Netlist Inc (QB) (NLST) Quote

Read the next 3 posts sounds like it maybe happening...

Stokd
7:25 PM

$NLST To add some context: recently Micron 294 trial was rescheduled because Micron claimed to essentially lose a key expert witness, and need to either convince the man—whose wife is on her deathbed—to attend trial against his preference, or find another expert to adopt his reports/opinions and testify.

Not a position Micron wants to be in within weeks of trial... maybe Gilstrap saw opportunity.

"Court directed Micron to either arrange for Dr. Stone to be present and testify in person during the May 20,2024 trial setting or, if he elects to withdraw from Micron’s trial team, Micron is to secure a replacement expert with sufficient qualifications who will wholly adopt each of Dr.Stone’s reports and opinions who will testify in person during the May 20,2024 trial setting by “stepping into the shoes” of Dr. Stone. The Court made it clear during the telephonic hearing on April 23,2024, that in no event would the Court allow the retention by Micron of a new technical expert who..."
Rest below
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_571014352.png

Stokd
7m

$NLST Well look at this...🔥 in the Micron 628 case I mentioned earlier—Netlist's Declaratory Judgment for No Bad Faith Assertion—just filed is a JOINT NOTICE OF DESIGNATION OF MEDIATOR.
"Plaintiff Netlist, Inc. (“Netlist”) and Defendants Micron Technology, Inc., Micron Semiconductor Products, Inc., and Micron Technology Texas LLC (collectively “Micron”) respectfully and jointly give notice of their designation of Judge David Folsom as mediator in this action."
It's getting even more interesting...
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_571011702.png

Stokd
15m

$NLST 🔥Well... this is interesting🔥
Just filed by Gilstrap Sua Sponte in the Micron 294 case.
"The Court issues this Order sua sponte. The Court is of the opinion that the parties might benefit from an additional effort to mediate this case. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the parties to mediate in this case promptly and at a mutually agreeable place and date, but no later than May 13, 2024. The mediation shall be conducted by the Hon. David Folsom, 6002 Summerfield Drive, Texarkana, Texas 75503, david@folsomadr.com. To ensure that mediation is as productive as possible, the Court hereby ORDERS that each party shall personally attend such mediation with lead counsel, local counsel, and a representative who has full and unilateral authority to act on and compromise on all pending disputes. No party or representative shall leave the mediation session, once it begins, without the approval of the mediator."
Read the rest in image below.
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_571011114.png

lol !!! for all of us who ever cried the blues even remotely over nlst, yeah i'm included as well..........

Thats what I am thinking!!.make it so

microby
21m

only one claim number 16 brings mountains of mass product RDIMM of gen4 on the damages scale ⚖️

additionally, as integrated in 417, the highly specialized LRDIMM

417💪🍀🙏 my weekend number😀

many greetings friends! 🤜

„…. ‘417 Patent add sections on “Load Isolation,” “Back-to-Back Adjacent Read Commands,” “Serial-Presence Detect Device,” “Tied Data Strobe Signal Pins,” and “Memory Density Multiplication,” in addition to the ’912 Patent’s subject matter on “Command Signal Translation......”
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570995898.png

100% exactly how i felt it went, fwiw...

My own opinion of the call was that it was good. Hong outlined the increase in revenue. He outlined the increase in market outlook for chip sales. He outlined plans to appeal the PTAB decisions using both the PTO appeal process and then (if needed), to the CAFC level. He also outlined the continued heavy investment into the CXL chip development and stated it would be an important part of the company in last half of this decade.

He made clear his disdain of the PTAB process and his astonishment that the 912 (claim16) patent IPR request was even considered again, never mind that it was granted and then overturned - after the SAME PTAB AND the CAFC looked at it and said it WAS patentable 5 TIMES in the last 14 years.

It is unbelievable to me that anyone could come to the conclusion that Hong was thinking of basically "throwing in the towel". I listened to the SAME CC you did and I don't not feel that way at all. Was Hong's disappointment at the PTAB decisions evident? Of course. But all I see is Hong making plans to appeal them.

