower mine operating earnings.
On April 22, 2015, the Company
completed the bought deal private placement, issuing 4,620,000 common shares at a price of CAD$6.50 per share for gross proceeds
of $24.5 million (CAD$30.0 million), or net proceeds of $23.0 million (CAD$28.1 million) after share issuance costs.
As previously announced on July
27, 2015, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to acquire all of the issued and outstanding shares of SilverCrest for
consideration of 0.2769 common shares of First Majestic plus CAD$0.0001 in cash per SilverCrest common share. With this acquisition,
SilverCrest’s Santa Elena Mine will be First Majestic’s sixth producing silver mine, adding further growth potential
to the Company’s portfolio of Mexican projects and enhances the Company’s working capital position. Pending the close
of the SilverCrest acquisition, which is expected in early October, the Company plans to revise production and cost estimates and
include SilverCrest’s Santa Elena Mine in its consolidated operating guidance.
OPERATIONAL HIGHLIGHTS AND
UPDATES
Total production for the quarter
was 3,802,558 silver equivalent ounces consisting of 2,716,503 ounces of silver, 3,528 ounces of gold, 11,078,235 pounds of lead
and 3,824,737 pounds of zinc. The 3% decrease in production compared to the previous quarter was primarily attributed to lower
production from Del Toro, which encountered 16% lower silver grades and a decrease in silver recoveries while mining through a
lower grade area of the Perseverancia mine, as well as a 9% decrease in production at La Parrilla due to a return to normal zinc
grades after encountering exceptionally high zinc grades within the Vacas mine last quarter. The decreases at Del Toro and La Parrilla
were partially offset by a 33% improvement in production at La Guitarra due to improved silver and gold grades and a new quarterly
production record at San Martin.
At La Encantada, the ramp up
to the 3,000 tpd is progressing as planned. The new ball mill averaged 2,889 tpd in the month of July with similar silver grades
and recoveries experienced in the prior quarter. With economies of scale resulting from the higher throughput levels, AISC are
expected to improve in the second half of the year. In addition, silver grades are expected to remain in the range of 160 g/t to
180 g/t for the remainder of the year.
Due to the discovery of the Ojuelas
ore body at La Encantada, the Company is planning to release an updated NI 43-101 Technical Report in the fourth quarter of 2015.
Since the initial discovery in late 2014, over 6,350 metres in 28 holes have been completed in and around the Ojuelas ore body.
It is expected that all 28 holes, pending final assays, will be considered in the updated NI 43-101 Technical Report which will
incorporate a cut-off date of August 6, 2015. Two drill rigs are currently active and continue to infill drill and explore the
open ends to the north and south flanks.
The cross section shown in figure
1 is part of the ongoing exploration program being carried out by the Company and includes numerous holes and assay results. Highlights
includes hole ILE 14-161 which intersected 34 metres of oxide mineralization with average grades of 303 g/t silver, 2.3% lead,
8.4% zinc and very low manganese. Also, suphide mineralization containing high levels of lead and zinc was also discovered in the
scarn directly below the oxide manto. Samples are undergoing metallurgical testing and the results will be released in the upcoming
Technical Report.
COSTS AND CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
Cash cost per ounce (after by-product
credits) for the quarter was $8.74 per payable ounce of silver, down from $9.63 per ounce in the second quarter of 2014. Compared
to the previous quarter, the cash cost per ounce increased 6% primarily due to annual union bonuses at Del Toro and La Parrilla
and less by-product credits at La Parrilla due to the decrease in zinc production. Cash costs at all other mines either improved
or were consistent when compared to the previous quarter.
As shown in the table below,
consolidated AISC in the second quarter was $14.49 per payable silver ounce, a 4% increase compared to $13.88 per ounce in the
previous quarter and a 20% reduction compared to $18.18 per ounce in the second quarter of 2014. With the La Encantada mill expansion
now complete plus higher silver and gold grades at San Martin and La Guitarra, the Company expects AISC to further improve in the
second half of the year.
