Seafarer Exploration Corp (PK) (SFRX) Quote

SFRX's issue could be they're too brilliant........

Let's say they put the ShipShark (aka GalleonFinder) in the water at Juno, and let's "assume" it said there was a treasure ship within 50 miles.

I know the San Miguel Archangel shipwreck (Amelia Research and Recovery) is at Jupiter Inlet. Maybe it detected that treasure ship which is why they believe there is treasure at Juno. It would be within 50 miles.

If they can't tweak the ShipShark and dial back the range, then that could be the issue.

Just a thought.

Happy Thursday!

Ya I kinda don't get the not diving on targets either. But hey let's scan the ocean floor to Africa and hope everyone else pays for it. Still got my shares that I put to sleep just in case though.

Seems they are just too busy 'scanning' rather than digging a hole to recover already pin-pointed treasure. Now mid-September and who cares about something so trivial as recovering gold and silver.

$$$ Today is the Day $$$$

$$$$ $frx $$$$

I wonder why they haven’t provided an……

update on the device.

Maybe they’re working on a JV with SpaceX????

Hmmm

Side-scan sonar is useful "if" you're.......

on a wreck that sunk with a valuable cargo.

Any technology is ONLY useful on junk sites because after a few dives that should help you determine to move on.

The reason there is NO announcement of treasure should be obvious when one reads SFRX reports, as well as the reports of the ones that were there before SFRX.

There is no technology that can find what isn't there. IF the device works it's telling me what I already know, which is Juno is a junk site.

As far as the GalleonFinder Kyle says they're building, it's amazing that he can say such crap with a straight face. If they had technology that was even half that good, they wouldn't be selling discounted shares to raise money.

I happen to notice that Legacy Network hasn't posted a video since they did the promo tour hyping SFRX's rise to a 3-cent stock.

https://www.youtube.com/@venturelounge/videos

Kyle is right, there is no other company in the industry that compares to SFRX, but it isn't something to brag about.

If they have a 50 mile searcher, why did they need to spend $48,000 on the side scanner.

He also mentions the device they have that detects a treasure ship within 50 miles.

Big deal

I bet SpaceX has a device that detects a treasure ship from space

$$$ Today is the Day $$$$

$$$$ $frx $$$$

No, no, no. Here’s Kyle discussing the…….

GalleonFinder. At least that’s what I call it.

You can jump to the 6:30 mark and the 26:20 mark for the meat. Be prepared to be amazed.

He says Melbourne was a dud, yet they renewed the permits.

He also proclaims there is no other company in the industry that compares to SFRX. I agree with him on that.

He also mentions the device they have that detects a treasure ship within 50 miles.

You can’t make this crap up.

Enjoy! The film crews should have been on site since day one at Juno!

The GalleonFinder? Is that what they call their SSS-600K side scan sonar they leased/purchased a year ago May? The SSS-600K side scan sonar does a good job by itself. Doesn’t need any R&D $$.

Why?

IMO, because NOTHING is as it seems.

One can always rely on SFRX to fail, also IMO.

Looks like today is indeed the day that the PPS could trade below a half penny, AGAIN

One thing you can never say
Is that you haven't been told

That’s probably for the device Kyle said……

they can put in the water and it can detect a treasure ship within 50 miles.

It’s part of their two-pronged approach, or so it seems.

They apparently lack the ability to recognize what a treasure laden shipwreck site would like, hence the SeaSearcher.

And to make up for the lack of competent research, they invented the GalleonFinder(?).

Just a WAG!

#realmenofgenius

Just a question, if the SeaSearcher works, why are they spending $11,100 avg a week on R&D the first 6 months of this year?

If the SeaSearcher works, Why don’t they fulfill their contract for scanning services to a third party explorer that the have been paid $140,000 deposit?

For those who don’t read the 10-Q:

During 2021 the Company entered into an agreement to provide scanning services using its SeaSearcher technology to a corporation involved in searching for historic shipwreck material. Under the terms of the agreement the Company received an upfront payment of $140,000 which has been included in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets at June 30, 2024 and December 31, 2023 as deferred revenue as the services have not yet been provided.

