ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for default Register for Free to get streaming real-time quotes, interactive charts, live options flow, and more.

What Are They Thinking at Barclays?

Share On Facebook
share on Linkedin
Print

What is it that the banking industry doesn’t understand?  What is it that Barclays doesn’t understand?  There are days when the news is absolutely befuddling.  This is one of them.

What the FSA is Saying to Barclays

Just reading the morning headlines about Barclays ought to be confusing to UK banking customers.  “Regulator warns Barclays: “We’re Still Watching You”” (Guardian); “FSA Keeps up Pressure on Barclays to Reform” (Telegraph); “Barclays Told to Keep up Pressure to Reform” (Reuters); “FSA Demands Overhaul at Barclays” (Money Marketing); “Pressure on Barclays to Reform” (City A.M.); “Welcome to Barclays, Mr. Jenkins, You’re Downgraded” (Financial News).

Then, up pops this report from Sky News:  “Barclay’s Urges ‘Rogue Banker’ Ban.”

What Barclays is Saying to Parliament

It seems that Barclays (the same Barclays in all those headlines) has recommended to the Parliamentary Commission on Banking Standards that the government set up yet another watchdog over the banking industry.  Aside from the absurdity of the suggestion, in and of itself, which I will explain in a moment, this unfolding scenario is like watching an alleged criminal on the witness stand suggesting to the court that it should do something about all the other criminals out there.

With all the urging for Barclays to get their house in order, they have the unmitigated gall to pose themselves as the one bank with a corner on the wisdom that it will take to end “rogue bankers.”  I hope that, at least in this case, the politicians are smarter than the bankers.  So far, it’s not clear.

Would You Let This Man Pilot Your Plane?

The appointment of Anthony Jenkins as CEO of Barclays was dependent upon the approval of the FSA.  This is a man who has been a Barclays executive; a man whose business division had 84% of the complaints lodged against it in one six-month period upheld.  But that’s okay.  There were only 11,000+ complaints in that half year.  Let’s put it this way:  If airlines posted the number of complaints upheld against their pilots at the gates at Heathrow, would you board this man’s plane?

Granted, there may be some wisdom in promoting from within, at least in the short term, so that someone familiar with the organization takes control.  On the other hand, when the organization has been plagued with scandals such as the Libor manipulation and PPI over-selling (which would have been within his purview), is Jenkins really the best man for the job?

Join, watch and keep up to date with all the live data, charts, info and the latest news and blogs from the financial markets with ADVFN.

Barclays Rogue Proposal

OK, class.  What have we learned so far?  A rogue bank, deeply involved in the Libor scandal, the PPI scandal, and others, has promoted one of its own, who very well could be complicit in at least some of the bank’s misadventures.  Well, there’s more.  The rogue bank has now suggested that Parliament establish a Chartered Institute of Bankers that would “promote and develop professional standards across the industry, and to administer a new professional register which all staff who work within certain functions are required to sign.”  And, get this – the institute would be “independent of the banking industry, but be funded by the major banks.”

Independent?  Are you kidding me?  Have they forgotten that adage that says, “Don’t bite the hand that funds you?”  Barclay’s recommendation makes it sounds like there are no banking standards now.  Are they saying that registering bankers will ensure that they abide by the regulations?  That is patently absurd.  To be fair, the proposal also recommends that rogue bankers would be removed from the register and banned from the industry.  Now there’s a good idea!  Why not do it now?

May I humbly suggest that it’s not registration and more regulation that the banking industry needs.  It’s accountability.  There is no need to build a whole new wing of bureaucracy.  The need is to institute justice and hand out punishments comparable to the banking crimes at every level and across every bank, including Barclays.  The need is to reward customers for their business instead of picking their pockets.

But that’s not going to happen.  That’s not the way the system works.  And Barclays is proving it.

ADVFN: The world’s leading stocks and shares information website, provides the private investor with all the latest high-tech trading tools and includes live price data streaming, stock quotes and the option to access ‘Level 2’ data on all of the world’s key exchanges (LSE, NYSE, NASDAQ, Euronext etc).

 

CLICK HERE TO REGISTER FOR FREE ON ADVFN, the world's leading stocks and shares information website, provides the private investor with all the latest high-tech trading tools and includes live price data streaming, stock quotes and the option to access 'Level 2' data on all of the world's key exchanges (LSE, NYSE, NASDAQ, Euronext etc).

This area of the ADVFN.com site is for independent financial commentary. These blogs are provided by independent authors via a common carrier platform and do not represent the opinions of ADVFN Plc. ADVFN Plc does not monitor, approve, endorse or exert editorial control over these articles and does not therefore accept responsibility for or make any warranties in connection with or recommend that you or any third party rely on such information. The information available at ADVFN.com is for your general information and use and is not intended to address your particular requirements. In particular, the information does not constitute any form of advice or recommendation by ADVFN.COM and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any investment decisions. Authors may or may not have positions in stocks that they are discussing but it should be considered very likely that their opinions are aligned with their trading and that they hold positions in companies, forex, commodities and other instruments they discuss.

Leave A Reply

 
Do you want to write for our Newspaper? Get in touch: newspaper@advfn.com