The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As described in Note 3 to the financial statements, the Company has accumulated a deficit of $1,959,796 as of December 31, 2018. These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 3. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. Our opinion is not modified with respect to this matter.
Notes to the Financial Statements
Note 1 - Organization and Operations
New Century Resources Corporation
New Century Resources Corporation (the Company), was incorporated under the laws of the State of Utah in July of 1979 as WEM Petroleum, Inc. From inception through 1981, the Company conducted operations in the oil and gas industry. Pursuant to an option granted the Company in August of 1979, the Company exercised its right to drill exploratory wells on 640 acres in Cache County, Utah. Although various wells were drilled and completed, the Company did not realize any revenues from these oil and gas operations. In 1984, the Company attempted to refocus its business efforts into the mining industry by entering into an option to lease property and mining equipment in Montana. It ceased any significant business operations in the latter part of the 1980's when it failed to exercise the option, due to lack of funding. In 1988, the Company made an effort to commence conducting business again by expanding its business purpose to include the marketing and development of high-tech products.
The Company's Board was also authorized to seek out suitable candidates for acquisition or merger. In addition, the Company authorized a reverse split of its issued and outstanding shares one (1) share for ten (10) shares, although the same was never affected. The Company ceased doing business until late 1993.
In October 1993, the Corporation changed its name to New Century Resources Corporation, acquiring 100% of the outstanding stock of G.C. Gulf Western Trading Limited (G.C.) in exchange for 7,200,000 shares of stock, which gave the stockholders of G.C. control of the Corporation by which it has conducted its operations. This acquisition was accounted for as a reverse merger or recapitalization of G.C. No goodwill or other write-up to fair market value of the assets of G.C. occurred at the time of the merger. In 1994, the company was re-domiciled in the state of Nevada. The Nevada entity became the surviving corporation and the Utah Corporation was dissolved on February 14, 1994. As a result of the merger/change of domicile, the Articles of Incorporation of the Nevada entity became the Articles of the Company.
The Company divested itself of its 100% owned subsidiary G.C. on December 12, 2000, thereby eliminating the Trekkopje mining claims, a capitalized cost of $10,533,252, the related liabilities amounting to $8,500,000 from its acquisition, the note payable to its principal stockholder, which aggregated, came to a total of $1,046,640, and any claims to accrued interest. This divestiture was the unanimous decision of the board of directors, which was based in part, upon the Corporation's inability to raise the necessary capital to fund the exploration and development of the Trekkopje Uranium reserves. In addition, a feasibility study conducted by Dr. Brian Hambleton played crucial role in their decision making process, concluding that, due to the current Uranium market, exploitation of the Uranium reserves on the property would not be financially viable, and did not foresee any immediate or mid-term prospects in world market conditions and pricing which would lead to a pricing level justifiable of the exploitation of the Uranium reserves.
The Company has no commitments, understandings, or agreements with regard to any proposed business operations or opportunities. It is the intention of Management to actively solicit interested third parties who may be interested in acquiring a controlling interest in what is essentially a "shell" corporation. Such transactions are commonly referred to as "reverse mergers", whereby the Company would acquire all the issued and outstanding shares of a private entity in exchange for a controlling interest in the public company. No assurance can be given that Management of the Company will be successful in attracting a suitable candidate for this type of transaction or some other type of business combination; or what time frame might be involved in consummating any such transaction.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared as if the Company had its corporate capital structure as of December 12, 2000.
23
Table of Contents
Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of presentation
The accompanying financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”).
Use of Estimates and Assumptions
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements as well as the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
The Company’s significant estimates and assumptions include the fair value of financial instruments; inventory valuation and obsolescence; revenue recognized or recognizable; sales returns and allowances; income tax rate, income tax provision and valuation allowance of deferred tax assets; and the assumption that the Company will be a going concern. Those significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to those estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value.
Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.
Management regularly reviews its estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such reviews, and if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below:
Level 1
Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.
Level 2
Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.
Level 3
Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.
Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.
The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and
24
Table of Contents
liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.
The carrying amounts of a Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, prepaid expenses, accounts payable, and notes payable, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.
Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm's-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm's-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated.
Fiscal Year-End
The Company elected December 31 as its fiscal year-end date.
Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents.
Related Parties
The Company follows subtopic 850-10,
Related Party Disclosures
, of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions.
Pursuant to Section 850-10-20 the related parties include a.) affiliates of the Company; b.) entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the fair value option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of Section 825–10–15, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity; c.) trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; d.) principal owners of the Company; e.) management of the Company; f.) other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and g.) other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.
The financial statements shall include disclosures of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, and other similar items in the ordinary course of business. However, disclosure of transactions that are eliminated in the preparation of or combined financial statements is not required in those statements. The disclosures shall include: a.) the nature of the relationship(s) involved ; b.) a description of the transactions, including transactions to which no amounts or nominal amounts were ascribed, for each of the periods for which income statements are presented, and such other information deemed necessary to an understanding of the effects of the transactions on the financial statements; c.) the dollar amounts of transactions for each of the periods for which income statements are presented and the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms from that used in the preceding period; and d.) amounts due from or to related parties as of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement.
Commitment and Contingencies
The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or unasserted claims
25
Table of Contents
that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.
If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a potential material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed.
Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed. Management does not believe, based upon information available at this time that these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, there is no assurance that such matters will not materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial position, and results of operations or cash flows.
Revenue Recognition
The Company follows paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured. The Company has not generated revenues in the years presented.
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes under Section 740-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based upon differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the statements of operations in the period that includes the enactment date.
The Company adopted section 740-10-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 740-10-25”). Section 740-10-25 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under Section 740-10-25, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Section 740-10-25 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures.
The estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities are reported in the accompanying balance sheets, as well as tax credit carry-backs and carry-forwards. The Company periodically reviews the recoverability of deferred tax assets recorded on its balance sheets and provides valuation allowances as management deems necessary.
Uncertain Tax Positions
The Company did not take any uncertain tax positions and had no adjustments to its income tax liabilities or benefits pursuant to the provisions of Section 740-10-25 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2018 or 2017.
Net Income (Loss) per Common Share
26
Table of Contents
Net income (loss) per common share is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially dilutive outstanding shares of common stock during the period to reflect the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through contingent share arrangements, stock options and warrants.
As of December 31, 2018, there are potential share equivalents based on conversion options associated with our convertible promissory notes (approximately 27,388,580 potential shares), however, due to net operating losses sustained, anti-dilution issues are not applicable.
Cash Flows Reporting
The Company adopted paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments. The Company reports the reporting currency equivalent of foreign currency cash flows, using the current exchange rate at the time of the cash flows and the effect of exchange rate changes on cash held in foreign currencies is reported as a separate item in the reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and separately provides information about investing and financing activities not resulting in cash receipts or payments in the period pursuant to paragraph 830-230-45-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.
Subsequent Events
The Company follows the guidance in Section 855-10-50,
Subsequent Events
, of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the disclosure of subsequent events. The Company will evaluate subsequent events through the date when the financial statements were issued. Pursuant to ASU 2010-09,
Subsequent Events (Topic 855)
, of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the Company as an SEC filer considers its financial statements issued when they are widely distributed to users, such as filing them on EDGAR.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
We have reviewed the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) accounting pronouncements and interpretations thereof that have effectiveness dates during the periods reported and in future periods. The Company has carefully considered the new pronouncements that alter previous generally accepted accounting principles and does not believe that any new or modified principles will have a material impact on the corporation’s reported financial position or operations in the near term. The applicability of any standard is subject to the formal review of our financial management and certain standards are under consideration.
