TheCoach
22 hours ago
Hey HomeB. Obviously you've never coached. You've got to play every angle. But, hey, what do I know. 11 conference championships, 3 state titles, working with international teams, and, a robost portfolio. To all responders, just remember, jealousy is a stinky cologne. Have a great day everyone and good luck!
Cheers,
Coach
pumper_stumper
4 days ago
I could only try to talk sense to you people but can't give you the education to understand these obvious red flags. Yes, your losses are YOUR fault not managements! You ignored these obvious signs and hundreds more!!
August 2022:
I ask the question, how many vague, meaningless terms will shareholders accept from the company before they see through the bull? The answer appears to be this many, and the many more to come!
Hasn't "days and weeks ahead" taught shareholders anything?
No one can see that "ongoing and near completion" it just as meaningless and vague?
No one can see that "finalizing" is just as meaningless and vague?
How about " testing and use of the therapeutics are expected to be made possible ", and just as hilarious "plans are in place to proceed"? Now there's something you can hang your hat onto, right? LOL Yet they are quoted on this very board as if they were progress! This is beyond ridiculous!
NOT ONE shareholder will stand up and say date "xxxx" is the latest date that those meaningless phrases can mean! It was attempted back after the "days and weeks ahead" to say it meant 2 months max, which then was conveniently taken back... after 2 months. lol
I'll tell you, this company knows how to string along shareholders. If I didn't read the words, I'd say "no this is fiction, they don't really believe this. It's an act"
As I have said, there is a price for wearing blinders and not seeing plain in your face bull from the company. That price is a declining stock price!
Wishing, hoping and dreaming, while ignoring the reality of the failures of this company is NOT a valid investing strategy!
WE WILL SEE LOWER PRICES! Markets teach expensive lessons..
ENZC
Enzolytics Inc (PK)
0.0007
Its_TradingG
5 days ago
I showed you all the information that I had received from the Cotropias.
which was pure BS, congrats you got duped. Along with the rest of us, except you had no investment in ENZC lol good luck trying to recoup from the "SAFE" or should I say, not so safe.
Specific risks of investing in a SAFE:
Uncertain Conversion Event: SAFEs rely on a future equity financing round for conversion. If the company fails to raise funds or achieve a liquidity event, the SAFE may not convert, leaving investors with no equity.
Limited Control: SAFE investors generally have no voting rights or say in company decisions.
Potential for High Dilution: While SAFEs may have valuation caps and discounts, investors can still be diluted if the company raises more funding or issues additional SAFEs.
Risk of Total Loss: If the startup fails, SAFE investors could lose their entire investment. (THIS IS YOU)
SEC warnings: The SEC has issued warnings about investing in SAFEs, cautioning that they may not be as "safe" as the name suggests.
As you've been told for the 100th time, maybe you'll get it soon.
TJ24
5 days ago
The following information was provided by the Cotropias as part of their Wefunder offering:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the following reasons, we expect the human antibody Clone 3 to be an effective an immuotherapeutic treatment for individuals with HIV/AIDS.
In Vitro Testing Has Demonstrated the Neutralizing Capability of Our Monoclonal Antibody Clone 3
The ability of HIV to mutate renders anti-retroviral therapies ineffective against HIV in many cases. Because the Company's monoclonal antibody therapy targets a portion of the virus that does not change, such mutations are not expected to affect the monoclonal antibody therapy.
Significant testing demonstrates the basis for this expectation. Specifically, in in vitro tests conducted in five independent laboratories, Clone 3 has been tested against 41 clinical HIV isolates (strains) of the virus. Clone 3 has demonstrated that it successfully neutralizes 37 of them (100% effective against 92% of the HIV strain against which it was tested).
Clone 3 neutralizes the Clade B isolate that is predominate in North America and Europe. Clone 3 has also demonstrated the ability to neutralize the Clade C isolate found in Africa, China and India. In view of these test results, the Company is moving forward with animal trials to establish Clone 3 as a significant means for treatment of those that have HIV.
