Washington, D.C. 20549
References in this annual report to the
“common shares” are to the common shares of TIM. References to the “American Depositary Shares” or “ADSs”
are to TIM’s American Depositary Shares, each representing five common shares. The ADSs are evidenced by American Depositary
Receipts, or “ADRs,” which are listed on the New York Stock Exchange, or the NYSE, under the symbol “TSU.”
We calculate market share information based
on information provided by Brazil’s National Telecommunications Agency (
Agência Nacional de Telecomunicações
),
or Anatel. We calculate penetration data based on information provided by the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (
Instituto
Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística
), or IBGE.
The preparation of financial statements
in conformity with IFRS requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates. It also requires management to exercise its
judgment in the process of applying our accounting policies. Those areas involving a higher degree of judgment or complexity, or
areas where assumptions and estimates are significant to the consolidated financial statements, are disclosed in Note 3 to our
consolidated financial statements.
Solely for the convenience of the reader,
we have translated some amounts included in “Item 3A. Key Information—Selected Financial Data” and elsewhere
in this annual report from
reais
into U.S. dollars using the commercial selling exchange rate as reported by the Central
Bank of Brazil (
Banco Central do Brasil
), or Central Bank, at December 31, 2015 of R$3.9048 to U.S.$1.00. These translations
should not be considered representations that any such amounts have been, could have been or could be converted into U.S. dollars
at that or at any other exchange rate. Such translations should not be construed as representations that the
real
amounts
represent or have been or could be converted into U.S. dollars as of that or any other date. See “Item 3. Key Information—A.
Selected Financial Data—Exchange Rates” for information regarding exchange rates for the Brazilian currency.
Certain figures included in this annual
report have been subject to rounding adjustments. Accordingly, figures shown as totals in certain tables may not be an arithmetic
aggregation of the figures that precede them.
The “Technical Glossary” at
the end of this annual report provides definitions of certain technical terms used in this annual report and in the documents incorporated
in this annual report by reference.
This annual report contains statements
in relation to our plans, forecasts, expectations regarding future events, strategies and projections, which are forward-looking
statements and involve risks and uncertainties and are therefore, not guarantees of future results. Forward-looking statements
speak only as of the date they were made, and we undertake no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements
after we file this annual report because of new information, future events and other factors. We and our representatives may also
make forward-looking statements in press releases and oral statements. Statements that are not statements of historical fact, including
statements about the beliefs and expectations of our management, are forward-looking statements. Words such as “anticipate,”
“believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “forecast,” “intend,” “plan,”
“predict,” “project” and “target” and similar words are intended to identify forward-looking
statements, which necessarily involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties. Our actual results and performance could differ
substantially from those anticipated in our forward-looking statements. These statements appear in a number of places in this annual
report, principally in “Item 4. Information on the Company” and “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects,”
and include, but are not limited to, statements regarding our intent, belief or current expectations with respect to:
Because forward-looking statements are
subject to risks and uncertainties, our actual results and performance could differ significantly from those anticipated in such
statements and the anticipated events or circumstances might not occur. The risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited
to:
Part I
|
Item 1.
|
Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers
|
Not applicable.
|
Item 2.
|
Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable
|
Not applicable.
|
A.
|
Selected Financial Data
|
The selected financial data presented
below should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements, including the notes thereto. Our consolidated
financial statements included herein as of and for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 have been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers
Auditores Independentes. The reports of PricewaterhouseCoopers Auditores Independentes on the consolidated financial statements
appear elsewhere in this annual report. For our consolidated financial statements, including the notes thereto, as of and for
the year ended December 31, 2013, please refer to the financial statements accompanying our annual report filed on Form 20-F on
April 15, 2014 with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The following table presents a summary
of our historical consolidated financial and operating data for each of the periods indicated. Solely for the convenience of the
reader,
real
amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015 have been translated into U.S. dollars at the commercial
market rate in effect on December 31, 2015 (as reported by the Central Bank of R$3.9048 to U.S.$1.00). See “—Exchange
Rates” for information regarding exchange rates for the Brazilian
real
. You should read the following information
together with our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this annual report and with “Item
5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.”
|
|
|
As
of and for the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2015
U.S.$
|
|
|
|
2015
R$
|
|
|
|
2014
R$
|
|
|
|
2013
R$
|
|
|
|
2012
R$
(Reclassified)(1)
|
|
|
|
2011
R$
(Reclassified)(1)
|
|
|
|
|
(thousands
of
reais
or U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)
|
Income Statement Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating revenue
|
|
|
4,389,175
|
|
|
|
17,138,851
|
|
|
|
19,498,165
|
|
|
|
19,921,291
|
|
|
|
18,763,947
|
|
|
|
17,085,977
|
|
Cost of service provided and goods sold
|
|
|
(2,127,345
|
)
|
|
|
(8,306,857
|
)
|
|
|
(10,083,920
|
)
|
|
|
(10,822,202
|
)
|
|
|
(9,880,984
|
)
|
|
|
(8,542,639
|
)
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
2,261,830
|
|
|
|
8,831,994
|
|
|
|
9,414,245
|
|
|
|
9,099,089
|
|
|
|
8,882,963
|
|
|
|
8,543,338
|
|
Operating revenue (expenses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling expenses
|
|
|
(1,236,144
|
)
|
|
|
(4,826,895
|
)
|
|
|
(5,022,972
|
)
|
|
|
(4,911,522
|
)
|
|
|
(4,774,161
|
)
|
|
|
(4,848,512
|
)
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(306,105
|
)
|
|
|
(1,195,277
|
)
|
|
|
(1,130,754
|
)
|
|
|
(1,012,556
|
)
|
|
|
(1,029,943
|
)
|
|
|
(963,394
|
)
|
Other incomes (expenses), net
|
|
|
111,246
|
|
|
|
434,395
|
|
|
|
(774,830
|
)
|
|
|
(736,138
|
)
|
|
|
(755,489
|
)
|
|
|
(663,783
|
)
|
Operating profit before financial income (expense)
|
|
|
830,828
|
|
|
|
3,244,217
|
|
|
|
2,485,689
|
|
|
|
2,438,873
|
|
|
|
2,323,370
|
|
|
|
2,067,649
|
|
Financial income (expenses)
|
|
|
(67,706
|
)
|
|
|
(264,378
|
)
|
|
|
(292,772
|
)
|
|
|
(302,720
|
)
|
|
|
(169,890
|
)
|
|
|
(244,168
|
)
|
Income before income tax and social tax contribution
|
|
|
763,122
|
|
|
|
2,979,839
|
|
|
|
2,192,917
|
|
|
|
2,136,153
|
|
|
|
2,153,480
|
|
|
|
1,823,481
|
|
Income tax and social contribution
|
|
|
(232,712
|
)
|
|
|
(908,694
|
)
|
|
|
(646,498
|
)
|
|
|
(630,539
|
)
|
|
|
(704,592
|
)
|
|
|
(545,636
|
)
|
Net income for the year
|
|
|
530,410
|
|
|
|
2,071,145
|
|
|
|
1,546,419
|
|
|
|
1,505,614
|
|
|
|
1,448,888
|
|
|
|
1,277,845
|
|
Net income per share
|
|
|
0.2192
|
|
|
|
0.8558
|
|
|
|
0.6396
|
|
|
|
0.62276
|
|
|
|
0.59950
|
|
|
|
0.56450
|
|
Diluted net income per share
|
|
|
0.2191
|
|
|
|
0.8557
|
|
|
|
0.6393
|
|
|
|
0.62280
|
|
|
|
0.59943
|
|
|
|
0.56420
|
|
Number of shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares (in millions)
|
|
|
2,421
|
|
|
|
2,421
|
|
|
|
2,421
|
|
|
|
2,418
|
|
|
|
2,418
|
|
|
|
2,418
|
|
Preferred shares (in millions)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Dividends per share
|
|
|
0.04958
|
|
|
|
0.1936
|
|
|
|
0.1518
|
|
|
|
0.1480
|
|
|
|
0.1423
|
|
|
|
0.1259
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant, equipment and intangibles, net
|
|
|
5,282,355
|
|
|
|
20,626,541
|
|
|
|
18,237,563
|
|
|
|
14,643,423
|
|
|
|
13,555,699
|
|
|
|
12,493,487
|
|
Total assets
(2)
|
|
|
9,066,700
|
|
|
|
35,403,652
|
|
|
|
32,343,144
|
|
|
|
27,931,722
|
|
|
|
26,036,062
|
|
|
|
23,533,424
|
|
Loans and financing
|
|
|
2,029,921
|
|
|
|
7,926,436
|
|
|
|
6,754,419
|
|
|
|
4,746,656
|
|
|
|
4,390,095
|
|
|
|
3,660,583
|
|
Shareholders’ equity
|
|
|
4,336,469
|
|
|
|
16,933,044
|
|
|
|
15,322,034
|
|
|
|
14,594,640
|
|
|
|
13,832,870
|
|
|
|
12,953,354
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the Year Ended December
31,
|
|
|
|
|
2015
U.S.$
|
|
|
|
2015
R$
|
|
|
|
2014
R$
|
|
|
|
2013
R$
|
|
|
|
2012
R$
(Reclassified)(1)
|
|
|
|
2011
R$
(Reclassified)(1)
|
|
|
|
|
(thousands of
reais
or U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)
|
|
Capital stock
|
|
|
2,526,710
|
|
|
|
9,866,298
|
|
|
|
9,866,298
|
|
|
|
9,839,770
|
|
|
|
9,839,770
|
|
|
|
9,839,770
|
|
Cash Flow Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operations
|
|
|
1,095,627
|
|
|
|
4,278,206
|
|
|
|
6,441,064
|
|
|
|
5,269,502
|
|
|
|
4,965,169
|
|
|
|
4,154,180
|
|
Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(723,233
|
)
|
|
|
(2,824,082
|
)
|
|
|
(6,863,357
|
)
|
|
|
(3,560,907
|
)
|
|
|
(3,764,726
|
)
|
|
|
(4,319,253
|
)
|
Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (used) in financing activities
|
|
|
(150,254
|
)
|
|
|
(586,713
|
)
|
|
|
367,643
|
|
|
|
(844,697
|
)
|
|
|
(225,918
|
)
|
|
|
1,051,696
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
222,140
|
|
|
|
867,411
|
|
|
|
(54,650
|
)
|
|
|
857,862
|
|
|
|
1,166,925
|
|
|
|
886,623
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
1,340,143
|
|
|
|
5,232,992
|
|
|
|
5,287,642
|
|
|
|
4,429,780
|
|
|
|
3,262,855
|
|
|
|
2,376,232
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
|
1,562,283
|
|
|
|
6,100,403
|
|
|
|
5,232,992
|
|
|
|
5,287,642
|
|
|
|
4,429,780
|
|
|
|
3,262,855
|
|
|
(1)
|
The reclassifications are illustrated
in Note 3(b) of the Financial Statements accompanying our annual report filed on Form
20-F on April 26, 2013 with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
|
|
(2)
|
See Note 2(e) to our consolidated financial
statements. With respect to the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the total assets were reduced in R$206,445
and R$72,915 based on the same matter.
|
Brazilian Economic Environment
Our business, prospects, financial condition
and results of operations are dependent on general economic conditions in Brazil.
Historically, macroeconomic conditions
in Brazil have been characterized by wide swings in economic growth and significant fluctuations in interest, inflation, and foreign
exchange rates. In recent years, official interest rates in Brazil, as well as the exchange rate of the
real
against the
U.S. dollar, have fluctuated, and gross domestic product, or GDP, growth has been increasingly weak compared to prior years, slowing
to 0.2% in 2014, and contracting in 2015at a rate of 3.8% with a forecasted contraction of 2.9% in 2016.
Throughout 2012, global economic uncertainty
and financial market volatility contributed to uncertainty in Brazilian economic conditions. Although the U.S. showed better financial
conditions and stronger job market indicators in early 2012, its growth for the remainder of 2012 remained low given higher savings
requirements, tighter fiscal policy and low global growth rates. During 2012, the continued uncertainty in Europe, particularly
in Greece, Spain, Italy and Portugal, intensified concerns regarding the fiscal sustainability and risk of sovereign default of
those countries, reducing the confidence of international investors and bringing volatility to the markets. The continued financial
deterioration of these countries appears to have impaired the global economy and, indirectly, the growth of emerging markets, including
Brazil and China, which experienced growth well below forecasts in 2012. The stock exchanges of emerging countries declined generally
and international capital flows demonstrated less tolerance for political and economic uncertainties.
The Brazilian government, in the face of
this speculative and volatile international economic environment, adopted a series of countercyclical measures to stimulate the
economy, including tax decreases, a decrease in interest rates, an expansion of credit and a systematic easing of monetary policy.
The Special System of Settlement and Custody basic interest rate (
Sistema Especial de Liquidação e Custódia
),
or SELIC, (which is the benchmark interest rate payable to holders of certain securities issued by the Brazilian government) was
cut throughout 2012, reaching a low of 7.25% on October 10, 2012, where it remained until April 17, 2013 when it was again revised
positively. Efforts by the Brazilian government to stimulate the economy did not have the intended effect, with GDP growth of only
0.9% in 2012. Efforts by the Brazilian government to stimulate the economy were reversed in 2013 due to inflationary pressure.
As of December 31, 2013, the SELIC rate was 10.00% and as of December 31, 2014, was 11.75%. In January 2015, the SELIC rate was
raised to 12.25%, and then further increased in March 2015 to 12.75% to 13.25% at the end of April 2015, to 13.75% in June 2015,
and finally to 14.25% at the end of July 2015, where it remained as of December 31, 2015. During the first quarter of 2016, the
SELIC remained stable at 14.25%.
From time to time, there have been significant
fluctuations in the exchange rate between the Brazilian currency and the U.S. dollar and other currencies, with recent years showing
significant and consistent depreciation as explained in further detail below in “—Exchange Rates.” Although in
2009 and 2010, the
real
appreciated against the U.S. dollar by 25.5% and 4.3%, respectively, in 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014,
the
real
depreciated against the U.S. dollar by 12.6%, 10.6%, 14.7% and 13.4%, respectively. During 2015, as a result of
the poor economic conditions in Brazil, large-scale investigations related to corruption and bribery involving certain politicians,
state-owned companies and construction companies (including
the ongoing “Lava Jato”
investigation, among others)
, depreciation of the
real
increased at a rate much higher than in previous years. On
September 24, 2015, the
real
fell to a historical low since the introduction of the currency in 1994, at R$4.195 per U.S.$1.00.
As of December 31, 2015, the
real
-U.S. dollar exchange rate was R$3.9048 per U.S.$1.00.
The official inflation rate was 6.41% in
2014, above the 5.91% recorded in 2013, the 4.5% rate targeted by the Central Bank, and just within the upper limits of the “oscillating”
band of plus or minus two percentage points considered acceptable by the Central Bank. In 2015, inflation increased significantly,
with an official inflation rate of 10.7%. Inflation in 2015 was negatively impacted by the rise in the administered prices of goods
and services such as electricity, water and fuels, as controlled by the Brazilian government. Inflation directly impacts our results
of operations as certain of our assets and liabilities are subject to monetary adjustments by reference to indexes that measure
or that are impacted by inflation such as National Index of Consumer Price (
Índice Nacional de Preços ao Consumidor
Amplo
), or IPCA, Long-Term Interest Rate (
Taxa de Juros de Longo Prazo
), or TJLP, and SELIC. In 2015, the net impact
of inflation adjustments was a loss of R$121.0 million and in 2014, was a loss of R$100.5 million. The loss in 2014 can be explained
by inflation adjustments on a R$93 million loan and on a R$913 million loan, each from the Brazilian Development Bank (
Banco
Nacional de Desenvolvimento Econômico e Socia
l), or BNDES, and, to a lesser extent, losses due to inflation adjustment
on provisions for the aggregate contingency value of public civil actions and lawsuits pending against us. The loss in 2015 can
similarly be explained by inflation adjustments on a R$69 million loan and on a R$1,475 million loan, each from BNDES (see “Item
5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Sources of Funds—Financial
Contracts”) and, to a lesser extent, losses due to inflation adjustment on provisions for the aggregate contingency value
of public civil actions and lawsuits pending against us (see “Item 8. Financial Information—A. Consolidated Statements
and Other Financial Information—Legal Proceedings”). In addition to the foregoing direct impacts, if inflation rises,
disposable income of families may decrease in real terms, leading to lack of purchasing power among our customer base. Measures
to combat inflation, such as a tight monetary policy with high interest rates, result in restrictions on credit and short-term
liquidity, further decreasing the purchasing power of our customers.
The table below sets forth data regarding
GDP growth or contraction, inflation, interest rates and
real
/U.S. dollar exchange rates in the periods indicated:
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
GDP growth (contraction)
(1)
|
|
|
(3.8)%
|
|
|
0.1%
|
|
|
2.3%
|
|
|
0.90%
|
Inflation (IGP-M)
(2)
|
|
|
10.54%
|
|
|
3.67%
|
|
|
5.53%
|
|
|
7.81%
|
Inflation (IPCA)
(3)
|
|
|
10.67%
|
|
|
6.4%
|
|
|
5.9%
|
|
|
5.8%
|
DI Rate
(4)
|
|
|
14.14%
|
|
|
11.57%
|
|
|
9.77%
|
|
|
6.90%
|
TJLP
(5)
|
|
|
7.50%
|
|
|
5.00%
|
|
|
5.00%
|
|
|
5.50%
|
Appreciation (devaluation) of the
real
against the U.S. dollar
|
|
|
(47.01)%
|
|
|
(13.39)%
|
|
|
(14.64)%
|
|
|
(8.94)%
|
Exchange rate (closing)—R$ per U.S.$1.00
|
|
|
3.9048
|
|
|
2.6562
|
|
|
2.3426
|
|
|
2.0435
|
Average exchange rate—R$ per U.S.$1.00
(6)
|
|
|
3.9613
|
|
|
2.6553
|
|
|
2.3621
|
|
|
2.0487
|
|
(1)
|
Brazilian GDP for 2015, 2014 and 2013 was calculated using the new procedures adopted by the IBGE.
|
|
(2)
|
Inflation (IGP-M) is the general market price index as measured by Fundação Getúlio Vargas, or FGV, and
represents data accumulated over the 12 months in each year ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013.
|
|
(3)
|
Inflation (IPCA) is a consumer price index measured by IBGE, and represents data accumulated over the 12 months in each year
ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013.
|
|
(4)
|
The DI rate is the average daily inter-bank deposit rate in Brazil.
|
|
(5)
|
Represents the interest rate applied by BNDES in long-term financings (end of the period).
|
|
(6)
|
Average exchange rate on the last day of each year.
|
Sources: BNDES, Central Bank,
FGV, and IBGE.
Exchange Rates
We will pay any cash dividends, interest
on shareholders’ equity and any other cash distributions with respect to our common shares in
reais
. Accordingly,
exchange rate fluctuations will affect the U.S. dollar amounts received by the holders of ADSs on conversion by the depositary
of dividends and other distributions in Brazilian currency on our common shares represented by ADSs. Fluctuations in the exchange
rate between Brazilian currency and the U.S. dollar will affect the U.S. dollar equivalent price of our common shares on the Brazilian
stock exchanges. In addition, exchange rate fluctuations may also affect our dollar equivalent results of operations. See “Item
5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.”
Since 1999, the Central Bank has allowed
the
real
/U.S. dollar exchange rate to float freely, and, since that time, the
real
/U.S. dollar exchange rate has
fluctuated considerably. The
real
depreciated against the U.S. dollar by 15.7% in 2001 and 34.3% in 2002. Although the
real
appreciated by 22.3%, 8.8%, 13.4%, 9.5% and 20.7% against the U.S. dollar in 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively, in
2008, as a result of the international financial and economic crisis, the
real
depreciated against the U.S. dollar by 24.0%.
In 2009 and 2010, the
real
appreciated against the U.S. dollar by 25.5% and 4.3%, respectively. In 2011, the
real
depreciated by 4.8% against the U.S. dollar. On December 31, 2011, the period-end
real
/U.S. dollar exchange rate was R$1.8758
per U.S.$1.00. In 2012, the
real
depreciated a further 8.94% against the U.S. dollar. On December 31, 2012, the period-end
real
/U.S. dollar exchange rate was R$2.0435 per U.S.$1.00.
Real
/U.S. dollar depreciation continued through 2013,
2014 and 2015. On December 31, 2013, the period-end
real
/U.S. dollar exchange rate was R$2.3426 per U.S.$1.00. On December
31, 2014, the period-end
real
/U.S. dollar exchange rate was R$2.6562 per U.S.$1.00. In 2015, the
real
continued to
depreciate significantly against the U.S. dollar, with the period-end
real
/U.S. dollar exchange rate at R$3.9048 per U.S.$1.00
on December 31, 2015, representing a 47.01% depreciation.
In the past, the Brazilian government has
implemented various economic plans and utilized a number of exchange rate policies, including sudden devaluations, periodic mini-devaluations
during which the frequency of adjustments ranged from a daily to a monthly basis, floating exchange rate systems, exchange controls
and dual exchange rate markets. We cannot predict whether the Central Bank or the Brazilian government will continue to let the
real
float freely or intervene in the exchange rate market by returning to a currency band system or otherwise. The
real
may depreciate or appreciate substantially against the U.S. dollar.
The following table shows the selling rate
for U.S. dollars for the periods and dates indicated. The information in the “Average” column represents the annual
average of the exchange rates during the periods presented.
|
|
Reais
per U.S. dollar
|
Year
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
Average
|
|
Year End
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
1.9016
|
|
|
|
1.5345
|
|
|
|
1.6746
|
|
|
|
1.8758
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
2.1121
|
|
|
|
1.7024
|
|
|
|
1.9550
|
|
|
|
2.0435
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
2.4169
|
|
|
|
1.9528
|
|
|
|
2.1603
|
|
|
|
2.3426
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
2.7403
|
|
|
|
2.1974
|
|
|
|
2.3547
|
|
|
|
2.6562
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
4.1949
|
|
|
|
2.5754
|
|
|
|
3.3387
|
|
|
|
3.9048
|
|
|
|
Reais
per U.S. dollar
|
Month
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
October 2015
|
|
|
|
4.0010
|
|
|
|
3.7386
|
|
|
November 2015
|
|
|
|
3.8506
|
|
|
|
3.7010
|
|
|
December 2015
|
|
|
|
3.9831
|
|
|
|
3.7476
|
|
|
January 2016
|
|
|
|
4.1558
|
|
|
|
3.9863
|
|
|
February 2016
|
|
|
|
4.0492
|
|
|
|
3.8653
|
|
|
March 2016
|
|
|
|
3.9913
|
|
|
|
3.5589
|
|
|
April 2016 (through April 13)
|
|
|
|
3.6921
|
|
|
|
3.5284
|
|
Source: Central Bank/Bloomberg
On April 13, 2016, the selling rate
was R$3.5429 to US$1.00. The
real
/dollar exchange rate fluctuates and, therefore, the selling rate at April 13,
2016 may not be indicative of future exchange rates.
Brazilian law provides that, whenever there
is a serious imbalance in Brazil’s balance of payments or serious reasons to foresee such imbalance, temporary restrictions
may be imposed on remittances of foreign capital abroad. For approximately six months in 1989, and early 1990, for example, the
Brazilian Federal Government, or Federal Government, froze all dividend and capital repatriations that were owed to foreign equity
investors. These amounts were subsequently released in accordance with Federal Government directives. There can be no assurance
that similar measures will not be taken by the Federal Government in the future.
|
B.
|
Capitalization and Indebtedness
|
Not applicable.
|
C.
|
Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds
|
Not applicable.
This section is intended to be a summary
of more detailed discussions contained elsewhere in this annual report. The risks described below are not the only ones we face.
Our business, results of operations or financial condition could be harmed if any of these risks materializes and, as a result,
the trading price of our shares and our ADSs could decline.
Risks Relating to our Business
We may be unable to successfully implement
our business strategy.
Our business will be adversely affected
if we are unable to successfully implement our strategic objectives. Factors beyond our control may prevent us from successfully
implementing our strategy.
Our business strategy is aimed at improving
revenues and selective growth, while maintaining financial discipline. To achieve this goal, we seek to strengthen our market position
by leveraging mobile telephony to increase broadband usage and by exploiting opportunities arising from fixed-to-mobile substitution.
Our ability to implement our strategy is
influenced by many factors outside of our control, including:
|
·
|
an increase in the number of competitors in the telecommunications industry that could affect our market share;
|
|
·
|
increased competition from global and local OTT players (operators such as mobile virtual network operators or branded resellers
offering content and services on the Internet without owning their own proprietary telecommunications network infrastructure);
|
|
·
|
increased competition in our principal markets that could affect the prices we charge for our services;
|
|
·
|
our ability to strengthen our competitive position in the Brazilian mobile telecommunications market;
|
|
·
|
our ability to develop and introduce new and innovative technologies that are received favorably by the market, and to provide
value-added services to encourage the use of our network;
|
|
·
|
system technology failures, which could negatively affect our revenues and reputation;
|
|
·
|
the introduction of transformative technologies that could be difficult for us to keep pace with and which could cause a significant
decrease in our revenues and/or revenues for all mobile telephone carriers;
|
|
·
|
our ability to operate efficiently and to refinance our debt as it comes due, particularly in consideration of political and
economic conditions in Brazil and uncertainties in credit and capital markets;
|
|
·
|
our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel;
|
|
·
|
performance of third party service providers and key suppliers on which we depend, such as any difficulties we may encounter
in our supply and procurement processes, including as a result of the insolvency or financial weakness of our suppliers;
|
|
·
|
government policy and changes in the regulatory environment in Brazil;
|
|
·
|
the effect of exchange rate fluctuations;
|
|
·
|
the effect of inflation;
|
|
·
|
the outcome of litigation, disputes and investigations in which we are involved or may become involved; and
|
|
·
|
the costs we may incur due to unexpected events, in particular where our insurance is not sufficient to cover such costs.
|
As a result of these uncertainties, there
can be no assurance that our strategic objectives can effectively be attained in the manner and within the timeframes described.
We face increasing competition from other
players and services, which may adversely affect our results of operations.
The opening of the Brazilian market to
competition for telecommunications services has adversely affected historical margins in the industry. We face increased competition
throughout Brazil from new entrants and existing players in the personal communications service, or PCS, market. We compete with
providers of wireless services and trunking, and with providers of fixed-line telecommunications and Internet access services,
because of the trend toward the convergence and substitution of fixed services for mobile, as well as bundling data and voice services.
As a result, the cost of maintaining our revenue share has increased and in the future we may incur higher advertising and other
costs as we attempt to maintain or expand our market presence. Other than TIM, the following entities also hold authorizations
to provide PCS with national coverage: Claro S.A., under the brand name Claro, Telefônica Brasil S.A., or Telefônica
Brasil, under the brand name Vivo, TNL PCS S.A. and 14 Brasil Telecom Celular S.A., under the brand name Oi and, recently, Nextel
Telecomunicações Ltda., under the brand name Nextel, each of which offers mobile services through its existing trunking
network and recently launched third generation, or 3G, and fourth generation, or 4G, mobile telecommunications network technology.
Possible market consolidation may allow other telecommunications companies to compete more aggressively against us. Additionally,
we may face competitors with greater access to financial resources.
We also expect to face increased competition
from other services. Technological changes in the telecommunications field, such as the development and roll-out of 3G and 4G mobile
network technology, and Voice over Internet Protocol, or VOIP (including offers from third party OTT competitors like Skype, Google
Talk, FaceTime and WhatsApp), are expected to introduce additional sources of competition in the voice market. OTT applications
are often free of charge, other than for data usage, accessible via smartphones, tablets and computers and allow their users to
have access to potentially unlimited messaging and voice services over the Internet, bypassing more expensive traditional voice
and messaging services such as SMS, which have historically been a source of significant revenues for mobile network operators
such as us. With the growing use of smartphones, tablets and computers in Brazil, an increasing number of customers are using OTT
application services in substitution for traditional voice or SMS communications. As a result of these and other factors, we face
a mobile market in which price pressure has been increasing.
OTT application providers also leverage
on existing infrastructures and generally do not operate capital-intensive business models associated with traditional mobile network
operators like us. OTT application service providers have recently become more sophisticated competitors, and technological developments
have led to a significant improvement in the quality of service, in particular speech quality, delivered via data communications
applications such as OTT. In addition, players with strong brand capability and financial strengths, such as Apple, Google and
Microsoft, have turned their attention to the provision of OTT application services. In the long term, if non-traditional mobile
voice and data services or similar services continue to increase in popularity, as they are
expected to do, and if we and other
mobile network operators are not able to address this competition, this could contribute to further declines in average revenue
per user, or ARPU, and lower margins across many of our products and services, thereby having a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.
We expect that new products and technologies
will emerge and that existing products and technologies will be further developed. The advent of new products and technologies
such as these could have a variety of consequences for us. New products and technologies may reduce the price of our services by
providing lower-cost alternatives, or they may also be superior to, and render obsolete, the products and services we offer and
the technologies we use, thus requiring investment in new technology. If such changes occur, our most significant competitors in
the future may be new participants in the market without the burden of an installed base of older equipment. The cost of upgrading
our infrastructure and technology to continue to compete effectively could be significant.
Rising competition may increase our churn
rate and could continue to adversely affect our market share and margins. Our ability to compete successfully will depend on the
effectiveness of our marketing efforts and our ability to anticipate and adapt in a timely manner to developments in the industry,
including the technological changes and new services that may be introduced, changes in consumer preferences, demographic trends,
economic conditions and discount pricing strategies by competitors. It is difficult to predict which of many possible factors will
be important in maintaining our competitive position or what expenditures will be required to develop and provide new technologies,
products or services to our customers. If we are unable to compete successfully, our business, financial condition and results
of operations will be materially adversely affected.
We may be unable to respond to the recent
trend towards consolidation in the Brazilian wireless telecommunications market.
The Brazilian telecommunications market
has been consolidating. For example, in September 2014, Telefónica S.A., or Telefónica, entered into a stock purchase
agreement to acquire from Vivendi S.A., or Vivendi, all of the shares of GVT Participações S.A., the controlling
shareholder of Global Village Telecom S.A., or the GVT Acquisition. Anatel approved the GVT Acquisition in December 2014 and the
Brazilian antitrust authority, Administrative Council for Economic Defense (
Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica
),
or CADE, approved the same in March 2015. The GVT Acquisition increases Telefónica’s share of the Brazilian telecommunications
market, and we believe such trend is likely to continue in the industry as players continue to consolidate. Additional joint ventures,
mergers and acquisitions among telecommunications service providers are possible in the future. If such consolidation occurs, it
may result in increased competition within our market. We may be unable to adequately respond to pricing pressures resulting from
consolidation in our market, adversely affecting our business, financial condition and results of operations. We may also consider
engaging in merger or acquisition activity in response to changes in the competitive environment, which could divert resources
away from other aspects of our business.
We may face difficulties responding to
new telecommunications technologies.
The Brazilian wireless telecommunications
market is experiencing significant technological changes, as evidenced by the following, among other factors:
|
·
|
shorter time periods between the introduction of new telecommunication technologies and subsequent upgrades or replacements;
|
|
·
|
the expansion of LTE and 4G technology, and the introduction of the 4.5G network layer and simultaneous management of multiple
technology layers, such as GSM, 3G, and 4G through different spectrum bands, which also involves managing the LTE RAN sharing agreement
among TIM and two other mobile operator companies (see “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Site-Sharing
and Other Agreements”);
|
|
·
|
new customer behaviors, particularly migrating services from voice to data, requiring new planning models and accelerating
the evolution of communications to increasingly occur on the IP network;
|
|
·
|
ongoing improvements in the capacity and quality of digital technology available in Brazil; and
|
|
·
|
continued auction of licenses for the operation of additional bandwidth.
|
We may be unable to keep pace with these
technological changes, which could affect our ability to compete effectively and have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
Our business is dependent on our ability
to expand our services and to maintain the quality of the services provided.
Our business as a mobile telecommunications
services provider depends on our ability to maintain and expand our mobile telecommunications services network. We believe that
our expected growth will require, among other things:
|
·
|
continuous development of our operational and administrative systems;
|
|
·
|
increasing marketing activities;
|
|
·
|
improving our understanding of customer wants and needs;
|
|
·
|
continuous attention to service quality; and
|
|
·
|
attracting, training and retaining qualified management, technical, customer relations, and sales personnel.
|
We believe that these requirements will
place significant demand on our managerial, operational and financial resources. Failure to manage successfully our expected growth
could reduce the quality of our services, with adverse effects on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our operations are also dependent upon
our ability to maintain and protect our network. Damage to our network and backup systems could result in service delays or interruptions
and limit our ability to provide customers with reliable service over our network. The occurrence of any event that damages our
network may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our operations depend on our ability
to maintain, upgrade and efficiently operate accounting, billing, customer service, information technology and management information
systems.
Sophisticated information and processing
systems are vital to our growth and our ability to monitor costs, render monthly invoices, process customer orders, provide customer
service and achieve operating efficiencies. We cannot assure that we will be able to successfully operate and upgrade our information
and processing systems or that they will continue to perform as expected. Any failure in our accounting, information and processing
systems could impair our ability to collect payments from customers and respond satisfactorily to customer needs, which could adversely
affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may experience a decrease in customer
growth and high rate of customer turnover, which could increase our costs of operations and reduce our revenue.
Our subscriber acquisition rate can be
negatively affected by overall market penetration and the maturity of product life cycles. Additionally, our churn rates are mainly
affected by price competition from our competitors and aggressive subsidization of handset sales, adverse macroeconomic conditions
in Brazil and our strict policy of terminating customers who do not continue to use our services or do not pay their bills on time.
Churn reflects the number of customers who terminate their service or have their service terminated during a period, expressed
as a percentage of the simple average of customers at the beginning and end of the period. As indicated by historical churn rates,
we may experience a high rate of customer turnover, which could reduce our revenue and possibly increase our cost of operations.
Several factors in addition to competitive pressures could influence our subscriber acquisition rate and our churn rate, including
limited network coverage, lack of reliable service and economic conditions in Brazil.
Our controlling shareholder may exercise
its control in a manner that differs from the interests of other shareholders.
Telecom Italia S.p.A., or Telecom Italia,
through its ownership of TIM Brasil Serviços e Participações S.A., or TIM Brasil, our controlling shareholder,
has the ability to determine actions that require shareholder approval, including the election of a majority of our directors and,
subject to Brazilian law, the payment of dividends and other
distributions. Telecom Italia’s single largest shareholder is
Vivendi, which is able to exercise significant influence over Telecom Italia. Telecom Italia may pursue acquisitions, asset sales,
joint ventures or financing arrangements or may pursue other objectives that conflict with the interests of other shareholders
and which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
System failures could result in reduced
user traffic and reduced revenue and could harm our reputation.
Our success largely depends on the continued
and uninterrupted performance of our information technology network systems and of certain hardware. Our technical infrastructure
(including our network infrastructure for mobile telecommunications services) is vulnerable to damage or interruption from information
and telecommunication technology failures, power loss, floods, windstorms, fires, terrorism, intentional wrongdoing, human error
and similar events. Unanticipated problems at our facilities, system failures, hardware or software failures, computer viruses
or hacker attacks could affect the quality of our services and cause service interruptions. Any of these occurrences could result
in reduced user traffic and reduced revenue and could harm our levels of customer satisfaction and our reputation.
We face various cyber-security risks
that, if not adequately addressed, could have an adverse effect on our business.
We face various cyber-security risks that
could result in business losses, including but not limited to contamination (whether intentional or accidental) of our networks
and systems by third parties with whom we exchange data, equipment failures, unauthorized access to and loss of confidential customer,
employee and/or proprietary data by persons inside or outside of our organization, cyber-attacks causing systems degradation or
service unavailability, the penetration of our information technology systems and platforms by ill-intentioned third parties, and
infiltration of malware (such as computer viruses) into our systems. Cyber-attacks against companies have increased in frequency,
scope and potential harm in recent years. Further, the perpetrators of cyber attacks are not restricted to particular groups or
persons. These attacks may be committed by company employees or third parties operating in any region, including jurisdictions
where law enforcement measures to address such attacks are unavailable or ineffective We may not be able to successfully protect
our operational and information technology systems and platforms against such threats. Further, as cyber-attacks continue to evolve,
we may incur significant costs in the attempt to modify or enhance our protective measures or investigate or remediate any vulnerability.
The inability to operate our networks and systems as a result of cyber-attacks, even for a limited period of time, may result in
significant expenses to us and/or a loss of market share to other communications providers. The costs associated with a major cyber-attack
could include expensive incentives offered to existing customers and business partners to retain their business, increased expenditures
on cyber security measures and the use of alternate resources, lost revenues from business interruption and litigation. If we are
unable to adequately address these cyber-security risks, or operating network and information systems could be compromised, which
would have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Certain debt agreements of our subsidiaries
contain financial covenants and any default under such debt agreements may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition
and cash flows.
Certain of our subsidiaries’ existing
debt agreements contain restrictions and covenants and require the maintenance or satisfaction of specified financial ratios and
tests. The ability of our subsidiaries to meet these financial ratios and tests can be affected by events beyond our and their
control, and we cannot assure that they will meet those tests. Failure to meet or satisfy any of these covenants, financial ratios
or financial tests could result in an event of default under these agreements. As of December 31, 2015, we had approximately R$9,442
million in consolidated outstanding indebtedness of which 35% was denominated in foreign currency (primarily U.S. dollars), for
which we use derivative instruments to offset exposure to foreign currency. If we are unable to meet these debt service obligations,
or comply with these debt covenants, we could be forced to restructure or refinance this indebtedness, seek additional equity capital
or sell assets.
Due to the nature of our business we
are exposed to numerous lawsuits, consumer claims and tax-related proceedings.
Our business exposes us to a variety of
lawsuits and other proceedings brought by or on behalf of consumers in the ordinary course of our operations as a mobile telecommunications
provider in Brazil. We are subject to a number of public civil actions and class actions that have been brought against mobile
telecommunications providers in
Brazil relating principally to the expiration of prepaid usage credits, minimum term clauses, subscription
fees and the use of land to install our network sites. These suits include claims contesting certain aspects of the fee structure
of our prepaid and postpaid plans which are commonplace in the Brazilian telecommunications industry. As of December 31, 2015,
we are subject to 14,156 consumer claims classified as probable loss, filed at the judicial and administrative levels. The aggregate
contingency value of these claims is R$51.9 million. See Note 22 to our consolidated financial statements.
In addition, federal, state and municipal
tax authorities have questioned some tax procedures we have adopted, emphasizing the issues related to our tax planning strategies
as well as questions regarding the calculation of the basis for certain sector-specific contributions (FUST and FUNTTEL, as each
are defined in “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Taxes on Telecommunications Goods and
Services”). As of December 31, 2015, we are subject to approximately 2,587 tax-related lawsuits and administrative proceedings
with an aggregate value of approximately R$8.6 billion, including risks related to lawsuits classified as probable and possible
loss.
An adverse outcome in, or any settlement
of, these or other lawsuits could result in losses and costs to us, with an adverse effect on our business practices and results
of operations. In addition, our senior management may be required to devote substantial time to these lawsuits, which they could
otherwise devote to our business. See Notes 3(c) and 22 to our consolidated financial statements.
Any modification or termination of our
ability to use the “TIM” trade name may adversely affect our business and operating results.
Telecom Italia owns the rights to the “TIM”
trade name, which is currently licensed to us. Telecom Italia may stop us from using the TIM trade name any time. The loss of the
use of the “TIM” trade name could have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results.
We are subject to credit risk with respect
to our customers.
Our operations depend to a significant
extent on the ability of our customers to pay for our services. In the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013, we made allowances
for doubtful accounts in the amounts of R$230.6 million, R$248.6 million, and R$240.0 million, respectively, primarily due to defaults
in payment by our customers. As a percentage of our gross revenue, our provisions for doubtful accounts amounted to 0.9%, 0.9%,
and 0.8% in the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively. Under Anatel regulations, we are allowed to undertake
certain measures to reduce customer defaults, such as restricting or limiting the services we provide to customers with a history
of defaults. If we are unable to undertake measures to limit payment defaults by our subscribers or that allow us to accept new
subscribers based on credit history, we will remain subject to outstanding uncollectible amounts, which could have an adverse effect
on our results of operations.
We may be subject to liability related
to outsourcing certain functions to third-party service providers.
We may be exposed to liabilities due to
our outsourcing of certain functions to third-party service providers, for which we may not have made sufficient provisions. Recent
government announcements and legal proceedings have called into question the ability of public service concessionaires to carry
out their operations by outsourcing certain functions. Though no definitive position has been reached by any governmental authority,
recent court opinions could set legal precedent that could call into question our ability to outsource certain operations. This
may require us to hire as employees certain workers who currently work for us on an outsourced basis, which could adversely affect
our results of operations and financial condition.
We depend on key suppliers.
We rely on various suppliers and vendors,
including Apple, Samsung, Ericsson, Alcatel-Lucent S.A., Huawei and Nokia, to supply network equipment and mobile handsets and
accessories necessary for our business. These suppliers may, among other things, delay delivery periods, increase their prices,
limit the amounts they are willing to supply to us, or may suffer disruptions in their own supply chains. If these suppliers are
unable or unwilling to provide us with equipment or supplies on a regular basis, we could face difficulties in carrying out our
operations, which could negatively affect our results of operations and limit our ability to execute our concession agreements.
Our infrastructure could be damaged as
a result of natural disasters.
Our operations may be suspended or interrupted
for an indeterminate period if any of our transmission bases are damaged by natural disasters, including by fire, explosion, storms
or similar events. If we are unable to prevent against such damage in the event of a natural disaster, the interruption of our
operations would have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Risks Relating to the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry
Anatel classified us as an economic group
with significant market power in some markets and are now subject to increased regulation.
Under Anatel’s General Plan for Competition
Goals (
Plano Geral de Metas de Competição
), or PGMC, we have been classified as having significant market
power in the following relevant markets: (i) passive infrastructure in transport and access networks (provision of cellular towers);
(ii) mobile network inbound calls (otherwise referred to as the mobile network termination market); and (iii) national roaming.
Due to such classification, we are subject to increased regulation under the PGMC, which could have an adverse effect on our business
financial condition and results of operations. Specifically, because we have been classified as having significant market power
in the mobile network termination market, the rates charged by mobile service providers to other mobile service providers to terminate
calls on their mobile networks (
Valor de Uso de Rede Móvel
), or VU-M, are regulated.
On July 4, 2014, Anatel approved, by means
of Resolution No. 639/2014, a rule for the definition of maximum reference rates for entities with significant market power, based
on a cost model, for VU-M, as well as the termination of calls on local fixed line networks, or TU-RL, and the Industrial Exploration
of Dedicated Lines (
Exploração Industrial de Linhas Dedicadas
), or EILD. Pursuant to Anatel’s rule,
reference rates will decline based on a glide path until the cost modeling known as LRIC+ Bottom Up, which takes into consideration
all long-run incremental costs, updated to current values, of providing a particular service and the unit costs of such service
based on an efficient network considering the existing regulatory obligations, is applied (2019, for VU-M and TU-RL; and 2020,
for EILD). On July 7, 2014, Anatel published the corresponding Acts No. 6,210/2014, 6,211/2014 and 6,212/2014, which determined
the specific reference rates to be adopted as of February 2016. It is our position that Anatel’s decision to establish VU-M
rates – a price related to the provision of telecommunications services in the private regime – based on a cost model
does not comply with Brazilian law. Accordingly, we filed an annulment application with Anatel in connection with the July 2014
resolution, which was rejected by Anatel in March 2015. In May 2015, we presented a further appeal, and this appeal is still under
review by Anatel. We are currently reevaluating our strategy due to new commercial conditions, and there is no assurance that our
appeal will be successful and even if our appeal were to be successful, we would likely still be subject to some form of systematic
rate regulation as a result of our classification as having significant market power.
Because of our classification as having
significant market power in the national roaming market, we must also offer roaming services to other mobile providers without
significant market power at the rates approved by Anatel. We are also required to provide other providers without significant market
power access to our towers and masts due to our classification as having significant market power in that portion of the passive
infrastructure market.
As a mobile telecommunications provider,
we are subject to extensive regulatory obligations in the performance of our activities which may limit our flexibility in responding
to market conditions, competition and changes in our cost structure or with which we may be unable to comply.
Our business is subject to extensive government
regulation, including any changes that may occur during the period of our authorization to provide telecommunication services.
Anatel, which is the main telecommunications industry regulator in Brazil, regulates, among others:
|
·
|
industry policies and regulations;
|
|
·
|
rates and tariffs for telecommunications services;
|
|
·
|
telecommunications resource allocation;
|
|
·
|
interconnection and settlement arrangements; and
|
In addition to the rules set forth by Anatel,
we are subject to compliance with various legal and regulatory obligations including, but not limited to, the obligations arising
from the following:
|
·
|
the PCS authorizations under which we operate our cellular telecommunications business;
|
|
·
|
the fixed authorizations (local, national long distance, international long distance and multimedia service) under which we
operate our telecommunications business;
|
|
·
|
the Consumer Defense Code; and
|
|
·
|
the General Telecommunications Law (Law No. 9,472/97, as amended).
|
In addition, like other companies, we are
also subject to national and international anti-corruption laws. We believe that we are currently in material compliance with our
obligations arising out of each of the above referenced laws, regulations and authorizations. However, as administrative proceedings
for breach of quality standards have been brought by Anatel in the past , we cannot provide any assurance that we are in full compliance
with our service quality obligations under the PCS authorizations. In fact, there are some administrative proceedings regarding
noncompliance with quality goals and regulatory obligations that resulted in Anatel levying fees against TIM Celular as part of
its universal measures adopted in 2012 for all mobile operators, which were issued to improve the quality of services provided
to the population overall.
A recent example of how sudden and unilateral
government action can affect our industry occurred in December 2015, when mobile telecommunications operators received a judicial
order to block the application
WhatsApp
nationally for a period of 48 hours as a preventative measure in connection with
a criminal suit proceeding in the First Division Criminal Court of São Bernardo do Campo.
We cannot assure that we will be able to
fully comply with each of the applicable laws, regulations and authorizations or that we will be able to comply with future changes
in the laws and regulations to which we are subject. Moreover, compliance with this extensive regulation, the conditions imposed
by our authorization to provide telecommunication services and other governmental action may limit our flexibility in responding
to market conditions, competition and changes in our cost structure. These regulatory developments or our failure to comply with
them could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The Brazilian government under certain
circumstances may terminate our authorizations or we may not receive renewals of our authorizations.
We operate our business under authorizations
granted by the Brazilian government. As a result, we are obligated to maintain minimum quality and service standards, including
targets for call completion rates, geographic coverage and voice accessibility, data accessibility, voice drop, data drop, data
throughput, user complaint rates and customer care call completion rates. Our ability to satisfy these standards, as well as others,
may be affected by factors beyond our control. We cannot assure that, going forward, we will be able to comply with all of the
requirements imposed on us by Anatel or the Brazilian government. Our failure to comply with these requirements may result in the
imposition of fines or other government actions, including, restrictions on our sales and, in an extreme situation, the termination
of our authorizations in the event of material non-compliance.
Our radio frequency, or RF, authorizations
for the 800 MHz, 900 MHz and 1800 MHz bands that we use to provide PCS services started to expire in September 2007 and are renewable
for one additional 15-year period, requiring payment at every two-year period equal to 2% of the prior year’s revenue net
of taxes, by way of investment under the Basic and Alternative Service Plans, which are intended to increase telecommunications
penetration throughout Brazil. Anatel has stated that the revenue on which the 2% payment is based should be calculated as including
revenues derived from interconnection as well as additional facilities and conveniences. As a result, we are currently disputing
these RF authorization renewal payments both administratively and judicially.
Between 2007 and 2014, we acquired new
RF authorizations used for 3G and 4G mobile telephone services at the 2100 MHz, 2500 MHz and 700 MHz bands. In December 2015, Anatel
auctioned left over radiofrequencies in the 1,800 MHz, 1,900 MHz and 2,500 MHz bands. We submitted bids for the left over lots
of the 2,500 MHz band which had originally been auctioned in 2012. This particular band spectrum provides for 4G mobile services.
The bidding currently remains in the “Opening, Analysis and Assessment of Price Proposals” stage, and the auction is
expected to be finalized, with winners to be selected in the first half of 2016. However, based on the preliminary results of the
bidding, we have been classified as the first ranked bidder in the lots for Recife, in the state of Pernambuco, and Curitiba, in
the state of Paraná, based on our bids of R$32 million and R$24.5 million, respectively, totaling R$56.5 million, which
bids were renewed in March 2016.
RF authorizations are generally valid for a period of 15 years and renewable for 15 more
years (with exceptions such as the LTE ‘P’ Band, for which the authorization period is less than 15 years), and our
current authorizations will start to expire in April 2023, beginning with 3G RF authorizations.
Any partial or total revocation of our
authorizations or failure to receive renewal of such authorizations when they expire would have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition and results of operations.
The new index applied for the remuneration
for the use of PCS networks may not be adequate.
Since 2006, Anatel has used the Telecommunications
Service Index (
Índice de Serviços de Telecomunicações
), or IST, to adjust mobile and fixed
termination rates and EILD, which substitutes the General Price Index (
Índice Geral de Preços Disponibilidade
Interna
), or the IGP-DI, an inflation index developed by the FGV, a private Brazilian foundation. Thus, the prices we may
charge for our services may be indirectly impacted by this index. In the years 2010 through 2013, the IST presented a much smaller
variation than the IGP-DI, however in 2014 and 2015, the IST varied more than the IGP-DI. On July 4, 2014, Anatel approved, by
means of Resolution No. 639/2014, a rule for the definition of maximum reference rates for entities with significant market power,
based on a cost model, for VU-M, TU-RL, and EILD. Pursuant to Anatel’s rule, reference rates will decline based on a glide
path until the cost modeling known as LRIC+ Bottom Up is applied (2019, for VU-M and TU-RL; and 2020, for EILD). On July 7, 2014,
Anatel published the corresponding Acts No. 6,210/2014, 6,211/2014 and 6,212/2014, which determined the specific reference rates
to be adopted as of February 2016. If this new adjustment mechanism, or any other mechanism chosen by Anatel in the future, does
not adequately reflect the true effect of inflation on our prices, our results of operations could be adversely affected. As
previously mentioned, we have filed an annulment application with Anatel in connection with the July 2014 resolution, however
we are currently reevaluating our strategy due to new commercial conditions, and there is no assurance that our appeal will be
successful and even if our appeal were to be successful, we would likely still be subject to some form of rate regulation as a
result of our classification as having significant market power.
Anatel’s proposal regarding the
consolidation of prices could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.
Anatel issued new regulations on interconnection
rules from 1997 to 2014, some of which could have an adverse effect on our results. The rules that may adversely affect our results
are (1) Anatel had defined clearly that the same PCS provider with different authorization areas may receive only one instead of
two interconnection charges, or VU-M, for long distance calls originated and terminated in their networks, and (2) if the free-market
negotiation of prices for mobile termination VU-M is not successful, Anatel (i) would apply, in 2012 and 2013, Resolution 576,
which contemplates a reduction of approximately 18% and 12% in 2012 and 2013, respectively, over the mobile interconnection rate;
and (ii) will apply Resolution 600 from 2014 to 2016, according to which the VU-M reference rates of the operators with significant
market power in 2014 were 75% of the valid VU-M in 2013, and in 2015 by 50% of the valid VU-M in 2013. As noted above, in July
2014, Anatel established a fully allocated
cost model for reference rates by allocating the various service
costs to determine a basic price, effective as of February 2016. Although we have filed an action for annulment of Anatel’s
VU-M decision (which was rejected by Anatel but which we are appealing), we are currently reevaluating our strategy due to new
commercial conditions, and there is no assurance that our appeal will be successful and even if our appeal were to be successful,
we would likely still be subject to some form of rate regulation as a result of our classification as having significant market
power. Accordingly these regulations can have an adverse effect on our results of operations because (1) our interconnection
charges would likely continue to drop significantly, thereby reducing our revenues, and (2) Anatel may allow more favorable prices
for operators without significant market power.
The introduction of mobile virtual network
operators, or MVNOs, in the Brazilian market could have an unintended adverse effect on our results.
In November 2010, Anatel approved a resolution
establishing the rules to permit the exploration of mobile services by means of a virtual network, based on commercial agreements
between established operators and virtual operators. The rules established there could be two types of MVNOs. The first type of
MVNO are those with a business model to provide low-cost mobile phone services by relying on business arrangements with traditional
mobile operators to purchase minutes of use, or MOU, for sale to their own customers. The second type is a full MVNO with an authorization
that permitted the provision of services based on a sharing of infrastructure agreement with an established mobile operator.
We were the first mobile operator to negotiate
a contract with a virtual operator. The first contract to be submitted for Anatel’s approval in December 2010 was for an
authorization license in partnership with us, and commercial operations commenced in July 2012. We commenced operations with a
second virtual operator in March 2013 and, as of December 2015, these operators collectively represent approximately 375,000 subscribers.
We have signed contracts with further virtual operators and currently expect that the launch of commercial services with such operators
will occur in 2016.
Our commercial partners have opted for
the authorization license, which carries the obligations and responsibilities for providing the service. The 4G auction rules stipulated
an obligation for the acquiring operator to make a public offer of the purchased RF spectrum in the MVNO model. Increased competition
from MVNOs could reduce our profitability and the profitability of the mobile telecommunications industry generally, reducing the
capacity for investment and innovation. Such increased competition could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
Actual or perceived health risks or other
problems relating to mobile telecommunications technology could lead to litigation or decreased mobile communications usage, which
could harm us and the mobile industry as a whole.
The effects of, and any damage caused by,
exposure to an electromagnetic field were and are the subject of careful evaluations by the international scientific community,
but until now there is no scientific evidence of harmful effects on health. We cannot rule out that exposure to electromagnetic
fields or other emissions originating from wireless handsets will not be identified as a health risk in the future.
Moreover, media and other reports have
suggested that RF emissions from wireless handsets and base stations may cause health problems.
Our mobile communications business may
be harmed as a result of these alleged health risks. For example, the perception of these health risks could result in a lower
number of customers, reduced usage per customer or potential consumer liability. These concerns could have an adverse effect on
the wireless communications industry and, possibly, expose wireless providers, including us, to litigation.
In addition, although Brazilian law already
imposes strict limits in relation to transmission equipment, these concerns may cause regulators to impose greater restrictions
on the construction of base station towers or other infrastructure, which may hinder the completion of network build-outs and the
commercial availability of new services and may require additional investments. The expansion of our network may be affected by
these perceived risks if we experience problems in finding new sites, which in turn may delay the expansion and may affect the
quality of our services.
On July 2, 2002, Anatel published Resolution
No. 303 that limits emission and exposure for fields with frequencies between 9 kHz and 300 GHz. In 2009, the Brazilian government
enacted Law No. 11,934 establishing limits related to the magnetic and electromagnetic emissions to be as defined by the World
Health Organization and requiring that operators had to maintain a record of the measurements of the levels of the magnetic and
electromagnetic emissions of each transmitting station. The records must be five years old at most. In 2015, Anatel established
a computerized system called Mosaic in order to store the measurement reports and better assess the level of human exposure to
electromagnetic fields. Anatel also began working with Brazilian telecommunications operators in January 2015 to ensure their required
registered reports were being stored in Mosaic. TIM met its 2015 required reporting levels, submitting 10,243 registered reports.
Any of these or any other additional regulations
could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Government authorities could also increase
regulation of wireless handsets and base stations as a result of these health concerns or wireless companies, including us, could
be held liable for costs or damages associated with these concerns, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operation. We cannot assure you that further medical research and studies will refute a link between the
mobile technology in question and these health concerns.
Measures adopted by Anatel aiming to
ensure service quality could have an adverse effect on our results.
In July 2012, with the express goal of
improving the quality of mobile telecommunications services provided in Brazil, Anatel issued administrative injunctions suspending
three of the primary mobile providers, including Claro and TIM Celular, from selling and activating new mobile service plans. Anatel
lifted the suspension only after these providers made formal commitments to undertake specific investments related to the expansion
of their respective networks and improvement of their respective services.
In November 2012, Anatel issued a new administrative
injunction to suspend and stop our “Infinity Day" promotion, in which customers from specific states were charged per
day of use for voice service to TIM numbers and local fixed telephones. Anatel, in its preliminary analysis, considered the promotion
to be potentially harmful to the quality of our mobile services. The injunction was revoked in January 2013, after Anatel determined
that the promotion did not pose a risk to the provision of our mobile services.
Although measures adopted by Anatel such
as the aforementioned are likely to be temporary, such measures may, along with any new measures adopted in the future, have a
material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flow and may limit our ability to implement
our business strategy.
Risks Relating to Brazil
The Brazilian government has exerted
significant influence over the Brazilian economy and continues to do so. This involvement, like local political and economic conditions,
may have an adverse effect on our activities, our business, or the market prices of our shares and ADSs.
The Brazilian government has frequently
intervened in the Brazilian economy and occasionally made drastic changes in economic policy. To influence the course of Brazil’s
economy, control inflation and implement other policies, the Brazilian government has taken various measures, including the use
of wage and price controls, currency devaluations, capital controls and limits on imports and freezing bank accounts. We have no
control over, and cannot predict what measures or policies the Brazilian government may take or adopt in the future. Our business,
financial condition, revenues, results of operations, prospects and the trading price of our securities may be adversely affected
by changes in government policies and regulations, as well as other factors, such as:
|
·
|
fluctuating exchange rates;
|
|
·
|
changes in tax regimes;
|
|
·
|
liquidity in domestic capital and credit markets;
|
|
·
|
reductions in salaries or income levels;
|
|
·
|
rising unemployment rates;
|
|
·
|
tax policies (including those currently under consideration by the Brazilian Congress);
|
|
·
|
exchange controls and restrictions on remittances abroad; and
|
|
·
|
other political, diplomatic, social or economic developments in or affecting Brazil.
|
Uncertainty regarding changes by the Brazilian
government to the policies or standards that affect these or other factors could contribute to economic uncertainty in Brazil and
increase the volatility of the Brazilian securities market and of securities issued abroad by Brazilian companies.
Additionally, interruptions in the credit
and other financial markets, and the deterioration of the Brazilian and/or global economic environment may, among other effects:
(1) have a negative impact on demand, which may reduce sales, operating income and cash flow; (2) decrease consumption of our products;
(3) restrict the availability of financing for our operations or investments, or for the refinancing of our debt in the future;
(4) cause creditors to modify their credit risk policies and restrict our ability to negotiate any of the terms of our debt in
the future; (5) cause the financial situation of our clients or suppliers to deteriorate or (6) decrease the value of our investments.
Tax reforms may affect our prices.
In 2010, the Brazilian government increased
the tax on financial operations, or IOF, rate on foreign investments in fixed income securities from 2% to 4%. This tax increase
was intended to decrease speculation on Brazilian markets and reduce the volatility of appreciation of the
real
, reinforcing
official efforts to discourage foreign investment by increasing transaction costs.
In 2011, the IOF tax was expanded to tax
loans entered into by banks and companies outside of Brazil with a maturity of less than 360 days. Additionally, the IOF tax rate
related to exchange currency increased from 0% to 0.38%, with certain exceptions. The IOF tax rate related to international loans
entered into in Brazil by foreign banks and companies remained at 6% in 2012, however the maturity requirement was increased from
360 to 1800 days (approximately 5 years), and subsequently reduced to 720 days and later to 360 days in an effort to manage the
flow of foreign capital entering Brazil through offshore loans. In 2013, the Brazilian government maintained the IOF tax rate on
international loans at 6% and the maturity requirement at 360 days. On June 4, 2014, the minimum maturity for such international
loans subject to the IOF was reduced from 360 to 180 days, maintaining the rate of 6% in 2015.
Effective as of December 1, 2011, currency
exchange transactions carried out for the inflow of funds to Brazil for investments made by a foreign investor (including a holder
of ADSs that is non-resident in Brazil, as applicable) are subject to IOF/Exchange tax at a 0% rate in the case of variable income
transactions carried out on Brazilian stock, futures and commodities exchanges, as well as in the acquisitions of shares of Brazilian
publicly-held companies in public offerings or subscription of shares related to capital contributions, provided that the company
has registered its shares for trading in the stock exchange. As of June 5, 2013, this beneficial tax treatment was extended to
all investment made under the rules of Resolution 2,689, of January 26, 2000, as amended, or Resolution CMN 2,689, of the National
Monetary Council (
Conselho Monetário Nacional
), or CMN, in the Brazilian financial and capital markets, including
an investment in our common shares.
Since December 24, 2013, the transfer of
shares that are listed on a stock exchange located in Brazil with the specific purpose of backing the issuance of depositary receipts
traded abroad is subject to a 0% IOF rate. From October 8, 2014, operations of trading Fixed Income Index Fund quotas on stock
exchanges or organized over-the-counter market are subject to a 0% rate of IOF.
On July 1, 2015, Decree No. 8,426 came
into effect, which restored PIS and COFINS on financial revenues at a cumulative rate of 4.65% (previously set at 0% by Decree
No. 5,442/2005). From that date, all financial revenues became taxable, except for revenues related to foreign exchange variations
of exportation of goods and services, revenues resulting from foreign exchange variations of obligations undertaken by the company,
including loans and financing and revenues related to hedging transactions on stock exchange values, and revenues from commodities
and futures exchanges or over the counter transactions.
In addition, Law No. 13,241, published
on December 31, 2015, suspended the 0% PIS and COFINS rate on the sale of goods such as smartphones and handsets, which starting
from January 1, 2016 were set back to the rate of 7.6% of COFINS and 1.65% for PIS.
Since December 2015, the principal tax
applicable to goods and telecommunication services (
Imposto sobre Circulação de Mercadorias e Serviços
),
or ICMS, rates over telecommunication and goods were increased in some Brazilian states due to local legislation to an average
of 3% and 1%, respectively.
Provisional Measure No. 687, published
on August 18, 2015 (and converted into Law No. 13,196, which was published on December 2, 2015) authorized the monetary adjustment,
based on the IPCA, of the Contribution to the Development of the National Film Industry (
Contribuição para o Desenvolvimento
da Indústria Cinematográfica Nacional
), or CONDECINE, which is a tax levied on telecommunications services with
the objective of promoting Brazilian audiovisual industry.
Further changes in tax regulations could
impact our financial assets and liabilities as well as our pricing, which could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
Inflation, and government measures to
curb inflation, may adversely affect the Brazilian economy, the Brazilian securities market, our business and operations and the
market prices of our shares or the ADSs.
Historically, Brazil has experienced high
rates of inflation. Inflation and some of the Brazilian government’s measures taken in an attempt to curb inflation have
had significant negative effects on the Brazilian economy generally. Inflation, policies adopted to contain inflationary pressures
and uncertainties regarding possible future governmental intervention have contributed to economic uncertainty and heightened volatility
in the Brazilian securities market.
According to the General Market Price Index
(
Índice Geral de Preços do Mercado
), or IGP-M, a general price inflation index developed by FGV, the inflation
rates in Brazil were 1.2% in 2005, 3.8% in 2006, 7.8% in 2007, 9.8% in 2008, negative 1.72% in 2009, 11.32% in 2010, 5.10% in 2011,
7.81% in 2012, 5.51% in 2013, 3.67% in 2014 and 10.54% in 2015. In addition, according to the National Extended Consumer Price
Index (
Índice Nacional de Preços ao Consumidor Amplo
), or IPCA, published by the Brazilian Institute of Geography
and Statistics (
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística
), or IBGE, the Brazilian consumer price inflation
rates were, 5.7% in 2005, 3.1% in 2006, 4.6% in 2007, 5.9% in 2008, 4.3% in 2009, 5.9% in 2010, 6.5% in 2011, 5.8% in 2012, 5.9%
in 2013, 6.4% in 2014 and 10.67% in 2015. Inflation increased monthly throughout 2016, as measured by the IPCA-15, which records
inflation from approximately the 15th of the previous month to the 15th of the current month, by 0.92% over the month of January,
1.42% over the month of February, and 0.43% over the month of March. Uncertainty regarding certain government fiscal measures could
contribute to greater inflation over the course of 2016. The Brazilian government’s measures to control inflation have often
included maintaining a tight monetary policy with high interest rates, thereby restricting availability of credit and reducing
economic growth. Inflation, actions to combat inflation and public speculation about possible additional actions have also contributed
materially to economic uncertainty in Brazil and to heightened volatility in the Brazilian securities markets.
Inflation may increase in Brazil in the
future. Periods of higher inflation may decrease the rate of growth of the Brazilian economy, which could lead to reduced demand
for our products in Brazil and decreased net sales. If inflation rises, families’ disposable income may decrease in real
terms, leading to lack of purchasing power among our customer base. Inflation is also likely to increase some of our costs and
expenses, which we may not be able to pass on to our customers and, as a result, may reduce our profit margins and net income.
Inflation also directly impacts our results of operations because certain of our assets and liabilities are subject to inflation.
In addition, higher inflation generally leads to higher domestic interest rates, and, as a result, the costs of servicing our debt
may increase, resulting in lower net income. Inflation and its effect on domestic interest rates can, in addition, lead to reduced
liquidity in the domestic capital and lending markets, which could affect our ability to refinance our
indebtedness in those markets.
Any decline in our net sales or net income and any deterioration in our financial condition would also likely lead to a decline
in the market price of our shares and the ADSs.
Exchange rate movements may adversely
affect our financial condition and results of operations.
The Brazilian currency has been devalued
frequently over the past four decades. Throughout this period, the Brazilian government has implemented various economic plans
and exchange rate policies, including sudden devaluations, periodic mini-devaluations (during which the frequency of adjustments
has ranged from daily to monthly), exchange controls, dual exchange rate markets and a floating exchange rate system. From time
to time, there have been significant fluctuations in the exchange rate between the Brazilian currency and the U.S. dollar and other
currencies. For example, the
real
depreciated against the U.S. dollar by 15.7% in 2001, 34.3% in 2002, 32% in 2008, 4.8%
in 2011, 8.94% in 2012, 14.64% in 2013, 13.39% in 2014 and 47.01% in 2015. Notwithstanding the fact that the
real
has appreciated
11.5%, 8.7%, 25.4%, and 4.3% in 2006, 2007, 2009 and 2010, respectively, there can be no guarantees as to whether the
real
will depreciate or appreciate against the U.S. dollar in the future.
Appreciation of the
real
against
the U.S. dollar may lead to a deterioration of the country’s current account and the balance of payments, as well as to a
dampening of export-driven growth. Any such appreciation could reduce the competitiveness of our exports and adversely affect our
net sales and our cash flows from exports. Devaluation of the
real
relative to the U.S. dollar could create additional inflationary
pressures in Brazil by increasing the price of imported products, which may result in the adoption of deflationary government policies.
The sharp depreciation of the
real
in relation to the U.S. dollar may generate inflation and governmental measures to fight
possible inflationary outbreaks, including the increase in interest rates. Devaluations of the
real
would reduce the U.S.
dollar value of distributions and dividends on our common shares and ADSs and may also reduce the market value of such securities.
Any such macroeconomic effects could adversely affect our net operating revenues and our overall financial performance.
We acquire our equipment and handsets from
global suppliers, the prices of which are denominated in U.S. dollars. Depreciation of the
real
against the U.S. dollar
may result in a relative increase in the price of our equipment and handsets. Thus, we are exposed to foreign exchange risk arising
from our need to make substantial dollar-denominated expenditures, particularly for imported components, equipment and handsets,
that we have limited capacity to hedge.
Fluctuations in interest rates may have
an adverse effect on our business and the market prices of our shares or the ADSs.
The Central Bank establishes the basic
interest rate target (the SELIC rate) for the Brazilian financial system by reference to the level of economic growth of the Brazilian
economy, the level of inflation and other economic indicators. The SELIC rate was revised, positively and negatively, during 2011
and was 11.00% as of December 31, 2011. In 2012, the Central Bank undertook a systematic easing of monetary policy in an effort
to stimulate growth. The SELIC rate was cut throughout 2012, reaching a low of 7.25% on October 10, 2012, where it remained until
April 17, 2013, after which it was repeatedly revised upward. As of December 31, 2013, the SELIC rate was 10.00% and as of December
31, 2014, the SELIC rate was 11.75%. The SELIC rate was again revised upward throughout 2015: in January 2015, the SELIC rate was
raised to 12.25%, and then further increased in March 2015 to 12.75% to 13.25% at the end of April 2015, to 13.75% in June 2015,
and finally to 14.25% at the end of July 2015, where it remained as of December 31, 2015. During the first quarter of 2016, the
SELIC remained stable at 14.25%.
At December 31, 2015, all of our indebtedness
was either denominated in
reais
and subject to Brazilian floating interest rates or subject to currency swaps that are tied
to Brazilian floating interest rates, including R$2,528 million tied to the TJLP, R$2,300 million tied to the Interbank Deposit
Certificate Rate (
Certificado de Depositário Interbancário
), or CDI rate, an interbank certificate of deposit
rate that applies to our foreign currency swaps and some of our other
real
-denominated indebtedness, and R$69 million tied
to UMIPCA (
Unidade Monetária IPCA do BNDES
) and R$564 million tied to fixed interest rates and R$1,475 million tied
to SELIC. Any increase in the CDI rate or the TJLP rate may have an adverse impact on our financial expenses and our results of
operations. Nevertheless the company invests its cash in CDI, which can absorb part of the financial expenses impact.
The effects of the weak domestic economy
could reduce purchases of our products and services and adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.
Although the global economy recently has
been showing signs of improvement, domestic economic conditions are weak. The official inflation rate has continued to climb, reaching
10.67% in 2015. Inflation directly impacts our results of operations as result of certain of our assets and liabilities being subject
to inflation adjustment, and if inflation rises, disposable income of families may decrease in real terms, leading to lack of purchasing
power among our customer base. Brazilian GDP contracted by 3.8% in 2015, its worst result since 1990, and there is significantly
reduced liquidity in the domestic capital and lending markets. In response to such tighter credit, negative financial news or declines
in income or asset values, consumers and businesses may postpone spending, which could have a material adverse effect on the demand
for our products and services. A loss of customers or a reduction in purchases by our current customers could have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flow and may negatively affect our ability to meet our growth
targets.
The ongoing “Lava Jato” investigation
regarding corruption at and with Petróleo Brasileiro S.A., or Petrobras, and any future corruption investigations in Brazil,
may hinder the growth of the Brazilian economy and could have an adverse effect on our business.
Petrobras and certain other Brazilian companies
active in the energy and infrastructure sectors are facing investigations by the CVM, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission,
or the SEC, the Brazilian Federal Police and the Brazilian Federal Prosecutor’s Office, in connection with corruption allegations,
or the “Lava Jato” investigations. Depending on the duration, outcome and possible expansion of such investigations,
the companies involved may face downgrades from rating agencies, funding restrictions and a reduction in their revenues. Given
the relatively significant weight of the companies cited in the investigation, this could have an adverse effect on Brazil’s
growth prospects in the near to medium term. Negative effects on a number of companies may also impact the level of investments
in infrastructure in Brazil which may lead to lower economic growth in the near to medium term.
The ongoing Operação Lava
Jato investigations along with the economic downturn resulted in Brazil being downgraded to junk grade by S&P in September
2015, by Fitch in December 2015 and by Moody’s in February 2016, with corresponding downgrades of various major Brazilian
companies. Such downgrades have further worsened the conditions of the Brazilian economy and the condition of Brazilian companies,
including us. Persistently poor macroeconomic conditions resulting from, among other things, the Operação Lava Jato
investigations and any future corruption investigations in Brazil and their consequences could have a material adverse effect on
us.
We may be impacted by volatility in the
global financial markets.
We are susceptible to swings in global
economic conditions, typified most recently by difficult credit and liquidity conditions and disruptions leading to greater volatility
commencing in mid-2007 with the global financial crisis. The global economy has largely recovered, however markets remain subject
to ongoing volatility factors including interest rate divergence, geopolitical events, and global growth expectations, and there
is no assurance that similar conditions will not arise again. In the long term, as a consequence, global investor confidence may
remain low and credit will may remain relatively lacking. Hence, additional volatility in the global financial markets may occur.
Additional volatility in the global financial
markets could have a material adverse effect on our ability to access capital and liquidity on acceptable financial terms, and
consequently on our operations. Furthermore, an economic downturn could negatively affect the financial stability of our customers,
which could result in a general reduction in business activity and a consequent loss of income for us.
Risks Relating to Our Commons Shares and the ADSs
Holders of our ADSs are not entitled
to attend shareholders’ meetings and may only vote through the depositary.
Under Brazilian law, only shareholders
registered as such in our corporate books may attend shareholders’ meetings. All common shares underlying our ADSs are registered
in the name of the depositary. A holder of ADSs, accordingly, is not entitled to attend shareholders’ meetings. Holders of
our ADSs may exercise their limited voting
rights with respect to our common shares represented by the ADSs only in accordance
with the deposit agreement relating to the ADSs. There are practical limitations upon the ability of ADS holders to exercise their
voting rights due to the additional steps involved in communicating with ADS holders. For example, we are required to publish a
notice of our shareholders’ general meetings in certain newspapers in Brazil. Holders of our shares can exercise their right
to vote at a shareholders’ general meeting by attending the meeting in person or voting by proxy. By contrast, holders of
our ADSs will receive notice of a shareholders’ general meeting by mail from the ADR depositary following our notice to the
ADR depositary requesting the ADR depositary to do so. To exercise their voting rights, ADS holders must instruct the ADR depositary
on a timely basis. This voting process will take longer for ADS holders than for direct holders of our shares.
We cannot assure you that holders will
receive the voting materials in time to ensure that such holders can instruct the depositary to vote the shares underlying their
respective ADSs. In addition, the depositary and its agents are not responsible for failing to carry out holder’s voting
instructions or for the manner of carrying out your voting instructions. This means that holders may not be able to exercise their
right to vote and may have no recourse if our shares held by such holders are not voted as requested.
Holders of our ADSs or common shares
in the United States may not be entitled to participate in future preemptive rights offerings.
Under Brazilian law, if we issue new shares
for cash as part of a capital increase, we generally must grant our shareholders the right to purchase a sufficient number of shares
to maintain their existing ownership percentage. Rights to purchase shares in these circumstances are known as preemptive rights.
We may not legally allow holders of our ADSs or common shares in the United States to exercise any preemptive rights in any future
capital increase unless we file a registration statement with the SEC with respect to that future issuance of shares or the offering
qualifies for an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act. At the time of any future capital increase,
we will evaluate the costs and potential liabilities associated with filing a registration statement with the SEC and any other
factors that we consider important to determine whether to file such a registration statement. We cannot assure holders of our
ADSs or common shares in the United States that we will file a registration statement with the SEC to allow them to participate
in a preemptive rights offering. As a result, the equity interest of those holders in us may be diluted proportionately.
Judgments seeking to enforce our obligations
in respect of our shares or ADSs in Brazil will be payable only in reais.
If proceedings are brought in the courts
of Brazil seeking to enforce our obligations with respect to our shares or ADSs, we will not be required to discharge our obligations
in a currency other than
reais
. Under Brazilian exchange control limitations, an obligation in Brazil to pay amounts denominated
in a currency other than
reais
may only be satisfied in Brazilian currency at the exchange rate, as determined by the Central
Bank, in effect on the date the judgment is obtained, and such amounts are then adjusted to reflect exchange rate variations through
the effective payment date. The then prevailing exchange may not afford non-Brazilian investors with full compensation for any
claim arising out of or related to our obligations under our shares or the ADSs. See “—A. Selected Financial Data—Exchange
Rates” for information regarding exchange rates for the Brazilian
real
.
Volatility and lack of liquidity in the
Brazilian stock market may substantially limit investors’ ability to sell shares at the price and time desired.
Investment in securities traded in emerging
markets such as Brazil often involves more risk than other world markets, given the track record of economic instability and constant
changes. The Brazilian stock market is significantly smaller, less liquid and more concentrated, compared to the world’s
major stock market. At December 30, 2015, BM&FBOVESPA’s market capitalization was approximately R$1.9 trillion (U.S.$489.7
billion). The Brazilian capital market shows significant concentration. The top five shares in terms of trading volume accounted
for approximately 30.1 % of the total volume traded on the BM&FBOVESPA in the year ended December 31, 2015. These characteristics
of the Brazilian capital market may substantially limit the ability of investors to sell shares at the desired price and time,
which may materially and adversely affect share prices.
Shares eligible for future sale may adversely
affect the market value of our shares and ADSs.
All of our shareholders have the ability,
subject to applicable Brazilian laws and regulations and applicable securities laws in the relevant jurisdictions, to sell our
shares and ADSs. We cannot predict what effect, if any,
future sales of our shares or ADSs may have on the market price of our
shares or ADSs. Future sales of substantial amounts of such shares or ADSs, or the perception that such sales could occur, could
adversely affect the market prices of our shares or ADSs.
Holders of ADSs or common shares could
be subject to Brazilian income tax on capital gains from sales of ADSs or common shares.
According to Article 26 of Law No. 10,833
of December 29, 2003, which came into force on February 1, 2004, capital gains realized on the disposition of assets located in
Brazil by non-Brazilian residents, whether or not to other non-residents and whether made outside or within Brazil, are subject
to taxation in Brazil at a rate of 15%, or 25% if realized by investors resident in a “tax haven” jurisdiction (i.e.,
a country that does not impose any income tax or that imposes tax at a maximum rate of less than 17% (as amended by National Treasury
Ordinance No. 488 of November 1, 2014; prior to this date, the maximum rate for “tax haven” qualification purposes
was 20%)). Although we believe that the ADSs will not fall within the definition of assets located in Brazil for the purposes of
Law No. 10,833, considering the general and unclear scope of Law 10,833 and the absence of any judicial guidance in respect thereof,
we are unable to predict whether such interpretation will ultimately prevail in the Brazilian courts.
See “Item 10. Additional Information—E.
Taxation—Brazilian Tax Considerations.”
