Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
NOTE 1 — BUSINESS DESCRIPTION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Business Description
Accretive Health, Inc., together with its subsidiaries (the "Company"), is a leading provider of services that help healthcare providers generate sustainable improvements in their operating margins and cash flows while also improving patient, physician and staff satisfaction for its customers. The Company achieves these results for its customers through an integrated approach encompassing an end-to-end revenue cycle management service offering and physician advisory services. The Company does so by deploying a unique operating model that leverages its extensive healthcare site experience, innovative technology and process excellence. The Company also offers modular services, allowing clients to engage the Company for only specific components of its end-to-end revenue cycle management service offering.
The Company’s primary service offering consists of revenue cycle management ("RCM"), which helps healthcare providers to more efficiently manage their revenue cycles. This encompasses patient registration, insurance and benefit verification, medical treatment documentation and coding, bill preparation and collections from patients and payers. The Company's physician advisory services ("PAS") offering assists hospitals in complying with payer requirements regarding whether to classify a hospital visit as an in-patient or an out-patient observation case for billing purposes and consists of both concurrent review and retrospective chart audits to help its customers achieve compliant and accurate billing. The Company also provides its customers with retrospective appeal management service support for both governmental and commercial payers.
In December 2015, the Company announced a long-term strategic partnership with Ascension Health Alliance, the parent of our largest customer and the nation’s largest Catholic and non-profit health system, and TowerBrook Capital Partners ("TowerBrook"), an investment management firm, which transaction (the "Transaction") was completed on February 16, 2016. As part of the Transaction, the Company amended and restated its Master Professional Services Agreement ("A&R MPSA") with Ascension Health ("Ascension") effective February 16, 2016 with a term of
ten
years. Pursuant to the A&R MPSA and with certain limited exceptions, the Company will become the exclusive provider of RCM services and PAS with respect to acute care services provided by the hospitals affiliated with Ascension that execute supplement agreements with the Company.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect the Company's financial position as of
March 31, 2016
, the results of operations for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2016
and
2015
, and the cash flows of the Company for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2016
and
2015
. These financial statements include the accounts of Accretive Health, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All material intercompany amounts have been eliminated in consolidation. These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial reporting and as required by the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Accordingly, certain information and footnote disclosures required for complete financial statements are not included herein. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair presentation of the interim financial information have been included. Operating results for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2016
, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any other interim period or for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2016
.
When preparing financial statements in conformity with GAAP, the Company must make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and related disclosures at the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates. For a more complete discussion of the Company’s significant accounting policies and other information, the unaudited condensed consolidated
Accretive Health, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) — (Continued)
financial statements and notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2015
(the "2015 10-K").
NOTE 2 — RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") and are adopted by the Company as of the specified effective date. Unless otherwise discussed, the Company's management believes that recently issued accounting pronouncements do not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows, or do not apply to the Company's operations.
In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers
("ASU 2014-09")
,
which provides guidance for revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 requires that a company recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount equal to the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments. On July 9, 2015, the FASB approved the deferral of the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year. As a result, ASU 2014-09 will be effective for the Company’s fiscal year beginning January 1, 2018, with retrospective applicability to prior periods. The Company may choose to adopt the standard as of the original effective date of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016; if it does so, the Company is required to apply the standard beginning in the first interim period within the year of adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this prospective guidance on its consolidated financial statements.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-05, Customers Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement ("ASU 2015-05"). The Company adopted ASU 2015-05 on the required date of January 1, 2016 using the prospective method. For the three months ended March 31, 2016, the Company did not enter into any new arrangements covered by this standard.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) ("ASU 2016-02"), which supersedes existing guidance on accounting for leases in Topic 840, Leases. ASU 2016-02 generally requires all leases to be recognized in the statement of financial position. The provisions of ASU 2016-02 are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018; early adoption is permitted. The provisions of ASU 2016-02 are to be applied using a modified retrospective approach. The Company has not yet determined the potential effects of this new standard on its consolidated financial statements, if any.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting ("ASU 2016-09"). ASU 2016-09 simplifies the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions, including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification in the statement of cash flows. The provisions of ASU 2016-09 are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted for any entity in any interim or annual period. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this prospective guidance on its consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 3 — FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Company has adopted the provisions of FASB Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements ("ASC 820"), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC 820 does not require any new fair value measurements, but provides guidance on how to measure fair value by providing a fair value hierarchy used to classify the source of the information. The fair value hierarchy distinguishes between assumptions based on market
Accretive Health, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) — (Continued)
data (observable inputs) and an entity’s own assumptions (unobservable inputs). The hierarchy consists of three levels:
|
|
•
|
Level 1:
Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities;
|
|
|
•
|
Level 2:
Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets; and
|
|
|
•
|
Level 3:
Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable.
