Distribution, Rate and Yield
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
Ended June 30, 2014
|
|
For the Three Months
Ended June 30, 2013
|
|
NET INTEREST INCOME AND NET INTEREST MARGIN
|
|
Average
Balance
|
|
Interest
Income/
Expense
|
|
Average
Yield/
Rate
|
|
Average
Balance
|
|
Interest
Income/
Expense
|
|
Average
Yield/
Rate
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, gross(1)
|
|
$
|
974,673
|
|
$
|
11,617
|
|
|
4.78
|
%
|
$
|
817,565
|
|
$
|
10,051
|
|
|
4.93
|
%
|
Securitiestaxable
|
|
|
287,841
|
|
|
2,047
|
|
|
2.85
|
%
|
|
358,532
|
|
|
2,399
|
|
|
2.68
|
%
|
Securitiestax exempt(2)
|
|
|
79,845
|
|
|
779
|
|
|
3.91
|
%
|
|
58,474
|
|
|
550
|
|
|
3.77
|
%
|
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions
|
|
|
31,598
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
0.28
|
%
|
|
39,198
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
0.31
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest earning assets(2)
|
|
|
1,373,957
|
|
|
14,465
|
|
|
4.22
|
%
|
|
1,273,769
|
|
|
13,030
|
|
|
4.10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
|
23,919
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
7,212
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,611
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
1,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,830
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
62,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,334
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,469,085
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,373,202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and shareholders' equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand, noninterest-bearing
|
|
$
|
436,018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
392,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand, interest-bearing
|
|
|
199,010
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
0.17
|
%
|
|
167,726
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
0.14
|
%
|
Savings and money market
|
|
|
354,826
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
0.19
|
%
|
|
281,565
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
0.18
|
%
|
Time depositsunder $100
|
|
|
20,610
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
0.31
|
%
|
|
23,292
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
0.36
|
%
|
Time deposits$100 and over
|
|
|
194,483
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
0.32
|
%
|
|
194,738
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
0.40
|
%
|
Time depositsbrokered
|
|
|
37,766
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
0.88
|
%
|
|
81,118
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
0.97
|
%
|
CDARSmoney market and time deposits
|
|
|
14,408
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
0.06
|
%
|
|
17,918
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
0.04
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
821,103
|
|
|
506
|
|
|
0.25
|
%
|
|
766,357
|
|
|
595
|
|
|
0.31
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
1,257,121
|
|
|
506
|
|
|
0.16
|
%
|
|
1,158,479
|
|
|
595
|
|
|
0.21
|
%
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,279
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
3.89
|
%
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
1,557
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
0.26
|
%
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
822,660
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
0.25
|
%
|
|
775,924
|
|
|
685
|
|
|
0.35
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities and demand, noninterest-bearing / cost of funds
|
|
|
1,258,678
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
0.16
|
%
|
|
1,168,046
|
|
|
685
|
|
|
0.24
|
%
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
31,444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,681
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,290,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,201,727
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders' equity
|
|
|
178,963
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171,475
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity
|
|
$
|
1,469,085
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,373,202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income(2) / margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,958
|
|
|
4.07
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
12,345
|
|
|
3.89
|
%
|
Less tax equivalent adjustment(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(273
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(192
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
13,685
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
(1)
-
Includes
loans held-for-sale. Yield amounts earned on loans include loan fees and costs. Nonaccrual loans are included in average balance.
-
(2)
-
Reflects
tax equivalent adjustment for tax exempt income based on a 35% tax rate.
49
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended
June 30, 2014
|
|
For the Six Months Ended
June 30, 2013
|
|
NET INTEREST INCOME AND NET INTEREST MARGIN
|
|
Average
Balance
|
|
Interest
Income/
Expense
|
|
Average
Yield/
Rate
|
|
Average
Balance
|
|
Interest
Income/
Expense
|
|
Average
Yield/
Rate
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, gross(1)
|
|
$
|
952,628
|
|
$
|
22,756
|
|
|
4.82
|
%
|
$
|
807,901
|
|
$
|
20,140
|
|
|
5.03
|
%
|
Securitiestaxable
|
|
|
287,946
|
|
|
4,217
|
|
|
2.95
|
%
|
|
372,044
|
|
|
4,860
|
|
|
2.63
|
%
|
Securitiestax exempt(2)
|
|
|
79,895
|
|
|
1,557
|
|
|
3.93
|
%
|
|
49,563
|
|
|
932
|
|
|
3.79
|
%
|
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions
|
|
|
47,504
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
0.26
|
%
|
|
77,858
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
0.26
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest earning assets(2)
|
|
|
1,367,973
|
|
|
28,592
|
|
|
4.21
|
%
|
|
1,307,366
|
|
|
26,031
|
|
|
4.02
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
|
24,323
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
7,224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,566
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
1,425
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,892
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
63,063
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,944
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,464,008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,407,872
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and shareholders' equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand, noninterest-bearing
|
|
$
|
432,501
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
426,424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand, interest-bearing
|
|
|
199,207
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
0.16
|
%
|
|
166,073
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
0.14
|
%
|
Savings and money market
|
|
|
346,251
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
0.18
|
%
|
|
282,392
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
0.17
|
%
|
Time depositsunder $100
|
|
|
20,887
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
0.32
|
%
|
|
23,940
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
0.36
|
%
|
Time deposits$100 and over
|
|
|
194,644
|
|
|
316
|
|
|
0.33
|
%
|
|
192,518
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
0.42
|
%
|
Time depositsbrokered
|
|
|
43,384
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
0.92
|
%
|
|
86,561
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
0.97
|
%
|
CDARSmoney market and time deposits
|
|
|
16,770
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
0.04
|
%
|
|
14,714
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
0.04
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
821,143
|
|
|
1,027
|
|
|
0.25
|
%
|
|
766,198
|
|
|
1,220
|
|
|
0.32
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
1,253,644
|
|
|
1,027
|
|
|
0.17
|
%
|
|
1,192,622
|
|
|
1,220
|
|
|
0.21
|
%
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,279
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
3.87
|
%
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
812
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
0.25
|
%
|
|
207
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
0.97
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
821,955
|
|
|
1,028
|
|
|
0.25
|
%
|
|
775,684
|
|
|
1,399
|
|
|
0.36
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities and demand, noninterest-bearing / cost of funds
|
|
|
1,254,456
|
|
|
1,028
|
|
|
0.17
|
%
|
|
1,202,108
|
|
|
1,399
|
|
|
0.23
|
%
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
32,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,080
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,286,631
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,237,188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders' equity
|
|
|
177,377
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170,684
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity
|
|
$
|
1,464,008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,407,872
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income(2) / margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,564
|
|
|
4.06
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
24,632
|
|
|
3.80
|
%
|
Less tax equivalent adjustment(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(545
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(326
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
27,019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
24,306
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
(1)
-
Includes
loans held for sale. Yield amounts earned on loans include loan fees and costs. Nonaccrual loans are included in average balance.
-
(2)
-
Reflects
tax equivalent adjustment for tax exempt income based on a 35% tax rate.
50
Table of Contents
Volume and Rate Variances
The Volume and Rate Variances table below sets forth the dollar difference in interest earned and paid for each major category of
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities for the noted periods, and the amount of such change attributable to changes in average balances (volume) or changes in average interest rates.
Volume variances are equal to the increase or decrease in the average balance times the prior period rate, and rate variances are equal to the increase or decrease in the average rate times the prior
period average balance. Variances attributable to both rate and volume changes are equal to the change in rate times the change in average balance and are included below in the average volume column.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
2014 vs. 2013
Increase (Decrease) Due to
Change In:
|
|
|
|
Average
Volume
|
|
Average
Rate
|
|
Net
Change
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Income from interest earning assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, gross
|
|
$
|
1,874
|
|
$
|
(308
|
)
|
$
|
1,566
|
|
Securitiestaxable
|
|
|
(501
|
)
|
|
149
|
|
|
(352
|
)
|
Securitiestax exempt(1)
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
229
|
|
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income from interest earnings assets(1)
|
|
|
1,577
|
|
|
(142
|
)
|
|
1,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense on interest-bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand, interest-bearing
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
25
|
|
Savings and money market
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
42
|
|
Time depositsunder $100
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Time deposits$100 and over
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
(37
|
)
|
Time depositsbrokered
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
(114
|
)
|
CDARSmoney market and time deposits
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
(141
|
)
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
(178
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income(1)
|
|
$
|
1,718
|
|
$
|
(105
|
)
|
|
1,613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less tax equivalent adjustment(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,532
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
(1)
-
Reflects
tax equivalent adjustment for tax exempt income based on a 35% tax rate.
51
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
2014 vs. 2013
Increase (Decrease) Due to
Change In:
|
|
|
|
Average
Volume
|
|
Average
Rate
|
|
Net
Change
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Income from interest earning assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, gross
|
|
$
|
3,446
|
|
$
|
(830
|
)
|
$
|
2,616
|
|
Securitiestaxable
|
|
|
(1,226
|
)
|
|
583
|
|
|
(643
|
)
|
Securitiestax exempt(1)
|
|
|
591
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
625
|
|
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
1
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income from interest earnings assets(1)
|
|
|
2,773
|
|
|
(212
|
)
|
|
2,561
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense on interest-bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand, interest-bearing
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
43
|
|
Savings and money market
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
73
|
|
Time depositsunder $100
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Time deposits$100 and over
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
(82
|
)
|
Time depositsbrokered
|
|
|
(196
|
)
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
(217
|
)
|
CDARSmoney market and time deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
(178
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(178
|
)
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
(285
|
)
|
|
(86
|
)
|
|
(371
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income(1)
|
|
$
|
3,058
|
|
$
|
(126
|
)
|
|
2,932
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less tax equivalent adjustment(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(219
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,713
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
(1)
-
Reflects
tax equivalent adjustment for tax exempt income based on a 35% tax rate.
