Music Licensing Inc (PK) (SONG) News

"But he said something on social media only someone with the stuff would know; and thats based on us not reading all the public filings in the court docket or knowing what has been disclosed because we are unprepared special ed legal geniuses!!!"

Track record speaks for itself and so does Jake's.

If anyone wonders why I am so confident... this happened when I busted HPIL which is now CE and CTO, untradable for years. Darcy, a business partner to the CEO tried to claim some ransoms person in Arizona was me. When they went into the PPO hearing I did the same thing I am doing here, live videos, from a location he cannot be at, posting from the accounts he claims the wrong person runs, etc.

So what happened? Darcy ended up with a 2 year PPO against him 🤣

I've literally done this before and SMOKED the scammers. People can chime in here and talk like lawyers all they want, but they don't know the actual game here. I don't lose. Jake and Davy are F'd.

No need for me to send emails anymore, it seems the actual stalkers peak in here every second of the day and "may" very well be posting. The fact they have clearly seen the evidence absolving Kevin and are still pursing this is actually one of the most special ed decisions I have seen by a lawyer... but as we have seen he clearly is the worst lawyer I have ever witnessed...

https://youtube.com/shorts/o9aMKL37k24

This is a video I did earlier today when I realized the DV case was at a time and place I will be in a different city and timezone. I find it funny that Jake and Davy read all of this on the board, but can't seem to understand what they are willingly doing to themselves. They are willingly forcing Judge Brown to read all my emails and attachments, watch all my videos, and hear me talk to Jake on a spaces years ago while I talk not the video confirming the same voice. I am clearly white.

So here is the updated plan... just in case the live stream fails I will film a backup video the morning of. That way you see the time, date, I will show my GPS location, confirmed with a video of the area around me, I will make posts and send emails live, which can be timestamped and confirmed from all the accounts. This will be filmed and uploaded early on July 16th, in a location it is physically impossible for Kevin to be at.

Meanwhile, what will they show? That he filed some motions that includes content from emails they also received two days prior? Some post that seems to show I know something I shouldn't but they didn't check to see what was posted publicly on the dockets? My goodness they are idiots.

Meanwhile, a white guy in a different city and state will be posting from these accounts talking in a. voice that matches all previous voice conversation the accounts in question have had going back years... and the dude is white while Kevin is black? You can't look at this situation and walk away thinking Davy and Jakey combined have a single braincell.

And what will be the outcome? A judge in Collier County will read a dissertation on their scheme to defraud the courts for personal gain and punitively go after anyone that speaks about it online with false allegations, in other court cases? How do they think this is a good idea? Are they really this stupid?

Oh, I am sorry, I did not understand the previous post. I believe there was a typo.
Is that how you defend your clients in court?

You must be Jake's incompetent lawyer and yes man.

I rather keep it this way for now.
Gee, I wonder why?

If you look at my post, it is neutral on the issues. I am just stating what it is.
Riiiiiiiight.

Go figure, a lawyer who isn't telling the truth...(insert stereotypical lawyer jokes here).

Oh, I am sorry, I did not understand the previous post. I believe there was a typo. In any case, I rather keep it this way for now. I think you are making a false assumption that I am defending Jake. If you look at my post, it is neutral on the issues. I am just stating what it is.

Clearly a lawyer, posting on BCAP and SONG boards only, about what will be seen in court regarding the 3a10... I smell desperation. They constaintly monitor this board hoping their scam won't be identified by authorities. Guess who will likely be reading my markup of Davy's fraudulent opinion letter and motion to the court...

...Judge Chris Brown... because... checks notes... Jake and Davey want to push the issue that is clearly false and the scope, 4 corners, 100% contains the topic of the 3a10 claims posted online assuming he is making the same claims he ALWAYS does and claimed in the Motion for Sanctions and emails to me.

They just aren't smart enough to drop everything and make the problem go away before the JUDGES read it. It's hilarious they are going to be solely responsible for outing their own scam because they made more false and frivolous claims in court like they have many times before.

