ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for default Register for Free to get streaming real-time quotes, interactive charts, live options flow, and more.

Samuel Heath – Financial distress risk

Share On Facebook
share on Linkedin
Print

While Samuel Heath (LSE:HSM) has an impressive history of profits for a £5m market capitalisation company (see yesterday’s newsletter) it is going into a period when sales may fall by over one-third. Will it survive? I’ll look at its balance sheet where the largest burden is the pension deficit. The pension liability needs analysis to see if that is likely to topple the company.

Piotroski factors are used to obtain an overview of its finances – at least finances up to March 2020. But, given so much has changed since March, we need to also look at potential danger points in a time deep recession. Thus, we’ll consider its cash flow generation.

Balance sheet

£m   March 2020   March 2019
Non-current assets
Intangible 0.2 0.1
Property, plant and equipment (of which freehold property is £1.5m) 3.6 3.2
Deferred tax assets 0.9 1.0
Total non-current assets 4.7 4.3
Current assets
Inventories 4.2 4.0
Receivables 2.4 2.3
Cash 3.0 3.2
Total current assets 9.6 9.4
TOTAL ASSETS 14.3 13.8
Liabilities
Payables -1.9 -1.8
Pension deficit -6.6 -7.4
Other liabilities -0.2 -0.2
NET ASSETS 5.7 4.4

For a £5m company the balance sheet is exceptionally strong if we ignore the pension deficit on the defined benefit scheme.  It has no bank debt, and payables to suppliers are more than covered by receivables from customers. That leaves £3m in cash plus £1.5m in freehold land and buildings as well as inventories of taps, door handles etc of £4.2m and plant and machinery of £2m.

The pension deficit

The company’s defined benefit schemes were merged and closed to new members in 2005/6. At March 2020, the scheme had £8.4m of assets (invested 78% equities and 22% cash) and £15m of liabilities, leaving a deficit of £6.6m. But there is a related deferred tax asset of £1.2m meaning that the net liability is £5.3m. This is a substantial deficit for a £5m company.

The firm has agreed to step up payments into the scheme to close the gap. Around £0.36m is paid out each year to pensioners but Samuel Heath put in £0.516m in 2019 and £0.783m in the year to March 2020. A new “Pension Recovery Plan” requires that in the current year the company puts in £1m. It also pays around £0.4m pa to the defined contribution plan scheme.

Clearly, these sums are quite a burden to the company, especially if it is going into a loss-making year or two.

In the absence of bank debt or excessive supplier credit, that le………………To read more subscribe to my premium newsletter Deep Value Shares – click here http://newsletters.advfn.com/deepvalueshares/subscribe-1

 

CLICK HERE TO REGISTER FOR FREE ON ADVFN, the world's leading stocks and shares information website, provides the private investor with all the latest high-tech trading tools and includes live price data streaming, stock quotes and the option to access 'Level 2' data on all of the world's key exchanges (LSE, NYSE, NASDAQ, Euronext etc).

This area of the ADVFN.com site is for independent financial commentary. These blogs are provided by independent authors via a common carrier platform and do not represent the opinions of ADVFN Plc. ADVFN Plc does not monitor, approve, endorse or exert editorial control over these articles and does not therefore accept responsibility for or make any warranties in connection with or recommend that you or any third party rely on such information. The information available at ADVFN.com is for your general information and use and is not intended to address your particular requirements. In particular, the information does not constitute any form of advice or recommendation by ADVFN.COM and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any investment decisions. Authors may or may not have positions in stocks that they are discussing but it should be considered very likely that their opinions are aligned with their trading and that they hold positions in companies, forex, commodities and other instruments they discuss.

Leave A Reply

 
Do you want to write for our Newspaper? Get in touch: newspaper@advfn.com