The
Company's net interest margin (FTE), expressed as a percentage of average earning assets, increased 18 basis points to 4.07% for the second quarter of 2014, from 3.89% for the second
quarter of 2013. For the six months ended June 30, 2014, net interest margin increased 26 basis points to 4.06%, from 3.80% for the six months ended June 30, 2013. The increase in the
net interest margin for the second quarter and for the six months ended June 30, 2014, compared to the same periods in 2013, was primarily due to loan growth, higher yields on securities, and a
lower cost of funds.
Net
interest income increased 13% to $13.7 million for the second quarter of 2014, compared to $12.2 million for the second quarter of 2013. Net interest income increased
11% to $27.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014, compared to $24.3 million the six months ended June 30, 2013. The increase in the net interest income for the
second quarter and for the six months ended June 30, 2014, compared to the same periods in 2013, was primarily due to loan growth and an increase in core deposits.
A
substantial portion of the Company's earning assets are variable-rate loans that re-price when the Company's prime lending rate is changed, compared to a large base of core deposits
that are generally slower to re-price. This causes the Company's balance sheet to be asset-sensitive, which means that all else being equal, the Company's net interest margin will be lower during
periods when short-term interest rates are falling and higher when rates are rising.
52
Table of Contents
Provision for Loan Losses
Credit risk is inherent in the business of making loans. The Company establishes an allowance for loan losses through charges to
earnings, which are presented in the statements of income as the provision for loan losses. Specifically identifiable and quantifiable known losses are promptly charged off against the allowance. The
provision for loan losses is determined by conducting a quarterly evaluation of the adequacy of the Company's allowance for loan losses and charging the shortfall or excess, if any, to the current
quarter's expense. This has the effect of creating variability in the amount and frequency of charges to the Company's earnings. The provision for loan losses and level of allowance for each period
are dependent upon many factors, including loan growth, net charge-offs, changes in the composition of the loan portfolio, delinquencies, management's assessment of the quality of the loan portfolio,
the valuation of problem loans and the general economic conditions in the Company's market area.
There
was a credit to the provision for loan losses of $198,000 for the second quarter of 2014, compared to a credit to the provision for loan losses of $270,000 for the second quarter
of 2013. The credit to the provision for loan losses for the six months ended June 30, 2014 was $208,000, compared to a credit to the provision for loan losses $270,000 for the six months ended
June 30,2013.
The
allowance for loan losses totaled $18.6 million, or 1.88% of total loans at June 30, 2014, compared to $19.3 million, or 2.30% of total loans at June 30,
2013, and $19.2 million, or 2.09% of total loans at December 31, 2013. The allowance for loan losses to total loans decreased at June 30, 2014, compared to June 30, 2013,
and December 31, 2013, primarily due to increasing loan balances with no default histories, improving the quality of the loan portfolio overall. Net charge-offs totaled $27,000 for the second
quarter of 2014, compared to net recoveries of $270,000 for the second quarter of 2013, and net charge-offs of $166,000 for the fourth quarter of 2013. Provisions for loan losses are charged to
operations to bring the allowance for loan losses to a level deemed appropriate by the Company based on the factors discussed under "Allowance for Loan Losses".
Noninterest Income
The following table sets forth the various components of the Company's noninterest income for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three
Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
Increase
(decrease)
2014 versus 2013
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
Amount
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Service charges and fees on deposit accounts
|
|
$
|
646
|
|
$
|
618
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
Gain on sales of SBA loans
|
|
|
442
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
308
|
|
|
230
|
%
|
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance
|
|
|
397
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
-3
|
%
|
Servicing income
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
-19
|
%
|
Gain on sales of securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
-100
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
(112
|
)
|
|
-31
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income
|
|
$
|
2,047
|
|
$
|
1,915
|
|
$
|
132
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six
Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
Increase
(decrease)
2014 versus 2013
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
Amount
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Service charges and fees on deposit accounts
|
|
$
|
1,266
|
|
$
|
1,195
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
Gain on sales of SBA loans
|
|
|
599
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
122
|
%
|
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance
|
|
|
795
|
|
|
826
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
-4
|
%
|
Servicing income
|
|
|
661
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
|
-12
|
%
|
Gain on sales of securities
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income
|
|
$
|
4,064
|
|
$
|
3,578
|
|
$
|
486
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
increase in noninterest income in the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014, compared to the same periods in 2013 was primarily attributable to a higher gain on
sales of SBA loans.
Historically,
a significant percentage of the Company's noninterest income has been associated with its SBA lending activity, as gains on the sale of loans sold in the secondary market
and servicing income from loans sold with servicing rights retained. For the three months ended June 30, 2014, SBA loan sales resulted in a $442,000 gain, compared to a $134,000 gain on sale of
SBA loans for the three months ended June 30, 2013. For the six months ended June 30, 2014, SBA loan sales resulted in a $599,000 gain, compared to a $270,000 gain on sale of SBA loans
for the six months ended June 30, 2013.
The
servicing assets that result from the sales of SBA loans with servicing retained are amortized over the expected term of the loans using a method approximating the interest method.
Servicing income generally declines as the respective loans are repaid.
54
Table of Contents
Noninterest Expense
The following table sets forth the various components of the Company's noninterest expense for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three
Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
Increase
(decrease)
2014 versus 2013
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
Amount
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits
|
|
$
|
6,819
|
|
$
|
5,864
|
|
$
|
955
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
Occupancy and equipment
|
|
|
987
|
|
|
1,028
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
-4
|
%
|
Data processing
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
-17
|
%
|
Insurance expense
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
FDIC deposit insurance premiums
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
Software subscriptions
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
-35
|
%
|
Correspondent bank charges
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
Low income housing investment losses
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
(135
|
)
|
|
-45
|
%
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
(274
|
)
|
|
-69
|
%
|
Subordinated debt redemption charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
(167
|
)
|
|
-100
|
%
|
Foreclosed assets, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
96
|
|
|
-100
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
1,701
|
|
|
1,466
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense
|
|
$
|
10,934
|
|
$
|
10,389
|
|
$
|
545
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six
Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
Increase
(decrease)
2014 versus 2013
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
Amount
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits
|
|
$
|
13,062
|
|
$
|
11,875
|
|
$
|
1,187
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
Occupancy and equipment
|
|
|
1,932
|
|
|
2,096
|
|
|
(164
|
)
|
|
-8
|
%
|
Data processing
|
|
|
502
|
|
|
579
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
-13
|
%
|
Insurance expense
|
|
|
538
|
|
|
508
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
FDIC deposit insurance premiums
|
|
|
454
|
|
|
466
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
-3
|
%
|
Software subscriptions
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
585
|
|
|
(147
|
)
|
|
-25
|
%
|
Correspondent bank charges
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
343
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
Low income housing investment losses
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
611
|
|
|
(258
|
)
|
|
-42
|
%
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
712
|
|
|
1,382
|
|
|
(670
|
)
|
|
-48
|
%
|
Subordinated debt redemption charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
(167
|
)
|
|
-100
|
%
|
Foreclosed assets, net
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
(251
|
)
|
|
232
|
|
|
-92
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
3,331
|
|
|
2,809
|
|
|
522
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense
|
|
$
|
21,668
|
|
$
|
21,170
|
|
$
|
498
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
Table of Contents
The
following table indicates the percentage of noninterest expense in each category for the periods indicated:
Noninterest Expense by Category
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Percent
of Total
|
|
2013
|
|
Percent
of Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits
|
|
$
|
6,819
|
|
|
62
|
%
|
$
|
5,864
|
|
|
56
|
%
|
Occupancy and equipment
|
|
|
987
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
1,028
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
Data processing
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
327
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
Insurance expense
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
253
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
FDIC deposit insurance premiums
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
207
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
Software subscriptions
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
294
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
Correspondent bank charges
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
179
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
Low income housing investment losses
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
300
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
400
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
Subordinated debt redemption charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
167
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
Foreclosed assets, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
-1
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
1,701
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
1,466
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense
|
|
$
|
10,934
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
$
|
10,389
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Percent
of Total
|
|
2013
|
|
Percent
of Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits
|
|
$
|
13,062
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
$
|
11,875
|
|
|
56
|
%
|
Occupancy and equipment
|
|
|
1,932
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
2,096
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
Data processing
|
|
|
502
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
579
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
Insurance expense
|
|
|
538
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
508
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
FDIC deposit insurance premiums
|
|
|
454
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
466
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
Software subscriptions
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
585
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
Correspondent bank charges
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
343
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
Low income housing investment losses
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
611
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
712
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
1,382
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
Subordinated debt redemption charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
167
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
Foreclosed assets, net
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
(251
|
)
|
|
-1
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
3,331
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
2,809
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense
|
|
$
|
21,668
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
$
|
21,170
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest
expense for the second quarter of 2014 increased to $10.9 million, from $10.4 million for the second quarter of 2013. Noninterest expense for the six months
ended June 30, 2014 was $21.7 million, compared to $21.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013. The increase in noninterest expense for the second quarter and six
months ended June 30, 2014 compared to the same periods in 2013 was primarily due to increased salaries and employee benefits expense, partially offset by lower professional fees, data
processing and software subscriptions, low income housing investment losses, and a $167,000 charge in the second quarter of 2013 related to the redemption of floating-rate subordinated debt. Higher
salaries and employee benefits expense reflected the growth in staffing for business initiatives, the impact of merit increases, and costs associated with the reorganization of administrative
responsibilities in the second quarter of 2014. Professional fees were lower due to net recoveries in legal fees as a result of the resolution or payoff of certain problem loans in the second quarter
of 2014. Data processing and software subscriptions were lower mainly due to system conversion costs in the second quarter of 2013. Full time equivalent employees were 203 at June 30, 2014 and
191 at June 30, 2013.
