0000915913DEF
14Afalse00009159132022-01-012022-12-310000915913alb:MastersJrMember2022-01-012022-12-31iso4217:USD0000915913alb:MastersJrMember2021-01-012021-12-3100009159132021-01-012021-12-310000915913alb:MastersJrMember2020-01-012020-12-310000915913alb:LutherCKissamIVMember2020-01-012020-12-3100009159132020-01-012020-12-310000915913alb:EquityAwardsGrantedDuringTheYearUnvestedMemberalb:MastersJrMember2022-01-012022-12-310000915913ecd:PeoMemberalb:MastersJrMemberalb:EquityAwardsGrantedInPriorYearsUnvestedMember2022-01-012022-12-310000915913alb:EquityAwardsGrantedDuringTheYearVestedMemberecd:PeoMemberalb:MastersJrMember2022-01-012022-12-310000915913ecd:PeoMemberalb:MastersJrMemberalb:EquityAwardsGrantedInPriorYearsVestedMember2022-01-012022-12-310000915913ecd:PeoMemberalb:MastersJrMemberalb:EquityAwardsThatFailedToMeetVestingConditionsMember2022-01-012022-12-310000915913alb:EquityAwardsValueOfDividendsAndOtherEarningsPaidAdjustmentMemberecd:PeoMemberalb:MastersJrMember2022-01-012022-12-310000915913ecd:PeoMemberalb:EquityAwardAdjustmentsMemberalb:MastersJrMember2022-01-012022-12-310000915913alb:EquityAwardsGrantedDuringTheYearUnvestedMemberalb:MastersJrMember2021-01-012021-12-310000915913ecd:PeoMemberalb:MastersJrMemberalb:EquityAwardsGrantedInPriorYearsUnvestedMember2021-01-012021-12-310000915913alb:EquityAwardsGrantedDuringTheYearVestedMemberecd:PeoMemberalb:MastersJrMember2021-01-012021-12-310000915913ecd:PeoMemberalb:EquityAwardAdjustmentsMemberalb:MastersJrMember2021-01-012021-12-310000915913alb:EquityAwardsGrantedDuringTheYearUnvestedMemberalb:MastersJrMember2020-01-012020-12-310000915913ecd:PeoMemberalb:MastersJrMemberalb:EquityAwardsGrantedInPriorYearsUnvestedMember2020-01-012020-12-310000915913alb:EquityAwardsGrantedDuringTheYearVestedMemberecd:PeoMemberalb:MastersJrMember2020-01-012020-12-310000915913ecd:PeoMemberalb:MastersJrMemberalb:EquityAwardsGrantedInPriorYearsVestedMember2020-01-012020-12-310000915913ecd:PeoMemberalb:MastersJrMemberalb:EquityAwardsThatFailedToMeetVestingConditionsMember2020-01-012020-12-310000915913alb:EquityAwardsValueOfDividendsAndOtherEarningsPaidAdjustmentMemberecd:PeoMemberalb:MastersJrMember2020-01-012020-12-310000915913ecd:PeoMemberalb:EquityAwardAdjustmentsMemberalb:MastersJrMember2020-01-012020-12-310000915913ecd:PeoMemberalb:LutherCKissamIVMemberalb:PensionAdjustmentsServiceCostMember2020-01-012020-12-310000915913alb:LutherCKissamIVMemberalb:EquityAwardsGrantedDuringTheYearUnvestedMember2020-01-012020-12-310000915913ecd:PeoMemberalb:LutherCKissamIVMemberalb:EquityAwardsGrantedInPriorYearsUnvestedMember2020-01-012020-12-310000915913alb:EquityAwardsGrantedDuringTheYearVestedMemberecd:PeoMemberalb:LutherCKissamIVMember2020-01-012020-12-310000915913ecd:PeoMemberalb:LutherCKissamIVMemberalb:EquityAwardsGrantedInPriorYearsVestedMember2020-01-012020-12-310000915913ecd:PeoMemberalb:LutherCKissamIVMemberalb:EquityAwardsThatFailedToMeetVestingConditionsMember2020-01-012020-12-310000915913alb:EquityAwardsValueOfDividendsAndOtherEarningsPaidAdjustmentMemberecd:PeoMemberalb:LutherCKissamIVMember2020-01-012020-12-310000915913ecd:PeoMemberalb:LutherCKissamIVMemberalb:EquityAwardAdjustmentsMember2020-01-012020-12-310000915913alb:EquityAwardsGrantedDuringTheYearUnvestedMember2022-01-012022-12-310000915913ecd:NonPeoNeoMemberalb:EquityAwardsGrantedInPriorYearsUnvestedMember2022-01-012022-12-310000915913alb:EquityAwardsGrantedDuringTheYearVestedMemberecd:NonPeoNeoMember2022-01-012022-12-310000915913ecd:NonPeoNeoMemberalb:EquityAwardsGrantedInPriorYearsVestedMember2022-01-012022-12-310000915913ecd:NonPeoNeoMemberalb:EquityAwardsThatFailedToMeetVestingConditionsMember2022-01-012022-12-310000915913ecd:NonPeoNeoMemberalb:EquityAwardsValueOfDividendsAndOtherEarningsPaidAdjustmentMember2022-01-012022-12-310000915913ecd:NonPeoNeoMemberalb:EquityAwardAdjustmentsMember2022-01-012022-12-310000915913alb:EquityAwardsGrantedDuringTheYearUnvestedMember2021-01-012021-12-310000915913ecd:NonPeoNeoMemberalb:EquityAwardsGrantedInPriorYearsUnvestedMember2021-01-012021-12-310000915913alb:EquityAwardsGrantedDuringTheYearVestedMemberecd:NonPeoNeoMember2021-01-012021-12-310000915913ecd:NonPeoNeoMemberalb:EquityAwardsGrantedInPriorYearsVestedMember2021-01-012021-12-310000915913ecd:NonPeoNeoMemberalb:EquityAwardsThatFailedToMeetVestingConditionsMember2021-01-012021-12-310000915913ecd:NonPeoNeoMemberalb:EquityAwardsValueOfDividendsAndOtherEarningsPaidAdjustmentMember2021-01-012021-12-310000915913ecd:NonPeoNeoMemberalb:EquityAwardAdjustmentsMember2021-01-012021-12-310000915913alb:EquityAwardsGrantedDuringTheYearUnvestedMember2020-01-012020-12-310000915913ecd:NonPeoNeoMemberalb:EquityAwardsGrantedInPriorYearsUnvestedMember2020-01-012020-12-310000915913alb:EquityAwardsGrantedDuringTheYearVestedMemberecd:NonPeoNeoMember2020-01-012020-12-310000915913ecd:NonPeoNeoMemberalb:EquityAwardsGrantedInPriorYearsVestedMember2020-01-012020-12-310000915913ecd:NonPeoNeoMemberalb:EquityAwardsThatFailedToMeetVestingConditionsMember2020-01-012020-12-310000915913ecd:NonPeoNeoMemberalb:EquityAwardsValueOfDividendsAndOtherEarningsPaidAdjustmentMember2020-01-012020-12-310000915913ecd:NonPeoNeoMemberalb:EquityAwardAdjustmentsMember2020-01-012020-12-31000091591312022-01-012022-12-310000915913ecd:PeoMember12022-01-012022-12-310000915913ecd:PeoMember22022-01-012022-12-310000915913ecd:PeoMember32022-01-012022-12-31
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
______________________________________________________________________________________
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filed by the Registrant |
X |
|
|
|
|
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant |
|
|
Check the appropriate box:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
|
|
|
|
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule
14a-6(e)(2)) |
|
|
|
X |
|
Definitive Proxy Statement |
|
|
|
|
|
Definitive Additional Materials |
|
|
|
|
|
Soliciting Material Under Rule 14a-12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ALBEMARLE CORPORATION |
(Name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
N/A |
(Name of person(s) filing proxy statement, if other than the
registrant) |
Payment of Filing Fee (Check all boxes that apply):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
No fee required. |
|
|
|
|
|
Fee paid with preliminary materials. |
|
|
|
|
|
Fee computed on table on exhibit required by Item 25(b) per
Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|
|
|
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Albemarle Corporation 2023 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”) will be held at
Albemarle Corporation, 4250 Congress Street, Charlotte, North
Carolina 28209, on Tuesday, May 2, 2023, at 7:00 a.m., Eastern
Time, for the following purposes:
1.Elect
the
ten nominees
named in the accompanying Proxy Statement to the Board of Directors
to serve for the ensuing year or until their successors are duly
elected and qualified;
2.Approve
the compensation of our named executive officers, on a non-binding
advisory basis, as disclosed in the accompanying Proxy
Statement;
3.Recommend
the frequency of future advisory votes on the compensation of our
named executive officers, on a non-binding advisory
basis;
4.Ratify
the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent
registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2023;
5.Approve
the 2023 Stock Compensation and Deferral Election Plan for
Non-Employee
Directors; and
6.Transact
any other business properly brought before the Annual Meeting or
any adjournments or postponements thereof.
Only shareholders of record at the close of business on Tuesday,
March 7, 2023, are entitled to receive notice of and vote at
the Annual Meeting.
To ensure your vote is counted, you are requested to vote your
shares promptly, regardless of whether you expect to attend the
Annual Meeting. Voting by the Internet or telephone is fast and
convenient, and your vote is immediately tabulated. In addition, by
using the Internet or telephone, you help reduce our postage and
proxy tabulation costs. You may also vote by completing, signing,
dating, and returning by Monday, May 1, 2023, the proxy
enclosed with paper copies of the materials in the postage-paid
envelope provided.
This year, we are again electronically disseminating Annual Meeting
materials to some of our shareholders, as permitted under the
“Notice and Access” rules approved by the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). Shareholders to whom Notice
and Access applies will receive a Notice of Internet Availability
of Proxy Materials ("Notice") containing instructions on how to
access Annual Meeting materials via the Internet. The Notice also
provides instructions on how to obtain paper copies if
desired.
If you are present at the Annual Meeting, you may vote in person
even if you already voted your proxy by the Internet, telephone, or
mail. Seating at the Annual Meeting will be on a first-come
basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By Order of the Board of Directors |
|
|
|
Kristin M. Coleman |
|
Executive Vice President, General Counsel |
|
and Corporate Secretary |
Approximate Date of Mailing of Proxy Materials or
Notice of Internet Availability:
March 21, 2023
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
This summary provides an overview and highlights information
contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement (“Proxy Statement”).
This summary does not contain all information that you should
consider, and you should read the entire Proxy Statement carefully,
before voting. Throughout the Proxy Statement, “we,” “us,” “our,”
“Company,” and “Albemarle” refer to Albemarle Corporation, a
Virginia corporation.
Annual Meeting
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date and Time |
Place |
Tuesday, May 2, 2023
|
Albemarle Corporation |
7:00 a.m., Eastern Time |
4250 Congress Street |
|
Charlotte, North Carolina 28209 |
Voting Matters
The following table summarizes the proposals to be considered at
the Annual Meeting and voting recommendation of our Board of
Directors (“Board of Directors” or “Board”) with respect to each
proposal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voting Matter |
Board Vote
Recommendation |
Proposal 1: |
Election of Directors |
FOR
each Nominee |
Proposal 2: |
Approval of Named Executive Officers’ Compensation, on a
non-binding advisory basis (Say-on-Pay) |
FOR |
Proposal 3: |
Recommendation on Frequency of Future Advisory Votes on the
Compensation of our Named Executive Officers, on a non-binding
advisory basis (Say-on-Frequency) |
"1 YEAR" |
Proposal 4: |
Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm |
FOR |
Proposal 5: |
Approve the 2023 Stock Compensation and Deferral Election Plan for
Non-Employee
Directors
|
FOR |
2022 Financial Highlights
Our exceptional 2022 performance is the result of asset
positioning, operational discipline, and a healthy balance sheet.
Our 2022 growth came from both volume and a new contracting
strategy that has allowed us to take advantage of strong lithium
markets. Our investments to accelerate growth and nurture
technological innovation support our current performance and
position us for future continued profitable growth.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales of $7.3 billion, more than double 2021 Net
Sales |
|
Cash Flows from Operations of $1.9 billion and positive free
cash flow |
|
Diluted EPS of $22.84, more than 21 times that of
2021 |
|
We increased our quarterly dividend for the 28th consecutive
year |
|
Our Purpose, Strategy, and Transformational Impact
Areas
We are committed to building a more resilient world:
Albemarle is a global leader in transforming essential resources
such as lithium and bromine into critical ingredients for modern
living. Together with our world-class resources, technical and
process knowledge, and safety and sustainability performance, we
partner with our customers to pioneer new ways to move, power,
connect, and protect.
We have a clear strategy to achieve profitable growth and enhance
sustainability:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grow
Profitably |
|
• Expand capacity to meet customer needs and generate
value
• Partner with strategic customers and stakeholders to facilitate
innovation and mutual growth
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximize Productivity |
|
• Deploy operating model to build a scalable platform for
growth
• Grow high-performance culture with best-in-class
capabilities
• Optimize earnings, cash flow and cost structure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Invest
with Discipline |
|
• Allocate capital and manage portfolio to generate long-term
value
• Maintain Investment Grade credit rating and support our
dividend
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advance Sustainability |
|
• Build competitive advantage through industry-leading ESG
performance
• Accelerate sustainability ambitions of customers and
communities
|
We lead the world in transforming essential resources into critical
ingredients around four transformational impact areas:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mobility |
|
• Advancing the future of movement by being a leading provider of
materials that make mobility better and cleaner
• From the battery in electric vehicles, to the initiator for
airbags, Albemarle is fundamental in the development of mobility
products and solutions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy |
|
• Powering the energy transition to meet the rising needs so we can
ensure the world has critical resources for years to
come
• From energy grid storage to the materials
required for energy-efficient buildings, neither would be possible
without Albemarle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Connectivity |
|
• Enabling an always-on world to make technology more consistent
and reliable, so we can continue to innovate more
efficiently
• From fire safety solutions in industrial cabling to the
protective glass on your cell phone, Albemarle makes connecting
safer and more reliable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health |
|
• Improving quality of life by making
health safer and
more attainable today, so the planet and future generations can
continue to thrive
• From ingredients for medicines to disinfection, Albemarle helps
ensure the food we eat is safe and plentiful, the water we drink is
clean, and the environment we live in is here to
stay
|
Governance and Corporate Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Board Independence |
|
• Independent Board, except CEO
• Lead Independent Director
• All Members of the Board's Standing Committees are
Independent
• Regular Executive Sessions of Independent Directors
• Board and Committee Authority to Retain Independent
Advisors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director Elections |
|
• Annual Election of Each Director
• Directors Do Not Stand for Re-election in the Year in Which They
Reach 72 Years of Age
• Resignation Policy for Directors Not Receiving Majority
Approval
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Meeting Attendance |
|
• All Current Directors Attended at Least 75% of the Total Number
of Meetings of our Board and Committees on which the Director
Served in 2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evaluating and Improving Board Performance |
|
• Annual Board and Committee Evaluation Process
• Continuing Director Education
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aligning Our Interests with Shareholders' Interests |
|
• Stock Ownership Guidelines for Directors and Executive
Officers
• Policies Prohibiting Hedging, Short Sale, and Pledging Our Stock
by Directors, Officers, and Employees
• No Shareholder Rights Plan (Poison Pill)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental and Social |
|
• Longstanding Commitment to Sustainability and Corporate
Responsibility
• Annual Sustainability Report Aligned with SASB and GRI
Standards
• Signed CEO Water Mandate in 2022, Expanding our Role with the UN
Global Compact
• CDP Reporting: First Year Scoring of Climate (B) and Water
(C)
• IRMA (Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance) Third-Party
Audit at Salar de Atacama and Self-Assessments at Greenbushes and
Wodgina
• Other 2022 Achievements Included Initial Assessment of Scope 3
GHG Emissions, First Product Life Cycle Assessments, and New
Limited Assurance of Scope 1 and 2 GHG Emissions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
• Annual Say-on-Pay Vote
• Risk Oversight by Full Board and Committees
• Robust Stockholder Engagement Program
• Quarterly Mandatory Information Security Training for All
Employees
|
Our Board of Directors
Our Director Nominees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Primary Occupation |
Age |
Director Since |
Standing Committee Membership |
Independent |
Other Public Company Boards |
M. Lauren Brlas
Former EVP and CFO, Newmont Mining Corporation
|
65 |
2017 |
Audit & Finance (Chair)
Capital Investment
|
Yes |
Three |
Ralf H. Cramer
Former President and CEO, Continental China
|
57 |
2022 |
Audit & Finance
Health, Safety & Environment
|
Yes |
None |
J. Kent Masters, Jr.
Chairman, President & CEO,
Albemarle Corporation
|
62 |
2015;
Chair since 2020 |
None |
No |
None |
Glenda J. Minor
Former SVP & CFO, Evraz North America
|
66 |
2019 |
Audit & Finance
Nominating & Governance
|
Yes |
Two |
James J. O’Brien
(Lead Independent Director)
Former Chairman and CEO,
Ashland Inc.
|
68 |
2012;
Lead Independent Director since 2020 |
Nominating & Governance (Chair)
Audit & Finance
|
Yes |
Two |
Diarmuid B. O’Connell
Former VP, Corporate & Bus. Dev., Tesla Motors
Inc.
|
59 |
2018 |
Executive Compensation
Health, Safety & Environment
|
Yes |
Three |
Dean L. Seavers
Former President, National
Grid U.S.
|
62 |
2018 |
Capital Investment (Chair)
Executive Compensation
|
Yes |
One |
Gerald A. Steiner
Former EVP, Sustainability & Corporate Affairs,
Monsanto
|
62 |
2013 |
Health, Safety & Environment (Chair)
Audit & Finance
|
Yes |
None |
Holly A. Van Deursen
Former Group VP, Petrochemicals, BP Corporation
|
64 |
2019 |
Capital Investment
Executive Compensation
|
Yes |
Two |
Alejandro D. Wolff
Former U.S. Ambassador to Chile
|
66 |
2015 |
Executive Compensation (Chair)
Nominating & Governance
|
Yes |
One |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Independent: 9 of 10 |
|
Average age: 63.1 |
|
Diverse: 5 of 10 |
|
Average tenure: 6.2 years |
Executive Compensation Highlights
Our executive compensation program is designed to attract and
retain highly-qualified executives, motivate our executives to
achieve our overall business objectives, and align our executives’
interests with those of our shareholders. Our compensation
philosophy rewards executives for achieving our financial and
stewardship metrics and building long-term value for our
shareholders and other stakeholders. We follow several other
principles when designing our executive compensation program
including: 1) pay-for-performance, 2) pay benchmarking,
3) aligning interests with our stakeholders, and
4) avoiding poor governance policies. For more information see
"Executive
Compensation Philosophy and Principles"
on page 35.
