UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-QSB
ý
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE
ACT
OF
1934
|
|
|
|
For
the quarterly period ended: MARCH 31, 2008
|
|
|
o
|
TRANSITION
REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
|
For
the
transition period from
_____
to
_____
|
|
|
Commission file number:
000-23819
———————————
GREEN BUILDERS,
INC.
|
(Exact Name of Small
Business Issuer as Specified in Its
Charter)
|
Texas
|
|
80-0171169
|
(State
or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation
or Organization)
|
|
(I.R.S
Employer Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8121
Bee Caves Rd., Austin, TX 78746
|
(Address
of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
|
512-732-0932
|
(Issuer's
Telephone Number)
|
|
|
Wilson Holdings,
Inc.
|
(Former
Name)
|
Check
whether the issuer: (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter time
period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for past 90 days.
Yes
ý
No
o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act):
Yes
o
No
x
State the number of shares
outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity as of the latest
practicable date:
As of May 13, 2008, the registrant
had 23,135,539 shares of common stock, par value $0.001,
outstanding.
Transitional
Small Business Issuer Disclosure Format:
Yes
o
No
ý
I
nde
x
PART I – FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
28
|
PART II – OTHER
INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAUTION
REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
This
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for Green Builders, Inc. (“we,” “us,” or the
“Company”) contains forward-looking statements. You can identify these
statements by forward-looking words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “intend,”
“anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” and “continue” or similar words.
Forward-looking statements include information concerning possible or assumed
future business success or financial results. You should read statements
that contain these words carefully because they discuss future expectations and
plans, which contain projections of future results of operations or financial
conditions or state other forward-looking information. We believe that it is
important to communicate future expectations to investors. However, there may be
events in the future that we are not able to accurately predict or
control. Accordingly, we do not undertake any obligation to update any
forward-looking statements for any reason, even if new information becomes
available or other events occur in the future.
Forward-looking
statements and information are based on current beliefs as well as assumptions
made by, and information currently available to, us concerning anticipated
financial performance, business prospects and strategies. Although management
considers these assumptions to be reasonable based on information currently
available to it, they may prove to be incorrect. The forward-looking statements
in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB are made as of the date it was issued
and we do not undertake any obligation to update publicly or to revise any of
the included forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information,
future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable law.
By their
very nature, forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and
uncertainties, both general and specific, and risks that outcomes implied by
forward-looking statements will not be achieved. We caution readers not to place
undue reliance on these statements as a number of important factors could cause
the actual results to differ materially from the beliefs, plans, objectives,
expectations and anticipations, estimates and intentions expressed in such
forward-looking statements.
Copies of
our public filings are available at
www.greenbuildersinc.com
and
on EDGAR at www.sec.gov.
Please
see Part 1, Item 1A – “Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the
transitional period ended September 30, 2007, as well as the “Risk Factors”
contained in Part I, Item 2 – “Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of
Operation” in this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB. In addition, new
risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for us to predict
all such factors, nor to assess the impact such factors might have on our
business or the extent to which any factor or combination of factors may cause
actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward looking
statements. Given these risks and uncertainties, investors should not place
undue reliance on forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual
results.
Whenever
we refer in this report to “Green Builders,” “the Company,” “we,” “us,” or
“our,” we mean Green Builders, Inc., a Texas corporation, and, unless the
context indicates otherwise, its predecessors and subsidiaries, including its
wholly-owned subsidiaries, Wilson Family Communities, Inc., a
Delaware corporation and GB Operations, Inc, a Texas corporation.
Item
1. Fi
nancia
l Statements
GREEN
BUILDERS, INC
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
|
|
As
of March 31, 2008 and September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March
31, 2008
|
|
|
September
30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
9,783,509
|
|
|
|
13,073,214
|
|
Restricted
cash
|
|
|
117,603
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
and land development
|
|
|
38,886,712
|
|
|
|
32,463,411
|
|
Homebuilding
inventories
|
|
|
9,366,645
|
|
|
|
2,843,704
|
|
Total
inventory
|
|
|
48,253,356
|
|
|
|
35,307,116
|
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
691,048
|
|
|
|
729,471
|
|
Debt
issuance costs, net of amortization
|
|
|
1,146,712
|
|
|
|
1,265,218
|
|
Equipment
and software, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of
$39,427
and $32,294, respectively
|
|
|
297,243
|
|
|
|
232,357
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
|
60,289,470
|
|
|
|
50,607,375
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
|
4,019,176
|
|
|
|
1,404,151
|
|
Accrued
real estate taxes payable
|
|
|
424,366
|
|
|
|
405,060
|
|
Accrued
liabilities and expenses
|
|
|
444,569
|
|
|
|
215,372
|
|
Accrued
interest
|
|
|
210,239
|
|
|
|
464,809
|
|
Deferred
revenue
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
159,381
|
|
Notes
payable and lines of credit
|
|
|
30,858,868
|
|
|
|
20,638,358
|
|
Subordinated
convertible debt, net of $2,966,046 and $3,245,220 discount,
respectively
|
|
|
13,533,954
|
|
|
|
13,254,780
|
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
49,491,171
|
|
|
|
36,541,911
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock, $0.001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized and 23,135,538
shares
issued and outstanding, respectively
|
|
|
23,136
|
|
|
|
23,136
|
|
Additional
paid in capital
|
|
|
27,775,939
|
|
|
|
27,040,304
|
|
Retained
deficit
|
|
|
(17,000,776
|
)
|
|
|
(12,997,976
|
)
|
Total
stockholders' equity
|
|
|
10,798,299
|
|
|
|
14,065,464
|
|
Commitments
and contingencies
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
|
$
|
60,289,470
|
|
|
|
50,607,375
|
|
See
accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
GREEN
BUILDERS, INC.
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations
|
|
For
the Three and Six Months Ended March 31, 2008 and
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Six
Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding
and related services
|
|
$
|
484,511
|
|
|
|
797,506
|
|
|
|
484,511
|
|
|
|
1,830,165
|
|
Land
sales
|
|
|
657,036
|
|
|
|
969,729
|
|
|
|
1,765,348
|
|
|
|
1,406,870
|
|
Total
revenues
|
|
|
1,141,547
|
|
|
|
1,767,235
|
|
|
|
2,249,859
|
|
|
|
3,237,035
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Cost
of revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding
and related services
|
|
|
405,558
|
|
|
|
564,251
|
|
|
|
405,558
|
|
|
|
1,343,054
|
|
Land
sales
|
|
|
222,484
|
|
|
|
818,892
|
|
|
|
931,539
|
|
|
|
1,249,378
|
|
Total
cost of revenues
|
|
|
628,042
|
|
|
|
1,383,143
|
|
|
|
1,337,097
|
|
|
|
2,592,431
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Gross
profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding
and related services
|
|
|
78,953
|
|
|
|
233,255
|
|
|
|
78,953
|
|
|
|
487,111
|
|
Land
sales
|
|
|
434,552
|
|
|
|
150,838
|
|
|
|
833,809
|
|
|
|
157,493
|
|
Total
gross profit
|
|
|
513,505
|
|
|
|
384,092
|
|
|
|
912,762
|
|
|
|
644,604
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Costs
and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
general and administration
|
|
|
949,243
|
|
|
|
998,332
|
|
|
|
2,629,957
|
|
|
|
1,981,488
|
|
Sales
and marketing
|
|
|
501,249
|
|
|
|
168,742
|
|
|
|
756,548
|
|
|
|
448,779
|
|
Total
costs and expenses
|
|
|
1,450,493
|
|
|
|
1,167,074
|
|
|
|
3,386,505
|
|
|
|
2,430,267
|
|
Operating
loss
|
|
|
(936,988
|
)
|
|
|
(782,982
|
)
|
|
|
(2,473,744
|
)
|
|
|
(1,785,663
|
)
|
Other
income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
on fair value of derivatives
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(5,076,957
|
)
|
Interest
and other income
|
|
|
65,763
|
|
|
|
47,857
|
|
|
|
158,958
|
|
|
|
77,993
|
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
(774,437
|
)
|
|
|
(619,015
|
)
|
|
|
(1,688,014
|
)
|
|
|
(1,336,744
|
)
|
Total
other expense
|
|
|
(708,674
|
)
|
|
|
(571,157
|
)
|
|
|
(1,529,056
|
)
|
|
|
(6,335,708
|
)
|
Net
loss
|
|
$
|
(1,645,662
|
)
|
|
|
(1,354,139
|
)
|
|
|
(4,002,800
|
)
|
|
|
(8,121,371
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted loss per share
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
|
(0.17
|
)
|
|
|
(0.45
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
23,135,538
|
|
|
|
18,055,538
|
|
|
|
23,135,538
|
|
|
|
17,881,082
|
|
See
accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
GREEN
BUILDERS, INC.
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
For
the Six Months Ended March 31, 2008 and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
|
$
|
(4,002,800
|
)
|
|
|
(8,121,371
|
)
|
Non
cash adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
on fair value of derivatives
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,076,957
|
|
Amortization
of convertible debt discount
|
|
|
279,174
|
|
|
|
523,831
|
|
Amortization
of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
118,506
|
|
|
|
117,186
|
|
Stock-based
compensation expense
|
|
|
675,635
|
|
|
|
234,909
|
|
Services
provided without compensation by principal shareholders
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
192,722
|
|
|
|
68,003
|
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Increase
in total inventory
|
|
|
(12,946,241
|
)
|
|
|
(4,244,269
|
)
|
Increase
in other assets
|
|
|
(147,166
|
)
|
|
|
(278,023
|
)
|
Increase
(decrease) in accounts payable
|
|
|
2,615,024
|
|
|
|
(155,147
|
)
|
Increase
in real estate taxes payable
|
|
|
19,306
|
|
|
|
418,161
|
|
Increase
(decrease) in accrued expenses
|
|
|
229,197
|
|
|
|
(269,168
|
)
|
Increase
in restricted cash
|
|
|
(117,603
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Decrease
in deferred revenue
|
|
|
(159,381
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Increase
(decrease) in accrued interest
|
|
|
(254,570
|
)
|
|
|
161,586
|
|
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(13,438,195
|
)
|
|
|
(6,467,345
|
)
|
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase
of fixed assets
|
|
|
(72,019
|
)
|
|
|
(70,416
|
)
|
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(72,019
|
)
|
|
|
(70,416
|
)
|
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuances
(repayments) of notes payable and lines of credit, net
|
|
|
10,220,510
|
|
|
|
2,236,968
|
|
Proceeds
from issuance of subordinated conv debt
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
Cash
paid for debt issuance costs
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(342,555
|
)
|
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
10,220,510
|
|
|
|
2,144,413
|
|
Net
decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(3,289,706
|
)
|
|
|
(4,393,348
|
)
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
13,073,214
|
|
|
|
8,803,777
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
9,783,509
|
|
|
|
4,410,429
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
paid for interest
|
|
$
|
1,829,188
|
|
|
|
1,017,436
|
|
Cash
paid for income taxes
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
See
accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
(1) Organization
and Business Activity
Green
Builders, Inc., (the “Company”), is a Texas corporation formerly known as Wilson
Holdings, Inc, a Nevada corporation. Effective April 4, 2008, Wilson
Holdings, Inc, a Nevada corporation, completed its reincorporation to the State
of Texas pursuant to the Plan of Conversion as ratified by the shareholders at
the 2008 annual meeting of shareholders held on April 3, 2008. As
part of the reincorporation, a new Certificate of Formation was adopted and
Wilson Holdings, Inc.’s corporate name was changed to Green Builders, Inc., and
the Certificate of Formation will now govern the rights of holders of the
Company’s common stock. The Company has been using the name “Green
Builders” in its regular business operations since June 2007 and will continue
to do so. Effective April 8, 2008, the Company’s common stock began
trading under the symbol “GBH” on the American Stock Exchange.
Effective
October 11, 2005 pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization dated
as of September 2, 2005 by and among Wilson Holdings, Inc., a Delaware
corporation, a majority of its stockholders, Wilson Family Communities, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (“WFC”) and Wilson Acquisition Corp., a Delaware
corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, WFC and Wilson
Acquisition Corp. merged and WFC became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Company.
The
consolidated financial statements and the notes of the Company as of March 31,
2008 and for the three months and six months ending March 31, 2008 and 2007 have
been prepared by management without audit pursuant to rules and regulations of
the Securities Exchange Commission and should be read in conjunction with the
September 30, 2007 audited financials statements contained in the Company’s
Annual Report on 10-KSB for the transitional period from January 1, 2007 to
September 30, 2007. In the opinion of management, all normal,
recurring adjustments necessary for the fair presentation of such financial
information have been included. The preparation of financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Certain
information and footnote disclosures normally included in the annual financial
statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted.
(2)
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
(a) Revenue
Recognition
Revenues
from property sales are recognized in accordance with SFAS No. 66, “Accounting
for Sales of Real Estate.” Revenues from land development services to
builders are recognized when the properties associated with the services are
sold, when the risks and rewards of ownership are transferred to the buyer and
when the consideration has been received, or the title company has processed
payment. For projects that are consolidated, homebuilding revenues
and services will be categorized as homebuilding revenues and revenues from
property sales or options will be categorized as land sales.