56
Table of Contents
In
the normal course of business, the Company becomes a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial
instruments include commitments to extend credit in the form of loans, or through commercial or standby letters of credit, and financial guarantees. These instruments represent varying degrees of
exposure to risk in excess of the amounts included in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. The Company calculates an off-balance sheet credit risk reserve for all unfunded
commitments.
Income Tax Expense
The Company computes its provision for income taxes on a monthly basis. The effective tax rate is determined by applying the Company's
statutory income tax rates to pre-tax book income as adjusted for permanent differences between pre-tax book income and actual taxable income. These permanent differences include, but are not limited
to, increases in the cash surrender
value of life insurance policies, California Enterprise Zone deductions, certain expenses that are not allowed as tax deductions, and tax credits.
The
Company's Federal and state income tax expense for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014 was $1.7 million and $3.2 million, respectively. The income tax
expense was $1.2 million and $2.0 million for the same periods in 2013. The following table shows the Company's effective income tax rates for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the
Three Months
Ended
June 30,
|
|
For the
Six Months
Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
Effective income tax rate
|
|
|
33.5
|
%
|
|
29.3
|
%
|
|
33.5
|
%
|
|
28.8
|
%
|
The
difference in the effective tax rate compared to the combined Federal and state statutory tax rate of 42% is primarily the result of tax exempt securities, the Company's investment
in life insurance policies whose earnings are not subject to taxes, tax credits related to investments in low income housing limited partnerships, Enterprise Zone tax credits, and hiring credits.
The
Company has net investments of $874,000 in low-income housing limited partnerships as of June 30, 2014, generating tax credits of approximately $412,000 for 2014, compared to
tax credits of approximately $727,000 for 2013. The Company had California Enterprise Zone tax savings of approximately $162,000 for 2013. The California state legislature eliminated the Enterprise
Zone tax deductions beginning January 1, 2014.
Some
items of income and expense are recognized in different years for tax purposes than when applying generally accepted accounting principles leading to timing differences between the
Company's actual tax liability, and the amount accrued for this liability based on book income. These temporary differences comprise the "deferred" portion of the Company's tax expense or benefit,
which is accumulated on the Company's books as a deferred tax asset or deferred tax liability until such time as they reverse.
Realization
of the Company's deferred tax assets is primarily dependent upon the Company generating sufficient future taxable income to obtain benefit from the reversal of net deductible
temporary differences and utilization of tax credit carryforwards and the net operating loss carryforwards for Federal and California state income tax purposes. The amount of deferred tax assets
considered realizable is subject to adjustment in future periods based on estimates of future taxable income. Under generally accepted accounting principles a valuation allowance is required to be
recognized if it is
"more likely than not" that a deferred tax asset will not be realized. The determination of the realizability of the deferred tax assets is highly subjective and dependent upon judgment concerning
management's evaluation of both positive and negative evidence, including forecasts of future income, cumulative losses, applicable tax planning strategies, and assessments of current and future
economic and business conditions.
57
Table of Contents
The Company had net deferred tax assets of $19.1 million and $23.3 million at June 30, 2014, and December 31, 2013, respectively.
After consideration of the matters in the preceding paragraph, the Company determined that it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax asset at June 30, 2014 and December 31,
2013 will be fully realized in future years.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
As of June 30, 2014, total assets increased to $1.48 billion, compared to $1.40 billion at June 30, 2013,
and decreased from $1.49 billion at December 31, 2013. Securities available-for-sale (at fair value) were $261.5 million at June 30, 2014, a decrease of 11% from
$293.8 million at June 30, 2013, and a decrease of 7% from $280.1 million at December 31, 2013. Securities held-to-maturity (at amortized cost) were $96.0 million at
June 30, 2014, compared to $81.7 million at June 30, 2013, and $95.9 million at December 31, 2013. The total loan portfolio, excluding loans held-for-sale, was
$990.3 million at June 30, 2014, an increase of 18% from $842.0 million at June 30, 2013, and an increase of 8% from $914.9 million at December 31, 2013.
Deposits
totaled $1.27 billion at June 30, 2014, compared to $1.19 billion at June 30, 2013, and $1.29 billion at December 31, 2013. Deposits
(excluding all time deposits and CDARS deposits) increased $129.6 million, or 15%, to $1.0 billion at June 30, 2014, from $873.9 million at June 30, 2013, and
increased $29.9 million, or 3%, from $973.6 million at December 31, 2013. There was no subordinated debt at June 30, 2014, compared to $9.3 million at
June 30, 2013, and no subordinated debt at December 31, 2013.
Securities Portfolio
The following table reflects the balances for each category of securities at the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2013
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Securities available-for-sale (at fair value):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
158,996
|
|
$
|
225,397
|
|
$
|
207,644
|
|
Asset-backed securities
|
|
|
27,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
53,868
|
|
|
47,646
|
|
|
52,046
|
|
Trust preferred securities
|
|
|
21,312
|
|
|
20,735
|
|
|
20,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
261,489
|
|
$
|
293,778
|
|
$
|
280,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities held-to-maturity (at amortized cost):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
16,037
|
|
$
|
14,211
|
|
$
|
15,932
|
|
MunicipalsTax Exempt
|
|
|
79,935
|
|
|
67,520
|
|
|
79,989
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
95,972
|
|
$
|
81,731
|
|
$
|
95,921
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
Table of Contents
The
following table summarizes the weighted average life and weighted average yields of securities at June 30, 2014:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Life
|
|
|
|
Within One
Year or Less
|
|
After One and
Within Five
Years
|
|
After Five and
Within Ten
Years
|
|
After Ten
Years
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Yield
|
|
Amount
|
|
Yield
|
|
Amount
|
|
Yield
|
|
Amount
|
|
Yield
|
|
Amount
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Securities available-for-sale (at fair value):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
60,833
|
|
|
2.69
|
%
|
$
|
98,163
|
|
|
2.84
|
%
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
158,996
|
|
|
2.78
|
%
|
Asset-backed securities
|
|
|
1,790
|
|
|
1.13
|
%
|
|
12,015
|
|
|
0.81
|
%
|
|
13,508
|
|
|
0.68
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,313
|
|
|
0.77
|
%
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,677
|
|
|
2.77
|
%
|
|
47,191
|
|
|
3.09
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,868
|
|
|
3.05
|
%
|
Trust preferred securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,312
|
|
|
4.87
|
%
|
|
21,312
|
|
|
4.87
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,790
|
|
|
1.13
|
%
|
$
|
79,525
|
|
|
2.41
|
%
|
$
|
158,862
|
|
|
2.73
|
%
|
$
|
21,312
|
|
|
4.87
|
%
|
$
|
261,489
|
|
|
2.80
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities held-to-maturity (at amortized cost):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,174
|
|
|
3.20
|
%
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,863
|
|
|
3.23
|
%
|
$
|
16,037
|
|
|
3.22
|
%
|
MunicipalsTax Exempt(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,791
|
|
|
4.36
|
%
|
|
22,031
|
|
|
4.08
|
%
|
|
54,113
|
|
|
3.82
|
%
|
|
79,935
|
|
|
3.92
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,965
|
|
|
3.61
|
%
|
$
|
22,031
|
|
|
4.08
|
%
|
$
|
62,976
|
|
|
3.73
|
%
|
$
|
95,972
|
|
|
3.80
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
(1)
-
Reflects
tax equivalent yield based on a 35% tax rate.
The
securities portfolio is the second largest component of the Company's interest-earning assets, and the structure and composition of this portfolio is important to an analysis of the
financial condition of the Company. The portfolio serves the following purposes: (i) it provides a source of pledged assets for
securing certain deposits and borrowed funds, as may be required by law or by specific agreement with a depositor or lender; (ii) it provides liquidity to even out cash flows from the loan and
deposit activities of customers; (iii) it can be used as an interest rate risk management tool, since it provides a large base of assets, the maturity and interest rate characteristics of which
can be changed more readily than the loan portfolio to better match changes in the deposit base and other funding sources of the Company; and (iv) it is an alternative interest-earning use of
funds when loan demand is weak or when deposits grow more rapidly than loans.
The
Company's portfolio may include: (i) U.S. Treasury securities and U.S. Government sponsored entities' debt securities for liquidity and pledging; (ii) mortgage-backed
securities, which in many instances can also be used for pledging, and which generally enhance the yield of the portfolio; (iii) municipal obligations, which provide tax free income and limited
pledging potential; (iv) collateralized mortgage obligations, which generally enhance the yield of the portfolio; and (v) single entity issue trust preferred securities, which generally
enhance the yield on the portfolio.
The
Company classifies its securities as either available-for-sale or held-to-maturity at the time of purchase. Accounting guidance requires available-for-sale securities to be marked to
fair value with an offset to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a component of shareholders' equity. Monthly adjustments are made to reflect changes in the fair value of the Company's
available-for-sale securities. The investment securities available-for-sale portfolio totaled $261.5 million at June 30, 2014, a decrease of 11% from $293.8 million at
June 30, 2013, and a decrease of 7% from $280.1 million at December 31, 2013. At June 30, 2014, the investment securities available-for-sale portfolio was comprised of
$159.0 million of agency mortgage-backed securities (all issued by U.S. Government sponsored entities), $53.9 million of corporate bonds, $27.3 million of asset-backed securities,
and $21.3 million of single entity issue trust preferred securities.
59
Table of Contents
The
investment securities held-to-maturity portfolio, at amortized cost, totaled $96.0 million at June 30, 2014, compared to $81.7 million at June 30, 2013,
and $95.9 million at December 31, 2013. At June 30, 2014, the investment securities held-to-maturity portfolio was comprised of $80.0 million of tax-exempt municipal bonds,
and $16.0 million of agency mortgage-backed securities.
The
Company has not used interest rate swaps or other derivative instruments to hedge fixed rate loans or securities to otherwise mitigate interest rate risk.
Loans
The Company's loans represent the largest portion of invested assets, substantially greater than the securities portfolio or any other
asset category, and the quality and diversification of the loan portfolio is an important consideration when reviewing the Company's financial condition.
