Dragon Lady
9 minutes ago
$SONG: Bid $20 / 500K = .00004 PER SHARE LOL !!!
Edit: Ihub has now updated from SONG.L to old SONGD.
Jake has nothing to do with Hipgnosis Songs Fund... Current SONG price here:
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/SONG/overview
Yepper - and this Jake P Noch rolling shit heap is right back "in the pocket" where it belongs w/ a Grand Canyon wide spread and almost $ZERO liquidity LMAO !!
Nice try DIRTY JAKE on the London Stock Exchange scam hustle n con job this AM - everyone needed a good laugh at the dumb shit kid :))
SONG
Music Licensing, Inc.
32.00
-3.00
-8.57%
20.00 / 33.00 (1 x 1)
1 for 500,000 MOTHER OF ALL OTC STINKY PINKY GUTTER TICKER RECORD SETTING REVERSE SPLITS means "real best price" aka Bid is:
$20 / 500,000 = .00004 REAL "TRUE SHARE PRICE".....
Special aka FOUR ZERO AFTER DECIMAL GUTTER TICKER :))
TOTAL MARKET CAP on this scam approx 6K total O/S shares X $20 bid = $120,000.00 LMAO !!!
That's a used auto in the neck of the woods where mommas Regina Noch mega bucks Trust Funder luxury gig n crib is located at 2951 Crayton Rd Naples, FL 34103.... :))
http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/corporationsearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=EntityName&directionType=Initial&searchNameOrder=LOT68A%20L190000256970&aggregateId=flal-l19000025697-025f9f12-858c-4a60-9f1b-20be2519a6b9&searchTerm=LOT%206%2C%20LLC&listNameOrder=LOT6%20L060000952620
Dragon Lady
33 minutes ago
Thanks much Dave :) Slow your roll, folks. There was a symbol change from SONGD to SONG. The US ticker for SONG just isn't in our market data feed yet, so it's defaulting to the next available market in the feed. It'll self-correct when the new ticker propagates into the feed.
The reason the dander got a bit "upity" here this AM Dave, is the CEO of this ticker (aka OTC traded USA based "SONG") aka Jake P Noch as this all was happening - he created a 2nd, "new" SONG ticker board yesterday to "capitalize" on the $100 per share printing - he did it on purpose obviously to deceive and pump this stock's ticker price, etc.
We see that you've deleted that scam duplicate "SONG" msg board already - so thanks again Dave !
Ihub ADMIN has it handled folks (as always !) - all is good and under control :))
P-Rawl
49 minutes ago
Simultaneously to starting that new board, he's desperately posting on Twitter links to a press release, which I believe would have cost him at least $300, about acquiring royalty stakes in one of eight old album tracks that together generated just $133 in the last 12 months. 😂
$SONG "DO IT TO ME" by DaniLeigh Joins Music Licensing, Inc. (OTC: SONG) Portfolio: The royalty-generating hit "DO IT TO ME" by DaniLeigh has been acquired by Music Licensing, Inc. (OTC: SONG), a key player in the management of music royalties. This… https://t.co/ll6BoJvhgR pic.twitter.com/VFJB3n1V1A— Pro Music Rights (@ProMusicRights) June 13, 2024
SCAMBUSTERKING
4 hours ago
This tweet was also a bold faced lie. 18 cases? He has two defaults because the person couldn't afford a lawyer, one moved to federal, and there are now two sanctions filed, and they haven't responded to ANY motions. All Jake can do is lie, pathological to the max.
No social media platform will entertain his narcissism. He's a child larping as an adult on social media poorly.
Music Licensing, Inc. (OTC: $SONG) intends to provide an update on the collection campaign after receiving the first batch of subpoenas back from Twitter. The reason for the lack of updates is cyberstalker(s) emailing our legal counsel, the opposing counsel, the judge, and random…— Pro Music Rights (@ProMusicRights) May 11, 2024
SCAMBUSTERKING
4 hours ago
As we knew at the time, this tweet was a complete lie. We now have the notice of service for all of them showing they were not served and in fact weren't served till weeks later in some cases, well after this tweet. Second, the exact opposite happened, no one is talking about SONG on X, go look at $SONG tags, ghost town outside a few misc non-company tweets. Literally no one cares anymore, Jake killed the company, no one trusts him anymore, because almost everything is a lie.
