0000915913DEF 14Afalse00009159132022-01-012022-12-310000915913alb:MastersJrMember2022-01-012022-12-31iso4217:USD0000915913alb:MastersJrMember2021-01-012021-12-3100009159132021-01-012021-12-310000915913alb:MastersJrMember2020-01-012020-12-310000915913alb:LutherCKissamIVMember2020-01-012020-12-3100009159132020-01-012020-12-310000915913alb:EquityAwardsGrantedDuringTheYearUnvestedMemberalb:MastersJrMember2022-01-012022-12-310000915913ecd:PeoMemberalb:MastersJrMemberalb:EquityAwardsGrantedInPriorYearsUnvestedMember2022-01-012022-12-310000915913alb:EquityAwardsGrantedDuringTheYearVestedMemberecd:PeoMemberalb:MastersJrMember2022-01-012022-12-310000915913ecd:PeoMemberalb:MastersJrMemberalb:EquityAwardsGrantedInPriorYearsVestedMember2022-01-012022-12-310000915913ecd:PeoMemberalb:MastersJrMemberalb:EquityAwardsThatFailedToMeetVestingConditionsMember2022-01-012022-12-310000915913alb:EquityAwardsValueOfDividendsAndOtherEarningsPaidAdjustmentMemberecd:PeoMemberalb:MastersJrMember2022-01-012022-12-310000915913ecd:PeoMemberalb:EquityAwardAdjustmentsMemberalb:MastersJrMember2022-01-012022-12-310000915913alb:EquityAwardsGrantedDuringTheYearUnvestedMemberalb:MastersJrMember2021-01-012021-12-310000915913ecd:PeoMemberalb:MastersJrMemberalb:EquityAwardsGrantedInPriorYearsUnvestedMember2021-01-012021-12-310000915913alb:EquityAwardsGrantedDuringTheYearVestedMemberecd:PeoMemberalb:MastersJrMember2021-01-012021-12-310000915913ecd:PeoMemberalb:EquityAwardAdjustmentsMemberalb:MastersJrMember2021-01-012021-12-310000915913alb:EquityAwardsGrantedDuringTheYearUnvestedMemberalb:MastersJrMember2020-01-012020-12-310000915913ecd:PeoMemberalb:MastersJrMemberalb:EquityAwardsGrantedInPriorYearsUnvestedMember2020-01-012020-12-310000915913alb:EquityAwardsGrantedDuringTheYearVestedMemberecd:PeoMemberalb:MastersJrMember2020-01-012020-12-310000915913ecd:PeoMemberalb:MastersJrMemberalb:EquityAwardsGrantedInPriorYearsVestedMember2020-01-012020-12-310000915913ecd:PeoMemberalb:MastersJrMemberalb:EquityAwardsThatFailedToMeetVestingConditionsMember2020-01-012020-12-310000915913alb:EquityAwardsValueOfDividendsAndOtherEarningsPaidAdjustmentMemberecd:PeoMemberalb:MastersJrMember2020-01-012020-12-310000915913ecd:PeoMemberalb:EquityAwardAdjustmentsMemberalb:MastersJrMember2020-01-012020-12-310000915913ecd:PeoMemberalb:LutherCKissamIVMemberalb:PensionAdjustmentsServiceCostMember2020-01-012020-12-310000915913alb:LutherCKissamIVMemberalb:EquityAwardsGrantedDuringTheYearUnvestedMember2020-01-012020-12-310000915913ecd:PeoMemberalb:LutherCKissamIVMemberalb:EquityAwardsGrantedInPriorYearsUnvestedMember2020-01-012020-12-310000915913alb:EquityAwardsGrantedDuringTheYearVestedMemberecd:PeoMemberalb:LutherCKissamIVMember2020-01-012020-12-310000915913ecd:PeoMemberalb:LutherCKissamIVMemberalb:EquityAwardsGrantedInPriorYearsVestedMember2020-01-012020-12-310000915913ecd:PeoMemberalb:LutherCKissamIVMemberalb:EquityAwardsThatFailedToMeetVestingConditionsMember2020-01-012020-12-310000915913alb:EquityAwardsValueOfDividendsAndOtherEarningsPaidAdjustmentMemberecd:PeoMemberalb:LutherCKissamIVMember2020-01-012020-12-310000915913ecd:PeoMemberalb:LutherCKissamIVMemberalb:EquityAwardAdjustmentsMember2020-01-012020-12-310000915913alb:EquityAwardsGrantedDuringTheYearUnvestedMember2022-01-012022-12-310000915913ecd:NonPeoNeoMemberalb:EquityAwardsGrantedInPriorYearsUnvestedMember2022-01-012022-12-310000915913alb:EquityAwardsGrantedDuringTheYearVestedMemberecd:NonPeoNeoMember2022-01-012022-12-310000915913ecd:NonPeoNeoMemberalb:EquityAwardsGrantedInPriorYearsVestedMember2022-01-012022-12-310000915913ecd:NonPeoNeoMemberalb:EquityAwardsThatFailedToMeetVestingConditionsMember2022-01-012022-12-310000915913ecd:NonPeoNeoMemberalb:EquityAwardsValueOfDividendsAndOtherEarningsPaidAdjustmentMember2022-01-012022-12-310000915913ecd:NonPeoNeoMemberalb:EquityAwardAdjustmentsMember2022-01-012022-12-310000915913alb:EquityAwardsGrantedDuringTheYearUnvestedMember2021-01-012021-12-310000915913ecd:NonPeoNeoMemberalb:EquityAwardsGrantedInPriorYearsUnvestedMember2021-01-012021-12-310000915913alb:EquityAwardsGrantedDuringTheYearVestedMemberecd:NonPeoNeoMember2021-01-012021-12-310000915913ecd:NonPeoNeoMemberalb:EquityAwardsGrantedInPriorYearsVestedMember2021-01-012021-12-310000915913ecd:NonPeoNeoMemberalb:EquityAwardsThatFailedToMeetVestingConditionsMember2021-01-012021-12-310000915913ecd:NonPeoNeoMemberalb:EquityAwardsValueOfDividendsAndOtherEarningsPaidAdjustmentMember2021-01-012021-12-310000915913ecd:NonPeoNeoMemberalb:EquityAwardAdjustmentsMember2021-01-012021-12-310000915913alb:EquityAwardsGrantedDuringTheYearUnvestedMember2020-01-012020-12-310000915913ecd:NonPeoNeoMemberalb:EquityAwardsGrantedInPriorYearsUnvestedMember2020-01-012020-12-310000915913alb:EquityAwardsGrantedDuringTheYearVestedMemberecd:NonPeoNeoMember2020-01-012020-12-310000915913ecd:NonPeoNeoMemberalb:EquityAwardsGrantedInPriorYearsVestedMember2020-01-012020-12-310000915913ecd:NonPeoNeoMemberalb:EquityAwardsThatFailedToMeetVestingConditionsMember2020-01-012020-12-310000915913ecd:NonPeoNeoMemberalb:EquityAwardsValueOfDividendsAndOtherEarningsPaidAdjustmentMember2020-01-012020-12-310000915913ecd:NonPeoNeoMemberalb:EquityAwardAdjustmentsMember2020-01-012020-12-31000091591312022-01-012022-12-310000915913ecd:PeoMember12022-01-012022-12-310000915913ecd:PeoMember22022-01-012022-12-310000915913ecd:PeoMember32022-01-012022-12-31

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
______________________________________________________________________________________
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant X
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant
Check the appropriate box:
Preliminary Proxy Statement
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
X Definitive Proxy Statement
Definitive Additional Materials
Soliciting Material Under Rule 14a-12
ALBEMARLE CORPORATION
(Name of registrant as specified in its charter)
N/A
(Name of person(s) filing proxy statement, if other than the registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check all boxes that apply):
X No fee required.
Fee paid with preliminary materials.
Fee computed on table on exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.



alb-20230321_g1.jpg
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Albemarle Corporation 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”) will be held at Albemarle Corporation, 4250 Congress Street, Charlotte, North Carolina 28209, on Tuesday, May 2, 2023, at 7:00 a.m., Eastern Time, for the following purposes:
1.Elect the ten nominees named in the accompanying Proxy Statement to the Board of Directors to serve for the ensuing year or until their successors are duly elected and qualified;
2.Approve the compensation of our named executive officers, on a non-binding advisory basis, as disclosed in the accompanying Proxy Statement;
3.Recommend the frequency of future advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers, on a non-binding advisory basis;
4.Ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2023;
5.Approve the 2023 Stock Compensation and Deferral Election Plan for Non-Employee Directors; and
6.Transact any other business properly brought before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof.
Only shareholders of record at the close of business on Tuesday, March 7, 2023, are entitled to receive notice of and vote at the Annual Meeting.
To ensure your vote is counted, you are requested to vote your shares promptly, regardless of whether you expect to attend the Annual Meeting. Voting by the Internet or telephone is fast and convenient, and your vote is immediately tabulated. In addition, by using the Internet or telephone, you help reduce our postage and proxy tabulation costs. You may also vote by completing, signing, dating, and returning by Monday, May 1, 2023, the proxy enclosed with paper copies of the materials in the postage-paid envelope provided.
This year, we are again electronically disseminating Annual Meeting materials to some of our shareholders, as permitted under the “Notice and Access” rules approved by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). Shareholders to whom Notice and Access applies will receive a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials ("Notice") containing instructions on how to access Annual Meeting materials via the Internet. The Notice also provides instructions on how to obtain paper copies if desired.
If you are present at the Annual Meeting, you may vote in person even if you already voted your proxy by the Internet, telephone, or mail. Seating at the Annual Meeting will be on a first-come basis.
By Order of the Board of Directors
Kristin M. Coleman
Executive Vice President, General Counsel
and Corporate Secretary
Approximate Date of Mailing of Proxy Materials or
Notice of Internet Availability:
March 21, 2023



TABLE OF CONTENTS
1
6
i


ii


PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
This summary provides an overview and highlights information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement (“Proxy Statement”). This summary does not contain all information that you should consider, and you should read the entire Proxy Statement carefully, before voting. Throughout the Proxy Statement, “we,” “us,” “our,” “Company,” and “Albemarle” refer to Albemarle Corporation, a Virginia corporation.
Annual Meeting
Date and Time Place
Tuesday, May 2, 2023
Albemarle Corporation
7:00 a.m., Eastern Time 4250 Congress Street
Charlotte, North Carolina 28209
Voting Matters
The following table summarizes the proposals to be considered at the Annual Meeting and voting recommendation of our Board of Directors (“Board of Directors” or “Board”) with respect to each proposal.
Voting Matter Board Vote
Recommendation
Proposal 1: Election of Directors FOR
each Nominee
Proposal 2: Approval of Named Executive Officers’ Compensation, on a non-binding advisory basis (Say-on-Pay) FOR
Proposal 3: Recommendation on Frequency of Future Advisory Votes on the Compensation of our Named Executive Officers, on a non-binding advisory basis (Say-on-Frequency) "1 YEAR"
Proposal 4: Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm FOR
Proposal 5:
Approve the 2023 Stock Compensation and Deferral Election Plan for Non-Employee Directors
FOR
2022 Financial Highlights
Our exceptional 2022 performance is the result of asset positioning, operational discipline, and a healthy balance sheet. Our 2022 growth came from both volume and a new contracting strategy that has allowed us to take advantage of strong lithium markets. Our investments to accelerate growth and nurture technological innovation support our current performance and position us for future continued profitable growth.
Net Sales of $7.3 billion, more than double 2021 Net Sales Cash Flows from Operations of $1.9 billion and positive free cash flow Diluted EPS of $22.84, more than 21 times that of 2021 We increased our quarterly dividend for the 28th consecutive year
1


Our Purpose, Strategy, and Transformational Impact Areas
We are committed to building a more resilient world:
Albemarle is a global leader in transforming essential resources such as lithium and bromine into critical ingredients for modern living. Together with our world-class resources, technical and process knowledge, and safety and sustainability performance, we partner with our customers to pioneer new ways to move, power, connect, and protect.
We have a clear strategy to achieve profitable growth and enhance sustainability:
Grow
Profitably
• Expand capacity to meet customer needs and generate value
• Partner with strategic customers and stakeholders to facilitate innovation and mutual growth
Maximize Productivity
• Deploy operating model to build a scalable platform for growth
• Grow high-performance culture with best-in-class capabilities
• Optimize earnings, cash flow and cost structure
Invest
with Discipline
• Allocate capital and manage portfolio to generate long-term value
• Maintain Investment Grade credit rating and support our dividend
Advance Sustainability
• Build competitive advantage through industry-leading ESG performance
• Accelerate sustainability ambitions of customers and communities
We lead the world in transforming essential resources into critical ingredients around four transformational impact areas:
Mobility
• Advancing the future of movement by being a leading provider of materials that make mobility better and cleaner
• From the battery in electric vehicles, to the initiator for airbags, Albemarle is fundamental in the development of mobility products and solutions
Energy
• Powering the energy transition to meet the rising needs so we can ensure the world has critical resources for years to come
• From energy grid storage to the materials required for energy-efficient buildings, neither would be possible without Albemarle
Connectivity
• Enabling an always-on world to make technology more consistent and reliable, so we can continue to innovate more efficiently
• From fire safety solutions in industrial cabling to the protective glass on your cell phone, Albemarle makes connecting safer and more reliable
Health
• Improving quality of life by making health safer and more attainable today, so the planet and future generations can continue to thrive
• From ingredients for medicines to disinfection, Albemarle helps ensure the food we eat is safe and plentiful, the water we drink is clean, and the environment we live in is here to stay
2


Governance and Corporate Highlights
Board Independence
• Independent Board, except CEO
• Lead Independent Director
• All Members of the Board's Standing Committees are Independent
• Regular Executive Sessions of Independent Directors
• Board and Committee Authority to Retain Independent Advisors
Director Elections
• Annual Election of Each Director
• Directors Do Not Stand for Re-election in the Year in Which They Reach 72 Years of Age
• Resignation Policy for Directors Not Receiving Majority Approval
Meeting Attendance
• All Current Directors Attended at Least 75% of the Total Number of Meetings of our Board and Committees on which the Director Served in 2022
Evaluating and Improving Board Performance
• Annual Board and Committee Evaluation Process
• Continuing Director Education
Aligning Our Interests with Shareholders' Interests
• Stock Ownership Guidelines for Directors and Executive Officers
• Policies Prohibiting Hedging, Short Sale, and Pledging Our Stock by Directors, Officers, and Employees
• No Shareholder Rights Plan (Poison Pill)
Environmental and Social
• Longstanding Commitment to Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility
• Annual Sustainability Report Aligned with SASB and GRI Standards
• Signed CEO Water Mandate in 2022, Expanding our Role with the UN Global Compact
• CDP Reporting: First Year Scoring of Climate (B) and Water (C)
• IRMA (Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance) Third-Party Audit at Salar de Atacama and Self-Assessments at Greenbushes and Wodgina
• Other 2022 Achievements Included Initial Assessment of Scope 3 GHG Emissions, First Product Life Cycle Assessments, and New Limited Assurance of Scope 1 and 2 GHG Emissions
Other
• Annual Say-on-Pay Vote
• Risk Oversight by Full Board and Committees
• Robust Stockholder Engagement Program
• Quarterly Mandatory Information Security Training for All Employees
3


Our Board of Directors
Our Director Nominees
Name and Primary Occupation Age Director Since Standing Committee Membership Independent Other Public Company Boards
M. Lauren Brlas
Former EVP and CFO, Newmont Mining Corporation
65 2017
Audit & Finance (Chair)

Capital Investment
Yes Three
Ralf H. Cramer
Former President and CEO, Continental China
57 2022
Audit & Finance

Health, Safety & Environment
Yes None
J. Kent Masters, Jr.
Chairman, President & CEO,
Albemarle Corporation
62 2015;
Chair since 2020
None No None
Glenda J. Minor
Former SVP & CFO, Evraz North America
66 2019
Audit & Finance

Nominating & Governance
Yes Two
James J. O’Brien
(Lead Independent Director)
Former Chairman and CEO,
Ashland Inc.
68 2012;
Lead Independent Director since 2020
Nominating & Governance (Chair)

Audit & Finance
Yes Two
Diarmuid B. O’Connell
Former VP, Corporate & Bus. Dev., Tesla Motors Inc.
59 2018
Executive Compensation

Health, Safety & Environment
Yes Three
Dean L. Seavers
Former President, National
Grid U.S.
62 2018
Capital Investment (Chair)