The lab results quoted were the product of testing in 5 independent laboratories. In tests conducted at the University of California of San Francisco (by Jay Levy, M.D.), Clone 3 Antibody was shown to have in vitro neutralization effect against geographically distinct clinical HIV (primary) isolates. Research conducted at four additional international institutes has confirmed these results of in vitro neutralization. In total, the neutralizing capabilities of Clone 3 have been verified at the following 5 laboratories:
1. University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA (Jay Levy, M.D.)
2. University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA (Kenneth Ugen, Ph.D.)
3. Polymun Scientific, GmbH, Vienna, AUSTRIA, (Hermann Katinger, Ph.D.)
4. Duke University, Durham, NC, USA (David Montefiori, Ph.D.)
5. Dana Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI), Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA, (Ruth Ruprecht, M.D., Ph.D.)
In these tests, Clone 3 neutralized [at IC90] 37 of 41 (>90%) of the clinical HIV-1 group M, N, and O isolates. Clone 3 neutralized 3 of 3 group O HIV isolates tested at 10 µg/ml in PBMC-based assay. In another study of Clone 3 tested against one group N primary HIV-1 isolate, results indicated that the IC90 for Clone 3 versus the HIV primary isolate YBF30 was 3.72 µg/ml. Further, Clone 3 has also been demonstrated to effectively neutralize 4 of 4 virulent pediatric South African clade C isolates [ZA349, ZA562, ZA600, ZA737]; and at 10 µg/ml, neutralize [IC99] a pediatric Zambian clade C HIV-1157, as well as the simian immunodeficiency virus construct SHIV-1157ip. Therefore, of the 45 HIV isolates against which Clone 3 has been tested, it neutralized 41 (over 91%).
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It seems that the Cotropias provided a good amount of of data in the above information.
Furthermore, between 2017 and 2020, the Cotropias had success in creating the recombinant form of the monoclonal antibody. The recombinant form is the form that is mass produced. They showed that the antibody could be mass produced.
The Cotropias were raising money for animal and human trials on the recombinant form. As far as I know, the animal and human trials have not taken place yet.
pumper_stumper
5 days ago
Stop it! You're hitting on many of the common pink sheet themes in a day! You are going to overload their brains!
Here is a fact to remember - 95-97% of all patents have no commercial value.
In the top 10 of pink sheet pumps is patents. Most pink sheet investors think patents validate the marketability of the product. Of course a patent means nothing in that regard. A patent doesn't even mean a product WORKS or has potential to work! It doesn't matter, as OTC investors don't understand patents. They flock to companies PRing patents like moths to light!
It really is a waste of time trying to educate TJ. But I'd love to challenge any ENZC pumper in this way. I will put up $20,000 in cash, if you put up $5,000 in cash, and can then demonstrate you've ever researched what percentage of drugs that are in lab testing, and then make it into a fully approved drug. Yes, this is the most basic of due diligence, yet these fools don't know and don't want to know. But of course the assumption is, despite having next to zero drug test reading knowledge, that THESE small handful of drugs by ENZC are going to magically be the exception. This again is insanity, pure and simple.
The lack of periodic test data published in PRs, over YEARS, is red flag number 1,032. But, hey Panther is bullish, and Chandra is working hard in silence, and that's all that matters, right? lol
pumper_stumper
5 days ago
Not odd at all. Again, the case is about one thing. It's not about ENZC as a company at all. It's about Zhabilov selling restricted shares (that he legally owned) years ago. So, it makes perfect sense that there is nothing in the complaint about Cotropia. Simple, because he didn't sell restricted shares.
In fact, it would be reasonable to think that either Chandra or Cotropia went to the SEC with their knowledge of Zhabilov selling his shares to get back at him for canning them, and that's what started this whole thing. There is no way the SEC is looking at ENZC stock transactions from the 2021-2 era, in 2024 unless someone tipped them off. This case is not about "investigations", it's about pink sheet execs turning on each other, which is VERY common, and part of the fun of watching this insanity.
pumper_stumper
5 days ago
Simple concept. If they were guilty of any criminal offense, show us the arrest, show us the charges!