In September 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-13 (ASU 2017-13) which addresses “Revenue Recognition” (Topic 605), "Revenue from Contracts with Customers" (Topic 606), and Leases (Topics 840 and 842). ASU 2017-13 requires entities to recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. As currently issued and amended, ASU 2017-13 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period, though early adoption is permitted for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. We have evaluated the impact of the adoption of ASU 2017-13 on our financial statements and determined that upon generating revenue, the Company will implement accounting system changes and provide the additional disclosure requirements related to the adoption.
27
Table of Contents
Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying financial statements.
Note 3 – Going Concern
The Company has adopted Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15,
“Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (“ASU 2014-15”)
. As a result, management is required to evaluate whether there are relevant conditions and events that would indicate the probability of the Company’s inability to meet its obligations as they become due within one year of the date the financial statements are issued.
The financial statements have been prepared under the assumption that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.
As reflected in the financial statements, the Company had an accumulated deficit at December 31, 2018 of $1,959,786 and net cash used in operating activities for the reporting periods then ended. While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to find a potential merger or acquisition transaction with another entity, there can be no assurances to that effect and is therefore not considered a mitigating factor in determining the probability that the Company will meet its obligations. The Company holds no assets, has generated no revenue and has relied on advances from its controlling shareholder and Director to meet its operating expenses. Through oral conveyance, management affirms that it is probable that it will meet its obligations through advances from the Company’s Director and controlling shareholder; therefore alleviating doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for the twelve month period from the date of the issuance of this report.
The financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
Note 4 – Convertible Notes Payable
Convertible Demand Notes Payable
On January 8, 2012, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with George Christodoulou, the Company’s President, in the amount of $8,500, and bears interest at 10% per annum. The note is convertible into shares of the Company stock, at the demand of the lender. The conversion rate is the total principal and accrued interest outstanding divided by the Company’s par value, $0.001. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2018, no shares were issued in satisfaction of payments and therefore no recognition of a beneficial conversion was made for the period.
Since there is an option for repayment in cash, the beneficial conversion will be determined at the time of demand if shares are used in satisfaction of the payment request.
The remaining principal balance on this convertible note payable was $8,500 and $8,500 as of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.
On January 8, 2012, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with Robert J. Nielson in the amount of $7,622, and bears interest at 10% per annum. The note is convertible into shares of the Company stock, at the demand of the lender. The conversion rate is the total principal and accrued interest outstanding divided by the Company’s par value, $0.001. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, no shares were issued in satisfaction of payments and therefore no recognition of a beneficial conversion was made for the period.
Since there is an option for repayment in cash, the beneficial conversion will be determined at the time of demand if shares are used in satisfaction of the payment request.
The remaining principal balance on this convertible note payable was $7,622 and $7,622 as of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.
Consulting Agreement
On October 7, 2013, the Company entered into a Consulting Agreement with Robert J. Nielson whereby Mr. Nielson will act as an independent consultant for a period of one year, automatically extending for one year periods on each anniversary date. Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, the Company agreed to pay compensation in the
28
Table of Contents
amount of $3,000 per month and is entitled to accrue said compensation for up to any period not to exceed three months’ time. On January 1, 2014, Mr. Nielson provided notice to the Company that he will no longer continue to perform under the Consulting Agreement and the Company accepted his resignation.
As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the balance owed by the Company to Mr. Nielson was $8,384 and $8,384, respectively.
Note 5 – Stockholder’s Deficit
Preferred Stock
The authorized preferred capital of the Company is 50,000,000 preferred shares, par value $0.001, of which none are issued or outstanding.
Common Stock
The authorized capital of the Company is 200,000,000 common shares, par value $0.001, of which 12,481,724 are issued or outstanding.
On January 8, 2012, the Company entered into convertible promissory notes with Robert J. Nielson, a consultant and shareholder, and George Christodoulou, the Company’s President, in the amounts of $7,622 and $8,500, respectively (see Note 6). The notes are convertible into shares of the Company stock, at the demand of the lenders. The conversion rate is the total principal and accrued interest outstanding divided by the Company’s par value, $0.001. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2018, no shares were issued in satisfaction of payments.
Note 6 – Equity
On October 22, 2018, the Company was informed that our registered independent public accountant, Anton & Chia, LLP, of Newport Beach, California, declined to stand for re-appointment.
On October 22, 2017, the Company engaged AJ Robbins CPA, LLC of Denver, Colorado, as its new registered independent public accountant. During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 and prior to October 22, 2018 (the date of the new engagement), we did not consult with AJ Robbins CPA, LLC regarding (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, (ii) the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s financial statements by AJ Robbins CPA, LLC, in either case where written or oral advice provided by AJ Robbins CPA, LLC would be an important factor considered by us in reaching a decision as to any accounting, auditing or financial reporting issues or (iii) any other matter that was the subject of a disagreement between us and our former auditor or was a reportable event (as described in Items 304(a)(1)(iv) or Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K, respectively).
Note 7 – Related Party Transactions
Free Office Space
The Company has been provided office space by its Chief Executive Officer at no cost. The management determined that such cost is nominal and did not recognize the rent expense in its financial statement.
Advances from Shareholder
From time to time, stockholders of the Company will make advances to the Company for working capital purposes. As of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company’s stockholder advances totaled $138,034 and $107,855, respectively. These advances are non-interest bearing and payable on demand.
Convertible Demand Note Payable
On January 8, 2012, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with George Christodoulou, the Company’s president, in the amount of $8,500. The twenty-four month note bears interest at 10% per annum and is
29
Table of Contents
convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at the demand of the lender. The conversion rate is the total principal and accrued interest outstanding divided by the Company’s par value, $0.001. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, no shares were issued in satisfaction of payments. The balance, including principal and accrued interest as of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 is $14,440 and $13,589, respectively.
On January 8, 2012, the Company entered into a twenty-four month convertible promissory note with Robert J. Nielson in the amount of $7,622, bearing interest at 10% per annum. The note is convertible into shares of the Company stock, at the demand of the lender. The conversion rate is the total principal and accrued interest outstanding divided by the Company’s par value, $0.001. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, no shares were issued in satisfaction of payments. The balance, including principal and accrued interest as of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, was $12,949and $12,187, respectively.
Note 8 – Executive Compensation
Since 1994, the Company has not paid any compensation to officers, directors or executives. The Board of Directors has adopted a general resolution generally permitting the payment of executive compensation, but neither compensation amounts nor any plan for the payment of the same have been approved. It is not anticipated that any executive compensation will be paid, aside from the reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses, unless or until the Company is able to enter into revenue producing activities.
The Company has not adopted, and does not intend to adopt in the foreseeable future, any stock appreciation rights, compensation plan providing for cash, shares or other compensation to any executive or long term incentive plan.
Note 9 – Income Taxes
The Company has available net operating loss carry-forwards for financial statement and federal income tax purposes. These loss carry-forwards expire if not used within 20 years from the year generated. The Company's management has decided a valuation allowance is necessary to reduce any tax benefits because the available benefits are more likely than not to expire before they can be used. The tax based accumulated deficit creates tax benefits in the amount of $391,969 from inception through December 31, 2018.
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial statement purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes.
Significant components of the Company's deferred tax liabilities and assets as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 are as follows:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
391,957
|
|
|
384,938
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(391,957)
|
|
|
(384,938)
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
The valuation allowance for deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 was $391,957 and $384,938, respectively. In assessing the recovery of the deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income in the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversals of future deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. As a result, management determined it was more likely than not the deferred tax assets would not be realized as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and maintained a full valuation allowance.
30
Table of Contents
Reconciliation between the statutory rate and the effective tax rate is as follows for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017:
Federal statutory tax rate
|
|
|
(20.0)
|
%
|
Permanent differences and valuation allowance
|
|
|
(20.0)
|
%
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Note 10 – Subsequent Events
The Company has evaluated all events that occur after the balance sheet date through the date when the financial statements were issued to determine if they must be reported. The Management of the Company determined that there were no reportable subsequent events to be disclosed.