Executive Compensation
Yes One
Gerald A. Steiner
Former EVP, Sustainability & Corporate Affairs, Monsanto
62 2013
Health, Safety & Environment (Chair)

Audit & Finance
Yes None
Holly A. Van Deursen
Former Group VP, Petrochemicals, BP Corporation
64 2019
Capital Investment

Executive Compensation
Yes Two
Alejandro D. Wolff
Former U.S. Ambassador to Chile
66 2015
Executive Compensation (Chair)

Nominating & Governance
Yes One
4



alb-20230321_g2.jpg alb-20230321_g3.jpg alb-20230321_g4.jpg alb-20230321_g5.jpg
Independent: 9 of 10 Average age: 63.1 Diverse: 5 of 10 Average tenure: 6.2 years

Executive Compensation Highlights
Our executive compensation program is designed to attract and retain highly-qualified executives, motivate our executives to achieve our overall business objectives, and align our executives’ interests with those of our shareholders. Our compensation philosophy rewards executives for achieving our financial and stewardship metrics and building long-term value for our shareholders and other stakeholders. We follow several other principles when designing our executive compensation program including: 1) pay-for-performance, 2) pay benchmarking, 3) aligning interests with our stakeholders, and 4) avoiding poor governance policies. For more information see "Executive Compensation Philosophy and Principles" on page 35.
In line with our compensation principles, our NEOs are primarily rewarded through performance-based cash and equity incentive awards. This is intended to both encourage and recognize strong company performance and stock price growth, further driving shareholder value. In 2022, 87% of the target compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and an average of 73% of target compensation of our other NEOs was variable and subject to performance factors.
Albemarle's incentive plans convey a balanced focus between growth, efficiency, and stewardship. The 2022 executive compensation program provided short-term annual cash bonuses designed to drive adjusted EBITDA and adjusted cash flow from operations, and long-term performance-based equity awards designed to drive total stockholder return and return on invested capital, all as described in further detail below under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 29.
5


PROPOSAL 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
The Board of Directors, upon unanimous recommendation of the Nominating & Governance Committee, unanimously approved the persons named below as nominees for election to the Board of Directors at the Annual Meeting. Each of the nominees is currently a member of the Board of Directors. Each of the nominees (i) has been nominated for election at the Annual Meeting to hold office until the 2024 annual meeting of shareholders or, if earlier, the election or appointment of their successor, and (ii) has consented to being named as such and to serve as such if elected. The proxies submitted for the Annual Meeting cannot be voted for more than ten nominees.
Proxies will be voted “FOR” the election of the persons named below (or if for any reason such persons are unavailable, for such substitutes as the Board of Directors may designate) as Directors for the ensuing year. The Board of Directors has no reason to believe that any of the nominees will be unavailable. Each nominee who is elected will serve as a Director until his or her successor is elected at our 2024 annual meeting of shareholders or until his or her earlier resignation, replacement, or removal.
Each nominee is listed below with information as of the record date (March 7, 2023) concerning age, principal occupation, employment, and directorships during the past five years and positions with the Company, if applicable, and the year in which they first became a Director of the Company. Also set forth below is a brief discussion of the specific experience, qualifications, attributes, or skills that led to his or her nomination as a Director, in light of the Company’s business and governance structure.
The following table highlights the qualifications and experience of each member of our Board that contributed to the Board’s determination that each individual is uniquely qualified to serve on the Board. While designation on this table indicates competency or experience in the relevant area, this high-level summary is not intended to be an exhaustive list of each nominee’s skills or contributions.
6


Summary of Skills, Experience, and Background for Director Nominees
Brlas Cramer Masters Minor O'Brien O'Connell Seavers Steiner Van Deursen Wolff
alb-20230321_g6.jpg
alb-20230321_g7.jpg
alb-20230321_g8.jpg
alb-20230321_g9.jpg
alb-20230321_g10.jpg
alb-20230321_g11.jpg
alb-20230321_g12.jpg
alb-20230321_g13.jpg
alb-20230321_g14.jpg
alb-20230321_g15.jpg
KEY COMPETENCIES
Current/Former Public Company CEO or COO n n n n n
P&L Experience n n n n n n n n n
Relevant Industry Experience n n n n n n n n n n
R&D / Innovation Experience n n n n n n n n n
Manufacturing / Operations Experience n n n n n n n
Global / Emerging Markets Experience n n n n n n n n n n
Supply Chain and Logistics Experience n n n n n n
IT / Cybersecurity / Technology Capability n n n n n n
Financial Literacy n n n n n n n n n n
M&A Experience n n n n n n n n n n
Risk Management n n n n n n n n n n
Public Company Compliance / Governance n n n n n n n n n n
Strategy Development n n n n n n n n n n
Public Company Executive Compensation n n n n n n n
Leadership Development / Succession Planning n n n n n n n n n n
Public / Government Affairs n n n n n n n n
Diversity, Equity & Inclusion n n n n n n
Natural Resource Management / Environment n n n n n n n n
Safety / Health n n n n n n n n n
COMPLIANCE
Independent Director Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
Audit Committee Financial Expert Y N N Y Y N N N N N
Current Public Company Boards (including ALB) 4 1 1 3 3 4 2 1 3 2
Current Public Company Audit Committees (including ALB) 3 1 3 1 2 1 1
DEMOGRAPHICS
Age 65 57 62 66 68 59 62 62 64 66
Tenure 6 1 8 4 11 5 5 10 4 8
DIVERSITY
Gender (Female, Male)
F M M F M M M M F M
Race (Black, Hispanic, White)
W W W B W W B W W H
BOARD STANDING COMMITTEES (Chair, Member)
Audit & Finance C M M M M
Capital Investment M C M
Executive Compensation M M M C
Health, Safety & Environment M M C
Nominating & Governance M C M
Lead Independent Director Y
7


Director Nominees
alb-20230321_g6.jpg

Independent
Age: 65
Director Since: 2017
Committees:
Audit & Finance (Chair)
Capital Investment
M. Lauren Brlas
Ms. Brlas retired from the Newmont Mining Corporation (“Newmont”), a global gold company and producer of copper, silver, zinc, and lead, in December 2016. Ms. Brlas joined Newmont in 2013 and served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer until October 2016. From 2006 through 2013, Ms. Brlas held various positions of increasing responsibility with Cleveland-Cliffs Inc., a North American producer of iron ore and steel, where most recently she served as Chief Financial Officer and then as Executive Vice President and President, Global Operations.
Attributes and Skills:
Ms. Brlas brings significant operational and financial executive leadership experience, including in the natural resources industry, to our Board. This executive leadership experience as well as Ms. Brlas’ extensive background in financial and governance matters supports her re-election to our Board.
Other Public Company Directorships:
Constellation Energy Corporation (an energy provider), 2022 – current
Autoliv, Inc. (a developer, manufacturer, and marketer of airbags, seatbelts, and steering wheels), 2020 – current
Graphic Packaging International, LLC (a producer of paper-based packaging solutions), 2019 – current
Exelon Corporation (an energy provider), 2018 – 2022
Perrigo Company plc (a producer of self-care health solutions), 2003 – 2019
Calpine Corporation (a generator of electricity from natural gas and geothermal resources), 2016 – 2018

alb-20230321_g7.jpg

Independent
Age: 57
Director Since: 2022
Committees:
Audit & Finance
Health, Safety & Environment
Ralf H. Cramer
Mr. Cramer has served as Industry Advisor / Consultant at Knowledge Experienced, an automotive and industrial consulting company, since 2018. Mr. Cramer has also served as a Senior Consultant at Shenzhen Shentou Investment Co Ltd., a cross-border M&A consultancy and investment company, since 2018. Mr. Cramer has served on the boards of directors of BBS Automation GmbH, an automation solutions provider, since May 2018, Knorr-Bremse Truck, a subsidiary of Knorr-Bremse A.G., a braking system manufacturer, since December 2018, and Metalsa S.A., an automotive solutions provider, since May 2019. Mr. Cramer served as an Executive Board Member of Continental AG, which develops technologies and services for mobility of people and goods, from 2009 to 2017 and as President, Global Division Chassis & Safety from 2008 to 2013. During that time, Mr. Cramer also served as President and CEO of Continental China, an automotive component manufacturer, from 2013 to 2017.
Attributes and Skills:
Mr. Cramer’s executive experience with multinational companies in the automotive industry and manufacturing operations brings an international business perspective to our Board. Mr. Cramer’s extensive knowledge of the global automotive industry and operational, financial, and international leadership experience supports his re-election to our Board.

8


alb-20230321_g8.jpg

Age: 62
Director Since: 2015
Chairman Since: 2020
J. Kent Masters, Jr.
Mr. Masters has served as Chairman, President and CEO of Albemarle since 2020. Prior to joining Albemarle, Mr. Masters served as Chief Executive Officer of Foster Wheeler AG, a global engineering and construction contractor and power equipment supplier, from 2011 to 2014, when Foster Wheeler AG was acquired by Amec plc to form Amec Foster Wheeler plc. Mr. Masters served as a director of Amec Foster Wheeler plc from 2015 to 2017. Mr. Masters also served as a member of the executive board of Linde AG, a manufacturer and seller of industrial gases, from 2006 to 2011.
Attributes and Skills:
Mr. Masters brings significant global business experience in key industries relevant to our large capital projects, such as engineering and construction, power equipment, and industrial gases, to our Board. Mr. Masters’ global business experience as well as his previous experience in the lithium industry (including his prior service on the board of directors for Rockwood Holdings, Inc.) supports his re-election to our Board.
Other Public Company Directorships:
Amec Foster Wheeler plc (a consultancy, engineering, and project management company), 2015 – 2017

alb-20230321_g9.jpg

Independent
Age: 66
Director Since: 2019
Committees:
Audit & Finance
Nominating & Governance
Glenda J. Minor
Ms. Minor has served as Chief Executive Officer and Principal of Silket Advisory Services, a privately owned consulting firm advising companies on financial, strategic and operational initiatives, since 2016. Prior to Silket, Ms. Minor served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Evraz North America Limited, a North American steel manufacturer from 2010 to 2016. Ms. Minor also served as Vice President, Finance, Controller, Chief Accounting Officer, and General Auditor of Visteon Corporation, a global technology company that designs, engineers, and manufactures cockpit electronics and connected car solutions, from 2000 to 2010.
Attributes and Skills:
Ms. Minor brings extensive financial and international leadership experience across different industries and different continents to our Board. Ms. Minor’s financial and international leadership experience as well as her in-depth understanding of the preparation and analysis of financial statements and her experience in capital market transactions, accounting, treasury, investor relations, financial and strategic planning, and business expansion supports her re-election to our Board.
Other Public Company Directorships:
Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc. (a global provider in the metals recycling industry and a manufacturer of finished steel products), 2020 – current
Curtiss-Wright Corporation (a global provider of products and services in the aerospace & defense and industrial markets), 2019 – current

9


alb-20230321_g10.jpg

Independent
Age: 68
Director Since: 2012
Lead Independent Director Since: 2020
Committees:
Nominating & Governance (Chair)
Audit & Finance
James J. O'Brien
Mr. O’Brien served as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer from 2002 to 2014, as President and Chief Operating Officer in 2002, and as Senior Vice President and Group Operating Officer from 2001-2002 of Ashland Inc., a diversified energy company. Mr. O’Brien served as President of Valvoline, a global marketer and supplier of premium branded lubricants and automotive services, from 1995 to 2001. Mr. O’Brien worked at Ashland for 38 years prior to his retirement in December 2014.
Attributes and Skills:
Mr. O’Brien brings extensive knowledge of the chemical industry and significant experience gained from service on the board of directors of other public companies to our Board. Mr. O’Brien’s industry knowledge and public company board experience as well as his significant management experience and knowledge in the areas of finance, accounting, international business operations, risk oversight, and corporate governance supports his re-election to our Board.
Other Public Company Directorships:
Eastman Chemical Company (a specialty chemical company), 2016 – current
Humana Inc. (a managed health care company), 2006 – current
Wesco International, Inc. (an electronics distribution and services company), 2015 – 2017

alb-20230321_g11.jpg

Independent
Age: 59
Director Since: 2018
Committees:
Executive Compensation
Health, Safety & Environment
Diarmuid B. O'Connell
Mr. O'Connell served as Chief Strategy Officer of Fair Financial Corp., an automotive leasing fintech company, from 2018 to 2019. Prior to Fair Financial, Mr. O’Connell served as Vice President, Corporate & Business Development at Tesla Motors Inc., an American electric vehicle manufacturer, energy storage company, and solar panel manufacturer, from 2010 to 2017 and Vice President, Business Development from 2006 to 2010. Mr. O’Connell served as Chief of Staff, Bureau of Political Military Affairs at the U.S. Department of State from 2003 to 2006.
Attributes and Skills:
Mr. O'Connell brings experience in the electric vehicle and energy storage industry as well as valuable perspectives on global applications of alternative energy that provide insights into the end uses of our products to our Board. This industry knowledge as well as Mr. O'Connell’s background in marketing, government relations, operations, and manufacturing supports his re-election to our Board.
Other Public Company Directorships:
Tech and Energy Transition Corporation (a special purpose acquisition company), 2021 – current
Volvo Car AB (a company that designs, manufactures, and supplies automobiles), 2021 – current
Dana Incorporated (a global manufacturer in drivetrain and e-Propulsion systems), 2018 – current

10


alb-20230321_g12.jpg

Independent
Age: 62
Director Since: 2018
Committees:
Capital Investment (Chair)
Executive Compensation
Dean L. Seavers
Mr. Seavers has served as a senior advisor, in a part time consulting role, at Stifel Financial Corp., a full-service financial services firm, since 2020. Prior to Stifel Financial, Mr. Seavers served as President of National Grid U.S., a U.S. supplier of consumer energy, from 2014 to 2019 and as Executive Director of National Grid plc, a multinational electricity and gas utility company, from 2015 to 2019. Mr. Seavers founded and served as Chief Executive Officer, President and Director of Red Hawk Fire & Security, a provider of life safety and security solutions, from 2012 to 2018, and President of Global Services of the Fire & Security business of United Technologies Corporation, an aerospace and defense company, from 2010 to 2011.
Attributes and Skills:
Mr. Seavers brings an operational perspective and vision to our Board from a variety of industries representing end uses of our products. Mr. Seavers’ extensive executive leadership and deep energy, fire safety and technology industry experience supports his re-election to our Board.
Other Public Company Directorships:
Ametek, Inc. (a global manufacturer of electronic instruments and electromechanical devices), 2022 – current
PG&E Corporation / Pacific Gas & Electric Company (a holding company of natural gas / electric energy utility company), 2020 – 2022; Chairman, Pacific Gas & Electric Company, 2020 – 2022
James Hardie plc (a producer and marketer of fiber cement siding and backerboard and of fiber gypsum products), 2021 – 2022
Environmental Impact Acquisition Corporation (a special purpose acquisition company), 2021 – 2022

alb-20230321_g13.jpg

Independent
Age: 62
Director Since: 2013
Committees:
Health, Safety & Environment (Chair)
Audit & Finance
Gerald A. Steiner
Mr. Steiner co-founded and served as CEO from 2015 to 2021 and Executive Chairman from 2021 to 2022 of CoverCress, Inc., a company developing a new crop for renewable fuels. Mr. Steiner founded in 2014 and continues to serve at Alta Grow Consulting LLC, a business consulting firm. Prior to Alta Grow Consulting, he served as Executive Vice President, Sustainability and Corporate Affairs at Monsanto Company, a leading global provider of agricultural products for farmers, from 2003 to 2014. Among other roles, Mr. Steiner has also served at the following organizations:
Chairman, 2012 – 2014, and board member, 2003 – 2014, Food and Agriculture Section of the Biotechnology Industry Organization (a biotechnology innovation organization)
Chairman, 2012 – 2013, board member, 2014 – 2014, and Trustee Emeritus, 2015 – current, The Keystone Center (a policy center for agriculture, early childhood education, and energy for rural communities)
Co-founder, Field to Market (an agricultural sustainability organization); current Executive Chairman of Stony Creek Colors (a plant-based dyes company)
Attributes and Skills:
Mr. Steiner brings extensive experience in the renewable fuels and agricultural industry to our Board. This industry experience as well as Mr. Steiner’s extensive experience in government affairs, global business and strategy supports his re-election to our Board.

