Newlook Industries Corp (NLI) News

read my post , it was based on what you posted on the goings on at Newlook. You are the one who continually brings up Fanotech. I didn't but stock from Fanotech and they are really not my concern. But you seem obsessed? Good luck with that .
You are good with PR , did you buy into Newlook / Vertility thinking it was a premium product? And who told you that ?

if you are looking for information you sure have an odd way of getting it. You are spouting nonsense about a company and persons of which you know nothing about ( except for what good old JS has put into circulation about them ) .

In terms of the lack of posters , well we have to thank Lucky for that . Seems he scared away all the touters ( some of them paid ) . Now you are left with the real world . I have a guess that many of the longs will be back soon as JS will once again fail to deliver on his secret plan . Call them haters , i call them people who are pissed off because they were mislead . Period.

In terms of your question , if someone thinks they have been unjustly dealt with it is up to them to determine their pursuits , ( not you ,that is of course unless you have a GOD complex) and since you admittedly don't have the details surrounding the issue i would have to say that is a childish question.
i don't know why you got banned, using your rational i would have to be a moderator ???? yes you do have trouble connecting the dot's sometimes and since you have sworn that you have no credibility the only rational thing to say is you should send your resume to JS as he is looking for good people like you .Make sure he doesn't pay you in stock .lol

Since you have no credibility i will just have to assume your statement of a " Ramshackle business " is untrue and most likely the opposite .

Again i did not chose to discuss Fanotech . it is YOU that continually brings it up . Try to stick with what you know , did you ever think i may not know the answer and can't answer it . Like i have said to you SEVERAL times i am not who you think i am , it's just that simple . I can say i have done more research than you .

Lastly , and i hate to answer a question with a question as i know it does confuse you , can you stay focused and figure out where your money is and how you can get it back . And i really couldn't give a shit about what YOU want to discuss. Did i ever mention i hate people who have GOD complexes?

If you are just pissing around trying to get info , what is it you want to do with the info ? To me you are much more intent on slandering people who have absolutely nothing to do with you , that is of course if you are not who I think you are .

Good luck

Oh, and I hate to break this to you...

But you're probably the only person in the world, who thinks McDonalds serves a "Premium Sandwich"...

If you really think the greasy garbage they serve at McDonalds is "Premium"... Then that probably says a lot about the equipment you've been trying to sell at Fanotech .

When I say you aren't a good representative of Fanotech, this is what I'm talking about... Right when it seems we're about to have a nice conversation, you retreat to this silliness... What bluff are you talking about? I just asked you a question. What spin are you talking about? I tried to directly address each of your statements. And how is it cheer-leading when I challenge Aletheia1 assertion? He made what I thought were faulty statements, and I corrected him to the best of my ability using whatever PRs I could find on the matter. I was hoping he would correct me in return, but there was nothing but crickets...

The same seems to be happening with you. I suggest the possibility that your "Premium Sandwich" might not have been as "Premium" as you led people to believe, and might have been worth less than the "Premium" price you were demanding... And instead of correcting me, instead of proving me wrong, you abruptly duck out of the conversation.

And then you claim that I don't have a leg to stand on??? I'm not even trying to stand. I'm just trying to get information. You're the one who's evading.

Why didn't you even try to answer my questions about the lack of recent information available about Fanotech? Or why Fanotech's website has been completely gutted for months?

Your earlier post , the one i am referring to on this board , you seem quite skeptical indeed. More like a cheer leader.

You don't have a leg to stand on , someone called your bluff and now all you can do is spin .

Gotta go , heading to get a premium sandwich . At least i have the common sense to understand that we have to pay these people at Mcdonalds as they have suppliers to pay and employees to pay . That's called class, something JS and Co will NEVER have .

After all , it would be hard to go home after and brag about how i ripped someone off for a burger.It would be hard to look your family in the eye once they have figured out all you are is a rip off artist. I will end with this , sometimes you have to be more careful of who you rip off .

I don't know if you've noticed, but I'm not a moderator on either IAGM or WLSA... And if I had any control over these boards, do you really think I'd still be getting over half my messages removed? And do you really think I'd be banned?