Right about now is when quite a lot is happening. Multiple trials and decisions will take place in the next 1-6 months.

I just cannot understand why anyone would suddenly develop a dour outlook at this particular time.

That is incorrect.

We have been over this before. E*Trade DOES charge a fee to trade OTC stocks. It is $6.95

Right on their web page here:

https://us.etrade.com/what-we-offer/pricing-and-rates

Over-the-counter stock trades

A $6.95 commission (or a $4.95 commission for customers who execute at least 30 stock, ETF and otions trades per quarter) apples to online trades of OTC stocks, including OTC, OTCBB, grey market, and OTC-traded foreign securities.

Their website states it and I can tell the board that it is true. I have paid $6.95 for every trade I have made of Netlist stock.

I've never paid a fee for any stock transaction on eTrade

No fees at eTrade

That could explain it. We can all hope.

TDA now Schwab i trade alot and told them they needed to lower fee and we worked it out call and ask it can't hurt

Who is your Broker?
I have Charles Schwab. Before that was TD Ameritrade. They both charged 6.95 for OTC trades.
I have E*TRADE also, and they charge the same.
Yes, trading a 1000 shares at a time would be nice money.

Anyway, I will have to reconsider all trading come May court date.
If more delays than more time to trade.

you need to talk to your broker I pay less that $3.50 a trade so less that $7. round trip and I don't buy less than 1k shares at a time most often more. Also I'm trading everyday yesterday I bought kopn @ .729 sold this a.m. for .874 20% gain so money to work with.
So for me it would have worked..

Maybe theres a deal in the works

Again chuck reminds me of another tough SOB! Nothing no one kicks him down! He just keeps fighting always ! God bless CHUCK! He is fighting for what is right and true!

Yea, swing trading NLST would have been a good option over the years. The problem is that since NLST is on the OTC is the $14 FEE to trade (Buy&Sell.)
On a small lot trade of 100 shares, there would have to be at least a .14 different in price to cover this fee. Only large lot trade of like 1000 shares would be profitable. A second problem is that, if you have been in NLST for years, and in a taxable account, most of your shares are probably in the Long Term Capital gains category So, selling them now may not be a good option tax wise. Unless Biden proposed 46% capital gains tax comes true.

The only place to trade is in an IRA!!! But you still have that $14 Fee.

Just reflecting on the tone of the call. There didn't seem to be any enthusiasm at all. It was as low key as possible with a hurry up and get it over with attitude. Not one mention of any future activity.

No flaming here, but why would Chuck throw in the towel after 10 yrs of fighting when in the next two , three or four months different things will becoming to a head? your statement doesn't make any sense to me.

wtg I wished I would started flipping way back when i first bought lol I'd be up huge by now. I have never sold a shre yet.

i agree totally, but for now i just want to see the next trial commence on the date ordered.

ty! I have 4 accounts with NLST shares. 1 of them I flip when the opportunity presents itself. this is fidelity

Is Chuck getting ready to throw in the towel?

Before the flaming starts, let me say that I am a 10+ year holder of over 100K shares. Yesterday's conference call definitely was a downer for me. They didn't once say anything of a positive nature of what is going on with the business. It was a very low key reading of the numbers and recap of the cases. Nothing was said of anything looking forward. We know they just hired some new marketing people, so why no mention of what is expected of them or what the plan is? No need to give away all the secrets but just some mention of what the plan is and what the expectations are would have been very positive and something that people would have liked to hear. What about new products? Once again no need to give away any secrets, just some mention of types of products under development. Some conversation of expectations of new alignments with other manufacturers or a report on how things are going with Hynix would have been nice. All in all just a terrible call.

Because of the lack of any positive news, and the tones of voice from both Chuck and Gail, it seems to me that they are done.

nice buy are you holding all these shares or flipping ??? also who do you trade with? what broker??

