Societe Generale Effekten (S28218) News

I'll take that a concession LOL

pfwheew... that's a chuckle.

Wow, just dandy after you out of nowhere, decided to go on a personal rant attack, violating one of the few rules here on this uncensored board.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174478595

Posts about other Members' family members are off l

I didnt make any claim at all other than saying that I emailed the auditor and they confirmed that they are handling the audit? You're still confused LOL

Lol, those Amish dudes have it right.

I come on these boards to take in all opinions and advice. Good or bad. My "issue" with you is that in that instance, your behavior indicates that you're not objective, so I am less likely to take your information with as much confidence as I would if you had showed me u were objective. Get it?

A new survey finds that more than 1-in-4 Democrats, 28%, think America would be better off if Trump was assassinated

https://x.com/charliekirk11/status/1836511736213704769

I get what you're saying, but you're the one who made the claim, he didn't. Therefore the argument only works if the auditor is legit.

Simple. You jumped into a back and forth between me and him without knowing that he initially claimed that BMXI lied about hiring an auditor. Your argument on his behalf was that BMXI could just have hired them for show so his argument still stood strong.

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/MHwjBKzC2t3jzKAn/?mibextid=6GsUZ4 A GROUND RULE TRIPLE?

So, you're only issue is that I am not "objective" and I'm a "hater"? Yet you don't disagree with most of what I post?

Seems like a roundabout way to admit that we both agree BMXI is an OTC scam.

I'm okay with being labeled a "hater" and not objective, doesn't bothe

I could give a fk if he's wrong. As I said, I am discussing the possibilities that your conclusion is erroneous.

what am i wrong about?

what have I stated that is wrong?

He literally admitted below that he was wrong pal. LOL.

I know its hard for you to admit you were wrong but its ok.

Wow, so you've got the monopoly on reading and taking understanding from Gittle's posts.

Seemed like irrespective of past posts (I read back on your chat, and I started by asking you where he said that) we were discussing on most recent pronouncements, where discussion from you both

All getting excited and blind to how ridiculous this all is. They are meant to have been building an NFT Marketplace as big as eBay, where is it? As I’ve told to all a long there is no such thing. So how do they get around that problem? They change the company into a fin tech investment business and

Where did I claim that BMXI was legit? or that I was taking BMXI's financials, PRs and tweets as fact and not lies? The only positive i stated was that I emailed them and confired that chadwick was handling their audit. I even literally said that all the redflags you rasied were valid?....refer to m

From 1.10 to 0.34

LOL.....you think you are being fair and objective in reviewing and judging the merits of a company like BMXI? Based on what info - OTC "filings", PRs and social media posts? You're being fed disinformation. It's how they work.

Adam needs to give a update. Hope he secured some funding

No, you are still confused. This back and forth between us started when you took up for gitreal without understanding that he initially stated that they never hired Chadwick to begin with. I never said that you said it...I said that you were defending his argument in my back and forth with him witho