Gains realized by non-Brazilian holders
on dispositions of common shares in Brazil or in transactions with Brazilian residents may be exempt from Brazilian income tax,
or taxed at a rate of 15% or 25%, depending on the circumstances. Gains realized through transactions on Brazilian stock exchanges,
if carried out in accordance with Resolution CMN 2,689, as described below in “Item 10. Additional Information—E. Taxation—Brazilian
Tax Considerations—Taxation of Gains,” are exempt from the Brazilian income tax. Gains realized through transactions
on Brazilian stock exchanges not in accordance with Resolution CMN 2,689 are subject to tax at a rate of 15% and also to withholding
income tax at a rate of 0.005% (to offset the tax due on eventual capital gain). Gains realized through transactions with Brazilian
residents or through transactions in Brazil not on the Brazilian stock exchanges and not in accordance with Resolution CMN 2,689
are subject to tax at a rate of 15%, or 25% if realized by investors resident in a tax haven jurisdiction
An exchange of ADSs for common shares
risks loss of certain foreign currency remittance and Brazilian tax advantages.
The ADSs benefit from the certificate of
foreign capital registration, which permits J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., or J.P. Morgan, as depositary, to convert dividends and
other distributions with respect to common shares into foreign currency, and to remit the proceeds abroad. Holders of ADSs who
exchange their ADSs for common shares will then be entitled to rely on the depositary’s certificate of foreign capital registration
for five business days from the date of exchange. Thereafter, they will not be able to remit non-Brazilian currency abroad unless
they obtain their own certificate of foreign capital registration, or unless they qualify under Resolution CMN 2,689, which entitles
certain investors to buy and sell shares on Brazilian stock exchanges without obtaining separate certificates of registration.
If holders of ADSs do not qualify under
Resolution CMN 2,689, they will generally be subject to less favorable tax treatment on distributions with respect to our common
shares. There can be no assurance that the depositary’s certificate of registration or any certificate of foreign capital
registration obtained by holders of ADSs will not be affected by future legislative or regulatory changes, or that additional Brazilian
law restrictions applicable to their investment in the ADSs may not be imposed in the future.
If we raise additional capital through
an offering of shares, investors’ holdings may be diluted.
We may need to raise additional funds through
a capital increase, public or private debt financings, or a new share issuance in connection with our business. Any additional
capital raised through the issuance of shares or securities convertible into shares conducted on stock exchanges or through public
offerings may be made, according to Brazilian law, without preemptive rights for the holders of our shares, which may result in
the dilution of our holdings in our share capital.
|
Item 4.
|
Information on the Company
|
|
A.
|
History and Development of the Company
|
Basic Information
TIM Participações S.A. is
a corporation (sociedade anônima) organized under the laws of the Federative Republic of Brazil. The Company was incorporated
in the Federative Republic of Brazil for an indefinite period on May 22, 1998 under the name Tele Celular Sul Participações
S.A., which was later changed to TIM Participações S.A. on August 30, 2004.
Our headquarters are located at Avenida
das Américas, 3434-7th floor, 22640-102 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil and our telephone number is +55 (21) 4109-3742 and our fax
number is +55 (21) 4109-3314.
Our agent for service of process in the
United States is C T Corporation System located at 111 Eighth Avenue, New York, NY 10011.
Historical Background
Our indirect controlling shareholder, Telecom
Italia, began operating in Brazil in 1998 and through us is currently a leading wireless operator in the country. In the 2001 auctions
held by Anatel for cellular frequency Bands D and E, Telecom Italia was the only company to be awarded licenses covering the entirety
of the Brazilian territory, which at the time made Telecom Italia the sole operator to offer services on a nationwide level under
the same brand. In 2002, Telecom Italia (then Telecom Italia Mobile) formed TIM Brasil, the holding company of Telecom Italia’s
operating companies in Brazil.
Prior to the incorporation of Telebrás,
the Brazilian state-owned telecommunications monopoly, in 1972, there were more than 900 telecommunications companies operating
throughout Brazil. Between 1972 and 1975, Telebrás, as a regulated monopoly, acquired almost all the telephone companies
operating in Brazil. Beginning in 1995, the Brazilian Federal Government undertook a comprehensive reform of Brazil’s telecommunications
regulatory system. In 1996 and 1997, the Brazilian government privatized Telebrás and established Anatel as an independent
regulatory agency. In connection with the privatization, Telebrás was broken up, or the Breakup, into 12 new holding companies,
or the New Holding Companies, that consisted of
|
·
|
eight cellular telecommunications service providers, each operating in one of ten regions, each a Cellular Region;
|
|
·
|
three fixed-line telecommunications service providers, each providing local service and intraregional long distance service
in one of three regions, each a Fixed-Line Region; and
|
|
·
|
Embratel Participações S.A., or Embratel, which provides domestic long distance telecommunications service (including
intraregional and interregional), as well as international telecommunications service throughout Brazil.
|
Upon the Breakup of the Telebrás
system, the Brazilian territory was initially divided by Anatel into ten separate cellular service regions, or Band A, each serviced
by one of the New Holding Companies operating in the cellular telecommunications business. In addition, under the General Telecommunications
Law, the Federal Government granted authorizations to new companies to provide cellular telecommunications service within a 25
MHz sub-band within the band of 800 to 850 MHz, which is referred to as Band B. Companies operating under the Band B were distributed
throughout ten different regions, which generally overlap with the Band A regions. Anatel’s rules at the time prevented the
controlling shareholders of Band A and Band B cellular service providers from holding more than one license, either in the form
of an authorization or a concession, in a single PCS region and as a result, some companies controlled by Telecom Italia waived
their rights to provide PCS services in certain areas.
In July 1998, the Federal Government sold
substantially all its shares of the New Holding Companies, including its shares of Tele Sudeste Celular Participações
S.A., or TSU, and Tele Nordeste Celular Participações S.A., or TND, the two companies that, following a series of
acquisitions, corporate reorganizations and corporate name changes, merged to form TIM Participações in 2004. In
December 2002, TIM Sul, TIM Nordeste and Maxitel S.A.,
or TIM Maxitel, had converted their respective concessions to operate under
Cellular Mobile Service, or SMC, regulations into authorizations to operate under PCS regulations.
We continued to expand and restructure
our operations through a series of corporate reorganizations, mergers, acquisitions and name changes, and we are currently held,
directly and indirectly, by Telecom Italia through its wholly owned subsidiary, TIM Brasil. In turn, the single largest shareholder
of Telecom Italia is Vivendi, which is able to exercise significant influence over Telecom Italia. See “Item 4. Information
on the Company—C. Organizational Structure” for a description of our current corporate structure and Exhibit 8.1 attached
hereto for a list of our significant subsidiaries as of the date of this annual report.
In 2011, our shareholders approved our
adherence to the Novo Mercado rules and the transfer of trading of the shares issued by us to the Novo Mercado. In order to join
the Novo Mercado, we entered into a Novo Mercado Participation Agreement with the BM&FBOVESPA. Through this agreement, which
became effective on July 27, 2011, we are required to adhere to heightened requirements relating to corporate governance and the
disclosure of information to the market. Additionally, as of such date, our shares started trading on the Novo Mercado segment
of the BM&FBOVESPA. Pursuant to the Novo Mercado Regulations, we are not permitted to issue preferred shares, participation
bonuses or any kind of shares with restricted voting rights. As part of our migration to the Novo Mercado listing segment of the
BM&FBOVESPA, our preferred shares ceased to trade on August 2, 2011. On August 4, 2011, our ADSs representing preferred shares
ceased to trade on the NYSE. From August 3, 2011, we only had common shares traded on the Novo Mercado listing segment of BM&FBOVESPA,
by using the code “TIMP3” and as from August 5, 2011, our ADSs representing five common shares instead of ten preferred
shares commenced trading on the NYSE. See “Item 9. The Offer and Listing—A. Offer and Listing Details.”
On July 8, 2011, our wholly owned subsidiary
TIM Celular entered into an agreement with Companhia Brasiliana de Energia and AES Elpa (the AES Group in Brazil) for the purchase
of all of AES Elpa’s equity interests in Eletropaulo Telecomunicações and 98.3% of the interest of AES RJ,
or the AES Atimus Acquisition. We completed the acquisition on October 31, 2011, after all conditions precedent to the contract
were completed and certain regulatory approvals were obtained. We paid a total of R$1,074.2 million and R$447.5 million, respectively,
for each of Eletropaulo Telecomunicações and AES RJ. In connection with the acquisition, Eletropaulo Telecomunicações
changed its corporate name to TIM Fiber SP Ltda., or TIM Fiber SP, and AES RJ changed its corporate name to TIM Fiber RJ S.A.,
or TIM Fiber RJ, and we call this business, collectively, TIM Fiber.
In accordance with the reorganization of
TIM Fiber, on August 29, 2012, TIM Fiber RJ and TIM Fiber SP were merged into TIM Celular, which owns and operates an extensive
fiber optic network in metropolitan São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro. The purpose of this reorganization was to simplify our
organizational structure and improve the administrative, operational and financial efficiency of the companies controlled by us.
2015 Important Events
Towers Sale and Leaseback
In November 2014 and January 2015, TIM
Celular entered into sale and leaseback transaction, or the ATC Sale-Leaseback Transaction, pursuant to which it executed a Sales
Agreement, or the Sales Agreement, and a Master Lease Agreement, or MLA, with American Tower do Brasil Cessão de Infraestruturas
Ltda., or ATC. Under the Sales Agreement, TIM Celular can sell up to 6,481 telecommunications towers owned by it for approximately
R$3 billion, and under the MLA TIM Celular can then lease back part of the space on these towers for a period of 20 years from
the date of transfer of each tower, with monthly rental prices depending on the type of tower (greenfield or rooftop). The ATC
Sale-Leaseback Transaction will benefit the Company’s operating and financial capacity and allow it to expand its investments
and improve quality of services.
The Sales Agreement provides for the towers
to be transferred in tranches to ATC as conditions precedent are met. As of December 31, 2015, three tranches of transfers were
made, on April 29, September 30 and December 16, 2015. As a result of these three tranches of transfers, we transferred a total
of 5,483 towers (84.6% of the total owned by TIM) to ATC, and received a total of R$2,498,421 in cash. The gain on the portion
of the assets effectively sold, amounting to R$1,210,980 (net of transaction costs), was recognized as income for financial year
2015, while the gain on the portion of the towers subject to sale and leaseback, amounting to R$1,002,393 (net of transaction costs),
was deferred over the lease term (20 year) per the MLA. The discount rate used in the ATC Sale-Leaseback Transaction was determined
based on observable market transactions that the lessee would have to pay in
a similar lease or borrowing arrangement. The discount
rate applied in each tranche is described in Note 1.b to our consolidated financial statements.
2015 mobile market developments
According to Anatel, the Brazilian
mobile market reached 257.8 million lines nationwide at the end of 2015, corresponding to a penetration ratio of 125.7%,
compared to 138.0% in 2014, for an annual contraction rate of 8.2%, compared to a 3.6% growth rate in 2014. Brazil is the
fifth largest mobile telephony market in the world, and telephony is currently the most common means of communication in
Brazilian households among all social classes. Although the Brazilian telecommunications market’s prepaid customer base
has contracted by 13.3% (or 28.39 million lines) over the course of 2015, to 184.5 million lines, it still continues to
represent the market’s largest component, constituting 71.6% of total subscriber base as of December 31, 2015 as
compared to 75.8% as of December 31, 2014. The significant reduction in the overall number of prepaid users is mainly
due to macroeconomic pressures, acceleration in users consolidating multiple SIM cards to a single one, high penetration of
mobile service and the rapid substitution of voice for data usage, resulting in a decrease in the so-called “community
effect” where consumers value a telecommunications system more as more users adopt it. The postpaid business, however,
reached 73.2 million lines in 2015, a 8.0% increase over 2014.
Capital Expenditures
The majority of our capital expenditures
in 2013 were related to the expansion of our capacity and quality of our 3G technology and development of technology infrastructure.
Our principal capital expenditures in 2014 related to our investment of approximately R$2.92 billion in the acquisition of a license
to operate in the 700 MHz spectrum for 4G mobile technology and R$3.7 billion related to improvements in network infrastructure.
In 2015, our capital expenditures totaled R$4.7 billion, of which 92.4% was dedicated to network infrastructure. For a detailed
breakdown of our capital expenditures in 2013, 2014 and 2015, as well as the total amount of the same each year, see “Item
5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Uses of Funds—Material Capital
Expenditures.”
During 2016, 2017 and 2018, we expect to
consolidate our position as the leading mobile telecommunications operator in infrastructure investments, based on public capital
expenditure data reported by other operators. See “—B. Business Overview—Competitive Strengths—High quality
services” and “—B. Business Overview—Our Strategy—Construction of a unique infrastructure network
in the Brazilian market and improving our network” for further information on the types and geographical distribution of
these ongoing infrastructure investments. Our capital expenditures are based on commercial, technical and economic factors such
as service rates, service demand, price and availability of equipment. There is no assurance that our estimates of such commercial,
technical and economic factors will prove to be correct, or that we will actually spend our planned capital expenditures in future
periods.
Market Characteristics
The Brazilian mobile telecommunications
market has in recent years been characterized by the expansion of the number of subscribers, investment in network infrastructure
and subsidies to attract and retain customers. These expenditures have resulted in a significant increase in mobile penetration,
revenue generation and competition for customers. In 2015, a tougher macroeconomic environment affected the telecommunications
industry as a whole, and contributed to the first year of overall customer base reduction. As of December 31, 2015, there were
approximately 257.8 million mobile lines, representing approximately 125.7% of the population, compared to approximately 280.7
and 271.1 million mobile lines representing approximately 138.0% and 134.3% of the population in 2014 and 2013. As is the case
throughout most of Latin America, the Brazilian mobile telecommunications market is characterized by a large number of prepaid
customers, but as previously mentioned, this trend is changing as a result of macroeconomic pressures, an acceleration in users
consolidating multiple SIM cards to a single one, a high penetration of mobile service and the rapid substitution of voice for
data usage, resulting in an overall reduction in the total number of prepaid base users and a decrease in the so-called “community
effect” where consumers value a telecommunications system more as more users adopt it. According to Anatel, at the end of
2013, 2014 and 2015, approximately 71.6%, 80.5% and 78.0%, respectively, of mobile lines
were prepaid and 28.4%, 19.5% and 22.0%,
respectively, were postpaid. The postpaid business reached 73.2 million lines in 2015, a 8.0% increase over 2014.
Our Business
We are the second largest provider of mobile
telecommunication services in Brazil based on the number of phone lines, with 66.2 million lines and a market share of 25.7% in
2015, as compared to 75.7 million lines and market share of 26.9% in 2014, based on data from Anatel. In the year ended December
31, 2015, we lost 9,486 million net lines, compared to a net addition of 2,289 million lines in the year ended December 31, 2014.
Through our subsidiaries in various telecommunications markets throughout Brazil, we operate mobile, fixed and long distance telephony,
data transmission and ultra-broadband (speeds of more than 34 MB per second, or Mbps) services. For the year ended December 31,
2015, our gross service revenue was R$23.1 billion, a 5.8% decrease from the year ended December 31, 2014, in comparison to a 2.1%
decrease in gross service revenue from 2013 to 2014.
Through our GSM network, we serve approximately
95% of the urban population of Brazil, representing the largest GSM network coverage of any mobile telecommunications services
provider in Brazil (based on publicly available data of other mobile telecommunications providers), with a presence in approximately
3.4 thousand municipalities. We offer extensive data coverage throughout Brazil with our GPRS technology, covering 100% of our
coverage area and our EDGE technology reached almost 95% of our coverage area, in addition to our sophisticated 3G and 4G network
covering approximately 82% and 54% respectively of the urban population of Brazil. Our international roaming agreements include
approximately 474 networks available in approximately 212 countries. Our fiber network extends from northern to southern Brazil,
with an extensive wide area network, or backbone, of approximately 70,000 kilometers, and metropolitan area networks, or backhaul.
Our fiber optic network has a unique capacity to offer high quality mobile ultra-broadband service, available through our Live
TIM network in the Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo metropolitan regions. In 2015, we continued to connect our antennas with
our fiber optic network, a project that reached 194 cities in 2015. This is a key project for the Company which enables us to deliver
a high performance data experience to our users. In 2013, we completed the LT Amazonas project, our long distance fiber optic network
connecting major cities in the north of Brazil, one of Brazil’s regions with the greatest lack of infrastructure. Fiber optics
are particularly important in rural areas such as these because the signals that are transmitted through fiber experience less
attenuation (loss of signal strength) and, therefore, can travel longer distances. In connection with the LT Amazonas project,
we have entered into financial lease agreements for the right to use infrastructure with companies that operate transmission lines
in Northern Brazil.
Our growth in the mobile telecommunications
market does not result in revenue cannibalization (substitution of fixed-line services for mobile services), as we are essentially
a pure mobile operator with no landline legacy, unlike many of our competitors that offer both fixed-line and mobile telephony
services. Also, we abide by a “no subsidy” policy for handset and accessories sales, which helps avoid pressure on
margins and costs as we grow.
We believe our net investments of approximately
R$4.7 billion in 2015, a 18.6% increase over 2014 and of which approximately 92.4% went towards infrastructure, is indicative of
our commitment to enhancing our ability to provide services of the highest quality and meet the demand for voice traffic in Brazil.
According to our strategic plan which we disclosed to the market on February 16, 2016, or the 2016-2018 Industrial Plan, we plan
on investing almost R$14 billion in Brazil between 2016 and 2018, with the majority of this amount directed to network development.
As of December 31, 2015, we had more than
13.1 thousand points of sales through premium shops and dealers (exclusive or multi-brand) and consolidated partnerships with large
retail chains. This figure includes 182 of our own stores. In addition to these retail stores, our customers have access to prepaid
phone services through supermarkets, newsstands, and other small retailers as alternative channels to access our products and services,
totaling more than 328 thousand points of sale throughout Brazil.
For the corporate market, we have more
than 465 third party business partners focused on serving small and medium companies and a direct sales force team of 95 employees
focused on large companies.
In order to serve our customer base of
over 66.2 million customers, we maintain sixteen customer care centers, four of our own and twelve outsourced, comprising around
fourteen thousand customer service representatives.
Moreover, we have continuously invested in alternative customer service channels,
developing solutions based on interactive voice response, or IVR, and self-service and mobile applications for iOS and Android.
Competitive Strengths
We believe that our robust network infrastructure,
together with our brand recognition and our widespread sales network, positions us well to capitalize on opportunities in the telecommunications
industry in Brazil and meet the growing demand in the mobile telecommunications market. We believe our main strengths include:
High quality services.
In
the first quarter of 2015, TIM maintained strong results among mobile operators according to Anatel’s Performance Service
Index (
Índice de Desempenho no Atendimento
), or IDA. In the second quarter of 2015, however, the performance levels
of all mobile operators declined. We commenced a process to redress this and in August, the date of the last official report disclosed
by Anatel, TIM again achieved the second position among mobile operators.
Our services were also set apart from
other telecommunication economic groups as having the fewest customer complaints registered with the Brazilian
Consumer Protection and Defense Authority, or PROCON, integrated in the National Information Integration System, or SINDEC.
The TIM economic group has the fewest registered complaints per one thousand customers, having received 64.4% fewer
complaints recorded than the economic group with the largest number of complaints. According to an official report by the
National Consumer Bureau (
Secretaria Nacional do Consumidor
), or SENACON, over the course of 2015, the TIM
economic group satisfactorily resolved 80% of Preliminary Investigation Letters, or CIPs, and 75% of Justified Complaints, or
RFs, submitted by PROCON. These performance rankings are commensurate with our 2014 results.
Live TIM was recognized by Anatel in 2015
as the best internet connection in the market. Reinforcing our innovative approach and focus on quality, Live TIM was also the
Brazilian leader of Netflix’s ISP Speed Index, which measures Netflix performance on particular internet service providers
in different countries, and is the most recommended by customers of fixed internet services. In September 2015, we became the leader
among Brazilian telecommunications companies in terms of number of cities covered by 4G technology (reaching 411 cities and representing
59% of the urban population in Brazil). In 2015, we received from various market institutions a total of five awards related to
customer service (2 gold and 3 silver). We were also awarded second place by ALOIC – the Alliance of Latin American Organizations
for Interaction with Customers at the Latam Award held in Mexico in March 2016.
We furthered our commitment to transparency
when, in the third quarter of 2014, we began making our financial results meetings open to investors and journalists, as well as
by teleconference, computer, smartphone and tablet.
We also continue to provide high quality
services by means of our continued investment in infrastructure. Such investments have been achieved organically, including through
building long distance networks and establishing our metropolitan fiber optic cable network, with 1152 new sites connected to fiber
in December 2015 compared to December 2014, and by means of acquisition of additional bandwidths including the 700 MHz bandwidth
nationally. In December 2015, when Anatel auctioned left over radiofrequencies in the 1,800 MHz, 1,900 MHz and 2,500 MHz bands,
we submitted bids for the left over lots of the 2,500 MHz band which had originally been auctioned in 2012. This particular band
spectrum provides for 4G mobile services. The bidding currently remains in the “Opening, Analysis and Assessment of Price
Proposals” stage, and the auction is expected to be finalized, with winners to be selected in the first half of 2016. However,
based on the preliminary results of the bidding, we have been classified as the first ranked bidder in the lots for Recife, in
the state of Pernambuco, and Curitiba, in the state of Paraná, based on our bids of R$32 million and R$24.5 million, respectively,
totaling R$56.5 million, which bids were renewed in March 2016. As of December 31, 2015 as compared to December 31, 2014, we achieved
a 108.4% increase in volume of e-NodeB and 19.2% increase in volume of NodeB, the equipment responsible for adding, respectively,
4G and 3G data traffic capacity to an antenna, and installed and had 1,152 new sites connected to fiber optics, an increase of
32%. During the period from December 31, 2014 to December 31, 2015, our 4G network coverage grew by more than seven times in terms
of the number of cities covered, while our 3G network coverage grew by more than 41% over the same period, resulting in our total
coverage reaching almost 95% of Brazil’s urban population.
We have also added to our network infrastructure
by means of inorganic growth historically, for example, through the acquisition of assets such as Intelig and AES Atimus (later
known as TIM Fiber and now TIM Celular).
The acquisition of Intelig expanded our network infrastructure by adding a 100% digital
fiber optic network installed from northern to southern Brazil, totaling more than 500,000 kilometers of fiber optic cables, with
an extensive wide area network (backbone) of approximately 15,000 kilometers and metropolitan area networks (backhaul) in Brazil’s
principal cities. In addition, we added to our network telephone exchanges and satellite stations, connecting to major networks
and with capability in major international submarine cable systems. The AES Atimus acquisition positioned us well, compared to
our competitors, to capture broadband Internet market share. In Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo, Brazil’s two largest
cities, we have a total of 5,500 kilometers of fiber optic cable and 550,000 businesses. Investing in fiber optics in this way
allows us to provide high quality services to our customers. These acquisitions also enabled a reduction of infrastructure rental
costs, while helping us to obtain significant synergies related to our existing fiber optic network.
Throughout 2015, we also expanded the installation
of “Biosites” across Brazil, a cellular antenna shaped like a lamp post and designed to accommodate 3G and/or 4G transmission
equipment, illustrating our focus on seeking innovative infrastructure alternatives to improve the quality of and our customers’
satisfaction with our services. Each Biosite is a multifunctional device, allowing not only for the installation of new 3G and/or
4G stations, but also modernizing streetlights in cities and reducing visual clutter, since the cellular antennas and their necessary
equipment are self-contained within the post itself, without the need for external or auxiliary engineering structure. During the
remainder of 2015 and 2016, we are expected to consolidate our position as the leading mobile telecommunications operator in infrastructure
investments, based on public capital expenditure data reported by other operators.
We are also better able to provide high
quality services due to our strong relationship with our suppliers. We operate a system for information technology vendor management
in order to improve the commitment of our suppliers. As a result of this approach, we benefit from enhancements like (i) better
accountability of end-to-end vendors on our business processes; (ii) better contractual conditions and savings due to the increase
of volumes per vendor; (iii) vendor consolidation and specialization in specific platforms/processes, creating the opportunity
for long-term investments in such areas; and (iv) active contribution to transformation and simplification.
These processes were organized and improved
through detailed rules such as the Projects Review Board and Investments, and the Function Points Productivity Contractual Auditing.
This allowed us to achieve an excellent level of information technology governance, exemplified by better business contribution
of each investment due to shared objectives and goals. As a result, we improved our efficacy and efficiency.
Strong brand associated with innovation.
We believe we have a strong brand and a reputation for innovation, having pioneered several product launches in Brazil, such as
the introduction of pay-per-call (rather than per minute) offers in the Brazilian market (Infinity Pré), followed by a prepaid
daily Internet package delivering a limited traffic allowance (Infinity Web) and a combined daily package of Internet and text
messages (Infinity Web + Torpedo). We also introduced the concept of and equalization of prices for local calls and long distance
within our network and, in the postpaid business, we launched the concept of unlimited calls within the TIM network (TIM Liberty).
TIM launched the first daily prepaid service option (a promotion for customers that have the Infinity plan), data package sharing
among multiple devices, and an exclusive partnership with WhatsApp which provides for, among other features, unlimited data traffic
for WhatsApp messages (Controle WhatsApp). More recently, TIM launched new plans with unlimited WhatsApp messages, sharing of internet
and minutes that can be used on any operator, anywhere in Brazil. We believe the subsequent development of other plans based on
these concepts strengthen our leadership position vis-à-vis our competitors in terms of innovation.
Our mobile phone plans have also transformed
the mobile telecommunications market in Brazil, in line with our strategy to increase voice traffic and long distance calls in
Brazil and to accelerate the growing trend in the substitution of fixed-line telephone services for mobile telephone services.
We believe our offering of innovative plans in the Brazilian market has ultimately had the effect of contributing to the increase
in voice traffic in Brazil in recent years and has been instrumental in positioning us as a service provider capable of establishing
new standards in the market.
The only Brazilian telecommunications
company listed on the Novo Mercado
.
Since our listing on the
Novo Mercado
in July 2011, we are the only company
in the Brazilian telecommunications sector listed on this segment of the BM&FBOVESPA. As part of our listing on the
Novo
Mercado
, we are required to adhere to heightened requirements relating to corporate governance and the disclosure of information
to the market. As part of our strong commitment to these principles, we made our 2015 financial year financial results meetings
available by
teleconference, smartphone and tablet in addition to computer. We believe that the listing on the
Novo Mercado
provides greater liquidity and value for our shares and allows us greater access to international markets, promotes the strengthening
of our corporate image and increases confidence in us, in addition to reaffirming the long-term commitment of the Telecom Italia
Group in Brazil. We believe listing on the
Novo Mercado
also aligns the interests among our controlling and minority shareholders
with respect to voting rights, tag along rights and dividend policy.
In addition, we belong to a select group
of companies comprising the portfolio of the Corporate Governance Index, the BM&FBOVESPA Tag Along Stock Index, and the Carbon
Efficient Index, comprised of companies that have committed to adopt transparent practices with respect to their emissions of greenhouse
gases. In November 2015, we were listed for the eighth consecutive year as part of the portfolio of the Corporate Sustainability
Index of the BM&FBOVESPA, an index comprised of companies that have a strong commitment to sustainability and social responsibility.
In August 2013, we received for the second consecutive time the gold seal of Greenhouse Gas Protocol, the program of the Center
for Sustainability Studies of the FGV, which aims to foster corporate responsibility with respect to greenhouse gas emissions.
Highly qualified and experienced
executives and controlling shareholder support.
We have a team of highly qualified executives, widely recognized in the
industry and possessing extensive experience in telecommunications markets in Europe and emerging countries. Our executive compensation
policy seeks to align the interests of our executives with those of our shareholders, through variable compensation plans and stock
options that reward good performance and the accomplishment of certain goals, as well as provide for improved executive retention.
Our controlling shareholder’s support
in our operations is further demonstrated through the sharing of know-how and best practices and development of new solutions for
networking, marketing and finance, which are rapidly rolled out under a “plug & play” strategy, under which network
innovations may be developed by our parent company first in other regions and then implemented with us.
Our Strategy
Our strategy includes:
Protecting the value of prepaid customer
base, shifting focus from absolute market share to share of total revenue, and strengthening our existing customer base.
As
mentioned above, the Brazilian mobile telecommunications market is facing an overall reduction in the number of prepaid customers,
as users which previously held multiple SIM cards are consolidating to one single SIM card due to macroeconomic pressures. In connection
with this trend, our strategy is to be chosen as the single SIM provider for the prepaid market by providing offers that are attractive
and valuable to customers (such as offering plans with more voice minutes and internet usage) and maintaining our reputation for
quality. To support this strategy, we will also implement a new handset strategy and new initiatives in our sales channel model,
including a more efficient regional approach.
Our growth strategy is mainly focused on
addressing the potential for mobile Internet in the Brazilian market, particularly increasing mobile Internet penetration and data
traffic. We believe mobile operators are in a strong position to address the demand for broadband in Brazil, with the ability to
provide flexible price plans (including the prepaid market) affordable to the majority of the Brazilian population. The lack of
fixed infrastructure is still an issue for accessibility to fixed broadband, especially in suburban areas, making mobile coverage
more suitable for such customers without broadband access. In addition to providing affordability and coverage advantages, mobile
operators appeal to the new cultural demand for Internet connectivity at all times and in all places. The machine-to-machine market,
or M2M, is also an area of opportunity for growth with future applications to be developed.
In addition, our strategy also involves
increasing the loyalty of our existing customer base by offering exclusive products to existing customers, focusing on value-added
services in our offers, and by differentiation in our products and services. Value-added services represent an important part of
the TIM strategy, as it is already a relevant market and has high growth rates with the potential to increase revenue streams.
Recent value-added services that we have launched include TIM Music, TIM Protect (backup, antivirus, devices insurance) and plans
that include unlimited usage of the WhatsApp messaging application. Such services are generally launched through a partnership
with an established over the top player. We believe the foregoing strategies will allow us to strengthen customer loyalty without
requiring us to incur higher costs, as increased traffic within our own network does not significantly increase our operational
costs. We are also constantly seeking new customers through new marketing efforts and promotional initiatives.
Capitalizing on fixed-mobile substitution
in voice and traditional services.
We seek to capitalize on the existing opportunity of fixed-mobile substitution in voice
and data traffic and encourage the use of mobile devices, rather than fixed lines, for long distance communication and Internet.
We believe that the main advantage of our product offerings is that our users are able to use our network with the largest prepaid
community in the country, given that TIM is the leader in prepaid market. We continue to develop product offerings in connection
with this strategy, which we view as key driver for growth.
In the voice market, this strategy has
been successful in part due to the limited service offerings of other long distance carriers in Brazil and the acceleration of
fixed-mobile substitution. We have become the market leader in the long distance telecommunications market based on our market
share. Fixed-mobile substitution is increasingly evident in Brazilian market, as fixed telephony operators have experienced a decline
in revenues. Since we are primarily a mobile operator with robust network infrastructure, the impact of any reduction in the fixed
telephony market does not impact our performance and we therefore encourage the acceleration of fixed-mobile substitution, which
in turn increases demand for our services.
Providing Internet access to everyone.
We intend to provide universal Internet access to all classes, offering our prepaid and postpaid customers competitive data usage
plans through wireless handsets or other data devices (e.g. tablets, wearables, etc.). Our focus on increased data usage among
our customers is also influenced by our ability to effectively manage our handset and accessories sales, with primary focus on
smartphone models that provide for quality Internet access at a low cost. This approach has allowed us to offer our services at
a highly competitive price, offer convenient payment methods, meet market demand and allow for opportunities for innovation. The
result of this strategy can be seen in the increase in our number of data users from 49% of our customer base in December 2014
to 51% of our customer base in December 2015.
Leading mobile internet growth in our sector
is a key pillar of our strategy, since we see this as the most important market in terms of growth and size in the foreseeable
future. Our marketing efforts have also been designed to stimulate internet usage and leverage our 3G and 4G networks by providing
for suitable and affordable postpaid and prepaid internet plans.
Construction of a unique infrastructure
network in the Brazilian market and improving our network.
We are committed to developing a robust network infrastructure
capable of serving our customer base and anticipating new trends and technologies in the industry. The development of this infrastructure
requires both organic (planning and infrastructure development projects for the existing network) and inorganic (acquisitions)
investments. As part of our strategy to focus our investments in infrastructure, we acquired Intelig in December 2009 to establish
our own fiber optic network and develop automation projects and acquired the company formerly known as AES Atimus (later TIM Fiber
and now TIM Celular) in 2011 to strengthen and expand our fiber optic network.
In 2015, we carried out this strategy through
ongoing investments in projects that will continue to differentiate and strengthen our network, such as the construction of new
fiber optic networks in the north and northeast of Brazil. In 2015, we delivered major infrastructure projects in 9 major cities
throughout Brazil. We have expanded our Mobile BroadBand, or MBB, project, which was launched in 2013, to more than 190 cities,
providing improved data transmission for mobile broadband users through an expanded high-speed fiber optic network and new functionalities
in the core and access networks. Our commitment to providing improved, high-quality services is further reflected by our R$4.7
billion in investments in 2015, roughly 60% of which were in 4G, 3G and 2G infrastructure.
Our infrastructure investment program is
facilitated by our strategy to end handset subsidies and to allocate these savings toward infrastructure improvements. We believe
that the implementation of our no-subsidy policy has given us a significant competitive advantage compared to other mobile telecommunications
operators in the marketplace.
We plan to continue to invest in infrastructure
in coming years, with an estimated capital expenditures budget, according to our 2016-2018 Industrial Plan, for the period of almost
R$14 billion, which does not consider new 4G spectrum licenses. TIM is the Brazilian mobile operator expected to invest more than
any other between 2016 and 2018, according to data submitted to Anatel.
Expansion into new businesses and
continued strength in recently expanded sectors.
In 2015, Live TIM remained the leader in the residential ultra-broadband
market (speeds of more than 34Mbps) according to Anatel,
with 34.5% of market share by December. Live TIM offers high quality ultra-broadband,
with high-speed data connection varying from 35 Mbps until 1 gigabit (1,000 Mbps) downstream and 500 Mbps upstream speeds, operating
within Rio de Janeiro, Duque de Caxias, Nova Iguaçu, São João do Meriti and São Paulo.
In 2015, we had a base of 231 thousand
clients, covering 2.6 million addressable households in 269 neighborhoods in the cities mentioned above. We will continue expanding
our coverage in Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo states throughout 2016. Our success with Live TIM has resulted from a strategy
of transparent communication and a commitment to deliver the services that the consumer actually purchased, which differentiates
us from local market practice. As a consequence, Live TIM continues to lead Netflix’s ranking of best broadband services
in Brazil (in terms of Netflix performance on particular internet service providers), has the most satisfied users of the market
according to research published by CVA Solutions, and has been listed as the best broadband service by Estado de São Paulo,
one of Brazil’s leading newspapers.
The Brazilian government has also launched
a number of noteworthy programs that are expected to generate additional demand for residential broadband services:
|
·
|
Minicom
: is a program that creates the digital cities in Brazil. The initiative allows for the installation of infrastructure
for network connections at public agencies, server training and free Internet access spaces for the community.
|
|
·
|
PNBL 2.0
: The Brazilian National Broadband Program was established in 2010 with the objective of expanding the infrastructure
and telecommunications services, promoting access to people with the best possible price, quality and coverage. PNBL 2.0 is the
second phase of the Program with focus on super-fast fixed networks and mobile access.
|
In addition to favorable market competition
conditions, we believe that Live TIM’s own competitive strengths will allow it continue to retain its position as leader
in this market. These competitive strengths include provision of high quality service, and a differentiated value proposition comprised
of the effective delivery of speeds above of what Anatel’s regulation prescribes and no penalty or loyalty contracts.
Regional Overview
We offer GSM telecommunications services
with a national reach to 95% of the urban population, which is one of the most extensive GSM coverage areas in Brazil, with a presence
in 3,448 municipalities. We have 2G coverage available to approximately 95% of the urban population, 3G coverage available to approximately
82% of the urban population and 4G coverage available to approximately 54% of the urban population of Brazil.
The map below shows our national coverage
areas, considering 2G, 3G and 4G coverage:
The following table shows combined information
regarding the Brazilian mobile telecommunications market and our customer base, coverage and related matters, at the dates indicated.
|
|
As of or For the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
Brazilian population
(1)
|
|
|
205.2
|
|
|
|
203.5
|
|
|
|
198.7
|
|
Total penetration
(2)(3)
|
|
|
125.7
|
%
|
|
|
138.0
|
%
|
|
|
136.4
|
%
|
Brazilian subscribers
|
|
|
257.8
|
|
|
|
280.7
|
|
|
|
271.1
|
|
National percentage subscriber growth
|
|
|
(8.2
|
)%
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
Population we cover
(1)(6)
|
|
|
187.5
|
|
|
|
185.0
|
|
|
|
176.8
|
|
Percentage of urban population we cover
(4)(6)
|
|
|
94.9
|
%
|
|
|
94.9
|
%
|
|
|
94.8
|
%
|
Total number of our subscribers
|
|
|
66.2
|
|
|
|
75.7
|
|
|
|
73.4
|
|
Our percentage growth in subscribers
|
|
|
(12.5
|
)%
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
Our percentage of postpaid customers
|
|
|
20.5
|
%
|
|
|
16.5
|
%
|
|
|
16.7
|
%
|
Our ARPU
(5)
|
|
|
16.7
|
|
|
|
17.6
|
|
|
|
18.6
|
|
|
(1)
|
According to the information used by Anatel.
|
|
(2)
|
Percentage of the total population of Brazil using mobile services, equating one mobile line to one subscriber.
|
|
(3)
|
Based on information published by Anatel and IBGE/IPC Maps.
|
|
(4)
|
Number of people able to access our mobile network, based on Anatel’s coverage criteria.
|
|
(5)
|
Average monthly revenue earned per TIM subscriber.
|
Mobile Service Rates and Plans
In Brazil, as in most of Latin America,
mobile telecommunications service is offered on a “calling party pays” basis, under which the customer generally pays
only for outgoing calls. Additional charges apply when a customer receives or places calls while outside of the customer’s
“registration area,” which are the areas into which we divide our coverage areas.
Under our current authorizations, we are
allowed to set prices for our service plans, provided that such amounts do not exceed a specified inflation adjusted cap. Anatel
must ratify our basic and other service plans, but its focus is on compliance with the relevant regulatory rules rather than the
prices charged. See “—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry—Rate Regulation.” We charge
different rates for our services, which vary according to the customer’s service plan. Per minute prices decrease as customers
commit to purchasing more minutes per month. Prices can also vary depending on the type of call (for example, calls from other
operators on fixed lines or calls outside of the network for mobile calls) or the location of the parties on a call.
Anatel regulations require mobile telecommunications
providers to offer service to all individuals regardless of income level. We recommend service plans that are suitable to each
potential customer’s needs and credit history, such as our prepaid service plans described below. If a customer fails to
make timely payment, services can be interrupted. See “—Billing and Collection.”
We offer mobile services under a variety
of rate plans to meet the needs of different customer classification, including our corporate customers. The rate plans are either
postpaid, where the customer is billed monthly for the previous month, or prepaid, where the customer pays in advance for a specified
volume of use over a specified period.
Our postpaid plans include the following
charges:
|
·
|
monthly subscription charges, which usually include a bundle of minutes and data that are included in the monthly service charge;
|
|
·
|
usage charges, for usage in excess of the specified number of minutes included in the monthly subscription charge; and
|
|
·
|
additional charges, including charges for value-added services and data services.
|
Certain plans include the cost of national
roaming and long distance in the price per minute so that all calls within Brazil cost the same amount per minute. Some postpaid
plans are designed for high and moderate usage subscribers, who are typically willing to pay higher monthly fees in exchange for
minutes included in the monthly service charge while other plans are designed to satisfy the more limited needs of low-usage postpaid
subscribers. We also offer customized services to our corporate clients, which may include local call rates between employees wherever
located in Brazil.
We offer a single prepaid plan with promotional
offerings, which does not include monthly charges. Prepaid customers can purchase a prepaid credits plan that may be used for calls,
data and additional services, based on the specific customer’s needs. We have agreements with large national retail stores
chains, in addition to partnerships with regional retail stores chains, to offer online recharge. Customers can also recharge straight
from their mobile handsets using credit cards such as Visa, MasterCard or Diners Club.
Consumer Plans
In 2015, TIM launched a new portfolio to
provide a complete mobile communications solution, which combines voice, data and SMS. We believe the new portfolio will reinforce
the strength of our innovative marketing positioning, while maintain our customer base revenues.
Within the consumer business, our main
plans include:
Prepaid Plans
|
·
|
Infinity
: under this prepaid plan, the customer is charged per call of unlimited duration to in-network TIM numbers
and local fixed telephones; in 2014, the option of being charged per day for in-network calls was introduced. For SMS and mobile
Internet services, clients are charged for day of use, with no charge on any day when not used;
|
|
·
|
TIM Beta
: limited plan addressed to young consumers, charged per day for voice (to TIM numbers), SMS and mobile Internet
services. The plan works in member-get-member mechanism of acquisition.
|
|
·
|
TIM PRE
: new offering launched on November 2015, which includes a weekly data package, unlimited SMS and an amount of
minutes that can be used for local and long distance, both in-network and out-of-network calls. The customer is automatically charged
on a weekly basis, as long as there is enough balance available.
|
As a complementary offering to our prepaid
plans, we also launched Turbo 7 which consists of a package service that includes unlimited in-network calls, SMS and 50 MB of
data per day, over the course of seven days, for R$7. TIM also launched the Turbo WhatsApp offering, based on a partnership between
the Company and the instant messaging service WhatsApp. For R$12, customer has 50MB of data and a 30 day free access to the WhatsApp
application (VOIP calls not included).
Post-Paid Plans
|
·
|
Liberty
: in this post-paid plan, the customer receives unlimited talk time with any number on the TIM network, with
no restriction on the number or duration of calls, and elects a combination of voice “minutes” and data packages based
upon their usage needs. The voice “minutes” portion of the
Liberty
plan provides the customer, each for a monthly
flat fee, with a set number of minutes used to call fixed lines and out-of-network mobile networks. For another monthly flat fee,
the
Liberty
customer can choose an Internet access package from among several options;
|
|
·
|
Liberty Express
: for a monthly flat fee paid by credit card, the user gets a package of services that covers the average
postpaid customer’s needs. Such services include unlimited in-network calls to TIM numbers, unlimited SMS, and a set number
of out-of-network voice minutes combined with a set package of data. The voice and data package combinations under the
Liberty
Express
plan include 40 minutes and 600 MB of Internet for R$74.90 per month.
|
|
·
|
TIM POS
: new portfolio launched on November 2015, which includes a monthly 1000-minute package that can be used for
local and long distance (in-network and out-of-network calls), unlimited SMS and a choice of data package ranging from 2GB to 20GB.
In this offer, domestic roaming is included free of charge.
|
Controle Plans
|
·
|
Liberty Controle and Liberty Controle Express
: for a fixed rate every month, the customer has unlimited talk time with
any number on the TIM network. For an additional fixed R$12 rate per month,
Web + Torpedo Mensal
provides 300 MB of Internet
access through mobile phones and unlimited SMS per month. Customers also have the possibility of using Infinity Web 10 after reaching
100% of their original 300 MB data plan until the end of the month. Once a new month starts, their fair usage will be restored
and they’ll be back to using the
Web+Torpedo Mensal
.
Liberty Controle and Liberty Controle Express
customers
also receive a R$10 credit to use as the customer wishes (including daily Internet and SMS if he has not elected to add the
Web
+ Torpedo Mensal
to his plan).
|
|
·
|
Controle WhatsApp
: for a fixed monthly fee, offers unlimited text and voice messages and photos through the WhatsApp
application with no bearing on the customer’s Internet allowance, 500 MB of data usage, unlimited SMS to all Brazilian carriers
and a R$10 credit for the customer to use as he wishes. Access to WhatsApp also remains free and without speed reduction in the
event the customer otherwise reaches his or her data allowance limit, and the customer has the option of buying an additional 300
MB or use daily internet until the end of that same month . This plan is based on a partnership between the Company and the instant
messaging service WhatsApp. TIM was the first player to offer WhatsApp within the main benefits of a mobile telecommunications
plan and focuses on the data-intensive users with lower available income (thus capturing a large proportion of the emerging middle
class with this kind of need). The
Controle WhatsApp
plan also capitalizes on the growing demand for mobile Internet in
the Brazilian market and the WhatsApp application, specifically, as Brazil currently ranks second in the world market for users
of this application.
|
|
·
|
TIM Controle
: new plan launched on November 2015, which includes a monthly 500-minute package that can be used for local
and long distance (in-network and out-of-network calls), unlimited SMS and a 1 GB of data. In this offer, domestic roaming is included
free of charge. Following the success of the Controle WhatsApp plan, the new TIM Controle also allow customers to access WhatsApp
free of data charges (offer does not include VOIP calls).
|
Beginning in the first quarter of 2015,
for prepaid and control plans, we changed the structure of all of our data plans. Before this date, once a customer reached their
plan limit, he was able to continue using data, but at a reduced navigation speed. Now, once a customer has reached the limit of
their data plan, the data transmission is no longer available and the user has two options: (i) to repurchase a data package or
(ii) to wait for the next data period to commence, which varies by plan, at which point his data availability and usage limit are
renewed in full. Postpaid customers can also purchase a data package to navigate in full speed but the usage is not blocked when
he reaches the limit of his data package.
Corporate Plans
In 2015, we continued to improve our positioning
towards the large companies as potential clients, offering a variety of corporate solutions for mobile or fixed services (both
voice and data), as well as value-added services and mobile-to-mobile services. The approach for these top clients are driven by
customized solutions and a premium customer service focus.
In the “Small and Medium Enterprises”
(
Pequenas e Médias Empresas
), or PME, customer group, we have focused on the benefits of our main mobile plan offering,
Liberty Empresa
, which provides unlimited in-network calls to TIM local and long-distance numbers within Brazil, unlimited
talk to any radio user via SME through the
Liberty Empresa Rádios
option, as well as various package options for
voice minutes for calls to other operators. To meet the market demand for better control and optimization of customer usage, we
have also released a shared minutes package called “
Pacote de Minutos Compartilhados Liberty
” in August 2015.
The shared minutes packages vary from 600 to 100,000 shared local minutes.
A main concentration during recent years
has been improving the plan based upon specific needs demonstrated to us. In 2014, for example, we introduced loyalty clauses into
new 24 months contracts, with the goal of strengthening customer loyalty to our brand. These loyalty-based contracts are available
with all renewed corporate customer plans. In 2013, we launched
Liberty Empresa Controle
as another plan offering in this
part of the market, which provides for a fixed monthly bill without additional charges. This fixed bill includes unlimited in-network
calls and a certain amount of credit to use towards other telecom services, such as Internet, SMS and calls to other providers.
When the client runs out of credit, he still has the benefit of unlimited in-network calls and the option of purchasing a top-up
for more credits. This plan allows companies to expand the use of mobile phones as a tool, while maintaining control of their expenses.
Accordingly, the
Liberty Empresa Controle
plan has a strong appeal for companies seeking other alternatives, such as prepaid
plans, for their telecommunications needs. In addition to
Liberty Empresa
and
Liberty Empresa Controle
plans, we
launched in May 2015 the plan
TIM Empresa Tarifa Flat
as a better replacement for
TIM
Empresa Mundi
plans.
TIM Empresa Tarifa Flat
plans represent a major innovation in the Brazilian market because it significantly reduced the
bill shock risk to our clients. It includes local and national long distance calls at the same flat rate of R$0.29/minute to all
telecommunication providers and to all directions, even if the employees exceed the minute package of 100, 400 and 800 minutes,
allowing our client to better estimate the bill. All options also include 100 MB internet built-ins, 50 SMS and unlimited local
calls to the enterprise’s TIM numbers and quickly became a best seller.
Towards the end of 2015, we released two
new voice plus data offers with competitive prices that were mainly responsible for increasing our revenue. In September, we encouraged
our prospects to customize their mobile plans by offering 12 combinations of local minutes plus data, for competitive prices. Starting
at R$69,90 monthly, clients pick Liberty Empresa 200, 400 or 800 local minute package to call other providers (unlimited calls
to TIM numbers anywhere in Brazil are included) and choose from 1GB, 3GB, 6GB or 10GB internet. Also, the data packages could be
share with up to 3 devices (smartphone, modem or tablet) with no speed loss nor reduction. We called this offer “
Fale
Mais Navegue Mais.
”
In November 2015, we launched a new portfolio
of offerings to consumers to diminish the “community effect”, we kept business offers attractive to our target customers
by also releasing the “
Tarifa Flat 1000 minutos + Multi 3GB
” offer, promising “a lot of minutes and plenty
of internet, to all providers and to anywhere in Brazil.” It includes 1,000 minute package to call all providers, local and/or
national long distance, plus 3GB of internet data, 800 SMS and unlimited local calls to the enterprise’s TIM numbers for
only R$99,90 monthly. There were also 6GB and 10GB options, respectively at R$129,90 and R$144,90, monthly.
A new Internet data package/plan called
Liberty Web Empresa Multi
was launched in March 2015, offering our customers the unique experience to share internet with
up to 3 devices (smartphone, modem and tablet), with no speed loss nor reduction. Within all of our Internet plan offerings for
PMEs, we have launched degrees of discounts depending on the size of data packages that are acquired by the customers. And the
TIM Backup solution, which was once offered at no cost for those which subscribe a data plan, is now charged due to its incompatibly
with our new main data portfolio,
Liberty Web Empresa Multi
.
The following presents a brief summary
of certain key elements of our Internet corporate offerings:
|
·
|
In March 2015 we launched a new family of data plans, the
Liberty Web Empresa Multi
1GB, 3GB, 6GB, 10GB, 20GB and 50GB:
that offer the possibility to share data with up to 3 devices (smartphone, modem or tablet) with no speed loss nor reduction. Fixed
prices respectively charged at R$34.90, R$49.90, R$64.90, R$79.90, R$109.90 and R$159.90 per month. These plans are unavailable
for customized orders.
|
|
·
|
Liberty Web Empresa 1 GB, 3 GB and 10 GB
: post-paid plans that offer Internet access through modems and
tablets, with possibility of repurchasing. This data plan and its packages are no longer offered as our main internet option, as
it was replaced for the new Liberty Web Empresa Multi portfolio, and is available for customized orders, only.
|
|
·
|
Liberty Web Smart
: plan that offers Internet access for a fixed monthly flat fee only if the customer uses the service
during the billing month, with possibility of repurchasing.
|
|
·
|
Liberty Web 20 MB, 50 MB, 100 MB, 300 MB, 600 MB, 1 GB and 3 GB:
the first option (20MB) is offered free of charge to
our new clients and is automatically included in voice plans that have no data package; from the 50MB data package onwards, data
packages are charged at fixed prices of R$9.90,
|
R$14.90, R$21.90, R$29.90, R$34.90 and R$49.90 per month, respectively, for mobile
phone Internet access, with possibility of repurchasing. These packages provide new service options for certain users without Internet
to complete their service portfolio and provide new pricing options for heavy users of data.
|
·
|
Liberty Torpedo
: plan that offers unlimited SMS to any operator at a fixed monthly rate, only payable in the month used.
|
We have also provided for bargaining flexibility
for our Senior Account Channel, allowing this sales force to negotiate at a higher level of discounts.
Value-Added Services
We are constantly seeking to increase value
to our customers through innovative offers and products, and 2015 was no exception. We offer, directly or through agreements entered
into with third parties, value-added services, including short message services or text messaging, multimedia messaging services,
push-mail, video call, WAP downloads, web browsing, business data solutions, mobile-learning services with TIM “Educação”,
wellness services with TIM “Bem Estar”, songs with TIM Music, ringbacktones with TIM “Som de Chamada”,
applications with TIM Apps Club, voicemail, conference calling, chats and other content to our postpaid and prepaid customers.
Under various postpaid mobile plans some value-added services are included in the monthly subscription charge at a specified level
of usage.
The following is a brief summary of our
principal value-added service offerings to consumers and corporate customer groups:
|
·
|
TIM Protect Portfolio
: a range of services designed to increase the security of our customer’s devices and personal
information. The main services are:
|
|
·
|
TIM Protect Segurança
: security solution to protect customer’s PCs, Macs and Android smartphones and tablets
with award-winning technologies from Kaspersky Lab. Protection against all new and emerging Internet threats; premium anti-theft/loss
protection for Android devices; helps bank, shop and pay online safely
|
|
·
|
TIM Protect Backup
: white-label personal cloud solution provided by Funambol. This multi-platform solution supports
all types of devices by allowing the storage and synchronization of subscribers’ data (photos, videos, files, etc.)
|
|
·
|
TIM Protect Contacts Backup
: provides customer’s phonebook storage and synchronization including SIM-based contacts
on feature phones thanks to Gemalto’s SIM cloud backup solution.
|
|
·
|
TIM CPF Seguro
: monitors the customer’s CPF (social security number) on-line. Alerts the customer in case of any
search or change by any credit, legal or commercial institution, regarding the customer’s CPF.
|
|
·
|
TIM Gourmet
: provides a full range of gastronomy services, including a restaurants and events guide, a delivery service
(in partnership with ifood.com) and recipes from Chef Claude Troisgros.
|
|
·
|
TIM Music
: a music platform for all devices, which includes:
|
|
·
|
TIM Music by Deezer
: in partnership with Deezer, TIM Music by Deezer is a service of streaming music which includes
offline mode always available through the TIM Music by Deezer application.
|
|
·
|
TIM “Som de Chamada”
: a ringbacktone service in partnership with Armotech. Through TIM “Som de Chamada”
the customer can choose a song that callers will hear when they call the customer’s TIM number.
|
|
·
|
TIM Music Store
: A music store for mp3 music and ringtones. Specially for features or low end phones.
|
|
·
|
TIM “Educação”
: a multi-platform umbrella of learning services, which uses SMS, WAP, Internet,
applications and interactive voice response, or IVR. Specific services include:
|
|
·
|
TIM Wizard Inglês
: an English course in partnership with Wizard, the biggest Brazilian English course franchise,
which teaches English using its methodology.
|
|
·
|
TIM Espanhol
: a basic Spanish course.
|
|
·
|
TIM Descomplica ENEM
: a mobile course in partnership with Descomplica that permits users to prepare for the ENEM and
Vestibular, Brazilian college entrance exams.
|
|
·
|
TIM Português
: Portuguese tips with Sergio Nogueira, a Brazilian famous Portuguese teacher.
|
|
·
|
TIM “Bem Estar”
: a multi-platform umbrella of wellness services, which uses SMS, WAP, Internet, applications
and IVR. A prominent feature of this value-added service are “Daily Tips” endorsed by Brazilian personalities, including
“TIM Saúde” (health tips with Drauzio Varella), “TIM Boa Forma” (fitness tips with Solange Frazão),
“TIM Receitas” (food recipes tips with Edu Guedes) and “TIM Estilo” (style tips with Gloria Kallil).
|
|
·
|
TIM Apps Club
: an innovative and signature applications service, wherein the user pays a small monthly fee and receives
access to hundreds of the best Android applications without additional cost.
|
|
·
|
TIM Radar
: a tracking services for all a company’s devices which also permits the company to send unlimited SMS
to employees to provide them with instructions, directions and other relevant messages. TIM Radar will, among others, help companies
improve their deliveries and pick-ups.
|
|
·
|
InfoTIM
: a corporate SMS service, which allows corporate clients to send and receive SMS to their customer base through
the TIM VAS Platform. InfoTIM is an Application to Peer, or A2P, service.
|
|
·
|
Gestor Web
: a control tool that enables our corporate clients to manage and control the voice access use of their employees
through an exclusive area of the TIM website.
|
|
·
|
TIM Banca Virtual
: a digital information service that provides the main magazines in the country (such as Veja, Exame,
Superinteressante, Fitness, VIP and Capricho) for our clients to access when, where and how they want. The disclosed contents can
be viewed through a portal or via an application that is available for the operating systems Android and IOS, through smartphone,
tablet or computer. The main distinguishing feature of the “TIM Banca Virtual” is the user's reading experience, and
goes beyond simple transcription of physical searches to digital format and brings elements such as sound, video and interactivity.
The model is already used by Editora Abril in their digital content but is the first of its kind for Brazilian telecommunications
carriers.
|
|
·
|
TIM Clube de Descontos
: a weekly subscription service that provides discounts online and offline for the main stores
from all over the country.
|
|
·
|
TIM Viagens
: an innovative service that provides, through an application, information, tips, prices, hotels, car and
flight offers using a partnership with Booking.com and Decolar.com.
|
|
·
|
TIM Seu Dinheiro
: an application that gives the user the knowledge of how to control expenditures, how to save money
and also provides a tool that helps to put in practice all the content.
|
|
·
|
TIM Empregos
: an innovative service that provides, through an application, information on open jobs in a city of choice
within certain departments and job roles. “TIM Empregos” is a partnership with Vagas.com.
|
|
·
|
TIM Kids Criar and TIM Kids Brincar
: an innovative platform focused on children from 0 to 10 years with videos, music,
interactive games, and educational activities.
|
|
·
|
TIM Gravidez
: a platform providing all information that an expectant family needs to have before and after having a
baby. An innovative feature of this service is that mothers and fathers receive different content showing each point of view.
|
|
·
|
TIM Espaço Mulher
: a multiplatform service focused on women of all ages with the newest content and tips relating
to, among others, eating, relationship, family and fitness.
|
|
·
|
TIM Audiobook
: an innovative service that permits the user to buy and listen to audiobooks direct from the user’s
phone and without internet.
|
|
·
|
EI Plus
: a subscription service costing R$4.99 per week, where TIM users can watch live content from Esporte Interativo’s
channels (including, for example, UEFA Champions League matches, Brazilian C and D Division soccer tournaments, NFL games, MMA
tournaments) by means of an iOS, Android and Windows Phone application and website.
|
|
·
|
IM Games Club
: an innovative subscription games applications service, wherein the user pays a small fee and receives
access to hundreds of the best game applications without additional cost.
|
We offer data services which support our
value-added services across every technology currently available on our network, starting from GPRS/EDGE capability using the GSM
network, followed by 3G/ High Speed Packet Access, or HSPA capability, using 3G infrastructure, and, since 2013, also through the
4G layer, which is fully dedicated to data services. Also in 2013, we launched the MBB program, which combines high capacity backhaul
with advanced features of HSPA, such as HSPA+ and Dual Carrier, reaching up to 42Mbps per cell. By December 2015, our 4G data transmission
technology, Long Term Evolution, or LTE, at the 2.5GHz and 1800MHz spectrum, was available in 411 cities (representing 59% of urban
population). LTE allows the user to access the Internet at very high data speeds. The 2.5GHz LTE network layer is built under an
innovative RAN sharing deal with another two Brazilian mobile operators, which establishes that each operator is responsible to
cover part of the Brazil with LTE network (see “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Site-Sharing
and Other Agreements”). This agreement brings significant savings in LTE construction and operation for both companies while
keeping subscribers and services completely separate.
Some changes in our business model for
value-added services, such as new pricing and implementation strategies, were instrumental in increasing our profits and those
of our partners. Value-added services represented 35% of our mobile services gross revenues in 2015, 28.0% of our mobile services
gross revenues in 2014, 22.3% of our mobile services gross revenues in 2013, 19.3% of our mobile services gross revenues in 2012.
We continued to experience growth in usage of these services in 2015, as illustrated by revenue growth from value-added services
of 17% compared to 2014.
Financial and Other Services
Financial Services
In May 2013, the Government enacted Provisional
Measure No. 615, which was passed as Law No. 12,865 in October 2013, which provides that telecommunications operators may offer
mobile payment services.
From 2013, we have strengthened our activities
in the financial service field through the development of partnerships and products for mobile banking, insurance, mobile payment,
and “mobile money,” all of which strengthen our core business and provide additional sources of revenue generation.
We have entered into financial services pilot projects in partnership with various financial institutions, including testing of
Near Field Communication, or NFC, technologies in partnership with Mastercard, RedeCard and Gemalto and “mobile money”
payments via mobile phones with Caixa Econômica Federal and MasterCard.
Mobile Insurance
At the beginning of 2012, we launched TIM
Insurance for Mobile Theft, our insurance product in partnership with Assurant Solutions. At first we launched the theft insurance
exclusively through our virtual store, and were the first and still the only operator to offer mobile theft insurance through an
online channel. We now also offer mobile theft insurance in our own stores. The product allows our customers to protect themselves
against the costs of mobile handset theft and/or accidental damages (physical or water damage) for monthly prices ranging from
R$2.99 to R$54.99, depending on the contracted coverage (theft only, damage only, or complete) and price of the device.
Financial Protection Insurance –
“Protected Invoice”
Our “Protected Invoice” service
is a financial protection insurance for postpaid plans that guarantees payment of up to 3 of the customer’s TIM bills, each
up to R$100.00, in the event of involuntary unemployment or full or temporary physical disability. The insurance, which costs R$6.50
per month, is offered to our postpaid customer base through Smart Message channel, which provides a convenient and easy way to
subscribe.
New Insurances – Personal and Residential
Markets
Our insurance portfolio also includes the
personal and residential accidents markets as a means of capitalizing on additional lines of revenue. We offer two types of personal
accident insurance plans:
Personal Accident Insurance with Help Desk Assistance
and
Personal Accident Insurance with
Concierge Assistance
. Both insurance plans guarantee the payment of R$5,000 in compensation to the beneficiaries in a result
of accidental death. Additionally, the plans also offer assistance to plan customers when needed, which adds value for the customer
because they can make use of the product routinely, as opposed to only in the rare instance of accidental death.
Personal Accident Insurance with Help
Desk
offers technical support assistance over the phone, Internet, chat and remote access (Virtual Tour) for hardware problems
(including PCS, Laptops, netbooks, tablets and smartphones). The insurance costs R$8.90 per month and is offered to our postpaid
customer base through Smart Message, SMS and IVR channels.
Personal Accident Insurance with Concierge
offers travel assistance when traveling, for financial and health purposes, emergencies and daily activities. The insurance costs
R$6.90 per month and is offered to our postpaid customer base through Smart Message, SMS and IVR channels.
We also offer two types of residential
accident insurance plans: “
Casa Protegida
” and “C
asa Protegida Completo.
” The first offers
cover fire, explosion, lightning and aircraft. It costs R$9.90 per month and is offered to our prepaid customer base. The second
offers the same coverage but also includes residential assistance (such as electrician services, leakage tests, and other residential
assistance) that can be used at any time. This insurance is offered to the postpaid customer base and has a cost of R$16.90 per
month. Both products are offered to our customer base through Smart Message, SMS and IVR channels.
Micro Rewards Platform - Telecom Bonus
As another source of new revenue, TIM partnered
in 2014 with MinuTrade to participate in “Micro Rewards” platform. The Micro Rewards platform integrates TIM’s
systems with many different partner companies in order to provide to our common customers certain bonuses or credits towards TIM
purchases, or Telecom Bonuses. For example, in the Brazilian bank market is common to charge customers a monthly fee for account
maintenance. In exchange for the monthly fee payment, participating banks reward the customers with a Telecom Bonus which can be
used for in-network calls, long distance calls, SMS and daily data packages. Our new revenue comes from selling the wholesale value
of the Telecom Bonus to the banks and other partner companies. MinuTrade receives a commission for use of the “Micro Rewards”
platform.
TIM Itaucard
The TIM Itaucard is our first payment product,
a co-branded credit card in partnership with Itaú, which brings us an unprecedented relationship program based on Itaú's
benefits platform. In 2015 our focus was on gaining market share through online efforts and stimulating credit card spending to
increase the product’s profitability. TIM Itaucard allows the Company to develop a deeper, more loyal client relationship
and provides increased revenues.
Liberty Controle Express
In November 2012, with the idea of creating
a postpaid plan that could be sold without the need for a credit assessment, a new Controle plan paid exclusively with a credit
card was launched. The plan was launched with three distinct values of R$18.00 for Rio Grande do Sul, and R$28.00 and R$48.00 for
the rest of the country. The plan also can be acquired by self-service through our website, in addition to our owned stores.
Mobile Money
With a focus on developing a product for
non-banking prepaid clients, we entered into a partnership with Caixa Econômica Federal and MasterCard to develop new payments
options via mobile, in the “mobile money” format, a virtual version of a prepaid bank card associated with a mobile
number. With this “mobile money” service, which is named TIM Multibank CAIXA, users can use their TIM mobile devices
to pay their bills and send and receive money. With the growth in popularity of this service, TIM will strongly contribute to the
financial enfranchisement of millions of Brazilians, given that 40% of Brazilian population currently have no bank account.
Revenues
Our total gross operating revenue by category
of activity for each of the last three years is set forth below.
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|
(in millions of R$)
|
Category of Activity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenue
|
|
|
23,120.9
|
|
|
|
24,533.2
|
|
|
|
25,065.2
|
|
Goods sold
|
|
|
2,646.9
|
|
|
|
4,471.3
|
|
|
|
4,596.5
|
|
Gross operating revenue
|
|
|
25,767.8
|
|
|
|
29,004.5
|
|
|
|
29,661.8
|
|
Revenue from mobile telephone services
includes revenue from:
|
·
|
monthly subscription charges;
|
|
·
|
network usage charges for local mobile calls;
|
|
·
|
interconnection charges;
|
|
·
|
national and international long distance calls;
|
|
·
|
value-added services, including charges for short message services or text messaging, multimedia messaging services, push-mail,
BlackBerry service, video call, turbo mail, WAP downloads, web browsing, business data solutions, songs, games, TV access, voicemail,
conference calling, chats and other content and services;
|
|
·
|
sales of mobile handsets and accessories; and
|
Monthly Subscription Charges
We receive a monthly subscription fee under
our postpaid mobile plans, which varies based on the usage limits under the relevant plan.
Network Usage Charges
We divide our coverage areas into certain
areas defined as “home registration areas.” Calls within the same home registration area are considered local calls.
Each of our customers is registered as a user of one of our home registration areas.
As determined by Anatel, our usage rate
categories for local mobile services on a prepaid or postpaid basis are as follows:
|
·
|
VC1. The VC1 rate is our base rate per minute and applies to mobile / fixed calls made by a customer located in the customer’s
home registration area to a person registered in the same home registration area.
|
|
·
|
VC. The VC rate is our base rate per minute and applies to mobile / mobile calls made by a customer located in the customer’s
home registration area to a person registered in the same home registration area.
|
|
·
|
AD. AD is a per-call surcharge applicable to all outgoing calls or incoming calls made or received by a customer while outside
such customer’s home registration area.
|
|
·
|
VU-M. Value of Use of Mobile Network (Valor de Uso de Rede Móvel), or VU-M, also known as an interconnection rate or
mobile termination rate, is the fee another telecommunications service provider pays us for the use of our network by such provider’s
customers, in this case for local calls. (See “—Interconnection Charges”).
|
Usage charges are for minutes in excess
of those included as part of the monthly subscription charge under the relevant postpaid plan.
Roaming Fees
We receive revenue pursuant to roaming
agreements we have entered into with other mobile telecommunications service providers. When a call is made from within our coverage
area by a client of another mobile service provider, that service provider is charged a roaming fee for the service used, be it
voice, text messaging or data, at our applicable rates. Similarly, when one of our clients makes a mobile call when that customer
is outside of our coverage area using the network of another service provider, we must pay the charges associated with that call
to the mobile service provider in whose coverage area the call originates at the applicable rate of such mobile service provider.
Automatic national roaming permits our
customers to use their mobile telephones on the networks of other mobile service providers while traveling or “roaming”
in the limited areas of Brazil not covered by our network, complementing our current mobile coverage. Similarly, we provide mobile
telecommunications service to customers of other mobile service providers when those customers place or receive calls while in
our network. Mobile service providers which are party to roaming agreements must provide service to roaming customers on the same
basis that such providers provide service to their own clients. All such providers carry out a monthly reconciliation of roaming
charges. Our roaming agreements have a one-year term and automatically renew for additional one-year terms.
In conjunction with the approval of the
PGMC, Anatel classified the four main national PCS providers as having significant market power in the national roaming market.
As a result of such classification, TIM Celular, Claro, Vivo and Oi are required to submit reference offers at least every six
months for Anatel’s approval and must offer roaming services to other mobile providers without significant market power at
the approved rates.
Interconnection Charges
Interconnection charges represent a significant
part of our revenues. We receive interconnection revenues in connection with any call originating from another service provider’s
network, mobile or fixed line, which is received by any mobile customer, of ours or of another provider’s, while using our
network. We charge the service provider from whose network the call originates an interconnection fee for every minute our network
is used in connection with the call.
We have entered into interconnection agreements
with all the telecommunications service providers operating in Brazil, which include provisions specifying the number of interconnection
points, the method by which signals must be received and transmitted, and the costs and fees for interconnection services. Nevertheless,
even in the absence of approval by Anatel, the parties to these interconnection agreements are obligated to offer interconnection
services to each other. See “—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry—Interconnection Regulation.”
The interconnection fees we were permitted to charge other mobile telecommunications providers, and which other mobile telecommunications
providers charge us, has in the past frequently been adjusted by inflation.
In 2007, an additional agreement relating
to interconnection fees entered into among the fixed telephony incumbents (with the exception of Embratel) and the mobile service
providers established an average VU-M increase of 2%. The same parties also executed an additional agreement, which was agreed
to by Anatel, contemplating a 68.5% increase in the VU-M fee over the VC-1 adjustment for 2008. Accordingly, in 2008, mobile also
received an average VU-M increase of 2%.
In March 2009, there was an agreement between
TIM and Embratel (because Embratel did not participate in the previous agreements) to establish the same conditions agreed between
TIM and the other incumbents, with the applicable adjustments in terms of financial agreements. In December, 2009, Anatel determined
that we must have only three VU-Ms, according to the three authorization areas (PGA regions).
In October 2011, Anatel decided to reduce
fixed to mobile rates, based on a reduction in the respective wholesale interconnection levels on call termination. Anatel proposed
a reduction of the fixed to mobile rates of 18% in 2012 and 12% in 2013, based on nominal declines.
In November 2012, as part of the cost model
transition, Anatel set out the 2014 mobile termination reference rate VU-M for operators with significant market power at 75% of
the valid VU-M in 2013, and the 2015 reference rate VU-M at 50% of the valid VU-M in 2013. Based on that, in December 2013, VU-M
prices for 2014 and 2015 were published in accordance with Resolution No. 600.
On July 4, 2014, Anatel approved, by means
of Resolution No. 639/2014, a rule for the definition of maximum reference rates for entities with significant market power, based
on a cost model, for VU-M, TU-RL, and EILD. Pursuant to Anatel’s rule, reference rates will decline based on a glide path
until the cost modeling known as LRIC+ Bottom Up is applied (2019, for VU-M and TU-RL; and 2020, for EILD). On July 7, 2014, Anatel
published the corresponding Acts No. 6,210/2014, 6,211/2014 and 6,212/2014, which determined the specific reference rates to be
adopted as of February 2016. With the adoption of the cost modeling methods, VU-M are expected to decline, approximately, as follows:
Region I: 40-45% in the first year, 47% in the subsequent years; Region II – 35% in the first year, 48% in the subsequent
years; and Region III: 24-30% in the first year, 39% in the subsequent years.
As previously noted, Anatel classified
us as belonging to economic groups with significant market power in the mobile network termination market to which these cost models
apply, which is the primary impact of our classification as a significant market power. Because the significant majority of our
interconnection charges are to the other leading telecommunications operators in Brazil, which are also classified as having significant
market power, we are also entitled to remunerate these providers at the reference rates approved by Anatel.
It is our position that Anatel’s
decision to establish VU-M rates – a price related to the provision of telecommunications services in the private regime
– based on a cost model does not comply with Brazilian law. Accordingly, we filed an annulment application with Anatel in
connection with the July 2014 resolution, which was rejected by Anatel in March 2015. In May 2015, we presented a further appeal,
and this appeal is still under review by Anatel. We are currently reevaluating our strategy due to new commercial conditions, and
there is no assurance that our appeal will be successful and even if our appeal were to be successful, we would likely still be
subject to some form of rate regulation as a result of our classification as having significant market power.
In addition to the VU-M reduction, Anatel
established a Bill & Keep, or B&K, rule between significant market power and non-significant market power PCSs. From January
2013 until February 2015, the B&K was 80%/20% as established by Resolution 600. On February 12, 2015, Anatel approved, by means
of Resolution No. 649/2015, the following new B&K percentages, amending the percentages established by Resolution 600: 75%/25%,
from 2015 until 2016; 65%/35%, from 2016 until 2017; 55%/45%, from 2017 until 2018; and 50%/50%, from 2018 until 2019, which was
object of a judicial suit (on going), in order to suspend its effects. After 2019 the VU-M will be charged by the significant market
power whenever their network is used to originate or to finish a call. In July 2015, we filed a lawsuit seeking to annul Resolution
No. 649/2015 and maintain the percentages originally
established by Resolution 600, which currently remains pending.
Long Distance
Telecommunications customers in Brazil
are able to select long distance carriers on a per-call basis under the carrier selection, or the CSP program, introduced in July
2003, by punching in a two digit code prior to dialing long distance. This regulation also increased the size of home registration
areas, calls within which are local calls and, as a result, reduced the number of home registration areas.
For mobile customers, we offer long distance
services throughout Brazil through our wholly owned subsidiary TIM Celular. This service allows our mobile customers the option
of continuing to use our service for long distance calls, which we believe strengthens our respective relationship and loyalty,
and enhances the perception of our brand as a comprehensive mobile telecommunications service. Mobile customers of other service
providers can also choose to use our long distance service.
Under this structure, a customer is charged
the VC1 or VC rates directly by us only for calls made by and completed to a number registered within that customer’s home
registration area. Long distance calls, however, are charged to a customer by the chosen long distance carrier. Other long distance
carriers, in turn, pay us a VU-M fee for any use of our network for a long distance call.
As determined by Anatel, our long distance
usage rate categories are as follows:
|
·
|
VC2. The VC2 rate applies to calls placed by a customer located in one of our home registration areas selecting us as the long
distance carrier, on a per-call basis, to place a call to a person registered in another home registration area within the same
wireless area recognized by Anatel;
|
|
·
|
VC3. The VC3 rate applies to calls placed by a customer located in one of our home registration areas selecting us as the long
distance carrier, on a per-call basis, to place a call to a person registered outside the same wireless area recognized by Anatel;
and
|
|
·
|
VU-M. VU-M is the fee another telecommunications service provider pays us for the use of our network by such provider’s
customers, in this case for long distance calls. (See “—Interconnection Charges.”)
|
In 2012, the unification of the long-distance
licenses 23 and 41 was concluded. The 23 customer base migrated to 41, thus making possible a single branded long distance operator
for both mobile and fixed. Also in 2012, the Liberty Passport offer for voice and data was launched, which offers customers the
innovative concept of unlimited use of Internet and voice services on five continents, paying a fixed value per day of use of each
service (voice or data), simplifying the adhesion to our international roaming service, with extremely attractive values.
Sales of Mobile Handsets
We offer a diverse portfolio of handset
models from several manufacturers, including Apple, Samsung, LG, Microsoft and Motorola, for sale through our dealer network, which
includes our own stores, exclusive franchises, authorized dealers and department stores. We are focused on offering an array of
handsets, including essential and smartphones such as the iPhone and Samsung Galaxy devices with enhanced functionality for value-added
services, including equipment that provides 4G, 3G, Dual SIM, NFC, Wi-Fi, Internet, Bluetooth and camera functionalities, while
practicing a policy of increasing smartphone penetration, focusing on large volumes to gain market share in Brazil. Our mobile
handsets can be used in conjunction with either our prepaid or postpaid service plans. At present, we believe that supplies of
mobile handsets are sufficient to satisfy demand, but also plan to expand our mobile handset portfolio to new devices focused on
the connectivity experience, such as routers, web and wearable devices.
Co-Billing Services
Co-billing occurs when we bill our customers
on behalf of another long distance service provider for services rendered to our customer by that carrier. Beginning July 2003,
we started providing co-billing services to other telecommunication service providers operating in Brazil. The rates of such services
are being negotiated under the supervision of Anatel.
Sales and Marketing
Our recent sales and marketing strategy
has been characterized by:
|
·
|
an evolution of our prepaid plans, aimed at breaking the interconnectivity barrier by leveling the prices of both in-network
and out-of-network calls using the mechanism of a recurrent recharge (R$7.00/week for clients). The Brazilian market, because of
interconnectivity charges, is uniquely characterized by individual clients regularly having chips of multiple telecommunications
operators. Accordingly, this change in prepaid plans to minimize the interconnectivity barrier keeps us ahead of our competitors,
with a great competitive differential, and reinforces our leadership in this market. We maintained our
Infinity
plan, which is popular with customers and competitive in areas that we already have leadership in the market, during the evolution
of this new plan;
|
|
·
|
an evolution
of our postpaid plans, within which we are pursuing a number of strategies, including: (i) a comprehensive review of our plans
in order to allow high levels of voice utilization without the interconnectivity impact (same price for any operator on local
or long distance calls), as well as high levels
|
of
data utilization, (ii) generating acquisition volume by offering postpaid plans that are easy to understand and SIM-only
plan options where the customer does not also need to purchase a device, (iii) creating new opportunities for transitioning
the higher spending prepaid customers to postpaid (for example, through our new
Controle
plan for data intensive
users), and (iv) creating new markets for postpaid plans, according to our customers’ usage profile (for example, a
Controle
plan with a R$50.00 price point);
|
·
|
improvement of the gamification on the TIM BETA platform, promoting our platform via application, implementing better and more
streamlined processes, in order to improve customer satisfaction, brand loyalty as well as profitability and the development of
new customer experiences to promote exclusively to our clients; and
|
|
·
|
a restructuring of our corporate business, targeting the growth of the overall sales force in order to boost mobile sales and
provide a convergent approach on selected markets and areas. This strategy will continue throughout 2016 in order to meet customer
needs and achieve alignment with industry demands.
|
Our Network
Our wireless networks use 2G, 3G and 4G
technologies and cover approximately 95% of the urban Brazilian population based on Anatel’s coverage criteria. In order
to move toward 4G services, in October 2012, we acquired additional bandwidth in the 2,530-2,540 MHz and 2,650-2,660 MHz sub-bands,
with national coverage, and the 450 MHz band in Espírito Santo, Paraná, Rio de Janeiro and Santa Catarina states.