11


alb-20230321_g14.jpg

Independent
Age: 64
Director Since: 2019
Committees:
Capital Investment
Executive Compensation
Holly A. Van Deursen
Ms. Van Deursen served as Group Vice President, Petrochemicals, at BP Corporation, a global provider of heat, light and mobility products and services, having starting working there in 1989 and holding various senior executive management roles before retiring as a member of the top-forty executive management team from 2000 to 2005. Ms. Van Deursen has twenty-four years of experience in the chemical, oil, and energy industries, including various engineering, manufacturing, and product development roles for Dow Corning Corporation (a chemical and plastics manufacturer and supplier).
Attributes and Skills:
Ms. Van Deursen brings extensive experience in the chemical, industrial, and contract manufacturing sectors, including from her previous service as a director for companies in the oilfield services, diversified industrial, and packaging sectors, to our Board. Ms. Van Deursen’s experience across sectors as well as her service in executive roles in business management, business development, and mergers & acquisitions in the U.S. and globally supports her re-election to our Board.
Other Public Company Directorships:
Kimball Electronics Inc. (a global contract manufacturer of durable goods electronics serving a variety of industries), 2019 – current
Synthomer plc (a global supplier of acrylic and vinyl emulsions and specialty polymers), 2018 – current
Capstone Green Energy Corporation (a global producer of highly efficient, low-emission, resilient microturbine energy systems), Chair 2017 – 2020; director 2007 – 2021
Enerpac Tool Group (formerly Actuant Corporation) (a diversified industrial company), 2008 – 2020
Bemis Company (a packaging company), 2008 – 2019
Petroleum Geo-Services (an oilfield services company), 2006 – 2018

alb-20230321_g15.jpg

Independent
Age: 66
Director Since: 2015
Committees:
Executive Compensation (Chair)
Nominating & Governance
Alejandro D. Wolff
Mr. Wolff served as Managing Director of Gryphon Partners LLC, a global advisory firm focused on frontier markets, from 2014 to 2016. Prior to Gryphon, he served as U.S. Ambassador to Chile from 2010 to 2013 and U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations from 2005 to 2010. Mr. Wolff has thirty-three years of service in the U.S. Department of State, including service in Algeria, Morocco, Chile, Cyprus, the U.S. Mission to the European Union in Brussels, and as Deputy Chief of Mission and Charge d’Affaires in France.
Attributes and Skills:
Mr. Wolff brings expertise in international political, economic, and commercial affairs to our Board. This expertise as well as Mr. Wolff’s lithium industry experience (including his prior service on the board of directors for Rockwood Holdings, Inc.) supports his re-election to our Board.
Other Public Company Directorships:
Frontier Group Holdings, Inc. (the holding company of Frontier Airlines, an ultra-low cost airline), 2019 – current
PG&E Corporation / Pacific Gas & Electric Company (a holding company of natural gas / electric energy utility company), 2019 – 2020
Versum Materials, Inc. (an electronic materials company), 2016 – 2019

12


Election of each Director requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by the holders of shares represented at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote (which means that the number of shares voted “FOR” a director must exceed the number of shares voted “AGAINST” a director). In uncontested elections, any Director who does not receive a majority of the votes cast must tender his or her resignation to the Board of Directors. The Nominating & Governance Committee will make a recommendation to the Board of Directors on whether or not to accept the tendered resignation.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” ALL OF THE FOREGOING NOMINEES.
13


GOVERNANCE MATTERS
Our Board of Directors and management periodically review our Corporate Governance Guidelines and other corporate governance policies, principles, and procedures, to determine whether they should be revised to address recent changes in regulatory requirements and evolving governance practices.
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines, including Director independence standards, our Code of Conduct, and the charters of our Audit & Finance, Executive Compensation, Nominating & Governance, Capital Investment, and Health, Safety & Environment committees are available on our website at www.albemarle.com (See Investors/Governance/Corporate Governance) and are available in print to any shareholder upon request by contacting our Investor Relations department.
Director Independence
The Board has determined that Directors Brlas, Cramer, Minor, O’Brien, O'Connell, Seavers, Steiner, Van Deursen, and Wolff are each “independent” as described by the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") listing standards and the independence standards of our Corporate Governance Guidelines.
In order for a Director or nominee to be considered “independent” by the Board, they must (i) be free of any relationship that, applying the rules of the NYSE, would preclude a finding of independence and (ii) not have any material relationship (either directly or as a partner, shareholder, or officer of an organization) with us or any of our affiliates, or any of our executive officers or any of our affiliates’ executive officers. In evaluating the materiality of any such relationship, the Board takes into consideration whether disclosure of the relationship would be required by the proxy rules under the Exchange Act. If disclosure of the relationship is required, the Board must make a determination that the relationship is not material as a prerequisite to finding that the Director or nominee is “independent.”
Leadership Structure; Risk Oversight; Sustainability Oversight; and ESG Matters
Leadership Structure
As part of our annual corporate governance and succession planning review, the Nominating & Governance Committee and the Board evaluate our board leadership structure to ensure that the structure in place is appropriate for the Company at the time.
The Company maintains combined roles of Chair of the Board and CEO. Given our current circumstances and operating strategies, we believe that having a combined Chair of the Board and CEO is the appropriate structure for our shareholders and our Company. Mr. O'Brien serves as our Lead Independent Director ("LID"). The Company continues to benefit from the leadership experience of our LID, Mr. O'Brien, and the strategic vision of our Chairman, President and CEO, Mr. Masters.
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide for two structural options: (1) a combined Chair of the Board and CEO with a LID, as we currently utilize, or (2) a Nonexecutive (Independent) Chair of the Board separate from the CEO. These Corporate Governance Guidelines include a description of the responsibilities for both a Nonexecutive (Independent) Chair of the Board and a LID in Annexes B and A thereof, respectively. With our current Board leadership structure of a combined Chair of the Board and CEO, our LID is responsible for presiding over executive sessions of the independent directors and non-management directors, facilitating information flow and communications between directors and the Chair/CEO, and coordinating the activities of the other independent directors, including conferring with the Nominating & Governance Committee and the Chair/CEO as to the membership of the various Board committees and committee chairs.
14


Risk Oversight
Our Board exercises overall risk governance at Albemarle, with committees taking the lead in discrete areas of risk oversight within their areas of responsibility. Our Board appraises our major risks and oversees that appropriate risk management and control procedures are in place and that management takes the appropriate steps to manage our major risks, with the assistance of the applicable committee(s) and support from management. Each of the committees regularly reports to the Board on risk management matters:
The Audit & Finance Committee is primarily responsible for risk oversight relating to financial statement integrity, ERM (as defined below), and significant risk within our Company, including, but not limited to, business and financial resilience and threats related to climate change, supply chain disruptions, and cybersecurity.
The Executive Compensation Committee is primarily responsible for risk oversight related to human resources and potential risks relating to our employee (including executive) compensation programs. See the “Compensation Risk Assessment” beginning on page 43.
The Nominating & Governance Committee is primarily responsible for risk oversight relating to corporate governance.
The Health, Safety & Environment Committee is primarily responsible for risk oversight relating to the effectiveness of our health, safety, and environment protection programs and potential risks relating to our sustainability programs.
The Capital Investment Committee is primarily responsible for risk oversight relating to major capital expenditure projects.
The Company's Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) program identifies and defines risks that could significantly impact shareholder value on a sustained or permanent basis. The ERM program helps to assess key risks, identify gaps, and develop and implement risk mitigation efforts. This information is integrated into our annual and long-range planning processes. Quantitative and qualitative factors are considered to rate each identified risk regarding severity and likelihood to determine which risks should be prioritized. Risk mitigation and management activities are tested with a broad group of relevant stakeholders. The ERM program is led by the Chief Risk Officer and involves extensive engagement with senior Company leaders worldwide. The Chief Risk Officer regularly reports to the Audit & Finance Committee, generally highlighting those risks identified as the most significant, reviewing the Company’s methods of risk assessment and risk mitigation strategies. In addition, each Global Business Unit addresses their most significant risks in their periodic strategy updates to the Board.
We believe the current leadership structure of the Board supports the risk oversight functions described above by providing independent leadership at the committee level, with ultimate oversight by the Board. This approach to risk oversight aligns with the Company's disclosure controls and procedures, which are designed to ensure that relevant information is gathered and reported to the Board and its committees, as appropriate.
Sustainability Oversight and ESG Matters
Our Board exercises overall governance of our sustainability program and its alignment to the Albemarle Way of Excellence (operating model) and our sustainability framework. Board committees take the lead in discrete areas of oversight within their areas of responsibility, with the Health, Safety &
15


Environment Committee monitoring progress on sustainability initiatives on a quarterly basis. Each of the Board committees regularly reports to the Board on sustainability matters.
Health, Safety & Environment Audit & Finance Executive Compensation
Energy & Greenhouse Gases n
Natural Resource Water n
Management Resource Stewardship n
Waste n
Safety n
People, Workplace Diversity, Equity & Inclusion n
& Community Investment in Talent n
Community & Stakeholder Engagement n
Value Chain Excellence n
Sustainable Product & Process Innovation n
Shareholder Value Business & Financial Resilience n
Business Ethics & Regulatory Compliance n

Director Retirement Policy
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that in general, a non-employee Director should not stand for re-election in the year in which they reach 72 years of age, although the Board has the authority to grant exceptions to this limitation on a case-by-case basis. None of our current Directors attained or will attain the age of 72 in 2023.
Meetings of Non-Employee Directors
Executive sessions of the non-employee members of the Board were held regularly in conjunction with scheduled meetings of the Board during 2022. Mr. O'Brien, in his role as LID, presided at the executive sessions of the non-employee Directors held during the year. Shareholders and other interested persons may contact the Chair of the Nominating & Governance Committee or the non-employee members of the Board as a group through the method described under "How do I communicate with the Board of Directors?" in the "Questions and Answers about this Proxy Statement and the Annual Meeting" beginning on page 91.
Director Continuing Education
We encourage Directors to attend periodic director continuing education programs. Typically, director education programs focus on issues and trends affecting directors of publicly-held companies. We reimburse our Directors for tuition and expenses associated with attending these programs.
Attendance at Annual Meeting
We anticipate all Directors will attend the annual meeting of shareholders each year. All incumbent Directors attended our 2022 annual meeting of shareholders.
Board Meetings
The Board meets during the year to review significant developments affecting us and to act on matters requiring the Board's approval, and may hold special meetings between scheduled meetings when appropriate. During 2022, the Board held a total of nine meetings.
16


Committees of the Board of Directors; Assignments and Meetings
The Board maintains five "standing committees:" Audit & Finance; Executive Compensation; Nominating & Governance; Health, Safety & Environment; and Capital Investment. In addition, the Board maintains an Executive Committee, composed of Messrs. O'Brien and Masters. The Board has determined that all members of the standing committees are “independent” within the meaning of the listing standards of the NYSE and the independence standards of our Corporate Governance Guidelines. See “Director Independence” on page 14.
The following table lists committee assignments of each current Director as of the March 7, 2023 record date and the number of times each committee met during 2022. Each of the Directors attended at least 75% of the total number of Board meetings and meetings of the committees of the Board on which the Director served in 2022.
Audit & 
Finance
Committee
Executive
Compensation
Committee
Nominating &
Governance
Committee
Health, Safety &
Environment
Committee
Capital Investment Committee
Management Director
J. Kent Masters, Jr.
Non-Employee Directors
M. Lauren Brlas n
Ralf H. Cramer
Glenda J. Minor
James J. O’Brien n
Diarmuid B. O'Connell
Dean L. Seavers n
Gerald A. Steiner n
Holly A. Van Deursen
Alejandro D. Wolff n
Number of Meetings in 2022 7 7 4 4 6
Chair Member
Audit & Finance Committee
The duties of the Audit & Finance Committee are set forth in its charter, which can be found on the Company’s website at www.albemarle.com (see Investors/Governance/Corporate Governance/Governance Documents).
The Audit & Finance Committee is a separately designated standing committee in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act.
The Board of Directors has determined that all Audit & Finance Committee members are financially literate, as required by SEC regulations and NYSE rules, and the Board of Directors has determined that each of Mses. Brlas and Minor and Mr. O’Brien is an “audit committee financial expert,” as that term is defined in the rules of the SEC under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Please also see the “Audit & Finance Committee Report,” on page 81.
The Audit & Finance Committee's primary role is to oversee the integrity of the financial information reported by the Company. The Audit & Finance Committee appoints the Company's independent registered public accounting firm, approves the scope of audits performed by it and by the internal audit staff, and reviews the results of those audits. The Audit & Finance Committee also meets
17


with management, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, and the internal audit staff to review audit and non-audit results, as well as financial, accounting, compliance, and internal control matters. In addition, the Board has delegated oversight of the Company’s enterprise risk management program and compliance and ethics program to the Audit & Finance Committee.
Cybersecurity Matters
The Audit & Finance Committee exercises oversight of information security matters and the Company’s cybersecurity program. The Company bases its policies and procedures relating to cybersecurity on National Institute of Standards and Technology (“NIST”) and ISA/IEC standards. The Company engages a third-party cybersecurity firm to conduct an annual cyber assessment using the NIST Cybersecurity Framework, which in 2022 was completed for each of our 16 manufacturing sites around the globe.
Our cybersecurity program applies a zero-trust architecture focused on privilege, functionality, and network segmentation and utilizes specific team functions to constantly scan and monitor for threats and vulnerability. We operate a security monitoring program and deploy a security operations center with in-house incident response teams and engage external vendors to perform annual penetration tests to provide validation of security technologies and procedures. Information security training is conducted as part of our compliance program, with a mandatory training program provided to new employees and recurring training occurring on a quarterly basis. In addition, the Company has procured an information security insurance policy. Our Chief Information Officer and Chief Information Security Officer generally update the Board annually on these and other related matters and report to the Audit & Finance Committee on a periodic/as needed basis.
Executive Compensation Committee
The duties of the Executive Compensation Committee are set forth in its charter, which can be found on the Company’s website at www.albemarle.com (see Investors/Governance/Corporate Governance/Governance Documents).
The Executive Compensation Committee’s primary role is to develop and oversee the implementation of our philosophy with respect to the compensation of our executive officers and other key employees, including the named executive officers listed in this Proxy Statement. The Executive Compensation Committee has the overall responsibility of evaluating the performance (and determining the compensation) of the CEO and approving the compensation structure for senior management and other key employees.
The Executive Compensation Committee also approves cash incentive awards and compensation packages of certain executive-level personnel and may grant stock options, stock appreciation rights, performance units, restricted stock, restricted stock units, and cash incentive awards under The Albemarle Corporation 2017 Incentive Plan (the "2017 Incentive Plan"). In addition, the Chief Human Resources Officer annually reports to the Executive Compensation Committee on the results of the Company's workforce analysis, including headcount, turnover, workforce diversity, and pay equity.
The Executive Compensation Committee reviews and approves the performance, compensation, and annual performance goals of the CEO with input from all independent Directors and the CEO’s self-evaluation. The Executive Compensation Committee approves the compensation of the other named executive officers based upon the evaluation and recommendation of the CEO. The Executive Compensation Committee periodically meets with members of senior management in order to assess progress toward meeting long-term objectives. The Executive Compensation Committee reports regularly to the Board of Directors on matters relating to the Executive Compensation Committee’s responsibilities. In addition, the Executive Compensation Committee follows regulatory and legislative developments and considers corporate governance best practices in performing its duties. For additional information with
18


respect to the Executive Compensation Committee, please see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 29.
In performing its responsibilities with respect to executive compensation decisions, the Executive Compensation Committee receives information and support from the Company’s Human Resources Department and retained Pearl Meyer & Partners, LLC ("Pearl Meyer") (from January to August of 2022) and Farient Advisors LLC ("Farient") (starting August 2022) as outside independent compensation consulting firms. Pearl Meyer and Farient are each a nationally recognized executive compensation consultant which the Executive Compensation Committee retained to provide information concerning compensation paid by competitors and members of our compensation peer group and to assist in designing executive compensation plans. For additional information with respect to the Executive Compensation Committee and compensation consultants, please see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 29.
Independence of the Executive Compensation Consultants
The Executive Compensation Committee has concluded, based on the consideration of the factors specified in the SEC’s rules and the NYSE’s listing standards, that each of its compensation consultants, Pearl Meyer (from January to August of 2022) and Farient (from August 2022), is independent and does not have a conflict of interest in its engagement by the Executive Compensation Committee.
In making this conclusion with respect to each of Pearl Meyer and Farient, the Executive Compensation Committee received written confirmation from each of Pearl Meyer and Farient addressing these factors and supporting this determination.
Executive Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
No member of the Executive Compensation Committee was at any time an officer or employee of the Company, nor is any member of the Executive Compensation Committee related to any other member of the Executive Compensation Committee, any other member of the Board of Directors, or any executive officer of the Company or has a relationship disclosed below in "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions." No executive officer of the Company served as a director or member of the compensation committee of another entity, one of whose executive officers is a member of the Company’s Executive Compensation Committee, or the Company's Board of Directors.
Nominating & Governance Committee
The duties of the Nominating & Governance Committee are set forth in its charter, which can be found on the Company’s website at www.albemarle.com (see Investors/Governance/Corporate Governance/Governance Documents).
The Nominating & Governance Committee assists the Board of Directors on all matters relating to the selection, qualification, duties, and compensation of members of the Board of Directors, as well as the annual evaluation of the Board of Directors’ performance and processes. The Nominating & Governance Committee also assists the Board of Directors with oversight of corporate governance.
The Nominating & Governance Committee identifies Director candidates through recommendations made by members of the Board of Directors, management, shareholders, and others, including professional search firms.
19


