A Pennsylvania judge recommended that Kirkland & Ellis LLP
be prevented from advising Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. on
its attempted takeover of Mylan NV after the law firm had earlier
represented Mylan on other matters.
Citing "the critical importance of every attorney's duty of
'undivided loyalty,'" the judge held that Kirkland's earlier work
for Mylan on drug approvals and other matters should bar the law
firm from advising Teva, which has made a $40 billion unsolicited
offer for its smaller rival but has been rejected.
Officials at Kirkland, which has previously defended its role
advising Teva, weren't immediately available for comment.
"It would be hard to imagine a representation more opposed to a
current client's interests, more in breach of a fiduciary duty
toward those interests, than...a hostile takeover attempt of the
clients' entire corporate affiliate group," the judge wrote.
The report, issued late Tuesday, could shake up a bitter,
three-way takeover battle. Mylan has rejected Teva's bid in
unusually harsh terms and is instead forging ahead with its own,
twice-rejected offer for Perrigo Co.
The recommendation comes from a magistrate judge and isn't
binding on the senior judge on the case, which Mylan filed last
month in federal court in western Pennsylvania, not far from its
U.S. corporate headquarters.
Mylan said its relationship with Kirkland has given the law firm
access to confidential information about products including its
EpiPen allergic-reaction treatment, which Teva is now targeting
with a competing product.
Kirkland said it had walled off attorneys working on Mylan's
regulatory issues from those advising Teva. It also argued that it
never worked for Mylan NV, the Dutch parent entity that emerged
from a so-called "tax inversion" earlier this year, but had instead
only worked for a handful of U.S.-based Mylan subsidiaries.
The judge rejected that argument. "Defendant's contention that
the fortuitous circumstance of a recent reorganization adding a
tier of holding-company ownership to the Mylan corporate affiliate
structure now relieves it of an important component of its
fiduciary duty is disquieting," the judge said.
Write to Liz Hoffman at liz.hoffman@wsj.com
Subscribe to WSJ: http://online.wsj.com?mod=djnwires