As part of regulatory commitments, we started
covering six cities by April 2013 with 4G/LTE. As of December 2013, we had provided 4G coverage to approximately 27% of the urban
population of Brazil, including 19 capital cities. By the end of 2015, we were providing 4G/LTE coverage in 411 cities, making
us the national leader in provision of 4G/LTE by number of cities covered, considering implementation in both the 2.5GHz and 1800MHz
layers. These cities represent 59% of total Brazilian urban population.
In September 2014, we invested approximately
R$2.85 billion to acquire additional bandwidth in the 700 MHz range, aligned with our strategy of expanding our broadband and 4G
service across Brazil. We expect to initiate access to this bandwidth in 2017, depending on the progression of spectrum clean-up
required of the winning bidders for the spectrum (see “—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry—Frequencies
and Spectrum Background”). In December 2015, as part of an Anatel auction, we submitted bids for the left over lots of the
2,500 MHz band, which provides for 4G mobile services. The bidding currently remains in the “Opening, Analysis and Assessment
of Price Proposals” stage, and the auction is expected to be finalized, with winners to be selected in the first half of
2016. However, based on the preliminary results of the bidding, we have been classified as the first ranked bidder in the lots
for Recife, in the state of Pernambuco (Region AR 81), and Curitiba, in the state of Paraná (Region AR 41), based on our
bids of R$32 million and R$24.5 million, respectively, totaling R$56.5 million, which bids were renewed in March 2016.
These investments allowed us to reach,
by the end of 2015, the milestone of 411 cities with 4G coverage, or 59% of the country’s urban population. We are thus the
undisputed leader in 4G coverage in Brazil among mobile telecommunications providers, both by number of cities served and percentage
of population covered. A major portion of the Company’s capital expenditures between 2016 and 2018 will be dedicated to further
investment in 4G networks.
We consider the purchase of any frequency
made available by Anatel for the provision of mobile services as a priority, since having available frequency is core to our business.
In 2015, we made R$4.3 billion, or 92% of our capital expenditures (excluding licenses) in investments to improve our network infrastructure,
primarily in 4G and 3G deployment, expansion and capacity enhancement of optical transport networks, quality maintenance and enabling
of fiber-to-the-site and MBB programs.
Our wireless network has both centralized
and distributed functions, and mainly includes transmission equipment, consisting primarily of 12,850 BTS in our GSM network, 12,365
nodeBs for the 3G layer and 7,689 eNodeBs for 4G network as of December 2015, hardware equipment and software installation and
upgrades. The network is connected primarily by IP radio links and/or optical fiber transmission systems distributed nationwide.
Only a few radiobase stations remain connected by leased lines. Nokia Siemens Networks, Ericsson and Huawei are our main suppliers
for GSM and 3G equipment.
In 2013, we launched MBB, initially in
39 cities, which has improved data transmission for mobile broadband users through an expanded high-speed fiber optic network and
new functionalities in the network core. Our MBB service now reaches 194 cities. By the end of 2015, we delivered important infrastructure
projects for the benefit of MBB users, including improvements in data transmission which in turn improve MBB performance, high-speed
optical fibers, radio access upgrades and implementation of new functionalities in the network core. We will continue investing
in high performance MBB.
Another priority is developing our national
network. Between 2016 and 2018, we plan on investing approximately R$14 billion in capital expenditures, continuing our commitment
to infrastructure development. In December 2015 as compared with the December 2014, we increased by 32% the quantity of sites connected
by optical fiber, contributing to a 29% increase in data carried on our network during 2015. The results are consistent with Anatel’s
network quality requirements, and with TIM retaining its solid performance in 2015. From April to October 2015, the Company has
met all Anatel’s targets for both voice and data services (3G/4G) in every single state. This achievement is a result of
our strong commitment to quality and better usage experience, and our goal to accelerate infrastructure development, particularly
with respect to data expansion.
With the acquisition of Intelig, we have
integrated more than 15 thousand kilometers of long-distance fiber optic cables connecting the main cities of Brazil. We have been
deploying 40G/DWDM/ROADM (dense wavelength-division multiplexing and reconfigurable optical add-drop multiplexer) layers on top
of this existing network, modernizing the existing assets by replacing the legacy network. In addition, during last three years,
we have entered into joint construction contracts and other partnerships and initiatives, in addition to completing construction
projects on our own, that resulted in the expansion of our fiber optic network by approximately 16.0 thousand kilometers (currently
TIM has approximately 70.2 thousand kilometers of optical routes). We have also established a partnership with a consortium of
electric transmission line operators in the northern region of Brazil, where we acquired the right to launch optical ground wire
(OPGW) cables connecting the cities of Manaus, Macapá and other cities near to the transmission line in 2013. During the
next few years, we plan to execute additional projects to increase the capillarity of our long-distance backbone network.
Our switching exchanges and intelligent
network platforms enable us to offer flexible, high quality voice service at extremely competitive prices. Our satellite network
covers distant areas of the country and is being expanded and renewed to provide high capacity private service to other carriers
and corporate customers. We also acquired capacity from major submarine cable systems such as AmericasII, Globenet and Atlantis2.
As mentioned above, we have initiated a multi-year plan to expand the network with a goal of expanding coverage to the most isolated
areas of Brazil.
Finally, the AES Atimus Acquisition and
consequent creation of TIM Fiber (now TIM Celular) has improved our optical fiber (or fiber optic) network presence in the metropolitan
regions of Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo. Our optical fiber network has a unique capacity to offer high quality ultra-broadband
service, available through our Live TIM service.
As of December 31, 2015, our optical fiber
infrastructure is highlighted by the following characteristics:
|
·
|
the presence of TIM Fiber (now TIM Celular) services in 161 neighborhoods in the metropolitan regions of Rio de Janeiro and
São Paulo, with continued expansion in Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo where our Live TIM service is available;
|
|
·
|
the presence of fiber optic networks in 75 cities; and
|
|
·
|
an extensive wide area network, or backbone, of approximately 70,264 kilometers.
|
Site-Sharing and Other Agreements
With the objective of avoiding unnecessary
duplication of networks and infrastructures, Anatel permits telecommunications service providers to use other providers’
networks as secondary support in providing telecommunications services. Therefore, we have allowed other telecommunications service
providers to use our infrastructure, and we have used others’ infrastructure, pursuant to site-sharing agreements we have
entered into with such providers.
Additionally, other sharing plans are being
agreed among mobile operators, such as joint construction of long distance lines, backhaul sharing, and even studies for sharing
radio access frequencies have been made, with focus on lowering costs and increasing the penetration of the wireless services in
Brazil.
In November 2012, we executed a memorandum
of understanding, or MoU, aimed at negotiating the joint use of LTE network (4G technology) under a RAN sharing model pursuant
to which Oi will invest in (and provide TIM with access to) infrastructure in certain cities, while TIM Celular will invest in
(and provide Oi with access to) infrastructure in other cities. On March 27, 2013, CADE approved the MoU without any restrictions.
On April 18, 2013, Anatel also approved the MoU. In late 2013, TIM Celular and Oi negotiated the extension of the MoU to additional
cities, including adding training centers, and the revision certain obligations of each party under the MoU. CADE fully approved
the inclusion of new territories and governance structure on November 18, 2013, which completed all regulatory steps necessary
for approval.
During 2015, the LTE RAN sharing model
for the 2.5GHz spectrum was extended to a third partner operator, Vivo, which is part of the Telefonica group, in order to maximize
the benefits that common RAN assets can bring. Anatel and CADE have already approved this three-party deal for certain cities.
In April 2014, TIM Celular and Oi filed
with CADE and Anatel an MoU aimed at negotiating the joint construction, implementation and reciprocal assignment of elements of
their respective network infrastructure for GSM (2G) and UMTS (3G). On April 25, 2014, during a meeting with TIM Celular and Oi,
Anatel requested additional information, including the final draft of the agreement to be executed by the parties. On May 6, 2014,
CADE requested additional information about the transaction. On December 30, 2014, TIM and Oi provided additional information and
clarification before CADE and Anatel, as requested by the respective authorities. On January 29, 2015, CADE approved the transaction
without restrictions and on March 24, 2015, Anatel approved the transaction without restrictions.
In June 2015, we executed an MoU aimed
at negotiating the joint use of LTE network (4G technology) under a RAN sharing model (MOCN) pursuant to which Vivo, Oi and TIM
will invest proportionally (2 Vivo, 1 Oi and 1 TIM) in sites in certain cities based on their coverage obligations. On December
11, 2015, CADE approved the operation without any restrictions. On December 17, 2015, Anatel also approved the operation based
upon MOCN spectrum sharing among only the 3 operators. At the beginning of 2016, however, Anatel required that the parties include
new clauses in the contract permitting a new additional operator be added. This contract covers 32 cities in 2015 and will cover
150 cities in 2016 and 525 cities in 2017.
Customer Service
In order to serve our customer base, over
66.2 million customers, we maintain sixteen customer care centers, four of our own and twelve outsourced, comprising around fourteen
thousand customer service representatives.
Moreover, we have directed efforts at maximizing
customer satisfaction through continuous improvements in our processes and systems. We have developed solutions based on interactive
voice response, or IVR, self-service and mobile applications for iOS and Android. We have also invested in workforce training on
how to explain more clearly our services to new and existing customers, using a new Virtual Training System. Additionally, we have
improved processes at every level, including simplifying billing and accounting processes, launching projects to enhance our workforce
productivity, updating procedures focused on meeting customer demands, and developing programs to encourage attendance.
In 2015, we developed our electronic customer
service menu (URA) by offering more customer-oriented options, providing new services, working to improve current services and
working to better comprehend and even solve the customer's issue within the electronic service menu, particularly with respect
to certain critical demands. Within the URA, we implemented the concept of decision tree to better achieve the foregoing. We continue
to work towards achieving systemic and procedural synergy, multichannel monitoring and management of control indicators.
Our portal *144# uses Unstructured Supplementary
Service Data, or USSD, a technology to allow the activation of services from the mobile device itself. In order to increase self-service
access, we continue to improve humanization features in our Interactive Voice Response, or IVR, to refine our automated calling
process, enabling client identification, manual selection of options, and recording and reporting through a unique sequential protocol.
A new regulatory policy allowed us to, when requested by customers, automatically unsubscribe such customer through the IVR, and
also to make callbacks to the customer in case of call interruption.
In 2015, we improved the customer care
model created in 2014 focused on internet and social media, which aims to improve our customer experience through these digital
channels and to provide greater convenience and autonomy. We also designed a specific digital customer care channel – chat
and online support – to our TIM Beta customers. We also expanded the Siebel customer relationship management, or CRM, system
to postpaid customers, in addition to prepaid customers (for whom the system was implemented in 2014). In the same vein, we commenced
a project to replace our current CRM for corporate customers, continuing our commitment to the modernization of our customers service.
We directed many of our efforts to customer
service infrastructure. These include aforementioned implementation of Siebel CRM for postpaid and Controle customers, the implementation
of Cisco’s IPCC - Precision Routing and a workforce management and point of contact distributor called Backoffice, and the
delivery of a new care structure and an omni-channel platform. In respect of our infrastructure governance, we have implemented
involuntary routing and focused on reducing droppage of network calls, reducing network contingencies, unifying various tools and
increasing the immediate capability of calls.
We are continuously seeking ways to improve
our customer service level. We constantly monitor and record customer interactions with the company through our proprietary CRM
system, enabling improvements of unique and innovative services capabilities at multiple points of contact.
Billing and Collection
Our company-wide, integrated billing and
collection systems are provided by a third-party vendor. These systems have four main functions:
|
·
|
customer information management;
|
|
·
|
accounts receivable management; and
|
|
·
|
billing and collection.
|
These billing systems give us significant
flexibility in developing service plans and billing options.
Certain aspects of billing customers in
Brazil are regulated by Anatel. For mobile telephones, currently if a customer’s payment is more than 15 days overdue, we
can suspend the customer’s ability to make outgoing calls, and if the payment is 45 days overdue, we can suspend the customer’s
ability to receive incoming calls. After 90 days from the customer’s payment due date, we generally discontinue service entirely,
although discontinuation of service is sometimes delayed between 120 and 180 days after the due date for valued customers. For
fixed telephones, if a customer’s payment is more than 30 days overdue, we can suspend the customer’s ability to make
outgoing calls, and if the payment is 60 days overdue, we can suspend the customer’s ability to receive incoming calls. The
rules of discontinuation of fixed service are the same as those applied for the mobile service.
In March 2014, Anatel approved a single
regulation for the telecommunications sector, with general rules for customer service, billing, and service offers, which are applicable
to fixed, mobile, broadband and cable TV customers.
In order to avoid delinquency and discontinuation
of service, however, we have invested in CRM models to identify customers with higher propensity to early delinquency, or when
a postpaid customer does not pay the first or second invoice, and also reinforced credit history checks for our customers prior
to service activation. As a result, our bad debt remained flat throughout 2015. Our “
Plano Express
” has also
proved to be an important tool to prevent early delinquency.
Pursuant to Anatel regulations, we and
other telephone service providers periodically reconcile the interconnection and roaming charges owed among them and settle on
a net basis. See “—Interconnection Charges” and “—Roaming Fees.” Currently, the roaming reconciliation
process is largely managed by industry sponsored groups, including Verisign Clearing House for domestic roaming TDMA and MACH for
domestic and international GSM, while the interconnection reconciliation process is primarily managed directly by us.
Fraud Detection and Prevention
“Subscription fraud,” which
consists of using identification documents of another individual to obtain mobile services, is the main fraud relating to mobile,
fixed and long distance service. We are focused on implementing prevention measures in our points of sales to avoid such subscription
fraud. Examples of prevention measures include digital authentication for our sales front end system, a strong training program,
maintaining a blacklist of offenders to prevent fraud, analysis of the documentation presented and monitoring and identification
of point of sale.
Seasonality
We have experienced a trend of generating
a significantly higher number of new clients and handset sales in the fourth quarter of each year as compared to the other three
fiscal quarters. A number of factors contribute to this trend, including the increased use of retail distribution in which sales
volume increases significantly during the year-end holiday shopping season, the timing of new product and service announcements
and introductions, and aggressive marketing and promotions in the fourth quarter of each year.
Sources and Availability of Raw Materials
Our business and results of operations
are not significantly affected by the availability and prices of raw materials.
Competition
Mobile Competitors
TIM is the brand name under which we market
our mobile telecommunications services. We offer GSM, 3G, and 4G technologies. Currently, our subsidiaries hold mobile licenses
for each of the ten wireless areas of Brazil recognized by Anatel, making us a mobile operator in Brazil offering complete nationwide
coverage. In two of our ten areas we are the Telebrás legacy provider. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—A.
History and Development of the Company—Historical Background.” Our network covers approximately 95% of the country’s
population based on Anatel’s coverage criteria.
In addition to TIM, there are three other
major participants in the Brazilian mobile market that offer nationwide coverage in all Anatel wireless areas: Vivo, Claro and
Oi
The Brazilian mobile telecommunications
industry is highly competitive. Any adverse effects on our results and market share from competitive pressures will depend on a
variety of factors that cannot be assessed with precision and that are beyond our control. Among such factors are our competitors’
size, experience, business strategies and capabilities, the prevailing market conditions and the applicable regulations.
Other Competition
We also compete with fixed line telephone
service providers. The fixed line incumbent providers in Brazil (Oi, Telefónica and Embratel) offer packages of services
including voice (both fixed line and mobile), broadband and other services, e.g. bundling. Fixed line providers are, however, required
to offer their services to unaffiliated mobile providers on the same basis they are offered to affiliated mobile providers. Our
acquisition of Intelig broadened our participation in the fixed telecommunication sector.
We also compete in the corporate telephony
business with Nextel, which acts, as part of its services, as a digital trunking (based on push-to-talk technology), or SME, provider.
SME providers operate under rules similar to the rules applicable to mobile telecommunications service providers, though trunking
operators are not permitted to offer their services to individuals. Nextel has provided trunking services in Brazil since 2001
and, on December 14, 2010, bid R$1.2 billion in winning 12 lots involving new GSM and UMTS frequencies in Anatel’s auction,
which gave Nextel the opportunity to be the fifth nationwide mobile telecommunications competitor. Nextel also entered into a national
roaming agreement with Telefónica in the beginning of 2014, whereby Nextel personal mobile service, or SMP, customers can
use Telefónica mobile 2G and 3G network in regions where Nextel does not have coverage.
On February 9, 2015, Anatel approved, by
means of Resolution No. 647/2015, the adjustment of SME licenses into PCS licenses. In December 2015, Nextel won the auction for
the 30 Mhz band in the 1,800 Mhz spectrum in São Paulo with an offer of R$455 million. Nextel will use this spectrum to
offer SMP services in a movement to transition from an SME operator to an SMP operator.
Our Operational Contractual Obligations
For more information on our material contractual
obligations, see “Item 10. Additional Information—C. Material Contracts.”
Interconnection and Other Agreements
We have entered into interconnection agreements
with most of the telecommunications service providers operating in Brazil. The terms of our interconnection agreements include
provisions specifying the number of interconnection points, the method by which signals must be received and transmitted, and the
costs and fees for interconnection services. Due to our migration to PCS, we have adapted our interconnection to conform to the
PCS rules and submitted these revised contracts to Anatel. Nevertheless, even in the absence of approval by Anatel, the parties
to these interconnection agreements are obligated to offer interconnection services to each other. See “—Interconnection
Regulation.”
As a means to improve efficiency and reduce
costs, we also enter into agreements with the other major Brazilian telecommunications operators related to (i) the cancellation
of idle circuits and (ii) interconnection using Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) technology.
Roaming Agreements
We have entered into roaming agreements
for automatic roaming services with other mobile operators outside our regions. Automatic roaming allows our customers to use their
mobile telephones on the networks of other mobile operators while traveling abroad or out of TIM coverage areas in Brazil. Similarly,
we provide mobile services for customers of other mobile operators when those customers place or receive calls while visiting Brazilians
cities with TIM coverage. We provide services for the clients visiting our network on the same infra-structure basis provided to
our own clients. All of the mobile operators party to these agreements must carry out a monthly reconciliation of roaming charges
with its roaming partners.
Through TIM Brasil, we are a member of
the Brazilian Association of Telecommunications Resources (
Associação Brasileira de Recursos em Telecomunicações
),
or ABRT, a group comprised of all mobile and fixed telecommunications service providers operating in Brazil. This association is
in charge of managing telecommunications projects in compliance with Anatel in order to support common interests of its members.
Our GSM national and international roaming services are supported by individual agreements with our partners.
National Roaming Agreements
In accordance with Anatel requirements,
we have entered into national roaming agreements with other Brazilian operators to guarantee a mobile service (voice and SMS) on
Anatel’s list of cities with less 30,000 habitants.
International Roaming Agreements
We have international roaming agreements
available in approximately 208 different countries on approximately 550 networks. These agreements include at a minimum voice service,
and may be enhanced based on the technology available on the visiting network and can include SMS, multimedia messaging service,
or MMS, GPRS, EDGE, 3G and 4G. Our international roaming agreements have steadily expanded in recent years. In 2013, we became
the first operator in Brazil to provide international 4G roaming in Italy, one of the main destinations in Europe for Brazilian
travelers. By the end of 2015, we expanded our 4G service to 18 additional countries and 21 operators.
We were also the first Brazilian mobile
operator to launch a user-friendly international roaming plan, charging per day of usage. In 2013, we expanded our coverage to
prepaid customers and developed a different option for the
Liberty Express
plan. In October 2015, the
Liberty Passport
offering was redesigned to offer increased data to customers in key destinations, with the goal of creating a better overall user
experience for our customers in general. Moreover, focusing on a key portion of TIM customers, the offering was made available
in the United States at a
rate of R$9.90 per day of use. As of December 2015, international roaming is available to customers on
our Prepaid, Controle and Liberty plans.
Site-Sharing Agreement
With the objective of avoiding unnecessary
duplication of networks and infrastructure, Anatel permits telecommunications service providers to use other providers’ networks
as secondary support in providing telecommunications services. Therefore, we have allowed other telecommunications service providers
in our region to use our infrastructure, and we have used other providers’ infrastructure, pursuant to site-sharing agreements
with such operators.
Co-billing services
Co-billing occurs when we bill one of our
customers on behalf of a long distance service provider for services rendered to our customers by that carrier. Beginning in July
2003, we started providing co-billing services to other telecommunication service providers operating in Brazil. The rates of such
services are being negotiated under Anatel oversight.
Disclosure Pursuant to Section 219 of the Iran Threat Reduction
and Syria Human Rights Act
Section 219 of the Iran Threat Reduction
and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012 added Section 13(r) to the Exchange Act. Section 13(r) requires an issuer to disclose in its
annual or quarterly reports filed with the SEC whether the issuer or any of its affiliates has knowingly engaged in certain activities,
transactions or dealings with the Government of Iran, relating to Iran or with designated natural persons or entities involved
in terrorism or the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction during the period covered by the annual or quarterly report. Disclosure
is required even when the activities were conducted outside the United States by non-U.S. entities and even when such activities
were conducted in compliance with applicable law.
In accordance with our Code of Ethics,
we seek to comply with all applicable laws.
Activities relating to Iran
We are not to our knowledge engaged in
any activities, transactions or dealings with the Government of Iran or that relate in any way to Iran.
We are also required to disclose our affiliates’
activities relating to Iran. We have been informed that other members of the Telecom Italia Group have entered into Roaming Agreements
and certain agreements (of a
de minimis
value) for the provision of telecommunication services with Iranian telecommunications
operators. The information in this section is based solely on information provided to us by our parent Telecom Italia and our former
affiliate Telecom Argentina S.A., or Telecom Argentina (for additional details on our relationship with Telecom Argentina in the
year ended December 31, 2015 and as of the date of this Report, see “—Telecom Argentina” below), for purposes
of complying with our obligations under Section 13(r) of the Exchange Act.
Telecom Italia and Telecom Argentina inform
us that the activities, transactions or dealings each company had in the year ended December 31, 2015 that, to its knowledge, relate
in any way to Iran are (1) Roaming Agreements, which allow its mobile customers to use their mobile devices on a network outside
of their home network, or Roaming Agreements, (2) international telecommunications services agreements with international carriers,
which cover delivery of traffic to Iran through non-Iranian carriers, or International Carrier Agreements, and (3) other commercial
communications agreements of a
de minimis
value.
Telecom Italia
Telecom Italia informs us that the only
activities that Telecom Italia had in the year ended December 31, 2015 that, to its knowledge, relate in any way to Iran are:
|
·
|
Roaming Agreements with the following Iran mobile phone operators: Taliya, KFZO – TKC (former Payam Kish), Rightel Communication,
Irancell (MTN) and Mobile Company of Iran (MCI);
|
|
·
|
International Carrier Agreements between its subsidiary Telecom Italia Sparkle S.p.A., or TI Sparkle, directly and through
its subsidiaries, with Telecommunication Company of Iran; and
|
|
·
|
Telecom Italia has entered into certain agreements for the provision of telecommunication services (marine radio traffic) with
Telecommunication Company of Iran (TCI) for services to Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines.
|
Telecom Argentina
On November 14, 2013, Telecom Italia and
Telecom Italia International N.V., or Telecom Italia International, and collectively the Telecom Argentina Sellers, and Tierra
Argentea S.A., or Tierra Argentea, a company controlled by the Telecom Argentina Sellers, announced their acceptance of the offer
made by Fintech Telecom, LLC, or Fintech, to acquire Telecom Italia’s controlling stake in Telecom Argentina owned by the
Telecom Argentina Sellers through their subsidiaries Sofora Telecomunicaciones S.A., or Sofora, and Nortel Inversora S.A., or Nortel,
and Tierra Argentea. The purchase offer was for a total amount of US$960 million. In implementing the above-mentioned agreements,
on December 10, 2013, the Class B Shares of Telecom Argentina and the Class B Shares of Nortel owned by Tierra Argentea were transferred
to Fintech for a total amount of US$108.7 million. On October 25, 2014, the Telecom Argentina Sellers announced the acceptance
of an offer by Fintech to amend and restate the agreement announced on November 14, 2013. As a result: (1) on October 29, 2014,
Telecom Italia International transferred 17% of the capital stock of Sofora to the Fintech Group; (2) it was confirmed that the
transfer of the 51% controlling interest in Sofora was subject to the prior regulatory approval of the Argentine Secretary of Communications
(
Secretaría de Comunicaciones
) and closing of the transaction would not occur until such approval is obtained. Following
such approval, the transfer of such controlling interest occurred on March 8, 2016. Accordingly, although we include relevant information
for Telecom Argentina for the year ended December 31, 2015, the Telecom Italia Group has divested its entire remaining stake in
Telecom Argentina as of the date of this Report.
Telecom Argentina informs us that the only
activities it had in the year ended December 31, 2015 that, to its knowledge, relate in any way to Iran are:
|
·
|
A Roaming Agreement between Telecom Personal S.A., or Personal, its subsidiary engaged in the provision of mobile telecommunication
services in Argentina, with Mobile Company of Iran (MCI) (formerly TCI); and
|
|
·
|
International Carrier Agreements with other international carriers (fixed services) for the delivery of traffic to Iran.
|
Roaming Agreements
The Telecom Italia Group operates one of
the largest mobile networks in Italy. Through its foreign subsidiaries, Telecom Italia also has large mobile operations in Brazil
(TIM Participações, by means of its subsidiary TIM Celular) and, until March 8, 2016, had large mobile operations
in Argentina and Paraguay (Telecom Argentina, by means of its subsidiaries Personal and Núcleo S.A., respectively).
It is pursuant to Roaming Agreements that
a mobile customer is able to use his or her mobile phone on a network different from such mobile subscriber’s home network.
The following is the definition of roaming that we provide in the glossary of this annual report:
Roaming is a function that enables customers
to use their mobile telephone on networks of service providers other than the one with which they signed their initial contract.
The roaming service is active when wireless is used in a foreign country (included on a GSM network).
Like all major mobile networks, in response
to the competition and customers’ demands, Telecom Italia, TIM Participações, Telecom Argentina and their subsidiaries
have entered into Roaming Agreements with many foreign mobile networks, so as to allow their customers to make and receive calls
abroad.
Roaming Agreements, including those relating
to Iran, are on standard terms and conditions. Entering into Roaming Agreements is an activity carried out in the ordinary course
of business by a mobile network operator.
Roaming Agreements are, generally, reciprocal.
Pursuant to a Roaming Agreement, our mobile customers may, when in a foreign country covered by the network, or the Foreign Network,
of an operator with which we have a Roaming Agreement, make and receive calls on their mobile phone using such operator’s
network. Likewise, the Foreign Network’s customers may make and receive calls using our networks when these customers are
in Brazil.
The Foreign Network bills us for calls
made and received by our roaming customer on their network at the roaming rate agreed upon in the applicable Roaming Agreement.
Then, we will bill our end customers according to the specific tariff plan of the subscription agreement they have signed with
us. Likewise, we bill the Foreign Network at the roaming rate agreed upon in the applicable Roaming Agreement. The Foreign Network
will bill its clients for the calls made and received using our networks according to their specific customer agreements. Roaming
Agreements do not, generally, contemplate other fees or disbursements.
Telecom Italia informs us that in 2015,
the impact on Telecom Italia Group net profit (loss) arising from such roaming contracts is as follows:
|
·
|
its total revenues from Roaming Agreements with Iranian networks were approximately 423 thousand euros;
|
|
·
|
its total charges from Roaming Agreements with Iranian networks were approximately 450 thousand euros;
|
|
·
|
its total receivables from Roaming Agreements with Iranian networks were approximately 642 thousand euros; and
|
|
·
|
its total payables from Roaming Agreements with Iranian networks were approximately 1,502 thousand euros.
|
Telecom Argentina informs us that in 2015,
the consolidated impact on net profit (loss) arising from its Roaming Agreements with MCI were as follows:
|
·
|
its total revenues received under Roaming Agreements with MCI were approximately 3 thousand Argentine pesos;
|
|
·
|
its total charges paid under Roaming Agreements with MCI were approximately 3 thousand Argentine pesos.
|
According to information provided to us
by Telecom Italia and Telecom Argentina, these revenues and charges are immaterial to their consolidated revenues and operating
expenses.
The purpose of such Roaming Agreements
is to provide Telecom Italia and Telecom Argentina’s customers with coverage in areas where they do not own networks. In
order to remain competitive and maintain such coverage, the Telecom Italia Group intends to continue maintaining these agreements.
As previously mentioned, Telecom Italia completed the sale of its controlling stake in Telecom Argentina on March 8, 2016 and accordingly
we are not aware as to whether Telecom Argentina intends to continue maintaining these Roaming Agreements.
International Carrier Agreements
As a rule in the modern telecommunication
business, when voice and data traffic from a specific network is placed to or transported through another carrier’s network,
or the Host Network, the Host Network receives a fee from the incoming network. Likewise, when voice and data traffic coming from
one of our networks is placed with, or transported through, a Host Network, we owe a fee to such Host Network.
Telecom Italia informs us that in 2015,
the impact on its net profit (loss) arising from the above-mentioned International Carrier Agreements is as follows:
|
·
|
its total revenues from traffic from networks located in Iran to its networks were approximately 709 thousand euros;
|
|
·
|
its total charges from traffic to networks in Iran from its networks were approximately 3,910 thousand euros;
|
|
·
|
its total receivables from traffic from networks located in Iran to its networks were approximately 4,344 thousand euros; and
|
|
·
|
its total payables from traffic to networks located in Iran from its networks were approximately 2,645 thousand euros.
|
The purpose of this agreement is to allow
exchange of international traffic. Consequently, Telecom Italia intends to continue maintaining this agreement.
Telecom Argentina’s total charges
paid in 2015 under International Carrier Agreements regarding delivery of traffic to Iran were approximately 6,022 thousand Argentine
pesos.
All such revenues and charges are
de
minimis
with respect to Telecom Italia and Telecom Argentina’s consolidated revenues, operating expenses trade receivables
and trade payables, respectively.
Other De Minimis Commercial Communications
Agreements
Telecom Italia had no revenues in 2015
from its other commercial communications agreements within Iran as described above, and its total receivables from such commercial
communications agreements in 2015 amounted to 502 thousand euros.
Taxes on Telecommunications Goods and Services
The costs of telecommunications goods and
services to clients are subject to a variety of federal, state and local taxes (in addition to taxes on income), the most significant
of which are ICMS, COFINS, PIS, FUST, FUNTTEL, FISTEL, CONDECINE and corporate income tax and social contribution on net income,
which are described below.
|
·
|
ICMS
. The principal tax applicable to goods and telecommunication services is a state value-added tax, the
Imposto
sobre Circulação de Mercadorias e Serviços
, or ICMS, which the Brazilian states levy at varying rates
on certain revenues arising out of the sale of goods and services, including certain telecommunications services. The ICMS tax
rate for domestic telecommunications services is levied at rates between 25% and 35%. The ICMS tax rate levied on the sale of mobile
handsets and other products such as modem and SIM cards averages 17% or 20% throughout the Cellular Regions, with the exception
of certain handsets whose manufacturers are granted certain local tax benefits, thereby reducing the rate to as low as 7%. In 2005,
certain of the Brazilian states started to charge ICMS on the sale of mobile handsets under a “tax replacement” system,
under which the taxpayer that manufactures the goods is required to anticipate and pay ICMS amounts that would otherwise only become
due in later steps of the distribution chain.
|
Since December 2015, the ICMS rates over telecommunication and
goods were increased in some Brazilian states by an average of 3% and 1%, respectively, pursuant to local legislation.
|
·
|
COFINS
.
Contribuição Social para o Financiamento da Seguridade Social
, or COFINS, is a social contribution
levied on gross revenues (financial revenues are levied at the rate of 0% due to Decree No. 5,442/2005 if the company is taxed
in the non-cumulative method or if it applies both methods). Since January 1, 2000, companies began to pay COFINS tax on their
bills at a rate of 3%. In December 2003, through Law No. 10,833, COFINS legislation was further amended, making this tax noncumulative,
raising the rate to 7.6% for certain transactions, except in connection with, among others, telecommunications services, for which
the method continues on a cumulative basis at a rate of 3%. On July 1, 2015, Decree No. 8,426 came into effect, which restored
COFINS on financial revenues at a rate of 4.0%, except for some types of financial revenues (for example, revenues from foreign
exchange variations of exportation of goods and services, revenues resulting from foreign exchange fluctuations of obligations
undertaken by the company, including loans and financing and revenues related to hedging transactions on stock exchange values,
and revenues from commodities and futures exchanges or over the counter transactions and related to the operational activities
of the company).
|
|
·
|
PIS
.
Programa de Integração Social
, or PIS, is another social contribution levied at the rate of
0.65%, on gross revenues from telecommunications service activities. In December 2002, Law No. 10,637 was enacted, making such
contribution non-cumulative and increasing the rate to 1.65% on gross revenues
|
(financial revenues are levied at the rate of 0%
due to Decree No. 5,442/2005 if the company is taxed in the non-cumulative method or if it applies both methods), except in connection
with telecommunications services, for which the method continues on a cumulative basis at a rate of 0.65%. On July 1, 2015, Decree
No. 8,426 came into effect, which restored PIS on financial revenues at a rate of 0.65%, except for some types of financial revenues
(for example, revenues from foreign exchange variations of exportation of goods and services, revenues resulting from foreign exchange
fluctuations of obligations undertaken by the company, including loans and financing and revenues related to hedging transactions
on stock exchange values, and revenues from commodities and futures exchanges or over the counter transactions and related to the
operational activities of the company).
|
·
|
FUST
. On August 17, 2000, the Brazilian government created the
Fundo de Universalização dos Serviços
de Telecomunicações
, or FUST, a fund that is supported by a tax applicable to all telecommunications services.
The purpose of the FUST is to reimburse a portion of the costs incurred by telecommunications service providers to meet the universal
service targets required by Anatel (such as targets for rural and impoverished areas, schools, libraries and hospitals), in case
these costs are not entirely recovered through the collection of telecommunications service fees and charges. FUST tax is imposed
at a rate of 1% on gross operating revenues, net of discounts, ICMS, PIS and COFINS, and its cost may not be passed on to clients.
Telecommunication companies can draw from the FUST to meet the universal service targets required by Anatel.
|
On December 15, 2005, Anatel enacted Ordinance
No. 7/05 requiring that FUST should be paid on revenues arising from interconnection charges since its effectiveness. A notice
was issued deciding that we must adjust values on the FUST calculation basis in order to include interconnection revenues received
from other telecommunications companies. A writ of mandamus was filed against Anatel to avoid the terms of Ordinance No. 7/05.
The first level decision was issued in our favor. Such decision was challenged by Anatel and the Appeal will still be judged by
second level.
|
·
|
FUNTTEL
. On November 28, 2000, the Brazilian government created the
Fundo para Desenvolvimento Tecnológico
das Telecomunicações
, or FUNTTEL, a fund that is supported by a social contribution tax applicable to all telecommunications
services. FUNTTEL is a fund managed by BNDES and FINEP, government research and development agencies. The purpose of FUNTTEL is
to promote the development of telecommunications technology in Brazil and to improve competition in the industry by financing research
and development in the area of telecommunications technology. FUNTTEL Tax is imposed at a rate of 0.5% on gross operating revenues,
net of discount, ICMS, PIS and COFINS, and its cost may not be passed on to clients.
|
On March 21, 2013, Anatel enacted Resolution
No. 95, which regulates FUNTTEL collection. As in the case of FUST, it requires that FUNTTEL be calculated based upon revenues
arising from interconnection charges since its effectiveness. Sinditelebrasil, the Brazilian syndicate of telecom companies, filed
a Writ of Mandamus against Anatel in order to compel Anatel not to apply Resolution No. 95. An injunction was issued in our favor
but the final decision has not been rendered yet.
|
·
|
FISTEL
.
Fundo de Fiscalização das Telecomunicações
, or FISTEL, is a fund supported
by a tax applicable to telecommunications services, which was established in 1966 to provide financial resources to the Brazilian
government for its regulation and inspection of the sector. FISTEL consists of two types of fees: (1) an installation inspection
fee assessed on telecommunications stations upon the issuance of their authorization certificates, as well as every time a new
mobile number is activated, and (2) an annual operations inspection fee that is based on the number of authorized stations in operation,
as well as the total basis of mobile numbers at the end of the previous calendar year. The amount of the installation inspection
fee is a fixed value, depending on the kind of equipment installed in the authorized telecommunication station. Effective April
2001, the installation and inspection fee is assessed based on net activations of mobile numbers (that is, the number of new mobile
activations reduced by the number of cancelled subscriptions), as well as based on the net additions of radio base stations. The
operations inspection fee equals 33% of the total amount of installation inspection fees that would have been paid with respect
to existing equipment. The public funds raised from this installation fee are appropriated to either the Brazilian Communication
Company, or EBC, or ANCINE, in order to benefit Brazilian cinema industry.
|
|
·
|
Corporate Income Tax and Social Contribution on Net Income
. Income tax expense is made up of two components, a corporate
income tax, or IRPJ, on taxable income and a social contribution tax on net income, or CSLL. The corporate income tax is payable
at the rate of 15% plus an additional rate of 10% (levied on the part of taxable profits that exceeds R$0.02 million per month
or R$0.24 million per year). The social contribution tax is currently assessed at a rate of 9% of adjusted net income.
|
In 2013, the Brazilian government enacted
Provisional Measure No. 627/2013, in order to end the Transitional Tax Regime, or RTT. RTT was implemented in 2008 as a way to
neutralize the tax impact caused by the adoption of IFRS accounting rules in lieu of Brazilian GAAP. Provisional Measure No. 627/2013
allows taxpayers to choose either to maintain RTT in 2014 or to be subject to the provisions contained in the Provisional Measure
No. 627/2013. Although taxpayers were permitted elect to maintain RTT treatment in 2014, for financial year 2015 they were obligated
to adopt the new IFRS accounting rules.
Another substantial change brought about
by Provisional Measure No. 627/2013 is the treatment of dividends. Generally, dividends paid up to the limit of the Company’s
accounting profits are exempt from corporate income tax. However, during 2013, Brazilian tax authorities published guidance indicating
that such exemption should only apply to dividends paid based on the profits calculated according to the rules prior to IFRS (referred
to as “fiscal profits”). If any dividends exceed this limit, then they must be taxed. This generated much debate among
taxpayers and, as a response, dividends paid in the last five years over the limit of “fiscal profits” will be exempted
as long as taxpayers adopt the new rules in 2014.
In May 2014, Provisional Measure No. 627
was converted into Law No. 12,973, the main objective of which was to implement the new tax regime, adapted to the new accounting
guidance provided by IFRS, ending the RTT. Given that the implementation requires specific adjustments to promote the elimination
of the effects of registration of the new accounting methods and criteria to the statutory books, some assets and liabilities now
have different methods and accounting criteria from those previously adopted by the former accounting rule. Law No. 12,973 establishes
as a condition for the accurate tax treatment of these differences to impact only at the time of the realization of these assets
or liabilities the creation of subaccounts for individualized control. The treatment is the same in regards to present value adjustments
and fair value adjustments.
The rules for deductibility of goodwill
were maintained for the transactions which occurred or will occur prior to the end of 2017. The tax treatment by TIM Celular of
the goodwill arising from the purchase of the companies AES Atimus SP and RJ will not be impacted by the new rules.
Regarding dividends, Law No. 12,973 ensures
the full and unconditional exemption on payment or credit of profits or dividends earned between January 1, 2008 and December 31,
2013, previously paid or not. Uncertainty remains, however, about the exemption on profits and dividends generated in the calendar
year 2014, if higher than the taxable income in the same period in the case of companies that do not opt for early adoption of
the new post-RTT tax regime that year.
Dividends are not subject to withholding
income tax when paid. However, as the payment of dividends is not tax deductible for the company that is distributing them, there
is an alternative regime for stockholder compensation called “interest on equity,” which allows companies to deduct
any interest paid to stockholders from net profits for tax purposes.
These distributions may be paid in cash.
The interest is calculated in accordance with daily pro rata variation of the Brazilian government’s long term interest rate,
or TJLP, as determined by the Central Bank from time to time, and cannot exceed the greater of: (1) 50% of the net income (before
taxes and already considering the deduction of the own interest amount attributable to stockholders) related to the period in respect
of which the payment is made; or (2) 50% of the sum retained profits and profits reserves as of the date of the beginning of the
period in respect of which the payment is made.
Any payment of interest to stockholders
is subject to withholding income tax at the rate of 15%, or 25% in the case of a stockholder who is domiciled in a tax haven. These
payments may be qualified, at their net value, as part of any mandatory dividend.
Losses carried forward are available for
offset during any year up to 30.0% of annual taxable income. No time limit is currently imposed on the application of net operating
losses on a given tax year to offset future taxable income within the same tax year, nevertheless there is no monetary restatement.
Companies are taxed based on their worldwide
income rather than on income produced solely in Brazil. As a result, profits, capital gains and other income obtained abroad by
Brazilian entities are added to their net profits for tax purposes. In addition, profits, capital gains and other income obtained
by foreign branches or income obtained from subsidiaries or foreign corporations controlled by a Brazilian entity are computed
in the calculation of an entity’s profits, in proportion to its participation in such foreign companies’ capital. Previously,
Brazilian entities were allowed to deduct income tax paid abroad, up to the amount of Brazilian income taxes imposed on such income
(reciprocity of treatment between Brazil and the country from which the income or gain comes from is required in order for this
rule to apply). Effective January 1, 2002, however, profits (including retained profits from previous years) realized by a Brazilian
entity from controlled or affiliated companies are taxed as of the date of the Brazilian entity’s year-end balance sheet,
unless the Brazilian entity is liquidated before the date of its year-end balance sheet, in which case the profits are taxed at
the time of its liquidation.
Prior to January 1, 2002, profits realized
by an entity in Brazil from a branch or agency were taxed as of the date of the Brazilian entity’s year-end balance sheet,
and profits from a controlled or affiliated company were taxed as of the date such amounts were paid or made available to the Brazilian
company as dividends or otherwise.
Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry
General
The telecommunications sector is regulated
by Anatel, which was established by law and is administratively independent and financially autonomous from the Ministry of the
Communications. Anatel is responsible for promulgating standards related to telecommunications services and regulating the relationship
between different operators, as set forth in the General Law of Telecommunications (
Lei Geral de Telecomunicações
),
Law No. 9,472, dated July 16, 1997 and the
Regulamento da Agência Nacional de Telecomunicações
, or the
Anatel Decree.
Despite liberalization, which occurred
in 1997, the Brazilian telecommunications market still faces persistent dominant positions held by fixed incumbent operators. In
particular, broadband access is currently offered by operators over their own infrastructure and the respective regulatory framework
is not always based on effective implementation of the wholesale access obligations.
Regarding the operating activities of TIM
Celular and Intelig (in August 2012, TIM Fiber was merged into TIM Celular, which assumed TIM Fiber’s existing service obligations),
Anatel has developed a strict regulation of mobile communications services known as Personal Communication Service (
Serviço
Móvel Pessoal
), or PCS, land line services known as Commuted Fixed Telephonic Service (
Serviço Telefônico
Fixo Comutado
), or STFC and data communication known as Multimedia Service of Communication (
Serviço de Comunicação
Multimedia
), or SCM.
Anatel may regularly alter these standards
based on changes in technology, in particular regarding PCS technology, which are common to the telecommunications sector. In order
to allow operators to plan for the implementation of these policies, Anatel approved a General Plan of Update of Telecommunications
Regulation in Brazil (
Plano Geral para Atualização da Regulamentação das Telecomunicações
no Brasil
), or PGR, pursuant to which it established short-, medium-, and long-term policies for two, five, and ten-year terms,
respectively. Anatel has authority to propose and to issue regulations that are legally binding on telecommunications service providers.
Any proposed regulation or action by Anatel is subject to a period of public comment, which may include public hearings, and may
be challenged in Brazilian courts. This regulation process takes into consideration Anatel’s specialized analysis of different
areas of the telecommunication sector and matters resulting from public hearings, by means of which the regulation proposals are
considered by Anatel, state authorities and the general public. We follow these public hearings closely.
A presidential decree issued on June 30,
2011, established a bidding process for fourth generation RFs, an important landmark for the telecommunications sector. The bid
occurred in 2012 and, in order to guarantee full rural service by 2018, Anatel linked the 4G blocks in the 2,500 MHz band to the
450MHz band in specific geographic regions of Brazil. As a result, the four winning operators of the 4G blocks in the 2,500 MHz
band linked to the 450MHz band are subject to coverage commitments in rural areas. Such presidential decree also resulted in two
new regulations to measure mobile and fixed broadband quality standards. The presidential decree also approved the Regulation on
Universal Obligations (
Plano Geral de Metas de Universalização
), or PGMU, creating fixed line universal service
obligations binding on the STFC concessionaires.
With respect to the new regulations on
quality standards currently being implemented by Anatel and a group of interested companies, the PCS quality regulation went into
force in 2012 (partially in March and fully in October), and the SCM measurement regulation went into effect in November 2012.
Full adoption of these standards will require new investments.
In 2014, Anatel issued certain regulations
which are particularly relevant to our operations, particularly Resolution No. 632/2014, published in March 2014, which approved
the General Regulation on Telecommunications Customers Rights (
Regulamento Geral de Direitos do Consumidor de Serviços
de Telecomunicações – RGC
), with general rules for customer service, billing, and service offers, which
are applicable to fixed, mobile, broadband and cable TV customers, as well as Resolution 639/2014, which approved the rule for
the definition of maximum reference rates based on a cost model for entities with significant market power in respect of VU-M,
TU-RL and EILD.
Throughout 2015, Anatel issued other important
regulations and public consultations that will have great impact on TIM and Intelig’s activities, particularly those summarized
below:
|
·
|
Between July and August 2015, Anatel approved a public consultation to review groups the groups deemed to have significant
market power in relevant markets, as previously established in Resolution 600/12. We are currently classified as having significant
market power in the following markets: (i) passive infrastructure in transport and access networks (provision of towers); (ii)
mobile network inbound calls (otherwise referred to as the mobile network termination market); and (iii) national roaming. The
results of this consultation could have an adverse effect on our competition and business financial condition;
|
|
·
|
In August 2015, Anatel approved, by means of Resolution No. 655/2015, the regulation of national telecommunications products
and systems. The resolution lays down specific rules for the fulfillment of certain established commitments to the acquisition
of domestically-produced technology products and establishes that Brazilian telecommunications operators must submit to that agency
the following documents: (i) the consolidated reports for the period in question, (ii) the report of eligible invoices and (iii)
the total amount invested in the implementation of the commitment, set in the Auction No 004/2012 /PVCP/SPV/Anatel, and which will
be the basis for calculating the percentage of domestically-produced technology products. Our failure to comply with these obligations
may result in various fines and penalties being imposed on us by Anatel.
|
|
·
|
In August 2015, Anatel approved, by means of Resolution No. 656/2015, the regulation of risk management in telecommunications
networks and the usage of telecommunication services in disasters, emergency situations and public crises. The resolution established
the creation of a Risk Management Group and Performance Monitoring of Telecommunication Network (GGRR), which will be composed
by Anatel Superintendents and Brazilian telecommunications operators. The resolution foresees the creation of the group to manage
the risks that may affect the safety of telecommunications critical infrastructure in such times of crisis. For the same reason,
the resolution required operators to present a Risk Management Plan to Anatel by February 15, 2016.
|
Authorizations and Concessions
With the privatization of the Telebrás
system and pursuant to the Lei Mínima, or the Minimum Law, Band A and Band B service providers were granted concessions
under SMC or
Serviço Móvel Celular
, or Cellular Mobile Service, regulations. Each concession was a specific
grant of authority to supply mobile telecommunications services in a defined geographical area, subject to certain requirements
contained in the applicable list of obligations attached to each concession.
Through resolutions enacted in September
2000 and January 2001, Anatel launched the PCS regime, and began encouraging mobile telecommunications service providers operating
under SMC regulations to convert their concessions into authorizations under PCS regulations. According to the rules issued by
Anatel, SMC providers would not be able to renew their concessions to provide SMC services, and were compelled to convert to the
PCS regime in order to continue their operations. The permission from Anatel to transfer the control of these companies was also
conditioned on rules that compelled SMC providers to migrate its SMC concessions to PCS authorizations, and to operate under the
PCS regulations.
In 1997 and 1998, our predecessors were
granted SMC concessions and in December 2002, such SMC concessions were converted into PCS authorizations, with an option to renew
the authorizations for an additional 15 years following the original expiration dates of the authorizations. TIM Celular acquired
PCS authorizations in conjunction with auctions of bandwidth by Anatel in 2001, and subsequently acquired additional authorizations
and operations under the PCS regulations as well.
On May 30, 2011, we entered into two new
RF terms, formalizing the acquisition of excess RF in the states of Minas Gerais, Paraná, Santa Catarina, Amapá,
Roraima, Pará, Amazonas and Maranhão and those new terms expire in April 2023.
In October 2012, we acquired the 2,530-2,540
MHz and 2,650-2,660 MHz sub-bands, with national coverage, and the 450 MHz band in Espírito Santo, Paraná, Rio de
Janeiro and Santa Catarina states (the 450 MHz band was jointly acquired with Intelig).
In March 2014, Anatel ruled on the allocation
of the 4,900 MHz band for telecommunications services.
In December 2014, we acquired the 718-728
MHz and 773-783 MHz sub-bands, with national coverage. These sub-bands are not yet available for mobile operation since broadcasters
are still using them. The mobile operation will only begin after the reallocation of broadcasting channels and approval by Anatel.
On March 4, 2015, by Decision No. 66/2015-CD,
Anatel approved our renewal application related to the 4G Block (2500 MHz P Band) in Minas Gerais, and also approved our renewal
application concerning the authorization terms of the D and E Bands (900 MHz and 1800 MHz). On July 22, 2015, Authorization Act
No. 4710/2015-CD was issued (and subsequently published in the Official Gazette of July 28, 2015), extending the use of the aforementioned
authorizations terms.
In December 2015, Anatel auctioned left
over radiofrequencies in the 1,800 MHz, 1,900 MHz and 2,500 MHz bands. We submitted bids for the left over lots of the 2,500 MHz
4G band, which had originally been auctioned in 2012. The bidding currently remains in the “Opening, Analysis and Assessment
of Price Proposals” stage, and the auction is expected to be finalized, with winners to be selected in the first half of
2016. However, based on the preliminary results of the bidding, we have been classified as the first ranked bidder in the lots
for Recife, in the state of Pernambuco, and Curitiba, in the state of Paraná, based on our bids of R$32 million and R$24.5
million, respectively, totaling R$56.5 million, which bids were renewed in March 2016.
The STFC and SCM authorization terms do
not have an expiration date.
The following table shows each of our authorizations
in effect on December 31, 2015:
Territory
|
|
|
450 MHz
|
|
|
800 MHz,
900 MHz and
1800 MHz
|
|
|
Additional Frequencies
1800 MHz
|
|
|
1900 MHz and
2100 MHz (3G)
|
|
2500 MHz V1
Band (4G)
|
|
|
2500 MHz P Band
**
(4G)
|
|
|
|
700 MHz
|
|
States of Amapá, Roraima, Pará, Amazonas and Maranhão
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
March, 2031
|
|
|
April, 2023
|
|
|
April, 2023
|
|
October, 2027
|
|
|
PA – February, 2024
*
|
|
|
|
December, 2029
|
|
States of Rio de Janeiro and Espírito Santo
|
|
|
October, 2027
|
|
|
March, 2031
|
|
|
ES – April, 2023
|
|
|
April, 2023
|
|
October, 2027
|
|
|
RJ – February, 2024
*
|
|
|
|
December, 2029
|
|
States of Acre, Rondônia, Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul, Tocantins, Distrito Federal, Goiás, Rio Grande do Sul (except for the city of Pelotas and its surrounding region) and the cities of Londrina and Tamarana in the state of Paraná
|
|
|
PR - October, 2027
|
|
|
March, 2031
|
|
|
April, 2023
|
|
|
April, 2023
|
|
October, 2027
|
|
|
DF – February, 2024
*
|
|
|
|
December, 2029
|
|
State of São Paulo
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
March, 2031
|
|
|
Interior – April, 2023
|
|
|
April, 2023
|
|
October, 2027
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
December, 2029
|
|
State of Paraná (except for the cities of Londrina and Tamarana)
|
|
|
October, 2027
|
|
|
September, 2022
*
|
|
|
April, 2023
|
|
|
April, 2023
|
|
October, 2027
|
|
|
February, 2024
*
|
|
|
|
December, 2029
|
|
Territory
|
|
|
450 MHz
|
|
|
800 MHz,
900 MHz and
1800 MHz
|
|
|
Additional Frequencies
1800 MHz
|
|
|
1900 MHz and
2100 MHz (3G)
|
|
2500 MHz V1
Band (4G)
|
|
|
2500 MHz P Band
**
(4G)
|
|
|
|
700 MHz
|
|
State of Santa Catarina
|
|
|
October, 2027
|
|
|
September, 2023
*
|
|
|
April, 2023
|
|
|
April, 2023
|
|
October, 2027
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
December, 2029
|
|
City of Pelotas and its surrounding region in the State of Rio Grande do Sul
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
April, 2024
*
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
April, 2023
|
|
October, 2027
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
December, 2029
|
|
State of Pernambuco
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
May, 2024
*
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
April, 2023
|
|
October, 2027
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
December, 2029
|
|
State of Ceará
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
November, 2023
*
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
April, 2023
|
|
October, 2027
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
December, 2029
|
|
State of Paraíba
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
December, 2023
*
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
April, 2023
|
|
October, 2027
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
December, 2029
|
|
State of Rio Grande do Norte
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
December, 2023
*
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
April, 2023
|
|
October, 2027
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
December, 2029
|
|
State of Alagoas
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
December, 2023
*
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
April, 2023
|
|
October, 2027
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
December, 2029
|
|
State of Piauí
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
March, 2024
*
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
April, 2023
|
|
October, 2027
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
December, 2029
|
|
State of Minas Gerais (except for the cities in sector 3 of PGO for RF of 3G and excess RF)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
April, 2028
*
|
|
|
April, 2023
|
|
|
April, 2023
|
|
October, 2027
|
|
|
February, 2030
|
|
|
|
December, 2029
|
|
States of Bahia and Sergipe
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
August, 2027
*
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
April, 2023
|
|
October, 2027
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
December, 2029
|
|
*
Terms already renewed for 15 years and therefore not entitled to another renewal period.
**
Only covers complementary areas in the specified states.
According to the General Telecommunications
Law and regulations issued by Anatel thereunder, licenses to provide telecommunications services are granted either under the public
regime, by means of a concession or a permission, or under the private regime, by means of an authorization. Only STFC incumbents
are currently operating under the public regime. All the other telecommunications services providers in Brazil are currently operating
under the private regime, including all the PCS services providers.
Telecommunications services providers under
the private regime are classified as either providing a service of collective interest or restricted interest. Collective interest
private regime services are subject to requirements imposed by Anatel under their authorizations and the General Telecommunications
Law. Restricted interest private regime services are subject to fewer requirements than public regime or collective interest private
regime services. According to the General Telecommunications Law and the regulation thereunder, all the PCS services providers
in Brazil operate under the collective interest private regime.
In August 2009, Anatel gave its approval
for the acquisition of the fixed line operator Intelig, which at the time was a local, national and international long distance
operator in Brazil and provided fixed broadband service in a number of regions in Brazil. According to the regulations, TIM Celular
and Intelig were obliged to resolve the overlapping of their fixed service authorizations, keeping only one authorization per class
of service. From July 2012, local fixed telephone service have been provided by Intelig and the national and international long
distance telephone service have been provided by TIM Celular, under the selection code 41.
In July 2011, TIM Celular acquired from
the Companhia Brasiliana de Energia and AES Elpa, its interest in Eletropaulo Telecomunicações (100%) and AES RJ
(98.3%) (together, “AES Atimus,” later named TIM Fiber and now TIM Celular). The contract was signed on July 8, 2011.
On October 31, 2011, after all conditions set forth by the relevant regulatory agency were fulfilled, the transaction was completed.
With these new acquisitions, TIM Celular not only significantly expanded its operations in the data communications business, or
SCM, in the urban areas of the states of Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo, but also obtained important synergies related to
the acquired fiber optic network. In August 2012, TIM Fiber was merged into TIM Celular. In connection with such merger, TIM Celular
assumed TIM Fiber’s service obligations, thereby ensuring continuity of services.
National Broadband Program
In May 2010, the Brazilian government approved
a National Broadband Program to extend national broadband coverage by 2014. The plan includes the reactivation of Telebrás,
which is responsible for managing and operating a national fiber optic network, and a new framework aimed at reducing the wholesale
connectivity price and consequently allowing a more affordable price of “entry level” broadband residential connections.
Other measures included in the plan are represented by fiscal incentives to induce the operators to offer broadband access to low
income families, public investments in research and financial support to national industries. Following a scheduled review of the
program, a price decrease and a 100% coverage requirement for Public Schools are under discussion and will probably be added to
the plan over the next few years.
According to a report by the Communications
Ministry in June 2013, since the launch of National Broadband Program the number of cities with access to mobile broadband has
grown by 330%, and all major cities had access to fixed broadband.
We have signed contracts with Telebrás
and currently offer lower cost Internet packages under the National Broadband Program. In December 2013, we also signed a fiber
optic network sharing agreement with Telebrás, which provides for the sharing of 2208 kilometers of long-distance fiber
cables. This agreement will enable high speed broadband access in remote locations within the North and Northeast of Brazil, network
improvements in the Southeast, and will bring benefits to São Paulo, Belo Horizonte and Rio de Janeiro by alleviating congestion
on the backbone network routes. We believe that this partnership with Telebrás signals a path to unprecedented market share
which will enable further development and innovation of the telecom sector.
Obligations of Telecommunications Companies
In November 1999, Anatel and the Brazilian
mobile service providers jointly adopted a Protocol for Mobile Cellular Service Providers, or the Protocol. The Protocol established
additional quality of service targets and rates, which SMC operators were required to achieve by June 2001. Although the General
Telecommunications Law does not specify any penalties for failing to meet the targets required by the Protocol, Anatel was required
to examine the performance of the Brazilian telecommunications companies under the Protocol’s standards. Despite migration
to PCS in December 2002, from January to June 2003, we reported to Anatel regarding, and had complied with, all quality of service
indicators applicable to SMC operators. The Protocol ceased to be applicable to TIM Sul, TIM Nordeste and TIM Maxitel after July
2003.
Beginning in September 2003, we became
subject to the PCS quality of service indicators. Our quality of service obligations under our PCS authorizations differ substantially
from those under the previous SMC concessions. See “—PCS Regulation.” Since December 2003, we have achieved the
majority of the service of quality requirements applicable to the PCS service operators. Some of our PCS quality of service indicators
are currently difficult to achieve due to, for example, our dependence on the performance of third parties and the continuing clarification
of some of the quality of service measurements under the PCS rules. As a result, since 2004 Anatel has been filing administrative
proceedings against TIM Celular and TIM Nordeste for non-compliance with certain of our quality of service obligations. In some
of these proceedings, Anatel applied a fee that did not cause a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations. We will continue to strive to meet all of our quality of service obligations under the PCS authorizations.
In 2011, Anatel published Resolution No.
575/11 to Review of the Regulation on the Management of Quality of Service – PCS. The new regulation established new quality
goals, evaluation criteria, data collection and quality monitoring of Service Providers – PCS. The Anatel regulation aims
to create a comprehensive model of quality management of the PCS providers providing preventive and proactive on the part of the
Agency, through the incorporation of indicators and benchmarks that allow the systematic evaluation of the quality of service in
all its dimensions. Anatel also published Resolution No. 574/11 in 2011, which set broadband quality measurement standards.
This new list of proposals for quality
indicators is divided into two major groups: Operational Indicators and Indicators Research for measuring the quality of service
perceived by the user. Anatel is likely to launch a new public consultation by the end of 2016, in order to review the quality
framework.
PCS Regulation
In September 2000, Anatel promulgated regulations
regarding PCS wireless telecommunications services that are significantly different from the ones applicable to mobile companies
operating under Band A and Band B. The new rules allow companies to provide wireless telecommunications services under PCS authorizations.
The PCS authorizations allow new entrants in the Brazilian telecommunications market to compete with existing telecommunications
service providers.
According to rules issued by Anatel, renewal
of a concession to provide mobile telecommunications services, as well as permission from Anatel to transfer control of cellular
companies, are conditioned on agreement by such cellular service provider to operate under the PCS rules. TIM Sul, TIM Nordeste
and TIM Maxitel converted their cellular concessions into PCS authorizations in December 2002, and later transferred them to TIM
Sul, TIM Nordeste and TIM Maxitel, which are now TIM Celular subject to obligations under the PCS regulations. See “—Authorizations
and Concessions.”
Anatel has initiated administrative proceedings
against TIM Celular for noncompliance with certain quality standards and noncompliance with its rules and authorization terms.
We have been fined by Anatel in some proceedings and are still discussing the penalty imposed in appeals before the Agency. As
a result of these proceedings, Anatel applied some fines that did not cause a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations. In the year ended December 31, 2015, the total amount of these fines was R$92,983 thousand.
However, only R$28,621 thousand was classified as “probable loss” by our legal advisors.
We continue to do our best to fully comply
with our obligations under the PCS regime or with future changes in the regulations to which we are subject. See “—Obligations
of Telecommunications Companies,” “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to our Business”
and “Item 8. Financial Information—A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information—Legal Proceedings.”
According to the new PCS regulations, we
are required to adjust our operating processes and agreements to such new rules, including our interconnection agreements, as well
as agreements with our customers. By April 2005, substantially all of our interconnection arrangements were covered by agreements
that had been amended to reflect the PCS regulations.
In August 2007, Anatel issued Resolution
No. 477 establishing new obligations regarding PCS, in particular in connection with users’ rights towards their mobile services
providers.
In October 2012, Anatel enacted the Regulation
on Universal Obligations related to the fixed line universal service obligations (
Plano Geral de Metas de Universalização
),
or PGMU, regulating backhauling, public pay phones and telephone services for families with low incomes, among others. In November
2012, Anatel enacted the General Plan for Competition Goals (
Plano Geral de Metas de Competição
), whose goal
is to encourage competition by creating interconnection obligations and the sharing of infrastructure already installed by other
operators.
In March 2014 by means of Resolution No.
632/2014, Anatel approved the adoption of a single regulation for the telecommunications sector (
Regulamento Geral de Direitos
do Consumidor de Serviços de Telecomunicações
), or RGC, with general rules for customer service, billing,
and service offers, which are applicable to fixed, mobile, broadband and cable TV customers.
Significant Market Power
In November 2012, Anatel published a new
competition framework known as the PGMC. Also in November 2012, Anatel published a series of regulations identifying groups with
significant market power in the following relevant markets as defined by the PGMC: (i) copper pair or coaxial cable data transmission
access landline network infrastructure offer at transmission rates up to 10 Mbps (Act No. 6.617, of November 8, 2012); (ii) wholesale
local transport and long distance inland network infrastructure offer for data transmission rates of 34 Mbps or less (Act No. 6.619,
of November 8, 2012); (iii) passive infrastructure for transport and access networks (Act No. 6.620, of November 8, 2012); (iv)
mobile network inbound calls (Act No. 6.621, of November 8, 2012); and (v) national roaming (Act No. 6.622, of November 8, 2012).
The TIM Group, comprised of TIM Celular
and Intelig, is currently classified as a significant market power in the following markets: (i) passive infrastructure in transport
and access networks (provision of towers); (ii) mobile network inbound calls (otherwise referred to as the mobile network termination
market); and (iii) national roaming.
Due to such classification we are now subject
to increased regulation under the PGMC, which could have an adverse effect on our business financial condition and results of operations.
Specifically, because we have been classified as having significant market power in the mobile network termination market, the
rates charged by mobile service providers to other mobile service providers to terminate calls on their mobile networks, or VU-M,
are regulated. On July 4, 2014, Anatel approved, by means of Resolution No. 639/2014, a rule for the definition of maximum reference
rates for entities with significant market power, based on a cost model, for VU-M, TU-RL, and EILD. Pursuant to Anatel’s
rule, reference rates will decline based on a glide path until the cost modeling known as LRIC+ Bottom Up is applied (2019, for
VU-M and TU-RL; and 2020, for EILD). On July 7, 2014, Anatel published the corresponding Acts No. 6,210/2014, 6,211/2014 and 6,212/2014,
which determined the specific reference rates to be adopted as of February 2016. Because of our classification as having significant
market power in the national roaming market, we must also offer roaming services to other mobile providers without significant
market power at the rates approved by Anatel. We are also required to provide other providers without significant market power
access to our towers and masts due to our classification as having significant market power in that portion of the passive infrastructure
market.
For additional detail, see – “Network
Usage Charges”, “Roaming Fees”, “Interconnection Charges” and “Long Distance”.
Interconnection Regulation
Telecommunication operators must publish
a public interconnection offer on both economic and technical conditions and are subject to the “General Interconnection
Regulatory Framework” promulgated by Anatel in 2005.
In 2005, Anatel issued a ruling for “Accounting
Separation and Cost Accounting,” introducing the obligation of presenting the Accounting Separation and Allocation Document
(
Documento de Separação e Alocação de Contas
), or DSAC, by the license holders and groups holding
Significant Market Power in the offering of fixed and/or mobile network interconnection and wholesale leased lines (
Exploração
Industrial De Linha Dedicada
), or EILD. Starting from 2006 (for fixed operators) and 2008 (for mobile operators related to
the results of 2006 and 2007), operators (TIM included) are delivering the requested information to Anatel.
In 2013, Anatel reviewed almost the entirety
of DSAC. Pursuant to Resolutions No. 608 and 619, the level of information to be delivered to Anatel and the number of products
analyzed were extended. Rules on costs allocation were also standardized in order to allow comparison of the results among operators.
With respect to mobile interconnection,
in October 2011, Anatel established a mechanism for reducing fixed-to-mobile call rates, applying a reduction of 18% in 2012 and
12% in 2013. In November 2012, through Resolution 600, Anatel decided that the VU-M reference rates in 2014 would be 75% of the
valid VU-M in 2013, and in 2015 by 50% of the valid VU-M in 2013. Based on that, in December 2013, VU-M prices for 2014 and 2015
were published in accordance with Resolution No. 600.
In addition to the VU-M reduction, Anatel
established a B&K rule between significant market power and non-significant market power PCSs. From January 2013 until February
2015, the B&K was 80%/20%. In December 2014, Anatel published Public Consultation No. 47, submitting to public comments potential
amendments to the B&K percentages established by Resolution 600. On February 12, 2015, Anatel approved, by means of Resolution
No. 649/2015, the following new B&K percentages, amending the percentages established by Resolution 600: 75%/25%, from 2015
until 2016; 65%/35%, from 2016 until 2017; 55%/45%, from 2017 until 2018; and 50%/50%, from 2018 until 2019, which was object of
a judicial suit (on going), in order to suspend its effects. After 2019 the VU-M will be charged by the significant market power
whenever their network is used to originate or to finish a call. In July 2015, we filed a lawsuit seeking to annul Resolution No.
649/2015 and maintain the percentages originally
established by Resolution 600, which currently remains pending.
With respect to fixed interconnection,
Anatel revised the criteria for pricing the use of fixed networks in May 2012. According to such regulation, after January 1, 2014,
a full B&K regime (in which no payments are due for the traffic termination) was implemented for local STFC operators dealing
with other local STFC operators. Currently, therefore, no payments are due for the use of a local STFC operator’s network
by other local STFC operator. On
July 4, 2014, Anatel approved, by means of Resolution No. 639/2014, a rule for the definition
of maximum reference rates for entities with significant market power, based on a cost model, for VU-M, TU-RL, and EILD.
Pursuant to Anatel’s rule, reference
rates will decline based on a glide path until the cost modeling known as LRIC+ Bottom Up is applied (2019, for VU-M and TU-RL;
and 2020, for EILD). On July 7, 2014, Anatel published the corresponding Acts No. 6,210/2014, 6,211/2014 and 6,212/2014, which
determined the specific reference rates to be adopted as of February 2016.
Rate Regulation
Under our PCS authorizations, we are allowed
to set prices for our service plans, subject to approval by Anatel, provided that such amounts do not exceed a specified inflation
adjusted cap. Anatel currently uses the IST (
Índice de Serviços de Telecomunicações
), a specific
price inflation index developed by the Agency, in evaluating prices and determining the relevant cap for prices charged in the
telecommunications industry. As mentioned above, on July 4, 2014, Anatel approved the calculation of VU-M, TU-RL and EILD reference
rates based on a cost model. We expect that the adjustment of our prices will follow the market trend, and that the adjustment
will be below the annual inflation rate based on the IST. If this new inflation adjustment mechanism, or any other mechanism chosen
by the Brazilian government in the future, does not adequately reflect the true effect of inflation on our prices, our results
of operations could be adversely affected.
Number Portability
In March 2007 Anatel issued a new regulation
regarding number portability in Brazil for fixed telephony and PCS providers. Portability is limited to migration between providers
of the same telecommunications services. For PCS providers, portability can take place when customer changes services provider
within the same Registration Area as well as when customer changes the service plan of the same area. Anatel finished the nationwide
NP implementation schedule in March 2009.
Value-Added Services and Internet Regulation
Value-added services are not considered
under Brazilian telecommunications regulations to be telecommunications services, but rather an activity that adds features to
a telecommunications service. Regulations require all telecommunications service providers to grant network access to any party
interested in providing value-added services, on a non-discriminatory basis, unless technically impossible. Telecommunications
service providers also are allowed to render value-added services through their own networks. Internet connection is considered
by Brazilian legislation to be a value-added service, and its providers are not considered to be telecommunications companies.
Current regulations allow us or any other interested party to offer Internet connection through our network.
In April 2014, the Brazilian President
passed Law No. 12,965 of 2014, known as the Legal Framework for the Use of the Internet (
Marco Civil da Internet
), or the
Internet Framework, which establishes the principles, guarantees, rights and duties for the use of the Internet in Brazil. The
bill sets forth a number of guidelines and rules to be observed by users and providers, such as the protection of privacy, the
protection of personal data, the preservation and guarantee of net neutrality, the liability for damages caused by content generated
or published by third parties and the storage and disclosure of usage logs.
According to the Internet Framework, a
presidential decree will be enacted regulating the bill’s provisions, and enacting specific rules regarding network traffic
management techniques. Before the presidential decree is enacted, both the Brazilian Internet Steering Committee (
Comitê
Gestor da Internet
) and Anatel will express their opinion on the decree. Brazil’s Ministry of Justice has also launched
a public debate on the main themes related to the bill. In addition to the presidential implementing decree, two other statues
were discussed during 2015: the personal data protection act, which still needs to be enacted, and the copyright act, which needs
updating, which may be concluded in 2016.
Although a subject of great debate, Anatel
seems to have expressed itself as the competent authority to regulate network neutrality. This conclusion can be drawn from their
analysis of the request for approval for the acquisition of Brasil Telecom by Oi, in which a neutral treatment of the network was
imposed. Furthermore, Anatel included regulation of network neutrality in the SCM Regulation proposal, submitted for public consultation
in 2011, forbidding the blockage and discriminatory treatment of traffic, except for the procedures shown as essential for the
safety and stability of the service and its supporting networks. Although such specific rules related to net neutrality were not
confirmed in the final version of the SCM regulation, approved by Anatel in 2013, a general principle remained in the regulation
that SCM providers must observe net neutrality principle, in accordance with Anatel’s regulations and the applicable law.
Frequencies and Spectrum Background
We have a license to operate PCS services
in the 450 MHz, 700 MHz, 800 MHz, 900 MHz, 1.8 GHz, 1.9/2.1 GHz and 2.5 GHz frequency ranges, which allows us to provide mobile
communications services with 2G, 3G and 4G technologies throughout Brazil.
In connection with the PCS authorization
auctions in 2001 and 2002, Anatel divided the Brazilian territory into three separate regions, each of which is equal to the regions
applicable to the public regime fixed-line telephone service providers. PCS services could only be provided under Bands C, D and
E at that time with initially 1800 MHz band and afterwards also the 900 MHz band. We acquired the D band in regions II and III
and the E band in region I, completing our national coverage when considering TIM Sul, TIM Nordeste and Maxitel coverage.
We requested a renewal of our authorizations
for the D and E bands (1800 and 900 MHz frequencies) in September 2013, given that the initial term for which the authorization
was expiring. The process was reviewed by Anatel, which handed down a decision based on formal legal opinion by the Federal Attorney
General on the matter. According to such decision, TIM was entitled under the current rules to a renewal of our authorizations
for the D and E bands, starting from March 2016.
On March 4, 2015, by Decision No. 66/2015-CD,
Anatel approved our renewal application concerning the authorization terms for the D and E Bands based on the Federal Attorney
General’s decision. As a result, our authorization term for the usage of these radiofrequencies is extended for 15 years,
starting from March 2016. On July 22, 2015, this decision was formalized through the issuance of Authorization Act No. 4710/2015-CD,
as later published in the Official Gazette of July 28, 2015.
In December 2007, we acquired new authorizations
for the 1800 MHz frequency in the São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro in order to improve our RF capacity in these regions. Within
the same auction, Claro and Vivo acquired authorizations to provide PCS services in regions where we historically provide services
but where Claro and Vivo previously did not, using 1800 MHz and 1900 MHz bands, which has resulted in increased competition in
these regions. In the same auction, Oi received authorization to provide PCS services in the state of São Paulo using 1800
MHz (band M in the whole state and band E in the state’s countryside).
In December 2010 Anatel auctioned an empty
3G band of radio spectrum consisting of (10+10) MHz in 2.1 GHz in the whole country (the “H Band” Auction), and other
left over frequencies in the 900 MHz and 1800 MHz bands that had not been assigned in previous auctions.
|
·
|
Of the 12 available lots in the H Band, 10 were awarded to Nextel, a new entrant in the GSM market, which has traditionally
offered trunking services in Brazil. Current operators were prevented from participating due to spectrum caps. Oi and CTBC managed
to win the remaining two lots where they had cap availability.
|
|
·
|
The new entrant will be benefited with spectrum and infrastructure sharing, specifically in locations with less than 30,000
inhabitants, subjected to commercial agreements.
|
|
·
|
TIM won individual block of frequencies in five service areas, strengthening its presence in the North, Santa Catarina, Minas
Gerais and Paraná, biding a total of R$81.8 million, which will be paid proportionately to the remaining years in the existing
authorization licenses (remaining years/15).
|
|
·
|
VIVO won blocks in 900 MHz and due to available cap, managed to win lots of 1700/1800 MHz in all regions, completing a national
coverage of (10+10) MHz in this band.
|
|
·
|
Claro won blocks of spectrum in the 1700/1800 MHz band.
|
In December 2011, Anatel started auction
No. 001/2011-PVCP/SPV, pursuant to which 16 blocks in the 1,800 MHz band were sold to Claro, Oi, CTBC and TIM. As a result of our
participation in the auction, we will expand
our 2G coverage and increase our presence in the northern and midwestern regions of
Brazil, including the states of Paraná, Espirito Santo, Rio Grande do Sul, Santa Catarina and Minas Gerais. Our corresponding
RF authorization periods were formalized with Anatel in May 2013, after Anatel ruled on an appeal challenging the bidding process
outcome.
In 2012, Anatel established a bidding process
in order to comply with Presidential Decree No. 7.512 of June 2011, which set April 2012 as the deadline to auction the 2.5GHz
band, in order to introduce 4G technology in Brazil. Anatel modeled the auction with 2 national blocks of (20+20)MHz (W and Z)
and 2 national blocks of (10+10)MHz (V1 and V2). In order to guarantee full rural service by 2018, Anatel linked the 4G blocks
to the 450MHz band in specific geographic regions of Brazil. By April 30, 2013, FIFA Confederations Cup host cities (Belo Horizonte,
Fortaleza, Rio de Janeiro, Recife, Salvador and Brasília), in preparation for hosting the FIFA 2014 World Cup and the 2016
Olympic Games, were to have been served by 4G. Following the results of the auction in October 2012, TIM acquired for R$340 million
the 2,530-2,540 MHz and 2650-2660 MHz sub-bands, with national coverage, and the 450 MHz band in Espírito Santo, Paraná,
Rio de Janeiro and Santa Catarina states (the 450 MHz band was jointly acquired with Intelig). Certain 4G coverage commitments
were effective as early as April 2013, while the first coverage commitments for the 450 MHz band were effective in June 2014. As
of December 2013, we are providing 4G coverage to approximately 10% of the urban population of Brazil, including eight capital
cities. In December 2013, we launched 4G in Natal, ahead of Anatel’s required schedule. As of December 2014, we have been
providing 4G coverage in compliance with the schedule required by Anatel. Satisfaction of the these coverage commitments demands
heavy capital investments and a commitment to acquire products with national technology, with R$1.5 billion to be invested in 4G
alone over the next three years.
We participated in the auction as a group
bidding in the name of TIM and Intelig. We did not bid for the W block (Amazonas as a rural area), which we viewed as having a
high premium if compared to the X block (67%), whereas we successfully acquired the V1 block, which in our view held the best CAPEX/OPEX
profile associated with rural services in its selected regions (RJ, ES, SC and PR). The joint bid allowed us to take advantage
of the flexibility of the auction rules. These bands brought heavy coverage obligations as its short range characteristics demands
large investments.
The year 2013 began with indications from
the government and Anatel that they hoped to speed up the move to digitalization of TV in Brazil. In November 2013, Anatel approved
the dedication of a single band, of the 700MHz spectrum, exclusively to mobile services.