In line with our compensation principles, our NEOs are primarily
rewarded through performance-based cash and equity incentive
awards. This is intended to both encourage and recognize strong
company performance and stock price growth, further driving
shareholder
value. In 2022, 87% of the target compensation of our Chief
Executive Officer and an average of 73% of
target compensation of our other NEOs was variable and subject to
performance factors.
Albemarle's incentive plans convey a balanced focus between growth,
efficiency, and stewardship. The
2022 executive compensation program provided short-term annual cash
bonuses designed to drive adjusted EBITDA and adjusted cash flow
from operations, and long-term performance-based equity awards
designed to drive total stockholder return and return on invested
capital, all as described in further detail below under
“Compensation
Discussion and Analysis”
beginning on
page 29.
|
|
|
PROPOSAL 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
|
The Board of Directors, upon unanimous recommendation of the
Nominating & Governance Committee, unanimously approved the
persons named below as nominees for election to the Board of
Directors at the Annual Meeting. Each of the nominees is currently
a member of the Board of Directors. Each of the nominees
(i) has been nominated for election at the Annual Meeting to
hold office until the 2024 annual meeting of shareholders or, if
earlier, the election or appointment of their successor, and
(ii) has consented to being named as such and to serve as such
if elected. The proxies submitted for the Annual Meeting cannot be
voted for more than
ten nominees.
Proxies will be voted “FOR”
the election of the persons named below (or if for any reason such
persons are unavailable, for such substitutes as the Board of
Directors may designate) as Directors for the ensuing year. The
Board of Directors has no reason to believe that any of the
nominees will be unavailable. Each nominee who is elected will
serve as a Director until his or her successor is elected at our
2024 annual meeting of shareholders or until his or her earlier
resignation, replacement, or removal.
Each nominee is listed below with information as of the record date
(March 7, 2023) concerning age, principal occupation,
employment, and directorships during the past five years and
positions with the Company, if applicable, and the year in which
they first became a Director of the Company. Also set forth below
is a brief discussion of the specific experience, qualifications,
attributes, or skills that led to his or her nomination as a
Director, in light of the Company’s business and governance
structure.
The following table highlights the qualifications and experience of
each member of our Board that contributed to the Board’s
determination that each individual is uniquely qualified to serve
on the Board. While designation on this table indicates competency
or experience in the relevant area, this high-level summary is not
intended to be an exhaustive list of each nominee’s skills or
contributions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary of Skills, Experience, and Background for Director
Nominees |
|
|
|
Brlas |
Cramer |
Masters |
Minor |
O'Brien |
O'Connell |
Seavers |
Steiner |
Van Deursen |
Wolff |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KEY COMPETENCIES |
Current/Former Public Company CEO or COO |
n |
n |
n |
|
n |
|
n |
|
|
|
P&L Experience |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
|
Relevant Industry Experience |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
R&D / Innovation Experience |
n |
n |
n |
|
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
Manufacturing / Operations Experience |
n |
n |
n |
|
n |
n |
n |
|
n |
|
Global / Emerging Markets Experience |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
Supply Chain and Logistics Experience |
n |
n |
n |
|
n |
n |
|
|
n |
|
IT / Cybersecurity / Technology Capability |
n |
|
|
n |
n |
n |
n |
|
|
n |
Financial Literacy |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
M&A Experience |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
Risk Management |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
Public Company Compliance / Governance |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
Strategy Development |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
Public Company Executive Compensation |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
|
|
|
n |
n |
Leadership Development / Succession Planning |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
Public / Government Affairs |
|
|
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
Diversity, Equity & Inclusion |
n |
|
n |
n |
|
|
n |
|
n |
n |
Natural Resource Management / Environment |
n |
n |
n |
|
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
|
Safety / Health |
n |
n |
n |
|
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
n |
COMPLIANCE |
Independent Director |
Y |
Y |
N |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Audit Committee Financial Expert |
Y |
N |
N |
Y |
Y |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
Current Public Company Boards (including ALB) |
4 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
Current Public Company Audit Committees (including ALB) |
3 |
1 |
— |
3 |
1 |
2 |
— |
1 |
1 |
— |
DEMOGRAPHICS |
Age |
65 |
57 |
62 |
66 |
68 |
59 |
62 |
62 |
64 |
66 |
Tenure |
6 |
1 |
8 |
4 |
11 |
5 |
5 |
10 |
4 |
8 |
DIVERSITY |
Gender (Female,
Male)
|
F |
M |
M |
F |
M |
M |
M |
M |
F |
M |
Race (Black,
Hispanic,
White)
|
W |
W |
W |
B |
W |
W |
B |
W |
W |
H |
BOARD STANDING COMMITTEES (Chair,
Member)
|
Audit & Finance |
C |
M |
|
M |
M |
|
|
M |
|
|
Capital Investment |
M |
|
|
|
|
|
C |
|
M |
|
Executive Compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
M |
M |
|
M |
C |
Health, Safety & Environment |
|
M |
|
|
|
M |
|
C |
|
|
Nominating & Governance |
|
|
|
M |
C |
|
|
|
|
M |
Lead Independent Director |
|
|
|
|
Y |
|
|
|
|
|
Director Nominees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Independent
Age:
65
Director Since:
2017
Committees:
•Audit
& Finance (Chair)
•Capital
Investment
|
|
M. Lauren Brlas
Ms. Brlas retired from the Newmont Mining Corporation
(“Newmont”), a global gold company and producer of copper, silver,
zinc, and lead, in December 2016. Ms. Brlas joined Newmont in
2013 and served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer until October 2016. From 2006 through 2013, Ms. Brlas
held various positions of increasing responsibility with
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc., a North American producer of iron ore and
steel, where most recently she served as Chief Financial Officer
and then as Executive Vice President and President, Global
Operations.
Attributes and Skills:
Ms. Brlas brings significant operational and financial
executive leadership experience, including in the natural resources
industry, to our Board. This executive leadership experience as
well as Ms. Brlas’ extensive background in financial and
governance matters supports her re-election to our
Board.
Other Public Company Directorships:
•Constellation
Energy Corporation (an energy provider), 2022 –
current
•Autoliv,
Inc. (a developer, manufacturer, and marketer of airbags,
seatbelts, and steering wheels), 2020 – current
•Graphic
Packaging International, LLC (a producer of paper-based packaging
solutions), 2019 – current
•Exelon
Corporation (an energy provider), 2018 – 2022
•Perrigo
Company plc (a producer of self-care health solutions), 2003 –
2019
•Calpine
Corporation (a generator of electricity from natural gas and
geothermal resources), 2016 – 2018
|
|
|
|
Independent
Age:
57
Director Since:
2022
Committees:
•Audit
& Finance
•Health,
Safety & Environment
|
|
Ralf H. Cramer
Mr. Cramer has served as Industry Advisor / Consultant at
Knowledge Experienced, an automotive and industrial consulting
company, since 2018. Mr. Cramer has also served as a Senior
Consultant at Shenzhen Shentou Investment Co Ltd., a cross-border
M&A consultancy and investment company, since 2018.
Mr. Cramer has served on the boards of directors of BBS
Automation GmbH, an automation solutions provider, since May 2018,
Knorr-Bremse Truck, a subsidiary of Knorr-Bremse A.G., a braking
system manufacturer, since December 2018, and Metalsa S.A., an
automotive solutions provider, since May 2019. Mr. Cramer
served as an Executive Board Member of Continental AG, which
develops technologies and services for mobility of people and
goods, from 2009 to 2017 and as President, Global Division Chassis
& Safety from 2008 to 2013. During that time, Mr. Cramer
also served as President and CEO of Continental China, an
automotive component manufacturer, from 2013 to 2017.
Attributes and Skills:
Mr. Cramer’s executive experience with multinational companies
in the automotive industry and manufacturing operations brings an
international business perspective to our Board. Mr. Cramer’s
extensive knowledge of the global automotive industry and
operational, financial, and international leadership experience
supports his re-election to our Board.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Age:
62
Director Since:
2015
Chairman Since:
2020
|
|
J. Kent Masters, Jr.
Mr. Masters has served as Chairman, President and CEO of
Albemarle since 2020. Prior to joining Albemarle, Mr. Masters
served as Chief Executive Officer of Foster Wheeler AG, a global
engineering and construction contractor and power equipment
supplier, from 2011 to 2014, when Foster Wheeler AG was acquired by
Amec plc to form Amec Foster Wheeler plc. Mr. Masters served
as a director of Amec Foster Wheeler plc from 2015 to 2017.
Mr. Masters also served as a member of the executive board of
Linde AG, a manufacturer and seller of industrial gases, from 2006
to 2011.
Attributes and Skills:
Mr. Masters brings significant global business experience in
key industries relevant to our large capital projects, such as
engineering and construction, power equipment, and industrial
gases, to our Board. Mr. Masters’ global business experience
as well as his previous experience in the lithium industry
(including his prior service on the board of directors for Rockwood
Holdings, Inc.) supports his re-election to our Board.
Other Public Company Directorships:
•Amec
Foster Wheeler plc (a consultancy, engineering, and project
management company), 2015 – 2017
|
|
|
|
|
Independent
Age:
66
Director Since:
2019
Committees:
•Audit
& Finance
•Nominating
& Governance
|
|
Glenda J. Minor
Ms. Minor has served as Chief Executive Officer and Principal
of Silket Advisory Services, a privately owned consulting firm
advising companies on financial, strategic and operational
initiatives, since 2016. Prior to Silket, Ms. Minor served as
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Evraz North
America Limited, a North American steel manufacturer from 2010 to
2016. Ms. Minor also served as Vice President, Finance,
Controller, Chief Accounting Officer, and General Auditor of
Visteon Corporation, a global technology company that designs,
engineers, and manufactures cockpit electronics and connected car
solutions, from 2000 to 2010.
Attributes and Skills:
Ms. Minor brings extensive financial and international
leadership experience across different industries and different
continents to our Board. Ms. Minor’s financial and
international leadership experience as well as her in-depth
understanding of the preparation and analysis of financial
statements and her experience in capital market transactions,
accounting, treasury, investor relations, financial and strategic
planning, and business expansion supports her re-election to our
Board.
Other Public Company Directorships:
•Schnitzer
Steel Industries, Inc. (a global provider in the metals recycling
industry and a manufacturer of finished steel products), 2020 –
current
•Curtiss-Wright
Corporation (a global provider of products and services in the
aerospace & defense and industrial markets), 2019 –
current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Independent
Age:
68
Director Since:
2012
Lead Independent Director Since:
2020
Committees:
•Nominating
& Governance (Chair)
•Audit
& Finance
|
|
James J. O'Brien
Mr. O’Brien served as Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer from 2002 to 2014, as President and
Chief
Operating Officer in 2002, and as Senior Vice President and Group
Operating Officer from 2001-2002 of Ashland Inc., a diversified
energy company. Mr. O’Brien served as President of Valvoline,
a global marketer and supplier of premium branded lubricants and
automotive services, from 1995 to 2001. Mr. O’Brien worked at
Ashland for 38 years prior to his retirement in December
2014.
Attributes and Skills:
Mr. O’Brien brings extensive knowledge of the chemical
industry and significant experience gained from service on the
board of directors of other public companies to our Board.
Mr. O’Brien’s industry knowledge and public company board
experience as well as his significant management experience and
knowledge in the areas of finance, accounting, international
business operations, risk oversight, and corporate governance
supports his re-election to our Board.
Other Public Company Directorships:
•Eastman
Chemical Company (a specialty chemical company), 2016 –
current
•Humana
Inc. (a managed health care company), 2006 – current
•Wesco
International, Inc. (an electronics distribution and services
company), 2015 – 2017
|
|
|
|
|
Independent
Age:
59
Director Since:
2018
Committees:
•Executive
Compensation
•Health,
Safety & Environment
|
|
Diarmuid B. O'Connell
Mr. O'Connell served as Chief Strategy Officer of Fair
Financial Corp., an automotive leasing fintech company, from 2018
to 2019. Prior to Fair Financial, Mr. O’Connell served as Vice
President, Corporate & Business Development at Tesla Motors
Inc., an American electric vehicle manufacturer, energy storage
company, and solar panel manufacturer, from 2010 to 2017 and Vice
President, Business Development from 2006 to 2010.
Mr. O’Connell served as Chief of Staff, Bureau of Political
Military Affairs at the U.S. Department of State from 2003 to
2006.
Attributes and Skills:
Mr. O'Connell brings experience in the electric vehicle and
energy storage industry as well as valuable perspectives on global
applications of alternative energy that provide insights into the
end uses of our products to our Board. This industry knowledge as
well as Mr. O'Connell’s background in marketing, government
relations, operations, and manufacturing supports his re-election
to our Board.
Other Public Company Directorships:
•Tech
and Energy Transition Corporation (a special purpose acquisition
company), 2021 – current
•Volvo
Car AB (a company that designs, manufactures, and supplies
automobiles), 2021 – current
•Dana
Incorporated (a global manufacturer in drivetrain and e-Propulsion
systems), 2018 – current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Independent
Age:
62
Director Since:
2018
Committees:
•Capital
Investment (Chair)
•Executive
Compensation
|
|
Dean L. Seavers
Mr. Seavers has served as a senior advisor, in a part time
consulting role, at Stifel Financial Corp., a full-service
financial services firm, since 2020. Prior to Stifel Financial,
Mr. Seavers served as President of National Grid U.S., a U.S.
supplier of consumer energy, from 2014 to 2019 and as Executive
Director of National Grid plc, a multinational electricity and gas
utility company, from 2015 to 2019. Mr. Seavers founded and
served as Chief Executive Officer, President and Director of Red
Hawk Fire & Security, a provider of life safety and security
solutions, from 2012 to 2018, and President of Global Services of
the Fire & Security business of United Technologies
Corporation, an aerospace and defense company, from 2010 to
2011.
Attributes and Skills:
Mr. Seavers brings an operational perspective and vision to
our Board from a variety of industries representing end uses of our
products. Mr. Seavers’ extensive executive leadership and deep
energy, fire safety and technology industry experience supports his
re-election to our Board.
Other Public Company Directorships:
•Ametek,
Inc. (a global manufacturer of electronic instruments and
electromechanical devices), 2022 – current
•PG&E
Corporation / Pacific Gas & Electric Company (a holding company
of natural gas / electric energy utility company), 2020 – 2022;
Chairman, Pacific Gas & Electric Company, 2020 –
2022
•James
Hardie plc (a producer and marketer of fiber cement siding and
backerboard and of fiber gypsum products), 2021 – 2022
•Environmental
Impact Acquisition Corporation (a special purpose acquisition
company), 2021 – 2022
|
|
|
|
|
Independent
Age:
62
Director Since:
2013
Committees:
•Health,
Safety & Environment (Chair)
•Audit
& Finance
|
|
Gerald A. Steiner
Mr. Steiner co-founded and served as CEO from 2015 to 2021 and
Executive Chairman from 2021 to 2022 of CoverCress, Inc., a company
developing a new crop for renewable fuels. Mr. Steiner founded
in 2014 and continues to serve at Alta Grow Consulting LLC, a
business consulting firm. Prior to Alta Grow Consulting, he served
as Executive Vice President, Sustainability and Corporate Affairs
at Monsanto Company, a leading global provider of agricultural
products for farmers, from 2003 to 2014. Among other roles,
Mr. Steiner has also served at the following
organizations:
•Chairman,
2012 – 2014, and board member, 2003 – 2014, Food and Agriculture
Section of the Biotechnology Industry Organization (a biotechnology
innovation organization)
•Chairman,
2012 – 2013, board member, 2014 – 2014, and Trustee Emeritus, 2015
– current, The Keystone Center (a policy center for agriculture,
early childhood education, and energy for rural
communities)
•Co-founder,
Field to Market (an agricultural sustainability organization);
current Executive Chairman of Stony Creek Colors (a plant-based
dyes company)
Attributes and Skills:
Mr. Steiner brings extensive experience in the renewable fuels
and agricultural industry to our Board. This industry experience as
well as Mr. Steiner’s extensive experience in government
affairs, global business and strategy supports his re-election to
our Board.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Independent
Age:
64
Director Since:
2019
Committees:
•Capital
Investment
•Executive
Compensation
|
|
Holly A. Van Deursen
Ms. Van Deursen served as Group Vice President,
Petrochemicals, at BP Corporation, a global provider of heat, light
and mobility products and services, having starting working there
in 1989 and holding various senior executive management roles
before retiring as a member of the top-forty executive management
team from 2000 to 2005. Ms. Van Deursen has twenty-four years
of experience in the chemical, oil, and energy industries,
including various engineering, manufacturing, and product
development roles for Dow Corning Corporation (a chemical and
plastics manufacturer and supplier).
Attributes and Skills:
Ms. Van Deursen brings extensive experience in the chemical,
industrial, and contract manufacturing sectors, including from her
previous service as a director for companies in the oilfield
services, diversified industrial, and packaging sectors, to our
Board. Ms. Van Deursen’s experience across sectors as well as
her service in executive roles in business management, business
development, and mergers & acquisitions in the U.S. and
globally supports her re-election to our Board.