(b) Cash
and Cash Equivalents
For
purposes of the statements of cash flows, the Company considers all short term,
highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to
be cash and cash equivalents.
The
Company has restricted cash of approximately $118,000 with a financial
institution as part of a letter of credit issued for Elm Grove
development.
(c) Inventory
Inventory
is stated at cost unless it is determined to be impaired, in which case the
impaired inventory would be written down to the fair market
value. Inventory costs include land, land development costs, deposits
on land purchase contracts, model home construction costs, capitalized interest,
real estate taxes incurred during development and construction phases, and
homebuilding costs. No significant impairments of inventory were
recorded in 2007 or 2008.
(d) Use
of Estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Accordingly, actual results could differ
from those estimates.
The
Company has estimated and accrued liabilities for real estate property taxes on
its purchased land in anticipation of development, and other liabilities
including the beneficial conversion liability, the fair value of warrants and
options. To the extent that the estimates are dramatically different
to the actual amounts, it could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
(e) Municipal
Utility and Water District Reimbursements
The
Company owns one property located in a Municipal Utility District (MUD) and one
property located in a Water Control and Improvement District (WCID). The Company
incurs development costs for water, sewage lines and associated treatment plants
and other development costs and fees for these properties. Under the agreement
with the districts, the Company expects to be reimbursed partially for the above
developments costs. The Districts will issue bonds to repay the Company, once
the property has sufficient assessed value for the District taxes to repay the
bonds. As the project is completed and homes are sold within the District, the
assessed value increases. It can take several years before the assessed value is
sufficient to provide sufficient tax revenue for the Company to recapture its
costs. The Company has estimated that it will recover approximately
50% to 100% of eligible costs spent through March 31, 2008. The
Company has completed Phase 1 for the Rutherford West project and has
approximately $980,000 of Water Control and Improvement District reimbursements
included in inventory that it anticipates it will collect from bond issuances
made by the district. The Company anticipates the first reimbursement
will be approximately $500,000 in December 2008. When the
reimbursements are received they will be recorded as reductions in the related
asset’s balance. The Districts will pay for property set aside for the
preservation of endangered species, greenbelts and similar uses. To
the extent that the estimated reimbursements are dramatically different to the
actual reimbursements, it could have a material effect on our financial
statements.
(f) Subordinated
Convertible Debt
The
company’s subordinated convertible debt and the related warrants have been
accounted for in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) No. 98-5,
“Accounting for Convertible Securities with Beneficial Conversion Features or
Contingently Adjustable Conversion Ratios,” EITF No. 00-19, “Accounting for
Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a
Company’s Own Stock,” EITF 00-27, “Application of issue 98-5 to Certain
Convertible Instruments”, EITF 05-02 “Meaning of ‘Conventional Convertible Debt
Instrument’ in Issue No. 00-19”, and EITF 05-04 “The Effect of a Liquidated
Damages Clause on a Freestanding Financial Instrument Subject to Issue No. 00-19
updated with FSP EITF 00-19-2, “Accounting for Registration Payment
Arrangements”.
(g) Loss
Per Common Share
Earnings
per share is accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 128, “Earnings per
Share,” which requires a dual presentation of basic and diluted earnings per
share on the face of the statements of earnings. Basic loss per share
is based on the weighted effect of common shares issued and outstanding, and is
calculated by dividing net loss by the weighted average shares outstanding
during the period. Diluted loss per share is calculated by dividing net loss by
the weighted average number of common shares used in the basic loss per share
calculation plus the number of common shares that would be issued assuming
exercise or conversion of all potentially dilutive common shares
outstanding.
The
Company has issued stock options and warrants convertible into shares of common
stock. These shares and warrants have been excluded from loss per share at March
31, 2008 and 2007 because the effect would be anti-dilutive as summarized in the
table below:
|
|
March
31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Stock
options
|
|
|
1,653,333
|
|
|
|
735,000
|
|
Common
stock warrants
|
|
|
1,143,125
|
|
|
|
1,157,187
|
|
Subordinated
convertible debt warrants
|
|
|
8,250,000
|
|
|
|
8,375,000
|
|
Total
|
|
|
11,046,458
|
|
|
|
10,267,187
|
|
(h) Reclassification
Certain prior period amounts have been
reclassified to conform to current period presentation.
(i) Adoption
of New Accounting Pronouncements
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value
Measurements” (“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 provides guidance for using fair
value to measure assets and liabilities. The standard also responds to
investors’ request for expanded information about the extent to which a company
measures assets and liabilities at fair value, the information used to measure
fair value, and the effect of fair value measurements on earnings. SFAS 157
will be effective for the Company’s fiscal year beginning October 1, 2008. The
Company is currently reviewing the effect SFAS 157 will have on its
financial statements.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option
for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities — Including an amendment of
FASB Statement No. 115.” The statement permits entities to choose to
measure certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value. Unrealized gains
and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected are
reported in earnings. SFAS No. 159 will be effective for the Company’s
fiscal year beginning October 1, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the
impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 159; however, it is not expected to
have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results
of operations or cash flows.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), "Business Combinations" (FAS
141(R)), which establishes accounting principles and disclosure requirements for
all transactions in which a company obtainscontrol over another
business. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the
adoption of SFAS No. 141 (R); however, it is not expected to have a
material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, "Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements" (FAS 160), which prescribes the accounting by
a parent company for minority interests held by other parties in a subsidiary of
the parent company. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of
the adoption of SFAS No. 160; however, it is not expected to have a
material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
In March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161,
Disclosures About Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities – an amendment of FASB Statement No.
133,
(“SFAS 161”). SFAS 161 expands the disclosure requirements in SFAS
133,
Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities,
regarding an entity’s derivative
instruments and heading activities. The Company is currently evaluating the
impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 161.
(3) Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Liquidity
At March
31, 2008, the Company had approximately $9.8 million in cash and cash
equivalents. The Company completed a public offering of common stock in May
2007, resulting in net proceeds of approximately $14 million.
On June
29, 2007, Green Builders entered into a $55 million revolving credit facility
(the “Credit Facility”) with a syndicate of banks led by RBC Centura Bank as
administrative agent. The Credit Facility allows the Company to
obtain revolving credit loans and provides for the issuance of letters of
credit. The amount available at any time under the Credit Facility for revolving
credit loans or the issuance of letters of credit is determined by a borrowing
base. The borrowing base is calculated as the sum of the values for homes and
lots in the subdivision to be developed as agreed to by the Company and the
agent. The Company’s obligations under the Credit Facility will be
secured by the assets of each subdivision to be developed with the proceeds of
loans available under the Credit Facility.
The
initial maturity date for the Credit Facility is June 29, 2008. The
facility will be reviewed by our syndicate of banks and renewed for successive
12 month periods, so long as the following items have been
satisfied: no event of default shall exist, no material adverse
effect in the financial condition, operations, business or management of Green
Builders shall exist and extension fees in the amount determined by the agent
and all costs associated incurred in connection with the proposed extension must
be paid. The final borrowing base calculation will be made twelve
months prior to the termination of the Credit Facility and no borrowings may be
made in excess of such amount.
The
Company is currently evaulating the amount of capital needed for the next
renewal term of the facility. The Company anticipates that it will
reduce the line of credit to $30 million. As of March 31, 2008, the
Credit Facility has loaned the Company has approximately $12.4 million and has
issued an $118,000 letter of credit.
Outstanding
borrowings under the Credit Facility bear interest at the prime rate plus 0.25%.
The Company is charged a letter of credit fee equal to 1.10% of each letter of
credit issued under the Credit Facility. The Credit Facility may be prepaid
without premium or penalty. Quarterly principal reductions will be
required during the final 12 months of the term.
The
Company’s growth will require substantial amounts of cash for earnest money
deposits, land purchases, development costs, interest payments and homebuilding
costs. Until we begin to sell an adequate number of lots and homes to cover
monthly operating expenses, our sales, marketing, general and administrative
costs will deplete cash. To maintain its liquidity, the Company has financed the
majority of its land and development activities with debt, and believes it can
continue to do so in the future through a combination of conventional and
subordinated convertible debt, joint venture financing, sales of selected lot
positions, sales of land and lot options. The Company may be required
to raise additional capital to support growth and operations for the next twelve
months.
Capital
Resources
The
Company has raised approximately $16.5 million of subordinated convertible debt,
and approximately $14 million in a public offering of the Company’s common stock
completed in May 2007. The Company also entered into a $55 million revolving
Credit Facility mentioned previously. The Company is currently evaulating the
amount of capital needed for the next renewal term of the
facility. The Company anticipates that it will reduce the line of
credit based on capital requirements needed for that period to $30
million.
Due to
current conditions in the market, the Company has seen a slowdown in revenue
from home and lot sales. The Company is considering selling tracts of
commercial and residential land in order to achieve profitability. If
the Company is not able to sell tracts of land, it expects that it will incur
significant losses in 2008. Due to the change in market conditions discussed
above and a longer than expected acceleration of homebuilding operations, our
financial projections have changed. Due to current market conditions
and slower than expected home and land sales, the Company may need to raise
additional capital to support future growth and current operations for the next
twelve months. See risk factors below.
Land and
homes under construction compose the majority of the Company’s assets, which
could suffer devaluation if the housing and real estate market suffers a
significant downturn due to interest rate increases or other
reasons. If we are not in compliance with our debt covenants, we may
be required to repay our debt sooner than anticipated requiring liquidation of
assets or the use of cash to satisfy its debt obligations. A
significant downturn could also make it more difficult for the Company to
liquidate assets, to raise cash and to pay off debts, which could have a
material adverse effect.
(4)
Inventory
The
Company’s land inventory includes real estate held for sale or under development
and earnest money on land purchase options. Construction in progress includes
development costs, prepaid development costs, and development costs on land
under option but not owned. Homebuilding inventory represents speculative homes
under construction. The Company expects the homebuilding inventory to
increase as it continues to build in additional communities.
Earnest
money deposits for land costs and development costs on land under option, not
owned, totaled approximately $625,000 at March 31, 2008 and September 30, 2007,
of which approximately $575,000 is non-refundable if the Company does not
exercise the option and purchase the land.
As of
March 31, 2008 the Company had approximately 340 acres under development and
construction in Hays County, Travis County and Williamson County,
Texas. The Company completed Phase 1 in Rutherford West in 2007 and
Phase 6 in Georgetown Village in 2006.
In April
2007 10 acres of the Company’s Highway 183 project was condemned by the State of
Texas. In July 2007 the Company received final judgment from the
State of Texas and received proceeds of approximately $410,000 for the condemned
land. The Company sold and closed the remaining 5 acres in December
2007 for approximately $190,000.
Effective
July 2007, the Company temporarily suspended development of phases 2 through 5
of Rutherford West. From that date, all interest costs related to
holding this property has been recorded as an expense.
Below is
a summary of the property completed, owned or under contract by the Company at
March 31, 2008:
Property
|
|
Finished
Lots/Homes
|
|
|
Owned
Unfinished
Acreage
|
|
|
Approximate
Acreage
Under
Option
|
|
|
Land
and Project Costs
at
March 31, 2008
(in
thousands)
|
|
Texas
County
|
Rutherford
West
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
521
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
$
|
12,192
|
|
Hays
|
Georgetown
Village
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
419
|
|
|
|
10,136
|
|
Williamson
|
Villages
of New Sweden
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
521
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
10,817
|
|
Travis
|
Elm
Grove
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
5,607
|
|
Hays
|
Other
land
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
Sub-total
land
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
1,251
|
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
$
|
38,887
|
|
|
Homebuilding
inventory
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
9,367
|
|
|
Total
inventory
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
1,251
|
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
$
|
48,253
|
|
|
Below is
a summary of the property completed, owned or under contract by the Company at
September 30, 2007:
Property
|
|
Finished
Lots/Homes
|
|
|
Owned
Unfinished
Acreage
|
|
|
Approximate
Acreage
Under
Option
|
|
|
Land
and Project Costs
at
Sept. 30, 2007
(in
thousands)
|
|
Texas
County
|
Rutherford
West
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
521
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
$
|
12,369
|
|
Hays
|
Highway
183
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
Travis
|
Georgetown
Village
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
419
|
|
|
|
6,199
|
|
Williamson
|
Villages
of New Sweden
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
521
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
10,716
|
|
Travis
|
Elm
Grove
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
3,011
|
|
Hays
|
Other
land projects
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
Sub-total
land
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
1,226
|
|
|
|
480
|
|
|
$
|
32,463
|
|
|
Homebuilding
inventory
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,844
|
|
|
Total
inventory
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
1,226
|
|
|
|
480
|
|
|
$
|
35,307
|
|
|
(5) Consolidation
of Variable Interest Entities
At
December 31, 2006, the Company determined it was the primary beneficiary in
certain homebuilder agreements as defined under FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)
(“FIN 46(R)”), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” (VIEs), because the
Company has a significant, but less than controlling, interest in certain
entities also party to the homebuilder agreements. The results of these clients
have been consolidated into its financial statements for the three months ended
December 31, 2006.