$NLST silly wabbit tricks are for kids

Longer they keep kicking the can down the road the more they will pay!

robcobb
42m

$NLST The Ptab has put a temporary funk on everything right now.When we win the boc 00993 and Micron 294 trials,(IMO)things will look very different!To all the seniors on the board we have all been through times in our lives when things seem to be going against us,to have something unexpected turn it all around.Thats what I am expecting when we win both trials in May (IMO),and Judge Gilstrap sets the royalty rate for the 463 case.We have already accrued another years damage and interest when Judge Gilstrap sets that rate since the 463 trial!Samsungs liabilities will increase significantly over another year if they appeal.We don’t know what the future holds but I will be like Chuck and not give up! I have faith in Jason and Judge Gilstrap getting justice for Nlst ! I will be there to witness it when it happens!For those that don’t understand how strong Chucks resolve is haven’t been here for the last ten years!Good luck to the true longs!

thats just it, seeing it through. common sense will tell you after all this time they have to be legit or they would of been shot down years ago. lol !!! its having to entertain all the deceit and corruption of a justice system that allows it that just kills me ! but i will see this through to the end, or when i think the pps is high enough for my own personal gain.

I agree wether there witness shows up or not i dont think they are getting out of a major penalty. Im just happy to see gilstrap state were going forward with may20th. Another four weeks dosnt make a difference after waiting 3+ yrs for me. I know there is a few others that have been here 10+ yrs and entering retirement so i really hope they all get the satisfaction of seeing this through

Stokd
15m

$NLST Apparently some think that we're going to stay at the current price till all CAFC appeals are concluded. With many catalysts to come as verdicts/rulings/trials—even though we need to wait for the CAFC till we can collect—there is no way we don't run quite a bit as we gradually get these wins under our belt.

I would add that as things progress in Netlist's favor, the possibility of deals/settlements remains and could tip the balance in negotiations prior to CAFC conclusions.

Remember, that the negative aspects of our litigation situation is the PTAB, and with mostly all key patent IPRs being concluded, most of the bad news is in the rear view mirror.

Another thought is that there is no way that any investor would stay if they thought the only upside is in 2 years—it is just venting frustration or trying to affect sentiment to capitalize IMO—because they know like the rest of us that there are plenty of opportunity here prior to conclusion of appeals.

I agree 100% next few months should tell the story.

lol

lol!!! chuck has big kahoonas. he isnt playing i dont see him giving into any demands at all.

sounds like a plan but in the world of otc there is no way they would let us hold a 4.5 pps!!! in theory your plan is the move. but the reality is if we think we're crying now, we'd be stroking out one by one and there wouldnt be enough ambulances to get to all of us in time !!!

nlst needs to do an R/S say 1 for 3 triple the short position lol

they lost to begin with for starters. no jdla, no license. how much they get racked for is another story. my 2 cents!

all depends on whether the entity is long term or short. long we're winners.

Sounds like the may20th trial date is set and a go either way micron wants it. 1)get stone to the podium, 2) find replacement of stone(highly unlikely in my opinion) or 3) trial with out the witness which would be suicide on microns part. Lets get this done whoop whoop

I think we WILL see another offering. It'll be interesting to see how quickly it is scooped up. Or not!

Let's not forget - at the time of the last offering, many of these IPR's were still up in the air. Now that the PTAB has screwed us, the only hope left is for the CAFC to overrule the PTAB. If NLST does make a stock offering and it is scooped up quickly? It will be telling as to the general sentiment of the bigger investors.

To date, the entity that scooped up that last offering is under water on it. That might dissuade other entities from taking a risk on further offerings.

business as usual after the call and getting better, time for the pps to rebound again lol !!!

Worrisome? Downright fearful! Another offering would suck big time. And based on unending delays (and then appeals after final decisions), it seems they won't see $ from these cases any time soon but they'll need to get working capital somehow.
Holding at a loss with little capital to average down lower is a disheartening position to be in.

cc call https://event.choruscall.com/mediaframe/webcast.html?webcastid=VifXFy7W

Stokd $NLST I hope folks understand, that with Gilstrap's order and reasoning yesterday to not stay or sever the 912 from the Micron 294 case, and to proceed with trial regardless of the PTAB IPR decision... it essentially clears any uncertainty regarding the Samsung 293 trial—which is on same patents—also not being stayed or severed, and I assume will be scheduled for the next available date once the BOC trial is over.