Other Public Company Directorships:
•Kimball
Electronics Inc. (a global contract manufacturer of durable goods
electronics serving a variety of industries), 2019 –
current
•Synthomer
plc (a global supplier of acrylic and vinyl emulsions and specialty
polymers), 2018 – current
•Capstone
Green Energy Corporation (a global producer of highly efficient,
low-emission, resilient microturbine energy systems), Chair 2017 –
2020; director 2007 – 2021
•Enerpac
Tool Group (formerly Actuant Corporation) (a diversified industrial
company), 2008 – 2020
•Bemis
Company (a packaging company), 2008 – 2019
•Petroleum
Geo-Services (an oilfield services company), 2006 –
2018
|
|
|
|
|
Independent
Age:
66
Director Since:
2015
Committees:
•Executive
Compensation (Chair)
•Nominating
& Governance
|
|
Alejandro D. Wolff
Mr. Wolff served as Managing Director of Gryphon Partners LLC,
a global advisory firm focused on frontier markets, from 2014 to
2016. Prior to Gryphon, he served as U.S. Ambassador to Chile from
2010 to 2013 and U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations from 2005 to
2010. Mr. Wolff has thirty-three years of service in the U.S.
Department of State, including service in Algeria, Morocco, Chile,
Cyprus, the U.S. Mission to the European Union in Brussels, and as
Deputy Chief of Mission and Charge d’Affaires in
France.
Attributes and Skills:
Mr. Wolff brings expertise in international political,
economic, and commercial affairs to our Board. This expertise as
well as Mr. Wolff’s lithium industry experience (including his
prior service on the board of directors for Rockwood Holdings,
Inc.) supports his re-election to our Board.
Other Public Company Directorships:
•Frontier
Group Holdings, Inc. (the holding company of Frontier Airlines, an
ultra-low cost airline), 2019 – current
•PG&E
Corporation / Pacific Gas & Electric Company (a holding company
of natural gas / electric energy utility company), 2019 –
2020
•Versum
Materials, Inc. (an electronic materials company), 2016 –
2019
|
Election of each Director requires the affirmative vote of a
majority of the votes cast by the holders of shares represented at
the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote (which means that the
number of shares voted
“FOR”
a director must exceed the number of shares voted
“AGAINST”
a director). In uncontested elections, any Director who does not
receive a majority of the votes cast must tender his or her
resignation to the Board of Directors. The Nominating &
Governance Committee will make a recommendation to the Board of
Directors on whether or not to accept the tendered
resignation.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” ALL
OF THE FOREGOING NOMINEES.
GOVERNANCE MATTERS
Our Board of Directors and management periodically review our
Corporate Governance Guidelines and other corporate governance
policies, principles, and procedures, to determine whether they
should be revised to address recent changes in regulatory
requirements and evolving governance practices.
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines, including Director
independence standards, our Code of Conduct, and the charters of
our Audit & Finance, Executive Compensation, Nominating &
Governance, Capital Investment, and Health, Safety &
Environment committees are available on our website at
www.albemarle.com (See Investors/Governance/Corporate Governance)
and are available in print to any shareholder upon request by
contacting our Investor Relations department.
Director Independence
The Board has determined that Directors Brlas, Cramer, Minor,
O’Brien, O'Connell, Seavers, Steiner, Van Deursen, and Wolff
are each “independent” as described by the New York Stock Exchange
("NYSE") listing standards and the independence standards of our
Corporate Governance Guidelines.
In order for a Director or nominee to be considered “independent”
by the Board, they must (i) be free of any relationship that,
applying the rules of the NYSE, would preclude a finding of
independence and (ii) not have any material relationship
(either directly or as a partner, shareholder, or officer of an
organization) with us or any of our affiliates, or any of our
executive officers or any of our affiliates’ executive officers. In
evaluating the materiality of any such relationship, the Board
takes into consideration whether disclosure of the relationship
would be required by the proxy rules under the Exchange Act. If
disclosure of the relationship is required, the Board must make a
determination that the relationship is not material as a
prerequisite to finding that the Director or nominee is
“independent.”
Leadership Structure; Risk Oversight; Sustainability Oversight; and
ESG Matters
Leadership Structure
As part of our annual corporate governance and succession planning
review, the Nominating & Governance Committee and the
Board evaluate our board leadership structure to ensure that the
structure in place is appropriate for the Company at the
time.
The Company maintains combined roles of Chair of the Board and CEO.
Given our current circumstances and operating strategies, we
believe that having a combined Chair of the Board and CEO is the
appropriate structure for our shareholders and our Company.
Mr. O'Brien serves as our Lead Independent Director ("LID").
The Company continues to benefit from the leadership experience of
our LID, Mr. O'Brien, and the strategic vision of our
Chairman, President and CEO, Mr. Masters.
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide for two structural
options: (1) a combined Chair of the Board and CEO with a LID,
as we currently utilize, or (2) a Nonexecutive (Independent)
Chair of the Board separate from the CEO. These Corporate
Governance Guidelines include a description of the responsibilities
for both a Nonexecutive (Independent) Chair of the Board and a LID
in Annexes B and A thereof, respectively. With our current
Board leadership structure of a combined Chair of the Board and
CEO, our LID is responsible for presiding over executive sessions
of the independent directors and non-management directors,
facilitating information flow and communications between directors
and the Chair/CEO, and coordinating the activities of the other
independent directors, including conferring with the Nominating
& Governance Committee and the Chair/CEO as to the membership
of the various Board committees and committee chairs.
Risk Oversight
Our Board exercises overall risk governance at Albemarle, with
committees taking the lead in discrete areas of risk oversight
within their areas of responsibility. Our Board appraises our major
risks and oversees that appropriate risk management and control
procedures are in place and that management takes the appropriate
steps to manage our major risks, with the assistance of the
applicable committee(s) and support from management. Each of the
committees regularly reports to the Board on risk management
matters:
•The
Audit & Finance Committee
is primarily responsible for risk oversight relating to financial
statement integrity, ERM (as defined below), and significant risk
within our Company, including, but not limited to, business and
financial resilience and threats related to climate change, supply
chain disruptions, and cybersecurity.
•The
Executive Compensation Committee
is primarily responsible for risk oversight related to human
resources and potential risks relating to our employee (including
executive) compensation programs. See the “Compensation
Risk Assessment”
beginning on page 43.
•The
Nominating & Governance Committee
is primarily responsible for risk oversight relating to corporate
governance.
•The
Health, Safety & Environment Committee
is primarily responsible for risk oversight relating to the
effectiveness of our health, safety, and environment protection
programs and potential risks relating to our sustainability
programs.
•The
Capital Investment Committee
is primarily responsible for risk oversight relating to major
capital expenditure projects.
The Company's Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) program identifies
and defines risks that could significantly impact shareholder value
on a sustained or permanent basis. The ERM program helps to assess
key risks, identify gaps, and develop and implement risk mitigation
efforts. This information is integrated into our annual and
long-range planning processes. Quantitative and qualitative factors
are considered to rate each identified risk regarding severity and
likelihood to determine which risks should be prioritized. Risk
mitigation and management activities are tested with a broad group
of relevant stakeholders. The ERM program is led by the Chief Risk
Officer and involves extensive engagement with senior Company
leaders worldwide. The Chief Risk Officer regularly reports to the
Audit & Finance Committee, generally highlighting those risks
identified as the most significant, reviewing the Company’s methods
of risk assessment and risk mitigation strategies. In addition,
each Global Business Unit addresses their most significant risks in
their periodic strategy updates to the Board.
We believe the current leadership structure of the Board supports
the risk oversight functions described above by providing
independent leadership at the committee level, with ultimate
oversight by the Board. This approach to risk oversight aligns with
the Company's disclosure controls and procedures, which are
designed to ensure that relevant information is gathered and
reported to the Board and its committees, as
appropriate.
Sustainability Oversight and ESG Matters
Our Board exercises overall governance of our sustainability
program
and its alignment to the Albemarle Way of Excellence (operating
model) and our sustainability framework. Board committees
take the lead in discrete areas of oversight within their areas of
responsibility, with the Health, Safety &
Environment Committee monitoring progress on sustainability
initiatives on a quarterly basis. Each of the Board committees
regularly reports to the Board on sustainability
matters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health, Safety & Environment |
Audit & Finance |
Executive Compensation |
|
Energy & Greenhouse Gases |
n |
|
|
Natural Resource |
Water |
n |
|
|
Management |
Resource Stewardship |
n |
|
|
|
Waste |
n |
|
|
|
Safety |
n |
|
|
People, Workplace |
Diversity, Equity & Inclusion |
|
|
n |
& Community |
Investment in Talent |
|
|
n |
|
Community & Stakeholder Engagement |
n |
|
|
|
Value Chain Excellence |
n |
|
|
Sustainable |
Product & Process Innovation |
n |
|
|
Shareholder Value |
Business & Financial Resilience |
|
n |
|
|
Business Ethics & Regulatory Compliance |
|
n |
|
Director Retirement Policy
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that in general, a
non-employee Director should not stand for re-election in the year
in which they reach 72 years of age, although the Board has
the authority to grant exceptions to this limitation on a
case-by-case basis. None of our current Directors attained or will
attain the age of 72 in 2023.
Meetings of Non-Employee Directors
Executive sessions of the non-employee members of the Board were
held regularly in conjunction with scheduled meetings of the Board
during 2022. Mr. O'Brien, in his role as LID, presided at the
executive sessions of the non-employee Directors held during the
year. Shareholders and other interested persons may contact the
Chair of the Nominating & Governance Committee or the
non-employee members of the Board as a group through the method
described under "How
do I communicate with the Board of Directors?"
in the "Questions
and Answers about this Proxy Statement and the Annual
Meeting"
beginning on page 91.
Director Continuing Education
We encourage Directors to attend periodic director continuing
education programs. Typically, director education programs focus on
issues and trends affecting directors of publicly-held companies.
We reimburse our Directors for tuition and expenses associated with
attending these programs.
Attendance at Annual Meeting
We anticipate all Directors will attend the annual meeting of
shareholders each year. All incumbent Directors attended our 2022
annual meeting of shareholders.
Board Meetings
The Board meets during the year to review significant developments
affecting us and to act on matters requiring the Board's approval,
and may hold special meetings between scheduled meetings when
appropriate. During 2022, the Board held a total of nine
meetings.
Committees of the Board of Directors; Assignments and
Meetings
The Board maintains five "standing committees:"
Audit &
Finance; Executive Compensation; Nominating & Governance;
Health, Safety & Environment; and Capital Investment. In
addition, the Board maintains an Executive Committee, composed of
Messrs. O'Brien and Masters. The Board has determined that all
members of the standing committees are “independent” within the
meaning of the listing standards of the NYSE and the independence
standards of our Corporate Governance Guidelines. See
“Director
Independence”
on page 14.
The following table lists committee assignments of each current
Director as of the March 7, 2023 record date and the number of
times each committee met during 2022. Each of the Directors
attended at least 75% of the total number of Board meetings and
meetings of the committees of the Board on which the Director
served in 2022.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit &
Finance
Committee |
Executive
Compensation
Committee |
Nominating &
Governance
Committee |
Health, Safety &
Environment
Committee |
Capital Investment Committee |
Management Director |
|
|
|
|
|
J. Kent Masters, Jr. |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Employee Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
M. Lauren Brlas |
n |
|
|
|
☐ |
Ralf H. Cramer
|
☐ |
|
|
☐ |
|
Glenda J. Minor |
☐ |
|
☐ |
|
|
James J. O’Brien |
☐ |
|
n |
|
|
Diarmuid B. O'Connell |
|
☐ |
|
☐ |
|
Dean L. Seavers |
|
☐ |
|
|
n |
Gerald A. Steiner |
☐ |
|
|
n |
|
Holly A. Van Deursen |
|
☐ |
|
|
☐ |
Alejandro D. Wolff |
|
n |
☐ |
|
|
Number of Meetings in 2022 |
7 |
7 |
4 |
4 |
6 |
Audit & Finance Committee
The duties of the Audit & Finance Committee are set forth
in its charter, which can be found on the Company’s website at
www.albemarle.com (see Investors/Governance/Corporate
Governance/Governance Documents).
The Audit & Finance Committee is a separately designated
standing committee in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of
the Exchange Act.
The Board of Directors has determined that all Audit &
Finance Committee members are financially literate, as required by
SEC regulations and NYSE rules, and the Board of Directors has
determined that each of Mses. Brlas and Minor and
Mr. O’Brien
is
an “audit committee financial expert,” as that term is defined in
the rules of the SEC under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Please
also see the “Audit &
Finance Committee Report,”
on page 81.
The Audit & Finance Committee's primary role is to oversee
the integrity of the financial information reported by the Company.
The Audit & Finance Committee appoints the Company's
independent registered public accounting firm, approves the scope
of audits performed by it and by the internal audit staff, and
reviews the results of those audits. The Audit & Finance
Committee also meets
with management, the Company’s independent registered public
accounting firm, and the internal audit staff to review audit and
non-audit results, as well as financial, accounting, compliance,
and internal control matters. In addition, the Board has delegated
oversight of the Company’s enterprise risk management program and
compliance and ethics program to the Audit & Finance
Committee.
Cybersecurity Matters
The Audit & Finance Committee exercises oversight of
information security matters and the Company’s cybersecurity
program. The Company bases its policies and procedures relating to
cybersecurity on National Institute of Standards and Technology
(“NIST”) and ISA/IEC standards. The Company engages a third-party
cybersecurity firm to conduct an annual cyber assessment using the
NIST Cybersecurity Framework, which in 2022 was completed for each
of our 16 manufacturing sites around the globe.
Our cybersecurity program applies a zero-trust architecture focused
on privilege, functionality, and network segmentation and utilizes
specific team functions to constantly scan and monitor for threats
and vulnerability. We operate a security monitoring program and
deploy a security operations center with in-house incident response
teams and engage external vendors to perform annual penetration
tests to provide validation of security technologies and
procedures. Information security training is conducted as part of
our compliance program, with a mandatory training program provided
to new employees and recurring training occurring on a quarterly
basis. In addition, the Company has procured an information
security insurance policy. Our Chief Information Officer and Chief
Information Security Officer generally update the Board annually on
these and other related matters and report to the Audit &
Finance Committee on a periodic/as needed basis.
Executive Compensation Committee
The duties of the Executive Compensation Committee are set forth in
its charter, which can be found on the Company’s website at
www.albemarle.com (see Investors/Governance/Corporate
Governance/Governance Documents).
The Executive Compensation Committee’s primary role is to develop
and oversee the implementation of our philosophy with respect to
the compensation of our executive officers and other key employees,
including the named executive officers listed in this Proxy
Statement. The Executive Compensation Committee has the overall
responsibility of evaluating the performance (and determining the
compensation) of the CEO and approving the compensation structure
for senior management and other key employees.
The Executive Compensation Committee also approves cash incentive
awards and compensation packages of certain executive-level
personnel and may grant stock options, stock appreciation rights,
performance units, restricted stock, restricted stock units, and
cash incentive awards under The Albemarle Corporation 2017
Incentive Plan (the "2017 Incentive Plan"). In addition, the
Chief Human Resources Officer annually reports to the Executive
Compensation Committee on the results of the Company's workforce
analysis, including headcount, turnover, workforce diversity, and
pay equity.
The Executive Compensation Committee reviews and approves the
performance, compensation, and annual performance goals of the CEO
with input from all independent Directors and the CEO’s
self-evaluation. The Executive Compensation Committee approves the
compensation of the other named executive officers based upon the
evaluation and recommendation of the CEO. The Executive
Compensation Committee periodically meets with members of senior
management in order to assess progress toward meeting long-term
objectives. The Executive Compensation Committee reports regularly
to the Board of Directors on matters relating to the Executive
Compensation Committee’s responsibilities. In addition, the
Executive Compensation Committee follows regulatory and legislative
developments and considers corporate governance best practices in
performing its duties. For additional information with
respect to the Executive Compensation Committee, please see
“Compensation
Discussion and Analysis”
beginning on page 29.
In performing its responsibilities with respect to executive
compensation decisions, the Executive Compensation Committee
receives information and support from the Company’s Human Resources
Department and retained Pearl Meyer & Partners, LLC ("Pearl
Meyer") (from January to August of 2022) and Farient Advisors LLC
("Farient") (starting August 2022) as outside independent
compensation consulting firms. Pearl Meyer and Farient are each a
nationally recognized executive compensation consultant which the
Executive Compensation Committee retained to provide information
concerning compensation paid by competitors and members of our
compensation peer group and to assist in designing executive
compensation plans. For additional information with respect to the
Executive Compensation Committee and compensation consultants,
please see “Compensation
Discussion and Analysis”
beginning on page 29.
Independence of the Executive
Compensation Consultants
The Executive Compensation Committee has concluded, based on the
consideration of the factors specified in the SEC’s rules and the
NYSE’s listing standards, that each of its compensation
consultants, Pearl Meyer (from January to August of 2022) and
Farient (from August 2022), is independent and does not have a
conflict of interest in its engagement by the Executive
Compensation Committee.
In making this conclusion with respect to each of
Pearl Meyer and Farient,
the Executive Compensation Committee received written confirmation
from each of Pearl Meyer and Farient addressing these factors and
supporting this determination.
Executive Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation
No member of the Executive Compensation Committee was at any time
an officer or employee of the Company, nor is any member of the
Executive Compensation Committee related to any other member of the
Executive Compensation Committee, any other member of the Board of
Directors, or any executive officer of the Company or has a
relationship disclosed below in "Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions."
No executive officer of the Company served as a director or member
of the compensation committee of another entity, one of whose
executive officers is a member of the Company’s Executive
Compensation Committee, or the Company's Board of
Directors.
Nominating & Governance Committee
The duties of the Nominating & Governance Committee are
set forth in its charter, which can be found on the Company’s
website at www.albemarle.com (see Investors/Governance/Corporate
Governance/Governance Documents).