Director Candidate Recommendations and Nominations by Shareholders
Shareholders should submit any director candidate recommendations to the Nominating & Governance Committee through the method described in "Shareholder Proposals” on page 98. In addition, any shareholder entitled to vote for the election of directors may nominate persons for election to the Board of Directors if such shareholder complies with the procedures set forth in our Bylaws and summarized in “Shareholder Proposals”. Copies of our Bylaws are available at no charge in the Company’s public filings with the SEC or from the Secretary of the Company.
Nominating & Governance Committee Process for Identifying and Evaluating Director Candidates
The Nominating & Governance Committee identifies and evaluates all director candidates in accordance with the director qualification standards described in the Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Board as a whole is benefited by the diversity of its members and their collective knowledge of accounting and finance; management and leadership; vision and strategy; business operations; business judgment; crisis management; risk assessment and management; industry knowledge; corporate governance; environment, social impact, and sustainability; and global markets. The Nominating & Governance Committee aims to balance these considerations through its ongoing consideration of Directors and nominees, as well as its annual self-evaluation process.
The Nominating & Governance Committee evaluates a candidate’s qualifications to serve as a member of the Board based on the background and expertise of such candidate as well as the background and expertise of the Board as a whole. The Nominating & Governance Committee considers such relevant factors as it deems appropriate, including the current composition of the Board of Directors; the balance of management and independent Directors; diversity in gender, race, ethnicity, background, and experiences; the need for financial expertise; the evaluation of other prospective nominees; and a candidate’s ethical standards, accountability, past achievements, professionalism and collegiality, and availability to serve in light of other commitments. The Nominating & Governance Committee may also determine new skills, qualities, and/or experiences that should be considered in the context of a Director candidate. The Nominating & Governance Committee is committed to including in each director search qualified candidates who reflect a diversity of backgrounds, including diversity of gender and race. When particular needs are identified, a search is initiated with sufficient time for adequate research and deliberation.
When considering a Director standing for re-election, in addition to the attributes described above, the Nominating & Governance Committee considers that individual’s past contribution and future commitment to the Company. The Nominating & Governance Committee evaluates the totality of the merits of each prospective nominee that it considers and does not restrict itself by establishing minimum qualifications or attributes. The Nominating & Governance Committee is committed to effective succession planning and refreshment for our Board of Directors, including having honest and difficult conversations with existing Directors as may be deemed necessary.
After completing potential Director nominees’ evaluations, the Nominating & Governance Committee makes a recommendation to the full Board of Directors as to the persons who should be nominated by the Board of Directors, and the Board of Directors determines the nominees after considering the recommendation of the Nominating & Governance Committee. There is no difference in the manner by which the Nominating & Governance Committee evaluates prospective nominees for Directors based upon the source from which the individual was first identified, including whether a candidate is recommended by a shareholder.
Our Bylaws provide for proxy access. A shareholder, or group of up to 20 shareholders, that has owned continuously for at least three years shares of Albemarle stock representing an aggregate of at least 3% of our outstanding shares, may nominate and include in the Company’s proxy materials director
20


nominees constituting up to 20% of the Board, provided that the shareholder(s) and nominee(s) satisfy the requirements in our Bylaws.
The Nominating & Governance Committee did not receive any Board of Director candidate recommendations from any shareholders in connection with the Annual Meeting.
Health, Safety & Environment Committee
The duties of the Health, Safety & Environment Committee are set forth in its charter, which can be found on the Company’s website at www.albemarle.com (see Investors/Governance/Corporate Governance/Governance Documents).
The Health, Safety & Environment Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities in assessing the effectiveness of our health, safety, and environmental programs and initiatives, including our progress toward the enhancement of our global reputation, responsible corporate stewardship, our corporate social responsibility, and the sustainability of our products and operations.
Among other matters, the Health, Safety & Environment Committee is responsible for reviewing and overseeing:
Programs and practices related to ensuring the safe manufacture, distribution, use, and disposal of Company products;
Contributions to long-term strategy and sustainability initiatives;
Global public policy and advocacy development strategies related to health, safety, environmental, and sustainability issues;
Policies and approach to human rights and the rights of indigenous people;
The Company’s emergency response plan and political contributions;
Efforts to minimize the Company’s environmental impact and implementation of the Company’s climate strategy; and
Impacts of accessing the resources required to create long-term stakeholder value.
In addition, the Board has delegated oversight of the annual and long-term goals for the Company’s health, environment, safety, and emissions targets and sustainability initiatives, including quarterly status reports on efforts to attain those goals, to the Health, Safety & Environment Committee.
Capital Investment Committee
The duties of the Capital Investment Committee are set forth in its charter, which can be found on the Company’s website at www.albemarle.com (see Investors/Governance/Corporate Governance/Governance Documents).
The Capital Investment Committee assists the Board with oversight of management's execution of major capital expenditure projects in support of the Company's strategic plans. The Capital Investment Committee is responsible for, among other matters, advising and informing the Board on the critical path and costs for capital projects, as well as risk oversight and making recommendations to the Board with respect to new major capital expenditures.
21


CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The Board of Directors has adopted a written Related Person Transaction Policy that governs the review, approval, or ratification of covered related person transactions. The Audit & Finance Committee manages this policy. The policy generally provides that we may enter into a related person transaction only if the Audit & Finance Committee or the disinterested members of the Board of Directors approves or ratifies such transaction in accordance with the policy’s guidelines, if the transaction is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders, and if the transaction is on arm’s length terms comparable to those that could be obtained with an unrelated third party, or if the transaction involves compensation approved by our Executive Compensation Committee.
Related person transactions must be presented to the Audit & Finance Committee for approval and, at each subsequently scheduled Audit & Finance Committee meeting, our management will update the Audit & Finance Committee as to any material change to the proposed related person transaction. The Chair of the Audit & Finance Committee has been delegated authority to act on behalf of the Audit & Finance Committee with respect to the review and approval of a proposed transaction in the event that our General Counsel, in consultation with our CEO or CFO, determines that it is not practicable to wait until the next scheduled Audit & Finance Committee for the transaction to be acted upon.
The Audit & Finance Committee may pre-approve the repurchase of shares of common stock from related persons, provided that such repurchase is on terms no less favorable to us than those that could be obtained in arm’s length dealings with an unrelated third party.
For purposes of this policy, a “related person transaction” is a transaction, arrangement, or relationship (or any series of similar transactions, arrangements, or relationships) in which we are or will be a participant and the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and in which any related person had, has, or will have a direct or indirect interest.
A “related person” is any Director, Director nominee, or executive officer; a holder of more than 5% of our common stock; an immediate family member or person sharing the household of any of foregoing persons; or any firm, corporation, or other entity in which any of the foregoing persons is employed or is a general partner or principal or in a similar position or in which such person has a 5% or greater beneficial ownership interest. For purposes of determining whether a transaction is a related person transaction, the Audit & Finance Committee may rely upon Item 404 of Regulation S-K.
The Audit & Finance Committee was not presented with, and the Company did not participate in, any related person transactions since the beginning of 2022, and no such related person transactions are currently proposed.
22


DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Annual Compensation
Our non-employee Directors receive the following compensation:
COMPENSATION ANNUALLY
Annual Cash Retainer $100,000
Annual Equity Grant of Restricted Common Stock $150,000
Additional Cash Fees:
Lead Independent Director or Non-Executive Chair of the Board, as applicable $50,000
Audit & Finance Committee Chair $25,000
Executive Compensation Committee Chair $20,000
Nominating & Governance Committee Chair $15,000
Health, Safety & Environment Committee Chair $15,000
Capital Investment Committee Chair $15,000
We pay the annual cash retainer fee and any applicable additional cash fees to our non-employee Directors in equal quarterly installments. The portion of cash compensation for a non-employee Director who has a partial quarter of service (due to joining the Board, or beginning service in a Board leadership role, during the quarter) is pro-rated. We do not pay meeting fees or additional compensation to Directors for special meetings.
We make the annual equity grant of restricted common stock to our non-employee Directors in accordance with the 2013 Stock Compensation and Deferral Election Plan for Non-Employee Directors of Albemarle Corporation (the “2013 Directors Plan”). The number of shares of common stock awarded is calculated by dividing the $150,000 annual equity retainer by the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant and rounding down to the nearest full share increment. The annual equity grant of restricted common stock is made on the first trade day of July and vests as of the following July 1, except, with respect to a non-employee Director who (i) does not stand for reelection for the following compensation year, pursuant to meeting the Company’s retirement guidelines, at the time of the annual meeting of shareholders when the Director effectively retires, or (ii) elects not to stand for reelection for the following compensation year, at the annual meeting of shareholders, when their term as a Director effectively ends. Vesting is subject to the non-employee Director’s continued service on our Board through such vesting date. The equity grant amount for a non-employee Director who has a partial year of service (due to joining the Board during the year) is pro-rated.
Deferred Compensation
Under the 2013 Directors Plan, non-employee Directors may defer, in 10% increments, all or part of their cash retainer fee and/or chair fees into a deferred cash account and may defer, in 10% increments, all or part of their stock compensation into a deferred phantom stock account. Fees deferred, in whole or in part, into a phantom stock account are recorded by the Company as phantom shares. Deferred cash accounts and phantom stock accounts are unfunded and maintained for record-keeping purposes only.
Distributions under the 2013 Directors Plan will generally be paid in a lump sum unless the participant specifies installment payments over a period up to ten years. Deferred cash account amounts are paid in the form of cash and deferred phantom stock account amounts are paid in whole shares of common stock. Unless otherwise elected by the participant as permitted under the 2013 Directors Plan,
23


distributions will begin on February 15 in the year following the earlier of the participant’s turning 65 years old or ending their tenure as a Company non-employee Director. For 2022, Mr. Steiner and Ms. Van Deursen each elected to defer all of their stock compensation into their respective deferred phantom stock accounts, and Mr. Steiner and Ms. Van Deursen each elected to defer 100% of their cash compensation into their deferred cash accounts.
2013 Directors Plan
The 2013 Directors Plan provides for the grant of shares of common stock to each non-employee Director (each, a “participant”) of the Company. In the event of a change in capital, changes in shares of capital stock, or any special distribution to our shareholders, the administrator of the 2013 Directors Plan will make equitable adjustments in the number of shares of common stock that have been, or thereafter may be, granted to participants. The maximum aggregate number of shares of common stock that may be issued under the 2013 Directors Plan is 500,000 shares.
Our General Counsel administers the 2013 Directors Plan, interpreting all provisions of the 2013 Directors Plan, establishing administrative regulations to further the purpose of the 2013 Directors Plan, and taking any other action necessary for the proper operation of the 2013 Directors Plan. The Company has discretionary authority to increase the amount of shares of common stock issued to each participant during the compensation year, subject to a $150,000 limitation on the value of the shares to be issued to any participant in any compensation year.
Our General Counsel may amend, suspend, or terminate the 2013 Directors Plan, but no such amendment can (i) increase the number of shares of common stock that may be granted to any participant (except as described above) or (ii) increase the total number of shares of common stock that may be granted under the 2013 Directors Plan. Any amendment of the 2013 Directors Plan must comply with applicable rules of the NYSE.
At the Annual Meeting, shareholders will vote on whether to approve the 2023 Stock Compensation and Deferral Election Plan for Non-Employee Directors, which is intended to replace the 2013 Directors Plan, which will expire by its terms in May 2023. Please see "Proposal 5 – Approval of 2023 Stock Compensation and Deferral Election Plan for Non-Employee Directors" beginning on page 84.
Other Benefits and Perquisites
Non-employee Directors are eligible for certain other benefits and perquisites as follows. The cost of such other benefits and perquisites are included as other compensation in our Director Compensation Table if such disclosure is required by, or exceeds the threshold specified under, SEC rules.
Matching Gifts Program: The Albemarle Foundation will make matching donations for qualified charitable contributions for any non-employee Director up to a total of $3,000 per year.
Medical Plan Access: Non-employee Directors may enroll in the Company-sponsored medical insurance plans at the same rate as active employees. This benefit does not extend to other health and welfare benefits.
Training and Development: We reimburse non-employee Directors for expenses associated with Director training and development.
Travel Reimbursements: We reimburse non-employee Directors for the reasonable expenses of attending Board and committee meetings.
24


Director Compensation Table
The following table presents information relating to the compensation earned by our non-employee Directors who served during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 ("Fiscal Year 2022"). Mr. Masters, as an employee Director, does not receive compensation from the Company in his capacity as a Director.
Director Compensation Table
Name
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)(1)
Stock Awards ($)(2)
All Other Compensation ($)(3)
Total ($)
M. Lauren Brlas $ 122,500  $ 149,965  $ 3,000  $ 275,465 
Ralf H. Cramer(4)
$ 85,833  $ 197,655  $ —  $ 283,488 
Glenda J. Minor $ 100,000  $ 149,965  $ —  $ 249,965 
James J. O'Brien $ 162,500  $ 149,965  $ 3,000  $ 315,465 
Diarmuid B. O'Connell $ 100,000  $ 149,965  $ —  $ 249,965 
Dean L. Seavers $ 112,500  $ 149,965  $ —  $ 262,465 
Gerald A. Steiner $ 112,500  $ 149,965  $ —  $ 262,465 
Holly A. Van Deursen $ 100,000  $ 149,965  $ —  $ 249,965 
Alejandro D. Wolff $ 117,500  $ 149,965  $ —  $ 267,465 
___________________________________________________
(1)Amounts shown include fees that have been deferred at the election of the non-employee Director under the 2013 Directors Plan.
(2)Amounts shown represent the aggregate grant date fair value of stock awards recognized in Fiscal Year 2022 in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. On July 1, 2022, each then serving non-employee Director received 731 shares of common stock (some of which were deferred by certain Directors) for their service as a Director. In accordance with the 2013 Directors Plan, non-employee Directors received shares of common stock equal to $150,000 divided by the closing price per share of common stock on July 1, 2022, which was $205.15, rounded down to the nearest 1-share increment. The amounts set forth above reflect our accounting expense for these awards and do not correspond to the actual value that will be recognized by each of the non-employee Directors. Shares granted pursuant to the 2013 Directors Plan vest (i) the July 1st next following the grant date for non-employee Directors who completed their term of service or (ii) on the completion of their term of service for non-employee Directors not standing for reelection at the annual meeting of shareholders. No Director holds any other unvested equity or has options outstanding.
(3)Represents matching donations for qualified charitable contributions.
(4)Mr. Cramer joined the Board in February 2022. Upon joining the Board, Mr. Cramer received, on February 21, 2022, a pro-rated stock grant of 250 shares of common stock based on the closing price per share of common stock on such date, which was $190.76. He also received the grant made to all non-employee Directors on July 1, 2022, as described in footnote 2 above.
25


