MAGCPA
2 weeks ago
I’ll humor you and the other readers of this board one more time.
I was just correcting/expanding on some of your “FACTS” so the readers of these posts can make their own determination as to a “good” or “bad” investment based on actual FACTS.
1) For the 9-months ended December 2023 they had $71,000 in revenue (revenues are declining) FACT
Actual FACT For the 9-months ended December 2023 Revenues were $367,680 and have gone up 3 of the past 4 years.
Here are the numbers:
In Fiscal 2023 they did $ 307,141 in revenues
In Fiscal 2022 they did $ 637,459 in revenues
In Fiscal 2021 they did $ 88,794 in revenues
In Fiscal 2020 they did $ 113,001 in revenues
So, for the 9-month period ended December 31, 2023, revenues were up 3 of their past 4 years in addition to exceeding their average revenue for their last 4 years ($286,599). Revenue timing can move between fiscal years, so taking a 4-year average should take care of that potential disparity and give a better indication as to how the company is doing.
I know you have some difficulty with reading and numbers, so I hope this helps.
2) BSEG stock is down (FACT)
Once again, I’ll repeat myself from my last post “I guess it’s all relative”.
To flat out state BSEG stock is down without any relative “facts” is meaningless. It’s all relative as to what someone paid for the stock to determine if their stock is up or down. By the way, Nvidia and Apple were both down at the close on Wednesday May 1 2024 (FACT).
3) Lastly
“You and I are different types of investors - you buy shares at .0235 and feel if it goes to .03 you are content.”
It’s truly amazing and ludicrous for you to go into your dissertation (apparently, you have too much free time), on the trading of ONE OTC stock, as to my investment type without knowing me.
I invest to make money long-term and trade to make short-term profits. I’m fairly certain you do the same. So, are we different? Maybe you meant different types of strategic investors? Once again, it’s still ludicrous, based on ONE OTC stock, for you to know what type of investor I am without knowing me.
And yes, I’m definitely content with a 27.66% return (.0065 (.03-.0235)/.0235) on any trade!
That's enough comic relieve for today reading and responding to your posts.
As you stated we do not know each other and we can care less about each other, so I will leave it at that.
John_Vallay
2 weeks ago
I am not sure what 'Highest production in company history now. New energies and remarkable new employees.' means, but failure should not be acceptable. Public companies that don't produce top and bottom line results, or have share price that is down from previous year, 2-years and 5-years should be let go.
Board of Directors should never accept failure.
BSEG is a publicly traded company and management has a responsibility to shareholders - Big Screen Entertainment Group has been a failure. BSEG the stock has been a failure.
Management needs to resign, or Board must find someone else to entrust this public company to, because they have failed at every responsibility.
Another example is capital raise - management was raising capital? Since they have not announced anything, I can only assume that they failed at raising capital. That assumption is based on SEC and FINRA laws, which require a company to announce capital raise closing. Since they made no announcements that can only mean their capital raise efforts have been a failure.
How can a board of directors allow such inept people to remain in position.
Unfortunately failure seems to be acceptable with this company.
John_Vallay
2 weeks ago
It would seem to me, based on your message board posts, that you are happy with BSEG and your investment in the company.
You and I are different types of investors - you buy shares at .0235 and feel if it goes to .03 you are content.
I don't understand that philosophy but that does not make me wrong or make you right - maybe it's just a matter of looking and perceiving something completely different.
As for revenues:
In Fiscal 2023 they did $307,141 in revenues
In Fiscal 2022 they did $637,459 in revenues
When you are a small company decreases in revenues are not acceptable. My point is that the business model is not working because for shareholders its not usually a good investment or trade.
Small companies, such as BSEG is, can not have a decline in revenues.
If you want to state that Fiscal Year 2024 will show $450,000, or in that range is higher than previous year - I agree with you, but the decline is still there because FY2022 was $637K.
If you bought shares at .0235 and .02 and with today's stock being at .0265 and you made .006 a shares than I am happy for you.
