Enzolytics Inc (PK) (ENZC) Quote

"superior intellect" what a laugh.

A bigger laugh: back in the day, here on the $ENZC board, many folks actually believed he was a "medical doctor", not a "manipulator of documents".

It appeared even other so-called "doctors" were fooled and actually believed they were conversing w/ a medical-professional w/ relevant expertise regarding $ENZC's scam products.

OTC rubes never cease to amaze.

To make things worse, the News/Update page has some weird new update/post. I don't even think Docsetc controls his own site or manages it because why is there a link to an Online Casino telegram forum listed on what is supposed to be "legal" updates about the "lawsuit". Everything about this stinks 

You were the one pumping ENZC and posting about talking to Chandra. You are just a worthless conman.

Nothing on the blackhole website indicates the name of the law firm -https://superiorintellect.net/

At first you claimed there was 5 law firms very interested in filing the lawsuit.

You claim a retainer has been paid but never follow through with the details such as how much was paid and to which law firm was the retainer paid.

Why is everything about the lawsuit veiled in a shroud of secrecy?

The fake lawsuit is all about enriching docsetc.

IG

Here is the link to the black hole - he actually gave two links https://ENZCLawsuit.com and https://superiorintellect.net/.

The first one now redirects to the second URL.

Keep in mind that the law firm hasn't been named and a lawsuit still hasn't been filed.

IG

Would you please provide link to sign up as a plaintiff?. It did not work last time , snd I still need to tabulate all my shares lost. Thank you

Underwater shareholders flailing, a complete clown-show here.

Horses led to water, but they were too smart to drink and died slow deaths.

Some of these guys could use a good psychologist.

Whatever makes you feel better BOZO. More lame insults and flat out LIES while you wait for shares you're not getting LOL. No lawsuit, no free shares in the fake AI stock Adnexus and even if that did happen you're a SUCKER for accepting shares as a mends for all the wrongdoing that's been done, A STRAIGHT UP SUCKER! If that's You and Docetc's angle, try harder because that won't fly with real ENZC investors.

How's that LOI with CBDW and Adnexus going?

Thanks Doc... I look forward to Chandra saying "I would love to give you shares in Adnexus equal to what you had in ENZC"... Then there can be a different suit against CC, I assume.

Wonder which of these posters is Chandra... I vote for It's Trading G.

It can't be Price and Volume or I-Glow... That Dude has so many posts, he is in a permanent rut in his computer chair that he can't be broken out of without an Ambulatory team, think I have seen him on "Hoarders"...

I guess Chandra pays them well though... You would think that would buy GOOD Psychology, but they have no idea how to function with that Art form.

A year later... where's the list? Can't wait!

Docset, you have my email still? Contact me
please thx,
b

Sorry but it is docsetc that has posted so much false and misleading information about the fake lawsuit.

First it was a class action lawsuit - now it is in State Court and it is a business fraud lawsuit. That would be very difficult to collect.

But you keep leg riding docsetc - but it didn't work out very well when he was pumping ENZC.

IG

What happened to this timeline?

docsetc
Wednesday, 03/05/2025 12:01:43 PM

The Law Firm's retainer is being paid this next week. The case will be filed shortly thereafter.

Firm's name will be published at that time. Court filing schedule, projected, will also be published at that time."

As you can see that was posted on 03/05/2025 - who paid the retainer - has the lawsuit still not been filed so you can unveil the shroud of secrecy around the unnamed law firm.

IG

What are you referring to?
Poor child. Not what most folks here tell me. Was there something specific in my post you disagree with?

Please address it specifically so I can be corrected.

Make your fkn point.

Otherwise, why post?

Very nice post - docsetc has never stated how much he has spent on the lawsuit that could be independently verified.

IG

When was the lawsuit filed and in which court?

What is the name of the law firm representing the shareholders?

The lawsuit is as fake as you are - first a pumper and now telling investors to send their personal and private information into a black hole. And they haven't heard from the law firm - the reason is because you are a conman yammering about a fake lawsuit but never delivering anything.

IG

More lame insults, still no updates no lawsuit

Poor child. Not what most folks here tell me.

Keep on ranting insanely, guess it gives you something to do.

No you speak like a blame-shifting scapegoater.
What does lolz mean? I don't speak like a little girl. You bought into the scam and continued believing for far too long despite countless warnings that you ignored.