Music Licensing, Inc. (OTC: $SONG) subpoenas have already been served. https://t.co/xWNLzEukgm— Pro Music Rights (@ProMusicRights) May 13, 2024
Dragon Lady
1 day ago
READ THIS FOLKS !! -----> You can't just file a complaint in court, go "someone somewhere said something illegal but I won't cite it or show any proof, so give me the detailed account of 500 people now"
These social media companies will destroy this in court. The motion to compel will simply lead to iHub filing and killing the case all together. He already admitted on iHub himself it is a witch hunt and that people on the list hadn't mentioned him in 4 years. Jake can't help but ruin his own plan because he is so arragent and petty.
I was literally about to write a near word-for-word variant of exactly what you said there - as it's SPOT-ON 100% STONE COLD THE TRUTH !!!
What DIRTY JAKE aka THE NAPLES KID CON is "trying" to do is known as "Subpoena fishing" and "Discovery hustling" etc - and it's illegal and will be quashed and booted to the curb like yesterdays old news.
iHUB didn't even bother filing a formal response - their legal counsel (vis use of a mere email to Dirty Jake counsel) in no uncertain terms told Jake's amateur dick brained lawyer, "YOU GOT NOTHING - 1st amendment has precedent - we ain't wasting our time with you" blah blah thee end.
iHUB has a perfect 100% batting average of destroying these fishing expedition and shit ass "un-cases" exactly as Dirty Jake is pulling here as his latest circus stunt !!
The iHUB counsel w/ a 100% perfect batting avg and KNOWING that shit head will then file the "motion to compel"...... iHUB is letting/leading dick brain to burn his mommas money in the court/lawyer incinerator laughing at this dumb ass -
iHUB legal will drag this kid through motions and delays and filings till he takes his dumb ass ball and crawls bruised and beaten back to mommas crib n gig luxury estate....:))
iHUB will file if/when the time comes - "Motion to quash" and it will be based on "fishing expedition" law(s) and also "failure to state a valid claim" and "defective over broad complaint" and a half dozen "other" defects in this nothing case.......and the other defendants will like-wise merely ignore these shit subpoena fishing trips and/or quash and several will likely file to dismiss for "fraudulent defective complaint" or whatever......
https://www.eff.org/files/filenode/fix_wilson_yard/fwy-motiontoquash-reply.pdf
That is not exactly analogous as to who is Plaintiff etc - BUT it 100% is "case law" as to "abuse of process via fishing expeditions" and how frowned on they are by The Courts - Jake will not walk away from this shit show circus stunt un-harmed nor will his dumb ass attorney. The court is gonna spank their asses hard before this is all said and done.
AS YOU CORRECTLY STATED - you CAN NOT merely call law enforcement and/or enter a court and shout:
""THESE BAD PEOPLE - like a 100 of them THEY whoever THEY even are....THEY THREATENED ME and THEY whoever THEY ARE say means things about me - ME a public figure who claims to be a Gangsta and a rap shit head and famous big name biz exec using ALL lies and all fraud" blah blah blah.....
Jake's defective complaint is grossly over-broad, it's non specific, it has no valid claim for relief that can be granted and it DOES NOT ID BY ANY MEANS any "maker of a threat" and the SPECIFICS of fantasy supposed imaginary "threat" - and I mean NOT ONE DAMN ONE !!
It's fishing and discovery abuse and name hunting - it's going to get slapped by the court and every subpoena will be punted like a Super Bowl wining kick in overtime :))
Try calling your local police - and IF even 5 "people" are in a park, tell the responding officers "THEY THREATENED ME - SO DAMN IT, DO SOMETHING YOU FOOLS" - and watch WTF happens LMAO !!!
Officer: WHO THREATENED YOU EXACTLY AND HOW ????
Dirty Jake: ONE of them - those guys I think, yeah, it was one of them over there. I heard mean things and they threatened me, yeah, that's it !!!
Officer: WHAT exact "threat" sir did they make and when and using what words or objects or actions - explain it to me in detail sir ???