STOCK OWNERSHIP
Stock Ownership Guidelines
We maintain stock ownership guidelines to further align the interests of our Directors and officers with our shareholders. Directors and officers are expected to achieve ownership in the amounts set forth in the table below within five years of being appointed to the relevant role. Each non-employee Director and NEO was in compliance with these requirements as of the record date, March 7, 2023.
Position Target Value
Non-Employee Directors 5x annual cash retainer
Chief Executive Officer 6x base salary
Chief Financial Officer 4x base salary
Other Executive Officers 3x base salary
In order to help ensure robust stock ownership, Directors and officers are required to hold at least 50% (after taking into account any tax withholding) of their net shares vesting in any twelve-month period until they meet their target value, and are deemed to be in compliance with the guidelines if they sell no more than that amount. Stock options are not counted as value owned when calculating target value.
Our insider trading policy prohibits, among other things, Directors, officers, and employees of the Company from engaging in short sales, put options, or call options; purchasing on margin or holding in margin accounts; pledging, hypothecating, or otherwise encumbering as collateral for indebtedness; or hedging, short selling, or pledging the Company’s shares. In addition, to further align our Directors’ and NEOs’ interests with those of our shareholders, our insider trading policy restricts purchases and sales of our stock by Directors and certain employees, including NEOs, to the 30-day period beginning on the third trading day following an earnings announcement (the day of the announcement constituting the first day) and only after being cleared to trade by our General Counsel or a designee thereof, or in accordance with a previously existing Rule 10b5-1 trading plan that meets applicable SEC requirements.
Principal Shareholders
The following table provides certain information about each person or entity known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the issued and outstanding shares of our common stock.
Name and Address of Beneficial Owners Number of
Shares
Percent of Class*
The Vanguard Group
100 Vanguard Boulevard, Malvern, PA 19355 14,147,413
(1)
12.1  %
BlackRock, Inc.
55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055 9,321,844
(2)
7.9  %
Capital International Investors
333 South Hope Street, 55th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90071 7,868,987
(3)
6.7  %
___________________________________________________
*    Ownership percentages set forth in this column are based on the assumption that each of the principal shareholders continued to own, as of the record date, the number of shares reflected in the table. Calculated based upon 117,299,392 shares of common stock outstanding as of the record date, March 7, 2023.
(1)Based solely on the information contained in the Schedule 13G Amendment filed by the Vanguard Group (“Vanguard”) with the SEC on February 9, 2023. The report states that Vanguard has aggregate beneficial ownership of 14,174,413 shares of common stock, including shared voting power over 168,628 shares of common stock, sole dispositive power over 13,690,202 shares of common stock, and shared dispositive power over 484,211 shares of common stock.
26


(2)Based solely on the information contained in the Schedule 13G Amendment filed by BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”) with the SEC on February 3, 2023. The report states that BlackRock has aggregate beneficial ownership of 9,321,844 shares of common stock, including sole voting power over 8,492,988 shares of common stock and sole dispositive power over 9,321,844 shares of common stock.
(3)Based solely on the information contained in the Schedule 13G filed by Capital International Investors (“CII”) with the SEC on February 13, 2023. The report states that CII has aggregate beneficial ownership of 7,868,987 shares of common stock, including sole voting power over 7,765,262 shares of common stock and sole dispositive power over 7,868,987 shares of common stock.
Directors and Executive Officers
The following table sets forth as of March 7, 2023, the beneficial ownership of common stock by each Director of the Company, the NEOs listed in the Summary Compensation Table, and all Directors and executive officers of the Company as a group.
Name of Beneficial Owner or Number of Persons in the Group
Number of Shares Beneficially
Owned(1)
Percent of Class
Phantom Shares Without
Voting or Investment Power(2)
M. Lauren Brlas 6,900 * — 
Kristin M. Coleman
(3)
* — 
Ralf H. Cramer 981 * — 
Netha N. Johnson 43,253 * — 
J. Kent Masters 70,347 * — 
Glenda J. Minor 4,106 * 783 
Eric W. Norris 45,426 * — 
James J. O’Brien 2,813 * 15,160 
Diarmuid B. O'Connell 6,681 * — 
Dean L. Seavers 6,749 * — 
Gerald A. Steiner 6,500 * 9,354 
Scott A. Tozier 109,422
(4)
* 263 
Holly A. Van Deursen 1,650 * 3,280 
Alejandro D. Wolff 9,958 * 3,423 
All directors and executive officers as a group (18 persons) 447,460  * 32,496 
___________________________________________________
*    Indicates beneficial ownership of less than 1% of common stock. Calculated based upon 117,299,392 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 7, 2023 and assuming conversion or exercise of such holder’s options, as the case may be, for purposes of calculating the total number of shares outstanding, but not the conversion or exercise of securities held by third parties.
(1)The amounts in this column include shares of common stock with respect to which certain persons had the right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days of March 7, 2023: Mr. Masters 54,475 shares; Mr. Johnson 19,639 shares; Mr. Norris 20,090 shares; and Mr. Tozier: 38,310 shares.
(2)The amounts in this column reflect phantom shares held in the deferred stock account of each person and represent an equivalent number of shares of common stock. Although such shares are not “beneficially owned” as defined under SEC rules, we believe that inclusion of such shares gives our shareholders important additional information regarding the shareholdings of our Directors.
(3)Ms. Coleman joined the Company on November 28, 2022.
(4)Includes 1,609 shares held in the Albemarle Savings Plan.
27


DELINQUENT SECTION 16(a) REPORTS
Based solely on our review of the forms required by Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act furnished to us, we believe that our Directors, officers, and beneficial owners of greater than 10% of common stock were compliant with applicable filing requirements in 2022, except that a Form 4 reporting the grant of director stock compensation to Mr. Cramer on February 21, 2022 was not filed on a timely basis due to a delay in obtaining EDGAR filing codes and was subsequently disclosed in a Form 4 filed on February 25, 2022.
28


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
2022 KEY EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE ACTIVITIES
Advisory Shareholder Say-on-Pay Vote
At our 2022 annual meeting of shareholders, 95.3% of shareholders who cast a vote approved the compensation for 2021 of our named executive officers (“NEOs” — as determined in accordance with SEC rules). 95.3%
Say-on-Pay Approval
Shareholder Engagement
In the fall of 2022, we continued our practice of annual engagement with shareholders. These discussions provide us a basis upon which we continually evaluate our executive compensation and corporate governance practices. This initiative was led by a group of senior officers of the Company, acting on behalf and at the request of the Executive Compensation Committee (the “Committee”), by reaching out to 50 shareholders representing approximately 63% of our outstanding shares. A total of 8 shareholders elected to engage with us (representing approximately 18% of our outstanding shares), for which we organized follow-up calls. This outreach reflects our commitment to understand and address key issues of importance to our shareholders.
We received positive feedback from our investors, indicating support for the general structure and operation of our executive compensation program. Discussions focused on Environment, Social and Governance topics and how we govern our program, measure results and make meaningful progress. Our investors were pleased with our corporate responsibility and sustainability efforts and the ongoing progress we are making.
Compensation Committee Actions
The Committee continued to monitor trends and developments with respect to executive compensation and benefit policies. As part of this monitoring, the Committee adjusted the severance and change in control provisions for our executive officers to better align with our 2023 compensation peer group. We changed the severance multiple for a termination of employment outside of a Change in Control protection period from 1.5 to 2 years for the CEO and from 1 year to 1.5 years for the other executive officers. For a Change in Control with termination of employment we aligned the benefits continuation period with the severance period and approved for PSUs to be earned in full at target (from prorated at the greater of actual or target).
In 2022, the Committee went through a selection process to determine who to best advise it as its independent compensation consultant. The Committee selected Farient and started engaging with them in the second half of 2022.
29


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Albemarle again followed a strong pay-for-performance and values-based approach in 2022. The summary below highlights our business results, how our talent management supported those results, and how we align executive pay and performance.
2022 Performance
2022 Business Highlights
Financial Performance
In 2022, we achieved tremendous financial results and growth. Net sales were up ~120% vs 2021, actively capturing pricing upsides, strong contract negotiations, higher volumes, and strategic market position. Operating Profit was up ~210% vs 2021, primarily driven by pricing favorability, partly offset by higher raw material, natural gas, and logistics costs. Diluted EPS was more than 21 times that of 2021. Strong cash generation led to a positive free cash flow in 2022 while we continued to invest in growth projects. Our balance sheet reflects significant liquidity of approximately $3 billion, with a leverage (defined as consolidated net funded debt to consolidated EBITDA) ratio of approximately 0.5x, giving us substantial flexibility to act as new growth opportunities are identified.
USD in millions (except Diluted EPS)
2022
2021
Variance
Net Sales $ 7,320  $ 3,328  $ 3,992 
Net Income attributable to Albemarle $ 2,690  $ 124  $ 2,566 
Operating Profit $ 2,470  $ 798  $ 1,672 
Diluted EPS $ 22.84  $ 1.06  $ 21.78 
Operating Cash Flow $ 1,908  $ 344  $ 1,564 
Investing and Financing Activities
Completed the acquisition of the Qinzhou lithium conversion plant in Guangxi China for $200 million on October 25, 2022.
La Negra trains 3&4 handed over to operations in 1Q22. Kemerton train 1 achieved first product in July 2022. Kemerton train 2 mechanically complete and transitioned to commissioning phase.
Albemarle was awarded a $150 million U.S. Department of Energy grant for US-based lithium concentrator facility to support domestic electric vehicle supply chain.
Acquired land and building for Albemarle Technology Park to further our mine-to-market innovation strategy.
Successful execution of capital projects for the TBBPA (Tetrabromobisphenol A) expansion at Jordan Bromine Company and DPE (DiPhenylEthane) expansion at Magnolia allowed for increased volumes in 2022.
Concluded strategic review of Catalysts - decision made to retain as a wholly owned subsidiary branded as Ketjen. Turn-around planning underway.
Realigning core Lithium and Bromine businesses into Energy Storage and Specialties segments effective January 1, 2023.
30


Extended and expanded our revolving credit line to $1.5 billion. Raised $1.7 billion in bonds in May 2022.
Invested in critical organizational capability, with a focus on Asia-Pacific, to enable strategy execution.
Sustainability
Furthered our sustainability strategy with focus turning to completing IRMA (Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance) third party assessments for the Salar de Atacama, closing gaps to IRMA 50 (or higher). Released 2021 sustainability report on June 2, 2022 with a video conference with live Q&A.
How our Talent Strategies and Actions Support our Performance
People Drive Albemarle’s Success
Our HR mission is to create empowered, inspired, and inclusive teams working collaboratively. Our employee value proposition is to provide best-in-career employee experiences, empowered by a values-centered culture and globally diverse and inclusive teams.

Our workforce spans over 25 countries and expanded in 2022 from around 5,600 employees to over 6,900 employees.
Employee Engagement
Employee Empowerment Survey
As part of our listening strategy, we launched a global employee empowerment survey which had a strong 65% response rate (a response rate above 50% is considered good). 76% of our employees responded favorably to their satisfaction with working at Albemarle (benchmark: 73% for the manufacturing industry). Three areas of opportunity to improve satisfaction include collaboration, communication, and future career opportunities and development, which we are actively addressing.
Voluntary Employee Turnover
Managing voluntary turnover is a critical part of our talent strategy, given the potential loss of expertise and experience and it being an indicator of employee engagement. For 2022, we set and achieved an aspirational voluntary turnover target of 5.3%. Given the high inflation globally, we implemented an off cycle pay increase globally.
Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
We implemented comprehensive DE&I dashboards for our leadership to regularly track and act on critical metrics that help us to understand the representation, development, and advancement of diverse groups across the organization.
We set 2022 targets relative to 2021 and achieved the results shown below.
2021 Actual 2022 Target 2022 Achieved
Percentage of the global workforce that is female 21.9% 22.9% 24.0%
Percentage of the US workforce at the Director level and higher that is racially diverse 16.9% 17.9% 21.3%
31


Employee Engagement
Employee Resource Groups and Annual CEO Day of Understanding
Our Employee Resource Groups, which we call CONNECT groups, promote an atmosphere of inclusion and encouragement, where every employee’s voice is heard. These executive-sponsored, employee-led groups are formed to promote a better workplace through shared perspectives and goals that positively impact our employees and their experience, alignment with our core values, and the creation and strengthening of relationships across the company.

CONNECT groups focus on four areas: 1. Heritage Month Activities – cultural education and awareness, communication skills, valuing differences, breaking down barriers to inclusion, and membership campaigns; 2. Career Development – leadership skills, networking, mentoring, guest speakers, increased access to company leaders, and talent development resources; 3. Attracting Talent – support for the company’s diversity recruiting efforts, support for onboarding and retention, association partnerships, and supplier diversity recommendations; 4. Community Outreach – contribute to the communities where we live and work via strategic alignment with one or two preferred non-profits.

In 2021, our CEO, Kent Masters, became a signatory to CEO Action for Diversity and Inclusion, the largest CEO-driven business commitment to advance DE&I in the workplace. In 2022, we held our second annual CEO Day of Understanding. CEO Days of Understanding encourage organizations to host candid conversations throughout the year to highlight and engage with real-time issues and events as they arise. As a signatory of CEO Action for Diversity and Inclusion, we are committed to providing unconscious bias training, sharing best practices, and engaging our Board of Directors in DE&I work.

The annual CEO Day of Understanding is a great opportunity for our CEO to re-emphasize our commitment to DE&I and its importance to the success of the Company. It also gives employees an opportunity to engage directly with our CEO on the topic of DE&I.
Celebrating our Achievements Together
At Albemarle, winning awards is not the end goal. Outside recognition however reflects the commitment of our organization and employee base, who work hard every day to create a diverse, equitable and inclusive environment. To them we owe the following distinctions:
a.2023 Military Friendly Employer
b.2023 Military Spouse Friendly Employer
c.2022 Charlotte’s and Nation’s Best and Brightest to Work For
d.America’s Best Employers by Forbes’ Best Companies List

We are committed to providing accessible learning & leadership opportunities that enhance both employee skills as well as our organizational agility and alignment through our Albemarle University.
32


Developing Leadership Capability
Albemarle’s coaching, mentoring, and leadership development learning journeys nurture skills leaders need to effectively lead themselves and others, now and in the future. In 2022, 300+ existing and aspiring leaders participated in a formal internal leadership development program. Our programs include assessments, virtual coaching apps, action learning projects, and visibility to senior leaders.
Global Enablement
Consistent with our culture of belonging and inclusion, we take pride in ensuring our learning and leadership development is delivered in local language for most employees. Of the leadership development participants, 62% were leaders located outside of the U.S.
Learning Experience
We are continuing to invest in increasing capacity to support employee development and solutions at scale—globally, regionally, and virtually. In 2022, we:
Enabled employee-empowered development by expanding our library of online courses and videos
Increased available L&D resources globally + regionally with a growing Organizational Effectiveness team
Added a specific focus on optimizing learning approaches for deskless workers through our Manufacturing Excellence L&D practice.
Talent Management Strategies
We believe that a strong pool of talent for our most critical roles is built through senior leaders developing other leaders, consistent talent practices, digitization, and the capacity for ongoing career development for all employees. A newly formed Talent Advancement team supports Albemarle in talent management, succession planning, and organization development.
Enterprise Talent Strategy
In 2022, we focused on strengthening the foundations of our enterprise talent management practices. C-suite succession plans and candidates are reviewed annually by the Executive Leadership Team and the Board of Directors. Throughout the year, the ELT plans for talent development and advancement monthly, focused on the most critical roles and highest potential talent.
Performance Excellence
In 2022, our executive team held their organizations accountable to have more frequent and meaningful employee-manager review conversations. We created 150+ enhanced executive profiles, developed the infrastructure for digital career and talent profiles for all employees, and aligned practices for assessing, developing, and advancing talent. Our performance management systems were enhanced with Objectives and Key Results (OKRs), and a redesigned impact scale.
Career Growth and Development
Our talent management strategies are supported by strong investments in individual career development and advancement. Resources to support managers with developing talent, fostering a growth mindset, and aligning career path goals will be enhanced in 2023. Guidance for leaders to support internal mobility is coupled with a new toolkit and workshop for employees focused on career growth and development at Albemarle.
33


Alignment of Executive Pay and Performance
Performance Based Compensation
In 2022, 87% of the target compensation of our CEO and an average of 73% of the target compensation of our other NEOs was variable and subject to performance factors. In determining target values we use the stock closing price at the grant date for PSUs and RSUs and Black Scholes for stock options.
Annual Bonus Plan
Our Corporate Annual Incentive Plan paid out due to strong financial performance and performance on stewardship. We achieved adjusted EBITDA at 280% of target and Adjusted Cash Flow from Operations at 278% of target, resulting in a payout for both metrics at 200%. See page 45 for more detail as well as for the payout for each of the NEOs.
Long-Term Incentive Mix Our NEOs receive LTIP based on a mix of performance shares (50%), stock options (25%) and restricted stock units (25%).
Performance Shares
As described in further detail below, our Performance Shares for the 2020-2022 performance cycle paid out at 200% of target. This was driven by a strong Total Shareholder Return of 223% for the period, which positioned us at the 99th percentile of the compensation peer group. This was also driven by our ROIC performance for the period of 15.8%, which was well above the target level of 10.0% for the period.
Pay for Performance
We are committed to ensuring the alignment between Company performance and executive compensation. "Pay for performance" is one of our Four Compensation Principles. The overarching goal of our compensation program is to create executive compensation plans that incentivize and align with the creation of sustained shareholder value.

NAVIGATING THE CD&A
In the balance of this CD&A we provide additional details on the items described on the previous pages, along with information on our executive compensation design, management, and outcomes.
Executive Compensation Framework
Purpose of our Executive Compensation Program | Executive Compensation Philosophy and Principles | Focus on Performance | Key Elements of our Executive Compensation Program | Performance Goals
Executive Compensation Management
Roles in Determining Executive Compensation | Use of an Independent Compensation Consultant | Use of Market Data | Metric Selection and Goal Setting | Compensation Risk Assessment
2022 Compensation Decisions and Outcomes 2022 Base Salary | 2022 Annual Incentive Program | Long-Term Incentives | 2022 LTIP Grants
Additional Information Executive Benefits | Perquisites | Post Termination Payments | Clawbacks | Deductability of Executive Compensation | Taxation of “Parachute” Payments and Deferred Compensation | Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION FRAMEWORK
Purpose of our Executive Compensation Program
Our executive compensation program is designed to attract and retain highly-qualified executives, motivate our executives to achieve our overall business objectives, and align our executives’ interests with those of our shareholders. We achieve this through a set of underlying principles that inform the design and operation of our executive compensation program. We believe that our 2022 compensation practices demonstrated our commitment to these principles in the face of a challenging environment. Our
34


NEOs for Fiscal Year 2022, determined as of December 31, 2022, in accordance with SEC rules and regulations, are:
NAME PRINCIPAL POSITION
J. Kent Masters, Jr. Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Scott A. Tozier Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
Eric W. Norris President, Lithium
Netha N. Johnson, Jr. President, Bromine
Kristin M. Coleman Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

Executive Compensation Philosophy and Principles
Our compensation philosophy rewards executives for achieving our financial and stewardship metrics and building long-term value for our shareholders and other stakeholders. We follow several other principles when designing our executive compensation program including:
Pay-for-Performance
Set majority of compensation as variable and at-risk
Ensure an appropriate balance between annual and long-term incentives commensurate with the position's decision-making time horizon
Tie incentives to performance against financial, operational, strategic, and individual goals
Use quantifiable and measurable performance metrics that are clearly disclosed
Provide significant upside potential and downside risk for superior and low performance
Pay Benchmark
We benchmark compensation against our compensation peer group
We use the median in the compensation peer group as our reference point for determining target compensation
Other factors include performance, scope of responsibilities, and impact on the company's performance as well as internal equity considerations
Align Interests with our Stakeholders
Design programs that discourage unnecessary or excessive risk-taking
Cap payout opportunities under the incentive plans
Set minimum vesting periods for equity awards
Reward long-term financial results that drive financial value creation through a balanced equity mix
Operate meaningful share ownership guidelines (stock options are not included in determining ownership values)
Maintain a pay recoupment (i.e., clawback) policy
Avoid Poor Governance Practices
No tax gross-ups
No-single-trigger accelerated vesting upon a change-in-control
No discounting, reloading or re-pricing of share options without shareholder approval
No guaranteed compensation or increases
No excessive perquisites
No dividends paid on unvested restricted shares units or performance share units until such awards vest
No strict targeting of compensation to a specific percentile of our compensation peer group
No hedging or monetization transactions involving the establishment of a short position in our securities and no entering into any arrangement that, directly or indirectly, involves the use of our securities as collateral for a loan
35


Focus on Performance
In line with our compensation principles, our NEOs are primarily rewarded through performance-based cash and equity incentive awards. This is intended to both encourage and recognize strong company performance and stock price growth, further driving shareholder value.
Long-term equity incentives are awarded through a combination of performance-based shares ("PSUs"), stock options, and time-based restricted stock units ("RSUs") in order to link executive compensation more closely with the Company's performance. The diagrams below depict each element of target compensation as a percentage of total target direct compensation for our CEO and other NEOs, expressed as an average, for 2022. In determining target values we use the stock closing price at the grant date for PSUs and RSUs and Black Scholes for stock options.
alb-20230321_g16.jpg alb-20230321_g17.jpg
Key Elements of our Executive Compensation Program
The key elements of our NEOs' compensation, and how these elements are linked to performance, are summarized in the chart below. For each NEO, the Committee reviews and approves annually each component of compensation and the resulting total compensation. The Committee benchmarks the individual components of compensation and total compensation to our compensation peer group. In setting the compensation for each NEO, the Committee also considers other factors, including the scope and complexity of the NEO's position, level of performance, skills and experience, and contribution to the overall success of the Company, as well as internal equity.
36


Compensation Element Purpose Performance Alignment
Fixed Base Salary
Provide competitive levels of fixed pay to attract and retain executives

Recognize role scope, skills required, performance, contribution, leadership and potential
Individual performance taken into account when considering changes
At Risk Short-Term Cash Incentive To motivate and reward the successful execution of our operating plan and strategic goals as well as Business Unit and individual performance Opportunity of 0%-200% of target based on performance
Long-Term Incentive Awards Attract, retain and motivate executive talent; align interests with our shareholders and value realization with stock price; drive accountability for long-term performance
PSUs (50%), stock options (25%), and RSUs (25%)

In determining target values we use the stock closing price at the grant date for PSUs and RSUs and Black Scholes for stock options

2022 equity awards cliff vest after 3 years. For RSUs and PSUs, this is a change from previous years. This change was made to align with payout opportunities and vesting provisions relative to our compensation peer group
Performance Goals
Our incentive plans balance short- and long-term performance goals to ensure that the interests of our executives are aligned with those of our shareholders for short- and long-term performance. The following provides a summary overview of the short- and long-term goals(1).
Goals Rationale Weight
Short-Term Goals Adjusted EBITDA Incentivize management to meet and exceed target earnings. Aligns with focus on growth and efficiency 50%
Adjusted Cash Flow from Operations Incentivize management to meet and exceed target cash flow in support of growth and efficiency 25%
Stewardship Stewardship goals incentivize management, consistent with our values, to be good stewards, and are critical for our license to operate. Stewardship goals include occupational and process safety as well as environmental targets 10%
Individual Emphasize individual accountability. Individual goals are aligned to our Operating Model which includes: Operational Discipline, Competitive Capabilities, High Performance Culture, and Sustainable Approach 15%
Long-Term Goals Relative Total Shareholder Return ("rTSR") Linking pay to long-term shareholder interest 50%
Adjusted Return on Invested Capital ("ROIC") Emphasizes our commitment to invest efficiently and generate long-term returns 50%
Note: For our NEOs, 25% of LTIP is granted in stock options, 25% in RSUs, and 50% in performance-based PSUs, which are equally divided between PSUs based on rTSR performance and Adjusted ROIC. In determining target values, we use the stock closing price at the grant date for PSUs and RSUs and Black Scholes for stock options.
___________________________________________________
(1) See pages 45 and 49 for a more detailed overview of the short- and long-term incentive plans and definitions for each of the performance goals.
37


The Committee believes that the Company continues to make significant progress in accelerating its sustainability performance, including establishing long-range sustainability goals. For the Committee to include additional ESG goals in the incentive plans, the goals must be:
Measurable: measurable and supported by a data collection process that is properly defined and documented, such that data can be audited by external parties, and
Suitable: aligned with our strategy and the interests of stakeholders, while incentivizing the right behavior and culture of our employees.
The company includes stewardship goals in its short-term incentive program. Some ESG objectives have typically been included in the personal goals for the CEO and other NEOs. Starting in 2021, personal goals were expanded to include additional goals such as natural resource management, stakeholder engagement, diversity, and talent management.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION MANAGEMENT
The Committee comprises independent directors who develop, amend and approve our executive compensation program. To ensure the executive compensation program is effective and reasonable, the Committee uses a variety of inputs including the results of our annual say-on-pay vote, feedback from shareholders, the advice of the Committee's independent compensation consultant informed by market practices, and input from the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer.
Roles in Determining Executive Compensation
Compensation Committee
Develop, amend, and approve executive compensation programs to remain consistent with our values and philosophy, support the recruitment and retention of executive talent, and help achieve business objectives
Determine and approve the appropriate level of compensation for all executive officers
Determine and approve short- and long-term incentive plan targets for all executive officers
Evaluate CEO individual performance and determine NEO compensation
Select the independent compensation consultant and determine its engagement
Independent Directors of the Board
Review and approve talent development and succession plans for the NEOs
Appoint executive officers
CEO
Evaluate performance for the executive officers, other than himself, and make compensation recommendations to the Committee
Independent Compensation Consultant
Inform the Committee of market trends, developments in executive compensation, and provide recommendations for appropriate adjustments to the Company's compensation programs, policies, and practices in-line with our business and talent strategies, and investor expectations
Analyze the prevailing executive compensation structure and plan designs, and help the Committee assess the competitiveness of our compensation program in the context of aligning executive officer interests with those of our shareholders
Total compensation actions, annual and long-term performance goals and objectives, contractual agreements, and benefits are evaluated and determined by the Committee and discussed with the Board.
In light of Mr. Masters’ 2020 employment contract expiring at the end of 2023, the Board of Directors discussed with Mr. Masters the terms and conditions of a contract extension well ahead of the
38


2020 contract end date to manage leadership continuity. This resulted in the amendments described below to his employment arrangements. The Committee determined Mr. Masters’ compensation under the new contract, with the assistance of Farient, as follows:
Process: The Executive Compensation Committee considered and analyzed President and Chief Executive Officer compensation relative to a 50/50 blended peer group consisting of the 2023 compensation peer group (see "Use of Market Data" beginning on page 40) and market data pertaining to non-durable goods companies similar in size to Albemarle.
Target Total Direct Compensation: Based on this analysis and in recognition of Mr. Masters’ experience and expertise, the Executive Compensation Committee set Mr. Masters’ target total direct compensation between the median and 75th percentile of the blended peer group.
Compensation Mix: Mr. Masters’ incentive-based compensation under the new contract equals 90% of target total direct compensation, with 16% based on short-term incentives and 74% on long-term incentives.
Severance Eligibility: Mr. Masters’ eligibility for severance payments and benefits are aligned with practices among the blended peer group.
Use of an Independent Compensation Consultant
The Committee has retained an independent compensation consultant, to provide advice on best practices and market developments, as well as to provide independent advice to the Committee. Farient has served as the independent compensation consultant since August 2022, succeeding Pearl Meyer in that role.
The Committee regularly meets with the independent compensation consultant without management present. The independent compensation consultant participates in Committee meetings throughout the year, reviews materials in advance, consults with the Chair of the Committee, provides to the Committee data on market trends and compensation design, assesses recommendations for base salary and annual incentive awards for our NEOs, and periodically meets with management. The independent compensation consultant may provide consulting advice to management outside the scope of executive compensation with the approval of the Committee. In 2022, neither Pearl Meyer nor Farient provided any other consulting advice or services to management outside the scope of executive compensation. The Committee does not delegate authority to its independent compensation consultant.
The independent compensation consultant gathers and analyzes data at the direction of the Committee, advises the Committee on compensation standards and trends, and assists in the development of policies and programs. The Committee directs, approves, and evaluates the work of the independent compensation consultant in relation to all executive compensation matters. The Committee considers Farient to be independent from our management pursuant to SEC standards. Please see “Independence of the Executive Compensation Consultant” beginning on page 19.
For the assessment of the alignment between performance and compensation, the Committee relies on advice from its independent compensation consultant. The independent compensation consultant evaluates the relationship between performance and compensation and the Committee then considers this relationship in making pay decisions pertaining to the CEO.
Given the results of these assessments, the Committee concluded that Albemarle's executive compensation, including that for the CEO, is aligned with our performance. We believe that the results of the 2022 Say-on-Pay vote demonstrate strong shareholder support for our compensation program, with approximately 95% of the votes cast approving such compensation.
39


Use of Market Data
The Committee engages the independent compensation consultant to undertake an annual review of the compensation peers that are used to provide insight into market competitive pay levels and practices. In partnership with our independent compensation consultant, a robust process has been established to appropriately assess the relevance of different companies in the context of making compensation comparisons. The criteria used to select the peer companies in our Peer Group is summarized in the chart below.
Universe of Publicly Traded Companies
Traded on major US exchanges
Standalone companies domiciled in or with pay/disclosure practices consistent with the US
Industry
Chemicals
Size
Revenue within 0.4x - 2.5x of 2022 projected revenue as an indicator of complexity and scope for executive roles
In setting 2022 base salaries, target total cash compensation, and target total direct compensation, the Committee generally considered the last reported data from our 2022 Peer Group (as set forth below). The Committee also referred to survey information from nationally recognized compensation surveys. The variation of actual pay relative to the market median is dependent on the executive officer's performance, experience, knowledge, skills, level of responsibility, potential to impact our performance and future success, the need to retain and motivate strategic talent, and internal equity considerations.
For 2022, we continued with the same Peer Group we used in 2021, with the exception of W.R. Grace & Co., which was acquired in September 2021 by Standard Industries Holdings Inc.
2022 PEER GROUP
Ashland Global Holdings Inc. (ASH) International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. (IFF)
Avient Corporation (f/k/a PolyOne Corporation) (AVNT) Minerals Technologies Inc. (MTX)
Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. (AXTA) Newmarket Corporation (NEU)
Cabot Corporation (CBT) Olin Corporation (OLN)
Celanese Corporation (CE) RPM International Inc. (RPM)
CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) The Chemours Company (CC)
Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) The Mosaic Company (MOS)
FMC Corporation (FMC) The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG)
H.B. Fuller Company (FUL) Trinseo Plc (TSE)
For the 2023 peer group, the Committee engaged Farient, to undertake a structural review of the compensation peers to ensure alignment with the Company's growth. In partnership with Farient, a robust process was established to assess the relevance of different companies in the context of making compensation comparisons. The criteria used to select the peer companies is summarized in the table below.
40


Universe of Publicly Traded Companies
Traded on major US exchanges
Standalone companies domiciled in or with pay/disclosure practices consistent with the US
Industry
Chemicals
Diversified Metals & Mining
Copper
Gold
Precious Metals & Minerals
Silver
EV- and Lithium-related
Global Lithium & Battery ETF companies
Size
Revenue within 0.4x - 2.5 x range of 2023 projected revenue as an indicator of complexity and scope for executive roles
Quantitative Criteria
High-growth trajectory (Revenue growth 3 yr. CAGR)
Strong operating margins (EBITDA margin)
Market premium to capital
Significant investment mode (Capex / Depreciation)
Qualitative Criteria
Global operations (International revenues as a % of total)
Value-added extraction/processing
Business-to-Business sales model
Direct competitor for talent (add to peer group if company meets this criterion)
For 2023, we made a significant change in our peer group compared to previous years. This was driven by the application of the above criteria, with change in Company revenue expected to from from ~$7.3 billion in 2022 to a range of $11.3-$12.9 billion for 2023. The 2023 peer group is comprised of the companies listed in the following table.
2023 PEER GROUP
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (APF)
FMC Corporation (FMC)
Celanese Corporation (CE) Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX)
Chemours Company, The (CC) Huntsman Corporation (HUN)
Corteva, Inc. (CTVA) Mosaic Company (MOS)
Dow Inc. (DOW) Newmont Corporation (NEM)
DuPont de Nemours, Inc. (DD) Olin Corporation (OLN)
Eastman Chemical (EMN) Westlake Chemical Corporation (WLK)
For 2023, the following companies are no longer included in our compensation peer group: Ashland Global Holdings Inc., Avient Corporation (f/k/a PolyOne Corporation), Axalta Coating Systems Ltd., Cabot Corporation, CF Industries Holdings, Inc., H.B. Fuller Company, International Flavors & Fragrances Inc., Minerals Technologies Inc., Newmarket Corporation, RPM International Inc., The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company, and Trinseo Plc.
In setting 2023 compensation for Mr. Masters, including his amended employment agreement as described below, the Committee also referred to survey information from nationally recognized compensation surveys. The variation of actual pay relative to the market median is dependent on the executive officer's performance, experience, knowledge, skills, level of responsibility, potential to impact our performance and future success, the need to retain and motivate strategic talent, and internal equity considerations.
41


Metric Selection and Goal Setting
Balanced Focus on Growth and Efficiency
Albemarle's incentive plans convey a balanced focus between growth, efficiency, and stewardship. The following overview shows the general alignment for each of our short-term and long-term metrics.
 Annual Incentive Program Weight Aligns with
Metrics Growth Efficiency Stewardship
Financial Performance Adjusted EBITDA 50% x x
Adjusted Cash Flow from Operations 25% x
Stewardship Occupational Safety 4% x
Process Safety 3% x
Environmental Safety 3% x
Individual Performance 15%
Long-Term Incentive Program Weight Aligns with Vesting
Vehicle Metrics Growth Efficiency
Performance Stock Units TSR relative to the 2022 Peer Group 25% x x Cliff vest after 3 years
Adjusted ROIC 25% x
Restricted Stock Units 25% x
Stock Options 25% x
Annual Incentive Plan
The Committee chose these performance metrics to align the AIP with our 2022 business goals and objectives. The Committee chose the relative weights of the performance measures based on the desire to emphasize financial results while maintaining a focus on non-financial objectives.
The Committee chose Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Cash Flow from Operations as 2022 AIP metrics because they were considered the key measures of financial performance in the Company’s 2022 annual operating plan. Adjusted EBITDA is a measure of our ability to generate earnings and Adjusted Cash Flow from Operations is a performance measure aligned with our objective of generating cash for debt reduction and growth.
"Adjusted EBITDA" is defined as total Company earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization, as adjusted for non-recurring, non-operating, and special items.
"Adjusted Cash Flow from Operations" is defined as cash from operations as reported on our Statement of Cash Flows, adjusted for pension contributions, joint venture earnings distribution timing, non-recurring, or unusual items.
The superior performance levels for both of these metrics, disclosed below, were set by the Committee at levels that, while believed to be realistic, were achievable only as the result of exceptional performance.
Stewardship metrics were included because they are critical to our license to operate, aligned with our sustainability objectives and consistent with our values. Our stewardship metrics consist of three factors: occupational safety, process safety, and environmental responsibility. For each of the three stewardship metrics, we set a target and superior performance level. Performance below target does not
42


pay out. Occupational safety was measured as our OSHA recordable rate, which is calculated as the number of OSHA recordable injuries x 200,000 hours and divided by the actual total man-hours worked; process safety was measured by severity score; and environmental responsibility was measured by the number of level 2 environmental incidents. "Level 2 environmental incidents" are reportable quantity environmental incidents, including, spills and releases; neighbor complaints related to odor, noise or other facility issues; and regulatory agency administrative action or citation.
Individual performance is included to emphasize the individual accountability for each of the executives for achieving specific goals. Performance goals typically include both leadership objectives and strategic business objectives.
The Committee may take into account extraordinary or infrequently occurring events, or significant corporate transactions in deciding to adjust the results used to determine whether the AIP objectives have been met. The Committee retains the right to exercise discretion in determining the final level of the awards paid, in order to ensure that the AIP remains consistent with its stated objectives. In determining the actual results for 2022, the Committee did not exercise discretion.
Long-Term Incentive Plan
Our PSU grants have a three year performance period, with performance measured in rTSR as compared to our Peer Group and Adjusted ROIC, each with equal weighting. The rTSR performance metric emphasizes the linkage between our pay-for-performance philosophy and our shareholders' interests. The Adjusted ROIC performance metric emphasizes our continued commitment to invest efficiently and generate long-term returns, and ensures alignment between our expected return on capital and long-term payout opportunities for our executives.
Compensation Risk Assessment
As part of its oversight of the Company’s executive compensation program, the Committee considers the impact of the Company’s executive compensation program and the incentives created by the compensation programs that it administers, on the Company’s risk profile. In addition, the Committee reviews all employee compensation policies and procedures, including the incentives that they create and factors that may reduce the likelihood of excessive risk-taking, to determine whether they encourage risk-taking that is reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the company. At the Committee’s direction, our Chief Human Resources Officer and members of our Total Rewards team, together with our Vice President, Audit & Risk Management and members of our Internal Audit team, conducted a risk assessment of our compensation programs. This assessment included, but was not limited to, evaluation of our compensation program features, the most significant of which are outlined below.
43


Performance Measures and Period
The performance goals set forth in our annual bonus and long-term incentive plans are based upon budgeted levels that are reviewed and approved by the Committee. We believe these goals are challenging yet attainable at their targeted levels without the need to take inappropriate risks, take actions that would violate our Code of Conduct, or make material changes to our long-term business strategy or operations. Payouts under both incentive plans are capped at 200% of target to make it less likely that executives would pursue outsized short-term achievements at the expense of the long term.
Our long-term incentive plan awards are based on a three-year performance period, which encourages our executives to focus on the sustained growth of our company rather than seeking potentially unsustainable short-term gains.
Goal Setting and Leverage All business goals are quantitative in nature and have predefined threshold, target, and superior performance and payout levels. Performance and payout ranges are aligned with the market.
Pay Mix The three primary elements of our executive compensation program are base salary, annual bonus, and long-term incentive compensation. We use the median of the market as our reference point for managing total compensation. To ensure our NEOs focus on the long term, their total compensation is heavily weighted towards their long-term incentives. This approach mitigates the need for executives to take significant risks to earn average competitive compensation and also ensures that the interests of our executives are closely aligned with those of our shareholders.
Funding Funding for the plans is included in our annual operating plan and adjusted throughout the year based on actual and projected performance.
Controls and Processes Performance and payout targets are set by the Committee. The Committee determines, at the end of the performance period, payout under the plans based on their assessment of company performance relative to the goals. Amounts paid to any officer under our annual bonus or long-term incentive compensation plans are subject to recovery in accordance with our clawback policy.
Other Risk Mitigating Factors We have stock ownership requirements for all officers that ensure the interests of our leaders and shareholders are aligned. We also prohibit officers from engaging in forms of hedging or monetization transactions involving the establishment of a short position in our securities and from entering into any arrangement that, directly or indirectly, involves the use of our securities as collateral for a loan.
Exclusion of Unusual Items The Committee has discretion to adjust performance results that reflect significant transactions or other unusual items, if such events were not anticipated at the time the goals were initially established. We believe allowing these exclusions ensures our executives will focus on the merits of proposed transactions for Albemarle, rather than the effect a proposed action may have on incentive compensation.
The Committee reviewed the findings of the assessment and concluded that our compensation programs are designed with the appropriate balance of risk and reward in relation to our overall business strategy and that our compensation programs do not create disproportionate incentives for our employees to take risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

44


2022 COMPENSATION DECISIONS AND OUTCOMES
2022 Base Salaries
The base salary of each NEO was reviewed with an April 1, 2022 effective date, as summarized in the chart below. The Committee concluded that the changes are reasonable and appropriate after considering a competitive analysis of market data of our compensation peer group provided by the Committee’s independent compensation consultant, the recommendations of our CEO, other than with respect to his own base salary, and other factors described in this proxy statement. Consequently, in 2022, the Committee increased the base salaries for each of our then-current NEOs to reflect each individual’s responsibilities and performance and to increase their base salaries to more market-competitive levels.
Executive Officer 2021 Year-End Base Salary 2022 Increase in Annualized Base Salary 2022 Annualized Base Salary
J. Kent Masters, Jr.
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer $ 1,100,000  $ 55,000  $ 1,155,000 
Scott A. Tozier
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer $ 628,899  $ 31,445  $ 660,344 
Eric W. Norris
President, Lithium $ 580,663  $ 29,033  $ 609,696 
Netha N. Johnson, Jr.
President, Bromine $ 556,200  $ 27,810  $ 584,010 
Kristin M. Coleman
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary $ —  $ —  $ 653,000 
Note: Ms. Coleman joined the Company on November 28, 2022.
2022 Annual Incentive Program (AIP)
For all NEOs, performance under the AIP is measured 85% based on business performance and 15% on individual performance. "Business performance" for this purpose is defined (i) as performance of the Company for executives in Corporate roles, such as CEO, CFO, and Executive Vice President, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary (including Messrs. Masters and Tozier and Ms. Coleman), as performance of the Company, and (ii) as a combination of GBU and Company performance (with a weighting of 59.5% and 25.5%, respectively) for Global Business Uni. For 2022, the Committee established the AIP metrics, including the weighting of each metric and payout opportunities at threshold, target and superior performance levels, shown in the tables below.
Corporate Roles
Metrics and Weighting Adjusted EBITDA Adjusted Cash Flow from Operations Stewardship Individual Performance
Corporate Corporate Corporate
Corporate Roles 50.0% 25.0% 10.0% 15.0%
Weighted Payout Opportunities Adjusted EBITDA Adjusted Cash Flow from Operations Stewardship Individual Performance
Corporate Corporate Corporate
Threshold 25.0% 12.5% N/A 0%-30%
Target 50.0% 25.0% 10.0% 0%-30%
Superior 100.0% 50.0% 20.0% 0%-30%
45


GBU Presidents
Metrics and Weighting Adjusted EBITDA Adjusted Cash Flow from Operations Stewardship Individual Performance
Corporate GBU Corporate GBU Corporate GBU
GBU Presidents 15.0% 35.0% 7.5% 17.5% 3.0% 7.0% 15.0%
Weighted Payout Opportunities Adjusted EBITDA Adjusted Cash Flow from Operations Stewardship Individual Performance
Corporate GBU Corporate GBU Corporate GBU
Threshold 7.50% 17.50% 3.75% 8.750% N/A N/A 0%-30%
Target 15.0% 35.0% 7.5% 17.5% 3.0% 7.0% 0%-30%
Superior 30.0% 70.0% 15.0% 35.0% 6.0% 14.0% 0%-30%
Threshold performance of Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Cash Flow from Operations pays out at 50% of the target level. Stewardship performance below target does not result in any payout. For performance at the superior level, payout doubles for all three metrics, compared to payout at target. Linear interpolation is used to determine awards for performance between the identified points. Individual performance pays out between 0% and 30%.
Performance in 2022 against our 2022 AIP Metrics
Different plans apply to the NEOs based on their Corporate or GBU responsibility:
The Corporate Plan applies to Messrs. Masters and Tozier and Ms. Coleman.
The Lithium Plan applies to Mr. Norris.
The Bromine Plan applies to Mr. Johnson.
The following tables summarize the threshold, target, and superior performance levels set by the Committee for 2022 and the actual results achieved in 2022 for the Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Cash Flow from Operations metrics under each of the plans that apply to our NEOs. In determining the actual results for 2022 relative to business targets set for 2022, the Committee did not exercise discretion.
46


Corporate Plan
Corporate Performance Range Performance
Financial Performance in Millions USD Weight Threshold 85% Target 100% Superior 115% In Millions USD Performance Relative to Target
Adjusted EBITDA 50% $1,054 $1,240 $1,426 $3,476 280%
Adjusted Cash Flow from Operations 25% $700 $824 $948 $2,290 278%
Stewardship Weight N/A Target Superior In Numbers Performance Relative to Target
Occupational Safety OSHA Recordable Rate 4.0% N/A ≤0.26 ≤0.15 0.14 209.1%
Process Safety Severity Score 3.0% N/A ≤17 ≤7 12.00 150.0%
Environment Level 2 Environmental Incidents 3.0% N/A ≤11 ≤4 6.00 171.4%
Payout Opportunity 50% 100% 200% Total business performance payout* 165.1%
* Additional individual performance opportunity of between 0-30%. Total Company payout is not to exceed the calculated Company performance plus an average of 15% for individual performance.
Lithium Plan
Lithium Performance Range Performance
Financial Performance in Millions USD Weight Threshold 85% Target 100% Superior 115% In Millions USD Performance Relative to Target
Adjusted EBITDA 35% $711 $836 $961 $3,096 370%
Adjusted Cash Flow from Operations 17.5% $475 $559 $643 $2,311 413%
Stewardship Weight N/A Target Superior In Numbers Performance Relative to Target
Occupational Safety OSHA Recordable Rate 2.8% N/A ≤0.30 ≤0.18 0.16 216.7%
Process Safety Severity Score 2.1% N/A ≤9 ≤3 4.00 183.3%
Environment Level 2 Environmental Incidents 2.1% N/A ≤3 ≤1 2.00 150.0%
Payout Opportunity 50% 100% 200% Total business performance payout* 164.9%
* Additional individual performance opportunity of between 0-30%. Total Company payout is not to exceed the calculated Company performance plus an average of 15% for individual performance.
47


Bromine Plan
Bromine Performance Range Performance
Financial Performance in Millions USD Weight Threshold 85% Target 100% Superior 115% In Millions USD Performance Relative to Target
Adjusted EBITDA 35% $340 $400 $460 $474 119%
Adjusted Cash Flow from Operations 17.5% $358 $421 $484 $456 108%
Stewardship Weight N/A Target Superior In Numbers Performance Relative to Target
Occupational Safety OSHA Recordable Rate 2.8% N/A ≤0.31 ≤0.19 0.28 125.0%
Process Safety Severity Score 2.1% N/A ≤6 ≤2 8.00 0.0%
Environment Level 2 Environmental Incidents 2.1% N/A ≤4 ≤1 4.00 100.0%
Payout Opportunity 50% 100% 200% Total business performance payout* 150.1%
* Additional individual performance opportunity of between 0-30%. Total Company payout is not to exceed the calculated Company performance plus an average of 15% for individual performance.
AIP Payout History
The following graph illustrates the 2022 AIP payout for the Corporate Plan against payout levels over the previous years, with the payout representing a combination of Company and individual performance. We believe the fluctuations in payout confirm the actual correlation of pay-for-performance at Albemarle.
alb-20230321_g18.jpg
48


AIP earning opportunity for our NEOs
Under the AIP, each of our current NEOs can earn a bonus targeted at a certain percentage of their base salary. For 2022, our NEOs’ target bonus percentages were 135% (Mr. Masters), 80% (Mr. Tozier, Norris, Johnson and Ms. Coleman) for achieving target performance levels for Company and individual performance combined. The Committee concluded that the changes in bonus target levels are reasonable and appropriate after considering a competitive analysis of market data of our compensation peer group provided by the Committee’s independent compensation consultant, the recommendations of our CEO, other than with respect to his own base salary, and other factors described in this proxy statement. Consequently, in 2022, the Committee increased the bonus target level for the CEO from 125% to 135% and the bonus target levels for Mr. Norris and Mr. Johnson from 75% to 80% to reflect each individual’s responsibilities and performance and to increase their base salaries to more market-competitive levels.
Actual earnings for our NEOs under the 2022 AIP
The Committee reviewed the Company’s 2022 performance and determined that the potential awards for the NEOs were funded consistent with the plan metrics set during the first quarter of the year. After this determination was made, Mr. Masters engaged the Committee in a further discussion of the Company’s performance and of each NEO’s individual performance compared to their objectives. In light of the accomplishments by each NEO that were cited by Mr. Masters to the Committee, it was recommended by Mr. Masters and approved by the Committee that the individual performance-related payout for each NEO be set as follows: Mr. Tozier 17.5%, Mr. Norris 17.5%, Mr. Johnson 25%, and, Ms. Coleman 17.5%.
In the case of Mr. Masters, in early 2023 the Board assessed his performance against his 2022 goals, which included: Financial and Shareholder Value, Customer Experience, Growth, Platform for Growth, Talent, Sustainability, Manufacturing Excellence, Working with the Board. The Committee determined that an individual performance payout of 25% was appropriate given performance against these measures.
When applied to and combined with the Company score, this yielded actual bonus payouts for each NEO shown in the table below.
2022 AIP Payouts
Name Eligible Earnings X Target
Bonus
%
= Target
Bonus
Amount
X Payout Based on (Company Performance + Individual Performance) = Actual
Bonus
Amount
J. Kent Masters, Jr. $ 1,141,438  x 135% = $ 1,540,942  x 165.1% + 25.0% = $ 2,929,916 
Scott A. Tozier $ 652,590  x 80% = $ 522,072  x 165.1% + 17.5% = $ 953,502 
Eric W. Norris $ 602,537  x 80% = $ 482,029  x 164.9% + 17.5% = $ 879,222 
Netha N. Johnson, Jr. $ 577,153  x 80% = $ 461,722  x 150.1% + 25.0% = $ 808,365 
Kristin M. Coleman $ 60,827  x 80% = $ 48,662  x 165.1% + 17.5% = $ 88,875 
Note: Ms. Coleman joined the Company on November 28, 2022, and thus her bonus was prorated for the year.
Long Term Incentives
PSU results for the 2020-2022 performance period
2020-2022 Relative Total Shareholder Return. For the 2020 PSU grants, 50% of the performance was based on the achievement of TSR performance relative to our 2020 Peer Group over a three-year performance period. The original 2020 Peer Group included 16 companies. One company
49


(W.R. Grace) was acquired during the period and was therefore not included in the rTSR calculation. Our rTSR for the period placed us at the 99th percentile relative to our 2020 Peer Group.
The following table illustrates threshold, target, and superior relative performance levels and the percentage of the target grant earned for each performance level. Results between threshold and target, and target and superior performance, are interpolated. The table also includes the relative performance result and the percentage of grants earned as determined by the Committee.
2020 rTSR PSU Grant Metrics
Threshold Target Superior Actual Result
Percentile performance relative to the 2020 Peer Group 25th 50th 75th 99th
% of Grants Earned 50% 100% 200% 200%
The following table shows the rTSR PSU grants approved in February 2020 by the Committee for the NEOs and the grant values approved by the Committee in February 2023 after it determined the 2020-2022 rTSR relative performance results.
2020 rTSR PSU Grants
Number of Units Number of Units Number of Units
at Threshold at Target at Superior 2020 Earned PSUs
50% 100% 200%
J. Kent Masters, Jr.
Scott A. Tozier 1,680 3,360 6,720 6,720
Eric W. Norris 1,680 3,360 6,720 6,720
Netha N. Johnson, Jr. 1,680 3,360 6,720 6,720
Kristin M. Coleman
Note: Mr. Masters and Ms. Coleman joined the Company after these grants were made.
2020-2022 Return on Invested Capital. For the 2020 PSU grants, 50% of the performance was based on ROIC relative to the target set at the beginning of the three-year performance period. ROIC performance was calculated for each calendar year during the three-year performance period and averaged over the three-year performance period. The target level of 10% was set in light of the significant investments planned for the period and with the expectation that for some investments the returns would fall outside the performance period.
The following table illustrates threshold, target, and superior relative ROIC performance levels and the percentage of the target grant earned for each performance level. Results between threshold and target, and target and superior performance, are interpolated. The table also includes the relative ROIC performance result and the percentage of grants earned as determined by the Committee.
2020 ROIC PSU Grant Metrics
Threshold Target Superior Actual Result
ROIC 9% 10% 12% 15.80%
% of Grants Earned 50% 100% 200% 200%
50


The following table shows the ROIC PSU grants approved in February 2020 by the Committee for the NEOs and the ROIC PSU grant values approved by the Committee in February 2022 after it determined the 2020-2022 performance results.
2020 ROIC PSU Grants
Number of Units Number of Units Number of Units 2020 Earned
at Threshold at Target at Superior PSUs
50% 100% 200%
J. Kent Masters, Jr.
Scott A. Tozier 1,680 3,360 6,720 6,720
Eric W. Norris 1,680 3,360 6,720 6,720
Netha N. Johnson, Jr. 1,680 3,360 6,720 6,720
Kristen Coleman
Note: Mr. Masters and Ms. Coleman joined the Company after these grants were made.
2022 LTIP Grants
In February 2022, the Committee approved a total grant value for the NEOs under the LTIP. The values granted to each NEO are set forth below, as well as the approximate percentage apportioned in the form of PSUs, RSUs, and stock options. As part of her employment with the Company on November 28, 2022, Ms. Coleman received 9,395 RSUs (to offset the loss of equity at her former company). The RSUs vest 100% on the third anniversary of the grant date subject to her continued employment.
2022 Grants
Value Granted Stock Options RSUs PSUs
J. Kent Masters, Jr. $6,500,000 25% 25% 50%
Scott A. Tozier $1,100,000 25% 25% 50%
Eric W. Norris $1,350,000 25% 25% 50%
Netha N. Johnson, Jr. $1,350,000 25% 25% 50%
Kristin M. Coleman $2,500,000 —% 100% —%
The number of PSUs and RSUs granted were based on the stock closing price at the grant date. The number of stock options was determined using the Black Scholes value of the options. The number of PSUs assume target achievement of performance metrics.
PSU Grants
The performance-based PSU grants are based 50% on the Company's TSR relative to our 2022 Peer Group as measured over a three-year period and 50% based on the Company's ROIC performance as calculated for each calendar year during the three-year performance period and averaged over such period.
51


rTSR PSU Grants
The following table illustrates the number of units granted for performance at threshold, target, and superior levels for the 2022 rTSR PSU grants.
2022 rTSR PSU Grants
Number of Units at Threshold Number of Units at Target Number of Units at Superior
J. Kent Masters, Jr. 2,540 8,466 16,932
Scott A. Tozier 430 1,433 2,866
Eric W. Norris 528 1,759 3,518
Netha N. Johnson, Jr. 528 1,759 3,518
Kristin M. Coleman
The following table illustrates threshold, target, and superior relative performance levels for the rTSR PSUs and the performance of the target grant earned for each performance level. Results between threshold and target, and target and superior performance will be interpolated. Payout will be capped at 100% if absolute TSR is negative.
2022 rTSR PSU Grants
Threshold Target Superior
Percentile performance relative to the 2022 Peer Group 30th 50th 75th
% of Grants Earned 30% 100% 200%
Adjusted ROIC PSU Grants
The following table illustrates the number of units granted for performance at threshold, target, and superior levels for the Adjusted ROIC PSU grants.
2022 Adjusted ROIC PSU Grants
Number of Units at Threshold Number of Units at Target Number of Units at Superior
J. Kent Masters, Jr. 2,540 8,466 16,932
Scott A. Tozier 430 1,433 2,866
Eric W. Norris 528 1,759 3,518
Netha N. Johnson, Jr. 528 1,759 3,518
Kristin M. Coleman
52


The 2022 Adjusted ROIC PSU grant is measured against adjusted ROIC performance levels set by the Committee. ROIC is calculated for each calendar year during the three-year performance period and averaged over such period, and is determined using the following formula:
Annual Adjusted ROIC = Earnings Before Taxes + Depreciation/Amortization - CAPEX Maintenance
Average Gross Investment (Gross PP&E + Working Capital - Major Construction in Progress not generating revenue)
CAPEX = Capital Expenditures
PP&E = Property Plant and Equipment
For assets that are generating revenue for less than 6 months of the calendar year, we subtract CAPEX from the denominator, while subtracting the associated EBITDA for those assets from the numerator.
The following table illustrates the percentage of the target Adjusted ROIC grant earned for each performance level. Results between threshold and target, and target and superior performance will be interpolated.
2022 Adjusted ROIC PSU Grants
Threshold Target Superior
% of Grants Earned 30% 100% 200%
Performance and payout opportunities reflect the dual character of both rTSR and Adjusted ROIC PSU grants:
The grants are performance-based to ensure payout opportunities are aligned with shareholder interests.
The grants are also competitive in nature and as such reflect performance and payout opportunities aligned with our compensation peer group and the broader market in which we compete for talent.
All shares earned will vest in early 2025 at the time the Committee evaluates the three-year performance for both rTSR and ROIC. For Mr. Masters, the shares earned will become non-forfeitable on the earlier of December 31, 2023 or the date the Company appoints a new Chief Executive Officer.
RSU Grants
In February 2022, the Committee approved grants of RSU awards to our NEOs, as follows. Ms. Coleman's RSUs were granted at the time of her employment on November 28, 2022.
2022 RSU Grants
J. Kent Masters, Jr. 8,466
Scott A. Tozier 1,433
Eric W. Norris 1,759
Netha N. Johnson, Jr. 1,759
Kristin M. Coleman 9,395
All of the RSUs will vest on the third anniversary of the grant date in 2025. For Mr. Masters, the RSUs will become non-forfeitable on the earlier of December 31, 2023 or the date the Company appoints a new Chief Executive Officer.
53


Stock Option Grants
In February 2022, the Committee approved grants of stock options to our NEOs, as follows:
2022 Stock Option Grants
J. Kent Masters, Jr. 25,794
Scott A. Tozier 4,366
Eric W. Norris 5,358
Netha N. Johnson, Jr. 5,358
Kristin M. Coleman
The stock options vest and become exercisable on the third anniversary of the grant date in 2025, and expire ten years from the date of the grant. For Mr. Masters, the stock options will become non-forfeitable on the earlier of December 31, 2023 or the date the Company appoints a new Chief Executive Officer, but will not be exercisable until the third anniversary of the grant date.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Executive Benefits
The Company provides NEOs other benefits generally provided to other Albemarle employees, including:
Health and dental insurance (the Company pays a portion of costs);
Basic life insurance;
Long-term disability insurance;
Participation in the Albemarle Corporation Savings Plan (“Savings Plan”)*, including Company matching and Defined Contribution Pension Benefit ("DCPB")* contributions;
Participation in the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan ("EDCP")*; and
Matching charitable contributions.
___________________________________________________
See page 67 for additional information on the Savings Plan, DCPB, and EDCP.
Perquisites
Our perquisites are not a significant element of our compensation program. They are limited in nature and focused on areas directly related to a business purpose or help to foster the health, security, and well-being of our senior executives for the benefit of the Company.
When an NEO is required to relocate geographically in order to join the Company, or is asked to relocate due to a change in their work location after joining the Company, we provide them with the same relocation package that is offered to management and senior professional employees. Certain relocation expenses are grossed-up for taxes, as is the competitive practice within our Peer Group and, more broadly, in the general marketplace.
We also offer executives physical exams and limited reimbursement for financial planning. We do not provide tax gross-ups on such amounts to NEOs.
54


Post-Termination Payments
We believe that providing our executives, including our NEOs, with reasonable severance benefits aligns their interests with shareholders’ interests in the context of potential change in control transactions. We also believe that such benefits help facilitate our recruitment and retention of senior executive talent.
Consistent with this philosophy, we maintain a Severance Pay Plan that provides severance payments to certain of our employees if we terminate their employment without "cause" due to (a) a request that they relocate and they elect not to do so or (b) we eliminate their position or have a change in our organizational structure with a similar effect.
We entered into severance compensation agreements with each of our NEOs, providing for severance payments in the event of a change in control-related termination. None of these severance compensation agreements includes an excise tax gross-up.
The Committee periodically reviews our post-employment compensation arrangements taking into consideration best practices, and believes that these arrangements are generally consistent with arrangements currently being offered by our Peer Group. The Committee has determined that both the terms and payout levels are appropriate to accomplish our stated objectives. The Committee also considered the non-competition agreement that we would receive from the NEO in exchange for any post-employment termination benefits. Based on these considerations, the Committee believes that such arrangements are appropriate and reasonable.
For additional information with respect to change in control arrangements, please see “Potential Payments upon Termination” beginning on page 68.
Clawbacks
In 2017, the Company adopted a Compensation Recoupment and Forfeiture Policy, and in the event misconduct by any employee results in a financial restatement, as more specifically defined in the policy, the policy requires that our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer reimburse the Company for (i) the gross amount of any bonus or other incentive-based or equity-based compensation received by such officer from the Company during the 12-month period following the date the document required to be restated was first publicly issued or filed (whichever occurs first) with the SEC and (ii) any profits realized from the sale of securities of the Company during such 12-month period. The policy further requires any employee who engaged in such misconduct to reimburse the Company the same amounts set forth in (i) and (ii) above applicable to that employee, and requires any such employee whose employment is terminated for cause to forfeit all unpaid cash-based incentive compensation under our 2017 Incentive Plan (whether or not accrued and/or payable at such time) and all unvested equity-based awards (whether or not earned at such time), in each case as of the date such employee is notified of termination of his or her employment for cause (as defined under the policy). We expect to amend the policy in fiscal year ending December 31, 2023 to reflect new incentive-based compensation recovery rules (anticipated to be) established by the NYSE pursuant to Dodd-Frank Act.
In addition, in 2018 we disclosed that based on an internal investigation, we voluntarily self-reported potential issues relating to the use of third party sales representatives in our Refining Solutions business, within our Catalysts segment, to the U.S. Department of Justice (the "DOJ"), the SEC, and the Dutch Public Prosecutor (the "DPP") and are cooperating with the DOJ, the SEC, and the DPP in their review of these matters. In connection with our internal investigation, we have implemented, and are continuing to implement, appropriate remedial measures. We have commenced discussions with the SEC about a potential resolution. Our Board of Directors determined, as a prudent governance measure while the investigation is pending, to condition payment to each of our NEOs for fiscal year 2017 (the "2017 NEO’s" and each a "2017 NEO") the cash incentive bonus for fiscal year 2017 (the “2017 cash incentive”)
55


on each 2017 NEO executing a clawback agreement applicable to the 2017 cash incentive. Accordingly, in February 2018, the Company entered into a clawback agreement with each of our 2017 NEOs and other executives at that time. The clawback agreements supplement the Company’s existing policy described above and provide that each 2017 NEO's 2017 cash incentive is subject to clawback by the Company in the event that the Committee determines that, with respect to the Company’s internal investigation or the government’s review of these matters following such self-report, the NEO: (1) engaged in unlawful conduct or misconduct; (2) failed to cooperate in any related investigation; (3) violated the Company’s Code of Conduct or any other Company policy; or (4) failed to exercise appropriate supervision or oversight.
Deductability of Executive Compensation
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally places a $1 million annual deduction limit on compensation paid to “covered employees,” which includes our NEOs. The Committee makes compensation decisions based on our guiding compensation principles and the interests of shareholders, even if such compensation is non-deductible by the Company.
Taxation of "Parachute" Payments and Deferred Compensation
We do not provide our NEOs with a “gross-up” or other reimbursement payment for any tax liability that they might owe because of the application of Sections 280G, 4999, or 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. Sections 280G and 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code provide that executive officers, directors who hold significant equity interests in our Company, and certain other service providers may be subject to an excise tax if they receive payments or benefits in connection with a change in control of the Company that exceeds certain prescribed limits, and that the Company, or a successor, may forfeit a deduction on the amounts subject to this additional tax. Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code also imposes additional significant taxes on an executive officer, director or other service provider to the Company in the event that they receive “deferred compensation” that does not meet certain requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
We follow The Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, or ASC Topic 718, for our stock-based awards. ASC Topic 718 requires companies to measure the compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees and directors, including stock options, RSU awards, and performance share awards (including PSUs), based on the grant date “fair value” of these awards. This calculation is performed for accounting purposes and reported in the compensation tables below for equity awards to our NEOs as required by the applicable SEC rules. ASC Topic 718 also requires companies to recognize the compensation cost of their stock-based compensation awards in their income statements over the period that the recipient of such compensation is required to render service in exchange for the option or other award. For performance unit awards (including PSUs), stock-based compensation expense recognized may be adjusted over the performance period based on interim estimates of performance against pre-set objectives.
56


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
The Executive Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement with management and, based on such review and discussion, recommended to the Board of Directors that it be included in this Proxy Statement.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
Alejandro D. Wolff, Chair
Diarmuid B. O'Connell
Dean L. Seavers
Holly A. Van Deursen
57


COMPENSATION TABLES AND OTHER INFORMATION
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The following table presents information for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020 relating to total compensation of our CEO, CFO, and the three other highest paid executive officers (the “NEOs”).

Summary Compensation Table
Name and Principal Position
Year(1)
Salary
($)
(2)
Bonus
($)
(3)
Stock Awards
($)
(4)(5)
Option Awards
($)
(4)(6)
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation
($)(7)
Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings
($)
All Other Compensation
($)
(8)
Total
($)
J. Kent Masters, Jr. 2022 $ 1,139,346  $ —  $ 5,044,043  $ 1,625,022  $ 2,929,916  $ —  $ 379,829  $ 11,118,156 
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer 2021 $ 1,071,923  $ —  $ 4,177,432  $ 1,375,013  $ 2,181,372  $ —  $ 235,013  $ 9,040,753 
2020 $ 667,053  $ —  $ 3,248,889  $ —  $ 908,807  $ —  $ 114,620  $ 4,939,369 
Scott A. Tozier 2022 $ 651,394  $ 150  $ 853,781  $ 275,058  $ 953,502  $ —  $ 175,024  $ 2,908,909 
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer