HUMBL Inc (PK) (HMBL) Quote

Oh, how touching “pathetic is a complement.” Almost nailed it. Just one tiny thing: the word you’re looking for is “compliment” with an i, not an e.

Their DD is exemplary and rewarding. When I grow up I want to be a clown also!
Pathetic is a complement.

True.

Hilarious.

With another 40 billion or so that need to be dumped, it will get there.


.


Watch your wallet


Buyer Beware
Pump and Dump Share Selling Scam



..

I took it that he meant "you two" as in you and NoBoDo are funny...


.


Watch your wallet


Buyer Beware
Pump and Dump Share Selling Scam



..

100 million of that volume is double counted but what does it matter anyways….🤣

Seems like there is incredible strength if that kind of dumping can’t keep it at .0001.

You too, are funny.

Please!
no bid anyone?

Yet it closed @ .0003 , no bid anyone?

But but ThetreesCanBeFooled

257M dumped today at .0002 with the obligatory last second paint back up.

Keep up the stellar work, you're doing a bang up job of conning your fellow man.

If only. 33% per day grows pretty fast...
Looks to me like it is just 0.0002’s bought at the bid just being moved to the ask for a 33% flip. Anyone able to do this has a license to print money.

Somebody do the public math & tell me what your return would be if you could bank 33% per day for say, 40 trading days.

I do in fact flip all the time, stuff that can be flipped, slowly building positions & lowering basis, waiting to unload into occasional excitement.

Unfortunately, $HMBL doesn't make it easy (constant dilution, little buying pressure, etc).

Hotel California here.

You two are funny.

Every single post. But this is America, I am told you can be dumb as rocks and still run an $11bil company. HMBL management can spell correctly, does that mean it is worth much more than $11bil?

We are so lucky-to-have the tree correcting our typos-and-misspellings.

Unfortunately, that’s all the tree is good for.

He’s a terrible HMBL advocate who’s blinded by his insider relationship with the company.

It’s entirely possible HMBL will never exit the low trip zeros.

So sad.

It’s not really catching a typo, when it happens every post, anyway, happy Friday the 13th

We have to wait until Thiago works out his dispute with Thiago about the pile of slag.

Thiago is taking Thiago out for some after work beers tonight so there is some hope that they will reach some sort of compromise.

Once that happens...TO DA MOON!

Give what time?

Market Cap | 12,593,828 | 06/12/2025
Authorized Shares | 85,000,000,000 | 06/12/2025
Outstanding Shares | 41,979,425,852 | 06/12/2025
Restricted | 2,901,728,766 | 06/12/2025
Unrestricted | 39,077,697,086 | 06/12/2025
Held at DTC | 38,882,804,867 | 06/12/2025

https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/HMBL/security

$HMBL

“it printed at .0025.“

Exactly, not at 0.0003…it was not marked a “buy” because it wasn’t.

But what does it matter? Seriously.

The stock is 0.0002x0.0003 with no hint of that changing right now.

Looks to me like it is just 0.0002’s bought at the bid just being moved to the ask for a 33% flip.

That’s what happens at these levels.

Give what time? That print is going to magically change price?

Sorry I don't make shit up. The ask got reduced from 1B to 948M after that 40M slap regardless it printed at .0025.

"whatever you need to tell yourself."

Dumping...



.


Watch your wallet


Buyer Beware
Pump and Dump Share Selling Scam



..

Give it a time! My dilutional theory works sometimes

When facts are presented and some resort to minutia and personal attacks it is a great day!

That’s all that’s left…

Congratulations on catching a typo. I bet your followers will be backing up the truck to load shares due to your excellent DD!
Great work!

That is technically neither because it is exactly halfway between the bid and ask.

But whatever you need to tell yourself.

It was a 0.00025 trade.

That's technically a buy, but the broker/MM printed at .0025. Sometimes, they slap with it later time.

0.0025 Sport.

Level 2 shifted today! And that's the moment that I was looking for. No one is fooled.

1.1B bid at T2 vs 946M at T3! Bears need to pack up for a summer vacation.

40M hit at .0003! That's my boy! Good morning

But that is not what this is. At all. I get the confusion.

Confusion??? What a discombobulated convoluted cluster. You know I'm a "read only". Engaging is not an option. >>

I admitted to you long ago that reading SEC filings makes my brain hurt. Over the years I've read countless threads in which you were involved. I simply tried to keep up and leaned on you to make sense of what is nonsensical to me. >>

I'm a musician and a pretty damn good one at that. That's my strength. These boards are just a side hobby that I find entertaining. But this one -- this "cluster" -- my brain is beyond hurting. Dude, GLTY making heads or tails out if it!

I am not going to lie, I did have to google this one, after being called an armature by a restless local when it comes to a stock that I own.