|
The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments, which include financial assets such as cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash equivalents, accounts receivable, amounts due from related party, short-term investments and certain other current assets, as well as financial liabilities such as accounts payable, customer liabilities, customer liabilities-related party, accrued compensation and benefits and certain other accrued expenses, approximate their fair values, due to the short-term nature of these instruments. The Company’s financial assets which are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis consist of cash equivalents, which are highly liquid money market funds and accordingly are classified as Level 1 assets in the fair value hierarchy. The Company’s certificates of deposit are valued at face value, plus accrued interest, which approximates fair value, and are reported as Level 2 assets in the fair value hierarchy. The Company does
no
t have any financial liabilities that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
The Company’s
8.00%
Series A Convertible Preferred Stock,
$0.01
par value per share (the “Preferred Stock”), and the Warrant (as defined in Note 10) are Level 3 financial instruments and were valued using a combination of binomial lattice and Black-Scholes models to determine the fair value allocation. The primary assumptions used in such models were expected length of time prior to conversion, and exercise of warrants, of the Preferred Stock and Warrant (
5
-
10
years), the exercise price of the Warrant of
$3.50
per share, the risk free rate over the expected time horizon (
1.35%
to
1.66%
), the Company’s stock price (
$2.65
), the expected annual volatility of the Company stock price (
40%
) and the market rate of preferred stock for comparable companies (
9.50%
).
NOTE 4 — ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE AND ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS
Accounts receivable is comprised of unpaid balances pertaining to non-RCM service fees and net receivable balances for RCM customers after considering cost reimbursements owed to such customers, including related accrued balances.
The Company maintains an estimated allowance for doubtful accounts to reduce its accounts receivable to the amount that it believes will be collected. This allowance is based on the Company’s historical experience, its assessment of each customer’s ability to pay, the length of time a balance has been outstanding, input from key customer resources assigned to each customer, and the status of any ongoing operations with each applicable customer.
Movements in the allowance for doubtful accounts are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
March 31,
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
(unaudited)
|
Beginning balance
|
$
|
99
|
|
|
$
|
314
|
|
(Recoveries) provision
|
(17
|
)
|
|
9
|
|
Write-offs
|
—
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
Ending balance
|
$
|
82
|
|
|
$
|
239
|
|
Accretive Health, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) — (Continued)
NOTE 5 — PROPERTY, EQUIPMENT AND SOFTWARE
Property, equipment and software consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2016
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
Computer and other equipment
|
$
|
21,490
|
|
|
$
|
21,348
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
18,914
|
|
|
17,851
|
|
Software
|
22,700
|
|
|
22,302
|
|
Office furniture
|
4,977
|
|
|
4,888
|
|
Property, equipment and software, gross
|
68,081
|
|
|
66,389
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
(41,058
|
)
|
|
(39,172
|
)
|
Property, equipment and software, net
|
$
|
27,023
|
|
|
$
|
27,217
|
|
The following table summarizes the allocation of depreciation and amortization expense between cost of services and selling, general and administrative expenses (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
March 31,
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
(unaudited)
|
Cost of services
|
$
|
2,098
|
|
|
$
|
1,482
|
|
Selling, general and administration
|
173
|
|
|
235
|
|
Total depreciation and amortization
|
$
|
2,271
|
|
|
$
|
1,717
|
|
NOTE 6 — CUSTOMER LIABILITIES
Customer liabilities consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
Deferred customer billings, current
(1)
|
$
|
228,102
|
|
|
$
|
130,124
|
|
Accrued service costs, current
(1)
|
84,972
|
|
|
70,656
|
|
Customer deposits, current (1)
|
5,824
|
|
|
1,641
|
|
Deferred revenue, current
|
61
|
|
|
95
|
|
Current portion of customer liabilities
|
318,959
|
|
|
202,516
|
|
Deferred customer billings, non-current
|
$
|
22,627
|
|
|
$
|
431,944
|
|
Customer deposits, non-current (1)
|
208
|
|
|
533
|
|
Non current portion of customer liabilities
|
$
|
22,835
|
|
|
$
|
432,477
|
|
Total customer liabilities
|
$
|
341,794
|
|
|
$
|
634,993
|
|
(1) Includes
$107.3 million
,
$40.5 million
and
$1.2 million
in current deferred customer billings, accrued service costs and customer deposits, respectively, for a related party that is included in the current portion of customer liabilities - related party in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2016. In addition, at March 31, 2016, the Company had
$0.2 million
in non-current customer deposits due to such related party.