Here's your post at "the top", 5/10/23, when $ENZC traded for .10:

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=171882105

Same day, one of countless posts you ignored:

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=171882581

Meanwhile you were gloating about $gains & tax considerations and suggesting $ENZC was going to .20 next for whatever garbage reasons you believed.

Go ahead & continue believing you're smarter than all those who pointed out the obvious here.

You & your naive cohort were an easily-conned group of MARKs.

My guess is it'll happen again on another "medical" or "drug" stock where certain types honestly believe they have an edge on DD.

Well, Dr. Chandra has shown his true colors. He has blocked me on X. for calling him out on ENZC. Let's suit the motherf**ker. 

This statement contains several legal inaccuracies and misleading claims. Let’s break it down piece by piece:

1. “The law firm who took the case is assigning a new contracted partner as of yesterday to the case.”
• Issue: The phrase “contracted partner” is unusual in legal contexts. Partners in law firms are typically full equity or non-equity partners, not contracted.
• Why it matters: If the firm were significantly shifting leadership or outsourcing the case to another attorney, that could signal internal uncertainty about its strength.

2. “A preliminary judicial review had the attorney’s telling us this would be filed as a state-bound Securities Violations case (all charges being of business fraud) because all plaintiffs registered are shareholders.”
• Issue: “Preliminary judicial review” does not exist in this context. Judges don’t review cases before they’re filed.
• Securities violations vs. Business Fraud:
• A securities fraud case must meet specific legal thresholds, such as proving intentional deception that induced shareholders to buy, hold, or sell securities.
• Just being a shareholder doesn’t automatically make a case a securities fraud case—you must show specific fraudulent actions that directly caused financial loss.
• Why it matters: The claim suggests a misinterpretation of how securities fraud cases are classified. If business fraud is the main charge, it might belong under corporate or contract law, not securities law.

3. “That and only that reason has to have the case filed as a securities violations act, with all charges being a fraud charges, and there’s five of those.”
• Issue: This is legally incorrect—a case isn’t forced into securities law just because plaintiffs are shareholders.
• Why it matters: A lawsuit must fit within the legal framework of securities law, meaning it must:
1. Meet SEC Rule 10b-5 standards (misstatements, reliance, causation, damages).
2. Be filed in the correct jurisdiction (state vs. federal court depends on laws violated).
3. Distinguish between securities fraud and corporate fraud.

4. “Anyone who wants to sue Chandra and Adnexus, have instant standing to do so, if they were a shareholder from 5/1/2024 or earlier, ever since the SEC filed against Zhabilov for the $92 million etc. That legally gave everyone the ability to sue them.”
• Issue 1: “Instant standing to sue”
• Being a past shareholder doesn’t automatically grant standing in court.
• Standing requires demonstrating personal harm—simply owning shares isn’t enough.
• If plaintiffs sold before the fraud was publicly revealed, courts may argue no loss was suffered due to fraud.
• Issue 2: “Since the SEC filed… that legally gave everyone the ability to sue.”
• The SEC’s lawsuit does not automatically grant private plaintiffs standing—it enforces federal securities laws, but private claims must prove direct harm and reliance on fraudulent information.
• Courts often dismiss copycat lawsuits that don’t independently prove fraud.

Final Takeaways:
• Misinterpretation of legal procedures: No “preliminary judicial review” determines if a case is state-bound securities fraud.
• Flawed securities fraud claim: Just owning shares doesn’t automatically qualify a lawsuit under securities law.
• Standing is not automatic: The SEC filing against Zhabilov does not guarantee all past shareholders can sue.


If you’re considering involvement, ensure the legal basis is solid—otherwise, the case could face early dismissal for lack of standing or failure to prove fraud.

Yeah make sure you and your buddy Chandra who you spoke with on the phone get your timing together. You're pathetic

Lol, nobody here gives a shit about Chandra.
...these guys will disappear or whine about excuses for Chandra, as soon as we have him served... You guys make so many stupid assumptions and are so clueless its no wonder you lost money on this scam.

I can't wait to see what boards you get conned-on next.

I'm sure your DD will be just as adequate there too.

Hey DRHUMI, these guys will disappear or whine about excuses for Chandra, as soon as we have him served, which won't be long from now. Hope it's on the same day he takes Adnexus public. The law firm said it would be fantastic timing if we're able to do that. I intend to try and get pics of him being served.