On June
19, 2007, the Company purchased one of its VIEs, Green Builders, Inc, now a
wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, and commenced homebuilding operations
under the name Green Builders. The Company ceased providing services
to its homebuilder clients and terminated its relationship with its final
homebuilder client on August 2, 2007 subsequent to the sale of all the homes for
which the Company had guaranteed the loans. There was no
consolidation of VIEs for the three months and six months ended March 31,
2008.
Below is
a summary of the effect of the consolidation of these entities for the three
months ended March 31, 2007.
|
|
Three
Months Ended March 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
WFC
|
|
|
VIEs
|
|
|
|
Consolidating
entries
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
1,033,540
|
|
|
|
797,506
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(63,811
|
)
|
|
|
1,767,235
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
of Revenues
|
|
|
818,892
|
|
|
|
628,063
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(63,811
|
)
|
|
|
1,383,144
|
|
General,
administrative, sales and marketing
|
|
|
1,014,986
|
|
|
|
152,088
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,167,074
|
|
Costs
and expenses before interest
|
|
|
1,833,878
|
|
|
|
780,151
|
|
|
|
|
(63,811
|
)
|
|
|
2,550,218
|
|
Operating
income/(loss)
|
|
|
(800,338
|
)
|
|
|
17,355
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(782,983
|
)
|
(a)
Eliminates
WFC revenues in VIE expenses, eliminates VIE expenses in
WFC.
Below is
a summary of the effect of the consolidation of these entities for the six
months ended March 31, 2007.
|
|
Six
Months Ended March 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
WFC
|
|
|
VIEs
|
|
|
|
Consolidating
entries
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
1,738,839
|
|
|
|
1,830,165
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(331,969
|
)
|
|
|
3,237,035
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
of Revenues
|
|
|
1,342,771
|
|
|
|
1,589,118
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(339,457
|
)
|
|
|
2,592,432
|
|
General,
administrative, sales and marketing
|
|
|
2,169,875
|
|
|
|
294,036
|
|
|
|
|
(33,644
|
)
|
|
|
2,430,267
|
|
Costs
and expenses before interest
|
|
|
3,512,646
|
|
|
|
1,883,154
|
|
|
|
|
(373,101
|
)
|
|
|
5,022,699
|
|
Operating
income/(loss)
|
|
|
(1,773,807
|
)
|
|
|
(52,989
|
)
|
|
|
|
41,132
|
|
|
|
(1,785,664
|
)
|
(b)
Eliminates
WFC revenues in VIE expenses, eliminates VIE expenses in WFC.
(6) Operating
and Reporting Segments
The
Company has two reporting segments: homebuilding and related services, and land
sales. The Company’s reporting segments are strategic business units that offer
different products and services. The homebuilding and related services segment
includes home sales and services provided to homebuilders. The Company is
required to consolidate its homebuilder services clients per FIN 46(R). The
Company identifies the clients it consolidates as “VIEs.” Land sales consist of
land in various stages of development sold, including finished lots. The Company
charges identifiable direct expenses and interest to each segment and allocates
corporate expenses and interest based on an estimate of each segment’s relative
use of those expenses. Depreciation expense is included in selling, general and
administrative and is immaterial.
The
following table presents segment operating results before taxes for the three
months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding
and
Related
Services
|
|
|
Land
Sales
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Homebuilding
and
Related
Services
|
|
|
Land
Sales
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Revenues
from external customers
|
|
$
|
484,511
|
|
|
|
657,036
|
|
|
|
1,141,547
|
|
|
|
797,506
|
|
|
|
969,729
|
|
|
|
1,767,235
|
|
Costs
and expenses:
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
of revenues
|
|
|
405,558
|
|
|
|
222,484
|
|
|
|
628,042
|
|
|
|
564,252
|
|
|
|
818,892
|
|
|
|
1,383,144
|
|
Selling,
general and administrative
|
|
|
987,295
|
|
|
|
463,198
|
|
|
|
1,450,493
|
|
|
|
709,461
|
|
|
|
457,613
|
|
|
|
1,167,074
|
|
Loss
on fair value of derivatives
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Interest
& other income
|
|
|
(36,169
|
)
|
|
|
(29,593
|
)
|
|
|
(65,763
|
)
|
|
|
(25,911
|
)
|
|
|
(21,946
|
)
|
|
|
(47,857
|
)
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
231,307
|
|
|
|
543,130
|
|
|
|
774,437
|
|
|
|
172,129
|
|
|
|
446,886
|
|
|
|
619,015
|
|
Total
costs and expenses
|
|
|
1,587,990
|
|
|
|
1,199,218
|
|
|
|
2,787,209
|
|
|
|
1,419,931
|
|
|
|
1,701,445
|
|
|
|
3,121,376
|
|
Loss
before taxes
|
|
$
|
(1,103,480
|
)
|
|
|
(542,182
|
)
|
|
|
(1,645,662
|
)
|
|
|
(622,425
|
)
|
|
|
(731,716
|
)
|
|
|
(1,354,141
|
)
|
Segment
Assets
|
|
$
|
16,016,769
|
|
|
|
44,272,702
|
|
|
|
60,289,470
|
|
|
|
3,908,727
|
|
|
|
34,366,631
|
|
|
|
38,275,358
|
|
Capital
expenditures
|
|
$
|
23,368
|
|
|
|
2,596
|
|
|
|
25,964
|
|
|
|
56,237
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
56,237
|
|
The following
table presents segment operating results before taxes for the six months ended
March 31, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding
and
Related
Services
|
|
|
Land
Sales
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Homebuilding
and
Related
Services
|
|
|
Land
Sales
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Revenues
from external customers
|
|
$
|
484,511
|
|
|
|
1,765,348
|
|
|
|
2,249,859
|
|
|
|
1,830,165
|
|
|
|
1,406,870
|
|
|
|
3,237,035
|
|
Costs
and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
of revenues
|
|
|
405,558
|
|
|
|
931,539
|
|
|
|
1,337,097
|
|
|
|
1,343,055
|
|
|
|
1,249,377
|
|
|
|
2,592,432
|
|
Selling,
general and administrative
|
|
|
2,260,353
|
|
|
|
1,126,153
|
|
|
|
3,386,505
|
|
|
|
1,488,221
|
|
|
|
942,046
|
|
|
|
2,430,267
|
|
Loss
on fair value of derivatives
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,076,957
|
|
|
|
5,076,957
|
|
Interest
& other income
|
|
|
(87,427
|
)
|
|
|
(71,531
|
)
|
|
|
(158,958
|
)
|
|
|
(12,000
|
)
|
|
|
(65,993
|
)
|
|
|
(77,993
|
)
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
421,517
|
|
|
|
1,266,497
|
|
|
|
1,688,014
|
|
|
|
974,512
|
|
|
|
362,232
|
|
|
|
1,336,744
|
|
Total
costs and expenses
|
|
|
3,000,001
|
|
|
|
3,252,657
|
|
|
|
6,252,658
|
|
|
|
3,793,788
|
|
|
|
7,564,619
|
|
|
|
11,358,407
|
|
Loss
before taxes
|
|
$
|
(2,515,490
|
)
|
|
|
(1,487,309
|
)
|
|
|
(4,002,800
|
)
|
|
|
(1,963,623
|
)
|
|
|
(6,157,749
|
)
|
|
|
(8,121,372
|
)
|
Segment
Assets
|
|
$
|
16,016,769
|
|
|
|
44,272,702
|
|
|
|
60,289,470
|
|
|
|
3,908,727
|
|
|
|
34,366,631
|
|
|
|
38,275,358
|
|
Capital
expenditures
|
|
$
|
64,817
|
|
|
|
7,202
|
|
|
|
72,019
|
|
|
|
137,466
|
|
|
|
(67,050
|
)
|
|
|
70,416
|
|
(7) Related
Party Transactions
Issuance
of Convertible Debt
Barry A.
Williamson is a member of our board of directors and, until January 31,
2006, was a member of the board of directors of Tejas Incorporated, the parent
company of our Placement Agent for the sale of our convertible notes.
Mr. Williamson was re-elected to the board of directors of Tejas
Incorporated in November 2006.
In
September 2006, the Company entered into an agreement to lease approximately
5,000 square feet for its corporate offices, which it began occupying on
October 1, 2006. The lease requires monthly payments of approximately
$11,000 per month for 36 months. The lease was with a subsidiary of Tejas
Incorporated until January 2008. In January 2008 the building being
leased was bought by an unrelated party. The Company believes that
the lease is paid at fair market value for similar space in the Austin, Texas
commercial real estate market.
In
December 2006, Tejas Securities Group, Inc. exercised 535,000 warrants,
exercisable at $2.00 per share, in a cashless exercise netting the warrant
holder 348,913 shares of common stock.
Consulting
Arrangement with Audrey Wilson
In
February 2007 the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Audrey
Wilson, the wife of Clark N. Wilson, our President and Chief Executive Officer.
Pursuant to the consulting agreement, the Company has agreed to pay Ms. Wilson
$10,000 per month for a maximum of six months. Ms. Wilson agreed to
devote at least twenty-five hours per week assisting the Company with the
following activities: (i) the establishment of “back-office” processes for
homebuilding activities, including procurement, sales and marketing and other
related activities, and (ii) developing our marketing strategy for marketing and
sale of land to homebuilders. Subsequent to the completion of the six
month period in July 2007, Ms. Wilson continues to provide consulting services
to the Company at no cost to the Company. In accordance with Staff
Accounting Bulletin 5A, for the six months ended March 31, 2008, the Company has
recorded $60,000 as compensation expense and credited equity for three months of
services recorded at fair market value. On May 13, 2008, the consulting
agreement was re-instated and Ms. Wilson will be paid $10,000 per month for a
maximum of 12 months.
Vendor
Payments
The
Company has entered into contractual work agreements with Wilson
Roofing. Wilson Roofing is owned by relatives of Clark N. Wilson, our
President and Chief Executive Officer. The company paid Wilson
Roofing approximately $127,000 and $216,000 for the three and six months ended
March 31, 2008. Management believes that services were provided at
fair market value.
(8) Commitments
and Contingencies
Options
Purchase Agreements
In order
to ensure the future availability of land for development and homebuilding, the
Company plans to enter into lot-option purchase agreements with unaffiliated
third parties. Under the proposed option agreements, the Company pays a stated
deposit in consideration for the right to purchase land at a future time,
usually at predetermined prices or a percentage of proceeds as homes are sold.
These options generally do not contain performance requirements from the Company
nor obligate the Company to purchase the land. In order for the Company to start
or continue the development process on optioned land, it may incur development
costs on land it does not own before it exercises its option agreement.
Lease
Obligations
In
September 2006, the Company entered into an agreement to lease approximately
5,000 square feet for its corporate offices, which it began occupying on
October 1, 2006. The lease requires monthly payments of
approximately
$11,000 per month through October 2009. The Company also has office equipment
leases and trailers. The Company’s future minimum lease payments for future
fiscal years are as follows:
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Lease
obligations
|
|
$
|
80,120
|
|
|
|
148,881
|
|
|
|
17,097
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
Employment
Agreements with Executive Officers
On
February 14, 2007, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Clark
N. Wilson, its President and Chief Executive Officer. In the event of the
involuntary termination of Mr. Wilson’s service with the Company, the
agreement provides for monthly payments equal to Mr. Wilson’s monthly
salary payments to continue for 12 months. The agreement contains a provision
whereby Mr. Wilson is not permitted to be employed in any position in which
his duties and responsibilities comprise residential land development and
homebuilding in Texas or in areas within 200 miles of any city in which the
Company is conducting land development or homebuilding operations at the time of
such termination of employment for a period of one year from the termination of
his employment, if such termination is voluntary or for cause, or involuntary
and in connection with a corporate transaction.
Consulting
Arrangement with Arun Khurana
On
September 18, 2007, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Arun
Khurana, its Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to which Mr.
Khurana will transition from his position as an executive officer of the Company
into a consulting role, beginning December 31, 2007 and ending on October 31,
2008. The transition into a consulting role is a part of the
Company’s efforts to reduce its expenditures through fiscal 2008 as the Company
has decided to focus its efforts on commencing its homebuilding
operations.
Pursuant
to the consulting agreement, during the consulting term Mr. Khurana will (i)
review and provide comments on the Company’s periodic filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, (ii) advise the Company on its
Sarbanes-Oxley Act compliance and implementation efforts, (iii)
advise the Company regarding financing and joint venture matters, and (iv)
transition his responsibilities to the Chief Accounting Officer of the
Company. During the consulting term, Mr. Khurana will receive a
consulting fee of $11,500 per month and all his unvested options to purchase the
Company’s common stock vested in full on October 31, 2007.