Gross
loans, excluding loans held-for-sale, represented 67% of total assets at June 30, 2014, 60% at June 30, 2013, and 61% of total assets at December 31, 2013. The
ratio of loans to deposits increased to 78.11% at June 30, 2014, from 70.81% at June 30, 2013, and from 71.13% at December 31, 2013.
Loan Distribution
The Loan Distribution table that follows sets forth the Company's gross loans, excluding loans held-for-sale, outstanding and the
percentage distribution in each category at the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2014
|
|
June 30, 2013
|
|
December 31, 2013
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
% of Total
|
|
Balance
|
|
% of Total
|
|
Balance
|
|
% of Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
415,557
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
$
|
383,068
|
|
|
46
|
%
|
$
|
393,074
|
|
|
43
|
%
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and residential
|
|
|
454,676
|
|
|
46
|
%
|
|
370,620
|
|
|
44
|
%
|
|
423,288
|
|
|
46
|
%
|
Land and construction
|
|
|
47,758
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
26,705
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
31,443
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
Home equity
|
|
|
56,743
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
48,667
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
51,815
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
Consumer
|
|
|
16,112
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
13,097
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
15,677
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
990,846
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
842,157
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
915,297
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Deferred loan (fees) costs, net
|
|
|
(505
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(207
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(384
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, including deferred fees and costs
|
|
|
990,341
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
841,950
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
914,913
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(18,592
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(19,342
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(19,164
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net
|
|
$
|
971,749
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
822,608
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
895,749
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Company's loan portfolio is concentrated in commercial loans, primarily manufacturing, wholesale, and services, and commercial real estate, with the remaining balance in land
development and construction, home equity and consumer loans. The Company does not have any concentrations by industry or group of industries in its loan portfolio, however, 57% of its gross loans
were secured by
real property at June 30, 2014, compared to 53% at June 30, 2013, and 55% at December 31, 2013. While no specific industry concentration is considered significant, the Company's
lending operations are located in areas that are dependent on the technology and real estate industries and their supporting companies.
The
Company has established concentration limits in its loan portfolio for commercial real estate loans, commercial loans, construction loans and unsecured lending, among others. All
loan types are within established limits. The Company uses underwriting guidelines to assess the borrowers' historical cash flow to determine debt service, and we further stress test the debt service
under higher interest
60
Table of Contents
rate
scenarios. Financial and performance covenants are used in commercial lending to allow the Company to react to a borrower's deteriorating financial condition should that occur.
The
Company's commercial loans are made for working capital, financing the purchase of equipment or for other business purposes. Commercial loans include loans with maturities ranging
from thirty days to one year and "term loans" with maturities normally ranging from one to five years. Short-term business loans are generally intended to finance current transactions and typically
provide for periodic principal payments, with interest payable monthly. Term loans normally provide for floating interest rates, with monthly payments of both principal and interest.
The
Company is an active participant in the SBA and U.S. Department of Agriculture guaranteed lending programs, and has been approved by the SBA as a lender under the Preferred Lender
Program. The Company regularly makes such guaranteed loans (collectively referred to as "SBA loans"). The guaranteed portion of these loans is typically sold in the secondary market depending on
market conditions. When the guaranteed portion of an SBA loan is sold the Company retains the servicing rights for the sold portion. During the second quarter and the six months ended June 30,
2014, loans were sold resulting in a gain on sale of SBA loans of $442,000 and $599,000, respectively.
As
of June 30, 2014, commercial and residential real estate mortgage loans of $454.7 million consist primarily of adjustable and fixed-rate loans secured by deeds of trust
on commercial and residential property. The real estate mortgage loans at June 30, 2014, consist of $222.1 million, or 49%, of commercial owner occupied properties,
$232.6 million, or 51%, of commercial investment properties, and $473,000 (less than 1%) in residential properties. Properties securing the commercial real estate mortgage loans are generally
located in the Company's primary market, which is the Greater San Francisco Bay Area.
The
Company's commercial real estate loans consist primarily of loans based on the borrower's cash flow and are secured by deeds of trust on commercial and residential property to
provide a secondary source of repayment. The Company generally restricts real estate term loans to no more than 75% of the property's appraised value or the purchase price of the property during the
initial underwriting of the credit, depending on the type of property and its utilization. The Company offers both fixed and floating rate loans. Maturities on real estate mortgage loans are generally
between five and ten years (with amortization ranging from fifteen to twenty-five years and a balloon payment due at maturity); however, SBA and certain other real estate loans that can be sold in the
secondary market may be granted for longer maturities.
The
Company's land and construction loans are primarily to finance the development/construction of commercial and single family residential properties. The Company utilizes underwriting
guidelines to assess the likelihood of repayment from sources such as sale of the property or availability of permanent mortgage financing prior to making the construction loan. Construction loans are
provided only in our market area, and we have extensive controls for the disbursement process. The projects are typically infill construction in strong markets. Land and construction loans increased
$21.1 million to $47.8 million, at June 30, 2014, from $26.7 million, at June 30, 2013, and increased $16.4 million from $31.4 million, at
December 31, 2013, primarily as a result of strong housing demand within the Company's lending area.
The
Company makes home equity lines of credit available to its existing customers. Home equity lines of credit are underwritten initially with a maximum 75% loan to value ratio. Home
equity lines are reviewed at least semiannually, with specific emphasis on loans with a loan to value ratio greater than 70%. The Company takes measures to work with customers to reduce line
commitments and minimize potential losses. There have been no adverse classifications to date as a result of the review.
Additionally,
the Company makes consumer loans for the purpose of financing automobiles, various types of consumer goods, and other personal purposes. Consumer loans generally provide
for the monthly payment of principal and interest. Most of the Company's consumer loans are secured by the personal property being purchased or, in the instances of home equity loans or lines, real
property.
61
Table of Contents
With certain exceptions, state chartered banks are permitted to make extensions of credit to any one borrowing entity up to 15% of the bank's capital and reserves
for unsecured loans and up to 25% of the bank's capital and reserves for secured loans. For HBC, these lending limits were $27.9 million and $46.4 million at June 30, 2014,
respectively.
Loan Maturities
The following table presents the maturity distribution of the Company's loans (excluding loans held-for-sale) as of June 30,
2014. The table shows the distribution of such loans between those loans with predetermined (fixed) interest rates and those with variable (floating) interest rates. Floating rates generally fluctuate
with changes in the prime rate as reflected in the Western Edition of The Wall Street Journal. As of June 30, 2014, approximately 58% of the Company's loan portfolio consisted of floating
interest rate loans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in
One Year
or Less
|
|
Over One
Year But
Less than
Five Years
|
|
Over
Five Years
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
357,659
|
|
$
|
50,967
|
|
$
|
6,931
|
|
$
|
415,557
|
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and residential
|
|
|
64,677
|
|
|
224,312
|
|
|
165,687
|
|
|
454,676
|
|
Land and construction
|
|
|
47,277
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,758
|
|
Home equity
|
|
|
51,828
|
|
|
1,703
|
|
|
3,212
|
|
|
56,743
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
15,720
|
|
|
321
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
16,112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
$
|
537,161
|
|
$
|
277,784
|
|
$
|
175,901
|
|
$
|
990,846
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans with variable interest rates
|
|
$
|
490,869
|
|
$
|
73,356
|
|
$
|
6,891
|
|
$
|
571,116
|
|
Loans with fixed interest rates
|
|
|
46,292
|
|
|
204,428
|
|
|
169,010
|
|
|
419,730
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
$
|
537,161
|
|
$
|
277,784
|
|
$
|
175,901
|
|
$
|
990,846
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan Servicing
As of June 30, 2014 and 2013, $136.1 million and $143.1 million, respectively, in SBA loans were serviced by the
Company for others. Activity for loan servicing rights was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three
Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
For the Six
Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Beginning of period balance
|
|
$
|
500
|
|
$
|
670
|
|
$
|
525
|
|
$
|
709
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
58
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
(143
|
)
|
|
(136
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period balance
|
|
$
|
606
|
|
$
|
631
|
|
$
|
606
|
|
$
|
631
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan
servicing rights are included in accrued interest receivable and other assets on the unaudited consolidated balance sheets and reported net of amortization. There was no valuation
allowance as of June 30, 2014 and 2013, as the fair value of the assets was greater than the carrying value.
62
Table of Contents
Activity
for the I/O strip receivable was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three
Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
For the Six
Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Beginning of period balance
|
|
$
|
1,664
|
|
$
|
1,777
|
|
$
|
1,647
|
|
$
|
1,786
|
|
Unrealized holding loss
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period balance
|
|
$
|
1,633
|
|
$
|
1,726
|
|
$
|
1,633
|
|
$
|
1,726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Quality
Financial institutions generally have a certain level of exposure to credit quality risk, and could potentially receive less than a
full return of principal and interest if a debtor becomes unable or unwilling to repay. Since loans are the most significant assets of the Company and generate the largest portion of its revenues, the
Company's management of credit quality risk is focused primarily on loan quality. Banks have generally suffered their most severe earnings declines as a result of customers' inability to generate
sufficient cash flow to service their debts and/or downturns in national and regional economies and declines in overall asset values including real estate. In addition, certain debt securities that
the Company may purchase have the potential of declining in value if the obligor's financial capacity to repay deteriorates.
The
Company's policies and procedures identify market segments, set goals for portfolio growth or contraction, and establish limits on industry and geographic credit concentrations. In
addition, these policies establish the Company's underwriting standards and the methods of monitoring ongoing credit quality. The Company's internal credit risk controls are centered in underwriting
practices, credit granting procedures, training, risk management techniques, and familiarity with loan customers as well as the relative diversity and geographic concentration of our loan portfolio.
The
Company's credit risk may also be affected by external factors such as the level of interest rates, employment, general economic conditions, real estate values, and trends in
particular industries or geographic markets. As an independent community bank serving a specific geographic area, the Company must contend with the unpredictable changes in the general California
market and, particularly, primary local markets. The Company's asset quality has suffered in the past from the impact of national and regional economic recessions, consumer bankruptcies, and depressed
real estate values.
