Unicredit Bank AG (UC7PTF) Quote

Stokd
Yesterday 7:40 PM

$NLST Part 3—
Our situation at this point is simple because there really is no “race to finality” anymore, given most PTAB decisions will conclude either before and some simultaneously with trial verdicts. The only race now is preferably to get

DP,




You operate on elementary level insults.....you tried so hard to counter things I brought up about the company with those insults but you were on the losing end, you know that now, must be embarrassing to admit to yourself. Why would anyone defend BB like y

Stokd
Yesterday 7:40 PM

$NLST Part 4
Hence, we want to do the CAFC once without remand if possible, with emphasis is on reaching finality in order to collect damages, and take up/address other relief after. Unless a particular remand is beneficial—we never know what co

I've actually missed all of this. What did happen with Dolly Parton?

boobberrrrrrrrrrrrr in dda house!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

BoJ's Ueda says rates could rise in July, depending on data

This is the best attitude

Oooo yesss

If I want to see a rottweiler raw dogging some chick, I already know where to go.

You do??? Wow... lol

As for following the technicals this has a bear flag.

Of note, the previous bear flag when it was around .008 played out and it dropped to the .0065 level where it has now formed another bear flag suggesting another drop. For those keeping score, I did mention it to one of the pumpte

BJDX - not sure where it's heading

Stokd $NLST Part1
If I could make a video—even just with my phone—and knew how to post it here without youtube. I feel like there’s a lot I can explain about the finality aspect, the CAFC timeline chart, and anything else in general—always have a lot to say. Easier to do live/visually/no ch

https://scontent-bos5-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/448394455_8124832664201905_2132522664523117533_n.jpg?stp=dst-jpg_s600x600&_nc_cat=106&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=5f2048&_nc_ohc=i2DjlTMjVKsQ7kNvgGOEjy5&_nc_ht=scontent-bos5-1.xx&oh=00_AYABBQ_AKTH4wJqbK5VaHY5cOBKdRf4IMVt1QpCDfbYpnw&oe=6671FC3D

Stokd $NLST Part-2
Valuable key patents—912/918/054/060/160—are all well aligned timing wise with the 2 won cases which involve them all—Samsung 463 & Micron 294. All are very close to the next step of CAFC appeal—918 & 054 just began.

Because the timeline for patents &

Whala, Personally I think the US is lost

No way the US market is lost - IMO.
-----------------------------------------

What is the main reason 'in the first place' - that Brands have a protection period ? Its because 'The Brand had the to pay for the research

This is a mixed shelf offering while the one from November 2021 was a shelf offering. All shelf offerings are valid for a maximum of 3 years.

Instead of registering each security separately, a mixed shelf offering combines multiple types of securities into a unified offering, streamli

Thank you. As regards mr Loudoun i know nothing and he is of no interest to me. My only desire is to see proper engineering/physics and to dispute false claims pertaining to these areas.

Stokd $NLST Few things about Samsung Response to Netlist Motion to Withdraw Ongoing Royalty.

Not ruled on yet—"Proposed Order" always filed as exhibit with a motion, at times with response. Easily identifiable being listed separately on Courtlistener/Pacer(top pic).

Perhaps today?

JJ: are you still bearish?

I hear ya Mr CeeCee but they are clearly waiting on something before they submit the BLA.

Any hypotheses on what they might be waiting on, if not manufacturing?

https://mdmwoundventures.com ✅DoublePrintsHuzzah!

$UBQU Innovative outcomes already doing 5M inRevenue Annually and growing, with facilities already in place to help make it happen. Just watch what we do!
https://twitter.com/CorporateUbqu/status/1767983893544566905
YEP HUZZAH! on DECK oh GIRL
https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/cho

omar.. you give nothing but Junior High commentary............better to be thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt......have a nice day.