(9)
Indebtedness
Revolving
Credit Facility
On June
29, 2007, Wilson Family Communities entered into a $55 million revolving credit
facility with a syndicate of banks led by RBC Centura Bank, as administrative
agent. The initial maturity date for the Credit Facility is June 29,
2008. The facility will be reviewed by our syndicate of banks and may be
extended for successive 12 month periods, so long as the following items have
been satisfied: no event of default shall exist, no material adverse
effect in our financial condition, operations, business or management shall
exist and extension fees in the amount determined by the agent and all costs
associated incurred in connection with the proposed extension must be
paid. The final borrowing base calculation will be made twelve months
prior to the termination of the Credit Facility and no borrowings may be made in
excess of such amount.
The
Company has guaranteed all of the obligations under the Credit Facility. The
obligations of the credit facility will be secured by the assets of each
subdivision to be developed with the proceeds of loans available under the
credit facility. The Credit Facility has loaned approximately $12.4 million to
the Company and issued a letter of credit of approximately
$118,000.
The
credit facility allows the Company to obtain revolving credit loans and provides
for the issuance of letters of credit. The amount available at any time under
the credit facility for revolving credit loans or the issuance of letters of
credit is determined by a borrowing base. The borrowing base is calculated as
the sum of the values for homes and lots in the subdivision to be developed as
agreed to by the Company and the agent.
Outstanding
borrowings under the credit facility will bear interest at the prime rate plus
0.25%. The Company is charged a letter of credit fee equal to 1.10% of each
letter of credit issued under the credit facility. The Company may elect to
prepay the credit facility at any time without premium or penalty.
The
credit facility contains customary terms and covenants limiting the Company’s
ability to take certain actions, including terms that limit the Company’s
ability to place liens on property, pay dividends and other restrictions and
payments.
The
Credit Facility contains customary covenants limiting our ability to take
certain actions, including covenants that:
|
·
|
affect
how the Company can develop our
properties;
|
|
·
|
limit
the ability to pay dividends and other restricted
payments;
|
|
·
|
limit
the ability to place liens on its
property;
|
|
·
|
limit
the ability to engage in mergers and acquisitions and dispositions of
assets;
|
|
·
|
require
the Company to maintain a minimum net worth of $20,000,000, including
subordinated debt (although the minimum net worth may be $17,000,000 for
one quarter);
|
|
·
|
prohibit
the ratio of debt (excluding convertible debt) to equity (including
convertible debt) from exceeding (A) 1.75 to 1.0 prior to September 30,
2007, (B) 1.85 to 1.0 from September 30, 2007 until March 30, 2008 and (C)
2.0 to 1.0 thereafter; and
|
|
·
|
require
the Company to maintain working capital of at least
$15,000,000
|
|
·
|
limit
the number of completed speculative homes to 12% of the total borrowing
base available for homes
|
An event
of default will occur under the credit facility if certain events occur,
including the following:
|
·
|
a
failure to pay principal or interest on any loan under the credit
facility;
|
|
·
|
the
inaccuracy of a representation or warranty when
made;
|
|
·
|
the
failure to observe or perform covenants or
agreements;
|
|
·
|
an
event of default beyond any applicable grace period with respect to any
other indebtedness;
|
|
·
|
the
commencement of proceedings under federal, state or foreign bankruptcy,
insolvency, receivership or similar
laws;
|
|
·
|
a
condition where any loan document, or any lien created thereunder, ceases
to be in full force and effect;
|
|
·
|
the
entry of a judgment greater than $1,000,000 that remains undischarged;
or
|
If an
event of default occurs under the credit facility, then the lenders may: (1)
terminate their commitments under the credit facility; (2) declare any
outstanding indebtedness under the credit facility to be immediately due and
payable; and (3) foreclose on the collateral securing the
obligations.
The
Company is currently out of compliance with the terms of the Borrowing Base
Agreement due to the total number of completed speculative homes that were
included in the “eligible property” as of March 31, 2008 and is operating under
a wavier which expires July 1, 2008. Per the Borrowing Base Agreement, the
Company may not exceed more than 12% of the total borrowing base available for
homes then included in homes defined as “eligible property.” “Eligible Property”
is defined as homes that meet the requirements of the borrowing base agreement
for financing under the Master Line and calculation of borrowing availability.
The Company is investigating various solutions to become compliant with the
syndicate of banks. If the Company is unable to comply with any one or more of
these financial covenants, and is unable to obtain a waiver for the
non-compliance, the Company could be precluded from incurring additional
borrowings and its obligation to repay indebtedness outstanding under the
facility
could be accelerated in full. The Company can give no assurance that in such an
event, it would have or be able to obtain sufficient funds to satisfy all
repayment obligations.
The above
description of the material terms of the credit facility is not a complete
statement of the parties’ rights and obligations with respect to such
transactions. The above statements are qualified in their entirety by reference
to the Borrowing Base Loan Agreement executed in connection with the credit
facility, a copy of which is filed with the Company's Annual report filed on
September 30, 2007.
The
following schedule lists the Company’s notes payable and lines of credit
balances at March 31, 2008 and September 30, 2007:
In
Thousands
|
|
Rate
|
|
Maturity
Date
|
|
3/31/2008
|
|
|
9/30/2007
|
|
Line
of Credit, $3 million, development
|
|
Prime+.50%
|
|
Mar-1-08
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
472
|
|
Notes
payable, land
|
|
12.50%
|
|
Mar-1-09
|
|
|
4,700
|
|
|
|
4,700
|
|
Notes
payable, seller financed
|
|
7%
& Prime + 2%
|
|
Oct.
2010/11
|
|
|
2,475
|
|
|
|
2,475
|
|
Notes
payable, land
|
|
12.50
%
|
|
Mar-1-09
|
|
|
7,300
|
|
|
|
7,300
|
|
Notes
payable, development
|
|
Prime+.50%
|
|
Feb-1-10
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,502
|
|
Notes
payable, land and development
|
|
Prime+3.00%
|
|
Feb-1-09
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,440
|
|
Line
of Credit, $55 million facility, land, land development, and
homebuilding
|
|
Prime+.25%
|
|
June-29-08
|
|
|
12,422
|
|
|
|
2,749
|
|
Notes
payalbe, land and land development
|
|
12.50%
|
|
Nov-1-09
|
|
|
3,963
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
2005
$10 million, Subordinated convertible notes, net of discount of $415
thousand and $459 thousand, respectively
|
|
5.00%
|
|
Dec-1-12
|
|
|
9,584
|
|
|
|
9,541
|
|
2006
$6.50 million as of June 30, 2007, $6.75 million, Subordinated convertible
notes, net of discount of $2,550 and $2,786 thousand
respectively
|
|
5.00%
|
|
Sep-1-13
|
|
|
3,950
|
|
|
|
3,714
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
44,393
|
|
|
|
33,893
|
|
(a) In
March 2006 the Company secured a $3.0 million line of credit development loan,
maturing on March 30, 2008, at prime plus 0.50% with a minimum floor of
7.00%, and interest payable monthly. The loan was secured by property being
developed totaling approximately 32.6 acres located in Williamson
County. The loan was paid in December 2007 and the lots were
refinanced as a developed lot loan with our $55 million credit
facility
(b) In
March 2007, the Company secured a $4.7 million term land loan maturing March
2009. The loan is secured by land of 534 acres located in eastern
Travis County. The interest rate on the loan is 12.5%, with interest payable
monthly. The loan has no financial covenants.
(c) As
part of the purchase of 534 acres in Travis County described above, the Company
entered into four notes payable, seller financed with a cumulative balance of
approximately $2.5 million. Three of the notes payable with a cumulative balance
of $1.9 million are at an interest rate of 7.0% and the fourth note payable
issued for approximately $600,000 is at an interest rate of prime rate with an
anniversary date of October 28 of each year plus 2.0%. The terms of the note
were modified in October 2007 with the principal payments extended for one
year. The revised terms of the notes payable now call for quarterly
interest payments commencing October 12, 2007 and principal payments of $1.4
million in October 2010 and $1.0 million due in October 2011.
(d) In
February 2007 the company secured a loan of approximately $7.3 million to
finance approximately 538 acres. The interest rate is 12.5% annually and
requires monthly interest payments, with a maturity of two years and is
renewable for an additional year for a 1% loan fee. The loan is secured by the
underlying land.
(e)
In February 2007 the Company obtained a development loan of approximately $4.6
million. The loan matures on February 1, 2010 and requires quarterly interest
payments and principal pay downs as lots are sold. The loan is secured by the
property being developed at an interest rate of prime plus 0.50%. The
loan was paid in December 2007 and the lots were refinanced as a developed lot
loan with our $55 million credit facility
(f) In
February 2007 the Company obtained a development loan of approximately $3.1
million to develop approximately 30 acres. The loan has an interest rate of
prime plus 3.00%, with interest payable monthly. The loan was paid in December
2007 and the lots were refinanced as a developed lot loan with our $55 million
credit facility.
(g) In
June 2007 the Company established a $55 million credit facility with a syndicate
of banks. The Company currently has approximately $12.4 million in
borrowing for land and home construction.
(h) In
October 2007 the Company refinanced its land obligation on a land loan for
approximately 120 acres in Williamson County of approximately $1.1 million and
obtained a new loan of approximately $4.3 million to finance development
approximately 40 acres in Williamson County. The interest rate
is 12.5% annually and requires monthly interest payments, with a maturity of two
years.
Subordinated
Convertible Debt
The
Company accounts for all derivative financial instruments in accordance with
SFAS No. 133. Prior to 2007, derivative financial instruments were recorded as
liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet and measured at fair value. The
Company accounted for the various embedded derivative features as being bundled
together as a single, compound embedded derivative instrument that was
bifurcated from the debt host contract, referred to as the “single compound
embedded derivatives.” The single compound embedded derivative
features include within the convertible note the conversion feature, the early
redemption option and the fixed price conversion adjustment. The initial value
of the single compound embedded derivative liability was bifurcated from the
debt host contract and recorded as a derivative liability, which resulted in a
reduction of the initial carrying amount (as unamortized discount) of the
convertible notes. The unamortized discount was amortized using the
straight-line method over the life of the convertible note, or 7 years. The
penalty warrants were valued based on the fair value of the Company’s common
stock on the issuance date using a Black-Scholes valuation model and the
unamortized discount was to be amortized as interest expense over the 7-year
life of the notes using the straight-line method. In January 2007, the Company
adopted FSP EITF 00-19-2. Prior to adoption of FSP EITF 00-19-2, the
uncertainty of a successful registration of the shares underlying the
subordinated convertible debt required that the freestanding and embedded
derivatives be characterized as derivative liabilities. FSP EITF 00-19-2
specifically addressed the accounting for a registration rights agreement and
the requirement to classify derivative instruments subject to registration
rights agreements as liabilities was withdrawn. The Company
re-evaluated its accounting for the subordinated debt transaction and determined
that the liability for the penalty warrants be included in the allocation of the
proceeds to the various components of the transaction according to paragraph 16
of APB Opinion No. 14, “Accounting
for Convertible Debt
and Debt issued with Stock Purchase Warrants.”
The Company also
determined the notes contained a beneficial conversion feature under Issues 98-5
and 00-27, and used the effective conversion price based on the proceeds
allocated to the convertible instrument to compute the intrinsic value of the
embedded conversion option. The Company recalculated the discount on the
convertible debt at its intrinsic value and re-characterized the freestanding
and embedded derivatives as equity. The previous valuation adjustments of the
derivative liabilities were reversed and the amortization of the discounts was
adjusted based upon the recalculation. Per FSP EITF 00-19-2, the Company was
permitted to adjust the previous amounts as a cumulative accounting
adjustment.
The net
effect of the change increased the net carrying amount of the subordinated
convertible debt and eliminated the derivative liabilities. There was also an
increase of $4.8 million in total stockholders’ equity. During the
year ended December 31, 2006, the Company recognized approximately $8.5 million
of loss on fair value of derivatives related to the subordinated convertible
debt. For the six months ended March 31, 2007, the Company recognized a loss of
$5,076,957 on fair value of derivates related to the subordinated convertible
debt. Under the new FSP EITF 00-19-2 the derivatives were eliminated
and hence there will no longer be gains and losses related to the current
subordinated convertible debt.
2005,
$10MM, 5%, Subordinated Convertible Debt
On
December 19, 2005, the Company issued $10 million in aggregate principal
amount of 5% subordinated convertible debt due December 1, 2012 to certain
purchasers. The following are the key features of the subordinated convertible
debt: interest accrues on the principal amount of the subordinated convertible
debt at a rate of 5% per annum and the debt is payable semi-annually on
May 1 and December 1 of each year, with interest payments beginning on
June 1, 2006. The subordinated convertible debt is due on December 1,
2012 and is convertible, at the option of the holder, into shares of our common
stock at a conversion price of $2.00 per share. The conversion price is subject
to adjustment for stock splits, reverse stock splits, recapitalizations and
similar corporate actions. An adjustment in the conversion price is also
triggered upon the issuance of certain equity or equity-linked securities with a
conversion price, exercise price, or share price less than $2.00 per share. The
anti-dilution provisions state the conversion price cannot be lower than $1.00
per share.