I also wonder if/how his reasoning may impact his decision whether to proceed with the stayed and ready for trial Micron 203 case involving the 918/054/060/160 patents.

Short interest data means NOTHING whether from ORTEX or FINTEL. "They" have many ways around this data.
IT MEANS ZERO~!

So, take it for what it's worth........ it doesn't even give an accurate idea of how shorted a ticker is.

Overstock lawsuit tells all the ways they get around showing their cards. This was exposed by a defendant who posed as
a market maker and had to spill the beans under testimony. All the tricks "they" (the real market makers) use to hide transactions.

Why is it Ken Griffen is so upset with the proposed auction of stocks saying it will disrupt order flow~? Without order flow
Citadel and Virtu make no money, THAT'S WHY. The auction is also more transparent. Ken and Dougie Fresh of Virtu don't like transparency.
They are both still fighting the CAT system.

Think NetList isn't shorted/naked shorted massively~? Better think again. These guys are not backing NetList's patented IP that is stolen by the corporate Clown Cartel of Google, Samsung, and Micron. They are counting on the deep pocket Clown
Cartel to win and steal NetList patents outright without paying a dime in licensing or any damages.
My guess is that NetList has been shorted/naked shorted to the hilt, in hopes that Hong would capitulate and go bankrupt
so the Clown Cartel could steal all of NetList patents/IP.

If going by "short data" provided by the powers that be for ANY ticker, good luck making sound choices.
Data is manipulated like everything in this CORRUPT market.

Good that NetList has a Kangal lawyer in Jason Sheasby keeping these Clown Cartel wolves at bay. Eh~? So far the Kangal lawyer's bite force was enough to win some money from ScamScum in just one jury trial, but his bite will be even more pronounced in upcoming trials,

Also good that Judge Gilstrap and Judge Payne are presiding over these cases. I do not think these Judges can be bought off like we have seen in the case of PTAB which should be totally abolished. PTAB is not being used for what it was originally intended, and now deep pockets seem to control what patents PTAB decides are valid and not valid. Also gives PTAB control of how to interpret the claims in the patent protections. This is ABUSIVE, and political theater for large Companys to buy patent decisions. PTAB should be dissolved and/or reformulated to do what it was originally intended to do.

$NLST baby~!

NLST Plaintiff (Netlist) Oppostion to Samsung's Renewed Motion to Stay the #463 Case. Filed Yesterday. Only Available, so far, on Pacer. I'll post the pertinent pages in the comments.
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570809121.jpg

https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570809193.jpg

https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570809642.jpg

https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570809788.jpg

https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570809915.jpg

https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570810056.jpg

https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570810552.jpg

https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570810725.jpg

NLST Indefinitely delaying the enforcement of the jury's findings in favor of the PTAB proceedings
at this point would be unjust and inefficient. Once the remaining two motions in this case are resolved,
Samsung can appeal the jury's verdict to the Federal Circuit just as Netlist plans to appeal the PTAB's
findings of invalidity. At that point, the Federal Circuit will be able to decide the outstanding issues in
each case with the benefit of the full record from both actions should it so choose. This is plainly the
most just and efficient course of action. Samsung's proposed stay, on the other hand, would deprive
the Federal Circuit of the opportunity to decide when and how to review these judgments and further,
would conceal the jury's findings of infringement, validity, and willfulness from the record, along with
any contradictory representations Samsung made in this Court and before the PTAB. This is not the
purpose of a stay and this Court should not delay its final decision

not exactly my interpretation as these are Jason Sheasby’s words in arguement for why a delay makes no sense.

low vol bs......means nothing.....

just went back up !!! oh and yeah, one of these days !!!

OTC Short Interest report for Netlist shows a decrease of 229K shares (229,319 to be exact).

Total short interest went down to 8,988,618 from 9,219,937. Next report due out May 9th.