Accretive Health, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) — (Continued)
NOTE 7 — SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
The share-based compensation expense relating to the Company’s stock options and restricted stock awards ("RSAs") for the three months ended
March 31, 2016
and
2015
was
$6.9 million
and
$5.2 million
, respectively, with related tax benefits of approximately
$2.8 million
and
$2.0 million
, respectively.
Total share-based compensation expense that has been included in the Company's consolidated statements of operations was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
March 31,
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
(unaudited)
|
Share-based compensation expense allocation details:
|
|
|
|
Cost of services
|
$
|
2,003
|
|
|
$
|
1,400
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
4,895
|
|
|
3,796
|
|
Total share-based compensation expense (1)
|
$
|
6,898
|
|
|
$
|
5,196
|
|
(1) Includes
$0.1 million
and
$0.2 million
in share-based compensation expense paid in cash during the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the estimated fair value of each option as of its grant date. These inputs are subjective and generally require significant analysis and judgment to develop. The Company used Monte Carlo simulations to estimate the fair value of its RSAs with vesting based on market-based performance conditions as of their respective grant dates. Expected life is based on the market condition to which the vesting is tied.
The following table sets forth the significant assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the Monte Carlo simulations and the calculation of share-based compensation expense for the three months ended
March 31, 2016
and
2015
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
Future dividends
|
—
|
|
—
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
1.4% to 1.9%
|
|
1.5% to 1.8%
|
Expected volatility
|
50%
|
|
50%
|
Expected life
|
6.25
|
|
6.25
|
Forfeitures
|
5.68% annually
|
|
5.68% annually
|
The risk-free interest rate input is based on U.S. Treasury instruments, and expected volatility of the share price based upon review of the historical volatility levels of the Company’s common stock in conjunction with that of public companies that operate in similar industries or are similar in terms of stage of development or size and a projection of this information toward its future expected volatility. The Company used the simplified method to estimate the expected option life for 2016 and 2015 option grants. The simplified method was used due to the lack of sufficient historical data available to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate the expected term of each stock option.
Accretive Health, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) — (Continued)
Stock Options
A summary of the options activity during the three months ended
March 31, 2016
is shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Weighted-Average Exercise Price
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2016
|
15,260,266
|
|
|
$
|
10.23
|
|
Granted
|
428,549
|
|
|
2.64
|
|
Exercised
|
(38,940
|
)
|
|
1.98
|
|
Canceled
|
(64,360
|
)
|
|
11.59
|
|
Forfeited
|
(712,570
|
)
|
|
6.07
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2016
|
14,872,945
|
|
|
$
|
10.23
|
|
Outstanding and vested and exercisable at March 31, 2016
|
9,241,287
|
|
|
$
|
11.46
|
|
Outstanding and vested and exercisable at December 31, 2015
|
8,876,517
|
|
|
$
|
11.63
|
|
Restricted Stock Awards
A summary of the restricted stock activity during the three months ended
March 31, 2016
is shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
|
|
Shares
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2016
|
9,255,932
|
|
|
$
|
4.24
|
|
Granted
|
3,071,876
|
|
|
2.58
|
|
Vested
|
(354,497
|
)
|
|
7.68
|
|
Forfeited
|
(101,852
|
)
|
|
4.94
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2016
|
11,871,459
|
|
|
$
|
3.79
|
|
In most cases, RSA vesting is based on the passage of time. The amount of share-based compensation expense is based on the fair value of the Company's common stock on the respective grant dates and is recognized ratably over the vesting period.