The
Company may redeem all or a portion of the subordinated convertible debt after
December 1, 2008 at a redemption price that incorporates a premium that
ranges from 3% to 10% during the period beginning December 1, 2008 and
ending on the due date. In addition, the redemption price will include any
accrued but unpaid interest on the subordinated convertible debt. Upon a change
in control event, each holder of the subordinated convertible debt
may
require us to repurchase some or all of its subordinated convertible debt at a
purchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the subordinated
convertible debt plus accrued and unpaid interest. The due date may accelerate
in the event the Company commences any case relating to bankruptcy or
insolvency, or related events of default. The Company’s assets will be available
to pay obligations on the subordinated convertible debt only after all senior
indebtedness has been paid.
The
subordinated convertible debt has a registration rights agreement whereby the
Company filed a registration statement registering the resale of the underlying
shares with the SEC. The Company must maintain the registration
statement in an effective status until the earlier to occur of (i) the date
after which all the registrable shares registered thereunder shall have been
sold and (ii) the second anniversary the date on which each warrant has been
exercised in full and after which by the terms of such Warrant there are no
additional warrant shares as to which the warrant may become exercisable;
provided that in either case, such date shall be extended by the amount of time
of any suspension period. Thereafter the Company shall be entitled to withdraw
the registration statement, and upon such withdrawal and notice to the
investors, the investors shall have no further right to offer or sell any of the
registrable shares pursuant to the registration statement. The registration
statement filed pursuant to the registration rights agreement was declared
effective by the SEC on August 1, 2006.
The
Company also issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 750,000 shares of
common stock to the purchasers of the subordinated convertible debt, 562,500
shares which vested and the remaining shares will never vest. The
warrants were exercisable only upon the occurrence of certain events and then
only in the amount specified as follows: (i) with respect to 25% of the warrant
shares, on February 3, 2006 if the registration statement shall not have
been filed with the SEC by such date (the Company filed a Form SB-2 registration
statement on February 2, 2006); (ii) with respect to an additional 25% of
the warrant shares, on April 19, 2006 if the registration statement shall
not have been declared effective by the SEC by such date; (iii) with respect to
an additional 25% of the warrant shares, on May 19, 2006 if the
registration statement shall not have been declared effective by the SEC by such
date; and (iv) with respect to the final 25% of the warrant shares, on
June 18, 2006 if the registration statement shall not have been declared
effective by the SEC by such date. Management has recorded the fair value of
these warrants due to the uncertainty surrounding the timeline of getting the
registration statement effected and the high probability that these warrants
would be issued. The shelf registration statement relating to these
warrants was declared effective on August 1, 2006 and 562,500 of these
warrants have vested and the remaining 187,500 warrants will never
vest.
The
penalty warrants were valued based on the fair value of the Company’s common
stock on the issuance date of $1.60, using a Black-Scholes approach, risk free
interest rate of 4.25%; dividend yield of 0%; weighted-average expected life of
the warrants of 10 years; and a 60% volatility factor, resulting in an allocated
value of approximately $613,000. The penalty warrants are recorded as part of
the debt discount and an increase in additional paid in capital, and amortized
over the 7-year life of the notes using the straight-line rate
method.
The
Company also incurred closing costs of $588,000 which included placement agent
fees of $450,000 plus reimbursement of expenses to the placement agent of
$125,000, plus 750,000 fully vested warrants to purchase Company’s common stock
at $2.00 per share with a 10 year exercise period, valued at $829,000, for a
total of $1.4 million, recorded as debt issuance costs, to be amortized over the
7-year life of the notes using the straight line method. These warrants were
valued based on the fair value of the Company’s common stock of $1.60, using a
Black-Scholes valuation model, at a $2.00 exercise price, risk free interest
rate of 4.25%; dividend yield of 0%; weighted-average expected life of warrants
of 10 years; and a 60% volatility factor.
Subordinated
Convertible Note at March 31, 2008 and September 30, 2007:
|
|
March
31,
2008
|
|
|
September
30,
2007
|
|
Notional
balance
|
|
$
|
10,000,000
|
|
|
|
10,000,000
|
|
Unamortized
discount
|
|
|
(415,648
|
)
|
|
|
(459,400
|
)
|
Subordinated
convertible debt balance, net of unamortized discount
|
|
$
|
9,584,352
|
|
|
|
9,540,600
|
|
2006,
$6.5MM, 5%, Subordinated Convertible Debt
On
September 29, 2006, the Company raised capital of $6.75 million in
aggregate principal amount of 5% subordinated convertible debt due
September 1, 2013, to certain purchasers. As of December 31, 2006,
$6.75 million had been received in cash, the remaining $250,000 was a receivable
from an owner of land that the Company had under option to
purchase. During the quarter ended June 2007, the Company did not
exercise its option to purchase the land and therefore does not expect to
receive the additional $250,000. In addition, during the
quarter ended June
30, 2007,
one of our convertible debt holders who is also the seller of Bohl’s tract
purchased common stock with a promissory note. Under the terms of the
promissory note, should the Company not exercise the option to purchase the
Bohl’s tract the convertible debt would be used for repayment of the promissory
note. As the Company did not exercise the option to purchase Bohl’s
tract the promissory note was repaid from the repayment of the convertible
debt. The following are the key features of the subordinated
convertible debt: interest accrues on the principal amount of the subordinated
convertible debt at a rate of 5% per annum, payable semi-annually on March 1 and
September 1 of each year, with interest payments beginning on March 1,
2006. The subordinated convertible debt is due on September 1, 2013 and is
convertible, at the option of the holder, into shares of common stock at a
conversion price of $2.00 per share. The conversion price is subject to
adjustment for stock splits, reverse stock splits, recapitalizations and similar
corporate actions. An adjustment in the conversion price is also triggered upon
the issuance of certain equity or equity-linked securities with a conversion
price, exercise price, or share price less than $2.00 per share. The
anti-dilution provisions state the conversion price cannot be lower than $1.00
per share.
The
Company may redeem all or a portion of the subordinated convertible debt after
September 1, 2009 at a redemption price that incorporates a premium that
ranges from 3% to 10% during the period beginning September 1, 2009 and
ending on the due date. In addition, the redemption price will include any
accrued but unpaid interest on the subordinated convertible debt. Upon a change
in control event, each holder of the subordinated convertible debt may require
us to repurchase some or all of its subordinated convertible debt at a purchase
price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the subordinated convertible debt
plus accrued and unpaid interest. The due date may accelerate in the event the
Company commences any case relating to bankruptcy or insolvency, or related
events of default. The Company’s assets will be available to pay obligations on
the subordinated convertible debt only after all senior indebtedness has been
paid.
The
subordinated convertible debt has a registration rights agreement whereby the
Company filed a registration statement registering the resale of the underlying
shares with the SEC. The Company must maintain the registration
statement in an effective status until the earlier to occur of (i) the date
after which all the registrable shares registered thereunder shall have been
sold and (ii) the second anniversary of the later to occur of (a) the closing
date, and (b) the date on which each warrant has been exercised in full and
after which by the terms of such warrant there are no additional warrant shares
as to which the warrant may become exercisable; provided that in either case,
such date shall be extended by the amount of time of any suspension period.
Thereafter the Company shall be entitled to withdraw the registration statement,
and upon such withdrawal and notice to the investors, the investors shall have
no further right to offer or sell any of the registrable shares pursuant to the
registration statement.
The
Company also issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 506,250 shares of
common stock to the purchasers of the subordinated convertible debt. The
warrants are exercisable only upon the occurrence of certain events and then
only in the amount specified as follows: (i) with respect to 25% of the warrant
shares, on November 13, 2006 if the registration statement shall not have
been filed with the SEC by such date (the Company filed a Form SB-2 registration
statement on October 16, 2006); (ii) with respect to an additional 25% of
the warrant shares, on January 27, 2007 if the registration statement shall
not have been declared effective by the SEC by such date; (iii) with respect to
an additional 25% of the warrant shares, on February 26, 2007 if the
registration statement shall not have been declared effective by the SEC by such
date; and (iv) with respect to the final 25% of the warrant shares, on
March 28, 2007 if the registration statement shall not have been declared
effective by the SEC by such date. The Company met certain of these milestones
and has recorded 75% of the fair value of these warrants but the registration
statement was not declared effective by the SEC prior to March 28, 2007 and
therefore 75% of the warrant shares have vested and remain exercisable. The
Company also incurred closing costs of $140,000, including placement agent fees
of approximately $70,000 plus reimbursement of expenses to the placement agent
of $25,000, for a total of $95,000 to the placement agent, recorded as debt
issuance costs, to be amortized over the 7-year life of the notes using the
straight-line rate method.
The
issuance of the debt resulted in an embedded beneficial conversion feature
valued at approximately $2.5 million, which will be recorded as part of the debt
discount and an increase in additional paid in capital, and amortized over the
7-year life of the notes using the straight-line rate method.
The
penalty warrants were based on the fair value of the Company’s common stock on
the issuance date of $1.91, using a Black-Scholes approach, risk free interest
rate of 4.64%; dividend yield of 0%; weighted-average expected life of the
warrants of 10 years; and a 60% volatility factor. The allocated value of the
penalty warrants totaled approximately $846,000 and are recorded as part of the
debt discount and an increase in additional paid in capital, and amortized over
the 7-year life of the notes using the straight-line rate method.
Convertible
Note at March 31, 2008 and September 30, 2007:
|
|
March
31,
2008
|
|
|
September
30,
2007
|
|
Notional
balance
|
|
$
|
6,500,000
|
|
|
|
6,500,000
|
|
Unamortized
discount
|
|
|
(2,550,398
|
)
|
|
|
(2,785,820
|
)
|
Subordinated
convertible debt balance, net of unamortized discount
|
|
$
|
3,949,602
|
|
|
|
3,714,180
|
|
(10) Common
Stock
The
Company is authorized to issue 100,000,000 shares of common stock.
Each
common stockholder is entitled to one vote per share of common stock
owned.
The
Company sold 5,000,000 shares of common stock in a public offering at $3.25 per
share that closed on May 19, 2007 and concurrently began trading on the American
Stock Exchange under the symbol “WIH.” The stock is now being traded under the
ticker symbol “GBH.” The Company incurred the following transaction
costs related to the financing:
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
|
Cash
paid to investment banker for underwriting and other fees
|
|
$
|
1,219
|
|
Legal,
printing, accounting and stock exchange registration fees
|
|
|
497
|
|
Travel
and selling related costs
|
|
|
503
|
|
Warrants
to purchase 500,000 shares at $4.06 with a fair value based on the
Black-Scholes option pricing model with a risk free interest rate of
4.64%; dividend yield of 0%; weighted-average expected life of the
warrants of 1 years; and a 60% volatility factor at $0.56 per
warrant.
|
|
|
280
|
|
Total
expenses
|
|
$
|
2,499
|
|
During
June 2007, the Company issued 80,000 shares of common stock for the purchase of
Green Builders, Inc.
(11) Common
Stock Option / Stock Incentive Plan
In August
2005, the Company adopted the 2005 Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan (the “Stock
Option Plan”). The plan contains two separate equity programs: 1) the Option
Grant Program for eligible persons at the discretion of the plan administrator
to be granted options to purchase shares of common stock, and 2) the Stock
Issuance Program under which eligible persons may, at the discretion of the plan
administrator, be issued shares of common stock directly, either through the
immediate purchase of such shares or as a bonus for services rendered to the
Company or any parent or subsidiary. The market value of the shares underlying
option issuance prior to the merger of the Company and WFC was determined by the
Board of Directors as of the grant date. This plan was assumed by WFC. The fair
value of the options granted under the plan was determined by the Board of
Directors prior to the merger of the Company and WFC.
The Board
is the plan administrator and has full authority (subject to provisions of the
plan) and it may delegate a committee to carry out the functions of the
administrator. Persons eligible to participate in the plan are employees,
non-employee members of the Board or members of the board of directors of any
parent or subsidiary.
The stock
issued under the Stock Option Plan shall not exceed 2,500,000 shares. Unless
terminated at an earlier date by action of the Board of Directors, the Stock
Option Plan terminates upon the earlier of (1) the expiration of the ten year
period measured from the date the Stock Option Plan is adopted by the Board or
(2) the date on which all shares available for issuance under the Stock Option
Plan shall have been issued as fully-vested shares.
The
Company had 846,667 shares of common stock available for future grants under the
Stock Option Plan at March 31, 2008. Compensation expense
related to the Company’s share-based awards for the three months ended March 31,
2008 and 2007 was approximately $36,000 and $40,000,
respectively. For the six months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 the
Compensation expense related to the Company’s share-based awards was
approximately $676,000 and $235,000, respectively.
Before
January 1, 2006, options granted to non-employees were recorded at fair
value in accordance with SFAS No. 123 and EITF 96-18. These options are issued
pursuant to the Stock Option Plan and are reflected in the disclosures
below.
During
the three months ended March 31, 2008, the Company issued options to purchase
75,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price range of $0.91 - $0.93 per
share which was equal to the closing price of our common stock as reported on
the American Stock Exchange on the date of grant. Using the Black-Scholes
pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions: risk free
interest rate of 4.64%; dividend yields of 0%; weighted average expected life of
options of 5 years; and a 60% volatility factor. Based on these
assumptions, management estimated the fair market value of the grants to be
$0.99 per share. Management estimated the volatility factor based on an average
of comparable companies due to its limited trading history.