The following table contains
the mine by mine AISC from the second quarter of 2015 compared to the previous quarter and the second quarter of 2014.
|
All-in Sustaining Costs (per Payable Silver Ounce) |
|
Mine |
Q2 2015 |
Q1 2015 |
Q/Q change |
Q2 2014 |
Y/Y change |
La Encantada |
$18.32 |
$17.85 |
3% |
$14.25 |
29% |
La Parrilla |
$14.48 |
$12.58 |
15% |
$11.42 |
27% |
Del Toro |
$6.97 |
$7.25 |
-4% |
$20.44 |
-66% |
San Martin |
$9.62 |
$8.69 |
11% |
$15.89 |
-39% |
La Guitarra |
$13.32 |
$17.71 |
-25% |
$23.39 |
-43% |
Total: |
$14.49 |
$13.88 |
4% |
$18.18 |
-20% |
Capital expenditures in the second
quarter were $17.4 million, primarily consisting of $4.2 million at La Encantada, $4.0 million at La Parrilla, $3.8 million at
Del Toro, $2.8 million at San Martin and $2.1 million at La Guitarra. Compared to the previous quarter, capital expenditures increased
10% primarily due to higher investment at La Encantada to complete the plant expansion. In the first half of 2015, the Company
invested a total of $33.1 million towards capital expenditures, or approximately $4.7 million below budget, and expects the second
half of 2015 to achieve similar savings due to lower sustaining costs and fewer expansionary investments.
Mr. Ramon Mendoza Reyes, Vice
President Technical Services for First Majestic, is a "qualified person" as such term is defined under National Instrument
43-101, and has reviewed and approved the technical information disclosed in this news release.
ABOUT FIRST MAJESTIC
First Majestic is a mining company
focused on silver production in México and is aggressively pursuing the development of its existing mineral property assets
and the pursuit through acquisition of additional mineral assets which contribute to the Company achieving its corporate growth
objectives.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION contact
info@firstmajestic.com, visit our website at www.firstmajestic.com or call our toll free number 1.866.529.2807.
FIRST MAJESTIC SILVER CORP.
“signed”
Keith Neumeyer, President &
CEO
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING
INFORMATION
This news release includes certain
"Forward-Looking Statements" within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
and applicable Canadian securities laws. When used in this news release, the words “anticipate”, “believe”,
“estimate”, “expect”, “target”, “plan”, “forecast”, “may”,
“schedule” and similar words or expressions, identify forward-looking statements or information. These forward-looking
statements or information relate to, among other things: the price of silver and other metals; the accuracy of mineral reserve
and resource estimates and estimates of future production and costs of production at our properties; estimated production rates
for silver and other payable metals produced by us, the estimated cost of development of our development projects; the effects
of laws, regulations and government policies on our operations, including, without limitation, the laws in Mexico which currently
have significant restrictions related to mining; obtaining or maintaining necessary permits, licences and approvals from government
authorities; and continued access to necessary infrastructure, including, without limitation, access to power, land, water and
roads to carry on activities as planned.
These statements reflect the
Company’s current views with respect to future events and are necessarily based upon a number of assumptions and estimates
that, while considered reasonable by the Company, are inherently subject to significant business, economic, competitive, political
and social uncertainties and contingencies. Many factors, both known and unknown, could cause actual results, performance or achievements
to be materially different from the results, performance or achievements that are or may be expressed or implied by such forward-looking
statements or information and the Company has made assumptions and estimates based on or related to many of these factors. Such
factors include, without limitation: fluctuations in the spot and forward price of silver, gold, base metals or certain other commodities
(such as natural gas, fuel oil and electricity); fluctuations in the currency markets (such as the Canadian dollar and Mexican
peso versus the U.S. dollar); changes in national and local government, legislation, taxation, controls, regulations and political
or economic developments in Canada, Mexico; operating or technical difficulties in connection with mining or development activities;
risks and hazards associated with the business of mineral exploration, development and mining (including environmental hazards,
industrial accidents, unusual or unexpected formations, pressures, cave-ins and flooding); risks relating to the credit worthiness
or financial condition of suppliers, refiners and other parties with whom the Company does business; inability to obtain adequate
insurance to cover risks and hazards; and the presence of laws and regulations that may impose restrictions on mining, including
those currently enacted in Mexico; employee relations; relationships with and claims by local communities and indigenous populations;
availability and increasing costs associated with mining inputs and labour; the speculative nature of mineral exploration and development,
including the risks of obtaining necessary licenses, permits and approvals from government authorities; diminishing quantities
or grades of mineral reserves as properties are mined; the Company’s title to properties; and the factors identified under
the caption “Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Information Form, under the caption “Risks Relating
to First Majestic's Business”.