The Company's RSA agreements allow employees to surrender to the Company shares of common stock upon vesting of their RSAs in lieu of their payment of the required personal employment-related taxes. The Company does not withhold taxes in excess of minimum required statutory requirements. During the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, employees delivered to the Company
129,042
and
77,275
shares of stock, respectively, which the Company recorded at a cost of approximately
$0.3 million
and
$0.5 million
, respectively. Shares surrendered for payment of personal employment-related taxes are held in treasury.
Accretive Health, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) — (Continued)
NOTE 8 — OTHER
Other costs are comprised of reorganization-related and certain other costs. For the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company incurred
$10.8 million
and
$1.3 million
in other costs, respectively.
Reorganization-related
During the
three
months ended March 31, 2016, the Company incurred pretax restructuring charges of
$0.7 million
, primarily consisting of facilities related expenses. The Company did
no
t incur restructuring charges for the three months ended March 31, 2015. The Company’s reorganization liability activity is included in accrued compensation and benefits and other accrued expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.
The Company’s reorganization liability activity was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
March 31,
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
(unaudited)
|
Reorganization liability, beginning balance
|
$
|
2,493
|
|
|
$
|
3,454
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
687
|
|
|
—
|
|
Cash payments
|
(302
|
)
|
|
(1,922
|
)
|
Reorganization liability, ending balance
|
$
|
2,878
|
|
|
$
|
1,532
|
|
Other
During the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company incurred other costs of
$10.1 million
and
$1.3 million
, respectively. The
$10.1 million
of costs incurred during the three months ended March 31, 2016 primarily related to incentive payments and legal fees for the closing of the transaction with Ascension Health Alliance and TowerBrook that was completed on February 16, 2016 (see Note 10). For the three months ended March 31, 2015, the Company incurred other costs of
$1.3 million
primarily related to the restatement of its previously issued consolidated financial statements (the "restatement'). These costs were primarily legal, accounting and consulting costs incurred related to the restatement.
NOTE 9 — INCOME TAXES
Income tax provisions for interim periods are based on estimated annual income tax rates, adjusted to reflect the effects of any significant infrequent or unusual items which are required to be discretely recognized within the current interim period. The Company’s intention is to permanently reinvest its foreign earnings outside the United States. As a result, the effective tax rates in the periods presented are largely based upon the projected annual pre-tax earnings by jurisdiction and the allocation of certain expenses in various taxing jurisdictions where the Company conducts its business. These taxing jurisdictions apply a broad range of statutory income tax rates.
The income tax expense and benefit for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 were higher than the amount derived by applying the federal statutory tax rate of
35%
primarily due to the impact of state taxes. The tax rate is also impacted by discrete items that may occur in any given period.
The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to U.S. federal income taxes as well as income taxes in multiple state and foreign jurisdictions. The Company's 2013, 2012, and 2011 U.S. federal income tax returns are currently under examination. State jurisdictions have various open tax years. The statutes of limitations for most states range from three to six years.
Accretive Health, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) — (Continued)
During the three months ended March 31, 2016 and March 31, 2015, the Company wrote-off approximately
$1.5 million
and
$2.2 million
of deferred tax assets due to the expiration and exercise of shared-based awards. The additional paid-in capital was reduced by the corresponding amount.
The decrease in the Company’s deferred tax assets in the three month period ended March 31, 2016 is due primarily to the contractual revenue recognition event related to Ascension. This event reduced the deferred customer billings deferred tax asset by approximately
$124.3 million
during the reporting period, offset by additions to deferred customer billings during the quarter.
At December 31, 2015, the Company had deferred tax assets of
$300.8 million
, of which
$48.2 million
related to net operating loss carryforwards. The majority of these carryforwards were generated in 2013, 2014 and 2015 when the Company incurred substantial expenses related to the restatement. On February 16, 2016, the Company entered into the A&R MPSA with Ascension, effective February 16, 2016 with a term of
10
years. Pursuant to the A&R MPSA and with certain limited exceptions, the Company will become the exclusive provider of RCM services and PAS with respect to acute care services provided by the hospitals affiliated with Ascension that execute supplement agreements with the Company. At March 31, 2016, the Company believes its deferred tax assets will be realizable. Should the additional business with Ascension that the Company anticipates receiving in connection with the A&R MPSA not be as profitable as expected, such realizability assessment may change.