You have very little understanding of the law (as well as investing). You have a silly idea that scamming is illegal. There are no criminal charges, nor will there ever be. There are zero legal actions against the company, from shareholders or the SEC. Not even a civil case! You rant about criminality and illegal actions by the company... show me the damn cases, show me the damn charges (which by the way, even if they existed, they'd then have to succeed and be proven)! It doesn't take years to file a damn case.
The reason why you have Terry creating a fake lawsuit is that even lowly Terry knows there is no case, otherwise it would have been filed, a YEAR ago!
If the execs could read your posts claiming they are criminals, I'd love to see them sue you for defamation! Maybe Terry's attorneys could defend you? lol
This is getting old. I keep trying to explain the same simple concepts, but you keep bringing up these things again and again. If you are right show me the damn cases!
price_and_volume
6 days ago
Dude it takes 2 to tango.
So, to you, scamming people is simply part of capitalism? Madoff was guilty of fraud, and deserved jail.
His investors were guilty of foolishly believing in returns that were too good to be true.
They believed they were the smarter-than-everyone-else chosen-ones - so yeah, some would say they deserved losses, which amazingly they never had to suffer during the belief-stage.
Whatever - get over yourself & Madoff - why not hold docsetc accountable for his fraud?
After all, this is the $ENZC board
#seeyouatthetop!
pumper_stumper
6 days ago
Being rewarded for being a smart investor is part of capitalism. Being punished for ignoring those that called out the scam years ago, and instead clinging to hope instead of logic, and for participating in known lies about lawsuits is natural.
Do you know of any legitimate company who's listed corporate email wasn't working for nearly a year, so that shareholders couldn't even email the company with questions? Yet without a word about it from the company? That alone wasn't enough of a sign for you? I'm sure you either made excuses for why that was okay, or, you were clueless that it happened.
You didn't miss one thing, you (and most here) missed/dismissed HUNDREDS of signs this was a scam.... for years! You cannot be rewarded for that!
You don't have a choice as to whether you like this or not. This is how markets work, always have and always will. Learn or be financially punished. That is the one thing that you do have a choice in. But, blaming others for your losses is 180 degrees from taking responsibility, and will result in more losses. There are several from this board that have moved on and suffered even more punishment in other scams!!! That's the price for not accepting blame and not educating themselves
Many don't have these skills. FINE! Understand it and don't attempt to buy individual stocks, and certainly be smart enough to not buy a pink sheet!!
pumper_stumper
1 week ago
I'm directly blaming every shareholder that has losses here, including you, for your losses! The signs of this scam have been obvious for YEARS! The fact is, you shouldn't be investing in OTC, and more definitely in an OTC "drug company"
You want to tell me you have the education and detailed knowledge of the drug industry to have been able to tell anything this company was "working on" was a viable drug candidate? I'll answer the question, no, you don't and not even close. Instead, rely on anonymous posters on a message board, who also don't have such knowledge and have no track record for any successful investing, and follow their opinions instead, simply because they are bullish like you, and expect to be rewarded for doing this? No!
Did you take a single minute to look at my ten year history of exposing scams here, and how every single one of my frequently posted stocks are down 99% or more, except for the more recent ones, who haven't had the time to lose 99% yet? This, while the market as a whole is up by multiples in that period? I'll answer... you didn't.
You need someone to point out to you that ANY drug company in history that has ever developed and testing a drug that have reached the market has hundreds or thousands of scientists working for them? And instead you think 5 people, one of whom was banned from practicing medicine, another who sued his father to take the "drug" his father developed 20 freakin years ago as his only "success", and another having not a single verifiable success in the drug industry in his life, are going to create and get a viable drug approved? This kind of thinking is insanity. You cannot be rewarded for insanity. THIS is YOUR fault, not the managements fault.
This is like saying someone put up a sign at the edge of a cliff saying "jump", and you jumped off it, and now you want to blame the person putting up the sign! NO! How about common sense?
The fact is that 99% of OTC investors NEVER learn, because like you, they don't learn and see how their losses were their own faults. By blaming management, you'll just go out and make the same mistake again.