In September 2014, Anatel concluded the
700 MHz spectrum auction that granted to TIM, Vivo, Claro and Algar the operation of the 700 MHz frequency for the 4G mobile technology,
to be added to the current LTE service in the 2.5 GHz RF. We bid on Block 2 of that auction, for national coverage of the 700 MHz
band, and won the same with a bid of R$1.947 billion (a 1% premium over the minimum price of R$1.927 billion). The 700MHz spectrum,
with its long range and good penetration characteristics, is very important to the expansion of the mobile data network in the
country, offering even better 4G navigation quality to customers and allowing service to reach a greater number of users, supporting
both rural obligations and city coverage. Another benefit of our acquisition of Block 2 of the 700MHz spectrum is the potential
for economies of scale with respect to equipment and synergy with the Asia-Pacific Telecommunity, or APT, band plan and the European
digital dividend for the spectrum.
The auction also required the winning bidders
to proportionally reimburse the broadcasters for the clean-up of the spectrum previously held and used by them. We have spent R$1.199
billion in order to create in March 2015 an entity called the Entity for Administration of TV and RTV Channel Relocation and Digitalization
Process, or EAD, with the other winning bidders, to ensure the spectrum clean-up. The price allocated to clean-up of the spectrum
related to unsold blocks was shared proportionately among the winning bidders who bought the other blocks. To offset such additional
cost to the winning bidders, the price of the 700 MHz spectrum was discounted using Anatel’s WACC methodology. In December
2014, we paid R$1.678 billion and recorded R$61 million as a debt in our financial statements as of December 31, 2014 (see Note
14(f) to our consolidated financial statements).
The Authorization Terms for usage of the
700 MHz spectrum were signed in December 2014 and the Articles of Association and By-laws of EAS were filed on March 2, 2015.
In December 2015, Anatel auctioned left
over radiofrequencies in the 1,800 MHz, 1,900 MHz and 2,500 MHz bands. We submitted bids for the left over lots of the 2,500 MHz
band which had originally been auctioned in 2012. This particular band spectrum provides for 4G mobile services. The bidding currently
remains in the “Opening,
Analysis and Assessment of Price Proposals” stage, and the auction is expected to be finalized,
with winners to be selected in the first half of 2016. However, based on the preliminary results of the bidding, we have been classified
as the first ranked bidder in the lots for Recife, in the state of Pernambuco, and Curitiba, in the state of Paraná, based
on our bids of R$32 million and R$24.5 million, respectively, totaling R$56.5 million, which bids were renewed in March 2016.
VU-M and Wholesale Market
The interconnection of telecommunication
operators is mandatory, allowing the users of different services to make calls from one network to another. In the case of PCS,
Anatel has established that, whenever its network is used to originate or to receive calls, the operators will receive the Value
of Use of Mobile Network (
Valor de Uso de Rede Móvel
), or VU-M, also known as an interconnection rate or mobile termination
rate, set by free agreement. Anatel urged us to adopt a single VU-M per region, as such region is set out in the PCS General License
Plan (
Plano Geral de Autorizações
), or PGA, which began on November 1, 2010. We declined to do so and instead
choose to commercially negotiate VU-Ms with different providers. Under applicable regulations, VU-M rates could be negotiated among
operators with reference rates only applied by Anatel in case of dispute.
In October 2011, Anatel decided to reduce
fixed to mobile rates, based on a reduction in the respective wholesale interconnection levels on call termination. Anatel proposed
a reduction of the fixed to mobile rates of 18% in 2012 and 12% in 2013, based on nominal declines. We believe the rate reductions
put in place by Anatel fail to consider the need to preserve PCS market competition, and we filed an administrative appeal with
Anatel, which was denied in December 2012.
In November 2012, as part of the cost model
transition, Anatel set the 2014 mobile termination reference rate VU-M for operators with significant market power in the mobile
network inbound calls market at 75% of the valid VU-M in 2013, and the 2015 reference rate VU-M at 50% of the valid VU-M in 2013.
Based on that, in December 2013, VU-M prices were published in accordance with Resolution No. 600 for 2014 and 2015.
We believe, however, that when Anatel adopted
such decisions, it failed to observe the proper administrative process required to issue new regulations. We filed an annulment
application with Anatel in connection with the November 2012 resolution, which was denied by Anatel in November 2014.
On July 4, 2014, Anatel approved, by means
of Resolution No. 639/2014, a rule for the definition of maximum reference rates for entities with significant market power, based
on a cost model, for VU-M, TU-RL, and EILD. Pursuant to Anatel’s rule, reference rates will decline based on a glide path
until the cost modeling known as LRIC+ Bottom Up is applied (2019, for VU-M and TU-RL; and 2020, for EILD). On July 7, 2014, Anatel
published the corresponding Acts No. 6,210/2014, 6,211/2014 and 6,212/2014, which determined the specific reference rates to be
adopted as of February 2016.
It is our position that Anatel’s
decision to establish VU-M rates – a price related to the provision of telecommunications services in the private regime
– based on a cost model does not comply with Brazilian law. Accordingly, we filed an annulment application with Anatel in
connection with the July 2014 resolution, which was rejected by Anatel in March 2015. In May 2015, we presented a further appeal,
and this appeal is still under review by Anatel. We are currently reevaluating our strategy due to new commercial conditions, however,
and there is no assurance that our appeal will be successful and even if our appeal were to be successful, we would likely still
be subject to some form of rate regulation as a result of our classification as having significant market power.
Industrial Exploration of Dedicated Lines
In December 2010, Anatel approved a public
hearing that considered alterations of the Industrial Exploration of Dedicated Lines (
Exploração Industrial de
Linha Dedicada
) or EILD, which established mechanisms for the operation of transmissions circuits to increase transparency
between operators and concessionaires. In May 2012, Anatel approved the new EILD regulations (
Regulação de Exploração
Industrial de Linha Dedicada
) or REILD, or REILD, detailing mechanisms to optimize the operating structure for transmission
loop contracts in order to increase contract price transparency and affording equal treatment to independent service providers
from concessionaire groups. The REILD specifically sets out more effective rules on project definition including Standard EILD
or Special EILD, in addition to contract and delivery terms, and specifies EILD delivery dispute resolution procedures. Concurrently,
in May 2012, Anatel approved new EILD reference prices, substantially lower than those previously in place, and a step towards
value fixation in disputes between service providers.
According to the new REILD, contracts executed
prior to its implementation should be amended within 120 days from publication. We have started discussions to amend our EILD contracts,
though we have found it necessary to ask Anatel’s intervention to solve certain disputes. While the new REILD provides procedures
for promptly resolving disputes involving the provision of dedicated lines, Oi has taken legal actions that delayed the actual
amendment of the EILD contracts we had with them. In June 2014, an agreement was settled and we signed new EILD contracts with
Oi.
Considering that EILD is also a market
subject to the asymmetric regulation defined by Anatel in the PGMC, operators classified by Anatel as pertaining to group with
significant market power in the EILD market, such as Oi, were required to submit reference prices and offers for Anatel’s
approval, as well as to only offer EILD through a specific system designed for the PGMC. In September 2013, Anatel approved, for
the first time, reference prices and offers of the operators with significant market power in the EILD market. At least every six
months new reference prices and offers must be submitted for Anatel’s approval. We are not currently classified as having
significant market power in the EILD market.
Costs Modeling
The implementation of a costs model by
Anatel has been in development since March 2005, when the Separation and Allocation of Accounts Document (
Documento de Separação
e Alocação de Contas
), or DSAC was approved, for pricing of STFC and PCS interconnection, as well as wholesale
market inputs, in particular with regards to dedicated lines (EILD) and unbundling.
In August 2011, a consortium headed by
Advisia Consultants was hired to develop the optimized modeling of costs, which would be the basis for all the models the agency
will use, in particular when establishing rates and prices of telecommunications services.
The implementation of the costs model was
one of the short term goals set by the PGR, with expectation of conclusion in 2013, however it will only be effective in 2016.
In December 2012, Anatel held, in Brasilia,
the International Seminar on Modeling and costs. The event aimed to provide an overview of the model development costs in the region
of the Americas and Brazil. Some meetings have taken since this time to discuss changes in the cost model with national operators.
In September 2013, Anatel submitted for
public comment a draft of its rule on pricing of STFC and PCS interconnection, as well as EILD, based on a cost model. Such rule
and the corresponding reference amounts were published by Anatel in July 2014, establishing that reference amounts based on cost
model will come into force in 2016.
See – “Interconnection Regulation.”
Migration of the Mobile Networks with
Analog Technology
In February 2011, Anatel approved Resolution
No. 562/11, which modified a provision of the regulation on conditions of use of RF, determining that, after a period of 360 days
from the publication, the use of analog technology in RF sub bands of 800 MHz would no longer be allowed.
In relation to the use of such RF, we no
longer have any subscriber of analog technology (AMPS). However, our analog networks are still used by STFC concessionaires to
provide services to subscribers in rural areas of the country, a service called RuralCel.
The implementation of the RuralCel service
was carried out by the companies in the Telebrás system, prior to the privatization process in 1998. Once the privatization
of these companies was completed, SMC operators are required to keep sharing such infrastructure (mobile networks with analog technology)
with STFC concessionaires with rural subscribers. There is a dispute with STFC concessionaires as to the compensation payable for
the availability of the RuralCel support network.
Anatel decided to temporarily postpone
shutting down this service, but only until the first half of 2016. We continue to interact with the regulating agency regarding
the shutdown of our analog mobile networks and with
STFC concessionaires in respect of the migration of their subscribers from
our analog networks in connection with our deactivation thereof.
Regulation of Quality
In October 2011, Anatel published PCS and
SCM quality management regulations to establish quality parameters which were to have been met by the mobile telephone and Internet
connection operators in up to 12 months. Most quality parameters established became effective in October and November 2012.
Among such quality parameters, most notable
are the ones relating to the quality of the networks, both mobile and fixed, creating obligations of minimum and average speeds
in numbers, higher than those currently used by operators, which required investments so that such obligations could be met.
As a response to the need to better quantify
the financial impacts, Grupo Oi has presented cancellation request along with a revision request to Anatel for the presentation
of technical surveys of the economic impacts of the new regulations.
The aforementioned request was submitted
for a public hearing by Anatel, which resulted in a series of differing opinions regarding quality measures by the different operations
that are currently being considered by Anatel.
With regard to STFC, Anatel approved in
December 2012 the Quality Management Regulation for STFC service providers, the purpose of which is the creation of a new quality
management model available, such as Quality Management Regulation for PCS and SCM.
In February 2013, Anatel published STFC
quality management regulations to establish quality parameters which should be met by fixed telephone operators in 120 days. All
parameters established became effective in June 2013.
Anatel is likely to launch a new public
consultation by the end of 2016, in order to review the quality framework.
Consolidation of TIM and Intelig STFC
Licenses
With the acquisition of Intelig by TIM
Participações, we were required to eliminate the existing overlapping licenses in order to abide by regulations.
We were given 18 months to implement these changes, beginning on the date of closing of the transaction. This term was later extended
for an additional 12 months, expiring on June 30, 2012.
On December 30, 2011 we filed petitions
with Anatel to authorize the consolidation of our STFC license terms in the local mode under Intelig and STFC LDN and LDI under
TIM. On June 30, 2012 we returned CSP 23 to Anatel, keeping the operation of STFC LDN and LDI bound to CSP 41 TIM Celular S.A.
license, whereas Intelig keep the STFC local license.
The amendments to the STFC Instrument of
Authorization executed between TIM/Intelig and Anatel providing on the foregoing statutes were published on October 26, 2012.
On August 29, 2012, the companies TIM Fiber
SP and TIM Fiber RJ formalized before Anatel their waiver of SCM exploration authorizations. Promptly thereafter, both companies
were merged into TIM Celular S.A., which is already authorized to provide such services. Anatel terminated the SCM authorizations
held by TIM Fiber SP and TIM Fiber RJ. Upon absorption of TIM Fiber SP and TIM Fiber RJ, TIM Celular S.A, as successor in interest,
became the provider of the services previously provided by these companies.
Inclusion of ninth digit in several areas
In December 2010, Anatel published
Resolution No. 553/2010, determining the inclusion of one more digit for mobile numbers in the 011 area code region, which
includes the city of São Paulo and neighboring cities. The change requires users to add the digit 9 to the beginning
of existing mobile numbers. Anatel’s decision to add one more digit to mobile phone numbers in the 011 area code was
intended to increase the availability of numbers in the metropolitan area of São Paulo from 37 million to 90 million,
as it is expected that availability of mobile numbers
would end by 2013 at the current rate of subscription growth. The ninth digit was successfully implemented on July 29,
2012.
This measure requires residents of the
011 area code region to carry out possible adjustments to private equipment and systems such as, for example, PABX equipment and
phone lists, in addition to technical adjustments carried out by telecommunication companies. Technical, Communications and Regulatory
work groups have been created by representatives of all PCS and STFC operators, in order to prepare for the implementation of the
ninth digit in a synchronized way for all the operators, with standardized communication to avoid adjustment difficulties for users.
After July 29, 2012, calls to mobile numbers
using the 8 digits were still completed for a 90-day period, to allow networks and users to adapt. During these 90 days, operators
implemented gradual interceptions and users received messages with guidance on how to dial. After this transition period, calls
to mobile numbers dialed with 8 digits were no longer completed.
The ninth digit was implemented in all
the remaining areas of the state of São Paulo on August 25, 2013, and in the states of Rio de Janeiro and Espirito Santo
on October 27, 2013. Beginning on November 2, 2014, referred to as “D Day”, the ninth digit was implemented in the
states of Amapá, Amazonas, Maranhão, Pará and Roraima. On May 31, 2015, cellular numbers in the states of
Pernambuco, Alagoas, Paraíba, Rio Grande do Norte, Ceará and Piauí acquired the ninth digit, and on October
11, 2015, the same was implemented in the states of Minas Gerais, Bahia and Sergipe.
Anatel has defined the terms for implementing
the ninth digit in PCS in other locations in Brazil, as follows:
Term
|
State
|
National
Codes
|
May 29, 2016
|
Acre, Distrito Federal, Goiás, Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul, Rondônia, Tocantins
|
61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68 and 69
|
November 6, 2016
|
Paraná, Rio Grande do Sul, Santa Catarina
|
41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 51, 53, 54 and 55
|
Anatel Administrative Proceedings
Under the terms of its PCS authorization,
TIM Celular implemented mobile personal telecommunications coverage for the assigned area. Under such term of authorization, TIM
Celular is required to operate in accordance with the quality standards established by Anatel. If it fails to meet the minimum
quality standards required, TIM Celular is subject to Obligation Non-Compliance Determination Procedures, or PADO, and applicable
penalties. Anatel has brought administrative proceedings against the TIM Group for (1) noncompliance with certain quality service
indicators (PGMQ); and (2) default of certain other obligations assumed under the Terms of Authorization and pertinent regulations.
In its defense before Anatel, the TIM Group attributed the lack of compliance to items beyond its control and not related to its
activities and actions. We cannot predict the outcome of these proceedings at this time, but have accrued the amount in our balance
sheet as a provision for all those cases in which we estimate our loss to be probable.
|
C.
|
Organizational Structure
|
We are part of the Telecom Italia Group,
which is engaged principally in the communications sector and, particularly, the fixed and mobile national and international telecommunications
sector, the television sector and the office products sector. The operating segments of the Telecom Italia Group are organized
according to the relative geographical localization for the telecommunications business (Domestic—Italy, Brazil and, until
March 8, 2016, Argentina). We are currently held, directly and indirectly, by Telecom Italia through its wholly owned subsidiary,
TIM Brasil. In turn, the single largest shareholder of Telecom Italia is Vivendi, which is able to exercise significant influence
over Telecom Italia.
Substantially all assets held by TIM Participações
consist of the shares of its wholly owned subsidiaries TIM Celular (incorporated in the Federative Republic of Brazil and headquarters
located in the State of São Paulo), and Intelig (incorporated in the Federative Republic of Brazil and headquarters located
in the State of Rio de Janeiro).
The following chart illustrates our current
ownership structure:
|
D.
|
Property, Plants and Equipment
|
Our principal properties consist of
transmission equipment, switching exchanges and gateway equipment, which connect calls to and from customers and enables data
traffic connections, and radio base stations, which comprise certain signal transmission and reception equipment covering a
defined area. At our radio base stations we have also installed antennas and certain equipment to connect these antennas with
our switching equipment. As of December 31, 2015, we had 125 MGW, 68 MSC-S, 234 radio controller stations, 12,365 NodeB,
4,876 (not considering Oi and Vivo equipment) and 7689 (including all partners’ equipment) eNodeB, 12,850 BTS and
approximately 70 thousand kilometers in fiber optic cable networks. We generally lease or buy the sites where our mobile
telecommunications network equipment is installed. Over the course of financial year 2015, we had leased approximately 17,000
new square meters of real property, all of which was available for installation of our equipment. We also lease approximately
139,864 square meters and owns approximately 66,293 square meters of office space. There are no material encumbrances that
may affect our utilization of our property or equipment. All of our property and equipment is owned or leased domestically;
we do not own or lease any property or equipment outside of Brazil. For the years 2016 through 2018, according to 2016-2018
Industrial Plan, we plan to invest almost R$14 billion in capital expenditures, with the majority of this amount directed to
network development and investments in information technology.
|
Item 4A.
|
Unresolved Staff Comments
|
None.
|
Item 5.
|
Operating and Financial Review and Prospects
|
The following discussion of the Company’s
financial condition and operating results should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial
statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 included in this annual report that have been prepared in
accordance with IFRS, issued by IASB as well as with the information presented under “Item 3. Key Information—A. Selected
Financial Data.” For our consolidated financial statements, including the notes thereto, as of and for the year ended December
31, 2013, please refer to the financial statements accompanying our annual report filed on Form 20-F on April 15, 2014 with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
Brazilian Political and Economic Overview
Brazilian Economy
Although the global economy recently has
been showing signs of improvement, domestic economic conditions are deteriorating. In 2015, Brazilian GDP contracted by 3.8%, its
worst result since 1990, causing Brazil to fall two
positions to ninth place in the World GDP Ranking according to International
Monetary Fund estimates. Accounted in U.S. dollars, the Brazilian economy as a whole contracted by 25% in 2015, heavily impacted
by a 47% devaluation of the
real
. Growth is expected to remain modest in 2016 due to tighter monetary and fiscal policies,
weak external demand and low levels of investment. Standard & Poor’s lowered Brazil’s credit rating in September
2015 to junk status, as did Fitch in December 2015 and Moody’s in February 2016. Such downgrade has further worsened the
conditions of the Brazilian economy and the condition of Brazilian companies.
The official inflation rate was 10.67%
in 2015, significantly above both the 4.5% rate targeted by the Central Bank and the “oscillating” band of plus or
minus two percentage points considered acceptable by the Central Bank. A chief cause of this inflation was the increase, by 18.08%
in 2015, in the administered prices of goods and services such as electricity, water and fuels, as controlled by the Brazilian
government. Inflation increased monthly throughout 2016, as measured by the IPCA-15, which records inflation from approximately
the 15th of the previous month to the 15th of the current month, by 0.92% over the month of January, 1.42% over the month of February,
and 0.43% over the month of March. Uncertainty regarding certain government fiscal measures could contribute to greater inflation
over the course of 2016.
Inflation directly impacts our results
of operations as certain of our assets and liabilities are subject to monetary adjustments by reference to indexes that measure
or that are impacted by inflation such as IPCA, TJLP or SELIC. In 2015, the net impact of inflation adjustments was a loss of R$121.0
million and in 2014, was a loss of R$100.5 million. The loss in 2014 can be explained by inflation adjustments on a R$93 million
loan and on a R$913 million loan, each from the Brazilian Development Bank (
Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Econômico
e Socia
l), or BNDES, and, to a lesser extent, losses due to inflation adjustment on provisions for the aggregate contingency
value of public civil actions and lawsuits pending against us. The loss in 2015 can similarly be explained by inflation adjustments
on a R$69 million loan and on a R$1,475 million loan, each from BNDES (see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—B.
Liquidity and Capital Resources—Sources of Funds—Financial Contracts”) and, to a lesser extent, losses due to
inflation adjustment on provisions for the aggregate contingency value of public civil actions and lawsuits pending against us
(see “Item 8. Financial Information—A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information—Legal Proceedings”).
In addition to the foregoing direct impacts, if inflation rises, disposable income of families may decrease in real terms, leading
to lack of purchasing power among our customer base. Measures to combat inflation, such as a tight monetary policy with high interest
rates, result in restrictions on credit and short-term liquidity, further decreasing the purchasing power of our customers.
Over the past few years, the
real
has significantly and continuously devalued as against the dollar. In 2015, as a result of the poor economic conditions in Brazil,
including in connection with the Operação Lava Jato scandal, the
real
grew at a rate much higher than in previous
years. On September 24, 2015, the
real
fell to a historical low since the introduction of the currency in 1994, at R$4.195
per U.S.$1.00. As of December 31, 2015, the U.S. dollar-
real
exchange rate was R$3.905 per U.S.$1.00, representing a 47%
increase over December, 31 2014 when the exchange rate was R$2.655. Exchange rate fluctuations affect our financial performance
and results of operations. Devaluation of the
real
relative to the U.S. dollar could create additional inflationary pressures
in Brazil by increasing the price of imported products. We acquire our equipment and handsets from global suppliers, the prices
of which are denominated in U.S. dollars, and accordingly depreciation of the
real
against the U.S. dollar may result in
a relative increase in the price of our equipment and handsets. Thus, we are exposed to foreign exchange risk arising from our
need to make substantial dollar-denominated expenditures, particularly for imported components, equipment and handsets, that we
have limited capacity to hedge. With respect to loans denominated in currencies other than
reais
, we enter into currency
swaps to hedge against exchange rate fluctuations (see “—B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Sources of Funds—Financial
Contracts”). The sharp depreciation of the
real
in relation to the U.S. dollar may also generate inflation and governmental
measures to fight possible inflationary outbreaks, including the increase in interest rates. Any such macroeconomic effects could
adversely affect our net operating revenues and our overall financial performance.
The Brazilian current account closed the
year with a deficit of U.S.$58.94 billion or 3.32% of GDP, a sound increase when compared to 2014 due to the strong devaluation
of the Brazilian
real
and the slowdown in domestic economic activity. In 2014, the deficit reached U.S.$104.07 billion.
The 2015 deficit as adjusted was the highest recorded since the Central Bank began recording this metric in 1947 and worst result
in the last five years. Direct external investments totaled U.S.$75.07 billion, however, entirely covering the current deficit
for the first time since 2012.See “Item 3. Key Information—A. Selected Financial Data” for further information
regarding Brazilian governmental fiscal and monetary policies related to the above factors.
Brazilian Mobile Market
The Brazilian mobile market reached 257.8
million lines nationwide at the end of December 2015, corresponding to a penetration ratio of 125.66% (compared to 138.0% in 2014)
and an annual contraction rate of 8.2% (compared to the 3.6% annual growth rate as of December 2014). Brazil is the fifth largest
mobile telephony market in the world, and telephony is currently the most common means of communication in Brazilian households
among all social classes. According to Anatel, mobile market net adds were negative at 22.94 million in 2015, representing a downturn
as compared to 2014’s 9.6 million net adds. This reflects the overall reduction in the number of customers in the Brazilian
mobile telecommunications market (in particular the prepaid market), as users which previously held multiple SIM cards are consolidating
to one single SIM card due to adverse macroeconomic pressures, the high penetration of mobile service and the rapid substitution
of voice by data usage, resulting in an important reduction in the so-called “community effect” where consumers value
a telecommunications system more as more users adopt it. Although the Brazilian telecommunications market’s prepaid customer
base has contracted by 13.3% (or 28.39 million lines) over the course of 2015, to 184.5 million lines, it still continues to represent
the market’s largest component, constituting 71.6% of total subscriber base as of December 31, 2015 as compared to 75.8% as
of December 31, 2014.
As of December 31, 2015, we are the second
largest provider of mobile telecommunication services in Brazil based on the number of phone lines, with a subscriber base of 66.2
million lines (a 12.5% decrease from our 2014 subscriber base of 75.7 million lines) and a market share of 25.7% in 2015 compared
to market share of 26.9% in 2014, based on data from Anatel. We are the leader in the important prepaid business, with 52.65 million
clients as of December 31, 2015 (a 16.7% decrease from 2014). Our postpaid business, reached 13.58 million users as of December
31, 2015 (a 8.6% increase from 2014) and accounted for 20.5% of our total subscriber base (compared to 16.5% in 2014). In 2015,
our total customer base fell by 9.49 million (compared to net additions of 2.3 million in 2014), largely as a result of the overall
trend of prepaid business disconnections, which amounted to 10.56 million in the year.
ARPU is a key performance indicator which
is calculated for any period as total net service revenue divided by average customer base. Our ARPU was R$16.68 in the year ended
December 31, 2015, a decrease of 5.6% when compared to an ARPU of R$17.67 for the year ended December 31, 2014, largely due to
the recent decrease in VU-M rates and the reduction in voice usage, a higher priced service, as compared to data usage per customer.
See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications
Industry—Interconnection Regulation” for information regarding recent regulatory changes to VU-M rates.
In 2015, our average customer base, calculated
as the simple mean of monthly averages, decreased 0.6% to 73.9 million, compared to 74.3 million customers in 2014.
The following table shows the total average
number of customers during 2015, 2014 and 2013.
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|
(in thousands of users)
|
Average number of customers using postpaid plans
(1)
|
|
|
13,281
|
|
|
|
12,258
|
|
|
|
11,382
|
|
Average number of customers using prepaid plans
(1)
|
|
|
60,594
|
|
|
|
62,037
|
|
|
|
60,522
|
|
Total number of customers
(1)
|
|
|
73,785
|
|
|
|
74,295
|
|
|
|
71,905
|
|
|
(1)
|
Average numbers are based on the number of customers at the end of each month during the relevant year, including December
of the previous year. We define customers as the number of active lines, or SIM cards on our network.
|
Critical Accounting Policies
Critical accounting policies are those
that are important to the presentation of our financial condition and results of operations and require management’s most
subjective, complex judgments, often requiring management to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.
As the number of variables and assumptions affecting the possible future resolution of the uncertainties increases, those judgments
become more complex.
Accounting estimates and judgments are
continuously reassessed. They are based on the Company’s historical experience and other factors, such as expectations of
future events, considering the circumstances presented as at the base date of the financial statements.
By definition, the accounting estimates
resulting from such assumptions rarely equal the actual outcome. The estimates and assumptions that present significant risk with
probability to cause relevant adjustments in the book values of assets and liabilities for the next fiscal years are shown below.
We also describe our significant accounting policies, including the ones discussed below, in Note 3 to our consolidated financial
statements.
Loss on Impairment of Non-Financial Assets
Losses from impairment take place when
the book value of assets or cash generating unit exceeds the respective recoverable value, which is considered as the fair value
less costs to sell, or the value in use, whichever is greater. The calculation of the fair value less costs to sell is based on
the information available from sale transactions involving similar assets or market prices less the additional costs incurred to
dispose of those assets. The value in use is based on the discounted cash flow model. Cash flows derive from the Company’s
business plan. Since this is an ongoing business as from the fifth projection year a perpetuity of nominal growth of cash flows
was estimated.
Any reorganization activities to which
the Company has not committed itself on the financial statements disclosure date on which the financial statements are reported
or any material future investments aimed at improving the asset base of the cash generating unit being tested are excluded for
the purposes of the impairment test.
The recoverable value is sensitive to the
discount rates used in the discounted cash flow method, as well as with expected future cash receivables and the growth rate of
revenue and expenses used for extrapolation purposes. Adverse economic conditions may lead to significant changes in these assumptions.
At December 31, 2015 and 2014, the principal
non-financial assets valued in this way were goodwill recorded by the Company (see Notes 3(a) and 14 to our consolidated financial
statements), and the fair value of goodwill was substantially in excess of its net book value.
Income Tax and Social Contribution (Current
and Deferred)
Income tax and social contribution (current
and deferred) are calculated in accordance with interpretations of the legislation currently in force. This process normally includes
complex estimates in order to define the taxable income and differences. In particular, deferred tax assets on income tax and social
contribution losses and temporary differences are recognized to the extent that it is probable that future taxable income will
be available and can be offset. The recoverability of the deferred income tax on tax and social contribution losses and temporary
differences takes into account estimates of taxable income (see Notes 3(b) and 10 to our consolidated financial statements).
Provision for Legal and Administrative
Proceedings
Legal and administrative proceedings are
analyzed by the Company’s management and internal and external legal advisors. The Company’s reviews take into account
factors such as the hierarchy of laws, case law available, recent court decisions and their relevance in the legal order. Such
reviews involve the judgment of our management (see Notes 3(c) and 22 to our consolidated financial statements).
Fair Value of Derivatives and Other Financial
Instruments
Financial instruments presented at fair
value in the balance sheet are measured using evaluation techniques that considers observable data or observable data derived from
the market (see Notes 3(d) and 39 to our consolidated financial statements).
Unbilled Revenues
Considering that some billing cut-off dates
occur at intermediate dates within the months, at the end of each month there are revenues already earned by the Company but not
effectively billed to the customers. These unbilled revenues are recorded based on estimates which take into account historical
data of usage, number of days since the last billing date, among other factors.
Sale and leaseback
A sale and leaseback transaction is one
where the group sells an asset and immediately reacquires the use of the asset by entering into a lease with the buyer. The accounting
treatment of the sale and leaseback depends upon the substance of the transaction (by applying the lease classification principles)
and whether or not the sale was made at the asset’s fair value.
For sale and finance leasebacks, any profit
from the sale is deferred and amortized over the lease term. For sale and operating leasebacks, generally the assets are sold
at fair value, and accordingly the profit or loss from the sale is recognized immediately in the group profit and loss account.
At
the commencement of the lease term, the group recognizes finance leases as assets and liabilities in its balance sheet at amounts
equal to the fair value of the leased property or, if lower, the present value of the minimum lease payments, each determined
at the inception of the lease.
The
discount rate used in a sale and finance leasebacks transaction is determined based on observable market transactions that the
lessee would have to pay in a similar lease or borrowing arrangement. As mentioned in note 1.b to our consolidated financial statements,
the discount rates applied by Company’s management in the transactions entered throughout the year were determinant for
the computation of the gain portion accounted through profit & loss as well as the gain portion deferred and amortized over
the lease term.
Results of Operations
The following discussion should be read
in conjunction with “Item 4. Information on the Company.” As set forth in greater detail below, our financial condition
and results of operations are significantly affected by Brazilian telecommunications regulation, including the regulation of rates.
See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry—Rate
Regulation.” Our financial condition and results of operations have also been, and are expected to continue to be, affected
by the political and economic environment in Brazil. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating
to Brazil.”
In particular, our financial performance
will be affected by:
|
·
|
an increase in the number of competitors in the telecommunications industry that could affect our market share;
|
|
·
|
increased competition from global and local Over The Top, or OTT, players (operators such as mobile virtual network operators
or branded resellers offering content and services on the Internet without owning their own proprietary telecommunications network
infrastructure);
|
|
·
|
increased competition in our principal markets that could affect the prices we charge for our services;
|
|
·
|
our ability to strengthen our competitive position in the Brazilian mobile telecommunications market;
|
|
·
|
our ability to develop and introduce new and innovative technologies that are received favorably by the market, and to provide
value-added services to encourage the use of our network;
|
|
·
|
system technology failures, which could negatively affect our revenues and reputation;
|
|
·
|
the introduction of transformative technologies that could be difficult for us to keep pace with and which could cause a significant
decrease in our revenues and/or revenues for all mobile telephone carriers;
|
|
·
|
our ability to operate efficiently and to refinance our debt as it comes due, particularly in consideration of political and
economic conditions in Brazil and uncertainties in credit and capital markets;
|
|
·
|
our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel;
|
|
·
|
performance of third party service providers and key suppliers on which we depend, such as any difficulties we may encounter
in our supply and procurement processes, including as a result of the insolvency or financial weakness of our suppliers;
|
|
·
|
government policy and changes in the regulatory environment in Brazil;
|
|
·
|
the effect of exchange rate fluctuations;
|
|
·
|
the effect of inflation;
|
|
·
|
the outcome of litigation, disputes and investigations in which we are involved or may become involved; and
|
|
·
|
the costs we may incur due to unexpected events, in particular where our insurance is not sufficient to cover such costs.
|
The following table shows certain components
of our statement of operations for each year in the three-year period ended December 31, 2015, as well as the percentage change
from year to year.
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
Percentage change
|
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
2015 – 2014 (%)
|
|
2014 – 2013 (%)
|
Net Operating Revenues
|
|
|
17,138,851
|
|
|
|
19,498,165
|
|
|
|
19,921,291
|
|
|
|
(12.1
|
)
|
|
|
(2.1
|
)
|
Cost of services and goods
|
|
|
(8,306,857
|
)
|
|
|
(10,083,920
|
)
|
|
|
(10,822,202
|
)
|
|
|
(17.6
|
)
|
|
|
(6.8
|
)
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
8,831,994
|
|
|
|
9,414,245
|
|
|
|
9,099,089
|
|
|
|
(6.2
|
)
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling expenses
|
|
|
(4,826,895
|
)
|
|
|
(5,022,972
|
)
|
|
|
(4,911,522
|
)
|
|
|
(3.9
|
)
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(1,195,277
|
)
|
|
|
(1,130,754
|
)
|
|
|
(1,012,556
|
)
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
Other operating expenses
|
|
|
434,395
|
|
|
|
(774,829
|
)
|
|
|
(736,138
|
)
|
|
|
(156.1
|
)
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
(5,587,777
|
)
|
|
|
(6,928,556
|
)
|
|
|
(6,660,216
|
)
|
|
|
(19.4
|
)
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
Operating income before financial results
|
|
|
3,244,217
|
|
|
|
2,485,689
|
|
|
|
2,438,873
|
|
|
|
30.5
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
Net financial results
|
|
|
(264,377
|
)
|
|
|
(292,772
|
)
|
|
|
(302,720
|
)
|
|
|
(9.7
|
)
|
|
|
(3.3
|
)
|
Operating income before taxes
|
|
|
2,979,840
|
|
|
|
2,192,917
|
|
|
|
2,136,153
|
|
|
|
35.9
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
Income and social contribution tax benefit
|
|
|
(908,694
|
)
|
|
|
(646,499
|
)
|
|
|
(630,539
|
)
|
|
|
40.6
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
2,071,145
|
|
|
|
1,546,419
|
|
|
|
1,505,614
|
|
|
|
33.9
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
Results of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2015
Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2014
Operating Revenues
Our operating revenues consisted of:
|
·
|
monthly subscription charges;
|
|
·
|
usage charges, which include roaming charges;
|
|
·
|
interconnection charges;
|
|
·
|
other service revenues; and
|
|
·
|
proceeds from the sale of handsets and accessories.
|
The composition of our operating revenues
by category of service is presented in Note 26 to our consolidated financial statements and discussed below. We do not determine
net operating revenues or allocate cost by category of service.
The following table shows certain components
of our operating revenues, as well as the percentage change of each component from the prior year, for each of 2015 and 2014:
Statement of Operations Data: Operating
Revenues
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
Percentage change
|
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2015 – 2014 (%)
|
|
|
(in millions of
reais
)
|
|
|
Monthly subscription charges and usage charges
|
|
|
9,763.9
|
|
|
|
11,007.0
|
|
|
|
(11.3
|
)
|
Fixed services
|
|
|
1,003.2
|
|
|
|
901.2
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
Interconnection charges
|
|
|
1,581.8
|
|
|
|
2,630.7
|
|
|
|
(39.9
|
)
|
Long distance charges
|
|
|
2,710.7
|
|
|
|
3,094.1
|
|
|
|
(12.4
|
)
|
Value-added services
|
|
|
7,741.8
|
|
|
|
6,616.0
|
|
|
|
17.0
|
|
Other service revenues
|
|
|
319.6
|
|
|
|
284.2
|
|
|
|
12.5
|
|
Gross operating revenues from services
|
|
|
23,120.9
|
|
|
|
24,533.2
|
|
|
|
(5.8
|
)
|
Value-added and other taxes relating to services
|
|
|
(5,680.1
|
)
|
|
|
(5,817.3
|
)
|
|
|
(2.4
|
)
|
Discounts and returns on services
|
|
|
(2,057.0
|
)
|
|
|
(2,390.8
|
)
|
|
|
(14.0
|
)
|
Net operating revenues from services
|
|
|
15,383.8
|
|
|
|
16,325.0
|
|
|
|
(5.8
|
)
|
Sales of mobile handsets and accessories
|
|
|
2,646.9
|
|
|
|
4,471.3
|
|
|
|
(40.8
|
)
|
Value-added and other taxes on handset sales
|
|
|
(567.9
|
)
|
|
|
(906.1
|
)
|
|
|
(37.3
|
)
|
Discounts and returns on handset sales
|
|
|
(323.9
|
)
|
|
|
(392.1
|
)
|
|
|
(17.4
|
)
|
Net operating revenues from handset and accessory sales
|
|
|
1.755.0
|
|
|
|
3,173.2
|
|
|
|
(44.7
|
)
|
Net operating revenues
|
|
|
17,138.90
|
|
|
|
19,498.2
|
|
|
|
(12.1
|
)
|
Our gross service revenue for the year
ended December 31, 2015 was R$23,120.9 million, representing a 5.8% decrease from R$24,533.2 million in the year ended December
31, 2014, mainly due to major changes in usage patterns (primarily a shift from voice to data usage), deteriorating macroeconomic
conditions in Brazil and the impact of VU-M rate cuts. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Regulation
of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry—Interconnection Regulation” for information regarding recent regulatory
changes to VU-M rates.
The gross handset revenue for the year
ended December 31, 2015 was R$2,646.9 million, a 40.8% decrease over R$4,471.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, resulting
from reduced handset sales following an adverse macroeconomic environment that affected the Brazilian retail sector as a whole,
together with exchange rate variations resulting in a 47% depreciation of the
real
against the U.S. dollar.
Gross revenues for the year ended December
31, 2015 totaled R$25,767.8 million, a 11.2% decrease from the year ended December 31, 2014.
Net operating revenues decreased 12.1%
to R$17,138.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2015 from R$19,498.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2014 for the reasons
described below:
Monthly Subscription Charges and Usage
Charges
Revenue from monthly subscription charges
and usage charges was R$9,763.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2015, a 11.3% decrease from R$11,007.0 million in the year
ended December 31, 2014, due primarily to the reduction in mobile usage as a result of the macroeconomic slowdown in Brazil and
the trend toward migration from voice to data services as reflected by the 12.5% decrease in our total subscriber base from 75.7
million lines in 2014 to 66.2 million lines in 2015, with the largest decrease in our prepaid subscribers.
The total average monthly minutes of use,
or MOU, for 2015 and 2014 were as follows:
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
Average total MOU
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
Fixed Services
Revenue from fixed services was R$1,003.2
million in the year ended December 31, 2015, a 11.3% increase from R$901.2 million in December 31, 2014, mainly due to strong results
in the ultra-broadband business and a redesign of our service portfolio to integrate fixed-plus-mobile service for all of our large
corporate clients.
Interconnection Charges
Interconnection revenues consist of amounts
paid to us by other mobile and fixed line providers for completion of calls and SMS on our network of calls and SMS originating
on their networks. Our interconnection revenues were R$1,581.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2015, a 39.9% decrease from
R$2,630.7 million in 2014, principally due to a combination of the recent cut in VU-M rates (see “Item 4. Information on
the Company—B. Business Overview—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry—Interconnection Regulation”
for information regarding recent regulatory changes to VU-M rates) and the reduction of overall voice traffic and SMS messaging.
Interconnection as a percentage of total gross services revenues decreased to 6.84% in the year ended December 31, 2015.
Long Distance Charges
Revenues from long distance charges decreased
12.4% to R$2,710.7 million in the year ended December 31, 2015 from R$3,094.1 million in the year ended December 31, 2014, reflecting
the trend of increasing data usage by customers as compared to voice which has resulted in the commoditization of long distance.
Our new offers launched in November of 2015, which included off-network calls within Brazil at the same price of on-network calls,
may reduce the pace of this process and help to increase long distance charge revenues.
Value-Added Services
Value-added service revenues increased
17.0% to R$7,741.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2015 from R$6,616.0 million the year ended December 31, 2014, principally
due to the launch of a new portfolio of offers focusing on innovative revenue sources (such as value-added services). Value-added
services include SMS, MMS, data transmission, downloads (wallpaper and ringtones), television access, voicemail, chat and others.
See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Value Added Services” for additional information
on value-added services. Data transmission, supported by our 3G and 4G networks, is the key component to our value-added service
revenues, and we have focused on improving our position in this area through expanding partnerships, incentivizing our customer
base to acquire smartphones and promoting our mobile broadband service through TIM web broadband.
Other Service Revenues
Revenues from other services
increased 12.5% to R$319.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2015 from R$284.2 million in the year ended December 31,
2014, mainly driven by the growth of revenues related to infrastructure sharing, and partially offset by the decline in tower
leasing revenues as a consequence of the ATC Sale-Leaseback Transaction (see “Item 4. Information on the
Company—A. History and Development of the Company—2015 Important Events—Towers Sale & Leaseback”
and Note 1.b to our consolidated financial statements).
Sales of Mobile Handsets
Sales of mobile handsets decreased 40.8%
to R$2,646.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2015 from R$4,471.3 million registered in the year ended December 31, 2014.
The decrease was mainly due to reduced handset sales volumes as a result of a deteriorating macroeconomic environment that affected
the Brazilian retail sector as a whole, together with exchange rate variations resulting in a 47% depreciation of the
real
against the U.S. dollar.
Value-Added and Other Taxes Relating
to Services
The principal tax on telecommunications
services is ICMS tax, which is imposed at rates between 25% and 35%. ICMS is also the principal tax on sales of handsets, which
is imposed at a rate between 7% and, beginning in 2016, 20%. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Taxes
on Telecommunications Goods and Services.”
Two federal social contribution taxes,
PIS and COFINS, are imposed at combined rates of 3.65% on gross revenues operating relating to telecommunications services and
at combined rates of 9.25% on mobile telephone handset sales.
Our value-added and other taxes relating
to services and handset sales was R$6,248.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to R$6,723.4 million in the year
ended December 31, 2014, a decrease of 7.1%. This decrease is mainly due to a decrease in gross revenues, which reflected an impact
on all business fronts as a result of major changes in usage patterns (reflecting shift from voice to data), difficult macroeconomic
conditions, as well as the impact of mobile-termination rate cuts.
Discounts on Services and Handset Sales
Discounts on services and handset sales
decreased 14.4% to R$2,380.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to R$2,782.9 million in the year ended December
31, 2014, due mainly to lower related revenues.
Costs of Services and Goods
Costs of services and goods decreased by
17.6% to R$8,306.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2015 from R$10,083.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2014, mainly
due to lower VU-M rates to be paid by us when our customers connect to another network and a reduction in the volume of handsets
sold. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications
Industry—Interconnection Regulation” for information regarding recent regulatory changes to VU-M rates.
The following table shows the components
of costs of services and goods for each of the periods indicated.
Statement of Operations Data: Costs
of Services and Goods
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
Percentage change
|
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2015 – 2014 (%)
|
|
|
(in millions of
reais
)
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(2,535.7
|
)
|
|
|
(2,345.5
|
)
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
Interconnection, circuit leasing and related expenses
|
|
|
(2,805.4
|
)
|
|
|
(3,429.1
|
)
|
|
|
(18.2
|
)
|
Third party services
|
|
|
(490.9
|
)
|
|
|
(439.5
|
)
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
Personnel
|
|
|
(91.0
|
)
|
|
|
(80.3
|
)
|
|
|
13.4
|
|
Rental and insurance
|
|
|
(495.6
|
)
|
|
|
(412.5
|
)
|
|
|
20.1
|
|
FISTEL tax and other
|
|
|
(31.7
|
)
|
|
|
(36.6
|
)
|
|
|
(13.5
|
)
|
Total cost of services
|
|
|
(6,450.2
|
|
|
|
(6,743.5
|
)
|
|
|
(4.3
|
)
|
Cost of handsets and accessories sold
|
|
|
(1,856.7
|
)
|
|
|
(3,340.5
|
)
|
|
|
(44.4
|
)
|
Total cost of services and goods
|
|
|
(8,306.9
|
)
|
|
|
(10,083.9
|
)
|
|
|
(17.6
|
)
|
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expenses
grew 8.1% to R$2,535.7 million in the year ended December 31, 2015 from R$2,345.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2014,
mainly due to an increase in general capital expenditures as explained in more detail in “—B. Liquidity and Capital
Resources.”
Interconnection, Circuit Leasing and
Related Expenses
Interconnection, circuit leasing and related
expenses consist of the amount paid to fixed-line and other mobile service providers for termination of our outgoing calls on their
networks as well as lease payments to fixed carriers for the use of their network. Interconnection, circuit leasing and related
expenses costs decreased 18.2% to R$2,805.4 million in the year ended December 31, 2015 from R$3,429.1 million in the year ended
December 31, 2014, mainly due to the a decrease in out-of-network voice and SMS traffic and the reduction in VU-M rates. See “Item
4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry—Interconnection
Regulation” for information regarding recent regulatory changes to VU-M rates.
Third Party Services
Third party services costs were R$490.9
million in the year ended December 31, 2015, increasing 11.7% from R$439.5 million incurred in the year ended December 31, 2014,
mainly due to higher costs from outside providers in connection with maintaining our own network, directly related to the increased
amount of equipment we must maintain as a result of infrastructure investments.
Personnel
Personnel costs increased 13.4% to R$91.0
million in the year ended December 31, 2015 from R$80.3 million in the year ended December 31, 2014. This increase was mainly due
to the Company’s adjustment of personnel salaries for inflation, as well as other adjustments made by the Company to benefits
received by its personnel.
Rental and Insurance
Rental and insurance costs increased 20.1%
to R$495.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2015 from R$412.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2014. This increase
is primarily due to the higher number of leased sites, which include both leases of land for placement of our owned towers, as
well as leases of space on the towers of other operators.
FISTEL Tax and Other
FISTEL tax and other costs decreased 13.5%
to R$31.7 million in the year ended December 31, 2015 from R$36.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2014, due primarily to
lower tax payments. FISTEL tax is directly related to customer base, and our customer base decreased (especially through the disconnection
of prepaid users with low ARPU).
Costs of Handsets and Accessories Sold
The cost of handsets and accessories sold
in 2015 was R$1,856.7 million, representing a 44.4% decrease from R$3,340.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2014. This decrease
is attributable to decreased handset sales volumes as described above under “—Sales of Mobile Handsets”.
Gross Profit Margins
The following table shows our gross profits,
as well as the percentage change, for each of the periods indicated:
Statement of Operations Data: Gross
Profit
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
Percentage change
|
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2015 – 2014 (%)
|
|
|
(in millions of
reais
)
|
|
|
Net operating revenues from services
|
|
|
15,383.8
|
|
|
|
16,325.0
|
|
|
|
(5.8
|
)
|
Cost of services
|
|
|
(6,450.2
|
)
|
|
|
(6,743.5
|
)
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Gross profit from services
|
|
|
8,933.6
|
|
|
|
9,581.5
|
|
|
|
(6.8
|
)
|
Net operating revenues from sales of mobile handsets and accessories
|
|
|
1,755.0
|
|
|
|
3,173.2
|
|
|
|
(44.7
|
)
|
Cost of goods
|
|
|
(1,856.7
|
)
|
|
|
(3,340.5
|
)
|
|
|
(44.4
|
)
|
Gross loss from sales of mobile handsets and accessories
|
|
|
(101.6
|
)
|
|
|
(167.3
|
)
|
|
|
(39.2
|
)
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
8,882.0
|
|
|
|
9,414.2
|
|
|
|
(6.2
|
)
|
Our gross profit margin from services
(gross profit as a percentage of net service revenues) decreased from 58.7% in the year ended December 31, 2014 to 58.1% in the
year ended December 31, 2015. This performance is mainly due to major changes in usage patterns (primarily a shift from voice
to data usage), deteriorating macroeconomic conditions in Brazil and the impact of VU-M rate cuts, offset by a 16.7% increase
in our value-added services net revenues, which have a better profit margins than other services we offer.
Our negative gross margin for sales of
mobile handsets and accessories increased from negative 5.3% in the year ended December 31, 2014 to negative 5.8% in the year ended
December 31, 2015.
Our overall gross profit margin increased
from 48.3% in the year ended December 31, 2014 to 51.5% in December 31, 2015. This resulted primarily from a higher gross profit
margin from services.
Operating expenses
The following table shows our operating
expenses, as well as the percentage change from year to year of each component, for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014:
Statement of Operations Data: Operating
Expenses
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
Percentage change
|
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2015 – 2014 (%)
|
|
|
(in millions of
reais
)
|
|
|
Selling expenses
|
|
|
(4,826.9
|
)
|
|
|
(5,023.0
|
)
|
|
|
(3.9
|
)
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(1,195.3
|
)
|
|
|
(1,130.8
|
)
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
Other operating expenses, net
|
|
|
434.4
|
|
|
|
(774.8
|
)
|
|
|
156.1
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
(5,587.8
|
)
|
|
|
(6,928.6
|
)
|
|
|
(19.4
|
)
|
Our total operating expenses decreased
by 19.4% to R$5,587.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2015 from R$6,928.6 million in December 31, 2014, mainly due to the
factors described below:
Selling Expenses
Selling expenses decreased 3.9% to R$4,826.9
million in the year ended December 31, 2015 from R$5,023.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2014, mainly due to a significant
decrease in advertising expenses, despite the launch of a new portfolio of plans in November, a reduction in commissioning expenses
and a decrease in FISTEL taxes for the reasons described in “—FISTEL Tax and Other”.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses increased
by 5.7% to R$1,195.3 million in the year ended December 31, 2015 from R$1,130.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2014, mainly
as a result of an increase of depreciation and amortization.
Other Operating Expenses, Net
Other net operating expenses
decreased by 156.1% to a gain of R$434.4 million in the year ended December 31, 2015 from R$774.8 million in the year ended
December 31, 2014. This decrease was mainly due to gains resulting from the ATC Sale-Leaseback Transaction (see “Item
4. Information on the Company—A. History and Development of the Company—2015 Important Events—Towers Sale
& Leaseback” and Note 1.b to our consolidated financial statements), and partially offset by higher costs on
contingencies.
Net Financial Expense
We had net financial expense of R$264.4
million in the year ended December 31, 2015, from a net financial expense of R$292.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2014.
The variation was due principally to our maintenance of financial assets exceeding our financial liabilities for the most part
of 2015, with financial revenues growing more than financial expenses, an increase in the SELIC interest rate and higher volatility
of the
real
in relation to foreign currencies.
Income and Social Contribution Taxes
Income and social contribution taxes are
calculated based on the separate income of each subsidiary, adjusted by the additions and exclusions permitted in the year ended
December 31, 2015 under tax law. We recorded income and social contribution tax of R$908.7 million in the year ended December 31,
2015, an increase of 40.6% when compared to R$646.5 million recorded for the year ended December 31, 2014, due mainly to higher
pre-tax income.
Net Income
Our net income in the year ended December
31, 2015 was R$2,071.0 million, representing an increase of 33.9% from a net income of R$1,546.4 million in the year ended December
31, 2014.
Results of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2014
Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2013
Operating Revenues
Our operating revenues consisted of:
|
·
|
monthly subscription charges;
|
|
·
|
usage charges, which include roaming charges;
|
|
·
|
interconnection charges;
|
|
·
|
other service revenues; and
|
|
·
|
proceeds from the sale of handsets and accessories.
|
The composition of our operating revenues
by category of service is presented in Note 30 to our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31,
2014 and discussed below. We do not determine net operating revenues or allocate cost by category of service.
The following table shows certain components
of our operating revenues, as well as the percentage change of each component from the prior year, for each of 2014 and 2013:
Statement of Operations Data: Operating
Revenues
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
Percentage change
|
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
2014 – 2013 (%)
|
|
|
(in millions of
reais
)
|
|
|
Monthly subscription charges and usage charges
|
|
|
11,007.0
|
|
|
|
11,309.8
|
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)
|
Fixed services
|
|
|
901.2
|
|
|
|
1,071.8
|
|
|
|
(15.9
|
)
|
Interconnection charges
|
|
|
2,630.7
|
|
|
|
3,760.8
|
|
|
|
(30.0
|
)
|
Long distance charges
|
|
|
3,094.1
|
|
|
|
3,332.9
|
|
|
|
(7.2
|
)
|
Value-added services
|
|
|
6,616.0
|
|
|
|
5,353.7
|
|
|
|
23.6
|
|
Other service revenues
|
|
|
284.2
|
|
|
|
236.3
|
|
|
|
20.3
|
|
Gross operating revenues from services
|
|
|
24,533.2
|
|
|
|
25,065.2
|
|
|
|
(2.1
|
)
|
Value-added and other taxes relating to services
|
|
|
(5,817.3
|
)
|
|
|
(5,588.3
|
)
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Discounts and returns on services
|
|
|
(2,390.8
|
)
|
|
|
(2,775.8
|
)
|
|
|
(13.9
|
)
|
Net operating revenues from services
|
|
|
16,325.0
|
|
|
|
16,701.1
|
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)
|
Sales of mobile handsets and accessories
|
|
|
4,471.3
|
|
|
|
4,596.5
|
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)
|
Value-added and other taxes on handset sales
|
|
|
(906.1
|
)
|
|
|
(956.3
|
)
|
|
|
(5.2
|
)
|
Discounts and returns on handset sales
|
|
|
(392.1
|
)
|
|
|
(419.9
|
)
|
|
|
(6.6
|
)
|
Net operating revenues from handset and accessory sales
|
|
|
3,173.2
|
|
|
|
3,220.2
|
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
Net operating revenues
|
|
|
19,498.2
|
|
|
|
19,921.3
|
|
|
|
(2.1
|
)
|
Our gross service revenue for the year
ended December 31, 2014 was R$24,533.2 million, representing a 2.1% decrease from R$25,065.2 million in the year ended December
31, 2013, mainly due a significant decrease in VU-M rates, and a reduction in SMS usage and voice traffic.
See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B.
Business Overview—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry—Interconnection Regulation” for information
regarding recent regulatory changes to VU-M rates.
The gross handset revenue for the year
ended December 31, 2014 was R$4,471,3 million, a 2.7% decrease over R$4,596.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, resulting
from reduced handset sales. Gross revenues for the year ended December 31, 2014 totaled R$29,004.5 million, a 2.2% decrease from
the year ended December 31, 2013.
Net operating revenues decreased 2.1% to
R$19,498.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2014 from R$19,921.3 million in the year ended December 31, 2013 for the reasons
described below:
Monthly Subscription Charges and Usage
Charges
Revenue from monthly subscription charges
and usage charges was R$11,007.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2014, a 2.7% decrease from R$11,309.8 million in the year
ended December 31, 2013, due primarily to the reduction in mobile usage as a result of the macroeconomic slowdown in Brazil and
the trend toward migration from voice to data services.
The total average monthly MOU for 2014
and 2013 were as follows:
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
Average total MOU
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
Fixed Services
Revenue from fixed services was R$901.2
million in the year ended December 31, 2014, a 15.9% decrease from R$1,071.8 million in December 31, 2013, mainly due to the ongoing
restructuring of Intelig’s business, focused primarily a redesign of our service portfolio to integrate fixed-plus-mobile
service for all of our large corporate clients, as well as on a renewal of our customer base, an expansion of our multiservice
network, a reorganization of our sales team and general brand repositioning.
Interconnection Charges
Interconnection revenues consist of amounts
paid to us by other mobile and fixed line providers for completion of calls and SMS on our network of calls and SMS originating
on their networks. Our interconnection revenues were R$2,630.7 million in the year ended December 31, 2014, a 30.0% decrease from
R$3,760.8 million in 2013, principally due to the impact of the decrease in VU-M rates during the year and the reduction of incoming
SMS revenue. Interconnection as a percentage of total gross services revenues decreased to 10.72% in the year ended December 31,
2014.
Long Distance Charges
Revenues from long distance charges decreased
7.2% to R$3,094.1 million in the year ended December 31, 2014 from R$3,332.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2013, reflecting
the tendency of users to replace the communications by means of long distance calls for new data technologies, for example the
WhatsApp application.
Value-Added Services
Value-added service revenues increased
23.6% to R$6,616.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2014 from R$5,353.6 million the year ended December 31, 2013, principally
due to the launch of new offers and the popularity of new data plans, such as
Controle WhatsApp
. Value-added services include
SMS, MMS, data transmission, downloads (wallpaper and ringtones), television access, voicemail, chat and others.
See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B.
Business Overview—Value Added Services” for additional information on value-added services.
SMS revenues represent a significant portion
of our total value-added service revenues. Data transmission, supported by our 3G and 4G networks, is also a key component to our
value-added service revenues, and we have focused on improving our position in this area through expanding partnerships, incentivizing
our customer base to acquire smartphones and promoting our mobile broadband service through TIM web broadband.
Other Service Revenues
Revenues from other services increased
20.3% to R$284.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2014 from R$236.3 million in the year ended December 31, 2013, mainly due
to the increase of SIM card sales.
Sales of Mobile Handsets
Sales of mobile handsets decreased 2.7%
to R$4,471.3 million in the year ended December 31, 2014 from R$4,596.5 million registered in the year ended December 31, 2013.
The decrease was mainly due to a lower volume of handset sales as a result of weaker macroeconomic environmental conditions.
Value-Added and Other Taxes Relating
to Services
The principal tax on telecommunications
services is ICMS tax, which is imposed at rates between 25% and 35%. ICMS is also the principal tax on sales of handsets, which
was, at the time, imposed at a rate between 7% and 17 % (until the beginning of 2016, when the upper rate increased to 20%). See
“Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Taxes on Telecommunications Goods and Services.”
Two federal social contribution taxes,
PIS and COFINS, are imposed at combined rates of 3.65% on gross revenues operating relating to telecommunications services and
at combined rates of 9.25% on mobile telephone handset sales.
Our value-added and other taxes relating
to services and handset sales was R$6,723.4 million in the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to R$6,544.6 million in the year
ended December 31, 2013, an increase of 2.7%. This increase is mainly due to a decrease in revenue from sources that are less impacted
by taxes (such as interconnection revenues) and an increase in revenue from sources that are more impacted by taxes (such as data
revenues).
Discounts on services and handset sales
decreased 12.9% to R$2,782.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to R$3,195.8 million in the year ended December
31, 2013, due mainly to lower revenues.
Costs of Services and Goods
Costs of services and goods decreased by
6.8% to R$10,083.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2014 from R$10,822.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2013, mainly
due to lower VU-M rates to be paid by us when our customers connect to another network and the lower cost of handsets.
See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B.
Business Overview—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry—Interconnection Regulation” for information
regarding recent regulatory changes to VU-M rates.
The following table shows the components
of costs of services and goods for each of the periods indicated.
Statement of Operations Data: Costs
of Services and Goods
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
Percentage change
|
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
2014 – 2013 (%)
|
|
|
(in millions of
reais
)
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(2,345.5
|
)
|
|
|
(2,097.9
|
)
|
|
|
11.8
|
|
Interconnection, circuit leasing and related expenses
|
|
|
(3,429.1
|
)
|
|
|
(4,518.9
|
)
|
|
|
(24.1
|
)
|
Third party services
|
|
|
(439.5
|
)
|
|
|
(403.2
|
)
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
Personnel
|
|
|
(80.3
|
)
|
|
|
(61.1
|
)
|
|
|
31.4
|
|
Rental and insurance
|
|
|
(412.5
|
)
|
|
|
(358.9
|
)
|
|
|
14.9
|
|
FISTEL tax and other
|
|
|
(36.6
|
)
|
|
|
(31.2
|
)
|
|
|
17.3
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
Percentage change
|
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
2014 – 2013 (%)
|
|
|
(in millions of
reais
)
|
|
|
Total cost of services
|
|
|
(6,743.5
|
)
|
|
|
(7,471.4
|
)
|
|
|
(9.7
|
)
|
Cost of handsets and accessories sold
|
|
|
(3,340.5
|
)
|
|
|
(3,350.8
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
Total cost of services and goods
|
|
|
(10,083.9
|
)
|
|
|
(10,822.2
|
)
|
|
|
(6.8
|
)
|
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expenses
grew 11.8% to R$2,345.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2014 from R$2,097.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2013,
mainly due to an increase in general capital expenditures as explained in more detail in “—B. Liquidity and Capital
Resources.”
Interconnection, Circuit Leasing and
Related Expenses
Interconnection, circuit leasing and related
expenses consist of the amount paid to fixed-line and other mobile service providers for termination of our outgoing calls on their
networks as well as lease payments to fixed carriers for the use of their network. Interconnection, circuit leasing and related
expenses costs decreased 24.1% to R$3,429.1 million in the year ended December 31, 2014 from R$4,518.9 million in the year ended
December 31, 2013, mainly due to the a decrease in out-of-network voice and SMS traffic and the reduction in VU-M rates.
See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B.
Business Overview—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry—Interconnection Regulation” for information
regarding recent regulatory changes to VU-M rates.
Third Party Services
Third party services costs were R$439.5
million in the year ended December 31, 2014, increasing 9.0% from R$403.2 million incurred in the year ended December 31, 2013,
mainly due to higher costs from outside providers in connection with maintaining our own network, directly related to the increased
amount of equipment we must maintain as a result of infrastructure investments.
Personnel
Personnel costs increased 31.4% to R$80.3
million in the year ended December 31, 2014 from R$61.1 million in the year ended December 31, 2013. This increase was mainly due
to the Company’s adjustment of personnel salaries for inflation, as well as other adjustments made by the Company to benefits
received by its personnel.
Rental and Insurance
Rental and insurance costs increased 14.9%
to R$412.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2014 from R$358.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2013. This increase
is primarily due to the higher number of leased sites, which include both leases of land for placement of our owned towers, as
well as leases of space on the towers of other operators.
FISTEL Tax and Other
FISTEL tax and other costs increased 17.3%
to R$36.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2014 from R$31.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2013, due primarily to
higher tax payments. FISTEL tax is directly related to customer base, and our customer base increased; therefore FISTEL tax accordingly
increased. Other taxes to which we are subject vary depending on revenues, which also increased.
Costs of Handsets and Accessories Sold
The cost of handsets and accessories sold
in 2014 was R$3,340.5 million, representing a 0.3% decrease from R$3,350.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2013. This decrease
is attributable to decreased handset sales volumes as described above under “—Sales of Mobile Handsets”.
Gross Profit Margins
The following table shows our gross profits,
as well as the percentage change, for each of the periods indicated:
Statement of Operations Data: Gross
Profit
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
Percentage change
|
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
2014 – 2013 (%)
|
|
|
(in millions of
reais
)
|
|
|
Net operating revenues from services
|
|
|
16,325.0
|
|
|
|
16,701.1
|
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)
|
Cost of services
|
|
|
(6,743.5
|
)
|
|
|
(7,471.4
|
)
|
|
|
(9.7
|
)
|
Gross profit from services
|
|
|
9,581.5
|
|
|
|
9,229.7
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
Net operating revenues from sales of mobile handsets and accessories
|
|
|
3,173.2
|
|
|
|
3,220.2
|
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
Cost of goods
|
|
|
(3,340.5
|
)
|
|
|
(3,350.8
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
Gross loss from sales of mobile handsets and accessories
|
|
|
(167.3
|
)
|
|
|
(130.6
|
)
|
|
|
28.1
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
9,414.2
|
|
|
|
9,099.1
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
Our gross profit margin from services (gross
profit as a percentage of net service revenues) increased from 55.26% in the year ended December 31, 2013 to 58.69% in the year
ended December 31, 2014. This performance is mainly explained by a 23.6% increase in our sales of value-added services, which have
a better profit margins than other services we offer.
Our negative gross margin for sales of
mobile handsets and accessories increased from negative 4.05% in the year ended December 31, 2013 to negative 5.3% in the year
ended December 31, 2014.
Our overall gross profit margin increased
from 45.7% in the year ended December 31, 2013 to 48.28% in December 31, 2014. This resulted primarily from a higher gross profit
margin from services.
Operating expenses
The following table shows our operating
expenses, as well as the percentage change from year to year of each component, for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013:
Statement of Operations Data: Operating
Expenses
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
Percentage change
|
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
2014 – 2013 (%)
|
|
|
(in millions of
reais
)
|
|
|
Selling expenses
|
|
|
(5,023.0
|
)
|
|
|
(4,911.5
|
)
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(1,130.8
|
)
|
|
|
(1,012.5
|
)
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
Other operating expenses, net
|
|
|
(774.8
|
)
|
|
|
(736.1
|
)
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
(6,928.6
|
)
|
|
|
(6,660.2
|
)
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
Our total operating expenses increased
slightly by 4.0% to R$6,928.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2014 from R$6,660.2 million in December 31, 2013, mainly due
to the factors described below:
Selling Expenses
Selling expenses increased 2.2%, to R$5,023.0
million in the year ended December 31, 2014 from R$4,911.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2013, mainly due to costs associated
with a larger number of owned stores in 2014 as compared with 2013; our owned stores went from 163 stores at the end of 2013 to
173 stores in the end of 2014.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses increased
by 11.7% to R$1,130.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2014 from R$1,012.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2013, mainly
as a result of an increase in expenses associated with maintenance of our equipment, due to higher capital expenditures on the
same.
Other Operating Expenses, Net
Other net operating expenses increased
by 5.3% to R$774.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2014 from R$736.1 million in the year ended December 31, 2013. This decrease
was mainly due to an increase in FUST/FUNTEL expenses (which are different than FISTEL taxes, which increased in the period, as
described above) (See Note 30 to our consolidated financial statements).
Net Financial Expense
We had net financial expense of R$292.8
million in the year ended December 31, 2014, from a net financial expense of R$302.7 million in the year ended December 31, 2013.
The variation was due principally to our maintenance of negative net debt for the most part of 2014, with financial revenues growing
more than financial expenses, an increase in the SELIC interest rate and higher volatility of the
real
in relation to foreign
currencies.
Income and Social Contribution Taxes
Income and social contribution taxes are
calculated based on the separate income of each subsidiary, adjusted by the additions and exclusions permitted in the year ended
December 31, 2014 under tax law. We recorded income and social contribution tax of R$646.5 million in the year ended December 31,
2014, an increase of 2.5% when compared to R$630.5 million recorded for the year ended December 31, 2013, due mainly to higher
pre-tax income.
Net Income
Our net income in the year ended December
31, 2014 was R$1,546.4 million, representing an increase of 2.7% from a net income of R$1,506 million in the year ended December
31, 2013.
B. Liquidity and Capital Resources
We expect to finance our capital expenditures
and other liquidity requirements for the remainder of 2016, 2017 and 2018 with our cash, operating revenue, renewals of maturing
short-term indebtedness and disbursements from our existing long-term credit line with BNDES of R$5,763 million, of which R$2,830
million remains undisbursed and available at our request and with our loan agreement with Finnish Export Credit / KfW of U.S.$150
million, of which the full U.S.$150 million remains undisbursed and available at our request. See “Item 5. Operating and
Financial Review and Prospects—B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Sources of Funds—Financial Contracts”
for additional detail on our financial contracts and Note 39 to our to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of
the other types of financial instruments used by the Company.
On February 16, 2016, the Company disclosed
to the market our 2016-2018 Industrial Plan, which covers our strategic and capital expenditures plan for the period between 2016
and 2018. According to the 2016-2018 Industrial Plan, the Company intends to invest approximately R$14 billion in capital expenditures
on organic growth, with the majority of this amount directed to network development. These investments will, among other benefits,
help improve the delivery of services and growth of customer base.
Our net debt position in 2015 of R$1,733
million (loans plus accrued interest, lease obligations and derivatives (liabilities), less cash and cash equivalents, derivatives
(assets), lease assets and short term investments) means we should not need substantial funding to meet our obligations or to conduct
our activities. We believe that our current working capital is sufficient for our present requirements.
Sources of Funds
Cash from operations
Our cash flows from operating activities
was R$4,278,206 thousand in the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to R$6,441,064 thousand in the year ended December 31, 2014.
We had other variations in our operational
assets and liabilities which decreased our cash from operations. The main variations of assets and liabilities were:
|
·
|
Decrease of accounts receivable in the amount of R$739.9 million.
|
|
·
|
Increase in accounts payable to suppliers in the amount of R$1,816 million.
|
|
·
|
Increase in judicial deposits, or assets of the Company placed on deposit with the Court and held in judicial escrow pending
resolution of certain legal proceedings, in the amount of R172.8 million.
|
Financial Contracts
We and our subsidiaries are party to the
financial contracts described below, each to be used for purposes of the development of our business, generally, unless otherwise
expressly provided herein. With respect to loans denominated in currencies other than
reais
, we enter into currency swaps
to hedge against exchange rate fluctuations.
In 2015, TIM Celular received disbursements
totaling R$1,461 million related to existing and new financing agreements, as set forth below and as each agreement is described
further in the following paragraph:
|
·
|
R$1,271 million disbursed from BNDES pursuant to an existing credit facility dated as of December 23, 2013; and
|
|
·
|
R$190 million disbursed from Cisco Systems Capital Corporation, or Cisco Capital, under a new facility agreement dated as of
December 10, 2015.
|
The terms of our long-term debt contain
cross-default clauses, restrictions on our ability to merge with another entity and restrictions on our ability to prematurely
redeem or repay such debt. We are currently not, and do not expect to be, in breach of any material covenant of our debt instruments,
which breach would be construed an event of default under their terms.
As mentioned above, our principal financing
agreements are
|
·
|
Finance Contract, dated as of June 3, 2008, between European Investment Bank, as lender, TIM Celular S.A. and TIM Nordeste
(incorporated by TIM Celular), as borrowers and TIM Participações as guarantor, in the total principal amount of
€200 million fully disbursed, and fully swapped into local currency, between September 2009 and June 2010. The total outstanding
amount as of December 31, 2015 converted from euros was R$1,115 million, including accrued interest. The drawings, the last of
which matures in June 2017, bear an average cost of 88.06% of the CDI after hedging. In March 2015, TIM Celular recouponed one
of the swaps that was hedging the €200 million, which helped to reduce the cost indexed to CDI. The Guarantee was provided
by Itaú BBA for the principal amount of €220 million.
|
|
·
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of November 19, 2008, among BNDES, as lender, TIM Celular, as borrower, and TIM Participações
as guarantor, in the principal amount of R$592.9 million. The agreement, which matures on July 15, 2017, bears the average interest
fixed rate of 2.17% plus the TJLP and the interest rate of 10.23% plus the UMIPCA. On December 31, 2015, the outstanding amount
under this credit agreement, including accrued interest, was R$185 million.
|
|
·
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of November 19, 2008, among BNDES, as lender, TIM Nordeste (incorporated by TIM Celular), as borrower,
and TIM Participações as guarantor, in the principal amount of R$202 million. The agreement, which matures on July
15, 2017, bears the average interest at a fixed rate of 2.03% plus the TJLP and the interest rate of 10.23% plus UMIPCA. On December
31, 2015, the outstanding amount under this credit agreement, including accrued interest, was R$61 million.
|
|
·
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of November 19, 2008 and amended on June 29, 2010, among BNDES, as lender, TIM Celular, as borrower,
and TIM Participações as guarantor, in the principal amount of R$716.9 million, which R$692.9 million was disbursed,
the undrawn value of the credit line was cancelled. The agreement, which matures on July 15, 2018 bears interest at (1) a fixed
rate of 3.62% plus the TJLP or (2)
|
fixed interest rate of 4.5% per annum. On December 31, 2015, the outstanding amount under this
credit agreement, including accrued interest, was R$290 million.
|
·
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of November 19, 2008, amended on December 12, 2008, June 29, 2010, and December 10, 2012, among
BNDES, as lender and TIM Celular and Intelig, as borrowers, and TIM Participações as guarantor, in the principal
amount of R$3,674 million (a R$2,164 million increase in the credit limit was effected by way of amendment on December 10, 2012).
The agreement, which matures on December 15, 2019 bears interest at either (1) a fixed rate of 3.32% plus the TJLP; (2) TJLP or
(3) fixed interest rate of 2.5% per annum. As of December 31 2015, the outstanding debt of TIM Celular under this credit agreement,
including accrued interest, was R$984 million and the outstanding debt of Intelig including accrued interest, was R$86 million.
|
|
·
|
Facility Agreement, dated as of November 28, 2008, between BNP Paribas, as lender, and TIM Celular, as borrower and TIM Participações
as guarantor, in the total principal amount of U.S.$143.6 million fully disbursed and swapped on January 15, 2009. The total outstanding
amount as of December 31, 2015 converted from U.S. dollars was R$187 million, including accrued interest. The agreement matures
on December 2017 and bears an average cost of 97.42% of the CDI after hedging.
|
|
·
|
Finance Contract, dated as of December 29, 2011, between European Investment Bank, as lender, TIM Celular, as borrower and
TIM Participações as guarantor, in the total principal amount of €100 million fully disbursed, and swapped into
local currency. The total outstanding amount as of December 31, 2015, converted from euros was R$483 million, including accrued
interest. The agreement matures on August 2019, bear an average cost of 93.60% of the CDI after hedging. In March 2015, TIM Celular
recouponed the swaps that hedged the €100 million, which helped to reduce the cost indexed to CDI. The bank guarantee was
provided by SACE sPa. for the principal amount of €115 million.
|
|
·
|
Finance Contract, dated as of July 13, 2012, between European Investment Bank, as lender, TIM Celular, as borrower and TIM
Participações as guarantor, in the total principal amount of €100 million. The €50 million disbursed was
swapped into local currency and the other €50 million was canceled by the company. The total outstanding amount as of December
31, 2015, converted from euros was R$262 million, including accrued interest. The agreement matures in February 2020 and bears
an average cost of 93.60% of the CDI after hedging. In March, 2015 TIM Celular made a recouponing in the swaps that was hedging
the €100 million, with this transaction the company was able to reduce the debt cost in terms of CDI. The bank guarantee was
provided by KfW IPEX for the principal amount of €52.5 million.
|
|
·
|
Master Loan Agreement, dated as of June 20, 2013, between Cisco Capital, as lender, TIM Celular, as borrower. The purpose of
the loan is to finance TIM Celular’s purchase of Cisco and third-party products and services. The loan to be given pursuant
to the Master Loan Agreement was executed pursuant to a Facility Agreement, dated as of August 28, 2013, between Cisco Capital,
as lender, and TIM Celular, as borrower, in the total principal amount of U.S.$50 million. On October 14, 2014, a new Facility
Agreement was signed, between Cisco Capital, as lender, and TIM Celular, as borrower, in the total principal amount of U.S.$50
million. The new Facility Agreement was fully disbursed on November 5, 2014. On November 18, 2015, a new Facility Agreement was
signed between Cisco Capital, as lender and TIM Celular, as borrower in the total principal amount of U.S.$50 million. The new
Facility Agreement was fully disbursed on December 15, 2015. The total outstanding amount as of December 31, 2015 converted from
U.S. dollars was R$470 million, including accrued interest. The first agreement matures in September 2018 and bears an average
cost of 93.80% of the CDI after hedging, the second agreement matures in November 2019 and bears an average cost of 91.90% of the
CDI after hedging and the third agreement matures in December 2020 and bears an average cost of 84.50% of the CDI after hedging.
No guarantees were issued under this loan.
|
|
·
|
Promissory Note, dated as of July 31, 2013, between Bank of America, N.A., as bank, TIM Celular S.A., as borrower, in the total
principal amount of U.S.$119.8 million. The total outstanding amount as of December 31, 2015 converted from U.S. dollars was R$468
million, including accrued interest. The agreement matures on September 20, 2016 and has an average cost of 102,00% of the CDI
after hedging. No guarantees were issued under this loan. The proceeds of the loan under the Promissory Note is to be entirely
used for repayment of obligations under the Promissory Note issued by TIM Celular in favor of Bank of America on July 31, 2013.
|
|
·
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of December 23, 2013, between BNDES, as lender and TIM Celular, as borrower, and TIM Participações
as guarantor, in the principal amount of R$5,700 million. The agreement, involves six credit lines, each of which has different
conditions, interest rates and tenors: (1) Credit Line A, in an amount of R$2,401 million, a fixed interest rate of 2.52% plus
the TJLP and 8 years tenor; (2) Credit Line B, in an amount of R$600.4 million, a fixed interest rate of 2.52% plus the SELIC and
8 years tenor; (3) Credit Line C, in an amount of R$2,036 million, a fixed interest rate of 2.52% plus the SELIC and 8 years tenor;
(4) Credit Line D, in an amount of R$428 million, a fixed interest rate of 3.50% and 7 years tenor; (5) Credit Line E, in an amount
of R$189 million, a fixed interest rate of 1.42% plus the TJLP and 8 years tenor; and (6) Credit Line F, in an amount of R$45 million,
an interest rate of TJLP and 8 years tenor. Each credit line is to be used for specific purposes as set forth in the Credit Agreement.
As of December 31 2015, the outstanding amount under this credit agreement, including accrued interest, was R$3,030 million.
|
|
·
|
Loan Agreement, dated as of April 15, 2014, between KfW IPEX as lender, TIM Celular, as borrower and TIM Participações
as guarantor, in the principal amount of U.S.$100 million. The total outstanding amount as of December 31, 2015 converted from
U.S. dollars was R$305 million, including accrued interest. The agreement matures on April 15, 2019 and bears an average cost of
102.50% of the CDI after hedging. No guarantees were issued under this loan.
|
|
·
|
Loan Agreement, dated as of December 23, 2015, between Finnish Export Credit as lender, KfW IPEX as facility agent, TIM Celular,
as borrower and TIM Participações as guarantor, in the principal amount of U.S.$150 million. The new Loan Agreement
is divided in three tranches of U.S.$ 50 million to be disbursed in 2016, 2017 and 2018. As of December 31 2015, no disbursements
had been made under the Loan Agreement. The agreement matures on January 2, 2024. No guarantees were issued under this loan.
|
See Note 18 in our consolidated financial
statements for a further description of such financing agreements.
The following financial contracts were
disclosed in our annual report filed on Form 20-F with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 15, 2015, all of which have
since matured and been repaid by the Company:
|
·
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of September 18, 2012, between Banco do Brasil, or BB, as lender and TIM Celular, as borrower, in
the principal amount of R$150.0 million. The agreement, which matured on September 18, 2015, was fully repaid.
|
|
·
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of December 17, 2012, between BB as lender, TIM Celular, as borrower, in the principal amount of
R$150 million. The agreement, which matured on September 18, 2015, was fully repaid.
|
|
·
|
Promissory Note, dated as of September 19, 2013, between JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as lender, and TIM Celular
S.A., as borrower, in the total principal amount of U.S.$50 million. The agreement, which matured in September 2015, was fully
repaid.
|
Funds From Subsidiaries
There are no material restrictions on the
ability of our subsidiaries to transfer funds to the Company in the form of cash dividends, loans or advances.
Uses of Funds
Our principal uses of funds during the
three year period ended December 31, 2015, were capital expenditures, payment of dividends to our shareholders and loan repayments.
Material Capital Expenditures
Our capital expenditures in 2015, 2014
and 2013 related primarily to:
|
·
|
acquiring and developing our fiber optic network;
|
|
·
|
deployment and expansion of the capacity of our third and fourth generation (3G and 4G) network;
|
|
·
|
implementation and maintenance of our GSM and TDMA networks;
|
|
·
|
purchases of equipment relating to our migration to PCS operations;
|
|
·
|
expanding network capacity, geographic coverage and digitalization;
|
|
·
|
acquisition of new licenses, primarily for additional bandwidth in the 4G spectrums;
|
|
·
|
developing new operational systems to meet customers’ demands and information technology systems; and
|
|
·
|
free handsets provided to corporate customers.
|
The following table contains a breakdown
of our investments in fixed assets for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013:
Capital Expenditures Categories
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|
(in millions of
reais
)
|
Network
|
|
|
3,498.2
|
|
|
|
2,975.7
|
|
|
|
2,767.8
|
|
Information technology
|
|
|
807.8
|
|
|
|
698.7
|
|
|
|
718.9
|
|
Licences
|
|
|
190.8
|
|
|
|
2,997.9
|
|
|
|
136.6
|
|
Other
|
|
|
267.4
|
|
|
|
181.8
|
|
|
|
247.4
|
|
Total capital expenditures
|
|
|
4,764.2
|
|
|
|
6,854.2
|
|
|
|
3,870.6
|
|
See “Item 4. Information on the Company—A.
History and Development of the Company—Capital Expenditures.”
Dividends
Our Dividends are calculated in accordance
with our By-laws and Brazilian corporate law. Pursuant to our By-laws, we must distribute an amount equivalent to 25% of adjusted
net income as minimum dividend each year ended December 31, provided that there are funds available for distribution.
For the purposes of the Brazilian corporate
law and in accordance with our By-laws, “adjusted net income” is the amount equal to the net profit adjusted to reflect
allocations to or from: (1) the legal reserve, and (2) a contingency reserve for probable losses, if applicable.
The following table contains a breakdown
of the dividends and interest on shareholders’ equity actually paid (net of income taxes) by us to our shareholders during
the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013:
Dividend Distribution
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|
(in millions of
reais
)
|
Dividends
|
|
|
468.6
|
|
|
|
367.3
|
|
|
|
843.3
|
|
Interest on shareholders’ equity
|
|
|
468.6
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total distributions
|
|
|
468.6
|
|
|
|
367.3
|
|
|
|
843.3
|
|
On April 12, 2016 our shareholders
approved the distribution of R$468.6 million as dividends in accordance of the minimum required on Brazilian Law, with respect
to our 2015 results. On April 14, 2015 our shareholders approved the distribution of R$367.3 million as dividends in accordance
of the minimum required on Brazilian Law, with respect to our 2014 results. On April 10, 2014 our shareholders approved the distribution
of R$843.3 million as dividends in accordance of the minimum required on Brazilian Law, with respect to our 2013 results. On April
11, 2013 our shareholders approved the distribution of R$743.0 million as dividends in accordance of the minimum
required on Brazilian
Law, with respect to our 2012 results. On April 11, 2012 our shareholders approved the distribution of R$533.4 million as dividends
in accordance of the minimum required on Brazilian Law, with respect to our 2011 results.
Funding and Treasury Policies
The Company maintains a general policy
of continually monitoring its financial position and treasury activities in order to ensure solid fiscal control. As a result of
our (1) strong cash position, (2) comfortable leverage ratio of 0.26 Net Debt to EBITDA (for additional detail, see “—Leverage”
below) and an available credit facility from BNDES of R$2.8 billion that can be disbursed until December 2016,
the Company
does not foresee any funding needs until 2016. However in accordance with our funding and treasury policy, the Company will continue
to monitor new financing opportunities with a particular focus on soft loans, or loans with a below-market interest rate, and long-term
facilities.
Leverage
Management tracks the ratio of net debt
to EBITDA, which we refer to as the financial leverage index, in order to monitor the sustainability of our debt levels and our
ability to take on additional debt. The ratio is a common credit analysis metric in the telecommunications industry and shows approximately
how many years it would take to pay back our indebtedness, assuming no new debt is taken on, EBITDA remains constant and all cash
and cash equivalents may be used to repay debt. In addition, we believe that the ability to take on additional debt is a critical
factor affecting success, as indebtedness may be required to make investments necessary to grow the Company’s business. We
believe that our current financial leverage index of 0.26 reflects low levels of indebtedness and the ability to incur additional
debt if needed for investment. Investors should be cautious in comparing our financial leverage index to that of other companies
that report a similar ratio of debt to EBITDA because EBITDA in particular may be calculated differently from company to company,
leading to financial leverage indices that are not comparable. Accordingly, any such comparison may be misleading.
The following table sets forth our financial
leverage index for the reported periods:
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
(in millions of
reais
)
|
Total loans (Notes 18 and 39)
|
|
|
6,936,374
|
|
|
|
6,310,765
|
|
Leasing – Liabilities (Note 15)
|
|
|
1,618,506
|
|
|
|
329,669
|
|
Leasing – Assets (Note 15)
|
|
|
(199,935
|
)
|
|
|
(195,036
|
)
|
Debt with Anatel (Note 17)
|
|
|
77,450
|
|
|
|
61,860
|
|
Less: cash and cash equivalents (Notes 4 and 5)
|
|
|
(6,100,403
|
)
|
|
|
(5,232,992
|
)
|
Net debt
|
|
|
1,732,578
|
|
|
|
1,274,266
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
6,606,188
|
|
|
|
5,538,268
|
|
Financial leverage index
|
|
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
0.23
|
|
A reconciliation of our net income to EBITDA,
as well as a further explanation of the calculation of our financial leverage index, is also presented in Note 39 to our consolidated
financial statements.
|
C.
|
Research and Development
|
Research and Development
We do not independently develop new telecommunications
hardware and depend upon the manufacturers of telecommunications products for the development of new hardware. Accordingly, we
do not expect to incur material research and development expenses in the future.
Patents and Licenses
We hold no material intellectual property
assets. Telecom Italia owns the rights to the “TIM” trade name which is currently licensed to us.
Customer Base and Market Share
In the year ended December 31, 2015, our
subscriber base decreased 12.5% to 66.2 million clients, which represents a market share of 26.1%. This overall subscriber base
reduction was a result of a significant reduction in the number of prepaid customers in the Brazilian mobile telecommunications
market, generally, as most of our disconnections were of prepaid plans. Prepaid plan users concentrate the lower-middle socioeconomic
classes of Brazil, as defined by the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística
).
These users are particularly affected by macroeconomic pressures in Brazil, accelerating the number of users consolidating multiple
SIM cards to a single one, the high penetration of mobile service and the rapid substitution of voice for data usage, resulting
in a decrease in the “community effect”. Our prepaid business reached 52.6 million users in the year ended December
31, 2015, a decrease of 16.7% from the year ended December 31, 2014. The number of our postpaid users was 13.6 million in the year
ended December 31, 2015, a 8.6% increase from the year ended December 31, 2014.
Although no assurances can be given as
to the size of our subscriber base and market share in the future, we intend to focus on maintaining and improving our strong position
in the mobile and fixed telecommunications market in Brazil. Our strategies for doing so are outlined in more detail in “—B.
Business Overview—Our Strategy.”
Change of Mix Between Postpaid and Prepaid Customers
With respect to the composition of our
clients, our postpaid customers accounted for 20.5% of our total subscriber base in the year ended December 31, 2015, compared
to 16.5% from a year ago, largely due to the solid pace of postpaid net additions and higher disconnections of the prepaid base
as described above.
Trends in Sales and Prices of Mobile Units and Service
Plans
The volume of unit sales in the same period
increased markedly due, in part, to the growth of handset and accessory use as an affordable alternative for Internet access for
Classes C and D users and the substitution of fixed-line telephone services for mobile telephone services. As evidence of this
trend, mobile Internet devices represented more than half of our total sales in 2015.
Under our PCS authorizations, we are allowed
to set prices for our service plans, subject to approval by Anatel, provided that such amounts do not exceed a specified inflation
adjusted cap. We expect that the adjustment of our prices will follow the market trend, and that the adjustment will be below the
annual inflation rate based on the IST (
Índice de Serviços de Telecomunicações
), a general price
inflation index. The rates for our service plans, as well as a description of the main features of such plans, are set out in “Item
4. Information on the Company—B. Business—Mobile Service Rates and Plans.”
Average Revenue Per User (ARPU) Per Month
TIM’s ARPU was R$16.68 in the year
ended December 31, 2015, a decrease of 5.6% when compared to an ARPU of R$17.67 for the year ended December 31, 2014, largely due
to the recent decrease in VU-M rates and the reduction in voice usage, a higher priced service, as compared to data usage per customer.
See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry—Interconnection
Regulation” for information regarding recent regulatory changes to VU-M rates.
Revenues from value-added services had
an important role in offsetting ARPU’s downward trend of the market as a whole. In 2015 we registered a value-added service
revenue growth of 17%, which accounted for 35% of total gross service revenue (compared to 28% registered in 2014). We anticipate
that revenues from value-added services will continue to increase and become a larger component of our total service revenues,
particularly based on the availability of our 3G and 4G offers (such as our mobile broadband solution). As the provision of value-added
services has a relatively low marginal cost, we anticipate that value-added services will contribute to the growth of our operating
margins.
Competitive Environment
Brazil has a competitive scenario that
is almost unique in the world. The competition in the country’s mobile telephony sector has become more intense due to recent
mergers and acquisitions. This market has been growing at a rapid pace compared not only to the telecom industry but also to other
sectors of the economy. Brazil is one of the few markets with four nationwide competitors, each with a market share between 18%
and 30%, which TIM believes, acts as the driver of growth and for the development of differentiated and quality services at fair
and competitive prices.
In 2015, amid a competitive landscape,
our subscriber acquisition costs (which are comprised of a subsidy, commissions and total advertising expenses) amounted to R$30.5
per gross add for the year ended December 31, 2015, compared to R$27.4 in the year ended December 31, 2014. The increase of 11.3%
against the prior period is primarily due to a greater focus on the acquisition of high-value customers.
In addition to competition from other traditional
mobile telecommunications service providers, the level of competition from fixed-line service providers has increased, and we expect
will continue to increase, as fixed-line service providers attempt to attract subscribers away from mobile service based on price
and package offers that bundle multiple applications such as voice services (mobile and fixed-line), broadband and other services.
Technological changes in the telecommunications field, such as the development of third generation, and number portability are
expected to introduce additional sources of competition. It is also expected that Anatel will auction licenses to provide mobile
telecommunications services over additional bandwidth frequencies to accommodate these emerging technologies.
The year 2015 continued to be marked by
both the government’s programs to encourage digital inclusion and the development of convergent services, recently inaccessible
to the majority of the population.
The Brazilian mobile telephony market is
the fourth largest in the world and reached a penetration level of 125.7% telephone lines for every 100 inhabitants in 2015, making
mobile telephony the most widely used form of communication in Brazilian homes across all social classes. The prepaid portion of
the mobile telecommunications market decreased 13.3% in 2015 to 184.5 million accesses, which represents 71.6% of the total market.
The postpaid portion of the industry reached 73.3 million lines in 2015, an increase of 8.1%. The deteriorating macroeconomic environment
in Brazil impacted the sector, which saw the total mobile user base decline for the first time after years of continued growth,
an acceleration of the substitution of voice services for data usage and messaging applications, a strong decline in the use of
multiple SIM cards and the reduction of the so-called “community effect” on prepaid users, where consumers value a
telecommunications system more as more users adopt it.
According to data published by Anatel,
the fixed telephony sector contracted by 3.2% in 2015 as compared to 2014, ending the year with 43.6 million lines, representing
a penetration level of approximately 21.3 lines for each 100 inhabitants.
|
E.
|
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
|
The equipment and property rental agreements
signed by the Company and its subsidiaries have different maturity dates. Below is a list of minimum rental payments to be made
under such off-balance sheet agreements:
|
2016
|
|
|
|
769,059
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
807,512
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
843,850
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
881,823
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
921,505
|
|
|
F.
|
Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations
|
The following table shows our contractual
obligations and commercial commitments as of December 31, 2015:
Payments due by Period (in millions
of
reais
)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Less
than 1 year
|
|
|
|
1-3
years
|
|
|
|
4-5
years
|
|
|
|
More
than 5 years
|
|
Total borrowings (post hedge)(1)
|
|
|
6,936
|
|
|
|
1,827
|
|
|
|
2,092
|
|
|
|
2,160
|
|
|
|
857
|
|
Finance leases(2)
|
|
|
1,496
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
1,430
|
|
Total(3)
|
|
|
8,432
|
|
|
|
1,863
|
|
|
|
2,107
|
|
|
|
2,175
|
|
|
|
2,287
|
|
|
(1)
|
Considering the balances related to derivative financial instruments as of December 31, 2015.
|
|
(2)
|
The information regarding payments due by period under our finance leases reflects future payments due that are non-cancelable
without payment of a related penalty.
|
|
(3)
|
Other than as set forth herein (see, for example, Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Our Business),
we have no capital lease obligations, unconditional purchase obligations, or other long-term liabilities reflected on our balance
sheet of our primary financial statements. Interest is not included in long-term debt since it is subject to variable interest.
|
Contingent Pension Liabilities
Until December 1999, we participated in
a multi-employer defined benefit plan, or the Telebrás Pension Plan, that covered the employees of the Telebrás System
who retired before the Breakup as well as those who continued working for the operating companies after the Breakup. We are contingently
liable, jointly and severally, with the other New Holding Companies, for the unfunded obligations of the Telebrás Pension
Plan with respect to all such employees who retired before January 30, 2000. In December 1999, we changed to a defined benefit
plan (the “PBS Plan”) that covers only those former employees of Telebrás who continued to be employed by us
after December 1999.
In November 2002, we created a separate
defined contribution plan, or the TIMPREV Pension Plan. Migration to this plan was optional for employees linked to the PBS Plan.
Migration to the TIMPREV Pension Plan extinguishes the migrating participant’s rights under the PBS Plan.
SISTEL and TIMPREV
The Company and TIM Celular have sponsored
a private defined benefit pension plan for a group of Telebrás system’s former employees, which is managed by Fundação
Sistel de Seguridade Social – SISTEL, as a consequence of the legal provisions applicable to the privatization process of
these companies in July 1998.
Given that in 1999 and 2000 the sponsors
of the pension plans managed by SISTEL had already negotiated conditions for the creation of individual pension plans for each
sponsoring company and the maintenance of joint liability only in relation to the participants already assisted on January 31,
2000, the Company and its subsidiaries, like other companies created as a result of the former Telebrás system, created
in 2002 the TIMPREV Pension Plan, a defined contribution pension plan meeting the most modern social security standards adopted
by private companies, and enabling migration to this plan of the employee groups linked to SISTEL.
On November 13, 2002, the Brazilian Secretariat
for Supplementary Pension Plans, through official ruling CGAJ/SPC No. 1917, approved the statutes of the new pension plan, or hereafter
the Statutes of the TIMPREV Benefits Plan, as a defined contribution plan, which provide for new conditions for granting and maintaining
benefits, as well as the rights and obligations of the Plan Managing Entity, the sponsoring companies, participants and the beneficiaries
thereof.
Under this new plan, the sponsor’s
regular contribution will correspond to 100% of a participant’s basic contribution, and TIMPREV’s managing entity will
ensure the benefits listed below, under the terms and conditions agreed upon, with no obligation to grant any other benefits, even
if the government-sponsored social security entity starts granting them:
|
·
|
Normal retirement pension
|
|
·
|
Early retirement pension
|
|
·
|
Deferred proportional benefit
|
However, as not all of the Company’s
and its subsidiaries’ employees have migrated to TIMPREV, the pension and health care plans deriving from the TELEBRÁS
system listed below remain in force:
PBS:
defined benefits
plan of SISTEL, which includes active employees who participated in the plans sponsored by the companies of the former TELEBRÁS
system;
PBS Assistidos:
a multi-sponsored
pension plan for inactive employees;
Convênio de Administração:
for managing pension payments to retirees and pensioners of the predecessors of the subsidiary companies; and
PAMEC/Apólice de Ativos:
health care plan for pensioners of the predecessors of the subsidiary companies.
As happened with the
Termo de Relação
Contratual Atípica
, or TRCA Plan, the Company, until December 31, 2010, had understood that it was responsible for liabilities
of PAMEC participants (health care plan) related to the Company and its subsidiaries. Based on a new understanding of its internal
and external lawyers, the Company has changed its position. As a result, the liabilities previously recorded were written off.
In accordance with the rules established
by NPC-26 issued by the Institute of Independent Auditors of Brazil – IBRACON, and approved by CVM Resolution No. 371, the
plans having a surplus are not recorded by the Company, as it is impossible to recover these amounts. Furthermore, the amounts
of contributions will not be reduced for future sponsors.
On January 29, 2007 and April 9, 2007,
through the Brazilian Secretariat for Supplementary Pension Plans- SPC, the Ministry of Social Security approved the transfer of
the management of the PBS–Tele CelularSul, TIM PrevSul, PBT–TIM, Convênio de Administração, PBS–Telenordeste
Celular and TIM PrevNordeste benefit plans (according to SPC/DETEC/CGAT Communications Nos. 169, 167, 168, 912, 171 and 170, respectively)
from SISTEL to HSBC – Fundo de Pensão.
The PBS Assistido plan continues to be
managed by SISTEL. The only exception is Plano PAMEC, which was extinguished, with the Company remaining responsible for coverage
of the respective benefit, which is now called PAMEC/Apólice de Ativos.
In 2015, contributions to pension plans
and other post-employment benefits amounted to R$48.6 million.
|
Item 6.
|
Directors, Senior Management and Employees
|
|
A.
|
Directors and Senior Management
|
Board of Directors
We are administered by a Board of Directors
(
Conselho de Administração
) and a Board of Executive Officers (
Diretoria
), which are overseen by a
Fiscal Council (
Conselho Fiscal
) and a Statutory Audit Committee (
Comitê de Auditoria Estatutário
).
The Board of Directors is composed of five to nineteen members, each serving for a two year term with the possibility of re-election.
Directors’ duties and responsibilities
are determined by Brazilian law, our By-laws (
Estatuto Social
) and our Disclosure and Corporate Governance Policy (
Política
de Divulgação/Negociação e Diferenças de Governança Corporativa da NYSE
), as determined
by CVM Instruction 358/2002. All decisions taken by our Board of Directors are recorded in the board’s minute books. The
Board of Directors holds regular meetings once every quarter of the fiscal year and also holds special meetings whenever called
by the chairman, by two directors or by the Chief
Executive Officer. The chairman of the Board of Directors may also invite, at
his discretion, any of our key employees to the Board of Directors’ meetings, in order to discuss any relevant corporate
matter. The Board of Directors has two special advisory committees: the Compensation Committee (
Comitê de Remuneração
)
and the Control and Risks Committee (
Comitê de Controle e Riscos
), both composed only of members of the Board of Directors.
The Statutory Audit Committee also reports to the Board of Directors.
Members of our Board of Directors are required
to comply with, and have agreed to comply with, our Disclosure and Corporate Governance Policy, our Code of Ethics and certain
other Brazilian law regulations including the “
Regulamento de Listagem do
Novo Mercado
da BM&FBOVESPA –
Bolsa de Valores Mercadorias e Futuros
.”
The following are the current members of
the Board of Directors and their respective titles, whose terms of office will be valid until the annual shareholders’ meeting
to be held in 2017:
Name
|
Title
|
Date
of Birth
|
Date
Appointed
|
Franco Bertone
|
Chairman
|
April 9, 1952
|
April 14, 2015
|
Adhemar Gabriel Bahadian
|
Director
|
October 22, 1940
|
April 14, 2015
|
Oscar Cicchetti
|
Director
|
June 17, 1951
|
April 14, 2015
|
Francesca Petralia
|
Director
|
August 30, 1953
|
April 14, 2015
|
Manoel Horácio Francisco da Silva
|
Director
|
July 16, 1945
|
April 14, 2015
|
Piergiorgio Peluso
|
Director
|
March 25, 1968
|
April 14, 2015
|
Rodrigo Modesto de Abreu
|
Director
|
April 19, 1969
|
April 14, 2015
|
Alberto Emmanuel Carvalho Whitaker
|
Director
|
October 10, 1940
|
April 14, 2015
|
Mario di Mauro
|
Director
|
August 26, 1971
|
April 14, 2015
|
Herculano Aníbal Alves
|
Director
|
February 27, 1953
|
April 14, 2015
|
Messrs. Whitaker, Bahadian and Alves are
qualified as independent directors according to Brazilian independence standards. They are scheduled to be re-elected or replaced
at the annual shareholders’ meeting to be held in 2017. Set forth below are brief biographical descriptions of the members
of the Board of Directors.
Franco Bertone
. Mr. Bertone holds
a degree in Electronic Engineering from Universitá degli Studi di Pavia. He developed his professional career in the information
and communications technology industry both in Italy and internationally (Europe, USA, Middle East and South America). After graduation,
he joined Sirti S.p.A., or Sirti, a telecommunications engineering firm, where in Italy in 1978, he specialized in data processing
and digital transmission, in Sweden and the USA he specialized in computer controlled switching systems from 1979 to 1980, and
he gained program management experience in major turn-key telecommunication projects in Saudi Arabia from 1980 to 1985. At Sirti,
Mr. Bertone started a software business unit in Italy, where he worked from 1986 to 1991, marketing network management systems
and planning tools for the telecommunications industry. In 1992, he was appointed Managing Director of the UK subsidiary of Sirti,
where he developed a design and field services outsourcing business for telecommunications and cable operators in the UK and the
USA from 1992 to 1997. In 1997, he joined Telecom Italia to run operations in Bolivia and Argentina. In 2003, he moved to the Telecom
Italia Group’s Latin American headquarters in Brazil as Statutory Director of Corporate Affairs from 2003 to 2006. He was
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Empresa Nacional de Telecomunicaciones S.A., or Entel, from 1997 to 2002 and from 2006
to 2008, and held various titles at Telecom Argentina, including Executive Vice President from 2001 to 2002, Chief Operating Officer
in 2008, and Chief Executive Officer from 2009 to 2013. In between roles at Telecom Argentina, Mr. Bertone held the position of
Chairman of Telecom Personal from 2010 to 2013. He also served as board member of privately owned and publicly traded companies
in the USA, UK, Netherlands, Germany, Argentina, Brazil and other Latin American markets and is currently Chairman of Telecom Italia
International and TIM Brasil (each fully owned subsidiaries of Telecom Italia) and Chief Executive Officer of TIM Brasil.
Adhemar Gabriel Bahadian
. Mr. Bahadian
was a Brazilian Ambassador in Rome from 2006 to 2009 and a Deputy-Chairman of the trade negotiations related to the Free Trade
Area of Americas (FTAA) from 2003 to 2005. Mr. Bahadian holds a degree in Law from the Pontifícia Universidade Católica
do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-RJ) and a master’s degree from Instituto Rio Branco.
Oscar Cicchetti
. Mr. Cicchetti began
his professional career in 1978, as analyst at software company Datamat S.p.A. He joined what is now Telecom Italia in 1979 (known
at that time as Società Idroelettrica Piemontese, or
SIP), and from 1979 to 1984, was responsible for Network Operations
and then Head of Sales and Field Services in several regional organizations. In 1987, he moved to Telecom Italia’s headquarters
in Rome, and from 1987 to 1993, was Head of Organization and Processes in the Personnel Department. In 1993, he was involved in
a task force that managed the privatization process of the Italian state owned telecommunications company and its subsequent integration
into the Telecom Italia Group. From 1994 to 1997, he was Chief of Staff of the Chief Operational Officer, and then of the Chief
Executive Officer of the Telecom Italia Group. From 1997 to 2000, he held several key management positions in the Telecom Italia
Group, such as Head of the International Business Unit, Head of Strategy, Head of the Network Division. In 2001, he left the Telecom
Italia Group and, as investor and Chief Executive Officer, managed the successful turnaround of Netscalibur Italia S.p.A., an Internet
data company sold to Infracom Group in 2006. In 2007, Mr. Cicchetti became Managing Director of the merged company, Infracom Network
Application S.p.A. He rejoined the Telecom Italia Group in January 2008, where he has held a series of top management positions,
including Head of Business Strategies & International Development, Head of Domestic Market Operations, and Head of Technology
& Operations. From September 2014 to March 2015, he was Chief Executive Officer of the Telecom Argentina Group and Chairman
of Telecom Personal. In addition to being a member of the Board of Directors of TIM Participações, he is a member
of the Executive Committee of the Association of Italian Telecommunication Companies. At present, he is also Chief Executive Officer
of Telecom Italia’s towers company, INWIT S.p.A. - Infrastrutture Wireless Italiane S.p.A.
Francesca Petralia
. After graduating
in Law, Mrs. Petralia began her career in 1978 as in-house counsel in Fiat Auto S.p.A., Grandi Lavori S.p.A. and Selenia Industrie
Elettroniche Associate S.p.A. She joined Telecom Italia in 1990, focusing on international legal affairs. From 2002 to 2011, she
was head of Corporate Finance Legal Affairs within the Legal Department. Subsequently, she acted as Group Compliance Officer until
February 2013. She was a member of the board directors of the Argentine companies Sofora Telecomunicaciones and Telecom Argentina
from April 2013 to March 2016. She is a member of the Board of Directors of the South American companies TIM Brasil, as well as
of the holding Telecom Italia International N.V. in The Netherlands and of the Italian companies INWIT S.p.A. and Persidera S.p.A.
Mrs. Petralia acts at Telecom Italia as head of International Legal Affairs. Previously, from February 2013 to February 2014, she
was head of Corporate and Legal Affairs in South America.
Manoel Horácio Francisco da Silva
.
Mr. Francisco da Silva holds a degree in Business Administration from Pontifícia Universidade Católica (PUC) of São
Paulo and also completed the Advanced Management Program in the Harvard Business School. He was the Chief Executive Officer of
Banco Fator from 2002 to 2011 and has been Chairman of the Board of Directors of Banco Fator since August, 2011. He was Chief Executive
Officer of Telemar and also managed the area of paper and cellulose from Cia. Vale do Rio Doce. He worked in the Group Ericsson
do Brasil for 23 years, where he reached the position of Chief Executive Officer in many companies of the Group. He was also the
Chief Executive Officer of Ficap and of Sharp Equipamentos Eletrônicos. He also served as the Superintendent Officer of the
Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional, responsible for the restructuring of Companhia Vale do Rio Doce after its privatization.
He has held a position in the board of directors of many companies, such as Sadia (currently BRF S.A.), Bahia Sul, Group Ericson,
Docenave and Telemar. In 1989, he was appointed as the major financial professional of the year by the Instituto Brasileiro de
Executivos de Finanças.
Piergiorgio Peluso
. After graduating
in Economic and Social Sciences from the Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi in 1992, with a specialization in Finance,
from 1992 to 1994, Mr. Peluso held the position of experienced accountant at Arthur Andersen & Co. From 1994 to 1998, he was
Senior Financial Analyst at Mediobanca. He was Vice President, from 1998 to 2000, of the Financial Institutions Group and, from
2000 to 2001, of the Mergers & Acquisitions Group, with Credit Suisse First Boston. In 2002, he joined Medio Credito Centrale
S.p.A. (Capitalia Group) as Central Director Advisory Area. He retained this position until 2005, when he was appointed Central
Director at Capitalia S.p.A. From 2007 to 2009, following the merger of Capitalia S.p.A. and UniCredit Group S.p.A., he was Head
of Investment Banking Italy at UniCredit Group S.p.A. In 2009, he was appointed CEO of UniCredit Corporate Banking S.p.A. Following
the merger of UniCredit Corporate Banking S.p.A. with UniCredit S.p.A., in 2010 he was appointed Head of Corporate & Investment
Banking Italy, UniCredit Group. From 2011 to September 2012, he was Managing Director of Fondiaria SAI S.p.A. In addition to being
a member of the Board of Directors of TIM Participações, Mr. Peluso is also a non-executive member of the Board of
Directors of Telecom Italia Media S.p.A., Telecom Argentina and Fondazione Telecom Italia. Since September 26, 2012, Mr. Peluso
has been Head of Administration, Finance and Control at Telecom Italia, and since April 18, 2014, he has been the manager responsible
for preparing Telecom Italia’s financial statements.
Rodrigo Modesto de Abreu
. Mr. Abreu
holds a bachelor’s degree in Electrical Engineering from Universidade de Campinas and a Master of Business Administration,
or MBA, from Stanford Graduate School of Business. Mr.
Abreu has more than 25 years of experience in the telecommunication and
information technology sectors, having worked at various companies and in positions in that field, in Brazil and abroad. From 1991
to 1998, Mr. Abreu worked at the Brazilian group Promon S.A., or Promon, where he worked on engineering, sales, marketing, corporate
strategic planning and business development. After that, in 1999, he became a summer associate at the Palo Alto, California office
of McKinsey & Co., focusing on information technology. After returning to Brazil in 2000, Mr. Abreu rejoined the Promon group,
where he worked as Chief Executive Officer of Promon IP S.A. In 2002, he was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Promon Tecnologia
Ltda., where he integrated all of the technology-related activities of Promon Telecom, Promon IP and Promon Intelligens into a
single company. From 2004 to 2006, he worked as President of Nortel Networks Brazil. In 2006, Mr. Abreu joined Cisco Systems, Inc.,
Latin America, moving to Miami, Florida in 2007 to lead the company’s operations in over 40 countries in the region. In late
2008, he returned to Cisco do Brasil as Corporate Vice President and President, where he worked until his move to TIM Participações
in 2013.
Alberto Emmanuel Carvalho Whitaker
.
Mr. Whitaker holds a degree in Law from Faculdades Metropolitanas Unidas – FMU and is a lawyer duly admitted to the Brazilian
Bar Association, São Paulo Section (OAB/SP). He is also a business administrator duly registered at the Regional Administration
Council of São Paulo (CRA/SP). He attended several extension courses focused on Corporate Governance at the following institutions:
Instituto Brasileiro de Governança Corporativa (IBGC), the University of Chicago, the International Institute for Management
Development (IMD, Lausanne), the National Association of Corporate Directors - Washington, and the Global Corporate Governance
Forum - IFC-Washington. He has been a member of the Advisory Board of COPPEAD-RJ, Brazil, since September 2010 and was a member
of the Audit Boards of Fundação TUPY and Lojas Marisa. Mr. Whitaker has also been a Member of the Board of Directors
of CRA-SP, Brazil (class entity) since October 2008 and a member of the Board of Directors of Instituto Brasileiro de Governança
Corporativa (IBGC) from March 2008 to 2014, and once again since March 2016. From 2006 to date, he has been on the Board of Directors
of the Museu de Arte de São Paulo (MASP) and of the Fundação Bienal de São Paulo. At TIM Participações,
Mr. Whitaker was a member of the Fiscal Council/Audit Committee, from April 11, 2008 to December 12, 2013; chairman of the Fiscal
Council/Audit Committee from October 28, 2010 to December 12, 2013, and has been a member and coordinator of the Statutory Audit
Committee from December 12, 2013 to date; a member of the Board of Directors from May 8, 2014 to date; and a member of Control
and Risks Committee from May 8, 2014 to date.
Mario di Mauro
. Mr. Di Mauro holds
a bachelor’s degree in Economics and an MBA from the University G. D’Annunzio in Chieti, Italy). He has been the head
of Strategy & Innovation (covering IT Strategic Planning, Group Strategy, and IT Business Positioning) at Telecom Italia since
February 2014 in Rome, Italy. He is a member of the board of directors of the Italian companies Olivetti S.p.A.and Advanced Caring
Centre s.r.l. since 2014 and Chief Executive Officer of Tim Ventures s.r.l. since 2015. Prior to that, Mr. Di Mauro occupied several
positions at Telecom Italia, namely: head of Strategic Projects from 2013 to 2014; head of Business Valuation – Mergers &
Acquisitions from 2010 to 2013; head of International Planning & Control from 2008 to 2010; and head of Business Positioning
& Competitive Analysis from 2006 to 2008. From 2001 to 2005, Mr. Di Mauro was head of the Planning & Control & Investment
Projects at Telecom Italia. From 2000 to 2001, he was responsible for Controlling Activities and from 1998 to 2001 he was a Senior
Analyst Controlling Activities, both positions within the International Affairs division of Telecom Italia Mobile S.p.A., which
has since merged with Telecom Italia. From 1995 to 1998, Mr. Di Mauro was a consultant and an Assistant Professor in Chieti, Italy.
Herculano Aníbal Alves
. Mr.
Alves received a degree in Economics from Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, PUC-SP in 1980, a
specialist in Financial Administration from Fundação Getúlio Vargas in 1983 and a master's degree in Finance
and Investments from Fundação Getúlio Vargas in 1989. Since May 2014, Mr. Alves has been an Equities Consultant
at BRAM – Bradesco Asset Management S.A. DTVM, or BRAM. He was Director of Equities of BRAM US from September 2011 to March
2015, Head of Equities at BRAM – Bradesco Asset Management Ltda. from July 2001 to April 2014, and Senior Manager of Equities
at Bradesco Templeton Asset Management Ltda. from June 1998 to June 2001. Previously, he also held the position of Director of
Equities at the banking company ABN AMRO from February 1995 to June 1998 and he served as an equity portfolio manager, investment
analysis manager and analyst at Unibanco from June 1985 to January 1995. From January 1983 to June 1985, he worked at Banco Bozano
Simonsen in the credit area, and from March 1971 to September 1982 at the bus company Vila Carrão Ltda. in the administrative
and financial area. Mr. Alves has been a member of the Investment Committee and of the Assets Allocation Committee of BRAM since
2001 and is also member of the Monthly Committee of BRAM with the vice-presidents of Banco Bradesco. He has been member of the
Board of Directors of the Association of Capital Markets Investors (
Associação dos Investidores do Mercado de
Capitais
) since 2011,
Vice-President of the Private Equity Fund Commission of Anbima since 2012, and he was technical director
and adviser of the Brazilian Association of Capital Markets (
Associação Brasileira de Mercado de Capitais
),
or ABAMEC / SP, from 1982 to 1992. In addition, he served has served as advisor to various private equity investment funds and
since 2012 he has been an alternate member of the Board of Directors of the fund 2BCapital. Mr. Alves was also a Professor at Fundação
Armando Alvares Penteado - FAAP.
We do not have contracts with our directors
providing benefits upon termination of their appointments.
Board of Executive Officers
Pursuant to our By-laws, our Board of Executive
Officers (the members of which we also refer to as our Statutory Officers) is comprised of at least two and no more than nine members,
who may or may not be shareholders. The title of the members of our Board of Executive Officers shall be as follows: (1) Chief
Executive Officer, (2) Chief Financial Officer, (3) Investors Relations Officer, (4) Purchasing & Supply Chain Officer, (5)
Chief Operating Officer, (6) Chief Marketing Officer, (7) Regulatory and Institutional Affairs Officer, (8) Legal Officer; and
(9) Chief Technology Officer. Each member of our Board of Executive Officers, who serve two-year terms of office (with re-election
permitted) may be elected or dismissed by our Board of Directors at any time and with no cause. There is currently a vacancy for
the position of our Chief Operations Officer.
The following are the current members of
the Board of Executive Officers and their respective titles, whose terms of office will remain valid until the first Board of Directors’
Meeting to be held after the 2016 annual shareholders’ meeting :
Name
|
Title
|
Date
of Birth
|
Date
Appointed
|
Rodrigo Modesto de Abreu
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
April 19, 1969
|
April 14, 2014
|
Guglielmo Noya
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
April 27,1962
|
January 15, 2015
|
Rogério Tostes Lima
|
Investors Relations Officer
|
February 13, 1971
|
April 14, 2014
|
Daniel Junqueira Pinto Hermeto
|
Purchasing & Supply Chain Officer
|
April 27, 1971
|
April 14, 2014
|
Pietro Labriola
|
Chief Operating Officer
|
October 1, 1967
|
December 16, 2015
|
Mario Girasole
|
Regulatory and Institutional Affairs Officer
|
June 8, 1968
|
April 14, 2014
|
Jaques Horn
|
Legal Officer
|
March 15, 1964
|
April 14, 2014
|
Leonardo de Carvalho Capdeville
|
Chief Technology Officer
|
September 4, 1969
|
February 12, 2015
|
Brief biographical descriptions of our
executive officers are set forth below.
Rodrigo Modesto de Abreu
. See “—Board
of Directors.”
Guglielmo Noya
. Mr. Noya is an Italian
citizen and holds a Master degree in Mechanical Engineering from Università degli Studi di Roma ‘La Sapienza’
as well as a MBA from ISDA - Istituto Superiore Direzione Aziendale. Currently, he is Chief Financial Officer of the Company. Mr.
Noya has almost twenty years of experience in telecommunications industry in Europe and Latin America. Prior to the present appointment,
from 2010 until 2014, he was the Group Head of M&A at Telecom Italia. From 2008 until 2009, he acted as Chief Operating Officer
at the Company. Mr. Noya has been the General Director of Telecom Personal – Argentina from 2005 until 2007 and the CEO of
Entel PCS - Chile from 2002 to 2005. Prior to that, from 1997 until 2002, he worked at Telecom Italia, first as a Director of International
Business Development for the Americas and later as Area Manager of Brazil. From 1990 to 1997 he was senior financial analyst at
I.M.I - Istituto Mobiliare Italiano, one of the leading development banks in Italy. Previously, from 1987 to 1990 he worked as
researcher and system designer in the sector of advanced metrology and renewable energies in private Italian companies. He speaks
English, Spanish, Portuguese fluently and Italian as a native.
Rogério Tostes Lima
. Mr.
Tostes holds a degree in Business Administration from FUMEC-MG and Master of Business Administration, or MBA, from Ohio University
and Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV). In 1996, he joined an audit team from Arthur Andersen responsible to evaluate/split
Telebras system and prepare the privatization process. Right after that, in 1999, Mr. Tostes worked for Banco Safra overlooking
its two mobile companies, BCP/BSE operations in SP and Northeast. From 2002 till 2008, we worked as Equity Sellside Analyst for
Banco
Safra and then for Banco Santander. He has been at TIM Brasil since 2008 and Investors Relations Officer since 2011.
Daniel Junqueira Pinto Hermeto
.
Mr. Hermeto holds a degree in Electrical Engineering from the Escola Federal de Engenharia de Itajubá concluded in 1994.
He attended a post-graduate program in Business Administration at Fundação Getulio Vargas – São Paulo
in 2002 and also holds a MBA in Executive Management from the Fundação Instituto de Administração –
São Paulo concluded in 2007. Mr. Hermeto began his career in 1995 as a Product and Sales Engineer at Siemens in São
Paulo. In 1997, he was promoted to the role of Senior Engineer, performing his duties in Munich. From 1998 to 2008, he worked for
Motorola as Manager of Purchasing and Senior Purchaser from 1998 to 2002, Senior Manager of MP&L from 2003 to 2004, Chief Officer
of Manufacturing Operations in 2005 and Chief Officer of Purchasing, Planning and Logistics from 2006 to 2008. Between February,
2008 and November, 2009, Mr. Hermeto worked as the Chief Officer of Purchasing and Logistics in Claro, reporting directly to the
Chief Executive Officer, and was responsible for the areas of Purchasing, Sourcing, Logistics and Inventory Management throughout
the country.
Pietro Labriola.
Mr. Labriola is
an Italian citizen with a degree in Administration from Universidade de Studi di Bari and a masters in Innovation and Technology
Management from ASMIT Advanced School. With more than 20 years of experience in the telecommunications sector, Mr. Labriola assumed
the position of Chief Operating Officer TIM Participações in August 2015. Prior to this, he held the following positions
in the Telecom Italia group: Chief Transformation Officer from 2013 through 2015, Executive Vice President Business Market from
2009 through 2012, Executive Vice President Fixed Line Services from 2007 through 2008, Executive Vice President Marketing from
2001 through 2006. From 1996 through 2001, Mr. Labriola held positions as Marketing Director and Business Director at Infostrada
Serviços de Comunicações Fixas.
Mario Girasole
. Mr. Girasole is
an Italian citizen with a Laurea Magistralis in Economics from University LUISS (Rome). He also has an L.L.M. in International
Business Law (London), post graduate in Competition Policy, in International Commerce and Modern Economic History, and executive
education at London Business School (Finance), Harvard (School of Government), Columbia Business School (Advanced Management Program)
and INSEAD (International Directors Programme). He joined TIM in 1997, for the regulatory and pricing area, in Rome. Previously,
he was responsible for economic analysis in antitrust in law firms. From 2000 to 2003, he headed, in Brussels, the TIM Group relations
with the institutions of the European Union, and was appointed to the position of Deputy-Chairman of the European Mobile Sector
(GSM Europe). Starting from 2004, he was Head of Public and Regulatory Affairs at Telecom Italia America Latina and at TIM Brasil.
During this period, he worked also as Director of Entel Bolivia and Alternate Director of TIM Participações. Mr.
Girasole is the Regulatory and Institutional Affairs Officer of the Company since January 2009. He is also member of the Boards
and Councils of national and international entities, including SindiTelebrasil, GSM Latin America, Italo-Brazilian Chamber of Commerce
and the Brazilian Institute for competition studies (IBRAC). In September 2014, Mr. Girasole was awarded as Knight of the Order
of the Star of Italy by the President of the Italian Republic "for promoting friendly relations and co-operation with other
countries and ties with Italy."
Jaques Horn
. Mr. Horn graduated
in Law (LLB) at Candido Mendes University, and earned specializations at Harvard and the Academy of International and American
Law. He has been Chief Legal Officer at TIM since July 2010. He worked at Tetra Pak from 2007 to 2010, as Legal Director, where
he was responsible for the Central and South America and the Caribbean regions. He also worked at Shell, from 1994 to 2007, as
Legal Corporate Manager at the holding company and Legal Director at the subsidiary companies. Mr. Horn worked as Legal Counsel
at Companhia Atlantic de Petroleo (ARCO Petroleum Co.) from 1990 to 1994, as a Lawyer at Franco, Bhering, Barbosa & Novaes
Law Firm for one year, and as a Tax Senior Consultant at Arthur Andersen for almost four years.
Leonardo de Carvalho Capdeville
.
Mr. Capdeville holds a degree from Instituto Nacional de Telecomunicações – INATEL in Electronic Engineering,
specializing in Telecommunications. He also holds an MBA from Fundação Getúlio Vargas in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Mr. Capdeville also attended the International Program of Management Development at IEDE - Institute for Executive Development
in Madrid, Spain. Currently, he is Chief Technology Officer of the Company, elected on February 12, 2015. Prior to that, Mr. Capdeville
was responsible for the Network, IT and Wholesale departments at the Company. From 1998 to 2014, Mr. Capdeville was a Network Director
at Telefônica Brasil (under the brand name Vivo). Mr. Capdeville also worked at Promon Eletrônica Ltda, or Promon,
from 1991 to 1995 and then from 1996 to 1998. While at Promon, he held the position of engineer responsible for implementing the
mobile telephony in the State of Espírito Santo, Brazil, and performed other activities related to network projects. From
February 1995 to October 1996, Mr. Capdeville worked at
Gerenciamento e Assessoria de Serviços S/C Ltda., as coordinator
of the implementation of the team and of the data communication area.
There are no family relationships among
any of our directors and executive officers, nor any arrangement or understanding with major shareholders, customers or suppliers
pursuant to which any director or executive officer was selected.
Statutory Audit Committee
The current composition of the Statutory
Audit Committee consists of three members.
The following are the current members of
our Statutory Audit Committee:
Name
|
Date
of Birth
|
Date
Appointed
|
Alberto Emmanuel Carvalho Whitaker
|
October 10, 1940
|
April 14, 2015
|
Adhemar Gabriel Bahadian
|
October 22, 1940
|
April 14, 2015
|
Herculano Aníbal Alves
(*)
|
February 27, 1953
|
April 14, 2015
|
|
(*)
|
Audit committee financial expert.
|
The Statutory Audit Committee was created
and its members appointed at the shareholders’ meeting held on December 12, 2013, in accordance with Rule 10A-3 under Section
301 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or Sarbanes-Oxley, and CVM Instruction 509/2011. The Statutory Audit Committee’s internal
regulations were approved at the Board of Directors meeting held on December, 23, 2013.
The Statutory Audit Committee is composed
of at least three (3) and at the most five (5) members, all elected by the Board of Directors, who serve two-year terms of office,
matching the terms of the members of the Board of Directors. Re-election is permitted up to, for a maximum period of 10 years.
Members of the Statutory Audit Committee may be dismissed by our Board of Directors at any time and without cause.
The Statutory Audit Committee’s general
duties and responsibilities under Brazilian corporate law, our By-laws and its internal rules, include: (i) opining, preliminarily,
on the hiring and removal from office of the independent auditor in charge of auditing the financial statements, or any other service
provided by such auditor, whether or not it may be related to auditing; (ii) analyzing the auditor’s annual work plan, discussing
the results of the activities performed, revisions made and assessing the performance of the independent auditors; (iii) supervising
independent auditors’ activities to assess their independence, quality and adequacy of the services provided to the Company,
including, to the full extent permitted by law, assistance solving any disagreement between the management and the independent
auditors concerning the presentation of financial statements; (iv) supervising the activities performed by the internal audit department,
and for that purpose analyzing the annual work plan, discussing the results of the activities performed, the revisions made and
assess the performance of internal auditors; (v) supervising and analyzing the effectiveness, quality and integrity of the Company’s
internal controls over financial reporting, in order to, inter alia, monitor the implementation of the provisions related to: (a)
the presentation of the financial statements, including quarterly financial information and other interim statements; and (b) the
disclosure of information and evaluations based on adjusted financial data and on non-accounting data, resulting in unexpected
additions to the structure of the usual reports on financial statements; (vi) analyzing complaints, anonymous or not, concerning
any accounting matters from internal controls or audit, received by the Company, as well as suggesting measures that may be taken;
(vii) examining, assessing and expressing opinions, in advance, based on the material provided by the Company's management, on
whether the contracts to be signed between the Company, or its subsidiaries, on one hand, and the majority shareholder or its subsidiaries,
associated companies, or companies under common control or which may control the said shareholder, or parties related in some other
way to the Company, on the other hand, meet the standards that normally apply within the market to similar agreements between independent
parties, with the Statutory Audit Committee having the right to request further clarification or the opinion of independent third
parties, whenever deemed necessary; (viii) drawing up the annual synthesis report, pursuant CVM rules, to be presented, together
with the financial statements, including a description of: (a) its activities, the results and conclusions reached and recommendations
made; and (b) any situation where there is a significant disagreement between the Company's management, independent auditors and
the Statutory Audit Committee regarding financial statements of the Company; and (ix) assessing and monitoring the Company’s
exposure to risk, with the right to request detailed information on policies and proceedings related to: (a)
remuneration of the
management; (b) utilization of the Company assets; and (c) expenses incurred on behalf of the Company.
Fiscal Council
The current composition of the Fiscal Council
consists of three members, two of which were elected by our controlling shareholder and one by the minority shareholders.
The following are the current members of
our Fiscal Council, whose terms of office will be valid until the annual shareholders’ meeting to be held in 2016:
Name
|
Date
of Birth
|
Date
Appointed
|
Oswaldo Orsolin
|
May 30, 1943
|
April 14, 2015
|
Josino de Almeida Fonseca
|
February 12, 1940
|
April 14, 2015
|
Guido Vinci
|
October 15, 1967
|
April 14, 2015
|
Under Brazilian corporate law, our By-laws
and the internal rules of the Fiscal Council, the Fiscal Council’s general duties and responsibilities include monitoring
the actions of management and verifying its compliance with legal duties and appropriate statutes; providing opinions regarding
management’s annual report, business plans and budgets; and performing reviews of, and opinions regarding our financial statements.
All members serve independently from the Company in their capacities on the Fiscal Council.
Other Committees
We have other non-statutory committees
including a Compensation Committee and a Control and Risks Committee.
Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee was established
by the Board of Directors on September 30, 2008 to: (1) prepare proposals for our Board of Directors regarding allotment of the
overall annual remuneration approved by general shareholders’ meeting; (2) provide our Board of Directors with proposals
concerning the remuneration of our executive officers; (3) evaluate the compensation criteria of Company’s executive officers;
and (4) monitor the performance of the decisions taken by management and the Company’s policies relating to senior executive
compensation.
The members of our Compensation Committee
are appointed and dismissed by our Board of Directors. The Compensation Committee consists of three members, all of whom are effective
members of our Board of Directors.
The following are the current members of
our Compensation Committee:
Name
|
Date
of Birth
|
Date
Appointed
|
Manoel Horácio Francisco da Silva
|
July 16, 1945
|
April 14, 2015
|
Oscar Cicchetti
|
June 17, 1951
|
April 14, 2015
|
Francesca Petralia
|
August 30, 1953
|
April 14, 2015
|
Control and Risks Committee
The Control and Risks Committee was established
by the Board of Directors on June 18, 2013, and tasked with the following responsibilities: (a) recommending internal control measures
to be adopted by the Board of Directors establishing the specific authority of the Board of Executive Officers and the limits of
such specific authority, subject to the provisions of the By-laws, as well as deciding on the assignment of new functions to the
Directors; (b) monitoring the Company’s compliance with our corporate governance policy and periodically updating the same;
(c) without prejudice to the competence of the Board of Directors, recommending procedures for better supervision of the management
of the Directors; (d) acknowledging the internal audit work plan reviewed by the Company’s Statutory Audit Committee in accordance
with the Company's By-laws; (e) approving the compliance department’s work plan and monitoring compliance with the same;
(f) reviewing and evaluating periodic reports issued in accordance with the internal control and risk management system by the
internal audit department and the compliance department and, in connection with the same, requesting that the internal audit department
review
specific operational areas or that the compliance department develop new procedures; (g) supervising and monitoring issues
related to the social responsibility of the Company, and monitoring the Company’s compliance with the principles established
in our Code of Ethics; and (h) analyzing any other matters related to the internal control of the Company as are delegated by the
Board of Directors.
The following are the current members of
the Control and Risks committee:
Name
|
Date
of Birth
|
Date
Appointed
|
Franco Bertone
|
April 09, 1952
|
April 14, 2015
|
Francesca Petralia
|
August 30, 1953
|
April 14, 2015
|
Alberto Emmanuel Carvalho Whitaker
|
October 10, 1940
|
April 14, 2015
|
Piergiorgio Peluso
|
March 25, 1968
|
April 14, 2015
|
Adhemar Gabriel Bahadian
|
October 22, 1940
|
April 14, 2015
|
In a meeting held on April 12,
2016, we approved the aggregate amount of approximately R$22.1 million as compensation to our statutory officers and
approximately R$2.3 million as compensation to our board of directors during 2016. The statutory officers’ and
directors’ compensation is composed of fixed remuneration, benefits, bonuses, short-term incentives and participation
in long term incentive plans.
Accordingly, we did not set aside or accrue
any amounts to provide pension, retirement or similar benefits to our officers and directors during 2015. The aggregate compensation
to our statutory officers in the year ended December 31, 2015, including fixed remuneration, benefits, bonuses, short-term incentive
and long term incentive plans, was approximately R$16.3 million considering INSS (approximately R$14.5 million without INSS).
Our statutory officers and other managers
of the company are eligible to receive a short-term incentive (Management by Objectives, or MBO) bonuses. The general criteria
for the MBO bonus are approved by our Board of Directors and provide that eligible statutory officers and other managers may receive
an amount calculated based on the organizational roles and certain pre-established performance targets.
Some key officers are also eligible to
participate in a long-term incentive plan (stock option plans) for which compensation is based on performance targets for our share
price. The general criteria for the stock option plans are approved by our Board of Directors and provide that eligible participants
may buy our shares at a discount or at a readjusted price, applied over the base exercise price, based on ongoing relative performance.
See also “—D. Our Employees—Stock Options.”
For the year ended on December 31, 2015,
each member of our Board of Directors received R$379,193 considering INSS (R$311,366 without INSS) and each member of our Fiscal
Council received annual compensation of R$215,646 considering INSS (R$168,474 without INSS), paid pro rata according to each member’s
time of service on such body.
See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management
and Employees—A. Directors and Senior Management” and “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—B.
Compensation.”
On December 31, 2015, we had 13,062 full-time
employees. We do not employ a significant number of temporary employees. The following tables show a breakdown of our employees
as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013.
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
Network
|
|
|
1,966
|
|
|
|
1,972
|
|
|
|
1,436
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
4,195
|
|
|
|
4,095
|
|
|
|
3,961
|
|
Information technology
|
|
|
517
|
|
|
|
512
|
|
|
|
516
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
Customer care
|
|
|
5,033
|
|
|
|
5,233
|
|
|
|
5,134
|
|
Support and other
|
|
|
1,351
|
|
|
|
1,048
|
|
|
|
1,120
|
|
Total number of employees
|
|
|
13,062
|
|
|
|
12,860
|
|
|
|
12,167
|
|
All employees are represented by state
labor unions associated with the Federação Nacional dos Trabalhadores em Telecomunicações and the Federação
Interestadual dos Trabalhadores em Telecomunicações or the Sindicato dos Engenheiros do Estado do Paraná e
Nordeste. We negotiate a new collective labor agreement every year with the local unions. Management considers our relations with
our work force to be satisfactory. We have not experienced a work stoppage that had a material effect on our operations.
Employee Benefit Plans
The Company and its subsidiaries have defined
benefit and defined contribution plans in place. In general, defined benefit plans establish a specific retirement benefit amount
that an employee will receive upon retirement, usually dependent on one or more factors such as age, length of service and remuneration.
The liability recognized in the balance
sheet with respect to defined benefit pension plans is the present value of the defined benefit liability as at the balance sheet
date, less the fair value of plan assets, and past service cost adjustments are not recognized. The defined benefit obligation
is calculated annually by independent actuaries, using the projected unit credit method. The present value of defined benefit obligation
is determined by discounting estimated future cash outflows, using interest rates consistent with market yields, which are denominated
in the currency in which benefits will be paid and which have maturities close to those of the respective pension plan liabilities.
The actuarial gains and losses resulting
from changes in actuarial assumptions are recorded within shareholders’ equity as other comprehensive income, as incurred.
Past service costs are recognized immediately
in income, unless the changes to the pension plan are conditional upon employees remaining in employment for a specific time period
(the period in which the right is acquired). In this case, past service costs are amortized using the straight-line method over
the period during which the right was acquired.
With respect to defined contribution plans,
the Company makes contributions to pension insurance plans public or private on a mandatory, contractual or voluntary. The Company
has no further obligation for payment after the contribution is made. The contributions are recognized as employee benefit expense
when due.
Following the acquisition and incorporation
of AES Atimus (later TIM Fiber and now TIM Celular) in 2011, we assumed this company’s defined benefit pension plan. The
plan is currently under review and will be separated from the Eletropaulo Telecomunicações plan and TIM Fiber’s
portion will be migrated to another administrator.
Currently, there are no more active participant
contributions to this plan and there is no payment of monthly contributions. We have undertaken an actuarial study following the
premises of IAS-19 and CVM to identify the existence of actuarial liabilities. Were we to identify a deficit, we would be obligated
to report such deficit on the company’s balance sheet as OCI (Other Comprehensive Income). At present, the great majority
of participants are still young. We believe expenditures to cover eventual deficits under this legacy plan to be remote. There
should be no short-term obligation.
Since 2006, the company’s pension
funds had been administered by HSBC. After a two year process beginning in 2011, during which the company evaluated other multiemployer
pension fund management companies, the company elected to transfer the administration of the following pension plans to Icatu Pension
Funds (
Icatu Fundo Multipatrocinado
), a pension fund management company in Brazil: Defined Benefit Plan - Tele Celular Sul
PBS; PBS Tele Nordeste Celula; Defined Contribution Plan - Nordeste TIMPREV, TIMPREV Sul; and Intelig Gente.
In February 2013, the National Superintendency
of Pension Funds (
Superintendência Nacional de Previdência Complementar
), or PREVIC, approved the transfer of
administration, and the entire transfer process was concluded
in May 2013. Since this time, these plans have been closed to new
members. The Benefit Plan PBT TIM remains managed by HSBC.
Stock Options
We operate share-based compensation plans,
settled in shares, under which we receive the services of certain employees in consideration for equity options granted. The fair
value of the employee’s services are recognized as an expense, with a compensating entry to capital reserves, and are determined
by reference to the fair value of the options granted. Non-market-related vesting conditions are included in the assumptions underlying
the number of option which will vest. The total expense amount is recognized during the period over which the rights vest, when
specific vesting conditions should be fulfilled. On the balance sheet date, the entity reviews its estimates regarding the number
of options which will vest, based on the non-market-related vesting conditions. It recognizes the effect of this review of initial
estimates, if any, in the income statement, with a corresponding adjustment to the capital reserve.
Amounts paid to employees, net of any directly
attributable transaction costs, are credited to capital reserve and share issuance premium reserve, if applicable, when options
are exercised.
Social contributions payable in connection
with the granting of share options are deemed an integral part of the grant itself, and the payment is treated as a transaction
settled in cash.
Defined Contribution Plan
During 2002, TIM created a new defined
contribution pension plan, or TIMPREV, which allowed employees to migrate from the former pension plan. The Secretary of Complementary
Pension approved TIMPREV on November 13, 2002 in Notification 1,917 CGAJ/SPC. TIMPREV sets forth new guidelines for the granting
and maintenance of benefits and outlines new rights and obligations for Sistel, the plan administrator; sponsors; participants
and their respective beneficiaries.
Migration from the PBS Plan to TIMPREV
is optional. In order to encourage migration to TIMPREV, we offered bonuses to those employees migrating before January 29, 2003.
As of December 31, 2004, more than 90% of the participants in our private plan had migrated to TIMPREV. Upon electing to migrate
to TIMPREV, a participant extinguishes all rights to benefits under the PBS Plan.
During 2008, the Company made its best
effort to encourage migration of the remaining participants of the defined benefit plans to TIMPREV. Even though employees agreed
with the migration proposed, legal complications not allow this change prevented the migration at that time. The situation was
resolved in 2009 and a new cycle of migration encouragement for TIMPREV was offered. On this occasion more participants migrated
to TIMPREV plans, one of the plans (PBT) was closed.
As more employees participate in TIMPREV,
we anticipate that the sponsor’s risk to eventual actuarial deficit will decrease, consistent with the characteristics of
typical defined contribution plans. Under the rules of defined contribution plans, the sponsor normally contributes 100% of the
basic contribution of the participant. In accordance with the terms and conditions of the approved rules, the administrator of
TIMPREV will ensure the benefits listed below:
|
·
|
a regular retirement pension;
|
|
·
|
an anticipated retirement pension;
|
|
·
|
a deferred proportional benefit; and
|
However, the administrator will not assume
responsibility for granting any other benefit, even if social security officially grants it to its beneficiaries.
In accordance with Brazilian law, our employees
also receive payments based on our financial performance. The amount of the payment is determined by negotiation between us and
the unions representing our employees.
Due to the incorporation of Intelig by
us in 2010, the pension plan of this company was taken over by TIM. The Intelig pension plan is a closed defined contribution plan,
managed by HSBC Pension Fund and it’s not offered to our employees anymore, since we have started a process with the Secretary
of Complementary Pension to change the plan rules, in order to close the plan to new members. For new Intelig employees or those
transferred from Intelig to TIM, we now offer the supplementary defined contribution plan managed by Itaú Vida e Previdência
S.A, since Intelig also became a sponsor of this plan.
As of December 31, 2015, our directors
and executive officers, owned, in the aggregate, 16,903 common shares, which represented 0.00070% of our common shares outstanding.
Accordingly, each of our directors or executive officers beneficially owns less than one percent of outstanding common shares.
Some key officers are also eligible to
participate in a long term incentive plan (stock option plans) for which compensation is based on performance targets for our share
price, as further described in “—B. Compensation” and “—D. Our Employees—Stock Options.”
|
Item 7.
|
Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions
|
The following table sets forth information
relating to the ownership of common shares by TIM Brasil and our officers and directors. We are not aware of any other shareholder
that beneficially owns more than 5% of our common shares.
Name of owner
|
|
Common Shares Owned
|
|
Percentage of Outstanding Common Shares
|
TIM Brasil Serviços e Participações S.A.
|
|
|
1,611,969,946
|
|
|
|
66.58192
|
%
|
All our officers and directors as a group
*
|
|
|
16,903
|
|
|
|
0.00070
|
%
|
Total
|
|
|
1,611,986,849
|
|
|
|
66.58262
|
%
|
|
*
|
Represents less than 1%.
|
Since TIM Brasil owns 66.58% of our outstanding
common shares, it has the ability to control the election of our Board of Directors and to determine the direction of our strategic
and corporate policies. The common shares held by TIM Brasil have the same voting rights as the common shares held by other holders
and TIM Brasil has no special voting rights beyond those ordinarily accompanying the ownership of our common shares.
As of December 31, 2015, there were 468,428,340
common shares represented by ADSs. As of such date, the number of common shares represented by ADSs represented 19.35% of our total
capital.
TIM Brasil is a wholly owned Brazilian
subsidiary of Telecom Italia International, which in turn is a wholly owned Dutch subsidiary of Telecom Italia. Telecom Italia
is a corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of Italy. In turn, the single largest shareholder of Telecom Italia is
Vivendi, which is able to exercise significant influence over Telecom Italia. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—C.
Organizational Structure.”
Telecom Italia and its subsidiaries, or
the Telecom Italia Group, operate mainly in Europe, the Mediterranean Basin and South America. The Telecom Italia Group is engaged
principally in the communications sector and, particularly, the fixed and mobile national and international telecommunications
sector, the television sector and the office products sector. Telecom Italia is one of three mobile operators authorized to provide
services using GSM 900 technology in Italy and one of three operators authorized to provide services using GSM 1800 (formerly DCS
1800) technology in Italy. It is also one of four operators holding a UMTS authorization and providing 3G telephony services in
Italy and it is one of the three operators that acquired a 800MHz spectrum in 2011 to provide 4G services in Italy.
As of December 31, 2015 the Telecom Italia
Group had approximately 11.7 million physical retail accesses (retail) in Italy, a decrease of 0.7 million compared to December
31, 2014. The wholesale customer portfolio in Italy was approximately 7.5 million accesses for telephone services at December 31,
2015, an increase of 0.2 million accesses compared to December 31, 2014. The broadband portfolio in Italy reached 8.9 million accesses
at December 31, 2015 (consisting of approximately 7.0 million retail accesses and approximately 1.9 million wholesale accesses),
substantially stable compared to December 31, 2014 (8.8 million accesses). In addition, the Telecom Italia Group had approximately
30.0 million mobile telephone lines in Italy at December 31, 2015, a decrease of approximately0.3 million compared to December
31, 2014.
Significant Changes in Percentage Ownership of Principal
Shareholders
None.
Shareholders’ Agreements
None.
|
B.
|
Related Party Transactions
|
As of December 31, 2015, we did not owe
to our affiliates any amounts arising out of outstanding inter-company loans. We had receivables and payables in amounts of R$16,662
thousand and R$113,024 thousand, respectively on December 31, 2015 with companies of the Telecom Italia Group. See Note 36 to our
consolidated financial statements.
Guarantees of Obligations of our Subsidiaries
We are guarantor for TIM Celular’s
Finance Contract with European Investment Bank in the principal amount of €350 million as of December 31, 2015. European Investment
Bank has also bank guarantees from SACE SpA, Banco Itaú BBA and KfW IPEX in the principal amount of €115.0 million
€220.0 million and €52.5 million, respectively.
We are guarantor in favor of BNDES, in
the amount of R$4,635 million as of December 31, 2015, under the Credit Agreements of TIM Celular and Intelig.
We are guarantor in favor of KfW IPEX,
in the amount of U.S.$78 million as of December 31, 2015, under the Loan Agreement of TIM Celular.
For more information on our guarantees
of obligations of our subsidiaries, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—B. Liquidity and Capital
Resources—Sources of Funds—Financial Contracts.”
Agreement between Telecom Italia and TIM Participações
and our Subsidiaries
At the shareholders’ meeting held
on April 12, 2016, our shareholders approved an extension of the Cooperation and Support Agreement, originally signed in
May 3, 2007 with Telecom Italia, for an additional 12 month period until April 30, 2017. The purpose of this agreement is to enable
us to benefit from Telecom Italia’s internationally recognized expertise, built throughout years of operation in more mature
and developed markets. The cooperation and support activities to be performed by the parties will be focused in adding value to
our operations through:
|
·
|
Benefiting from Telecom Italia’s experience and industrial capacity as one of the major players in the European market;
|
|
·
|
Applying the systems/services/processes/best practices that were largely used in the Italian market and may be easily customized
for the Brazilian market through limited investments and mitigated implementation risks; or
|
|
·
|
An increase in efficacy and efficiency by adopting in-house solutions that have been widely tested and used.
|
The extended term of the agreement provides
for a total price cap of €11.751 million. The price cap represents the maximum consideration to be paid by TIM Participações
operating companies for all the services and support rendered by Telecom Italia during 2016 and 2017 under the agreement.
|
C.
|
Interests of Experts and Counsel
|
Not applicable.
|
Item 8.
|
Financial Information
|
|
A.
|
Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information
|
See “Item 18. Financial Statements.”
Legal Proceedings
The Company and its subsidiaries are subject
to judicial and administrative proceedings, including civil, labor, tax and regulatory claims covering a wide range of matters
that arise in the ordinary course of business. We adopted a policy of analyzing each such proceeding and making a judgment as to
whether a loss is probable, possible or remote. We make accruals for legal proceedings that we are party to when we determine that
losses are probable and can be reasonably estimated. For civil, labor, tax and regulatory proceedings where risk of loss has been
classified as possible, there is no provision made and these proceedings are not expected to have a material adverse effect on
our business or financial condition. Our judgment is always based on the opinion of our legal advisers. Accrual balances are adjusted
to account for changes in circumstances for ongoing matters and the establishment of additional accruals for new matters. While
we believe that the current level of accruals is adequate, changes in the future could impact these determinations.
We reviewed the disclosure of our legal
proceedings in our annual report filed on Form 20-F with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 15, 2015, and determined
that, except where disclosed in detail below, no single legal proceeding, in itself, was material to our business or financial
condition. Accordingly, in this annual report on Form 20-F, we disclose in detail those legal proceedings which we and our legal
advisors have determined to be material, along with overall summaries and the aggregate value of our legal proceedings where risk
of loss is probable.
Consumer Lawsuits
As of December 31, 2015, our subsidiaries
are party to consumer lawsuits at the judicial and administrative levels where the risk of loss is considered probable amounting
to R$51,953 thousand (R$66,531 thousand
as of December 31, 2014). These lawsuits relate to questions regarding alleged improper
billing, contract cancellation, quality of services, defects and flaws in the delivery of equipment and undue restriction.
PROCON and Public Prosecutor’s
Office
TIM is involved in judicial and administrative
proceedings brought by PROCON and various state public prosecutor’s offices where the risk of loss is considered probable
in the amount of R$3,324 thousand
as of December 31, 2015 (R$3,743 thousand
as of December 31, 2014). These proceedings
arise from consumer complaints related to alleged: (i) failures in the provision of network services; (ii) bundling arrangements
for product and services; (iii) issues related to quality care; (iv) violations of PROCON’s Customer Service Rules (
Novas
Regras Para o Serviço de Atendimento ao Consumidor
); (v) contractual violations, (vi) misleading advertising; and (vii)
suspension of loyalty benefits in cases of theft of cell phones.
Lawsuits by Former Business Partners
TIM is a defendant in lawsuits filed by
certain former commercial partners for alleged breach of contract. The amounts involved for such lawsuits where the risk of loss
is considered probable are of R$18,496 thousand
as of December 31, 2015 (R$14,918 thousand
as of December 31, 2014).
|
·
|
A lawsuit filed by Botafogo Comércio e Importação Ltda. against TIM Celular, in 2002, by a former commercial
partner, who argues that TIM Celular did not perform the contract and practiced unfair
|
competition which ended up putting them
out of business. A settlement procedure commenced and was adjudicated, whereby TIM Celular was required to pay consequential damages,
lost profits and moral damages. The calculations of such damages as presented by TIM Celular, prepared by a retained expert witness,
total approximately R$6,307 thousand, however this value is still pending final determination. In the meantime, TIM Celular filed
an action to reverse the judgment, in which the judge granted an injunction until a final decision is issued. Currently, TIM is
waiting for a decision to be handed down in respect of Botafogo Comércio e Importação Ltda’s appeal.
|
·
|
In 2009, the São Paulo based retail group TVM, a commercial partner of TIM Celular in São Paulo, filed a lawsuit
to terminate its existing agreement with TIM Brazil, though the parties ultimately settled. In its settlement, TVM agreed to transfer
15 of its stores to TIM Celular (or an entity indicated by TIM Celular). These stores ended up being transferred to DM5 Comércio
e Representação Ltda., or DM5. However, DM5 did not pay the transfer fees to TVM, and TVM subsequently filed a collection
lawsuit. TIM Celular and DM5 were jointly and severally ordered by the Court of Appeals to pay an amount of R$4,019 thousand (plus
interests and penalties). TIM Celular has filed an appeal of the appellate decision to the Federal Superior Court, which is currently
pending judgment.
|
Environmental and Infrastructure
As of December 31, 2015, our subsidiaries
are party to lawsuits with various actors arising from environmental licensing and installation / operation licensing issues. The
amounts involved in such lawsuits where the risk of loss is considered probable are R$3,606 thousand
as of December 31,
2015 (R$4,276 thousand
as of December 31, 2014).
Other
We are also party to other civil claims
brought by several different agents described above, in respect of, among others: (i) renewal of rental contracts; (ii) equity
subscription of shares; (iii) compensation claims; (iv) alleged breach of contract; and (v) debt actions. The amounts involved
in such civil claims where the risk of loss is considered probable are R$10,812 thousand
as of December 31, 2015 (R$12,709
thousand
as of December 31, 2014).
Additionally, Intelig is involved in a
lawsuit filed by a creditor of Editora JB and Gazeta Mercantil. The judge in that case ordered a seizure order on Intelig’s
bank account in the amount of R$3,994 thousand based on the reasoning that Editora JB and Gazeta Mercantil are part of the same
economic group as Intelig. Intelig has filed an interlocutory appeal, which was not granted. After that, Intelig filed a request
for amendment, which was also rejected. Intelig is awaiting a decision as to whether the suit may be heard on appeal by the Superior
Court (
Superior Tribunal de Justiça
).
Labor Claims
A significant percentage of our labor claims
relate to either claims filed by former employees of service providers who, in accordance with Brazilian labor legislation, have
filed claims against us on the grounds that we are responsible for labor-related obligations not satisfied by the service provide
companies, or our organizational restructuring processes, in particular the closure of our customer service call centers in Fortaleza,
Salvador and Belo Horizonte, which resulted in the termination of approximately 800 employees, including in-house staff and outsourced
personnel.
There was a public civil action filed by
the Labor Public Prosecutor’s Office of the Third Region, in the State of Minas Gerais, which alleged irregular outsourcing
practices and demanded collective punitive damages. A judgment was rendered on April 16, 2008, in which the acting judge ruled
the Labor Public Prosecutors’ Office claims as partially valid, recognizing irregular outsourcing and granting collective
punitive damages. An appeal was filed but was dismissed on July 13, 2009. In order to obtain staying effects for its appeal, TIM
Celular filed an unspecified writ of prevention, which was dismissed without prejudice. In order to reverse the decision of the
Regional Labor Court of the Third Region, TIM Celular filed an appeal alleging abusive acts by the judge with the Superior Labor
Court, and obtained a favorable decision, which reversed the appellate court’s decision. A motion for clarification was filed,
but dismissed. On September 16, 2009, a motion to review was filed, which is currently pending judgment by the Higher Labor Court.
Following the above mentioned public civil
action in Minas Gerais, the Labor Public Prosecutor’s Office of the Federal District filed a claim alleging irregular outsourcing
practices and demanding collective punitive damages. The action was found to be without merit, with the court ruling that under
the General Telecommunications Law, all outsourcing in the telecommunications sector is legal. The Labor Public Prosecutor’s
Office filed an ordinary appeal with the Regional Labor Court of the Tenth Region in March 2010, but the ruling of the lower court
was upheld. Thereafter, the Labor Public Prosecutor’s Office filed for a review, which is pending a hearing by the by the
Higher Labor Court.
A group of actions have been filed in the
state of Paraná, involving claims for damages in connection with contractual provisions set forth in employees’ work
cards. According to an internal rule, TELEPAR had undertaken to supplement the retirement benefits of employees hired prior to
1982. Prior to its privatization, TELEPAR had proposed to implement this benefit by means of the payment of a certain amount in
cash. However, some of the company’s former employees have questioned this transaction, and in some cases have obtained favorable
decisions.
There are a series of labor claims, particularly
in São Paulo, brought by former Gazeta Mercantil employees who have filed claims requesting the inclusion of Holdco or TIM
Participações as defendants, claiming damages from Holdco and TIM Participações. Plaintiffs who have
filed the claims were employees of Gazeta Mercantil, without any employment ties to Holdco or TIM Participações.
However, prior to the merger with TIM Participações, Holdco belonged to the Docas economic group, of which Gazeta
Mercantil is part.
Social Security Claims
In São Paulo, TIM Celular received
a debit assessment notice referring to alleged irregularity in the payment of social security contributions in connection with
the payment of profit sharing in the amount of R$4,713 thousand. TIM Celular filed its administrative defense, but on September
16, 2009, a decision was rendered which upheld the assessment notice. An administrative appeal was filed on October 5, 2009, the
judgment of which is still pending.
In May 2006, TIM Celular was issued a tax
assessment notice in the amount of R$2,389 thousand for social security contributions that were allegedly due in connection with
the following: (1) hiring bonuses (2) non-adjusted bonuses (3) payments to self-employed persons, and (4) sales incentives. TIM
Celular filed an administrative defense but the tax assessment was upheld. TIM Celular filed an appeal with the Ministry of Finance’s
Taxpayers’ Council, which is now pending judgment.
Intelig in Rio de Janeiro received notifications
for the release of tax debt regarding alleged irregularities in the payment of social security contributions levied in connection
with the following: (1) profit sharing, (2) retention of 11% on service agreements, (3) failure to deduct and pay management fees,
and (4) failure to properly fill out the GFIP. An administrative defense was presented, with an unfavorable outcome. Intelig filed
an appeal with the Taxpayers’ Commission of the Ministry of Finance, which is currently pending judgment. Based on the final
decision in the administrative proceedings with respect to the assessment for 11% withholding on service agreements, a legal action
was filed to reverse the assessment.
Tax Claims
Federal Taxes
The total federal tax claims assessed against
the Company, not including ordinary course of business taxes (FUST/FUNTTEL/FISTEL and other), is equal to R$1,965,525 as of December
31, 2015. Among these, the material federal tax claims relate to:
|
·
|
Tax carry forward loss, or CIT, and negative basis of Social Contribution on Profits (
Contribuição Social
sobre o Lucro Líquido
), or CSLL, compensation disallowance; challenge to the goodwill expenses deduction; disallowance
of withholding tax compensation due to an alleged lack of documentary support; failure to pay monthly estimated CIT/CSLL due; failure
to present digital files; failure to comply with formal requirements and compliance procedures related to Regional Tax Incentives
of the Superintendency for the Development of the Northeast (
Superintendência de Desenvolvimento do Nordeste
), or
SUDENE. The amount in controversy as of December 31, 2015, classified as a possible contingency, is R$1,264,205 (approximately
R$1,687,592 as of December 31, 2014).
|
|
·
|
Alleged improper credits that resulted in tax carryforward losses and CSLL negative basis compensation disallowance. The amount
in controversy as of December 31, 2015, classified as a possible contingency, is R$85,135 (R$85,478 as of December 31, 2014).
|
|
·
|
Social contribution on net income on exchange variation resulting from swap operations accounted for on a cash basis. The amount
in controversy as of December 31, 2015 is approximately R$35,662 (R$35,662 as of December 31, 2014).
|
|
·
|
Withholding tax collection on income of residents’ remittances abroad, including those remitted as international roaming
and payment to unidentified beneficiaries, as well as the payment of CIDE on royalty remittances abroad, including international
roaming. The amount in controversy as of December 31, 2015 is R$150,763 (R$236,962 as of December 31, 2014). In respect of Intelig,
amount in controversy as of December 31, 2015 is R$33,722 (R$39,957 as of December 31, 2014).
|
|
·
|
Alleged failure to calculate and collect corporate income tax, PIS/COFINS and social contribution on profits due to total or
partial disregard, by the Brazilian Internal Revenue Service (
Receita Federal do Brasil
), of the compensations proceeded
and from CIT negative balance calculated on previous years. The amount in controversy as of December 31, 2015 is R$229,823 (R$268,995
as of December 31, 2014).
|
State Taxes
The total state tax claims assessed against
the Company as of December 31, 2015 is equal to R$4,620,713. Among these, the material state tax claims relate to:
|
·
|
ICMS collection on telecommunication services provided, as well as on handsets sales and credits in “pre-paid”
services, and alleged undue ICMS credit on sales which allegedly benefitted from a basis of calculation reduction. The amount in
controversy as of December 31, 2015 is R$60,322 (R$74,615 as of December 31, 2014).
|
|
·
|
ICMS credit entries and debt reversals, identification and documentation support of amounts and information included in clients’
bills, such as the tax rate and credits applied. The amount in controversy as of December 31, 2015 is R$772,336 (R$855,497 as of
December 31, 2014). In respect of Intelig, the amount in controversy as of December 31, 2015 is R$18,594 (R$20,285 as of December
31, 2014).
|
|
·
|
ICMS taxation on international roaming services provided. The amount in controversy as of December 31, 2015 is R$25,567 (R$27,891
as of December 31, 2014).
|
|
·
|
ICMS credits regarding the tax treatment of loaned handsets when they are returned to the Company. The amount in controversy
as of December 31, 2015 is R$20,358 (R$20,358 as of December 31, 2014).
|
|
·
|
Alleged incorrect deduction of unconditional discounts offered to customers using the ICMS basis of calculation, as well as
penalties for alleged noncompliance with an accessory obligation. The amount in controversy as of December 31, 2015 is R$932,584
(R$1,343,892 as of December 31, 2014).
|
|
·
|
Alleged mismatch between the Company’s tax bookkeeping and their respective accessory obligations (electronic file to
report information related to services provided in accordance with Ordinance No. 115/2003), the regular record of goods’
entry and sale operations, as well as non-confirmed credits entered in the specific accessory obligation regarding ICMS information
and calculation (
Guia de Informação e Apuração do ICMS
). The amount in controversy as of December
31, 2015 is R$64,744 (R$68,356 as of December 31, 2014).
|
|
·
|
Use of a tax benefit (Program for the Economic, Integrated and Sustainable Development of the Federal District PRO-DF) granted
by the state tax authority, which was later declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. Additionally, the company was assessed
due to alleged undue credit of ICMS resulting from interstate purchase of goods with tax benefit granted in the state of origin.