100%Xpert SHORTs Here✅MOASSIVE evidence of SHORTS✅


'......wow Xpert Traitors.......wow"

It just amazes me how easy it is to see armatures who have no real business world experience make fools of themselves and resort to personal attacks..
They were obviously schooled in Google U and AI University! LOL

I received the same BA, with only two semesters of accounting.

So, some of the conversation here is above my pay grade.

However, I still enjoy watching those on the good side, correcting the scammers/pumpers with their garbage posts on the losing side.

We all know you’re lying, no one is fooled.

So sorry. I only had Accounting !, Accounting !! and Managerial Accounting when I received by BS in Business Management
But it was good enough to be a Director for a 7 billion dollar corporation. (Now 11 billion since I early retired)

I didn’t have enough prerequisites when it was offered.

I needed:

SA 201 Everything You Need to Know about Naked Shorty

and,

SA 210 An Introduction to Air Shares aka Counterfeit Equity Markers.

You should have taken Fantasy Accounting like some here apparently have so you can understand the logic of the arguments.

Thanks for posting proof that the slag pile is real.
Is it next to the heliport?
Great photos!

“If the asset was transferred, it would show up on the balance sheet. It could have been a gift, it could have been in return for preferred A shares, it could have been a long term loan at $100/month for 200k months. The asset would appear as an asset, and any liability would show up under... wait for it... liabilities - either long term or short.“

But that is not what this is. At all. I get the confusion. The liability you are talking about is independent of the asset. This is not, it is actually the consideration which has not been paid.

The closest analogy would be a sellers note. Where a buyer buys an asset and issues the seller a note. But that is independent of the sales agreement and itself would outline payment due dates, events of default, remedies, etc. The note exists independently of the asset sale.

That does not exist in this case…AT ALL.

Simple question, according to the sales agreement and the UCC when is HMBL obligated to pay by???

Answer: there is no deadline.

At best the sales agreement is wholly deficient, at worst it is a scam transaction.

“When I said year end, you decided that it had to do current liabilities. The problem with no payment by year end is that the IRS would look into the transaction as a potential shifting of assets and liabilities to avoid taxes. That could be easily resolved, but could require additional work to demonstrate that YBYRA was not expecting cash or another asset in return for the fertilizer, but instead stock. Further, they would need to demonstrate that any tax consequences by this deal was a result of a legitimate deal.”

What I am talking about has nothing to do with the tax treatment.

“You claim that auditors HATE reclassifying assets or liabilities. That is fantasy. First off, there is a contractual obligation for HMBL to pay YBYRA. It is in writing. What isn't in writing follows UCC for the transfer of goods. The companies can at any time modify the contract as long as the terms don't overly benefit one company over the other. They could decide at any time to delay the first payment until 2029 if they wanted.”

I guess I should clarify, they don’t hate reclassifying assets. Happens all the time. For example if a note sitting in the long terms liabilities goes into default and it all has to get reclassified into current liabilities.

What they don’t like is when a company represents that a liability is current and is directly tied to an asset as consideration not paid, and then goes past the one year mark. So either the company was stupid or intentionally misrepresented it. They don’t like that.

Think about it…If a company was able to book an asset and then show the entire consideration as a long term liability with no note, security or other instrument associated with it then companies could book all sorts of fanciful assets, let them show up on the books for a couple of years and then just rescind the whole thing at some future point.

Besides how do they “delay” something (as your example posits) that has no deadline to begin with?

One more time, PLEASE!
What is your insider position with this company?
(SEC Rule 17(b) requires disclosure)

Um, you write about yourself?
You clearly have no idea what you are talking about.

Where did you come up with this theory?
If the asset was transferred, it would show up on the balance sheet. It could have been a gift, it could have been in return for preferred A shares, it could have been a long term loan at $100/month for 200k months. The asset would appear as an asset, and any liability would show up under... wait for it... liabilities - either long term or short.

When I said year end, you decided that it had to do current liabilities. The problem with no payment by year end is that the IRS would look into the transaction as a potential shifting of assets and liabilities to avoid taxes. That could be easily resolved, but could require additional work to demonstrate that YBYRA was not expecting cash or another asset in return for the fertilizer, but instead stock. Further, they would need to demonstrate that any tax consequences by this deal was a result of a legitimate deal.

You claim that auditors HATE reclassifying assets or liabilities. That is fantasy. First off, there is a contractual obligation for HMBL to pay YBYRA. It is in writing. What isn't in writing follows UCC for the transfer of goods. The companies can at any time modify the contract as long as the terms don't overly benefit one company over the other. They could decide at any time to delay the first payment until 2029 if they wanted.

I’m sorry…do you need that explained to you again?

“That is definitely not true. You took what I said about the end of the year and ran with it, but you ran in the wrong direction.“

Please explain how I took “what you said” when my reply was to another poster?

Especially since I was quoting them and not you.