The best part, Davy is the one that lied to the court! Because he KNOWS he knew the ID's of at least three of the John Doe's and Judge Brown is going to read that, the C&D letters, and the filings where Jake gloats about knowing these people and sending them letters written by Davy. Then Davy, like an idiot, claims they are John Doe's in court and anonymous accounts.

Absolutely COOKED and it is their own fault, they could end it all right now and close all cases like they did a few others when they knew they got bested. Some of the collection lawsuits have already been voluntarily dismissed 🤣

And yet again, your profile is very suspect. You never address the fact that you have a recently created profile with only eleven posts all having to do with defending Jake and his scams.
No response?

Go figure, Jake, or Jake's lawyer.

100% acknowledge, I just have a different purpose for it than being credible with the judge I do not want public.

Cool story bro, unless they do something to tell her not to read them she will and there is a second case where the judge most definitely read all of it. Because they are too stupid and petty to figure out the self own they set themselves up for.

Do you at least acknowledge the point I'm trying to make (regardless of whether you are right or not)?

"Cockface" doesn't look serious or professional and doesn't add to your credibility with documents that are submitted in court (which you hoped for) whether you are serious or not.

Again, I couldn't care less about who you are. I am simply telling you that this is not how legal procedures work, but please continue to believe in it. The judge won't go outside the proceedings presented before them.

Didn't bother because I already have Jake sussed and his extortion racket is just a tangent to the REAL subject at hand - that SONG and BCAP are scams and Jake is a fraud.

And again, Jake was accusing the defendant of being someone who he isn't. Judges don't take kindly to false accusations in court.

And yet again, your profile is very suspect. You never address the fact that you have a recently created profile with only eleven posts all having to do with defending Jake and his scams.

I also notice you cherry pick the points you want to respond to.

Bottom line - Jake will lose in his extortion racket he's trying to get approved in court.

Ain't happening.

You keep avoiding the issues here and talking about stuff I clearly do not care about. I am not a lawyer, I am not Kevin, I am not a party to the case... yet Davy and Jakey are willing to sabotage their scam in courts by willingly let a judge read the REAL law behind the 3a10, see their history of frivolous and false accusations in Collier County Court for the same thing they are claiming against Kevin now...

... on a day I will be on a work trip and will be live stream posting:

- I'm white
- My voice is not Kevin's
- I have access to the accounts, so I'll post and send an email to all parties to confirm the time stamps
- And Ill show my GPS location and video of my surroundings in a yet to be disclosed city at the EXACT SAME TIME they are looking at Kevin

🍿🫶

This could honestly not be funnier...

I'm very much not as serious as many here. but I am right 🤣

Weren't you at the hearing? The judge literally told them that they can file motion to strike and admonish Kevin for his filings because they are irrelevant and do not comply with any Procedure.

Yes

Enough said.

There are allegations. Whether being incorrect or correct is something that a judge or jury would need to find.

We'll have to wait to see how this all pans out but accusing the wrong person usually doesn't go over well with judges.

And again, your profile is suspect.

Yes but they were introduced not for their content. Kevin was introducing the content of the filings, and the Judge will dismiss on these grounds. For the purpose of this forum, there is no wrong or right accusations. There are allegations. Whether being incorrect or correct is something that a judge or jury would need to find.

Well, nothing happened in the hearing, and the judge scolded Kevin for his filings. The parties were also reprimanded for missing the scheduled mediation.
That doesn't mean she didn't read them and that she will strike them from the court record.

You are making a lot of assumptions and your logic is faulty.

What are you correcting? He will be in Collier and I will be a different timezone, city, and live streaming from YouTube posting from these accounts, sending an email, all timestamped live... showing I am the same person on the spaces from Nov 2023 from the FLOW account you can tell from the voice clear as day it is me and not Kevin.

The guy with the accounts will be proven to be a timezone away at the same time they have eyes on Kevin. 🍿

That should go relatively well for Davy and Jakey.

