We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register for streaming realtime charts, analysis tools, and prices.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G.R.(Hldgs) | LSE:GRH | London | Ordinary Share | GB0003581526 | ORD 5P |
| Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 5.125 | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
| Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - |
| Last Trade Time | Trade Type | Trade Size | Trade Price | Currency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | O | 0 | 5.125 | GBX |
G.R.(Hldgs) (GRH) Share Charts1 Year G.R.(Hldgs) Chart |
|
1 Month G.R.(Hldgs) Chart |
Intraday G.R.(Hldgs) Chart |
| Date | Time | Title | Posts |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19/10/2009 | 13:29 | GRH - Cash Ј1.5mln - MC Ј275k - Only 5% of shares in free float... | 21 |
| 15/5/2009 | 11:10 | GRH with Charts & News | 22 |
| 02/6/2006 | 20:15 | GREAT CASH SHELL | 35 |
| Trade Time | Trade Price | Trade Size | Trade Value | Trade Type |
|---|
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 19/10/2009 13:27 by monkey puzzle Not exactly much encouragement to do so was there..month after amonth after month of nothing! Today's news hardly seem to warrant the change in the share price unless that's shorts closing of course. Usual doom and gloom from the chairman. |
Posted at 15/5/2009 11:40 by gluefactory Not at all Badger.Holders will release shares when a realistic price is obtained and with only 600,000 shares in free float they could feasibly rise to 7-8 spread before a trance of shares take that price out |
Posted at 15/5/2009 11:24 by double6 Well - at least we're getting back to a more realistic MC - can MM's hold the price up ? |
Posted at 15/5/2009 10:50 by gluefactory If there are only 600,000 shares in free float,that equates to £18k at buy price so getting someone with a couple of 100k to invest is not feasible or possible.No such thing as 7 baggers waiting to be noticed,and I guess there has to be a number of matters in the background which is affecting the share price Has anyone gone to the company and asked a question or two? |
Posted at 14/5/2009 11:11 by bozzy_s Cash in the bank of 10p per share |
Posted at 14/5/2009 10:55 by bozzy_s DYOR naturally.I've picked up a few as they seem undervalued vs net cash in the bank. Mkt cap 13.1m shares x 2.5p = £327k Net current assets @ 31/12/08 = £1,636k (nearly all cash) Investment properties @ 31/12/08 = £756k Plant and equipment / minus deferred income tax liabilities = £62k Net assets @ 31/12/08 = £2,455k Assume operating loss continues at c.£20k per month Leaves net assets, approx, of £2,375k at 30/4/09 = 18p per share |
Posted at 02/6/2006 19:06 by simontemplar Tiredbroker-Wrong again! I said the midprice was 15p not that I bought at 15p but rather nearer the opening offer price of 20p. When I first posted on this thread it was to state that I wasn't sure about what you had said concerning the XD date. I never said that I disagreed with you. I would have very much appreciated being informed in a civil manner as to the precise date of entitlement and meaning of XD date versus the record date without the subsequent self lauding and jibes of 'small players getting it a bit wrong'. I did edit what I had said concerning my uncertainty of the date of entitlement but only after verifying what you had said. The fact that I removed my words of uncertainty obviously indicated that, after checking with what you had said, I concurred with your statement. I didn't post until long after I had initially traded because I don't see the need to post after every trade I make, it was only after I had a query that I did so. I traded because I saw a good trading opportunity and that proved to be the case. |
Posted at 02/6/2006 10:04 by simontemplar tiredbroker_ Research indeed! You should try it since you are incorrect on a few counts!1)GRH opened yesterday with a mid price of 15p giving a market cap of £2.05m. 2)I said the share had risen 200% not that I had made a 200% profit. 3)I can assure you that I paid just slightly more than the opening offer price. 4)GRH had cash of £12,332,108 to be precise, debtors of £162,000 and stocks of £72,000. They also had investments of £1,254,183 and tangible assts of £873,606. 5)Your assesment presumes that the company will be wound up but this is not a formality. 6)I admitted to my former ignorance of the correct understanding of 'record date' but you have implied that I have concealed that fact.( Please see post 25 for clarification of this). I was fooling no one therefore and was honest in this regard so for you to state otherwise was misleading and cheap. |
Posted at 02/6/2006 09:06 by tiredoldbroker Simontemplar, no haughtiness on my part, and no 200% rise for you yesterday either, I'm afraid to say. A 200% rise would mean the price had trebled. You stated that you thought I was wrong about there being a difference between an xd date and a record date, and I put you right, Sorry if that puts your nose out of joint.Oh, and there are further fundamentals you maybe should have checked out. With about 13.17m ordinary shares in issue, the dividend of 72.1p per share they've just paid will cost about £9.49m, while at the time of the last figures, they had apparent cash of £12m, leaving them maybe £2.5m. But they also have Preference shares in issue, about £1.5m nominal as I recall, with a whopping 10.5% coupon (interest rate). In case you don't know, if they do decide to wind up the company, they have to pay off the Pref holders before the ordinary shareholders get anything else. If they are lucky, they may be able to pay them off at par (£1); if not, with such a high coupon, they may have to offer way over the £1 face value to get the Pref holders to accept repayment. At best, this leaves £1m for the ordinary shareholders. If they keep the company going, with or without a quote, the burden of paying the Pref dividend will make a big hole in what the remaining cash is worth. Now, even at 20p (and I suspect you paid a fair bit more than that for your shares), the Ordinary shares had a market value of £2.6m, at 40p that's a staggering £5.2m, which just doesn't look right compared to the cash they are entitled to. You can't just ignore the Preference shares, the holders rank ahead of the Ordinary shareholders in law and in any winding-up, and may even have the right to challenge any further moves by the company to pay out cash, if they feel it endangers the security of their investment. Meanwhile the ongoing businesses of G.R. - Morland sheepskins and some property dealing in the USA) made a half year loss of £190,000 on turnover of barely half a million. Simontemplar, you may choose to edit your earlier comments in an attempt to hide your original idea and intentions, but you are really only fooling yourself. A little research is often a good idea. |
Posted at 01/6/2006 15:56 by wiganer It does look most bizarre, especially when you compare it to the experience of other businesses that have done the special dividend thing, where normally if anything there is an overshoot of share price below difference between market cap and special divi. TGM being a good example. |
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