The Nominating & Governance Committee assists the Board of
Directors on all matters relating to the selection, qualification,
duties, and compensation of members of the Board of Directors, as
well as the annual evaluation of the Board of Directors’
performance and processes. The Nominating & Governance
Committee also assists the Board of Directors with oversight of
corporate governance.
The Nominating & Governance Committee identifies Director
candidates through recommendations made by members of the Board of
Directors, management, shareholders, and others, including
professional search firms.
Director Candidate Recommendations and Nominations by
Shareholders
Shareholders should submit any director candidate recommendations
to the Nominating & Governance Committee through the method
described in "Shareholder
Proposals”
on page 98.
In addition, any shareholder entitled to vote for the election of
directors may nominate persons for election to the Board of
Directors if such shareholder complies with the procedures set
forth in our Bylaws and summarized in “Shareholder
Proposals”.
Copies of our Bylaws are available at no charge in the Company’s
public filings with the SEC or from the Secretary of the
Company.
Nominating & Governance Committee Process for Identifying and
Evaluating Director Candidates
The Nominating & Governance Committee identifies and
evaluates all director candidates in accordance with the director
qualification standards described in the Corporate Governance
Guidelines. The Board as a whole is benefited by the diversity of
its members and their collective knowledge of accounting and
finance; management and leadership; vision and strategy; business
operations; business judgment; crisis management; risk assessment
and management; industry knowledge; corporate governance;
environment, social impact, and sustainability; and global markets.
The Nominating & Governance Committee aims to balance
these considerations through its ongoing consideration of Directors
and nominees, as well as its annual self-evaluation
process.
The Nominating & Governance Committee evaluates a candidate’s
qualifications to serve as a member of the Board based on the
background and expertise of such candidate as well as the
background and expertise of the Board as a whole. The
Nominating & Governance Committee considers such relevant
factors as it deems appropriate, including the current composition
of the Board of Directors; the balance of management and
independent Directors; diversity in gender, race, ethnicity,
background, and experiences; the need for financial expertise; the
evaluation of other prospective nominees; and a candidate’s ethical
standards, accountability, past achievements, professionalism and
collegiality, and availability to serve in light of other
commitments. The Nominating & Governance Committee may also
determine new skills, qualities, and/or experiences that should be
considered in the context of a Director candidate. The
Nominating & Governance Committee is committed to
including in each director search qualified candidates who reflect
a diversity of backgrounds, including diversity of gender and race.
When particular needs are identified, a search is initiated with
sufficient time for adequate research and
deliberation.
When considering a Director standing for re-election, in addition
to the attributes described above, the Nominating &
Governance Committee considers that individual’s past contribution
and future commitment to the Company. The Nominating &
Governance Committee evaluates the totality of the merits of each
prospective nominee that it considers and does not restrict itself
by establishing minimum qualifications or attributes. The
Nominating & Governance Committee is committed to
effective succession planning and refreshment for our Board of
Directors, including having honest and difficult conversations with
existing Directors as may be deemed necessary.
After completing potential Director nominees’ evaluations, the
Nominating & Governance Committee makes a recommendation
to the full Board of Directors as to the persons who should be
nominated by the Board of Directors, and the Board of Directors
determines the nominees after considering the recommendation of the
Nominating & Governance Committee. There is no difference
in the manner by which the Nominating & Governance
Committee evaluates prospective nominees for Directors based upon
the source from which the individual was first identified,
including whether a candidate is recommended by a
shareholder.
Our Bylaws provide for proxy access. A shareholder, or group of up
to 20 shareholders, that has owned continuously for at least three
years shares of Albemarle stock representing an aggregate of at
least 3% of our outstanding shares, may nominate and include in the
Company’s proxy materials director
nominees constituting up to 20% of the Board, provided that the
shareholder(s) and nominee(s) satisfy the requirements in our
Bylaws.
The Nominating & Governance Committee did not receive any
Board of Director candidate recommendations from any shareholders
in connection with the Annual Meeting.
Health, Safety & Environment Committee
The duties of the Health, Safety & Environment Committee
are set forth in its charter, which can be found on the Company’s
website at www.albemarle.com (see Investors/Governance/Corporate
Governance/Governance Documents).
The Health, Safety & Environment Committee assists the
Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities in
assessing the effectiveness of our health, safety, and
environmental programs and initiatives, including our progress
toward the enhancement of our global reputation, responsible
corporate stewardship, our corporate social responsibility, and the
sustainability of our products and operations.
Among other matters, the Health, Safety & Environment Committee
is responsible for reviewing and overseeing:
•Programs
and practices related to ensuring the safe manufacture,
distribution, use, and disposal of Company products;
•Contributions
to long-term strategy and sustainability initiatives;
•Global
public policy and advocacy development strategies related to
health, safety, environmental, and sustainability
issues;
•Policies
and approach to human rights and the rights of indigenous
people;
•The
Company’s emergency response plan and political
contributions;
•Efforts
to minimize the Company’s environmental impact and implementation
of the Company’s climate strategy; and
•Impacts
of accessing the resources required to create long-term stakeholder
value.
In addition, the Board has delegated oversight of the annual and
long-term goals for the Company’s health, environment, safety, and
emissions targets and sustainability initiatives, including
quarterly status reports on efforts to attain those goals, to the
Health, Safety & Environment Committee.
Capital Investment Committee
The duties of the Capital Investment Committee are set forth in its
charter, which can be found on the Company’s website at
www.albemarle.com (see Investors/Governance/Corporate
Governance/Governance Documents).
The Capital Investment Committee assists the Board with oversight
of management's execution of major capital expenditure projects in
support of the Company's strategic plans. The Capital Investment
Committee is responsible for, among other matters, advising and
informing the Board on the critical path and costs for capital
projects, as well as risk oversight and making recommendations to
the Board with respect to new major capital
expenditures.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The Board of Directors has adopted a written Related Person
Transaction Policy that governs the review, approval, or
ratification of covered related person transactions. The Audit
& Finance Committee manages this policy. The policy generally
provides that we may enter into a related person transaction only
if the Audit & Finance Committee or the disinterested members
of the Board of Directors approves or ratifies such transaction in
accordance with the policy’s guidelines, if the transaction is in
the best interests of the Company and its shareholders, and if the
transaction is on arm’s length terms comparable to those that could
be obtained with an unrelated third party, or if the transaction
involves compensation approved by our Executive Compensation
Committee.
Related person transactions must be presented to the Audit &
Finance Committee for approval and, at each subsequently scheduled
Audit & Finance Committee meeting, our management will update
the Audit & Finance Committee as to any material change to the
proposed related person transaction. The Chair of the Audit &
Finance Committee has been delegated authority to act on behalf of
the Audit & Finance Committee with respect to the review and
approval of a proposed transaction in the event that our General
Counsel, in consultation with our CEO or CFO, determines that it is
not practicable to wait until the next scheduled Audit &
Finance Committee for the transaction to be acted
upon.
The Audit & Finance Committee may pre-approve the repurchase of
shares of common stock from related persons, provided that such
repurchase is on terms no less favorable to us than those that
could be obtained in arm’s length dealings with an unrelated third
party.
For purposes of this policy, a “related person transaction” is a
transaction, arrangement, or relationship (or any series of similar
transactions, arrangements, or relationships) in which we are or
will be a participant and the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and
in which any related person had, has, or will have a direct or
indirect interest.
A “related person” is any Director, Director nominee, or executive
officer; a holder of more than 5% of our common stock; an immediate
family member or person sharing the household of any of foregoing
persons; or any firm, corporation, or other entity in which any of
the foregoing persons is employed or is a general partner or
principal or in a similar position or in which such person has a 5%
or greater beneficial ownership interest. For purposes of
determining whether a transaction is a related person transaction,
the Audit & Finance Committee may rely upon Item 404 of
Regulation S-K.
The Audit & Finance Committee was not presented with, and the
Company did not participate in, any related person transactions
since the beginning of 2022, and no such related person
transactions are currently proposed.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Annual Compensation
Our non-employee Directors receive the following
compensation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPENSATION |
ANNUALLY |
Annual Cash Retainer |
$100,000 |
Annual Equity Grant of Restricted Common Stock |
$150,000 |
Additional Cash Fees: |
|
Lead Independent Director or Non-Executive Chair of the Board, as
applicable |
$50,000 |
Audit & Finance Committee Chair |
$25,000 |
Executive Compensation Committee Chair |
$20,000 |
Nominating & Governance Committee Chair |
$15,000 |
Health, Safety & Environment Committee Chair |
$15,000 |
Capital Investment Committee Chair |
$15,000 |
We pay the annual cash retainer fee and any applicable additional
cash fees to our non-employee Directors in equal quarterly
installments. The portion of cash compensation for a non-employee
Director who has a partial quarter of service (due to joining the
Board, or beginning service in a Board leadership role, during the
quarter) is pro-rated. We do not pay meeting fees or additional
compensation to Directors for special meetings.
We make the annual equity grant of restricted common stock to our
non-employee Directors in accordance with the 2013 Stock
Compensation and Deferral Election Plan for Non-Employee Directors
of Albemarle Corporation (the “2013 Directors Plan”). The
number of shares of common stock awarded is calculated by dividing
the $150,000 annual equity retainer by the closing price of the
Company’s common stock on the date of grant and rounding down to
the nearest full share increment. The annual equity grant of
restricted common stock is made on the first trade day of July and
vests as of the following July 1, except, with respect to a
non-employee Director who (i) does not stand for reelection for the
following compensation year, pursuant to meeting the Company’s
retirement guidelines, at the time of the annual meeting of
shareholders when the Director effectively retires, or (ii) elects
not to stand for reelection for the following compensation year, at
the annual meeting of shareholders, when their term as a Director
effectively ends. Vesting is subject to the non-employee Director’s
continued service on our Board through such vesting date. The
equity grant amount for a non-employee Director who has a partial
year of service (due to joining the Board during the year) is
pro-rated.
Deferred Compensation
Under the 2013 Directors Plan, non-employee Directors may defer, in
10% increments, all or part of their cash retainer fee and/or chair
fees into a deferred cash account and may defer, in 10% increments,
all or part of their stock compensation into a deferred phantom
stock account. Fees deferred, in whole or in part, into a phantom
stock account are recorded by the Company as phantom shares.
Deferred cash accounts and phantom stock accounts are unfunded and
maintained for record-keeping purposes only.
Distributions under the 2013 Directors Plan will generally be paid
in a lump sum unless the participant specifies installment payments
over a period up to ten years. Deferred cash account amounts are
paid in the form of cash and deferred phantom stock account amounts
are paid in whole shares of common stock. Unless otherwise elected
by the participant as permitted under the 2013 Directors
Plan,
distributions will begin on February 15 in the year following
the earlier of the participant’s turning 65 years old or ending
their tenure as a Company non-employee Director.
For 2022, Mr. Steiner and Ms. Van Deursen each elected to
defer all of their stock compensation into their respective
deferred phantom stock accounts, and Mr. Steiner and
Ms. Van Deursen each elected to defer 100% of their cash
compensation into their deferred cash accounts.
2013 Directors Plan
The 2013 Directors Plan provides for the grant of shares of common
stock to each non-employee Director (each, a “participant”) of
the Company. In the event of a change in capital, changes in shares
of capital stock, or any special distribution to our shareholders,
the administrator of the 2013 Directors Plan will make equitable
adjustments in the number of shares of common stock that have been,
or thereafter may be, granted to participants. The maximum
aggregate number of shares of common stock that may be issued under
the 2013 Directors Plan is 500,000 shares.
Our General Counsel administers the 2013 Directors Plan,
interpreting all provisions of the 2013 Directors Plan,
establishing administrative regulations to further the purpose of
the 2013 Directors Plan, and taking any other action necessary for
the proper operation of the 2013 Directors Plan. The Company has
discretionary authority to increase the amount of shares of common
stock issued to each participant during the compensation year,
subject to a $150,000 limitation on the value of the shares to be
issued to any participant in any compensation year.
Our General Counsel may amend, suspend, or terminate the 2013
Directors Plan, but no such amendment can (i) increase the
number of shares of common stock that may be granted to any
participant (except as described above) or (ii) increase the
total number of shares of common stock that may be granted under
the 2013 Directors Plan. Any amendment of the 2013 Directors Plan
must comply with applicable rules of the NYSE.
At the Annual Meeting, shareholders will vote on whether to approve
the 2023 Stock Compensation and Deferral Election Plan for
Non-Employee Directors, which is intended to replace the 2013
Directors Plan, which will expire by its terms in May 2023. Please
see "Proposal
5 – Approval of 2023 Stock Compensation and Deferral Election Plan
for Non-Employee Directors"
beginning on page 84.
Other Benefits and Perquisites
Non-employee Directors are eligible for certain other benefits and
perquisites as follows. The cost of such other benefits and
perquisites are included as other compensation in our Director
Compensation Table if such disclosure is required by, or exceeds
the threshold specified under, SEC rules.
•Matching
Gifts Program:
The Albemarle Foundation will make matching donations for qualified
charitable contributions for any non-employee Director up to a
total of
$3,000 per
year.
•Medical
Plan Access:
Non-employee Directors may enroll in the Company-sponsored medical
insurance plans at the same rate as active employees. This benefit
does not extend to other health and welfare benefits.
•Training
and Development:
We reimburse non-employee Directors for expenses associated with
Director training and development.
•Travel
Reimbursements:
We reimburse non-employee Directors for the reasonable expenses of
attending Board and committee meetings.
Director Compensation Table
The following table presents information relating to the
compensation earned by our non-employee Directors who served during
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 ("Fiscal Year 2022").
Mr. Masters, as an employee Director, does not receive
compensation from the Company in his capacity as a
Director.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director Compensation Table |
Name |
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)(1)
|
Stock Awards ($)(2)
|
All Other Compensation ($)(3)
|
Total ($) |
M. Lauren Brlas |
$ |
122,500 |
|
$ |
149,965 |
|
$ |
3,000 |
|
$ |
275,465 |
|
Ralf H. Cramer(4)
|
$ |
85,833 |
|
$ |
197,655 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
283,488 |
|
Glenda J. Minor |
$ |
100,000 |
|
$ |
149,965 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
249,965 |
|
James J. O'Brien |
$ |
162,500 |
|
$ |
149,965 |
|
$ |
3,000 |
|
$ |
315,465 |
|
Diarmuid B. O'Connell |
$ |
100,000 |
|
$ |
149,965 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
249,965 |
|
Dean L. Seavers |
$ |
112,500 |
|
$ |
149,965 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
262,465 |
|
Gerald A. Steiner |
$ |
112,500 |
|
$ |
149,965 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
262,465 |
|
Holly A. Van Deursen |
$ |
100,000 |
|
$ |
149,965 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
249,965 |
|
Alejandro D. Wolff |
$ |
117,500 |
|
$ |
149,965 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
267,465 |
|
___________________________________________________
(1)Amounts
shown include fees that have been deferred at the
election
of the non-employee Director under
the 2013 Directors Plan.
(2)Amounts
shown represent the aggregate grant date fair value of stock awards
recognized in Fiscal Year 2022 in accordance with FASB ASC Topic
718. On July 1, 2022, each then serving non-employee Director
received 731 shares of common stock (some of which were deferred by
certain Directors) for their service as a Director. In accordance
with the 2013 Directors Plan, non-employee Directors received
shares of common stock equal to $150,000 divided by the closing
price per share of common stock on July 1, 2022, which was
$205.15, rounded down to the nearest 1-share increment. The amounts
set forth above reflect our accounting expense for these awards and
do not correspond to the actual value that will be recognized by
each of the non-employee Directors. Shares granted pursuant to the
2013 Directors Plan vest (i) the July 1st next following the
grant date for non-employee Directors who completed their term of
service or (ii) on the completion of their term of service for
non-employee Directors not standing for reelection at the annual
meeting of shareholders.
No Director holds any other unvested equity or has options
outstanding.
(3)Represents
matching donations for qualified charitable
contributions.
(4)Mr. Cramer
joined the Board in February 2022. Upon joining the Board,
Mr. Cramer received, on February 21, 2022, a pro-rated
stock grant of 250 shares of common stock based on the closing
price per share of common stock on such date, which was $190.76. He
also received the grant made to all non-employee Directors on
July 1, 2022, as described in footnote 2
above.
STOCK OWNERSHIP
Stock Ownership Guidelines
We maintain stock ownership guidelines to further align the
interests of our Directors and officers with our shareholders.
Directors and officers are expected to achieve ownership in the
amounts set forth in the table below within five years of being
appointed to the relevant role. Each non-employee Director and NEO
was in compliance with these requirements as of the record date,
March 7, 2023.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Position |
Target Value |
Non-Employee Directors |
5x annual cash retainer |
Chief Executive Officer |
6x base salary |
Chief Financial Officer |
4x base salary |
Other Executive Officers |
3x base salary |
In order to help ensure robust stock ownership, Directors and
officers are required to hold at least 50% (after taking into
account any tax withholding) of their net shares vesting in any
twelve-month period until they meet their target value, and are
deemed to be in compliance with the guidelines if they sell no more
than that
amount. Stock options are not counted as value owned when
calculating target value.
Our insider trading policy prohibits, among other things,
Directors, officers, and employees of the Company from engaging in
short sales, put options, or call options; purchasing on margin or
holding in margin accounts; pledging, hypothecating, or otherwise
encumbering as collateral for indebtedness; or hedging, short
selling, or pledging the Company’s shares. In addition, to further
align our Directors’ and NEOs’ interests with those of our
shareholders, our insider trading policy restricts purchases and
sales of our stock by Directors and certain employees, including
NEOs, to the 30-day period beginning on the third trading day
following an earnings announcement (the day of the announcement
constituting the first day) and only after being cleared to trade
by our General Counsel or a designee thereof, or in accordance with
a previously existing Rule 10b5-1 trading plan that meets
applicable SEC requirements.