Dirty Jake: I told you - I heard shouting and I think one even said I'm a caca caca faced doo doo head and he will kick the shit out of me cause I'm an idiot looking gangsta rapper with my shitty gold necklaces and big giant ass hat watch - yeah, they, THEY said it officer !!
Officer - well, I'm looking over there and I see some people by a park bench, maybe a few guys, WTF exactly are you talking about ? You need to tell me EXACTLY WHICH ONE and I mean their clothing, height, weight, what exact words they used, why you were supposedly "threatened" etc sir ?
Dirty Jake: YOU DO SOMETHING NOW DAMN IT - don't you know who my momma is and how rich we are ???
Officer to partner: Lets get the fuck out of here - this is a dumbshit and he's got nothing. Here sir - here's a card for a detective and the police station address - file a police report if you want.
Dirty Jake: Will the police report get them arrested ?
Officer: NO, we don't even look at them. It'll be filed and after X number of days they are disposed of. Good luck, have a nice day - and try not to call and waste our time unless an actual crime is taking place. Thanks pal - nice gold chains.
lucky, mydog
2 days ago
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
IN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
CASE NO. 11-2024-CA-000814-0001-XX
JAKE P. NOCH, and
MUSIC LICENSING INC.
Plaintiffs,
v.
JOHN DOE, et al.
Defendants.
__________________________________/
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANT’S COMPLIANCE WITH
SUBPOENA & MOTION FOR SANCTIONS
Plaintiffs, JAKE P. NOCH and MUSIC LICENSING INC. (hereinafter collectively “Mr.
Noch”) by and through their undersigned counsel, submit this Motion to Compel Defendant’s
Compliance with Subpoena to INVESTORSHUB.COM INC. (hereinafter referred to as “iHub”)
to obtain the identity of the Defendants. As such, identities of Defendant are unknow, thus iHub
are required to submit users’ account’s state drivers’ licenses, identification cards, e-mail
addresses, home addresses, phone numbers, and any other relevant information to the user
individuals included on the issued Subpoena. The following in support thereof:
Discovery Requests
1. Mr. Noch received several defamatory and threatening remarks made against them from
multiple user accounts on iHub.
2. Some of these statements were targeted towards Mr. Noch and his family.
Filing # 199895979 E-Filed 06/05/2024 01:11:04 PM
FILED: COLLIER COUNTY, CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK, 06/05/2024 01:11:04 PM
3. Defendants are hiding behind these iHub accounts and have repeatedly harassed Mr. Noch
by spreading false information and continuing to act threateningly.
4. Due to the non-stopping false and threatening statements, Mr. Noch hired the undersigned
counsel to commence an action to obtain the information of the owners of these accounts.
5. On May 10, 2024, the Plaintiffs issued to the Defendant their Subpoena. (Hereinafter
referred to as “Subpoena”).
6. On May 17th, 2024, Defendants’ Counsel contacted the opposing Plaintiff’s Counsel via
email and U.S. mail to object to Plaintiff's Subpoena, alleging that the users are protected
under their First Amendment. However, the First Amendment does not protect users from
illegal conduct.
WHEREFORE, the Plaintiffs respectfully request this Court to enter an Order to
compel the Defendant to respond to the Plaintiffs’ request to produce, to sanction the
Defendant with any alternative or additional relief the Court deems appropriate under the
circumstances, including attorneys’ fees and cost.
Respectfully submitted,
Transnational Matters, PLLC
BY: /s/ Davy Karkason, Esq.
Davy Karkason, Esq.
Florida Bar No.: 1031867
Attorney for Defendant
2121 Biscayne Blvd., # 1878
Miami, FL 33137
Office: (305) 417-9866
E-mail: dk@transnationalmatters.com
paralegal@transnationalmatters.com
[certificate of service on next page]
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 5th day of June, 2024, this Motion was
electronically transmitted to the Clerk of Court and all parties of record via the
Florida Courts E-Filing Portal (“FCEP”), and a true and correct copy of the foregoing
has been furnished by electronic mail to all counsel of record.