The amount in controversy as of December 31, 2015 is R$649,778 (R$698,898 as of December 31, 2014).
|
|
·
|
Alleged lack of ICMS collection on network infrastructure sharing operations considering that the originally deferred tax was
formerly not collected in accordance with Ordinance No. 128/98. The amount in controversy as of December 31, 2015 is R$87,550 (R$87,550
as of December 31, 2014).
|
|
·
|
Incidence of ICMS and the State Poverty Fund (
Fundo Estadual de Combate à Pobreza
– FECOP), on the acquisition
of fixed assets and on telecommunication services provided in specific cases set forth in local legislation. The amount in controversy
as of December 31, 2015 is R$67,941 (R$69,287 as of December 31, 2014).
|
|
·
|
Appropriation of ICMS credits originated from operational energy consumption and acquisition. The amount in controversy as
of December 31, 2015 is R$135,176 (R$201,841 as of December 31, 2014).
|
|
·
|
ICMS credits reversal and credits arising from the acquisition of fixed assets. The amount in controversy as of December 31,
2015 is R$549,627 (R$652,091 as of December 31, 2014).
|
|
·
|
Alleged improper crediting and duplication of ICMS after cancellation of telecom services due to improper billing / subscription
fraud. The amount in controversy as of December 31, 2015 is R$17,568 (R$19,165 as of December 31, 2014).
|
Municipal Taxes
The total municipal tax claims assessed
against the Company as of December 31, 2015 is equal to R$345,089. Among these, the material municipal tax claims relate to:
|
·
|
Charge of ISS tax and penalties due to the alleged lack of collection over the company’s revenue accounts. The amount
in controversy as of December 31, 2015 is R$94,359 (R$94,359 as of December 31, 2014).
|
|
·
|
Alleged lack of ISS collection regarding import services. The amount in controversy as of December 31, 2015 is R$92,499 (R$110,999
as of December 31, 2014).
|
FUST, FUNTTEL and EBC
The total amount assessed against the Company
as of December 31, 2015 is equal to R$1,563,863 (R$1,390,054 as of December 31, 2014).
The main claim involves the collection
of FUST and FUNTTEL following the issuance by Anatel of Ordinance No. 7/2005, particularly the collection of these contributions
related to interconnection revenues earned by telecommunications services providers from the date upon which Law 9,998/2000 came
into force.
Additionally, there is a claim relating
to contributions allegedly owed to the Brazilian Communications Company (
Empresa Brasileira de Comunicação
),
or EBC, for the development of public broadcasting, established by Law No. 11.652 / 2008.
Material Proceedings with Adverse Director, Management
or Affiliate
None.
Dividend Policy
Under our By-laws, we are required to distribute
an aggregate amount equal to at least 25% of our adjusted net income to our shareholders, either as dividends or as tax-deductible
interest on shareholders’ equity. We may also make additional distributions to the extent of available distributable profits
and reserves. Our subsidiary TIM Celular S.A. is also subject to mandatory distribution requirements and, to the extent of distributable
profits and reserves, is accordingly required to pay dividends to us. All of the aforementioned distributions may be made as dividends
or as tax-deductible interest on shareholders’ equity.
Brazilian corporations may make payments
to shareholders characterized as interest on shareholders’ equity (
juros sobre capital próprio
) as an alternative
form of making dividend distributions to the shareholders. The rate of interest may not be higher than the Federal Government’s
long-term interest rate as determined by BNDES from
time to time. Dividends are not subject to withholding income tax when paid.
On the other hand, interest on shareholders’ equity paid to shareholders is deductible from the corporation’s net income
for tax purposes, but the distributions are subject to withholding tax.
For the purposes of Brazilian corporate
law, and in accordance with our By-laws, adjusted net income is an amount equal to net profit adjusted to reflect allocations to
and from:
We are required to maintain a legal reserve,
to which we must allocate 5% of net income for each fiscal year until the amount for such reserve equals 20% of our capital. However,
we are not required to make any allocations to our legal reserve in respect of any fiscal year in which our legal reserve, together
with our other capital reserves, exceeds 30% of our capital. Losses, if any, may be charged against the legal reserve.
Brazilian corporate law also provides for
two discretionary allocations of net income that are subject to approval by the shareholders at the annual meeting. First, a percentage
of net income may be allocated to a contingency reserve for anticipated losses that are deemed probable in future years. Any amount
so allocated in a prior year must be either reversed in the fiscal year in which the loss was anticipated if such loss does not
in fact occur, or written off in the event that the anticipated loss occurs. Second, if the mandatory distributable amount exceeds
the sum of realized net income in a given year, such excess may be allocated to unrealized revenue reserve. Under Brazilian corporate
law, realized net income is defined as the amount of net income that exceeds the net positive result of equity adjustments and
profits or revenues from operations with financial results after the end of the next succeeding fiscal year.
Under Brazilian corporate law, any company
may, as a term in its by-laws, create a discretionary reserve that authorizes the allocation of a percentage of a company’s
net income to the discretionary reserve and must also indicate the purpose, criteria for allocation and a maximum amount of the
reserve. The Company’s By-laws authorize the allocation of the net income balance not allocated to the payment of the mandatory
minimum dividend to a supplementary reserve for the expansion of corporate business, not to exceed 80% of the capital.
We may also allocate a portion of our net
income for discretionary appropriations for plant expansion and other capital investment projects, the amount of which would be
based on a capital budget previously presented by our management and approved by shareholders. Under Brazilian corporate law, capital
budgets covering more than one year must be reviewed at each annual shareholders’ meeting. After completion of the relevant
capital projects, we may retain the appropriation until the shareholders vote to transfer all or a portion of the reserve to capital
realized.
The amounts available for distribution
may be further increased by a decrease in the contingency reserve for anticipated losses anticipated in prior years but not realized.
The amounts available for distribution are determined on the basis of financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS.
The legal reserve is subject to approval
by the shareholders voting at the annual meeting and may be transferred to capital but is not available for the payment of dividends
in subsequent years. Our calculation of net income and allocations to reserves for any fiscal year are determined on the basis
of financial statements prepared in accordance with CVM rules and Brazilian corporate law.
Under Brazilian corporate law, a company
is permitted to suspend the mandatory dividend in respect of common shares not entitled to a fixed or minimum dividend if:
|
·
|
its management (board of directors and board of executive officers) and fiscal council report to the shareholders’ meeting
that the distribution would be incompatible with the financial circumstances of that company; and
|
|
·
|
the shareholders ratify this conclusion at the shareholders’ meeting.
|
In this case,
|
·
|
the management must forward to CVM within five days of the shareholders’ meeting an explanation justifying the information
transmitted at the meeting; and
|
|
·
|
the profits which were not distributed are to be recorded as a special reserve and, if not absorbed by losses in subsequent
fiscal years, are to be paid as dividends as soon as the financial situation permits.
|
For the purposes of Brazilian corporate
law, 25% of the net income after income tax and social contribution for such fiscal year, net of any accumulated losses from prior
fiscal years and any amounts allocated to warrants and employees’ and management’s participation in a company’s
profits, shall be distributed as dividends.
Payment of Dividends
We are required by law and by our By-laws
to hold an annual shareholders’ meeting by April 30 of each year, at which, among other things, an annual dividend may be
declared by decision of our shareholders on the recommendation of our executive officers, as approved by our Board of Directors.
The payment of annual dividends is based on the financial statements prepared for the fiscal year ending December 31. Under Brazilian
corporate law, dividends are required to be paid within 60 days following the date the dividend is declared to shareholders of
record on such declaration date, unless a shareholders’ resolution sets forth another date of payment, which in any event
shall occur prior to the end of the fiscal year in which such dividend was declared.
A shareholder has a three-year period from
the dividend payment date to claim dividends in respect of its shares, after which we have no liability for such payment. Because
our shares are issued in book-entry form, dividends with respect to any share are credited to the account holding such share. We
are not required to adjust the amount of paid-in capital for inflation. Annual dividends may be paid to shareholders on a pro rata
basis according to the date when the subscription price is paid to us.
None.
Item 9. The Offer and
Listing
|
A.
|
Offer and Listing Details
|
Our common shares are listed on the
Novo
Mercado
segment of the São Paulo Stock Exchange (
BM&FBOVESPA S.A. - Bolsa de Valores Mercadorias e Futuros
),
or the BM&FBOVESPA, under the symbol “TIMP3” and our ADSs are listed on the New York Stock Exchange, or the NYSE,
under the symbol “TSU.” The table below sets forth, for the indicated periods, the high and low closing prices of the
ADSs on the NYSE, in U.S. dollars, and the common shares on the BM&FBOVESPA, in
reais
. On December 31, 2015, the last
reported sales price of our common shares on the BM&FBOVESPA was R$6.86 and on December 31, 2015, the last reported sales price
of our ADSs on the NYSE was U.S.$8.48. As of December 31, 2015, the U.S. dollar-
real
exchange rate was R$3.905 per U.S.$1.00.
At an extraordinary shareholders meeting
held on June 22, 2011 our shareholders approved, among other things: (1) the conversion of all of our preferred shares into common
shares, at a ratio of 0.8406 common shares for each preferred share; (2) our adherence to the
Novo Mercado
rules and the
transfer of trading of the shares issued by us to the
Novo Mercado
, and (3) amendments to our By-laws.
In order to join the
Novo Mercado
,
we entered into a
Novo Mercado
Participation Agreement with the BM&FBOVESPA. Through this agreement, which became effective
on July 27, 2011, we are required to adhere to heightened requirements relating to corporate governance and the disclosure of information
to the market. Additionally, as of such date, our shares started trading on the
Novo Mercado
segment of the BM&FBOVESPA.
Pursuant to the
Novo Mercado
Regulations, we are not permitted to issue preferred shares, participation bonuses or any kind
of shares with restricted voting rights.
Prior to August 2, 2011 we had common shares
and preferred shares listed on the BM&FBOVESPA under the symbols “TCSL3” and “TCSL4,” respectively.
Our ADSs listed on the NYSE each represented 10 preferred shares. As part of our migration to the
Novo Mercado
listing segment
of the BM&FBOVESPA, our preferred shares ceased to trade on August 2, 2011. On August 4, 2011, our ADSs representing preferred
shares ceased to trade on the
NYSE. From August 3, 2011, we only had common shares traded on the
Novo Mercado
listing segment
of BM&FBOVESPA, by using the code “TIMP3” and as from August 5, 2011, our ADSs representing five common shares
instead of ten preferred shares commenced trading on the NYSE.
|
|
NYSE
|
|
BM&FBOVESPA
|
|
BM&FBOVESPA
|
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
|
(in U.S.$ per ADS)
|
|
(in
reais
per preferred share)
|
|
(in
reais
per common share)
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
|
31.30
|
|
|
|
20.01
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
9.80
|
|
|
|
6.81
|
|
December 31, 2012
|
|
|
32.99
|
|
|
|
16.88
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
11.95
|
|
|
|
6.89
|
|
December 31, 2013
|
|
|
27.19
|
|
|
|
17.42
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
12.33
|
|
|
|
7.75
|
|
December 31, 2014
|
|
|
30.16
|
|
|
|
21.51
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
13.83
|
|
|
|
10.49
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
|
24.38
|
|
|
|
8.44
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
12.88
|
|
|
|
6.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
|
28.83
|
|
|
|
23.76
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
13.71
|
|
|
|
11.18
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
30.16
|
|
|
|
23.50
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
13.48
|
|
|
|
10.49
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
29.64
|
|
|
|
24.00
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
13.83
|
|
|
|
10.90
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
27.52
|
|
|
|
21.51
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
13.54
|
|
|
|
11.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
|
24.38
|
|
|
|
16.47
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
12.88
|
|
|
|
10.63
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
17.30
|
|
|
|
14.46
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
10.70
|
|
|
|
8.72
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
16.82
|
|
|
|
9.42
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
10.39
|
|
|
|
7.51
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
11.45
|
|
|
|
8.44
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
8.70
|
|
|
|
6.56
|
|
Month ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, 2015
|
|
|
11.11
|
|
|
|
9.53
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
8.57
|
|
|
|
7.55
|
|
November 30, 2015
|
|
|
11.45
|
|
|
|
9.98
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
8.70
|
|
|
|
7.65
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
|
10.01
|
|
|
|
8.44
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
7.75
|
|
|
|
6.56
|
|
January 31, 2016
|
|
|
8.45
|
|
|
|
7.33
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
6.79
|
|
|
|
5.76
|
|
February 29, 2016
|
|
|
8.74
|
|
|
|
7.12
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
6.95
|
|
|
|
5.68
|
|
March 31, 2016
|
|
|
11.38
|
|
|
|
9.24
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
8.24
|
|
|
|
7.21
|
|
April 2016 (through April 13, 2016)
|
|
|
11.20
|
|
|
|
10.08
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
8.03
|
|
|
|
7.28
|
|
Not applicable.
Our common shares are listed on the
Novo
Mercado
segment of the BM&FBOVESPA, under the symbol “TIMP3” and our ADSs are listed on the New York Stock
Exchange, or the NYSE, under the symbol “TSU.” For additional detail, see “—A. Offer and Listing Details.”
Trading on the Brazilian Stock Exchanges
The BM&FBOVESPA is the only Brazilian
Stock Exchange on which equity and debt securities issued by Brazilian companies are traded.
Trading on the BM&FBOVESPA is conducted
every business day, from 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., or from 11:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. during daylight saving time in Brazil, on an
electronic trading system called “Megabolsa.” Trading is also conducted between 5:45 p.m. and 7:00 p.m., or between
6:45 p.m. and 7:30 p.m. during daylight saving time in Brazil. The “after-market” trading is the scheduled after the
close of principal trading sessions, when investors may send purchase and sell orders and make trades through the home broker system.
This after-market trading is subject to regulatory limits on price volatility of securities traded by investors operating on the
Internet.
When shareholders trade shares or units
on BM&FBOVESPA, the trade is settled in three business days after the trade date, without adjustments to the purchase price.
The seller is ordinarily required to deliver the shares or units to the exchange on the second business day following the trade
date. Delivery of and payment for shares or units are made through the facilities of
Central Depositária BM&FBOVESPA
,
BM&FBOVESPA’s clearing house.
In order to maintain control over the fluctuation
of BM&FBOVESPA index, BM&FBOVESPA has adopted a “circuit breaker” system pursuant to which trading sessions
may be suspended for a period of 30 minutes or one hour whenever BM&FBOVESPA index falls below 10% or 15%, respectively, in
relation to the closing index levels of the previous trading session. The BM&FBOVESPA also implemented a 15% limit, up or down,
on price fluctuations in shares traded on the spot market. The minimum and maximum price is based on a reference price for each
asset, which will be the previous session’s closing quote, when considering the asset at the beginning of the day before
the first trade, or the price of the day’s first trade. The asset’s reference price will be altered during the session
if there is an auction sparked by the intraday limit being breached. In this case the reference price will become whatever results
from the auction.
Although the Brazilian equity market is
Latin America’s largest in terms of market capitalization, it is smaller and less liquid than the major U.S. and European
securities markets. Moreover, BM&FBOVESPA is less liquid than the New York Stock Exchange and other major exchanges in the
world. Although any of the outstanding shares of a listed company may trade on a Brazilian stock exchange, in most cases fewer
than half of the listed shares are actually available for trading by the public, the remainder being held by small groups of controlling
persons, governmental entities or one principal shareholder. Trading on Brazilian stock exchanges by non-residents of Brazil is
subject to registration procedures.
Trading on Brazilian stock exchanges by
a holder not deemed to be domiciled in Brazil, for Brazilian tax and regulatory purposes (a “non-Brazilian holder”),
is subject to certain limitations under Brazilian foreign investment legislation. With limited exceptions, non-Brazilian holders
may only trade on Brazilian stock exchanges in accordance with the requirements of Resolution CMN 2,689. Resolution CMN 2,689 requires
that securities held by non-Brazilian holders be maintained in the custody of, or in deposit accounts with, financial institutions
and be registered with a clearinghouse duly authorized by the Central Bank and the CVM. In addition, Resolution CMN 2,689 requires
non-Brazilian holders to restrict their securities trading to transactions on Brazilian stock exchanges or qualified over-the-counter
markets. With limited exceptions, non-Brazilian holders may not transfer the ownership of investments made under Resolution CMN
2,689 to other non-Brazilian holders through a private transaction. See “Item 10. Additional Information—E. Taxation—Brazilian
Tax Considerations” for a description of certain tax benefits extended to non-Brazilian holders who qualify under Resolution
CMN 2,689.
Differentiated Levels of Corporate Governance
and the Novo Mercado
In order to increase the transparency of
the Brazilian capital markets and protect minority shareholders’ rights, BM&FBOVESPA has implemented certain new initiatives,
including:
|
·
|
a classification system referred to as “Differentiated Levels of Corporate Governance” applicable to the companies
already listed in BM&FBOVESPA; and
|
|
·
|
a new separate listing segment for qualifying issuers referred to as the
Novo Mercado
.
|
The Differentiated Levels of Corporate
Governance, Level 1 and Level 2, are applicable to listed companies that voluntarily comply with special disclosure and corporate
governance practices established by the BM&FBOVESPA. The companies may be classified into two different levels, depending on
their degree of adherence to the BM&FBOVESPA’s practices of disclosure and corporate governance.
To become a Level 1 company, an issuer
must voluntarily satisfy, in addition to the obligations imposed by Brazilian law, the following requirements:
|
·
|
ensure that shares amounting to at least 25% of its capital are outstanding and available for trading in the market;
|
|
·
|
adopt procedures that favor the dispersion of shares into the market whenever making a public offering;
|
|
·
|
comply with minimum quarterly disclosure standards;
|
|
·
|
follow stricter disclosure policies with respect to transactions with controlling shareholders, directors and officers involving
the issuer’s securities;
|
|
·
|
submit any existing shareholders’ agreements and stock option plans to the BM&FBOVESPA; and
|
|
·
|
make a schedule of corporate events available to the shareholders.
|
To become a Level 2 company, an issuer
must, in addition to satisfying the Level 1 criteria and the obligations imposed by Brazilian law, satisfy the following requirements:
|
·
|
require all directors to serve unstaggered one-year terms;
|
|
·
|
prepare and publish annual financial statements in English and in accordance with U.S. GAAP or IFRS;
|
|
·
|
create tag-along rights for minority shareholders, ensuring holders of common shares of the right to sell on the same terms
as a controlling shareholder, and ensuring preferred shareholders a price equal to at least 80% of that received by the selling
controlling shareholder;
|
|
·
|
grant preferred shareholders the right to vote in certain cases, including, without limitation, the transformation, spin-off
or merger of the company, and approval of agreements with related parties;
|
|
·
|
make a tender offer for all outstanding shares, for a price equal to fair market value, in the event of delisting from Level
2 qualification; and
|
|
·
|
agree to submit any disputes between the company and its investors exclusively to the BM&FBOVESPA’s Market Arbitration
Chamber.
|
The
Novo Mercado
is a separate listing
segment for the trading of shares issued by companies that voluntarily adopt certain additional corporate governance practices
and disclosure requirements which are more demanding than those required by the current law in Brazil. Companies may qualify to
have their shares traded in the
Novo Mercado
, if, in addition to complying with the Level 2 corporate governance practices
referred to above, their capital stock consists only of voting common shares.
On May 20, 2011 the Board of Directors
of TIM Participações recommended to the Extraordinary General Shareholders’ Meeting of the Company its migration
to the
Novo Mercado
listing segment of BM&FBOVESPA, which took place on June 22, 2011. With this migration TIM moved
to the highest level of corporate governance. Only 29% of Brazilian listed companies are in the
Novo Mercado
and TIM is
the only telecommunications company stock among them.
BM&FBOVESPA Market Administration
Panel
Pursuant to Law No. 9,307/96, a Market
Arbitration Panel (the “Panel”) has been established by the BM&FBOVESPA. The Panel was established to settle certain
types of disputes, including disputes relating to corporate governance, securities issues, financial regulatory issues and other
capital market matters, with respect to BM&FBOVESPA listed companies that have undertaken to voluntarily comply with Level
2 and
Novo Mercado
levels of corporate governance and disclosure. The Panel will provide a forum for dispute resolution
involving, among others, the BM&FBOVESPA, the applicable listed company and the shareholders, directors and management of the
applicable listed company.
Regulation of Brazilian Securities Markets
The Brazilian securities markets are principally
governed by Law No. 6,385, of December 7, 1976, and Brazilian corporate law, each as amended and supplemented, and by regulations
issued by the CVM, which has authority over stock exchanges and the securities markets in general; the National Monetary Council;
and the Central Bank, which has, among other powers, licensing authority over brokerage firms and regulates foreign investment
and foreign exchange transactions.
These laws and regulations, among others,
provide for licensing and oversight of brokerage firms, governance of the Brazilian stock exchanges, disclosure requirements applicable
to issuers of traded securities, restrictions on
price manipulation and protection of minority shareholders. They also provide
for restrictions on insider trading. Accordingly, any trades or transfers of our equity securities by our officers and directors,
our controlling shareholders or any of the officers and directors of our controlling shareholders must comply with the regulations
issued by the CVM.
Under Brazilian corporate law, a corporation
is either publicly held (
companhia aberta
), as we are, or closely held (
companhia fechada
). All publicly held companies
are registered with the CVM and are subject to reporting requirements. We have the option to ask that trading in securities on
BM&FBOVESPA be suspended in anticipation of a material announcement. Trading may also be suspended on the initiative of BM&FBOVESPA
or the CVM, based on or due to, among other reasons, a belief that a company has provided inadequate information regarding a material
event or has provided inadequate responses to inquiries by the CVM or BM&FBOVESPA.
The Brazilian over-the-counter market consists
of direct trades between individuals in which a financial institution registered with the CVM serves as intermediary. No special
application, other than registration with the CVM, is necessary for securities of a public company to be traded in this market.
The CVM requires that it be given notice of all trades carried out in the Brazilian over-the-counter market by the respective intermediaries.
Trading on BM&FBOVESPA by non-residents
of Brazil is subject to limitations under Brazilian foreign investment and tax legislation. The Brazilian custodian for our common
shares on behalf of the depositary for the ADSs, has obtained registration from the Central Bank to remit U.S. dollars abroad for
payments of dividends, any other cash distributions, or upon the disposition of the shares and sales proceeds thereto. In the event
that a holder of ADSs exchanges common shares for ADSs, the holder will be entitled to continue to rely on the custodian’s
registration for five business days after the exchange. Thereafter, the holder may not be able to obtain and remit U.S. dollars
abroad upon the disposition of our common shares or upon distributions relating to our common shares, unless the holder obtains
a new registration. See “Item 10. Additional Information—B. Memorandum and Articles of Association.”
Brazilian regulations also require that
any person or group of persons representing the same interest that has directly or indirectly acquired an interest corresponding
to 5% of a type or class of shares of a publicly traded company must provide such publicly traded company with information on such
acquisition and its purpose, and such company must transmit this information to the CVM. If this acquisition causes a change in
the corporate control or in the administrative structure of the company, as well as when such acquisition triggers the obligation
of making a public offering in accordance with CVM Instruction 358/03, then the acquiring entity shall disclose this information
to the applicable stock exchanges and the appropriate Brazilian newspapers. Regulations also require disclosure of any subsequent
increase or decrease of five percent or more in ownership of common shares, including warrants and debentures convertible into
common shares in the same terms above.
Trading on the New York Stock Exchange
We are a “controlled company”
and a “foreign private issuer” within the meaning of the NYSE corporate governance standards. Under the NYSE rules,
a controlled company is exempt from certain NYSE corporate governance requirements. In addition, a foreign private issuer may elect
to comply with the practice of its home country and not to comply with certain NYSE corporate governance requirements, including
the requirements that (1) a majority of the board of directors consist of independent directors, (2) a nominating and corporate
governance committee be established that is composed entirely of independent directors and has a written charter addressing the
committee’s purpose and responsibilities, (3) a compensation committee be established that is composed entirely of independent
directors and has a written charter addressing the committee’s purpose and responsibilities and (4) an annual performance
evaluation of the nominating and corporate governance and compensation committees be undertaken. Although we have similar practices,
they do not entirely conform to the NYSE requirements, therefore we currently use these exemptions and intend to continue using
them.
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
Although adoption of a code of ethics is
not required by Brazilian Corporate Law, we implemented a code of ethics regulating the conduct of our managers in connection with
the registration and control of financial and accounting information and their access to privileged and nonpublic information and
data to comply with the requirements of Sarbanes-Oxley and NYSE rules. See “Item 16B. Code of Ethics.”
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
|
Item 10.
|
Additional Information
|
Not applicable.
|
B.
|
Memorandum and Articles of Association
|
The following summarizes certain material
provisions of TIM’s By-laws and the Brazilian corporate law, the main bodies of regulation governing us. Copies of TIM’s
By-laws have been filed as exhibits to this annual report on Form 20-F. Except as described in this section, TIM’s By-laws
do not contain provisions addressing the duties, authority or liabilities of the directors and senior management, which are instead
established by Brazilian corporate law.
Registration
TIM’s By-laws have been registered
with the Public Registry of the state of Rio de Janeiro under company number (NIRE) 33.3.0027696-3.
Corporate Purpose
Article 2 of our By-laws provides that
our corporate purpose is to: (1) hold interest in the capital of companies that explore any type of telecommunications services,
under the terms and conditions provided for in the relevant permits, authorizations or concessions, companies that develop activities
that are necessary or useful to the provision of such services, or companies that provide Internet connection services, value-added
services and Internet application services; (2) promote, through its controlled or affiliated companies, the expansion and implementation
of any type of telecommunications services, under the terms and conditions provided for in the relevant permits, authorizations
or concessions; (3) promote, perform or give guidance in relation to the borrowing of funds from internal and external sources
to be invested by the Company or by its controlled companies; (4) promote and incentivize study and research activities for the
development of any type of telecommunications services, as well as of Internet connection services, other value-added services
and Internet application services; (5) provide, directly or through controlled or affiliated companies, services related to the
telecommunications industry; (6) promote, incentivize and coordinate, through controlled or affiliated companies, the education
and training of the staff required by the telecommunications industry in general; (7) perform or promote the importation of goods
and services for the controlled or affiliated companies; (8) engage in any other activities related or akin to its purpose; and
(9) hold interest in the corporate capital of other companies.
Company Management
According to our By-laws, our Board of
Directors is comprised of at least five and at most nineteen permanent members. The following is a description of some of the provisions
of our By-laws concerning the Board of Directors:
|
·
|
the Board of Directors has the power to approve loans and financing as well as other transactions giving rise to indebtedness,
for an amount exceeding R$300 million, as set forth in Article 22, Item XIII;
|
|
·
|
the Board of Directors has the power to allocate the total budget for management remuneration approved by the shareholders’
meeting among the directors and the executive officers, as necessary; and
|
|
·
|
the Board of Directors has the power to authorize the Company, as well as its controlled companies and affiliates, to enter
into, amend or terminate shareholders’ agreements.
|
There are no provisions in the By-laws
with respect to:
|
·
|
a director’s power to vote on a proposal in which such director is materially interested;
|
|
·
|
a director’s power to vote compensation to him or herself in the absence of an independent quorum;
|
|
·
|
borrowing powers exercisable by the directors;
|
|
·
|
age limits for retirement of directors;
|
|
·
|
required shareholding for director qualification; or
|
|
·
|
disclosure of share ownership.
|
The executive officers are the Company’s
representative and executive body, and each one of them shall act within his/her respective scope of authority. Following is a
description of some of the provisions of our By-laws concerning the Board of Executive Officers:
|
·
|
the power to authorize the participation of the Company or its companies controlled in any joint venture, partnership, consortium
or any similar structure;
|
|
·
|
the power to ratify, within the limits set forth in the By-laws, the purchase of materials and equipment and the execution
of property, construction work and service agreements; and
|
|
·
|
the power to approve the contracting by the Company or by its controlled companies of loans, financing, or any other transactions
implying indebtedness to the Company or its controlled companies, whose individual value is greater than R$30.0 million, provided
that certain provisions of the By-laws are observed.
|
Rights Relating to our Shares
Dividend Rights
Under our By-laws, we are required to distribute
an aggregate amount equal to at least 25% of our adjusted net income to our shareholders, either as dividends or as tax-deductible
interest on shareholders’ equity. We may also make additional distributions to the extent of available distributable profits
and reserves. Our subsidiary TIM Celular S.A. is also subject to mandatory distribution requirements and, to the extent of distributable
profits and reserves, is accordingly required to pay dividends to us. All of the aforementioned distributions may be made as dividends
or as tax-deductible interest on shareholders’ equity.
Brazilian corporations may make payments
to shareholders characterized as interest on shareholders’ equity (
juros sobre capital próprio
) as an alternative
form of making dividend distributions to the shareholders. The rate of interest may not be higher than the Federal Government’s
long-term interest rate as determined by BNDES from time to time. Dividends are not subject to withholding income tax when paid.
On the other hand, interest on shareholders’ equity paid to shareholders is deductible from the corporation’s net income
for tax purposes, but the distributions are subject to withholding tax.
For the purposes of Brazilian corporate
law, and in accordance with our By-laws, adjusted net income is an amount equal to net profit adjusted to reflect allocations to
and from:
We are required to maintain a legal reserve,
to which we must allocate 5% of net income for each fiscal year until the amount for such reserve equals 20% of our capital. However,
we are not required to make any allocations
to our legal reserve in respect of any fiscal year in which our legal reserve, together
with our other capital reserves, exceeds 30% of our capital. Losses, if any, may be charged against the legal reserve.
Brazilian corporate law also provides for
two discretionary allocations of net income that are subject to approval by the shareholders at the annual meeting. First, a percentage
of net income may be allocated to a contingency reserve for anticipated losses that are deemed probable in future years. Any amount
so allocated in a prior year must be either reversed in the fiscal year in which the loss was anticipated if such loss does not
in fact occur, or written off in the event that the anticipated loss occurs. Second, if the mandatory distributable amount exceeds
the sum of realized net income in a given year, such excess may be allocated to unrealized revenue reserve. Under Brazilian corporate
law, realized net income is defined as the amount of net income that exceeds the net positive result of equity adjustments and
profits or revenues from operations with financial results after the end of the next succeeding fiscal year.
Under Brazilian corporate law, any company
may, as a term in its by-laws, create a discretionary reserve that authorizes the allocation of a percentage of a company’s
net income to the discretionary reserve and must also indicate the purpose, criteria for allocation and a maximum amount of the
reserve. The Company’s By-laws authorize the allocation of the net income balance not allocated to the payment of the mandatory
minimum dividend to a supplementary reserve for the expansion of corporate business, not to exceed 80% of the capital.
We may also allocate a portion of our net
income for discretionary appropriations for plant expansion and other capital investment projects, the amount of which would be
based on a capital budget previously presented by our management and approved by shareholders. Under Brazilian corporate law, capital
budgets covering more than one year must be reviewed at each annual shareholders’ meeting. After completion of the relevant
capital projects, we may retain the appropriation until the shareholders vote to transfer all or a portion of the reserve to capital
realized.
The amounts available for distribution
may be further increased by a decrease in the contingency reserve for anticipated losses anticipated in prior years but not realized.
The amounts available for distribution are determined on the basis of financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS.
The legal reserve is subject to approval
by the shareholders voting at the annual meeting and may be transferred to capital but is not available for the payment of dividends
in subsequent years. Our calculation of net income and allocations to reserves for any fiscal year are determined on the basis
of financial statements prepared in accordance with CVM rules and IFRS.
Under Brazilian corporate law, a company
is permitted to suspend the mandatory dividend in respect of common shares not entitled to a fixed or minimum dividend if:
|
·
|
its management (Board of Directors and Board of Executive Officers) and Fiscal Council report to the shareholders’ meeting
that the distribution would be incompatible with the financial circumstances of that company; and
|
|
·
|
the shareholders ratify this conclusion at the shareholders’ meeting.
|
In this case,
|
·
|
the management must forward to CVM within five days of the shareholders’ meeting an explanation justifying the information
transmitted at the meeting; and
|
|
·
|
the profits which were not distributed are to be recorded as a special reserve and, if not absorbed by losses in subsequent
fiscal years, are to be paid as dividends as soon as the financial situation permits.
|
For the purposes of Brazilian corporate
law, 25% of the net income after income tax and social contribution for such fiscal year, net of any accumulated losses from prior
fiscal years and any amounts allocated to warrants and employees’ and management’s participation in a company’s
profits, shall be distributed as dividends.
Payment of Dividends
We are required by law and by our By-laws
to hold an annual shareholders’ meeting by April 30 of each year, at which, among other things, an annual dividend may be
declared by decision of our shareholders on the recommendation of our executive officers, as approved by our Board of Directors.
The payment of annual dividends is based
on the financial statements prepared for the fiscal year ending December 31. Under Brazilian corporate law, dividends are required
to be paid within 60 days following the date the dividend is declared to shareholders of record on such declaration date, unless
a shareholders’ resolution sets forth another date of payment, which in any event shall occur prior to the end of the fiscal
year in which such dividend was declared.
A shareholder has a three-year period from
the dividend payment date to claim dividends in respect of its shares, after which we have no liability for such payment. Because
our shares are issued in book-entry form, dividends with respect to any share are credited to the account holding such share. We
are not required to adjust the amount of paid-in capital for inflation. Annual dividends may be paid to shareholders on a pro rata
basis according to the date when the subscription price is paid to us.
Voting Rights
Each common share entitles the holder to
one vote at meetings of shareholders.
Meeting of Shareholders
According to Brazilian law, shareholders
must be previously notified through a notice published in three Brazilian official gazettes in order for an annual or extraordinary
shareholders’ meeting to be held. The notification must occur at least 15 days prior to the meeting scheduled date. If the
meeting so noticed is not held for any reason on first notice, a second notification must be published at least eight days before
the second meeting date.
On the first notice, meetings may be held
only if shareholders holding at least one-fourth of voting shares are represented. Extraordinary meetings for the amendment of
the By-laws may be held on the first notice only if shareholders holding at least two thirds of the voting capital are represented.
On a second call, the meetings are held regardless of quorum.
Pursuant to our By-laws and Brazilian corporate
law, shareholders at our annual shareholders’ meeting, which is required to be held within the first four months following
the end of the fiscal year, will convene to:
|
·
|
take the management accounts; examine, discuss and vote on the financial statements;
|
|
·
|
decide on the uses to which the net income of the fiscal year should be put and on the distribution of dividends; and
|
|
·
|
elect the members of the Fiscal Council and, when applicable, the members of the Board of Directors.
|
An extraordinary shareholders’ meeting
shall be convened whenever the Company interests so require. Pursuant to our By-laws and Brazilian corporate law, the following
actions, among others, are exclusive powers of the shareholders’ meeting:
|
·
|
to decide on the appraisal of assets given by shareholders to pay up capital stock;
|
|
·
|
to decide on the Company’s transformation, merger, take-over and split-up; its dissolution and liquidation; to appoint
and remove liquidators and appreciate their accounts;
|
|
·
|
to suspend the rights of shareholders not in compliance with their duties imposed by law, the By-laws or the
Novo Mercado
Listing Rules;
|
|
·
|
to elect and remove, at any time, the members of the Board of Directors and the Fiscal Council;
|
|
·
|
to determine the global or individual remuneration of the Board of Directors, Board of Executive Officers and the Fiscal Council;
|
|
·
|
to annually take the accounts of the management and decide on the submitted financial statements;
|
|
·
|
to decide where the Company shall file a civil liability law suit against the management for losses in the Company’s
assets as provided by law;
|
|
·
|
to resolve in compliance with all provisions of any law, the By-laws or the
Novo Mercado
rules about capital stock increase
by means of subscription of new shares, and on the issuance of any other bonds or securities, whether in Brazil or abroad and whenever
the limit of the authorized capital has been attained;
|
|
·
|
to decide on the withdrawal from the register of publicly-held companies before the CVM;
|
|
·
|
to decide on the delisting of the Company from the
Novo Mercado
listing segment;
|
|
·
|
to choose a company to prepare an opinion concerning the appraisal of the Company’s shares in the event of cancellation
or delisting; and
|
|
·
|
to previously approve the execution of loan agreements, management agreements and technical support services agreements, between
the Company or its controlled companies, on the one side, and the controlling shareholder or its controlled companies, affiliated
or under the same control or the controlling companies of the latter, or parties related to the Company, on the other side, after
prior assessment of the Statutory Audit Committee to the effect that the terms and conditions of the agreement in question are
in compliance with standards normally adopted in the market for transactions of the same nature between independent parties.
|
Preemptive Rights
Except in the case of a public offering
of ordinary shares or convertible debentures, public subscription or a public tender offer (whereby such actions must be authorized
by the Board of Directors in accordance with article 22, section II of the By-laws), each of our shareholders has a general preemptive
right to subscribe shares in any capital increase, in proportion to its shareholding. A minimum period of 30 days following the
publication of notice of the capital increase is allowed for the exercise of the right, and the right is transferable.
Preemptive rights to purchase shares may
not be offered to U.S. holders of the ADSs unless a registration statement under the Securities Act is effective with respect to
the shares underlying those rights or an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act is available. Consequently,
if you are a holder of our ADSs who is a U.S. person or is located in the United States, you may be restricted in your ability
to participate in the exercise of preemptive rights.
Right of Redemption
Subject to certain exceptions, the common
shares are redeemable by shareholders exercising withdrawal rights in the event that shareholders representing over 50% of the
voting shares adopt a resolution at a duly convened shareholders meeting to:
|
·
|
reduce the mandatory distribution of dividends;
|
|
·
|
change our corporate purpose;
|
|
·
|
participate in a group of companies;
|
|
·
|
transfer all of our shares to another company in order to make us a wholly owned subsidiary of that company;
|
|
·
|
split up, subject to the conditions set forth by Brazilian corporate law;
|
|
·
|
approve the acquisition of another company, the price of which exceeds certain limits set forth in Brazilian corporate law;
or
|
|
·
|
merge or consolidate ourselves with another company.
|
The redemption right expires 30 days after
publication of the minutes of the relevant shareholders’ meeting. The shareholders would be entitled to reconsider any action
giving rise to redemption rights within 10 days following the expiration of those rights if they determine that the redemption
of shares of dissenting shareholders would jeopardize our financial stability.
Brazilian corporate law excludes dissenters’
rights in such cases for holders of shares that have a public float rate higher than 50% and that are “liquid.” Shares
are defined as being “liquid” for these purposes if they are part of the BM&FBOVESPA Index or another stock exchange
index (as defined by CVM). For as long as our shares are part of any qualifying market index, the right of redemption shall not
be extended to our shareholders with respect to decisions regarding our merger or consolidation with another company, or the participation
in a group of companies as defined by Brazilian corporate law. Currently, our common shares do not have a public float rate higher
than 50%; accordingly dissenter’s withdrawal rights are applicable.
Unless otherwise provided in the By-laws,
which is not the case with us, a shareholder exercising rights to redeem shares is entitled to receive the book value of such shares,
determined on the basis of the last annual balance sheet approved by the shareholders. If the shareholders’ meeting giving
rise to redemption rights occurs more than 60 days after the date of the last annual balance sheet, a shareholder may demand that
its shares be valued on the basis of a new balance sheet that is as of a date within 60 days of such shareholders’ meeting.
Form and Transfer
Our shares are maintained in book-entry
form with a transfer agent, Banco Bradesco S.A., and the transfer of our shares is made in accordance with the applicable provision
of the Brazilian corporate law, which provides that a transfer of shares is effected by an entry made by the transfer agent on
its books, debiting the share account of the seller and crediting the share account of the purchaser, against presentation of a
written order of the seller, or judicial authorization or order, in an appropriate document which remains in the possession of
the transfer agent. The common shares underlying our ADS are registered on the transfer agent’s records in the name of the
Brazilian depositary.
Transfers of shares by a foreign investor
are made in the same way and executed by such investor’s local agent on the investor’s behalf except that, if the original
investment was registered with the Central Bank under the Brazilian foreign investment in capital markets regulations, the foreign
investor should also seek amendment, if necessary, though its local agent, of the certificate of registration to reflect the new
ownership.
BM&FBOVESPA reports transactions carried
out in its market to the
Central Depositária BM&FBOVESPA
, which is the exchange’s central clearing system.
A holder of our shares may choose, at its discretion, to participate in this system. All shares elected to be put into the system
will be deposited in custody with the relevant stock exchange, through a Brazilian institution duly authorized to operate by the
Central Bank and CVM and having a clearing account with the relevant stock exchange. The fact that such shares are subject to custody
with the relevant stock exchange will be reflected in our register of shareholders. Each participating shareholder will, in turn,
be registered in our register of beneficial shareholders, as the case may be, maintained by the relevant stock exchange and will
be treated in the same way as registered shareholders.
See “Item 5. Operating and Financial
Review and Prospects—B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Sources of Funds—Financial Contracts” the summary
of certain financing agreements to which we have been a party, other than contracts entered into in the ordinary course of business.
There are no restrictions on ownership
of our common shares by individuals or legal entities domiciled outside Brazil. However, the right to convert dividend payments
and proceeds from the sale of shares into foreign currency
and to remit such amounts outside Brazil is subject to restrictions
under foreign investment legislation which generally requires, among other things, that the relevant investments have been registered
with the Central Bank.
Foreign investors may register their investment
under Law No. 4,131 of September 3, 1962, or Law No. 4,131, or Resolution CMN 2,689. Registration under Law No. 4,131 or under
Resolution CMN 2,689 generally enables foreign investors to convert into foreign currency dividends, other distributions and sales
proceeds received in connection with registered investments and to remit such amounts abroad. Resolution CMN 2,689 affords favorable
tax treatment to foreign investors who are not resident in a tax haven jurisdiction, which is defined under Brazilian tax laws
as a country that does not impose taxes or where the maximum income tax rate is lower than 20% or that restricts the disclosure
of shareholder composition or ownership of investments.
Under Resolution CMN 2,689, foreign investors
may invest in almost all financial assets and engage in almost all transactions available in the Brazilian financial and capital
markets, provided that certain requirements are fulfilled. In accordance with Resolution CMN 2,689, foreign investors are individuals,
corporations, mutual funds and collective investments domiciled or headquartered abroad.
Pursuant to Resolution CMN 2,689, foreign
investors must:
|
·
|
appoint at least one representative in Brazil with powers to perform actions relating to the foreign investment;
|
|
·
|
complete the appropriate foreign investment registration form;
|
|
·
|
obtain registration as a foreign investor with the CVM; and
|
|
·
|
register the foreign investment with the Central Bank.
|
The securities and other financial assets
held by the foreign investor pursuant to Resolution CMN 2,689 must be:
|
·
|
registered or maintained in deposit accounts or under the custody of an entity duly licensed by the Central Bank or by the
CVM; or
|
|
·
|
registered in registration, clearing and custody systems authorized by the Central Bank or by the CVM.
|
In addition, securities trading by foreign
investors pursuant to Resolution CMN 2,689 is restricted to transactions carried out on the stock exchanges or organized over-the-counter
markets licensed by the CVM.
On January 26, 2000, the Central Bank enacted
Circular No. 2,963, providing that beginning on March 31, 2000, all investments by a foreign investor under Resolution CMN 2,689
are subject to the electronic registration with the Central Bank. Foreign investments registered under the Annex IV regulations
were required to conform to the new registration rules by June 30, 2000.
Resolution No. 1,927 of the CMN provides
for the issuance of depositary receipts in foreign markets in respect of shares of Brazilian issuers. Our ADS program was approved
under the Annex V regulations by the Central Bank and the Brazilian securities commission prior to the issuance of the ADSs. Accordingly,
the proceeds from the sale of ADSs by ADR holders outside Brazil are free of Brazilian foreign investment controls and holders
of the ADSs will be entitled to favorable tax treatment. According to Resolution CMN 2,689, foreign investments registered under
Annex V Regulations may be converted into the new investment system and vice-versa, provided the conditions set forth by the Central
Bank and the CVM are complied with.
Under current Brazilian legislation, the
Federal Government may impose temporary restrictions on remittances of foreign capital abroad in the event of a serious imbalance
or an anticipated serious imbalance of Brazil’s balance of payments. For approximately six months in 1989 and early 1990,
the Federal Government froze all dividend and capital repatriations that were owed to foreign equity investors, in order to conserve
Brazil’s foreign currency reserves. These amounts were subsequently released in accordance with Federal Government directives.
The imbalance in Brazil’s balance of payments increased during 1999, and there can be no assurance that such increases will
not incur in the future or that the Federal Government will not impose similar restrictions on foreign repatriations in the future
for similar or other reasons.
The following summary contains a description
of the principal Brazilian and U.S. federal income tax consequences of the ownership and disposition of the common shares or ADSs,
but it does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all the tax considerations that may be relevant to a decision to hold
common shares or ADSs. The summary is based upon the tax laws of Brazil and regulations thereunder and on the federal income tax
laws of the United States and regulations and other authorities thereunder as of the date hereof, all of which are subject to change.
Holders of common shares or ADSs should consult their tax advisers as to the tax consequences of the ownership and disposition
of common shares or ADSs in their particular circumstances.
Although there is at present no income
tax treaty between Brazil and the United States, the tax authorities of the two countries have had discussions that may culminate
in such a treaty in the future. No assurance can be given, however, as to whether or when a treaty will enter into force or how
it will affect the U.S. holders of common shares or ADSs.
Brazilian Tax Considerations
The following discussion summarizes the
principal Brazilian tax consequences of the ownership and disposition of common shares or ADSs by a non-Brazilian holder. This
discussion does not address all the Brazilian tax considerations that may be applicable to any particular non-Brazilian holder,
and each non-Brazilian holder should consult its tax adviser about the Brazilian tax consequences of investing in common shares
or ADSs.
Taxation of Dividends
Dividends paid by us in cash or in kind
from profits of periods beginning on or after January 1, 1996 (1) to the depositary in respect of common shares underlying ADSs
or (2) to a non-Brazilian holder in respect of common shares will generally not be subject to Brazilian income tax withholding.
Taxation of Gains
According to Article 26 of Law No. 10,833
of December 29, 2003, which came into force on February 1, 2004, capital gains realized on the disposition of assets located in
Brazil by non-Brazilian residents, whether or not to other non-residents and whether made outside or within Brazil, are subject
to taxation in Brazil at a rate of 15%, or 25% if made by investors domiciled in a Low or Nil Tax Jurisdiction (see discussion
below under “—Discussion on Low or Nil Tax Jurisdictions”). Although we believe that the ADSs will not fall within
the definition of assets located in Brazil for the purposes of Law No. 10,833, considering the general and unclear scope of Law
10,833 and the absence of any judicial guidance in respect thereof, we are unable to predict whether such interpretation will ultimately
prevail in the Brazilian courts.
Gains realized by non-Brazilian holders
on dispositions of common shares in Brazil or in transactions with Brazilian residents may be exempt from Brazilian income tax
or taxed at a rate of 15% or 25%, depending on the circumstances. Gains realized through transactions on Brazilian stock exchanges,
if carried out in accordance with Resolution CMN 2,689, as described below, are exempt from Brazilian income tax or subject to
income tax at a rate of 15% if a holder in a Low or Nil Tax Jurisdiction realizes the gain. Gains realized through transactions
on Brazilian stock exchanges are otherwise subject to Brazilian income tax at a rate of 15% and also to Brazilian withholding tax
at a rate of 0.005% (to offset the Brazilian income tax due on eventual capital gain). Gains realized through transactions with
Brazilian residents or through transactions in Brazil not on the Brazilian stock exchanges are subject to tax at a rate of 15%,
or 25% if made by investors resident in a Low or Nil Tax Jurisdiction. Non-Brazilian holders should consult their tax advisors
on the applicable income tax rate.
Non-Brazilian holders of common shares
registered under Resolution CMN 2,689 (which, pursuant to Resolution 1,927, includes ADSs) and which as of March 31, 2000 superseded
the Annex IV Regulations, may be subject to a more favorable tax treatment than as described above if the investor has:
|
·
|
appointed a representative in Brazil with power to take action relating to the investment in common shares;
|
|
·
|
registered as a foreign investor with the CVM; and
|
|
·
|
registered its investment in common shares with the Central Bank.
|
Under Resolution CMN 2,689, securities
held by foreign investors must be maintained under the custody of, or in deposit accounts with, financial institutions duly authorized
by the Central Bank and the CVM. In addition, securities trading is restricted under Resolution CMN 2,689 to transactions on Brazilian
stock exchanges or qualified over-the-counter markets. The preferential treatment afforded under Resolution CMN 2,689 and afforded
to investors in ADSs is not available to investors resident or domiciled in Low or Nil Tax Jurisdictions.
There can be no assurance that the current
preferential treatment for non-Brazilian holders of common shares under Resolution CMN 2,689 will be maintained.
Gain on the disposition of common shares,
subject to the tax treatment described above, is measured by the difference between the amounts in Brazilian currency realized
on the sale or exchange and the acquisition cost of the shares sold, measured in Brazilian currency, without any correction for
inflation. The acquisition cost of shares registered as an investment with the Central Bank is calculated on the basis of the foreign
currency amount registered with the Central Bank.
There is a possibility that gains realized
by a non-Brazilian holder upon the redemption of common shares will be treated as gains from the disposition of such common shares
to a Brazilian resident occurring off of a stock exchange and will accordingly be subject to tax at a rate of 15%, or 25% if realized
by an investor resident in a Low or Nil Tax Jurisdiction.
Any exercise of preemptive rights relating
to common shares or ADSs should not be subject to Brazilian taxation. Gains on the sale or assignment of preemptive rights relating
to common shares should be subject to the same tax treatment applicable to a sale or disposition of our common shares.
The deposit of common shares in exchange
for the ADSs may be subject to Brazilian income tax if the amount previously registered with the Central Bank as a foreign investment
in our common shares is lower than
|
·
|
the average price per common share on the BM&FBOVESPA on the day of the deposit; or
|
|
·
|
if no common shares were sold on that day, the average price per common share on the BM&FBOVESPA during the fifteen preceding
trading sessions.
|
The difference between the amount previously
registered and the average price of the common shares, calculated as set forth above, may be considered by the tax authorities
as a capital gain subject to income tax. Unless the common shares were held in accordance with Resolution CMN 2,689, in which case
the exchange would be tax-free, the capital gain will be subject to income tax at the following rates: (1) 15%, for gains realized
through transactions that were conducted on Brazilian stock exchanges; or (2) 15%, or 25% if realized by investors resident in
Low or Nil Tax Jurisdiction, for gains realized through transactions in Brazil that were not conducted on the Brazilian stock exchanges.
The cancellation of ADSs in exchange for
common shares is not subject to Brazilian income tax if the non-Brazilian holder qualifies under Resolution CMN 2,689, but is subject
to the IOF/Exchange tax as described below. If such non-Brazilian holder does not qualify under Resolution CMN 2,689, it will be
subject to the less favorable tax treatment described above in respect of exchanges of common shares.
There can be no assurance that the current
favorable tax treatment of non-Brazilian holders of common shares under Resolution CMN 2,689 will continue in the future.
Discussion on Low or Nil Tax Jurisdictions
For purposes of Brazilian law, Low or Nil
Tax Jurisdictions are countries and jurisdictions that do not tax income or that have a maximum income tax rate lower than 20%.
Since 1998, the Brazilian Internal Revenue Service has issued acts expressly listing the countries/jurisdictions that are to be
considered low tax jurisdictions for Brazilian tax purposes. Currently, the tax authorities have deemed approximately 65 countries
to be low tax jurisdictions pursuant to Normative Instruction 1,037/2010, article 1. These countries include the Bahamas, the British
Virgin Islands, the Cayman Islands, Hong Kong and Singapore.
Under Brazilian tax legislation, holders
domiciled in Low or Nil Tax Jurisdictions are: (1) subject to a higher rate of withholding tax on income and capital gains; (2)
not entitled to exemptions for investments in the Brazilian
capital markets; (3) subject to automatic application of transfer pricing
rules in transactions with Brazilian legal entities that are resident in Brazil; and (4) subject to thin capitalization rules on
debt with legal entities that are resident in Brazil.
On June 24, 2008, Law No. 11,727/08 (as
amended by National Treasury Ordinance No. 488 of November 1, 2014) introduced the concept of “privileged tax regime,”
which is a tax regime that (1) does not tax income or taxes it at a maximum rate lower than 17%; (2) grants tax benefits to non-resident
entities or individuals (a) without the requirement to carry out a substantial economic activity in the country or dependency or
(b) contingent to the non-exercise of a substantial economic activity in the country or dependency; (3) does not tax or that taxes
the income generated abroad at a maximum rate lower than 20%; or (4) does not provide access to information related to shareholding
composition, ownership of assets and rights or economic transactions carried out. According to article 2 of Normative Instruction
1,037/2010, LLCs incorporated in the United States, among others, are listed as privileged tax regimes by the tax authorities.
In principle, the best interpretation of
Law No. 11,727/08 is that the new concept of privileged tax regime should be solely applied for purposes of transfer pricing rules
in export and import transactions. However, due to the recent enactment of this Law, we are unable to ascertain whether or not
the privileged tax regime concept will be extended to the concept of Low or Nil Tax Jurisdiction. The provisions of Law No. 11,727/08
that refer to the privileged tax regime came into effect on January 1, 2009. Although we are of the opinion that the concept of
privileged tax regime should not affect the tax treatment of a non-resident shareholder described above, we cannot assure you whether
subsequent legislation or interpretations by the Brazilian tax authorities regarding the definition of privileged tax regime will
extend such concept to the tax treatment of a non-resident shareholder described above.
Prospective purchasers should therefore
consult with their tax advisors regarding the consequences of the implementation of Law No. 11,727/08, Normative Instruction No.
1,037/2010 and of any related Brazilian tax laws or regulations concerning Low or Nil Tax Jurisdictions and privileged tax regimes.
Distributions of Interest on Capital
A Brazilian corporation may make payments
to its shareholders characterized as interest on the corporation’s capital as an alternative form of making dividend distributions.
See “Item 8. Financial Information—A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information—Dividend Policy.”
The rate of interest may not be higher than the TJLP, as determined by the Central Bank from time to time. The total amount distributed
as interest on capital may not exceed, for tax purposes, the greater of:
|
·
|
50% of net income for the year in respect of which the payment is made, after the deduction of social contribution or net profits
and before (1) making any deduction for corporate income taxes paid and (2) taking such distribution into account; or
|
|
·
|
50% of retained earnings for the year prior to the year in respect of which the payment is made.
|
Payments of interest on capital are decided
by the shareholders on the basis of recommendations by our Board of Directors.
Distributions of interest on capital paid
to Brazilian and non-Brazilian holders of common shares, including payments to the depositary in respect of common shares underlying
ADSs, are deductible by us for Brazilian tax purposes up to the limit mentioned above. Such payments are subject to Brazilian income
tax withholding at the rate of 15%, except for payments to beneficiaries who are exempt from tax in Brazil, which are free of Brazilian
tax, and except for payments to beneficiaries domiciled in Low or Nil Tax Jurisdictions, whose payments are subject to withholding
at a 25% rate.
No assurance can be given that our Board
of Directors will not recommend that future distributions of profits be made as interest on capital instead of as dividends.
Other Brazilian Taxes
There are no Brazilian inheritance, gift
or succession taxes applicable to the ownership, transfer or disposition of the common shares or ADSs by a non-Brazilian holder
except for gift and inheritance taxes levied by some states in Brazil on gifts made or inheritances bestowed by individuals or
entities not resident or domiciled in Brazil or in
the relevant state to individuals or entities that are resident or domiciled
within such state in Brazil. There is no Brazilian stamp, issue, registration or similar taxes or duties payable by holders of
common shares or ADSs.
Tax on Foreign Exchange and Financial
Transactions
Tax on foreign exchange transactions, or
the “IOF/Exchange Tax”
Brazilian law imposes the IOF/Exchange
Tax on the conversion of
reais
into foreign currency and on the conversion of foreign currency into
reais
. The Brazilian
government increased the tax rate related to foreign investments in the Brazilian financial and capital markets to 6.0%, except
for investments made pursuant to Resolution CMN 2,689, which are exempted according to Decree No. 7,457/2011, which modified the
IOF/Exchange Tax rate from 2.0% to zero.
The outflow of funds from Brazil related
to investments carried out pursuant to Resolution CMN 2,689, including for dividend payments and return of capital, remains subject
to the 0% rate. In any case, the Brazilian Government is permitted to increase the rate at any time up to 25%. However, any increase
in rates may only apply to future foreign exchange transactions.
Tax on transactions involving bonds and
securities, or the “IOF/Bonds Tax”
Brazilian law imposes the IOF/Bonds Tax
on transactions involving bonds and securities, including those carried out on a Brazilian stock exchange. The rate of IOF/Bonds
Tax applicable to transactions involving the deposit of common shares in exchange for ADSs is currently 1.5%. The rate is applied
to the product of the number of common shares received and the closing price for those shares on the date prior to the transfer,
or if such closing price is not available, the last available closing price for such shares.
U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations
The following are the material U.S. federal
income tax consequences to a U.S. Holder described below of owning and disposing of common shares or ADSs, but it does not purport
to be a comprehensive description of all tax considerations that may be relevant to a particular person’s decision to hold
or dispose of such securities. The discussion applies only to a U.S. Holder that holds common shares or ADSs as capital assets
for U.S. federal income tax purposes and it does not describe all tax consequences that may be relevant to U.S. Holders subject
to special rules, such as:
|
·
|
certain financial institutions;
|
|
·
|
dealers or traders in securities or foreign currencies who use a mark-to-market method of tax accounting;
|
|
·
|
persons holding common shares or ADSs as part of a hedge, “straddle,” wash sale, conversion transaction, integrated
transaction or similar transaction or persons entering into a constructive sale with respect to the common shares or ADSs;
|
|
·
|
persons whose functional currency for U.S. federal income tax purposes is not the U.S. dollar;
|
|
·
|
partnerships or other entities classified as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes;
|
|
·
|
persons liable for the alternative minimum tax or the provisions of the Code known as the Medicare Contribution Tax;
|
|
·
|
tax-exempt entities, including “individual retirement accounts” or “Roth IRAs”;
|
|
·
|
persons who acquired our common shares or ADSs pursuant to the exercise of an employee stock option or otherwise as compensation;
|
|
·
|
persons holding shares in connection with a trade or business conducted outside of the United States; or
|
|
·
|
persons holding common shares or ADSs that own or are deemed to own ten percent or more of our voting stock.
|
If an entity that is classified as a partnership
for U.S. federal income tax purposes holds common shares or ADSs, the U.S. federal income tax treatment of a partner will generally
depend on the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. Partnerships holding common shares or ADSs and partners
in such partnerships should consult their tax advisers as to the particular U.S. federal income tax consequences of holding and
disposing of the common shares or ADSs.
This discussion is based on the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the “Code,” administrative pronouncements, judicial decisions and final, temporary
and proposed Treasury regulations, all as of the date hereof. These laws are subject to change, possibly with retroactive effect.
It is also based in part on representations by the depositary and assumes that each obligation under the deposit agreement and
any related agreement will be performed in accordance with its terms.
A “U.S. Holder” is a holder
who, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, is a beneficial owner of common shares or ADSs that is:
|
·
|
a citizen or individual resident of the United States;
|
|
·
|
a corporation, or other entity taxable as a corporation, created or organized in or under the laws of the United States, any
state therein or the District of Columbia; or
|
|
·
|
an estate or trust the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source.
|
In general, a U.S. Holder that owns ADSs
will be treated as the owner of the underlying common shares represented by those ADSs for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Accordingly,
no gain or loss will be recognized if a U.S. Holder exchanges ADSs for the underlying common shares represented by those ADSs.
The U.S. Treasury has expressed concerns
that parties to whom American depositary shares are released before delivery of shares to the depositary, or intermediaries in
the chain of ownership between U.S. holders and the issuer of the security underlying the American depositary shares, may be taking
actions that are inconsistent with the claiming of foreign tax credits by U.S. holders of American depositary shares. Such actions
would also be inconsistent with the claiming of the preferential rates of tax applicable to dividends received by certain non-corporate
U.S. Holders. Accordingly, the creditability of Brazilian taxes and the availability of the preferential tax rates for dividends
received by certain non-corporate U.S. Holders, each described below, could be affected by actions taken by such parties or intermediaries.
U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisers
concerning the U.S. federal, state, local and foreign tax consequences of owning and disposing of common shares or ADSs in their
particular circumstances.
This discussion assumes that the Company
is not, and will not become, a passive foreign investment company, as described below.
Taxation of Distributions
Distributions paid on common shares or
ADSs, including distributions of interest on capital, will generally be treated as dividends to the extent paid out of the Company’s
current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles). Because the Company does
not maintain calculations of its earnings and profits under U.S. federal income tax principles, it is expected that distributions
generally will be reported to U.S. Holders as dividends. Subject to applicable limitations and the discussion above regarding concerns
expressed by the U.S. Treasury, dividends paid by qualified foreign corporations to certain non-corporate U.S. Holders are taxable
at rates applicable to long-term capital gains. A foreign corporation is treated as a qualified foreign corporation with respect
to dividends paid on stock that is readily tradable on a securities market in the United States, such as the New York Stock Exchange
where our ADSs are traded. U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisers to determine whether these preferential rates will apply
to dividends they receive and whether they are subject to any special rules that limit their ability to be taxed at these preferential
rates.
The amount of a dividend will include any
amounts withheld by the Company in respect of Brazilian taxes on the distribution. The amount of the dividend will be treated as
foreign-source dividend income to U.S. Holders and will not be eligible for the dividends-received deduction generally allowed
to U.S. corporations under the Code. Dividends will be included in a U.S. Holder’s income on the date of the U.S. Holder’s
or, in the case of ADSs, the depositary’s receipt of the dividend. The amount of any dividend income paid in
reais
will be the U.S. dollar amount calculated by reference to the exchange rate in effect on the date of such receipt regardless of
whether the payment is in fact converted into U.S. dollars. If the dividend is converted into U.S. dollars on the date of receipt,
a U.S. Holder generally should not be required to recognize foreign currency gain or loss in respect of the dividend income. A
U.S. Holder may have foreign currency gain or loss if the dividend is converted into U.S. dollars after the date of its receipt.
Sale or Other Disposition of Common Shares
or ADSs
For U.S. federal income tax purposes, gain
or loss realized on the sale or other disposition of common shares or ADSs will be capital gain or loss, and will be long-term
capital gain or loss if the U.S. Holder held the common shares or ADSs for more than one year. The amount of the gain or loss will
equal the difference between the U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the common shares or ADSs disposed of and the amount realized
on the disposition, in each case as determined in U.S. dollars. Such gain or loss will generally be U.S.-source gain or loss for
foreign tax credit purposes. If a Brazilian tax is withheld on the sale or other disposition of common shares or ADSs, a U.S. Holder’s
amount realized will include the gross amount of the proceeds of such sale or other disposition before deduction of the Brazilian
tax.
See “—Brazilian Tax Considerations—Taxation
of Gains” for a description of when a disposition may be subject to taxation by Brazil.
Foreign Tax Credits in Respect of Brazilian
Taxes
Subject to applicable limitations that
may vary depending upon a U.S. Holder’s circumstances and subject to the discussion above regarding concerns expressed by
the U.S. Treasury, Brazilian income taxes withheld from dividends on common shares or ADSs generally will be creditable against
a U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability.
A U.S. Holder will be entitled to use foreign
tax credits to offset only the portion of its U.S. tax liability that is attributable to foreign-source income. This limitation
on foreign taxes eligible for credit is calculated separately with regard to specific classes of income. Because a U.S. Holder’s
gains from the sale or exchange of common shares or ADSs will generally be treated as U.S.-source income, this limitation may preclude
a U.S. Holder from claiming a credit for all or a portion of the Brazilian taxes imposed on any such gains. U.S. Holders should
consult their tax advisers as to whether these Brazilian taxes may be creditable against the U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income
tax liability on foreign-source income from other sources. Instead of claiming a credit, a U.S. Holder may elect to deduct such
Brazilian taxes in computing its taxable income, subject to generally applicable limitations under U.S. law. An election to deduct
foreign taxes instead of claiming foreign tax credits must apply to all taxes paid or accrued in the taxable year to foreign countries
and possessions of the United States.
The Brazilian IOF/Bonds Tax and any IOF/Exchange
Tax imposed on the deposit of common shares in exchange for ADSs and the cancellation of ADSs in exchange for common shares (as
discussed above under “—Brazilian Tax Considerations”) will not be treated as creditable foreign taxes for U.S.
federal income tax purposes. U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisers regarding the tax treatment of these taxes for U.S.
federal income tax purposes.
The rules governing foreign tax credits
are complex and, therefore, U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisers regarding the availability of foreign tax credits in
their particular circumstances.
Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules
The Company believes that it was not a
“passive foreign investment company,” or PFIC, for U.S. federal income tax purposes for its 2015 taxable year. However,
since PFIC status depends upon the composition of a company’s income and assets and the market value of its assets from time
to time, there can be no assurance that the Company will not be a PFIC for any taxable year.
If the Company were a PFIC for any taxable
year during which a U.S. Holder held common shares or ADSs, gain recognized by such U.S. Holder on a sale or other disposition
(including certain pledges) of the common shares or ADSs would be allocated ratably over the U.S. Holder’s holding period
for the common shares or ADSs. The amounts allocated to the taxable year of the sale or other disposition and to any year before
the Company became a PFIC would be taxed as ordinary income. The amount allocated to each other taxable year would be subject to
tax at the highest rate in effect for individuals or corporations, as appropriate, for such taxable year, and an interest charge
would be imposed on the resulting tax liability for such taxable year. Similar rules would apply to any distribution received by
a U.S. Holder on its common shares or ADSs to the extent in excess of 125% of the average of the annual distributions on common
shares or ADSs received by a U.S. Holder during the preceding three years or such U.S. Holder’s holding period, whichever
is shorter. Certain elections (such as a mark-to-market election) may be available that would result in alternative treatment under
the PFIC rules. U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisers to determine whether the Company is a PFIC for any given taxable
year and the tax consequences to them of holding shares in a PFIC.
If the Company is a PFIC for any taxable
year during which a U.S. Holder owned common shares or ADSs, the U.S. Holder will generally be required to file IRS Form 8621 with
its annual U.S. federal income tax returns, subject to certain exceptions.
Information Reporting and Backup Withholding
Payments of dividends and sales proceeds
that are made within the United States or through certain U.S.-related financial intermediaries generally are subject to information
reporting and may be subject to backup withholding unless (1) the U.S. Holder is a corporation or other exempt recipient or (2)
in the case of backup withholding, the U.S. Holder provides a correct taxpayer identification number and certifies that it is not
subject to backup withholding.
The amount of any backup withholding from
a payment to a U.S. Holder will be allowed as a credit against the U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability and may
entitle the U.S. Holder to a refund, provided that the required information is timely furnished to the IRS.
Certain U.S. Holders who are individuals
(and certain specified entities) may be required to report information relating to their ownership of an interest in certain foreign
financial assets, including stock of a non-U.S. person, subject to exceptions (including an exception for stock held through a
U.S. financial institution). U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisers regarding their reporting obligations with respect
to our common shares or ADSs.
U.S. HOLDERS OF OUR COMMON SHARES OR ADSs
SHOULD CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISERS AS TO THE BRAZILIAN, U.S. FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL AND OTHER TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE OWNERSHIP
AND DISPOSITION OF OUR COMMON SHARES OR ADSs BASED UPON THEIR PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES.
|
F.
|
Dividends and Paying Agents
|
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Statements contained in this annual report
as to the contents of any contract or other document referred to are not necessarily complete, and each of these statements is
qualified in all respects by reference to the full text of such contract or other document filed as an exhibit hereto. Anyone may
read and copy this report, including the exhibits hereto, at the Securities and Exchange Commission’s public reference room
in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the public reference room is available by calling 1-800-SEC-0330.
We are subject to the information and periodic
reporting requirements of the Exchange Act and, in accordance therewith, will file periodic reports and other information with
the SEC. These periodic reports and other information will be available for inspection and copying at the regional offices, public
reference facilities of the SEC
referred to above. As a foreign private issuer, we are exempt from certain provisions of the Exchange
Act prescribing the furnishing and content of proxy statements and periodic reports and from Section 16 of the Exchange Act relating
to short swing profits reporting and liability.
We will furnish to J.P. Morgan, as depositary,
copies of all reports we are required to file with the SEC under the Exchange Act, including our annual reports in English, containing
a brief description of our operations and our audited annual consolidated financial statements. In addition, we are required under
the Deposit Agreement to furnish the depositary with copies of English translations to the extent required under the rules of the
SEC of all notices of common shareholders’ meetings and other reports and communications that are generally made available
to holders of common shares. Under certain circumstances, the depositary will arrange for the mailing to all ADR holders, at our
expense, of these notices, reports and communications.
|
I.
|
Subsidiary Information
|
Not applicable.
|
Item 11.
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk
|
We are exposed to market risk from changes
in both foreign currency exchange and interest rates. We are exposed to foreign exchange rate risk mainly because certain costs
of ours are denominated in currencies (primarily U.S. dollars) other than those in which we earn revenues (primarily
reais
).
Similarly, we are subject to market risk deriving from changes in interest rates, which may affect the cost of our financing. Prior
to 1999, we did not use derivative instruments, such as foreign exchange forward contracts, foreign currency options, interest
rate swaps and forward rate agreements, to manage these market risks. In 1999 (April 1999 for TND), we began entering into hedging
agreements covering payments of principal on our foreign exchange denominated indebtedness. We also have entered into arrangements
to hedge market risk deriving from changes in interest rates for some of our debt obligations. We do not hold or issue derivative
or other financial instruments for trading purposes.
Interest Rate Risk
On December 31, 2015, the amount of our
outstanding debt which accrued interest at the CDI, TJLP, SELIC and IPCA floating interest rates totaled R$6,372 million. On the
same date, we had cash and cash equivalents, in the amount of R$6,700 million in instruments accruing interest at the CDI rate.
Over a one year period, before accounting
for tax expenses, a hypothetical, instantaneous and unfavorable change of 100 basis points in interest rates applicable to our
financial assets and liabilities on December 31, 2015 would have resulted in a variation of R$6 million in our interest expenses
from financial contracts and a variation of R$7 million in our income from financial investments (assuming that this hypothetical
100 basis point movement in interest rates uniformly applied to each “homogenous category” of our financial assets
and liabilities and that such movement in interest rates was sustained over the full one-year period).
Exchange Rate Risk
As of December 31, 2015, we did not have
any outstanding unhedged financial loans denominated in foreign currency and were thus not exposed to exchange rate risk based
on our loans.
We enter into hedging agreements to hedge our borrowings denominated in foreign currency and thus have limited
our exchange rate exposure regarding such borrowings.
Our revenues are earned almost entirely
in
real
, and we have no material foreign currency-denominated assets. We acquire our equipment and handsets from global
suppliers, the prices of which are primarily denominated in U.S. dollars. Thus, we are exposed to foreign exchange risk arising
from our need to make substantial dollar-denominated expenditures, particularly for imported components, equipment and handsets,
that we have limited capacity to hedge. In order to hedge part of the exchange rate risk linked to capital expenditures and operating
expenses, the Company has invested R$599 million in a U.S. dollar-denominated hard currency fund. Furthermore, depreciation of
the
real
against the U.S. dollar could create additional inflationary pressures in Brazil by increasing the price of imported
products which may result in the adoption of deflationary government policies.
|
Item 12.
|
Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities
|
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
|
D.
|
Description of American Depositary Receipts in Respect
of Common Shares
|
Our depositary is J.P. Morgan Chase Bank,
N.A., with its corporate trust office at which the ADRs will be administered is located at 1 Chase Manhattan Plaza, Floor 58, New
York, NY, 10005-1401, United States.
Each ADS represents five common shares,
deposited with the custodian and registered in the name of the depositary.
Charges of Depositary
The depositary may charge U.S$5.00 per
100 ADSs (or portion thereof) from each person to whom ADRs are issued against deposits of common shares, including deposits in
respect of distributions of additional common shares, rights and other distributions, as well as from each person surrendering
ADRs for withdrawal.
In addition, the following fees and charges
will be incurred by ADR holders, any party depositing or withdrawing common shares or any party surrendering ADRs or to whom ADRs
are issued (including, without limitation, issuance pursuant to a stock dividend or stock split declared by TIM Participações
or an exchange of stock regarding the ADRs or deposited securities or a distribution of ADRs pursuant to the deposit agreement),
whichever is applicable:
Depositary
Actions:
|
Description
of Fees Incurred by ADR Holders per Payment:
|
Depositing or substituting the underlying shares
|
U.S.$5.00 per 100 ADSs (or portion thereof)
|
Receiving or distributing dividends
|
U.S.$0.02 or less per ADS (or portion thereof)
|
Selling or exercising rights
|
U.S.$5.00 per 100 ADSs for all distributions of securities or the net cash proceeds from the sale thereof
|
Withdrawal of an underlying security
|
U.S.$5.00 per 100 ADSs or portion thereof plus a U.S.$20.00 fee
|
Transferring, splitting, grouping receipts
|
U.S.$1.50 per ADR or ADSs for transfers
made, to the extent not prohibited by the rules of any stock exchange or interdealer quotation system upon which the ADSs are traded
As necessary, transfer or registration
fees, if any, in connection with the deposit or withdrawal of deposited securities
|
General depositary services
|
As necessary, expenses incurred
by the depositary in connection with the conversion of
reais
into U.S. dollars
As necessary, cable, telex
and facsimile transmission and delivery charges incurred at the request of persons depositing or delivering common shares, ADRs
or any
|
Depositary
Actions:
|
Description
of Fees Incurred by ADR Holders per Payment:
|
|
deposited securities
As necessary, any fees and expenses incurred by the depositary in connection with the delivery of deposited
securities or otherwise in connection with the depositary’s or its custodian’s compliance with applicable laws, rules
or regulations.
|
Ongoing Reimbursements by the Depositary
J.P. Morgan, as depositary, has agreed
to reimburse certain reasonable Company’s expenses related to the establishment and maintenance of the ADR program. Such
reimbursable expenses include legal fees, investor relations servicing, investor related presentations, broker reimbursements,
ADR- related advertising and public relations in those jurisdictions in which the ADRs may be listed or otherwise quoted for trading,
accountants’ fees in relation to this Form 20-F filings with the SEC and other bona fide Program-related third party expenses.
During the year ended December 31, 2015,
we received from our depositary U.S.$2,813,831.84 as reimbursement of expenses related to annual stock exchange listing fees, standard
maintenance costs of ADRs, underwriting and legal fees and investor relations activities.
See also “Item 10. Additional Information—E.
Taxation.”
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December
31, 2015
(In thousands
of
Reais,
unless otherwise indicated)
TIM Participações S.A.
(“TIM Participações”, “Company” or the “Group”) is a publicly-held
corporation based in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro State and is a subsidiary of TIM Brasil Serviços e
Participações S.A. (“TIM Brasil”). TIM Brasil is a subsidiary of the Telecom Italia Group and holds
66.58% of the capital of TIM Participações as at December 31, 2015, (66.58% in 2014). The Company’s and
its subsidiaries, (“Group”) main purpose is to control companies providing telecommunications services, including
personal mobile telecom services and others, in their licensed areas. The services provided by TIM
Participações’ subsidiaries are regulated by the Agência Nacional de Telecomunicações
(“
Anatel
”).
The Company’s shares are traded
on the Brazilian stock exchange - BM&FBovespa. Additionally, TIM Participações trades its Level II
American Depositary Receipts (ADRs) on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) – USA. Accordingly, the Company is subject to
the rules of the Brazilian Securities Commission (Comissão de Valores Mobiliários or “CVM”) and
the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).
Direct subsidiaries
|
(a)
|
TIM Celular S.A. (“TIM Celular”)
|
The Company holds 100% of TIM Celular’s
shares. This subsidiary provides Landline telephone services (“STFC”) - Domestic Long Distance and International Long
Distance voice services, Personal Mobile Service (“SMP”), and Multimedia Communication Service (“SCM”)
in all Brazilian states and in the Federal District.
|
(b)
|
Intelig Telecomunicações Ltda. (“Intelig”)
|
The Company also holds 100% of Intelig’s
shares. This subsidiary provides STFC – Local voices services and SCM services in all Brazilian states and in the Federal District
(DF).
|
(b)
|
Material Transactions – Sale of Towers
|
In November 2014 and January 2015 TIM
Celular entered into two Sales Agreements with American Tower do Brasil Cessão de Infraestruturas Ltda.