A summary
of activity in common stock options for the three months and six months ended
March 31, 2008 are as follows:
|
|
Share
Roll
Forward
|
|
|
Range
of
Exercise Prices
(1)
|
|
|
Weighted
Avg
Exc
Price
|
|
Balance September
30, 2007
|
|
|
1,835,000
|
|
|
|
$1.65-$3.25
|
|
|
$
|
2.50
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
155,000
|
|
|
|
$1.78
|
|
|
$
|
1.78
|
|
Balance
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
1,990,000
|
|
|
|
$1.65-$3.25
|
|
|
$
|
2.45
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
$0.91-$0.93
|
|
|
$
|
0.93
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(411,667
|
)
|
|
|
$0.93-$3.25
|
|
|
$
|
1.82
|
|
Balance March
31, 2008
|
|
|
1,653,333
|
|
|
|
$0.91-$3.25
|
|
|
$
|
2.54
|
|
(1) For
each option, the exercise price per share was equal to the closing price of our
common stock as reported on the American Stock Exchange on the date of
grant.
The
following is a summary of options outstanding and exercisable at March 31,
2008:
Outstanding
|
Vested
|
Number of
Shares
Subject to
Options
Outstanding
|
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
1,653,333
|
5.99
|
$2.54
|
1,040,181
|
$4.25
|
$2.63
|
At March
31, 2008, there was approximately $846 thousand of unrecognized compensation
expense related to unvested share-based awards granted under the Company’s Stock
Option Plan. That expense is expected to be recognized over 5.99
years. In February 2007, the Company’s Board approved an 819,522
share increase in the number of shares issuable pursuant to its option plan for
a total of 2,500,000 shares issuable under the plan.
(12)
Purchase
of Green Builders, Inc.
On June
19, 2007, the Company purchased Green Builders, Inc. for $65,000 in cash and
80,000 shares of the Company’s common stock which was valued at $2.70 per share
on the date of the transaction. The total purchase price for the acquisition was
approximately $281,000. In addition the Company spent approximately
$24,000 in legal fees for the purchase. The Company allocated the
purchase price and legal fees to trademark with indefinite life in accordance
with SFAS 142.
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
17,081
|
|
Accounts
Receivable
|
|
|
2,900
|
|
Accounts
Payable
|
|
|
(6,190
|
)
|
Trademarks
|
|
|
292,691
|
|
Others
|
|
|
(9,276
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
297,206
|
|
In
conjunction with the acquisition, the Company increased the size of its Board of
Directors from four to five persons, and appointed Victor Ayad as a director of
the Company. Mr. Ayad was the President and sole shareholder
of Green
Builders, Inc. prior to the acquisition. The pro forma effect of the acquisition
on the Company’s income was not material and is already consolidated into the
Company’s results as a VIE under FIN 46(R).
(13)
Subsequent
Events
Effective
April 4, 2008, Wilson Holdings, Inc, a Nevada corporation, completed its
reincorporation to the State of Texas pursuant to the Plan of Conversion as
ratified by the shareholders at the 2008 annual meeting of shareholders held on
April 3, 2008. As part of the reincorporation, a new Certificate of
Formation was adopted and Wilson Holdings, Inc.’s corporate name was changed to
Green Builders, Inc., and the Certificate of Formation will now govern the
rights of holders of the Company’s common stock. The Company has been
using the name “Green Builders” in its regular business operations since June
2007 and will continue to do so. Effective April 8, 2008, the
Company’s common stock began trading under the symbol “GBH” on the American
Stock Exchange.
On April
14, 2008 our Credit Facility lenders notified us that our waiver of certain
borrowing base restrictions in the credit agreement will expire on July 1,
2008. Per the Borrowing Base Agreement, the Company may not exceed
more than 12% of the total borrowing base available for homes then included in
homes defined as “eligible property.” The Company is investigating various
solutions to become compliant with its syndicate of banks.
On May
13, 2008 the Company approved a consulting contract with Audrey Wilson, the wife
of our President and CEO. Pursuant to the consulting agreement, the
Company has agreed to pay Ms. Wilson $10,000 per month for a maximum of 12
months and Mrs. Wilson will perform the following services: (i) the
establishment of business processes for homebuilding activities, including,
sales and marketing and other related activities, and (ii) developing our
advertising and marketing strategy for marketing and sale of land and
homes.
It
em
2. M
anagem
ent’s Discussion and
Analysis or Plan of Operation
The
following discussion and analysis or plan of operation should be read in
conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and related
notes thereto included elsewhere in this report. This discussion contains
forward-looking statements. Please see the “Caution Regarding Forward-Looking
Information; Risk Factors” above and “Risk Factors” below for a discussion of
the uncertainties, risks and assumptions associated with these
statements.
Overview
Green
Builders, Inc., (the “Company”), is a Texas corporation formerly known as Wilson
Holdings, Inc, a Nevada corporation. Effective April 4, 2008, Wilson
Holdings, Inc, a Nevada corporation, completed its reincorporation to the State
of Texas pursuant to the Plan of Conversion as ratified by the shareholders at
the 2008 annual meeting of shareholders held on April 3, 2008. As
part of the reincorporation, a new Certificate of Formation was adopted and
Wilson Holdings, Inc.’s corporate name was changed to Green Builders, Inc., and
the Certificate of Formation will now govern the rights of holders of our common
stock. We have been using the name “Green Builders” in its regular
business operations since June 2007 and will continue to do
so. Effective April 8, 2008, our common stock began trading under the
symbol “GBH” on the American Stock Exchange.
Historically
our business plan was focused on the acquisition of undeveloped land that we
believe, based on our understanding of population growth patterns and
infrastructure development, is strategically located. This portion of
our business focus has required, and is expected to continue to require, the
majority of our financial resources. We have funded these
acquisitions primarily with bank debt. In tandem with our land
acquisition efforts and based upon our strategic market analysis, we also
prepare land for homebuilding. Additionally, we commenced
homebuilding activities in June 2007. We believe that as the central
Texas economy expands, the strategic land purchases, land development activities
and homebuilding activities will enable us to capitalize on the new growth
centers we expect will be created.
A primary
focus of our business has been the sale of developed lots to homebuilders,
including national homebuilders. Due to national conditions in the
market for homes and in the homebuilding industry during the second quarter of
2007 and continuing through May 2008, demand for finished lots by national
homebuilders is and we expect will continue to be significantly
reduced. As a result, orders placed for some of our finished lots
were cancelled. We elected to retain some of our lots for use in our
new homebuilding business (described below). We believe retaining
some of our lots for use in homebuilding activities will allow us to generate
homebuilding revenue to replace revenue from the loss of sales of these finished
lots.
In June
2007 we purchased Green Builders, Inc. and commenced our homebuilding operations
under that name. We are in the process of developing the Green
Builders brand. Our strategy is to build homes that are
environmentally responsible, resource efficient and consistent with local
style. Our home designs will be selected and prepared for each of our
markets based on local community tastes and the preferences of homebuyers.
Substantially all of our construction work will be performed by subcontractors
who will be retained for specific subdivisions pursuant to contracts entered in
2007 and 2008. We intend to build homes on the majority of the lots
we currently have under development and sell those finished homes. In
order to expand the business and increase home closings in future years, we have
entered into a purchase lot contract that would allow us to purchase
finished lots beginning in fiscal 2009. Furthermore, we
are currently negotiating with other developers to enter into
agreements that would give us the option to purchase additional finished lots
in the future.
Although
central Texas has been less affected than other areas, national real estate
trends have an impact on home buyers and lenders and we believe that sales of
new homes in our market will continue to decline in fiscal year
2008. We believe this slowdown is attributable to a decline in
consumer confidence, the inability of some buyers to sell their current homes
and the direct and indirect impact of the well-publicized turmoil in the
mortgage and credit markets. Due to current market conditions, we
feel that we will see a reduction in revenue from home and lot sales in fiscal
2008. We are considering selling tracts of commercial and residential
land in order to achieve profitability.
In order
to offset potential losses we have taken measures to reduce
expenditures. In January 2008, in order to reduce expenditures, we
effected a reduction in force which resulted in the termination of five of our
employees and two of our sales agents. Following this reduction in
force, we have 17 full-time employees, one part-time employee, five sales
agents, and three outside consultants. We may also enter
into joint venture arrangements with other land developers and builders in order
to preserve cash in case the slowdown impacts our business for a longer period
than expected.
Results
of Operations
|
|
Three
Months Ended March 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
%
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding
and related
services
revenues
|
|
$
|
485
|
|
|
$
|
798
|
|
|
$
|
(313
|
)%
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
Land
revenues
|
|
|
657
|
|
|
|
970
|
|
|
|
(313
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
Gross
Profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding
and related
services
gross profit
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
(154
|
)
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
Land
gross profit
|
|
|
435
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
Costs
& Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses
|
|
|
1,450
|
|
|
|
1,167
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Operating
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
(937
|
)
|
|
|
(783
|
)
|
|
|
(154
|
)
|
|
|
20
|
|
Net
Income (Loss)
|
|
$
|
(1,646
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,354
|
)
|
|
$
|
(292
|
)%
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six
Months Ended March 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
%
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding
and related
services
revenues
|
|
$
|
485
|
|
|
$
|
1,830
|
|
|
$
|
(1,346
|
)%
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
Land
revenues
|
|
|
1,765
|
|
|
|
1,407
|
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Gross
Profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding
and related
services
gross profit
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
487
|
|
|
|
(408
|
)
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
Land
gross profit
|
|
|
834
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
676
|
|
|
|
429
|
|
Costs
& Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses
|
|
|
3,387
|
|
|
|
2,430
|
|
|
|
956
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
Operating
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
(2,474
|
)
|
|
|
(1,786
|
)
|
|
|
(688
|
)
|
|
|
39
|
|
Net
Income (Loss)
|
|
$
|
(4,003
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,121
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,119
|
%
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
Homebuilding
and Related Services
Background
- Homebuilding and
related services revenue consists of revenue from home sales and from providing
services to our homebuilder customers. Prior to fiscal year 2008, all
home sales were generated by our homebuilder customers utilizing our homebuilder
services. We ceased providing services to homebuilder customers in
August 2007 and any future revenues from home sales will be from the sale of
homes we build through our Green Builders brand. We consolidate our
homebuilder customers into our operating results based on accounting
requirements according to FIN 46(R) and refer to these homebuilder customers as
Variable Interest Entities, or VIEs.
Revenues -
During the three
months ended March 31, 2008, we had revenues from homebuilding of
$485,000. For the three months ended March 31, 2007, all of the
homebuilding revenues were generated by one VIE consolidated into our operating
results. The decrease in revenues was primarily due to our transition
into homebuilding and away from providing services to homebuilder
customers.
Gross Profit
- Gross Profit on
homebuilding and related services decreased by $154,000 for the three months
ended March 31, 2008, compared to the same period in 2007 due to the termination
of services provided to homebuilder customers and the closings of our first two
homes in Georgetown Village.
In June
2007 we acquired Green Builders and have commenced our homebuilding
activities. We plan to sell homes in the Austin, Texas area for
prices ranging from $180,000 to $600,000. As of March 31, 2008 we
were actively building in three communities and have a total of eight sales and
two closings. We have 14 completed speculative units, five
speculative units under construction, five completed models, four models under
construction, and eight units in backlog. Backlog is defined as
homes under contract but
not yet delivered to our home buyers.
Although we feel that
the central Texas market is relatively strong, we believe that the turmoil in
the mortgage market combined with national
publicity
of a potential recession has caused a lack of urgency for buyers. As
such, sales were lower than anticipated for the three months ended March 31,
2008 and we expect that they will continue to be slow throughout fiscal
2008. In accordance with these expected market conditions, our
strategy is to build a limited number of speculative units per community and not
build additional units until we have a signed agreement of sale and earnest
money from a buyer.
Land
and Land Development
Background –
Land sales
revenue consists of revenues from the sale of undeveloped land and developed
lots. Developing finished lots from raw land takes approximately one
to three years. In response to the slowdown in the national housing market and
the reduction in demand for finished lots, we changed our strategy and have
elected to use our developed lots for our own homebuilding
operations. We may still sell our lots to national, regional and
local homebuilders that may purchase anywhere from five to one hundred or more
lots at a time. The delivery of these lots would likely be scheduled over
periods of several months or years.
Revenues –
Revenue from the
sale of land decreased 32% during the three months ended March 31, 2008 compared
to the same period in 2007. For the three months ended March 31,
2008, land sale revenues came from the sale of developed finished lots in our
Rutherford West and Georgetown Village projects, located in Northern Hays
County, Texas and the City of Georgetown, Texas, respectively. The
decrease compared to the same period in 2007 was primarily due to the decrease
in developed lot sales in the Georgetown Village
project.
