On May 24, 2019, NexPoint Advisors, L.P.: (1) issued a press release which is filed as Exhibit 1 hereto
and is incorporated herein by reference, and (2) made certain excerpts from the March 11, 2019, Delaware Chancery Court Opinion (FrontFour Capital Group LLC, et al. v. Brook Taube, et al., Case No. 2019-0100) available on its website
www.medleycapitalvote.com, which is filed as Exhibit 2 hereto and is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 1
|
|
Press Release.
|
|
|
Exhibit 2
|
|
Excerpts from the Delaware Chancery Court Opinion.
|
|
|
|
Media Contact: Lucy Bannon | (972) 419-6272 | lbannon@highlandcapital.com
|
|
|
ISS and Glass Lewis Recommend Stockholders of Medley Capital Corporation Vote FOR NexPoints Slate of
Nominees at Annual Meeting
Leading proxy advisory firms both support removal of incumbent directors Seth Taube and Arthur Ainsberg
from MCC board
DALLAS, May 24, 2019 NexPoint Advisors, L.P. (NexPoint) announced today that Institutional Shareholder
Services (ISS) and Glass Lewis, two leading independent proxy advisory firms, both issued reports recommending that stockholders of Medley Capital Corporation (MCC) (NYSE:MCC) vote FOR NexPoints independent director
nominees at the June 4, 2019 annual meeting of stockholders (the Annual Meeting). In their proxy analyses, both ISS and Glass Lewis found sufficient reason to support the removal of the two incumbent directors, Seth Taube and Arthur
Ainsberg, who are up for
re-election.
The following provides summaries of the respective reports. To vote in
accordance with the recommendations from ISS and Glass Lewis, MCC stockholders should DISCARD any WHITE proxy card, and vote FOR Stephen A. Mongillo and Mark T. Goglia, NexPoints nominees, using their BLUE proxy card.
Visit
www.MedleyCapitalVote.com
to learn more about NexPoints nominees and to access additional information ahead of the Annual Meeting.
ISS Report on MCC
In summary, ISS concluded:
|
|
|
That further change at the board level is warranted as a result of inferior shareholder returns
during the incumbents tenure, troubling operating performance, and the Delaware Memorandum Opinion that found the companys nominees breached their fiduciary duties; and
|
|
|
|
That NexPoint has presented a compelling case that
its nominees are the best option available to
achieve that change.
|
ISS raised specific issues about the financial situation at MCC, noting:
|
|
|
The fact that the [proxy] contest has an element of urgency because net asset values have declined;
|
|
|
|
The threat that if net asset value is below [a $275 million] threshold for two consecutive
quarters
[outstanding] notes could be accelerated, creating substantial distress for the company; and
|
|
|
|
The presence of other worrying trends in the companys operating performance.
|
ISS expressed concerns about the MCC director nominees, including:
|
|
|
Their conflicted and underperforming investment management as well as their role in
oversee[ing] negative total shareholder returns; and
|
|
|
|
The fact that the nominees appear to have participated in a stonewalling response to
[NexPoint].
|
In its support for NexPoints nominees, ISS noted:
|
|
|
That NexPoint has specifically and intentionally selected unaffiliated nominees so that they will act
solely in the best interests of all MCC stockholders to evaluate competing strategic alternative options; and
|