shoondale
6 days ago
How come you never see any of these 6700+ people enthused about this POS fraudulent Ponzi Scheme, buying into it, and posting on this board?
Answer: you PM them you will follow them if they follow you because you think it makes you look like an authority. Maybe to the United Health Fraud Ponzi Scheme operators who give you shares to bullshit suckers. But who else is fooled? Actually, you are quite useful to these followers. They see where you go and know what to stay away from because you never know what you are talking about. For instance, this POS fraudulent scam has gone down over 90% in less than 5 years while you rave about it. Go ahead and click on 5 yrs in the linked chart:
https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/UEEC
They follow you and distance themselves. The price action over the last 5 years, and lack of interest, speaks volumes about why you are followed. These followers know you as well as I do.
UEEC--Still a fan of me, I see.
Don't worry I have 6700+ of them on I-HUB.
Toodles.
fool
noun
a person who acts unwisely or imprudently; a silly person.
Zorax
7 days ago
In summation, I am fascinated by your continued references to me, I can tell you are a HUGE fan. Maybe when this is all over, I will hold one certificate share of UEEC stock, autograph it and mail it to you, to commemorate our stellar relationship. Given that I believe that UEEC stock will be somewhere between $5.00--$10.00 ++, and the cost of 1 forever postage stamp, this gift will cost me $5.75--$10.75, but you will need itSorry that's a lie and you know it.
Certificates will only be given if at all with the total holding amount period.
I don't even know a brokerage that will print a certificate any more. It's all handled by TA's and they practically abolished the practice for scam otcm stocks. But as others have said, don't let facts and truth stand in your way.
And yes, I will stop in and post should lies and affronts need to be debunked and destroyed.
shoondale
1 week ago
"FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Violations of Exchange Act Section IO(b) and Rule 10b-5 Thereunder
(UHP and Beplate)
SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Violations of Exchange Act Section I0(b) and Rules IOb-S(a) and (c) Thereunder
(Schiliro)
THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Aiding and Abetting Violations of Exchange Act Section lO(b) and Rule 10b-5(b)
(Schiliro)
FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Violations of Securities Act Section 17(a)
(All Defendants)
FIFTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Violations of Exchange Act Section 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(2)(B)
of the Exchange Act and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1 and 13a-13 Thereunder
(UHP)
SIXTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Aiding and Abetting Violations of Exchange Act Section 13(a),
13(b)(2)(A), 13(b)2)B), and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1 and 13a-13
(Beplate and Schiliro)
SEVENTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Violation of Section 13(b)(5) of the Exchange Act and Exchange Act Rule 13b2-1
(Beplate and Schiliro)
EIGHTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Violations of Exchange Act Section 13(a) and Rule 13a-14 Thereunder
(Beplate)
NINTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Violations of Rule 13b2-2 of the Exchange Act
(Beplate and Schiliro)
TENTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Violations of Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 304(a)
(Beplate)
ELEVENTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Violations of Exchange Act Section 16(a) and Rule 16a-3 Thereunder
(Beplate)"
https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/complaints/2022/comp25413.pdf
shoondale
1 week ago
UEEC-another bald-face lie from 🖕Sporty🖕..."As you, yourself stated, "Do not be hindered by the truth, it gets in the way of bashing."", You aren't quoting me, You are just plain pathological in your fabrications. Obviously, you can't cite a post containing that. But hey, we can't expect anything else from you and your cronies involved in this sociopathic scam based on a fraudulent company with a hyped fictitious magic bandage..
SPORTYNORTY
1 week ago
UEEC--So predictable. Never addresses his purpose/agenda for his pointless vitriol and negatively biased mistruths. As you, yourself stated, "Do not be hindered by the truth, it gets in the way of bashing."
You will never reveal why you are here, and that is fine with me. When UEEC gets that approval, you will disappear into cyber oblivion, where you belong. Remember to pick another clever alias by which to obscure your true intentions.
shoondale
1 week ago
Actually, you addressed me and I responded. But don't let that get in the way of your narrative. The truth never has and evidently never will. And it is more jaw dropping, amazed, utter bemusement at your lack of common sense and rejection of logic rather than being a fan in the conventional sense. By the way, have you forgotten all the "fan club" PM's I received from someone with a little doggie that wears a hat?
"No one has been ghosted by me."
That block menu can be tough to toggle and operate for some.
"In summation, I am fascinated by your continued references to me, I can tell you are a HUGE fan. Maybe when this is all over, I will hold one certificate share of UEEC stock, autograph it and mail it to you, to commemorate our stellar relationship. Given that I believe that UEEC stock will be somewhere between $5.00--$10.00 ++, and the cost of 1 forever postage stamp, this gift will cost me $5.75--$10.75, but you will need it."
I'm looking forward to it. You will get a break there (right in line with all your other prognostications I outlined in an earlier post). It will only cost the postage stamp and envelope. It will get mounted on the bathroom roller/dispenser as soon as I receive it.
shoondale
1 week ago
I've always maintained there is a long history of FDA submissions to the contrary of what you are stating. Check my posts. In fact, this bullshit has been going on since 2017. What is missing is a copy of the actual FDA determination and actual reasons for rejection. I wonder why United Health Fraud never divulges that?
"no FDA submissions"
https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=12414685&guid=4td-kaJ6H_M4B3h#UEEC_EX991_HTM
""FDA Selects HemoStyp ® for CtQ Pilot Program
Henderson, Nevada – December 4, 2017 –United Health Products, Inc. (UHP) (OTC: UEEC), manufacturer and marketer of HemoStyp®, a patented hemostatic gauze for the healthcare and wound care sectors, today announced that it is proceeding with its application for HemoStyp under the FDA’s new and innovative CtQ Pilot Program. The FDA selected UHP’s HemoStyp as only one of nine participants for the program. UHP management has scheduled its first face-to-face meeting with FDA experts for January 17, 2018 to provide the agency with whatever information it needs to advance the application for premarket approval (PMA).