(“ATC”). One of them related to the sale for up to 6,481 telecommunications towers, for approximately R$3
billion, and the other related to a Master Lease Agreement (“MLA”) for part of the space on these towers for
a period of 20 years from the date of transfer of each tower, under a sale and leaseback transaction, with provision for
the monthly rental amounts depending on the type of
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless otherwise
indicated)
tower (greenfield or rooftop). The sales
agreements provide for the towers to be transferred in tranches to the purchaser, due to the need to meet certain precedent conditions.
This transaction will benefit the Company’s
operating and financial capacity and allow it to expand its investments and improve quality.
Up to December 31, 2015, a total of
three transfers were made, on April 29, September 30 and December 16, 2015, which transferred 5,483 towers to ATC (84.6%
of the total owned by TIM). Cash proceeds received for those transactions totaled R$2,498,421.
The gain on the portion of the assets
effectively sold, amounting to R$1,210,980, was recognized in income for the year, net of transaction costs, while the gain
on the portion of the towers subject to sale and leaseback, amounting to R$1,002,393 (net of transaction costs), was deferred
over the lease term (20 year) as per the Master Lease Agreement.
The discount rate used in the transaction
was determined based on observable market transactions that the lessee would have to pay in a similar lease or borrowing arrangement.
The amounts of the discount rate applied in each tranche are described in Note 15.
The effects on the accounts are shown below:
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
Number of towers sold
|
|
|
5,483
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales amount
|
|
|
2,498,421
|
|
Asset residual value and transaction costs
|
|
|
(487,795
|
)
|
Gain on the transaction
|
|
|
2,010,626
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of the sale on income:
|
|
|
|
|
Income from disposal of assets
|
|
|
1,253,618
|
|
Asset residual value
|
|
|
(247,572
|
)
|
Write-off of provision for decommissioning costs
|
|
|
204,934
|
|
Effect on pre-tax income (under “other operating income (expenses), net”)
|
|
|
1,210,980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income and social contribution taxes (IR and CS)
|
|
|
(372,140
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net effect on income for the year
|
|
|
838,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenues
|
|
|
1,002,393
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment leased back
|
|
|
1,244,803
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance lease obligation (“leaseback”)
|
|
|
1,244,803
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect on net debt (*)
|
|
|
1,253,618
|
|
(*) Represents the total amount of the sale
less the finance lease obligation.
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES
S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December
31, 2015 and 2014
(In thousands
of
Reais,
unless otherwise indicated)
|
2.
|
Basis for preparation and disclosure of the financial
statements
|
The financial statements have been prepared
in accordance to the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) issued by the International Accounting Standards Board
(IASB), and disclose all (and only) the applicable significant information related to the financial statements, which is consistent
with the information utilized by management in the performance of its duties.
The significant accounting policies applied
to the preparation of the financial statements are described below. These policies were consistently applied in the years presented,
unless otherwise indicated.
|
(a)
|
General preparation and disclosure criteria
|
The financial statements were prepared
taking into account the historical cost as the base value and financial assets and liabilities (including derivative
financial instruments) measured at fair value.
Assets and liabilities are reported
according to their degree of liquidity and collectability. They are reported as current when they are likely to be realized
or settled over the next 12 months. Otherwise, they are recorded as non-current. The only exception to this procedure
involves deferred income tax and social contribution balances, which are classified as non-current assets and liabilities.
|
(b)
|
Functional
currency and presentation currency
|
The
presentation currency for the financial statements is the Brazilian
Real
(R$), which is also the functional currency
for all the companies consolidated in these financial statements.
Transactions
in foreign currency are recognized at the exchange rate on the date of the transaction. Except for assets and liabilities recorded
at fair value, monetary items in foreign currency are converted into Brazilian
Reais
at the exchange rate on the date of
the balance sheet as informed by the Central Bank of Brazil. Exchange gains and losses linked to these accounts are recorded in
the statement of income.
Operating
segments are the entity’s components that develop business activities from which revenues can be obtained and expenses incurred.
Their operating results are regularly reviewed by the entity’s chief operating decision maker, in order to make decisions
on the allocation of resources and to assess the performance of each segment. For a segment to exist, it must have separate financial
information available.
The Company’s chief operating decision
maker, responsible for allocating resources and for periodic performance evaluation, is the Executive Board. The Executive Board
and the Board of Directors are jointly responsible for making strategic decisions and for managing the Group.
The Group’s strategy is to optimize
the consolidated results of TIM Participações. This strategy includes optimizing the operations of each group company,
in addition to taking advantage of the synergies generated among them. Notwithstanding the various business activities, the decision
makers see the Group as a single business segment and do not take into account specific strategies intended for a particular service
line. All decisions on strategic, financial, purchasing, investment and fund investment planning are made on a consolidated basis
.
The aim is to maximize the consolidated result obtained by exploring the SMP, STFC and SCM licenses.
|
(d)
|
Consolidation procedures
|
Subsidiaries are all entities in which the
Group holds the control. The Group controls an entity when it is liable or has rights to variable returns from its involvement
with the subsidiaries and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the investee. Subsidiaries are fully consolidated
from the date on which control is transferred to the Group. The consolidation is discontinued from the date that the Group loses
the control over that entity.
The purchase accounting method is used for
recording the acquisition of subsidiaries by the Group. The acquisition cost is measured as the fair value of assets acquired, equity
instruments (e.g. shares) issued and liabilities incurred or assumed by the acquirer at the date when control is exchanged. Identifiable
assets acquired, contingencies and liabilities assumed in a business combination are initially measured at their fair value at
the acquisition date, irrespective of the proportion of any
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless otherwise
indicated)
minority interest. The excess of the acquisition
cost over the fair value of the Group’s share of the identifiable net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. If the cost
of acquisition is less than the fair value of net assets of the subsidiary acquired, the difference is recognized directly in the
statement of income as other income, after a review of the concepts and calculations applied.
Transactions between Group companies, as
well as balances and unrealized gains and losses in these transactions, are eliminated. Accounting policies of subsidiaries have
been adjusted to ensure consistency with the accounting policies adopted by TIM Participações. The base date of the
financial statements used in the consolidation is the same for all Group companies.
During
2015, the Company reviewed its deferred income tax balances to adopt a net presentation when appropriate. The 2014 “Deferred
income tax and social contribution” in non-current assets and non-current liabilities decreased by R$ 351,967 as the
Company has the legally enforceable right to offset these balances by tax paying entity. Although the adjustment was a
correction, management believes that it is immaterial for purpose of the fair presentation of prior periods.
|
(f)
|
Approval of the financial
statements
|
These
financial statements were approved by the Company’s Board of Directors on April 14
,
2016.
|
(g)
|
New
standards, changes and interpretations of standards not yet in force
|
The
following new standards were issued by the IASB, but they are not in force for the year 2015. The early adoption of these standards,
although encouraged by IASB, has not been implemented by management.
IFRS
9
|
“Financial
Instruments” deals with the classification, measurement and recognition of financial assets and liabilities. IFRS 9 was
issued in November 2009 and October 2010 and replaces the parts of IAS 39 relating to the classification and measurement of financial
instruments. IFRS 9 requires the classification of financial assets in two categories: measured at fair value and measured at
amortized cost. The determination is made at the initial recognition. The classification basis depends on the entity’s business
model and on the contractual characteristics of the financial instruments’ cash flow. Regarding financial liabilities, the
standard maintains the majority of the requirements set forth in IAS 39. The main change is that, in cases where the fair value
option is adopted for financial liabilities, the portion of the change in fair value which is due to the entity’s own credit
risk is recorded in other comprehensive income, not in the income statement, except when this would result in an accounting mismatch.
The Group is assessing the overall impact of IFRS 9. The standard comes into force on January 1, 2018.
|
IFRS
15
|
This
new standard determines the concepts that an entity has to apply in revenue measurement and when it must be recognized. It was
initially issued to come into effect on January 1, 2017 and replace IAS 11 – “Construction Contracts”, IAS 18
– “Revenues” and related interpretations. The standard comes into effect on January 1, 2018. The Group is assessing
the overall impact of IFRS 15.
|
IFRS16
|
This
standard supersedes the existing standard on leasing, IAS 17 – Leases, and related interpretations, and establishes the
principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure on leasing for both parties to a contract, in other words,
clients (lessee) and suppliers (lessor). Lessees are required to recognize a leasing liability reflecting future payments of the
leasing and a “right to use an asset” for almost all leases contracts, excepting some short-term leases and contracts
of assets of a small amount. For lessors the accounting treatment remains almost unchanged, with the classification of leases
in operational or financial leases, and the accounting of these two kinds of lease contracts in different manners. The standard
comes into effect on January 1, 2019. The Group is assessing the impacts on its adoption and has still not defined the transition
method that will be used.
|
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015 and 2014
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless otherwise
indicated)
|
There are no other present IFRS
standards or IFRIC interpretations not yet in force that could have a significant impact on the financial statements of the
Group.
|
3.
|
Critical judgment in the application of the Company’s
accounting policies
|
Accounting estimates and judgments are
continuously reassessed. They are based on the Company´s historical experience and other factors, such as expectations
of future events, considering the circumstances presented as at the base date of the financial statements.
By definition, the accounting estimates
resulting from such assumptions rarely equal the actual outcome. The estimates and assumptions that present significant risk with
probability to cause relevant adjustments in the book values of assets and liabilities for the next fiscal years, are shown below:
|
(a)
|
Loss on impairment of non-financial assets
|
Losses from impairment take place when
the book value of an asset or cash generating unit exceeds the respective recoverable value, which is considered as the fair
value less costs to sell, or the value in use, whichever is greater. The calculation of the fair value less costs to sell is
based on the information available from sale transactions involving similar assets or market prices less the additional costs
incurred to dispose of those assets. The value in use is based on the discounted cash flow model. Cash flows derive from the
Company’s business plan. Since this is an ongoing business, as from the fifth projection year an estimated perpetuity
of nominal growth of cash flows was used.
Any reorganization activities to which the
Company has not committed itself on the financial statements disclosure date on which the financial statements are reported or
any material future investments aimed at improving the asset base of the cash generating unit being tested are excluded for the
purposes of the impairment test.
The recoverable value is sensitive to the
discount rates used in the discounted cash flow method, as well as with expected future cash receivables and the growth rate of
revenue and expenses used for extrapolation purposes. Adverse economic conditions may lead to significant changes in these assumptions.
At December 31, 2015 and 2014, the principal
non-financial asset valued in this manner was goodwill (Note 14).
|
(b)
|
Income tax and social contribution (current and
deferred)
|
Income
tax and social contribution (current and deferred) are calculated in accordance with interpretations of the legislation currently
in force. This process normally includes complex estimates in order to define the taxable income and differences. In particular,
deferred tax assets on income tax and social contribution losses and temporary differences are recognized to the extent that it
is probable that future taxable income will be available and can be offset. The recoverability of the deferred income tax
and social contribution losses and temporary differences takes into account estimates of taxable income (Note 10).
|
(c)
|
Provision for legal and administrative proceedings
|
Legal and administrative
proceedings are analyzed by the Company’s management assisted by internal and external legal advisors. The
Company’s reviews take into account factors such as the hierarchy of laws, case law available, recent court decisions
and their relevance in the legal order. Such reviews involve Management’s judgment (Note 22).
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
|
(d)
|
Fair value of derivatives and other financial instruments
|
Financial instruments presented at fair
value in the balance sheet are measured using evaluation techniques that consider observable data or observable data derived from
the market (Note 39).
As some billing cut-off dates
occur at intermediate dates within the months, at the end of each month there are revenues already earned by the Company but not
effectively billed to the customers. These unbilled revenues are recorded based on estimates which take into account historical
data of usage, number of days since the last billing date, among other factors (Note 6).
A sale and leaseback transaction is one where
the group sells an asset and immediately reacquires the use of the asset by entering into a lease with the buyer. The accounting
treatment of the sale and leaseback depends upon the substance of the transaction (by applying the lease classification principles).
For sale and finance leasebacks, any profit
from the sale is deferred and amortized over the lease term. For sale and operating leasebacks, generally the assets are sold at
fair value, and accordingly the profit or loss from the sale is recognized immediately in the group profit and loss account.
At the commencement of the lease term, the group recognizes finance leases as assets and liabilities in
its balance sheet at amounts equal to the fair value of the leased property or, if lower, the present value of the minimum lease
payments, each determined at the inception of the lease.
The
discount rate used in a sale and finance leasebacks transaction is determined based on observable market transactions that the
lessee would have to pay in a similar lease or borrowing arrangement. As mentioned in the note 1.b, the discount rates applied
by Company´s management in the transactions entered throughout the year were determinant for the computation of the gain
portion accounted through profit & loss as well as the gain portion deferred and amortized over the lease term.
|
4.
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
These are financial assets classified as
borrowings and receivables, being accounted at the amortized cost through the effective interest rate method. The Company’s
Management determines the classification of its financial assets upon their initial recognition.
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
113,244
|
|
|
|
134,719
|
|
Short term bank deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CDB/Repurchase agreements
|
|
|
5,987,159
|
|
|
|
5,098,273
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,100,403
|
|
|
|
5,232,992
|
|
Bank Deposit
Certificates (“CDB”) and Repurchases agreements are nominative securities issued by banks and sold to the public
as a means of raising funds. Such securities can be traded during the contracted period, at any time, without any significant
loss of value and are used to pay short-term obligations of the Company.
At December 31, 2015, the
annual average return of the Company’s CBDs and Repurchase agreements, including those not classified
as cash and cash equivalents, is 101.30% of the Interbank Deposit Certificate - CDI rate.
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
CDB/Repurchase agreements/DI Fund
|
|
-
|
|
41,149
|
Foreign exchange fund
|
|
|
599,414
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
599,414
|
|
|
|
41,149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion
|
|
|
599,414
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Non-current portion
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
41,149
|
|
At December 31, 2014, the total investments
classified as non-current were restricted for use by virtue of legal actions.
Quotas in a non-exclusive foreign exchange
fund were purchased during 2015. This foreign exchange
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015 and 2014
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
fund has daily liquidity, is indexed
to the US Dollar and is basically formed by highly liquid public securities. The investment is intended to reduce foreign
exchange risk on repayments to suppliers in foreign currency.
During 2015, some of the foreign exchange
fund quotas were designated as cash-flow hedge. The impact of this transaction resulted in operational cost reductions of R$11,523.
As at December 31, 2015, there were no foreign exchange fund quotas designated as a Hedge Accounting transaction.
|
6.
|
Trade accounts receivable
|
These are financial assets classified
as borrowings and receivables. They refer to accounts receivable from users of telecommunications services, from network
use (interconnection) and from sales of handsets and accessories. Accounts receivable are recorded at the price charged at
the time of the transaction. The balances of accounts receivable also include services provided and not billed through the
balance sheet d
ate.
Accounts receivable from clients
are initially recognized at fair value and are subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest rate
method less the allowance for doubtful accounts (“impairment”)
.
Losses
on doubtful accounts were recognized as a reduction at accounts receivable based on the profile of the subscriber portfolio, the
overdue aging of accounts receivable, the economy in general, the risks involved in each case and the collection curve, at an
amount deemed sufficient.
The fair value of accounts receivable equals
the book value recorded at December 31, 2015 and 2014. A portion of the accounts receivable, relating to the post-paid business,
is used to secure the total amount of BNDES borrowings (Note 18).
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
Billed services
|
|
|
995,879
|
|
|
|
1,021,573
|
|
Unbilled services
|
|
|
667,886
|
|
|
|
642,950
|
|
Network use
|
|
|
448,064
|
|
|
|
492,748
|
|
Sale of goods
|
|
|
1,120,449
|
|
|
|
1,780,685
|
|
Other accounts receivable
|
|
|
2,053
|
|
|
|
2,924
|
|
|
|
|
3,234,331
|
|
|
|
3,940,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(351,381
|
)
|
|
|
(373,577
|
)
|
|
|
|
2,882,950
|
|
|
|
3,567,303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion
|
|
|
(2,858,089
|
)
|
|
|
(3,537,417
|
)
|
Non-current portion
|
|
|
24,861
|
|
|
|
29,886
|
|
Changes in allowances for doubtful accounts, were as follows:
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opening balance
|
|
|
373,577
|
|
|
|
353,925
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
230,357
|
|
|
|
248,576
|
|
Write-off
|
|
|
(252,553
|
)
|
|
|
(228,924
|
)
|
Closing balance
|
|
|
351,381
|
|
|
|
373,577
|
|
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
The aging of the accounts receivable is as follows:
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yet to fall due
|
|
|
2,153,088
|
|
|
|
2,887,221
|
|
Past due for up to 30 days
|
|
|
189,186
|
|
|
|
161,726
|
|
Past due for up to 60 days
|
|
|
57,822
|
|
|
|
59,178
|
|
Past due for up to 90 days
|
|
|
406,850
|
|
|
|
385,012
|
|
Past due for more than 90 days
|
|
|
427,385
|
|
|
|
447,743
|
|
|
|
|
3,234,331
|
|
|
|
3,940,880
|
|
Inventories are stated at average acquisition
cost. A loss is recognized to adjust the cost of handsets and accessories to net realizable value (selling price) when this amount
is less than the average acquisition cost.
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile handsets and tablets
|
|
|
123,664
|
|
|
|
237,164
|
|
Accessories and pre-paid cards
|
|
|
19,762
|
|
|
|
22,868
|
|
TIM chips
|
|
|
12,170
|
|
|
|
20,943
|
|
|
|
|
155,596
|
|
|
|
280,975
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses on adjustment to realizable amount
|
|
|
(13,876
|
)
|
|
|
(16,942
|
)
|
|
|
|
141,720
|
|
|
|
264,033
|
|
|
8.
|
Indirect taxes and contributions recoverable
|
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
ICMS
|
|
|
1,708,059
|
|
|
|
1,850,569
|
|
Others
|
|
|
32,210
|
|
|
|
9,064
|
|
|
|
|
1,740,269
|
|
|
|
1,859,633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion
|
|
|
(922,593
|
)
|
|
|
(1,285,143
|
)
|
Non-current portion
|
|
|
817,676
|
|
|
|
574,490
|
|
The
Imposto sobre Circulação de Mercadorias
e Serviços -
ICMS recoverable basically refers to credits on the acquisition of property, plant and equipment directly related
to the provision of telecommunication services (credits divided into 48 months), as well as to ICMS tax substitution amounts from
goods acquired for resale, mainly mobile handsets, chips, tablets and modems sold by TIM Celular.
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015 and 2014
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
|
9.
|
Direct taxes and contributions recoverable
|
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax and social contribution
|
|
|
40,042
|
|
|
|
28,385
|
|
PIS/COFINS
|
|
|
228,383
|
|
|
|
309,186
|
|
Others
|
|
|
81,113
|
|
|
|
43,257
|
|
|
|
|
349,538
|
|
|
|
380,828
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion
|
|
|
(324,780
|
)
|
|
|
(357,482
|
)
|
Non-current portion
|
|
|
24,758
|
|
|
|
23,346
|
|
The
Programa
de Integração Social/Contribuição para o Financiamento da Seguridade Social -
PIS/COFINS recoverable refer to: (i) to credits regarding the purchase of inventories of goods for resale, basically
handsets, tablets and modems; (ii) to credits arising from a final and unappealable judgment on the unconstitutionality of
the broadening of the calculation base for these contributions under Law 9718/98, and (iii) to credits calculated on rights
and services used as input, electricity and rentals.
|
10.
|
Deferred income tax and social contribution
|
Deferred income tax and social contribution
are recognized on (1) accumulated income tax and social contribution losses carryforward and on (2) temporary differences arising
from differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying values in the financial statements. Deferred
income tax is determined using enacted tax rates (and tax laws), or substantially enacted, up to the balance sheet date. Subsequent
changes in tax rates or tax legislation may modify deferred tax credit and debit balances.
Deferred income tax and social contribution
credits are recognized only in the event of a profitable track record and/or when the annual forecast prepared by the Company,
examined by the Fiscal Council and approved by Management, indicates the likelihood of future realization of those tax credits.
As mentioned in Note 2 (e), the
balances of deferred income tax and social contribution credits and debits are shown in the balance sheet at the net amount,
when there is both a legal right and the intention to offset them at the time when current taxes are ascertained, usually in
relation to the same legal entity and the same taxation authority. Thus deferred tax credits and debits belonging to
different entities are, in general, shown separately, not at their net amount.
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the prevailing
tax rates were 25% for income tax and 9% for social contribution. The tax incentives presented in Note 34 are also being considered
in deferred taxes.
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
The amounts recorded are as follows:
Asset (liability)
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
Deferred taxes – Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
Deemed cost - Intelig
|
|
|
(120,730
|
)
|
|
|
(129,206
|
)
|
|
|
|
(120,730
|
)
|
|
|
(129,206
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes – Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carryforward loss - Income Tax
|
|
|
1,034,243
|
|
|
|
1,184,366
|
|
Carryforward social contribution
|
|
|
385,946
|
|
|
|
440,095
|
|
Temporary differences
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
122,299
|
|
|
|
130,288
|
|
Provision for legal and administrative proceedings
|
|
|
141,246
|
|
|
|
138,151
|
|
Adjustment to present value – 3G license
|
|
|
14,950
|
|
|
|
16,892
|
|
Deferred tax on IFRS adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation related to asset retirement obligations
|
|
|
6,482
|
|
|
|
25,280
|
|
Monetary charges on asset retirement
obligations
|
|
|
4,363
|
|
|
|
14,107
|
|
Capitalized interest
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
|
1,020
|
|
Authorization charges
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
1,934
|
|
Acquisition of shares from minority shareholders
|
|
|
53,569
|
|
|
|
53,569
|
|
Business combination – Intelig acquisition
|
|
|
71,405
|
|
|
|
71,405
|
|
Lease of LT Amazonas Infrastructure
|
|
|
11,022
|
|
|
|
8,381
|
|
Effect of merger of TIM Fibers
|
|
|
770
|
|
|
|
940
|
|
Profit sharing
|
|
|
16,594
|
|
|
|
26,047
|
|
Taxes with suspended enforceability
|
|
|
12,872
|
|
|
|
12,872
|
|
Fistel – Recovery TFI
|
|
|
50,721
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Amortized goodwill – TIM Fiber
|
|
|
(264,639
|
)
|
|
|
(201,125
|
)
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
(336,621
|
)
|
|
|
(150,842
|
)
|
Capitalization interests on 4G authorization
|
|
|
(84,751
|
)
|
|
|
(4,310
|
)
|
Others
|
|
|
5,484
|
|
|
|
(3,764
|
)
|
|
|
|
1,246,841
|
|
|
|
1,765,306
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance (Intelig and TIM Participações)
|
|
|
(1,232,315
|
)
|
|
|
(1,228,209
|
)
|
|
|
|
14,526
|
|
|
|
537,097
|
|
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015 and 2014
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
TIM Celular
TIM Celular has recorded deferred
income tax and social contribution assets on its total tax losses, social contribution losses and temporary differences, based
on a profitability history and the projected future taxable earnings.
Based on these projections, the subsidiary
expects to recover the credits as follows:
|
Deferred income tax and social contribution
|
|
|
2016
|
120,692
|
2017
|
91,305
|
2018
|
105,951
|
2019 onwards
|
57,679
|
Carryforward loss
|
375,627
|
|
|
Temporary differences
|
(361,101)
|
|
|
Total credits recoverable
|
14,526
|
The estimates for recovery of tax assets
were calculated taking into account the financial and business assumptions available December 31, 2015.
TIM Celular used credits related
to tax losses carried forward and negative basis of social contribution of R$206,083 in 2015 (R$203,688
in 2014).
Losses on the realization of tax credits
As TIM
Participações S.A. does not carry out activities that generate income tax and social contribution taxable
income, a full valuation allowance on tax credits arising from income tax and social contribution tax losses and temporary
differences, totaling R$93,215 at December 31, 2015 (R$84,917 at December 31, 2014), was recognized.
As
Intelig has not presented a history of taxable income, and does not expect future taxable income, a
full valuation allowance against tax credits was recorded in the amount of R$1,139,100 as of December 31, 2015
(R$1,143,292 as of December 31, 2014), of which R$1,006,749 refers to tax losses and negative base of social contribution and
R$132,351 to temporary differences.
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES
S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertising not aired/released (*)
|
|
|
162,145
|
|
|
|
225,423
|
|
Rentals and insurance
|
|
|
46,936
|
|
|
|
46,434
|
|
Network swap (**)
|
|
|
37,674
|
|
|
|
46,417
|
|
Others
|
|
|
18,535
|
|
|
|
18,577
|
|
|
|
|
265,290
|
|
|
|
336,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion
|
|
|
(210,056
|
)
|
|
|
(266,264
|
)
|
Non-current portion
|
|
|
55,234
|
|
|
|
70,587
|
|
(*) Represents early payments of
expenses for the advertising of TIM brand’s products and services, which are recognized in income according to the
period of broadcasting.
(**) On April 1, 2010, Intelig and
GVT entered into a contract with reciprocal agreement of assignment of fiber optic infrastructure (exchange of telecom
capacity or network swap), in order to expand their respective areas at operation. Given the economic nature of the
transaction, the amount was recognized in the (current and non-current) prepaid expenses account against a corresponding
entry to deferred revenues (current and non-current). Both amounts are being appropriated to income statement in the same
proportion over a period of 10 years.
These are recorded at their historical cost and updated according
to the legislation in force:
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
Civil
|
|
361,689
|
|
392,270
|
Labor
|
|
420,112
|
|
347,673
|
Tax
|
|
268,825
|
|
245,966
|
Regulatory
|
|
109
|
|
108
|
Others (*)
|
|
55,306
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current portion
|
|
1,106,041
|
|
986,017
|
(*)
Refer to financial investments
related to judicial proceedings.
Civil
These are court deposits to allow
civil suit to proceed where the Company is challenging the amounts involved. Most of these proceedings refer to lawsuits
filed by customers, involving of consumers’ rights, among others.
There are some proceedings involving different
issues, challenging the amount fixed by ANATEL for releasing the V1 sub-bands, to allow the implementation of 4G technology, after
TIM Celular had won the auction. In this case, the court deposit amounts to R$53,559 (R$47,870 as of December 31
,
2014).
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015 and 2014
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
Labor
These are amounts deposited in court
related to guarantees of execution and the filing of appropriate appeals, the relevant matter or amounts involved are still
being discussed. The amount is distributed among the several claims filed by the Company’s employees and third-party
service providers.
Tax
The Company
and its subsidiaries have made court deposits for tax issues to back various current court proceedings. These deposits refer
mainly to the following matters:
(i)
2% increase in the ICMS rat
e for the Fund for the Eradication of Poverty (FECP) in the State of Bahia
on prepaid telephone services provided by the Company. The current value of these deposits is R$ 80,205
(R$73,654
as of December 31, 2014)
.
(ii)
Use of credit for the purchase of electricity used directly by the companies for production purposes. The court is tending to
give a favorable judgment. The current value of these deposits is R$ 64,968
(R$60,098
as of December 31, 2014)
.
(iii)
Liability for
Contribuição Provisória sobre Movimentações Financeiras
- CPMF on capitalization
of loans; recognition of the right not to pay contributions allegedly due on the mere change of ownership of current accounts
as a result of a takeover. The current value of these deposits is R$ 31,450
(R$29,513
as of December 31, 2014)
.
(iv)
Constitutionality of collection of the Operations Monitoring Charge (TFF) by a number of municipal authorities. The current value
of these deposits is R$ 11,450
(R$10,044 as of December 31, 2014)
.
(v)
Failure to approve set-off of federal debts against credits for Withholding Tax (IRRF) because it is alleged that the credits
are insufficient, as well as the deposit placed to ensure the issue of a Tax Clearance Certificate. The current value of these
deposits is R$ 9,340
(R$8,678 as of December 31, 2014)
.
(vi)
Liability for
Imposto Sobre Serviços
- ISS on import services and outsourced services; alleged failure to pay
for land clearance and radio base station maintenance service, for ISS on the Company’s services and for ISS on
Co-billing services and software licensing (Blackberry). Guarantee of the right to take advantage of the benefit of
volunteered information and seeking to reverse confiscatory fines for late payment. The current value of these deposits is R$
5,524
(R$4,883 as of December 31, 2014)
.
(vii)
Ancillary services provided for in ICMS Agreement 69/98. The current value of these deposits is R$ 5,479
(R$5,226
as of December 31, 2014)
.
(viii)
Volunteered report of tax debits and consequent cancellation of charge of fine for late payment. The current value of these deposits
is R$ 4,001
(R$3,792 as of December 31, 2014)
.
(ix)
Deposit made by Intelig – Unconstitutionality and illegality of charging by
Fundo de Universalização dos
Serviços de Telecomunicação
- FUST. Plea for the recognition of the right not to pay FUST, and not to
include in its calculation base revenues transferred for interconnections and
Exploração Industrial de Linha
Dedicada
- EILD; and of the right not to be charged retroactively for differences arising from failure to comply with ANATEL
ruling 7/2005. The current value of these deposits is R$ 43,323
(R$38,064 as of December
31, 2014)
.
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
|
13.
|
Property, Plant and Equipment
|
Property, plant and equipment are stated
at acquisition and/or construction cost, less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses, if applicable.
Depreciation is calculated on the straight-line method over terms that take into account the expected useful lives of the assets
and their residual values.
The estimated costs of dismantling towers
and equipment on rented properties are capitalized and depreciated over the estimated useful life of these assets. The Company
recognizes the present value of these costs in property, plant and equipment with a counter-entry to the liability “provision
for decommissioning costs”. Interest incurred on updating the provision is classified as finance expenses.
Gains and losses from disposals are determined
by comparing the amounts of these disposals with the carrying values at the time of the transaction and are recognized in “other
operating expenses (revenues), net” in the statement of income.
On January 1
, 2009, Intelig
on its first adoption of IFRS, used deemed cost to measure its property, plant and equipment assets. After this, its property,
plant and equipment is demonstrated by acquisition and / or construction historical cost. Both (deemed cost and historical cost)
are deductible from the accumulated depreciation and from the impairment losses, if applicable.
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015 and 2014
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
|
(a)
|
Change in property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
Balance
2014
|
|
Additions
|
|
Write-offs
|
|
Transfer
|
|
Balance
2015
|
Cost of property, plant and equipment, gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commutation / transmission equipment
|
|
|
15,352,349
|
|
|
|
12,230
|
|
|
|
(730,640
|
)
|
|
|
1,931,980
|
|
|
|
16,565,919
|
|
Fiber optic cables
|
|
|
517,647
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(720
|
)
|
|
|
66,520
|
|
|
|
583,447
|
|
Free leased handsets
|
|
|
1,800,938
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(20,853
|
)
|
|
|
171,994
|
|
|
|
1,952,079
|
|
Infrastructure
|
|
|
4,391,570
|
|
|
|
1,244,803
|
|
|
|
(1,187,529
|
)
|
|
|
575,339
|
|
|
|
5,024,183
|
|
IT assets
|
|
|
1,468,792
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(21,194
|
)
|
|
|
53,907
|
|
|
|
1,501,507
|
|
General use assets
|
|
|
613,588
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(7,204
|
)
|
|
|
50,702
|
|
|
|
657,086
|
|
Land
|
|
|
40,451
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
343
|
|
|
|
40,794
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
671,845
|
|
|
|
2,804,968
|
|
|
|
(24,394
|
)
|
|
|
(2,850,785
|
)
|
|
|
601,634
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and
equipment, gross
|
|
|
24,857,180
|
|
|
|
4,062,003
|
|
|
|
(1,992,534
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
26,926,649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commutation/transmission equipment
|
|
|
(10,140,317
|
)
|
|
|
(1,196,356
|
)
|
|
|
683,561
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(10,653,118
|
)
|
Fiber optic cables
|
|
|
(161,975
|
)
|
|
|
(38,218
|
)
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(200,123
|
)
|
Free leased handsets
|
|
|
(1,673,641
|
)
|
|
|
(118,291
|
)
|
|
|
7,992
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,783,940
|
)
|
Infrastructure
|
|
|
(2,327,097
|
)
|
|
|
(367,840
|
)
|
|
|
810,248
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(1,884,692
|
)
|
IT assets
|
|
|
(1,234,678
|
)
|
|
|
(83,354
|
)
|
|
|
21,188
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(1,296,837
|
)
|
General use assets
|
|
|
(404,543
|
)
|
|
|
(43,044
|
)
|
|
|
6,994
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(440,591
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(15,942,251
|
)
|
|
|
(1,847,103
|
)
|
|
|
1,530,053
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(16,259,301
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commutation / transmission equipment
|
|
|
5,212,032
|
|
|
|
(1,184,126
|
)
|
|
|
(47,079
|
)
|
|
|
1,931,974
|
|
|
|
5,912,801
|
|
Fiber optic cables
|
|
|
355,672
|
|
|
|
(38,218
|
)
|
|
|
(650
|
)
|
|
|
66,520
|
|
|
|
383,324
|
|
Free leased handsets
|
|
|
127,297
|
|
|
|
(118,291
|
)
|
|
|
(12,861
|
)
|
|
|
171,994
|
|
|
|
168,139
|
|
Infrastructure
|
|
|
2,064,473
|
|
|
|
876,963
|
|
|
|
(377,281
|
)
|
|
|
575,336
|
|
|
|
3,139,491
|
|
IT assets
|
|
|
234,114
|
|
|
|
(83,352
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
53,914
|
|
|
|
204,670
|
|
General use assets
|
|
|
209,045
|
|
|
|
(43,044
|
)
|
|
|
(210
|
)
|
|
|
50,704
|
|
|
|
216,495
|
|
Land
|
|
|
40,451
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
343
|
|
|
|
40,794
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
671,845
|
|
|
|
2,804,968
|
|
|
|
(24,394
|
)
|
|
|
(2,850,785
|
)
|
|
|
601,634
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant
and equipment, net
|
|
|
8,914,929
|
|
|
|
2,214,900
|
|
|
|
(462,481
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
10,667,348
|
|
The balances for 2015 include
R$451,084
arising from the net
write-off related to the sale of towers and an addition R$
1,244,803
related
to the amount of the assets leased back (
Sale and Leaseback
).
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
|
|
Balance
2013
|
|
Additions
|
|
Write-offs
|
|
Transfer
|
|
Balance
2014
|
Cost of property, plant and equipment, gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commutation / transmission equipment
|
|
|
13,664,289
|
|
|
|
9,285
|
|
|
|
(858
|
)
|
|
|
1,679,633
|
|
|
|
15,352,349
|
|
Fiber optic cables
|
|
|
498,325
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
19,322
|
|
|
|
517,647
|
|
Free leased handsets
|
|
|
1,700,582
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(11,207
|
)
|
|
|
111,563
|
|
|
|
1,800,938
|
|
Infrastructure
|
|
|
3,915,669
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(338
|
)
|
|
|
476,239
|
|
|
|
4,391,570
|
|
IT assets
|
|
|
1,413,894
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(41,795
|
)
|
|
|
96,693
|
|
|
|
1,468,792
|
|
General use assets
|
|
|
577,702
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3,748
|
)
|
|
|
39,634
|
|
|
|
613,588
|
|
Land
|
|
|
40,505
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
40,451
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
716,151
|
|
|
|
2,386,909
|
|
|
|
(8,131
|
)
|
|
|
(2,423,084
|
)
|
|
|
671,845
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and
equipment, gross
|
|
|
22,527,117
|
|
|
|
2,396,194
|
|
|
|
(66,131
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
24,857,180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commutation/transmission equipment
|
|
|
(9,067,571
|
)
|
|
|
(1,073,558
|
)
|
|
|
920
|
|
|
|
(108
|
)
|
|
|
(10,140,317
|
)
|
Fiber optic cables
|
|
|
(127,033
|
)
|
|
|
(34,942
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(161,975
|
)
|
Free leased handsets
|
|
|
(1,559,511
|
)
|
|
|
(118,067
|
)
|
|
|
3,831
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
(1,673,641
|
)
|
Infrastructure
|
|
|
(2,004,384
|
)
|
|
|
(322,903
|
)
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2,327,097
|
)
|
IT assets
|
|
|
(1,199,207
|
)
|
|
|
(77,265
|
)
|
|
|
41,792
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(1,234,678
|
)
|
General use assets
|
|
|
(362,169
|
)
|
|
|
(46,113
|
)
|
|
|
3,737
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(404,543
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(14,319,875
|
)
|
|
|
(1,672,848
|
)
|
|
|
50,472
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(15,942,251
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commutation / transmission equipment
|
|
|
4,596,718
|
|
|
|
(1,064,273
|
)
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
1,679,525
|
|
|
|
5,212,032
|
|
Fiber optic cables
|
|
|
371,292
|
|
|
|
(34,942
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
19,322
|
|
|
|
355,672
|
|
Free leased handsets
|
|
|
141,071
|
|
|
|
(118,067
|
)
|
|
|
(7,376
|
)
|
|
|
111,669
|
|
|
|
127,297
|
|
Infrastructure
|
|
|
1,911,285
|
|
|
|
(322,903
|
)
|
|
|
(146
|
)
|
|
|
476,237
|
|
|
|
2,064,473
|
|
IT assets
|
|
|
214,687
|
|
|
|
(77,265
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
96,695
|
|
|
|
234,114
|
|
General use assets
|
|
|
215,533
|
|
|
|
(46,113
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
39,636
|
|
|
|
209,045
|
|
Land
|
|
|
40,505
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
40,451
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
716,151
|
|
|
|
2,386,909
|
|
|
|
(8,131
|
)
|
|
|
(2,423,084
|
)
|
|
|
671,845
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant
and equipment, net
|
|
|
8,207,242
|
|
|
|
723,346
|
|
|
|
(15,659
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
8,914,929
|
|
|
|
Annual
rate %
|
|
|
|
Commutation
/ transmission equipment
|
|
8
to 14.29
|
Fiber
optic cables
|
|
4
to 10
|
Free-leased
handsets
|
|
50
|
Infrastructure
|
|
4
to 10
|
Informatic
assets
|
|
20
|
General
use assets
|
|
4
to 10
|
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015 and 2014
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
In 2015, pursuant to IAS 16, the Company
and its subsidiaries assessed the useful life estimates for their property, plant and equipment, concluding that there was no significant
change or alteration to the circumstances on which the estimates had been based that would justify changes to the useful lives
currently in use. To determine the useful life of the assets, the Company considers not just the type of the asset, but also the
way it is used and the conditions to which the asset is submitted during its use.
Intangible assets are measured at historical
cost less accumulated amortization and impairment losses (if applicable), and reflect: (i) the purchase of authorizations and rights
to use radio frequency bands and (ii) software in use and/or development. Intangibles also include (i) the purchase of the right
to use the infrastructure of other companies, (ii) customer lists, and (iii) goodwill on the purchase of companies.
Amortization charges are calculated on the
straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the assets contracted and over the terms of the authorizations. The useful
life estimates of intangible assets are reviewed regularly.
Any financial charges on funds generically
raised (that is, without a specific destination) and used for obtaining qualified assets, which are assets that necessarily require
a significant time to be ready for use, are capitalized as a portion of the cost of the asset when it is likely to bring future
economic benefits for the entity and such costs can be accurately measured. These costs are amortized throughout the estimated
useful life of assets.
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
The amounts of the SMP authorizations and
radio frequency right to use, as well as software, goodwill and other items, were recorded as follows:
|
|
Balance
2014
|
|
Additions
|
|
Transfer
|
|
Write-offs
|
|
Capitalized
Interests
|
|
Balance
2015
|
Cost of intangible assets, gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software rights to use
|
|
|
11,502,962
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,601,622
|
|
|
|
(16,048
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
13,088,536
|
|
Authorizations
|
|
|
5,078,310
|
|
|
|
81,914
|
|
|
|
28,798
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,189,022
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
1,527,219
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,527,219
|
|
List of clients
|
|
|
95,200
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
95,200
|
|
Right to use infrastructure LT Amazonas
|
|
|
198,202
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
198,202
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
164,182
|
|
|
|
28,991
|
|
|
|
2,943
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
196,116
|
|
Intangible assets in development
|
|
|
2,954,175
|
|
|
|
1,770,712
|
|
|
|
(1,633,363
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
270,117
|
|
|
|
3,361,641
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets, gross
|
|
|
21,520,250
|
|
|
|
1,881,617
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(16,048
|
)
|
|
|
270,117
|
|
|
|
23,655,936
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software rights to use
|
|
|
(8,477,702
|
)
|
|
|
(1,132,698
|
)
|
|
|
2,877
|
|
|
|
15,741
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(9,591,782
|
)
|
Authorizations
|
|
|
(3,614,957
|
)
|
|
|
(344,915
|
)
|
|
|
(2,877
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3,962,749
|
)
|
List of clients
|
|
|
(53,200
|
)
|
|
|
(16,800
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(70,000
|
)
|
Right to use infrastructure LT Amazonas
|
|
|
(12,802
|
)
|
|
|
(9,909
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(22,711
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(38,955
|
)
|
|
|
(10,546
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(49,501
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(12,197,616
|
)
|
|
|
(1,514,868
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
15,741
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(13,696,743
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software use rights (b)
|
|
|
3,025,260
|
|
|
|
(1,132,698
|
)
|
|
|
1,604,499
|
|
|
|
(307
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,496,754
|
|
Authorizations
|
|
|
1,463,353
|
|
|
|
(263,001
|
)
|
|
|
25,921
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,226,273
|
|
Goodwill (c)
|
|
|
1,527,219
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,527,219
|
|
List of clients (d)
|
|
|
42,000
|
|
|
|
(16,800
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
25,200
|
|
Right to use infrastructure LT Amazonas
(e)
|
|
|
185,400
|
|
|
|
(9,909
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
175,491
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
125,227
|
|
|
|
18,445
|
|
|
|
2,943
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
146,615
|
|
Intangible assets in development (f)
|
|
|
2,954,175
|
|
|
|
1,770,712
|
|
|
|
(1,633,363
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
270,117
|
|
|
|
3,361,641
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
9,322,634
|
|
|
|
366,749
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(307
|
)
|
|
|
270,117
|
|
|
|
9,959,193
|
|
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015 and 2014
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
|
|
Balance
2013
|
|
Additions
|
|
Transfer
|
|
Capitalized
Interests
|
|
Balance
2014
|
Cost of intangible assets, gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software rights to use
|
|
|
10,172,666
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,330,296
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
11,502,962
|
|
Authorizations
|
|
|
4,968,081
|
|
|
|
93,180
|
|
|
|
17,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,078,310
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
1,527,219
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,527,219
|
|
List of clients
|
|
|
95,200
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
95,200
|
|
Right to use infrastructure LT Amazonas
|
|
|
380,473
|
|
|
|
3,287
|
|
|
|
(185,558
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
198,202
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
79,464
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
84,718
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
164,182
|
|
Intangible assets in development
|
|
|
30,963
|
|
|
|
4,340,062
|
|
|
|
(1,432,063
|
)
|
|
|
15,213
|
|
|
|
2,954,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets, gross
|
|
|
17,254,066
|
|
|
|
4,436,529
|
|
|
|
(185,558
|
)
|
|
|
15,213
|
|
|
|
21,520,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software rights to use
|
|
|
(7,478,596
|
)
|
|
|
(999,106
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(8,477,702
|
)
|
Authorizations
|
|
|
(3,269,536
|
)
|
|
|
(345,421
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3,614,957
|
)
|
List of clients
|
|
|
(36,400
|
)
|
|
|
(16,800
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(53,200
|
)
|
Right to use infrastructure LT Amazonas
|
|
|
(6,053
|
)
|
|
|
(6,749
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(12,802
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(27,300
|
)
|
|
|
(11,655
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(38,955
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(10,817,885
|
)
|
|
|
(1,379,731
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(12,197,616
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software use rights (b)
|
|
|
2,694,070
|
|
|
|
(999,106
|
)
|
|
|
1,330,296
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,025,260
|
|
Authorizations
|
|
|
1,698,545
|
|
|
|
(252,241
|
)
|
|
|
17,049
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,463,353
|
|
Goodwill (c)
|
|
|
1,527,219
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,527,219
|
|
List of clients (d)
|
|
|
58,800
|
|
|
|
(16,800
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
42,000
|
|
Right to use infrastructure LT Amazonas
(e)
|
|
|
374,420
|
|
|
|
(3,462
|
)
|
|
|
(185,558
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
185,400
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
52,164
|
|
|
|
(11,655
|
)
|
|
|
84,718
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
125,227
|
|
Intangible assets in development (f)
|
|
|
30,963
|
|
|
|
4,340,062
|
|
|
|
(1,432,063
|
)
|
|
|
15,213
|
|
|
|
2,954,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets,
net
|
|
|
6,436,181
|
|
|
|
3,056,798
|
|
|
|
(185,558
|
)
|
|
|
15,213
|
|
|
|
9,322,634
|
|
|
Annual
rate %
|
|
|
Software rights to use
|
20
|
Authorizations
|
5 to 50
|
List of clients
|
18
|
Right to use infrastructure - LT Amazonas
|
5
|
Other assets
|
20
|
|
(b)
|
Software rights to use
|
The costs associated with maintaining software
are recognized as expenses as incurred. Identifiable and unique development costs that are directly attributable to the design
and testing of software products, controlled by the Group, are recognized as intangible assets when all capitalization criteria
are met.
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
Directly attributable costs, which are capitalized
as part of the software product, include costs with employees directly allocated to its development.
|
(c)
|
Goodwill from previous years
|
|
c.1.
|
Intelig´s acquisition
|
The goodwill arising from the acquisition
of Intelig in December 2009 of R$210,015 is represented by/based on the subsidiary’s expected profitability.
Goodwill recoverability is tested annually through an impairment test.
As of December 31, 2015, the Company used
the value in use method to perform the impairment test, using the following assumptions:
|
·
|
Intelig’s network is
fundamental to the Group’s business development, allowing and supporting the development of the current and new
service offers as well as creating a significant leased lines’ cost reduction. To determine the cost savings related to
the leased lines, the Company used the market prices of circuit rents, taking into consideration also their locations. The
present value of these potential rents are deducted from the net value of Intelig’s tangible and intangible assets at
December 31, 2015;
|
|
·
|
The projection of Intelig’s
costs was based on the Company’s expected projection (4.12% p.a.) which is consistent with the projections prepared by
market
institutions;
|
|
·
|
Since this is a continuous business,
as from the fifth year the projection for the perpetuity of the cash flow growth has been estimated at 3% p.a.;
|
|
·
|
The discount rate applied to projected
cash flows was 10.40% p.a. (12.32% p.a.at December 31, 2014);
|
|
·
|
In the period from 2016 to 2020, projected
growth was 6.48%; and
|
|
·
|
The inflation rate expected by the Company
is 4.83% p.a. on average and is in line with the estimates prepared by representative market institutions.
|
The results of the test carried out as of
December 31, 2015 indicated that there was no need to recognize any impairment.
|
c.2.
|
Goodwill arising from TIM Fiber SP and TIM Fiber RJ
acquisitions
|
TIM Celular acquired, at the end of
2011, Eletropaulo Telecomunicações Ltda. (which, subsequently, which had its trade name changed to TIM Fiber SP
Ltda. – “TIM Fiber SP”) and AES Communications Rio de Janeiro S.A. (which, subsequently, had its tradename
changed to TIM Fiber RJ S.A. – “TIM Fiber RJ”). These companies were SCM providers in the main
municipalities of the Greater São Paulo and Greater Rio de Janeiro areas, respectively.
TIM Fiber SP Ltda. and TIM Fiber RJ. S.A.
were merged into TIM Celular S.A. on August 29, 2012.
The subsidiary TIM Celular recorded the
goodwill allocation related to the purchase of the companies TIM Fiber SP and TIM Fiber RJ, at the end of the process of the purchase
price allocation, at the amount of R$1,159,648.
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015 and 2014
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
In 2015, the Company identified the
need to alter the cash generating unit (“CGU”) previously known as TIM Fiber. TIM Celular is the new CGU as from
fiscal year 2015. This change was based on changes in the consumer profile in the mobile telephone markets, with a fall in
voice usage and a rise in data usage, thus requiring restructuring of the network infrastructure.
Under this new scenario, a convergence can
be seen between the data and voice networks, and decisions on investments in infrastructure are now taken on an integrated basis.
Accordingly, the Company adopted a new
strategy by using the transport network and optical fiber links in an integrated manner through fixed and mobile services, taking
advantage of the existing installations, with small cells in Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo in order to improve data traffic.
This integration makes it difficult to identify the flows relating to Fiber operations separately. In Management’s
opinion goodwill should also be assigned to the units generating benefits from mobile services.
The change in CGU as a result of
a change in strategy was consolidated in 2015. Therefore, from 2015, TIM Celular was the cash generating unit identified
for impairment testing of goodwill, in the amount
of
R$1,159,648.
The
impairment
testing of such goodwill considered the CGU “TIM Cellular” and the value in use method,
as well as considered the calculations model applied in prior years, according to the current standards.
The principal assumptions used in this method are:
|
·
|
Percentages of growth in the number of
clients, in line with the Company’s business plan and prepared for over five years;
|
|
·
|
Increase in revenues from
services provided due to:
guaranteed speed mix
and voice over IP option on the fixed-line component and increased demand for data, enlarging the footprint of 4G technology, spectrum,
network and growth on the mobile component;
|
|
·
|
Operational and maintenance cost estimates
include the growth in the number of clients served, occasional scale gains and inflation effects. The inflation rate expected by
the Company for Fiber and mobile business operational expenses (4.83% p.a. on average) is in line with the estimates prepared by
representative market institutions;
|
|
·
|
Considering that it is a continuous business,
as from the fifth year, it was estimated a perpetuity of nominal growth of cash flows of 3% p.a.;
|
|
·
|
The discount rate for estimated cash flows
was 12.00% p.a.
|
The result of this impairment tests performed
in December 31, 2015, considering both model (previous years and the new one) showed no evidence of the need to recognize
any losses.
|
c.3.
|
Acquisition of minority interests of TIM Sul and TIM
Nordeste
|
In 2005, the Company acquired all the shares
of the minority shareholders of TIM Sul and TIM Nordeste, in exchange for shares issued by TIM Participações, converting
these companies into full subsidiaries. The goodwill resulting from this transaction amounted
to
R$157,556.
The Group´s combined estimates (that
includes landline and mobile telephone services, broadband business, leased lines, etc) adjusted to the present value, indicate
that there is no need to recognize any impairment loss. The assumptions used for these estimates are detailed above.
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
As
part of the purchase price allocation process involving the acquisitions of TIM Fiber SP Ltda. and TIM Fiber RJ S.A., contractual
rights were identified for the companies acquired to provide future services. These contractual rights were evaluated at their
fair value on the acquisition date and are being amortized in accordance with their estimated useful life on the same date.
|
(e)
|
Infrastructure use rights - LT Amazonas
|
TIM Celular signed agreements for the right
to use infrastructure with companies that operate electric power transmission lines in Northern Brazil. Such agreements fall within
the scope of IFRIC 4 and are classified as financial leases.
Additionally TIM Celular entered into network
infrastructure sharing contracts with Telefônica Brasil S.A. also in the Northern Region. In these contracts, both operators
optimize resources and reduce their operational costs (Note 15).
|
(f)
|
Auction and payment of 4G License 700 MHz
|
On September 30, 2014, TIM Celular purchased
Lot 2 in the Auction of the 700 MHz band for R$1,739 million. In December 2014, the Company paid R$1,678 million.
The balance remaining of R$61 million, was recorded as a debt, as provided for in the call notice.
TIM Celular is challenging the
remaining balance with
Anatel
, which is subject to interest rates (1% per
month) indexed to the IGP-DI (General Price Index). These amounts are capitalized by the Company. The impact on the balance
for the year 2015 was R$7,731 (R$468 in December 2014) of interest and R$7,859 (R$719 in December 2014) of
monetary charges.
Additionally, as determined on the call
notice, the Company has borne the costs for cleaning the frequency band purchased. The nominal amount due by the Company
regarding the cleaning of the 700 MHZ frequency of the lot purchased is R$904 million. The Company has also an additional cost
of R$295 million related to the portion that has not been bought in the auction and that was subsequently split by
AnateL
among the companies that won the auction of R$295 million, totaling R$1,199 million to be paid related to this costs.
In order to perform the activities for
cleaning the spectrum, in March 2015, TIM, together with other companies that won the auction, have constituted a
Redistribution
and Digitalization Management Entity for TV and RTV Channels
, named “EAD”. On a yearly basis, from 2015 to
2018, TIM, with the other companies that won the auction, will disburse amounts, according to the schedule provided for in
the public notice, to cover, by means of the EAD, the costs related to these cleaning activities. As the amount payable
of R$1,199 relates to a long-term obligation, it was reduced by R$47 million from the application of the adjustment to
present value (“AVP”). Monthly, AVP interest is appropriated, as well as indexation charges on the IGP-DI. In
2015, the impact generated by the appropriation of AVP interest amounted to R$25,793 (R$2,068 in December 2014), while the
impact from indexation was R$98.307 (R$10,466 in December 2014).
As of April 9, 2015, the first payment of R$370,379 was made to EAD.
The license mentioned above relates to the
concept of qualifying asset. Consequently, the finance charges are capitalized at the average rate of 13.25% p.a. in connection
with the borrowings and financing valid for the period. The amount capitalized in 2015 was R$236,592 (R$12,677 in 2014).
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015 and 2014
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
Leases in which the Company, as lessee,
substantially holds the risks and benefits of ownership are classified as financial leases, which are capitalized at the beginning
of the lease at the lower of the fair value of the leased item and the present value of the payments provided for in the agreement.
Interest related to the lease is taken to income as finance costs over the contractual term.
TIM Celular entered into
tower lease agreements, as a lessee, from a sale and financial leaseback operation involving the sale of an asset and the
simultaneous lease of the same asset by the purchaser to the seller.
TIM Celular recognized a
liability corresponding to the present value of the compulsory minimum installments of the agreement.
Leases in which the Company, as lessor,
substantially transfers the risks and benefits of ownership to the other part (lessee) are classified as financial leases. These
lease values are transferred from intangible assets and are recognized as a receivable lease at the lower of the
fair value of the leased item and the present value of the receipts provided for in the agreement. Interest related to the lease
is taken to income as finance income over the contractual term.
Asset leases are financial assets registered
as borrowings and receivables.
Assets
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
LT
Amazonas
|
|
|
199,935
|
|
|
|
195,036
|
|
|
|
|
199,935
|
|
|
|
195,036
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
portion
|
|
|
(1,969
|
)
|
|
|
(1,525
|
)
|
Non-current
portion
|
|
|
197,966
|
|
|
|
193,511
|
|
LT Amazonas
As a result of the agreement entered
into with LT Amazonas, TIM Celular entered into network infrastructure sharing agreements with Telefônica Brasil S.A.
In these agreements, TIM Celular and Telefônica Brasil S.A. share investments in the Northern region of Brazil. The
subsidiary has receivables against Telefônica Brasil S.A. that have to be paid on a monthly basis for a period of 20
years. These amounts are annually inflation indexed by the IPC-A (Customer Index Price). The consolidated nominal amount of
future installments receivable by TIM Celular is R$370,938.
The table below includes the schedule of
cash receipts of the agreement currently in force. The amounts represent the cash receipts estimated in the signed agreements and
are stated at their nominal amount (these balances differ from those recorded in the accounting books,
where amounts are recorded at present value):
Nominal amounts
|
|
|
|
Up to December 2016
|
|
|
22,177
|
|
January 2017 to December 2020
|
|
|
80,832
|
|
January 2021 onwards
|
|
|
267,929
|
|
|
|
|
370,938
|
|
The present value of
installments rec
eivable is R$
199,935
(R$195,036
in 2014), of which R$185,558 is principal and R$
14,377 is
intere
st
accrued to December 31, 2015. These amounts were
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
estimated on the date of inception
of the agreements entered into with the transmission companies, projecting future cash receipts discounted at 12.56%.
Liabilities
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
LT
Amazonas
|
|
|
340,582
|
|
|
|
329,669
|
|
Sale
of Towers (Leaseback)
|
|
|
1,277,924
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
1,618,506
|
|
|
|
329,669
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
portion
|
|
|
(38,592
|
)
|
|
|
(3,642
|
)
|
Non-current
portion
|
|
|
1,579,914
|
|
|
|
326,027
|
|
TIM
Celular executed agreements for the right to use infrastructure with companies that operate electric power transmission lines
in Northern Brazil (“LT Amazonas”). The terms of these agreements are for 20 years, counted as from the date the assets
are ready to operate. The contracts provide for monthly payments to the electric power transmission companies, annually indexed
by IPC-A.
The table below
presents the future payments schedule for the agreements in force.
These amounts represent
the estimated disbursements under the agreements executed with the distributors and are shown at their nominal amount. These balances
differ from those shown in the books since, in the case of the latter, the amounts are shown at present value
:
Nominal amount
|
|
|
|
Up to December 2016
|
|
|
42,524
|
|
January 2017 to December 2020
|
|
|
148,211
|
|
January 2021 onwards
|
|
|
490,725
|
|
|
|
|
681,460
|
|
The consolidated nominal value of
future installments due by TIM Celular is R$681,460. Its present value is R$340,582 (R$329,669 in 2014), composed of
R$313,001 for principal and R$27,581 for interest as of December 31, 2015, and was estimated on the date the agreements were
signed with the transmission companies by projecting future payments and discounting these at 14.44%.. Additionally, the
amount of the right of use of LT Amazonas also considers R$70,759 related to investments in property, plant and equipment
made by TIM Celular and subsequently donated to the electric power transmission companies. These donations are already
included in the contract signed by the parties.
|
ii)
|
Sale and Leaseback of Towers
|
As a result of the tower lease agreements
(MLA), TIM Celular agreed to lease part of the infrastructure space existing on the same towers for a period of 20 years to be
counted as from the date of transfer of each tower. The agreements provide for monthly lease amounts according to the type of tower
(greenfield and rooftop), annually indexed by the IGP-M.
The table below includes the schedule of
payments of the agreement in force regarding the MLA. The amounts represent the disbursements estimated in the agreement signed
with ATC and are stated at their nominal amount (these balances differ from those recorded in the accounting
books, where amounts are recorded at present value):
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015 and 2014
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
|
|
Nominal
amount
|
|
|
|
Up to December
2016
|
|
170,859
|
January
2017 to December 2020
|
|
550,951
|
January
2021 onwards
|
|
1,989,194
|
|
|
2,711,004
|
The consolidated nominal amount of the
sum of future installments payable by TIM Celular is R$2,711,004. Their present value
is R$
1,277,924
,
of which R$
1,244,803 is
principal and R$
33,121
is
interest as of December 31, 2015. These amounts above were calculated and estimated on the date of inception of the
agreement, projecting future payments discounted at 14.39%, 17.08% and 17.00% for the amounts disbursed in April, September
and December 2015, respectively.
Suppliers accounts payable are obligations
to pay for goods or services that were purchased in the normal course of business. They are initially recognized at fair value
and subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest rate method. Given the short maturity term of these obligations,
in practical terms, they are usually recognized at invoice value.
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
Local currency
|
|
|
|
|
Suppliers of materials and services (a)
|
|
|
3,524,741
|
|
|
|
5,083,718
|
|
Interconnection (b)
|
|
|
76,670
|
|
|
|
154,641
|
|
Roaming (c)
|
|
|
1,206
|
|
|
|
635
|
|
Co-billing (d)
|
|
|
71,547
|
|
|
|
56,388
|
|
|
|
|
3,674,164
|
|
|
|
5,295,382
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suppliers of materials and services (a)
|
|
|
87,528
|
|
|
|
82,780
|
|
Interconnection (b)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
323
|
|
Roaming (c)
|
|
|
23,253
|
|
|
|
23,719
|
|
|
|
|
110,781
|
|
|
|
106,822
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion
|
|
|
3,784,945
|
|
|
|
5,402,204
|
|
(a) Represents the amount to be paid to
suppliers for the acquisition of materials and provision of services relating to tangible and intangible assets or for consumption
in the operation, maintenance and management, as provided for in the agreement between the parties.
(b) This refers to the use of the networks
of other landline and mobile telephone operators, with calls being initiated from TIM’s network and ending in the network
of other operators.
(c) This refers to calls made by customers
outside their registration area, who are therefore considered visitors in the other network.
(d) This refers to calls made by a customer
who chooses another long-distance operator.
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
|
17.
|
Authorizations of radio frequencies
|
In order to provide SMP services, TIM Celular obtained radio frequency authorizations for a fixed period and renewable for a further 15 years. The extension
of the right of use includes the payment of 2% of revenues recorded in the regions covered by the Authorization
that ends each biannual period. As of December 31, 2015, TIM Celular had accounts past due related to the renewal of Authorizations
in the amount of R$146,149 (R$124,394 as of December 31, 2014).
On December 5, 2014, TIM Celular
signed the Instrument of Authorization for the 700 MHz band (extract published in D.O.U. on December 8, 2014). The subsidiary
paid R$1,678 million, recording the remaining balance of R$61 million as a financial debt, according to the payment method
provided for in the call notice. As there were no bids for some lots in the Call Notice for the 700 MHZ band, TIM Celular,
along with other bidders, will have to bear a proportion of the costs regarding these lots, as a result of redistribution and
digitalization of TV and RTV channels and the solutions for interference problems in the radio communication systems, being
entitled to a discount on the final amount to be paid.
However, the methodology used by ANATEL
to calculate this amount was different from that included in the Call Notice and so TIM Celular filed an administrative appeal,
which was heard and denied in December 2014 (as were the appeals of the other Winning Bidders). On March 31, 2015, TIM Celular
filed a lawsuit questioning a surplus charge of R$61 million (R$77 million as of December 31, 2015), which is still pending trial
(Note 14).
As
mentioned above, the Company assumed an additional commitment for cleaning the 700 MHz radio frequency band, performing the
redistribution and digitalization of TV and RTV channels, and reducing negative interferences, upon the constitution of EAD,
with the total commitment assumed by TIM Celular amounting to R$1,199 million,
adjusted by the IGP-DI and paid in four
installments,
of which R$370 million (30%) was paid on April 9, 2015, to this entity
(Note 14.f).
On
March 4, 2015, ANATEL: (i) accepted the request for withdrawal of the application to extend the period of radio frequency use
for lot 208 (AR 92); (ii) granted the application to extend the authorization for radio frequency use for lot 222 (AR 31); and
(iii) granted the application for extension of the period of authorization for radio frequency use in Bands D and
E
.
On July 22, 2015, an Authorization Act extended the authorization for use of the above radio frequencies.
On
December 17, 2015 TIM was ranked best bidder for the acquisition of two Type B lots (E-30 - AR41, Curitiba and metropolitan
region and E-68 - AR81, Recife and metropolitan region) and is now awaiting conclusion of the bid opening and adjudicating
sessions relating to Bidding Process 002/2015-SOR /SPR/ANATEL to confirm its expected acquisition of 10 + 10 MHz / 2,500 MHz
thereof. Adjudication is due to conclude in the first quarter of 2016 and the corresponding licensing agreements are expected
to be signed in the second quarter of 2016.
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015 and 2014
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
At December 31, 2015, the Company and its
subsidiaries have the following commitments with ANATEL:
Authorizations payable
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
700 Mhz frequency band cleaning, net of AVP
|
|
|
918,388
|
|
|
|
1,164,666
|
|
Updated ANATEL Debt
|
|
|
77,450
|
|
|
|
61,860
|
|
Guarantee insurance on authorizations
|
|
|
15,985
|
|
|
|
20,013
|
|
Renewal of authorizations
|
|
|
146,149
|
|
|
|
124,394
|
|
Authorizations payable
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,248
|
|
|
|
|
1,157,972
|
|
|
|
1,372,181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion
|
|
|
(467,687
|
)
|
|
|
(493,169
|
)
|
Non-current portion
|
|
|
690,285
|
|
|
|
879,012
|
|
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
The Authorizations held on a primary basis
by TIM Celular as of December 31, 2015, as well as their maturity dates, are detailed below:
|
Maturity Date
|
Authorization Instruments
|
450 MHz
|
800 MHz,
900 MHz and
1,800 MHz
|
Additional frequencies
1,800 MHz
|
1,900 MHz and
2,100 MHz
(3G)
|
2,500 MHz
V1 Band
(4G)
|
2,500 MHz
(P** Band
(4G)
|
700 MHz
(4G)
|
Amapá, Roraima, Pará, Amazonas and Maranhão
|
-
|
March, 2031*
|
April, 2023
|
April, 2023
|
October, 2027
|
PA – February, 2024*
|
December, 2029
|
Rio de Janeiro and Espírito Santo
|
October, 2027
|
March, 2031*
|
ES - April, 2023
|
April, 2023
|
October, 2027
|
RJ – February, 2024*
|
December, 2029
|
Acre, Rondônia, Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul, Tocantins, Distrito Federal, Goiás, Rio Grande do Sul (except the municipality of Pelotas and region) and the municipalities of Londrina and Tamarana, in Paraná
|
PR - October, 2027
|
March, 2031*
|
April, 2023
|
April, 2023
|
October, 2027
|
DF – February, 2024*
|
December, 2029
|
São Paulo
|
-
|
March, 2031*
|
Countryside - April, 2023
|
April, 2023
|
October, 2027
|
-
|
December, 2029
|
Paraná (except the municipalities of Londrina and Tamarana)
|
October, 2027
|
September, 2022*
|
April, 2023
|
April, 2023
|
October, 2027
|
February, 2024*
|
December, 2029
|
Santa Catarina
|
October, 2027
|
September, 2023*
|
April, 2023
|
April, 2023
|
October, 2027
|
-
|
December, 2029
|
Municipality and region of Pelotas, in the State of Rio Grande do Sul
|
-
|
April, 2024*
|
-
|
April, 2023
|
October, 2027
|
-
|
December, 2029
|
Pernambuco
|
-
|
May, 2024*
|
-
|
April, 2023
|
October, 2027
|
-
|
December, 2029
|
Ceará
|
-
|
November, 2023*
|
-
|
April, 2023
|
October, 2027
|
-
|
December, 2029
|
Paraíba
|
-
|
December, 2023*
|
-
|
April, 2023
|
October, 2027
|
-
|
December, 2029
|
Rio Grande do Norte
|
-
|
December, 2023*
|
-
|
April, 2023
|
October, 2027
|
-
|
December, 2029
|
Alagoas
|
-
|
December, 2023*
|
-
|
April, 2023
|
October, 2027
|
-
|
December, 2029
|
Piauí
|
-
|
March, 2024*
|
-
|
April, 2023
|
October, 2027
|
-
|
December, 2029
|
Minas Gerais (except the municipalities of the PGO sector 3 for 3G the radio frequencies and others)
|
-
|
April, 2028*
|
April, 2023
|
April, 2023
|
October, 2027
|
February, 2030*
|
December, 2029
|
Bahia and Sergipe
|
-
|
August, 2027*
|
-
|
April, 2023
|
October, 2027
|
-
|
December, 2029
|
*Agreements already renewed for 15 years;
therefore, TIM is not entitled to a further renewal period.
** Only complementary areas in particular States.
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015 and 2014
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
|
18.
|
Borrowings and financing
|
These are recorded as financial liabilities
measured at the amortized cost, being represented by non-derivative financial liabilities that are not usually traded before maturity.
Initially, they are recognized at fair value,
being subsequently measured based on the effective interest rate method. The appropriation of financial expenses according to the
effective interest rate method is registered in income, under finance expenses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
Currency
|
|
Charges
|
|
date
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
BNDES (1)
|
|
|
URTJLP
|
|
|
TJLP to TJLP + 3.62% p.a.
|
|
|
Jul/17 to Jul/22
|
|
|
|
2,528,140
|
|
|
|
2,522,781
|
|
BNDES (1)
|
|
|
UMIPCA
|
|
|
UMIPCA + 2.62% p.a.
|
|
|
Jul/17
|
|
|
|
68,628
|
|
|
|
92,939
|
|
BNDES (1)
|
|
|
UM143
|
|
|
SELIC + 2.52% p.a.
|
|
|
Jul/22
|
|
|
|
1,475,426
|
|
|
|
913,208
|
|
BNDES (PSI) (1)
|
|
|
R$
|
|
|
2.50% to 4.50% p.a.
|
|
|
Jul/18 to Jan/21
|
|
|
|
563,465
|
|
|
|
386,420
|
|
BNB (2)
|
|
|
R$
|
|
|
10.00% p.a.
|
|
|
Jan/16
|
|
|
|
931
|
|
|
|
11,966
|
|
Banco do Brasil (CCB)
|
|
|
R$
|
|
|
106.50% of CDI
|
|
|
Sep/15 to Dec/15
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
413,458
|
|
Banco BNP Paribas (3)
|
|
|
USD
|
|
|
Libor 6M + 2.53% p.a.
|
|
|
Dec/17
|
|
|
|
187,038
|
|
|
|
190,841
|
|
European Investment Bank (EIB) (2)
|
|
|
USD
|
|
|
Libor 6M + 0.57% to 1.32%p.a.
|
|
|
Sep/16 to Feb/20
|
|
|
|
1,859,839
|
|
|
|
1,264,463
|
|
Bank of America (Res. 4131) (4)
|
|
|
USD
|
|
|
Libor 3M + 1.35% p.a.
|
|
|
Sep/16
|
|
|
|
468,114
|
|
|
|
318,387
|
|
KFW (3)
|
|
|
USD
|
|
|
Libor 6M+ 1.35% p.a.
|
|
|
Apr/19
|
|
|
|
304,924
|
|
|
|
266,509
|
|
JP Morgan (Res. 4131) (4)
|
|
|
USD
|
|
|
1.73% p.a.
|
|
|
Sep/15
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
133,448
|
|
Cisco Capital (4)
|
|
|
USD
|
|
|
1.80% to 2.50% p.a..
|
|
|
Sep/18 to Dec/20
|
|
|
|
469,931
|
|
|
|
239,999
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,926,436
|
|
|
|
6,754,419
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,326,186
|
)
|
|
|
(1,281,554
|
)
|
Non-current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,600,250
|
|
|
|
5,472,865
|
|
Guarantees:
|
(1)
|
Guaranteed by TIM Participações and collateral of certain receivables of TIM
Celular
|
|
(2)
|
Bank escrow and Surety by TIM Participações.
|
|
(3)
|
Guaranteed by TIM Participações.
|
The parent company TIM Participações
does not have borrowings or financing at December 31, 2015.
The foreign currency loan granted by
Banco BNP Paribas, and the financing arranged by TIM Celular with BNDES, were obtained for the purpose of expanding the
mobile phone network. They include covenants that require certain financial ratios to be attained, calculated half-yearly. TIM Celular has complied with these financial ratios.
Credit Facilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
used as of
|
Type
|
Currency
|
Date
of Opening
|
Term
|
Total
amount
|
Remaining
balance
|
December
31, 2015
|
December
31, 2014
|
|
BNDES (1)
|
URTJLP
|
Dec/13
|
Dec/16
|
2,635,600
|
1,411,173
|
437,927
|
786,500
|
|
BNDES (1)
|
UM143
|
Dec/13
|
Dec/16
|
2,636,400
|
1,355,370
|
435,530
|
845,500
|
|
BNDES (PSI) (1)
|
R$
|
Dec/13
|
Dec/16
|
428,000
|
-
|
299,000
|
129,000
|
|
BNDES (2)
|
R$
|
Dec/15
|
Dec/17
|
60,995
|
60,995
|
-
|
-
|
|
BNDES (2)
|
TJLP
|
Dec/15
|
Dec/18
|
2,940
|
2,940
|
-
|
-
|
|
KFW Finnvera
|
USD
|
Dec/15
|
Jun/18
|
150,000
|
150,000
|
-
|
-
|
|
Total:
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,172,457
|
1,761,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purpose:
|
(1)
|
Financing
of investments in network and information technology for the years 2014, 2015 and 2016.
|
|
(2)
|
Financing
of TIM’s Innovation Projects for the years 2016, 2017 and 2018.
|
The PSI (Investment Sustainment Program)
financing lines, obtained from BNDES, refer to specific
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
programs of this institution and have
interest rates lower than those used in ordinary BNDES operations. The balance at December 31, 2015, corresponding to the
adjustment of the subsidy granted by the BNDES for all the PSI lines is approximately R$146 million. This amount was recorded
in Deferred Revenues under the “Government Subsidies” line and deferred for the useful life of the asset being
financed and appropriated to income in “Subsidy income”.
On July 1, 2015, TIM Celular made an
early settlement of the CCBs existing with Banco do Brasil in the total amount of R$300 million. This early settlement aimed
at the efficient management of the Company’s indebtedness through the payment of its more expensive debts.
TIM Celular has swap transactions
to fully protect itself against any devaluation of the Brazilian currency against the US Dollar in its borrowings and financing
transactions. Nevertheless, this is not classified as hedge accounting.
The long-term portions of borrowings and
financing at December 31, 2015 mature as follows:
|
|
|
2017
|
|
1,212,352
|
2018
|
|
1,137,206
|
2019
|
|
1,478,750
|
2020
|
|
914,706
|
2021 onwards
|
|
857,236
|
|
|
5,600,250
|
Fair value of the borrowings
In Brazil there is no consolidated long-term
debt market with the characteristics of the BNDES and BNB facilities. In addition to the returns on long-term debt, the institutions
take into account the social benefits of each project for which financing is granted. For the purpose of fair value analysis, given
the absence of a similar market and the requirement that the projects address governmental interests, the fair value of the borrowing
is usually taken to be that shown in the accounting records.
The amount of PSI credit lines are recorded
at their fair value at the withdrawal date and the fair value is calculated considering the CDI rate at the withdrawal date. If
the fair value was calculated in December 31, 2015, the PSI credit lines would have an amount lower than that presented in the
financial statements by approximately R$30 million.
A further transaction with extremely
specific features is the borrowing obtained with BNP. This is secured by SACE, an Italian insurance company, which also
operates as a development institution. Given the features of the transaction, Management believes that its fair value is
equal to that shown on the Company’s balance sheet.
Regarding the funds raised with Bank of
America, Cisco Capital, and KFW, current market conditions do not indicate the existence of any factor that might lead to a fair
value different for these transactions to that shown in the accounting records.
After applying the evaluation criterion
that takes into account the characteristics of similar transactions, the Company identified differences between the fair and book
values of the funds raised from the European Investment Bank (EIB). The fair value of the transaction is approximately R$4 million
lesser than the accounting balance.
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015 and 2014
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
|
19.
|
Indirect taxes, fees and contributions payable
|
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
ICMS
|
|
|
419,547
|
|
|
|
561,845
|
|
ANATEL taxes and fees
|
|
|
21,354
|
|
|
|
35,627
|
|
ISS
|
|
|
43,109
|
|
|
|
38,776
|
|
Others
|
|
|
17,861
|
|
|
|
9,742
|
|
|
|
|
501,871
|
|
|
|
645,990
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion
|
|
|
(501,768
|
)
|
|
|
(645,896
|
)
|
Non-current portion
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
20.
|
Direct taxes, fees and contributions payable
|
The current income tax and social contribution
charges are calculated based on the tax laws enacted or substantially enacted up to the balance sheet date.
Brazilian tax legislation allows companies
to opt for quarterly or monthly payments of income tax and social contribution. The Company and its subsidiaries opted to pay income
tax and social contribution quarterly.
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax and social contribution
|
|
|
338,351
|
|
|
|
267,030
|
|
PIS/COFINS
|
|
|
63,658
|
|
|
|
71,836
|
|
Others (*)
|
|
|
55,022
|
|
|
|
52,472
|
|
|
|
|
457,031
|
|
|
|
391,338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion
|
|
|
(213,880
|
)
|
|
|
(162,311
|
)
|
Non-current portion
|
|
|
243,151
|
|
|
|
229,027
|
|
(*) Refers basically to TIM
Celular joining, since 2009, the REFIS program, a federal amnesty and refinancing tax program that permits companies to pay
the overdue balances on federal taxes (PIS, Cofins, IR and CSL) in installments.
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid services to be provided (1)
|
|
|
400,025
|
|
|
|
393,585
|
|
Government grants (2)
|
|
|
145,892
|
|
|
|
92,295
|
|
Network swap (3)
|
|
|
37,674
|
|
|
|
46,417
|
|
Anticipated receipts
|
|
|
25,877
|
|
|
|
33,150
|
|
Deferred gain on leaseback transaction (4)
|
|
|
973,613
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
1,583,081
|
|
|
|
565,447
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion
|
|
|
(484,392
|
)
|
|
|
(427,862
|
)
|
Non-current portion
|
|
|
1,098,689
|
|
|
|
137,585
|
|
(1) This refers to minutes not used by customers
involving pre-paid system services, which are appropriated to income when customers actually avail themselves of these services.
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
(2) Refers to the release of funds under the credit facility from the BNDES Investment Sustainment Program (BNDES PSI). The total sum of the subsidies granted by
the BNDES through December 31, 2015 was R$202,954. This amount is being amortized according to the useful life of the asset being
financed and appropriated to the “Other income (expenses), net” group (Note 30).
(3) Refers mainly to the transfer of onerous
contracts and reciprocal infrastructure of fiber optics (Note 11).
(4) Refers to amounts to be appropriated
from sales of towers (Note 1.b).
|
22.
|
Provision for legal and administrative proceedings
|
This is set up at an amount deemed sufficient
to cover losses and risks considered probable, based on analysis by the Company’s internal and external legal consultants
and by Management. Situations where losses are considered possible are subject to disclosure considering their historical values
and those where losses are considered remote are not disclosed.
The Company and its subsidiaries are parties
to legal and administrative proceedings on civil, labor, tax and regulatory areas which arise in the normal course of their business.