But I don't see how that can be a good trade or investment for you because even if you bought 1 million shares and sold it at a profit of .006 a shares, that is a $6,000 profit. But there is no liquidity for you to have purchased the 1 million shares and there is no liquidity to sell the 1 million shares, so at the end of the day - what are you talking about
Did you sell 100,000 shares at a .006 profit and net yourself a pre-tax profit of $600 - is that what this is all about?
I am truly happy for you because it doesn't matter what makes me happy because we do not know each other and we can care less about each other.
I was just trying to express my opinion on a stock that I see as being a bad investment, and the charts prove my theory to be correct, but good for you with your trade and profit because it would seem to me as if you timed everything perfectly.
I am truly happy for you and I am not being sarcastic or any other devious intention. I JUST DON'T GET IT. I ADMIT IT, I JUST DON'T GET IT.
Good Luck
MAGCPA
3 weeks ago
1) “For the 9-months ended December 2023 they had $71,000 in revenue (revenues are declining) FACT”
Apparently reading and simple math must be beneath your high intellect.
Revenues, according to my simplistic mind, for the 9-month period ended December 31, 2023, is $367,680. (Adding the 3 quarter numbers listed below to give a 9-month revenue total as of December 31, 2023)
Revenues:
Quarter ended June 30, 2023 $ 66,690
Quarter ended September 30, 2023 $ 229,868
Quarter ended December 31, 2023 $ 71,122
The Consolidated statement of operations for December 31, 2023, does state “for the three months ended December 31,2023” (not 9 months ended).
“For the year ended March 2023 they had $307,000 in revenue (the pizzeria on my corner did more) FACT”
I wish I was as smart as you, because I just don’t get how 367,680 is less than 307,000.
Could you please explain it to us simple minded people?
2) “BSEG stock is down (FACT)”
I guess it’s all relative.
My most recent purchases:
3/28/2024 .0235
4/9/2024 .02
Closing price 4/25/2024 .027
Again, in my simple mind, me thinks my stock purchases went up.
3) “Kimberly has paid herself a nice salary with shareholders money, she has a nice office which is paid for by shareholders, she has an expense account that pays for a car, meals, travel, etc, etc, etc, AGAIN, paid for by shareholders FACT”
For us simple minded people, maybe a definition of a “nice salary” would be appropriate and let the stockholders decide if it falls into the category of a “nice salary”
And the mention of “paid for by shareholders”.
FYE March 31, 2023 Financial Statement Note 3 “the Company paid an aggregate of approximately $ 33,200 to its Chief Executive Officer for the year ended March 31, 2023.
For the nine months ended December 31, 2023 Financial Statement Note 3 “the Company paid an aggregate of approximately $ 16,730 to its Chief Executive Officer.
That’s $49,930 of aggregate cash outlay for 21 months of work.
To me that’s not a “nice salary”. Me thinks she could have made that much in tips at your pizzeria on your corner.
The remainder of her salary is accrued and Kimberly, in the past, has been converting some of it to shares of restricted stock at .03/share. In my simple-minded opinion, this makes her a fiscally responsible CEO of shareholder’s money.
I’m hopeful this post is enlightening to all that will read it and not only to myself.
John_Vallay
4 weeks ago
The link you provided is a press release about THE MIRROR (FACT)
That press release DOES NOT disclose how much revenues will be generated (FACT)
You 'hope' revenues will be generated (FACT)
Past performance is indicative of future results (FACT)
I do not believe Kimberly, Big Screen Entertainment or anyone else inside the company has the intelligence or know-how to build, grow and maintain a successful company. (OPINION)
BSEG stock is down (FACT)
For the year ended March 2023 they had $307,000 in revenue (the pizzeria on my corner did more) FACT
For the 9-months ended December 2023 they had $71,000 in revenue (revenues are declining) FACT
Since the company was formed and been in business, they have lost $6,169,580 exactly FACT
That is all shareholders money from their past capital raises FACT
Kimberly has paid herself a nice salary with shareholders money, she has a nice office which is paid for by shareholders, she has an expense account that pays for a car, meals, travel, etc, etc, etc, AGAIN, paid for by shareholders FACT
I am sure your response will be enlightening to yourself, but I will most likely simply say - WHAT A SHAME, yet another person just doesn't get it.