NOTE 10 — 8% SERIES A CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
At the close of the Transaction on February 16, 2016 (as described in Note 1), the Company issued to TCP-ASC ACHI Series LLLP, a limited liability limited partnership jointly owned by Ascension Health Alliance and TowerBrook (the “Investor”): (i)
200,000
shares of Preferred Stock, for an aggregate price of
$200 million
, and (ii) a warrant with a term of
ten
years to acquire up to
60 million
shares of common stock, par value
$0.01
per share (“common stock”), at an exercise price of
$3.50
per share, on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Warrant Agreement (“Warrant”). The Preferred Stock is immediately convertible into shares of common stock.
The Company incurred direct and incremental expenses of
$21.3 million
(including
$14.0 million
in closing fees paid to the Investor) relating to financial advisory fees, closing costs, legal expenses and other offering-related expenses in connection with the Transaction. These direct and incremental expenses reduced the carrying amount of the Preferred Stock. In connection with the issuance of the Preferred Stock, a beneficial conversion feature of
$48.3 million
was recognized. Since the Preferred Stock is presently convertible into common stock, this amount was subsequently accreted to the carrying amount of the Preferred Stock, and treated as a deemed preferred stock dividend in the calculation of earnings per share.
Dividend Rights
The holders of the Preferred Stock are entitled to receive cumulative dividends January 1, April 1, July 1 and October 1 of each year (dividend payment dates), commencing on April 1, 2016, at a rate equal to
8%
per annum (preferred dividend) multiplied by the liquidation preference per share, initially
$1,000
per share adjusted for any unpaid cumulative preferred dividends. For the first
seven years
after issuance, the dividends on the Preferred Stock will be paid-in-kind. As of March 31, 2016, the Company had accrued dividends of
$2.0 million
associated with the Preferred Stock. There were
no
cash dividends declared in the three months ended March 31, 2016.
Conversion Features
Each share of the Preferred Stock may be converted to common stock on any date at the option of the holder into the per share amount (as defined in the Certificate of Designations of the
8.00%
Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (the "Series A COD")). Fractional shares will be rounded to the nearest whole share.
Accretive Health, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) — (Continued)
Redemption Rights
Since the redemption of the Preferred Stock is contingently or optionally redeemable and therefore not certain to occur, the Preferred Stock is not required to be classified as a liability under ASC 480,
Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity
. As the Preferred Stock is redeemable at the option of the holders upon a fundamental change (as defined in the Series A COD) and is redeemable in certain circumstances upon the occurrence of an event that is not solely within the Company's control, the Company has classified the Preferred Stock in mezzanine equity on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Voting Rights
Each holder of the Preferred Stock is entitled to vote with the Common Stock on an as-converted basis, and has full voting rights and powers equal to the voting rights and powers of the holders of Common Stock.
The following summarizes the Preferred Stock activity for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
Shares Issued and Outstanding
|
|
Carrying Value
|
Balance at December 31, 2015
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Issuance of preferred stock
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
108,909
|
|
Beneficial conversion feature deemed dividend
|
|
—
|
|
|
48,320
|
|
Accrued dividend payable
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,978
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2016
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
$
|
159,207
|
|
NOTE 11 — EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income, less any dividends, accretion or decretion, redemption or induced conversion on the Preferred Stock, by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. As the Preferred Stock participates in dividends alongside the Company’s common stock (per their participating dividends), the Preferred Stock would constitute participating securities under ASC 260-10 and are applied to earnings per share using the two-class method. Under this method, all earnings (distributed and undistributed) are allocated to common shares and participating securities based on their respective rights to receive dividends.
Diluted net income per share is calculated using the more dilutive of the if-converted or the two-class method. For the three months ended March 31, 2016, the two-class method was more dilutive and was computed by adjusting the denominator used in the basic net income per share computation by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the period plus, when their effect is dilutive, incremental shares consisting of shares subject to stock options, shares issuable upon vesting of RSAs and Preferred Stock.