Principal Shareholders
The following table provides certain information about each person
or entity known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of
the issued and outstanding shares of our common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owners |
Number of
Shares |
Percent of Class* |
The Vanguard Group |
|
|
|
100 Vanguard Boulevard, Malvern, PA 19355 |
14,147,413 |
(1)
|
12.1 |
% |
BlackRock, Inc. |
|
|
|
55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055 |
9,321,844 |
(2)
|
7.9 |
% |
Capital International Investors |
|
|
|
333 South Hope Street, 55th Floor, Los Angeles, CA
90071 |
7,868,987 |
(3)
|
6.7 |
% |
___________________________________________________
* Ownership
percentages set forth in this column are based on the assumption
that each of the principal shareholders continued to own, as of the
record date, the number of shares reflected in the table.
Calculated based upon 117,299,392 shares of common stock
outstanding as of the record date, March 7, 2023.
(1)Based
solely on the information contained in the Schedule 13G Amendment
filed by the Vanguard Group (“Vanguard”) with the SEC on
February 9, 2023. The report states that Vanguard has
aggregate beneficial ownership of 14,174,413 shares of common
stock, including shared voting power over 168,628 shares of common
stock, sole dispositive power over 13,690,202 shares of common
stock, and shared dispositive power over 484,211 shares of common
stock.
(2)Based
solely on the information contained in the Schedule 13G Amendment
filed by BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”) with the SEC on
February 3, 2023. The report states that BlackRock has
aggregate beneficial ownership of 9,321,844 shares of common stock,
including sole voting power over 8,492,988 shares of common stock
and sole dispositive power over 9,321,844 shares of common
stock.
(3)Based
solely on the information contained in the Schedule 13G filed by
Capital International Investors (“CII”) with the SEC on February
13, 2023. The report states that CII has aggregate beneficial
ownership of 7,868,987 shares of common stock, including sole
voting power over 7,765,262 shares of common stock and sole
dispositive power over 7,868,987 shares of common
stock.
Directors and Executive Officers
The following table sets forth as of March 7, 2023, the
beneficial ownership of common stock by each Director of the
Company, the NEOs listed in the Summary Compensation Table, and all
Directors and executive officers of the Company as a
group.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Beneficial Owner or Number
of Persons in the Group |
Number of Shares Beneficially
Owned(1)
|
Percent of Class |
Phantom Shares Without
Voting or Investment Power(2)
|
M. Lauren Brlas |
6,900 |
|
* |
— |
|
Kristin M. Coleman |
— |
(3)
|
* |
— |
|
Ralf H. Cramer |
981 |
|
* |
— |
|
Netha N. Johnson |
43,253 |
|
* |
— |
|
J. Kent Masters |
70,347 |
|
* |
— |
|
Glenda J. Minor |
4,106 |
|
* |
783 |
|
Eric W. Norris |
45,426 |
|
* |
— |
|
James J. O’Brien |
2,813 |
|
* |
15,160 |
|
Diarmuid B. O'Connell |
6,681 |
|
* |
— |
|
Dean L. Seavers |
6,749 |
|
* |
— |
|
Gerald A. Steiner |
6,500 |
|
* |
9,354 |
|
Scott A. Tozier |
109,422 |
(4)
|
* |
263 |
|
Holly A. Van Deursen |
1,650 |
|
* |
3,280 |
|
Alejandro D. Wolff |
9,958 |
|
* |
3,423 |
|
All directors and executive officers as a group (18
persons) |
447,460 |
|
|
* |
32,496 |
|
___________________________________________________
* Indicates
beneficial ownership of less than 1% of common stock. Calculated
based upon 117,299,392 shares of common stock outstanding as of
March 7, 2023 and assuming conversion or exercise of such
holder’s options, as the case may be, for purposes of calculating
the total number of shares outstanding, but not the conversion or
exercise of securities held by third parties.
(1)The
amounts in this column include shares of common stock with respect
to which certain persons had the right to acquire beneficial
ownership within 60 days of March 7, 2023:
Mr. Masters 54,475 shares; Mr. Johnson 19,639 shares;
Mr. Norris 20,090 shares; and Mr. Tozier: 38,310
shares.
(2)The
amounts in this column reflect phantom shares held
in
the deferred stock account of each person and represent an
equivalent number of shares of common stock. Although such shares
are not “beneficially owned” as defined under SEC rules, we believe
that inclusion of such shares gives our shareholders important
additional information regarding the shareholdings of our
Directors.
(3)Ms. Coleman
joined the Company on November 28, 2022.
(4)Includes
1,609 shares held in the Albemarle Savings Plan.
DELINQUENT SECTION 16(a) REPORTS
Based solely on our review of the forms required by Section 16(a)
of the Exchange Act furnished to us, we believe that our Directors,
officers, and beneficial
owners of greater than 10% of common stock were compliant with
applicable filing requirements in 2022, except that a Form 4
reporting the grant of director stock compensation to
Mr. Cramer on February 21, 2022 was not filed on a timely
basis due to a delay in obtaining EDGAR filing codes and was
subsequently disclosed in a Form 4 filed on February 25,
2022.
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
2022 KEY EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE ACTIVITIES
Advisory Shareholder Say-on-Pay Vote
|
|
|
|
|
|
At our 2022 annual meeting of shareholders, 95.3% of shareholders
who cast a vote approved the compensation for 2021 of our named
executive officers (“NEOs” — as determined in accordance with SEC
rules). |
95.3%
Say-on-Pay Approval |
Shareholder Engagement
In the fall of 2022, we continued our practice of annual engagement
with shareholders. These discussions provide us a basis upon which
we continually evaluate our executive compensation and corporate
governance practices. This initiative was led by a group of senior
officers of the Company, acting on behalf and at the request of the
Executive Compensation Committee (the “Committee”), by
reaching out to 50 shareholders representing approximately 63% of
our outstanding shares. A total of 8 shareholders elected to engage
with us (representing approximately 18% of our outstanding shares),
for which we organized follow-up calls. This outreach reflects our
commitment to understand and address key issues of importance to
our shareholders.
We received positive feedback from our investors, indicating
support for the general structure and operation of our executive
compensation program. Discussions focused on Environment, Social
and Governance topics and how we govern our program, measure
results and make meaningful progress. Our investors were pleased
with our corporate responsibility and sustainability efforts and
the ongoing progress we are making.
Compensation Committee Actions
The Committee continued to monitor trends and developments
with respect to executive compensation and benefit policies. As
part of this monitoring, the Committee adjusted the severance and
change in control provisions for our executive officers to better
align with our 2023 compensation peer group. We changed the
severance multiple for a termination of employment outside of a
Change in Control protection period from
1.5 to 2 years for the CEO and from 1 year to 1.5 years for the
other executive officers. For a Change in Control with termination
of employment we aligned the benefits continuation period with the
severance period and approved for PSUs to be earned in full at
target (from prorated at the greater of actual or
target).
In 2022, the Committee went through a selection process to
determine who to best advise it as its independent compensation
consultant. The Committee selected Farient and started engaging
with them in the second half of 2022.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Albemarle again followed a strong pay-for-performance and
values-based approach in 2022. The summary below highlights our
business results, how our talent management supported those
results, and how we align executive pay and
performance.
2022 Performance
2022 Business Highlights
Financial Performance
In 2022, we achieved tremendous financial results and growth. Net
sales were up ~120% vs 2021, actively capturing pricing upsides,
strong contract negotiations, higher volumes, and strategic market
position. Operating Profit was up ~210% vs 2021, primarily driven
by pricing favorability, partly offset by higher raw material,
natural gas, and logistics costs. Diluted EPS was more than 21
times that of 2021. Strong cash generation led to a positive free
cash flow in 2022 while we continued to invest in growth projects.
Our balance sheet reflects significant liquidity of approximately
$3 billion, with a leverage (defined as consolidated net
funded debt to consolidated EBITDA) ratio of approximately 0.5x,
giving us substantial flexibility to act as new growth
opportunities are identified.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USD in millions (except Diluted EPS) |
2022
|
2021
|
Variance
|
Net Sales |
$ |
7,320 |
|
$ |
3,328 |
|
$ |
3,992 |
|
Net Income attributable to Albemarle |
$ |
2,690 |
|
$ |
124 |
|
$ |
2,566 |
|
Operating Profit |
$ |
2,470 |
|
$ |
798 |
|
$ |
1,672 |
|
Diluted EPS |
$ |
22.84 |
|
$ |
1.06 |
|
$ |
21.78 |
|
Operating Cash Flow |
$ |
1,908 |
|
$ |
344 |
|
$ |
1,564 |
|
Investing and Financing Activities
•Completed
the acquisition of the Qinzhou lithium conversion plant in Guangxi
China for $200 million on October 25, 2022.
•La
Negra trains 3&4 handed over to operations in 1Q22. Kemerton
train 1 achieved first product in July 2022. Kemerton
train 2 mechanically complete and transitioned to
commissioning phase.
•Albemarle
was awarded a $150 million U.S. Department of Energy grant for
US-based lithium concentrator facility to support domestic electric
vehicle supply chain.
•Acquired
land and building for Albemarle Technology Park to further our
mine-to-market innovation strategy.
•Successful
execution of capital projects for the TBBPA (Tetrabromobisphenol A)
expansion at Jordan Bromine Company and DPE (DiPhenylEthane)
expansion at Magnolia allowed for increased volumes in
2022.
•Concluded
strategic review of Catalysts - decision made to retain as a wholly
owned subsidiary branded as Ketjen. Turn-around planning
underway.
•Realigning
core Lithium and Bromine businesses into Energy Storage and
Specialties segments effective January 1, 2023.
•Extended
and expanded our revolving credit line to $1.5 billion. Raised
$1.7 billion in bonds in May 2022.
•Invested
in critical organizational capability, with a focus on
Asia-Pacific, to enable strategy execution.
Sustainability
Furthered our sustainability strategy with focus turning to
completing IRMA (Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance) third
party assessments for the Salar de Atacama, closing gaps to IRMA 50
(or higher). Released 2021 sustainability report on June 2, 2022
with a video conference with live Q&A.
How our Talent Strategies and Actions Support our
Performance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
People Drive Albemarle’s Success
|
Our HR mission is to create empowered, inspired, and inclusive
teams working collaboratively. Our employee value proposition is to
provide best-in-career employee experiences, empowered by a
values-centered culture and globally diverse and inclusive
teams.
Our
workforce spans over 25 countries and expanded in 2022 from around
5,600 employees to over 6,900 employees. |
Employee Engagement
|
Employee Empowerment Survey
|
As part of our listening strategy, we launched a global employee
empowerment survey which had a strong 65% response rate (a response
rate above 50% is considered good). 76% of our employees responded
favorably to their satisfaction with working at Albemarle
(benchmark: 73% for the manufacturing industry). Three areas of
opportunity to improve satisfaction include collaboration,
communication, and future career opportunities and development,
which we are actively addressing. |
Voluntary Employee Turnover
|
Managing voluntary turnover is a critical part of our talent
strategy, given the potential loss of expertise and experience and
it being an indicator of employee engagement. For 2022, we set and
achieved an aspirational voluntary turnover target of 5.3%. Given
the high inflation globally, we implemented an off cycle pay
increase globally. |
Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
|
We implemented comprehensive DE&I dashboards for our leadership
to regularly track and act on critical metrics that help us to
understand the representation, development, and advancement of
diverse groups across the organization.
We set 2022 targets relative to 2021 and achieved the results shown
below. |
|
2021 Actual |
2022 Target |
2022 Achieved |
Percentage of the global workforce that is female |
21.9% |
22.9% |
24.0% |
Percentage of the US workforce at the Director level and higher
that is racially diverse |
16.9% |
17.9% |
21.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee Engagement |
Employee Resource Groups and Annual CEO Day of
Understanding
|
Our Employee Resource Groups, which we call CONNECT groups, promote
an atmosphere of inclusion and encouragement, where every
employee’s voice is heard. These executive-sponsored, employee-led
groups are formed to promote a better workplace through shared
perspectives and goals that positively impact our employees and
their experience, alignment with our core values, and the creation
and strengthening of relationships across the
company.
CONNECT
groups focus on four areas: 1. Heritage Month Activities –
cultural education and awareness, communication skills, valuing
differences, breaking down barriers to inclusion, and membership
campaigns; 2. Career Development – leadership skills,
networking, mentoring, guest speakers, increased access to company
leaders, and talent development resources; 3. Attracting
Talent – support for the company’s diversity recruiting efforts,
support for onboarding and retention, association partnerships, and
supplier diversity recommendations; 4. Community Outreach –
contribute to the communities where we live and work via strategic
alignment with one or two preferred
non-profits.
In
2021, our CEO, Kent Masters, became a signatory to CEO Action for
Diversity and Inclusion, the largest CEO-driven business commitment
to advance DE&I in the workplace. In 2022, we held our second
annual CEO Day of Understanding. CEO Days of Understanding
encourage organizations to host candid conversations throughout the
year to highlight and engage with real-time issues and events as
they arise. As a signatory of CEO Action for Diversity and
Inclusion, we are committed to providing unconscious bias training,
sharing best practices, and engaging our Board of Directors in
DE&I work.
The
annual CEO Day of Understanding is a great opportunity for our CEO
to re-emphasize our commitment to DE&I and its importance to
the success of the Company. It also gives employees an opportunity
to engage directly with our CEO on the topic of
DE&I. |
Celebrating our Achievements Together
|
At Albemarle, winning awards is not the end goal. Outside
recognition however reflects the commitment of our organization and
employee base, who work hard every day to create a diverse,
equitable and inclusive environment. To them we owe the following
distinctions:
a.2023
Military Friendly Employer
b.2023
Military Spouse Friendly Employer
c.2022
Charlotte’s and Nation’s Best and Brightest to Work
For
d.America’s
Best Employers by Forbes’ Best Companies List
We are committed to providing accessible learning & leadership
opportunities that enhance both employee skills as well as our
organizational agility and alignment through our Albemarle
University.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developing Leadership Capability
|
Albemarle’s coaching, mentoring, and leadership development
learning journeys nurture skills leaders need to effectively lead
themselves and others, now and in the future. In 2022, 300+
existing and aspiring leaders participated in a formal internal
leadership development program. Our programs include assessments,
virtual coaching apps, action learning projects, and visibility to
senior leaders. |
Global Enablement
|
Consistent with our culture of belonging and inclusion, we take
pride in ensuring our learning and leadership development is
delivered in local language for most employees. Of the leadership
development participants, 62% were leaders located outside of the
U.S. |
Learning Experience
|
We are continuing to invest in increasing capacity to support
employee development and solutions at scale—globally, regionally,
and virtually. In 2022, we:
•Enabled
employee-empowered development by expanding our library of online
courses and videos
•Increased
available L&D resources globally + regionally with a growing
Organizational Effectiveness team
Added a specific focus on optimizing learning approaches for
deskless workers through our Manufacturing Excellence L&D
practice.
|
Talent Management Strategies
|
We believe that a strong pool of talent for our most critical roles
is built through senior leaders developing other leaders,
consistent talent practices, digitization, and the capacity for
ongoing career development for all employees. A newly formed Talent
Advancement team supports Albemarle in talent management,
succession planning, and organization development. |
Enterprise Talent Strategy
|
In 2022, we focused on strengthening the foundations of our
enterprise talent management practices. C-suite succession plans
and candidates are reviewed annually by the Executive Leadership
Team and the Board of Directors. Throughout the year, the ELT plans
for talent development and advancement monthly, focused on the most
critical roles and highest potential talent. |
Performance Excellence
|
In 2022, our executive team held their organizations accountable to
have more frequent and meaningful employee-manager review
conversations. We created 150+ enhanced executive profiles,
developed the infrastructure for digital career and talent profiles
for all employees, and aligned practices for assessing, developing,
and advancing talent. Our performance management systems were
enhanced with Objectives and Key Results (OKRs), and a redesigned
impact scale. |
Career Growth and Development
|
Our talent management strategies are supported by strong
investments in individual career development and advancement.
Resources to support managers with developing talent, fostering a
growth mindset, and aligning career path goals will be enhanced in
2023. Guidance for leaders to support internal mobility is coupled
with a new toolkit and workshop for employees focused on career
growth and development at Albemarle. |
Alignment of Executive Pay and Performance
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Based Compensation |
In 2022, 87% of the target compensation of our CEO and an average
of
73%
of the target compensation of our other NEOs was variable and
subject to performance factors. In determining target values we use
the stock closing price at the grant date for PSUs and RSUs and
Black Scholes for stock options.
|
Annual Bonus Plan |
Our Corporate Annual Incentive Plan paid out due to strong
financial performance and performance on stewardship. We achieved
adjusted EBITDA at 280% of target and Adjusted Cash Flow from
Operations at 278% of target, resulting in a payout for both
metrics at 200%. See page 45
for more detail as well as for the payout for each of the
NEOs.
|
Long-Term Incentive Mix |
Our NEOs receive LTIP based on a mix of performance shares (50%),
stock options (25%) and restricted stock units (25%). |
Performance Shares |
As described in further detail below, our Performance Shares for
the 2020-2022 performance cycle paid out at 200% of target. This
was driven by a strong Total Shareholder Return
of 223% for the period, which positioned us at the
99th
percentile
of the compensation peer group. This was also driven by our ROIC
performance for the period of 15.8%, which was well above the
target level of 10.0% for the period.
|
Pay for Performance |
We are committed to ensuring the alignment between Company
performance and executive compensation. "Pay for performance" is
one of our Four Compensation Principles. The overarching goal of
our compensation program is to create executive compensation plans
that incentivize and align with the creation of sustained
shareholder value.
|
NAVIGATING THE CD&A
In the balance of this CD&A we provide additional details on
the items described on the previous pages, along with information
on our executive compensation design, management, and
outcomes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Compensation Framework |
Purpose of our Executive Compensation Program | Executive
Compensation Philosophy and Principles | Focus on Performance | Key
Elements of our Executive Compensation Program | Performance
Goals
|
Executive Compensation Management |
Roles in Determining Executive Compensation | Use of an Independent
Compensation Consultant | Use of Market Data | Metric Selection and
Goal Setting
| Compensation Risk Assessment
|
2022 Compensation Decisions and Outcomes |
2022 Base Salary | 2022 Annual Incentive Program | Long-Term
Incentives | 2022 LTIP Grants |
Additional Information |
Executive Benefits | Perquisites | Post Termination Payments |
Clawbacks | Deductability of Executive Compensation | Taxation of
“Parachute” Payments and Deferred Compensation | Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION FRAMEWORK
Purpose of our Executive Compensation Program
Our executive compensation program is designed to attract and
retain highly-qualified executives, motivate our executives to
achieve our overall business objectives, and align our executives’
interests with those of our shareholders. We achieve this through a
set of underlying principles that inform the design and operation
of our executive compensation program. We believe that our 2022
compensation practices demonstrated our commitment to these
principles in the face of a challenging environment.
