ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for tools Level up your trading with our powerful tools and real-time insights all in one place.
Good Vibrations Shoes Inc (PK)

Good Vibrations Shoes Inc (PK) (GVSI)

0.0026
-0.0002
(-7.14%)
Closed July 26 4:00PM

Your Hub for Real-Time streaming quotes, Ideas and Live Discussions

Key stats and details

Current Price
0.0026
Bid
0.0025
Ask
0.0028
Volume
3,025,435
0.0024 Day's Range 0.0028
0.001 52 Week Range 0.0284
Market Cap
Previous Close
0.0028
Open
0.0028
Last Trade
90000
@
0.0026
Last Trade Time
Financial Volume
$ 7,869
VWAP
0.002601
Average Volume (3m)
3,168,160
Shares Outstanding
2,117,502,607
Dividend Yield
-
PE Ratio
-
Earnings Per Share (EPS)
-
Revenue
-
Net Profit
-54k

About Good Vibrations Shoes Inc (PK)

Good Vibrations Shoe is an opportunity investor seeking assets in the blockchain industry. The company is headed by George Sharp, a longtime whistleblower and advocate against microcap fraud. In addition to consulting to public companies, attorneys and other entities associated with the financial ma... Good Vibrations Shoe is an opportunity investor seeking assets in the blockchain industry. The company is headed by George Sharp, a longtime whistleblower and advocate against microcap fraud. In addition to consulting to public companies, attorneys and other entities associated with the financial markets, Mr. Sharp is a former consultant to OTC Markets Group, Inc. Show more

Sector
Chems, Allied Pds-whsl, Nec
Industry
Chems, Allied Pds-whsl, Nec
Headquarters
Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Founded
1970
Good Vibrations Shoes Inc (PK) is listed in the Chems, Allied Pds-whsl sector of the OTCMarkets with ticker GVSI. The last closing price for Good Vibrations Shoes (PK) was $0. Over the last year, Good Vibrations Shoes (PK) shares have traded in a share price range of $ 0.001 to $ 0.0284.

Good Vibrations Shoes (PK) currently has 2,117,502,607 shares outstanding. The market capitalization of Good Vibrations Shoes (PK) is $5.93 million.

GVSI Latest News

Epazz, Inc. (OTC Pink: EPAZ) US Navy Collaboration ZenaDrone 1000

Epazz, Inc. (OTC Pink: EPAZ) US Navy Collaboration ZenaDrone 1000  Miami, FL-- (InvestorsHub NewsWire – November 9, 2023) – EmergingGrowth.com, a leading independent small cap...

Epazz, Inc. (OTC Pink: EPAZ) US Navy Collaboration ZenaDrone 1000 Extreme Weather Demo

Epazz, Inc. (OTC Pink: EPAZ) US Navy Collaboration ZenaDrone 1000 Extreme Weather Demo   Miami, FL-- (InvestorsHub NewsWire – November 7, 2023) – EmergingGrowth.com, a...

PeriodChangeChange %OpenHighLowAvg. Daily VolVWAP
1-0.0002-7.142857142860.00280.00280.002120842720.00270002CS
40.001173.33333333330.00150.00310.001429532590.00251682CS
120.000523.80952380950.00210.00310.001431681600.00210564CS
26-0.0113-81.29496402880.01390.02840.001102451990.00629067CS
52-0.0099-79.20.01250.02840.00174921750.0086396CS
156-0.0206-88.79310344830.02320.0770.00160762870.0198166CS
2600.002525000.00010.0771.0E-6201593230.01591282CS

Movers

View all
  • Most Active
  • % Gainers
  • % Losers
SymbolPriceVol.
CGTXCognition Therapeutics Inc
$ 3.44
(45.15%)
4.65M
NAMSNewAmsterdam Pharma Company NV
$ 22.49
(19.25%)
18.82k
RNAZTransCode Therapeutics Inc
$ 0.3474
(17.52%)
6.63M
YYGHYY Group Holding Ltd
$ 0.84
(14.60%)
743
YIBOPlanet Image International Ltd
$ 3.32
(13.89%)
56.87k
VTVTvTv Therapeutics Inc
$ 13.0022
(-38.67%)
33.34k
CEROCERo Therapeutics Holdings Inc
$ 0.1661
(-35.12%)
3.54M
TGLTreasure Global Inc
$ 1.40
(-24.32%)
54.54k
LUXHLuxUrban Hotels Inc
$ 0.1587
(-16.91%)
1.31M
JCSEJE Cleantech Holdings Limited
$ 1.1001
(-12.69%)
681
SLNASelina Hospitality PLC
$ 0.0276
(-8.00%)
24.54M
RNAZTransCode Therapeutics Inc
$ 0.3474
(17.52%)
6.63M
CGTXCognition Therapeutics Inc
$ 3.44
(45.15%)
4.65M
TLTiShares 20 plus Year Treasury Bond
$ 92.90
(-0.10%)
3.91M
CEROCERo Therapeutics Holdings Inc
$ 0.1661
(-35.12%)
3.54M

GVSI Discussion

View Posts
oceans11 oceans11 3 hours ago
And as you pull the puppet’s strings it responds with canned spam.
Toooo funny…
👍️0
Lime Time Lime Time 3 hours ago
Insiders made out huge on the GS run. Others are surely eyeing this up to do the same kind of run in 2025. This is so early on in the game. There are many catalysts coming here. I'm willing to add and hold to see this do another record OTCM run in 2025!
🤡 1 🤥 1
I-Glow I-Glow 3 hours ago
You are clueless about TSNP/HMBL - that was at a time when WSB/Reddit created a OTC Bubble and Zombie tickers - Greys all ran.

Sharp didn't do anything to create a run - HUMBL was a scam from the beginning - as you can see the price is now $0.0002.

Roaring Kitty/Keith Gill created the OTC Bubble when idiot investors were buying GME stock between $300 and $400. GME is now $24.

"Many catalysts coming. That's why George Sharp is keeping this fully Pink Current, Alt Reporting fully compliant. That's how the TSNP run started. Smart traders are slowly loading this gem"

A blind monkey can keep a SEC non-reporter current.

There isn't any smart or sophisticated would waste time and money on GVSI.

"American Blockchain Corporation
@OTCpinkGVSI

Jun 30, 2022
Our attorneys & auditors have concluded that it is impossible to audit $GVSI due to past corporate mismanagement of records/actions. Therefore, we are abandoning efforts to become an SEC reporter & are preparing an application for OTCIQ access to be filed with OTCM within 60 days"

Sharp is so incompetent that he can't get a simple name and symbol change processed by FINRA.

"American Blockchain Corporation
@OTCpinkGVSI
·l
Jul 18, 2023
Having disposed of prior management's appeal to the SEC regarding FINRA's previous name & symbol change rejections, today $GVSI will apply for a name change to American Blockchain & a symbol change to either BLXS BLKS or BLCH. We do not know how much time FINRA may require."

That was a year ago - and you are trying to convince yourself that "smart" investors are accumulating the GVSI garbage.

IG
👍️ 1 💯 1
Lime Time Lime Time 4 hours ago
My .0019s looking really good and even better when this is at .25 next year when the 2025 GVSI rally hits 🚀

Sharp playing a smart move here.
🤡 1 🤥 1
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 4 hours ago
Many catalysts coming. That's why George Sharp is keeping this fully Pink Current, Alt Reporting fully compliant.


Your "Pink current" and "Alt reporting" BS has been refuted by Sharp himself:

$GVSI Name Change - The Issue, the Solution, and the Good News pic.twitter.com/fllFyJiI67— American Blockchain Corporation (@OTCpinkGVSI) December 28, 2023

Here, the filing of the Form 15 did not absolve GVSI of it's delinquency. Nor does making the company Pink Current, as was accomplished during 2023. While the company is in good standing with OTC Markets, in the eyes of the SEC and FINRA, GVSI remains a delinquent reporter. FINRA will not process any corporate action such as a name change, symbol change or reverse (or forward) split while an issuer is deemed delinquent in its reporting requirements.

- George Sharp
December 28, 2023

I like how Sharp doesn't mention a reverse merger as a corporate action GVSI can't get processed. Deception by omission.

Sharp continues:

The Solution

In order for FINRA to process GVSI's corporate actions - FINRA does not approve actions, they only process them - GVSI will have to once again become a reporting issuer in good standing. To do so GVSI will have to file two years of audited statements within a Form 10 filing. Current management forsees no issue in getting this accomplished in the near future and thus being reinstated as an SEC reporter in good standing.

The Good News

GVSI management believes that the company is close to a significant acquisition with two potential targets under serious review. Of course, as always, the mission is not complete until it is complete. Both potential candidates understand the current issue with FINRA and neither forsees the issue as being a roadblock to an acquisition.

- George Sharp
December 28, 2023


And since Sharp "believes that the company is close to a significant acquisition with two potential targets," and we all know how that turned out, what does that say about the veracity that "current management forsees no issue in getting this accomished in the near future and thus being reinstated as an SEC reporter in good standing."

Not much I'd say looking at the failed "merger," "acquisition," and "targets" and Sharp's track record of lies in the past three years.

Sharp already has had three years of reporting under his belt as head of GVSI yet he continues to file unaudited financials, going directly against the SEC/FINRA requirements and what he says GVSI needs to do. He has NEVER filed an audited financial which he himself has said he must do.

Sharp really thinks his followers are gullible and stupid, and they are if they believe him.

Not to mention his dumping his 20 million common GVSI shares and then lying by saying he was never issued the shares..








That's how the TSNP run started. Smart traders are slowly loading this gem

GVSI pumpers only have another stock that has absolutely nothing to do with GVSI as a last hope and desperate attempt to save face.

Pumpers repeatedly ignore the fact that Tesoro/TSNP/HMBL was a fluke and part of a massive coordinated online pump and dump scheme that even Sharp criticized.

Neither $HMBL nor I pump. Period. End of story. The share price took off due to a combination of third party hype and short squeezing. This is not the company's fault. However, tortious interference comes with a price as those guilty of it will soon discover.— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) May 26, 2022

5/12 HUMBL never promoted its stock & it is not their fault that it went to a ridiculous $7+. Outsiders pumped the stock through social media & those that write ignorant advice newsletters like @insidrfinancial. It was FOMO & resulting short covering that caused HMBL to go $7+.— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) February 14, 2022

And TSNP didn't have all the SEC and FINRA problems that GVSI has.

So your BS "Pink Current" and "Alt Reporting fully compliant." garbage has once again gone up in smoke like all your arguments.
👍️0
Lime Time Lime Time 4 hours ago
Many catalysts coming. That's why George Sharp is keeping this fully Pink Current, Alt Reporting fully compliant. That's how the TSNP run started. Smart traders are slowly loading this gem 🚀
💩 1 🤡 1
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 6 hours ago
A lot of VOLUME in all of George's companies today!

GVSI volume is average and it's down -14.29%.

The pumper lies never end.

Gawd, I wish the pumpers would stop pumping my stocks. I mean you @Drugdoctor2014— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) August 7, 2023
💥 1
Drugdoctor Drugdoctor 8 hours ago
A lot of VOLUME in all of George's companies today!
🇧🇴 1 🇴🇲 1 👍️ 1 🚀 1
Tamboo Tamboo 11 hours ago
I investors never look free advise from unknown
🇧🇴 1 🇴🇲 1 👍️ 1 👎️ 1 🚀 1 🤡 1
surfkast surfkast 11 hours ago
But sadly there are confirmed pumpers who admit to coercing marks to buy so they can dump their shares! So sad.
👍️0
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 11 hours ago
Sorry,

The missing financials from 2016 - 2021 which Sharp is on the hook for will never be able to be filed because Sharp doesn't have all the info from so long ago.

Should read...

The missing financials from 2008- 2013 which Sharp is on the hook for will never be able to be filed because Sharp doesn't have all the info from so long ago.

Sharp will never be able to audit the books. That's why he didn't file the proper paper work for the so-called recent "merger" that failed miserably.

I had hope to start $GVSI as an SEC reporter, but after over a year of having two accounting firms work on it & discussions with the SEC, I begrudgingly agreed that I would not be able to get the books audited. https://t.co/tOP9FImksT— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) February 7, 2023

During the SEC review it was discovered that the designation of a class of pref shares issued by $GVSI's previous management is missing. On the SEC's advice, management has decided to withdraw the Form 10 and refile in December so that corrections can be made with the Nevada SOS. https://t.co/MhVwRI4NW1— American Blockchain Corporation (@OTCpinkGVSI) November 23, 2021

The "refiling" never happened.

On February 6, 2024, $GVSI announced that it had enter into a non-binding Term Sheet for the acquisition of a privately owned Blockchain enterprise. This evening, that company informed $GVSI by email, that it was terminating the merger effort as neither they nor the funding…— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) March 14, 2024

GVSI is a dead stock. It will never be able to find a credible merging candidate.
👍️0
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 11 hours ago
Sharp didn't file GVSI's registration termination until 2013 which means he's on the hook for missing financials from 2008 - 2013 from *before* he filed the Form 15.

https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=9394532&guid=4OO-kKAXfkhBWBh

And Sharp already said he can't audit the books from that time period.

I had hope to start $GVSI as an SEC reporter, but after over a year of having two accounting firms work on it & discussions with the SEC, I begrudgingly agreed that I would not be able to get the books audited. https://t.co/tOP9FImksT— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) February 7, 2023

GVSI is a dead stock.
👍️0
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 12 hours ago
The threatening clown show continues.

What is failed to be mentioned is that GVSI has lost about 90 - 95% of its value from just a few weeks ago. But the clown show continues and now with threats. Doesn't sound like a confident investor to me.

People who listened to this pumper clown have lost tons of money.

The missing financials from 2016 - 2021 which Sharp is on the hook for will never be able to be filed because Sharp doesn't have all the info from so long ago.

This is a dead cat bounce.

Buyer beware!

👍️0
surfkast surfkast 1 day ago
I see you are not smart enough to link back to follow the discussion before you put your foot in your mouth. So sad. SMH

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174806353
👍️ 1 🤣 1
Livinggood1 Livinggood1 1 day ago
Here's a solid post to all real buyers real people look at the board seems gvsi about to start rising otherwise... why all the paid interest... very interesting the time energy getting put in....
💩 1 🤡 1
Livinggood1 Livinggood1 1 day ago
Twighlight zone cause that's your exact play my God. Absolutely amazing the interest from you clow.....
💩 1 🤡 1
Livinggood1 Livinggood1 1 day ago
Why are you here??? Serious question!!
Paid!!
👍️0
Mr.Fields Mr.Fields 1 day ago
I'm noticing a lot of buying interest on the chart, with plenty of blue indicating people are purchasing stocks at current prices. This trend looks set to continue into next year, showing potential for investors to benefit from ongoing market activity.
👎️ 1 🤥 1
surfkast surfkast 1 day ago
Admitting to being a scammer and burning investors is pathetic.
🎯 1 👍️ 2 💯 1
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 1 day ago
I dumped on your asses.
That's what I've been warning about what GVSI pumpers and scam artists do to the less knowledgable...and here we have one of those scam artist pumpers freely admitting it.