Respectfully submitted by,
Transnational Matters, PLLC
BY: /s/ Davy Karkason, Esq.
Davy Karkason, Esq.
Florida Bar No.: 1031867
Attorney for Defendant
2121 Biscayne Blvd., # 1878
Miami, FL 331
https://cms.collierclerk.com/CMSWeb/home/pdfframe?k=QuueFLJ+XrKYIVf8NQbfDO1V00RDTUDTfrKoBnX/dEpBydOVPy2Fs0wdGeg0a8z/GlY8nAm8qIMrP5KxQJzGRA==
shoondale
7 days ago
"abuse of process" is the avenue everyone affected should look into and use against both Noch and his attorneys I would think. This draws the attorneys directly into having to pay damages to defendants they are suing on Mr. Noch's behalf. This seems to be the way to go after the attorneys. IMO sanctions are not sufficient alone. You should all also collect damages from these attorneys. This certainly would include those he was trying to unmask with his SLAPP. I would assume this is causing everyone a great deal of emotional stress they may never recover from. Here:
Abuse of process is a common law tort that involves the misuse of legal process(es) for an ulterior purpose. Abuse of process is one of several actionable offenses aimed at discouraging bad-faith litigation attempts. Indeed, courts hold the authority to sanction parties for bringing frivolous action, and parties also have a right to action under the claim of malicious prosecution.
Generally, the elements for abuse of process are: (1) the use of an illegal or improper use of process; (2) an ulterior motive or improper purpose; and in some jurisdictions (3) harm to a litigant. For the purposes of abuse of process, an arbitration proceeding is a judicial proceeding. Abuse of process has been described as misusing a "criminal or civil process against another party for a purpose different than the proceeding's intended purposes" and thereby causing the party damages (e.g., arrest, seizure of property, or economic injury).
A classic case of abuse of process entails an attempt by a plaintiff to coerce the defendant to do some collateral thing which they could not be legally and regularly compelled to do. For example, in a case where a former employer sought to bring criminal charges to its employee to recover stolen money, while knowing that the employee was not responsible for the theft, the court held the employer liable for abuse of process for initiating criminal charges while knowing that the charges were unsupported by probable cause.
In regard to defenses to abuse of process, there is disagreement among jurisdictions on whether good-faith reliance on an attorney's advice in bringing action serves as a complete defense. Still, attorneys who bring the improper process can be held liable to the damaged party as well.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/abuse_of_process#:~:text=Abuse%20of%20process%20has%20been,property%2C%20or%20economic%20injury).
SCAMBUSTERKING
1 week ago
BOOM! People getting sued are going for blood. Now making motions for sanctions against Jake's lawyers 😂
See 11-2024-CA-000849
DEFENDANT’S NOTICE OF SERVING MOTION FOR SANCTIONS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 57.105, FLORIDA STATUTES
Defendant, Attitude Dance Center, LLC, by and through the undersigned counsel, and
pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 57.105, hereby gives notice of serving its Motion for Sanctions upon
counsel for Plaintiff, Pro Music Rights, Inc. on June 4, 2024.
SHUMAKER, LOOP & KENDRICK, LLP
shajandr
1 week ago
JAKE P. NOCH wants a double burger - is put on a payment plan:
(Yes, JAKE, I am making fun of you and belittling you because you are a silly, reprehensible asshole and child. And, BTW, you have made yourself a public figure and richly deserve all the derision you are getting. With your record, I think you ought to be sued for abuse of process, among other claims including anti-SLAPP claims.)
Keep on dpin' whatcha doin' with DaPennyscamstocks and fake royalty claims and you'll wind up bunking with JUSTIN(E) COSTELLO.
And get much better lawyers. Try QUARLES and BRADY, they have a Naples office . Although I doubt they would deign to take you as a client - they are not that stoopid and you likely could nott even afford the evergreen retainer.
Trade smarter, not harder: Unleash your inner pro with our toolkit and live discussions.
tdbowieknife
28 minutes ago
![IH Geek [Dave]](https://investorshub.advfn.com/uicon/21785-small.png?cb=1464284891)
IH Geek [Dave]
39 minutes ago
I ll be back
2 days ago
Hot Features
Premium
