Waverunners
1 day ago
GetRch, interesting that you’re lecturing on patience now. The posts relating to future PRs by Pragmatic and I are clear statements of how the PMA timeline works. And could (should in my opinion) result in a PR.
BTW, where was your patience in March when you wrote:
“8 weeks to review sterilization data and submit is plenty long enough to have given a further update. This tells me that either they submitted and have big news coming, but are fearful of leaks so don't want another PR, or they are clueless on what to do next and are fumbling around looking for a Doug-like expert to bail them out.
Enough is enough Brian - Finish the Deal!”
OR Dec 2023:
“11 weeks is MORE THAN ENOUGH TIME to complete those tests. From the companies I've run, and my experience, If I was Thom, I would be sleeping at the test facility, right next to the testing team and the owners working daily to get this done well, ASAP.
I get "wait and see for shareholders." The wait and see by Thom while the test facility F#*^S around is INEXCUSABLE. Take some ownership and walk the test facility across the finish line.”
GetRch$lwly
1 day ago
As I've stated before. UEEC has zero reason to update shareholders or issue a PR until there is something to actually write about. They are not going to spend money having a PR written that states "Still waiting on the FDA." We must be patient. Patient that the process is executing as it should. That UEEC is providing answers to any questions the FDA may have. That the FDA is following their process, doing site visits as needed, etc.
There is zero benefit for Brian or anyone else at this company to hide information, or slow play this. It's very clear, the eggs are all in one basket . . . getting FDA approval.
Let's all have a bit more patience, and fingers crossed for some good news as soon as the news is actually news and not just rumors or speculation.
shoondale
5 days ago
👍️SEC👍️ Charges Rhode Island Stock Promoter with Microcap Fraud
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/lr-25993
The companies in question are SOLY, CNSP, EBET, VLCN, TOBAF
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced charges against Cranston, Rhode Island resident Ahmed Alomari and MCM Consulting, the entity Alomari controls, for fraud and other securities law violations related to their promotion of the stocks of at least five microcap issuers.
The SEC alleges that from at least March 2019 and continuing to February 2022, Alomari used such outlets as Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, investor chatrooms, and text blasts to promote these microcap stocks without disclosing the source or amount of compensation he received from, or on behalf of, the issuers for his promotion of their stocks. The SEC further alleges that Alomari personally invested in some of these issuers' securities, then surreptitiously sold the stocks while publicly recommending that investors buy them. This conduct included two initial public offerings in which Alomari allegedly invested and quickly sold all his shares for at least $1.4 million in profits. According to the SEC's complaint, Alomari also was able to publicly sell shares he had earned from his promotional services based on false representation letters confirming that the shares were available for public trading. The SEC alleges that Alomari directed his wife, whom he named as the sole officer of MCM Consulting, to sign the false representation letters.
The SEC's complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island, charges Alomari and MCM Consulting with violating the anti-fraud provisions of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, the anti-touting provisions of Section 17(b) of the Securities Act, which prohibit promotion of a security without disclosure of compensation received for the promotional activity, and the registration provisions of Section 5(a) and (c) of the Securities Act. The SEC's complaint additionally charges Alomari with violating Section 20(b) of the Exchange Act by violating the anti-fraud provisions through or by means of his wife. The complaint seeks, as to both Alomari and MCM Consulting, permanent injunctions from violating the charged provisions of the federal securities laws, disgorgement, prejudgment interest, civil monetary penalties, and a penny stock bar. The complaint also seeks a bar against Alomari from acting as an officer or director of a public company.
The SEC's case is being handled by Richard Harper, Jeffrey Cook, Alexandra Lavin, Jonathan Menitove, Ryan Murphy, and Celia Moore of the SEC's Boston Regional Office.
Waverunners
5 days ago
Pragmatic, another accurate post re the current state of the PMA and where it stands with the FDA. Thank You, Hopefully UHP updates Shareholders in a timely manner.
If/when they announce if the FDA has agreed to File the application, Hemostyp will then (and only then) move on to the full review stage.
Typically UHP is quick with positive news, and vague with negative news. We’ll see what happens this time around.
Here’s a quote from the last time Hemostyp got to this stage successfully.
May 5,2021,— yes 3 years ago.
“following the resubmission of its application for Pre-market Approval for HemoStyp gauze on April 6th, the FDA has now accepted for review and commenced its Substantive Review of the application.”
Hopefully there are no resubmissions required this time around. As in that case, the original was submitted Oct 2020.
shoondale
3 weeks ago
How come you never see any of these 6700+ people enthused about this POS fraudulent Ponzi Scheme, buying into it, and posting on this board?