Accretive Health, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) — (Continued)
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share available to common shareholders for the
three
months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively (in thousands, except share and per share data).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
March 31,
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
(unaudited)
|
Basic EPS:
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
167,403
|
|
|
$
|
(30,445
|
)
|
Less dividends on preferred shares
|
(50,298
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
Less income allocated to preferred shareholders
|
(33,071
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
Net income available to common shareholders - basic
|
$
|
84,034
|
|
|
$
|
(30,445
|
)
|
Diluted EPS:
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
167,403
|
|
|
(30,445
|
)
|
Less dividends on preferred shares
|
(50,298
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
Less income allocated to preferred shareholders
|
(32,845
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
Net income available to common shareholders - diluted
|
$
|
84,260
|
|
|
$
|
(30,445
|
)
|
Basic weighted-average common shares
|
98,289,802
|
|
|
95,889,146
|
|
Add: Effect of dilutive securities
|
943,172
|
|
|
—
|
|
Diluted weighted average common shares
|
99,232,974
|
|
|
95,889,146
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share (basic)
|
$
|
0.85
|
|
|
$
|
(0.32
|
)
|
Net income (loss) per common share (diluted)
|
$
|
0.85
|
|
|
$
|
(0.32
|
)
|
Because of their anti-dilutive effect,
21,733,844
and
22,437,635
common share equivalents comprised of stock options and RSAs have been excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation for the three months ended
March 31, 2016
and
2015
, respectively.
NOTE 12 — COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Legal Proceedings
The Company is subject to various claims, other pending and possible legal actions for product liability and other damages, and other matters arising out of the conduct of the Company’s business. On a quarterly basis, the Company reviews material legal claims against the Company. The Company accrues for the costs of such claims as appropriate and in the exercise of its judgment and experience. However, due to a lack of factual information available to the Company about a claim, or the procedural stage of a claim, it may not be possible for the Company to reasonably assess either the probability of a favorable or unfavorable outcome of the claim or to reasonably estimate the amount of loss should there be an unfavorable outcome. Therefore, for many of the claims, the Company cannot estimate a range of loss. The Company believes, based on current knowledge and after consultation with counsel, that the outcome of such claims and actions will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial position. However, in the event of unexpected future developments, it is possible that the ultimate resolution of such matters, if unfavorable, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial position.
Other than as described below, the Company is not presently a party to any material litigation or regulatory proceeding and is not aware of any pending or threatened litigation or regulatory proceeding against the Company
Accretive Health, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) — (Continued)
which, individually or in the aggregate, could have a material adverse effect on its business, operating results, financial condition or cash flows.
On May 17, 2013, the Company, along with certain of its former directors and former officers, was named as a defendant in a putative securities class action lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois (
Hughes v. Accretive Health, Inc. et al.).
The primary allegations, relating to its March 8, 2013 announcement that the Company would be restating its prior period financial statements, are that its public statements, including filings with the SEC, were false and/or misleading with respect to its revenue recognition and earnings prospects. On November 27, 2013, plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed the Company’s directors and former directors, other than Mary Tolan. On January 31, 2014, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. On September 25, 2014, the Court granted the Company motion to dismiss without prejudice, however, the plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint on October 23, 2014. On November 10, 2014, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the second amended complaint. While that motion was still pending, on January 8, 2015, plaintiffs filed a motion to amend the second amended complaint, seeking to add allegations regarding the recently issued restatement. On April 22, 2015, the court granted plaintiffs’ motion to amend, and a third amended complaint was filed on May 13, 2015. The Company moved to dismiss the third amended complaint on June 3, 2015. On December 7, 2015, the parties executed a memorandum of understanding to resolve the suit for
$3.9 million
and filed a notice of settlement with the district court. On March 8, 2016, the district court granted preliminary approval to the settlement. The final fairness hearing has been set for June 28, 2016. The Company believes the settlement payment of
$3.9 million
will be covered by insurance.
On February 11, 2014, the Company was named as a defendant in a putative class action lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Alabama (
Church v. Accretive Health, Inc
.). The primary allegation is that the Company attempted to collect debts without providing the notice required by the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ("FDCPA"). On November 24, 2015, the district court granted the Company's motion for summary judgment and dismissed the case with prejudice. Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal on December 21, 2015, and the appeal has been fully briefed, and will be argued on June 8, 2016.
On July 22, 2014, the Company was named as a defendant in a putative class action lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan (
Anger v. Accretive Health, Inc
.). The primary allegations are that the Company attempted to collect debts without providing the notice required by the FDCPA and Michigan Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and failed to abide by the terms of an agreed payment plan in violation of those same statutes. On August 27, 2015, the Court granted in part and denied in part the Company’s motion to dismiss. An amended complaint was filed on November 30, 2015. Discovery is underway. The Company believes that it has meritorious defenses and intends to vigorously defend itself against these claims. The outcome is not presently determinable.