Our
NEOs for Fiscal Year 2022, determined as of December 31, 2022,
in accordance with SEC rules and regulations, are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAME |
PRINCIPAL POSITION |
J. Kent Masters, Jr. |
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
Scott A. Tozier |
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer |
Eric W. Norris |
President, Lithium |
Netha N. Johnson, Jr. |
President, Bromine |
Kristin M. Coleman |
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate
Secretary |
Executive Compensation Philosophy and Principles
Our compensation philosophy rewards executives for achieving our
financial and stewardship metrics and building long-term value for
our shareholders and other stakeholders. We follow several other
principles when designing our executive compensation program
including:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pay-for-Performance |
•Set
majority of compensation as variable and at-risk
•Ensure
an appropriate balance between annual and long-term incentives
commensurate with the position's decision-making time
horizon
•Tie
incentives to performance against financial, operational,
strategic, and individual goals
•Use
quantifiable and measurable performance metrics that are clearly
disclosed
•Provide
significant upside potential and downside risk for superior and low
performance
|
Pay Benchmark |
•We
benchmark compensation against our compensation peer
group
•We
use the median in the compensation peer group as our reference
point for determining target compensation
•Other
factors include performance, scope of responsibilities, and impact
on the company's performance as well as internal equity
considerations
|
Align Interests with our Stakeholders |
•Design
programs that discourage unnecessary or excessive
risk-taking
•Cap
payout opportunities under the incentive plans
•Set
minimum vesting periods for equity awards
•Reward
long-term financial results that drive financial value creation
through a balanced equity mix
•Operate
meaningful share ownership guidelines (stock options are not
included in determining ownership values)
•Maintain
a pay recoupment (i.e., clawback) policy
|
Avoid Poor Governance Practices |
•No
tax gross-ups
•No-single-trigger
accelerated vesting upon a change-in-control
•No
discounting, reloading or re-pricing of share options without
shareholder approval
•No
guaranteed compensation or increases
•No
excessive perquisites
•No
dividends paid on unvested restricted shares units or performance
share units until such awards vest
•No
strict targeting of compensation to a specific percentile of our
compensation peer group
•No
hedging or monetization transactions involving the establishment of
a short position in our securities and no entering into any
arrangement that, directly or indirectly, involves the use of our
securities as collateral for a loan
|
Focus on Performance
In line with our compensation principles,
our NEOs are primarily rewarded through performance-based cash and
equity incentive awards. This is intended to both encourage and
recognize strong company performance and stock price growth,
further driving shareholder value.
Long-term equity incentives are awarded through a combination of
performance-based shares ("PSUs"), stock options, and time-based
restricted stock units ("RSUs") in order to link executive
compensation more closely with the Company's performance.
The diagrams below depict
each element of target compensation as a percentage of total target
direct compensation for our CEO and other NEOs, expressed as an
average, for 2022. In determining target values we use the stock
closing price at the grant date for PSUs and RSUs and Black Scholes
for stock options.
Key Elements of our Executive Compensation Program
The key elements of our NEOs' compensation, and how these elements
are linked to performance, are summarized in the chart below. For
each NEO, the Committee reviews and approves annually each
component of compensation and the resulting total compensation. The
Committee benchmarks the individual components of compensation and
total compensation to our compensation peer group. In setting the
compensation for each NEO, the Committee also considers other
factors, including the scope and complexity of the NEO's position,
level of performance, skills and experience, and contribution to
the overall success of the Company, as well as internal
equity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation Element |
Purpose |
Performance Alignment |
Fixed |
Base Salary |
Provide competitive levels of fixed pay to attract and retain
executives
Recognize role scope, skills required, performance, contribution,
leadership and potential
|
Individual performance taken into account when considering
changes |
At Risk |
Short-Term Cash Incentive |
To motivate and reward the successful execution of our operating
plan and strategic goals as well as Business Unit and individual
performance |
Opportunity of 0%-200% of target based on performance |
Long-Term Incentive Awards |
Attract, retain and motivate executive talent; align interests with
our shareholders and value realization with stock price; drive
accountability for long-term performance |
PSUs (50%), stock options (25%), and RSUs (25%)
In determining target values we use the stock closing price at the
grant date for PSUs and RSUs and Black Scholes for stock
options
2022 equity awards cliff vest after 3 years. For RSUs and PSUs,
this is a change from previous years. This change was made to align
with payout opportunities and vesting provisions relative to our
compensation peer group
|
Performance Goals
Our incentive plans balance short- and long-term performance goals
to ensure that the interests of our executives are aligned with
those of our shareholders for short- and long-term performance. The
following provides a summary overview of the short- and long-term
goals(1).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goals |
Rationale |
Weight |
Short-Term Goals |
Adjusted EBITDA |
Incentivize management to meet and exceed target earnings. Aligns
with focus on growth and efficiency |
50% |
Adjusted Cash Flow from Operations |
Incentivize management to meet and exceed target cash flow in
support of growth and efficiency |
25% |
Stewardship |
Stewardship goals incentivize management, consistent with our
values, to be good stewards, and are critical for our license to
operate. Stewardship goals include occupational and process safety
as well as environmental targets |
10% |
Individual |
Emphasize individual accountability. Individual goals are aligned
to our Operating Model which includes: Operational Discipline,
Competitive Capabilities, High Performance Culture, and Sustainable
Approach |
15% |
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Goals |
Relative Total Shareholder Return ("rTSR") |
Linking pay to long-term shareholder interest |
50% |
Adjusted Return on Invested Capital ("ROIC") |
Emphasizes our commitment to invest efficiently and generate
long-term returns |
50% |
Note: For our NEOs, 25% of LTIP is granted in stock options, 25% in
RSUs, and 50% in performance-based PSUs, which are equally divided
between PSUs based on rTSR performance and Adjusted ROIC. In
determining target values, we use the stock closing price at the
grant date for PSUs and RSUs and Black Scholes for stock
options. |
___________________________________________________
(1) See
pages
45
and
49
for a more detailed overview of the short- and long-term incentive
plans and definitions for each of the performance
goals.
The Committee believes that the Company continues to make
significant progress in accelerating its sustainability
performance, including establishing long-range sustainability
goals. For the Committee to include additional ESG goals in the
incentive plans, the goals must be:
•Measurable:
measurable and supported by a data collection process that is
properly defined and documented, such that data can be audited by
external parties, and
•Suitable:
aligned with our strategy and the interests of stakeholders, while
incentivizing the right behavior and culture of our
employees.
The company includes stewardship goals in its short-term incentive
program. Some ESG objectives have typically been included in the
personal goals for the CEO and other NEOs. Starting in 2021,
personal goals were expanded to include additional goals such as
natural resource management, stakeholder engagement, diversity, and
talent management.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION MANAGEMENT
The Committee comprises independent directors who develop, amend
and approve our executive compensation program. To ensure the
executive compensation program is effective and reasonable, the
Committee uses a variety of inputs including the results of our
annual say-on-pay vote, feedback from shareholders, the advice of
the Committee's independent compensation consultant informed by
market practices, and input from the Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer.
Roles in Determining Executive Compensation
|
|
|
Compensation Committee |
•Develop,
amend, and approve executive compensation programs to remain
consistent with our values and philosophy, support the recruitment
and retention of executive talent, and help achieve business
objectives
|
•Determine
and approve the appropriate level of compensation for all executive
officers
|
•Determine
and approve short- and long-term incentive plan targets for all
executive officers
|
•Evaluate
CEO individual performance and determine NEO
compensation
|
•Select
the independent compensation consultant and determine its
engagement
|
Independent Directors of the Board |
•Review
and approve talent development and succession plans for the
NEOs
|
•Appoint
executive officers
|
CEO |
•Evaluate
performance for the executive officers, other than himself, and
make compensation recommendations to the Committee
|
Independent Compensation Consultant |
•Inform
the Committee of market trends, developments in executive
compensation, and provide recommendations for appropriate
adjustments to the Company's compensation programs, policies, and
practices in-line with our business and talent strategies, and
investor expectations
|
|
|
•Analyze
the prevailing executive compensation structure and plan designs,
and help the Committee assess the competitiveness of our
compensation program in the context of aligning executive officer
interests with those of our shareholders
|
|
|
Total compensation actions, annual and long-term performance goals
and objectives, contractual agreements, and benefits are evaluated
and determined by the Committee and discussed with the
Board.
In light of Mr. Masters’ 2020 employment contract expiring at
the end of 2023, the Board of Directors discussed with
Mr. Masters the terms and conditions of a contract extension
well ahead of the
2020 contract end date to manage leadership continuity. This
resulted in the amendments described below to his employment
arrangements. The Committee determined Mr. Masters’
compensation under the new contract, with the assistance of
Farient, as follows:
•Process:
The Executive Compensation Committee considered and analyzed
President and Chief Executive Officer compensation relative to a
50/50 blended peer group consisting of the 2023 compensation peer
group (see "Use
of Market Data"
beginning on page 40)
and market data pertaining to non-durable goods companies similar
in size to Albemarle.
•Target
Total Direct Compensation:
Based on this analysis and in recognition of Mr. Masters’
experience and expertise, the Executive Compensation Committee set
Mr. Masters’ target total direct compensation between the median
and 75th percentile of the blended peer group.
•Compensation
Mix:
Mr. Masters’ incentive-based compensation under the new
contract equals 90% of target total direct compensation, with 16%
based on short-term incentives and 74% on long-term
incentives.
•Severance
Eligibility:
Mr. Masters’ eligibility for severance payments and benefits
are aligned with practices among the blended peer
group.
Use of an Independent Compensation Consultant
The Committee has retained an independent compensation consultant,
to provide advice on best practices and market developments, as
well as to provide independent advice to the Committee. Farient has
served as the independent compensation consultant since August
2022, succeeding Pearl Meyer in that role.
The Committee regularly meets with the independent compensation
consultant without management present. The independent compensation
consultant participates in Committee meetings throughout the year,
reviews materials in advance, consults with the Chair of the
Committee, provides to the Committee data on market trends and
compensation design, assesses recommendations for base salary and
annual incentive awards for our NEOs, and periodically meets with
management. The independent compensation consultant may provide
consulting advice to management outside the scope of executive
compensation with the approval of the Committee. In 2022, neither
Pearl Meyer nor Farient provided any other consulting advice or
services to management outside the scope of executive compensation.
The Committee does not delegate authority to its independent
compensation consultant.
The independent compensation consultant gathers and analyzes data
at the direction of the Committee, advises the Committee on
compensation standards and trends, and assists in the development
of policies and programs. The Committee directs, approves, and
evaluates the work of the independent compensation consultant in
relation to all executive compensation matters. The Committee
considers Farient to be independent from our management pursuant to
SEC standards. Please see “Independence
of the Executive Compensation Consultant”
beginning on page 19.
For the assessment of the alignment between performance and
compensation, the Committee relies on advice from its independent
compensation consultant. The independent compensation consultant
evaluates the relationship between performance and compensation and
the Committee then considers this relationship in making pay
decisions pertaining to the CEO.
Given the results of these assessments, the Committee concluded
that Albemarle's executive compensation, including that for the
CEO, is aligned with our performance. We believe that the results
of the 2022 Say-on-Pay vote demonstrate strong shareholder support
for our compensation program, with approximately 95% of the votes
cast approving such compensation.
Use of Market Data
The Committee engages the independent compensation consultant to
undertake an annual review of the compensation peers that are used
to provide insight into market competitive pay levels and
practices. In partnership with our independent compensation
consultant, a robust process has been established to appropriately
assess the relevance of different companies in the context of
making compensation comparisons. The criteria used to select the
peer companies in our Peer Group is summarized in the chart
below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Universe of Publicly Traded Companies |
•Traded
on major US exchanges
•Standalone
companies domiciled in or with pay/disclosure practices consistent
with the US
|
|
|
Industry |
•Chemicals
|
|
|
Size |
•Revenue
within 0.4x - 2.5x of 2022 projected revenue as an indicator of
complexity and scope for executive roles
|
In setting 2022 base salaries, target total cash compensation, and
target total direct compensation, the Committee generally
considered the last reported data from our 2022 Peer Group (as set
forth below). The Committee also referred to survey information
from nationally recognized compensation surveys. The variation of
actual pay relative to the market median is dependent on the
executive officer's performance, experience, knowledge, skills,
level of responsibility, potential to impact our performance and
future success, the need to retain and motivate strategic talent,
and internal equity considerations.
For 2022, we continued with the same Peer Group we used in 2021,
with the exception of W.R. Grace & Co., which was acquired in
September 2021 by Standard Industries Holdings Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022 PEER GROUP |
Ashland Global Holdings Inc. (ASH) |
International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. (IFF) |
Avient Corporation (f/k/a PolyOne Corporation) (AVNT) |
Minerals Technologies Inc. (MTX) |
Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. (AXTA) |
Newmarket Corporation (NEU) |
Cabot Corporation (CBT) |
Olin Corporation (OLN) |
Celanese Corporation (CE) |
RPM International Inc. (RPM) |
CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) |
The Chemours Company (CC) |
Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) |
The Mosaic Company (MOS) |
FMC Corporation (FMC) |
The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG) |
H.B. Fuller Company (FUL) |
Trinseo Plc (TSE) |
For the 2023 peer group, the Committee engaged Farient, to
undertake a structural review of the compensation peers to ensure
alignment with the Company's growth. In partnership with Farient, a
robust process was established to assess the relevance of different
companies in the context of making compensation comparisons. The
criteria used to select the peer companies is summarized in the
table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Universe of Publicly Traded Companies
|
•Traded
on major US exchanges
•Standalone
companies domiciled in or with pay/disclosure practices consistent
with the US
|
|
|
Industry
|
•Chemicals
•Diversified
Metals & Mining
•Copper
•Gold
•Precious
Metals & Minerals
•Silver
•EV-
and Lithium-related
•Global
Lithium & Battery ETF companies
|
|
|
Size
|
•Revenue
within 0.4x - 2.5 x range of 2023 projected revenue as an indicator
of complexity and scope for executive roles
|
|
|
Quantitative Criteria
|
•High-growth
trajectory (Revenue growth 3 yr. CAGR)
•Strong
operating margins (EBITDA margin)
•Market
premium to capital
•Significant
investment mode (Capex / Depreciation)
|
|
|
Qualitative Criteria
|
•Global
operations (International revenues as a % of total)
•Value-added
extraction/processing
•Business-to-Business
sales model
•Direct
competitor for talent (add to peer group if company meets this
criterion)
|
For 2023, we made a significant change in our peer group compared
to previous years. This was driven by the application of the above
criteria, with change in Company revenue expected to from from
~$7.3 billion in 2022 to a range of $11.3-$12.9 billion for 2023.
The 2023 peer group is comprised of the companies listed in the
following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023 PEER GROUP
|
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (APF)
|
FMC Corporation (FMC)
|
Celanese Corporation (CE) |
Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) |
Chemours Company, The (CC) |
Huntsman Corporation (HUN) |
Corteva, Inc. (CTVA) |
Mosaic Company (MOS) |
Dow Inc. (DOW) |
Newmont Corporation (NEM) |
DuPont de Nemours, Inc. (DD) |
Olin Corporation (OLN) |
Eastman Chemical (EMN) |
Westlake Chemical Corporation (WLK) |
For 2023, the following companies are no longer included in our
compensation peer group: Ashland Global Holdings Inc., Avient
Corporation (f/k/a PolyOne Corporation), Axalta Coating Systems
Ltd., Cabot Corporation, CF Industries Holdings, Inc., H.B. Fuller
Company, International Flavors & Fragrances Inc., Minerals
Technologies Inc., Newmarket Corporation, RPM International Inc.,
The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company, and Trinseo Plc.
In setting 2023 compensation for Mr. Masters, including his
amended employment agreement as described below, the Committee also
referred to survey information from nationally recognized
compensation surveys. The variation of actual pay relative to the
market median is dependent on the executive officer's performance,
experience, knowledge, skills, level of responsibility, potential
to impact our performance and future success, the need to retain
and motivate strategic talent, and internal equity
considerations.
Metric Selection and Goal Setting
Balanced Focus on Growth and Efficiency
Albemarle's incentive plans convey a balanced focus between growth,
efficiency, and stewardship. The following overview shows the
general alignment for each of our short-term and long-term
metrics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Incentive Program |
Weight |
Aligns with |
|
Metrics |
Growth |
Efficiency |
Stewardship |
Financial Performance |
Adjusted EBITDA |
50% |
x |
x |
|
Adjusted Cash Flow from Operations |
25% |
|
x |
|
Stewardship |
Occupational Safety |
4% |
|
|
x |
Process Safety |
3% |
|
|
x |
Environmental Safety |
3% |
|
|
x |
|
Individual Performance |
15% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Incentive Program |
Weight |
Aligns with |
Vesting |
Vehicle |
Metrics |
Growth |
Efficiency |
Performance Stock Units |
TSR relative to the 2022 Peer Group |
25% |
x |
x |
Cliff vest after 3 years |
Adjusted ROIC |
25% |
|
x |
Restricted Stock Units |
|
25% |
|
x |
Stock Options |
|
25% |
x |
|
Annual Incentive Plan
The Committee chose these performance metrics to align the AIP with
our 2022 business goals and objectives. The Committee chose the
relative weights of the performance measures based on the desire to
emphasize financial results while maintaining a focus on
non-financial objectives.