Well, nothing happened in the hearing, and the judge scolded Kevin for his filings. The parties were also reprimanded for missing the scheduled mediation.

The Judges will not read things that are outside of the proceedings that have no bearing on the actual dispute.
But it has to do with the proceedings since Jake has repeatedly blamed the defendant with being Scambusterking, even though it has been repeatedly brought to Jake's attention that he has the wrong person and that he's making false accusations against the defendant.

And you don't know what the judge reads.

What are you inside her head?

No, I am telling you facts, being in the domain for a while myself, that you are completely wrong and that Jake's lawyers know how to navigate these waters more than you think. The Judges will not read things that are outside of the proceedings that have no bearing on the actual dispute. Let alone, they don't have the power to do any criminal prosecution if they're civil judges.

All I'm saying is if you are thinking of sending emails in the future, it would make your argument stronger if you refrain from using the word "Cockface" as Jake's name.

It lacks seriousness and professionalism if it ever becomes part of the court record.

She literally stated that it falls outside of this case and thus, she won't read.
Although I think it does fall outside what is being litigated, it doesn't mean the judge won't read it or let it be part of the court record.

We'll see.

But your alias seems suspect.

These type of hearings are in person. Look at the case number. They are not done online or over zoom.

Whew, just checking... just emails to Jake and Davy whom isn't a real lawyer, he just pretends to be one and somehow passed the bar to check some box. My audience was Davy and Jake given them plenty of info to drop this. They aren't smart enough, therefore they are going to continue pushing the boundaries regarding committing fraud upon the court. The judge will read it regardless.

I don't think you get the tongue in cheek here, clearly you were on the call and have details only someone in the court would have... which you have now told me. Clearly you know something, not yet public, is about to be filed to change the status of the submissions so she knows what not to read. Because unless there is something telling her not to read it, she will read it.

If you can't tell, I am pulling info out of you to further verify who I live you to be, but you are clearly one who joined the hearing and given post history 🫶

Peep my last post, I am uploading the video to match that post and a little details. I hope Davy and Jake have fun watching me live stream from a different city, and live watching me post from these accounts and sending email from the Sarah Weiser email while they are claiming Kevin is the one behind it all as you look at my WHITE arm on camera 😂

Kisses 😘

I know you aren't part of the suit but you said you have been sending documentation to lawyers on both sides, no?

Per this case in public view, it is still in the courts as a separate issue. Here is what I am going to do....

"Set on Domestic Violence Hearing docket 7/16/2025 beginning at 9:00 AM Brown, Chris (see notice of hearing for actual hearing time)"

The beauty of this all is I am scheduled a business trip for the Tuesday through Friday of next week and will be in another city. I am scheduling a live feed for the same day and time as the hearing showing me in a completely different city while they lie to the judges face 😂

I don't think you understand legal procedure. She literally stated that it falls outside of this case and thus, she won't read. Judges have hundreds of cases to deal with and won't waste time when they don't have the proper jurisdiction to hear an action. There are procedure to introduce arguments and Kevin got it all wrong. Jake's attorneys can file a motion to strike now against Kevin. She gave them the green light to do so.

I'm not in a lawsuit and I am not submitting things in court. 🤣

We'll have to wait to see if it stays in court records.

A bit of advice would be to stop calling Jake P. Noch "Jake P. Cockface" for documents you are planning on submitting to the lawyers in court. It would make your argument more serious and professional.

There is nothing filed to strike them from the record on the public docket. Meaning, until she reads them she won't know the scope. Meaning, cats out of the bag!

Unless you know something non-public... 😘👋

Not a great hider... keep screenshotting this account and submitting to the court !!! It just means you had full access to enough info to know I'm not Kevin and you moved over anyways. Musta been a shock to see a black guy on video after watching me show videos Im in fact white and talked to Jake on spaces 2 years ago and Kevin clearly didnt.

Scramble time!!! Now the other judge will read all the 3a10 stuff because of whatever stalking stuff was files.