Nonperforming
assets are comprised of the following: loans for which the Company is no longer accruing interest; restructured loans which have been current under six months; loans
90 days or more past due and still accruing interest (although they are generally placed on nonaccrual when they become 90 days past due, unless they are both well-secured and in the
process of collection); and foreclosed assets. Management's classification of a loan as "nonaccrual" is an indication that there is reasonable doubt as to the full recovery of principal or interest on
the loan. At that point, the Company stops accruing interest income, and reverses any uncollected interest that had been accrued as income. The Company begins recognizing interest income only as cash
interest payments are received and it has been determined the collection of all outstanding principal is not in doubt. The loans may or may not be collateralized, and collection efforts are pursued.
Loans may be restructured by management when a borrower has experienced some change in financial status causing an inability to meet the original repayment terms and where the Company believes the
borrower will eventually overcome those circumstances and make full restitution. Foreclosed assets consist of properties acquired by foreclosure or similar means that management is offering or will
offer for sale.
63
Table of Contents
The
following table summarizes the Company's nonperforming assets at the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Nonaccrual loansheld-for-investment
|
|
$
|
7,688
|
|
$
|
13,868
|
|
$
|
11,326
|
|
Restructured and loans over 90 days past due and still accruing
|
|
|
454
|
|
|
510
|
|
|
492
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming loans
|
|
|
8,142
|
|
|
14,378
|
|
|
11,818
|
|
Foreclosed assets
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
659
|
|
|
575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming assets
|
|
$
|
8,667
|
|
$
|
15,037
|
|
$
|
12,393
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming assets as a percentage of loans plus foreclosed assets
|
|
|
0.87
|
%
|
|
1.78
|
%
|
|
1.35
|
%
|
Nonperforming assets as a percentage of total assets
|
|
|
0.59
|
%
|
|
1.07
|
%
|
|
0.83
|
%
|
The
following table presents nonperforming loans by class at the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2014
|
|
December 31, 2013
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual
|
|
Restructured and
Loans Over 90 Days
Past Due and
Still Accruing
|
|
Total
|
|
Nonaccrual
|
|
Restructured and
Loans Over 90 Days
Past Due and
Still Accruing
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
3,729
|
|
$
|
454
|
|
$
|
4,183
|
|
$
|
4,414
|
|
$
|
492
|
|
$
|
4,906
|
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and residential
|
|
|
1,693
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,693
|
|
|
4,363
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,363
|
|
Land and construction
|
|
|
1,688
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,688
|
|
|
1,761
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,761
|
|
Home equity
|
|
|
546
|
|
|
|
|
|
546
|
|
|
666
|
|
|
|
|
|
666
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
7,688
|
|
$
|
454
|
|
$
|
8,142
|
|
$
|
11,326
|
|
$
|
492
|
|
$
|
11,818
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming
assets were $8.7 million, or 0.59% of total assets, at June 30, 2014, compared to $15.0 million, or 1.07% of total assets, at June 30, 2013, and
$12.4 million, or 0.83% of total assets, at December 31, 2013. Included in total nonperforming assets were foreclosed assets of $525,000 at June 30, 2014, compared to $659,000 at
June 30, 2013, and $575,000 at December 31, 2013. The decline
in nonperforming assets at June 30, 2014 was primarily due to loan payoffs, charge-offs, and upgrades in nonperforming loans' risk categories.
The
following table provides a summary of the loan portfolio by loan type and credit quality classification at the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2014
|
|
June 30, 2013
|
|
December 31, 2013
|
|
|
|
Nonclassified
|
|
Classified*
|
|
Total
|
|
Nonclassified
|
|
Classified*
|
|
Total
|
|
Nonclassified
|
|
Classified*
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
405,575
|
|
$
|
9,982
|
|
$
|
415,557
|
|
$
|
372,077
|
|
$
|
10,991
|
|
$
|
383,068
|
|
$
|
380,806
|
|
$
|
12,268
|
|
$
|
393,074
|
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and residential
|
|
|
446,287
|
|
|
8,389
|
|
|
454,676
|
|
|
363,222
|
|
|
7,398
|
|
|
370,620
|
|
|
416,992
|
|
|
6,296
|
|
|
423,288
|
|
Land and construction
|
|
|
46,070
|
|
|
1,688
|
|
|
47,758
|
|
|
24,576
|
|
|
2,129
|
|
|
26,705
|
|
|
29,682
|
|
|
1,761
|
|
|
31,443
|
|
Home equity
|
|
|
53,885
|
|
|
2,858
|
|
|
56,743
|
|
|
45,974
|
|
|
2,693
|
|
|
48,667
|
|
|
48,818
|
|
|
2,997
|
|
|
51,815
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
15,872
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
16,112
|
|
|
12,729
|
|
|
368
|
|
|
13,097
|
|
|
15,336
|
|
|
341
|
|
|
15,677
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
967,689
|
|
$
|
23,157
|
|
$
|
990,846
|
|
$
|
818,578
|
|
$
|
23,579
|
|
$
|
842,157
|
|
$
|
891,634
|
|
$
|
23,663
|
|
$
|
915,297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
*
-
Classified
loans in the table above are gross of SBA guarantees.
64
Table of Contents
The following provides a rollforward of troubled debt restructurings ("TDRs"):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2014
|
|
|
|
Performing
TDRs
|
|
Nonperforming
TDRs
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2014
|
|
$
|
492
|
|
$
|
3,230
|
|
$
|
3,722
|
|
Principal repayments/advances/upgrades
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
(560
|
)
|
|
(568
|
)
|
Net charge-offs
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
Change in TDR classification
|
|
|
1,180
|
|
|
(1,180
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2014
|
|
$
|
1,634
|
|
$
|
1,490
|
|
$
|
3,124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
|
|
|
|
Performing
TDRs
|
|
Nonperforming
TDRs
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2013
|
|
$
|
2,309
|
|
$
|
1,798
|
|
$
|
4,107
|
|
Principal repayments/advances/upgrades
|
|
|
(914
|
)
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
(976
|
)
|
Net charge-offs
|
|
|
|
|
|
(372
|
)
|
|
(372
|
)
|
Change in TDR classification
|
|
|
(217
|
)
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June, 2013
|
|
$
|
1,178
|
|
$
|
1,581
|
|
$
|
2,759
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses is an estimate of probable incurred losses in the loan portfolio. Loans are charged-off against the
allowance when management believes the uncollectibility of a loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance for loan losses. Management's methodology for
estimating the allowance balance consists of several key elements, which include specific allowances on individual impaired loans and the formula driven allowances on pools of loans with similar risk
characteristics. Allocations of the allowance may be made for specific loans, but the entire allowance is available for any loan that, in management's judgment, should be charged-off.
Specific
allowances are established for impaired loans. Management considers a loan to be impaired when it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due
according to the original contractual terms of the loan agreement, including scheduled interest payments. Loans for which the terms have been modified with a concession granted, and for which the
borrower is experiencing financial difficulties, are considered troubled debt restructurings and classified as impaired. When a loan is considered to be impaired, the amount of impairment is measured
based on the fair value of the collateral less costs to sell if the loan is collateral dependent, or on the present value of expected future cash flows or values that are observable in the secondary
market. If the measure of the impaired loans is less than the investment in the loan, the deficiency will be charged off against the allowance for loan losses if the amount is a confirmed loss, or,
alternatively, a specific allocation within the allowance will be established. Loans that are considered impaired are specifically excluded from the formula portion of the allowance for loan losses
analysis.
The
estimated loss factors for pools of loans that are not impaired are based on determining the probability of default and loss given default for loans within each segment of the
portfolio, adjusted for significant factors that, in management's judgment, affect collectability as of the evaluation date. The Company's historical delinquency experience and loss experience are
utilized to determine the probability of default and loss given default for segments of the portfolio where the Company has experienced losses in the past. For segments of the portfolio where the
Company has no significant
65
Table of Contents
prior
loss experience, the Company uses quantifiable observable industry data to determine the probability of default and loss given default.
Loans
that demonstrate a weakness for which there is a possibility of loss if the weakness is not corrected, are categorized as "classified." Classified assets include all loans
considered as substandard, substandard-nonaccrual, and doubtful and may result from problems specific to a borrower's business or from economic downturns that affect the borrower's ability to repay or
that cause a decline in the value of the underlying collateral (particularly real estate), and foreclosed assets. The principal balance of classified assets, net of SBA guarantees, was
$23.1 million at June 30, 2014, $23.8 million at June 30, 2013, and $23.6 million at December 31, 2013. Loans held-for-sale are carried at the lower of cost
or estimated fair value, and are not allocated an allowance for loan losses.
It
is the policy of management to maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level adequate for risks inherent in the loan portfolio. On an ongoing basis, we have engaged an outside
firm to perform independent credit reviews of our loan portfolio. The FRB and the California Department of Business OversightDivision of Financial Institutions also review the allowance
for loan losses as an integral part of the examination process. Based on information currently available, management believes that the allowance for loan losses is adequate. However, the loan
portfolio can be adversely affected if California economic conditions and the real estate market in the Company's market area were to weaken. Also, any weakness of a prolonged nature in the technology
industry would have a negative impact on the local market. The effect of such events, although uncertain at this time, could result in an increase in the level of nonperforming loans and increased
loan losses, which could adversely affect the Company's future growth and profitability. No assurance of the ultimate level of credit losses can be given with any certainty.