I guess we will see. Maybe hear something this week? Not cheering, or pooing anything. Just hoping this long journey pays out a little.

$$$ Today is the Day $$$$

$$$$ $frx $$$$

I'd like to see that. Hope it happens. But I still have my doubts because of the history. Hope it explodes and we all do very well.

I’ve never said I would be loading……

at the first press release. Again, you mischaracterized my comments Buttercup.

The PR’s are what you and others are focused on, and because you’re invested you’re getting emotional. I get that. It happens once you invest.

What I said repeatedly is that IF they find substantial treasure at Juno, I will load the boat. I do not believe they will, and I do not believe it’s the site to prove to the world the tech works. It can’t find what is NOT there.

But let’s say they move on to another site and provide actual research and supporting documentation that suggests they are at or near a historical shipwreck. I may load the boat or at least take a position based on that if the wreck had the right legal profile.

Do I think that will happen? Of course not, but if it did…..

You and others predetermined based on hype that there was treasure at Juno with NO supporting data or documentation.

You do you and I’ll do me. But please stop suggesting I said things I didn’t.

GL Buttercup!

Happy Monday!

When they announce treasure at Juno (and they will) I'm really interested to read the reactions of posters here. Most have been here a long time whether for or against the company. I think we will make a ton of money and get some entertainment at the same time.

Quote: I have millions of reasons also, but I also have been holding these millions of reasons for a long timeand the dance continues.
Not being a negative Nelly, just keeping it real. Just in case.
Many of you still believe in fairy tales and unicorns, I don't.
👍️ 0
________________________________

You are one of the very few here that is not in denial to the reality of the issues. First of all, the Juno Beach ship-'scuttle' (my opinion) bears no supportive research providing the name of the ship, the tonnage of the ship, number of artillery pieces, a treasure manifest along with the date of it's supposed sinking (scuttling). Yet there are supposedly billions in treasure on board. Eighty feet of water, an extreme challenge for free diving salvage in the 16th Century but yet there are no cannons on site.

As to SeaSearcher, some years ago supposedly the big break through in treasure hunting was the molecular frequency discriminator. This could be tuned to a transmitting frequency for either gold or silver. Targets could be buried (unbeknown to the operator) a half a mile away and the operator could actually trace the frequency line right to the buried target and pin-point it. Amazingly true but for some unexplainable reason, no one could ever prove that a real treasure was found anywhere using this application. That's how I view SeaSearcher.

I mentioned this before but if I'm not mistaken Kennedy already stated that the SeaSearcher has located gold and silver targets on the Juno site. If working as its claimed, they also know the depth and size pf the target. Do I have that correct? Just no time to do one simple proofing dig? Of course Kennedy would say everything is working just fine. What else would one expect him to say? Not that it means anything but when they excavate and recover this believed treasure, I shall be the first to apologize for my pointed skepticism.

I don’t need some super duper gadget to tell me what the data and research already tell us.


You also say you will be loading the boat with shares at the first press release.

Doesn't that mean the sea searcher works?

Don't respond or respond. Don't care that is all the arguing you are getting from me today.

Keep posting while you can. Your time is almost up.

If the device works they won’t diving…….

There was no treasure at the ballast pile. No cannons. It’s a dud site. Theses facts can’t disputed, only ignored.

I don’t need some super duper gadget to tell me what the data and research already tell us.

That said, if they begin diving and there is no treasure, then what?

Doesn’t that mean the device doesn’t work?

GL

Worse case? I think most likely. Years and years of practice.

I'm 50/50 , I think sea sercher works, but not sure of treasure at Juno.
It is being dragged out. Should be showtime soon.

I have millions of reasons also, but I also have been holding these millions of reasons for a long timeand the dance continues.
Not being a negative Nelly, just keeping it real. Just in case.
Many of you still believe in fairy tales and unicorns, I don't.