If you'd actually read my posts, you'd know that I never said anything close to IAGM being a "sure thing". I wish you'd at least try to maintain a certain degree of accuracy. I'm mostly just posting things that I find on the web.

When I say they are bad at running their company, I'm mostly trying to get your goat . Though you know these guys certainly aren't the saints you're trying to make them out to be. What about all these open records that show Gabe lying under oath... Are you saying that that never occurred? What about this nearly million-dollar lawsuit they have over Simmonds posting records that were already open to the public anyway. Are you saying that's a worthwhile pursuit? And if the company is in such good shape, why can't I find anything new about them online? And why is their website in shambles?

Again, I wish you'd stop thinking that I'm defending Simmonds... Just because I attack you doesn't automatically mean I support him... I'm actually quite critical of him, and according to your fliier alias, the fact that I criticize him is one of the things you use as proof that I must be him... Though yes, that logic does confuse me .

And your "Premium Sandwich" analogy is interesting... Again I have no connection to Simmonds and have no inside information, but I could see a couple possibilities as to why someone might not want to pay full price for this "Premium Sandwich" once they had a chance to look at it... One, like you said, maybe they are simply trying to get the best deal they can... Or two, maybe when they looked at it, they realized that it wasn't quite the "Premium Sandwich" that was being advertised. Again I don't know the answer, nor do I presume to know the answer... Like I said before, I'm skeptical of Simmonds based on what I've seen of Simmonds, but I'm also skeptical of the Tomassonis based on what I've seen of the Tomassonis... And your behavior here doesn't really help my opinion of them .

So , why is it you think they are so bad at running a company ? How do you actually know that ? I mean really , maybe you are just confused again .

I don't think you have enough fingers to count how many business your man has run into the ground in the time Fanotech has been operating . Better add your toes in there . Bet his Daddy is real proud of him .

Nothing childish about the letter , if anything ( If you were a real shareholder you would thank him for setting the record straight ), as you sure weren't going to get that from good old JS . But for some strange reason you are a hater? Oh so very strange?

Maybe you can understand it this way , when you order a Big Mac at the drive through window you can tell everyone in the car you will soon have a Premium Sandwich in your hand . But you get to the first window they say " please pay for your sandwich" . So you can answer you own question now by answering this . If you tell the person at the window that you can't pay until you have the burger half eaten ( or half sold ) , what do you think they will say ? Better yet when they tell you no, come back and try again but this time say , well the buger has been sitting there too long so i only want pay half as much and the guy in the car behind me is going to pay . And if that doesn't work say , well there is no way you can sell that buger now so you may as well just give it to me . Get my drift or have i confused you ? So the moral of the story is if you don't have the money to buy a sandwich don't blame it on Mc Donalds.

One last thing , Fanotech is still operating how is WLSA and Newlook doing ( which should be your main concern). Have you found any new blood . How does a business run like that , what is it's main revenue stream ? As a simple reminder , it was JS that published all that crap about deals and we are going to file soon etc . What can any of that have to do with Gabe and Fanotech . Just be honest you are deflecting .

As far as being banned , well you and your buddy kicked me off IAMG , i think you should beg for me to come back . I think it's down 2 cents with no volume . So much for sure things eh? Get the spin guys working to see who you can blame that on , can't be me as i wasn't there.

Yeah, I guess I have an occasional good day...
But mostly I have my bad days .


So, since you chose to contact me again, can I assume you're finally ready to continue our discussion over how bad the Tomassonis are at running their business?

I had assumed that your daddy had me banned to avoid this conversation... I'm surprised you're wanting to start it back up again.

But, OK, here it goes...


Do you remember when Gabe posted that absurdly childish letter to the board: http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=71554645

I asked him a few questions, and for whatever reason, he failed to respond... Maybe you could help clear the matter up. Lets start with you answering this question:

If things such as the Joint Venture, the American Sales rights, Newlooks ownership in shares, etc. are so inaccurate, then why is it that Fanotech waited until their Christmas letter before bringing them up and denying their existence?