But I do look forward to your reply and I will give you credit if you can make any statement with any reply that makes any sense to this post.
John_Vallay
4 weeks ago
First - I never said anything against people that sell or short.
I was simply stating that you as a BSEG shareholder should not want that.
In even simpler terms - you didn't understand my post and the meaning behind my words.
Secondly - What PR about sales.
Investors want to see sales numbers in 10Q's and 10K's.
In even simpler terms - I don't understand what sales you are happy about.
Third - God has nothing to do with the stock market.
I keep God and religion out of all conversations and message board posts.
In even simpler terms - I am far to intelligent to use God or religion in any way to try to make a point, especially any point that has to do with the stock market.
Finally - Do not let my intelligence intimidate you.
You keep trying to retort, but if you look at our interactions, and putting aside opinions, you have never replied in a cohesive and intelligent manner to any post I have made.
Don't be discouraged - you keep trying, just like BSEG is trying to not be at a 3-year low in the stock price.
We live in a world in which most people think they are good at everything they do, but based on salaries & job titles and responsibilities, personal relationships and marriages, and IQ scores and common sense - statistics show that most people are not good at what they do.
Your past trading history, specifically profit & loss, will tell you if you are good at what you do.
John_Vallay
4 weeks ago
I am really confused. You like when shareholders sell their shares. You think this is a good thing for a stock.
Maybe someone needs to teach you the supply and demand philosophy associated in the stock market. When shareholders are selling and there are no buyers, it usually results in a stock price drop, as is the case with BSEG.
Only a fool and his money would want sellers and shorters in a stock.
There is no trading in this stock so that means even if a person came in with $5,000 the stock can double - you know, to 4 cents a share, but it is a safe assume that upon a stock price increase of that nature, it will surely drop.
AS FOR SHORTING BSEG - you can't short a Pink Sheet company or a stock that is 2 cents. It can not be done.
John_Vallay
3 months ago
Dawg
Not sure if you know much about Hollywood & making movies but production company LuckyChap Entertainment was started by Margot Robbie and her husband. Together they have produced several films and television series, including the critically acclaimed films I, Tonya (2017), Promising Young Woman (2020), and Barbie (2023). They have done more revenues and generated more profits from these 3 films then BSEG has done in all their years.
LuckyChap would not be a successful public company, but for their founders and management team everyone is making money.
Being a public company requires continued, sustainable and significant top and bottom line results, none of which BSEG has ever accomplished. They have failed, so now they are pivoting to family and faith projects, a sector that has never been financially successful for a company. Yes, there may have been movies in this genre that were successful, but the company that produces or distributes these movies are not focused on faith and family. It just happens that 1 project was in that space, but all others are not.
I am guessing you are a paid promoter, because no current investor can be happy with BSEG's management. Since there is basically no trading in the stock no one else thinks this dog has any potential. A dog with fleas is probably the best analogy because people stay away from dawgs with fleas.
As for nastiness in the world vs faith and family - Investing is about making money, not saving the manatees or promoting a narrative that is inconsequential to stock price or company success.
I would suggest you look at BSEG annual revenues since the day they started the business and say to yourself - is this a growing company, or a company that wants to grow.
If it is a growing company than it is a good investment
If it is a company that wants to grow than it needs to grow before its a good investment.
John_Vallay
3 months ago
From the write up: Green Planet Microcaps was compensated 600,000 restricted common shares for 3 months of investor relations and will not be liable for any consequential, incidental, punitive, special, exemplary or indirect damages resulting directly or indirectly from the use of or reliance upon any material provided by Green Planet Microcaps or derived from Green Planet Microcap’s website and/or newsletters.
BSEG should be worth $0.0001 a share. At $0.25 it is overvalued and people will probably lose money.
Trade smarter, not harder: Unleash your inner pro with our toolkit and live discussions.
DawgTrading
2 days ago
janeyH
3 months ago
Hot Features
Premium