The FDA has stated that it intends to work collaboratively with pilot program participants during the review of their PMA submission to define characteristics of the device that are critical to product quality, and how these characteristics are controlled in design and manufacturing prior to the postmarket inspection. For pilot program participants, the FDA would forego conducting the standard PMA preapproval inspection, and a postmarket inspection focusing on the PMA applicant’s implementation of the critical to quality characteristics would be conducted instead.
The CtQ Pilot Program was created to identify products that have a chemical makeup of demonstrated safe interaction with the body –as evidenced by years of prior product usage and studies-- to be approved for Class III internal surgical use. The program’s intent is to allow products that have demonstrated repeated safe interaction to enter the market in a more efficient manner. This application will run simultaneously with the company’s prior Class II application for expanded indication. The market for 2017 internal surgical market for hemostatic products is estimated at in excess of seven billion dollars, and is expected to grow at 7.1% over the next few years, to reach more than $8.3 billion by 2022. (http://industryarc.com/Report/15189/hemostats-market.html)
Concurrent with its CtQ Pilot Program participation, UHP reaffirms that its current Class II application – Expanded Indication submission with the US FDA-- continues to progress, and is in an advanced stage of review
About Premarket Approval Application Critical to Quality (PMA CtQ) Pilot Program
Top-quality medical devices help the FDA better protect and promote public health. And one of the top priorities for FDA’s medical devices center is a focus on quality.
More specifically, the FDA is working with stakeholders—industry, health care providers, patients, payers, and investors—to build a strong Case for Quality.
This program allows the FDA to identify device manufacturers that consistently produce high-quality devices. By doing so, we can better focus our resources helping other manufacturers raise their level of quality. This program also helps the FDA identify and promote practices that support consistent quality manufacturing, and align our regulatory, enforcement, compliance approaches with those practices.
The FDA launched the Case for Quality in 2011 following an in-depth review of device quality data and feedback from both FDA and industry stakeholders. The FDA’s analysis flagged certain widespread or common manufacturing risks that impact product quality. The review also showed manufacturers that focus on and manage those risks often become more productive, receiving fewer complaints, needing to open fewer CAPAs and investigations, and having lower quality-related product costs than their competitors.
In simple terms, the review identified that an investment in quality has long-term payoffs."
SPORTYNORTY
1 week ago
UEEC--No one has been ghosted by me. Yet, you still refuse to answer any questions as to your reason for hanging out on a board that you have no equity investment in. I know, next Zorax will chime in saying nobody has to disclose anything, yada yada yada. What you and the other one fail to recognize is that anyone that would have put any credence at your combined prattle, is long gone. Those of us that remain are here, and nothing short of FDA communication is relevant. This includes your incessant assertions that there were no clinical studies, no FDA submissions, no peer reviews, again, yada yada yada. All myth. Your response to this will be links to nothing, hyperbole mixed with conjecture and statements of falsehoods presented as gospel. We have all heard it before.
In summation, I am fascinated by your continued references to me, I can tell you are a HUGE fan. Maybe when this is all over, I will hold one certificate share of UEEC stock, autograph it and mail it to you, to commemorate our stellar relationship. Given that I believe that UEEC stock will be somewhere between $5.00--$10.00 ++, and the cost of 1 forever postage stamp, this gift will cost me $5.75--$10.75, but you will need it.
shoondale
1 week ago
First of all, you cannot even figure out you have been ghosted by Sporty. So it is beyond question you cannot figure out he is screwing around with you, by inviting me to post, since you have been PM'ing him to do the opposite. You have no idea that you could chop a couple of fingers off and still count the number of authentic shareholders, who have posted here, with one hand. If I were in your shoes, instead of worrying about my motivation, I'd be trying to figure out who is shooting me straight and who is playing with me. If you could do that, you might, god forbid, garner a morsel of respect. Right now, you are being played for a total fool at every level and don't even know enough what to ask, let alone who to trust. Do I have that right?
"You won’t admit to owning… not owning.. or shorting the position either.. let’s hear it.. what is your position in UEEC????"
shoondale
1 week ago
Sporty; name one time you have been right about this POS stock scam? Just one?
I thought you would have learned by now...after all these years of bullshitting yourself. Maybe I am giving you too much credit?
[SPORTYNORTY
Re: Scumbag Fraudsters post# 10908
Wednesday, January 11, 2023 9:36:42 PM
Post# 10909 of 12746
Pre-Market Approval NOW CONFIRMED. Thank you
SPORTYNORTY
Re: None
Friday, March 22, 2024 10:21:58 AM
Post# 13242 of 13566
Looking for UEEC to either be bought out, or announce a deep pocketed partner to finance manufacturing and production. Only going to cost companies more money as time goes. The longer they wait, the more us shareholders make.
Waverunners
3 weeks ago
This has been a busy day…
First there are no employees. Then I find out I was an employee and was fired. I hope I got a good severance package.
But wait, another insinuated that I also associate with Thom through my company Waveny Partners.
Last week I was a short.
My goodness this is a lot to keep track of.
How much were they paying me? Was I possibly getting $15,000 a month like Thom. Paid via shares if needed?
Wait, if Thom is my associate through Waveny, am I not entitled to some of the 15,000 a month he currently makes.
Hey now, hold on a second, If I am a former employee, clearly I would have been the smartest employee and thereby be the CEO.
And the CEO was fired (stepped down.) Hmmmm