The
following tables summarize the Company's loan loss experience, as well as provisions and charges to the allowance for loan losses and certain pertinent ratios for the periods
indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2014
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
Consumer
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
11,846
|
|
$
|
6,894
|
|
$
|
77
|
|
$
|
18,817
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (charge-offs) recoveries
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
Provision (credit) for loan losses
|
|
|
(349
|
)
|
|
159
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
(198
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
$
|
11,454
|
|
$
|
7,069
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
$
|
18,592
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RATIOS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans(1)
|
|
|
0.02
|
%
|
|
-0.01
|
%
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
0.01
|
%
|
Allowance for loan losses to total loans(1)
|
|
|
1.16
|
%
|
|
0.71
|
%
|
|
0.01
|
%
|
|
1.88
|
%
|
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans
|
|
|
140.68
|
%
|
|
86.82
|
%
|
|
0.85
|
%
|
|
228.35
|
%
|
-
(1)
-
Average
loans and total loans exclude loans held-for-sale.
66
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2013
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
Consumer
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
12,455
|
|
$
|
6,770
|
|
$
|
117
|
|
$
|
19,342
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
(119
|
)
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(175
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
|
|
445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net recoveries
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
Provision (credit) for loan losses
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
(583
|
)
|
|
26
|
|
|
(270
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
$
|
12,811
|
|
$
|
6,388
|
|
$
|
143
|
|
$
|
19,342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RATIOS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized net recoveries to average loans(1)
|
|
|
0.03
|
%
|
|
0.10
|
%
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
0.13
|
%
|
Allowance for loan losses to total loans(1)
|
|
|
1.52
|
%
|
|
0.76
|
%
|
|
0.02
|
%
|
|
2.30
|
%
|
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans
|
|
|
89.10
|
%
|
|
44.43
|
%
|
|
0.99
|
%
|
|
134.52
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2014
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
Consumer
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
12,533
|
|
$
|
6,548
|
|
$
|
83
|
|
$
|
19,164
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
(595
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(595
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (charge-offs) recoveries
|
|
|
(407
|
)
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
(364
|
)
|
Provision (credit) for loan losses
|
|
|
(672
|
)
|
|
478
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
(208
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
$
|
11,454
|
|
$
|
7,069
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
$
|
18,592
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RATIOS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans(1)
|
|
|
0.09
|
%
|
|
-0.01
|
%
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
0.08
|
%
|
Allowance for loan losses to total loans(1)
|
|
|
1.16
|
%
|
|
0.71
|
%
|
|
0.01
|
%
|
|
1.88
|
%
|
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans
|
|
|
140.68
|
%
|
|
86.82
|
%
|
|
0.85
|
%
|
|
228.35
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
Consumer
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
12,866
|
|
$
|
6,034
|
|
$
|
127
|
|
$
|
19,027
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
(959
|
)
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(1,015
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
1,338
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (charge-offs) recoveries
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
|
|
585
|
|
Provision (credit) for loan losses
|
|
|
(434
|
)
|
|
148
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
(270
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
$
|
12,811
|
|
$
|
6,388
|
|
$
|
143
|
|
$
|
19,342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RATIOS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans(1)
|
|
|
0.10
|
%
|
|
0.05
|
%
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
0.15
|
%
|
Allowance for loan losses to total loans(1)
|
|
|
1.52
|
%
|
|
0.76
|
%
|
|
0.02
|
%
|
|
2.30
|
%
|
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans
|
|
|
89.10
|
%
|
|
44.43
|
%
|
|
0.99
|
%
|
|
134.52
|
%
|
-
(1)
-
Average
loans and total loans exclude loans held-for-sale.
67
Table of Contents
The following table provides a summary of the allocation of the allowance for loan losses by class at the dates indicated. The allocation presented should not be
interpreted as an indication that charges to the allowance for loan losses will be incurred in these amounts or proportions, or that the portion of the allowance allocated to each category represents
the total amount available for charge-offs that may occur within these classes.
Allocation of Allowance for Loan Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2013
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
Percent
of Loans
in each
category
to total
loans
|
|
Allowance
|
|
Percent
of Loans
in each
category
to total
loans
|
|
Allowance
|
|
Percent
of Loans
in each
category
to total
loans
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
11,454
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
$
|
12,811
|
|
|
46
|
%
|
$
|
12,533
|
|
|
43
|
%
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and residential
|
|
|
4,862
|
|
|
46
|
%
|
|
4,949
|
|
|
44
|
%
|
|
4,922
|
|
|
46
|
%
|
Land and construction
|
|
|
755
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
280
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
356
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
Home equity
|
|
|
1,452
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
1,159
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
1,270
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
Consumer
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
143
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
83
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
18,592
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
$
|
19,342
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
$
|
19,164
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
allowance for loan losses totaled $18.6 million, or 1.88% of total loans at June 30, 2014, compared to $19.3 million, or 2.30% of total loans at June 30,
2013, and $19.2 million, or 2.09% of total loans at December 31, 2013. The allowance for loan losses to total loans decreased at June 30, 2014, compared to June 30, 2013,
and December 31, 2013, primarily due to increasing loan balances with no default histories, improving the quality of the loan portfolio overall. Loan charge-offs reflect the realization of
losses in the portfolio that were partially recognized previously through the provision for loan losses. The Company had net charge-offs of $27,000, or 0.01% of average loans, for the second quarter
of 2014, compared to net recoveries of $270,000, or 0.13% of average loans, for the second quarter of 2013, and net charge-offs of $166,000, or 0.07% of average loans, for the fourth quarter of 2013.
The
allowance for loan losses related to the commercial portfolio decreased $1.1 million at June 30, 2014 from December 31, 2013, as a result of a credit to the
provision for loan losses of $672,000 and net charge-offs of $407,000. The decrease in the allowance for loan losses was primarily due to a decline in problem loans. The allowance for loan losses
related to the real estate portfolio increased $521,000 at June 30, 2014 from December 31, 2013, as a result of a provision for loan losses of $478,000 and net recoveries of $43,000. The
increase in the allowance for loan losses was primarily due to an increase in the balance of real estate loans outstanding, partially offset by a decline in problem loans.
Deposits
The composition and cost of the Company's deposit base are important components in analyzing the Company's net interest margin and
balance sheet liquidity characteristics, both of which are discussed in greater detail in other sections herein. The Company's liquidity is impacted by the volatility of deposits from the propensity
of that money to leave the institution for rate-related or other reasons. Deposits can be adversely affected if economic conditions in California, and the Company's market area in particular, weaken.
Potentially, the most volatile deposits in a financial institution are jumbo
68
Table of Contents
certificates
of deposit, meaning time deposits with balances that equal or exceed $100,000, as customers with balances of that magnitude are typically more rate-sensitive than customers with smaller
balances.
The
following table summarizes the distribution of deposits and the percentage of distribution in each category of deposits for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2014
|
|
June 30, 2013
|
|
December 31, 2013
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
% to Total
|
|
Balance
|
|
% to Total
|
|
Balance
|
|
% to Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Demand, noninterest-bearing
|
|
$
|
456,235
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
$
|
407,516
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
$
|
431,085
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
Demand, interest-bearing
|
|
|
193,041
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
171,027
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
195,451
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
Savings and money market
|
|
|
354,175
|
|
|
28
|
%
|
|
295,336
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
347,052
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
Time depositsunder $100
|
|
|
20,379
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
23,062
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
21,646
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
Time deposits$100 and over
|
|
|
195,619
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
197,718
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
195,005
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
Time depositsbrokered
|
|
|
33,614
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
76,800
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
55,524
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
CDARSmoney market and time deposits
|
|
|
14,785
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
17,580
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
40,458
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
$
|
1,267,848
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
$
|
1,189,039
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
$
|
1,286,221
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Company obtains deposits from a cross-section of the communities it serves. The Company's business is not generally seasonal in nature. Public funds were 8% of deposits at
June 30, 2014, 8% at June 30, 2013, and 9% at December 31, 2013.
Total
deposits increased $78.8 million to $1.27 billion at June 30, 2014, from $1.19 billion at June 30, 2013, while brokered deposits decreased
$43.2 million during this period. Total deposits decreased $18.4 million at June 30, 2014 from $1.29 billion at December 31, 2013, primarily due to a decrease in
brokered deposits of $21.9 million and a decrease of $25.7 million in CDARS deposits, partially offset by an increase in core deposits. During the fourth quarter of 2013, the Company
received $27.5 million in deposits from a law firm which were placed in a CDARS money market account. All of the $27.5 million in deposits from the law firm were withdrawn in January,
2014. Deposits (excluding all time deposits and CDARS deposits) increased $126.9 million, or 15%, to $1.0 billion at June 30, 2014, from $873.9 million at June 30,
2013, and increased $29.9 million, or 3%, from $973.6 million at December 31, 2013.
At
June 30, 2014, the Company had $108.1 million (at fair value) of securities pledged for $98.0 million in certificates of deposits from the State of California. At
June 30, 2013, the Company had $108.4 million (at fair value) of securities pledged for $98.0 million in certificates of deposits from the State of California. At
December 31, 2013, the Company had $108.0 million (at fair value) of securities pledged for $98.0 million in certificates of deposits from the State of California.
CDARS
deposits were comprised of $6.9 million of money market accounts and $7.9 million of time deposits at June 30, 2014. CDARS deposits were comprised of
$9.0 million of money market accounts and $8.6 million of time deposits at June 30, 2013. CDARS deposits were comprised of $34.8 million of money market accounts and
$5.7 million of time deposits at December 31, 2013.
69
Table of Contents
The
following table indicates the contractual maturity schedule of the Company's time deposits of $100,000 and over, and all CDARS time deposits and brokered deposits as of
June 30, 2014:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
% of Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Three months or less
|
|
$
|
104,913
|
|
|
44
|
%
|
Over three months through six months
|
|
|
63,407
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
Over six months through twelve months
|
|
|
34,801
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
Over twelve months
|
|
|
34,047
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
237,168
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Company focuses primarily on providing and servicing business deposit accounts that are frequently over $100,000 in average balance per account. As a result, certain types of
business clients that the Company serves typically carry average deposits in excess of $100,000. The account activity for some account types and client types necessitates appropriate liquidity
management practices by the Company to help ensure its ability to fund deposit withdrawals.