Gross Profit
- Gross profit on
land and land development increased by $284,000 for the three months ended March
31, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 due to previously written off
refunds of Living Unit Equivalent (LUE) fees from the Bohl’s
Tract. Gross profit on land and land development increased for the
three months ended March 31, 2008 due to previously written off refunds of
Living Unit Equivalent (LUE) fees from the Bohl’s Tract and higher margins in
the sale of 5 acres of undeveloped land.
We are
considering selling tracts of undeveloped or developed land in order to increase
revenue from the sale of land in 2008 to counteract the anticipated slowdown in
revenue from homebuilding activity. We anticipate that sales from
developed lots will be slow in fiscal 2008 due to the decreased demand for
finished lots from national homebuilders.
General
and Administrative Expenses
|
|
Three
Months Ended March 31
|
|
Breakdown
of G&A Expenses
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
%
Change
|
|
Salaries,
benefits, payroll taxes and related emp. exps.
|
|
$
|
375,230
|
|
|
$
|
365,932
|
|
|
|
9,298
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
Stock
Compensation expense
|
|
|
35,935
|
|
|
|
39,550
|
|
|
|
(3,615
|
)
|
|
|
-9
|
%
|
Legal,
accounting, auditing, and investor relations
|
|
|
183,606
|
|
|
|
141,689
|
|
|
|
41,917
|
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
Consultants
|
|
|
86,234
|
|
|
|
46,101
|
|
|
|
40,133
|
|
|
|
87
|
%
|
General
overhead, including office expenses, insurance, and travel
|
|
|
208,986
|
|
|
|
229,931
|
|
|
|
(20,945
|
)
|
|
|
-9
|
%
|
Amortization
of subordinated debt costs and transaction costs
|
|
|
59,253
|
|
|
|
175,130
|
|
|
|
(115,878
|
)
|
|
|
-66
|
%
|
Total
G&A
|
|
$
|
949,243
|
|
|
$
|
998,332
|
|
|
|
(49,089
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
%)
|
|
|
Six
Months Ended March 31
|
|
Breakdown
of G&A Expenses
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
%
Change
|
|
Salaries,
benefits, payroll taxes and related emp. exps.
|
|
$
|
877,979
|
|
|
$
|
607,530
|
|
|
|
270,449
|
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
Stock
Compensation expense
|
|
|
675,635
|
|
|
|
234,909
|
|
|
|
440,726
|
|
|
|
188
|
%
|
Legal,
accounting, auditing, and investor relations
|
|
|
353,840
|
|
|
|
295,741
|
|
|
|
58,099
|
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
Consultants
|
|
|
140,806
|
|
|
|
62,573
|
|
|
|
78,233
|
|
|
|
125
|
%
|
General
overhead, including office expenses, insurance, and travel
|
|
|
463,191
|
|
|
|
396,035
|
|
|
|
67,156
|
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
Amortization
of subordinated debt costs and transaction costs
|
|
|
118,506
|
|
|
|
384,701
|
|
|
|
(266,195
|
)
|
|
|
-69
|
%
|
Total
G&A
|
|
$
|
2,629,957
|
|
|
$
|
1,981,488
|
|
|
|
648,469
|
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
General
and administrative expenses are composed primarily of salaries of general and
administrative personnel and related employee benefits and taxes. During the
three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, salaries, benefits, taxes and
related employee expenses totaled approximately $375,000 and $366,000,
respectively, and represented approximately 40% and 37%, respectively, of total
general and administrative expenses for the periods. The increase for the three
months ended is due to an increase in expenses for additional headcount through
January 2008. In January 2008 we had a reduction in
force. We believe that the reduction in salary and related employee
expenses will decrease by approximately $50,000 a month.
Stock
compensation expense was approximately $36,000 and $40,000 for the three months
ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The decrease in stock
compensation expense for the three months March 31, 2008 was due to the
termination of employees in January 2008 and the reversal of the stock option
expense for unvested shares.
Legal,
accounting, audit and investor relations expense totaled $184,000 and $142,000
for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. For
the three months ended March 31, 2008, the increase in legal, accounting, audit,
and investor relations expenses were due to the expenses incurred for the
company name change to Green Builders and our reincorporation to
Texas.
Consultant
expenses were approximately $86,000 and $46,000 for the three months ended March
31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. These expenses increased due to an
increase in consulting services for the development of our homebuilding
activities and for consulting services provided by our former principal
officer.
General
overhead expenses, including rent, office expenses and insurance totaled
$209,000 and $230,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. This increase for the three months ended March 31, 2008 is
due to the additional costs associated with the commencement of homebuilding
activities in 2007.
Amortization
of subordinated convertible debt issuance costs and transaction costs was
approximately $59,000 and $175,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and
2007. This decrease is attributable to one-time costs relating to
consulting services for
capital
raising and the initial
underwriting
fees for our public offering and due to the adoption of FSP
00-10-2.
Selling
and Marketing Expenses
|
|
Three
Months Ended March 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
%
Change
|
|
Selling
and Marketing Expenses
|
|
$
|
501,249
|
|
|
$
|
168,741
|
|
|
|
332,508
|
|
|
|
197
|
%
|
|
|
Six
Months Ended March 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
%
Change
|
|
Selling
and Marketing Expenses
|
|
$
|
756,548
|
|
|
$
|
448,778
|
|
|
|
307,770
|
|
|
|
69
|
%
|
Sales and
marketing expenses include selling costs, salaries and related taxes and
benefits, marketing activities including websites, brochures, catalogs, signage,
and billboards, and market research, all of which benefit our corporate presence
and are not included as homebuilding cost of sales. As a percentage
of revenues during the three months ended March 31, 2008, we increased
selling and marketing costs, when compared to the same periods of the prior
year, to help develop our homebuilding business, increase awareness of our brand
through advertising, public relations, and community marketing initiatives and
sell our existing inventory.
We expect
sales and marketing expenses to increase substantially as we continue to ramp up
our homebuilding business and develop our green building strategy and corporate
branding.
Interest
and Other Expense and Income
|
|
Three
Months Ended March 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
%
Change
|
|
Loss
on fair value of derivatives
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Interest
expense - convertible debt
|
|
|
214,690
|
|
|
|
209,375
|
|
|
|
5,315
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
Interest
discount expense - convertible debt
|
|
|
139,587
|
|
|
|
75,179
|
|
|
|
64,408
|
|
|
|
86
|
%
|
Interest
expense - land and development loans
|
|
|
420,160
|
|
|
|
334,461
|
|
|
|
85,699
|
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
Interest
income and misc income
|
|
|
(65,763
|
)
|
|
|
(47,857
|
)
|
|
|
(17,906
|
)
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
Total
interest and other expense and income
|
|
$
|
708,674
|
|
|
$
|
571,158
|
|
|
|
137,516
|
|
|
|
24
|
%
|
|
|
Six
Months Ended March 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
%
Change
|
|
Loss
on fair value of derivatives
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
5,076,957
|
|
|
|
(5,076,957
|
)
|
|
|
-100
|
%
|
Interest
expense - convertible debt
|
|
|
420,939
|
|
|
|
418,681
|
|
|
|
2,258
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
Interest
discount expense - convertible debt
|
|
|
279,174
|
|
|
|
456,527
|
|
|
|
(177,353
|
)
|
|
|
-39
|
%
|
Interest
expense - land and development loans
|
|
|
987,901
|
|
|
|
461,537
|
|
|
|
526,364
|
|
|
|
114
|
%
|
Interest
income and misc income
|
|
|
(158,958
|
)
|
|
|
(77,993
|
)
|
|
|
(80,965
|
)
|
|
|
104
|
%
|
Total
interest and other expense and income
|
|
$
|
1,529,056
|
|
|
$
|
6,335,709
|
|
|
|
(4,806,653
|
)
|
|
|
-76
|
%
|
Interest
expense for land and development loans increased by approximately $86,000 for
the three months ended March 31, 2008 over the same period in
2007. The increase is attributable to our determination to expense,
rather than to capitalize, interest related to property temporarily not under
development. In addition discount expense for the convertible debt
increased due to the adoption of FSP 00-10-2.
Interest
and other income increased approximately $18,000 for the three months ended
March 31, 2008 over the same period in 2007. The increase consisted of interest
earned on the cash raised in our May 2007 public offering as well as cash
equivalents and immaterial amounts of miscellaneous other income.
Financial
Condition and Capital Resources
Liquidity
At March
31, 2008 we had approximately $9.8 million in cash and cash equivalents. We
completed a public offering of our common stock in May 2007, resulting in net
proceeds to us of approximately $14 million.
On June
29, 2007, Wilson Family Communities entered into a $55 million revolving credit
facility (the “Credit Facility”) with a syndicate of banks led by RBC Centura
Bank, as administrative agent. Green Builders have guaranteed the
obligations of Wilson Family Communities under the Credit Facility. The
Credit Facility allows us to obtain revolving credit loans and provides for the
issuance of letters of credit. The amount available at any time under the Credit
Facility for revolving credit loans or the issuance of letters of credit is
determined by a borrowing base. The borrowing base is calculated as the sum of
the values for homes and lots in the subdivision to be developed as agreed
by us and the agent. Our obligations under the Credit Facility
will be secured by the assets of each subdivision to be developed with the
proceeds of loans available under the Credit Facility.
The
initial maturity date for the Credit Facility is June 29, 2008. The
facility will be reviewed by our syndicate of banks and renewed for
successive 12 month periods, so long as the following items have been
satisfied: no event of default shall exist, no material adverse
effect in our financial condition, operations, business or management shall
exist and extension fees in the amount determined by the agent and all costs
associated incurred in connection with the proposed extension must be
paid. The final borrowing base calculation will be made twelve months
prior to the termination of the Credit Facility and no borrowings may be made in
excess of such amount. We are currently evaulating the amount of capital needed
for the next renewal term of the facility and anticipate that we will reduce the
line of credit to $30 million. As of March 31, 2008, the Credit
Facility has loaned approximately $12.4 million and issued an $118,000 letter of
credit.
Outstanding
borrowings under the Credit Facility bear interest at the prime rate plus
0.25%. We are charged a letter of credit fee equal to 1.10% of each
letter of credit issued under the Credit Facility. We may elect to prepay the
Credit Facility at any time without premium or penalty. Quarterly
principal reductions are required during the final 12 months of the
term.
The
Credit Facility contains customary covenants limiting our ability to take
certain actions, including covenants that
|
·
|
affect
how we can develop our properties;
|
|
·
|
limit
the ability to pay dividends and other restricted
payments;
|
|
·
|
limit
the ability to place liens on its
property;
|
|
·
|
limit
the ability to engage in mergers and acquisitions and dispositions of
assets;
|
|
·
|
require
the Company to maintain a minimum net worth of $20,000,000, including
subordinated debt (although the minimum net worth may be $17,000,000 for
one quarter);
|
|
·
|
prohibit
the ratio of debt (excluding convertible debt) to equity (including
convertible debt) from exceeding (A) 1.75 to 1.0 prior to September 30,
2007, (B) 1.85 to 1.0 from September 30, 2007 until March 30, 2008 and (C)
2.0 to 1.0 thereafter; and
|
|
·
|
require
the Company to maintain working capital of at least
$15,000,000
|
|
·
|
limit
the number of completed speculative homes to 12% of the total borrowing
base available for homes
|
An event
of default will occur under the Credit Facility if certain events occur,
including the following:
|
·
|
a
failure to pay principal or interest on any loan under the Credit
Facility;
|
|
·
|
the
inaccuracy of a representation or warranty when
made;
|
|
·
|
the
failure to observe or perform covenants or
agreements;
|
|
·
|
an
event of default beyond any applicable grace period with respect to any
other indebtedness;
|
|
·
|
the
commencement of proceedings under federal, state or foreign bankruptcy,
insolvency, receivership or similar
laws;
|
|
·
|
any
loan document, or any lien created thereunder, ceases to be in full force
and effect;
|
|
·
|
the
entry of a judgment greater than $1,000,000 that remains undischarged;
or
|
If an
event of default occurs under the Credit Facility, then the lenders may: (1)
terminate their commitments under the Credit Facility; (2) declare any
outstanding indebtedness under the Credit Facility to be immediately due and
payable; and (3) foreclose on the collateral securing the
obligations.
We are
currently out of compliance with the terms of the Borrowing Base Agreement under
the Credit Facility due to the total number of completed speculative homes that
were included in the definition of “eligible property” as of March 31, 2008 and
are operating under a wavier which expires July 1, 2008. Per the Borrowing Base
Agreement, we may not exceed more than 12% of the total borrowing base available
for homes then included in homes defined as “eligible property.” “Eligible
Property” is defined as homes that meet the requirements of the borrowing base
agreement for financing under the Master Line and calculation of borrowing
availability. We are investigating various solutions to become compliant with
our syndicate of banks. If we are unable to comply with any one or more of these
financial covenants, and are unable to obtain a waiver for the noncompliance, we
could be precluded from incurring additional borrowings and our obligation to
repay indebtedness outstanding under the facility, our term loans, and our
outstanding note indentures could be accelerated in full. We can give no
assurance that in such an event, we would have, or be able to obtain, sufficient
funds to pay all debt required to repay.