The law firm who took the case is assigning a new contracted partner as of yesterday to the case. A preliminary judicial review had the attorney's telling us this would be filed as a state-bound Securities Violations case (all charges being of business fraud) because all plaintiffs registered are shareholders. That and only that reason has to have the case filed as a securities violations act, with all charges being a fraud charges, and there's five of those.

Anyone who wants to sue Chandra and Adnexus, have instant standing to do so, if they were a shareholder from 5/1/2024 or earlier, ever since the SEC filed against Zhabilov for the $92 million etc. That legally gave everyone the ability to sue them.

Talk soon, it's been crazy around here lately.

Terry

TRUTH!

Fake lawsuit

It's his suit, Genius. You don't understand how that works since you are used to being in charge due to your World Of Warcraft rank of Supreme Earth Commander General, but I'm not in charge of the suit, so I'm not giving any of you Boiler room Elite Pocket Protector Ninjas any info.

"Doc said not to post private details about the suit, which I respect because he's in control of it."

Ok you lap dog! Lol .. “I do anything my master tells me” - DRHUMilating

It’s going to come out eventually. Keep stalling and delaying the inevitable dude, doesn’t matter.

Cocksetc why are you on X but conveniently ignoring iHub when it's time to give details about your fake lawsuit? You're too invested in Adnexus, you can't wait for your buddy to go Public so you can secretly invest huh?
#ADNEXUSBIOTECH #Enzolytics #ENZC #CBDW WOW, CBDW liquidating out with a 'sale of assets' to an investment company who specializes in Waste Management. I guess this is poetic justice for such a holding company to maybe do something with Adnexus. 😁— SuperTAbrams (@Supertabra55141) March 19, 2025

Laughing my a$@ off at all these guys BEGGING for an update by Doc, LMAO: So, are all shareholders included in this then? Or? I want to ensure I am included as per my creation of account on your website, etc. however, I have never received any emails or communication regarding this. Should those of us that signed up be receiving updates via email?— ChandraNeeds2Pay (@Needs2Pay) March 6, 2025

OTC Guy... HAHA okay. The only other OTC I owned was RGBP, and got out with a profit.

Doc said not to post private details about the suit, which I respect because he's in control of it.

Explain why you are here.

Explain why you are so desperate for info on the Lawsuit, to the point you asked me about it.

Why do you hit the refresh button on this tab 380 times a day?

Isn't it difficult to remember everything you say with 10 usernames?

Another OTC guy with keyboard muscles.

Why don't you post the name of the law firm and what court the complaint was filed in.

You have been duped again first with the docsetc pumping and now with the fake lawsuit.

IG

You're supporting a fake lawsuit and you call other people retarded? No wonder you lost all your money.

That's what I thought Jackie @Jack Torrance

Well, the website doesn't work on my Phone using a secured or non-secured connection. I can't reach it on my work computer either because the site ISN'T SECURE AND MY PERSONAL OR FINANCIAL INFORMATION MAY BE COMPROMISED AND A BAD SERVER CERTIFICATE, which has been pointed out time and time again since the website launched. Since you're so smart and we're all morons what does that mean?

Has the lawsuit been filed?
Who is the law firm?
Have you received any updates on the so called website?

You're talking as if you know what's going on, make your point @Jack Torrance I'll be here waiting.

You're just making stuff up with no proof behind it to make your point, you sound ridiculous like a kid throwing a tantrum. Why are you here DrDummi? You know docsetc's lawsuit website is no longer up right? See for yourself: ENZCLAWSUIT.COM 
Don't tell us your waiting to be updated about the lawsuit. If the stock board is dead why are you here trying to explain yourself? You working for Chandra?

Well, 6 people don't magically find themselves all here at once for no reason, so it's either a Boiler room full of people bashing penny's while playing World Of Warcraft and Call Of Duty because they are too terrified of Real Combat...

OR...

It's 2 people with multiple usernames and no Boiler room... But keep the video games.

Regardless though, there are no REGULAR people that have lives that need any input from any of you.

Anything else?

Read the Room?

Take a Hint?

Ignorance & assumptions w/ every post lol.
Did you find an Alexa or Roku remote to talk to yet? I've never used either, but from what I hear there's more intelligent life on those devices than in the minds of repeatedly conned pennystock bagholders.

Keep trying to get the upper-hand w/ your insults.

When you're explaining, you're losing.

That's a worthwhile lesson for you & your gf running the supposed lawsuit.