And in case my question confused you, let me be more clear:

On April 21, 2011, WLSA published a PR stating: "Vertility Technology Corporation has acquired an exclusive and perpetual license to manufacture, market and sell all products currently manufactured by FANOTECH (...), and that this license will extend throughout the United States of America"

Starting on July 19, 2011, NLI's filings repeatedly stated: "On February 18, 2011 the Company executed a second addendum to the terms of the June 6, 2010 letter of intent. This addendum provided the Company with an immediate ownership of 10% of Fanotech Manufacturing Group"

If these statements were inaccurate, why didn't Fanotech publish clarification immediately following these claims?

Why didn't Fanotech publish clarification in May 2011, June 2011, July 2011, August 2011, September 2011, October 2011, or November 2011?

Why is it that Fanotech waited until their Christmas letter, before they finally denied the existence of these deals?

Hmmm... don't seem so confused here ?

If so will the proceeds just go to the creditors?
What creditors are you referring? There's only about $200,000 still owed to the receiver (which is scheduled to be paid up by the end of the year). They owe a million or so to related parties (who have already agreed to receive payment in shares). And they owe 6 mil to WLSA... Which will be dismissed as part of their divestment of WLSA shares.

How is this a bad thing? It provides essential money for their acquisition. It eliminates 6 million of their debt. It distances them from any potential lawsuit against WLSA. And, depending on the yet-to-be-released details of the debt settlement, it may result in the return of the large chunk of NLI shares owned by WLSA.

As far as whether or not this requires "an independent valuation"... I don't know the specifics of Canada's securities regulations... And I suspect you don't either... Though I would assume NLI's lawyers and internal auditors have at least some working knowledge of the laws.

Taken from the WLSA site

D the G

I am saying that there are rules governing the disposition of major assets of a Company especially to non arms length parties. I am saying that by removing the major asset of New Look it leaves New Look with only the uncompleted transaction Fanotech.If the deal is a cash deal that is one thing but as usual there is no clarity. With the amount of debt outstanding the creditors/receiver would simply grab the liquid asset. All non arms length transactions would require an independent valuation. I suspect there is more to come.

Let me see if I got this straight
Newlook Industries (NLI) sold a total of 23,132,457 shares of Wireless Age at $0.08 per share.
John Simmonds and Family acquired approximately 5.4 million shares and approximately 13.2 million shares were acquired by twenty three (23) separate investors including Directors, Advisory Board Members and Senior Management, and some of their respective Family Trusts. So that equals 18.6 million shares approximately worth 1,488,000.New Look is a public company with a disastrous balance sheet so without shareholders approval with a non arms length transaction New Look can authorize this. I don't think so. Also was this transaction paid for in cash? If so will the proceeds just go to the creditors? That leaves New Look with its major asset diversified and it what is left is Fanotech a company that according to the last set of statements has not closed. I do not know how you could get a transaction like this through without independent business appraisals and shareholders approval.New Look shareholder should be demanding answers.

i would buy if it opens at 8 cents or lower as it was 20 pre cto

maybe the news stream picks up here as well now that wlsa is speaking up

etrade will find a way to let americans buy this as it is NOT tsxv but cnsx. they will have a broker do it for an etrade global client somehow i believe

i think this gets trading again here soon

http://www.cnq.ca/Page.asp?PageID=2013&AA_RecordID=362

CNSX: New Listing-Newlook Industries Corp. (NLI)

The common shares of Newlook Industries Corp. have been approved for listing on CNSX. The Company has 30,455,932 common shares outstanding with a public float of approximately 21.5 million shares.

Listing and disclosure documents for Newlook Industries Corp. will be available in the CNSX Listings Disclosure Hall.

Trading Date: Tuesday, March 29, 2011
Symbol: NLI
CUSIP: 651515 10 8
ISIN: CA 651515 10 8 3

Applications are being accepted for Market Makers for "NLI ".

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/CNSX-New-Listing-Newlook-cnw-1492923054.html?x=0

Wlsa is starting to move hope it will be the same with Newlook in the next months.

nice news here

Just waiting the stock to be tradeble again

figured we may as well make a board for this