FHS First HighSchool Education Group Co Ltd

ITEM 3. KEY INFORMATION

A. [Reserved]

B. Capitalization and Indebtedness

Not applicable.

C. Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds

Not applicable.

D. Risk Factors

Summary Risk Factors

Our business is subject to a number of risks, including risks that may prevent us from achieving our business objectives or may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, and prospects. These risks are discussed more fully below and include, but are not limited to, risks related to:

Risks related to our business and industry

Risks related to our corporate structure

Risks related to doing business in China

Risks related to the ADS

Risks Related to Our Business and Industry

Our efforts to be in compliance with the Implementation Rules has materially and adversely affected and may continue to materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospect in the future.

On May 14, 2021, the PRC State Council promulgated the amended Implementation Rules for Private Education Laws (the “Implementation Rules”), which became effective on September 1, 2021. Pursuant to the Implementation Rules, (1) foreign-invested enterprises established in China and social organizations whose actual controllers are foreign parties shall not sponsor, participate in or actually control private schools that provide compulsory education, (2) social organizations or individuals shall not control any private school that provides compulsory education or any non-profit private school that provides pre-school education by means of, among others, merger, acquisition and contractual arrangements, and (3) private schools providing compulsory education shall not conduct any transaction with any related party, and any other private school conducting any transaction with any related party shall follow the principles of openness, fairness and impartiality, fix the price reasonably and regulate the decision-making, and shall not damage the interests of the state and the school or the rights and interests of the teachers and students, which may impose restrictions on the above-mentioned related party transactions. Such prohibition has significantly affected the enforceability of the exclusive management services and business cooperation agreements with affiliated entities providing compulsory education.

The Implementation Rules have had significant impacts on our business operations and our results of operations. As a result of the effectiveness of the Implementation Rules, we have lost control over the Affected Entities as from September 1, 2021, which primarily include the middle schools providing compulsory education and the sponsor entities within China that are affected by the Implementation Rules. Consequently, we classified the operation for the Affected Entities as discontinued operations. We have determined that, in substance, we had ceased to recognize revenues for all activities related to the Affected Entities and had discontinued all business activities with such entities by September 1, 2021 while continuing to provide essential services to keep these schools in normal operations. Such discontinuation has had a material and adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our ability to engage in the compulsory education in China has been materially and adversely affected, and we cannot assure you that we will be able to restore such ability, which could materially and adversely affect our business, prospects, results of operations and financial condition.

We have limited operating history, which makes it difficult to predict our prospects and our business and financial performance.

We have a limited operating history of nine years, with our first school established in 2012. Our limited operating history may not serve as an adequate basis for evaluating our prospect and results of operations, including revenues, cash flows and operating margins. We have encountered, and may continue to encounter in the future, risks, challenges and uncertainties associated with operating a private education business, such as addressing regulatory compliance and uncertainty, engaging, training and retaining high-quality teachers, and expanding our school network. If we do not manage these risks successfully, our operating and financial results may differ materially from our expectations and our business and financial performance may suffer.

In addition, as some of our schools commenced operations recently, they have not yet reached their full capacity. For newly established schools, we only admit students for the entry classes, such as the tenth grade for high schools, but not higher grades, upon the establishment of a new school, which leads to a relatively lower utilization rate for such schools. With our existing students progressing into the next grades in school and as we fill up new entry classes, the utilization rates of our newly established schools will increase accordingly. We cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully increase the utilization rate for the schools that are in the ramp-up stage, which may materially and adversely affect our business growth and profitability.

If local governments claim to have sponsor interests in certain of our schools, we could be subject to contractual disputes in relation to the sponsorship in those schools or the entry into contractual arrangements over those schools.

We primarily collaborate with local governments to establish and operate our schools. The cooperative arrangements for a total of seven schools provide that the local governments retain ownership in the affected schools’ “ownership assets” without defining what constitutes such assets. It is possible that “ownership assets” could be interpreted in a way to include sponsor interest, in which case, the local governments may have a claim over the sponsor interest in the affected schools. We have obtained written statements from local governments for all of the seven schools confirming our understanding that “ownership assets” refer to real estate and tangible assets that local governments provided.

In addition, the school operation permits for Yunnan Hengshui Experimental Secondary School—Xishan School and Yunnan Yuxi Hengshui Experimental High School provide that the local governments and Long-Spring Education are co-sponsors of such schools. We have obtained written statements for Yunnan Hengshui Experimental Secondary School—Xishan School and Yunnan Yuxi Hengshui Experimental High School from the local governments confirming our understanding that the sponsor interests of such schools belong to Long-Spring Education. As of the date of this annual report, we are in the process of amending these permits to designate Long-Spring Education as the sole sponsor.

Furthermore, according to the list released by People's Government of Xishan District on March 30, 2022, Yunnan Hengshui Experimental Secondary School—Xishan School may be turned into a public school from September 2022. As of the date of this annual report, we are in the process of communicating with the competent authorities on such matter.

To the extent that any local government has a claim over the sponsor interest in or control over any of our schools, we could be subject to contractual disputes. For example, the government claimants could argue that they have de facto sponsor interest in the affected schools per our cooperative arrangements and that the entry into the contractual arrangements in relation to the affected schools have infringed their interests. If the government claimants successfully persuaded the court to rule in their favor, we could lose control over the affected schools and may be unable to receive the full rights and economic benefits of any or all of those schools, in which case we would no longer be able to include the operating results of those schools in our consolidated financial statements, which in turn would materially and adversely affect business, results of operation and financial condition.

Uncertainties exist in relation to new legislation or proposed changes in the PRC regulatory requirements regarding private education, which may materially and adversely affect our group structure, our business, financial condition and results of operation

Pursuant to the Law on Promoting Private Education of the PRC (the “Private Education Law”), last amended and becoming effective on December 29, 2018, sponsors of private schools may choose to establish schools in China as either non-profit or for-profit schools. Sponsors are not permitted to establish for-profit schools that provide compulsory education services, which cover grades one to nine. Sponsors of for-profit private schools are entitled to retain the profits from their schools and the operating surplus may be allocated to the sponsors pursuant to the PRC Company Law and other relevant laws and regulations. Sponsors of non-profit private schools are not entitled to any distribution of profits from their schools and all revenues must be used for the operation of the schools. For further details, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Regulations—Regulations on Private Education in the PRC—The Law on Promoting Private Education.” Our school sponsors have registered Hengshizhong Education Tutorial School, Xinping Long-Spring Advanced Secondary School, and Xishuangbanna Long-Spring Experimental Secondary School as for-profit private schools and have registered Qujing Hengshui Experimental Secondary School, Xinping Hengshui Experimental Middle School, Qiubei Long-Spring Experimental Secondary School, Wenshan Long-Spring Experimental Secondary School, and Mengla Long-Spring Experimental Secondary School as non-profit private schools, while have not submitted classified registration materials for the rest of our schools as for-profit or non-profit educational institutions. We cannot assure you that our current intention to register some of our schools as non-profit educational institutions will not materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. As a holding company, our ability to generate profits, pay dividends and other cash distributions to our shareholders under the Private Education Law is affected by many factors, including but not limited to the characterizations of our schools as for-profit or non-profit schools, the profitability of our schools and other affiliated entities, and our ability to receive dividends and other distributions from our wholly-owned PRC subsidiary, Yunnan WFOE, which in turn depends on the service fees paid to Yunnan WFOE from our schools and other affiliated entities. If our schools are unable to be registered as for-profit private education entities, the approval of which is subject to the discretion of government authorities, our contractual arrangements with such schools may be subject to more stringent scrutiny. Furthermore, pursuant to the Private Education Law, sponsors are not permitted to establish for-profit schools if such schools provide compulsory education services, which cover grades one to nine. Nevertheless, during the reporting period, compulsory education services accounted for a significant portion of our student base as well as revenue.

In addition, the Opinions on Further Strengthening and Regulating the Administration of Education Fees (the “Opinions”), which were issued on August 17, 2020 by the MOE, the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Finance, the State Administration of Market Regulation and the National Press and Publication Administration, reiterate the provision from the decision that the sponsors of non-profit privately-run schools may not obtain proceeds from the running of schools. The Opinions further provide that the sponsors of non-profit privately-run schools and non-profit sino-foreign cooperative educators may not obtain proceeds from the running of schools such as tuition income, distributing school balances (residual assets) or transferring proceeds from the running of schools through related-party transactions or affiliated parties or other means. The Opinions have not specified (1) whether the contractual arrangements fall within the activities of transferring the proceeds from the running of schools through profit privately-run schools and non-profit sino-foreign cooperative educators may not obtain proceeds from the running of schools such as tuition income, distributing school balances (residual assets) or transferring proceeds from the running of schools through related-party transactions or affiliated parties or other means, (2) the relevant legal consequences of engaging in activities through contractual arrangements, or (3) the scope of proceeds from the running of schools by listing other possible income sources such as meal and accommodation services.

We are entitled to the tuition and boarding fees to be paid by our schools that are largely derived from the proceeds from the running of schools pursuant to our contractual arrangements. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—C. Organizational Structure—Our Contractual Arrangements.” If any law and regulation that may be promulgated in the future further defines the contractual arrangements, including ours, as related-party transactions transferring proceeds from the running of schools, we may not obtain the part of the tuition and boarding fees under our contractual arrangements that is funded by proceeds from the running of schools. As advised by our PRC legal counsel, Jingtian & Gongcheng, the Opinions do not affect the legality of our contractual arrangements in accordance with applicable PRC laws and regulations, as the provisions under the Opinions did not render the contractual arrangements invalid under the Civil Code of the PRC. As of the date of this annual report, however, we have not sought declaration from the relevant government authorities as to the legality of our contractual agreements under the Opinions, and we are not aware of any official administrative or judicial declaration on, or interpretation of, the Opinions, especially as applied to contractual or other similar arrangements under which we operate. We are also not aware of when official administrative or judicial declaration or interpretation on that matter will be released, if at all, and we cannot assure you that the Opinions will not be interpreted, or further laws and regulations will not be promulgated, in a way that would affect or impair our ability to retain the tuition and boarding fees under the contractual arrangements in the future. Our business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially and adversely affected if we are unable to obtain any or all of the tuition and boarding fees to be paid by our schools under the contractual arrangements.

We may not be able to execute our growth strategies, continue to grow rapidly or manage our growth effectively.

We have experienced steady growth and expansion since the establishment of our first secondary school in 2014. We plan to continue to expand our operations in different geographic locations in China primarily by (1) entering into partnerships with local governments and independent third parties; (2) establishing new self-owned schools; and (3) acquiring additional schools if there are suitable targets.

However, we may not be able to continue to grow as we did in the past due to uncertainties involved in the process as follows:

These risks may increase significantly as we expand into new geographical areas. We may find it difficult to manage our financial resources, implement uniform education standard and operational policies and maintain consistency across our network. There are no guarantees that we will be able to effectively manage any future growth in an efficient, cost-effective and timely manner, or at all. Our growth in a relatively short period of time is not necessarily indicative of results that we may achieve in the future. In addition, local governments and cooperative partners may have interests which are not entirely in line with ours and may consider their own interests or the interests of other stakeholders of schools in making cooperation decisions, and as a result, we may be unable to execute our expansion plan and growth strategies in a cost-effective or timely manner, or at all. Any failure in our management and execution of our expansion plan may materially and adversely affect our ability to capitalize on new business opportunities, which in turn may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

These risks may increase significantly as we expand into new geographical areas. We may find it difficult to manage our financial resources, implement uniform education standard and operational policies and maintain consistency across our network. There are no guarantees that we will be able to effectively manage any future growth in an efficient, cost-effective and timely manner, or at all. Our growth in a relatively short period of time is not necessarily indicative of results that we may achieve in the future. In addition, local governments and cooperative partners may have interests which are not entirely in line with ours and may consider their own interests or the interests of other stakeholders of schools in making cooperation decisions, and as a result, we may be unable to execute our expansion plan and growth strategies in a cost-effective or timely manner, or at all. Any failure in our management and execution of our expansion plan may materially and adversely affect our ability to capitalize on new business opportunities, which in turn may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may be unable to charge tuition and boarding fees at sufficient levels to be profitable or increase our fee level.

Our revenues are primarily driven by our tuition and boarding fees. For 2019, 2020 and 2021, tuition income accounted for 78.1%, 78.4% and 81.0% of our total revenues, respectively, and our boarding fees accounted for 4.7%, 4.6% and 4.8% of our total revenues, respectively, for the same periods. Subject to applicable regulatory requirements, we determine our tuition and boarding fee rates based on many factors, including market supply and demands for our education, our cost of operations, the quality of education services we provide, the geographic area we operate in, and general economic conditions of the PRC. Although we have been able to increase the tuition and boarding fees we charge our students at certain schools in the past, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to maintain or increase our tuition in the future without adversely affecting the demand for our education services. Our competitive advantage might be adversely affected if we fail to implement the optimal pricing strategy to maintain our profitability, which could adversely affect our student enrollments and consequently our revenues and cash flow.

As part of our cooperation with local governments, we admit a certain number of local students on behalf of the government as publicly-sponsored students. These students pay us tuition typically at the level of public schools, which are usually lower than the normal tuition we charge, and under our cooperative arrangements with local governments for certain of our schools, we may receive government subsidies to make up for the tuition difference. As of December 31, 2019, 2020 and 2021, the number of publicly-sponsored students in our schools was 4,607, 6,755 and 7,993, respectively, accounting for 33.7%, 39.2% and 42.8% of our total students for our continuing operations as of the same dates. We have limited discretion in increasing the tuition for publicly-sponsored students, and the government subsidies have an upper limit which we may gradually use up over a number of years. We intend to re-negotiate with the local governments to obtain additional government subsidies to cover the tuition difference for the publicly-sponsored students after we use up the upper limit or our cooperative arrangements with local governments expire. If our re-negotiation efforts fail, or if we cannot collect the outstanding amount of government subsidies on time, we would be unable to make up for the price difference for publicly-sponsored students, which would materially and adversely affect our profitability.

The tuition and boarding fees we charge are subject to regulatory restrictions. While we are not required to obtain pre-approval from relevant authorities before raising our tuition and boarding fees in Yunnan province, China where most of our schools are located, we are generally required to file and record our price increase with local governments, who in turn still maintain certain level of control and oversight of our operation. We might also be inspected by relevant pricing authorities in the future, which could result in negative adjustments in our tuition and boarding fees and material disruption of our operations.

Furthermore, the tuition we may charge is subject to a number of other factors, such as the perception of our brand, the academic results achieved by our students, our ability to hire qualified teachers, and local economic conditions. Any significant deterioration in these factors could have a material adverse effect on our ability to charge tuition at levels for us to remain profitable.

If we fail to enroll and retain a sufficient number of students, our business could be materially and adversely affected.

Our ability to continue to enroll and retain students for our schools is critical to the continued success and growth of our business. The success of our efforts to enroll and retain students will depend on several factors, including our ability to:

In addition, local and provincial government authorities may impose restrictions on the number of students we can enroll. Our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected if we cannot maintain or increase our student base as we expand our school network.

Our ability to maintain sufficient cash to fund our operations depends on our financing activities.

Our ability to maintain sufficient cash to fund our operations depends on our financing activities. In April 2019, August 2020 and November 2021, we entered into sale and leaseback arrangements with certain financing leasing companies for net financing proceeds of RMB28.7 million, RMB93.5 million and RMB50.0 million (US$7.8 million), respectively. Under the sale and leaseback arrangements, Yunnan WFOE, Long-Spring Education, Yunnan Long-Spring Logistics Service Co., Ltd. and ten of our schools, or collectively the lessees, sold certain equipment, including computers, projectors and printers, to the lessors. Concurrent with the sale of the leased equipment, the lessees lease back all of the leased equipment sold to the lessor for a lease term of two or three years. We consider the substance of the transaction to be debt financing in nature and no gain or loss is recognized upon the sale of these assets. If the lessees fail to make lease payments in full and timely or there be any material adverse change in our business, the lessor has the right to immediately collect the total lease payments, request for penalty on late payment, and/or retrieve the leased equipment. As a result, our ability to maintain sufficient cash to fund our operations could be diminished, which may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Any unfavorable changes in our cooperative relationships with third parties or favorable government policy treatment may adversely affect our business.

Our asset-light business model, under which we form mutually beneficial cooperative arrangements with third parties, including local governments and real estate developers, has allowed us to grow rapidly and expand with light capital commitments and have more flexibility in our allocation of financial resources. Under such arrangements, our partners contributed or leased to us land and/or school facilities, and our government partners also granted to us favorable tax treatments or other forms of favorable government policies or support, while we contributed our expertise in operating private schools, teachers, as well as operating expenses of the schools and capital expenditures to construct and renovate school facilities.

If our relationship with our partners deteriorates or favorable government policies and support cease to be available, we may incur substantial amount of expenses in connection with our infrastructure, promotion, and other matters relating to school establishment and operations, which may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. We may also be unable to form cooperative relationship with third parties in the geographic areas we plan to enter and expand into, which would materially and adversely affect our ability to grow as quickly as planned or maintain historical growth rates.

The cooperative arrangements for five schools within our network have provided that the local government has the right to appoint a majority of a school’s board of supervisors, which shall be the supreme decision-making body in school management. As of the date of this annual report, we obtained written statements from local governments for four of such schools confirming that the school council or board of director should be the decision-making body for such schools. To the extent any of these local governments changes their view toward our collaborative relationships and claims to have control in these schools, we could be subject to contractual disputes with the local governments in relation to the management of such schools.

In September 2018, we entered into certain cooperation agreements with local governments in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China, pursuant to which we provide school operation and management services and receive service fees. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Our Schools and Programs” We are also required to meet certain academic performance targets pursuant to such agreements. If we fail to meet such performance targets, we may be found in breach of the agreements and be unable to continue our cooperation with the relevant governments, which may materially and adversely affect our relationship with the relevant governments, as well as our business, financial condition and results of operations. We may also be unable to enter into similar cooperation agreements with third parties in the future, which may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations

We may be unable to obtain all required approvals, licenses and make all required registrations for our education services and business operations, and may be subject to fines and penalties if the operations of our business do not comply with applicable PRC laws and regulation.

In order to conduct our business and operate our schools in China, we are required to obtain and maintain various approvals, licenses and permits and fulfill registration and filing requirements. For example, to establish and operate a school in the PRC, we are required to obtain a private school operation permit from the local education bureau and register with the local civil affairs bureau to obtain a certificate of registration for a privately-run non-enterprise unit for a non-profit school, or register with the local market supervision and administration department to obtain a business license for a for-profit school. Such local regulatory authorities may also conduct annual inspection of our schools. We currently hold valid private school operation permits for all of our operating schools except for Chengdu Long-Spring Tutorial School, Shaanxi Hengshi Tutorial School and Chongqing Hengshi Tutorial School, which are still in the process of obtaining a private school operation permit and registering with the local market supervision and administration department or the local civil affairs bureau, and Hengshizhong Education Tutorial School for which the private school operation permit has been cancelled. For such schools which conduct business before we can obtain a private school operation permit, we may be subject to order to cease our operation, refund the income we collected and a fine ranging from one to five times of the income the sponsor collected. Ordos Hengshui Experimental High School is still in the process of applying for the renewal of such permit. We cannot guarantee that all of our existing schools will be able to renew their permits, or that all of our newly opened schools will be able to receive operation permits in a timely manner or at all, which may materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.