Answer: you PM them you will follow them if they follow you because you think it makes you look like an authority. Maybe to the United Health Fraud Ponzi Scheme operators who give you shares to bullshit suckers. But who else is fooled? Actually, you are quite useful to these followers. They see where you go and know what to stay away from because you never know what you are talking about. For instance, this POS fraudulent scam has gone down over 90% in less than 5 years while you rave about it. Go ahead and click on 5 yrs in the linked chart:
https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/UEEC
They follow you and distance themselves. The price action over the last 5 years, and lack of interest, speaks volumes about why you are followed. These followers know you as well as I do.
UEEC--Still a fan of me, I see.
Don't worry I have 6700+ of them on I-HUB.
Toodles.
fool
noun
a person who acts unwisely or imprudently; a silly person.
Zorax
3 weeks ago
In summation, I am fascinated by your continued references to me, I can tell you are a HUGE fan. Maybe when this is all over, I will hold one certificate share of UEEC stock, autograph it and mail it to you, to commemorate our stellar relationship. Given that I believe that UEEC stock will be somewhere between $5.00--$10.00 ++, and the cost of 1 forever postage stamp, this gift will cost me $5.75--$10.75, but you will need itSorry that's a lie and you know it.
Certificates will only be given if at all with the total holding amount period.
I don't even know a brokerage that will print a certificate any more. It's all handled by TA's and they practically abolished the practice for scam otcm stocks. But as others have said, don't let facts and truth stand in your way.
And yes, I will stop in and post should lies and affronts need to be debunked and destroyed.
shoondale
3 weeks ago
"FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Violations of Exchange Act Section IO(b) and Rule 10b-5 Thereunder
(UHP and Beplate)
SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Violations of Exchange Act Section I0(b) and Rules IOb-S(a) and (c) Thereunder
(Schiliro)
THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Aiding and Abetting Violations of Exchange Act Section lO(b) and Rule 10b-5(b)
(Schiliro)
FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Violations of Securities Act Section 17(a)
(All Defendants)
FIFTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Violations of Exchange Act Section 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(2)(B)
of the Exchange Act and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1 and 13a-13 Thereunder
(UHP)
SIXTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Aiding and Abetting Violations of Exchange Act Section 13(a),
13(b)(2)(A), 13(b)2)B), and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1 and 13a-13
(Beplate and Schiliro)
SEVENTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Violation of Section 13(b)(5) of the Exchange Act and Exchange Act Rule 13b2-1
(Beplate and Schiliro)
EIGHTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Violations of Exchange Act Section 13(a) and Rule 13a-14 Thereunder
(Beplate)
NINTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Violations of Rule 13b2-2 of the Exchange Act
(Beplate and Schiliro)
TENTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Violations of Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 304(a)
(Beplate)
ELEVENTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Violations of Exchange Act Section 16(a) and Rule 16a-3 Thereunder
(Beplate)"
https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/complaints/2022/comp25413.pdf
shoondale
3 weeks ago
UEEC-another bald-face lie from 🖕Sporty🖕..."As you, yourself stated, "Do not be hindered by the truth, it gets in the way of bashing."", You aren't quoting me, You are just plain pathological in your fabrications. Obviously, you can't cite a post containing that. But hey, we can't expect anything else from you and your cronies involved in this sociopathic scam based on a fraudulent company with a hyped fictitious magic bandage..
SPORTYNORTY
3 weeks ago
UEEC--So predictable. Never addresses his purpose/agenda for his pointless vitriol and negatively biased mistruths. As you, yourself stated, "Do not be hindered by the truth, it gets in the way of bashing."
You will never reveal why you are here, and that is fine with me. When UEEC gets that approval, you will disappear into cyber oblivion, where you belong. Remember to pick another clever alias by which to obscure your true intentions.
shoondale
3 weeks ago
Actually, you addressed me and I responded. But don't let that get in the way of your narrative. The truth never has and evidently never will. And it is more jaw dropping, amazed, utter bemusement at your lack of common sense and rejection of logic rather than being a fan in the conventional sense. By the way, have you forgotten all the "fan club" PM's I received from someone with a little doggie that wears a hat?
"No one has been ghosted by me."
That block menu can be tough to toggle and operate for some.
"In summation, I am fascinated by your continued references to me, I can tell you are a HUGE fan. Maybe when this is all over, I will hold one certificate share of UEEC stock, autograph it and mail it to you, to commemorate our stellar relationship. Given that I believe that UEEC stock will be somewhere between $5.00--$10.00 ++, and the cost of 1 forever postage stamp, this gift will cost me $5.75--$10.75, but you will need it."
I'm looking forward to it. You will get a break there (right in line with all your other prognostications I outlined in an earlier post). It will only cost the postage stamp and envelope. It will get mounted on the bathroom roller/dispenser as soon as I receive it.