The provision set up for legal and administrative
proceedings is made up as follows:
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
Civil (a)
|
|
|
92,820
|
|
|
|
103,303
|
|
Labor (b)
|
|
|
69,312
|
|
|
|
62,947
|
|
Tax (c)
|
|
|
224,858
|
|
|
|
194,845
|
|
Regulatory (d)
|
|
|
28,621
|
|
|
|
45,414
|
|
|
|
|
415,611
|
|
|
|
406,509
|
|
The changes in the provision for legal and administrative proceedings
can be summarized as follows:
|
|
2014
|
|
Additions,
net of reversals
|
|
Payments
|
|
Monetary adjustment
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Civil (a)
|
|
|
103,303
|
|
|
|
318,315
|
|
|
|
(383,663
|
)
|
|
|
54,865
|
|
|
|
92,820
|
|
Labor (b)
|
|
|
62,947
|
|
|
|
8,705
|
|
|
|
(3,356
|
)
|
|
|
1,016
|
|
|
|
69,312
|
|
Tax (c)
|
|
|
194,845
|
|
|
|
32,080
|
|
|
|
(22,211
|
)
|
|
|
20,144
|
|
|
|
224,858
|
|
Regulatory (d)
|
|
|
45,414
|
|
|
|
873
|
|
|
|
(20,031
|
)
|
|
|
2,365
|
|
|
|
28,621
|
|
|
|
|
406,509
|
|
|
|
359,973
|
|
|
|
(429,261
|
)
|
|
|
78,390
|
|
|
|
415,611
|
|
The Company and its subsidiaries are subject
to various legal and administrative proceedings filed against them by consumers, suppliers, service providers and consumer protection
agencies, in connection with a number of issues that arise in the regular course of business of the entities. The main cases are
summarized as follows:
The subsidiaries are parties to lawsuits
that refer to claims that have been filed by consumers at the
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015 and 2014
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
legal and administrative levels.
These claims, which amount to
R$51,953 (R$66,531 as of
December 31, 2014) refer basically to
alleged collection errors, contract cancellation,
service quality, deficiencies and failures in equipment delivery, and unjustified inclusion in credit protection
services.
|
a.2.
|
Procon and Public Prosecutor’s
Office
|
TIM is a party
to court and administrative lawsuits filed by the Public Prosecutor’s Office and Procon (Consumer Protection Agency) arising
from consumer complaints that include: (i) alleged failure in the provision of network services; (ii) alleged sales of products
tied to services; (iii) challenges about the quality of client assistance; (iv) alleged violation of SAC Decree; (v) alleged violation
of agreements; (vi) alleged false advertising; and (vii) discussion about the charging of loyalty fine in cases of theft of handset.
The amounts involved total
R$3,324 (R$3,743 as of December 31, 2014).
|
a.3.
|
Former
trade partners
|
TIM
is a defendant in lawsuits filed by former trade partners that claim, among others, amounts on the basis of alleged non-compliance
with agreements. The amounts involved total R$18,496 (R$14,918 as of December 31, 2014).
TIM
is a defendant in other non-consumer lawsuits filed by different agents to challenge, among other: (i) renewal of lease agreements;
(ii) share subscription; (iii) indemnities; (iv) alleged non-compliance with agreements; and (v) collection suit. The amounts
involved total R$10,812 (R$12,709 as of December 31, 2014)
|
a.5.
|
Social and environmental,
and infrastructure
|
The subsidiaries
are parties to lawsuits involving different agents that challenge several licensing aspects, such as environmental licensing and
structure licensing (installation/operation). The amounts involved total
R$3,606 (R$4,276
as of December 31, 2014).
The main outstanding labor claims are summarized
below:
Claims filed by former employees, in relation
to matters such as salary differences, wage parity, payments of variable compensation/commissions, additional legal payments, overtime
and other provisions established during the period prior to privatization, as well as by former employees of service providers
who, in accordance with the labor legislation in force, have filed claims against the Company and/or its subsidiaries on the grounds
that they are responsible for labor related obligations that were not satisfied by the service provider companies.
Most of the 1,148 labor claims at December
31, 2015 (1,072 at December 31, 2014) filed against the Company and its subsidiaries, relate to claims that involve
former employees of service providers. The provision for these cases amounts to R$55,412 (R$50,149 at December 31, 2014).
Another significant portion
of the existing provision relates to the organizational restructuring processes, especially the closure of the Client Relationship
Centers (Call centers) in Fortaleza, Salvador and Belo Horizonte, which resulted in the termination of some 800 in-house staff
and outsourced personnel. At December 31, 2015, the provision for these cases amounts to R$7,232 (R$15,235 as of December 31, 2014).
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
Federal Taxes
|
|
|
52,576
|
|
|
|
33,644
|
|
State Taxes
|
|
|
75,970
|
|
|
|
65,548
|
|
Municipal Taxes
|
|
|
1,477
|
|
|
|
1,573
|
|
Intelig proceedings (purchase price allocation)
|
|
|
94,835
|
|
|
|
94,080
|
|
|
|
|
224,858
|
|
|
|
194,845
|
|
The Company and its subsidiaries have
received tax assessments for which Management, supported by internal and external legal counsel, consider the risk of loss as
probable. Most of these assessments refer to one-off operational issues where some supporting documentation required has not
yet been complied with in full, until now, or where formal procedures have not been strictly observed.
The total provision recorded is substantially
composed by the following proceedings:
Federal taxes
The provision for TIM Celular has been
made for nine cases referring to questionings regarding the taxes levied on CIDE, CPMF, CSLL, and IRRF transactions, and the
voluntary reporting of the penalty regarding FUST payment. The main amounts relate to court actions in which
TIM intends to claim the right not to pay the CPMF (a Federal contribution on financial movements) allegedly due to
simultaneous purchase and sale transactions of foreign currency and change of accountholder as result of merger, whose
amounts provided currently total R$31,338 (R$28,253 as of December 31, 2014), as well as the amount corresponding to the
fine and interest on FUST contribution for the year 2009, which does not include benefit from voluntary reporting, for which
the amount provided and updated in August 2015 is R$11,512.
The provision for Intelig regarding federal
taxes has been made for three cases of questioning of federal tax offsetting using the negative balance of IRPJ and the CSLL carried
forward from periods prior to offsetting, totaling the updated amount of R$4,968 (R$843 as of December 31, 2014).
State taxes
These include the amounts for tax assessments
questioning the usage of ICMS debits, as well as the documentation supporting the credits appropriated by the Company, for which
the updated amount provided is R$24,626 (R$22,352 as of December 31, 2014).
The updated provision made for Intelig’s
State taxes amount to R$21,726 (R$20,070 as of December 31, 2014). This total includes the amounts for assessments questioning
the documentation that supported the credits appropriated by the Company, for which the updated amount provided is R$17,369 (R$16,175
as of December 31, 2014).
Municipal taxes
These include the amounts involved in assessments
questioning the withholding and payment of the ISS-source on services provided by third parties with no employment relationship,
as well as the payment of own ISS regarding co-billing services.
Intelig cases
Tax proceedings arising from the acquisition
of Intelig and included in its purchase price allocation
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015 and 2014
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
process, amount to R$94,835 (R$94,080 as
of December 31, 2014).
ANATEL has brought administrative proceedings
against the subsidiaries for: (i) failure to meet with certain quality service indicators; (ii) default on certain obligations
assumed under the Instruments of Authorization; and (iii) non-compliance with the regulations of SMP and STFC, among others.
In 2015, payments were made to ANATEL due
to non-compliance with the General Quality Enhancement Plan (PGMQ) and the obligations regarding Users’ Rights and Guarantees
(DGU), in the amount of R$18,620.
|
(e)
|
Legal and administrative processes involving
possible losses
|
Civil, labor, tax and regulatory actions
have been filed against the Company and its subsidiaries involving risk of loss that is classified as possible by the Company’s
legal advisors and the Management. No provisions have been set up for these legal and administrative proceedings and no materially
adverse effects are expected on the financial statements as shown below:
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
Civil (e.1)
|
|
1,189,130
|
|
863,303
|
Labor (e.2)
|
|
442,800
|
|
489,790
|
Tax (e.3)
|
|
8,400,356
|
|
9,088,630
|
Regulatory (e.4)
|
|
65,849
|
|
91,934
|
|
|
10,098,135
|
|
10,533,657
|
The administrative and legal proceedings
assessed as possible losses by the Management are monitored and disclosed at their historical values.
The main actions
where the risk of loss is classified as possible are described below:
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
Actions
filed by consumers (e.1.1)
|
525,406
|
|
408,702
|
ANATEL
(e.1.2)
|
129,061
|
|
115,309
|
Procon
and
Public Prosecutor’s
Office
(e.1.3)
|
255,008
|
|
165,670
|
Former
trade partners (e.1.4)
|
118,698
|
|
82,034
|
Social
and environmental, and infrastructure (e.1.5)
|
41,240
|
|
25,377
|
Others
|
119,717
|
|
66,211
|
|
1,189,130
|
|
863,303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
e.1.1
|
Actions filed by consumers
|
These
actions refer particularly to
alleged incorrect billing, contract cancellation, service
quality, deficiencies and failures in equipment delivery, and unjustified inclusion in bad debtors’ lists.
The subsidiaries are parties to lawsuits
filed against ANATEL, due to the following reasons: (i) debit regarding the collection of 2% on the revenues obtained from value-added
services – VAS and
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
interconnection; (ii) pro rata monetary
charges applied to the price proposal established in the call notice for use of 4G frequencies; and (iii) alleged non-compliance
with service quality targets.
|
e.1.3.
|
Procon and Public Prosecutor’s Office
|
TIM is a party to court and administrative
lawsuits filed by the Public Prosecutor’s Office and Procon (Consumer Protection Agency) arising from consumer complaints
that include: (i) alleged failure in the provision of network services; (ii) alleged failure in the delivery of devices; (iii)
alleged non-compliance with State legislations; (iv) contract model and alleged undue charging of Value-Added Services - VAS; (v)
alleged violation of SAC Decree; (vi) alleged violation of agreements; and (vii) blocking of data.
|
e.1.4.
|
Former
trade partners
|
TIM
is a defendant in actions filed by several former trade partners who are claiming, among others, amounts on the basis of alleged
non-compliance with agreements.
|
e.1.5.
|
Social, environmental and
infrastructure
|
The subsidiaries are parties to lawsuits
involving different agents that challenge aspects related to (1) licensing, such as Environmental licensing and Structure licensing
(installation/operation) and (2) electromagnetic radiation emitted by the Telecom structures; renewal of leasing land agreements
to install sites; eviction from land leased to install sites; and presentation of registration data; among others. The amounts
involved are R$ 34,688 (R$21,597 as of December 31, 2014) and R$ 6,552 (R$3,780 as of December 31, 2014), respectively.
Most of the 3,400 labor claims filed against
the Company and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2015 (5,400 as of December 31, 2014) refer to claims made by former employees
of service providers in the amount of R$374,807 (R$404,834 as of December 31, 2014).
A significant percentage of the existing
proceedings relate to organizational restructuring processes, with highlight going to the closure of the Client Relationship Centers
(Call centers) in Fortaleza, Salvador and Belo Horizonte, and other internal sites of TIM, which resulted in the termination of
some 800 employees, including in-house staff and outsourced personnel. In addition to these proceedings, there are also those
filed by outsourced service providers alleging an employment relationship with TIM, in the total amount o
f
R$12,150 (R$20,274 as of December 2014).
The Company is a party to public civil actions
filed by the Labor District Attorney’s Office alleging irregular outsourcing practices and with collective moral damages
due to outsourcing totaling R$56,000 (R$56,000 as of December 31, 2014).
A group of actions have been filed in the
State of Paraná, involving claims for damages in connection with contractual provisions stamped in the employees` work register.
According to an internal rule, TELEPAR undertook to supplement the retirement benefits of employees hired up until 1982. Prior
to privatization, TELEPAR had proposed to implement this benefit by means of the payment of a certain amount in cash in the amount
of R$3,800.
There is a group of labor claims, particularly in São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, from former Gazeta Mercantil, Jornal
do Brasil and JB Editora employees who have filed claims requesting inclusion of Holdco as defendant. Prior to the merger with
TIM Participações, Holdco belonged to the Docas economic group, of which Gazeta Mercantil and Jornal do Brasil
are part.
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015 and 2014
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
TIM Celular received a Debit Assessment
Notice referring to alleged irregularity in the payment of social security contributions in connection with the payment of profit-sharing
amounting to R$ 4,282 (R$4,039 at December 31, 2014).TIM Celular was also assessed for social security contributions that were
allegedly due in connection with hiring bonus, non-adjusted bonus, payments to self-employed persons and sales incentives in the
amount of R$7,708 (R$7,321 as of December 31, 2014).
Intelig received Tax Assessments Debits
regarding alleged irregularity in the payment of social security contributions levied on profit sharing; retention of 11% on service
agreements; failure to pay Management’s fees and failure to properly fill out the FGTS– GFIP tax form, and erroneous
GFIP declaration totaling R$41,116 (R$30,063 as of December 31, 2014).
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
Federal Taxes (e3.1)
|
|
|
1,905,594
|
|
|
|
2,397,853
|
|
State Taxes (e.3.2)
|
|
|
4,585,810
|
|
|
|
4,980,731
|
|
Municipal Taxes (e.3.3)
|
|
|
345,089
|
|
|
|
318,817
|
|
FUST, FUNTTEL and EBC (e.3.4)
|
|
|
1,563,863
|
|
|
|
1,391,229
|
|
|
|
|
8,400,356
|
|
|
|
9,088,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assessment against the TIM Group for federal
taxes amounted to R$ 1,905,594 as of December 31, 2015. Of this total, the following issues are highlighted:
|
(i)
|
Amortization of goodwill paid on the acquisition of mobile phone companies, deduction of
goodwill amortization expenses, exclusion of goodwill reversal, other effects and the disallowance of set-offs and estimated
deductions paid, allegedly improper use of SUDENE benefits caused by lack of formalization on these benefits with the
Federal Revenue Department (RFB) and failure to pay the estimated
IRPJ and CSLL amounts. The amount involved is R$1,264,205
(R$1,687,592 at December 31, 2014).
|
|
(ii)
|
Method of offsetting tax losses and negative bases. The amount involved is R$85,135 (R$85,478 at
December 31, 2014.
|
|
(iii)
|
Collection of CSLL on monetary charges for swap transactions, registered on a cash basis.
The amount involved is R$35,662 (R$35,662 at December 31, 2014).
|
|
(iv)
|
Payment of IRRF on revenues from overseas residents, including those remitted for international
roaming and payment to unidentified beneficiaries, as well as collection of CIDE on royalties remitted overseas, including remittances
for international roaming. The amount involved is R$150,763 (R$236,962 at December 31, 2014) for TIM Celular and R$33,722 (R$39,957
at December 31, 2014) for Intelig.
|
|
(v)
|
Charge of IRPJ, PIS/COFINS and CSLL debts for the non-approval or partial approval of offsettings
carried out by the Company using credits from withholding tax on financial investments and negative IRPJ balance. The amount involved
is R$229,823 (R$268,995 at December 31, 2014).
|
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
Assessment against the TIM Group for State
taxes amounted to R$ 1,905,594 as of December 31, 2015. Of the total amount the following issues are highlighted:
|
(i)
|
Alleged failure to pay ICMS arising from debts forgiven for pre-paid services, as well
as alleged incorrect ICMS credit regarding outgoing goods allegedly benefited from a reduction in the calculation base. The
amount involved is R$60,322 (R$74,615 at December 31, 2014).
|
|
(ii)
|
ICMS credits booked and debits reversed as well as identification and supporting documentation
for amounts and information passed to customer bills, such as tax rates and credit granted. The amount involved is R$772,336 (R$855,497
at December 31, 2014).
|
|
(iii)
|
Taxation of international roaming services. The amount involved is R$25,567 (R$27,891 at December
31, 2014).
|
|
(iv)
|
Credits booked upon the return of cell phones on free lease. The amount involved is R$20,358 (R$20,358
at December 31, 2014).
|
|
(v)
|
Failure to include unconditional discounts offered to customers in the ICMS calculation base, and
a fine for alleged failure to comply with related ancillary obligations, including failure to submit register 60i of the SINTEGRA
file. The amount involved is R$932,584 (R$1,343,892 at December 31, 2014).
|
|
(vi)
|
Alleged conflict between ancillary obligations data and the payment of the tax. The amount involved
is R$64,744 (R$68,356 at December 31, 2014).
|
|
(vii)
|
Use of tax benefit (Program for Promoting the Integrated and Sustainable Economic Development
of the Federal District - PRÓ-DF) granted by the tax authority itself, but subsequently declared unconstitutional and
alleged incorrect credit of ICMS on interstate purchases of goods with tax benefits granted in the State of origin. The
amount involved is R$649,778 (R$698,898 at December 31, 2014).
|
|
(viii)
|
Alleged failure to deduct tax on network lease of means operations where the tax originally deferred
was allegedly not paid in the subsequent phase, pursuant to Agreement 128/98. The amount involved is R$87,550 (R$87,550 at December
31, 2014).
|
|
(ix)
|
Liability for ICMS and FECOP (State Anti-Poverty Fund) on fixed asset purchases and other transactions
and on the provision of telecommunications services in specific cases determined by the law. The amount involved is R$67,941 (R$69,287
at December 31, 2014)
|
|
(x)
|
Use of credit to purchase electricity for the companies’ production processes. The amount
involved is R$135,176 (R$201,841 at December 31, 2014).
|
|
(xi)
|
Credit reversal and late use of credit for purchase of fixed assets. The amount involved is R$549,627
(R$639,606 at December 31, 2014).
|
|
(xii)
|
Cancellation of telecommunications service due to improper invoicing/subscription fraud, and alleged
incorrect use of credit and duplication of ICMS The amount involved is R$17,568 (R$19,165 at December 31, 2014).
|
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015 and 2014
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
The total assessment against the TIM Group
for municipal taxes is R$345,089 as of December 31, 2015. Of this amount, the following issues stand out:
|
(i)
|
Payment of ISS and of a punitive fine for failure to pay the alleged tax on various revenue accounts
of the Company. The amount involved is R$92,499 (R$110,999 at December 31, 2014).
|
|
(ii)
|
Collection of ISS on import of services. The amount involved is R$94,359 (R$94,359 at December
31, 2014)
|
|
e
.3.4.
|
FUST,
FUNTTEL
and EBC
|
The amount assessed against the Group
for contributions to FUST, FUNTTEL and EBC is R$1,563,863 as of December 31, 2015 (R$1,390,054 at December 31, 2014). The principal
discussion involves the payment of the contributions to FUST (Telecommunications Services Universalization Fund
)
and FUNTTEL
(Telecommunications Technical Development Fund) as from the issue by ANATEL of Ruling No. 07/2005, relating primarily to the payment
of the FUST and FUNTTEL contributions on interconnection revenues earned by telecommunications service providers, as from the effective
date of Law N
o
. 9998/2000.
Additionally, the Group is
challenging the legality of charging the contribution for development of public radio broadcasting (Contribution to EBC,
Brazil’s Communication Agency), according to Law No. 11652/2008.
ANATEL has filed administrative proceedings
against the subsidiaries for: (i) not complying with certain quality indicators; (ii) defaulting on other obligations under Instruments
of Authorization and; (iii) not complying with SMP and STFC regulations, among others.
At December 31, 2015, the amount stated
for Breach of Obligation procedures (locally PADOs) that was rated ‘possible loss’ was R$65,849 (R$91,934 at December
31, 2014).
On obtaining an extension
of authorization to use radio frequencies associated with SMP, the TIM Celular subsidiary incurs contractual charges on
revenue from service plans sold under each authorization. However, ANATEL has included interconnection revenues in
the calculation base for these charges since 2011, and revenues from value-added services since 2012. In the opinion of Management,
this revenue should not be included because it is not expressly stipulated in the original Instruments of Authorization;
therefore the charges were challenged in administrative appeals, and will be forwarded for legal discussion when this
instance’s procedure has been exhausted.
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
|
23.
|
Provision for decommissioning costs
|
The changes in the obligations deriving
from future asset demobilization are set forth below:
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opening balance
|
|
|
286,275
|
|
|
|
299,813
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write-offs recorded throughout the year, net of additions
|
|
|
(258,627
|
)
|
|
|
(21,453
|
)
|
Monetary charges for the year
|
|
|
3,961
|
|
|
|
7,915
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closing balance
|
|
|
31,609
|
|
|
|
286,275
|
|
(*) The amounts consolidated in the period include the effect
of R$193,205
,
arising from the write-off related to the sale of
towers (Note 1.b).
The provision is recorded based on the following assumptions:
|
·
|
the unitary dismantling costs are estimated,
taking into account the services and materials involved in the process. The estimate is prepared by the network department based
on the information currently available;
|
|
·
|
a timetable for the dismantling is estimated
based on the useful life of the assets and the estimated initial costs are allocated through this timetable, updated by the expected
inflation rate. The expected inflation rate is aligned with the projections prepared by the main market institutions; and
|
|
·
|
the rate used to discount the cash flows
is the Company´s average debt cost, that was 12.27% p.a. at December 31, 2015 (9.98% p.a. at December 31, 2014).
|
The
capital stock is stated at the amount effectively raised from shareholders, net of the costs directly linked to the issuance process.
When
a company within the Group purchases Company’s shares, aiming at holding them as treasury shares, the amount paid, including
any directly attributable additional costs, is deducted from the Company’s shareholders’ equity until the shares are
cancelled or reissued. When these shares are reissued subsequently, any amount received, net of additional costs directly attributable
to the transaction, is included in shareholders’ equity.
The Company is authorized to increase its
capital upon resolution by the Board of Directors, without amending the bylaws, up to the limit of 4,450,000,000 common shares.
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
The subscribed and paid up capital is represented
as follows:
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value paid up
|
|
|
9,913,415
|
|
|
|
9,913,415
|
|
(-) Funding costs
|
|
|
(47,117
|
)
|
|
|
(47,117
|
)
|
Net value paid up
|
|
|
9,866,298
|
|
|
|
9,866,298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of common shares
|
|
|
2,421,032,479
|
|
|
|
2,421,032,479
|
|
At meetings held on September 5, 2014 and
October 6, 2014 the Board of Directors of TIM Participações approved the increase in the Company’s capital
of R$19,301 and R$7,227, respectively, by issuing 2,503,353 and 896,479 new common shares arising from the exercise of call options
by the beneficiaries of the Company’s Long-term Incentive Plan in that order.
The use of capital reserves is according
to the provisions of Article 200 of Law No. 6404/76, which refers to joint share companies. These reserves are comprised of:
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special goodwill reserve
|
|
|
380,560
|
|
|
|
380,560
|
|
Share options
|
|
|
20,876
|
|
|
|
16,372
|
|
Tax benefit reserve
|
|
|
1,040,661
|
|
|
|
947,538
|
|
|
|
|
1,442,097
|
|
|
|
1,344,470
|
|
|
b.1.
|
Special goodwill reserve
|
The special goodwill reserve arose from
the following transactions:
|
(i)
|
Takeover of the former subsidiaries TIM Sul and TIM
NE - acquisition of minority shares
|
In 2005 the Company acquired all the shares
held by the minority shareholders of TIM Sul S.A. and TIM Nordeste Telecomunicações S.A. This acquisition took place
by issuing new shares of TIM Participações S.A., converting those companies into full subsidiaries. At that time,
this transaction was recorded at the book value of the shares, no goodwill being recorded arising from the difference between market
value and the shares negotiated.
When first adopting IFRS, the Company availed
itself of the exemption that allows a subsidiary, when it adopts international accounting practices subsequent to its parent company
having adopted IFRS, to consider the balances previously reported to the parent company for consolidation purposes. In the balance
sheet of the transition to IFRS, the Company recorded the acquisition price based on the market value of the shares of TIM Participações
S.A. at that time, recording goodwill amounting to R$157,556.
|
(ii)
|
Acquisition of the shares of Holdco - purchase of
Intelig
|
On December 30, 2009, the Special General
Meeting of TIM Participações approved the takeover of Holdco, a company that held 100% of the equity of Intelig,
by TIM Participações. As a result of this transaction, the Company issued 127,288,023 shares.
Based on the former Brazilian accounting
principles (“BR GAAP”), the acquisition was recorded at the net book value of the assets acquired on the base date
November 30, 2009.
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
When IFRS was first adopted, the acquisition
was recorded on the base date December 31, 2009, taking into account the market value of the common and preferred shares of TIM
Participações on December 30, 2009, amounting to R$739,729. The difference between this amount and the book value
recorded under the former BR GAAP (R$516,725) created goodwill against capital reserves of R$223,004.
The balances recorded in these items represent
the expenses of the Company and its subsidiaries for the share options granted to their employees (Note 25).
TIM Celular enjoys tax benefits that provide
for restrictions in the distribution of profits of this subsidiary. According to the legislation that establishes such tax benefits,
the amount of taxes waived as a result of exemptions and reductions in the tax charge may not be distributed to shareholders and
must be registered as a tax incentive reserve of the legal entity. This reserve should only be used for offsetting of losses or
capital increase. The accumulated amount of benefits enjoyed by TIM Celular as of December 2015 and 2014 was R$1,040,661 and R$947,538,
respectively.
This refers to 5% of profit for every year
ended December 31, until the legal reserve equals 20% of capital. Also, the Company is authorized to stop setting up a legal
reserve when, together with the capital reserves, it exceeds 30% of capital.
This reserve can be used only for capital
increase or offsetting of accumulated losses.
|
c.2.
|
Statutory reserve for expansion
|
This reserve is set up based on paragraph
2, Article 46 of the Company’s bylaws and is intended for the expansion of the corporate business.
The balance of profits that are not mandatorily
allocated to other reserves and for the payment of dividends, is allocated to this reserve, which may not
exceed 80% of the capital. Once this limit is reached, it is incumbent on the shareholders’ meeting to decide on the
balance, either distributing this to shareholders or increasing the capital.
Dividends are calculated in accordance with
the bylaws and Brazilian Corporate Law.
As stipulated in its latest bylaws approved
on December 12, 2013, the Company must distribute a mandatory dividend for each business year ended December 31, provided that
funds are available for distribution, equivalent to 25% of the adjusted profit.
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015 and 2014
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
At December 31, 2015, dividends were calculated
as shown below:
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
Net income for the year
|
|
|
2,071,145
|
|
(-) Legal reserve constitution
|
|
|
(103,557
|
)
|
(-) Tax incentives not to be distributed
|
|
|
(93,123
|
)
|
Adjusted profit
|
|
|
1,874,465
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends to be distributed:
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum dividends calculated considering 25% of the adjusted profit
|
|
|
468,616
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends per share (Reais per share)
|
|
|
0.1936
|
|
At December 31, 2014, dividends were calculated
as follows:
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
Net income for the year
|
|
|
1,546,419
|
|
(-) Legal reserve constitution
|
|
|
(77,322
|
)
|
Adjusted profit
|
|
|
1,469,097
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends to be distributed
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum dividends calculated considering 25% of the adjusted profit
|
|
|
367,274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends per share (Reais per share)
|
|
|
0.1518
|
|
The Annual General Meeting of TIM
Participações S.A. held on April 14, 2015, approved payment of minimum mandatory dividends in the amount of
R$367,274. This amount was paid on June 16, 2015.
The balance of dividends payable at December
31, 2015 consists of the minimum dividends amount, calculated as above, in addition to prior year amounts totaling R$56,163 (R$53,728
in 2014).
2011-2013 Plan and 2014-2016 Plan
At the annual
meeting on August 5, 2011, and April 10, 2014, the shareholders of
TIM Participações
S.A. approved the long-term incentives plans, respectively the “
2011-2013 Plan” and the “2014-2016 Plan,”
for senior management and key executives of the Company and its subsidiaries.
The exercise
of options of the 2011-2013 Plan depends on the achievement of specific performance targets, while the exercise of options of
the 2014-2016 Plan is not subject to this condition. The Exercise Price is calculated with an upward or downward adjustment to
the Base Share Price, according to shares performance, as provided for in each Plan.
Share options are effective for six
years and the Company has no legal or informal obligation to repurchase or settle the options in cash.
On October 16, 2015, the 2nd Grant was made
under the 2014-2016 Plan.
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
The variation in the quantity of options
are presented below:
Date of grant
|
Share Options Granted
|
Maturity date
|
Exercise price
|
Balance at the beginning of the year
|
Granted in the year
|
Exercised in the year (*)
|
Forfeited in the year
|
Fall due in the year
|
Balance at the end of the year
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-2016 Plan – 2nd Grant
|
3,355,229
|
Out/21
|
8.4526
|
-
|
3,355,229
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
3,355,229
|
2014-2016 Plan – 1st Grant
|
1,687,686
|
Set/20
|
1.4184
|
1,456,353
|
-
|
-
|
(150,791)
|
-
|
1,305,562
|
2011-2013 Plan–
3rd Grant
|
3,072,418
|
Jul/19
|
8.1349
|
1,971,900
|
-
|
-
|
(439,916)
|
-
|
1,531,984
|
2011-2013 Plan–
2nd Grant
|
2,661,752
|
Set/18
|
8.9571
|
671,091
|
-
|
-
|
(157,187)
|
-
|
513,904
|
2011-2013 Plan–
1st Grant
|
2,833,595
|
Ago/17
|
8.8404
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Total
|
13,610,680
|
-
|
-
|
4,099,344
|
3,355,229
|
-
|
(747,894)
|
-
|
6,706,679
|
Weighted average exercise price
|
9.3854
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) No options were exercised in 2015 for the “2011-2013
plan” because the minimum performance was not reached.
|
Date of grant
|
Share Options Granted
|
Maturity date
|
Exercise price
|
Balance at the beginning of the year
|
Granted in the year
|
Exercised in the year (*)
|
Forfeited in the year
|
Fall due in the year
|
Balance at the end of the year
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-2016 Plan – 2nd Grant
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2014-2016 Plan – 1st Grant
|
1,687,686
|
Set/20
|
13.4184
|
-
|
1,687,686
|
-
|
(231,333)
|
-
|
1,456,353
|
2011-2013 Plan–
3rd Grant
|
3,072,418
|
Jul/19
|
8.1349
|
3,003,087
|
-
|
(971,221)
|
(59,966)
|
-
|
1,971,900
|
2011-2013 Plan–
2nd Grant
|
2,661,752
|
Set/18
|
8.9571
|
1,603,269
|
-
|
(896,479)
|
(35,699)
|
-
|
671,091
|
2011-2013 Plan–
1st Grant
|
2,833,595
|
Ago/17
|
8.8404
|
1,551,160
|
-
|
(1,532,132)
|
(19,028)
|
-
|
-
|
Total
|
10,255,451
|
-
|
-
|
6,157,516
|
1,687,686
|
(3,399,832)
|
(346,026)
|
-
|
4,099,344
|
Weighted average exercise price
|
10.1466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Below are the significant data included
in the model:
Date of grant
|
Weighted average price of shares on the date of grant
|
Volatility
|
Expected useful life of the option
|
Annual interest rate without risk
|
2011 Grant
|
R$8.31
|
51.73% p.a
|
6 years
|
11.94%p.a
|
2012 Grant
|
R$8.96
|
50.46% p.a
|
6 years
|
8.89%p.a
|
2013 Grant
|
R$8.13
|
48.45% p.a
|
6 years
|
10.66%p.a
|
2014 Grant
|
R$13.42
|
44.60% p.a
|
6 years
|
10.66%p.a
|
2015 Grant
|
R$ 8.45
|
35.50% p.a
|
6 years
|
16.10%p.a
|
The Base Share Price was calculated using
the weighted prices of the shares of TIM Participações, during the following periods:
|
·
|
2011-2013 Plan – 1st Grant
- Volume traded and the trading price of the shares in TIM Participações in the period of 30 days prior to 07/20/2011
(the date when the Company Board of Directors approved the benefit).
|
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015 and 2014
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
|
·
|
2011-2013 Plan– 2nd Grant
- Volume traded and the trading price of TIM Participações shares during the period 07/01/2012 to 08/31/2012.
|
|
·
|
2011-2013 Plan– 3rd Grant -
Volume
traded and the trading price of TIM Participações shares during the period of 30 days preceding 07/20/2013
.
|
|
·
|
2014-2016 Plan– 1st Grant -
Volume
traded and the trading price of TIM Participações shares during the period of 30 days preceding the date determined
by the Board of Directors (September 29, 2014).
|
|
·
|
2014-2016 Plan– 2nd Grant -
Volume
traded and the trading price of TIM Participações shares during the period of 30 days preceding the date determined
by the Board of Directors (September 29, 2015)
.
|
Using
the accrual basis of accounting, the expenses related to the long-term benefit plan are being accounted for on a monthly basis
and, at the end of the 12-month period, totaled R$
4,504 (R$5,687 in the same period of 2014).
Revenues from services rendered
The principal service revenues derives from
monthly subscription, the provision of separate voice, SMS and data services, and user packages combining these services, roaming
charges and interconnection revenue. The revenues are recognized as the services are used, net of sales taxes and discounts granted
on services. These revenues are recognized only when the amount of services rendered can be estimated reliably.
The revenues are recognized monthly via
invoicing, and billable revenues between the billing date and the end of the month (unbilled) are identified, processed and recognized
in the month in which the service was rendered. Calculations of unbilled revenues from the previous month are reversed out and
unbilled amounts are calculated at each month end.
Interconnection traffic and roaming revenues
are recorded separately, without offsetting the amounts owed to other telecom operators (the latter are accounted for as operating
costs).
The minutes not used by customers in the
prepaid service system are recorded as deferred revenues and allocated to income when these services are actually used by customers.
Revenues from product sales
Revenues from product sales (telephones,
mini-modems, tablets and other equipment) are recognized when the significant risks and benefits of the ownership of such products
are transferred to the buyer.
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenue - Mobile
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subscription and use
|
|
|
9,763,865
|
|
|
|
11,007,035
|
|
|
|
11,309,804
|
|
Network use
|
|
|
1,581,834
|
|
|
|
2,630,661
|
|
|
|
3,760,751
|
|
Long distance
|
|
|
2,710,730
|
|
|
|
3,094,139
|
|
|
|
3,332,965
|
|
VAS - Additional services
|
|
|
7,741,751
|
|
|
|
6,616,020
|
|
|
|
5,353,653
|
|
Others
|
|
|
319,581
|
|
|
|
284,168
|
|
|
|
236,255
|
|
|
|
|
22,117,761
|
|
|
|
23,632,023
|
|
|
|
23,993,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenue - Landline
|
|
|
1,003,185
|
|
|
|
901,159
|
|
|
|
1,071,787
|
|
Service revenue
|
|
|
23,120,946
|
|
|
|
24,533,182
|
|
|
|
25,065,215
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goods sold
|
|
|
2,646,866
|
|
|
|
4,471,320
|
|
|
|
4,596,539
|
|
Gross operating revenue
|
|
|
25,767,812
|
|
|
|
29,004,502
|
|
|
|
29,661,754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deductions from gross revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxes
|
|
|
(6,248,035
|
)
|
|
|
(6,723,442
|
)
|
|
|
(6,544,661
|
)
|
Discounts given
|
|
|
(2,213,041
|
)
|
|
|
(2,584,002
|
)
|
|
|
(2,948,294
|
)
|
Returns and others
|
|
|
(167,885
|
)
|
|
|
(198,893
|
)
|
|
|
(247,508
|
)
|
|
|
|
(8,628,961
|
)
|
|
|
(9,506,337
|
)
|
|
|
(9,740,463
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue
|
|
|
17,138,851
|
|
|
|
19,498,165
|
|
|
|
19,921,291
|
|
|
27.
|
Cost of services provided and goods sold
|
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel
|
|
|
(91,026
|
)
|
|
|
(80,259
|
)
|
|
|
(61,130
|
)
|
Third party services
|
|
|
(490,790
|
)
|
|
|
(439,018
|
)
|
|
|
(403,257
|
)
|
Interconnection and means of connection
|
|
|
(2,805,364
|
)
|
|
|
(3,429,108
|
)
|
|
|
(4,518,927
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(2,535,683
|
)
|
|
|
(2,345,481
|
)
|
|
|
(2,097,931
|
)
|
ANATEL fees
|
|
|
(14,742
|
)
|
|
|
(13,887
|
)
|
|
|
(13,071
|
)
|
Rentals and insurance
|
|
|
(495,550
|
)
|
|
|
(412,519
|
)
|
|
|
(358,948
|
)
|
Training
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
(453
|
)
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
Others
|
|
|
(16,952
|
)
|
|
|
(22,746
|
)
|
|
|
(17,986
|
)
|
Cost of services provided
|
|
|
(6,450,189
|
)
|
|
|
(6,743,471
|
)
|
|
|
(7,471,361
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
(1,856,668
|
)
|
|
|
(3,340,449
|
)
|
|
|
(3,350,841
|
)
|
|
|
|
(8,306,857
|
)
|
|
|
(10,083,920
|
)
|
|
|
(10,822,202
|
)
|
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015 and 2014
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel
|
|
|
(687,629
|
)
|
|
|
(624,730
|
)
|
|
|
(563,486
|
)
|
Third party services (*)
|
|
|
(2,191,028
|
)
|
|
|
(2,180,640
|
)
|
|
|
(2,201,727
|
)
|
Advertising and publicity
|
|
|
(560,558
|
)
|
|
|
(622,781
|
)
|
|
|
(592,421
|
)
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(230,357
|
)
|
|
|
(248,576
|
)
|
|
|
(240,051
|
)
|
ANATEL fees (**)
|
|
|
(871,184
|
)
|
|
|
(1,043,713
|
)
|
|
|
(1,030,576
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(162,267
|
)
|
|
|
(158,888
|
)
|
|
|
(170,084
|
)
|
Rentals and insurance
|
|
|
(93,265
|
)
|
|
|
(95,057
|
)
|
|
|
(76,509
|
)
|
Training
|
|
|
(509
|
)
|
|
|
(1,644
|
)
|
|
|
(1.186
|
)
|
Others
|
|
|
(30,098
|
)
|
|
|
(46,943
|
)
|
|
|
(35,482
|
)
|
|
|
|
(4,826,895
|
)
|
|
|
(5,022,972
|
)
|
|
|
(4,911,522
|
)
|
(*)
Includes mainly the expenses with commissions, and
professional and technical services.
(**) Represent the amounts regarding TFI (Facilities Inspection
Fee) and TFF (Operation Inspection Fee).
|
29.
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel
|
|
|
(265,198
|
)
|
|
|
(257,887
|
)
|
|
|
(207,260
|
)
|
Third party services
|
|
|
(471,747
|
)
|
|
|
(540,894
|
)
|
|
|
(513,741
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(319,106
|
)
|
|
|
(202,789
|
)
|
|
|
(180,570
|
)
|
Rentals and insurance
|
|
|
(67,465
|
)
|
|
|
(62,937
|
)
|
|
|
(72,779
|
)
|
Training
|
|
|
(11,877
|
)
|
|
|
(12,572
|
)
|
|
|
(13.113
|
)
|
Others
|
|
|
(59,884
|
)
|
|
|
(53,675
|
)
|
|
|
(25.093
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1,195,277
|
)
|
|
|
(1,130,754
|
)
|
|
|
(1,012,556
|
)
|
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
|
30.
|
Other income (expenses), net
|
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidy income, net
|
|
|
21,513
|
|
|
|
12,370
|
|
|
|
11,677
|
|
Fines on telecommunications services
|
|
|
37,630
|
|
|
|
34,107
|
|
|
|
39,226
|
|
Income from the disposal of assets (*)
|
|
|
1,459,067
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
50,528
|
|
|
|
9,002
|
|
|
|
8,030
|
|
|
|
|
1,568,738
|
|
|
|
55,479
|
|
|
|
58,933
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FUST/FUNTTEL (**)
|
|
|
(168,238
|
)
|
|
|
(189.701
|
)
|
|
|
(173,241
|
)
|
Taxes, fees and contributions
|
|
|
(3,970
|
)
|
|
|
(3.270
|
)
|
|
|
(1,416
|
)
|
Provision for legal and administrative proceedings, net of reversal
|
|
|
(348,339
|
)
|
|
|
(260.235
|
)
|
|
|
(279,755
|
)
|
Cost of disposal of assets (*)
|
|
|
(245,756
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
(23,125
|
)
|
|
|
(31,682
|
)
|
|
|
(21,374
|
)
|
|
|
|
(789,428
|
)
|
|
|
(484,888
|
)
|
|
|
(475,786
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of authorizations
|
|
|
(344,915
|
)
|
|
|
(345.421
|
)
|
|
|
(319,285
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1,134,343
|
)
|
|
|
(830,309
|
)
|
|
|
(795,071
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expenses), net
|
|
|
434,395
|
|
|
|
(774,830
|
)
|
|
|
(736,138
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*)
During the year, 5,483 towers were transferred to ATC under the 1
st
, 2
nd
and 3
rd
tranches,
respectively, according to the agreements entered into between the parties (Notes 14 and 1.b). The leaseback was analyzed and
classified as financial lease, taking into account the requirements set forth in IAS17.
The
risks and benefits of the assets were transferred to the purchaser
on each transfer date
(
on April 29, 2015, September 30, 2015 and December 16, 2015), and a total of
R$1,253,618 (R$1,210,980, net of residual values and decommissioning costs write-off) was recognized as other operating
income due to the disposal of assets.
(**)
Expenses incurred with contributions on several telecommunications revenues due to ANATEL, pursuant to legislation in
force.
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on financial investments
|
|
|
647,629
|
|
|
|
521,637
|
|
|
|
257,376
|
|
Interest received from clients
|
|
|
60,208
|
|
|
|
52,707
|
|
|
|
63,855
|
|
Swap interest
|
|
|
50,611
|
|
|
|
35,452
|
|
|
|
79,561
|
|
Interest on leasing
|
|
|
24,045
|
|
|
|
32,085
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Monetary charges
|
|
|
57,917
|
|
|
|
54,189
|
|
|
|
46,200
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
8,327
|
|
|
|
6,347
|
|
|
|
4,399
|
|
|
|
|
848,737
|
|
|
|
702,417
|
|
|
|
451,391
|
|
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015 and 2014
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on borrowings and financing
|
|
|
(179,726
|
)
|
|
|
(337,172
|
)
|
|
|
(268,133
|
)
|
Interest paid to suppliers
|
|
|
(142,092
|
)
|
|
|
(128,796
|
)
|
|
|
(54,992
|
)
|
Interest on taxes and fees
|
|
|
(21,124
|
)
|
|
|
(10,658
|
)
|
|
|
(1,191
|
)
|
Swap interest
|
|
|
(308,216
|
)
|
|
|
(185,284
|
)
|
|
|
(173,649
|
)
|
Interest on leasing
|
|
|
(145,274
|
)
|
|
|
(43,904
|
)
|
|
|
(14,869
|
)
|
Monetary charges
|
|
|
(178,904
|
)
|
|
|
(154,731
|
)
|
|
|
(103,582
|
)
|
Discounts granted
|
|
|
(64,004
|
)
|
|
|
(86,333
|
)
|
|
|
(97,066
|
)
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
(76,184
|
)
|
|
|
(50,416
|
)
|
|
|
(36,218
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1,115,524
|
)
|
|
|
(997,294
|
)
|
|
|
(749,700
|
)
|
|
33.
|
Foreign exchange variation, net
|
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
Gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings and financing
|
|
-
|
|
3,469
|
|
1,189
|
Suppliers
|
|
|
9,107
|
|
|
|
6,022
|
|
|
|
7,504
|
|
Swaps
|
|
|
1,109,006
|
|
|
|
273,444
|
|
|
|
206,332
|
|
Others
|
|
|
29,902
|
|
|
|
18,073
|
|
|
|
19,738
|
|
|
|
|
1,148,015
|
|
|
|
301,008
|
|
|
|
234,763
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings and financing
|
|
|
(1,108,309
|
)
|
|
|
(273,496
|
)
|
|
|
(233,446
|
)
|
Suppliers
|
|
|
(28,949
|
)
|
|
|
(11,469
|
)
|
|
|
(17,336
|
)
|
Swaps
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(5,780
|
)
|
|
|
22,113
|
|
Others
|
|
|
(8,348
|
)
|
|
|
(8,158
|
)
|
|
|
(10,505
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1,145,606
|
)
|
|
|
(298,903
|
)
|
|
|
(239,174
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange variations, net
|
|
|
2,409
|
|
|
|
2,105
|
|
|
|
(4,411
|
)
|
The exchange variation for the
year relates to borrowings and financing and suppliers balances denominated in foreign currency. Derivative financial
instruments were used to mitigate effects (Note 39).
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
|
34.
|
Income tax and social contribution expenses
|
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
Current income tax and social contribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax for the year
|
|
|
(353,117
|
)
|
|
|
(338,999
|
)
|
|
|
(340,763
|
)
|
Social contribution for the year
|
|
|
(130,928
|
)
|
|
|
(125,754
|
)
|
|
|
(110,565
|
)
|
Tax incentive – SUDENE/SUDAM (*)
|
|
|
93,123
|
|
|
|
137,192
|
|
|
|
151,316
|
|
|
|
|
(390,922
|
)
|
|
|
(327,561
|
)
|
|
|
(300,012
|
)
|
Deferred income tax and social contribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax
|
|
|
(378,168
|
)
|
|
|
(234,493
|
)
|
|
|
(240,518
|
)
|
Deferred social contribution
|
|
|
(136,140
|
)
|
|
|
(84,418
|
)
|
|
|
(86,585
|
)
|
|
|
|
(514,308
|
)
|
|
|
(318,911
|
)
|
|
|
(327,103
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income tax and social contribution
|
|
|
(3,464
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(3,424
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(908,694
|
)
|
|
|
(646,498
|
)
|
|
|
(630,539
|
)
|
The reconciliation of income tax and social
contribution expenses calculated at the applicable tax rates plus the amounts reflected in the statement of income is set forth
below:
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax and social contribution
|
|
|
2,979,839
|
|
|
|
2,192,917
|
|
|
|
2,136,153
|
|
Combined tax rate
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
Income and social contribution taxes at the combined tax rate
|
|
|
(1,013,145
|
)
|
|
|
(745,592
|
)
|
|
|
(726,292
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Additions)/exclusions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized carryforward losses and temporary differences
|
|
|
(4,106
|
)
|
|
|
(25,274
|
)
|
|
|
(53,214
|
)
|
Permanent additions and exclusions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-deductible donations
|
|
|
(3,058
|
)
|
|
|
(5,537
|
)
|
|
|
(4,443
|
)
|
Non-deductible fines
|
|
|
(12,939
|
)
|
|
|
(9,796
|
)
|
|
|
(6,359
|
)
|
Losses accounts receivable – Co billing
|
|
|
(3,267
|
)
|
|
|
(7,674
|
)
|
|
|
(5,558
|
)
|
Sale of towers
|
|
|
27,546
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Other permanent differences
|
|
|
(5,146
|
)
|
|
|
(3,007
|
)
|
|
|
(3,488
|
)
|
Tax incentive – SUDENE/SUDAM
|
|
|
93,123
|
|
|
|
137,192
|
|
|
|
151,316
|
|
Other amounts
|
|
|
12,298
|
|
|
|
13,190
|
|
|
|
17,499
|
|
|
|
|
104,451
|
|
|
|
99,094
|
|
|
|
95,753
|
|
Income tax and social contribution
|
|
|
(908,694
|
)
|
|
|
(646,498
|
)
|
|
|
(630,539
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
30.49
|
%
|
|
|
29.48
|
%
|
|
|
29.52
|
%
|
According to the Brazilian income tax
rules, for tax incentive not to be considered within the taxable income, they must be recorded as capital reserves, to be
used only to offset losses or increase share capital. TIM Celular has tax benefits compliant to these
rules.
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015 and 2014
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
Basic
earnings per share are calculated by dividing income attributable to shareholders of the Company by the weighted average number
of shares issued during the year.
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income attributable to shareholders of the Company
|
|
|
2,071,145
|
|
|
|
1,546,419
|
|
|
|
1,505,614
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares
issued (thousands)
|
|
|
2,420,237
|
|
|
|
2,417,850
|
|
|
|
2,416,837
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share (expressed in R$)
|
|
|
0.8558
|
|
|
|
0.6396
|
|
|
|
0.6230
|
|
Diluted earnings per share are calculated
by adjusting the weighted average number of shares outstanding to assume conversion of all dilutive potential shares.
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income attributable to shareholders of the Company
|
|
|
2,071,145
|
|
|
|
1,546,419
|
|
|
|
1,505,614
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares issued (thousands)
|
|
|
2,420,325
|
|
|
|
2,418,877
|
|
|
|
2,417,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share (expressed in R$)
|
|
|
0.8557
|
|
|
|
0.6393
|
|
|
|
0.6228
|
|
|
36.
|
Transactions with Telecom Italia Group
|
The consolidated balances of transactions
with companies of the Telecom Italia Group are as follows:
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecom Argentina Group (1)
|
|
|
3,073
|
|
|
|
2,843
|
|
Telecom Italia Sparkle (1)
|
|
|
6,212
|
|
|
|
7,282
|
|
Lan Group (4)
|
|
|
3,881
|
|
|
|
6,345
|
|
TIM Brasil (6)
|
|
|
2,822
|
|
|
|
2,458
|
|
Others
|
|
|
674
|
|
|
|
674
|
|
Total
|
|
|
16,662
|
|
|
|
19,602
|
|
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecom Italia S.p.A. (2)
|
|
|
38,823
|
|
|
|
31,095
|
|
Telecom Argentina Group (1)
|
|
|
5,304
|
|
|
|
1,246
|
|
Telecom Italia Sparkle (1)
|
|
|
14,657
|
|
|
|
14,638
|
|
Italtel (3)
|
|
|
45,004
|
|
|
|
36,849
|
|
Lan Group (4)
|
|
|
3,854
|
|
|
|
3,094
|
|
TIM Brasil (6)
|
|
|
4,309
|
|
|
|
3,780
|
|
Vivendi Group (7)
|
|
|
1,035
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Others
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
3,683
|
|
Total
|
|
|
113,024
|
|
|
|
94,385
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecom Italia S.p.A. (2)
|
|
|
3,668
|
|
|
|
2,938
|
|
|
|
2,804
|
|
Telecom Argentina Group (1)
|
|
|
5,771
|
|
|
|
6,663
|
|
|
|
7,448
|
|
Telecom Italia Sparkle (1)
|
|
|
5,223
|
|
|
|
10,230
|
|
|
|
17,352
|
|
Lan Group (4)
|
|
|
1,590
|
|
|
|
841
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
Total
|
|
|
16,252
|
|
|
|
20,672
|
|
|
|
27,966
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs/Expenses
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecom Italia S.p.A. (2)
|
|
|
9,769
|
|
|
|
7,225
|
|
|
|
6,281
|
|
Telecom Italia Sparkle (1)
|
|
|
35,626
|
|
|
|
28,059
|
|
|
|
29,065
|
|
Telecom Argentina Group (1)
|
|
|
3,109
|
|
|
|
2,880
|
|
|
|
7,403
|
|
Lan Group (4)
|
|
|
51,806
|
|
|
|
40,444
|
|
|
|
32,326
|
|
Generali (5)
|
|
|
1,053
|
|
|
|
6,212
|
|
|
|
12,509
|
|
Vivendi Group (7)
|
|
|
7,669
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Others
|
|
|
588
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
858
|
|
Total
|
|
|
109,620
|
|
|
|
84,820
|
|
|
|
88,442
|
|
|
(1)
|
These amounts refer to roaming, value-added services (VAS), assignment of means and international
voice data - wholesale. The “Telecom Argentina Group” consists of the companies Telecom Personal, Telecom Argentina
and Nucleo.
|
|
(2)
|
These amounts refer to international roaming, technical post-sales assistance and value-added services
(VAS).
|
|
(3)
|
The amounts refer to the development and maintenance of software used in invoicing telecommunications
services.
|
|
(4)
|
The amounts refer to the lease of links and EILD, lease of means (submarine cables) and signaling
services.
|
|
(5)
|
The amounts refer to insurance coverage taken out for operating risks, civil liability and health
insurance among others.
|
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
|
(6)
|
The amounts refer mainly to judicial deposits related to labor proceedings.
|
|
(7)
|
The amounts refer to value-added services (VAS).
|
The balance sheet account balances are recorded
in the following groups: accounts receivable, prepaid expenses, suppliers and other current assets and liabilities.
|
37.
|
Management Compensation
|
Key Management personnel includes the statutory
officers and the Board of Directors. The compensation of key Management personnel for services rendered is shown below:
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and other short-term benefits
|
|
|
13,170
|
|
|
|
11,272
|
|
Share-based payments
|
|
|
3,029
|
|
|
|
3,464
|
|
|
|
|
16,199
|
|
|
|
14,736
|
|
|
38.
|
Transactions with Telefónica Group
|
On April 28, 2007, Assicurazioni Generali
SpA, Intesa San Paolo S.p.A, Mediobanca S.p.A, Sintonia S.p.A and Telefónica S.A., entered into an agreement to, through
the holding Telco S.p.A (“Telco”), hold 23.6% of the voting capital of Telecom Italia S.p.A., the indirect parent company
of TIM Participações. This transaction was approved by ANATEL on November 5, 2007, together with certain restrictions
on the rights of Telefónica S.A. to guarantee absolute segregation of businesses and operations performed by the Telefónica
and TIM groups in Brazil.
Subsequently,
in April 2010, as a condition for the approval of the transaction by the CADE
, Telco´s
controlling companies signed a Performance Commitment Instrument (“TCD”), determining the rules of Telefónica
participation on Telecom Italia deliberations and its governance restrictions regarding the activities performed in the Brazilian
market. TIM Brasil, the controlling company of TIM Participações, also signed this TCD agreement as
the mediator part.
On December
4, 2013, while inspecting compliance with the TCD, CADE imposed a penalty to TIM Brasil because the company had allegedly failed
to submit the agreement entered into with a company of the Telefónica Group before entering into the TCD. On December 16,
2013, TIM Brasil submitted a motion for clarification, which automatically suspended the obligation to pay the penalty until CADE
has judged the appeal.
On December
22, 2014, the Steering Committee of ANATEL agreed with the request
Telco S.p.A. split,
submitted by Assicurazioni Generali S.p.A., Mediobanca S.p.A., Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A. and Telefónica S.A., the split transaction
being conditional on the suspension of Telefónica’s entire political rights in Telecom Italia and its subsidiaries,
and revoking the monitoring commitments previously stipulated. Furthermore, according to ANATEL’s decision, any equity interest
of Telefónica in Telecom Italia must be eliminated within eighteen (18) months.
The
Concentration Act referring to the split
was approved by CADE on March 25, 2015, conditional
on Telefónica’s executing and complying with a Concentration Control Agreement (“ACC”), intended to facilitate
Telefón
ica’s complete disinvestment from Telecom Italia, and setting the obligations considered necessary
by the CADE to minimize any anti-trust concerns arising from this direct holding from Telefónica in Telecom Italia.
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
Concomitantly
with the analysis of Telco’s spin-off, ANATEL and CADE approved the acquisition of GVT by Telefónica Brasil S.A.,
in December 2014 and March 2015, respectively. As part of the payment for the acquisition of GVT, and successive transactions
between Vivendi, Telefónica and acquisitions on the free market, Vivendi currently holds 21.39% of voting shares in Telecom
Italia, and 0.95% of total shares in Telefónica. In this context, in the case records related to the operation of Telco,
CADE confirmed the extinguishment of the obligations established in the TCD also with respect to TIM Brasil.
Simultaneously,
through a material fact disclosed on June 24, 2015, Telefónica informed that “
the total divestiture of its interest
in Telecom Italia S.p.A., in accordance with the regulatory and competition commitments assumed
”.
At December 31, 2015, there were in force
exclusively between TIM Group controlled by TIM Participações and the operators of the Telefónica group in
Brazil, agreements involving telecommunications services covering interconnection, roaming, site-sharing, infrastructure-sharing,
industrial exploitation for dedicated lines, as well as co-billing long distance calls agreements all entered into on an arm’s
length basis and, when applicable, considering the regulation on providing such services as shown below:
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
351,147
|
|
310,732
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
(122,301)
|
|
(75,083)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
911,892
|
|
1,206,043
|
|
1,456,276
|
Costs/Expenses
|
|
(574,580)
|
|
(792,587)
|
|
(1,117,651)
|
|
39.
|
Financial instruments and risk management
|
The financial instruments registered
by the Company and its subsidiaries include derivatives, which are financial liabilities measured at fair value through
profit or loss.
At each balance sheet date they are measured
at their fair value.
Interest, monetary adjustment, exchange
variation and variations arising from measurement at fair value, where applicable,
are recognized
in the result when incurred, under finance income or costs.
Derivatives
are initially recognized at fair value as of the date of the derivative agreement, being subsequently adjusted to fair value.
The method used for recognizing any gain or loss depends on whether the derivative is assigned or not as a hedge instrument in
cases where hedge accounting is adopted.
Through
its subsidiaries, the Company performs non-speculative derivative transactions, to (i) reduce the exchange variation risks and
(ii) manage exposure to the interest risks involved. The Company’s derivative financial transactions consist basically of
swap contracts.
The
Company’s financial instruments are presented, through its subsidiaries, in compliance with IAS 32.
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015 and 2014
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
Accordingly,
the major risk factors to which the Company and its subsidiaries are exposed as follows:
|
(i)
|
Exchange variation
risks
|
Exchange variation risks refer to the possibility
of subsidiaries incurring i) losses on unfavorable exchange rate fluctuation, which would increase the outstanding balances of
borrowings taken in the market along with the related financial expenses; or ii) increase in the cost of commercial agreements
affected by exchange variation. In order to reduce this kind of risk, the subsidiaries i) enter into swap contracts with financial
institutions with the purpose of avoiding the impact of exchange rate variations on borrowings and financing; and ii) invest in
foreign exchange funds with the purpose of reducing the impacts on commercial agreements.
At December 31, 2015, the borrowings and
financing of the subsidiaries indexed to foreign currency were fully hedged by swap contracts in terms of time and amount. Any
gains or losses arising from these swap contracts are charged to earnings of the subsidiaries.
The amount invested in the foreign exchange
funds is intended to hedge foreign exchange exposure linked to US dollar-denominated trade agreements.
Besides the risks mentioned above, no other
significant financial assets and liabilities are indexed to foreign currencies.
Interest rate risks relate to:
|
·
|
The possibility of variations in the fair
value of TJLP-indexed financing taken by the subsidiary TIM Celular, when these rates are not proportional to that of the Interbank
Deposit Certificates (CDI). As at December 31, 2015, the subsidiary TIM Celular has no swap transactions linked to the TJLP.
|
|
·
|
The possibility of unfavorable changes
in interest rates would result in higher finance costs for the subsidiaries due to the indebtedness and the obligations assumed
by the subsidiaries under the swap contracts indexed to floating interest rates (CDI percentage). However, at December 31, 2015,
the subsidiaries’ financial funds were invested in Interbank Deposit Certificates (CDI) and this considerably reduces such
risk.
|
|
(iii)
|
Credit
risk inherent to the provision of services
|
This
risk involves the possibility of the subsidiaries incurring losses arising from the inability of subscribers to pay the amounts
billed to them. To minimize this risk the subsidiaries engage in preventive credit analysis of all requests submitted by the sales
area and monitor the accounts receivable from subscribers, freezing the ability to use the services, among other actions, in case
customers do not pay their debts. No customers contributed with more than 10% of the net account receivables or revenues from
services rendered at December 31, 2015 and 2014.
|
(iv)
|
Credit
risk inherent to the sale of handsets and prepaid telephone cards
|
The
policy of the subsidiaries in selling handsets and distributing prepaid telephone cards is directly related to the credit risk
levels acceptable during the normal course of business. The choice of partners, the diversification of the portfolio of accounts
receivables, monitoring borrowing conditions, positions and order limits established for traders and the constitution of real
guarantees are the procedures adopted by the subsidiaries to contain possible problems in collecting from their business
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
partners.
There are no customers that contributed with more than 10% of the net accounts receivable of, or 10% of sales revenues at December
31, 2015 and 2014.
|
(v)
|
Financial credit risk
|
This risk relates to the possibility of
the subsidiaries incurring losses from difficulty in realizing their short-term investments and swap contracts due to bankruptcy
of the counterparties. The subsidiaries minimize the risk associated with these financial instruments by operating only with sound
financial institutions, and adopting policies that establish maximum risk concentration levels by institution.
Fair value of derivative financial instruments
The
consolidated derivative financial instruments are s
hown as follows:
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
Net
|
|
Assets
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transactions with derivatives
|
|
|
1,099,574
|
|
|
|
(109,512
|
)
|
|
|
990,062
|
|
|
|
510,698
|
|
|
|
(67,044
|
)
|
|
|
443,654
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion
|
|
|
608,915
|
|
|
|
(109,512
|
)
|
|
|
499,403
|
|
|
|
47,541
|
|
|
|
(67,044
|
)
|
|
|
(19,503
|
)
|
Non-current portion
|
|
|
490,659
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
490,659
|
|
|
|
463,157
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
463,157
|
|
The
consolidated financial derivative instruments with long-term maturities at December 31, 2015 are as follows:
|
|
Assets
|
|
Liabilities
|
2017
|
|
192,766
|
|
-
|
2018
|
|
64,655
|
|
-
|
2019
|
|
108,487
|
|
-
|
2020
onwards
|
|
124,751
|
|
-
|
|
|
490,659
|
|
-
|
Consolidated
financial assets and liabilities valued at fair value:
2015
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Total balance
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets valued at fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
|
599,414
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
599,414
|
|
Derivatives used for hedging purposes
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,099,574
|
|
|
|
1,099,574
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
599,414
|
|
|
|
1,099,574
|
|
|
|
1,698,988
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities valued at fair value through profit loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives used for hedging purposes
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
109,512
|
|
|
|
109,512
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
109,512
|
|
|
|
109,512
|
|
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015 and 2014
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
2014
|
|
|
Level
1
|
|
Level
2
|
|
Total
balance
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets valued at fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
|
41,149
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
41,149
|
|
Derivatives used for hedging purposes
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
510,698
|
|
|
|
510,698
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
41,149
|
|
|
|
510,698
|
|
|
|
551,847
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities valued at fair value through profit or loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives used for hedging purposes
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
67,044
|
|
|
|
67,044
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
67,044
|
|
|
|
67,044
|
|
The fair value of financial instruments
traded on active markets is based on quoted market prices at the balance sheet date. A market is regarded as active if quoted prices
are readily and regularly available from an exchange, dealer, broker, industry group, pricing service or regulatory agency, and
those prices represent actual and regularly occurring market transactions on an arm’s length basis. These instruments are
included in Level 1. The instruments included in Level 1 comprise, mainly, investments of Bank Deposit Certificates (CDBs) and
Repurchases (Repos) classified as trading securities.
The fair value of financial instruments
that are not traded on an active market (for example, over-the-counter derivatives) is determined by using valuation techniques.
These valuation techniques maximize the use of observable market data where it is available and rely as little as possible on entity
specific estimates. If all significant inputs required to fair value an instrument are observable, the instrument is included in
Level 2. If one or more of the significant inputs is not based on observable market data, the instrument is included in Level 3.
Specific valuation techniques used to value
financial instruments include:
|
·
|
Quoted market prices or financial institutions
quotes or dealer quotes for similar instruments.
|
|
·
|
The fair value of interest rate swaps is
calculated as the present value of the estimated future cash flows based on observable yield curves.
|
|
·
|
Other techniques, such as discounted cash
flow analysis, are used to determine fair value for the remaining financial instruments.
|
The fair values of derivative financial
instruments of the subsidiaries were determined based on future cash flows (asset and liability position), taking into account
the contracted conditions and bringing those flows to present value by means of the discounted future interest rates disclosed
in the market. The fair values were estimated at a specific time, based on information available and on Company’s own valuation
methodologies.
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
Financial instruments by category
The Company’s financial instruments by category are
summarized as follows:
|
|
Borrowings and
Receivables
|
|
Assets valued at
fair value
|
|
Total
|
At December 31, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets, as per balance sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
-
|
|
1,099,574
|
|
1,099,574
|
Trade accounts receivable and
other accounts receivable, excluding prepayments
|
|
|
2,882,950
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,882,950
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
599,414
|
|
|
|
599,414
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
6,100,403
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6,100,403
|
|
Leasing
|
|
|
199,935
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
199,935
|
|
|
|
|
9,183,288
|
|
|
|
1,698,988
|
|
|
|
10,882,276
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities valued
at fair value through profit or loss
|
|
Other financial
liabilities
|
|
Total
|
At December 31, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities, as per balance sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings and financings
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7,926,436
|
|
|
|
7,926,436
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
109,512
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
109,512
|
|
Suppliers and other obligations, excluding
legal obligations
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,784,945
|
|
|
|
3,784,945
|
|
Leasing
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,618,506
|
|
|
|
1,618,506
|
|
|
|
|
109,512
|
|
|
|
13,329,887
|
|
|
|
13,439,399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings and
Receivables
|
|
Assets valued at
fair value
|
|
Total
|
At December 31, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets, as per balance sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
510,698
|
|
|
|
1,099,574
|
|
Trade accounts receivable and other accounts
receivable, excluding prepayments
|
|
|
3,567,303
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,567,303
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,149
|
|
|
|
41,149
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
5,232,992
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,232,992
|
|
Leasing
|
|
|
195,036
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
195,036
|
|
|
|
|
8,995,331
|
|
|
|
1,698,988
|
|
|
|
9,547,178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities valued
at fair value through profit or loss
|
|
Other financial
liabilities
|
|
Total
|
At December 31, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities, as per balance sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings and financings
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6,754,419
|
|
|
|
6,754,419
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
67,044
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
67,044
|
|
Suppliers and other obligations, excluding
legal obligations
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,402,204
|
|
|
|
5,402,204
|
|
Leasing
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
329,669
|
|
|
|
329,669
|
|
|
|
|
67,044
|
|
|
|
12,486,292
|
|
|
|
12,553,336
|
|
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015 and 2014
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
The
regular purchases and sales of financial assets are recognized on the trade date - the date on which the Company undertakes to
buy or sell the asset. Investments are initially recognized at fair value. After initial recognition, changes in the fair value
are booked in income for the year as finance income and costs.
Financial
risk hedge policy adopted by the Company – Synthesis
The
Company’s policy states that mechanisms must be adopted to hedge against financial risks arising from borrowings taken out
in foreign currency, so as to manage the exposure to the risks associated with exchange variations.
Derivative
financial instruments against exchange variations must be acquired simultaneously with the closing of the debt that gave rise
to that exposure. The coverage level to be taken out for this exchange exposure is 100% of the risk, both in terms of maturity
date and amount.
At
December 31, 2015 no types of margins or collateral apply to the Company’s or the subsidiaries’ transactions involving
derivative financial instruments.
The
criteria for choosing the financial institutions abide by parameters that take into account the rating provided by reliable risk
analysis agencies, shareholders’ equity and concentration levels of transactions and funding.
The
transactions involving derivative financial instruments entered into by the subsidiaries and outstanding at December 31, 2015
and 2014 are shown in the table below:
December
31, 2015
COUNTERPARTY
|
AVERAGE
SWAP RATES
|
CURRENCY
|
SWAP
Type
|
DEBT
|
SWAP
|
Total
Debt
|
Total
Swap
(Asset Side)
|
%
Coverage
|
Asset
Side
|
Liability
Side
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USD
|
LIBOR
X DI
|
BEI
|
Santander,
CITI,
MS and BOFA
|
1,859,821
|
1,859,682
|
100%
|
LIBOR
6M + 0.89% p.a.
|
90.07%
of CDI
|
USD
|
LIBOR
X DI
|
BNP
|
CITI,
JP Morgan
|
187,038
|
187,038
|
100%
|
LIBOR
6M + 2.53% p.a.
|
97.42%
of CDI
|
USD
|
LIBOR
X DI
|
KfW
|
JP
Morgan
|
304,924
|
304,924
|
100%
|
LIBOR
6M + 1.35% p.a.
|
102.5%
of CDI
|
USD
|
LIBOR
X DI
|
BOFA
|
BOFA
|
468,114
|
468,114
|
100%
|
LIBOR
3M + 1.35% p.a.
|
102.00%
of CDI
|
USD
|
PRE
X DI
|
CISCO
|
Santander
|
469,931
|
469,931
|
100%
|
2.18%
p.a.
|
88.30%
of CDI
|
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
December 31, 2014
COUNTERPARTY
|
AVERAGE
SWAP RATES
|
CURRENCY
|
SWAP
Type
|
DEBT
|
SWAP
|
Total
Debt
|
Total
Swap
(Asset Side)
|
%
Coverage
|
Asset
Side
|
Liability
Side
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USD
|
LIBOR
X DI
|
BEI
|
Santander,
CITI
MS e BOFA
|
1,264,369
|
1,264,463
|
100%
|
LIBOR
6M + 0.86% p.a.
|
95.25%
of CDI
|
USD
|
LIBOR
X DI
|
BNP
|
CITI,
BES
|
190,841
|
190,841
|
100%
|
LIBOR
6M + 2.53% p.a.
|
97.42%
of CDI
|
USD
|
LIBOR
X DI
|
KfW
|
JP
Morgan
|
266,509
|
266,509
|
100%
|
LIBOR
6M + 1.35% p.a.
|
102.5%
of CDI
|
USD
|
LIBOR
X DI
|
BOFA
|
BOFA
|
318,387
|
318,387
|
100%
|
LIBOR
3M + 1.35% p.a.
|
102.00%
of CDI
|
USD
|
PRE
X DI
|
JP
Morgan
|
JP
Morgan
|
133,448
|
133,448
|
100%
|
1.73%
p.a.
|
101.50%
of CDI
|
USD
|
PRE
X DI
|
CISCO
|
Santander
|
239,998
|
239,999
|
100%
|
1.8%
p.a.
|
92.72%
of CDI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reference Amount
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Subject
|
|
|
|
|
(Notional)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USD exchange risk against CDI
|
|
Full hedge of exchange variation risk obtained from the banks BNP Paribas, EIB, BOFA, Cisco, KFW and JP Morgan.
|
|
BRL
|
|
|
2,182,666
|
|
|
|
1,901,769
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset position
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,099,574
|
|
|
|
2,377,645
|
|
Liability position
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(109,512
|
)
|
|
|
(1,933,991
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
990,062
|
|
|
|
443,654
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,182,666
|
|
|
|
1,901,769
|
|
|
|
990,062
|
|
|
|
443,654
|
|
In addition to the swap transactions mentioned
in the tables above, the Company took advantage of a favorable moment to close a forward swap transaction in advance in order to
ensure an attractive cost of 79.0% of CDI for a financing agreement in foreign currency that will be disbursed in the future to
Finnvera/KfW. Swap was closed based on the same payment flow as the debt to be disbursed in the future to ensure full hedging.
This transaction does not hold foreign exchange risk, since the initial dollar rate for this transaction (Debt and Swap) will be
simultaneously based on pre-established date in the future. On December 31, 2015 the MTM of the transaction registered in the books
was R$702 - Asset.
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015 and 2014
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
Position
showing the sensitivity analysis – effect of variation on the fair value of the swaps
In
order to identify possible distortions arising from consolidated derivative financial instrument transactions currently outstanding,
a sensitivity analysis was carried out taking into account three different scenarios (probable, possible and remote) and their
respective impacts on results, as follows:
Description
|
|
2015
|
|
Probable
Scenario
|
|
Possible
Scenario
|
|
Remote
Scenario
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) Debt
in USD (BNP Paribas, BEI,BOFA, Cisco and KFW)
|
|
|
3,356,719
|
|
|
|
3,356,719
|
|
|
|
4,218,884
|
|
|
|
5,090,243
|
|
b) Fair
value of the asset side of the swap
|
|
|
3,356,719
|
|
|
|
3,356,719
|
|
|
|
4,218,884
|
|
|
|
5,090,243
|
|
c) Fair
value of the liability side of the swap
|
|
|
(2,364,104
|
)
|
|
|
(2,364,104
|
)
|
|
|
(2,366,634
|
)
|
|
|
(2,369,978
|
)
|
d) =
(b+c) Net exposure in the swap
|
|
|
992,615
|
|
|
|
992,615
|
|
|
|
1,852,250
|
|
|
|
2,720,265
|
|
Final
Exposure (Scenario – Current Position)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,530
|
|
|
|
5,874
|
|
Given the characteristics of the
derivative financial instruments of the subsidiaries, our assumptions basically took into account the effect i) of the variation
in the CDI and; ii) of the variations in the US dollar used in the transactions, achieving, respectively, the percentages and
quotations indicated below:
Risk
variable
|
Probable
scenario
|
Possible
scenario
|
Remote
scenario
|
CDI
|
14.14%
|
17.68%
|
21.21%
|
USD
|
3.9048
|
4.8810
|
5.8572
|
As
the subsidiaries hold derivative financial instruments to hedge their respective financial debt, the variations in the scenarios
are monitored from the respective subject of the hedge, thereby showing that the counterpart of the effects involving the exposure
created by the swaps will be reflected in the debt. In the case of these transactions the subsidiaries disclosed the fair value
of the subject matter (debt) and the derivative financial instrument of the hedge on separate lines, as shown in the sensitivity
analysis position above, so as to reveal the net exposure of its subsidiaries in each of the three scenarios mentioned.
We
wish to draw attention to the fact that the sole purpose of the transactions closed by the subsidiaries involving derivative financial
transactions is to protect their balance sheet position. Therefore, any improvement or deterioration in their respective market
values will represent an inverse movement in the corresponding installments of the financial debt contracted, which is the subject
matter of the subsidiaries’ derivative financial instruments.
Our
sensitivity analyses referring to the derivative financial instruments outstanding at December 31, 2015 were conducted taking
into account basically the assumptions surrounding the variations in market interest rates and the variation of the US dollar
used in the swap agreements. The use of those assumptions in our analyses was exclusively due to the characteristics of our derivative
financial instruments, which represent exposure to interest rate and exchange variations only.
Position
showing gains and losses with derivatives in the period
|
|
2015
|
Net gains from USD vs. CDI transactions
|
|
|
851,401
|
|
In March/15 the Company reversed two swap
transactions and simultaneously entered into two new ones, with Bank of America and Santander, thus netting R$334 million in revenues.
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
Capital
management
The
Group’s objectives when managing capital is to safeguard the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern in order to provide
returns to shareholders and benefits to other stakeholders, in addition to maintaining an optimal capital structure to reduce
the cost of capital.
In
order to maintain or adjust its capital structure the Company can review its policy on paying dividends, returning capital to
the shareholders or also issuing new stock or selling assets to reduce its level of indebtedness, for example.
In
line with other companies in the sector, the Group monitors among others indexes its financial leverage based on the Net Debt-to-EBITDA
ratio.
The
financial leverage indices at December 31, 2015 and 2014 can be summarized as follows:
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total borrowings and derivatives (Notes 18 and 39)
|
|
|
6,936,374
|
|
|
|
6,310,765
|
|
Leasing - Liabilities (Note 15)
|
|
|
1,618,506
|
|
|
|
329,669
|
|
Leasing – Assets (Nota 15)
|
|
|
(199,935
|
)
|
|
|
(195,036
|
)
|
Debts with ANATEL (Note 17)
|
|
|
77,450
|
|
|
|
61,860
|
|
Minus: Cash and cash equivalents (Note 4)
|
|
|
(6,100,403
|
)
|
|
|
(5,232,992
|
)
|
Foreign exchange fund (Note 5)
|
|
|
599,414
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Net cash
|
|
|
1,732,578
|
|
|
|
1,274,266
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA (last 12 months) (not audited)
|
|
|
6,606,188
|
|
|
|
5,538,268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial leverage ratio (*)
|
|
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
0.23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation to Profit for the year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net profit for the year
|
|
|
2,071,145
|
|
|
|
1,546,419
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3,361,971
|
|
|
|
3,052,579
|
|
Financial result, net
|
|
|
264,378
|
|
|
|
292,772
|
|
Income and social contribution taxes
|
|
|
908,694
|
|
|
|
646,498
|
|
EBITDA (not audited) (**)
|
|
|
6,606,188
|
|
|
|
5,538,268
|
|
(*) The change in the ratio includes the effect of the sale of
towers.
(**) EBITDA: Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization
The Company and its subsidiaries maintain
a policy for monitoring the risks inherent to their operations. Accordingly, at December 31, 2015, the Company and its subsidiaries
had insurance coverage against operating risks, third party liability, and health, among others. The Management of the Company
and of its subsidiaries consider that insurance coverage is sufficient to cover eventual losses. The table below shows the main
assets, liabilities or interests insured and their respective amounts:
TIM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2015 and 2014
(In thousands of
Reais,
unless
otherwise indicated)
|
Types
|
|
Amounts insured
|
|
|
|
Operating risks
|
|
R$38,757,407
|
General Third Party Liability - RCG
|
|
R$80,000
|
Vehicles (Executive and Operational Fleets)
|
|
R$1,000 for Civil Liability Optional (Property Damages and Personal Injury) and R$100 for Moral Damages.
|
Rentals
The Company and its subsidiaries rent equipment
and properties by means of many rental agreements with different maturity dates. Below is a list of minimum rental payments committed
under such agreements:
|
2016
|
|
769,059
|
|
|
2017
|
|
807,512
|
|
|
2018
|
|
843,850
|
|
|
2019
|
|
881,823
|
|
|
2020
|
|
921,505
|
|
|
|
|
4,223,749
|
|
42.
|
Supplementary disclosure on cash flows
|
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
|
456,076
|
|
|
|
383,469
|
|
|
|
230,238
|
|
Income tax and social contribution paid
|
|
|
222,450
|
|
|
|
185,826
|
|
|
|
319,765
|
|
Additions to property, plant and equipment and intangible assets with no effect on cash
|
|
|
(1,244,803
|
)
|
|
|
(3,287
|
)
|
|
|
(309,714
|
)
|
Increase in leasing liabilities with no effect on cash
|
|
|
1,244,803
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
* * *