Investors are cautioned against
attributing undue certainty to forward-looking statements or information. Although the Company has attempted to identify important
factors that could cause actual results to differ materially, there may be other factors that cause results not to be anticipated,
estimated or intended. The Company does not intend, and does not assume any obligation, to update these forward-looking statements
or information to reflect changes in assumptions or changes in circumstances or any other events affecting such statements or information,
other than as required by applicable law.
Figure 1: La Encantada Silver Mine, Ojuela Manto
Exhibit 99.6
FIRST MAJESTIC SILVER CORP.
Suite
1805 – 925 West Georgia Street
Vancouver, B.C., Canada V6C 3L2
Telephone: (604) 688-3033 Fax: (604) 639-8873
Toll Free: 1-866-529-2807
Web site: www.firstmajestic.com; E-mail:
info@firstmajestic.com
NEWS
RELEASE
New York - AG |
|
Toronto – FR |
August 11, 2015 |
Frankfurt – FMV |
|
Mexico - AG |
|
First
Majestic Reports Second Quarter Financial Results and
La
Encantada Operational Update
FIRST MAJESTIC SILVER CORP. (AG:
NYSE; FR: TSX) (the "Company" or “First Majestic”) is pleased to announce the unaudited interim consolidated
financial results of the Company for the second quarter ended June 30, 2015. The full version of the financial statements and
the management discussion and analysis can be viewed on the Company's web site at www.firstmajestic.com or on SEDAR at
www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov. All amounts are in U.S. dollars unless stated otherwise.
Second
Quarter 2015 FINANCIAL Highlights
| · | Generated revenues of $54.2 million |
| · | Mine operating earnings amounted to $3.4
million |
| · | Operating cash flows before movements
in working capital and taxes of $16.4 million or $0.14 per share |
| · | Net loss after taxes amounted to $2.6
million or per share of ($0.02) |
| · | Produced 3.8 million silver equivalent
ounces, including 2.7 million ounces of pure silver |
| · | Total cash cost, net of by-product credits,
was $8.74 per payable silver ounce |
| · | All-in sustaining cost (“AISC”)
was $14.49 per payable silver ounce, a 20% reduction compared to $18.18 per ounce in second quarter of 2014 |
| · | Average realized selling price for silver
was $16.99 per ounce, compared to the quarterly COMEX average silver price of $16.38 per ounce |
| · | Cash and cash equivalents of $37.7 million
held at the end of the quarter |
Keith Neumeyer, President and CEO of First
Majestic, stated: “Our all-in sustaining cash costs in the first half of 2015 came in at the low end of guidance at $14.18
per ounce, or a 23% reduction compared to $18.46 per ounce in the first half of 2014. Cost reductions at Del Toro have had a great
impact on our bottom line with all-in sustaining costs falling to $7.13 per ounce in the first half of the year compared to $21.52
per ounce in the first half of 2014. Additional cost savings are anticipated in the second half of 2015 as we realize higher operational
efficiencies at La Encantada due to its recent expansion to 3,000 tpd.”