Our
growth will require substantial amounts of cash for earnest money deposits, land
purchases, development costs, interest payments and homebuilding costs. Until we
begin to sell an adequate number of lots and homes to cover monthly operating
expenses, sales, marketing, general and administrative costs will deplete
cash. Due to current market conditions and slower than expected
home and land sales, we may need to additional capital to support future growth
and current operations for the next twelve months.
Capital
Resources
We have
raised approximately $16.5 million of subordinated convertible debt, and
approximately $14 million in a public offering of the Company’s common stock
completed in May 2007. The Company entered into a $55 million
revolving
Credit Facility. We are currently evaulating the amount of capital
needed for the next renewal term of the facility. We anticipate that
we will reduce the line of credit to be $30 million.
Due to a
change in market conditions discussed above and a longer than expected
acceleration of homebuilding operations, our financial projections have
changed. We are considering selling tracts of commercial and
residential land in order to achieve profitability. If we are
not able to sell tracts of land, we expect that we will incur significant losses
in 2008. Due to current market conditions and slower than expected
home and land sales, we may need to raise additional capital to support future
growth and current operations for the next twelve months.
Land
and homes under construction comprise the majority of our assets. These assets
could suffer devaluation if the housing and real estate market for central
Austin suffers a significant downturn. Our debt secured by our real
estate holdings might then be called which may require us to liquidate assets to
satisfy our debt obligations. A significant downturn could also make
it more difficult for us to liquidate assets, to raise cash and to pay off
debts, which could have a material adverse effect.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
As of
March 31, 2008, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
The SEC
defines “critical accounting policies” as those that require application of
management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result
of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently
uncertain and may change in subsequent periods. Our accounting
policies are more fully described in the notes to our consolidated financial
statements.
As
discussed in the notes to the consolidated financial statements, the preparation
of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates
and assumptions about future events that affect the amounts reported in our
consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Future events and
their effects cannot be determined with absolute certainty. Therefore, the
determination of estimates requires the exercise of judgment. Actual results
could differ from those estimates, and such differences may be material to our
consolidated financial statements. Listed below are those policies and estimates
that we believe are critical and require the use of significant judgment in
their application.
Consolidation
of Variable Interest Entities
We offer
certain homebuilder clients surety for their interim construction loans and cash
advances to facilitate sales of our residential lots. We may be considered the
primary beneficiary as defined under FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (“FIN
46(R)”), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” (VIE), and the Company
may have a significant, but less than controlling, interest in the entities. We
account for each of these entities in accordance with FIN 46(R). Management uses
its judgment when determining if we are the primary beneficiary of, or have a
controlling interest in, any of these entities. Factors considered in
determining whether we have significant influence or has control include risk
and reward sharing, experience and financial condition of the other partners,
voting rights, involvement in day-to-day capital and operating decisions and
continuing involvement.
Inventory
Inventory
is stated at cost unless it is determined to be impaired, in which case the
impaired inventory would be written down to the fair market
value. Inventory costs include land, land development costs, deposits
on land purchase contracts, model home construction costs, advances to builders
and real estate taxes incurred during development and construction
phases.
Revenue
Recognition
Revenues
from property sales are recognized in accordance with SFAS No. 66, “Accounting
for Sales of Real Estate.” Revenues from land development services to builders
are recognized when the properties associated with the services are sold, when
the risks and rewards of ownership are transferred to the buyer and when the
consideration has been received, or the title company has processed payment. For
projects that are consolidated, homebuilding revenues and services will be
categorized as homebuilding revenues and revenues from property sales or options
will be categorized as land sales.
Use
of Estimates
We have
estimated and accrued liabilities for real estate property taxes on our
purchased land in anticipation of development, and other liabilities including
the beneficial conversion liability and the fair value of warrants and
options. To the extent that the estimates are different than the
actual amounts, it could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
Municipal
Utility and Water District Reimbursements
We
currently have planned the community of Villages of New Sweden within the
boundaries of New Sweden Municipal Utility District No. 1 and the community of
Rutherford West in Greenhawe Water Control and Improvement District No.
2. We incur development costs for the initial creation and operating
costs of these Districts and continuing costs for the water, sewer and drainage
infrastructure for these Districts. The Districts will issue bonds to
repay us, once the property has sufficient assessed value for the District taxes
to repay the bonds. As the project is completed and homes are sold within the
District, the assessed value increases. It can take several years
before the assessed value is sufficient to provide sufficient tax revenue for us
to recapture its costs. At this time, we estimate that we will recover
approximately 50 to 100% of eligible initial creation and operating costs spent
through March 31, 2008 at such time as each District issues its first bond
issue. We have completed Phase 1 for the Rutherford West project and
have approximately $980,000 of water district reimbursements included in
inventory that we anticipate will be collected from bond issuances made by the
District. We anticipate the first reimbursement will be approximately
$500,000 in December 2008. When the reimbursements are received we will record
them as reductions of the related asset’s balance. Usually, a District issues
its first bond issue only after completion of construction of approximately 200
houses. The Districts will pay for property set aside for the
preservation of endangered species, greenbelts and similar uses. To
the extent that the estimates are dramatically different to the actual facts, it
could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Convertible
Debt
The
subordinated convertible debt and the related warrants have been accounted for
in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) No. 98-5, “Accounting for
Convertible Securities with Beneficial Conversion Features or Contingently
Adjustable Conversion Ratios”, EITF No. 00-19, “Accounting for Derivative
Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own
Stock,” EITF 00-27, “Application of issue 98-5 to Certain Convertible
Instruments”, EITF 05-02 “Meaning of ‘Conventional Convertible Debt Instrument’
in Issue No. 00-19”, and EITF 05-04 “The Effect of a Liquidated Damages Clause
on a Freestanding Financial Instrument Subject to Issue No. 00-19” updated with
FSP EITF 00-19-2”, Accounting for Registration Payment
Arrangements.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”).
SFAS 157 provides guidance for using fair value to measure assets and
liabilities. The standard also responds to investors’ request for expanded
information about the extent to which a company measures assets and liabilities
at fair value, the information used to measure fair value, and the effect of
fair value measurements on earnings. SFAS 157 will be effective for the
Company’s fiscal year beginning October 1, 2008. The Company is currently
reviewing the effect SFAS 157 will have on its financial
statements.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option
for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities — Including an amendment of
FASB Statement No. 115.” The statement permits entities to choose to
measure certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value. Unrealized gains
and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected are
reported in earnings. SFAS No. 159 is effective as of the beginning of
an entity’s fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. The Company is
currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 159;
however, it is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), "Business Combinations" (FAS
141(R)), which establishes accounting principles and disclosure requirements for
all transactions in which a company obtains control over another
business. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the
adoption of SFAS No. 141; however, it is not expected to have a
material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, "Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements" (FAS 160), which prescribes the accounting by
a parent company for minority interests held by other parties in a subsidiary of
the parent company. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of
the adoption of SFAS No. 160; however, it is not expected to have a
material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
In March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161,
Disclosures About Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities – an amendment of FASB Statement No.
133,
(“SFAS 161”). SFAS 161 expands the disclosure requirements in SFAS
133,
Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities,
regarding an entity’s derivative
instruments and heading activities. The Company is currently evaluating the
impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 161.
Risk
Factors
We
are exposed to certain risks and uncertainties that could have a material
adverse impact on our business, financial condition and operating results. Our
annual report on Form 10-K for the transition period ended September 30, 2007
described various risk factors applicable to our business in Part I, Item 1
“Risk Factors”. The risks and uncertainties described in our
Form 10-K are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties that
we do not presently know, or that we currently view as immaterial, may also
impair our business operations. This report is qualified in its entirety by
these risk factors.
The
actual occurrence of any of the risks described in our Form 10-K or those
described below could materially harm our business, financial condition and
results of operations. In that case, the trading price of our common stock could
decline.
We
were required to obtain a waiver of non-compliance with certain covenants under
our borrowing base agreement. In the event that we are not able to
regain compliance with the covenant and the lender declines to waive our
non-compliance in the future, we may be required to repay amounts under the line
of credit which could harm our business.
We are
currently out of compliance with the terms of our Borrowing Base Agreement due
to the total number of completed speculative homes that were included in the
definition of “eligible property” as of March 31, 2008 and we are operating
under a wavier which expires July 1, 2008. Pursuant to the Borrowing
Base Agreement, we may not exceed more than 12% of the total borrowing base
available for homes then included in homes defined as “eligible property.”
Eligible property is defined as homes that meet the requirements of the
borrowing base agreement for financing under the Master Line and calculation of
borrowing availability. The Company is investigating various solutions to become
compliant with the syndicate of banks. If we are unable to comply with any one
or more of these financial covenants and are unable to obtain a waiver for the
non-compliance, we could be precluded from incurring additional borrowings and
our obligation to repay indebtedness outstanding under the facility could be
accelerated in full. We may not have or may not be able to obtain sufficient
funds to satisfy all repayment obligations. If we are unable to repay these
obligations our business would suffer.
If
we are unable to generate sufficient cash from operations or secure additional
borrowings or raise additional capital, we may find it necessary to curtail our
development activities.
Our
performance continues to be substantially dependent on future cash flows from
real estate financing and sales and there can be no assurance that we will
generate sufficient cash flow or otherwise obtain sufficient funds to meet the
expected development plans for our current and future properties. If we are
unsuccessful in obtaining adequate loans or in generating positive cash flows,
we could be forced to sell equity securities to raise additional
funds. There is no assurance that such financing would be available
or if the terms of which would be acceptable to us. This could
require us to abandon some of our development activities, including the
development of sub-divisions and entitling of land for development; forfeit
option fees and deposits; default on loans; violate covenants with our current
lenders and convertible note holders thereby putting us in default; and possibly
be forced to liquidate a substantial portion of our asset holdings at
unfavorable prices.
Item
3.
Control
s and Procedures
Our
management, including our principal executive officer and our principal
accounting officer, have evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended), as of the period ended March 31, 2008, the period covered by this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB. Based upon that evaluation, our principal
executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2008 to ensure
that the information required to be disclosed in the reports we file under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized,
and reported within the time periods specified by the rules and forms of the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There
were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal
controls over financial reporting during the three months ended March 31,
2008.
As
disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the transitional period from
January 1, 2007 to September 30, 2007, Arun Khurana transitioned from his role
as our principal financial officer to a consulting role with the
company.
We will be required to be in compliance
with Sarbanes Oxley Section 404 certification requirements relating to internal
controls for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008. We have
recently commenced our homebuilding operations. We have also recently
implemented a new enterprise wide information technology system. We
are continuing to work with our Audit Committee to implement internal controls
due to the above noted activities. Any failure to develop adequate
these internal controls would be likely to result in a material weakness in our
internal control.
PART
II – O
THER
INFORMATION
Item
1.
Legal
Proceedings
None.
Item
2.
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item
3.
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item
4.
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None.
Item
5.
Other
Information
On May
13, 2008, our Board of Directors approved our new Bylaws. The Bylaws
were implemented following our reincorporation from Nevada to Texas and the
change in our corporate name from Wilson Holdings, Inc. to Green Builders,
Inc. In addition to these changes, Section 4.03 was added clarifying
our ability to remove directors for cause and Sections 4.16 through 4.26 were
updated to conform with Texas law regarding indemnification
matters.
For a
complete description of the Bylaws of Green Builders, Inc. adopted by our Board
of Directors, please see Exhibit 3.1 hereto and our proxy statement for our
annual meeting of shareholders held April 3, 2008.
Exhibit
No.
|
Description
|
3.1*
|
Bylaws
of Green Builders, Inc.
|
3.2
|
Certificate
of Formation dated April 3, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Registrant’s
Current Report on Form 8-k dated April 3, 2008 and incorporated herein by
reference)
|
3.3
|
Certificate
of Amendment dated April 3, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the 8-k and
incorporated herein by reference)
|
4.1
|
Specimen
certificate for shares of Common Stock of Registrant (filed as Exhibit 4.1
to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-140747)
and incorporated herein by reference)
|
31.1*
|
Certification
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
31.2*
|
Certification
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
32*
|
Certification
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
*Filed
herewith
SIGNATURES
In
accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this
report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
|
GREEN
BUILDERS, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Clark
Wilson
|
|
|
|
Clark
Wilson
|
|
|
|
President
and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXHIBIT
INDEX
LIST OF
EXHIBITS
Exhibit
No.
|
Description
|
3.1*
|
Bylaws
of Green Builders, Inc.
|
3.2
|
Certificate
of Formation dated April 3, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Registrant’s
Current Report on Form 8-k dated April 3, 2008 and incorporated herein by
reference)
|
3.3
|
Certificate
of Amendment dated April 3, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the 8-k and
incorporated herein by reference)
|
4.1
|
Specimen
certificate for shares of Common Stock of Registrant (filed as Exhibit 4.1
to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-140747)
and incorporated herein by reference)
|
31.1*
|
Certification
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
31.2*
|
Certification
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
32*
|
Certification
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
*Filed
herewith
32