The Committee chose Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Cash Flow from
Operations as 2022 AIP metrics because they were considered the key
measures of financial performance in the Company’s 2022 annual
operating plan. Adjusted EBITDA is a measure of our ability to
generate earnings and Adjusted Cash Flow from Operations is a
performance measure aligned with our objective of generating cash
for debt reduction and growth.
•"Adjusted
EBITDA" is defined as total Company earnings before interest, tax,
depreciation and amortization, as adjusted for non-recurring,
non-operating, and special items.
•"Adjusted
Cash Flow from Operations" is defined as cash from operations as
reported on our Statement of Cash Flows, adjusted for pension
contributions, joint venture earnings distribution timing,
non-recurring, or unusual items.
•The
superior performance levels for both of these metrics, disclosed
below, were set by the Committee at levels that, while believed to
be realistic, were achievable only as the result of exceptional
performance.
Stewardship metrics were included because they are critical to our
license to operate, aligned with our sustainability objectives and
consistent with our values. Our stewardship metrics consist of
three factors: occupational safety, process safety, and
environmental responsibility. For each of the three stewardship
metrics, we set a target and superior performance level.
Performance below target does not
pay out. Occupational safety was measured as our OSHA recordable
rate, which is calculated as the number of OSHA recordable injuries
x 200,000 hours and divided by the actual total man-hours worked;
process safety was measured by severity score; and environmental
responsibility was measured by the number of level 2 environmental
incidents. "Level 2 environmental incidents" are reportable
quantity environmental incidents, including, spills and releases;
neighbor complaints related to odor, noise or other facility
issues; and regulatory agency administrative action or
citation.
Individual performance is included to emphasize the individual
accountability for each of the executives for achieving specific
goals. Performance goals typically include both leadership
objectives and strategic business objectives.
The Committee may take into account extraordinary or infrequently
occurring events, or significant corporate transactions in deciding
to adjust the results used to determine whether the AIP objectives
have been met. The Committee retains the right to exercise
discretion in determining the final level of the awards paid, in
order to ensure that the AIP remains consistent with its stated
objectives. In determining the actual results for 2022, the
Committee did not exercise discretion.
Long-Term Incentive Plan
Our PSU grants have a three year performance period, with
performance measured in rTSR as compared to our Peer Group and
Adjusted ROIC, each with equal weighting. The rTSR performance
metric emphasizes the linkage between our pay-for-performance
philosophy and our shareholders' interests. The Adjusted ROIC
performance metric emphasizes our continued commitment to invest
efficiently and generate long-term returns, and ensures alignment
between our expected return on capital and long-term payout
opportunities for our executives.
Compensation Risk Assessment
As part of its oversight of the Company’s executive compensation
program, the Committee considers the impact of the Company’s
executive compensation program and the incentives created by the
compensation programs that it administers, on the Company’s risk
profile. In addition, the Committee reviews all employee
compensation policies and procedures, including the incentives that
they create and factors that may reduce the likelihood of excessive
risk-taking, to determine whether they encourage risk-taking that
is reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the
company. At the Committee’s direction, our Chief Human Resources
Officer and members of our Total Rewards team, together with our
Vice President, Audit & Risk Management and members of our
Internal Audit team, conducted a risk assessment of our
compensation programs. This assessment included, but was not
limited to, evaluation of our compensation program features, the
most significant of which are outlined below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Measures and Period |
The performance goals set forth in our annual bonus and long-term
incentive plans are based upon budgeted levels that are reviewed
and approved by the Committee. We believe these goals are
challenging yet attainable at their targeted levels without the
need to take inappropriate risks, take actions that would violate
our Code of Conduct, or make material changes to our long-term
business strategy or operations. Payouts under both incentive plans
are capped at 200% of target to make it less likely that executives
would pursue outsized short-term achievements at the expense of the
long term.
Our long-term incentive plan awards are based on a three-year
performance period, which encourages our executives to focus on the
sustained growth of our company rather than seeking potentially
unsustainable short-term gains.
|
Goal Setting and Leverage |
All business goals are quantitative in nature and have predefined
threshold, target, and superior performance and payout levels.
Performance and payout ranges are aligned with the
market. |
Pay Mix |
The three primary elements of our executive compensation program
are base salary, annual bonus, and long-term incentive
compensation. We use the median of the market as our reference
point for managing total compensation. To ensure our NEOs focus on
the long term, their total compensation is heavily weighted towards
their long-term incentives. This approach mitigates the need for
executives to take significant risks to earn average competitive
compensation and also ensures that the interests of our executives
are closely aligned with those of our shareholders. |
Funding |
Funding for the plans is included in our annual operating plan and
adjusted throughout the year based on actual and projected
performance. |
Controls and Processes |
Performance and payout targets are set by the Committee. The
Committee determines, at the end of the performance period, payout
under the plans based on their assessment of company performance
relative to the goals. Amounts paid to any officer under our annual
bonus or long-term incentive compensation plans are subject to
recovery in accordance with our clawback policy. |
Other Risk Mitigating Factors |
We have stock ownership requirements for all officers that ensure
the interests of our leaders and shareholders are aligned. We also
prohibit officers from engaging in forms of hedging or monetization
transactions involving the establishment of a short position in our
securities and from entering into any arrangement that, directly or
indirectly, involves the use of our securities as collateral for a
loan. |
Exclusion of Unusual Items |
The Committee has discretion to adjust performance results that
reflect significant transactions or other unusual items, if such
events were not anticipated at the time the goals were initially
established. We believe allowing these exclusions ensures our
executives will focus on the merits of proposed transactions for
Albemarle, rather than the effect a proposed action may have on
incentive compensation. |
The Committee reviewed the findings of the assessment and concluded
that our compensation programs are designed with the appropriate
balance of risk and reward in relation to our overall business
strategy and that our compensation programs do not create
disproportionate incentives for our employees to take risks that
are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the
Company.
2022 COMPENSATION DECISIONS AND OUTCOMES
2022 Base Salaries
The base salary of each NEO was reviewed with an April 1, 2022
effective date, as summarized in the chart below. The Committee
concluded that the changes are reasonable and appropriate after
considering a competitive analysis of market data of our
compensation peer group provided by the Committee’s independent
compensation consultant, the recommendations of our CEO, other than
with respect to his own base salary, and other factors described in
this proxy statement. Consequently, in 2022, the Committee
increased the base salaries for each of our then-current NEOs to
reflect each individual’s responsibilities and performance and to
increase their base salaries to more market-competitive
levels.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Officer |
2021 Year-End Base Salary |
2022 Increase in Annualized Base Salary |
2022 Annualized Base Salary |
J. Kent Masters, Jr. |
|
|
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
$ |
1,100,000 |
|
$ |
55,000 |
|
$ |
1,155,000 |
|
Scott A. Tozier |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer |
$ |
628,899 |
|
$ |
31,445 |
|
$ |
660,344 |
|
Eric W. Norris |
|
|
|
President, Lithium |
$ |
580,663 |
|
$ |
29,033 |
|
$ |
609,696 |
|
Netha N. Johnson, Jr. |
|
|
|
President, Bromine |
$ |
556,200 |
|
$ |
27,810 |
|
$ |
584,010 |
|
Kristin M. Coleman |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate
Secretary |
$ |
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
653,000 |
|
Note: Ms. Coleman joined the Company on November 28,
2022.
2022 Annual Incentive Program (AIP)
For all NEOs, performance under the AIP is measured 85% based on
business performance and 15% on individual performance. "Business
performance" for this purpose is defined (i) as performance of
the Company for executives in Corporate roles, such as CEO, CFO,
and Executive Vice President, General Counsel & Corporate
Secretary (including Messrs. Masters and Tozier and
Ms. Coleman), as performance of the Company, and (ii) as
a combination of GBU and Company performance (with a weighting of
59.5% and 25.5%, respectively) for Global Business Uni. For 2022,
the Committee established the AIP metrics, including the weighting
of each metric and payout opportunities at threshold, target and
superior performance levels, shown in the tables
below.
Corporate Roles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metrics and Weighting |
Adjusted EBITDA |
Adjusted Cash Flow from Operations |
Stewardship |
Individual Performance |
Corporate |
Corporate |
Corporate |
Corporate Roles |
50.0% |
25.0% |
10.0% |
15.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Payout Opportunities |
Adjusted EBITDA |
Adjusted Cash Flow from Operations |
Stewardship |
Individual Performance |
Corporate |
Corporate |
Corporate |
Threshold |
25.0% |
12.5% |
N/A |
0%-30% |
Target |
50.0% |
25.0% |
10.0% |
0%-30% |
Superior |
100.0% |
50.0% |
20.0% |
0%-30% |
GBU Presidents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metrics and Weighting |
Adjusted EBITDA |
Adjusted Cash Flow from Operations |
Stewardship |
Individual Performance |
Corporate |
GBU |
Corporate |
GBU |
Corporate |
GBU |
GBU Presidents |
15.0% |
35.0% |
7.5% |
17.5% |
3.0% |
7.0% |
15.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Payout Opportunities |
Adjusted EBITDA |
Adjusted Cash Flow from Operations |
Stewardship |
Individual Performance |
Corporate |
GBU |
Corporate |
GBU |
Corporate |
GBU |
Threshold |
7.50% |
17.50% |
3.75% |
8.750% |
N/A |
N/A |
0%-30% |
Target |
15.0% |
35.0% |
7.5% |
17.5% |
3.0% |
7.0% |
0%-30% |
Superior |
30.0% |
70.0% |
15.0% |
35.0% |
6.0% |
14.0% |
0%-30% |
Threshold performance of Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Cash Flow
from Operations pays out at 50% of the target level. Stewardship
performance below target does not result in any payout. For
performance at the superior level, payout doubles for all three
metrics, compared to payout at target. Linear interpolation is used
to determine awards for performance between the identified points.
Individual performance pays out between 0% and 30%.
Performance in 2022 against our 2022 AIP Metrics
Different plans apply to the NEOs based on their Corporate or GBU
responsibility:
•The
Corporate Plan applies to Messrs. Masters and Tozier and
Ms. Coleman.
•The
Lithium Plan applies to Mr. Norris.
•The
Bromine Plan applies to Mr. Johnson.
The following tables summarize the threshold, target, and superior
performance levels set by the Committee for 2022 and the actual
results achieved in 2022 for the Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Cash
Flow from Operations metrics under each of the plans that apply to
our NEOs. In determining the actual results for 2022 relative to
business targets set for 2022, the Committee did not exercise
discretion.
Corporate Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate |
Performance Range |
|
Performance |
|
Financial Performance in Millions USD |
Weight |
Threshold 85% |
Target 100% |
Superior 115% |
|
In Millions USD |
Performance Relative to Target |
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
50% |
$1,054 |
$1,240 |
$1,426 |
|
$3,476 |
280% |
|
Adjusted Cash Flow from Operations |
25% |
$700 |
$824 |
$948 |
|
$2,290 |
278% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stewardship |
Weight |
N/A |
Target |
Superior |
|
In Numbers |
Performance Relative to Target |
|
|
|
Occupational Safety |
OSHA Recordable Rate |
4.0% |
N/A |
≤0.26 |
≤0.15 |
|
0.14 |
209.1% |
|
Process Safety |
Severity Score |
3.0% |
N/A |
≤17 |
≤7 |
|
12.00 |
150.0% |
|
Environment |
Level 2 Environmental Incidents |
3.0% |
N/A |
≤11 |
≤4 |
|
6.00 |
171.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payout Opportunity |
50% |
100% |
200% |
|
Total business performance payout* |
165.1% |
* Additional
individual performance opportunity of between 0-30%. Total Company
payout is not to exceed the calculated Company performance plus an
average of 15% for individual performance.
Lithium Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lithium |
Performance Range |
|
Performance |
|
Financial Performance in Millions USD |
Weight |
Threshold 85% |
Target 100% |
Superior 115% |
|
In Millions USD |
Performance Relative to Target |
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
35% |
$711 |
$836 |
$961 |
|
$3,096 |
370% |
|
Adjusted Cash Flow from Operations |
17.5% |
$475 |
$559 |
$643 |
|
$2,311 |
413% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stewardship |
Weight |
N/A |
Target |
Superior |
|
In Numbers |
Performance Relative to Target |
|
|
|
Occupational Safety |
OSHA Recordable Rate |
2.8% |
N/A |
≤0.30 |
≤0.18 |
|
0.16 |
216.7% |
|
Process Safety |
Severity Score |
2.1% |
N/A |
≤9 |
≤3 |
|
4.00 |
183.3% |
|
Environment |
Level 2 Environmental Incidents |
2.1% |
N/A |
≤3 |
≤1 |
|
2.00 |
150.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payout Opportunity |
50% |
100% |
200% |
|
Total business performance payout* |
164.9% |
* Additional
individual performance opportunity of between 0-30%. Total Company
payout is not to exceed the calculated Company performance plus an
average of 15% for individual performance.
Bromine Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bromine |
Performance Range |
|
Performance |
|
Financial Performance in Millions USD |
Weight |
Threshold 85% |
Target 100% |
Superior 115% |
|
In Millions USD |
Performance Relative to Target |
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
35% |
$340 |
$400 |
$460 |
|
$474 |
119% |
|
Adjusted Cash Flow from Operations |
17.5% |
$358 |
$421 |
$484 |
|
$456 |
108% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stewardship |
Weight |
N/A |
Target |
Superior |
|
In Numbers |
Performance Relative to Target |
|
|
|
Occupational Safety |
OSHA Recordable Rate |
2.8% |
N/A |
≤0.31 |
≤0.19 |
|
0.28 |
125.0% |
|
Process Safety |
Severity Score |
2.1% |
N/A |
≤6 |
≤2 |
|
8.00 |
0.0% |
|
Environment |
Level 2 Environmental Incidents |
2.1% |
N/A |
≤4 |
≤1 |
|
4.00 |
100.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payout Opportunity |
50% |
100% |
200% |
|
Total business performance payout* |
150.1% |
* Additional
individual performance opportunity of between 0-30%. Total Company
payout is not to exceed the calculated Company performance plus an
average of 15% for individual performance.
AIP Payout History
The following graph illustrates the 2022 AIP payout for the
Corporate Plan against payout levels over the previous years, with
the payout representing a combination of Company and individual
performance.
We
believe the fluctuations in payout confirm the actual correlation
of pay-for-performance at Albemarle.
AIP earning opportunity for our NEOs
Under the AIP, each of our current NEOs can earn a bonus targeted
at a certain percentage of their base salary. For 2022, our NEOs’
target bonus percentages were 135% (Mr. Masters), 80%
(Mr. Tozier, Norris, Johnson and Ms. Coleman) for
achieving target performance levels for Company and individual
performance combined. The Committee concluded that the changes in
bonus target levels are reasonable and appropriate after
considering a competitive analysis of market data of our
compensation peer group provided by the Committee’s independent
compensation consultant, the recommendations of our CEO, other than
with respect to his own base salary, and other factors described in
this proxy statement. Consequently, in 2022, the Committee
increased the bonus target level for the CEO from 125% to 135% and
the bonus target levels for Mr. Norris and Mr. Johnson from 75% to
80% to reflect each individual’s responsibilities and performance
and to increase their base salaries to more market-competitive
levels.
Actual earnings for our NEOs under the 2022 AIP
The Committee reviewed the Company’s 2022 performance and
determined that the potential awards for the NEOs were funded
consistent with the plan metrics set during the first quarter of
the year. After this determination was made, Mr. Masters
engaged the Committee in a further discussion of the Company’s
performance and of each NEO’s individual performance compared to
their objectives. In light of the accomplishments by each NEO that
were cited by Mr. Masters to the Committee, it was recommended
by Mr. Masters and approved by the Committee that the
individual performance-related payout for each NEO be set as
follows: Mr. Tozier 17.5%, Mr. Norris 17.5%,
Mr. Johnson 25%, and, Ms. Coleman 17.5%.
In the case of Mr. Masters, in early 2023 the Board assessed
his performance against his 2022 goals, which included: Financial
and Shareholder Value, Customer Experience, Growth, Platform for
Growth, Talent, Sustainability, Manufacturing Excellence, Working
with the Board. The Committee determined that
an individual performance payout of 25% was appropriate given
performance against these measures.
When applied to and combined with the Company score, this yielded
actual bonus payouts for each NEO shown in the table
below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022 AIP Payouts |
Name |
Eligible Earnings |
X |
Target
Bonus
% |
= |
Target
Bonus
Amount |
X |
Payout Based on (Company Performance + Individual
Performance) |
= |
Actual
Bonus
Amount |
J. Kent Masters, Jr. |
$ |
1,141,438 |
|
x |
135% |
= |
$ |
1,540,942 |
|
x |
165.1% |
+ |
25.0% |
= |
$ |
2,929,916 |
|
Scott A. Tozier |
$ |
652,590 |
|
x |
80% |
= |
$ |
522,072 |
|
x |
165.1% |
+ |
17.5% |
= |
$ |
953,502 |
|
Eric W. Norris |
$ |
602,537 |
|
x |
80% |
= |
$ |
482,029 |
|
x |
164.9% |
+ |
17.5% |
= |
$ |
879,222 |
|
Netha N. Johnson, Jr. |
$ |
577,153 |
|
x |
80% |
= |
$ |
461,722 |
|
x |
150.1% |
+ |
25.0% |
= |
$ |
808,365 |
|
Kristin M. Coleman |
$ |
60,827 |
|
x |
80% |
= |
$ |
48,662 |
|
x |
165.1% |
+ |
17.5% |
= |
$ |
88,875 |
|
Note: Ms. Coleman joined the Company on November 28, 2022, and
thus her bonus was prorated for the year.