Return on Equity and Assets
The following table indicates the ratios for return on average assets and average equity, and average equity to average assets for the
periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
Ended
June 30,
|
|
Six Months
Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
Annualized return on average assets
|
|
|
0.91
|
%
|
|
0.82
|
%
|
|
0.88
|
%
|
|
0.71
|
%
|
Annualized return on average tangible assets
|
|
|
0.91
|
%
|
|
0.82
|
%
|
|
0.88
|
%
|
|
0.71
|
%
|
Annualized return on average equity
|
|
|
7.45
|
%
|
|
6.53
|
%
|
|
7.28
|
%
|
|
5.88
|
%
|
Annualized return on average tangible equity
|
|
|
7.51
|
%
|
|
6.60
|
%
|
|
7.33
|
%
|
|
5.94
|
%
|
Dividend payout ratio(1)
|
|
|
38.51
|
%
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
39.97
|
%
|
|
N/A
|
|
Average equity to average assets ratio
|
|
|
12.18
|
%
|
|
12.49
|
%
|
|
12.12
|
%
|
|
12.12
|
%
|
-
(1)
-
Percentage
is calculated based on dividends paid on common stock and Series C Preferred Stock (on an as converted basis) divided by net income.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In the normal course of business, the Company makes commitments to extend credit to its customers as long as there are no violations of
any conditions established in the contractual arrangements. These commitments are obligations that represent a potential credit risk to the Company, but are not reflected on the Company's consolidated
balance sheets. Total unused commitments to extend credit were $396.0 million June 30, 2014, compared to $349.4 million at June 30, 2013, and $377.2 million at
December 31, 2013. Unused commitments represented 40%, 41%, and 41% of outstanding gross loans at June 30, 2014, June 30, 2013, and December 31, 2013, respectively.
The
effect on the Company's revenues, expenses, cash flows and liquidity from the unused portion of the commitments to provide credit cannot be reasonably predicted because there is no
certainty that
70
Table of Contents
lines
of credit and letters of credit will ever be fully utilized. The following table presents the Company's commitments to extend credit for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
December 31, 2013
|
|
|
|
Fixed Rate
|
|
Variable Rate
|
|
Fixed Rate
|
|
Variable Rate
|
|
Fixed Rate
|
|
Variable Rate
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Unused lines of credit and commitments to make loans
|
|
$
|
8,104
|
|
$
|
376,558
|
|
$
|
5,683
|
|
$
|
330,870
|
|
$
|
6,136
|
|
$
|
359,955
|
|
Standby letters of credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,370
|
|
|
2,775
|
|
|
10,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,099
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,104
|
|
$
|
387,928
|
|
$
|
8,458
|
|
$
|
340,900
|
|
$
|
6,136
|
|
$
|
371,054
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity and Asset/Liability Management
Liquidity refers to the Company's ability to maintain cash flows sufficient to fund operations and to meet obligations and other
commitments in a timely and cost effective fashion. At various times the Company requires funds to meet short-term cash requirements brought about by loan growth or deposit outflows, the purchase of
assets, or liability repayments. An integral part of the Company's ability to manage its liquidity position appropriately is the Company's large base of core deposits, which are generated by offering
traditional banking services in its service area and which have historically been a stable source of funds. To manage liquidity needs properly, cash inflows must be timed to coincide with anticipated
outflows or sufficient liquidity resources must be available to meet varying demands. The Company manages liquidity to be able to meet unexpected sudden changes in levels of its assets or deposit
liabilities without maintaining excessive amounts of balance sheet liquidity. Excess balance sheet liquidity can negatively impact the Company's interest margin. In order to meet short-term liquidity
needs the Company utilizes overnight Federal funds purchase arrangements and other borrowing arrangements with correspondent banks, solicits brokered deposits if cost effective deposits are not
available from local sources and maintains collateralized lines of credit with the FHLB and FRB. In addition, the Company can raise cash for temporary needs by selling securities under agreements to
repurchase and selling securities available-for-sale.
One
of the measures we analyze for liquidity is our loan to deposit ratio. Our loan to deposit ratio was 78.11% at June 30, 2014, compared to 70.81% at June 30, 2013, and
71.13% at December 31, 2013.
FHLB and FRB Borrowings and Available Lines of Credit
The Company has off-balance sheet liquidity in the form of Federal funds purchase arrangements with correspondent banks, including the
FHLB and FRB. The Company can borrow from the FHLB on a short-term (typically overnight) or long-term (over one year) basis. The Company had no overnight borrowings from the FHLB at June 30,
2014, June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2013. The Company had $261.2 million of loans pledged to the FHLB as collateral on an available line of credit of $137.7 million at
June 30, 2014.
The
Company can also borrow from the FRB's discount window. The Company had $339.9 million of loans pledged to the FRB as collateral on an available line of credit of
$253.6 million at June 30, 2014, none of which was outstanding.
At
June 30, 2014, the Company had Federal funds purchase arrangements available of $55.0 million. There were no Federal funds purchased outstanding at June 30, 2014,
June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2013.
71
Table of Contents
The Company may also utilize securities sold under repurchase agreements to manage our liquidity position. There were no securities sold under agreements to
repurchase June 30, 2014, June 30, 2013, and December 31, 2013.
The
following table summarizes the Company's borrowings under its Federal funds purchased, security repurchase arrangements and lines of credit for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2013
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Average balance year-to-date
|
|
$
|
773
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
Average interest rate year-to-date
|
|
|
0.12
|
%
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
0.20
|
%
|
Maximum month-end balance during the quarter
|
|
$
|
5,000
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Average rate at period-end
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Capital Resources
The Company uses a variety of measures to evaluate capital adequacy. Management reviews various capital measurements on a regular basis
and takes appropriate action to ensure that such measurements are within established internal and external guidelines. The external guidelines, which are issued by the Federal Reserve Board and the
FDIC, establish a risk-adjusted ratio relating capital to different categories of assets and off-balance sheet exposures. There are two categories of capital under the Federal Reserve Board and FDIC
guidelines: Tier 1 and Tier 2 Capital. Our Tier 1 Capital currently consists of total shareholders' equity (excluding accumulated other comprehensive income or loss), less
intangible assets and disallowed deferred tax assets. Our Tier 2 Capital includes the allowances for loan losses and off-balance sheet credit losses.
The
following table summarizes risk-based capital, risk-weighted assets, and risk-based capital ratios of the consolidated Company:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 Capital
|
|
$
|
176,058
|
|
$
|
166,820
|
|
$
|
165,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 2 Capital
|
|
|
15,893
|
|
|
13,885
|
|
|
14,754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total risk-based capital
|
|
$
|
191,951
|
|
$
|
180,705
|
|
$
|
179,916
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-weighted assets
|
|
$
|
1,268,215
|
|
$
|
1,105,051
|
|
$
|
1,175,813
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average assets for capital purposes
|
|
$
|
1,461,252
|
|
$
|
1,350,489
|
|
$
|
1,477,082
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well-Capitalized
Regulatory
Requirements
|
|
Minimum
Regulatory
Requirements
|
|
Capital ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total risk-based capital
|
|
|
15.1
|
%
|
|
16.4
|
%
|
|
15.3
|
%
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
Tier 1 risk-based capital
|
|
|
13.9
|
%
|
|
15.1
|
%
|
|
14.0
|
%
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
Leverage(1)
|
|
|
12.0
|
%
|
|
12.4
|
%
|
|
11.2
|
%
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
-
(1)
-
Tier 1
capital divided by quarterly average assets (excluding intangible assets and disallowed deferred tax assets).
72
Table of Contents
The
table above presents the capital ratios of the consolidated Company computed in accordance with applicable regulatory guidelines and compared to the standards for minimum capital
adequacy requirements for bank holding companies.
The
following table summarizes risk-based capital, risk-weighted assets, and risk-based capital ratios of HBC:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 Capital
|
|
$
|
163,447
|
|
$
|
158,552
|
|
$
|
149,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 2 Capital
|
|
|
15,932
|
|
|
13,911
|
|
|
14,790
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total risk-based capital
|
|
$
|
179,379
|
|
$
|
172,463
|
|
$
|
163,827
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-weighted assets
|
|
$
|
1,271,329
|
|
$
|
1,107,207
|
|
$
|
1,178,719
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average assets for capital purposes
|
|
$
|
1,464,302
|
|
$
|
1,352,479
|
|
$
|
1,477,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well-Capitalized
Regulatory
Requirements
|
|
Minimum
Regulatory
Requirements
|
|
Capital ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total risk-based capital
|
|
|
14.1
|
%
|
|
15.6
|
%
|
|
13.9
|
%
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
Tier 1 risk-based capital
|
|
|
12.9
|
%
|
|
14.3
|
%
|
|
12.6
|
%
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
Leverage(1)
|
|
|
11.2
|
%
|
|
11.7
|
%
|
|
10.1
|
%
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
-
(1)
-
Tier 1
capital divided by quarterly average assets (excluding intangible assets and disallowed deferred tax assets).
The
table above presents the capital ratios of HBC computed in accordance with applicable regulatory guidelines and compared to the standards for minimum capital adequacy requirements
under the FDIC's prompt corrective action authority.
Due
primarily to the redemption of $9 million floating-rate subordinated debt in the third quarter of 2013, the Company's total risk-based capital ratio, Tier 1 risk-based
capital ratio, and leverage ratio at June 30, 2014 decreased to 15.1%, 13.9%, and 12.0%, compared to 16.4%, 15.1%, and 12.4% at June 30, 2013, respectively. Due primarily to
distributions from HBC to HCC totaling $16 million during 2013, HBC's total risk-based capital ratio, Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio, and leverage ratio at June 30, 2014
decreased to 14.1%, 12.9%, and 11.2%, compared to 15.6%, 14.3%, and 11.7% at June 30, 2013, respectively. However, at June 30, 2014, the Company's and HBC's capital ratios exceed the
highest regulatory capital requirement of "well-capitalized" under prompt corrective action provisions.