There was an old saying, everyone likes a little??? But nobody likes a smart ??? Real shareholders are waiting and watching for news! Negative nellies, don’t help, don’t contribute anything. I have millions of reasons to see something positive be announced!! I have millions of reasons not to see negative things happen! Jmo

Nope. Sea searcher works great.

No more excuses

Juno has treasure or it doesn't.

We will find out one way or the other very soon.

I think it absolutely does, but of course those that think they know everything say the opposite. So I guess you can pick a side.

You would think so, however, I think there will be an excuse.
My guess is something off about the seasercher and now they will have to rescann entire area and will take the next 2 years lol.
Just a guess
I do hope I'm wrong, but I'm just giving a worse case scenario lol.

What else could the diving delay be ?
Hmmm it's got to be the billions in treasure.

There is no more excuses.

The news is coming any time now.

The next update in my opinion will be a press release.

They must be finding tons of targets in scanning to not be diving this long.
Hopefully it's the 15 billion dollars worth of treasure.
It must be all over the place , we should be very rich soon.

What else could the diving delay be ?
Hmmm it's got to be the billions in treasure.

$$$ Today is the Day $$$$

$$$$ $frx $$$$

That lawsuit led to Pretend Radio creating……

a podcast series. It’s quite entertaining. Here’s one of the episodes that includes SFRX’s CEO.

Hope you had a great time.

The sites are now being investigated with the new technology. It would pin point any treasure.

Maybe the next museum you go to will have treasure from Juno wreck site.

They don’t have an ID of the wreck……

and the site has been explored dating back to at least the late 80’s.

The ballast pile had no treasure and there are no cannons at the site.

But the CEO suggested potentially billion$ at Juno.

Manifests, historical data, and a path to title generally lead real salvors to projects. Not so with SFRX.

But hey, at least they have title.

GL

Thanks. It's been years, but I thought they had these sites investigated by old cargo manifests in Spain or where ever these ships were headed?

I just got back from snook fishing the keys. You know I hit the museum.
It's out there for sure

You’re mischaracterizing what this critic believes…..

My opinion of Juno not having treasure is much stronger than my opinion about the device. The device can’t find what ain’t there.

Having a admiralty claims on a huge Galleon with a device that can identify the precise location of targets. I don't care what some people say their opinion doesn't supercede the ability of the sea searcher.

We are on the cusp of making history. Those that don't believe even say they will "load the boat" with shares when there is a press release. Isn't that ironic...just sayin.

It was said back in February and March that some had been left at the dock, but the pps is now lower than it was when they announced they had the permit.

All those folks that bought when Legacy did the promo tour likely regret they listened to Matt and Max.

Remember Aqua Survey?

Aqua Survey agrees to use it's hest efforts to locate non-ferrous artifacts utilizing its electromagnetic survey technology on behalf of Seafarer (the "Services").

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1106213/000119983514000155/exhibit_10-3.htm

That is a great question that I wish any of us had the answer to.

I am sure there will be a bump when treasure is announced.

How much treasure? ...They already know since the sea searcher would detect any and all treasure at Juno. I hope that number is huge. Kyle thinks in the billions, but I have my doubts it's that much I guess we will find out soon.

Of course there are other variables in my opinion. Seafarer announced that they have a producer on staff Jay van Hoy on Facebook. So what does that mean? I can only assume.

They will have proven technology in the field with the sea searcher. I think that will pick up a lot of attention especially when it comes to if there is a media deal.

It went to 3 cents with the thought there is treasure so what could it actually go up to when the announcement comes. My intuition says around 5 cents...but then what?

Soon to find out. One way or another.