In April 2015, the Company was named among other defendants in an employment action brought by a former employee before the Maine Human Rights Commission ("MHRC"), alleging that she was improperly terminated in retaliation for uncovering alleged Medicare fraud. The Company filed its response with the MHRC on May 19, 2015 seeking that the Company be dismissed entirely from the action. On June 23, 2015, the MHRC issued its Notice of Right to Sue and decision to terminate its process with respect to all charges asserted by the former employee. The Plaintiff has filed a parallel
qui tam
action in the District of Maine (
Worthy v. Eastern Maine Healthcare Systems
) in which she makes the same allegations. The U.S. Department of Justice declined to intervene in the federal court action, and the case was unsealed in April 2015. The Company filed a motion to dismiss the Third Amended Complaint on March 21, 2016. The Company believes that it has meritorious defenses to both the employment law-related retaliation claim for which the MHRC has granted the Notice of Right to Sue letter and the federal
qui tam
case, and intends to vigorously defend itself against these claims. The outcomes are not presently determinable.
On June 17, 2015, the Company filed a confidential arbitration demand with the American Arbitration Association against Salem Hospital for unpaid fees due under the parties’ Accretive Health Services Agreement in an aggregate amount of
$9.3 million
. On July 31, 2015, Salem Hospital filed its answer, in which it denied the
Accretive Health, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) — (Continued)
Company’s claims and asserted counterclaims against the Company in the amount of
$2.7 million
. The outcome is not presently determinable.
On November 16, 2015, the Company was named in a putative class action lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan (
Dye v. Accretive Health, Inc.
). The primary allegations were that the Company attempted to collect debts without complying with the provisions of the FDCPA. The case was voluntarily dismissed on December 4, 2015.
On December 10, 2015, the plaintiff in the
Dye
action filed a class-action complaint in the Circuit Court for the County of Macomb, Michigan, alleging that the Company’s attempts to collect his debts had violated the Michigan Occupational Code. The Company filed its motion to dismiss on February 8, 2016 and on April 22, 2016, the Circuit Court Judge dismissed all claims and ordered the case closed.
NOTE 13 — RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
As a result of the closing of the Transaction on February 16, 2016 and
Ascension's ownership interest in the Investor, Ascension became a related party to the Company. See Note 10,
8%
Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, for additional information.
The Company provides RCM services to Ascension. The execution of the A&R MPSA, as discussed in Note 1, was a contractual settlement agreement of the prior Master Professional Services Agreement between the Company and Ascension. Therefore, during the three months ended March 31, 2016, the Company recorded revenue of
$343.4 million
in connection with these services. At March 31, 2016, the Company had
$149.1 million
in current portion of customer liabilities for a related party, consisting of
$40.5 million
in current accrued service costs,
$1.2 million
in current customer deposits and
$107.3 million
in current deferred customer billings. In addition, at March 31, 2016, the Company had
$0.2 million
in non-current portion of customer liabilities due to such related party.
As Ascension is the Company's largest customer, a significant percentage of the Company's cost of services is associated with providing services to Ascension. However, due to the nature of the Company's shared services and information technology operations, it is impractical to assign the dollar amount associated with services provided to Ascension.
NOTE 14 — SEGMENTS AND CUSTOMER CONCENTRATIONS
The Company has determined that it has a single operating segment in accordance with how its business activities are managed and evaluated. All of the Company’s significant operations are organized around the single business of providing end-to-end management services of revenue cycle operations for U.S.-based hospitals and other medical providers. Accordingly, for purposes of segment disclosures, the Company has only
one
reporting segment. All of the Company’s net services revenue and trade accounts receivable are derived from healthcare providers domiciled in the United States.
Hospital systems affiliated with Ascension have accounted for a significant portion of the Company’s net services revenue each year since the Company’s formation. For the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, net services revenue from hospitals affiliated with Ascension accounted for
98%
and
1%
, respectively, of the Company's total net services revenue. For the three months ended March, 31, 2015, three customers, unaffiliated with Ascension, accounted for
54%
of the Company's total net services revenue. The Ascension system, through its individual customer contracts with the Company, accounted for
43%
and
75%
of the Company’s total deferred customer billings at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. The loss of customers within the Ascension health system would have a material adverse impact on the Company’s operations.
The Company does not have a concentration of credit risk within accounts receivable as reported in the consolidated balance sheets with any one large customer at
March 31, 2016
and
December 31, 2015
.