Quantitative
measures established by regulation to help ensure capital adequacy require the Company and HBC to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of total risk-based capital and
Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier 1 capital to average assets (as defined). Management believes that, as of June 30,
2014, June 30, 2013, and December 31, 2013, the Company and HBC met all capital adequacy guidelines to which they were subject. There are no conditions or events since June 30,
2014 that management believes have changed the categorization of the Company or HBC as well-capitalized.
73
Table of Contents
At
June 30, 2014, the Company had total shareholders' equity of $181.5 million, including $19.5 million in preferred stock, $132.9 million in common stock,
$29.2 million in retained earnings, and ($92,000) of accumulated other comprehensive loss.
The
accumulated other comprehensive loss was ($92,000) at June 30, 2014, compared to accumulated other comprehensive loss of ($4.7) million at June 30, 2013, and an
accumulated other comprehensive loss of ($4.0) million at December 31, 2013. The unrealized gain (loss) on securities available-for-sale
included in accumulated other comprehensive income was an unrealized gain of $2.6 million, net of taxes, at June 30, 2014, compared to an unrealized loss of ($507,000) , net of taxes, at
June 30, 2013, and an unrealized loss of ($1.4) million, net of taxes, at December 31, 2013. The components of other comprehensive loss, net of taxes, at June 30, 2014 include the
following: an unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities of $2.6 million; the remaining unamortized unrealized gain on securities available-for-sale transferred to held-to-maturity of
$449,000; a liability adjustment on split dollar insurance contracts of ($1.9) million; a liability adjustment on the supplemental executive retirement plan of ($2.2) million; and an unrealized gain
on interest-only strip from SBA loans of $948,000.
Mandatory Redeemable Cumulative Trust Preferred Securities
To enhance regulatory capital and to provide liquidity, the Company, through unconsolidated subsidiary grantor trusts, issued mandatory
redeemable cumulative trust preferred securities of subsidiary grantor trusts. The subordinated debt was recorded as a component of long-term debt and included the value of the common stock issued by
the trusts to the Company. The common stock was recorded as other assets for the amount issued. Under applicable regulatory guidelines, the trust preferred securities qualified as Tier I
capital. The subsidiary trusts were not consolidated in the Company's consolidated financial statements.
During
the third quarter of 2012, the Company redeemed its 10.875% fixed-rate subordinated debentures in the amount of $7 million issued to Heritage Capital Trust I and the
Company's 10.600% fixed-rate subordinated debentures in the amount of $7 million issued to Heritage Statutory Trust I. The related trust securities issued by Capital Trust I and Statutory Trust
I were also redeemed in connection with the subordinated debt redemption and the trusts were dissolved.
During
the third quarter of 2013, the Company redeemed its Company's variable-rate subordinated debentures in the amount of $5 million issued to Heritage Statutory Trust II and
the Company's variable-rate subordinated debentures in the amount of $4 million issued to Heritage Statutory Trust III. The related trust securities issued by Statutory Trust II and
Statutory Trust III were also redeemed in connection with the subordinated debt redemption and the trusts were dissolved.
U.S. Treasury Capital Purchase Program
The Company received $40 million in November 2008 through the issuance of its Series A Preferred Stock and a warrant to
purchase 462,963 shares of its common stock to the Treasury through the U.S. Treasury Capital Purchase Program. The Series A Preferred Stock qualified as a component of Tier 1 capital.
On
March 7, 2012, in accordance with approvals received from the U.S. Treasury and the Federal Reserve, the Company repurchased all of the Series A Preferred Stock and paid
the related accrued and unpaid dividends. On June 12, 2013, the Company completed the repurchase of the common stock warrant for $140,000.
Series C Preferred Stock
On June 21, 2010, the Company issued to various institutional investors 21,004 shares of newly issued Series C Preferred
Stock. The Series C Preferred Stock is mandatorily convertible into 5,601,000
74
Table of Contents
shares
of common stock at a conversion price of $3.75 per share upon a subsequent transfer of the Series C Preferred stock to third parties not affiliates with the holder in a widely dispersed
offering. The Series C Preferred Stock is non-voting except in the case of certain transactions that would affect the rights of the holders of the Series C Preferred Stock or applicable
law. The holders of Series C Preferred Stock receive dividends on an as converted basis when dividends are also declared for holders of common stock. The Series C Preferred Stock is not
redeemable by the Company or by the holders and has a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share. The Series C Preferred Stock ranks senior to the Company's common stock.
Market Risk
Market risk is the risk of loss of future earnings, fair values, or future cash flows that may result from changes in the price of a
financial instrument. The value of a financial instrument may change as a result of changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices, equity prices and other market changes
that affect market risk sensitive instruments. Market risk is attributed to all market risk sensitive financial instruments, including securities, loans, deposits and borrowings, as well as the
Company's role as a financial intermediary in customer-related transactions. The objective of market risk management is to avoid excessive exposure of the Company's earnings and equity to loss and to
reduce the volatility inherent in certain financial instruments.
Interest Rate Management
Market risk arises from changes in interest rates, exchange rates, commodity prices and equity prices. The Company's market risk
exposure is primarily that of interest rate risk, and it has established policies and procedures to monitor and limit earnings and balance sheet exposure to changes in interest rates. The Company does
not engage in the trading of financial instruments, nor does the Company have exposure to currency exchange rates.
The
principal objective of interest rate risk management (often referred to as "asset/liability management") is to manage the financial components of the Company in a manner that will
optimize the risk/reward equation for earnings and capital in relation to changing interest rates. The Company's exposure to market risk is reviewed on a regular basis by the Asset/Liability
Committee. Interest rate risk is the potential of economic losses due to future interest rate changes. These economic losses can be reflected as a loss of future net interest income and/or a loss of
current fair market values. The objective is to measure the effect on net interest income and to adjust the balance sheet to minimize the inherent risk while at the same time maximizing income.
Management realizes certain risks are inherent, and that the goal is to identify and manage the risks. Management uses two methodologies to manage interest rate risk: (i) a standard GAP
analysis; and (ii) an interest rate shock simulation model.
The
planning of asset and liability maturities is an integral part of the management of an institution's net interest margin. To the extent maturities of assets and liabilities do not
match in a changing interest rate environment, the net interest margin may change over time. Even with perfectly matched repricing of assets and liabilities, risks remain in the form of prepayment of
loans or securities or in the form of delays in the adjustment of rates of interest applying to either earning assets with floating rates or to interest bearing liabilities. The Company has generally
been able to control its exposure to changing interest rates by maintaining primarily floating interest rate loans and a majority of its time certificates with relatively short maturities.
Interest
rate changes do not affect all categories of assets and liabilities equally or at the same time. Varying interest rate environments can create unexpected changes in prepayment
levels of assets and liabilities, which may have a significant effect on the net interest margin and are not reflected in the interest sensitivity analysis table. Because of these factors, an interest
sensitivity GAP report may not provide a complete assessment of the exposure to changes in interest rates.
75
Table of Contents
The
Company uses modeling software for asset/liability management in order to simulate the effects of potential interest rate changes on the Company's net interest margin, and to
calculate the estimated fair values of the Company's financial instruments under different interest rate scenarios. The program imports current balances, interest rates, maturity dates and repricing
information for individual financial instruments, and incorporates assumptions on the characteristics of embedded options along with pricing and duration for new volumes to project the effects of a
given interest rate change on the Company's interest income and interest expense. Rate scenarios consisting of key rate and yield curve projections are run against the Company's investment, loan,
deposit and borrowed funds portfolios. These rate projections can be shocked (an immediate and parallel change in all base rates, up or down) and ramped (an incremental increase or decrease in rates
over a specified time period), based on current trends and econometric models or stable economic conditions (unchanged from current actual levels).
The
following table sets forth the estimated changes in the Company's annual net interest income that would result from the designated instantaneous parallel shift in interest rates
noted, as of June 30, 2014. Computations of prospective effects of hypothetical interest rate changes are based on numerous assumptions including relative levels of market interest rates, loan
prepayments and deposit decay, and should not be relied upon as indicative of actual results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/(Decrease)
in Estimated Net
Interest Income
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Change in Interest Rates (basis points)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+400
|
|
$
|
13,039
|
|
|
24.2
|
%
|
+300
|
|
$
|
9,747
|
|
|
18.1
|
%
|
+200
|
|
$
|
6,430
|
|
|
11.9
|
%
|
+100
|
|
$
|
3,072
|
|
|
5.7
|
%
|
0
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
-100
|
|
$
|
(4,238
|
)
|
|
-7.9
|
%
|
-200
|
|
$
|
(8,695
|
)
|
|
-16.2
|
%
|
This
data does not reflect any actions that we may undertake in response to changes in interest rates such as changes in rates paid on certain deposit accounts based on local competitive
factors, which could reduce the actual impact on net interest income.
As
with any method of gaging interest rate risk, there are certain shortcomings inherent to the methodology noted above. The model assumes interest rate changes are instantaneous
parallel shifts in
the yield curve. In reality, rate changes are rarely instantaneous. The use of the simplifying assumption that short-term and long-term rates change by the same degree may also misstate historic rate
patterns, which rarely show parallel yield curve shifts. Further, the model assumes that certain assets and liabilities of similar maturity or period to repricing will react in the same way to changes
in rates. In reality, certain types of financial instruments may react in advance of changes in market rates, while the reaction of other types of financial instruments may lag behind the change in
general market rates. Additionally, the methodology noted above does not reflect the full impact of annual and lifetime restrictions on changes in rates for certain assets, such as adjustable rate
loans. When interest rates change, actual loan prepayments and actual early withdrawals from certificates may deviate significantly from the assumptions used in the model. Finally, this methodology
does not measure or reflect the impact that higher rates may have on adjustable-rate loan clients' ability to service their debt. All of these factors are considered in monitoring the Company's
exposure to interest rate risk.
76
Table of Contents