🚨 $SFRX

💰0.0051
Pink Current, AS: 9.9B, OS: 8.7B, US: 5.9B

Held at DTC Shares Updated:
🔴 4,490,559,572 (2024-09-06)
🟢 4,582,020,422 (2024-09-13)
Difference: +2.0% (+91M)

Outstanding Shares Updated:
🔴 8,677,824,737 (2024-09-06)
🟢 8,710,241,405 (2024-09-13)
Difference: +0.4% (+32M)

Restricted Shares Updated:
🔴 2,826,780,880 (2024-09-06)
🟢 2,799,197,548 (2024-09-13)
Difference: -1.0% (-27M)

Unrestricted Shares Updated:
🔴 5,851,043,857 (2024-09-06)
🟢 5,911,043,857 (2024-09-13)
Difference: +1.0% (+60M)

Chart, OTC Profile, Twitter, @otcupdates

With a $44m Market cap and not much left in the tank to dilute, what is the projected $ treasure they think they are looking at with their claims and permits?
I haven't looked in here for years.
TIA

What a piece of crap Torres is....

Everything happens for a reason though. He did get the idea flowing for inventing a device that can detect gold and silver.

Kyle shortly thereafter met Tim Reynolds from wild manta. When he asked Tim if this device existed and if it didn't can he invent such a device. Tim responded let me think about it.

Several months went by and Kyle said he kinda forgot about the conversation the two had. Tim called him after months of research and said he can do it. Guess what...

He did. The sea searcher is a custom 3d printed device. Several of the motherboards were created from scratch for its specific purpose. There has been millions of dollars invested into its existence.

There has been a lot of holdups but who do you call when things don't work? There is no help line for a device that doesn't exist. They have worked on not only the hardware but the algorithms for years. All for right now!

Having a admiralty claims on a huge Galleon with a device that can identify the precise location of targets. I don't care what some people say their opinion doesn't supercede the ability of the sea searcher.

We are on the cusp of making history. Those that don't believe even say they will "load the boat" with shares when there is a press release. Isn't that ironic...just sayin.

The past is the past but the past is what lead to the present. Now is the time...I can't wait.

2019/2020 very old news, to actual shareholders! Glad he was booted out!! Jmo

https://www.floridatoday.com/story/news/2020/05/22/lawsuit-melbourne-beach-treasure-hunter-publicly-faked-artifact-discovery/5224052002/

Let's see this over a Penny again next week ...

Kyle either spoke out of ignorance or……

out of his ass. Take your pick.

There has never been $1B salvaged off a single wreck. I guess it’s good for him SFRX has an uninformed shareholder base that believes such fairy tales.

Glad to know the device is working perfectly.

2025 will soon be here.

Happy Saturday!

Go SFRX


A few coins...

If you call millions and millions of dollars a few coins..lol...lol

If that is what you mean you are right again.

I know, I know, Kyle said billions...but truthfully I will settle for millions, but that's just me.

Two really interesting comments today……..

First we see sonar will replace radar.

The tech will be used for more than underwater exploration and identification.

Wowzer!

I know, this came from management.

Then we see this.

….the sea searcher works perfect with no issues.

I would take that to mean it’s confirming what previous salvors already concluded, which is that there is no significant treasure at Juno.

Maybe some pocket change, but Reynolds said it likely wouldn’t find a few coins.

"the sea searcher works perfect with no issues"

I hope shareholders understand that as important as the treasure will be that the technology will make the stock run. imo the PR announcing/showing treasure at Juno will make it jump but as the tech community absorbs the SeaSearcher technology we will get a really nice run. The tech will be used for more than underwater exploration and identification. Tim Reynolds is going to give us a grand slam imo.

If you are asking my opinion I think it will be very soon meaning a few weeks.

There has been significant progress and the sea searcher works perfect with no issues.

The current moved out and even though we believe there is a dive season and that may be true. They absolutely will dive on any day even in what Florida calls winter.

It's all good and everyone is excited and on a hush type of communication. Which usually means things are very close.

The Motherlode Ep 2 ~ AllenX……

Good talk about Sir Robert Marx and treasure galleons.

Would there be responses if SFRX actually……

succeeded and found treasure, while proving to the world the tech works?

Asking for a friend.

To date, we know that success hasn’t happened, don’t we?

It’s rhetorical.

It’s been a good month (wink, wink).