Second
QUARTER 2015 Highlights
|
Q2 |
Q1 |
Q/Q |
Q4 |
Q3 |
Q2 |
HIGHLIGHTS |
2015 |
2015 |
Change |
2014 |
2014 |
2014 |
Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ore Processed / Tonnes Milled |
662,637 |
631,609 |
5% |
683,528 |
621,196 |
671,024 |
Silver Ounces Produced |
2,716,503 |
2,776,855 |
(2%) |
3,074,567 |
2,680,439 |
3,098,218 |
Silver Equivalent Ounces Produced |
3,802,558 |
3,905,270 |
(3%) |
4,247,527 |
3,523,536 |
3,855,223 |
Cash Costs per Ounce(1) |
$8.74 |
$8.22 |
6% |
$8.51 |
$10.41 |
$9.63 |
All-in Sustaining Cost per Ounce(1) |
$14.49 |
$13.88 |
4% |
$14.43 |
$19.89 |
$18.18 |
Total Production Cost per Tonne(1) |
$46.80 |
$46.90 |
(0%) |
$47.15 |
$54.34 |
$51.81 |
Average Realized Silver Price per Ounce ($/eq. oz.)(1) |
$16.99 |
$17.05 |
(0%) |
$16.30 |
$19.10 |
$19.59 |
Financial ($ millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
$54.2 |
$54.6 |
(1%) |
$72.5 |
$40.8 |
$66.9 |
Mine Operating Earnings (2) |
$3.4 |
$5.0 |
(31%) |
$5.8 |
($1.8) |
$9.5 |
Net Earnings |
($2.6) |
($1.1) |
(133%) |
($64.6) |
($10.5) |
$7.6 |
Operating Cash Flows before Working Capital and Taxes (2) |
$16.4 |
$17.3 |
(5%) |
$21.1 |
$9.0 |
$19.0 |
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
$37.7 |
$22.4 |
69% |
$40.3 |
$34.7 |
$66.7 |
Working Capital (1) |
($0.9) |
($12.6) |
93% |
($2.9) |
$11.4 |
$46.1 |
Shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per Share ("EPS") - Basic |
($0.02) |
($0.01) |
(127%) |
($0.55) |
($0.09) |
$0.06 |
Adjusted EPS(1) |
($0.03) |
$0.00 |
(845%) |
$0.04 |
($0.04) |
$0.02 |
Cash Flow per Share(1) |
$0.14 |
$0.15 |
(8%) |
$0.18 |
$0.08 |
$0.16 |
| (1) | The Company
reports non-GAAP measures which include cash costs per ounce, all-in sustaining cost
per ounce, total production cost per ounce, total production cost per tonne, average
realized silver price per ounce, working capital, adjusted EPS and cash flow per share.
These measures are widely used in the mining industry as a benchmark for performance,
but do not have a standardized meaning and may differ from methods used by other companies
with similar descriptions. |
| (2) | The Company
reports additional GAAP measures which include mine operating earnings and operating
cash flows before movements in working capital and income taxes. These additional financial
measures are intended to provide additional information and do not have a standardized
meaning prescribed by IFRS. |
FINANCIAL REVIEW
The Company generated revenues of $54.2
million for the second quarter of 2015, a decrease of 19% compared to the second quarter of 2014 primarily due to a 13% decrease
in average realized silver prices and a 3% decrease in silver equivalent ounces sold. Compared to the prior quarter, revenues decreased
1% primarily due a minor decrease in total production.
Net loss increased by $1.5 million compared
to the prior quarter to a loss of $2.6 million, or ($0.02) per share. The loss is primarily related to a $1.5 million non-cash
loss on derivatives, prepayment facility and investments.
Mine operating earnings decreased to $3.4
million compared to $5.0 million in the previous quarter. The decrease in mine operating earnings was primarily affected by a decrease
in silver equivalent ounces sold.
Cash flows from operations before movements
in working capital and income taxes in the quarter totaled $16.4 million or $0.14 per share, compared to $17.3 million or $0.15
per share in the previous quarter. The decrease is due to lower mine operating earnings.
On April 22, 2015, the Company completed
the bought deal private placement, issuing 4,620,000 common shares at a price of CAD$6.50 per share for gross proceeds of $24.5
million (CAD$30.0 million), or net proceeds of $23.0 million (CAD$28.1 million) after share issuance costs.
As previously announced on July 27, 2015,
the Company entered into a definitive agreement to acquire all of the issued and outstanding shares of SilverCrest for consideration
of 0.2769 common shares of First Majestic plus CAD$0.0001 in cash per SilverCrest common share. With this acquisition, SilverCrest’s
Santa Elena Mine will be First Majestic’s sixth producing silver mine, adding further growth potential to the Company’s
portfolio of Mexican projects and enhances the Company’s working capital position. Pending the close of the SilverCrest acquisition,
which is expected in early October, the Company plans to revise production and cost estimates and include SilverCrest’s Santa
Elena Mine in its consolidated operating guidance.
OPERATIONAL HIGHLIGHTS AND UPDATES
Total production for the quarter was 3,802,558
silver equivalent ounces consisting of 2,716,503 ounces of silver, 3,528 ounces of gold, 11,078,235 pounds of lead and 3,824,737
pounds of zinc. The 3% decrease in production compared to the previous quarter was primarily attributed to lower production from
Del Toro, which encountered 16% lower silver grades and a decrease in silver recoveries while mining through a lower grade area
of the Perseverancia mine, as well as a 9% decrease in production at La Parrilla due to a return to normal zinc grades after encountering
exceptionally high zinc grades within the Vacas mine last quarter. The decreases at Del Toro and La Parrilla were partially offset
by a 33% improvement in production at La Guitarra due to improved silver and gold grades and a new quarterly production record
at San Martin.
At La Encantada, the ramp up to the 3,000
tpd is progressing as planned. The new ball mill averaged 2,889 tpd in the month of July with similar silver grades and recoveries
experienced in the prior quarter. With economies of scale resulting from the higher throughput levels, AISC are expected to improve
in the second half of the year. In addition, silver grades are expected to remain in the range of 160 g/t to 180 g/t for the remainder
of the year.
Due to the discovery of the Ojuelas ore
body at La Encantada, the Company is planning to release an updated NI 43-101 Technical Report in the fourth quarter of 2015. Since
the initial discovery in late 2014, over 6,350 metres in 28 holes have been completed in and around the Ojuelas ore body. It is
expected that all 28 holes, pending final assays, will be considered in the updated NI 43-101 Technical Report which will incorporate
a cut-off date of August 6, 2015. Two drill rigs are currently active and continue to infill drill and explore the open ends to
the north and south flanks.
The cross section shown in figure 1 is
part of the ongoing exploration program being carried out by the Company and includes numerous holes and assay results. Highlights
includes hole ILE 14-161 which intersected 34 metres of oxide mineralization with average grades of 303 g/t silver, 2.3% lead,
8.4% zinc and very low manganese. Also, suphide mineralization containing high levels of lead and zinc was also discovered in the
scarn directly below the oxide manto. Samples are undergoing metallurgical testing and the results will be released in the upcoming
Technical Report.
COSTS AND CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
Cash cost per ounce (after by-product credits)
for the quarter was $8.74 per payable ounce of silver, down from $9.63 per ounce in the second quarter of 2014. Compared to the
previous quarter, the cash cost per ounce increased 6% primarily due to annual union bonuses at Del Toro and La Parrilla and less
by-product credits at La Parrilla due to the decrease in zinc production. Cash costs at all other mines either improved or were
consistent when compared to the previous quarter.
As shown in the table below, consolidated
AISC in the second quarter was $14.49 per payable silver ounce, a 4% increase compared to $13.88 per ounce in the previous quarter
and a 20% reduction compared to $18.18 per ounce in the second quarter of 2014. With the La Encantada mill expansion now complete
plus higher silver and gold grades at San Martin and La Guitarra, the Company expects AISC to further improve in the second half
of the year.
The following table contains the mine by
mine AISC from the second quarter of 2015 compared to the previous quarter and the second quarter of 2014.
|
All-in Sustaining Costs (per Payable Silver Ounce) |
|
Mine |
Q2 2015 |
Q1 2015 |
Q/Q change |
Q2 2014 |
Y/Y change |
La Encantada |
$18.32 |
$17.85 |
3% |
$14.25 |
29% |
La Parrilla |
$14.48 |
$12.58 |
15% |
$11.42 |
27% |
Del Toro |
$6.97 |
$7.25 |
-4% |
$20.44 |
-66% |
San Martin |
$9.62 |
$8.69 |
11% |
$15.89 |
-39% |
La Guitarra |
$13.32 |
$17.71 |
-25% |
$23.39 |
-43% |
Total: |
$14.49 |
$13.88 |
4% |
$18.18 |
-20% |
Capital expenditures in the second quarter
were $17.4 million, primarily consisting of $4.2 million at La Encantada, $4.0 million at La Parrilla, $3.8 million at Del Toro,
$2.8 million at San Martin and $2.1 million at La Guitarra. Compared to the previous quarter, capital expenditures increased 10%
primarily due to higher investment at La Encantada to complete the plant expansion. In the first half of 2015, the Company invested
a total of $33.1 million towards capital expenditures, or approximately $4.7 million below budget, and expects the second half
of 2015 to achieve similar savings due to lower sustaining costs and fewer expansionary investments.