Be careful believing what pumpers here say. It's all nefarious manipulation and lies to "dump on your asses."

GVSI is a scam that will never get a Form 10 accepted/approved by the SEC/FINRA - much less get a reverse merger corporate action approved/processed because of all its regulatory problems.
👍️ 1 ✔️ 1
surfkast surfkast 1 day ago
Lime Time

Re: LuckyLovie post# 170773

Monday, April 08, 2024 10:02:53 PM

Post#
170774
of 172213
Yeah but I bought it way before you idiots ever knew of it, like I am doing with a lot of other stocks right now. You can trash my trading style as much as you want, continue on.

I dumped on your asses.
🏆️ 2 👍️ 2
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 2 days ago
It will happen here like TSNP reversed merger, can you refute that run never happened being Alt Reporting and giving the biggest gains on record of OTC Security Alt Reporting?

Your "Alt Reporting" BS has been refuted by Sharp himself:

$GVSI Name Change - The Issue, the Solution, and the Good News pic.twitter.com/fllFyJiI67— American Blockchain Corporation (@OTCpinkGVSI) December 28, 2023

Here, the filing of the Form 15 did not absolve GVSI of it's delinquency. Nor does making the company Pink Current, as was accomplished during 2023. While the company is in good standing with OTC Markets, in the eyes of the SEC and FINRA, GVSI remains a delinquent reporter. FINRA will not process any corporate action such as a name change, symbol change or reverse (or forward) split while an issuer is deemed delinquent in its reporting requirements.

- George Sharp
December 28, 2023

Sharp continues:

The Solution

In order for FINRA to process GVSI's corporate actions - FINRA does not approve actions, they only process them - GVSI will have to once again become a reporting issuer in good standing. To do so GVSI will have to file two years of audited statements within a Form 10 filing. Current management forsees no issue in getting this accomplished in the near future and thus being reinstated as an SEC reporter in good standing.

The Good News

GVSI management believes that the company is close to a significant acquisition with two potential targets under serious review. Of course, as always, the mission is not complete until it is complete. Both potential candidates understand the current issue with FINRA and neither forsees the issue as being a roadblock to an acquisition.

- George Sharp
December 28, 2023

And since Sharp "believes that the company is close to a significant acquisition with two potential targets," and we all know how that turned out, what does that say about the veracity that "current management forsees no issue in getting this accomished in the near future and thus being reinstated as an SEC reporter in good standing."

Not much I'd say looking at the failed "merger," "acquisition," and "targets" and Sharp's track record of lies in the past three years.

Sharp already has had three years of reporting under his belt as head of GVSI yet he continues to file unaudited financials, going directly against the SEC/FINRA requirements and what he says GVSI needs to do. He has NEVER filed an audited financial which he himself has said he must do.

Sharp really thinks his followers are gullible and stupid, and they are if they believe him.

Not to mention his dumping his 20 million common GVSI shares and then lying by saying he was never issued the shares..





Same will happen here.
The same thing won't happen here. GVSI pumpers only have another stock that has absolutely nothing to do with GVSI as a last hope and desperate attempt to save face.

Pumpers repeatedly ignore the fact that Tesoro/TSNP/HMBL was a fluke and part of a massive coordinated online pump and dump scheme that even Sharp criticized.

Neither $HMBL nor I pump. Period. End of story. The share price took off due to a combination of third party hype and short squeezing. This is not the company's fault. However, tortious interference comes with a price as those guilty of it will soon discover.— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) May 26, 2022

5/12 HUMBL never promoted its stock & it is not their fault that it went to a ridiculous $7+. Outsiders pumped the stock through social media & those that write ignorant advice newsletters like @insidrfinancial. It was FOMO & resulting short covering that caused HMBL to go $7+.— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) February 14, 2022

And TSNP didn't have all the SEC and FINRA problems that GVSI has.

So your BS "Alt reporting" garbage has once again gone up in smoke like all your arguments.
💥 1
Huggy Bear Huggy Bear 2 days ago
Early in the game? Man dude, you take the cake, and that's really saying something considering your contemporaries.
👍️ 1 💯 1
Lime Time Lime Time 2 days ago
It will happen here like TSNP reversed merger, can you refute that run never happened being Alt Reporting and giving the biggest gains on record of OTC Security Alt Reporting? Same will happen here. Very early in the game. You can't refute it 😆 🤣
🇧🇦 1 🇧🇴 1 🇴🇲 1 💩 1 🤡 1
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 2 days ago
Sharp issued the PRs and is keeping this fully Alt Reporting Compliant.
It doesn't need to be "fully Alt Reporting Compliant." It needs to be SEC registered and reporting to get a reverse merger (or any other corporate action) processed by the SEC/FINRA.

Something Sharp already said he can't do.

I had hope to start $GVSI as an SEC reporter, but after over a year of having two accounting firms work on it & discussions with the SEC, I begrudgingly agreed that I would not be able to get the books audited. https://t.co/tOP9FImksT— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) February 7, 2023

Our attorneys & auditors have concluded that it is impossible to audit $GVSI due to past corporate mismanagement of records/actions. Therefore, we are abandoning efforts to become an SEC reporter & are preparing an application for OTCIQ access to be filed with OTCM within 60 days— American Blockchain Corporation (@OTCpinkGVSI) June 30, 2022

The SEC doesn't care about "fully Alt Reporting Compliant" when GVSI is SEC delinquent and in violation of FINRA Rule 6490.

And the fact that GVSI is a shell it MUST get its Form 10 registration processed by the SEC/FINRA (which it can't do):

Shell companies must register with the SEC:

https://www.securitieslawyer101.com/2020/form-10-registration-statement/#:~:text=Both%20public%20and%20private%20companies,subject%20to%20SEC%20reporting%20requirements.

Both public and private companies can register a class of securities on Form 10. Form 10 is also used by shell purveyors to create inventory for reverse merger transactions that take a company from private to public company status. These shells are subject to SEC reporting requirements.

Q. If a non-reporting company was a shell company twenty years ago, is it required to file a Form 10 to cure its shell status for purposes of its shareholders having the ability to rely upon Rule 144’s safe harbor?

A. Yes, if a non-reporting entity was a shell company during any time in its history, it must either file a Form 10 registration statement or a registration statement on Form S-1 in order for its shareholders to rely upon Rule 144.

https://www.hg.org/legal-articles/how-finra-rule-6490-lmpacts-reverse-mergers-30567

HOW FINRA RULE 6490 lMPACTS REVERSE MERGERS

FINRA Rule 6490, has evolved since it was enacted over two years ago. For some time, FINRA has required that issuers provide expansive disclosures and supporting documentation not only for the corporate change subject to the notice but for the company’s entire corporate history from inception.

These disclosures are required of both SEC reporting and non-reporting issuers if they undertake corporate actions including reverse mergers. Compliance with Rule 6490's requirements is a minor task for companies going public by filing a registration statement with the SEC. Companies filing registration statements rarely have difficulties obtaining DTC eligibility unlike reverse merger issuers.

The public filings of companies who register with the SEC contain most of the supporting documentation required by Rule 6490.

It is no surprise that compliance with the requirements of Rule 6490 is less burdensome for companies going public using a registration statement because these companies have fewer corporate changes in their company history than companies engaging in reverse mergers. This is especially true for reverse merger issuers who undergo multiple changes of control and periods of inactivity.

The Problem with Reverse Mergers & Disclosure under Rule 6490

For companies that engage in reverse mergers as part of their going public transaction, compliance with Rule 6490's requirements can be impossible particularly when custodianship or receivership actions have been used by shell brokers to create public shells after years of inactivity. These companies may have multiple corporate actions related to prior changes of control and often have sketchy corporate histories. Some have even been hijacked through custodianship or receivership actions. In these circumstances, documents may be unavailable or if provided to FINRA, it could potentially result in FINRA referring the matter to the SEC’s Division of Enforcement.

These companies are almost always plagued with incomplete or fraudulent corporate records which make it extremely difficult for the post-reverse merger company to comply with FINRA Rule 6490. As a result, these companies may never get FINRA approval of the contemplated corporate action.

Rule 6490 Disclosures

Issuers must provide a cover letter disclosing the full corporate history for the issuer itemizing all material facts including every corporate change that has occurred from inception to present day.

Triggers for Review under FINRA RULE 6490

A FINRA review will be triggered if any of the five factors set forth in Rule 6490 are thought to be present:

• FINRA believes the forms are incomplete, inaccurate or filed without the appropriate corporate authority;

• The issuer is not current in its reporting obligations with the Securities and Exchange Commission;

• Persons involved in or related to the corporate action are the subject of pending or settled regulatory action or are under investigation by a regulatory body or are the subject of a pending criminal action related to fraud or securities law violations;

• Persons related to the corporate action are likely involved in fraudulent activities involving securities or may pose a threat to investors;

• There is significant uncertainty in the settlement and clearance process for the issuer’s securities.

Any company contemplating going public using a reverse merger must consider the potential impact Rule 6490 could have on its future corporate actions. Rule 6490 provides one more compelling reason why private companies seeking to go public should do so using a registration statement instead of a reverse merger.
💥 1
Lime Time Lime Time 2 days ago
Well, that all changes in 2025, which is why Sharp issued the PRs and is keeping this fully Alt Reporting Compliant. I think you have an issue at comprehending this, but it is a thing. Some people are slower than others and that is an accepted fact.
🤡 1 🤥 1
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 2 days ago
This is super clean.
GVSI is a dirty shell by definition.

https://bradshawlawgroup.com/reverse-mergers-a-basic-primer/

Conducting effective due diligence on the shell company is essential, as merging with a “dirty” shell (i.e., a shell whose management failed to follow proper SEC reporting procedures) could prove fatal for the private company.[13] In searching for “clean” shells, private companies should consider the shell’s number of stockholders, reporting record, and how and where it is listed.[14]

No audited financials means no reverse merger for GVSI and Sharp already said he abandoned getting GVSI audited, SEC registered and reporting and there are SIX YEARS of missing GVSI financial reports.

I had hope to start $GVSI as an SEC reporter, but after over a year of having two accounting firms work on it & discussions with the SEC, I begrudgingly agreed that I would not be able to get the books audited. https://t.co/tOP9FImksT— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) February 7, 2023

Our attorneys & auditors have concluded that it is impossible to audit $GVSI due to past corporate mismanagement of records/actions. Therefore, we are abandoning efforts to become an SEC reporter & are preparing an application for OTCIQ access to be filed with OTCM within 60 days— American Blockchain Corporation (@OTCpinkGVSI) June 30, 2022
👍️0
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 2 days ago
You know how George Sharp is constantly railing against Jason Black, Jason Tucker, Mark Miller and CNNA? Simply do a search in George Sharp's X feed for Jason Black, Jason Tucker, Mark Miller and CNNA. There is a very, very long list of posts

Just one example of countless Sharp posts about CNNA, Jason Black, Jason Tucker and Mark Miller:

$CNNA reported a new convertible note from Capitol Capital for which convicted felon, Mark Miller, and his partner, Jason Black, are being investigated for hijacking the company. It held old notes that Miller et al. used to give themselves stock.https://t.co/72VV3sgJqs https://t.co/pfvMA21Xwo pic.twitter.com/9LvikwgCIt— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) June 14, 2023

I found the last paragraph of this article extremely interesting:

https://www.securitieslawyer101.com/2023/shell-hijacker-mark-miller-sentenced-to-one-year-in-prison/

Public records show that Capitol Capital Corporation has also been involved as a noteholder in at least three other public issuers that used Jason Black as the CEO, MedX Holdings Inc (MEDH), Cann American Corp (CNNA), and Seven Arts Entertainment, Inc (SAPX). 

CNNA recently appointed Jason Tucker, former CEO of LEAS, as its new CEO, giving it yet another connection to past Miller frauds.  And according to SAPX OTC disclosures, on December 27, 2022, all the debt notes previously put in the name of Capitol Capital Corporation were transferred to an entity named Via Capital, represented in the SAPX filings by Jesus Cipriano, keeping the notes active despite Mark Miller’s various legal issues. Via Capital immediately started converting the debt into large chunks of free trading stock, including 150,000,000 shares on December 28, 2022, 150,000,000 shares on February 21, 2023, and 180,000,000 shares on March 6, 2023. SAPX has also begun to issue new debt notes to Via Capital.

Previously, in December 2020, Gary Kouletas (PAG Group LLC), who was another insider in LEAS and MEDH, was arrested and charged in a separate pump & dump scheme involving Global Resource Energy Inc (GBEN). That Indictment references an unnamed “Cooperating Witness” who is described as “a stock promoter and CEO of several public companies under federal investigation for securities fraud-related offenses but not yet charged."

Now do a search for GBEN on Sharp's X account.

Just one of Sharp's several posts and the dates of Sharp's posts are from just a few months before Gary Kouletas arrest:

Suspended $GBEN is another former scam by cowardly fraud artist, Jim Can aka Cem Can, of $BLUF fame who is currently cowering in Turkey and wanted in 3 countries.— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) August 18, 2020

There's a reason for Sharp to have a grudge against GBEN. GBEN insider Jim Can had sued Sharp in the past:

Judge orders that $7.8 million judgment fraudulently obtained by Jim Can against me be overturned. $BLUF $MULI $GBEN— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) September 11, 2014

Is Sharp the cooperating witness with "securities fraud-related offenses" Coincidence? I think not.

This house of cards will come tumbling down (again) soon enough.
👍️0
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 2 days ago
I will give Sharp credit though, he definitely warned people about GVSI many times:

I had regretted taking over $GVSI. Had I known what I was in for, I would have never had done it. But even my most fervent doubters know that I don't just give up once I start. I spent a lot of my own money to get this done in order to justify the confidence of my supporters. https://t.co/RHSjRXdDyo— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) February 7, 2023

Today, my attorney is filing for custodianship of $GVSI on my behalf. Those buying shares must know that there is incredible risk here. My application could be denied. I could find really bad skeletons.
Do not ask me questions regarding the progress. You will be blocked— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) April 19, 2021

As always, it happens when it happens. No guarantees. $GVSI https://t.co/RgIWrr0OEW— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) December 19, 2022

I had hope to start $GVSI as an SEC reporter, but after over a year of having two accounting firms work on it & discussions with the SEC, I begrudgingly agreed that I would not be able to get the books audited. https://t.co/tOP9FImksT— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) February 7, 2023

The plethora of partial name changes by previous management and its inept counsel didn't help $GVSI either and all that had to be unwound and mapped out. https://t.co/xk3RKcKZ8d— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) February 7, 2023

I did everything I could to avoid this necessity, but it could not be avoided. We'll have to wait a little longer for $GVSI & I'm not happy about it. This ticker is costing me a fortune.