She will not, because those items will be stricken from the record and have no bearing on the lawsuit. Therefore, he would need to file a separate action. That is basic procedure.

They are already filed and active. She'll read them.

She can't read it and won't do it because it falls outside the four corners of the complaint and the proceedings. The judge advised Kevin that if he wants to initiate another action, he can file a separate action, but he would need to prove standing. She acknowledged the purpose of the motion and warned Kevin that if he continues to do so, she will not allow him to file anything in the docket.

BORING! So did they actually discuss the false claims? But just wait til she reads it all 🫶, she has to.

Well, here is what happened. The judge dismissed both arguments but admonished Kevin for not following proper procedure and cluttering the docket. If he files again, attorneys for Jake can file a motion to strike, and the judge will not allow Herring to file anymore. For the purpose of the motion, the judge was very upset at Kevin. The argument of the matter falls outside the four corners of the complaint. She denied the motion for sanctions out of discretion since Kevin is not a lawyer, but nothing really did happen.

Was Amex on ready to serve him 🤣

Good news.

I wonder why Jake was the only person not present at the hearing? The defendant and the lawyers were all present.

Run Jake run!

BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Anyone get to listen!? Did the Judge rip into them!?

When it's all said and done, either Jake goes to prison and/or there will be huge class action lawsuits against him.

I'd hate to be him with so much incriminating evidence that's being uncovered concerning his many, many scams. A lot of the DD that's posted here is making its way into court documents thanks to Scambusterking.

Jake finally pissed off the wrong people who are demonstrating that they can actually do damage to a punk ass kid who thought he could scam himself into being a gangster multi-millionare.

What a joke.

Hey Jake - how's your credit card debt doing?

Run Jake run!

Can ya'll join today in Judge Brodie's court room zoom? Zoom info on her page:

https://www.ca.cjis20.org/About-The-Court/jud_profile.aspx?judge=brodie

11:15AM EST

I would love to hear how it went!

Perpetrator portraying himself as the victim yet again. This coming from a kid who threatened to sue his own shareholders and attempted to gain access to their personal information. The cyber stalker claims cyber stalking. Shareholders investments have been wiped out, shareholders want answers. Where's all of the proposed $50-$200 million in acquisitions? Shareholder value? Gags the TA, makes claims to shareholders on socials saying one thing while submitting filings that clearly show another. Doesn't this CEO have a fiduciary duty? Or does that not apply to him either.

LOL! So this is the same scenario. Sues Miles and claims multiple accounts are his baselessly 🤣 Files a stalking injunction 🤣

All I know is ....... in 2001 when he was paying for press releases about suing a Miles Goldman, he decided the name I use here was an alias of this Miles Goldman. Jake had made false copyright claims on lots of artists' SoundCloud accounts which had resulted in their music being removed from their acccounts. Some had made posts on YouTube and Reddit etc. saying what he had done. Someone possibly found a way to contact him directly. I've no idea if any of the other aliases on the court document were all the same person or not:
https://www.digitalmusicnews.com/2021/02/04/pro-music-rights-defamation-lawsuit/
Jake was good enough to pay for press releases about the case being dismissed:
https://www.digitalmusicnews.com/2021/02/09/pro-music-rights-goldman-lawsuit-dismissed/

HOLY FFFFF!!!! Jake is lying in court again 🤣. It looks like he file a "stalking violence" domestic violence. WTF is even going on 🤣 I can't read any of the dockets to see what he is claiming now. P-Rawl didn't he lie and do this to you too?

https://cms.collierclerk.com/showcaseweb/
Case #: 11-2025-DR-001316-DV01-01

OMG this is the best day ever. Tomorrow will be even better. I'm dying RN 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Literally none of this would be possible is Jakey and his idiot lawyer didn't double down on their fraud and lie to the courts about Kevin claiming for like the 6th time someone else is me they just accused without evidence. BAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAA. Biggest unforced error I've ever seen!