A total of 17 of our schools have not set up their own on-site medical clinics, all of such schools are in the process of engaging third-party hospitals and/or medical clinics with valid practice license to provide healthcare services on campus, and recruiting a sufficient number of medical care personnel. However, we cannot assure you that we may be able to obtain all relevant practice licenses, retain third-party licensed medical care providers or otherwise fully comply with the relevant laws and regulations relating to on-site medical clinics at all of our current locations in a timely manner or at all, and we may be subject to orders to rectify within a specified period of time.

While we intend to obtain all requisite permits, approvals and complete the necessary filings, renewals and registrations on a timely basis for our schools, there is no assurance that we will be able to obtain all required permits given the significant amount of discretion the local PRC authorities may have in interpreting, implementing and enforcing relevant rules and regulations, as well as other factors that are beyond our control and anticipation. If we fail to receive required permits in a timely manner or obtain or renew any permits and certificates, we may be subject to fines, confiscation of the gains derived from our non-compliant operations, the suspension of our non-compliant operations or disgorgement of our profits to compensate for any economic loss suffered by our students or other relevant parties, which may materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.

We may not be able to successfully integrate businesses we acquired or plan to acquire in the future, which may adversely affect our business growth.

We have expanded rapidly primarily through organic growth. We have, in the past, acquired an underperforming high school and successfully turned it into a high-quality high school with solid academic results. We may attempt to make similar acquisitions in the future. The integration of acquired schools is complicated and time-consuming and requires significant resource commitment, standardized integration process, and adequate planning and implementation. We may not successfully integrate the schools we acquire in a timely manner and may not effectively and efficiently manage our expansion, which would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, as advised by our PRC legal counsel, our plan to pursue further expansion through acquisitions could be affected by regulatory uncertainty in connection with the Private Education Law and related implementation rules.

We may be unable to engage with the Affected Entities to provide education services as we expected.

Following the effectiveness of the Implementation Rules, we have been engaging with the relevant government authorities and external advisors to seek full compliance with the Implementation Rules and other applicable PRC laws and regulations. However, we are exploring the possibility of continuing to engage with the Affected Entities in future cooperation on mutually acceptable terms and in full compliance with the Implementation Rules and other applicable PRC laws and regulations. The future cooperation may involve our provision of management services to the Affected Entities, such as consultation for school operation, catering and accommodation, property management and maintenance, administrative management, student admission and school branding. However, the future cooperation with the Affected Entities, if any, will be arm’s length transactions on mutually acceptable terms, and we cannot assure you that the cooperation under contemplation will be specifically permitted by competent government authorities or that we will be able to agree on commercial terms satisfactory to us, and as such, we may be unable to effect the cooperation with the Affected Entities as we expect.

We may not be able to attract and retain a sufficient number of qualified teachers and principals.

As an education service provider, our ability to recruit and retain qualified teachers and principals is crucial to the quality of our education and services and our brand and reputation. To ensure our successful operation and growth, we need to retain and continue to hire high-quality teachers specialized in specific subjects that are able to teach the courses we offer or plan to offer to our students, as well as high-quality principals who are able to effectively manage the operation of our schools. We must provide competitive compensation and benefits packages to attract and retain qualified candidates. However, there is no guarantee that we would be able to keep recruiting teachers and principals meeting the high standards in the future, or retain our current, high-quality teachers and principals, especially when we seek a more rapid expansion plan to meet the growing demands for our services. Furthermore, under our business model, we may not be able to provide extensive training to our newly hired teachers for them to familiarize with our teaching methods and to retain existing teachers who can provide such trainings. A shortage of high-quality teachers and principals, a decrease in the quality of our teachers’ and principals’ performance, whether actual or perceived, or a significant increase in the cost to engage or retain high-quality teachers and principals would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may not be able to maintain the market recognition of our brand and our reputation.

Our success depends heavily on our reputation. We might face potential difficulties in maintaining our reputation and brand recognition, which could adversely affect our student enrollments and results of operations. Our ability to maintain our brand and reputation could be affected by many factors, some of which are beyond our control, including: our ability to deliver satisfactory academic results, the teaching quality of our teachers, the academic quality and achievements of our students, news report about our company, our schools or our partners, results of government inspections or compliance with relevant regulations, unauthorized use or other infringement of our copyright and brand by third party, campus incidents, especially safety incidents, and any kind of disruption of our education services.

We have developed our student base mainly through word-of-mouth referrals. Our other promotion efforts include participating in education fairs organized by local governments and distributing relevant promotional materials in connection with such fairs. However, we cannot guarantee that our promotional efforts will be enough to maintain or enhance our reputation in the marketplace to remain competitive. Our promotional efforts may be insufficient to enhance our brand recognition and reputation and we may incur excessive expenses for our promotions, which may adversely affect our business.

Accidents, injuries or other harm at our school premises or otherwise arising from or in connection with our education services may adversely affect our reputation and subject us to liabilities.

We may be subject to liabilities arising from accidents or injuries or other harm to students or other people on our school premises, including those caused by or otherwise arising in connection with our school facilities, employees or education services. We could also face claims alleging that we were negligent, provided inadequate maintenance to our school facilities or supervision of our employees and therefore may be held liable for accidents or injuries suffered by our students or other people at our schools. In addition, if any of our students or our employees or contractors commits unlawful acts or displays seriously inappropriate behavior, we could face allegations that we failed to provide adequate security, supervision or were otherwise responsible for his or her actions, even if such acts or behavior may occur off our school premises. As an education services provider, we may be held liable for other accidents, injuries or other harm in relation to our education services and students, such as commuting to our schools and extracurricular activities. We may also be subject to liabilities arising from out-of-school activities or events which we organize or involve in. As a result, our schools may be perceived to be unsafe, which may discourage prospective students from applying to or attending our schools.

Our schools have also outsourced the operation of all of our meal catering services to third parties since September 2017. We cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain the quality of food or monitor the meal preparation process to ensure its quality, that service providers adhere to food quality standards, or that no incidents resulted from food quality will occur in the future. In the event of incidents arising from poor quality food that result in any serious health violations or medical emergencies, such as mass food poisonings, our business and reputation could be materially and adversely affected.

Furthermore, although we maintain certain liability insurance, the insurance coverage may not be adequate to fully protect us from these kinds of claims and liabilities. In addition, we may not be able to obtain liability insurance in the future at reasonable prices or at all. A liability claim against us or any of our employees could adversely affect our reputation, student enrollment and retention, and teacher recruitment and retention. Such a claim, even if unsuccessful, could create unfavorable publicity, incur substantial expenses for us and divert the time and resources of our management, all of which may have a material and adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

Failure to adequately and promptly respond to changes in examination systems, admission standards, test materials, teaching methods and regulation changes in the PRC could render our education services less attractive to students.

Our reputation, student enrollment, and results of operations depend in part on our ability to prepare our students for various tests and examinations, such as Gaokao. Admission and assessment processes undergo continuous changes, in terms of subject and skill focus, question type, examination format and the manner in which the processes are administered. We are therefore required to continually update and enhance our curricula, course materials and teaching methods. Any failure to respond to the changes in a timely and cost-effective manner will adversely impact our students’ academic performance and the marketability of our education services, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Regulations and policies that decrease the weight of scholastic competition achievements in the admissions process mandated by government authorities or adopted by schools or affect the number of students participating in Gaokao or Zhongkao may have an impact on our student enrollments and teaching methods. For example, the Ministry of Education of the PRC (the “MOE”), issued certain implementing opinions in January 2014 to clarify that local educational administrative departments at all levels, public schools and private schools are not allowed to use examinations to select their students for admission to middle schools from primary schools. As a result, we may need to adjust our teaching methods to accommodate a student body of a potentially wide competency range. Failure to track and respond to these changes in a timely and cost-effective manner would render our courses, services and products less attractive to students, which may materially and adversely affect our reputation and ability to continue to attract students.

If we fail to help our students achieve their academic goals, student and parent satisfaction with our education services may decline.

The success of our business depends on our ability to deliver quality school experiences and help our students achieve their academic goals. Our schools may not be able to meet the expectations of our students and their parents in terms of students’ academic performance. A student may not be able to attain the level of academic improvement that he or she seeks and his or her performance may otherwise not progress or decline due to reasons beyond our control. We may not be able to provide education that is satisfactory to all of our students and their parents, and student and parent satisfaction with our services may decline. In addition, we cannot guarantee that our students will be admitted to higher levels of education institutions of their choice. Any of the foregoing could result in a student’s withdrawal from our schools, and dissatisfied students or their parents may attempt to persuade other students or prospective students not to attend our schools. If our ability to retain students decreases significantly or if we otherwise fail to continue to enroll and retain new students, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

We face intense competition in the PRC education industry and we may fail to compete effectively.

The private education sector in China is rapidly evolving, highly fragmented and competitive, and we expect competition in this sector to persist and intensify. We compete with public schools and other private schools that offer similar programs in each geographic market where we operate our schools. In particular, we face significant competition from public schools and other private schools in Yunnan province, China. Although our business model and cooperative relationship with local governments helped us receive favorable regulatory treatments, we may fail to compete effectively with public schools that may enjoy more substantial financial and policy support from the local governments. Additionally, our competitors may adopt similar curriculums, school management approaches and marketing strategies, with different pricing and service packages that may be more appealing than ours to students and parents in the relevant regions. Some of our competitors might be able to dedicate more resources than we can to the development and improvement of their schools and respond more quickly than we can to the changes in student demands, testing materials, admission standards, market needs and new technologies. As such, we may be required to lower our tuition and boarding fees or increase our spending in order to maintain our competitiveness and retain or attract students and qualified teachers or pursue new market opportunities. If we are unable to successfully compete for new students, attract and retain competent teachers or other key personnel, maintain or increase our tuition level, enhance the quality of our education services or maintain our operations in a cost-effective manner, our business and/or results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

Our business may be disrupted if we lose the services of our senior management and other key personnel.

Our continued success depends in part on the expertise and dedication of our senior management team and other key personnel. We rely on our senior management and school administrators for the efficient and effective operation of our schools and the execution of our business plans, which is vital for us to compete in the education industry. We may experience changes in our senior management in the future for reasons beyond our control. We may not be able to retain our directors, senior management, or other key management personnel, who might either join our competitors or start their own businesses that directly compete with us. If we lose one or more of our directors, senior management, or other key management personnel, we might not be able to hire qualified candidates to fill the gap in a timely manner and our business could be materially disrupted or otherwise adversely affected.

Our school premises and facilities are subject to extensive governmental approvals and compliance requirements.

The construction and usage of our school premises requires various permits, certificates and approvals, including, for example, land use rights certificates, construction permits, public health permits and certificates for passing fire control assessments. As of the date of this annual report, we leased six business premises for our schools and were provided with 13 business premises by governments pursuant to our cooperative arrangements with them. For premises we leased from or were provided for use by local governments or entities associated with local governments, the lessors or premise providers failed to obtain the relevant land use rights certificates, construction planning approvals or construction permits, or failed to pass the relevant environmental protection verification, fire control assessment or inspection for completion of construction, or failed to provide us with the authorization to lease the premises. If the government authorities suspend the use of such premises or require measures to be taken to rectify the defects or any of our lease agreements is invalidated due to the defects of such premises, or if any third party successfully challenges our use of the affected premises, the operation of the affected schools could be interrupted and we may need to relocate those schools, which would incur additional expenses and our business and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

We have also encountered, and may in the future encounter, problems in fulfilling the conditions precedent to the receipt of the permits, certificates and approvals for our self-built premises. As of the date of this annual report, we built four business properties for our schools on the leased or provided premises. For our self-built school premises which we have already put in use, the lessors or premise providers have not obtained the relevant land use rights certificates, construction planning approval or construction permits, or passed environmental protection verification, fire control assessment and inspection for completion of construction primarily because the lessors or premise providers failed to fulfill the conditions precedent to completing such procedures, and we may be subject to fines and/or temporary suspension of the usage of the affected school premises before the defects are rectified. If the lessors, premise providers or we ourselves are not able to rectify the defects in a timely manner, or fail to obtain requisite permits, certificates or approvals for campuses and school premises we plan to develop in the future, we may become subject to administrative fines and other penalties, which could disrupt our business and cause us to incur additional expenses.

A significant portion of our schools are not in compliance with fire safety regulations.

According to the PRC fire safety laws and regulations, construction projects and decoration projects are generally required to obtain fire safety permits or complete fire safety filings except for certain statutory exemptions. As of the date of this annual report, we leased six business premises for our schools, were provided with 13 business premises by governments pursuant to our cooperative arrangements with them, and built four business properties for our schools on the leased or provided premises. As of the date of this annual report, we have neither obtained the fire safety permits or written evidence for passing the fire safety inspection nor made the requisite fire safety filings for any of our school premises, except for Yunnan Long-Spring Foreign Language Secondary School, primarily because the lessors or premise providers failed to fulfill the condition precedent to completing such procedures. We have, however, arranged inspections for nine of the premises by a third-party fire control assessment institution and obtained an assessment report that eight of our school premises have met the technical requirements for the fire safety inspections. We cannot assure you that the lessors, the premise providers or we ourselves would be able to obtain the fire safety permits, rectify the defects or otherwise fully comply with the relevant fire safety laws and regulations at all of our current locations in a timely manner or at all. Given the relevant lessors or premise providers have the legal obligation to obtain fire safety permits or complete fire safety filings, we cannot assure you that such lessor or premise provider can meet the conditions precedents to obtaining such permits or completing such filings, over which we have little control. We may be subject to orders to rectify within a specified period of time or to suspend operations for such non-compliance. As a result, we may not be able to occupy certain of our current locations and may be ordered to relocate our operations to other locations that comply with the relevant fire safety laws and regulations, and we cannot assure you that such alternative locations will be available on commercially reasonable terms or at all, which could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial conditions.

Failure to control rental costs, control the quality, maintenance and management of the leased school premises, obtain leases at desired locations at reasonable prices or failure to comply with the applicable PRC property laws and regulations regarding certain of our leased and owned premises could materially and adversely affect our business.

As of the date of this annual report, we leased six premises and have been provided with 13 premises by governments pursuant to our cooperative arrangements with a total gross floor area of approximately 982,173 square meters for our school operations. These school premises, including the associated school buildings and facilities, were developed and/or maintained by our landlords or the providers. Accordingly, we are not in a position to effectively control the quality, maintenance and management of such premises, buildings and facilities. In the event that the quality of the school premises, buildings and facilities deteriorates, or if any or all of our landlords or providers fail to properly maintain and renovate such premises, buildings or facilities in a timely manner, or at all, the operation of our schools could be materially and adversely affected. In addition, if any of our landlords terminates the existing lease agreements, refuses to continue to lease the premises to our schools when such lease agreements expire, or increase rent to the level not acceptable to us, or the providers refuse to continue to provide the premises for our use, we will be forced to relocate our schools to other locations, we may not be able to find suitable premises for such relocation without incurring significant time and costs, or at all. If this occurs, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected, and our students, teachers and staff may also be negatively affected by such relocation.

We did not receive from the lessors of some of our leased premises copies of the title certificates or obtain proof of authorization to lease or provide the premises for our use from land providers for certain of our school premises. As of the date of this annual report, we are not aware of any actions, claims or investigations threatened against us or our lessors or premise providers with respect to the defects in our land use interests. However, if any of our leases or cooperative arrangements is terminated as a result of challenges by third parties or government authorities for lack of title certificates or proof of authorization to lease, while we do not expect to be subject to any fines or penalties, we may be forced to relocate the affected schools and incur additional expenses relating to such relocation, or we may not be able to find suitable premises for relocation at all.

Under the applicable PRC laws and regulations, the parties to a lease agreement are required to register and file the executed lease agreement with the relevant government authorities. As of the date of this annual report, all the lease agreements for the leased properties that we occupy are not registered or filed. As advised by our PRC counsel, while the failure to complete the lease registration will not affect the legal effectiveness of the lease agreements according to PRC law, the relevant real estate administrative authorities may require the parties to the lease agreements to complete lease registration within a prescribed period of time and the failure to do so may subject the parties to fines ranging from RMB1,000 to RMB10,000 for each non-registered lease. While we have not been subject to any penalties or disciplinary action related to the failure to register our lease agreements, we cannot assure you that we will not be subject to penalties or other disciplinary actions for our past and future non-compliance. The failure to comply with the applicable PRC property laws and regulations regarding certain of our leased premises may cause us to make relocations and be subject to fines and suspension of business, which may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We face uncertainties with respect to the development of regulatory requirements on operating licenses and permits for our online education services in China.

As a supplement to conventional school programs, we provide online education services on third-party platforms to our students on a complimentary basis. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Our Online Education Services.” As advised by our PRC legal counsel, Jingtian & Gongcheng, the launch of the courses developed by us on third-party online platforms and the use of the education resources available thereon by our students and teachers do not involve any activities in relation to the provision of basic or value-added telecommunication services, and therefore we are not required to obtain additional approvals, licenses or permits for the online education services we currently provide, except for those we already obtained.

However, we may be required to apply for and obtain additional licenses or permits, or make additional registration and filings for our online education services, as the interpretation and implementation of current PRC laws and regulations are still evolving, and new laws and regulations may also be promulgated. There can be no assurance that once required, we will be able to obtain all the required approvals, licenses, permits and complete all necessary filings and registrations on a timely basis for our online education services, given the significant amount of discretion the PRC authorities may have in interpreting, implementing and enforcing relevant rules and regulations, as well as other factors beyond our control and anticipation. If we fail to obtain required approvals, licenses and permits or complete necessary registrations and filings in a timely manner, we may be subject to fines or suspension of our non-compliant operations, and we may be forced to cease the provision of online education services in whole or in part, which could adversely affect our overall teaching results and appeal to students.

Our business is subject to seasonal fluctuations, which may cause our operating results to fluctuate from quarter to quarter. This may result in volatility and adversely affect the price of the ADSs.

We have experienced, and expect to continue to experience, seasonal fluctuations in our results of operations, primarily due to seasonal changes in service days, student enrollments and influence of the summer and winter breaks. We generally require students to pay tuition and boarding fees for each semester upfront prior to the commencement of such semester, and recognize revenues for the tuition fees and boarding fees received proportionately over relevant period of the applicable program. However, the timing of our recording of our costs and expenses do not necessarily correspond with the timing of our recognition of revenues. Our interim results, growth rates and profitability may not be indicative of our annual results or our future results, and our historical interim and annual results, growth rates and profitability may not be indicative of our future performance for the corresponding periods. These fluctuations could result in volatility and adversely affect the price of the ADSs.

Termination of our cooperative relationship with Hebei Hengshui High School may adversely affect our business.

We have partnered with Hebei Hengshui High School, a well-regarded benchmark of secondary schools in China, in developing a series of standardized measures and protocols for each stage in a school’s development and for a wide variety of scenarios in school management and operation, which we require all of our schools to consistently adhere to. We also have teachers with work experience at Hebei Hengshui High School to coach our teachers to ensure the consistent implementation of effective teaching methods within our school network. If the cooperation is terminated by Hebei Hengshui High School, or if any unforeseeable events cause us to terminate our cooperation with Hebei Hengshui High School, we may be required to change the names of our schools and may be unable to recruit additional high-quality teachers laterally from Hebei Hengshui High School and ensure our overall teaching quality and the operation of our education system could be materially and adversely affected.

Failure to adequately protect our intellectual property could materially and adversely affect our business.

Unauthorized use of any of our intellectual property may adversely affect our business and reputation. We rely on a combination of copyright, trademark and trade secrets laws to protect our intellectual property rights. Nevertheless, third parties may obtain and use our intellectual property without due authorization. The practice of intellectual property rights enforcement action by the PRC regulatory authorities is in its early stage of development and is subject to significant uncertainty. We may also need to resort to litigation and other legal proceedings to enforce our intellectual property rights. Any such action, litigation or other legal proceedings could result in substantial costs and diversion of our management’s attention and resources and could disrupt our business. In addition, there is no assurance that we will be able to enforce our intellectual property rights effectively or otherwise prevent others from the unauthorized use of our intellectual property. Failure to adequately protect our intellectual property could materially and adversely affect our brand name and reputation, our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may be subject to intellectual property infringement claims, which may be expensive to defend and may disrupt our business and operations.

We cannot assure you that our operations or any aspects of our business do not or will not infringe upon or otherwise violate trademarks, patents, copyrights, know-how or other intellectual property rights held by third parties. From time to time, we may be subject to legal proceedings and claims relating to the intellectual property rights of others. In addition, there may be third-party trademarks, patents, copyrights, know-how or other intellectual property rights that are infringed by our products, services or other aspects of our business without our awareness. Holders of such intellectual property rights may seek to enforce such intellectual property rights against us in China, the United States or other jurisdictions. If any third-party infringement claims are brought against us, we may be forced to divert management’s time and other resources from our business and operations to defend against these claims, regardless of their merits.

Additionally, the application and interpretation of China’s intellectual property right laws and the procedures and standards for granting trademarks, patents, copyrights, know-how or other intellectual property rights in China are still evolving and are uncertain, and we cannot assure you that PRC courts or regulatory authorities would agree with our analysis. If we were found to have violated the intellectual property rights of others, we may be subject to liability for our infringement activities or may be prohibited from using such intellectual property, and we may incur licensing fees or be forced to develop alternatives of our own. As a result, our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may be materially and adversely affected.

We may be involved in labor and employment related disputes and legal claims from time to time arising out of our operations.

We may, from time to time, be involved in labor and employment related disputes with and subject to such claims by school personnel and other employees. We cannot assure you that any of the labor and employment related legal actions will be resolved in our favor. We may be subject to uncertainties as to the outcome of such legal proceedings and our business operations may be disrupted. Such legal or other proceedings involving us may, among other impacts, incur significant costs for us, divert our management and other resources, disrupt our business operations, draw negative publicity against us or damage our reputation. As a result, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

Our brand image, business and results of operations may be adversely impacted by students and employees’ misconduct and improper activities, many of which are beyond our control.

We have limited control over the behavior of our students, our teachers and other employees. To the extent any improper behavior is associated with our schools and education services, our ability to protect our brand image and reputation may be limited. In addition, if any of our students or employees suffer or allege to have suffered physical, financial or emotional harm following contact initiated in connection with our education services, we may face civil lawsuits or other liabilities initiated by the affected student and employees, or governmental or regulatory actions against us. In response to allegations of illegal or inappropriate activities in connection with our education services or any negative media coverage about us, PRC governmental authorities may intervene and hold us liable for non-compliance with PRC laws and regulations concerning the dissemination of information on the internet and subject us to administrative penalties or other sanctions, such as requiring us to restrict or discontinue some of the education services provided by us. As a result, our business may suffer and our brand image, student base, results of operations and financial condition may be materially and adversely affected.

We are exposed to the risk of other types of employee fraud or other misconduct. Other types of employee misconduct include intentionally failing to comply with government regulations, engaging in unauthorized activities and misrepresentation to our students, which could harm our reputation. It is not always possible to deter employee misconduct, and the precautions we take to prevent and detect this activity may not be effective in controlling unknown or unmanaged risks or losses, which could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We recorded share-based compensation, and we may grant share-based awards in the future, which may result in increased share-based compensation expense.

We recorded share-based compensation of RMB177.8 million in 2018 for our directors, officers and employees and certain external consultants for their services performed. We may grant share-based awards pursuant to our 2021 Share Incentive Plan and other share incentive plans to be adopted in the future, which we believe will help us attract and retain key personnel and employees. As a result, our expenses associated with share-based compensation may increase, which may have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Unauthorized disclosure of personal data that we collect and retain due to a system failure or otherwise could expose us to liabilities and adversely affect our reputation and business

We maintain records that include personal data, such as academic and medical records, address and family information. If the security measures we use to protect personal data are ineffective due to a system failure or other reasons, we could be liable for claims of invasion of privacy, impersonation, unauthorized purchases or other claims. In addition, we could be held liable for the misuse of personal data, fraudulent or otherwise, by our employees, independent consultants or third-party contractors.

We could incur significant expenses in connection with rectifying any security breaches, settling any resulting claims and providing additional protection to prevent additional breaches. In addition, any failure to protect personal information may adversely impact our ability to attract and retain students, harm our reputation and materially adversely affect our business, prospects and results of operations.

Any health pandemics, including the recent outbreak of COVID-19, and other natural disasters and calamities, could have a material adverse effect on our business operations.

We are vulnerable to health pandemics, including COVID-19, Ebola virus diseases, H1N1 flu, H7N9 flu, avian flu, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) and other epidemics. For example, the recent outbreak of COVID-19 has and is continuing to spread rapidly throughout China and other parts of the world. On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a global pandemic. Many businesses and social activities in China and other countries and regions were severely disrupted, including school operations. Such disruption and the potential slowdown of China’s economy could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Moreover, if the outbreak persists or escalates, we may be subject to further negative impact on our business operations. Our business operation could also be disrupted if any of our students, teachers and other staff members has contracted or is suspected of having contracted COVID-19 or any contagious disease or condition, since it could require them to be quarantined or our school facilities to be closed down and disinfected.

As a result of the government-mandated quarantine measures following the COVID-19 outbreak, the spring semester of 2020 at all the secondary schools in China, including ours, was postponed, and we have resorted to various alternative teaching methods, including live streaming, to resume basic teaching activities. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Our Online Education Services.” On March 31, 2020, the MOE also announced that Gaokao would be postponed by one month until July 2020 due to the COVID-19 outbreak. We have re-opened our high schools for graduating classes and our tutorial school programs since late March 2020 and re-opened our other classes in late April 2020. To reduce the risk of infection and contain the virus spread, we have implemented a series of control measures, including body temperature monitoring of our students and staff and periodical sanitization of school facilities. We have also expanded our school schedule with longer school hours and extended the spring semester to catch up with our teaching plans. The delayed school openings and the alternative teaching activities could adversely affect our student enrollment, our teaching results and our students’ academic performance. In addition, we also experienced a lower than expected student enrollment in the fall semester of 2020 due to the delayed campus construction by local governments and other third parties that we collaborate with during the COVID-19 outbreak. In 2021, we experienced higher operating costs due to increased spending in COVID-19 related prevention and testing equipment. We paid additional subsidies for our staff working during irregular shifts to accommodate local preventive and partial lock-down measures. In addition, compared with 2020, we were required to pay higher corporate social insurance premiums. In February 2020, Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security, Ministry of Finance, and State Administration of Taxation jointly announced Notice on the Exemption of the Payment of Social Insurance Premiums for Companies in China, a notice aiming to reduce corporate social insurance burden during COVID-19 outbreak. The exemption period ended in December 2020, and therefore our cost of revenues in 2021 slightly increased compared to 2020. All of the foregoing impacts of COVID-19 outbreak could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our tutorial schools experienced greater impact during the COVID-19 outbreak, compared with our high schools. Upon request, we made tuition refund of approximately RMB2.0 million to students from Hengshizhong Education Tutorial School for the compelled conversion from on-site classes to online courses under the impact of COVID-19 outbreak in January and February 2020. In 2021, we did not experience school closure due to the COVID-19 outbreak. However, we experienced refund of approximately RMB2.0 million (US$0.3 million) for our extra-curricular services including liberal education courses primarily including, among others, Chinese calligraphy, painting and swimming, under the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak. Furthermore, the COVID-19 outbreak related traveling and gathering restrictions in China in 2021 and first quarter of 2022 had an adverse impact on our student admission campaigns. Our student admission officers had to rely on higher portion of video calls and online marketing measures, whereas the quality of student admission might be negatively affected. We cannot assure you that we will not make similar tuition refund in the future, and our revenue may be curtailed, which could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. Along with the postponement of Gaokao in 2020, our tutorial schools experienced approximately a one-month delay of student admission. In addition, Hengshizhong Education Tutorial School also experienced a decrease of student enrollment from 650 for the class of 2019 to 456 for the class of 2020, which could reduce the tuition fees we may collect from such tutorial school and could undermine the perception of our brand recognition and reputation. All of the foregoing impacts of COVID-19 outbreak could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—A. Operating Results— Major Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations—COVID-19 outbreak.” We will pay close attention to the development of the outbreak of COVID-19 and continuously evaluate its impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition, which we believe will depend on the duration of the pandemic and the government’s responsive measures.

In addition, other natural disasters and calamities, such as fire, floods, typhoons, earthquakes, power loss, telecommunications failures, wars, riots, terrorist attacks or similar events, could cause severe disruption of our operations or those of our industry customers, which could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We have limited insurance coverage with respect to our business and operations.

We are exposed to various risks associated with our business and operations, and we have limited insurance coverage. We are exposed to risks including, among other things, accidents or injuries in our schools, loss of key management and personnel, business interruption, natural disasters, terrorist attacks and social instability or any other events beyond our control. The insurance industry in China is still at an early stage of development, and as a result insurance companies in China offer limited business-related insurance products. We do not have any business interruption insurance, or key-man life insurance. Any business interruption, legal proceeding or natural disaster or other events beyond our control could result in substantial costs and diversion of our resources, which may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting, we may be unable to accurately report our financial results or prevent fraud.

As a public company, we are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”), and the rules and regulations of the applicable listing and corporate governance standards of the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”). We expect that the requirements of these rules and regulations will continue to increase our legal, accounting, and financial compliance costs, make some activities more difficult, time-consuming and costly and place significant strain on our personnel, systems and resources.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other things, that we maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. Commencing with our fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, we must perform system and process evaluation and testing of our internal control over financial reporting to allow management to report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting in our Form 20-F filing for that year, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. In addition, once we cease to be an “emerging growth company” as the term is defined in the JOBS Act, our independent registered public accounting firm must attest to and report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.

In the course of auditing our consolidated financial statements that are included elsewhere in this annual report, we and our independent registered public accounting firm identified one material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, in accordance with the standards established by the PCAOB.

The material weakness that has been identified relates to our lack of sufficient number of financial reporting personnel with appropriate knowledge, experience and training of U.S. GAAP and SEC financial reporting requirements to properly address complex U.S. GAAP accounting issues and prepare and review financial statements and related disclosures in accordance with U.S. GAAP and reporting requirements set forth by the SEC. To remedy our identified material weakness, we have adopted and plan to continue to adopt certain measures to improve our internal control over financial reporting, including (1) hiring more qualified accounting personnel with extensive experience and knowledge in handling U.S. GAAP and SEC financial reporting requirements; (2) providing regular and appropriate trainings for our accounting staff, especially trainings related to U.S. GAAP and SEC reporting requirements; and (3) setting up performance measurement and reward plan for our accounting staff aligning with our objective of internal control over financial reporting and our ethical value. However, the implementation of these measures may not fully address these weakness and deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting, and we cannot conclude that they have been fully remedied. Our failure to correct these weakness and deficiencies or our failure to discover and address any other weakness and deficiencies could result in inaccuracies in our financial statements and impair our ability to comply with applicable financial reporting requirements and related regulatory filings on a timely basis. Moreover, ineffective internal control over financial reporting could significantly hinder our ability to prevent fraud.

We cannot assure you that there will not be additional material weaknesses or any significant deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting in the future. Any failure to maintain internal control over financial reporting could severely inhibit our ability to accurately report our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. If we are unable to conclude that our internal control over financial reporting is effective, or if our independent registered public accounting firm determines we have a material weakness or significant deficiency in our internal control over financial reporting once that firm begins its Section 404 reviews, investors may lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, the market price of the ADSs could decline, and we could be subject to sanctions or investigations by the NYSE, the SEC or other regulatory authorities. Failure to remedy any material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, or to implement or maintain other effective control systems required of public companies, could also restrict our future access to the capital markets. See “Item 15. Controls and Procedures—Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting” and Item 15. Controls and Procedures—Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.”

We are a “controlled company” under the Corporate Governance Rules of the NYSE, and we, as a result, can rely on exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements that could adversely affect our public shareholders.

Mr. Shaowei Zhang, our founder, chairman and chief executive officer, together with his spouse, Ms. Yu Wu, are able to exercise over 50% of the total voting power of our company. Therefore, we are, and expect to continue to be a “controlled company” under the Corporate Governance Rules of the NYSE. Under these rules a company of which more than 50% of the voting power is held by an individual, group or another company is a controlled company and may elect not to comply with certain corporate governance requirements, including the requirement that a majority of our directors be independent, as defined in the Corporate Governance Rules of the NYSE, and the requirement that our compensation committee and nominating and corporate governance committee consist entirely of independent directors. We currently rely on the exemptions with respect to (1) the requirement that a majority of the board of directors consist of independent directors, and (2) the requirement that the compensation committee and the nominating and corporate governance committee consist entirely of independent directors. As a result, you will not have the same protections afforded to shareholders of companies that are subject to all of NYSE corporate governance requirements.

Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure

If the PRC government finds that our corporate structure and contractual arrangements does not comply with applicable PRC laws and regulations, we could be subject to severe penalties and our business may be materially and adversely affected.

We are a Cayman Islands company and thus, we are classified as a foreign enterprise under the PRC laws. Foreign investment in the education industry in the PRC is extensively regulated and subject to numerous restrictions. Under the Special Administrative Measures for Foreign Investment Access (Negative List) (2021)(the “2021 Special Administrative Measures”), foreign investors are prohibited from investing in primary and middle schools in the PRC for students in grades one through nine. High school is also restricted industries for foreign investors, and foreign investors are only allowed to invest in such industries in cooperative ways with domestic investors, provided that domestic investors play a dominant role in such cooperation. Furthermore, under the Implementation Opinions of the MOE on Encouraging and Guiding the Entry of Private Capital in the Field of Education and Promoting the Healthy Development of Private Education, which was issued by the MOE on June 18, 2012, the foreign portion of the total investment in a Sino-foreign joint venture high school should be below 50%. According to relevant regulations, the foreign investors invested in high schools must be foreign education institutions, with relevant educational qualification and high quality of education. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Regulations—Regulations on Foreign Investment in Education in the PRC” for details. Accordingly, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Yunnan WFOE, in China is currently ineligible to apply for the required education licenses and permits in China for the operation of primary and middle schools. In order to establish the structure for operating our business in China, we entered into a series of arrangements in which our wholly-owned subsidiary, Yunnan WFOE, receives full economic benefits from our schools. For a description of these contractual arrangements, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—C. Organizational Structure—Our Contractual Arrangements.” We expect to continue to rely on our contractual arrangements to operate our education business.

On July 24, 2021, the General Office of State Council and the General Office of Central Committee of the Communist Party of China jointly promulgated the Opinions on Further Alleviating the Burden of Homework and After-School Tutoring for Students in Compulsory Education (the “Alleviating Burden Opinion”), which provides, among others, that (1) Academic AST Institutions are prohibited from raising funds by listing on stock markets or conducting any capitalization activities; and (2) foreign capital is prohibited from controlling or participating in any Academic AST Institutions through mergers and acquisitions, entrusted operation, joining franchise or variable interest entities. The Alleviating Burden Opinion provides that any violation of the foregoing shall be rectified. The Alleviating Burden Opinion further states that the administration and supervision over academic subjects tutoring institutions for students on grade ten to twelve shall be implemented by reference to the relevant provisions of the Alleviating Burden Opinion. It remains uncertain as to how and to what extent the administration over academic subjects tutoring institutions for students on grade ten to twelve will be implemented by reference of the Alleviating Burden Opinion.

If our corporate structure and contractual arrangements are found to be in violation of any PRC laws or regulations, or if we are found to be required but failed to obtain any of the permits or approvals for our private education business, the relevant PRC regulatory authorities, including the MOE, which regulates the education industry in China, the MOFCOM, which regulates the foreign investment in China, and the Ministry of Civil Affairs, which regulates the registration of schools in China, would have broad discretion in imposing fines or punishments upon us for such violations, including:

As of the date of this annual report, similar ownership structure and contractual arrangements were used by many China-based companies listed overseas, including a number of education companies listed in the United States. To our knowledge, none of the fines or punishments listed above has been imposed on any of these public companies, including companies in the education industry. However, we cannot assure you that such fines or punishments will not be imposed on us or any other companies in the future. If any of the above fines or punishments is imposed on us, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. If any of these penalties results in our inability to direct the activities of Long-Spring Education and its schools and subsidiaries that most significantly impact their economic performance, and/or failure to receive the economic benefits from Long-Spring Education and its schools and subsidiaries, we may not be able to consolidate Long-Spring Education and its schools and subsidiaries in our financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP. However, we do not believe that such actions would result in the liquidation or dissolution of our company, our wholly-owned subsidiaries in China or Long-Spring Education or its schools or subsidiaries.

In addition, pursuant to the Implementation Rules, (1) foreign-invested enterprises established in China and social organizations whose actual controllers are foreign parties shall not sponsor, participate in or actually control private schools that provide compulsory education, (2) social organizations or individuals shall not control any private school that provides compulsory education or any non-profit private school that provides pre-school education by means of, among others, merger, acquisition and contractual arrangements, and (3) private schools providing compulsory education shall not conduct any transaction with any related party. Where any other private school conducts any transaction with any related party, it shall follow the principles of openness, fairness and impartiality, fix the reasonable tuition and fees and regulate the decision-making, and shall not damage the state interests, the interests of the school or the rights and interests of the teachers and students, otherwise, there is a risk of being ordered to make corrections within a time limit, and the illegal gains, if any, shall be confiscated after the fees collected are returned; if the circumstances are serious, the sponsor, actual controller and member of the decision-making body or supervisory body shall not become the sponsor, actual controller or member of the decision-making body or supervisory body of other private school within one to five years; if the circumstances are especially serious with adverse social impact, the sponsor, actual controller and member of the decision-making body or supervisory body shall not become the sponsor, actual controller and members of the decision-making body or supervisory body of other private school permanently; if a violation of public security administration is constituted, the public security organ shall impose a public security administration punishment according to law; if a crime is constituted, criminal responsibility shall be investigated in accordance with the law.

These regulations may challenge the enforcement of our contractual arrangements that establish our corporate structure for operating our business, for example, the clause or provision of the exclusive management services and business cooperation agreement in relation to related party transactions between Yunnan WFOE and the affiliated entities to the extent concerning private schools offering compulsory education have been rendered not legally enforceable since September 1, 2021. Furthermore, our contractual arrangements may not be enforceable in the PRC if the PRC government authorities take a view that such contracts contravene any mandatory provision of PRC laws and administrative regulations or are otherwise not enforceable due to offending public order or good morals. In the event we are unable to enforce these contractual arrangements, for our continuing operations, we may not be able to exert effective control over the affiliated entities and its shareholders, and our ability to conduct our business may be materially and adversely affected. We are continuously assessing the impact of relevant regulations on our business and making necessary measures and efforts to comply with the requirements under these regulations and implementations, including restructuring corporate structure or unwinding contractual arrangements. However, the relevant authorities have yet to promulgate any detailed implementation rules and regulations under the Implementation Rules, it is still unclear whether the above provisions have any retrospective effect for contractual arrangements over private compulsory education schools existing before September 1, 2021, therefore, there remains uncertainty as to when and how the Implementation Rules will become specifically applied to our business.

Uncertainties exist with respect to the interpretation and implementation of the newly enacted Foreign Investment Law and how it may impact the viability of our current corporate structure, corporate governance, business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

On March 15, 2019, the National People’s Congress of the PRC (the “NPC”) promulgated the Foreign Investment Law, which came into effect on January 1, 2020 and replaced the trio of existing laws regulating foreign investment in China, namely, the Sino-foreign Equity Joint Venture Enterprise Law, the Sino-foreign Cooperative Joint Venture Enterprise Law and the Wholly Foreign-invested Enterprise Law. The Foreign Investment Law embodies an expected PRC regulatory trend to rationalize its foreign investment regulatory regime in line with prevailing international practice and the legislative efforts to unify the corporate legal requirements for both foreign and domestic investments. However, since it is relatively new, uncertainties still exist in relation to its interpretation and implementation, and failure to take timely and appropriate measures to cope with the regulatory-compliance challenges could result in material and adverse effect on us. For instance, though the Foreign Investment Law does not explicitly classify contractual arrangements as a form of foreign investment, it contains a catch-all provision under the definition of “foreign investment”, which includes investments made by foreign investors in China through means stipulated in laws or administrative regulations or other methods prescribed by the State Council of the PRC (the “State Council”). Therefore, it still leaves leeway for future laws, administrative regulations or provisions promulgated by the Stale Council to provide for contractual arrangements as a form of foreign investment, at which time it will be uncertain whether our contractual arrangements will be deemed to be in violation of the market access requirements for foreign investment in the PRC and if yes, how our contractual arrangements should be dealt with. In addition, if future laws, administrative regulations or provisions prescribed by the State Council mandate further actions to be taken by companies with respect to existing contractual arrangements, we may face substantial uncertainties as to whether we can complete such actions in a timely manner, or at all. In the worst-case scenario, we may be required to unwind our existing contractual arrangements and/or dispose of the relevant business operations, which could have a material and adverse effect on our current corporate structure, corporate governance, business, financial condition and results of operations.

We rely on contractual arrangements with Long-Spring Education and its shareholders for our business operations in China, which may not be as effective as direct ownership in providing control.

We have relied and expect to continue to rely on contractual arrangements with Long-Spring Education and its shareholders to operate our business in China. For a description of these contractual arrangements, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—C. Organizational Structure—Our Contractual Arrangements.” These contractual arrangements may not be as effective as direct equity ownership in providing us with control over our affiliate entities. Any failure by our affiliated entities, to perform their obligations under the contractual arrangements would have a material adverse effect on the financial position and performance of our company.

If we had direct ownership of Long-Spring Education, we would be able to exercise our rights as a shareholder to effect changes in the board of directors of Long-Spring Education, which in turn could implement changes, subject to any applicable fiduciary obligations, at the management and operational level. However, under the current contractual arrangements, we rely on the performance by our affiliated entities and their shareholders or sponsors of their obligations under the contracts to exercise control over our affiliated entities. The shareholders or sponsors of our affiliated entities may not act in the best interests of our company or may not perform their obligations under these contracts. Such risks exist throughout the period in which we intend to operate certain portion of our business through the contractual arrangements with Long-Spring Education. If any dispute relating to these contracts remains unresolved, we will have to enforce our rights under these contracts through the operations of PRC law and arbitration, litigation and other legal proceedings and therefore will be subject to uncertainties in the PRC legal system. See “—Any failure by our affiliated entities and their shareholders or sponsors to perform their obligations under our contractual arrangements with them would have a material and adverse effect on our business.” As a result, uncertainties in the commercial arbitration system or legal system in China could limit our ability to enforce these contractual arrangements. In addition, if the legal structure and the contractual arrangements were found to violate any existing or future PRC laws and regulations, we may be subject to fines or other legal or administrative sanctions. Therefore, our contractual arrangements with Long-Spring Education and its shareholders may not be as effective in ensuring our control over the relevant portion of our business operations as direct ownership would be.

If the imposition of government actions causes us to lose our right to direct the activities of our affiliated entities or our right to receive substantially all the economic benefits and residual returns from our affiliated entities and we are not able to restructure our ownership structure and operations in a satisfactory manner, we would no longer be able to consolidate the financial results of our affiliated entities.

Furthermore, we are a holding company incorporated in the Cayman Islands. As a holding company with no material operations of our own, we conduct a substantial majority of our operations through our subsidiaries established in China, the VIE, and its subsidiaries in China. We control and receive the economic benefits of the VIE and its subsidiaries’ business operations through certain contractual arrangements. Our ADSs listed on the NYSE represents shares of our offshore holding company instead of shares of the VIE or its subsidiaries in China. We may not be able to continue to satisfy the applicable requirements and rules with respect to such structure. If we are unable to satisfy the NYSE criteria for maintaining our listing, our securities could be subject to delisting.

If the PRC government determines that the contractual arrangements constituting part of the VIE structure do not comply with PRC regulations, or if these regulations change or are interpreted differently in the future, we may be unable to assert our contractual rights over the assets of the VIE, and our ADSs or ordinary shares may decline in value or become worthless.

Investors in the ADSs are not purchasing equity securities of our subsidiaries that have substantive business operations in China but instead are purchasing equity securities of a Cayman Islands holding company. We are a Cayman Islands holding company that conducts all of its operations and operates its business in China through its PRC subsidiaries and the affiliated entities through contractual agreements. Such structure involves unique risks to investors in the ADSs.

Recently, the PRC government adopted a series of regulatory actions and issued statements to regulate business operations in China, including those related to VIE and private schools, which may challenge the validity of our contractual arrangements. In the event that the PRC government determines that the contractual arrangements constituting part of the VIE structure do not comply with PRC regulations, or if these regulations change or are interpreted differently in the future, we may be unable to assert our contractual rights over the assets of the VIE, and our ADSs or ordinary shares may decline in value or become worthless.

On May 14, 2021, the PRC State Council promulgated the amended Implementation Rules, which became effective on September 1, 2021. Under the Implementation Rules, social organizations and individuals are prohibited from controlling a private school that provides compulsory education by means of, among others, merger, acquisition, and contractual arrangements, and a private school providing compulsory education is prohibited from conducting transactions with its related parties. In particular, the prohibition over related party transactions has significantly affected the enforceability of the exclusive management services and business cooperation agreements with affiliated entities providing compulsory education. Therefore, we re-assessed our control over the Affected Entities. Based on the relevant accounting standard in accordance with U.S. GAAP, we have concluded that we have lost control of the Affected Entities since September 1, 2021, in view of the significant uncertainties and restrictions the Implementation Rules impose on our ability to direct the range of ongoing activities that would most significantly impact the returns of those entities and to be exposed to returns that are commensurate with a controlling interest, and that such uncertainties and restrictions already had a significant impact on our ability to direct and its economic exposure from involvement with such entities.

Except for the Affected Entities, the contractual arrangements enable us to: (1) exercise effective control over the affiliated entities; (2) receive substantially all of the economic benefits of the affiliated entities in consideration for the services provided by us; and (3) have an exclusive option to purchase all of the equity interests in the affiliated entities when and to the extent permitted under PRC law. Therefore, we are able to consolidate the financial results of the affiliated entities in our consolidated financial statements. However, our PRC legal counsel has advised us that as there are substantial uncertainties regarding the interpretation and application of PRC laws and regulations, and we cannot assure you that the PRC government would agree that our corporate structure or any of the above contractual arrangements comply with current or future PRC laws or regulations. PRC laws and regulations governing the enforcement of these contractual arrangements are uncertain and the relevant government authorities may have broad discretion in interpreting these laws and regulations.

Any failure by our affiliated entities and their shareholders or sponsors to perform their obligations under our contractual arrangements with them would have a material and adverse effect on our business.

Our affiliated entities and their shareholders or sponsors may fail to take certain actions required for our business or to follow our instructions despite their contractual obligations to do so. In addition, there might be a risk that the shareholders of the performing parties to the contractual arrangements may raise objections to the arrangements. If they fail to perform their obligations under their respective agreements with us, we may have to rely on legal remedies under PRC law, including seeking specific performance or injunctive relief, which may not be effective. For example, if the shareholders of Long-Spring Education were to refuse to transfer their equity interests in Long-Spring Education to us or our designee if we exercise the purchase option pursuant to these contractual arrangements, or if they were otherwise to act in bad faith toward us, then we may have to take legal actions to compel them to perform their contractual obligations.

All the agreements under our contractual arrangements are governed by PRC law and provide for the resolution of disputes through arbitration in China. Accordingly, these contracts would be interpreted in accordance with PRC law and any disputes would be resolved in accordance with PRC legal procedures. The legal system in the PRC is not as developed as in some other jurisdictions, such as the United States. As a result, uncertainties in the PRC legal system could limit our ability to enforce these contractual arrangements. Meanwhile, there are very few precedents and little formal guidance as to how contractual arrangements in the context of a consolidated variable interest entity should be interpreted or enforced under PRC law. There remain significant uncertainties regarding the ultimate outcome of such arbitration should legal action become necessary. In addition, under PRC law, rulings by arbitrators are final, parties cannot appeal the arbitration results in courts, and if the losing parties fail to carry out the arbitration awards within a prescribed time limit, the prevailing parties may only enforce the arbitration awards in PRC courts through arbitration award recognition proceedings, which would require additional expenses and delay. Moreover, our contractual arrangements provided that arbitrators may award remedies over the shares and/or assets of our affiliated entities in China, injunctive relief and/or winding up of our affiliated entities, and that courts of competent jurisdictions are empowered to grant interim remedies in support of the arbitration pending the formation of an arbitral tribunal. However, under PRC law, arbitrators have no power to grant injunctive relief and may not directly issue a provisional or final liquidation order to protect assets or equity interest involved in case of disputes. In addition, interim remedies or enforcement orders granted by foreign courts in the United States and the Cayman Islands may not be recognized or enforceable in China. In the event we are unable to enforce our contractual arrangements, or if we suffer significant delay or other obstacles in the process of enforcing these contractual arrangements, we may not be able to exert effective control over our affiliate entities, and our ability to conduct our business may be negatively affected. See “—Risks Related to Doing Business in China—Uncertainties with respect to the PRC legal system could have a material adverse effect on us.”

The shareholders of Long-Spring Education may have actual or potential conflicts of interest with us and not act in the best interests of our company.

The shareholders of Long-Spring Education may have actual or potential conflicts of interest with us. These shareholders may breach, or cause Long-Spring Education to breach, or refuse to renew, the existing contractual arrangements we have with them and Long-Spring Education, which would have a material and adverse effect on our ability to effectively control Long-Spring Education and receive economic benefits from it. For example, the shareholders may be able to cause our agreements with Long-Spring Education to be performed in a manner adverse to us by, among other things, failing to remit payments due under the contractual arrangements to us on a timely basis. We cannot assure you that when conflicts of interest arise any or all of these shareholders will act in the best interests of our company or such conflicts will be resolved in our favor. Currently, we do not have any arrangements to address potential conflicts of interest between these shareholders and our company. If we cannot resolve any conflict of interest or dispute between us and these shareholders, we would have to rely on legal proceedings, which could result in disruption of our business and subject us to substantial uncertainty as to the outcome of any such legal proceedings.

Contractual arrangements between our affiliated entities and us may be subject to scrutiny by the PRC tax authorities and a finding that we or our affiliated entities owe additional taxes could materially reduce our net income and the value of your investment.

Under PRC laws and regulations, transactions between related parties should be conducted on an arm’s-length basis and may be subject to audit or challenge by the PRC tax authorities. We could face material adverse tax consequences if the PRC tax authorities determine that the contractual arrangements between us and our affiliated entities are not conducted on an arm’s-length basis and adjust the income of our affiliated entities through the transfer pricing adjustment. A transfer pricing adjustment could, among other things, result in, for PRC tax purposes, increased tax liabilities of our affiliated entities. In addition, the PRC tax authorities may require us to disgorge our prior tax benefits, and require us to pay additional taxes for prior tax years and impose late payment fees and other penalties on our affiliated entities for underpayment of prior taxes. To date, similar contractual arrangements have been used by many public companies, including companies listed in the United States, and, to our knowledge, the PRC tax authorities have not imposed any material penalties on those companies. However, we cannot assure you that such penalties will not be imposed on any other companies or us in the future. Our net income may be reduced if the tax liabilities of our affiliated entities materially increase or if they are found to be subject to additional tax obligations, late payment fees or other penalties.

If any of our affiliated entities becomes the subject of a bankruptcy or liquidation proceeding, we may lose the ability to use and enjoy assets held by such entity, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We currently conduct our operations in China through contractual arrangements with our affiliated entities and the shareholders of Long-Spring Education. As part of these arrangements, substantially all of our education-related assets that are important to the operation of our business are held by our affiliated entities. If any of these entities goes bankrupt and all or part of their assets become subject to liens or rights of third-party creditors, we may be unable to continue some or all of our business activities, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. If any of our affiliated entities undergoes a voluntary or involuntary liquidation proceeding, its equity owner or third-party creditors may claim rights relating to some or all of these assets, which would hinder our ability to operate our business and could materially and adversely affect our business, our ability to generate revenues and the market price of the ADSs.

We may rely on dividends paid by our PRC subsidiaries to fund cash and financing requirements. Any limitation on the ability of our PRC subsidiaries to pay dividends to us could have a material adverse effect on our ability to conduct our business and to pay dividends to holders of the ADSs and our ordinary shares.

We are a holding company, and we may rely on dividends to be paid by our PRC subsidiaries for our cash and financing requirements, including the funds necessary to pay dividends and other cash distributions to the holders of the ADSs and our ordinary shares and service any debt we may incur. If our PRC subsidiaries incur debt on their own behalf in the future, the instruments governing the debt may restrict its ability to pay dividends or make other distributions to us.

Pursuant to the Law on Promoting Private Education, sponsors of for-profit private schools are entitled to retain the profits from their schools and the operating surplus may be allocated to the sponsors pursuant to the PRC company law and other relevant laws and regulations. Sponsors of non-profit private schools are not entitled to any distribution of profits from their schools and all revenue must be used for the operation of the schools. According to Implementation Rules, a non-profit private school should allocate no less than 10% of its audited annual non-restricted net asset increase, or a for-profit private school should allocate no less than 10% of its audited annual net income, to its development, respectively. Under PRC laws and regulations, wholly foreign-owned enterprises in the PRC, such as Yunnan WFOE, may pay dividends only out of their accumulated profits as determined in accordance with PRC accounting standards and regulations. In addition, a wholly foreign-owned enterprise is required to set aside at least 10% of its after-tax profits each year, after making up previous years’ accumulated losses, if any, to fund certain statutory reserve funds, until the aggregate amount of such a fund reaches 50% of its registered capital. At the discretion of the wholly foreign-owned enterprise, it may allocate a portion of its after-tax profits based on PRC accounting standards to staff welfare and bonus funds. These reserve funds and staff welfare and bonus funds are not distributable as cash dividends. However, the relevant authorities have yet to promulgate any detailed implementation rules and regulations under the Implementation Rules. We remain uncertain as to the timing and substance of the rules under the Law on Promoting Private Education and Implementation Rules to be promulgated, and how such rules will impact our operation. Furthermore, if our subsidiaries or the affiliated entities in China incur debt on their own behalf in the future, the instruments governing the debt may restrict their ability to pay dividends or make other payments to us. Any limitation on the ability of our wholly-owned PRC subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other distributions to us could materially and adversely limit our ability to grow, make investments or acquisitions that could be beneficial to our business, pay dividends, or otherwise fund and conduct our business.

PRC regulation of loans and direct investment by offshore holding companies to PRC entities may delay or prevent us from making loans or additional capital contributions to our PRC subsidiaries and affiliated entities, which could harm our liquidity and our ability to fund and expand our business.

As an offshore holding company of our PRC subsidiaries and affiliated entities, we may (1) make loans to our PRC subsidiaries and affiliated entities, (2) make additional capital contributions to our PRC subsidiaries, (3) establish new PRC subsidiaries and make capital contributions to these new PRC subsidiaries, and (4) acquire offshore entities with business operations in China in an offshore transaction. However, most of these uses are subject to PRC regulations and approvals. For example:

As a result of the requirements and limitations outlined above, the amount of funds that we can directly contribute to our operations in China through Yunnan WFOE, is limited. In addition, on March 30, 2015, SAFE promulgated the Circular of the SAFE on Reforming the Administrative Measures of Settlement of Foreign Exchange Capital of Foreign-invested Enterprises (the “SAFE Circular 19”), a notice regulating the conversion by a foreign-invested company of its capital contribution in foreign currency into Renminbi. The notice requires that the capital of a foreign-invested company settled in Renminbi converted from foreign currencies shall be used only for purposes within the business scope as approved by the applicable government authorities and may not be used for equity investments in China unless such activity is set forth in the business scope or is otherwise permissible under PRC laws or regulations. In addition, SAFE strengthened its oversight of the flow and use of such capital of a foreign-invested company settled in Renminbi converted from foreign currencies. The use of such Renminbi capital may not be changed without SAFE’s approval, and may not in any case be used to repay Renminbi loans if the proceeds of such loans have not otherwise been used. Violations of the SAFE Circular 19 will result in severe penalties including hefty fines. As a result, the SAFE Circular 19 may significantly limit our ability to transfer the net proceeds from our initial public offering and future overseas offering to our operations in China through our PRC subsidiaries, which may adversely affect our ability to expand our business. On February 13, 2015, the SAFE promulgated the Circular on Further Simplifying and Improving the Direct Investment-related Foreign Exchange Administration Policies (the “SAFE Circular 13”), which was effective on June 1, 2015. Pursuant to the SAFE Circular 13, the registration of existing equity is required in lieu of annual foreign exchange inspection of direct investment. The SAFE Circular 13 also grants the authority to banks to examine and process foreign exchange registration with respect to both domestic and overseas direct investments.

We expect that PRC laws and regulations may continue to limit our use of proceeds from our overseas offering or from other financing sources. We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain these government registrations or approvals on a timely basis, if at all, with respect to future loans or capital contributions by us to our entities in China. If we fail to receive such registrations or approvals, our ability to use the proceeds from our initial public offering and future overseas offerings and foreign currency to capitalize our PRC operations may be hindered, which could adversely affect our liquidity and our ability to fund and expand our business.

Risks Related to Doing Business in China

PRC economic, political and social conditions, as well as changes in any government policies, laws and regulations, could adversely affect the overall economy in China or the education services market, which could harm our business.

Our revenues are all sourced from China. Accordingly, our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations are subject, to a significant extent, to economic, political and legal developments in China.

The PRC economy differs from the economies of most developed countries in many respects. Although the PRC economy has been transitioning from a planned economy to a more market-oriented economy since the late 1970s, the PRC government continues to play a significant role in regulating the industry. The PRC government continues to exercise significant control over China’s economic growth through allocating resources, controlling the incurrence and oversight and discretion over the conduct of our business and may intervene with or influence our operations as the government deems appropriate to further regulatory, political and societal goals. The PRC government has recently published new policies that significantly affected certain industries such as the education and internet industries, and we cannot rule out the possibility that it will in the future release regulations or policies regarding our industry that could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Changes in any of these policies, laws and regulations could adversely affect the economy in China or the market for education services, especially for Gaokao and Zhongkao, which could harm our business. Furthermore, the PRC government has recently indicated an intent to exert more oversight and control over overseas securities offerings and other capital markets activities and foreign investment in China-based companies like us. Any such action, once taken by the PRC government, could significantly limit or completely hinder our ability to offer or continue to offer securities to investors and cause the value of such securities to significantly decline or in extreme cases, become worthless.

While the PRC economy has experienced significant growth over the past decades, growth has been uneven, both geographically and among various sectors of the economy. In addition, the rate of growth has been slowing since 2012, and the impact of COVID-19 on the Chinese and global economies in 2020 is likely to be severe. In particular, the National Bureau of Statistics of China reported a 6.8% drop and a 3.2% growth in GDP for the first and second quarters of 2020, respectively, compared with the respective periods of 2019. Any adverse changes in economic conditions in China, in the policies of the PRC government or in the laws and regulations in China could have a material adverse effect on the overall economic growth of China. Any significant slowdown in China’s economic growth may cause our potential students to delay or cancel their plans to enroll in our schools, which in turn could reduce our revenues. The PRC government has implemented various measures to stimulate economic growth and guide the allocation of resources. Some of these measures may benefit the overall PRC economy, but may have a negative effect on us. For example, our financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected by government control over capital investments or changes in tax regulations. In addition, in the past, the PRC government has implemented certain measures, including interest rate adjustment, to control the pace of economic growth. These measures may cause decreased economic activity in China, which may adversely affect our business and results of operations. In addition, the increased global focus on social, ethical and environmental issues may lead to China’s adoption of more stringent standards in these areas, which may adversely impact the operations of China-based companies including us.

Furthermore, our company, the VIE and its subsidiaries, and our investors may face uncertainty about future actions by the government of China that could significantly affect the affiliated entities and its subsidiaries’ financial performance and operations, including the enforceability of the contractual arrangements. As of the date of this report, neither our company nor the VIE has received or has been denied permission from Chinese authorities to list on U.S. exchanges. However, there is no guarantee that our company or VIE will receive or not be denied permission from Chinese authorities to list on U.S. exchanges in the future.

Uncertainties with respect to the PRC legal system could have a material adverse effect on us.

The PRC legal system is a civil law system based on written statutes. Unlike the common law system, prior court decisions in a civil law system may be cited as reference but have limited precedential value. Since 1979, newly introduced PRC laws and regulations have significantly enhanced the protections of interest relating to foreign investments in China. However, since these laws and regulations are relatively new and the PRC legal system continues to evolve rapidly, the interpretations of such laws and regulations may not always be consistent, and enforcement of these laws and regulations involves significant uncertainties, any of which could limit the available legal protections.

In addition, the PRC administrative and judicial authorities have significant discretion in interpreting, implementing or enforcing statutory rules and contractual terms, and it may be more difficult to predict the outcome of administrative and judicial proceedings and the level of legal protection we may enjoy in the PRC than under some more developed legal systems. These uncertainties may affect our decisions on the policies and actions to be taken to comply with PRC laws and regulations, and may affect our ability to enforce our contractual rights, property (including intellectual property) or tort rights. In addition, the regulatory uncertainties may be exploited through unmerited legal actions or threats in an attempt to extract payments or benefits from us. Such uncertainties may therefore increase our operating expenses and costs, and materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.

Any actions by the Chinese government, including any decision to intervene or influence the operations of our PRC subsidiaries or the affiliated entities or to exert control over any offering of securities conducted overseas and/or foreign investment in China-based issuers, may cause us to make material changes to the operations of our PRC subsidiaries or the VIE, may limit or completely hinder our ability to offer or continue to offer securities to investors, and may cause the value of such securities to significantly decline or be worthless.

The Chinese government has exercised and continues to exercise substantial control over virtually every sector of the Chinese economy through regulation and state ownership. The ability of our subsidiaries and affiliated entities to operate in China may be impaired by changes in its laws and regulations, including those relating to education, taxation, land use rights, foreign investment limitations, and other matters.

The central or local governments of China may impose new, stricter regulations or interpretations of existing regulations that would require additional expenditures and efforts on our part to ensure our PRC subsidiaries and the affiliated entities’ compliance with such regulations or interpretations. As such, our PRC subsidiaries and the affiliated entities may be subject to various government actions and regulatory interference in the provinces in which they operate. They could be subject to regulation by various political and regulatory entities, including various local and municipal agencies and government sub-divisions. They may incur increased costs necessary to comply with existing and newly adopted laws and regulations or penalties for any failure to comply.

Furthermore, it is uncertain when and whether we will be required to obtain permission from the PRC government to list on U.S. exchanges in the future, and even when such permission is obtained, whether it will be later denied or rescinded. Although we believe that our company, our PRC subsidiaries, and the VIE, are currently not required to obtain permission from any Chinese authorities, and none of them has received any notice of denial of permission to list on the U.S. exchange, our operations could be adversely affected, directly or indirectly, by existing or future laws and regulations relating to our business or industry, particularly in the event permission to list on U.S. exchanges may be later required, or withheld or rescinded once given.

Accordingly, government actions in the future, including any decision to intervene or influence the operations of our PRC subsidiaries or the affiliated entities at any time, or to exert control over an offering of securities conducted overseas and/or foreign investment in China-based issuers, may cause us to make material changes to the operations of our PRC subsidiaries or the VIE, may limit or completely hinder our ability to offer or continue to offer securities to investors, and/or may cause the value of such securities to significantly decline or be worthless.

Based on the recent development of PRC law, there is significant uncertainty about the application and interpretation of the Law on Promoting Private Education, the Implementation Rules and their detailed implementation rules and regulations. We may be subject to significant limitations on our ability to engage in the private education business, acquire private schools, or receive payments from the VIE and may otherwise be materially and adversely affected by changes in PRC laws and regulations.

Pursuant to the Law on Promoting Private Education, sponsors of private schools may choose to establish schools as either non-profit or for-profit schools. Sponsors are not permitted to establish for-profit schools that provide compulsory education services, which covers grades one to nine and which accounts for a significant portion of our students as well as revenue during the reporting period. Sponsors of for-profit private schools are entitled to retain the profits from their schools and any operating surplus may be allocated to the sponsors pursuant to the PRC company law and other relevant laws and regulations. Sponsors of non-profit private schools are not entitled to any distribution of profits from their schools and all revenue must be used for the operation of the schools.

As a holding company, our ability to generate profits, pay dividends and other cash distributions to our shareholders under the Law on Promoting Private Education, the Implementation Rules and other relevant laws and regulations are affected by many factors, including whether our schools are characterized as for-profit or non-profit schools, the profitability of our schools, and our ability to receive dividends and other distributions from our PRC subsidiary, Yunnan WFOE, which in turn depends on the service fees paid to Yunnan WFOE from the affiliated entities. Yunnan WFOE has respectively entered into exclusive management services and business cooperation agreements with the affiliated entities and each of the shareholders of Long-Spring Education, pursuant to which Yunnan WFOE has the exclusive right to provide comprehensive technical and business support services to the affiliated entities. As advised by our PRC counsel, as of the date of this annual report, except for the Affected Entities, our right to receive the service fees from our schools and other affiliated entities did not, to our knowledge, contravene any PRC laws and regulations then in force. Likewise, the payment of service fees under our contractual arrangements should not be regarded as the distribution of returns, dividends or profits to the sponsors of our schools under the PRC laws and regulations then in force.

However, according to the Implementation Rules, which came into force and effect beginning September 1, 2021, (1) foreign-invested enterprises established in China and social organizations whose actual controllers are foreign parties shall not sponsor, participate in, or actually control private schools that provide compulsory education; (2) social organizations or individuals shall not control any private school that provides compulsory education or any non-profit private school that provides pre-school education by means of, among others, merger, acquisition and contractual arrangements; and (3) private schools providing compulsory education shall not conduct any transaction with any related party. Where any other private school conducts any transaction with any related party, it shall follow the principles of openness, fairness and impartiality, fix reasonable tuition and fees and regulate the decision-making, and shall not damage the state and the school or the rights and interests of the teachers and students, otherwise, there is a risk of being ordered to make corrections within a time limit, and the illegal gains, if any, shall be confiscated after the fees collected are returned; if the circumstances are serious, the sponsor, actual controller and member of the decision-making body or supervisory body shall not become the sponsor, actual controller or member of the decision-making body or supervisory body of other private school within one to five years; if the circumstances are especially serious with adverse social impact, the sponsor, actual controller and member of the decision-making body or supervisory body shall not become the sponsor, actual controller and members of the decision-making body or supervisory body of other private school permanently; if a violation of public security administration is constituted, the public security organ shall impose a public security administration punishment according to law; if a crime is constituted, criminal responsibility shall be investigated in accordance with the law.

Therefore, a private school providing compulsory education is prohibited from conducting transactions with its related parties. As a result, the clause or provision of the exclusive management services and business cooperation agreements, in relation to related party transactions between a private school providing compulsory education and Yunnan WFOE, have been rendered not legally enforceable since September 1, 2021. Since September 1, 2021, we have ceased our transactions with the Affected Entities, to the extent practicable. However, to keep these private schools providing compulsory education open, we continued to provide essential services without recognizing any revenues relating to such activities to schools providing compulsory education in our discontinued operation, which are key to the normal daily operation of these schools. As date of this annual report, schools providing compulsory education that we continue to provide services to have not received any further rectification requirements or penalty notices from the relevant competent authority, and we are currently unable to assess, with any certainty, the risks of penalty associated with our continued provision of such essential services. We are continuously assessing the impact of relevant regulations on our business and making necessary measures and efforts to comply with the requirements under these regulations and implementations, including restructuring corporate structure or unwinding contractual arrangements.

In particular, the enforcement of our contractual arrangements may be challenged, and our corporate structure may need to be restructured to comply with the new regulations, which may be time-consuming and expensive and impose additional restrictions on our business expansion and may further adversely affect our business operations and results of operations. See “—Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure—If the PRC government finds that our corporate structure and contractual arrangements does not comply with applicable PRC laws and regulations, we could be subject to severe penalties and our business may be materially and adversely affected.”

Recent joint statement by the SEC and the PCAOB, proposed rule changes submitted by Nasdaq, and the HFCAA all call for additional and more stringent criteria to be applied to emerging market companies upon assessing the qualification of their auditors, especially the non-U.S. auditors who are not inspected by the PCAOB. These developments could add uncertainties to our continued listing or future offerings of our securities in the U.S.

On April 21, 2020, the SEC Chairman Jay Clayton and the PCAOB Chairman William D. Duhnke III, along with other senior SEC staff, released a joint statement highlighting the risks associated with investing in companies based in or have substantial operations in emerging markets including China. The joint statement emphasized the risks associated with lack of access for the PCAOB to inspect auditors and audit work papers in China and higher risks of fraud in emerging markets.

On May 20, 2020, the U.S. Senate passed the HFCAA requiring a foreign company to certify it is not owned or controlled by a foreign government if the PCAOB is unable to audit specified reports because the company uses a foreign auditor not subject to PCAOB inspection. If the PCAOB is unable to inspect the company’s auditors for three consecutive years, the issuer’s securities are prohibited to trade on a national exchange. On December 2, 2020, the U.S. House of Representatives approved the HFCAA. On December 18, 2020, the HFCAA was signed into law.

On March 24, 2021, the SEC adopted interim final rules relating to the implementation of certain disclosure and documentation requirements of the HFCAA.

On June 22, 2021, the U.S. Senate passed a bill, the Accelerating Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act, which, if signed into law, would reduce the number of consecutive non-inspection years required for triggering the prohibitions under the HFCAA from three years to two. On February 4, 2022, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill which contained, among other things, an identical provision.

On September 22, 2021, the PCAOB adopted a final rule implementing the HFCAA, which provides a framework for the PCAOB to determine, as contemplated under the HFCAA, whether the PCAOB is unable to inspect or investigate completely registered public accounting firms located in a foreign jurisdiction because of a position taken by one or more authorities in that jurisdiction. On December 2, 2021, the SEC adopted amendments to finalize the implementation of disclosure and documentation measures, which require us to identify, in our annual report on Form 20-F, (1) the auditors that provided opinions to the financial statements presented in the annual report, (2) the location where the auditors’ report was issued, and (3) the PCAOB ID number of the audit firm or branch that performed the audit work. If the SEC determines that we have three consecutive non-inspection years, the SEC will issue stop order to prohibit the trading of our ADSs on any U.S. stock exchange or over-the-counter market.

On December 16, 2021, the PCAOB issued PCAOB Rule 6100 Board Determinations Under the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act. The PCAOB notified the SEC that it was unable to inspect or investigate completely registered public accounting firms headquartered in mainland China and in Hong Kong, because of the positions taken by authorities in mainland China and Hong Kong.

According to Article 177 of the PRC Securities Law (last amended in March 2020), no overseas securities regulator is allowed to directly conduct investigation or evidence collection activities in China. Accordingly, without the consent of the competent PRC securities regulators and relevant authorities, no organization or individual may provide the documents and materials relating to securities business activities to overseas regulators. Therefore, the audit working papers of our financial statements may not be fully inspected by the PCAOB without the approval of the PRC authorities.

Our current auditor, Audit Alliance LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that issues the audit report included elsewhere in this annual report and is headquartered in Singapore, is a firm registered with the PCAOB, and, as of the date of this annual report, was not included in the list of PCAOB Identified Firms in the PCAOB Determination Report issued in December 2021. Our ability to retain an auditor subject to PCAOB inspection and investigation, including but not limited to inspection of the audit working papers related to us, may depend on the relevant positions of U.S. and Chinese regulators. With respect to audits of companies with operations in China, such as our company, there are uncertainties about the ability of auditors of such companies to fully cooperate with a request by the PCAOB for audit working papers in China without the approval of Chinese authorities.

The increased regulatory scrutiny focus on U.S.-listed companies with operations in China could add uncertainties to our business operations, share price and reputation. The market prices of our ordinary shares and/or other securities could be adversely affected as a result of possible negative impacts of the HFCA and other similar rules and regulations. Furthermore, while we understand that there has been dialogue among the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the SEC and the PCAOB regarding the inspection of PCAOB-registered accounting firms in China, and the audit reports of Audit Alliance LLP incorporated by reference into this report are prepared by Singapore auditors who are subject to inspection and investigation by the PCAOB, there can be no assurance that our auditor or we will be able to comply with requirements imposed by U.S. regulators in the future and, as such, future investors may be deprived of such inspections, which could result in limitations or restrictions to our access in the U.S. capital markets. Furthermore, trading in our securities may be prohibited under the HFCAA or the Accelerating Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act if the SEC subsequently determines our audit work is performed by auditors that the PCAOB is unable to inspect or investigate completely, and as a result, U.S. national securities exchanges, such as the Nasdaq or the over-the-counter market, may determine to delist our securities.

We have not been identified by the SEC as a commission-identified issuer under the HFCAA as of the date of this annual report. However, the above recent developments may have added uncertainties to our listing and we cannot assure you whether the NYSE or regulatory authorities would apply additional and more stringent criteria to us since we are an emerging growth company and substantial all of our operations are conducting in China. Furthermore, the HFCAA, which requires that the PCAOB be permitted to inspect the issuer’s public accounting firm within three years, may result in the delisting of our company in the future if the PCAOB is unable to inspect our accounting firm at such future time. If, in the future, we have been identified by the SEC for three consecutive years, or, two consecutive years if the Accelerating Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act is signed into law, as a commission-identified issuer whose registered public accounting firm is determined by the PCAOB that it is unable to inspect or investigate completely because of a position taken by one or more authorities in China, the SEC may prohibit our shares or ADSs from being traded on a national securities exchange or in the over-the-counter trading market in the United States.

If the settlement reached between the SEC and the “big four” PRC-based accounting firms concerning the manner in which the SEC may seek access to audit working papers from audits in China of US-listed companies is not or cannot be performed in a manner acceptable to authorities in China and the United States, we may be unable to timely file future financial statements in compliance with the requirements of the Exchange Act in the future.

In late 2012, the SEC commenced administrative proceedings under Rule 102(e) of its Rules of Practice and also under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 against the mainland Chinese affiliates of the “big four” accounting firms. A first instance trial of the proceedings in July 2013 in the SEC’s internal administrative court resulted in an adverse judgment against the firms. The administrative law judge proposed penalties on the four PRC-based accounting firms including a temporary suspension of their right to practice before the SEC, although that proposed penalty did not take effect pending review by the Commissioners of the SEC. On February 6, 2015, before a review by the Commissioner had taken place, the Chinese accounting firms reached a settlement with the SEC whereby the proceedings were stayed. Under the settlement, the SEC accepted that future requests by the SEC for the production of documents would normally be made to the CSRC. The Chinese accounting firms would receive requests matching those under Section 106 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and would be required to abide by a detailed set of procedures with respect to such requests, which in substance would require them to facilitate production via the CSRC. The CSRC for its part initiated a procedure whereby, under its supervision and subject to its approval, requested classes of documents held by the accounting firms could be sanitized of problematic and sensitive content so as to render them capable of being made available by the CSRC to US regulators.

Under the terms of the settlement, the underlying proceeding against the four PRC-based accounting firms was deemed dismissed with prejudice at the end of four years starting from the settlement date, which was on February 6, 2019. Despite the final ending of the proceedings, the presumption is that all parties will continue to apply the same procedures: i.e., the SEC will continue to make its requests for the production of documents to the CSRC, and the CSRC will normally process those requests applying the sanitization procedure. We cannot predict whether, in cases where the CSRC does not authorize production of requested documents to the SEC, the SEC will further challenge the four PRC-based accounting firms’ compliance with U.S. law. If additional challenges are imposed on the Chinese affiliates of the “big four” accounting firms, we may be unable to timely file future financial statements in compliance with the requirements of the Exchange Act.

In the event that the SEC restarts the administrative proceedings, depending upon the final outcome, listed companies in the United States with major PRC operations may find it difficult or impossible to retain auditors in respect of their operations in the PRC, which could result in financial statements being determined to not be in compliance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, including possible delisting. Moreover, any negative news about any such future proceedings against these accounting firms may cause investor uncertainty regarding China-based, United States-listed companies and the market price of our ADSs may be adversely affected.

In the past we had engaged certain Chinese affiliates of the “big four” accounting firms as our independent registered public accounting firm. While we did not do so for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, we cannot assure you that we will not engage or otherwise rely on their audits in the future. If the accounting firm we engage were denied, even temporarily, the ability to practice before the SEC, and we were unable to timely find another registered public accounting firm to audit and issue an opinion on our financial statements, our financial statements could be determined not to be in compliance with the requirements of the Exchange Act. Such a determination could ultimately lead to the delisting of our ordinary shares from the NYSE or deregistration from the SEC, or both, which would substantially reduce or effectively terminate the trading of our ADSs in the United States.

Failure to comply with governmental regulations and other legal obligations concerning data protection and cybersecurity may materially and adversely affect our business, as we routinely collect, store and use data during the conduct of our business.

We routinely collect, store and use data during our operations. We are subject to PRC laws and regulations governing the collecting, storing, sharing, using, processing, disclosure and protection of data on the Internet and mobile platforms as well as cybersecurity. On August 17, 2021, the state council promulgated the Regulations on Protection of Critical Information Infrastructure, which became effective on September 1, 2021. Pursuant to the Regulations on Protection of Critical Information Infrastructure, critical information infrastructure shall mean any important network facilities or information systems of an important industry or field, such as public communication and information service, energy, communications, water conservation, finance, public services, e-government affairs and national defense science, which may endanger national security, peoples’ livelihoods and public interest in the event of damage, function loss or data leakage. In addition, relevant administration departments of each critical industry and sector, or Protection Departments, shall be responsible to formulate eligibility criteria and determine the critical information infrastructure operator in the respective industry or sector. The operators shall be informed about the final determination as to whether they are categorized as critical information infrastructure operators. On December 28, 2021, the Cyberspace Administration of China jointly with other 12 government authorities, issued the Measures for Cybersecurity Review (2021), which became effective on February 15, 2022, and repealed the Cybersecurity Review Measures (2020) simultaneously. The Measures for Cybersecurity Review (2021) provide that critical information infrastructure operators purchasing network products and services and data processors carrying out data processing activities, which affect or may affect national security, shall apply for cybersecurity review to the cyberspace administrations in accordance with the provisions thereunder. As of the date of this annual report, no detailed rules or implementation have been issued by any Protection Departments and we have not been informed that we are identified as a critical information infrastructure operator by any governmental authorities. We will closely monitor the rule-making process and will assess and determine whether we are required to apply for the cybersecurity review.

On August 20, 2021, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress promulgated the Personal Information Protection Law, which became effective on November 1, 2021. The Personal Information Protection Law aims at protecting the personal information rights and interests, regulating the processing of personal information, ensuring the orderly and free flow of personal information in accordance with the law, and promoting the reasonable use of personal information. According to the Personal Information Protection Law, personal information includes all kinds of identified or identifiable information related to natural persons recorded by electronic or other means, but excludes de-identified information. The Personal Information Protection Law also specified the rules for handling sensitive personal information, which includes biometrics, religious beliefs, specific identities, medical health, financial accounts, trails and locations, and personal information of teenagers under fourteen years old and other personal information, which, upon leakage or illegal usage, may easily infringe the personal dignity or harm safety of livelihood and property. Personal information handlers shall bear responsibility for their personal information handling activities, and must adopt necessary measures to safeguard the security of the personal information they handle. Otherwise, the personal information handlers will be ordered for rectification or suspension or termination of provision of services, confiscation of illegal income, subject to fines or other penalties.

The opinions recently issued by the General Office of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the General Office of the State Council may subject us to additional compliance requirement in the future.

Recently, the General Office of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the General Office of the State Council jointly issued the “Opinions on Severely Cracking Down on Illegal Securities Activities According to Law” (the “Opinions”), which were made available to the public on July 6, 2021. The Opinions emphasized the need to strengthen the administration over illegal securities activities and the supervision on overseas listings by China-based companies. These Opinions proposed to take effective measures, such as promoting the construction of relevant regulatory systems, to deal with the risks and incidents facing China-based overseas-listed companies and the demand for cybersecurity and data privacy protection. The aforementioned policies and any related implementation rules to be enacted may subject us to additional compliance requirement in the future. As the Opinions were recently issued, official guidance to act upon, and interpretation of the Opinions, remain unclear in several respects at this time. Therefore, we cannot assure you that we will remain fully compliant with all new regulatory requirements of the Opinions or any future implementation rules on a timely basis, or at all.

It may be difficult for overseas regulators to conduct investigations or collect evidence within China.

Shareholder claims or regulatory investigations that are common in jurisdictions outside China are difficult to pursue as a matter of law or practicality in China. For example, in China, there are significant legal and other obstacles to providing information needed for regulatory investigations or litigation initiated outside China. Although the authorities in China may establish a regulatory cooperation mechanism with the securities regulatory authorities of another country or region to implement cross-border supervision and administration, such cooperation with the securities regulatory authorities in the United States or other jurisdictions may not be efficient in the absence of a mutual and practical cooperation mechanism. Furthermore, according to Article 177 of the PRC Securities Law, or Article 177, which became effective in March 2020, no overseas securities regulator is allowed to directly conduct investigation or evidence collection activities within the territory of the PRC, and without the consent by the Chinese securities regulatory authorities and the other competent governmental agencies, no entity or individual may provide documents or materials related to securities business to any foreign party. While detailed interpretation of or implementation rules under Article 177 has yet to be promulgated, the inability of an overseas securities regulator to directly conduct investigation or evidence collection activities within China and the potential obstacles for information provision may further increase difficulties you face in protecting your interests. See “—Risks Related to our ADSs—You may face difficulties in protecting your interests, and your ability to protect your rights through U.S. courts may be limited, because we are incorporated under Cayman Islands law and conduct our operations in China” for risks associated with investing in us as a Cayman Islands company.

The discontinuation of any preferential tax treatment currently available to us, in particular the tax exempt status of our schools, could materially and adversely affect our results of operations.

Prior to the Private Education Law taking effect on December 29, 2018, private schools for which the school sponsors do not require returns are eligible to enjoy the same preferential tax treatment as public schools according to the Implementation Rules of the Law on Promoting Private Education. Pursuant to the Private Education Law, a non-profit private school may enjoy the same preferential tax treatments as public schools in accordance with the relevant PRC laws and regulations. Our school sponsors have registered Hengshizhong Education Tutorial School, Xinping Long-Spring Advanced Secondary School and Xishuangbanna Long-Spring Experimental Secondary School as for-profit private education institutions and have registered Qujing Hengshui Experimental Secondary School, Xinping Hengshui Experimental Middle School, Qiubei Long-Spring Experimental Secondary School, Wenshan Long-Spring Experimental Secondary School, and Mengla Long-Spring Experimental Secondary School as non-profit private schools. We have not made decisions to register some of our schools as for-profit or non-profit schools as we are currently in the transition period during which no registration election is required. There is a possibility that the PRC government may promulgate relevant tax regulations that will eliminate such preferential tax treatment, or the local tax bureaus may change their policy, in each such case, we will be subject to PRC enterprise income tax going forward. The discontinuation of any preferential tax treatment currently available to us or the determination of any of the relevant tax authorities that any of the preferential tax treatment we have enjoyed or currently enjoy is not in compliance with the PRC laws would cause our effective tax rate to increase, which would increase our tax expenses and reduce our net profit.

We may be subject to potential tax penalty and surcharge for the enterprise income tax payable in PRC.

As of the date of this annual report, our nine schools have not paid enterprise income tax for revenues generated from formal education services and three of these nine schools and another one school have not paid enterprise income tax for revenues generated from informal education services, among which we have obtained confirmation letters from or conducted interview with the PRC tax authorities for six of these schools to confirm that such schools are not required to pay enterprise income tax. As of the date of this annual report, we have not obtained confirmation letters from the PRC tax authorities for the remaining four schools, and we may be subject to additional tax liabilities if deemed payable by the relevant PRC tax authorities. If any of our schools is deemed to have failed to pay enterprise income tax within the prescribed time limit, we may be subject to tax penalty and related surcharges and our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

If we are classified as a PRC resident enterprise for PRC income tax purposes, such classification could result in unfavorable tax consequences to us and our non-PRC shareholders or the ADS holders.

Under the PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law and its implementation rules, an enterprise established under the laws of jurisdictions outside of the PRC with its “de facto management body” within the PRC is considered a “resident enterprise” and will be subject to PRC enterprise income tax on its global income at the rate of 25%. The implementation rules define the term “de facto management body” as the body that exercises full and substantial control and overall management over the business, productions, personnel, accounts and properties of an enterprise. In 2009, the State Administration of Taxation (the “SAT”) issued a circular, known as SAT Circular 82, which provides certain specific criteria for determining whether the “de facto management body” of a PRC-controlled enterprise that is incorporated offshore is located in China. Although this circular only applies to offshore enterprises controlled by PRC enterprises or PRC enterprise groups, not those controlled by PRC individuals or foreigners, the criteria set forth in the circular may reflect the SAT’s general position on how the “de facto management body” text should be applied in determining the tax resident status of all offshore enterprises. According to SAT Circular 82, an offshore incorporated enterprise controlled by a PRC enterprise or a PRC enterprise group will be regarded as a PRC tax resident by virtue of having its “de facto management body” in China and will be subject to PRC enterprise income tax on its global income only if all of the following conditions are met: (1) the senior management and core management departments in charge of daily operations are located mainly within the PRC; (2) decisions relating to the enterprise’s financial and human resource matters are made or are subject to approval by organizations or personnel in the PRC; (3) the enterprise’s primary assets, accounting books, company seals, and board and shareholder resolutions, are located or maintained in the PRC; and (4) at least 50% of voting board members or senior executives habitually reside in the PRC.

We believe none of our entities outside of China is a PRC resident enterprise for PRC tax purposes. However, the tax resident status of an enterprise is subject to determination by the PRC tax authorities and uncertainties remain with respect to the interpretation of the term “de facto management body.” If the PRC tax authorities determine that First High-School Education Group Co., Ltd. is a PRC resident enterprise for enterprise income tax purposes, we may be required to withhold a 10% withholding tax from dividends we pay to our shareholders that are non-resident enterprises, including the holders of the ADSs. In addition, non-resident enterprise shareholders (including the ADS holders) may be subject to PRC tax at a rate of 10% on gains realized on the sale or other disposition of ADSs or ordinary shares at a rate of 10%, if such income is treated as sourced from within the PRC. Furthermore, if PRC tax authorities determine that we are a PRC resident enterprise for enterprise income tax purposes, dividends paid to our non-PRC individual shareholders (including the ADS holders) and any gain realized on the transfer of ADSs or ordinary shares by such shareholders may be subject to PRC tax at a rate of 20% (which, in the case of dividends, may be withheld at source by us), if such gains are deemed to be from PRC sources. These rates may be reduced by an applicable tax treaty, but it is unclear whether non-PRC shareholders of First High-School Education Group Co., Ltd. would be able to claim the benefits of any tax treaties between their country of tax residence and the PRC in the event that First High-School Education Group Co., Ltd. is treated as a PRC resident enterprise. Any such tax may reduce the returns on your investment in the ADSs.

We face uncertainties with respect to indirect transfer of equity interests in PRC resident enterprises by their non-PRC holding companies.

In February 2015, the SAT issued the Bulletin on Issues of Enterprise Income Tax on Indirect Transfers of Assets by Non-PRC Resident Enterprises or Bulletin 7. Pursuant to Bulletin 7, an “indirect transfer” of PRC assets, including a transfer of equity interests in an unlisted non-PRC holding company of a PRC resident enterprise, by non-PRC resident enterprises may be re-characterized and treated as a direct transfer of the underlying PRC assets, if such arrangement does not have a reasonable commercial purpose and was established for the purpose of avoiding payment of PRC enterprise income tax. As a result, gains derived from such indirect transfer may be subject to PRC enterprise income tax, and the transferee or other person who is obligated to pay for the transfer is obligated to withhold the applicable taxes, currently at a rate of 10% for the transfer of equity interests in a PRC resident enterprise.

On October 17, 2017, the SAT issued the Announcement of the SAT on Issues Concerning the Withholding of Non-resident Enterprise Income Tax at Source, or Bulletin 37, which came into effect on December 1, 2017 and further amended on June 15, 2018. The Bulletin 37 further clarifies the practice and procedure of the withholding of nonresident enterprise income tax.

There is uncertainty as to the application of Bulletin 37 or previous rules under Bulletin 7. We face uncertainties on our offshore restructuring transactions or sale of the shares of our offshore subsidiaries, where non-resident enterprises, as the transferors, were involved. Under Bulletin 37 and Bulletin 7, our company may be subject to filing obligations or taxes if our company is the transferor in such transactions, and may be subject to withholding obligations if our company is the transferee in such transactions. As a result, we and our non-PRC shareholders may have the risk of being taxed for the disposition of our ordinary shares or ADS and may be required to spend valuable resources to comply with Bulletin 7 and Bulletin 37 or to establish that we or our non-PRC shareholders should not be taxed as an indirect transfer, which may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations or the investment by non-PRC investors in us.

The custodians or authorized users of our controlling non-tangible assets, including chops and seals, may fail to fulfill their responsibilities, or misappropriate or misuse these assets.

Under the PRC law, legal documents for corporate transactions, including agreements and contracts are executed using the chop or seal of the signing entity or with the signature of a legal representative whose designation is registered and filed with relevant PRC market regulation administrative authorities.

In order to secure the use of our chops and seals, we have established internal control procedures and rules for using these chops and seals. In any event that the chops and seals are intended to be used, the responsible personnel will submit the application through our office automation system and the application will be verified and approved by authorized employees in accordance with our internal control procedures and rules. In addition, in order to maintain the physical security of our chops, we generally have them stored in secured locations accessible only to authorized employees. Although we monitor such authorized employees, the procedures may not be sufficient to prevent all instances of abuse or negligence. There is a risk that our employees could abuse their authority, for example, by entering into a contract not approved by us or seeking to gain control of one of our subsidiaries or our affiliated entities or their subsidiaries. If any employee obtains, misuses or misappropriates our chops and seals or other controlling non-tangible assets for whatever reason, we could experience disruption to our normal business operations. We may have to take corporate or legal action, which could involve significant time and resources to resolve and divert management from our operations.

Restrictions on currency exchange may limit our ability to receive and use our revenues effectively.

The PRC government imposes controls on the convertibility of the Renminbi into foreign currencies and, in certain cases, the remittance of currency out of China. We receive substantially all of our revenues in Renminbi. Under our current corporate structure, our Cayman Islands holding company may rely on dividend payments from our PRC subsidiaries to fund any cash and financing requirements we may have. Under existing PRC foreign exchange regulations, payments of current account items, including profit distributions, interest payments and trade and service-related foreign exchange transactions, can be made in foreign currencies without prior approval of the SAFE, by complying with certain procedural requirements. Specifically, under the existing exchange restrictions, without prior approval of SAFE, cash generated from the operations of our PRC subsidiaries in China may be used to pay dividends to our company. However, approval from or registration with appropriate government authorities is required where Renminbi is to be converted into foreign currency and remitted out of China to pay capital expenses such as the repayment of loans denominated in foreign currencies. As a result, we need to obtain SAFE approval to use cash generated from the operations of our PRC subsidiaries and affiliated entities to pay off their respective debt in a currency other than Renminbi owed to entities outside China, or to make other capital expenditure payments outside China in a currency other than Renminbi.

In light of the flood of capital outflows of China in 2016 due to the weakening Renminbi, the PRC government has imposed more restrictive foreign exchange policies and stepped up scrutiny of major outbound capital movement including overseas direct investment. More restrictions and substantial vetting process are put in place by SAFE to regulate cross-border transactions falling under the capital account. If any of our shareholders regulated by such policies fails to satisfy the applicable overseas direct investment filing or approval requirement timely or at all, it may be subject to penalties from the relevant PRC authorities. The PRC government may at its discretion further restrict access in the future to foreign currencies for current account transactions. If the foreign exchange control system prevents us from obtaining sufficient foreign currencies to satisfy our foreign currency demands, we may not be able to pay dividends in foreign currencies to our shareholders, including holders of the ADSs.

Our subsidiaries and affiliated entities in China are subject to restrictions on making dividends and other payments to us.

We are a holding company and rely principally on dividends paid by our subsidiaries in China for our cash needs, including paying dividends and other cash distributions to our shareholders to the extent we choose to do so, servicing any debt we may incur and paying our operating expenses. The income for our PRC subsidiaries, especially Long-Spring Education, in turn depends on the service fees paid by the affiliated entities. Current PRC regulations permit our subsidiaries in China to pay dividends to us only out of their accumulated profits, if any, determined in accordance with Chinese accounting standards and regulations. Under the applicable requirements of PRC law, our PRC subsidiaries may only distribute dividends after they have made allowances to fund certain statutory reserves. These reserves are not distributable as cash dividends. Pursuant to the Law on Promoting Private Education, sponsors of for-profit private schools are entitled to retain the profits from their schools and the operating surplus may be allocated to the sponsors pursuant to the PRC company law and other relevant laws and regulations. Sponsors of non-profit private schools are not entitled to any distribution of profits from their schools and all revenue must be used for the operation of the schools. According to Implementation Rules, a non-profit private school should allocate no less than 10% of its audited annual non-restricted net asset increase, or a for-profit private school should allocate no less than 10% of its audited annual net income, to its development, respectively. In addition, prior to the specific Implementation Rules being promulgated by the State Council and other relevant regulations promulgated by other local and regional governments, at the end of each fiscal year, each of our schools that are private schools in China is required to allocate a certain amount to its development fund for the construction or maintenance of the school properties or purchase or upgrade of school facilities. In particular, our schools that require reasonable returns must allocate no less than 25.0% of their annual net income, and our schools that do not require reasonable returns must allocate no less than 25.0% of their annual increase in the net assets of the school for such purposes. However, the relevant authorities have yet to promulgate any detailed implementation rules and regulations under the Implementation Rules. We remain uncertain as to the timing and substance of the rules under the Law on Promoting Private Education and Implementation Rules to be promulgated, and how such rules will impact our operation. Furthermore, if our subsidiaries or the affiliated entities in China incur debt on their own behalf in the future, the instruments governing the debt may restrict their ability to pay dividends or make other payments to us. Any such restrictions may materially affect such entities’ ability to make dividends or make payments, in service fees or otherwise, to us, which may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Fluctuations in exchange rates could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and the value of your investment.

The value of the Renminbi against the U.S. dollar and other currencies is affected by changes in China’s political and economic conditions and China’s foreign exchange policies, among other things. In 2005, the PRC government changed its decades-old policy of pegging the value of the Renminbi to the U.S. dollar, and the Renminbi appreciated more than 20% against the U.S. dollar over the following three years. Between July 2008 and June 2010, this appreciation halted and the exchange rate between Renminbi and the U.S. dollar remained within a narrow band. Since June 2010, Renminbi has fluctuated against the U.S. dollar, at times significantly and unpredictably. On November 30, 2015, the Executive Board of IMF completed the regular five-year review of the basket of currencies that make up the Special Drawing Right (the “SDR”), and decided that with effect from October 1, 2016, Renminbi is determined to be a freely usable currency and will be included in the SDR basket as a fifth currency, along with the U.S. dollar, the Euro, the Japanese yen and the British pound. In the fourth quarter of 2016, the Renminbi has depreciated significantly against the backdrop of a surging U.S. dollar and persistent capital outflows from China. This depreciation halted in 2017, and the RMB appreciated approximately 7% against the U.S. dollar during this one-year period. In 2018, a new round of RMB depreciation emerged under the influence of a strong U.S. dollar and the trade friction between China and the United States. With the development of the foreign exchange market and progress towards interest rate liberalization and Renminbi internationalization, the PRC government may in the future announce further changes to the exchange rate system and we cannot assure you that Renminbi will not appreciate or depreciate significantly in value against the U.S. dollar in the future. It is difficult to predict how market forces or PRC or U.S. government policy may impact the exchange rate between Renminbi and the U.S. dollar in the future.

Significant revaluation of the Renminbi may have a material adverse effect on your investment. For example, to the extent that we need to convert U.S. dollars we receive from our overseas offering into Renminbi for our operations, appreciation of the Renminbi against the U.S. dollar would have an adverse effect on the Renminbi amount we would receive from the conversion. Conversely, if we decide to convert our Renminbi into U.S. dollars for the purpose of making payments for dividends on our ordinary shares or the ADSs or for other business purposes, appreciation of the U.S. dollar against the Renminbi would have a negative effect on the U.S. dollar amount available to us.

Very limited hedging options are available in China to reduce our exposure to exchange rate fluctuations. To date, we have not entered into any material hedging transactions in an effort to reduce our exposure to foreign currency exchange risk. While we may decide to enter into hedging transactions in the future, the availability and effectiveness of these hedges may be limited and we may not be able to adequately hedge our exposure or at all. In addition, our currency exchange losses may be magnified by PRC exchange control regulations that restrict our ability to convert Renminbi into foreign currency.

The M&A Rules and certain other PRC regulations establish complex procedures for some acquisitions of Chinese companies by foreign investors, which could make it more difficult for us to pursue growth through acquisitions in China.

The Provisions on the Merger and Acquisition of Domestic Enterprises by Foreign Investors (the “M&A Rules”) adopted by six PRC regulatory agencies in 2006 and amended in 2009, and some other regulations and rules concerning mergers and acquisitions established additional procedures and requirements that could make merger and acquisition activities by foreign investors more time-consuming and complex, including requirements in some instances that the MOFCOM, be notified in advance of any change-of-control transaction in which a foreign investor takes control of a PRC domestic enterprise. Moreover, the Anti-Monopoly Law requires that the MOFCOM shall be notified in advance of any concentration of undertaking if certain thresholds are triggered. In addition, the security review rules issued by the MOFCOM that became effective in September 2011 specify that mergers and acquisitions by foreign investors that raise “national defense and security” concerns and mergers and acquisitions through which foreign investors may acquire de facto control over domestic enterprises that raise “national security” concerns are subject to strict review by the MOFCOM, and the rules prohibit any activities attempting to bypass a security review, including by structuring the transaction through a proxy or contractual control arrangement. In the future, we may grow our business by acquiring complementary businesses. Complying with the requirements of the above-mentioned regulations and other relevant rules to complete such transactions could be time-consuming, and any required approval processes, including obtaining approval from the MOFCOM or its local counterparts may delay or inhibit our ability to complete such transactions, which could affect our ability to expand our business or maintain our market share.

PRC regulations relating to the establishment of offshore special purpose companies by PRC residents may subject our PRC resident beneficial owners or our PRC subsidiaries to liability or penalties, limit our ability to inject capital into our PRC subsidiaries, limit our PRC subsidiaries’ ability to increase its registered capital or distribute profits to us, or may otherwise adversely affect us.

The SAFE promulgated the Circular on Relevant Issues Relating to Foreign Exchange Administration of Overseas Investment and Financing and Return Investments Conducted by Domestic Residents through Overseas Special Purpose Vehicles (the “SAFE Circular 37”), in July 2014 that requires PRC residents or entities to register with SAFE or its local branch in connection with their establishment or control of an offshore entity established for the purpose of overseas investment or financing with such PRC residents or entities’ legally owned assets or equity interests in domestic enterprises or offshore assets or interests. On February 13, 2015, SAFE issued SAFE Circular 13, which took effect on June 1, 2015, pursuant to which, the power to accept SAFE registration was delegated from local SAFE to local qualified banks where the assets or interest in the domestic entity was located. In addition, such PRC residents or entities must update their SAFE registrations when the offshore special purpose vehicle undergoes material events relating to any change of basic information (including change of such PRC citizens or residents, name and operation term), increases or decreases in investment amount, transfers or exchanges of shares, or mergers or divisions.

SAFE Circular 37 is issued to replace the Circular on Relevant Issues Relating to Foreign Exchange Administration of Financing and Roundtrip Investments by Domestic Residents via Overseas Special Purpose Vehicles, or SAFE Circular 75.

If our shareholders who are PRC residents or entities do not complete their registration with the local SAFE branches, our PRC subsidiaries may be prohibited from distributing their profits and proceeds from any reduction in capital, share transfer or liquidation to us, and we may be restricted in our ability to contribute additional capital to our PRC subsidiaries. Moreover, failure to comply with the SAFE registration described above could result in liability under PRC laws for evasion of applicable foreign exchange restrictions.

We have used our best efforts to notify PRC residents or entities who directly or indirectly hold shares in our Cayman Islands holding company and who are known to us as being PRC residents to complete the foreign exchange registrations. However, we may not be informed of the identities of all the PRC residents or entities holding direct or indirect interest in our company, nor can we compel our beneficial owners to comply with SAFE registration requirements. As of the date of this annual report, all PRC residents known to us that currently hold direct or indirect ownership interests in our company completed the registration with SAFE as required by the SAFE Circular 37, except for Mr. Shaowei Zhang, who is in the process of updating his SAFE registration for his equity position in the offshore special purpose vehicles, including Long-Spring Education Management Limited, Long-Spring Education Technology Limited, and Long-Spring Education Consulting Limited. However, we may not at all times be fully aware or informed of the identities of all our shareholders or beneficial owners that are required to make or update such registration, and we cannot compel our beneficial owners to comply with SAFE registration requirements. As a result, we cannot assure you that all other shareholders or beneficial owners of ours who are PRC residents or entities have complied with, and will in the future make, obtain or update any applicable registrations or approvals required by SAFE regulations. Failure by such shareholders or beneficial owners to comply with SAFE regulations, or failure by us to amend the foreign exchange registrations of our PRC subsidiaries, could subject us to fines or legal sanctions, restrict our overseas or cross-border investment activities, limit our PRC subsidiaries’ ability to make distributions or pay dividends to us or affect our ownership structure, which could adversely affect our business and prospects.

Failure to comply with PRC regulations regarding the registration requirements for employee stock ownership plans or share option plans may subject the PRC plan participants or us to fines and other legal or administrative sanctions.

Pursuant to SAFE Circular 37, PRC residents who participate in share incentive plans in overseas non-publicly-listed companies due to their position as director, senior management or employees of the PRC subsidiaries of the overseas companies may submit applications to SAFE or its local branches for the foreign exchange registration with respect to offshore special purpose companies. Our directors, executive officers and other employees who are PRC residents and who have been granted share-based awards may have to follow SAFE Circular 37 to apply for the foreign exchange registration before our company becomes an overseas listed company. In February 2012, SAFE promulgated the Notices on Issues Concerning the Foreign Exchange Administration for Domestic Individuals Participating in Stock Incentive Plans of Overseas Publicly-Listed Companies, or SAFE Circular 7. Under SAFE Circular 7 and other relevant rules and regulations, PRC residents who participate in stock incentive plan in an overseas publicly-listed company are required to register with SAFE or its local branches and complete certain other procedures. Participants of a stock incentive plan who are PRC residents must retain a qualified PRC agent, which could be a PRC subsidiary of such overseas publicly listed company or another qualified institution selected by such PRC subsidiary, to conduct the SAFE registration and other procedures with respect to the stock incentive plan on behalf of its participants. Such participants must also retain an overseas entrusted institution to handle matters in connection with their exercise of share-based awards, the purchase and sale of corresponding shares or interests and fund transfers. In addition, the PRC agent is required to amend the SAFE registration with respect to the stock incentive plan if there is any material change to the stock incentive plan, the PRC agent or the overseas entrusted institution, or any other material changes.

We did not grant any share options to our employees or consultants under our 2021 Share Incentive Plan as of the date of this annual report but may do so in the future. When we do, from time to time, we need to apply for or update our registration with SAFE or its local branches on behalf of our employees or consultants who receive options or other equity-based incentive grants under our share incentive plan or material changes in our share incentive plan. However, we may not always be able to make applications or update our registration on behalf of our employees or consultants who hold any type of share incentive awards in compliance with SAFE Circular 7, nor can we ensure you that such applications or update of registration will be successful. If we or the participants of our share incentive plan who are PRC citizens fail to comply with SAFE Circular 7, we and/or such participants of our share incentive plan may be subject to fines and legal sanctions, there may be additional restrictions on the ability of such participants to exercise their share options or remit proceeds gained from sale of their shares into China, and we may be prevented from further granting share incentive awards under our 2021 Share Incentive Plan or any future share incentive plans to our employees or consultants who are PRC citizens.

The enforcement of the PRC Labor Contract Law and other labor-related regulations in the PRC may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress (the “SCNPC”) enacted the Labor Contract Law in 2007, and amended it on December 28, 2012. The Labor Contract Law introduced specific provisions related to fixed-term employment contracts, part-time employment, probationary periods, consultation with labor unions and employee assemblies, employment without a written contract, dismissal of employees, severance, and collective bargaining to enhance previous PRC labor laws. Under the Labor Contract Law, an employer is obligated to sign an unlimited-term labor contract with any employee who has worked for the employer for ten consecutive years. Further, if an employee requests or agrees to renew a fixed-term labor contract that has already been entered into twice consecutively, the resulting contract, with certain exceptions, must have an unlimited term, subject to certain exceptions. With certain exceptions, an employer must pay severance to an employee where a labor contract is terminated or expires. In addition, the PRC governmental authorities have continued to introduce various new labor-related regulations since the effectiveness of the Labor Contract Law.

Under the PRC Social Insurance Law and the Administrative Measures on Housing Fund, employees are required to participate in pension insurance, work-related injury insurance, medical insurance, unemployment insurance, maternity insurance, and housing funds and employers are required, together with their employees or separately, to pay the social insurance premiums and housing funds for their employees. However, certain of our affiliated entities did not make adequate social insurance and housing fund for certain employees. As the interpretation and implementation of labor-related laws and regulations are still evolving, we cannot assure you that our employment practices do not and will not violate labor-related laws and regulations in China, which may subject us to labor disputes or government investigations. We cannot assure you that we have complied or will be able to comply with all labor-related law and regulations regarding including those relating to obligations to make social insurance payments and contribute to the housing funds. If we are deemed to have violated relevant labor laws and regulations, we could be required to provide additional compensation to our employees and our business, financial condition and results of operations will be adversely affected.

Under the PRC Tort Law, employers shall bear tortious liability for any injury or damage caused to other people by their employees in the course of their employment. Entities that engage dispatched laborers shall bear tortious liability for any injury or damage caused to other people by such dispatched laborers in the course of their work and during the dispatch period, and the dispatching party shall bear corresponding supplementary liabilities if it is at fault. If the workers on our platform are deemed as our employees or dispatch employees by courts or arbitral tribunals, we shall bear the responsibilities accordingly.

These laws designed to enhance labor protection tend to increase our labor costs. In addition, as the interpretation and implementation of these regulations are still evolving, our employment practices may not be at all times be deemed in compliance with the regulations. As a result, we could be subject to penalties or incur significant liabilities in connection with labor disputes or investigations.

Labor contract laws in China may adversely affect our results of operations.

The current PRC Labor Contract Law imposes greater liabilities on employers and significantly affects the cost of an employer’s decision to reduce its workforce. Further, it requires certain terminations be based on the mandatory retirement age. In the event we decide to significantly change or decrease our workforce, the Labor Contract Law could adversely affect our ability to enact such changes in a manner that is most advantageous to our business or in a timely and cost-effective manner, thus materially and adversely affecting our financial condition and results of operations.

Risks Related to our ADSs

The trading price of the ADSs is likely to be volatile, which could result in substantial losses to investors.

The trading prices of the ADSs are likely to be volatile and could fluctuate widely due to factors beyond our control. This may happen because of broad market and industry factors, like the performance and fluctuation in the market prices or the underperformance or deteriorating financial results of other companies based in China that have listed their securities in the United States in recent years. The securities of some of these companies have experienced significant volatility since their initial public offerings, including, in some cases, substantial price declines in their trading prices. The trading performances of other Chinese companies’ securities after their offerings, may affect the attitudes of investors toward Chinese companies listed in the United States, which consequently may impact the trading performance of the ADSs, regardless of our actual operating performance. In addition, any negative news or perceptions about inadequate corporate governance practices or fraudulent accounting, corporate structure or other matters of other Chinese companies may also negatively affect the attitudes of investors towards Chinese companies in general, including us, regardless of whether we have conducted any inappropriate activities. In addition, securities markets may from time to time experience significant price and volume fluctuations that are not related to our operating performance, such as the large decline in share prices in the United States, China and other jurisdictions in late 2008, early 2009 and the second half of 2011, which may have a material adverse effect on the market price of the ADSs.

In addition to the above factors, the price and trading volume of the ADSs may be highly volatile due to multiple factors, including the following:

Our dual-class share structure with different voting rights will limit your ability to influence corporate matters and could discourage others from pursuing any change of control transactions that holders of our Class A ordinary shares and ADSs may view as beneficial. In addition, holders of our Class A ordinary shares may experience loss of voting power and dilution due to future issuances and conversions of our Class B ordinary shares.

Our authorized and issued ordinary shares are divided into Class A ordinary shares and Class B ordinary shares. In respect of matters requiring the votes of shareholders, holders of Class B ordinary shares are entitled to 20 votes per share, while holders of Class A ordinary shares are entitled to one vote per share based on our dual-class share structure. Each Class B ordinary share is convertible into one Class A ordinary share at any time by the holder thereof, while Class A ordinary shares are not convertible into Class B ordinary shares under any circumstances. Upon any direct or indirect sale, transfer, assignment or disposition of such number of Class B ordinary shares by the holder thereof to any person other than a designated holder (as defined in our memorandum and articles of association) or any person that is not an affiliate of such holder, or upon a change of beneficial ownership of any Class B ordinary shares as a result of which any person who is not a designated holder or any person who is not an affiliate of the holders of such ordinary shares becomes a beneficial owner of such ordinary shares, such Class B ordinary shares are automatically and immediately converted into the same number of Class A ordinary shares.

As of the date of this annual report, Mr. Shaowei Zhang (our founder, chairman and chief executive officer), Ms. Yu Wu (his spouse), and Longwater Topco B.V. beneficially own all of our issued Class B ordinary shares. These Class B ordinary shares constitute approximately 37.15% of our total issued and outstanding share capital and 92.20% of the aggregate voting power of our total issued and outstanding share capital due to the disparate voting powers associated with our dual-class share structure. See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—E. Share Ownership.” As a result of the dual-class share structure and the concentration of ownership, holders of Class B ordinary shares will have considerable influence over matters such as decisions regarding mergers, consolidations and the sale of all or substantially all of our assets, election of directors and other significant corporate actions. Any future issuances of Class B ordinary shares may be dilutive to the voting power of holders of Class A ordinary shares. Any conversions of Class B ordinary shares into Class A ordinary shares may dilute the percentage ownership of the existing holders of Class A ordinary shares within their class of ordinary shares. Such conversions may increase the aggregate voting power of the existing holders of Class A ordinary shares. In the event that we have multiple holders of Class B ordinary shares in the future and certain of them convert their Class B ordinary shares into Class A ordinary shares, the remaining holders who retain their Class B ordinary shares may experience increases in their relative voting power. Holders of Class B ordinary shares may take actions that are not in the best interest of us or our other shareholders. This concentration of ownership may discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of our company, which could have the effect of depriving our other shareholders of the opportunity to receive a premium for their shares as part of a sale of our company and may reduce the price of our ADSs. This concentrated control will limit your ability to influence corporate matters and could discourage others from pursuing any potential merger, takeover or other change of control transactions that holders of Class A ordinary shares and ADSs may view as beneficial.

Our dual-class share structure may adversely affect the trading market for and the trading price of the ADSs.

Certain shareholder advisory firms have announced changes to their eligibility criteria for inclusion of shares of public companies on certain stock market indices, including the S&P 500, to exclude companies with multiple classes of shares and companies whose public shareholders hold no more than 5% of total voting power from being added to such indices. In addition, several shareholder advisory firms have announced their opposition to the use of multiple class structures. As a result, our dual-class share structure may prevent the inclusion of the ADSs representing Class A ordinary shares in such indices and may cause shareholder advisory firms to publish negative commentary about our corporate governance practices or otherwise seek to cause us to change our capital structure. Any such exclusion from indices could result in a less active trading market for the ADSs. Any actions or publications by shareholder advisory firms critical of our corporate governance practices or capital structure could also adversely affect the value of the ADSs.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our business, or if they adversely change their recommendations regarding the ADSs, the market price for the ADSs and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for the ADSs will be influenced by research or reports that industry or securities analysts publish about our business. If research analysts do not establish and maintain adequate research coverage or if one or more analysts who cover us downgrade the ADSs or publish inaccurate of unfavorable research about our business, the market price for the ADSs would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts cease to cover us or fail to regularly publish reports on us regularly, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could cause the market price or trading volume for the ADSs to decline.

The sale or availability for sale of substantial amounts of the ADSs could adversely affect their market price.

Sales of substantial amounts of the ADSs in the public market, or the perception that these sales could occur, could adversely affect the market price of the ADSs and could materially impair our ability to raise capital through equity offerings in the future. The ADSs sold in our initial public offering were freely tradable without restriction or further registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and shares held by our existing shareholders may also be sold in the public market in the future subject to the restrictions in Rule 144 and Rule 701 under the Securities Act and the applicable lock-up agreements. As of the date of this annual report, there are 113,303,070 ADSs (equivalent to 37,767,690 Class A ordinary shares) outstanding. We cannot predict what effect, if any, market sales of securities held by our significant shareholders or any other shareholder or the availability of these securities for future sale will have on the market price of the ADSs.

Techniques employed by short sellers may drive down the market price of the ADSs.

Short selling is the practice of selling securities that the seller does not own but rather has borrowed from a third party with the intention of buying identical securities back at a later date to return to the lender. The short seller hopes to profit from a decline in the value of the securities between the sale of the borrowed securities and the purchase of the replacement shares, as the short seller expects to pay less in that purchase than it received in the sale. As it is in the short seller’s interest for the price of the security to decline, many short sellers publish, or arrange for the publication of, negative opinions regarding the relevant issuer and its business prospects in order to create negative market momentum and generate profits for themselves after selling a security short. These short attacks have, in the past, led to selling of shares in the market.

Public companies that have substantially all of their operations in China have been the subject of short selling. Much of the scrutiny and negative publicity has centered on allegations of a lack of effective internal control over financial reporting resulting in financial and accounting irregularities and mistakes, inadequate corporate governance policies or a lack of adherence thereto and, in many cases, allegations of fraud. As a result, many of these companies are now conducting internal and external investigations into the allegations and, in the interim, are subject to shareholder lawsuits and/or SEC enforcement actions.

It is not clear what effect such negative publicity could have on us. If we were to become the subject of any unfavorable allegations, whether such allegations are proven to be true or untrue, we could have to expend a significant amount of resources to investigate such allegations and/or defend ourselves. While we would strongly defend against any such short seller attacks, we may be constrained in the manner in which we can proceed against the relevant short seller by principles of freedom of speech, applicable state law or issues of commercial confidentiality. Such a situation could be costly and time-consuming, and could distract our management from growing our business. Even if such allegations are ultimately proven to be groundless, allegations against us could materially and adversely affect our business, and any investment in the ADSs could be greatly reduced or even rendered worthless.

Because we cannot guarantee to pay dividends in the foreseeable future, you must rely on price appreciation of the ADSs for return on your investment.

Considering that we have achieved net income in 2021, we intend to distribute a certain portion of our net income for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 as a cash dividend among the holders of our ordinary shares in 2022, conditional upon the passing of the relevant resolutions of our board of directors, provided that under no circumstances may the dividend be paid if it would result in our company being unable to pay our debts as they fall due in the ordinary course of business. However, we still intend to retain most, if not all, of our available funds and any future earnings to fund the development and growth of our business. Therefore, you should not rely on an investment in the ADSs as a source for any future dividend income.

Our board of directors has complete discretion as to whether to distribute dividends, subject to certain restrictions under Cayman Islands law, namely that our company may only pay dividends out of profits or share premium account, and provided always that in no circumstances may a dividend be paid if this would result in our company being unable to pay its debts as they fall due in the ordinary course of business. In addition, our shareholders may by ordinary resolution declare a dividend, but no dividend may exceed the amount recommended by our board of directors. Even if our board of directors decides to declare and pay dividends, the timing, amount and form of future dividends, if any, will depend on our future results of operations and cash flow, our capital requirements and surplus, the amount of distributions, if any, received by us from our subsidiaries, our financial condition, contractual restrictions and other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors. Accordingly, the return on your investment in the ADSs will likely depend entirely upon any future price appreciation of the ADSs. There is no guarantee that the ADSs would appreciate in value or even maintain the price at which you purchased the ADSs. You may not realize a return on your investment in the ADSs or even lose your entire investment in the ADSs.

Our memorandum and articles of association contain anti-takeover provisions that could have a material adverse effect on the rights of holders of our ordinary shares and the ADSs.

Our memorandum and articles of association contain provisions which could limit the ability of others to acquire control of our company or cause us to engage in change-of-control transactions. These provisions could have the effect of depriving our shareholders of an opportunity to sell their shares at a premium over prevailing market prices by discouraging third parties from seeking to obtain control of our company in a tender offer or similar transaction. Our board of directors has the authority, without further action by our shareholders, to issue preferred shares in one or more series and to fix their designations, powers, preferences, privileges, and relative participating, optional or special rights and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions, including dividend rights, conversion rights, voting rights, terms of redemption and liquidation preferences, any or all of which may be greater than the rights associated with our ordinary shares, in the form of ADS or otherwise. Preferred shares could be issued quickly with terms calculated to delay or prevent a change in control of our company or make removal of management more difficult. If our board of directors decides to issue preferred shares, the price of the ADSs may fall and the voting and other rights of the holders of our ordinary shares and ADSs may be materially and adversely affected.

Forum selection provisions in our memorandum and articles of association could limit the ability of holders of our Class A ordinary shares, ADSs or other securities to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us, our directors and officers, and potentially others.

Our memorandum and articles of association provide that the federal district courts of the United States are the exclusive forum within the United States for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act and the Exchange Act. However, the enforceability of similar federal court choice of forum provisions has been challenged in legal proceedings in the United States, and it is possible that a court could find this type of provision to be inapplicable, unenforceable, or inconsistent with other documents that are relevant to the filing of such lawsuits. If a court were to find the stipulated choice of forum provision contained in our memorandum and articles of association to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other forums or jurisdictions. If upheld, the forum selection clause in our memorandum and articles of association may increase the costs for you or limit your ability to bring a claim against us, our directors and officers, and potentially others in his or her preferred judicial forum, and this limitation may discourage such lawsuits. In addition, the Securities Act provides that both federal and state courts have jurisdiction over suits brought to enforce any duty or liability under the Securities Act or the rules and regulations thereunder. Accepting or consent to this forum selection provision does not constitute a waiver by you of compliance with federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder. You may not waive compliance with federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder. The exclusive forum provision in our memorandum and articles of association will not operate so as to deprive the courts of the Cayman Islands from having jurisdiction over matters relating to our internal affairs.

You may face difficulties in protecting your interests, and your ability to protect your rights through U.S. courts may be limited, because we are incorporated under Cayman Islands law and conduct our operations in China.

We are an exempted company incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands. Our corporate affairs are governed by our memorandum and articles of association, the Companies Act (As Revised) of the Cayman Islands, as amended, and the common law of the Cayman Islands. The rights of shareholders to take action against the directors, actions by minority shareholders and the fiduciary responsibilities of our directors to us under Cayman Islands law are to a large extent governed by the common law of the Cayman Islands. The common law of the Cayman Islands is derived in part from comparatively limited judicial precedent in the Cayman Islands as well as from the common law of England, the decisions of whose courts are of persuasive authority, but are not binding, on a court in the Cayman Islands. The rights of our shareholders and the fiduciary responsibilities of our directors under Cayman Islands law are not as clearly established as they would be under statutes or judicial precedent in some jurisdictions in the United States. In particular, the Cayman Islands has a less developed body of securities laws than the United States. Some U.S. states, such as Delaware, have more fully developed and judicially interpreted bodies of corporate law than the Cayman Islands. In addition, Cayman Islands companies may not have standing to initiate a shareholder derivative action in a federal court of the United States.

Shareholders of Cayman Islands exempted companies like us have no general rights under Cayman Islands law to inspect corporate records (other than the memorandum and articles of associations, any special resolutions passed by such companies, and the register of mortgages and charges of such companies) or to obtain copies of lists of shareholders of these companies. Our directors have discretion under our articles of association to determine whether or not, and under what conditions, our corporate records may be inspected by our shareholders, but are not obliged to make them available to our shareholders. This may make it more difficult for you to obtain the information needed to establish any facts necessary for a shareholder motion or to solicit proxies from other shareholders in connection with a proxy contest.

As a Cayman Islands company listed on the NYSE, we are subject to the NYSE corporate governance listing standards. However, NYSE rules permit a foreign private issuer like us to follow the corporate governance practices of its home country. Certain corporate governance practices in the Cayman Islands, which is our home country, may differ significantly from the NYSE corporate governance listing standards.

Pursuant to Sections 303A.01, 303A.04, 303A.05, 303A.07 and 302.00 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual, a company listed on the NYSE must have a majority of independent directors, a nominating and corporate governance committee composed entirely of independent directors and a compensation committee composed entirely of independent directors. We currently follow our home country practice in lieu of these requirements. We may also continue to rely on these and other exemptions available to foreign private issuers in the future.

In addition, we conduct our business operations in China, and all of our directors and senior management are based in China. The SEC, U.S. Department of Justice and other authorities often have substantial difficulties in bringing and enforcing actions against non-U.S. companies and non-U.S. persons, including company directors and officers, in certain emerging markets, including China. Additionally, our public shareholders may have limited rights and few practical remedies in China, as shareholder claims that are common in the United States, including class action securities law and fraud claims, generally are difficult or impossible to pursue as a matter of law or practicality in many emerging markets, including China.

As a result of all of the above, our public shareholders may have more difficulty in protecting their interests in the face of actions taken by management, members of the board of directors or controlling shareholders than they would as public shareholders of a company incorporated in the United States. See Exhibit 2.4 to this annual report.

Certain judgments obtained against us by our shareholders may not be enforceable.

We are a Cayman Islands exempted company and all of our assets are located outside of the United States. Substantially all of our current operations are conducted in China. In addition, most of our current directors and officers are nationals and residents of countries other than the United States. All or a substantial portion of the assets of these persons are located outside the United States. As a result, it may be difficult or impossible for you to bring an action against us or against these individuals in the United States in the event that you believe that your rights have been infringed under the U.S. federal securities laws or otherwise. Even if you are successful in bringing an action of this kind, the laws of the Cayman Islands and of China may render you unable to enforce a judgment against us, our assets, our directors and officers or their assets.

The voting rights of holders of ADSs are limited by the terms of the deposit agreement, and you may not be able to exercise your right to direct how your Class A ordinary shares which are represented by your ADSs are voted.

Holders of ADSs do not have the same rights as our registered shareholders. As a holder of the ADSs, you will only be able to exercise the voting rights with respect to the underlying Class A ordinary shares in accordance with the provisions of the deposit agreement. You will only be able to exercise the voting rights which are carried by the Class A ordinary shares represented by your ADSs indirectly by giving voting instructions to the depositary in accordance with the provisions of the deposit agreement. Under the deposit agreement, you must vote by giving voting instructions to the depositary. If we request the depositary to ask for your instructions, then upon receipt of your voting instructions, the depositary will try, as far as is practicable, to vote the underlying Class A ordinary shares which are represented by your ADSs in accordance with your instructions. If we do not request the depositary to ask for your instructions, the depositary may still vote in accordance with instructions you give, but it is not required to do so. You will not be able to directly exercise your right to vote with respect to the underlying Class A ordinary shares represented by your ADSs unless you withdraw the shares and became the registered holder of such shares prior to the record date for the general meeting. Under our second amended and restated memorandum and articles of association, the minimum notice period required for convening a general meeting will be seven days. When a general meeting is convened, you may not receive sufficient advance notice to withdraw the Class A ordinary shares underlying your ADSs and become the registered holder of such shares to allow you to attend the general meeting and vote directly with respect to any specific matter or resolution to be considered and voted upon at the general meeting. In addition, under our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association, for the purposes of determining those shareholders who are entitled to attend and vote at any general meeting, our directors may close our register of members and/or fix in advance a record date for such meeting, and such closure of our register of members or the setting of such a record date may prevent you from withdrawing the Class A ordinary shares underlying your ADSs and becoming the registered holder of such shares prior to the record date, so that you would not be able to attend the general meeting or to vote directly. If we ask for your instructions, the depositary will notify you of the upcoming vote and will arrange to deliver our voting materials to you. We cannot assure you that you will receive the voting materials in time to ensure that you can instruct the depositary to vote the underlying Class A ordinary shares represented by your ADSs. In addition, the depositary and its agents are not responsible for failing to carry out voting instructions or for their manner of carrying out your voting instructions. This means that you may not be able to exercise your right to vote and you may have no legal remedy if the shares underlying your ADSs are not voted as you requested.

The depositary may give us a discretionary proxy to vote our Class A ordinary shares underlying your ADSs if you do not vote at shareholders’ meetings, which could adversely affect your interests and the ability of our shareholders as a group to influence the management of our company.

Under the deposit agreement for the ADSs, if you do not give voting instructions to the depositary to direct how the Class A ordinary shares underlying your ADSs are voted, upon our request, the depositary will give us (or our nominee) a discretionary proxy to vote the Class A ordinary shares underlying your ADSs at shareholders’ meetings if:

The effect of this discretionary proxy is that if you do not give voting instructions to the depositary to direct how the Class A ordinary shares underlying your ADSs are voted, you cannot prevent the Class A ordinary shares underlying your ADSs from being voted, under the circumstances described above. This may make it more difficult for shareholders to influence the management of our company. Holders of our ordinary shares are not subject to this discretionary proxy.

You may not receive cash dividends if the depositary decides it is impractical to make them available to you.

The depositary has agreed to pay to you the cash dividends or other distributions it or the custodian receives on our Class A ordinary shares or other deposited securities underlying the ADSs, after deducting its fees and expenses. You will receive these distributions in proportion to the number of Class A ordinary shares your ADSs represent. However, the depositary may, at its discretion, decide that it is inequitable or impractical to make a distribution available to any holders of ADSs. For example, the depositary may determine that it is not practicable to distribute certain property through the mail, or that the value of certain distributions may be less than the cost of mailing them. In these cases, the depositary may decide not to distribute such property to you.

You may experience dilution of your holdings due to inability to participate in rights offerings.

We may, from time to time, distribute rights to our shareholders, including rights to acquire securities. Under the deposit agreement, the depositary will not distribute rights to holders of ADSs unless the distribution and sale of rights and the securities to which these rights relate are either exempt from registration under the Securities Act with respect to all holders of ADSs or are registered under the provisions of the Securities Act. The depositary may, but is not required to, attempt to sell these undistributed rights to third parties, and may allow the rights to lapse. We may be unable to establish an exemption from registration under the Securities Act, and we are under no obligation to file a registration statement with respect to these rights or underlying securities or to endeavor to have a registration statement declared effective. Accordingly, holders of ADSs may be unable to participate in our rights offerings and may experience dilution of their holdings as a result.

You may be subject to limitations on transfer of your ADSs.

Your ADSs are transferable on the books of the depositary. However, the depositary may close its books at any time or from time to time when it deems expedient in connection with the performance of its duties. The depositary may close its books from time to time for a number of reasons, including events in emergencies, and on weekends and public holidays. The depositary may refuse to deliver, transfer or register transfers of the ADSs generally when our share register or the books of the depositary are closed, or at any time if we or the depositary thinks it is advisable to do so because of any requirement of law or of any government or governmental body, or under any provision of the deposit agreement, or for any other reason.

ADS holders may not be entitled to a jury trial with respect to claims arising under the deposit agreement, which could result in less favorable outcomes to the plaintiff(s) in any such action.

The deposit agreement governing the ADSs representing our Class A ordinary shares provides that, to the fullest extent permitted by law, ADS holders waive the right to a jury trial of any claim they may have against us or the depositary arising out of or relating to our shares, the ADSs or the deposit agreement, including any claim under the U.S. federal securities laws.

If we or the depositary opposed a jury trial demand based on the waiver, the court would determine whether the waiver was enforceable based on the facts and circumstances of that case in accordance with the applicable state and federal law. To our knowledge, the enforceability of a contractual pre-dispute jury trial waiver in connection with claims arising under the federal securities laws has not been finally adjudicated by the United States Supreme Court. However, we believe that a contractual pre-dispute jury trial waiver provision is generally enforceable, including under the laws of the State of New York, which govern the deposit agreement, by a federal or state court in the City of New York, which has non-exclusive jurisdiction over matters arising under the deposit agreement. In determining whether to enforce a contractual pre-dispute jury trial waiver provision, courts will generally consider whether a party knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived the right to a jury trial. We believe that this is the case with respect to the deposit agreement and the ADSs. It is advisable that you consult legal counsel regarding the jury waiver provision before entering into the deposit agreement.

If you or any other holders or beneficial owners of ADSs bring a claim against us or the depositary in connection with matters arising under the deposit agreement or the ADSs, including claims under federal securities laws, you or such other holder or beneficial owner may not be entitled to a jury trial with respect to such claims, which may have the effect of limiting and discouraging lawsuits against us and/or the depositary. If a lawsuit is brought against us and/or the depositary under the deposit agreement, it may be heard only by a judge or justice of the applicable trial court, which would be conducted according to different civil procedures and may result in different outcomes than a trial by jury would have had, including results that could be less favorable to the plaintiff(s) in any such action.

Nevertheless, if this jury trial waiver provision is not permitted by applicable law, an action could proceed under the terms of the deposit agreement with a jury trial. No condition, stipulation or provision of the deposit agreement or ADSs serves as a waiver by any holder or beneficial owner of ADSs or by us or the depositary of compliance with any substantive provision of the U.S. federal securities laws and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.

As a company incorporated in the Cayman Islands, we are permitted to adopt certain home country practices for corporate governance matters that differ significantly from the NYSE corporate governance listing standards; these practices may afford less protection to shareholders than they would enjoy if we complied fully with the corporate governance listing standards.

The ADSs have been approved for listing on the NYSE. The NYSE corporate governance listing standards permit a foreign private issuer like us to follow the corporate governance practices of its home country. Certain corporate governance practices in the Cayman Islands, which is our home country, may differ significantly from the NYSE corporate governance listing standards.

For instance, we are not required to: (1) have a majority of the board be independent; (2) have a compensation committee or a nominations or corporate governance committee consisting entirely of independent directors; or (3) have regularly scheduled executive sessions with only independent directors each year. We intend to rely on some of these exemptions. As a result, you may not be provided with the benefits of certain corporate governance requirements of the NYSE.

We are a foreign private issuer within the meaning of the rules under the Exchange Act, and as such we are exempt from certain provisions applicable to U.S. domestic public companies.

Because we are a foreign private issuer under the Exchange Act, we are exempt from certain provisions of the securities rules and regulations in the United States that are applicable to U.S. domestic issuers, including:

We are required to file an annual report on Form 20-F within four months of the end of each fiscal year. In addition, we intend to publish our results on a quarterly basis through press releases, distributed pursuant to the rules and regulations of the NYSE. Press releases relating to financial results and material events will also be furnished to the SEC on Form 6-K. However, the information we are required to file with or furnish to the SEC will be less extensive and less timely than that required to be filed with the SEC by U.S. domestic issuers. As a result, you may not be afforded the same protections or information that would be made available to you were you investing in a U.S. domestic issuer.

We are an emerging growth company within the meaning of the Securities Act and may take advantage of certain reduced reporting requirements.

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the JOBS Act, and we may take advantage of certain exemptions from requirements applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies including, most significantly, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for so long as we remain an emerging growth company. As a result, if we elect not to comply with such auditor attestation requirements, our investors may not have access to certain information they may deem important. The JOBS Act also provides that an emerging growth company does not need to comply with any new or revised financial accounting standards until such date that a private company is otherwise required to comply with such new or revised accounting standards.

We incur significant costs as a result of being a public company, particularly after we cease to qualify as an “emerging growth company.”

We incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses as a result of being a public company. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as rules subsequently implemented by the SEC and the NYSE, impose various requirements on the corporate governance practices of public companies. We expect these rules and regulations to increase our legal and financial compliance costs and to make some corporate activities more time-consuming and costly. As a company with less than US$1.07 billion in revenues for our last fiscal year, we qualify as an “emerging growth company” pursuant to the JOBS Act. An emerging growth company may take advantage of specified reduced reporting and other requirements that are otherwise applicable generally to public companies. After we are no longer an “emerging growth company”, we expect to incur significant expenses and devote substantial management effort toward ensuring compliance with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the other rules and regulations of the SEC.

As a public company, we need to increase the number of independent directors and adopt policies regarding internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures. We also expect that operating as a public company will make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. In addition, we will incur additional costs associated with our public company reporting requirements. It may also be more difficult for us to find qualified persons to serve on our board of directors or as executive officers. We are currently evaluating and monitoring developments with respect to these rules and regulations, and we cannot predict or estimate with any degree of certainty the amount of additional costs we may incur or the timing of such costs.

We may be a passive foreign investment company, which could result in adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. investors owning the ADSs or our ordinary shares.

A non-U.S. corporation, such as our company, will be considered a passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, for any taxable year if either (1) at least 75% of its gross income is passive income or (2) at least 50% of the value of its assets (based on an average of the quarterly values of the assets during a taxable year) is attributable to assets that produce or are held for the production of passive income. Although the law in this regard is not entirely clear, we treat our affiliated entities as being owned by us for U.S. federal income tax purposes because we control their management decisions and are entitled to substantially all of the economic benefits associated with them. As a result, we consolidate their results of operations in our consolidated U.S. GAAP financial statements. If it were determined, however, that we are not the owner of our affiliated entities for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we would likely be treated as a PFIC for the current taxable year and any subsequent taxable year.

Assuming that we are the owner of our affiliated entities for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and based upon our current and projected income and assets, including the proceeds from our initial public offering, and projections as to the value of our assets, we do not expect to be a PFIC for the taxable year ending December 31, 2021 or the foreseeable future. However, no assurance can be given in this regard because the determination of whether we will be or become a PFIC is a factual determination made annually that will depend, in part, upon the composition of our income and assets. Fluctuations in the market price of the ADSs may cause us to be classified as a PFIC for the current or future taxable years because the value of our assets for purposes of the asset test, including the value of our goodwill and unbooked intangibles, may be determined by reference to the market price of the ADSs from time to time (which may be volatile). If our market capitalization subsequently declines, we may be or become classified as a PFIC for the current taxable year or future taxable years. Furthermore, the composition of our income and assets may also be affected by how, and how quickly, we use our liquid assets, including the cash raised in our initial public offering. Under circumstances where our revenues from activities that produce passive income significantly increases relative to our revenues from activities that produce non-passive income, or where we determine not to deploy significant amounts of cash for active purposes, our risk of becoming classified as a PFIC may substantially increase.

If we were treated as a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. investor held an ADS or an ordinary share, certain adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences could apply to the U.S. Holder. See “Item. 10 Additional Information—E. Taxation—United States Federal Income Taxation—Passive foreign investment company rules.”