I hope you get your losses back because I appreciate seeing conmen held accountable.

But if you do, my guess is you'll hand it over to another con lickity-split.

I just gave you follow #15 so I can see where you're posting and maybe help you out in future.

Cocsetc really went missing LOL

What does lolz mean? I don't speak like a little girl.

ENZC will never be Bullish again, I don't know why you would even think like that, but your only responsibility in Chandra's Boiler Room with your 5 co-workers including the "moderator" is to create disinformation. You wouldn't know anything about Psychology if it hit you in the head.

Nobody knew the career Patent Attorney would commit Securities Fraud, so that's where we are... Of course, losers with nothing better to do can pick ALL the penny stocks and say they will all fail just to get their jollies. Congrats on that to you and your fellows. Here is a dedication to all of you... Get something to talk to like a voice remote or something.

Lol, my guess is he'll come back.

And he'll tweet or PR or tell docsetc something BULLISH on the phone and you'll all get into a bullish-lather (again), believing this time is different lol, and you'll actually buy more, and then get taken to the cleaners AGAIN.

Because clearly some here can't learn from others, or from their own mistakes. I have never been so bored that I need to hang out on a board of a stock I don't own or wasn't defrauded on, but to each their own I guess. What do you "own"? worthless shares in a fraudulent scam company that you WERE defrauded on.

YOUR POSTS are what keep ME coming back.

Lovin the lolz here.

I don't know why you Four think anybody needs your advice. You are probably 1 person with 4 usernames, but 1 or 4 doesn't matter since you are OPFOR for Chandra. There is absolutely zero reason for you to be here unless you are hired for deflection purposes.

If Chandra is smart, with the Jury out on that, he will take over ENZC after everybody there disappears and Harry and his merry band are in the clink for Securities Fraud. That's if he avoids Jail time with a plea to help or whatever. Then he will give shares to everybody that was defrauded, that's the easy way out. That's an acceptable settlement for me, I can't speak for others.

I have never been so bored that I need to hang out on a board of a stock I don't own or wasn't defrauded on, but to each their own I guess.

DRDUMI the following tune is for you. Sweet Dreams..>>

Many times the short bus riders have to have information given the information before they understand that docsetc was a ENZC pumper and now he has been running the fake lawsuits scam.

It seems you are very naive and gullible because you believe everything that docsetc posts.

IG

Docset why did you vanish again? I simply pointed out exactly what you said. You can't have it both ways. Just tell everyone your secret law firm and get on with it. 

Has anyone who signed up on the website received any real information? 

Another good one Dr Humorous!
I think you can get to 100,000 posts this Month if you try real hard, like repeating 10 messages constantly every day. He's averaged less than 1 post per day in March, so maybe he picks up the pace he can get to 30 anyway...

Unfortunately for you, you've ignored or belittled all posts that have encouraged you to wake up from your doc-induced slumber.

Keep dreaming that you know what's going on, while ignoring those who have pointed it out to you forever on this board.

Maybe you'll get the name of the law firm on the 100,000 post, lol clown activity by you DRHUMI. Focus your energy towards the right people and get your head out of cocketc's butt hole!

I think you can get to 100,000 posts this Month if you try real hard, like repeating 10 messages constantly every day.

Cocsetc is burnt chicken now. Acting like he's too busy for iHub now lol law firm name release today as promised, CANT WAIT DOC!! 

Game..... blouses

Has the law firm responded to those that signed on your BS site.

It seems as you are attempting to have investors sign up on your site that is nebulous at best.

Have you filed the Complaint - if so which court and who is listed as the Plaintiffs - you lied to shareholders about you could only have 10 Plaintiffs and that isn't true.

Why can't you file the Complaint and start the process.

Who is paying the still unnamed Law Firm and you have to produce an itemized list of expenses that have already been paid to the Attorney.

This fake lawsuit is so shady - first you were one of the main ENZC pumpers - you posted that ENZC had a cure for Covid which isn't true.

You are morally and ethically bankrupt.

IG

You're  in lala land lol

"SIT TIGHT with your ENZC investment and wait. Trust me. I just emailed some of the info to another member here, but apparently someone is trying to stop me from helping the membership here"

"There is a lot going on and it's best to sit tight with your ENZC investment, while some things play through. ENZC is transitioning but not the way you think"

Yes that is you after your insider convo with Chandra. Who's a liar? Maybe you should try a platform where you can delete your old posts.