Mr. Ramon Mendoza Reyes, Vice President
Technical Services for First Majestic, is a "qualified person" as such term is defined under National Instrument 43-101,
and has reviewed and approved the technical information disclosed in this news release.
ABOUT FIRST MAJESTIC
First Majestic is a mining company focused
on silver production in México and is aggressively pursuing the development of its existing mineral property assets and
the pursuit through acquisition of additional mineral assets which contribute to the Company achieving its corporate growth objectives.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION contact info@firstmajestic.com,
visit our website at www.firstmajestic.com or call our toll free number 1.866.529.2807.
FIRST MAJESTIC SILVER CORP.
“signed”
Keith Neumeyer, President & CEO
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING
INFORMATION
This news release includes certain "Forward-Looking
Statements" within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and applicable Canadian
securities laws. When used in this news release, the words “anticipate”, “believe”, “estimate”,
“expect”, “target”, “plan”, “forecast”, “may”, “schedule”
and similar words or expressions, identify forward-looking statements or information. These forward-looking statements or information
relate to, among other things: the price of silver and other metals; the accuracy of mineral reserve and resource estimates and
estimates of future production and costs of production at our properties; estimated production rates for silver and other payable
metals produced by us, the estimated cost of development of our development projects; the effects of laws, regulations and government
policies on our operations, including, without limitation, the laws in Mexico which currently have significant restrictions related
to mining; obtaining or maintaining necessary permits, licences and approvals from government authorities; and continued access
to necessary infrastructure, including, without limitation, access to power, land, water and roads to carry on activities as planned.
These statements reflect the Company’s
current views with respect to future events and are necessarily based upon a number of assumptions and estimates that, while considered
reasonable by the Company, are inherently subject to significant business, economic, competitive, political and social uncertainties
and contingencies. Many factors, both known and unknown, could cause actual results, performance or achievements to be materially
different from the results, performance or achievements that are or may be expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements
or information and the Company has made assumptions and estimates based on or related to many of these factors. Such factors include,
without limitation: fluctuations in the spot and forward price of silver, gold, base metals or certain other commodities (such
as natural gas, fuel oil and electricity); fluctuations in the currency markets (such as the Canadian dollar and Mexican peso versus
the U.S. dollar); changes in national and local government, legislation, taxation, controls, regulations and political or economic
developments in Canada, Mexico; operating or technical difficulties in connection with mining or development activities; risks
and hazards associated with the business of mineral exploration, development and mining (including environmental hazards, industrial
accidents, unusual or unexpected formations, pressures, cave-ins and flooding); risks relating to the credit worthiness or financial
condition of suppliers, refiners and other parties with whom the Company does business; inability to obtain adequate insurance
to cover risks and hazards; and the presence of laws and regulations that may impose restrictions on mining, including those currently
enacted in Mexico; employee relations; relationships with and claims by local communities and indigenous populations; availability
and increasing costs associated with mining inputs and labour; the speculative nature of mineral exploration and development, including
the risks of obtaining necessary licenses, permits and approvals from government authorities; diminishing quantities or grades
of mineral reserves as properties are mined; the Company’s title to properties; and the factors identified under the caption
“Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Information Form, under the caption “Risks Relating to First Majestic's
Business”.
Investors are cautioned against attributing
undue certainty to forward-looking statements or information. Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors
that could cause actual results to differ materially, there may be other factors that cause results not to be anticipated, estimated
or intended. The Company does not intend, and does not assume any obligation, to update these forward-looking statements or information
to reflect changes in assumptions or changes in circumstances or any other events affecting such statements or information, other
than as required by applicable law.
Figure 1: La Encantada Silver Mine, Ojuela Manto
First Majestic Silver (NYSE:AG)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2024 to Apr 2024
First Majestic Silver (NYSE:AG)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2023 to Apr 2024