Long Term Incentives
PSU results for the 2020-2022 performance period
2020-2022 Relative Total Shareholder Return.
For the 2020 PSU grants, 50% of the performance was based on the
achievement of TSR performance relative to our 2020 Peer Group over
a three-year performance period. The original 2020 Peer
Group
included 16 companies. One company
(W.R. Grace) was acquired during the period and was therefore not
included in the rTSR calculation. Our rTSR for the period placed us
at the 99th
percentile relative to our 2020 Peer Group.
The following table illustrates threshold, target, and superior
relative performance levels and the percentage of the target grant
earned for each performance level. Results between threshold and
target, and target and superior performance, are interpolated. The
table also includes the relative performance result and the
percentage of grants earned as determined by the
Committee.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020 rTSR PSU Grant Metrics |
Threshold |
Target |
Superior |
Actual Result |
Percentile performance relative to the 2020 Peer Group |
25th |
50th |
75th |
99th |
% of Grants Earned |
50% |
100% |
200% |
200% |
The following table shows the rTSR PSU grants approved in February
2020 by the Committee for the NEOs and the grant values approved by
the Committee in February 2023 after it determined the 2020-2022
rTSR relative performance results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020 rTSR PSU Grants |
|
Number of Units |
Number of Units |
Number of Units |
|
|
at Threshold |
at Target |
at Superior |
2020 Earned PSUs |
|
50% |
100% |
200% |
|
J. Kent Masters, Jr. |
— |
— |
— |
— |
Scott A. Tozier |
1,680 |
3,360 |
6,720 |
6,720 |
Eric W. Norris |
1,680 |
3,360 |
6,720 |
6,720 |
Netha N. Johnson, Jr. |
1,680 |
3,360 |
6,720 |
6,720 |
Kristin M. Coleman |
— |
— |
— |
— |
Note: Mr. Masters and Ms. Coleman joined the Company
after these grants were made.
2020-2022 Return on Invested Capital.
For the 2020 PSU grants, 50% of the performance was based on ROIC
relative to the target set at the beginning of the three-year
performance period. ROIC performance was calculated for each
calendar year during the three-year performance period and averaged
over the three-year performance period. The target level of
10%
was set in light of the significant investments planned for the
period and with the expectation that for some investments the
returns would fall outside the performance period.
The following table illustrates threshold, target, and superior
relative ROIC performance levels and the percentage of the target
grant earned for each performance level. Results between threshold
and target, and target and superior performance, are interpolated.
The table also includes the relative ROIC performance result and
the percentage of grants earned as determined by the
Committee.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020 ROIC PSU Grant Metrics |
Threshold |
Target |
Superior |
Actual Result |
ROIC |
9% |
10% |
12% |
15.80% |
% of Grants Earned |
50% |
100% |
200% |
200% |
The following table shows the ROIC PSU grants approved in February
2020 by the Committee for the NEOs and the ROIC PSU grant values
approved by the Committee in February 2022 after it determined the
2020-2022 performance results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020 ROIC PSU Grants |
|
Number of Units |
Number of Units |
Number of Units |
2020 Earned |
|
at Threshold |
at Target |
at Superior |
PSUs |
|
50% |
100% |
200% |
|
J. Kent Masters, Jr. |
— |
— |
— |
— |
Scott A. Tozier |
1,680 |
3,360 |
6,720 |
6,720 |
Eric W. Norris |
1,680 |
3,360 |
6,720 |
6,720 |
Netha N. Johnson, Jr. |
1,680 |
3,360 |
6,720 |
6,720 |
Kristen Coleman |
— |
— |
— |
— |
Note: Mr. Masters and Ms. Coleman joined the Company
after these grants were made.
2022 LTIP Grants
In February 2022, the Committee approved a total grant value for
the NEOs under the LTIP. The values granted to each NEO are set
forth below, as well as the approximate percentage apportioned in
the form of PSUs, RSUs, and stock options. As part of her
employment with the Company on November 28, 2022, Ms. Coleman
received 9,395 RSUs (to offset the loss of equity at her former
company). The RSUs vest 100% on the third anniversary of the grant
date subject to her continued employment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022 Grants |
|
Value Granted |
Stock Options |
RSUs |
PSUs |
J. Kent Masters, Jr. |
$6,500,000 |
25% |
25% |
50% |
Scott A. Tozier |
$1,100,000 |
25% |
25% |
50% |
Eric W. Norris |
$1,350,000 |
25% |
25% |
50% |
Netha N. Johnson, Jr. |
$1,350,000 |
25% |
25% |
50% |
Kristin M. Coleman |
$2,500,000 |
—% |
100% |
—% |
The number of PSUs and RSUs granted were based on the stock closing
price at the grant date. The number of stock options was determined
using the Black Scholes value of the options. The number of PSUs
assume target achievement of performance metrics.
PSU Grants
The performance-based PSU grants are based 50% on the Company's TSR
relative to our 2022 Peer Group as measured over a three-year
period and 50% based on the Company's ROIC performance as
calculated for each calendar year during the three-year performance
period and averaged over such period.
rTSR PSU Grants
The following table illustrates the number of units granted for
performance at threshold, target, and superior levels for the 2022
rTSR PSU grants.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022 rTSR PSU Grants |
|
Number of Units at Threshold |
Number of Units at Target |
Number of Units at Superior |
J. Kent Masters, Jr. |
2,540 |
8,466 |
16,932 |
Scott A. Tozier |
430 |
1,433 |
2,866 |
Eric W. Norris |
528 |
1,759 |
3,518 |
Netha N. Johnson, Jr. |
528 |
1,759 |
3,518 |
Kristin M. Coleman |
— |
— |
— |
The following table illustrates threshold, target, and superior
relative performance levels for the rTSR PSUs and the performance
of the target grant earned for each performance level. Results
between threshold and target, and target and superior performance
will be interpolated. Payout will be capped at 100% if absolute TSR
is negative.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022 rTSR PSU Grants |
|
Threshold |
Target |
Superior |
Percentile performance relative to the 2022 Peer Group |
30th |
50th |
75th |
% of Grants Earned |
30% |
100% |
200% |
Adjusted ROIC PSU Grants
The following table illustrates the number of units granted for
performance at threshold, target, and superior levels for the
Adjusted ROIC PSU grants.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022 Adjusted ROIC PSU Grants |
|
Number of Units at Threshold |
Number of Units at Target |
Number of Units at Superior |
J. Kent Masters, Jr. |
2,540 |
8,466 |
16,932 |
Scott A. Tozier |
430 |
1,433 |
2,866 |
Eric W. Norris |
528 |
1,759 |
3,518 |
Netha N. Johnson, Jr. |
528 |
1,759 |
3,518 |
Kristin M. Coleman |
— |
— |
— |
The 2022 Adjusted ROIC PSU grant is measured against adjusted ROIC
performance levels set by the Committee. ROIC is calculated for
each calendar year during the three-year performance period and
averaged over such period, and is determined using the following
formula:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual
Adjusted ROIC |
= |
Earnings Before Taxes + Depreciation/Amortization - CAPEX
Maintenance |
Average Gross Investment (Gross PP&E + Working Capital - Major
Construction in Progress not generating revenue) |
|
|
|
CAPEX |
= |
Capital Expenditures |
PP&E |
= |
Property Plant and Equipment |
|
|
|
For assets that are generating revenue for less than 6 months of
the calendar year, we subtract CAPEX from the denominator, while
subtracting the associated EBITDA for those assets from the
numerator. |
The following table illustrates the percentage of the target
Adjusted ROIC grant earned for each performance level. Results
between threshold and target, and target and superior performance
will be interpolated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022 Adjusted ROIC PSU Grants |
|
Threshold |
Target |
Superior |
% of Grants Earned |
30% |
100% |
200% |
Performance and payout opportunities reflect the dual character of
both rTSR and Adjusted ROIC PSU grants:
•The
grants are performance-based to ensure payout opportunities are
aligned with shareholder interests.
•The
grants are also competitive in nature and as such reflect
performance and payout opportunities aligned with our compensation
peer group and the broader market in which we compete for
talent.
All shares earned will vest in early 2025 at the time the Committee
evaluates the three-year performance for both rTSR and ROIC. For
Mr. Masters, the shares earned will become non-forfeitable on
the earlier of December 31, 2023 or the date the Company
appoints a new Chief Executive Officer.
RSU Grants
In February 2022, the Committee approved grants of RSU awards to
our NEOs, as follows. Ms. Coleman's RSUs were granted at the time
of her employment on November 28, 2022.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022 RSU Grants |
J. Kent Masters, Jr. |
8,466 |
Scott A. Tozier |
1,433 |
Eric W. Norris |
1,759 |
Netha N. Johnson, Jr. |
1,759 |
Kristin M. Coleman |
9,395 |
|
|
All of the RSUs will vest on the third anniversary of the grant
date in 2025. For Mr. Masters, the RSUs will become
non-forfeitable on the earlier of December 31, 2023 or the
date the Company appoints a new Chief Executive
Officer.
Stock Option Grants
In February 2022, the Committee approved grants of stock options to
our NEOs, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022 Stock Option Grants |
J. Kent Masters, Jr. |
25,794 |
Scott A. Tozier |
4,366 |
Eric W. Norris |
5,358 |
Netha N. Johnson, Jr. |
5,358 |
Kristin M. Coleman |
— |
The stock options vest and become exercisable on the third
anniversary of the grant date in 2025, and expire ten years from
the date of the grant. For Mr. Masters, the stock options will
become non-forfeitable on the earlier of December 31, 2023 or
the date the Company appoints a new Chief Executive Officer, but
will not be exercisable until the third anniversary of the grant
date.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Executive Benefits
The Company provides NEOs other benefits generally provided to
other Albemarle employees, including:
•Health
and dental insurance (the Company pays a portion of
costs);
•Basic
life insurance;
•Long-term
disability insurance;
•Participation
in the Albemarle Corporation Savings Plan (“Savings Plan”)*,
including Company matching and Defined Contribution Pension Benefit
("DCPB")* contributions;
•Participation
in the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan ("EDCP")*;
and
•Matching
charitable contributions.
___________________________________________________
* See
page 67
for additional information on the Savings Plan, DCPB, and
EDCP.
Perquisites
Our perquisites are not a significant element of our compensation
program. They are limited in nature and focused on areas directly
related to a business purpose or help to foster the health,
security, and well-being of our senior executives for the benefit
of the Company.
When an NEO is required to relocate geographically in order to join
the Company, or is asked to relocate due to a change in their work
location after joining the Company, we provide them with the same
relocation package that is offered to management and senior
professional employees. Certain relocation expenses are grossed-up
for taxes, as is the competitive practice within our Peer Group
and, more broadly, in the general marketplace.
We also offer executives physical exams and limited reimbursement
for financial planning. We do not provide tax gross-ups on such
amounts to NEOs.
Post-Termination Payments
We believe that providing our executives, including our NEOs, with
reasonable severance benefits aligns their interests with
shareholders’ interests in the context of potential change in
control transactions. We also believe that such benefits help
facilitate our recruitment and retention of senior executive
talent.
Consistent with this philosophy, we maintain a Severance Pay Plan
that provides severance payments to certain of our employees if we
terminate their employment without "cause" due to (a) a
request that they relocate and they elect not to do so or
(b) we eliminate their position or have a change in our
organizational structure with a similar effect.
We entered into severance compensation agreements with each of our
NEOs, providing for severance payments in the event of a change in
control-related termination. None of these severance compensation
agreements includes an excise tax gross-up.
The Committee periodically reviews our post-employment compensation
arrangements taking into consideration best practices, and believes
that these arrangements are generally consistent with arrangements
currently being offered by our Peer Group. The Committee has
determined that both the terms and payout levels are appropriate to
accomplish our stated objectives. The Committee also considered the
non-competition agreement that we would receive from the NEO in
exchange for any post-employment termination benefits. Based on
these considerations, the Committee believes that such arrangements
are appropriate and reasonable.
For additional information with respect to change in control
arrangements, please see “Potential
Payments upon Termination”
beginning
on
page 68.
Clawbacks
In 2017, the Company adopted a Compensation Recoupment and
Forfeiture Policy, and in the event misconduct by any employee
results in a financial restatement, as more specifically defined in
the policy, the policy requires that our Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer reimburse the Company for (i) the
gross amount of any bonus or other incentive-based or equity-based
compensation received by such officer from the Company during the
12-month period following the date the document required to be
restated was first publicly issued or filed (whichever occurs
first) with the SEC and (ii) any profits realized from the
sale of securities of the Company during such 12-month period. The
policy further requires any employee who engaged in such misconduct
to reimburse the Company the same amounts set forth in (i) and (ii)
above applicable to that employee, and requires any such employee
whose employment is terminated for cause to forfeit all unpaid
cash-based incentive compensation under our 2017 Incentive Plan
(whether or not accrued and/or payable at such time) and all
unvested equity-based awards (whether or not earned at such time),
in each case as of the date such employee is notified of
termination of his or her employment for cause (as defined under
the policy). We expect to amend the policy in fiscal year ending
December 31, 2023 to reflect new incentive-based compensation
recovery rules (anticipated to be) established by the NYSE pursuant
to Dodd-Frank Act.
In addition, in 2018 we disclosed that based on an internal
investigation, we voluntarily self-reported potential issues
relating to the use of third party sales representatives in our
Refining Solutions business, within our Catalysts segment, to the
U.S. Department of Justice (the "DOJ"), the SEC, and the Dutch
Public Prosecutor (the "DPP") and are cooperating with the
DOJ, the SEC, and the DPP in their review of these matters. In
connection with our internal investigation, we have implemented,
and are continuing to implement, appropriate remedial measures. We
have commenced discussions with the SEC about a potential
resolution. Our Board of Directors determined, as a prudent
governance measure while the investigation is pending, to condition
payment to each of our NEOs for fiscal year 2017 (the "2017
NEO’s" and each a "2017 NEO") the cash incentive bonus for fiscal
year 2017 (the “2017 cash incentive”)
on each 2017 NEO executing a clawback agreement applicable to the
2017 cash incentive. Accordingly, in February 2018, the Company
entered into a clawback agreement with each of our 2017 NEOs and
other executives at that time. The clawback agreements supplement
the Company’s existing policy described above and provide that each
2017 NEO's 2017 cash incentive is subject to clawback by the
Company in the event that the Committee determines that, with
respect to the Company’s internal investigation or the government’s
review of these matters following such self-report, the NEO:
(1) engaged in unlawful conduct or misconduct; (2) failed
to cooperate in any related investigation; (3) violated the
Company’s Code of Conduct or any other Company policy; or
(4) failed to exercise appropriate supervision or
oversight.
Deductability of Executive Compensation
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally places a $1
million annual deduction limit on compensation paid to “covered
employees,” which includes our NEOs. The Committee makes
compensation decisions based on our guiding compensation principles
and the interests of shareholders, even if such compensation is
non-deductible by the Company.
Taxation of "Parachute" Payments and Deferred
Compensation
We do not provide our NEOs with a “gross-up” or other reimbursement
payment for any tax liability that they might owe because of the
application of Sections 280G, 4999, or 409A of the Internal Revenue
Code. Sections 280G and 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code provide
that executive officers, directors who hold significant equity
interests in our Company, and certain other service providers may
be subject to an excise tax if they receive payments or benefits in
connection with a change in control of the Company that exceeds
certain prescribed limits, and that the Company, or a successor,
may forfeit a deduction on the amounts subject to this additional
tax. Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code also imposes
additional significant taxes on an executive officer, director or
other service provider to the Company in the event that they
receive “deferred compensation” that does not meet certain
requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue
Code.
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
We follow The Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting
Standards Codification Topic 718, or ASC Topic 718, for our
stock-based awards. ASC Topic 718 requires companies to measure the
compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to
employees and directors, including stock options, RSU awards, and
performance share awards (including PSUs), based on the grant date
“fair value” of these awards. This calculation is performed for
accounting purposes and reported in the compensation tables below
for equity awards to our NEOs as required by the applicable SEC
rules. ASC Topic 718 also requires companies to recognize the
compensation cost of their stock-based compensation awards in their
income statements over the period that the recipient of such
compensation is required to render service in exchange for the
option or other award. For performance unit awards (including
PSUs), stock-based compensation expense recognized may be adjusted
over the performance period based on interim estimates of
performance against pre-set objectives.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
The Executive Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy
Statement with management and, based on such review and discussion,
recommended to the Board of Directors that it be included in this
Proxy Statement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
|
|
|
|
Alejandro D. Wolff, Chair |
|
Diarmuid B. O'Connell |
|
Dean L. Seavers |
|
Holly A. Van Deursen |
COMPENSATION TABLES AND OTHER INFORMATION
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The following table presents information for the fiscal years ended
December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020 relating to total
compensation of our CEO, CFO, and the three other highest paid
executive officers (the “NEOs”).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary Compensation Table |
Name and Principal Position |
Year(1)
|
Salary
($)(2)
|
Bonus
($)(3)
|
Stock Awards
($)(4)(5)
|
Option Awards
($)(4)(6)
|
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation
($)(7)
|
Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
Earnings
($) |
All Other Compensation
($)(8)
|
Total
($) |
J. Kent Masters, Jr. |
2022 |
$ |
1,139,346 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
5,044,043 |
|
$ |
1,625,022 |
|
$ |
2,929,916 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
379,829 |
|
$ |
11,118,156 |
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
2021 |
$ |
1,071,923 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
4,177,432 |
|
$ |
1,375,013 |
|
$ |
2,181,372 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
235,013 |
|
$ |
9,040,753 |
|
2020 |
$ |
667,053 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
3,248,889 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
908,807 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
114,620 |
|
$ |
4,939,369 |
|
Scott A. Tozier |
2022 |
$ |
651,394 |
|
$ |
150 |
|
$ |
853,781 |
|
$ |
275,058 |
|
$ |
953,502 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
175,024 |
|
$ |
2,908,909 |
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer |
|