The screw up by previous management is no surprise considering all their other screw ups. https://t.co/rU8pvRS8ke— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) November 23, 2021

I appreciate all the messages of support while I was working on bringing $GVSI current. When I took over it was an utter, chaotic mess.— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) February 7, 2023

Our attorneys & auditors have concluded that it is impossible to audit $GVSI due to past corporate mismanagement of records/actions. Therefore, we are abandoning efforts to become an SEC reporter & are preparing an application for OTCIQ access to be filed with OTCM within 60 days— American Blockchain Corporation (@OTCpinkGVSI) June 30, 2022

And Sharp never fixed the many SEC/FINRA problems GVSI has.

SEC restrictions on GVSI's corporate actions and FINRA's Notice of Deficiency means that GVSI won't be able to conduct a reverse merger, name change or symbol change among other corporate actions.

Just like I've been saying for years - there will be no merger for GVSI because of all the problems it has with the SEC/FINRA, the six years of missing audited financials which Sharp already said he can't fix and GVSI continued violation of FINRA Rule 6490.

$GVSI has finally received comments from FINRA who is concerned with acts by previous management, particularly, missing financials from that period.

The above tweet was recently deleted by Sharp. He wants no record of all the problems GVSI has.

There's a reason Sharp deleted a lot of his X/Twitter posts concerning GVSI recently.

It's over for GVSI.
👍️0
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 2 days ago
Why does what Sharp did at HUMBL sound so familiar here? Lying to and gaslighting investors, hiding important information from investors and stringing investors along with fraudulent pumps while he enriches himself (and insiders), just like he's doing here with GVSI. Remember Sharp dumped his 20 million GVSI common shares right before the failed merger and then lied by saying he was never issued the shares.

Hindenburg Research has a long history of exposing scams and scammers like Sharp using forensic financial research. It has been written up by the Economist and referenced by the SEC in their investigations.

https://hindenburgresearch.com/about-us/

https://hindenburgresearch.com/humbl/

Hindenburg Research

HUMBL: Illusions of Grandeur, Collapsing International Deals, And Lurking Dilution

Published on May 20, 2021

• HUMBL is an early-stage fintech company with a $5.6 billion fully diluted market cap that recently reverse-merged onto the OTC. It ended its most recent quarter with ~$156,000 in revenue and currently has ~$4.5 million in cash. It had zero revenue in 2020.

• The company aspires to be an Amazon or Alipay, imagining that it will facilitate payments to billions of people around the world by transcending borders and lowering costs using blockchain technology.  

• Our research shows the company has failed to deliver on even the most basic aspects of its business plan, including features it claimed were completed months ago. Six months after going public, its users can’t send or receive money on its “payment” app, let alone engage in low cost, cross-border crypto currency transactions.

• The vast majority of merchants appearing on HUMBL’s “Pay” platform don’t accept HUMBL Pay. Some didn’t even know they were on the platform and had never heard of HUMBL when we spoke with them.

• Despite HUMBL’s claims of disrupting the payments business, HUMBL uses another payment processor, Stripe, to support the few merchants on its platform who are accepting payments.

• We found that international deals announced over the last year – a key source of the company’s perceived legitimacy – never got off the ground or have quietly collapsed behind the scenes.

• For example, a partnership announced more than a year ago to bring HUMBL to Africa never got beyond the press release stage, according to an executive at its planned partner.

• A landmark $15.6 million deal to sell rights to HUMBL’s business in 15 countries in Oceania, including Australia and Tonga, collapsed. We found the partner for this major planned deal has no presence beyond a local entity filing, and operates out of a small residence.

• A deal to expand into India has been sidelined by COVID and regulations that prevent merchants from charging for digital payments, per HUMBL’s planned deal partner.

• An investment by a Singaporean company into HUMBL’s Asia business hasn’t resulted in any specific initiatives 6 months later, though directors at the company received shares valued at ~$14 million.

• HUMBL’s expansion into Mexico, where HUMBL’s CEO boasted of recruiting 300 merchants in 3 days, has only 2 merchants listed as accepting payments. Even those two told us they aren’t currently accepting HUMBL payments; the business in Mexico is on hold pending changes to the platform, according to a local merchant working with the company.

• Meanwhile, amidst these grand plans, HUMBL quietly issued preferred shares convertible into 5.54 billion common shares to insiders and family members, setting retail investors up for total annihilation when those shares unlock and become available for sale.

• The strategy was orchestrated in part by the company’s financial advisor and a major warrant holder, George Sharp, who gaslit investors following revelations of the issuance, later saying details on corporate action were withheld so as not to create “mass panic” and to save investors from themselves.

• Over the weekend, Sharp, who had made his account private days before, announced on Twitter that he was parting ways with HUMBL, leaving public shareholders little to show for these massive giveaways to insiders except ever-more grandiose plans that appear stuck at the vapor stage.

• HUMBL’s CEO, Brian Foote, responded to investor backlash by tweeting that he won’t convert his personal holdings of preferred shares until at least the end of 2022. He did not, however, offer the same assurances regarding 3 billion other shares, including those held by his family’s trust.

• In the past year, faith-based go-public transactions such as HUMBL have brought the investing public an endless parade of risky companies that boast of all the things they will someday revolutionize. Meanwhile, while investors are strung along by hope, and lulled into looking the other way, they face a literal reality of billions of shares becoming available to convert and sell.

Initial Disclosure: After extensive research, we have taken a short position in shares of HUMBL, Inc. This report represents our opinion, and we encourage every reader to do their own due diligence. Please see our full disclaimer at the bottom of the report.

Introduction

HUMBL says its mission is to help companies and businesses “rapidly migrate to the digital economy” through the blockchain.

In its go-public presentation, HUMBL CEO Brian Foote described his vision with a slide that compared HUMBL’s role in the development of the internet to that of Apple and Amazon.

The fledgling San Diego-based company already has 3 divisions, each with broad plans to revolutionize various digital economies:

• HUMBL Pay, which plans to rival Alipay and major payment processors, facilitating everything from payments to street merchants in Mexico to worker remittances in Tonga.

• HUMBL Marketplace, which plans to rival eCommerce giants by “allow(ing) consumers and merchants to connect more seamlessly in the digital economy.” It hosts several merchant stores that sell mostly handmade products like soap, pet beds, and jewelry and plans to offer sports and entertainment NFTs and digital tokens to track the authenticity of goods on its platform.

• HUMBL Financial, which aims to provide “simplified investing on the blockchain” and currently offers indices that create allocations for crypto portfolios.

Despite its ambitious plans, the company finished its recent March quarter with just ~$156,000 in revenue and a ~$1.4 million loss. [Pg. 22] It pays $3,250 per month to operate out of its WeWork office space and currently has ~$4.5 million in cash from recent sales of stock and warrants.

The company closed out 2020 with no revenue and a $713,000 net loss, according to its annual report.  

HUMBL went public after announcing a reverse merger deal in November, where it merged with a dormant flooring products business.

Shortly thereafter, the company’s market value peaked at about $50 billion on a fully diluted basis on the back of extreme blockchain enthusiasm among its OTC investor base.

After reviewing corporate filings and legal documents for HUMBL and various HUMBL-affiliated companies, and interviewing numerous former associates, business partners, and merchants, we believe that HUMBL is little more than a preliminary-stage startup propped up by techno-babble.

Currently, despite its penny stock status, HUMBL’s fully diluted market value stands at about $5.6 billion, making it one of the most overvalued illusions in the stock market today

Part I: HUMBL’s Opaque Transition To A Public Company

HUMBL announced a reverse merger with Tesoro Enterprises, Inc. on November 12th 2020, marking the beginning of its entrance onto the OTC Markets. The merger closed on December 3rd, 2020. [Pg. 2]

HUMBL Deal Is “Going to Bring Credibility Finally to the OTC”, Promoter Told HUMBL Investors

But HUMBL Shareholders Weren’t Told That Insiders Were To Be Issued Preferred Shares Convertible Into ~5.54 Billion Common Shares Until Over 4 Months Later

The HUMBL deal was shepherded by OTC investor George Sharp, who described himself during HUMBL’s debut webcast on December 9th as “an advocate for shareholder rights and honesty in the OTC.” [00:15] 

“I’m not easily impressed, but I was blown apart,” Sharp said about his introduction to HUMBL…This deal is going to bring credibility finally to the OTC.” [1:58, 2:45]

Right out of the gate, shareholders were left in the dark on a critical investment consideration—the number of actual fully diluted shares outstanding. This, of course, is key to understanding how much of the enterprise they actually would own and the company’s valuation.

The November press release announcing the deal was short on details, saying simply that HUMBL CEO Brian Foote had acquired “the control block of voting shares” and “a significant number of common shares.”

Rather Than Informing Its Shareholders That 5.54 Billion New Shares Would Be Created, HUMBL Issued 2 Press Releases Shortly After the Deal That Signaled Its Share Count Was Decreasing.

The Stock Soared ~91% On the “Good News”

The day after the merger announcement, the company (still named Tesoro at the time) issued a press release stating that CEO Brian Foote had retired 551 million shares without consideration, lowering the overall share count.  

This “good news” of the CEO voluntarily tightening the share count sent HUMBL shares spiking 91% from the prior day. 

Four days later, on November 17, the company announced that Foote had locked up an additional 318 million shares, yet again signaling that the CEO was actively removing shares from the overall share count.

The press release tallied the total reduction in shares, reiterating the notion that Foote was focused on constraining the share count:

“Upon completion of the conversion, Tesoro’s issued and outstanding number of common shares will have been reduced by over 860 million shares since Mr. Foote became President of Tesoro.” 

It also included this reassuring statement, highlighting the expectation that there would be no new shares outstanding in 2021, an assertion that would later prove highly misleading:  

“The company does not anticipate that the number of common shares outstanding will increase during the remainder of 2020 and throughout 2021.” 

HUMBL’s Fully Diluted Market Valuation Hit $50 Billion At One Point, (Greater Than The Market Cap of Twitter) Without Its Regular Shareholders Even Realizing

On February 25th, The Company Announced A Reverse Split. Rather Than Taking the Opportunity to Inform Investors About Its Billions of Shares of Latent Dilution, Promoter George Sharp Told Investors “If You’re Worried About Dilution, Don’t Be”.

By early February, HUMBL’s stock soared to highs of $7.72 as the broader market rallied along with everything crypto. Its investors still had no idea that its fully diluted market cap had just reached ~$50 billion, putting it on par with Twitter.

On February 25, HUMBL announced that FINRA had processed its planned corporate actions including its share issuances and a 4-to-1 reverse stock split.

In the press release, HUMBL COO Jeffrey Hinshaw said one of the reasons for the move was to “pinpoint the true value of the common shares”. Yet at the time, HUMBL did not provide specifics on its massively dilutive preferred shares, making such precision impossible.

The next day, promoter George Sharp fielded questions from concerned shareholders about the corporate action, assuaging those who were concerned about potential dilution: “If you’re worried about dilution, don’t be.” [9:30]

On the same call, Sharp told investors he was simply doing them a favor by being opaque about the company’s corporate actions, such as the surprise reverse stock split announced at the same time:

“I made the conscious decision that we were not going to tell you and I’ll tell you why: it would have created mass panic…I don’t want to sound like I’m your mother, but we saved a lot of you from yourselves here.”  [9:55]

HUMBL Filed its Annual Report On April 14th, Disclosing For The First Time (And 4 Months After the Deal Closed) That New Preferred Shares Issued to Insiders Can Convert Into Over 5.5 Billion Shares, Beginning December 2021

It wasn’t until April 14 that shareholders learned the details of the reverse-merger.

The company’s delayed annual report revealed that HUMBL outstanding common stock, on a fully diluted basis, had actually increased by more than 600%, from 974 million shares to 6.5 billion shares.

Specifically, HUMBL’s 552,522 Series B Preferred Shares are eligible for conversion at a rate of 10,000-to-1, into 5,525,220,000 shares of common stock, as soon as December 3, 2021. [Pg. 31] That number then increased in the latest quarterly filing by another ~18 million shares to ~5.54 billion total. [Pg. 3]

HUMBL’s long silence around the dilution stood in sharp contrast to the 2 announcements it made in November regarding the reduction of common stock. It also represented a total about-face from its statement that it did not anticipate an increase in common shares outstanding in 2021.

Facing Criticism From Investors on the Dilution Surprise, HUMBL’s CEO Foote Tweeted That He Wouldn’t Sell Any Of His Personal Shares Until The End of 2022 

No Assurances Were Made Regarding the Other 3 Billion Shares, Including Those Held By Foote’s Family And Deal Partners

Following the disclosure, HUMBL’s stock price began to drop as some investors wised up to the latent dilution.

In an effort to quell the panic, HUMBL’s CEO responded by tweeting that he would not sell his “personal shares” until the end of 2022.

Foote appeared to be referencing the preferred shares issued to his entity, 30 Block LLC, which holds 2,497,070,000 common shares on an as-converted basis (45% of the total). [Pg. 4] 

Foote said nothing, however, about the 335,610,000 shares, on an as-converted basis, held by The Stephen L. and Sandra M. Foote Revocable Trust. [Pg. 5]   Based on background checks, Stephen and Sandra appear to be Brian’s parents. The HUMBL holdings in their trust are worth $292 million based on current prices. 

There are also no assurances about the other 3,028,130,000 shares that unlock on December 3, either, which represent ~$2.6 billion worth of stock at current market prices. [Pg. 9]

That latent dilution represents a ticking time bomb for a stock that currently trades about $15 million in volume per day.  

Promoter Further Gaslights HUMBL Investors By Making Light Of Extraordinary Dilution Risk, Telling Them They Ought To Sell Their Shares If They Really Think Insiders Are Going To Dump Them At Year End

Promoter George Sharp also responded on Twitter to the backlash following HUMBL’s disclosure, telling shareholders to sell if they think 6 billion new shares will suddenly appear. 

This strikes us as classic gaslighting. To respond to Sharp, about 3 billion shares will suddenly become available for sale in December.

Sharp also chastised investors for not recognizing that insiders had earned these shares. The following individuals now have shares, on an as-converted basis, with the following current valuations: 

Brian Foote, CEO of HMBL: $2.2 billion [Pg. 4]

Mark Grado, consultant for HUMBL and Block 30: $488 million [Pg. 5]

Jeffrey Hinshaw, Co-founder and COO of HUMBL: $353 million [Pg.5]

Michele Rivera, Global Partners and Team Lead at HUMBL: $250 million [Pg. 5]

Sharp has done extraordinarily well too. He parlayed his $200,000 investment in HUMBL into an investment valued at around $394 million as of March 9, according to his company Forwardly Inc.’s annual report. [Pg. 20 -21]

Now we examine whether HUMBL’s achievements to date have warranted anything resembling its current valuation. 

Part II:  HUMBL’s Hollow “Launch”

On April 16, the HUMBL Pay app launched in the US, Canada, Mexico, Australia, Singapore, and New Zealand.   

Investors had been hotly anticipating this moment – and perhaps some clarification – since HUMBL’s CEO Brian Foote first described the business with buzzword-laden detail in his earlier December update.

Foote has offered the following descriptions of the business:

• “a mobile app in a limited sandbox” 

• “an elastic layer of Web Three that moves seamlessly across borders” 

• “a silo-buster” that “curates channels” 

• a “Synthetic continuum” that offers “an immersible experience” on a consumer’s “happy path”

Vertical #1—HUMBL Pay App: In A December Investor Call, CEO Foote Explained The Features Built “Right Now”, Which Included Sending And Receiving Money

Halfway through the December call, Foote cut to a slide summarizing all the app’s working features: “O.K. I’m a shareholder. What do you guys have built right now?”   [Dec. 9 Call – 25:22] 

Foote explained: 

“Right now, in the barn, we have – send money, request money, receive money, exchange money, stable coins.” 

Four Months Later, Those Basic Features Weren’t Functioning At Launch

On April 16, two months behind schedule, HUMBL launched HUMBL Pay, described as “a new way to connect, share and pay around the world.”

Yet we found through our testing that there is no way to send, receive, or request money between users or to even know which users are on the platform.

This becomes clear when attempting to search for the company’s most popular user. Among those helping generate excitement about the HUMBL launch was Nick Carter, former lead member of the 1990s hit boy band The Backstreet Boys. 

Carter told his nearly 675,000 Twitter followers that he’d signed up for HUMBL Pay and displayed a screen shot of his username. 

But when we tested the system, we found it didn’t recognize individual users – not even Nick Carter.

Futhermore, there is no indication that users can do anything with stablecoins. All told, the consumer features that Foote claimed to be functional 4 months earlier don’t seem to work.

Despite The Shortcomings Of The HUMBL Pay App, It Immediately Received Rave Reviews On The Apple Store, Suggesting Attempts To Alter Perceptions About The Launch

The Number of New Reviews Has Tapered Off to Nearly Zero, Indicating a Sharp Drop-Off In Interest

One would expect that buzz around a popular ‘paradigm shifting’ app would lead to an increase in users, popularity, and reviews over time.

Given the limitations of HUMBL Pay, the company seems to have experienced the opposite. The app had a few days of rave reviews followed by a complete collapse, trickling off to zero new reviews less than 2 weeks after launch.

Additionally, despite the lack of functioning features, a flood of 5-star reviews posted to the Apple Store didn’t line up with reality, suggesting a concerted effort to alter perceptions around the app and its launch.

A typical review praised the app’s ability to “send money back and forth between family and friends” – something HUMBL Pay clearly couldn’t do.  

Another reviewer claimed to be deleting PayPal, Venmo, and Etsy as HUMBL does everything those apps do – another blatantly untrue statement.

We Sampled Merchants Listed On the App And Found That Only About 5% Were Set Up To Take Payments 

Several We Spoke With Didn’t Know How They Got Listed On The Platform

HUMBL also launched features for merchants. The press release announcing the launch of HUMBL Pay explained that users would be able to “discover merchants; as well as pay, tip, rate and review those same merchants in contactless transactions.”  

But Step 1, discovering merchants, was a problem. Almost all of the merchants appeared to be in San Diego or NYC. And, searches for a region, say NYC, pulled up inaccurate listings, including merchants in Kansas City and Detroit.

Even after successfully locating a merchant on the system, we found there’s a good chance they don’t accept HUMBL. We reviewed 200 merchant listings on HUMBL Pay and found just 9 merchants out of those 200 who were identified as taking payments via the app. 

Partial List of merchants downloaded from the HUMBL Pay app 

We called numerous HUMBL Pay-listed merchants to ask if they take HUMBL payments. Here’s what a sample told us: 

• Doughnut Plant, NYC: “Never heard of it.” “We use Level Up.”

• Barleymash, San Diego: “I doubt we take it because I’ve never heard of it.”

• Los Tacos No. 1, NYC: “We take Apple Pay and Samsung Pay – that’s it.”

• A salesman at Hudson Toyota in Jersey City said he’d need to run it by his manager and called back to explain: “We looked into it and they allow customers to pay with crypto currencies so we wouldn’t be able to accept it.”

So how did all these businesses end up on the platform? 

On the day of the launch, Foote had posted on Twitter, encouraging people to “populate” the app with “ratings, reviews, installs.” 

As a result, HUMBL Pay may have been populated with hundreds or even thousands of merchants who didn’t enter their own information into the app and don’t even know what it is.

In HUMBL’s Q1 filing, the company stated that it had 13,000 “merchant accounts” on its platform. It appears the company is including in that metric vast numbers of merchants who have never heard of the company let alone use its payment services. [P. 39]

When we reached out to one of the 9 merchants actually accepting HUMBL payments — Derrick’s Personalized Exercise in the NYC area — Derrick told us that he already accepted PayPal and credit cards. He said he added HUMBL Pay because he is a HUMBL shareholder: “I thought I’d go all in.”

All told, organic actual demand seems rather thin.

Vertical #2—HUMBL Marketplace: There are Only 23 Merchants On HUMBL’s Shopify-Like Service

One We Spoke With Gave A Glowing Review, But When We Asked If He Was Compensated To Promote HUMBL He Declined To Answer, Citing An NDA With the Company

HUMBL has a second vertical that it hopes will connect consumers and merchants that it calls HUMBL Marketplace, where merchants can operate an online business and accept online payments for products such as soap, pet beds, and zodiac sign-inspired coffees.

HUMBL Marketplace looks like a preliminary attempt to compete with Shopify and other ecommerce solutions. HUMBL Marketplace has a total of 23 merchants on its platform as of this writing. (By comparison, Shopify reported 1,749,000 merchants using its software at the end of 2020. [Pg. 11]) 

We called several merchants and successfully connected with Jake Hubenak at The Meat Project. He told us that HUMBL had approached him about putting his barbeque seasoning business on the platform because someone at HUMBL used and liked the products.  

Hubenak told us “not a day goes by” when he doesn’t get an order through HUMBL. 

It was a glowing endorsement. But, when we asked if he got paid to promote HUMBL, he said he couldn’t talk about that because of a confidentiality agreement. 

HUMBL does not disclose whether it pays its merchants to endorse the platform, and a person might reasonably assume that a merchant would not need to be paid to feature his or her products on a selling platform.  

Note that FTC rule § 255.5 requires disclosure of compensation for testimonials, yet we saw no disclosure of any endorsement deal.

Despite Claims Of Disrupting The Payments World, HUMBL’s Marketplace Offering Currently Uses Stripe To Process Merchant Payments

We confirmed that the few merchants in the U.S. described as accepting payments – either through HUMBL Pay or HUMBL Marketplace – could actually receive payments.

But the acceptance of such payments doesn’t look to be part of a major disruption to the global payments space. HUMBL discloses on its website that it is not a licensed money transmitter:

“HUMBL, Inc. is not a money services business and does not hold itself out to be such. All money transmission services are being provided exclusively by third parties…HUMBL does not offer money transmission services.”

Instead, a review of HUMBL’s merchant contract shows that transactions are actually being done behind-the-scenes by Stripe, one of the largest online payment processors in the world, who would reasonably be assumed to be a competitor of HUMBL. 

Vertical #3—HUMBL Financial: Complex Setup and Reliance on Third-Party Exchanges

Beyond HUMBL Pay and HUMBL Marketplace, the final piece of the HUMBL enterprise is HUMBL Financial:

“HUMBL Financial™ created its BLOCK ETX products to simplify digital asset investing for customers and institutions seeking exposure to a new, 24/7 digital asset class.”

The vertical generated $2,156 in revenue as of last quarter. (Numbers not in thousands) [Pg. 38]

While the company aims to simplify investing in digital assets, we created an account and experienced the opposite. To access HUMBL’s crypto index products, users need to go through a convoluted process.

First, users need to purchase a license key. Then, HUMBL requires users to grant the app access to the user’s account already set up at an established exchange like Binance, Coinbase Pro, or Bittrex.

From there, users can invest in “index products” through the pre-existing exchange architecture. Index products are baskets of cryptocurrencies that are periodically rebalanced. HUMBL charges $5/month for the service.

Users on social media complained about the process, finding it confusing:

It seems clear that the features are preliminary and that HUMBL lacks the proprietary development-base to truly offer a seamless, integrated product.

HUMBL Claims That The App Uses 20,000 Lines Of Proprietary Code To Create Its Trading Strategies

Yet The “Strategies” Appear To Involve Simple Crypto Positions, Then Periodically Rebalancing Them

HUMBL claims it uses “over 20,000” lines of proprietary code to create crypto trading strategies for its users.

Yet many of the trading strategies offered by HUMBL appear quite simple. For instance, the Block 3 product had just purchased a portfolio of 50% BTC, 25% ETH, and 25% of Litecoin when we signed up for it. Later, the allocation shifted to 50% BTC, 25% Litecoin, and 25% DigiByte.

(Source: HUMBL Financial website)

We don’t think a simple product is a bad thing, but it is unclear how thousands of lines of code factor into optimizing such a portfolio and what would justify the $5/month fee.

PART III: HUMBL’s Vanishing International Deals

A key part of HUMBL’s perceived credibility is its claim to be making meaningful inroads as a payments business operating in markets around the world. According to CEO Brian Foote:   

“The 375 million people using Apple Pay are not the total addressable market. HUMBL was built to serve the other 7 billion global consumers for whom the cost, use, and movement of money is on a very different grid.” 

HUMBL Says It Got 300 Mexican Merchants Sign Up In The First 3 Days Of Its Launch

Months Later We Found Zero Activity

On the company’s first call with investors back in December, Foote explained that one reason HUMBL is based in San Diego is its proximity to Mexico: 

“Part of the reason our business was born here is the majority of merchants in Mexico are in cash still, like so physical paper bills and coins.” 

At the time, Foote said the company was surprised by the strong demand for the app among merchants in Mexico:

“I challenged our Mexico sales team. I said ‘OK. Go sign up 100 merchants in a week.’ They came back with 300 merchants in three days.” [Dec. 9, 2020 call, 26:00]

Five months later, however, we couldn’t find anywhere near 300 merchants on HUMBL Pay in Mexico.

Using the map feature, we located 19 merchants in total and identified 2 as accepting HUMBL payments. We reached out to ask about the app:

• Villa Café in Baja: We were told that they had the HUMBL system but had not yet been trained on it.

• Nicky’s Fish and Chips in Iztapalapa, Mexico City: An employee told us they had never heard of HUMBL but that the restaurant accepted credit cards.

“Borderless Day In Baja” Promotional Video Vanishes From HUMBL Website; Mexico Merchant Says Everything Is On Hold

On December 1st, HUMBL announced a successful pilot with merchants in Mexico. The release quoted a tour operator named Fernando Cuevas:

“HUMBL® instantly makes life easier for me, my business and my customers here in Mexico. Being able to pay people for goods and services digitally with HUMBL®, enables my customers to spend more time enjoying their trips, and less time seeking out ATM’s and cash payment options everywhere we go.”

On December 9th, the company posted a video to its website called “A Borderless Day In Baja” which featured a group of visitors touring Mexico with Cuevas, using HUMBL to pay merchants and transfer money to each other.

The video included a stop for a photo op with a Tijuana donkey named Monica painted with zebra stripes.[1] The owner of the zebra donkey accepted HUMBL, per the video:

A disclaimer at the end of the video stated that “all money transmission services are being provided exclusively by third parties” and that the video contains “live and simulated transactions”.

Those simulations still haven’t turned into reality, it seems, despite Mexico being included as one of the markets in which HUMBL Pay was said to have “launched” on April 16.

We contacted Cuevas via WhatsApp in late April. In addition to being the tour guide in HUMBL’s video, Cuevas was also named HUMBL’s “lead affiliate sales representative in the region”. He indicated that the app isn’t ready, writing that until modifications are made to the app, no merchants in Mexico will be able to use it. He then quickly deleted the messages and told us he couldn’t speak on the matter further.

An employee at the Hilo Negro winery and wine bar that featured in the closing segments of the promo video told us they accepted a variety of international and Mexican payment methods but not HUMBL:

“We only use Visa, Mastercard, Carnet (a Mexican transactions service) and also Samsung Pay…No, no we don´t use that one (HUMBL).”  

The “Borderless Day In Baja” video has been removed from HUMBL’s website, though it can still be found on Vimeo.

All told, we found no sign that HUMBL is revolutionizing business in Mexico. We think the company should clarify how many active merchants in Mexico have used the app and the total transaction volume to date.

HUMBL CEO Called Deal With India-Based Payment Processor DIPL A Chance “To Work For 1.4 Billion India Customers” 

More Than a Year Later, A Deal Partner Says The HUMBL Partnership Was Quashed By COVID And That Economics May Be Impossible

On March 20, 2020, HUMBL announced a deal with Digital India Payments (DIPL), a company that processes payments for 30,000 merchants in India, Nepal, Bangladesh, Maldives, Myanmar and Sri Lanka. 

A successful entry into the India market would have been a massive stepping stone toward HUMBL´s stated ambition of serving “7 billion global consumers”.

Foote was quoted as saying:  

“We look forward to putting HUMBL technologies to work for 1.4 billion India customers alongside (DIPL).” 

The ambitious plan involved providing DIPL’s merchants with software to enable banking and other services for its customers: 

“HUMBL Hubs will be offering walk-in services to customers, such as cash pickup, foreign exchange, fair lending, bill payments, pre-paid cards, store credits, travel bookings, internet and cell phone minutes from local merchant (“agent”) locations” 

We spoke with Nayan Raut, the managing director of Kloden Technologies, who was the consultant for  DIPL in negotiations with HUMBL and was listed as the contact in the press release announcing the deal. He told us that the partnership never went ahead, primarily because DIPL´s agent network largely shut down due to the pandemic.

He noted there were longer term issues, explaining that government regulations in India do not allow a payment platform to charge merchants or consumers any percentage, hampering HUMBL’s planned business model.

“As a consumer, however much I pay the merchant, the same amount goes into his bank account. In terms of digital payments there is 0% MDR (Merchant Discount Rate). That is so (the government) can push digitalization.” 

Describing DIPL as a start-up, Raut said he believed DIPL may collapse, along with the deal, as a result of India´s COVID crisis.

“I´m a little worried about DIPL. If they don´t have business for a year or so it will be very difficult for them to survive. I don´t know if they will survive.”

In short, it appears that beyond the press release, HUMBL’s India deal didn’t happen, probably won’t happen, and if it somehow did happen, wouldn’t make HUMBL any money due to regulatory hurdles.

HUMBL Deal With Nigeria’s One Kiosk Was Billed As “A Powerful Economic Driver” For Small Businesses and Communities 

More Than A Year Later, An Executive Says The Deal Never Got Off-The-Ground

On April 3, 2020, HUMBL announced a deal with Laos, Nigeria-based One Kiosk, which brings together merchants and online delivery services. 

At the time, One Kiosk’s CEO said his company had seen a boom in online ordering due to COVID-19 and he believed an ability to pair the company’s service with HUMBL’s financial services would be “a powerful economic driver.” 

Foote claimed HUMBL would use its platform to help local small businesses compete with larger companies:   

“HUMBL helps them get in the game against big box competitors.” 

But HUMBL didn’t help get anyone into the game. 

We reached out to Olatunbosun Babatunde, One Kiosk’s Chief Technology Officer, to check in on the project. He responded: 

“Thank you for reaching out. HUMBL actually reach out to us and they wanted One Kiosk to use their payment system on our platform as a way of entering the African market. But it never went beyond that.” 

HUMBL Announced a Landmark Deal To Sell Rights For 15 Oceania Countries for up to $15 Million To An Unnamed Partner

But The Deal Later Collapsed. We Found The Proposed Deal Partner Was An Entity With No Apparent Physical Or Online Presence, Based Out of a Personal Residence

In a letter to shareholders on January 22, 2021, Foote told investors that the company had secured “our first of multiple option payments on the distribution rights deal in [the] Oceania region” with “plans to enter the region with this group”.

According to a filing months later, an Australian entity called Tuigamala Group Pty Ltd (TGP) had paid $600,000 in December for an option to purchase the territory rights, with plans to invest an aggregate $15 million. [Pg. 33] The initial $600,000 payment also granted TGP 12.5 million warrants at $1 each, worth as much as $84 million at HUMBL’s peak.

Given HUMBL’s description of its plans, one might expect TPG to have had a significant foothold in the region, such as a network of merchants or consumers.

But we could find no online or physical evidence of TPG’s existence aside from its filings with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission.  The entity was created on September 16, 2019 and is owned by Julius Elisara Tuigamala, per the filings.  

The company’s principal place of business appears to be Tuigamala’s house in New Zealand at 37 Claremont Street, Kellyville Ridge NSW 2155. 

In the end, TGP never made any further payments to purchase the country rights and terminated negotiations, but kept the 12.5 million warrants. [Pg. 33] It is unclear whether TGP has exercised the warrants or sold any stock thus far.

HUMBL Announced a “Strategic Investment” From Singapore’s Cyberbeat, a “1.5 Billion Consumer and Merchant Opportunity”

Cyberbeat Is Less Than 2 Years Old And Has Only Two Listed Employees, Who Received Preferred Shares Valued At $14 Million

Less than two weeks after announcing the reverse merger transaction, HUMBL (then Tesoro) put out a press release detailing a “strategic investment” by Cyberbeat in Singapore.

A HUMBL executive was quoted in the release as saying the company viewed the deal as an “opportunity to establish this global relationship with a proven winner in the Asia Pacific region”, giving the company access to 1.5 billion consumers and merchants.

Local filings show “proven winner” Cyberbeat was incorporated in December 2019:

Dinh Thi Hong Hanh and Narayan Rajan Sashi are the only two employees for Cyberbeat listed on LinkedIn. They are also listed as the company’s only two directors in local filings.

The press release didn’t mention how much was actually invested by Cyberbeat, but HUMBL’s annual report showed that Cyberbeat and its two employees/directors received preferred shares convertible into 15,930,000 common shares, currently valued at ~$14 million. [Pg. 7]

Six months after the deal was announced, we have seen no details on specific initiatives resulting from the deal.

In Chile—HUMBL’s Partner is a 1-Year-Old Entity Whose CEO Told Us HUMBL Is Its First Investment of Its Kind.

So Far, The Investment of “Up To” $7.5 Million Has Only Consisted of a $1 Million Purchase of Discounted Stock

On March 16, HUMBL issued a press release announcing its latest international deal, an arrangement with a Chilean entity, the Aurea Group, which could invest “up to” $7.5 million in HUMBL, including $6.5 million for a 35% stake in HUMBL’s future Chilean subsidiary.

The potential business is considered so promising, HUMBL is even offering a limited-edition unisex T-shirt in its swag store to celebrate the yet-to-be-created Chilean business.

So far, all the group has invested in was a discounted block of HUMBL common stock. It paid $1 million for 437,500 shares or $2.29 per share, a 20% discount to the closing price of $2.86 on the date prior to the announcement.

It’s not surprising that investment firm Aurea Group was interested in buying discounted stock. It’s less clear how they’ll provide traction for HUMBL among merchants and consumers in the Chilean market aside from its network of personal relationships.

Aurea Group is new, having been incorporated in March 2020, a year before the HUMBL deal was announced, according to Chilean corporate records. Aurea CEO Juan Pablo Morales told us by phone:

“HUMBL is the first company we have formed an alliance with and we´re looking for more of these companies in order to connect Latin America with the technology from developed markets.”

HUMBL has yet to articulate an actionable strategy for partnering in Chile with a technology or payment company– or any company for that matter. In the press release, HUMBL’s description of where the deal is headed was typically vague:

“HUMBL and Aurea Group are already underway on HUMBL Latin America business development discussions in key verticals such as: banking, merchant and financial services, real estate, hospitality, tourism, sports, festivals, entertainment and ticketing services in the region.”

Aurea Group’s option to make a $6.5 million
👍️0
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 2 days ago
Let's review a few uncomfortable CURRENT facts about GVSI:

• FINRA is "concerned" (I'm sure it's more than concerned) about the six years of missing audited financials and previous management's "acts."
• SEC/FINRA approval of name/ticker change that failed miserably, indicating that something went terribly wrong with the SEC/FINRA.
• SEC restriction on corporate actions such as a name/ticker name change and a reverse merger.
• 5 years of SEC/FINRA audited financials delinquent (from 2008 - 2013) *before* filing its Form 15.
• Non SEC registered.
• Non SEC reporting.
• Non audited financials.
• Sharp himself stating he couldn't get GVSI audited.
• In continued violation of FINRA Rule 6490.
• FINRA Notice of Deficiency.
• SEC Rule15c2-11 warning.
• Price that has plummeted.
• Accumulation that has plummeted.
• Bloated share structure of 7 billion AS and 2.1 billion OS.
• No reverse merger anticipated and not even a candidate search has begun according to GVSI financials.
• A supposed recent "merger" failure (that wasn't really a merger since proper paper work was never filed with the SEC) that catastrophically failed.
• Sharp dumped his 20 million GVSI common shares right beforw the failed "merger" and then lied by saying he was never issued his common shares.
• A CEO who has repetitively lied to and gaslighted investors, hiding important information from and stringing investors along (with fraudulent pumps) while he enriches himself (and insiders), is abrasive and uncaring about shareholders, often blaming them for his mistakes and occupied with other priorities like racing his ponies and attacking other stocks.

What a glowing review from Sharp...full of regret...and in retrospect he would never had done it. Seems like even Sharp thinks GVSI is a disaster.

I had regretted taking over $GVSI. Had I known what I was in for, I would have never had done it. But even my most fervent doubters know that I don't just give up once I start. I spent a lot of my own money to get this done in order to justify the confidence of my supporters. https://t.co/RHSjRXdDyo— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) February 7, 2023

I had hope to start $GVSI as an SEC reporter, but after over a year of having two accounting firms work on it & discussions with the SEC, I begrudgingly agreed that I would not be able to get the books audited. https://t.co/tOP9FImksT— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) February 7, 2023

Our attorneys & auditors have concluded that it is impossible to audit $GVSI due to past corporate mismanagement of records/actions. Therefore, we are abandoning efforts to become an SEC reporter & are preparing an application for OTCIQ access to be filed with OTCM within 60 days— American Blockchain Corporation (@OTCpinkGVSI) June 30, 2022

Sharp already said he can't produce what FINRA/SEC is specifically asking for in its Notice of Deficiency - AUDITED financials from 2008 - 2013 to conform with FINRA Rule 6490 which GVSI has and is continuing to violate. And Sharp already said he ABANDONED getting GVSI audited which means he won't be able to get GVSI SEC registered and reporting for a reverse merger.

What Sharp says he plans to do in 2025 about another merger attempt and filing GVSI's Form 10 should be believed about as much as Sharp's tweets saying he would get GVSI SEC registered and reporting three years ago, that he would refile GVSI's SEC Form 10 registration statement three Decembers ago and never did, saying that WNFT had reached the "promised land" and would have a "business plan over the next several weeks which will include an acquisition(s)" that never materialized in September two years ago when Sharp said it would happen and saying he would not reverse split GRDO then did just that.

$WNFT reaches the promised land, after shedding its $GOFF persona.

The company will address its shareholders next week in a press release. Please do not rely on other peoples' assumptions. Only rely on the filings and statements made by the company.

Have a good long weekend.— Worldwide NFT (@WorldwideNFTInc) June 29, 2022

The mandatory settlement conference did not yield an agreement with Calasse, however we anticipate that $WNFT will proceed with a business plan over the next several weeks which will include an acquisition(s). This statement should not be construed as a guarantee for success.— Worldwide NFT (@WorldwideNFTInc) August 19, 2022

There will be no reverse split, dilution or toxic debt taken on so long as I am involved with $GRDO. Update filings will reflect a zero balance sheet. PRs are forthcoming.— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) October 5, 2018

I regret giving the impression that $GRDO would not r/s, but unfortunately, it was the only way to get things done. Why would the shareholders want as much as 800 million shares in dead certificates? The only purpose that serves is to make it more expensive to raise money.— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) August 9, 2019

I will never be involved with a company that wipes out the shareholders through a reverse split. $FORW $TSNP— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) November 2, 2020

Mind you that Sharp again said in the above tweet that he would NEVER reverse split any stock he's involved with AFTER he did just that for GRDO - is that being honest?

GVSI continues to slowly bleed out while people who listen to the pumpers will continue to buy and keep getting deeper and deeper in the hole with their investment because of dilusional and nefarious pumpers keep telling them that GVSI is "going to dollars" and that "a merger is coming," all the while the SEC/FINRA is MIA with it's corporate actions approvals. Sharp kept pumping the name, ticker symbol change and merger for months - so what happened? NOTHING! Again it was all BULLSHIT with no corporate actions approval and the merger failed miserably.

How many times will the remaining Sharp cult need to get swindled by Sharp? It's been happening over and over and over again. At this point you have to question their intelligence.

Sharp already said he can't produce what FINRA/SEC is specifically asking for in its Notice of Deficiency - AUDITED financials from 2008 - 2013 to conform with FINRA Rule 6490 which GVSI has and is continuing to violate. And Sharp already said he ABANDONED getting GVSI audited and SEC registered and reporting.

https://www.sec.gov/litigation/apdocuments/3-19407-event-2020-05-12-brief-in-support-of-application-for-review.pdf

FINRA's deficiency determination and the Commission's affirmation of FINRA's deficiency determination would have the collateral consequence of preventing GVSI from ever conducting future corporate actions.

The Company’s many shareholders have essentially all lost their investment in the Company.
👍️0
Lime Time Lime Time 2 days ago
I'm seeing a lot of blue on the chart, which means buys on the ask. This will continue through next year. Sharp has a plan here or else he would have abandoned it and this is fully pink current. Far from being abandoned, even though some people have lied about it in the past. This is super clean.
🤡 1 🤥 1
r-avilo r-avilo 2 days ago
Pump pump pump,, little No glow
U one sick Girl Scout
👍️0
Lime Time Lime Time 2 days ago
Facts will come here in 2025. And I don't agree with you either, but we can agree to disagree. You have zero money. I have a lot of money. Always looking for the best play, that's why I loaded this heavily at .0019
👍️ 1 🙄 1 🚀 1 🤡 1
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 2 days ago
George keeping it Pink Current for a good reason
But not SEC registered and reporting as he had to for any SEC corporate action approval such as a merger which is what's needed here and Sharp already said he can't get GVSI audited and registered with the SEC.

Our attorneys & auditors have concluded that it is impossible to audit $GVSI due to past corporate mismanagement of records/actions. Therefore, we are abandoning efforts to become an SEC reporter & are preparing an application for OTCIQ access to be filed with OTCM within 60 days— American Blockchain Corporation (@OTCpinkGVSI) June 30, 2022

I had hope to start $GVSI as an SEC reporter, but after over a year of having two accounting firms work on it & discussions with the SEC, I begrudgingly agreed that I would not be able to get the books audited. https://t.co/tOP9FImksT— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) February 7, 2023

Crude deflection attempt.
👍️0
Lime Time Lime Time 2 days ago
Seeing the huge amount of money insiders made, they will be eyeing this stock up for a TSNP2.0. Huge amount of money to be made here when the time is right. George keeping it Pink Current for a good reason 🚀
🤡 1 🤥 1
I-Glow I-Glow 2 days ago
Oh no, the HUMBL scam is down to $0.0002.

And the warrants from HUMBL were soooo worthless.

IG
🤡 1 🧌 1
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 2 days ago
GVSI up 12.5%
More pumper bullshit.
👍️0
Tamboo Tamboo 2 days ago
GVSI up 12.5%
👍️0
I-Glow I-Glow 2 days ago
The only plans Sharp has is to keep dangling the carrot in front of investors.

"Sharp has plans here for 2025

GVSI alternate reporting compliant.

Whoever bought at .0019 is in a very good spot."

I have heard the same nonsense for years.

" Lime Time
Thursday, 04/20/2023 3:19:16 PM

Price is cheap. Sharp only OTC CEO ever known to man to run tickers to multiple dollars"

That is a complete fabrication - Medbox ran from $0.06 to $202 - all of the APS pumps. The last APS pump ran from $0.10 to $22.

From 2012 to 2014 the weed tickers ran to dollars. Obviously don't know what you talking about.

You are just pumping.

IG
👍️ 1 💯 1
Lime Time Lime Time 3 days ago
Sharp has plans here for 2025

GVSI alternate reporting compliant.

Whoever bought at .0019 is in a very good spot.
🇧🇦 1 🇧🇴 1 🇴🇲 1 🚀 2 🤡 1 🤥 1
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 3 days ago
Let's review a few uncomfortable CURRENT facts about GVSI:

• FINRA is "concerned" (I'm sure it's more than concerned) about the six years of missing audited financials and previous management's "acts."
• SEC/FINRA approval of name/ticker change that failed miserably, indicating that something went terribly wrong with the SEC/FINRA.
• SEC restriction on corporate actions such as a name/ticker name change and a reverse merger.
• 5 years of SEC/FINRA audited financials delinquent (from 2008 - 2013) *before* filing its Form 15.
• Non SEC registered.
• Non SEC reporting.
• Non audited financials.
• Sharp himself stating he couldn't get GVSI audited.
• In continued violation of FINRA Rule 6490.
• FINRA Notice of Deficiency.
• SEC Rule15c2-11 warning.
• Price that has plummeted.
• Accumulation that has plummeted.
• Bloated share structure of 7 billion AS and 2.1 billion OS.
• No reverse merger anticipated and not even a candidate search has begun according to GVSI financials.
• A supposed recent "merger" failure (that wasn't really a merger since proper paper work was never filed with the SEC) that catastrophically failed.
• Sharp dumped his 20 million GVSI common shares right beforw the failed "merger" and then lied by saying he was never issued his common shares.
• A CEO who has repetitively lied to and gaslighted investors, hiding important information from and stringing investors along (with fraudulent pumps) while he enriches himself (and insiders), is abrasive and uncaring about shareholders, often blaming them for his mistakes and occupied with other priorities like racing his ponies and attacking other stocks.

What a glowing review from Sharp...full of regret...and in retrospect he would never had done it. Seems like even Sharp thinks GVSI is a disaster.

I had regretted taking over $GVSI. Had I known what I was in for, I would have never had done it. But even my most fervent doubters know that I don't just give up once I start. I spent a lot of my own money to get this done in order to justify the confidence of my supporters. https://t.co/RHSjRXdDyo— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) February 7, 2023

I had hope to start $GVSI as an SEC reporter, but after over a year of having two accounting firms work on it & discussions with the SEC, I begrudgingly agreed that I would not be able to get the books audited. https://t.co/tOP9FImksT— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) February 7, 2023

Our attorneys & auditors have concluded that it is impossible to audit $GVSI due to past corporate mismanagement of records/actions. Therefore, we are abandoning efforts to become an SEC reporter & are preparing an application for OTCIQ access to be filed with OTCM within 60 days— American Blockchain Corporation (@OTCpinkGVSI) June 30, 2022

Sharp already said he can't produce what FINRA/SEC is specifically asking for in its Notice of Deficiency - AUDITED financials from 2008 - 2013 to conform with FINRA Rule 6490 which GVSI has and is continuing to violate. And Sharp already said he ABANDONED getting GVSI audited which means he won't be able to get GVSI SEC registered and reporting for a reverse merger.

What Sharp says he plans to do in 2025 about another merger attempt and filing GVSI's Form 10 should be believed about as much as Sharp's tweets saying he would get GVSI SEC registered and reporting three years ago, that he would refile GVSI's SEC Form 10 registration statement three Decembers ago and never did, saying that WNFT had reached the "promised land" and would have a "business plan over the next several weeks which will include an acquisition(s)" that never materialized in September two years ago when Sharp said it would happen and saying he would not reverse split GRDO then did just that.

$WNFT reaches the promised land, after shedding its $GOFF persona.

The company will address its shareholders next week in a press release. Please do not rely on other peoples' assumptions. Only rely on the filings and statements made by the company.

Have a good long weekend.— Worldwide NFT (@WorldwideNFTInc) June 29, 2022

The mandatory settlement conference did not yield an agreement with Calasse, however we anticipate that $WNFT will proceed with a business plan over the next several weeks which will include an acquisition(s). This statement should not be construed as a guarantee for success.— Worldwide NFT (@WorldwideNFTInc) August 19, 2022

There will be no reverse split, dilution or toxic debt taken on so long as I am involved with $GRDO. Update filings will reflect a zero balance sheet. PRs are forthcoming.— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) October 5, 2018

I regret giving the impression that $GRDO would not r/s, but unfortunately, it was the only way to get things done. Why would the shareholders want as much as 800 million shares in dead certificates? The only purpose that serves is to make it more expensive to raise money.— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) August 9, 2019

I will never be involved with a company that wipes out the shareholders through a reverse split. $FORW $TSNP— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) November 2, 2020

Mind you that Sharp again said in the above tweet that he would NEVER reverse split any stock he's involved with AFTER he did just that for GRDO - is that being honest?

GVSI continues to slowly bleed out while people who listen to the pumpers will continue to buy and keep getting deeper and deeper in the hole with their investment because of dilusional and nefarious pumpers keep telling them that GVSI is "going to dollars" and that "a merger is coming," all the while the SEC/FINRA is MIA with it's corporate actions approvals. Sharp kept pumping the name, ticker symbol change and merger for months - so what happened? NOTHING! Again it was all BULLSHIT with no corporate actions approval and the merger failed miserably.

How many times will the remaining Sharp cult need to get swindled by Sharp? It's been happening over and over and over again. At this point you have to question their intelligence.

Sharp already said he can't produce what FINRA/SEC is specifically asking for in its Notice of Deficiency - AUDITED financials from 2008 - 2013 to conform with FINRA Rule 6490 which GVSI has and is continuing to violate. And Sharp already said he ABANDONED getting GVSI audited and SEC registered and reporting.

https://www.sec.gov/litigation/apdocuments/3-19407-event-2020-05-12-brief-in-support-of-application-for-review.pdf

FINRA's deficiency determination and the Commission's affirmation of FINRA's deficiency determination would have the collateral consequence of preventing GVSI from ever conducting future corporate actions.

The Company’s many shareholders have essentially all lost their investment in the Company.
👍️0
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 3 days ago
You know how George Sharp is constantly railing against Jason Black, Jason Tucker, Mark Miller and CNNA? Simply do a search in George Sharp's X feed for Jason Black, Jason Tucker, Mark Miller and CNNA. There is a very, very long list of posts

Just one example of countless Sharp posts about CNNA, Jason Black, Jason Tucker and Mark Miller:

$CNNA reported a new convertible note from Capitol Capital for which convicted felon, Mark Miller, and his partner, Jason Black, are being investigated for hijacking the company. It held old notes that Miller et al. used to give themselves stock.https://t.co/72VV3sgJqs https://t.co/pfvMA21Xwo pic.twitter.com/9LvikwgCIt— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) June 14, 2023

I found the last paragraph of this article extremely interesting:

https://www.securitieslawyer101.com/2023/shell-hijacker-mark-miller-sentenced-to-one-year-in-prison/

Public records show that Capitol Capital Corporation has also been involved as a noteholder in at least three other public issuers that used Jason Black as the CEO, MedX Holdings Inc (MEDH), Cann American Corp (CNNA), and Seven Arts Entertainment, Inc (SAPX). 

CNNA recently appointed Jason Tucker, former CEO of LEAS, as its new CEO, giving it yet another connection to past Miller frauds.  And according to SAPX OTC disclosures, on December 27, 2022, all the debt notes previously put in the name of Capitol Capital Corporation were transferred to an entity named Via Capital, represented in the SAPX filings by Jesus Cipriano, keeping the notes active despite Mark Miller’s various legal issues. Via Capital immediately started converting the debt into large chunks of free trading stock, including 150,000,000 shares on December 28, 2022, 150,000,000 shares on February 21, 2023, and 180,000,000 shares on March 6, 2023. SAPX has also begun to issue new debt notes to Via Capital.

Previously, in December 2020, Gary Kouletas (PAG Group LLC), who was another insider in LEAS and MEDH, was arrested and charged in a separate pump & dump scheme involving Global Resource Energy Inc (GBEN). That Indictment references an unnamed “Cooperating Witness” who is described as “a stock promoter and CEO of several public companies under federal investigation for securities fraud-related offenses but not yet charged."

Now do a search for GBEN on Sharp's X account.

Just one of Sharp's several posts and the dates of Sharp's posts are from just a few months before Gary Kouletas arrest:

Suspended $GBEN is another former scam by cowardly fraud artist, Jim Can aka Cem Can, of $BLUF fame who is currently cowering in Turkey and wanted in 3 countries.— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) August 18, 2020

There's a reason for Sharp to have a grudge against GBEN. GBEN insider Jim Can had sued Sharp in the past:

Judge orders that $7.8 million judgment fraudulently obtained by Jim Can against me be overturned. $BLUF $MULI $GBEN— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) September 11, 2014

Is Sharp the cooperating witness with "securities fraud-related offenses" Coincidence? I think not.

This house of cards will come tumbling down (again) soon enough.
👍️0
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 3 days ago
Why does what Sharp did at HUMBL sound so familiar here? Lying to and gaslighting investors, hiding important information from investors and stringing investors along with fraudulent pumps while he enriches himself (and insiders), just like he's doing here with GVSI. Remember Sharp dumped his 20 million GVSI common shares right before the failed merger and then lied by saying he was never issued the shares.

Hindenburg Research has a long history of exposing scams and scammers like Sharp using forensic financial research. It has been written up by the Economist and referenced by the SEC in their investigations.

https://hindenburgresearch.com/about-us/

https://hindenburgresearch.com/humbl/

Hindenburg Research

HUMBL: Illusions of Grandeur, Collapsing International Deals, And Lurking Dilution

Published on May 20, 2021

• HUMBL is an early-stage fintech company with a $5.6 billion fully diluted market cap that recently reverse-merged onto the OTC. It ended its most recent quarter with ~$156,000 in revenue and currently has ~$4.5 million in cash. It had zero revenue in 2020.

• The company aspires to be an Amazon or Alipay, imagining that it will facilitate payments to billions of people around the world by transcending borders and lowering costs using blockchain technology.  

• Our research shows the company has failed to deliver on even the most basic aspects of its business plan, including features it claimed were completed months ago. Six months after going public, its users can’t send or receive money on its “payment” app, let alone engage in low cost, cross-border crypto currency transactions.

• The vast majority of merchants appearing on HUMBL’s “Pay” platform don’t accept HUMBL Pay. Some didn’t even know they were on the platform and had never heard of HUMBL when we spoke with them.

• Despite HUMBL’s claims of disrupting the payments business, HUMBL uses another payment processor, Stripe, to support the few merchants on its platform who are accepting payments.

• We found that international deals announced over the last year – a key source of the company’s perceived legitimacy – never got off the ground or have quietly collapsed behind the scenes.

• For example, a partnership announced more than a year ago to bring HUMBL to Africa never got beyond the press release stage, according to an executive at its planned partner.

• A landmark $15.6 million deal to sell rights to HUMBL’s business in 15 countries in Oceania, including Australia and Tonga, collapsed. We found the partner for this major planned deal has no presence beyond a local entity filing, and operates out of a small residence.

• A deal to expand into India has been sidelined by COVID and regulations that prevent merchants from charging for digital payments, per HUMBL’s planned deal partner.

• An investment by a Singaporean company into HUMBL’s Asia business hasn’t resulted in any specific initiatives 6 months later, though directors at the company received shares valued at ~$14 million.

• HUMBL’s expansion into Mexico, where HUMBL’s CEO boasted of recruiting 300 merchants in 3 days, has only 2 merchants listed as accepting payments. Even those two told us they aren’t currently accepting HUMBL payments; the business in Mexico is on hold pending changes to the platform, according to a local merchant working with the company.

• Meanwhile, amidst these grand plans, HUMBL quietly issued preferred shares convertible into 5.54 billion common shares to insiders and family members, setting retail investors up for total annihilation when those shares unlock and become available for sale.

• The strategy was orchestrated in part by the company’s financial advisor and a major warrant holder, George Sharp, who gaslit investors following revelations of the issuance, later saying details on corporate action were withheld so as not to create “mass panic” and to save investors from themselves.

• Over the weekend, Sharp, who had made his account private days before, announced on Twitter that he was parting ways with HUMBL, leaving public shareholders little to show for these massive giveaways to insiders except ever-more grandiose plans that appear stuck at the vapor stage.

• HUMBL’s CEO, Brian Foote, responded to investor backlash by tweeting that he won’t convert his personal holdings of preferred shares until at least the end of 2022. He did not, however, offer the same assurances regarding 3 billion other shares, including those held by his family’s trust.

• In the past year, faith-based go-public transactions such as HUMBL have brought the investing public an endless parade of risky companies that boast of all the things they will someday revolutionize. Meanwhile, while investors are strung along by hope, and lulled into looking the other way, they face a literal reality of billions of shares becoming available to convert and sell.

Initial Disclosure: After extensive research, we have taken a short position in shares of HUMBL, Inc. This report represents our opinion, and we encourage every reader to do their own due diligence. Please see our full disclaimer at the bottom of the report.

Introduction

HUMBL says its mission is to help companies and businesses “rapidly migrate to the digital economy” through the blockchain.

In its go-public presentation, HUMBL CEO Brian Foote described his vision with a slide that compared HUMBL’s role in the development of the internet to that of Apple and Amazon.

The fledgling San Diego-based company already has 3 divisions, each with broad plans to revolutionize various digital economies:

• HUMBL Pay, which plans to rival Alipay and major payment processors, facilitating everything from payments to street merchants in Mexico to worker remittances in Tonga.

• HUMBL Marketplace, which plans to rival eCommerce giants by “allow(ing) consumers and merchants to connect more seamlessly in the digital economy.” It hosts several merchant stores that sell mostly handmade products like soap, pet beds, and jewelry and plans to offer sports and entertainment NFTs and digital tokens to track the authenticity of goods on its platform.

• HUMBL Financial, which aims to provide “simplified investing on the blockchain” and currently offers indices that create allocations for crypto portfolios.

Despite its ambitious plans, the company finished its recent March quarter with just ~$156,000 in revenue and a ~$1.4 million loss. [Pg. 22] It pays $3,250 per month to operate out of its WeWork office space and currently has ~$4.5 million in cash from recent sales of stock and warrants.

The company closed out 2020 with no revenue and a $713,000 net loss, according to its annual report.  

HUMBL went public after announcing a reverse merger deal in November, where it merged with a dormant flooring products business.

Shortly thereafter, the company’s market value peaked at about $50 billion on a fully diluted basis on the back of extreme blockchain enthusiasm among its OTC investor base.

After reviewing corporate filings and legal documents for HUMBL and various HUMBL-affiliated companies, and interviewing numerous former associates, business partners, and merchants, we believe that HUMBL is little more than a preliminary-stage startup propped up by techno-babble.

Currently, despite its penny stock status, HUMBL’s fully diluted market value stands at about $5.6 billion, making it one of the most overvalued illusions in the stock market today

Part I: HUMBL’s Opaque Transition To A Public Company

HUMBL announced a reverse merger with Tesoro Enterprises, Inc. on November 12th 2020, marking the beginning of its entrance onto the OTC Markets. The merger closed on December 3rd, 2020. [Pg. 2]

HUMBL Deal Is “Going to Bring Credibility Finally to the OTC”, Promoter Told HUMBL Investors

But HUMBL Shareholders Weren’t Told That Insiders Were To Be Issued Preferred Shares Convertible Into ~5.54 Billion Common Shares Until Over 4 Months Later

The HUMBL deal was shepherded by OTC investor George Sharp, who described himself during HUMBL’s debut webcast on December 9th as “an advocate for shareholder rights and honesty in the OTC.” [00:15] 

“I’m not easily impressed, but I was blown apart,” Sharp said about his introduction to HUMBL…This deal is going to bring credibility finally to the OTC.” [1:58, 2:45]

Right out of the gate, shareholders were left in the dark on a critical investment consideration—the number of actual fully diluted shares outstanding. This, of course, is key to understanding how much of the enterprise they actually would own and the company’s valuation.

The November press release announcing the deal was short on details, saying simply that HUMBL CEO Brian Foote had acquired “the control block of voting shares” and “a significant number of common shares.”

Rather Than Informing Its Shareholders That 5.54 Billion New Shares Would Be Created, HUMBL Issued 2 Press Releases Shortly After the Deal That Signaled Its Share Count Was Decreasing.

The Stock Soared ~91% On the “Good News”

The day after the merger announcement, the company (still named Tesoro at the time) issued a press release stating that CEO Brian Foote had retired 551 million shares without consideration, lowering the overall share count.  

This “good news” of the CEO voluntarily tightening the share count sent HUMBL shares spiking 91% from the prior day. 

Four days later, on November 17, the company announced that Foote had locked up an additional 318 million shares, yet again signaling that the CEO was actively removing shares from the overall share count.

The press release tallied the total reduction in shares, reiterating the notion that Foote was focused on constraining the share count:

“Upon completion of the conversion, Tesoro’s issued and outstanding number of common shares will have been reduced by over 860 million shares since Mr. Foote became President of Tesoro.” 

It also included this reassuring statement, highlighting the expectation that there would be no new shares outstanding in 2021, an assertion that would later prove highly misleading:  

“The company does not anticipate that the number of common shares outstanding will increase during the remainder of 2020 and throughout 2021.” 

HUMBL’s Fully Diluted Market Valuation Hit $50 Billion At One Point, (Greater Than The Market Cap of Twitter) Without Its Regular Shareholders Even Realizing

On February 25th, The Company Announced A Reverse Split. Rather Than Taking the Opportunity to Inform Investors About Its Billions of Shares of Latent Dilution, Promoter George Sharp Told Investors “If You’re Worried About Dilution, Don’t Be”.

By early February, HUMBL’s stock soared to highs of $7.72 as the broader market rallied along with everything crypto. Its investors still had no idea that its fully diluted market cap had just reached ~$50 billion, putting it on par with Twitter.

On February 25, HUMBL announced that FINRA had processed its planned corporate actions including its share issuances and a 4-to-1 reverse stock split.

In the press release, HUMBL COO Jeffrey Hinshaw said one of the reasons for the move was to “pinpoint the true value of the common shares”. Yet at the time, HUMBL did not provide specifics on its massively dilutive preferred shares, making such precision impossible.

The next day, promoter George Sharp fielded questions from concerned shareholders about the corporate action, assuaging those who were concerned about potential dilution: “If you’re worried about dilution, don’t be.” [9:30]

On the same call, Sharp told investors he was simply doing them a favor by being opaque about the company’s corporate actions, such as the surprise reverse stock split announced at the same time:

“I made the conscious decision that we were not going to tell you and I’ll tell you why: it would have created mass panic…I don’t want to sound like I’m your mother, but we saved a lot of you from yourselves here.”  [9:55]

HUMBL Filed its Annual Report On April 14th, Disclosing For The First Time (And 4 Months After the Deal Closed) That New Preferred Shares Issued to Insiders Can Convert Into Over 5.5 Billion Shares, Beginning December 2021

It wasn’t until April 14 that shareholders learned the details of the reverse-merger.

The company’s delayed annual report revealed that HUMBL outstanding common stock, on a fully diluted basis, had actually increased by more than 600%, from 974 million shares to 6.5 billion shares.

Specifically, HUMBL’s 552,522 Series B Preferred Shares are eligible for conversion at a rate of 10,000-to-1, into 5,525,220,000 shares of common stock, as soon as December 3, 2021. [Pg. 31] That number then increased in the latest quarterly filing by another ~18 million shares to ~5.54 billion total. [Pg. 3]

HUMBL’s long silence around the dilution stood in sharp contrast to the 2 announcements it made in November regarding the reduction of common stock. It also represented a total about-face from its statement that it did not anticipate an increase in common shares outstanding in 2021.

Facing Criticism From Investors on the Dilution Surprise, HUMBL’s CEO Foote Tweeted That He Wouldn’t Sell Any Of His Personal Shares Until The End of 2022 

No Assurances Were Made Regarding the Other 3 Billion Shares, Including Those Held By Foote’s Family And Deal Partners

Following the disclosure, HUMBL’s stock price began to drop as some investors wised up to the latent dilution.

In an effort to quell the panic, HUMBL’s CEO responded by tweeting that he would not sell his “personal shares” until the end of 2022.

Foote appeared to be referencing the preferred shares issued to his entity, 30 Block LLC, which holds 2,497,070,000 common shares on an as-converted basis (45% of the total). [Pg. 4] 

Foote said nothing, however, about the 335,610,000 shares, on an as-converted basis, held by The Stephen L. and Sandra M. Foote Revocable Trust. [Pg. 5]   Based on background checks, Stephen and Sandra appear to be Brian’s parents. The HUMBL holdings in their trust are worth $292 million based on current prices. 

There are also no assurances about the other 3,028,130,000 shares that unlock on December 3, either, which represent ~$2.6 billion worth of stock at current market prices. [Pg. 9]

That latent dilution represents a ticking time bomb for a stock that currently trades about $15 million in volume per day.  

Promoter Further Gaslights HUMBL Investors By Making Light Of Extraordinary Dilution Risk, Telling Them They Ought To Sell Their Shares If They Really Think Insiders Are Going To Dump Them At Year End

Promoter George Sharp also responded on Twitter to the backlash following HUMBL’s disclosure, telling shareholders to sell if they think 6 billion new shares will suddenly appear. 

This strikes us as classic gaslighting. To respond to Sharp, about 3 billion shares will suddenly become available for sale in December.

Sharp also chastised investors for not recognizing that insiders had earned these shares. The following individuals now have shares, on an as-converted basis, with the following current valuations: 

Brian Foote, CEO of HMBL: $2.2 billion [Pg. 4]

Mark Grado, consultant for HUMBL and Block 30: $488 million [Pg. 5]

Jeffrey Hinshaw, Co-founder and COO of HUMBL: $353 million [Pg.5]

Michele Rivera, Global Partners and Team Lead at HUMBL: $250 million [Pg. 5]

Sharp has done extraordinarily well too. He parlayed his $200,000 investment in HUMBL into an investment valued at around $394 million as of March 9, according to his company Forwardly Inc.’s annual report. [Pg. 20 -21]

Now we examine whether HUMBL’s achievements to date have warranted anything resembling its current valuation. 

Part II:  HUMBL’s Hollow “Launch”

On April 16, the HUMBL Pay app launched in the US, Canada, Mexico, Australia, Singapore, and New Zealand.   

Investors had been hotly anticipating this moment – and perhaps some clarification – since HUMBL’s CEO Brian Foote first described the business with buzzword-laden detail in his earlier December update.

Foote has offered the following descriptions of the business:

• “a mobile app in a limited sandbox” 

• “an elastic layer of Web Three that moves seamlessly across borders” 

• “a silo-buster” that “curates channels” 

• a “Synthetic continuum” that offers “an immersible experience” on a consumer’s “happy path”

Vertical #1—HUMBL Pay App: In A December Investor Call, CEO Foote Explained The Features Built “Right Now”, Which Included Sending And Receiving Money

Halfway through the December call, Foote cut to a slide summarizing all the app’s working features: “O.K. I’m a shareholder. What do you guys have built right now?”   [Dec. 9 Call – 25:22] 

Foote explained: 

“Right now, in the barn, we have – send money, request money, receive money, exchange money, stable coins.” 

Four Months Later, Those Basic Features Weren’t Functioning At Launch

On April 16, two months behind schedule, HUMBL launched HUMBL Pay, described as “a new way to connect, share and pay around the world.”

Yet we found through our testing that there is no way to send, receive, or request money between users or to even know which users are on the platform.

This becomes clear when attempting to search for the company’s most popular user. Among those helping generate excitement about the HUMBL launch was Nick Carter, former lead member of the 1990s hit boy band The Backstreet Boys. 

Carter told his nearly 675,000 Twitter followers that he’d signed up for HUMBL Pay and displayed a screen shot of his username. 

But when we tested the system, we found it didn’t recognize individual users – not even Nick Carter.

Futhermore, there is no indication that users can do anything with stablecoins. All told, the consumer features that Foote claimed to be functional 4 months earlier don’t seem to work.

Despite The Shortcomings Of The HUMBL Pay App, It Immediately Received Rave Reviews On The Apple Store, Suggesting Attempts To Alter Perceptions About The Launch

The Number of New Reviews Has Tapered Off to Nearly Zero, Indicating a Sharp Drop-Off In Interest

One would expect that buzz around a popular ‘paradigm shifting’ app would lead to an increase in users, popularity, and reviews over time.

Given the limitations of HUMBL Pay, the company seems to have experienced the opposite. The app had a few days of rave reviews followed by a complete collapse, trickling off to zero new reviews less than 2 weeks after launch.

Additionally, despite the lack of functioning features, a flood of 5-star reviews posted to the Apple Store didn’t line up with reality, suggesting a concerted effort to alter perceptions around the app and its launch.

A typical review praised the app’s ability to “send money back and forth between family and friends” – something HUMBL Pay clearly couldn’t do.  

Another reviewer claimed to be deleting PayPal, Venmo, and Etsy as HUMBL does everything those apps do – another blatantly untrue statement.

We Sampled Merchants Listed On the App And Found That Only About 5% Were Set Up To Take Payments 

Several We Spoke With Didn’t Know How They Got Listed On The Platform

HUMBL also launched features for merchants. The press release announcing the launch of HUMBL Pay explained that users would be able to “discover merchants; as well as pay, tip, rate and review those same merchants in contactless transactions.”  

But Step 1, discovering merchants, was a problem. Almost all of the merchants appeared to be in San Diego or NYC. And, searches for a region, say NYC, pulled up inaccurate listings, including merchants in Kansas City and Detroit.

Even after successfully locating a merchant on the system, we found there’s a good chance they don’t accept HUMBL. We reviewed 200 merchant listings on HUMBL Pay and found just 9 merchants out of those 200 who were identified as taking payments via the app. 

Partial List of merchants downloaded from the HUMBL Pay app 

We called numerous HUMBL Pay-listed merchants to ask if they take HUMBL payments. Here’s what a sample told us: 

• Doughnut Plant, NYC: “Never heard of it.” “We use Level Up.”

• Barleymash, San Diego: “I doubt we take it because I’ve never heard of it.”

• Los Tacos No. 1, NYC: “We take Apple Pay and Samsung Pay – that’s it.”

• A salesman at Hudson Toyota in Jersey City said he’d need to run it by his manager and called back to explain: “We looked into it and they allow customers to pay with crypto currencies so we wouldn’t be able to accept it.”

So how did all these businesses end up on the platform? 

On the day of the launch, Foote had posted on Twitter, encouraging people to “populate” the app with “ratings, reviews, installs.” 

As a result, HUMBL Pay may have been populated with hundreds or even thousands of merchants who didn’t enter their own information into the app and don’t even know what it is.

In HUMBL’s Q1 filing, the company stated that it had 13,000 “merchant accounts” on its platform. It appears the company is including in that metric vast numbers of merchants who have never heard of the company let alone use its payment services. [P. 39]

When we reached out to one of the 9 merchants actually accepting HUMBL payments — Derrick’s Personalized Exercise in the NYC area — Derrick told us that he already accepted PayPal and credit cards. He said he added HUMBL Pay because he is a HUMBL shareholder: “I thought I’d go all in.”

All told, organic actual demand seems rather thin.

Vertical #2—HUMBL Marketplace: There are Only 23 Merchants On HUMBL’s Shopify-Like Service

One We Spoke With Gave A Glowing Review, But When We Asked If He Was Compensated To Promote HUMBL He Declined To Answer, Citing An NDA With the Company

HUMBL has a second vertical that it hopes will connect consumers and merchants that it calls HUMBL Marketplace, where merchants can operate an online business and accept online payments for products such as soap, pet beds, and zodiac sign-inspired coffees.

HUMBL Marketplace looks like a preliminary attempt to compete with Shopify and other ecommerce solutions. HUMBL Marketplace has a total of 23 merchants on its platform as of this writing. (By comparison, Shopify reported 1,749,000 merchants using its software at the end of 2020. [Pg. 11]) 

We called several merchants and successfully connected with Jake Hubenak at The Meat Project. He told us that HUMBL had approached him about putting his barbeque seasoning business on the platform because someone at HUMBL used and liked the products.  

Hubenak told us “not a day goes by” when he doesn’t get an order through HUMBL. 

It was a glowing endorsement. But, when we asked if he got paid to promote HUMBL, he said he couldn’t talk about that because of a confidentiality agreement. 

HUMBL does not disclose whether it pays its merchants to endorse the platform, and a person might reasonably assume that a merchant would not need to be paid to feature his or her products on a selling platform.  

Note that FTC rule § 255.5 requires disclosure of compensation for testimonials, yet we saw no disclosure of any endorsement deal.

Despite Claims Of Disrupting The Payments World, HUMBL’s Marketplace Offering Currently Uses Stripe To Process Merchant Payments

We confirmed that the few merchants in the U.S. described as accepting payments – either through HUMBL Pay or HUMBL Marketplace – could actually receive payments.

But the acceptance of such payments doesn’t look to be part of a major disruption to the global payments space. HUMBL discloses on its website that it is not a licensed money transmitter:

“HUMBL, Inc. is not a money services business and does not hold itself out to be such. All money transmission services are being provided exclusively by third parties…HUMBL does not offer money transmission services.”

Instead, a review of HUMBL’s merchant contract shows that transactions are actually being done behind-the-scenes by Stripe, one of the largest online payment processors in the world, who would reasonably be assumed to be a competitor of HUMBL. 

Vertical #3—HUMBL Financial: Complex Setup and Reliance on Third-Party Exchanges

Beyond HUMBL Pay and HUMBL Marketplace, the final piece of the HUMBL enterprise is HUMBL Financial:

“HUMBL Financial™ created its BLOCK ETX products to simplify digital asset investing for customers and institutions seeking exposure to a new, 24/7 digital asset class.”

The vertical generated $2,156 in revenue as of last quarter. (Numbers not in thousands) [Pg. 38]

While the company aims to simplify investing in digital assets, we created an account and experienced the opposite. To access HUMBL’s crypto index products, users need to go through a convoluted process.

First, users need to purchase a license key. Then, HUMBL requires users to grant the app access to the user’s account already set up at an established exchange like Binance, Coinbase Pro, or Bittrex.

From there, users can invest in “index products” through the pre-existing exchange architecture. Index products are baskets of cryptocurrencies that are periodically rebalanced. HUMBL charges $5/month for the service.

Users on social media complained about the process, finding it confusing:

It seems clear that the features are preliminary and that HUMBL lacks the proprietary development-base to truly offer a seamless, integrated product.

HUMBL Claims That The App Uses 20,000 Lines Of Proprietary Code To Create Its Trading Strategies

Yet The “Strategies” Appear To Involve Simple Crypto Positions, Then Periodically Rebalancing Them

HUMBL claims it uses “over 20,000” lines of proprietary code to create crypto trading strategies for its users.

Yet many of the trading strategies offered by HUMBL appear quite simple. For instance, the Block 3 product had just purchased a portfolio of 50% BTC, 25% ETH, and 25% of Litecoin when we signed up for it. Later, the allocation shifted to 50% BTC, 25% Litecoin, and 25% DigiByte.

(Source: HUMBL Financial website)

We don’t think a simple product is a bad thing, but it is unclear how thousands of lines of code factor into optimizing such a portfolio and what would justify the $5/month fee.

PART III: HUMBL’s Vanishing International Deals

A key part of HUMBL’s perceived credibility is its claim to be making meaningful inroads as a payments business operating in markets around the world. According to CEO Brian Foote:   

“The 375 million people using Apple Pay are not the total addressable market. HUMBL was built to serve the other 7 billion global consumers for whom the cost, use, and movement of money is on a very different grid.” 

HUMBL Says It Got 300 Mexican Merchants Sign Up In The First 3 Days Of Its Launch

Months Later We Found Zero Activity

On the company’s first call with investors back in December, Foote explained that one reason HUMBL is based in San Diego is its proximity to Mexico: 

“Part of the reason our business was born here is the majority of merchants in Mexico are in cash still, like so physical paper bills and coins.” 

At the time, Foote said the company was surprised by the strong demand for the app among merchants in Mexico:

“I challenged our Mexico sales team. I said ‘OK. Go sign up 100 merchants in a week.’ They came back with 300 merchants in three days.” [Dec. 9, 2020 call, 26:00]

Five months later, however, we couldn’t find anywhere near 300 merchants on HUMBL Pay in Mexico.

Using the map feature, we located 19 merchants in total and identified 2 as accepting HUMBL payments. We reached out to ask about the app:

• Villa Café in Baja: We were told that they had the HUMBL system but had not yet been trained on it.

• Nicky’s Fish and Chips in Iztapalapa, Mexico City: An employee told us they had never heard of HUMBL but that the restaurant accepted credit cards.

“Borderless Day In Baja” Promotional Video Vanishes From HUMBL Website; Mexico Merchant Says Everything Is On Hold

On December 1st, HUMBL announced a successful pilot with merchants in Mexico. The release quoted a tour operator named Fernando Cuevas:

“HUMBL® instantly makes life easier for me, my business and my customers here in Mexico. Being able to pay people for goods and services digitally with HUMBL®, enables my customers to spend more time enjoying their trips, and less time seeking out ATM’s and cash payment options everywhere we go.”

On December 9th, the company posted a video to its website called “A Borderless Day In Baja” which featured a group of visitors touring Mexico with Cuevas, using HUMBL to pay merchants and transfer money to each other.

The video included a stop for a photo op with a Tijuana donkey named Monica painted with zebra stripes.[1] The owner of the zebra donkey accepted HUMBL, per the video:

A disclaimer at the end of the video stated that “all money transmission services are being provided exclusively by third parties” and that the video contains “live and simulated transactions”.

Those simulations still haven’t turned into reality, it seems, despite Mexico being included as one of the markets in which HUMBL Pay was said to have “launched” on April 16.

We contacted Cuevas via WhatsApp in late April. In addition to being the tour guide in HUMBL’s video, Cuevas was also named HUMBL’s “lead affiliate sales representative in the region”. He indicated that the app isn’t ready, writing that until modifications are made to the app, no merchants in Mexico will be able to use it. He then quickly deleted the messages and told us he couldn’t speak on the matter further.

An employee at the Hilo Negro winery and wine bar that featured in the closing segments of the promo video told us they accepted a variety of international and Mexican payment methods but not HUMBL:

“We only use Visa, Mastercard, Carnet (a Mexican transactions service) and also Samsung Pay…No, no we don´t use that one (HUMBL).”  

The “Borderless Day In Baja” video has been removed from HUMBL’s website, though it can still be found on Vimeo.

All told, we found no sign that HUMBL is revolutionizing business in Mexico. We think the company should clarify how many active merchants in Mexico have used the app and the total transaction volume to date.

HUMBL CEO Called Deal With India-Based Payment Processor DIPL A Chance “To Work For 1.4 Billion India Customers” 

More Than a Year Later, A Deal Partner Says The HUMBL Partnership Was Quashed By COVID And That Economics May Be Impossible

On March 20, 2020, HUMBL announced a deal with Digital India Payments (DIPL), a company that processes payments for 30,000 merchants in India, Nepal, Bangladesh, Maldives, Myanmar and Sri Lanka. 

A successful entry into the India market would have been a massive stepping stone toward HUMBL´s stated ambition of serving “7 billion global consumers”.

Foote was quoted as saying:  

“We look forward to putting HUMBL technologies to work for 1.4 billion India customers alongside (DIPL).” 

The ambitious plan involved providing DIPL’s merchants with software to enable banking and other services for its customers: 

“HUMBL Hubs will be offering walk-in services to customers, such as cash pickup, foreign exchange, fair lending, bill payments, pre-paid cards, store credits, travel bookings, internet and cell phone minutes from local merchant (“agent”) locations” 

We spoke with Nayan Raut, the managing director of Kloden Technologies, who was the consultant for  DIPL in negotiations with HUMBL and was listed as the contact in the press release announcing the deal. He told us that the partnership never went ahead, primarily because DIPL´s agent network largely shut down due to the pandemic.

He noted there were longer term issues, explaining that government regulations in India do not allow a payment platform to charge merchants or consumers any percentage, hampering HUMBL’s planned business model.

“As a consumer, however much I pay the merchant, the same amount goes into his bank account. In terms of digital payments there is 0% MDR (Merchant Discount Rate). That is so (the government) can push digitalization.” 

Describing DIPL as a start-up, Raut said he believed DIPL may collapse, along with the deal, as a result of India´s COVID crisis.

“I´m a little worried about DIPL. If they don´t have business for a year or so it will be very difficult for them to survive. I don´t know if they will survive.”

In short, it appears that beyond the press release, HUMBL’s India deal didn’t happen, probably won’t happen, and if it somehow did happen, wouldn’t make HUMBL any money due to regulatory hurdles.

HUMBL Deal With Nigeria’s One Kiosk Was Billed As “A Powerful Economic Driver” For Small Businesses and Communities 

More Than A Year Later, An Executive Says The Deal Never Got Off-The-Ground

On April 3, 2020, HUMBL announced a deal with Laos, Nigeria-based One Kiosk, which brings together merchants and online delivery services. 

At the time, One Kiosk’s CEO said his company had seen a boom in online ordering due to COVID-19 and he believed an ability to pair the company’s service with HUMBL’s financial services would be “a powerful economic driver.” 

Foote claimed HUMBL would use its platform to help local small businesses compete with larger companies:   

“HUMBL helps them get in the game against big box competitors.” 

But HUMBL didn’t help get anyone into the game. 

We reached out to Olatunbosun Babatunde, One Kiosk’s Chief Technology Officer, to check in on the project. He responded: 

“Thank you for reaching out. HUMBL actually reach out to us and they wanted One Kiosk to use their payment system on our platform as a way of entering the African market. But it never went beyond that.” 

HUMBL Announced a Landmark Deal To Sell Rights For 15 Oceania Countries for up to $15 Million To An Unnamed Partner

But The Deal Later Collapsed. We Found The Proposed Deal Partner Was An Entity With No Apparent Physical Or Online Presence, Based Out of a Personal Residence

In a letter to shareholders on January 22, 2021, Foote told investors that the company had secured “our first of multiple option payments on the distribution rights deal in [the] Oceania region” with “plans to enter the region with this group”.

According to a filing months later, an Australian entity called Tuigamala Group Pty Ltd (TGP) had paid $600,000 in December for an option to purchase the territory rights, with plans to invest an aggregate $15 million. [Pg. 33] The initial $600,000 payment also granted TGP 12.5 million warrants at $1 each, worth as much as $84 million at HUMBL’s peak.

Given HUMBL’s description of its plans, one might expect TPG to have had a significant foothold in the region, such as a network of merchants or consumers.

But we could find no online or physical evidence of TPG’s existence aside from its filings with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission.  The entity was created on September 16, 2019 and is owned by Julius Elisara Tuigamala, per the filings.  

The company’s principal place of business appears to be Tuigamala’s house in New Zealand at 37 Claremont Street, Kellyville Ridge NSW 2155. 

In the end, TGP never made any further payments to purchase the country rights and terminated negotiations, but kept the 12.5 million warrants. [Pg. 33] It is unclear whether TGP has exercised the warrants or sold any stock thus far.

HUMBL Announced a “Strategic Investment” From Singapore’s Cyberbeat, a “1.5 Billion Consumer and Merchant Opportunity”

Cyberbeat Is Less Than 2 Years Old And Has Only Two Listed Employees, Who Received Preferred Shares Valued At $14 Million

Less than two weeks after announcing the reverse merger transaction, HUMBL (then Tesoro) put out a press release detailing a “strategic investment” by Cyberbeat in Singapore.

A HUMBL executive was quoted in the release as saying the company viewed the deal as an “opportunity to establish this global relationship with a proven winner in the Asia Pacific region”, giving the company access to 1.5 billion consumers and merchants.

Local filings show “proven winner” Cyberbeat was incorporated in December 2019:

Dinh Thi Hong Hanh and Narayan Rajan Sashi are the only two employees for Cyberbeat listed on LinkedIn. They are also listed as the company’s only two directors in local filings.

The press release didn’t mention how much was actually invested by Cyberbeat, but HUMBL’s annual report showed that Cyberbeat and its two employees/directors received preferred shares convertible into 15,930,000 common shares, currently valued at ~$14 million. [Pg. 7]

Six months after the deal was announced, we have seen no details on specific initiatives resulting from the deal.

In Chile—HUMBL’s Partner is a 1-Year-Old Entity Whose CEO Told Us HUMBL Is Its First Investment of Its Kind.

So Far, The Investment of “Up To” $7.5 Million Has Only Consisted of a $1 Million Purchase of Discounted Stock

On March 16, HUMBL issued a press release announcing its latest international deal, an arrangement with a Chilean entity, the Aurea Group, which could invest “up to” $7.5 million in HUMBL, including $6.5 million for a 35% stake in HUMBL’s future Chilean subsidiary.

The potential business is considered so promising, HUMBL is even offering a limited-edition unisex T-shirt in its swag store to celebrate the yet-to-be-created Chilean business.

So far, all the group has invested in was a discounted block of HUMBL common stock. It paid $1 million for 437,500 shares or $2.29 per share, a 20% discount to the closing price of $2.86 on the date prior to the announcement.

It’s not surprising that investment firm Aurea Group was interested in buying discounted stock. It’s less clear how they’ll provide traction for HUMBL among merchants and consumers in the Chilean market aside from its network of personal relationships.

Aurea Group is new, having been incorporated in March 2020, a year before the HUMBL deal was announced, according to Chilean corporate records. Aurea CEO Juan Pablo Morales told us by phone:

“HUMBL is the first company we have formed an alliance with and we´re looking for more of these companies in order to connect Latin America with the technology from developed markets.”

HUMBL has yet to articulate an actionable strategy for partnering in Chile with a technology or payment company– or any company for that matter. In the press release, HUMBL’s description of where the deal is headed was typically vague:

“HUMBL and Aurea Group are already underway on HUMBL Latin America business development discussions in key verticals such as: banking, merchant and financial services, real estate, hospitality, tourism, sports, festivals, entertainment and ticketing services in the region.”

Aurea Group’s option to make a $6.5 million
👍️0
Lime Time Lime Time 3 days ago
Bidder moved up to .0027

Gonna be a great 2025 🚀
💩 1 🤡 1
I-Glow I-Glow 3 days ago
It is typical of Sharp to always blame others - "previous management".

It also proves that Sharp is very poor at researching the history of the 3 shells he hijacked. And that he is incompetent as a CEO of a public company.

Sharp controls 4 shells and all 4 have failed.

IG
🇬🇺 1 🇲🇵 1 👍️ 1 💩 1 🤡 1
I-Glow I-Glow 3 days ago
Here is a hint - when the SEC asks for financials from 20 years ago in their comments it means they are never going to deem it effective.

"Yep, my views certainly did change but have to say I'm still not positive that GS can't/won't deliver but I think it's certainly not looking good. Can he find the missing financials? Pretty sure now he needs them to be included with a new Form 10 filing."

You changed your view and hopefully learned more about OTC scams and won't believe any OTC company hype in the future.

IG
🇫🇴 1 🇷🇪 1 🇸🇹 1 💩 1 🤡 1
knrorrel knrorrel 4 days ago
i toooo - bye to 2025

but then .....
👍️0
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 4 days ago
Just checking in on GVSI. GLTA. EOM.
It's still a turd in the toilet. It always will be. GLTA. EOM.
👍️0
reaper247 reaper247 4 days ago
Just checking in on GVSI. GLTA. EOM.
👍️0

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock